Fit that nuclear battery as discussed on slashdot earlier that is supposed to be available into it and then I will be impressed, That would have some great possibilities.
thanks to the mineral oil PCs discussed yesterday we can now refer to the slashdot effect as the deep fry effect.
break out the batter, fish, beer, invite some friends, and submit your website to slashdot.
I noticed his tech was state of the art.
Seriously. I want to see something with some heat coming out of it. A friend of mine is doing something similar but overclocking the hell out of it. Maybe with a 2400 Barton OCd we could have a deep frier.
Brings a whole new meaning to "You want fries with that?"
I have a CS degree and have been in the IT world for a while. What I have discovered is that there is a large quantity of business/psych/pick your degree people who were ushered into becoming the computer person during the.com boom. Problem is a lot of these people need to be taken to courses, certified, re-trained every couple years. (on a side note I have found that physics and math majors who were ushered in do not have much problem evolving with new tech).
CS people however evolve rather seamlessly as basic hardware and software has not changed all that much in the last 30 years. Just more efficient uses of existing tech. As a CS personel I can look at a new device and think, "well its about time we got something like that" and pick it up. Other majors or Paper MCSE's tend to look at new tech and scratch their heads going "ummmmm, when do I get trained for that?". NT, UNIX, doesnt matter, give me a little while with google and a standard primer and I am on my way.
Long advice short. Get a Basic Degree in the area you want to work in, CS, Math, Physics. Dont specify in college but cover your bases so you have a good foundation to work off of. There arent enough people who know the basics. It is just easier to get a MCSE rather than learn to program and create circuitry.
still ugly as hell. I didnt like the design 10 years ago, still dont. Seriously, what is with IBM's design team, I am all for function over form but cant you think of something new?
What kind of hardware are you writing to? I dont know of any home equipment that will sustain that speed. Can anyone give me some insight into what would be able to store the data as fast as it came in?
Ya you wouldnt think microsoft and lavasoft or spybot were competitors either...until microsoft started crushing both companies with the purchase of GIANT.
I checked out several of these offers. incentiverewardcenter.com and freeipods.com
What it breaks down to is not the spam or the unsolicitated e-mail. Those can be avoided easily by temporary addresses and friend's -phone numbers However the problem comes when you actually are qualified for the IPod, you get the runaround. Then it becomes a matter of how much is your time worth. Sure you will get the ipod but I know with the time I spent cancelling orders, offers, talking on the phone, and e-mailing, I could have earned the money flipping burgers:) If you go to places like ripoffreport.com you will find similar testimonies.
hmmm I think I may have been a bit misunderstood. I am talking about the calls that come into my system, routed back out. Not intercepting all their calls. However I do look pretty good in a birthday suit...
until I start re-routing their calls to each other. Think of it, a simple firewall that sits on your network that re-routs overseas calls to each other. Just keep a list of numbers and add new ones as they come in, completely automated...get a couple thousand Voice over IP users to do this and viola, problem solved. Old fashioned ping of death, DOS attacks. Perfectly legitimate because I am just returning their calls right???
So is it illegal to run a sniffer on my network, or a keylogger on my PC to track people using my equipment?
Sometimes I think court ignorance is killing this country.
In this case if deregulation is the best option why dont we consider a couple more options.
Deregulate IPs: That way we can be more inventive with our technology rather than having someone give us permission to be on the net.
Deregulate Domain Names: Think of the expansion of the internet if we all could use www.slashdot.com!
How about the airways: why regulate who can fly where and when?
Honestly I can see some leniency but the regulations occur because we have to think about collisions. Dont come crying to me when you cant make a 911 call because a guy 2 blocks away is streaming his music to his IPod.
Just because we have 80% space free doesnt mean we need to pack it with other stuff. For you server admins out there, who among you don't follow the 80/20 rule? 80 percent of the resources 20% of the time.
This article is a good example of someone who needs a little more insite into how the world of technology works.
I am not sure, it would be interesting to see a full comparison between the two. Just lay out the numbers without people getting all up in arms about it.
I think it would be interesting to see a comparison between the number of linux users and exploits found versus the number of Windows users and exploits found.
It is logical to think that a larger number of users will find a larger number of exploits and bugs. But will the ratio be less for linux.
I just want to know if we would see more of these posts about linux exploits if linux had a bigger audience.
I know this post is late but I was trying to understand your sig and thought this discussion would shed light on it.
You ideas have interested me, I have a strong background in mathematics and while your assumptions hold water I am noticing that your are in fact making a lot of assumptions which we must do in the case of studying the possibility of god/ID, such as assuming that you know what the function is.
Would you be thinking that F(g) = ID; ? in that case, how do we (if intelligent design exists) as finite beings understand the function? Evolution may be a part of ID, who knows. Evolution points to a nice logrithmic expansion but we dont know what type of function an Intelligent Designer would have used.
Maybe as part of the function you have Evolution on a macro scale, maybe you dont.
Maybe you have an ID who has a hands off approach, maybe you dont have an ID at all in which case we would be looking at an entirely different function.
Or maybe you have an ID that designed things the way they are so that it would have a specific output.
Or we could take the step a little further, what if the ID dabbles just enough to keep the variables from destroying the output and is interested in seeing the outcome of the equation.
Slashdot Mirror
I mean hacking it to put windows on it.
So does this mean the geeks out there will hack it to put linux on it?
Fit that nuclear battery as discussed on slashdot earlier that is supposed to be available into it and then I will be impressed, That would have some great possibilities.
thanks to the mineral oil PCs discussed yesterday we can now refer to the slashdot effect as the deep fry effect. break out the batter, fish, beer, invite some friends, and submit your website to slashdot.
Brings a whole new meaning to "You want fries with that?"
CS people however evolve rather seamlessly as basic hardware and software has not changed all that much in the last 30 years. Just more efficient uses of existing tech. As a CS personel I can look at a new device and think, "well its about time we got something like that" and pick it up. Other majors or Paper MCSE's tend to look at new tech and scratch their heads going "ummmmm, when do I get trained for that?". NT, UNIX, doesnt matter, give me a little while with google and a standard primer and I am on my way.
Long advice short. Get a Basic Degree in the area you want to work in, CS, Math, Physics. Dont specify in college but cover your bases so you have a good foundation to work off of. There arent enough people who know the basics. It is just easier to get a MCSE rather than learn to program and create circuitry.
Finally a plane your mom can fit on...
still ugly as hell. I didnt like the design 10 years ago, still dont. Seriously, what is with IBM's design team, I am all for function over form but cant you think of something new?
What kind of hardware are you writing to? I dont know of any home equipment that will sustain that speed. Can anyone give me some insight into what would be able to store the data as fast as it came in?
Ya you wouldnt think microsoft and lavasoft or spybot were competitors either...until microsoft started crushing both companies with the purchase of GIANT.
What it breaks down to is not the spam or the unsolicitated e-mail. Those can be avoided easily by temporary addresses and friend's -phone numbers However the problem comes when you actually are qualified for the IPod, you get the runaround. Then it becomes a matter of how much is your time worth. Sure you will get the ipod but I know with the time I spent cancelling orders, offers, talking on the phone, and e-mailing, I could have earned the money flipping burgers :) If you go to places like ripoffreport.com you will find similar testimonies.
hmmm I think I may have been a bit misunderstood. I am talking about the calls that come into my system, routed back out. Not intercepting all their calls. However I do look pretty good in a birthday suit...
until I start re-routing their calls to each other. Think of it, a simple firewall that sits on your network that re-routs overseas calls to each other. Just keep a list of numbers and add new ones as they come in, completely automated...get a couple thousand Voice over IP users to do this and viola, problem solved. Old fashioned ping of death, DOS attacks. Perfectly legitimate because I am just returning their calls right???
I tried to stop the submission to no avail, check my post below.
http://www.barefeats.com/macvpc.html
I always love to hear from people who equate MHz with speed and and power.
Define faster Processor...kind of hard to compare the two...
So is it illegal to run a sniffer on my network, or a keylogger on my PC to track people using my equipment? Sometimes I think court ignorance is killing this country.
Deregulate IPs: That way we can be more inventive with our technology rather than having someone give us permission to be on the net.
Deregulate Domain Names: Think of the expansion of the internet if we all could use www.slashdot.com!
How about the airways: why regulate who can fly where and when?
Honestly I can see some leniency but the regulations occur because we have to think about collisions. Dont come crying to me when you cant make a 911 call because a guy 2 blocks away is streaming his music to his IPod.
Just because we have 80% space free doesnt mean we need to pack it with other stuff. For you server admins out there, who among you don't follow the 80/20 rule? 80 percent of the resources 20% of the time.
This article is a good example of someone who needs a little more insite into how the world of technology works.
Let the windows/mac bashing begin....
But honestly is this extra power really going to make things better? Is it necessary?
I couldnt help but notice the rather large amount of Sci-Fi/Fantasy Movies on that list. Anyone have ideas as to why they sell better?
I am not sure, it would be interesting to see a full comparison between the two. Just lay out the numbers without people getting all up in arms about it.
How did this get modded flamebait....I just wanted to see the numbers.
It is logical to think that a larger number of users will find a larger number of exploits and bugs. But will the ratio be less for linux.
I just want to know if we would see more of these posts about linux exploits if linux had a bigger audience.
Would you be thinking that F(g) = ID; ? in that case, how do we (if intelligent design exists) as finite beings understand the function? Evolution may be a part of ID, who knows. Evolution points to a nice logrithmic expansion but we dont know what type of function an Intelligent Designer would have used.
Maybe as part of the function you have Evolution on a macro scale, maybe you dont.
Maybe you have an ID who has a hands off approach, maybe you dont have an ID at all in which case we would be looking at an entirely different function.
Or maybe you have an ID that designed things the way they are so that it would have a specific output.
Or we could take the step a little further, what if the ID dabbles just enough to keep the variables from destroying the output and is interested in seeing the outcome of the equation.