The test cases linked to on Bugzilla require scripting. I'd link you to the document, but that wouldn't work from here, so you'll have to dig them out of Bugzilla yourself. They're on the non-duplicate bug page, the one from the middle of May.
Remote configuration (lirc) is the scariest part for a lot of people. If you had some kind of prominent compatibility list for remotes, that would be extremely helpful. That's mainly what keeps me from Myth...that I have to format my system and install another OS just to see if my Snapstream Firefly remote will work.
...then it should be subject to the rules of war. If one nation attacking the network infrastructure of another nation were considered to violate the rules of war, they would think twice. It would hardly be worth it for China to DDoS a few connections if it meant we would start executing their PoW's.
Unless they said they will use the clips unedited and without alteration (and if they did say that, they should fire their lawyers...nobody says that), they can do a bit of digital editing to make their ad appeal a bit more to their needs. The contest fine print undoubtedly says something along the lines of "All submissions become the property of Heinz Inc.", so I don't see what the problem is. Even if there was a 'horrible outcry' over their 'deception', it's has nothing negative to do with their actual food product, and they'd just have that much more exposure in the media. I totally don't see the problem.
I like Numb3rs well enough for me to give this stuff a try. Assuming they make it available outside the US...something their Innertube service never did.
Well, I'm assuming that the lack of a W3C standard for Canvas means that the W3C standard for that is to omit support for it. The original poster I was responding to, almost in the same breath, berated Microsoft for not complying with W3C standards and requested that they comply with a non-W3C one. I don't know much about WHATWG or Canvas, but you can't have your cake and eat it too. Either Microsoft will comply with all the W3C standards or they won't at all, or they'll comply with some. You can't have both A and C.
I reiterate: I am not challenging the validity of WHATWG as a standardizing organization, nor do I have anything against Canvas (nor am I a Microsoft fanboy), but I don't think it's fair to hold IE to impossible expectations.
(ok, so it's not a W3C standard; but IE is the only one missing it)
Let me see if I got this...you want Microsoft to pay attention to standards, but only the ones other browsers don't ignore? That's a standard right there...a double standard.
That's a nice little anecdote. Unfortunately, everyone in the world isn't you, and as such, some people may have differing computer needs. I edit high definition video...a PII-266 wouldn't cut it, nor would your new AMD64 3200+. It's worth it for someone like me to buy a new computer every six months..the tech is advancing fast enough that the latest CPU will be a noticeable upgrade (quad core made a heck of a difference over dual core from six months earlier, for video editing), and the old machine can still find a nice home in a cluster for rendering the effects.
That would be awesome. Then Intel could buy Matrox and start competing with a line of discrete video cards. Soon we'll have Intellox processors with on-die GPUs, and AMnVidiATi OverFusion chips to go up against them!
I don't see much of a link between D&D and school shootings at all. I have yet to hear about anyone going out with their arquebus and killing everyone.
I've been wondering the same thing since this all started. Vonage Canada's website never changed (although I don't know if the US one did or not) when they weren't supposed to take new customers, so I don't know if that means anything either. I'd been considering Vonage for my phone service (those WiFi phones look like a good deal), but this has made me a bit leery. Primus offers service, too...maybe I'll go with them, if only cuz they look like they might live a few months longer than Vonage.
This is kinda the spot that I'm in. I'm running a 6200 AGP with 128MB right now, so pretty much any card on the market will be an improvement. I don't run a lot of graphically demanding stuff, but, then, if you'd asked me five year ago, I didn't have Google Earth and I'd have said I didn't need a GPU at all. The 8600GT looks like a nice card to grab to segue my way into PCI-e cards with something that will probably passably handle most things I throw at it for the next couple years. I'm not expecting monster performance, just better than what I have for the near future. If my needs don't change (watching the specs for Star Trek Online pretty closely), it should do what I need it to do until they come out with AGPCI-ex32 cards for me to switch to.
It would be impossible to implement over here. There may not be enough competition in the broadband market, but there's enough that someone will say no to the RIAA and gain a significant competitive advantage if they do.
Slashdot Mirror
So it's more like the Zune squirting DRM...infects whatever it touches.
Or, alternately, if you go with Microsoft's interpretations, it's like the GPL.
The test cases linked to on Bugzilla require scripting. I'd link you to the document, but that wouldn't work from here, so you'll have to dig them out of Bugzilla yourself. They're on the non-duplicate bug page, the one from the middle of May.
You seem to be assuming that the underwear is inflexible. Most guys don't wear cast iron boxers.
Remote configuration (lirc) is the scariest part for a lot of people. If you had some kind of prominent compatibility list for remotes, that would be extremely helpful. That's mainly what keeps me from Myth...that I have to format my system and install another OS just to see if my Snapstream Firefly remote will work.
...then it should be subject to the rules of war. If one nation attacking the network infrastructure of another nation were considered to violate the rules of war, they would think twice. It would hardly be worth it for China to DDoS a few connections if it meant we would start executing their PoW's.
Unless they said they will use the clips unedited and without alteration (and if they did say that, they should fire their lawyers...nobody says that), they can do a bit of digital editing to make their ad appeal a bit more to their needs. The contest fine print undoubtedly says something along the lines of "All submissions become the property of Heinz Inc.", so I don't see what the problem is. Even if there was a 'horrible outcry' over their 'deception', it's has nothing negative to do with their actual food product, and they'd just have that much more exposure in the media. I totally don't see the problem.
Tea is best enjoyed without preachy people like you telling other people how to enjoy their tea.
Looks like it should be the caption after Batman socks The Joker in the jaw.
I like Numb3rs well enough for me to give this stuff a try. Assuming they make it available outside the US...something their Innertube service never did.
So, the terrorists can call the police to tell them 'No, it's not a bomb. Really. You can all go home.'
Is that graph measured in 'millions of unique spammers'?
I thought they meant the Robotech Defense Force.
Security Through Format Undesirability
Well, I'm assuming that the lack of a W3C standard for Canvas means that the W3C standard for that is to omit support for it. The original poster I was responding to, almost in the same breath, berated Microsoft for not complying with W3C standards and requested that they comply with a non-W3C one. I don't know much about WHATWG or Canvas, but you can't have your cake and eat it too. Either Microsoft will comply with all the W3C standards or they won't at all, or they'll comply with some. You can't have both A and C.
I reiterate: I am not challenging the validity of WHATWG as a standardizing organization, nor do I have anything against Canvas (nor am I a Microsoft fanboy), but I don't think it's fair to hold IE to impossible expectations.
(ok, so it's not a W3C standard; but IE is the only one missing it)
Let me see if I got this...you want Microsoft to pay attention to standards, but only the ones other browsers don't ignore? That's a standard right there...a double standard.
That's a nice little anecdote. Unfortunately, everyone in the world isn't you, and as such, some people may have differing computer needs. I edit high definition video...a PII-266 wouldn't cut it, nor would your new AMD64 3200+. It's worth it for someone like me to buy a new computer every six months..the tech is advancing fast enough that the latest CPU will be a noticeable upgrade (quad core made a heck of a difference over dual core from six months earlier, for video editing), and the old machine can still find a nice home in a cluster for rendering the effects.
Xbox 360 is PowerPC, right? Is that similar enough to get any benefit from this?
That would be awesome. Then Intel could buy Matrox and start competing with a line of discrete video cards. Soon we'll have Intellox processors with on-die GPUs, and AMnVidiATi OverFusion chips to go up against them!
but ppc's in ur xbox 360, running ur video games.
I don't see much of a link between D&D and school shootings at all. I have yet to hear about anyone going out with their arquebus and killing everyone.
Do you have a reference for that, like a link or something?
If your patent covers transmission of voice through a gas medium containing a portion of nitrogen, we'll see you in court.
I've been wondering the same thing since this all started. Vonage Canada's website never changed (although I don't know if the US one did or not) when they weren't supposed to take new customers, so I don't know if that means anything either. I'd been considering Vonage for my phone service (those WiFi phones look like a good deal), but this has made me a bit leery. Primus offers service, too...maybe I'll go with them, if only cuz they look like they might live a few months longer than Vonage.
This is kinda the spot that I'm in. I'm running a 6200 AGP with 128MB right now, so pretty much any card on the market will be an improvement. I don't run a lot of graphically demanding stuff, but, then, if you'd asked me five year ago, I didn't have Google Earth and I'd have said I didn't need a GPU at all. The 8600GT looks like a nice card to grab to segue my way into PCI-e cards with something that will probably passably handle most things I throw at it for the next couple years. I'm not expecting monster performance, just better than what I have for the near future. If my needs don't change (watching the specs for Star Trek Online pretty closely), it should do what I need it to do until they come out with AGPCI-ex32 cards for me to switch to.
It would be impossible to implement over here. There may not be enough competition in the broadband market, but there's enough that someone will say no to the RIAA and gain a significant competitive advantage if they do.