But, please, note that Marx wrote: "I am not a Marxist". He explained that he discovered just some general long-term tendencies in development of the society, but he never meant that the history is a predefined march towards this or that.
I agree. Human society is inherently violent, as we are descendants of apes. I think a robot should have at least kind of hands with boxing gloves on. A laser would be a lethal weapon, and it is another story. But boxing gloves would suggest reediness to engage in a physical fight to protect itself.
to watch and listen what usual (fat, skinny, old, etc.) people do and say before these Samsung TVs... It should be a strenuous and traumatizing job, as what is seen cannot be unseen.
Not warranted? Starting from 1789 it is about all what governments do. The Crimean and Franco-Prussian wars were the direct consequences of the Great French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars, the First World War was a result of French humiliation in Franco-Prussian war, and so on and so forth.
At the same time not knowing a culture, language, mentality, people of a country makes an effort of a regime change from outside often unpredictable and counterproductive.
I think all this would be a lesson not only for the US and the RF, but for the whole humanity that a regime change from outside is not a good thing. No matter how much one dislikes an incumbent, a nation should be let to have its own history, revolutions, etc.
I agree. I would like just to add that a door has several functions, and one of them is being a border line, not only physical one but also moral, legal, psychological, etc.
For example, if there is a picket fence around a property it does not mean that this fence must be impenetrable, i.e. to have barbed wire, movement sensors, etc. But still it is a good picket fence which have got many useful functions.
And people should not think, - oh, this picket fence is not secure, so I can cross it and do whatever I want on this property.
Here is the first consequence of that ageism in the donkey party's bureaucracy. If Bernard Sanders, a wise mature man, had been a candidate we would probably live now in another better world.
themselves. And in this system the chassis is the tube, and it is not moving.
As for emergencies, let us first have an emergency at the test site and see what could be done.
I think this experimental site would be in human history something like Johannes Gutenberg's printing shop of 1450, or Tim Berners-Lee discovery of hyperlink in 1989.
When a man flew first time in space in 1961, the next day there was only a tiny article in a central newspaper. As saying goes - destiny knocks on the door quietly.
If you have got a paranoya it still doesn't mean that there are no bots.
If, seriously though I saw modern parachutes. They are small, like a briefcase, light, and hitec. True, it would be a rough experience for a passenger, but I would still prefer this, an automated jump, than a sure death.
Why Airbus does not include a parachute in its concepts and aircraft? Even Russian military pilots have got an ejection system for more than half a century. Here is a video "MiG-29 Pilot Ejects Two Seconds Before Crash" https://youtu.be/5MQk1yvsoKY
But we, who pay for the tickets a lot of money still do not have anything. No safety system in the air at all.
react accordingly, - lowering speed and switching on the emergency light blinking. This is what should be called a self-driving car.
I do not understand how car manufacturers get away with it - building cars with 320 km/h speedometers, and at the same time not installing driver's alcohol detector, driver's mobile phone detector, etc.
At the same time more than a million people get killed by these cars each year and millions are wounded. These are WW3 figures.
If there were no documented collisions of a quadcopter and an airplane, why not to try to create it. For example, a flying DJI Phantom with the weight 1.2 kg and an airplane wing moving on rails. And see what happens. The FAA colleagues could do it first, and then print 700 pages regulations.
not the bots. Do not forget that Wikipedia is one of the most visited and read websites. And where there are people there are possibilities to make money.
Consequently a class of technological aristocracy appear who try to control what article could be published and which could be deleted. We shall not underestimate human creativity on a market.
All one needs is a capability to create and maintain a positive article about say a medicament which development cost a billion. But it is impossible if you cannot dominate other people' articles. It is not so visible in English Wikipedia, but mostly in some other popular languages.
It took jobs of countless airline staff. Passengers, especially business class, do not have to fly to talk or view an object. After 2001 airline industry became different.
Also training courses, books, mail, etc. It is different now too.
In my opinion the modern politics turned into a jar of spiders. Everybody eavesdrop, dislike, and attack each other. It is amplified significantly for someone like me who knows foreign languages and can watch it all from several sides.
I begin to wonder if Mikhail Bakunin's ideas were really that much farfetched, if the state as an institution is necessary at all. Or is it just turned into a source of mutual misunderstanding and hostility.
I think it is about the same all over the world. The same as violence against women, it's about 30% everywhere, 1 of 3 women, by the WHO statistics:
http://www.who.int/reproductiv...
Recall what was in John Podesta email messages, which became known just by a mere accident, because he did not use two steps authentication on his Gmail. It is about the same everywhere, as it is a property of Homo Sapiens.
Slashdot Mirror
But, please, note that Marx wrote: "I am not a Marxist". He explained that he discovered just some general long-term tendencies in development of the society, but he never meant that the history is a predefined march towards this or that.
I think it is a good idea. As Chinese proverb puts it: "Let a hundred flowers blossom".
I agree. Human society is inherently violent, as we are descendants of apes. I think a robot should have at least kind of hands with boxing gloves on. A laser would be a lethal weapon, and it is another story. But boxing gloves would suggest reediness to engage in a physical fight to protect itself.
to watch and listen what usual (fat, skinny, old, etc.) people do and say before these Samsung TVs... It should be a strenuous and traumatizing job, as what is seen cannot be unseen.
A human can cycle 557 miles (896 km) per day https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
30 miles is just a light warming for a strong cyclist.
Not warranted? Starting from 1789 it is about all what governments do. The Crimean and Franco-Prussian wars were the direct consequences of the Great French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars, the First World War was a result of French humiliation in Franco-Prussian war, and so on and so forth.
At the same time not knowing a culture, language, mentality, people of a country makes an effort of a regime change from outside often unpredictable and counterproductive.
I think all this would be a lesson not only for the US and the RF, but for the whole humanity that a regime change from outside is not a good thing. No matter how much one dislikes an incumbent, a nation should be let to have its own history, revolutions, etc.
I agree. I would like just to add that a door has several functions, and one of them is being a border line, not only physical one but also moral, legal, psychological, etc.
For example, if there is a picket fence around a property it does not mean that this fence must be impenetrable, i.e. to have barbed wire, movement sensors, etc. But still it is a good picket fence which have got many useful functions.
And people should not think, - oh, this picket fence is not secure, so I can cross it and do whatever I want on this property.
Here is the first consequence of that ageism in the donkey party's bureaucracy. If Bernard Sanders, a wise mature man, had been a candidate we would probably live now in another better world.
on Raspberry Pi 3 computer https://www.raspberrypi.org/ . It is an OS and a computer with the link to the physical world via GPIO.
that he could do it all alone, without at least some cooperation from inside.
Paw Paw Tunnel was built in 19th century. It has got a very good design, as there is alo a pedestrian (nowadays also cycling) trail near the boat channel in the tunnel:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://www.nps.gov/experience...
themselves. And in this system the chassis is the tube, and it is not moving.
As for emergencies, let us first have an emergency at the test site and see what could be done.
I think this experimental site would be in human history something like Johannes Gutenberg's printing shop of 1450, or Tim Berners-Lee discovery of hyperlink in 1989.
When a man flew first time in space in 1961, the next day there was only a tiny article in a central newspaper. As saying goes - destiny knocks on the door quietly.
to change time on multiple devices. Please, cancel it.
If you have got a paranoya it still doesn't mean that there are no bots. If, seriously though I saw modern parachutes. They are small, like a briefcase, light, and hitec. True, it would be a rough experience for a passenger, but I would still prefer this, an automated jump, than a sure death.
Why Airbus does not include a parachute in its concepts and aircraft? Even Russian military pilots have got an ejection system for more than half a century. Here is a video "MiG-29 Pilot Ejects Two Seconds Before Crash" https://youtu.be/5MQk1yvsoKY
But we, who pay for the tickets a lot of money still do not have anything. No safety system in the air at all.
react accordingly, - lowering speed and switching on the emergency light blinking. This is what should be called a self-driving car.
I do not understand how car manufacturers get away with it - building cars with 320 km/h speedometers, and at the same time not installing driver's alcohol detector, driver's mobile phone detector, etc.
At the same time more than a million people get killed by these cars each year and millions are wounded. These are WW3 figures.
go home.
If there were no documented collisions of a quadcopter and an airplane, why not to try to create it. For example, a flying DJI Phantom with the weight 1.2 kg and an airplane wing moving on rails. And see what happens. The FAA colleagues could do it first, and then print 700 pages regulations.
not the bots. Do not forget that Wikipedia is one of the most visited and read websites. And where there are people there are possibilities to make money.
Consequently a class of technological aristocracy appear who try to control what article could be published and which could be deleted. We shall not underestimate human creativity on a market.
All one needs is a capability to create and maintain a positive article about say a medicament which development cost a billion. But it is impossible if you cannot dominate other people' articles. It is not so visible in English Wikipedia, but mostly in some other popular languages.
It took jobs of countless airline staff. Passengers, especially business class, do not have to fly to talk or view an object. After 2001 airline industry became different.
Also training courses, books, mail, etc. It is different now too.
In my opinion the modern politics turned into a jar of spiders. Everybody eavesdrop, dislike, and attack each other. It is amplified significantly for someone like me who knows foreign languages and can watch it all from several sides.
I begin to wonder if Mikhail Bakunin's ideas were really that much farfetched, if the state as an institution is necessary at all. Or is it just turned into a source of mutual misunderstanding and hostility.
Edward being handed over to the US authorities. I think it would cause the third Russian revolution, a kind of Storming of the Bastille.
Russian society gave to the world such great [real] freedom thinkers as Mikhail Bakunin, who has got quite a few followers nowadays.
it seems to be easier. Here is a video Drone Flies into World's Largest Plane Antonov 225 Mriya https://youtu.be/A1ZMzsou-eQ?t...
I think it is about the same all over the world. The same as violence against women, it's about 30% everywhere, 1 of 3 women, by the WHO statistics:
http://www.who.int/reproductiv...
Recall what was in John Podesta email messages, which became known just by a mere accident, because he did not use two steps authentication on his Gmail. It is about the same everywhere, as it is a property of Homo Sapiens.