And it worked, didn't it? If this article hadn't used the buzzwords "google-like" it would probably never have gotten on CNet and ZDNet,
You know, there used to be these people who filtered out errors, mistakes, and plain old bullshit that n00b journalists wrote - before it was published. Editors, I think they were called.
Several lamps being viewed by a camera, and the image data was broken down to use as random numbers.
It's not the only way, though. There was a thing called ERNIE in the UK that generated random numbers for premium bonds[1] using radioactive substances and a Geiger counter as the seed.
On second thoughts, I take that back - he just posts random stories based on old random stories. When he's not too busy being a petulant, weiner-necked ponce, that is.
Economic Times, one of India's biggest business daily's is carrying a story about how a small colouring mistake forced Microsoft to recall 200,000 copies of Windows 95
Was the mistake that they thought "daily's" was the plural of "daily", when in fact it's the genitive/posessive singular?
Nah. Indians aren't generally that fucking ignorant.
Do people write Windows OS, Excel SS, Netscape WB, perl PL, Apache WS, slashdot BS?
Now you really are exaggerating.
Googler, I suppose.
Just goes to show, taking the mick out of krauts isn't just fun - it's educational!
Yup. The most enjoyable fights are those where there's no risk of losing. Like when you have infinite mod points, a chip on both sloping shoulders and a very very very small cock
[1] A combined savings bank/lottery. Really.
Luckily they missed and hit the usarweb instead.
On second thoughts, I take that back - he just posts random stories based on old random stories. When he's not too busy being a petulant, weiner-necked ponce, that is.
Nah. Indians aren't generally that fucking ignorant.
In Chauviet Russia, spelling corrects YOU!!!!
1a) Stand on block, or 1b) climb tree.
2) Taunt wedge. A lot.