Under copyright law: for profit and not for profit are no difference at all. No idea where you got that retarded idea from.
If I'm the author of a piece of work and hate it being transalted into Klingon or Elvish then be ready for a fight if you do translate it. Why you for funk sake think it would not matter under the law if you do so and distribute MY WORK in a translated form, is beyond me.
It is not fair use. How stupid are you? Hint: read the law. It states what fair use is and what a derived work is. It is clearly a derived work, your translation/subtitle would not an could not edist without the original work: it is clearly a derived work. Or did you work hard on a subtitle for an imaginary movie, waking up in the morning with the subtitles in your hand, realizing that in the same night, by accident, someone made the movie you accidentally happen to have the subtitles for? (facepalm)
They are monitored. Yes. Nevertheless they drive automatically. Or would you trust a car that never was driving automatically before? How would you craft an automatically driving car unlesss it is monitired during its first steps?
Here it is! Aos new self driving car: ta tam! Never was autonomous on the road ever... (unsupervised? supervised?)! Buy it now!
Pretty much any project in the real world hasn't. The coders who coded it (did I reall writete 'coders'?) is long gone from the team. The code I see and have to fix is probably written by a guy who is not working for the company since 20 years anymore...
It would make more sense to mail the boss in such cases, or reply to your coworker and add the boss to the list of recipients, and adress him/her directly with two or threesentences and the question how to proceede.
In teams where I have a leading role, all mails where I am on CC only, get filtered into a seperate mail folder. The chance that I ever read them is basically zero.
I go over such mails, before a meeting, to catch up what went on last days/weeks.
I'm all for less time at work but saying that days could be shorter and then assuming 100% output is foolish. Actually it is not. There is a reason why shifts on ships are 4h and not 8h since centuries. I rarely meet a software developer that can focus more than 3 or 4 hours a day. The rest of their 'shift' they do nothing any way, or worse: produce bugs, spoil the repository with faulty commits, or spoil requirements with stupid comments because they are to tired/exhausted to comprehend them. A normal human being is not made to perform 8h at top notch mental capabilities. You need special training for that, like martial arts, yoga or meditation. (that includes pilot training or military training, where people know how to get tired/unatending personnel back to awareness)
The Chinese mine them in deserts. Wow... how much can you shit up there? Mining Rare Earth minerals is just producing a lot of sand. And if you refine them in place a lot of salts. Who cares about that? Most of the 'waste' stuff can be sold anyway.
You are smarter than most americans, why don't you read an article about it?
Then you did not seek deep enough. Neo et all escape the matrix. Then they suddenly have super powers, get hunted by multiple copies of Agent Smith... etc. pe. pe. Obviously: they ares till in the Matrix.
Karate moves and other things are metaphorical, and should give you a clue: they are still in the Matrix.
The article is about a test drive. The cars I mentioned drive in the city on public roads. I thought you would read a few of the articles on that site (and/or google) and figure that.
In Karlsruhe we have self driving cars from every majour brand since minimum 10 years... cycling around, under supervision of course.
I live in Karlsruhe... and I worked for Continental, as test engineer for the cameras used in driver assisting cars. Continental is one of the mayjour manufacters of equipment for self driving cars and assisting systems. (Yes, that is the company that is mostly known for its tires)
The product owner is not needed for Sprint Planning. However in Scrum he is usually present.
The product owner is not a business user, not even in the remotest sense. Well. there might be exceptions. A business user evolving into a product owner or product manager.
In my experience, when people ask why a Product Owner should attend sprint planning meetings, it's because they're not doing agile, they're pretending to. This 'question' has nothing to do with agile or not. The question is: does the team need the PO for clarifications during sprint planning? If that is case, then obviously the back log items are not clear enough (acceptance criteria etc.)
Most sprint plannings I joined the PO was happy smiling/grinning in the corner;)
An autopilot is not a self driving car. And actually IMHO they should be forbidden. Either have a human controlled car with driver assistance or an autonomous car. But not a half bread aoutopilot.
Slashdot Mirror
Under copyright law: for profit and not for profit are no difference at all.
No idea where you got that retarded idea from.
If I'm the author of a piece of work and hate it being transalted into Klingon or Elvish then be ready for a fight if you do translate it. Why you for funk sake think it would not matter under the law if you do so and distribute MY WORK in a translated form, is beyond me.
It is not fair use.
How stupid are you? Hint: read the law. It states what fair use is and what a derived work is.
It is clearly a derived work, your translation/subtitle would not an could not edist without the original work: it is clearly a derived work.
Or did you work hard on a subtitle for an imaginary movie, waking up in the morning with the subtitles in your hand, realizing that in the same night, by accident, someone made the movie you accidentally happen to have the subtitles for?
(facepalm)
Of course translation is protected.
Why would it not?
Hiw would you think if
i translate your original Korean 'Harry Potter' look alike into german? ? ?
Why don't you simply invest some time and catch up with the last thirty years of AI research you obviously have missed?
They are monitored. Yes. Nevertheless they drive automatically.
Or would you trust a car that never was driving automatically before?
How would you craft an automatically driving car unlesss it is monitired during its first steps?
Here it is! Aos new self driving car: ta tam! Never was autonomous on the road ever ... (unsupervised? supervised?)!
Buy it now!
Hu?
Pretty much any project in the real world hasn't. ...
The coders who coded it (did I reall writete 'coders'?) is long gone from the team.
The code I see and have to fix is probably written by a guy who is not working for the company since 20 years anymore
It would make more sense to mail the boss in such cases, or reply to your coworker and add the boss to the list of recipients, and adress him/her directly with two or threesentences and the question how to proceede.
In teams where I have a leading role, all mails where I am on CC only, get filtered into a seperate mail folder. The chance that I ever read them is basically zero.
I go over such mails, before a meeting, to catch up what went on last days/weeks.
So, which drugs did you test, how often and what dosage, that you are such an expert on higher states of consciousness?
I'm all for less time at work but saying that days could be shorter and then assuming 100% output is foolish.
Actually it is not.
There is a reason why shifts on ships are 4h and not 8h since centuries.
I rarely meet a software developer that can focus more than 3 or 4 hours a day. The rest of their 'shift' they do nothing any way, or worse: produce bugs, spoil the repository with faulty commits, or spoil requirements with stupid comments because they are to tired/exhausted to comprehend them.
A normal human being is not made to perform 8h at top notch mental capabilities. You need special training for that, like martial arts, yoga or meditation. (that includes pilot training or military training, where people know how to get tired/unatending personnel back to awareness)
If I give away my own ROMs to archive.org, and they make sure only one person at the time is using it, they are basically on safe ground.
The right to load a program into a computer ... cough cough ... emulator ... remains to the owner of the software, which is in this case archive.org.
That it is displayed via the internet is of no consequences at all.
In its speed: yes.
In its opcode design/architecture? No!
The Chinese mine them in deserts. ... how much can you shit up there?
Wow
Mining Rare Earth minerals is just producing a lot of sand. And if you refine them in place a lot of salts.
Who cares about that? Most of the 'waste' stuff can be sold anyway.
You are smarter than most americans, why don't you read an article about it?
Then you did not seek deep enough. ... etc. pe. pe.
Neo et all escape the matrix.
Then they suddenly have super powers, get hunted by multiple copies of Agent Smith
Obviously: they ares till in the Matrix.
Karate moves and other things are metaphorical, and should give you a clue: they are still in the Matrix.
But Dark Star is one of the funniest movies ever. When I saw it, I thought it was a persiflage like Spaceballs.
You would be surprised how many stars you see:
Or you can look at some photos of NASA :)
Code ownership is so 1960s ...
The article is about a test drive.
The cars I mentioned drive in the city on public roads. I thought you would read a few of the articles on that site (and/or google) and figure that.
Rare earth mining does not produce toxic waste.
Why would it?
Basically you are just pit mining salts or digging out stones.
They are not rare.
And so cheap right now that plenty of mines in the americas are closed.
Google is your friend. ... just to mention it :)
Even google has a self driving car since roughly a decade
In the meantime: https://www.fzi.de/en/our-offe...
In Karlsruhe we have self driving cars from every majour brand since minimum 10 years ... cycling around, under supervision of course.
I live in Karlsruhe ... and I worked for Continental, as test engineer for the cameras used in driver assisting cars. Continental is one of the mayjour manufacters of equipment for self driving cars and assisting systems. (Yes, that is the company that is mostly known for its tires)
The product owner is not needed for Sprint Planning. However in Scrum he is usually present.
The product owner is not a business user, not even in the remotest sense. Well. there might be exceptions. A business user evolving into a product owner or product manager.
In my experience, when people ask why a Product Owner should attend sprint planning meetings, it's because they're not doing agile, they're pretending to.
This 'question' has nothing to do with agile or not.
The question is: does the team need the PO for clarifications during sprint planning? If that is case, then obviously the back log items are not clear enough (acceptance criteria etc.)
Most sprint plannings I joined the PO was happy smiling/grinning in the corner ;)
We have several systems that can 'reason'.
A system that can reason, is strong AI.
Regardless what you think.
An autopilot is not a self driving car.
And actually IMHO they should be forbidden.
Either have a human controlled car with driver assistance or an autonomous car. But not a half bread aoutopilot.
Because they want their own ones instead of buying the technology from Germany and Japan.
On the other hand a good deal of their equipment might be bought in ... no idea.
There is no agile method I'm aware of where business users are part of thr sprint planning.
What would be the point if that!?