Maybe you should read that article you linked. It doesn't say what you think it does.
"shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
"the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton."
Those emails were sent to other servers. Most of which are still up. And many of which are government email servers.
Russia may or may not have copies of all of them. Trump didn't ask them to go through their records.
He's asking Russia to go find them today. Not a year ago.
No other conclusion to make, based on his words, that he's asking them to hack other mail servers. And that's a basic form of cyber war.
What he said was, "Hey Russia, I hope you can find...." Where in there is he urging them to hack? Your "no other conclusion to make" is all in your head. Aside from that, if you believe Hillary they were all personal email. So by policy, none of them should have ended up on government servers. Right?
You are probably be aware that any hacking of HRC's personal State Dept. server would have had to be done before the deleted emails were deleted and the server taken offline. So at worst (making the probably incorrect assumption that Trump was serious), he was "asking" them to search through the data they had already snagged.
Eh, people make jokes. Shrub had his little lexidudlies that he'd throw out. One time someone caused the Soviet Far East to go on alert for half an hour..."My fellow Americans, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes."
Yup. Let us find a candidate running for president who has most likely committed treason.
Trump is the obvious answer. Right?
Welcome to Bizarro World, where the person who makes a joke about Russia hacking emails is a traitor, and a person who takes a bribe to supply uranium to Russia is a hero.
Sounds like a form of Treason if true. Inviting a foreign nation tho cyber-attack America and/or Americans... can;t believe people actually are willing to vote for this piece of garbage
US Constitution, Article III, Section 3: "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort."
If you thing saying, "Russia, I hope you find the missing emails" is to treason, you probably think saying, "I hope this person dies" is murder.
BlackBerry, which once assumed the tentpole position in the mobile market
"Frozen" is a tent pole for Disney. The iPhone is a tent pole for Apple. The Galaxy line of phones is a tent pole for Samsung. There is no such thing as a "tentpole position" in a market. Perhaps the editor meant "pole position"?
You're right, of course. But the Hughes H-4 was not an amphibious airplane. TFS has a misleading headline; the Chinese aircraft is the largest amphibious aircraft, not the largest seaplane.
Wasn't Bill Clinton raked over the coals by the Reps. for having just one!
Of the 3500 lawsuits mentioned in the USA today article, Trump was the plaintiff in 1900 and the defendant in 1450. I say 'was' because the number of current open civil suits is 50.
Why doesn't someone sue the government over this? They are circumventing Constitutional rights with this type of behavior but until it gets before the SCOTUS nothing will change.
Probably because the people whose rights are being violated, don't have any specific knowledge that their rights have been violated. The people who know other peoples' rights are being violated (Microsoft in this example) aren't having their own rights violated. Thus, nobody has standing to sue.
It's not a public aircraft. It's not being operated for "hobby", and it is much larger than the hobby rules permit. It is much larger than the part 107 rules will allow. It requires either a 333 or COA.
The easiest solution was for Facebook to hire out the "research" to one of the many true research facilities who already have COA or 333 to cover them.
Exactly. Yuma Proving Grounds is operated by the US Army Test and Evaluation Command; they regularly provide test services to non DoD/private industry.
Well, if you're talking about the trademark, then it's not blu-ray (blue-ray without the e); it's Blu-Ray. If you're going to be pedantic, why not go all the way? Or, you could just confess that you knew what the OP was referring to, and not get your underwear in a wad over something of little consequence.
He left the facts right next to the evidence on all the Weapons of Mass Destruction....
Well, there's this, for starters: "...multiple independent and bipartisan reports before and after the war have established beyond any doubt that Hussein was deeply enmeshed with terrorist activity from the time he took power in the late 1970s until the eve of his last war." Of course, you have to consider that the Washington Post may be stretching the truth a bit, if you think they may have an agenda here.
I doubt most baby boomers paid as much for tecom services per month as your average cell phone/home internet connection costs.
Maybe, but I doubt that it's really that far off. And for the difference, you're getting much, much more capability.
That "something like $10 a month" you think your boomer parents were paying was probably just the unlimited local calling portion of the phone bill, before taxes, fees, maintenance charges, extended area service charges, touch-tone charges, and all the other miscellaneous things the phone companies used to charge for. I'm pretty confident in saying this, because I'm a boomer and I remember what I used to pay. In 1986, the national average for a private, single-line touch-tone service was $49.25 per month. $49.25 in 1986 dollars would have been $107.77 in 2015.
it seems we only need about 2 hours per week for the essential work, if you averaged it over the entire population. If that estimate is approximately correct and we go with 40 hour work weeks as a basis, then 19 people could survive as long as one person is working full time.
I think this is what the "I will cut your salary in half and give it to someone less productive. Now you can be roommates with the guy at the gas station broke together in a run down apartment." comment was about.
If I'm interpreting what you have posted here and earlier correctly, you are positing that people who are productive will be productive regardless of the rewards. I work hard at being productive doing things that need doing. I do this in part because I enjoy the work, and in part because I am well compensated for doing it. Because I am well compensated, I can afford moderate amounts of nice things that make my life more enjoyable.
While the products of creative types undeniably make my life more enjoyable, they won't pay for a European vacation, will they? If the fruits of my labor were used to finance the discretionary time of 19 other people, I would not be able to afford many of the things that make my life more enjoyable, and I would be less inclined to be productive and more inclined to divide my time between investment (whatever that means) and recreation.
Slashdot Mirror
Hey, I hope you can find the bills I left in my trash.
How else would you do that but by coming into my house?
By waiting until you take the cans out to the street for pickup?
Maybe you should read that article you linked. It doesn't say what you think it does.
"shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
"the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton."
Those emails were sent to other servers. Most of which are still up. And many of which are government email servers.
Russia may or may not have copies of all of them. Trump didn't ask them to go through their records. He's asking Russia to go find them today. Not a year ago.
No other conclusion to make, based on his words, that he's asking them to hack other mail servers. And that's a basic form of cyber war.
What he said was, "Hey Russia, I hope you can find ...." Where in there is he urging them to hack? Your "no other conclusion to make" is all in your head. Aside from that, if you believe Hillary they were all personal email. So by policy, none of them should have ended up on government servers. Right?
You are probably be aware that any hacking of HRC's personal State Dept. server would have had to be done before the deleted emails were deleted and the server taken offline. So at worst (making the probably incorrect assumption that Trump was serious), he was "asking" them to search through the data they had already snagged.
Eh, people make jokes. Shrub had his little lexidudlies that he'd throw out. One time someone caused the Soviet Far East to go on alert for half an hour..."My fellow Americans, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes."
It's all great fun.
That wasn't Bush; it was Reagan.
Yup. Let us find a candidate running for president who has most likely committed treason. Trump is the obvious answer. Right?
Welcome to Bizarro World, where the person who makes a joke about Russia hacking emails is a traitor, and a person who takes a bribe to supply uranium to Russia is a hero.
Sounds like a form of Treason if true. Inviting a foreign nation tho cyber-attack America and/or Americans... can;t believe people actually are willing to vote for this piece of garbage
US Constitution, Article III, Section 3: "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort."
If you thing saying, "Russia, I hope you find the missing emails" is to treason, you probably think saying, "I hope this person dies" is murder.
Only a fool thinks they aren't already being tracked as for all intensive purposes bitcoin is NOT anonymous.
So, it's anonymous for non-intensive purposes? It's a doggy-dog world out there.
BlackBerry, which once assumed the tentpole position in the mobile market
"Frozen" is a tent pole for Disney. The iPhone is a tent pole for Apple. The Galaxy line of phones is a tent pole for Samsung. There is no such thing as a "tentpole position" in a market. Perhaps the editor meant "pole position"?
You're right, of course. But the Hughes H-4 was not an amphibious airplane. TFS has a misleading headline; the Chinese aircraft is the largest amphibious aircraft, not the largest seaplane.
You mean the break peddle?
More likely "brake pedal". Unless you mean "break the company, then peddle it to somebody."
Meanwhile, Trump has had four bankruptcies and is the subject of multiple class action suits over the scam that was Trump University.
Multiple is a bit of an understatement 3500 would be more accurate http://www.usatoday.com/story/...
Wasn't Bill Clinton raked over the coals by the Reps. for having just one!
Of the 3500 lawsuits mentioned in the USA today article, Trump was the plaintiff in 1900 and the defendant in 1450. I say 'was' because the number of current open civil suits is 50.
Why doesn't someone sue the government over this? They are circumventing Constitutional rights with this type of behavior but until it gets before the SCOTUS nothing will change.
Probably because the people whose rights are being violated, don't have any specific knowledge that their rights have been violated. The people who know other peoples' rights are being violated (Microsoft in this example) aren't having their own rights violated. Thus, nobody has standing to sue.
Portmanteau doesn't mean what you appear to think it means. Well, maybe for 'left-tards'.
It's not a public aircraft. It's not being operated for "hobby", and it is much larger than the hobby rules permit. It is much larger than the part 107 rules will allow. It requires either a 333 or COA.
The easiest solution was for Facebook to hire out the "research" to one of the many true research facilities who already have COA or 333 to cover them.
Exactly. Yuma Proving Grounds is operated by the US Army Test and Evaluation Command; they regularly provide test services to non DoD/private industry.
Who the fuck uses verizon anyway?
You're kidding, right? With 141.4 million subscribers as of May 2016, Verizon Wireless is the largest wireless telecommunications provider in the United States.
What happened on the 9th of november 2001 ??
You didn't know? That was the first occurrence of an idiotic date format related comment by an Anonymous Coward.
Without the e?
Well, if you're talking about the trademark, then it's not blu-ray (blue-ray without the e); it's Blu-Ray. If you're going to be pedantic, why not go all the way? Or, you could just confess that you knew what the OP was referring to, and not get your underwear in a wad over something of little consequence.
It's so adorable that you think that's spelled "blue-ray".
Wait - how do you think "blue-ray" is spelled?
VCRs haven't competed against DVDs for a long time. If you buy a movie, it has come on DVD (or blue-ray) for over a decade.
Well, you'd certainly think so. And in terms of competing, you're right. But amazingly, you can still buy movies in VHS format.
>Got any facts on that?
He left the facts right next to the evidence on all the Weapons of Mass Destruction....
Well, there's this, for starters: "...multiple independent and bipartisan reports before and after the war have established beyond any doubt that Hussein was deeply enmeshed with terrorist activity from the time he took power in the late 1970s until the eve of his last war." Of course, you have to consider that the Washington Post may be stretching the truth a bit, if you think they may have an agenda here.
To Slashdot editors: can we please stop with the unrelated crap?
Try to think of it as, "In other news...." Except, it's not news.
I doubt most baby boomers paid as much for tecom services per month as your average cell phone/home internet connection costs.
Maybe, but I doubt that it's really that far off. And for the difference, you're getting much, much more capability.
That "something like $10 a month" you think your boomer parents were paying was probably just the unlimited local calling portion of the phone bill, before taxes, fees, maintenance charges, extended area service charges, touch-tone charges, and all the other miscellaneous things the phone companies used to charge for. I'm pretty confident in saying this, because I'm a boomer and I remember what I used to pay. In 1986, the national average for a private, single-line touch-tone service was $49.25 per month. $49.25 in 1986 dollars would have been $107.77 in 2015.
it seems we only need about 2 hours per week for the essential work, if you averaged it over the entire population. If that estimate is approximately correct and we go with 40 hour work weeks as a basis, then 19 people could survive as long as one person is working full time.
I think this is what the "I will cut your salary in half and give it to someone less productive. Now you can be roommates with the guy at the gas station broke together in a run down apartment." comment was about.
If I'm interpreting what you have posted here and earlier correctly, you are positing that people who are productive will be productive regardless of the rewards. I work hard at being productive doing things that need doing. I do this in part because I enjoy the work, and in part because I am well compensated for doing it. Because I am well compensated, I can afford moderate amounts of nice things that make my life more enjoyable.
While the products of creative types undeniably make my life more enjoyable, they won't pay for a European vacation, will they? If the fruits of my labor were used to finance the discretionary time of 19 other people, I would not be able to afford many of the things that make my life more enjoyable, and I would be less inclined to be productive and more inclined to divide my time between investment (whatever that means) and recreation.
Marshall Law
Is he related to Judge Dredd? Or were you referring to martial law?