I always write and document all my code, including Perl, with the idea that someone else, perhaps less experienced, will have to pick it up
Trying to fix that for you...
I always write and document all my code, especially Perl, with the idea that someone else, usual me perhaps less experienced or just not looking at the code for a decade, will have to pick it up or replace it by a more sane language
I started with Perl around 1992 or 1993... did some serious stuff in it around 1997 and later never looked t it again because for every funking shit I have to google what it means.
What is so damn hard in having subroutines with named parameters instead of this $0 bullshit you have to split into your own local variables?
The language was nice when it was new, because it was really much much faster than sh and csh... and more straight forward working with files... but as a programming language it is just for mind masochists who get their kick from: "I'm superior to you, because I van perl, you can't..."
Perl is really a waste of time. I rejected every Perl offer I got during the last 15 years. For a reason.
FTFY: Article [II] (Amendment 2 - Bearing Arms) A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Because people are dumb. And some people don't stay up to date. in our days, Python is no longer suitable as a big size "web scale" web development platform. Why? Disks are now SSD and about 100 - 1000 times faster than a spinning disk.
Anyway, Python is a great teaching language and is used in many scientific projects, and it is straight forward.
There are variations that compile to machine code and are as fast as C... so who cares?
Python is superb if I have to query foreign web servers for the data, as the bottle neck is the internet and not Pythong.
And they didn't suspect something was amiss when someone answered the door? If I have a hang over, I don't open doors... oh, that was not what you meant?
Well, seems to bbe either an american or a white men problem. Where ever I was flying people put their hand luggage over their head. Why would Input my $2k somewhere in the fromt rows luggafe compartment and sit myself in the rear of the plane? How one can be so stupid not to put his own luggafe above his own head is beyond me.
I work every day with Macs and Linux boxes, so no ignorance on my part.
You need to use iTunes because someone decided that iPads, iPods etc. are not USB mounted disks.
The ignorant is you, btw. iTunes automatically organizes all your music in folders... everyone knows what the differecne between a play list and a 'folder' aka 'artist' aka 'album' is.
You simply don't want to get my point. No!! The Oxford comma makes not clear that Name1 and Name2 are strippers, why would it? There is no etra pause in front of the 'and' which would emphasize that. If there is an extra pause it would be after 'the strippers'. I understand the arguing about it... no worries. But: it makes no sense to me. Especially as I come from an other language. In other words: the added or missing ',' impies nothing to me, so no, I did not miss any joke.
Extend your example to 4 entities: "The stripers, Name1, Name2 (,) and Name3", you you still imply that "the stripers" is a quallifier for the other three? Instead of being a part of an enumeration?
Answering questions about silent letters would require an essay.
The last part in a list is devided by and or or to give the commas a meaning, otherwise it is unclear if the commas mean and or or... but actually we simply do that because we more or less write as we speak.
Considering the fact that party A handed over some goods to party B, and that party B handed over some money to party A, there most certainly was a trade and a 'contract'.
Modern iPods AFAIK don't mount as USB drives. So using iTunes is the only way And there is absolutely nothing particularly complicated about it, as long as you only handle music with it. I agree that managing iPads etc. is not so easy.
2) only use iTunes to manage your music without ever tinkering with how and where it is stored on your computer. That is wrong. You can store it where ever you want.
So: I'm not at all insisisting that it is the right way. There is no right way, well, the actual right way would be to still be able to mount iPods as USB drives, obviously. If you have a Mac or a Windows PC you can try the software iExplorer, It mounts them like USB disks and gives nicer options than iTunes: https://macroplant.com/iexplor..., most linux versinos mount iPads as drives, I assume they also can mount iPods.
Regarding other stores and CDs... CDs get automatically imported into the iTunes library, and music from other stores you can import manually and now: they are super easy to move onto the iPod!
Maybe I want to use other music players to play music on my computer? Then do it? Who or what is preventing you?
That's the point: Apple is "easy" when you are "trapped" and fully encapsulated within their products. And that point is wrong. OS X is just another Unix and treats users accordingly. iOS unfortunately is more restrictive.
Slashdot Mirror
I always write and document all my code, including Perl, with the idea that someone else, perhaps less experienced, will have to pick it up
Trying to fix that for you ...
I always write and document all my code, especially Perl, with the idea that someone else, usual me perhaps less experienced or just not looking at the code for a decade, will have to pick it up or replace it by a more sane language
I started with Perl around 1992 or 1993 ... did some serious stuff in it around 1997 and later never looked t it again because for every funking shit I have to google what it means.
What is so damn hard in having subroutines with named parameters instead of this $0 bullshit you have to split into your own local variables?
The language was nice when it was new, because it was really much much faster than sh and csh ... and more straight forward working with files ... but as a programming language it is just for mind masochists who get their kick from: "I'm superior to you, because I van perl, you can't ..."
Perl is really a waste of time. I rejected every Perl offer I got during the last 15 years. For a reason.
FTFY:
Article [II] (Amendment 2 - Bearing Arms)
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Moron ...
Putting something into a museum has not a giant momentum where I live ...
Erm, yeah, but WxANYTHING is Microsoft Windows MFC from the mid 1980s.
Who wants to program in that?
No idea what better Python libs are for GUI applications, but most certainly not the dreaded WxANYTHING libraries.
Because people are dumb.
And some people don't stay up to date.
in our days, Python is no longer suitable as a big size "web scale" web development platform.
Why? Disks are now SSD and about 100 - 1000 times faster than a spinning disk.
Anyway, Python is a great teaching language and is used in many scientific projects, and it is straight forward.
There are variations that compile to machine code and are as fast as C ... so who cares?
Python is superb if I have to query foreign web servers for the data, as the bottle neck is the internet and not Pythong.
And they didn't suspect something was amiss when someone answered the door? ... oh, that was not what you meant?
If I have a hang over, I don't open doors
In Germany basically all new phone lines are VoiP.
That is why you use a prepaid SIM card and toss it after registration, if you are really concerned about such things.
fancy terms like IPO that children or people with sub-90 IQ wouldn't recognize.
Or non native english speakers with IQ around 150?
Even for me, as a non native english speaker, the headline was pretty clear.
But then you miss the movies you could not afford to watch in the cinema! (in terms of time, obviously)
Wow ... ... and it costs, obvioulsy.
Comsider this: if the plane is blocking a terminal for 2h it is blocked for all other plannes
Well,
seems to bbe either an american or a white men problem.
Where ever I was flying people put their hand luggage over their head.
Why would Input my $2k somewhere in the fromt rows luggafe compartment and sit myself in the rear of the plane?
How one can be so stupid not to put his own luggafe above his own head is beyond me.
Well
In Europe we do it like this. And use all doors available at the plane.
I work every day with Macs and Linux boxes, so no ignorance on my part.
You need to use iTunes because someone decided that iPads, iPods etc. are not USB mounted disks.
The ignorant is you, btw. ... everyone knows what the differecne between a play list and a 'folder' aka 'artist' aka 'album' is.
iTunes automatically organizes all your music in folders
Visit a McDonalds in Europe and your assumptions will be corrected.
In a contract yes. But not in a sell over the counter.
Happens with my with any IDE ... because we are cursing about the code of our predecessors.
You simply don't want to get my point. ... no worries. But: it makes no sense to me. Especially as I come from an other language.
No!! The Oxford comma makes not clear that Name1 and Name2 are strippers, why would it?
There is no etra pause in front of the 'and' which would emphasize that. If there is an extra pause it would be after 'the strippers'.
I understand the arguing about it
In other words: the added or missing ',' impies nothing to me, so no, I did not miss any joke.
Extend your example to 4 entities: "The stripers, Name1, Name2 (,) and Name3", you you still imply that "the stripers" is a quallifier for the other three? Instead of being a part of an enumeration?
Answering questions about silent letters would require an essay.
The last part in a list is devided by and or or to give the commas a meaning, otherwise it is unclear if the commas mean and or or ... but actually we simply do that because we more or less write as we speak.
Cuba is not frozen in 1959, how do you come to that idea?
The 'problems' Cuba has are because of the american embargos.
Which 'democratic' government was overthrown by a 'communist' revolution?
Could you quote some Marx or Engels that support your position, please?
With a paper/carton cup. Like the rest of the world!
Even if the license of using the code to watch/download the movie is not transferable, the piece of paper with the code written on it is.
Considering the fact that party A handed over some goods to party B, and
that party B handed over some money to party A, there most certainly was a trade and a 'contract'.
However there is no mytical Apple thing preventing a Mac from booting Linux from an USB stick: https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/...
Modern iPods AFAIK don't mount as USB drives.
So using iTunes is the only way
And there is absolutely nothing particularly complicated about it, as long as you only handle music with it. I agree that managing iPads etc. is not so easy.
2) only use iTunes to manage your music without ever tinkering with how and where it is stored on your computer.
That is wrong. You can store it where ever you want.
So: I'm not at all insisisting that it is the right way. There is no right way, well, the actual right way would be to still be able to mount iPods as USB drives, obviously. If you have a Mac or a Windows PC you can try the software iExplorer, It mounts them like USB disks and gives nicer options than iTunes: https://macroplant.com/iexplor..., most linux versinos mount iPads as drives, I assume they also can mount iPods.
Regarding other stores and CDs ... CDs get automatically imported into the iTunes library, and music from other stores you can import manually and now: they are super easy to move onto the iPod!
Maybe I want to use other music players to play music on my computer?
Then do it? Who or what is preventing you?
That's the point: Apple is "easy" when you are "trapped" and fully encapsulated within their products.
And that point is wrong. OS X is just another Unix and treats users accordingly. iOS unfortunately is more restrictive.