I believe they are all corrupt, so I included the information on Wheeler (the head of the FCC) showing ties to an industry that would rather it was not neutral or open.
A U.S. Appeals Court just invalidated the FCC's net neutrality rules that would've made it illegal for telecom companies to favor certain types of traffic over others. The court ruled that the commission lacked the authority to implement and enforce such rules which were embedded in a complicated legal framework.
The entire FCC ruling was irrelevant, and so it was pandering and the court decision is what the market players want. It is a conspiracy, that's what the sort of lobbying Wheeler did is, conspiracy.
The FCC won't fight back, in fact this result was probably the intention along.
Prior to joining the FCC, Chairman Wheeler was Managing Director at Core Capital Partners, a venture capital firm investing in early stage Internet Protocol (IP)-based companies. He served as President and CEO of Shiloh Group, LLC, a strategy development and private investment company specializing in telecommunications services and co-founded SmartBrief, the internet’s largest electronic information service for vertical markets. From 1976 to 1984, Chairman Wheeler was associated with the National Cable Television Association (NCTA), where he was President and CEO from 1979 to 1984. Following NCTA, Chairman Wheeler was CEO of several high tech companies, including the first company to offer high speed delivery of data to home computers and the first digital video satellite service. From 1992 to 2004, Chairman Wheeler served as President and CEO of the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association (CTIA).
But it isn't "unconscious" is it? People can clearly see that a boy is a boy, and a girl is a girl, so they consciously act in a manner according to gender.
willful counter pressure advocated by "well-meaning" ideologues
Am I advocating something? Please point out where I am advocating anything, I am pointing out the obvious.
Besides your theory doesn't seem falsifiable
It isn't "my" theory, you actually believe I alone came up with gender bias starting at birth ? (actually before now that you can know the sex) I'm flattered, but you're wrong.
Why don't you Google it a bit, it seems to me new ideas may be more palatable to you if you discover them yourself.
Besides your theory doesn't seem falsifiable Any evidence of the contrary is seen as proof that social pressure is so prevalent people have become blind to it.
So it doesn't seem "falisifiable", but if it was. it would be wrong any way.
Why don't you point out
social pressure is so prevalent people have become blind to it
to a gay person, point it out to anyone that doesn't "fit in". And most certainly I am not blind to it.
You didn't write this post to me, it isn't a reply to me, it's an internal dialogue you're having with yourself.
How many other parents do that? Why are frilly pink things what see for sale? Boys get guns girls get dolls, Think about it, you know, without the defensive attitude.
First isolated in 1964, in its pure form, by Israeli scientists Raphael Mechoulam, Yechiel Gaoni and colleagues at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem,[7][8][9] it is a glassy solid when cold, and becomes viscous and sticky if warmed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/THC So yes THC has a crystal form, it can also be chemically bound to another substance for stability. And of course there is Marinol.
Some of these guys are smoking high quality oil on titanium nails, that shit is potent (having smoked it myself) I stay away from it because it makes me useless, and then it makes my tolerance so high I can only get a buzz eating a 500mg 5150 bar.
Just wait, someone is going to get it down to a THC powder, and then...
I quit smoking not too long ago, I had sweats, irritability, and sleeplessness for ~2 weeks, this isn't 1960's pot.
They can't reply or get your reply because they can't log in, I went so far as to track one person down via an ad sent to them, I have also received someone's complete information, SSN, etc. In the end I just drag them to the trash.
Slashdot Mirror
Most likely they will watch and see how this turns out, or even more likely they are all in it together and this is the test.
You lost me here, don't they already have that in spades?
It's a boring trip even in a Very Fast Picket OU.
And you're added to the "list".
I believe they are all corrupt, so I included the information on Wheeler (the head of the FCC) showing ties to an industry that would rather it was not neutral or open.
A U.S. Appeals Court just invalidated the FCC's net neutrality rules that would've made it illegal for telecom companies to favor certain types of traffic over others. The court ruled that the commission lacked the authority to implement and enforce such rules which were embedded in a complicated legal framework.
The entire FCC ruling was irrelevant, and so it was pandering and the court decision is what the market players want.
It is a conspiracy, that's what the sort of lobbying Wheeler did is, conspiracy.
The FCC won't fight back, in fact this result was probably the intention along.
Prior to joining the FCC, Chairman Wheeler was Managing Director at Core Capital Partners, a venture capital firm investing in early stage Internet Protocol (IP)-based companies. He served as President and CEO of Shiloh Group, LLC, a strategy development and private investment company specializing in telecommunications services and co-founded SmartBrief, the internet’s largest electronic information service for vertical markets. From 1976 to 1984, Chairman Wheeler was associated with the National Cable Television Association (NCTA), where he was President and CEO from 1979 to 1984. Following NCTA, Chairman Wheeler was CEO of several high tech companies, including the first company to offer high speed delivery of data to home computers and the first digital video satellite service. From 1992 to 2004, Chairman Wheeler served as President and CEO of the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association (CTIA).
http://www.fcc.gov/leadership/tom-wheeler
Don't use wireless, if you have the luxury to build it form scratch, have everything hardwired with a forward looking attitude (so fiber).
But the only way you would know that is if they told you or showed you a picture, you sure they aren't messing with you? (a joke)
Still running as AC eh?
Again AC, I advocate nothing do I?
If you haven't got the balls to post with your name, don't bother me with your lack of reading comprehension again,.
I'll take social pressure due to unconscious bias
But it isn't "unconscious" is it? People can clearly see that a boy is a boy, and a girl is a girl, so they consciously act in a manner according to gender.
willful counter pressure advocated by "well-meaning" ideologues
Am I advocating something? Please point out where I am advocating anything, I am pointing out the obvious.
Besides your theory doesn't seem falsifiable
It isn't "my" theory, you actually believe I alone came up with gender bias starting at birth ? (actually before now that you can know the sex) I'm flattered, but you're wrong.
Why don't you Google it a bit, it seems to me new ideas may be more palatable to you if you discover them yourself.
Besides your theory doesn't seem falsifiable Any evidence of the contrary is seen as proof that social pressure is so prevalent people have become blind to it.
So it doesn't seem "falisifiable", but if it was. it would be wrong any way.
Why don't you point out
social pressure is so prevalent people have become blind to it
to a gay person, point it out to anyone that doesn't "fit in".
And most certainly I am not blind to it.
You didn't write this post to me, it isn't a reply to me, it's an internal dialogue you're having with yourself.
How many other parents do that? Why are frilly pink things what see for sale? Boys get guns girls get dolls, Think about it, you know, without the defensive attitude.
With that diet I imagine they had to graze all day long, very little time for anything else.
It starts at birth, when they parents put pink clothes on the girl, and blue clothes on the boy.
But either way, liquid or powder (crystal) it's potent.
Not the sharpest tools in the shed are they.
First isolated in 1964, in its pure form, by Israeli scientists Raphael Mechoulam, Yechiel Gaoni and colleagues at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem,[7][8][9] it is a glassy solid when cold, and becomes viscous and sticky if warmed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/THC
So yes THC has a crystal form, it can also be chemically bound to another substance for stability.
And of course there is Marinol.
But either way, liquid or powder (crystal) it's potent.
And this is an interesting read. http://www.cannabis-med.org/data/pdf/2001-03-04-7.pdf
This + tablets = even lower PC sales.
None of which you can do if it's Facebook, or any other popular site.
You got a link for that? It better not be rense.com.
Some of these guys are smoking high quality oil on titanium nails, that shit is potent (having smoked it myself) I stay away from it because it makes me useless, and then it makes my tolerance so high I can only get a buzz eating a 500mg 5150 bar.
Just wait, someone is going to get it down to a THC powder, and then...
I quit smoking not too long ago, I had sweats, irritability, and sleeplessness for ~2 weeks, this isn't 1960's pot.
Oh and Google needs to admit they fucked up and fix it, I'm pretty sure that guys info I got could lead to some sort of law suit.
They can't reply or get your reply because they can't log in, I went so far as to track one person down via an ad sent to them, I have also received someone's complete information, SSN, etc.
In the end I just drag them to the trash.
I guess, it strikes more as "The punters like shiny things".
Can we stop putting unnecessary lights on everything, it's gotten tiresome.