LOL, well that's actually unfortunate. Sex is a wonderful, beautiful thing. I'm mainly responding to the nonsensical complaint the OP made here. Mainly that he can't grasp that engaging in risky behaviour caries a *gasp* risk.
Thank God I stumbled into a place that tells me to go home after the day is done. 'Round these here parts they seem to fear work done wrong more than work not done at all. The former usually costs double. I find it amusing that this is even concidered debatable material.
I don't really think so. You're assuming that games and peripheral devices serve no other purpose other than esthetics. I would wager that this is a mistake.
I can't say that I agree, but I can't see this as flamebate. WTF mods. Again, it's not about _your_ personal opinion. It's about the merrit of what is said.
Not always possible. Some women cannot use condoms due to skin allergies to the material. My wife and I found out the hard way that they lead to an unbearable burning.
Just 'cause you disagree with it doesn't make it trollish. At worst this is offtopic, but given the logical inconsistancies that are found in Christian theology to begin with, its not far fetched to imagine that no one in their right mind actually believes it to be true. The controversies and corruption alone are enough to make one question, quite seriously, whether they practice what they preach. Coincidently, these people have everything to lose if they can't keep the ball rolling in their favour. End result? A blatant display of hipocricy where by it's obvious they're in it for the money.
Now I'm confused... can someone please explain to me how this could possibly be understood as flamebait? I also don't get the joke either, and all that was meant is basically "why".
I honestly don't get it. All this is is chasing your own tail. Why not just admit that we don't have a model we can trust either way. Seems far more likely that we're holplessly ignorant on all sides.
Slashdot Mirror
LOL, well that's actually unfortunate. Sex is a wonderful, beautiful thing. I'm mainly responding to the nonsensical complaint the OP made here. Mainly that he can't grasp that engaging in risky behaviour caries a *gasp* risk.
I am not encouraging anything at all. I'm simply pointing out the obvious.
I don't understand what this means.
You HAVE control, and it is you misinterperting the issue. She cannot get pregnant if you don't put it in. It's very very simple.
As soon as possible. You don't need the health problems that come with prolonged periods of stress.
Thank God I stumbled into a place that tells me to go home after the day is done. 'Round these here parts they seem to fear work done wrong more than work not done at all. The former usually costs double. I find it amusing that this is even concidered debatable material.
I don't really think so. You're assuming that games and peripheral devices serve no other purpose other than esthetics. I would wager that this is a mistake.
How about still making it available and work on removing the church. It will yield a better outcome than 'why bother'.
It's all stuck to his wall at this moment.
It hurt to read ...
OK, then perhaps you shouldn't stick your pecker into things it can get pregnant. Grasping that?
*flamebait. oops :)
I can't say that I agree, but I can't see this as flamebate. WTF mods. Again, it's not about _your_ personal opinion. It's about the merrit of what is said.
Not always possible. Some women cannot use condoms due to skin allergies to the material. My wife and I found out the hard way that they lead to an unbearable burning.
Also, it's because they really are stupid.
It wasn't broken. Now it is.
Just 'cause you disagree with it doesn't make it trollish. At worst this is offtopic, but given the logical inconsistancies that are found in Christian theology to begin with, its not far fetched to imagine that no one in their right mind actually believes it to be true. The controversies and corruption alone are enough to make one question, quite seriously, whether they practice what they preach. Coincidently, these people have everything to lose if they can't keep the ball rolling in their favour. End result? A blatant display of hipocricy where by it's obvious they're in it for the money.
Only for the small minds that cannot comprehend its purpose. Go back to your crib, child.
VOTE OR DIE!
Now I'm confused... can someone please explain to me how this could possibly be understood as flamebait? I also don't get the joke either, and all that was meant is basically "why".
Because honour, honesty, and integrity has nothing to do with it.
I honestly don't get it. All this is is chasing your own tail. Why not just admit that we don't have a model we can trust either way. Seems far more likely that we're holplessly ignorant on all sides.
LOL wut?
Strawman much?
Yes, let us not be good people and neighbours. Let us be assholes and proud of it.