Slashdot Mirror


Dell Rethinking the Direct-Sales Market

Dell has always sold directly to consumers via their web site and phone operations; it's a basic element of their business. Chairman and chief executive Michael Dell is now conceding that the company may need to rethink basic practices by considering alternative methods of selling their products. While initially no specifics are given, the thought seems to be than eventually the company will begin working with a retail chain. "Dell's direct model came under pressure as the market for PCs shifted to notebooks from desktops last year. It is harder to custom configure notebook computers, so they had to be manufactured in advance, which lost Dell some of its cost advantage. In addition, consumers were showing a preference for touching and feeling a notebook PC before buying it."

278 comments

  1. That was quick... by mshurpik · · Score: 1, Funny

    TFA: >Michael Dell is now conceding that the company may need to....begin working with a retail chain.

    Hah! I said this last week when we were talking about HP beating them in sales.

    1. Re:That was quick... by kartan · · Score: 5, Funny

      someone give this guy a cookie.

    2. Re:That was quick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! I said this last week when we were talking about HP beating them in sales. Nice... I'm sure Dell first considered doing this last week.
    3. Re:That was quick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lolol

      dude if i had enough energy id be 'you' on every article

      and the security keyword thingy for this one was 'provoke' :D

    4. Re:That was quick... by renegadesx · · Score: 0

      wow! maybe you should be a lawyer? your rebuttals fucking rocks.

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    5. Re:That was quick... by Divebus · · Score: 4, Funny

      We shall now read from the book of Jobs, chapter 5:21:01 - "thou shalt go forth and multiply thine retail presence in upscale shopping areas, or within 200 yards of any Starbucks, and thou shalt be rewarded with massive growth for thine stockholders."

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    6. Re:That was quick... by lostguru · · Score: 3, Funny

      slashdot did that when he logged in

      --
      Jayne: "These are stone killers, little man. They ain't cuddly like me."
      98% of America's teens drink alcohol, smok
    7. Re:That was quick... by MooUK · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is there anywhere left that isn't within 200 yards of a Starbucks?

    8. Re:That was quick... by Divebus · · Score: 1

      Is there anywhere left that isn't within 200 yards of a Starbucks?

      I think they missed this location

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    9. Re:That was quick... by MooUK · · Score: 1

      I'm sure as soon as someone realises they'll dispatch an Emergency Response Starbucks Construction Team.

    10. Re:That was quick... by Forge · · Score: 1

      */Bigin Grumble
      Slashdot dosn't alow a mopderation of +6 ROTFLOL
      */End Grumble

      There is retail and there is retail. Let's see how far Dell takes it.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    11. Re:That was quick... by Divebus · · Score: 1

      Stores worked so well for Compaq *cough* - nothing like walking into a store where you can see how hideously fugly all the products looked in one place. It looked like a Radio Shack or an Amtrak train wreck.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    12. Re:That was quick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes,
      In Utah (those LDS souls believe coffee is an evil drug containing caffeine, which needs to be avoided unless it's in Coca-Cola)

    13. Re:That was quick... by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      Heh. I'm guessing Compaq had both beigeness and branding problems. They were corporate from what I remember. "Does your business earn at least $50k quarterly? Then you should step up to Compaq systems." etc.

      Gateway tried retail. I'm guessing everyone drove past the Gateway stores on the way to CompUSA, and then remembered on the way back, with the HP PC already in the back seat.

    14. Re:That was quick... by Divebus · · Score: 1

      My Mistake... it was the Gateway Store, not Compaq. Thanks for reconnecting those synapses.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    15. Re:That was quick... by zurmikopa · · Score: 1

      200 yards?
      I somehow ended up with 6 of them in my living room.
      I think they started resorting to non-euclidean construction.

  2. preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for touching and feeling.

    I have nothing more to add.

    1. Re:preference by JensenDied · · Score: 1
      Sounds like the DS:

      When they say "touching is good" they don't
      mean to take it into your bathroom and whack it to Mario.
      --

      09:F9:11:02 - 9D:74:E3:5B - D8:41:56:C5 - 63:56:88:C0

    2. Re:preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "preference for touching and feeling"

      hmm, seems to me that only zombies touch and don't feel anything... ?

  3. Dell direct sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dell has always sold directly to consumers via their web site and phone operations;

    No they haven't. Dell got their start by selling through smaller computer chain stores before their direct phone/catalog sales and the invention of the WWW.

    1. Re:Dell direct sales by dfghjk · · Score: 2, Informative

      That could not be more wrong. Dell has always sold direct. It dabbled in retail on a few occasions but not until it was well established as the leading direct sales company.

    2. Re:Dell direct sales by camperdave · · Score: 1

      They also sell machines through kiosks in malls. It's nice to be able to get a feel for what you're buying.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:Dell direct sales by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

      I have one in my mall. I think the thing is that they let you tough and feel and play (guess they gotta clean the keyboards) but you order it there and dell ships it to you. so it seems to be a halfway choice. I don't think you walk out that day with a laptop. of course, I asked the guy about getting it preinstalled with linux. um, nevermind...

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    4. Re:Dell direct sales by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Dell certainly hasn't "always" sold through the Web, because the Web didn't exist in the 1980s. Trust me: when I bought my PC's Limited Turbo XT back in 1987, the advert in (probably) PC Magazine contained only a phone number and a mailing address; nary a URL to be found. Maybe young Mike briefly tried pushing his boxes through local stores when he first started building them, but it was definitely a direct-sales-based operation by the time anyone outside of Austin noticed the company. Customer-direct sales of custom-built machines was the marketing niche that made Michael Dell.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    5. Re:Dell direct sales by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Hell the one I went to was a computer with a web browser.

      It's nice for the chicken and egg issue for first time buyers, but I went there hoping to find a pre-built system for work. (we needed a quickly).

      I was so annoyed and the kiosk guy completely mislead me on the phone.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    6. Re:Dell direct sales by saboola · · Score: 1

      In 1985 the company produced (in China) the first computer of its own design (the "Turbo PC"), which contained an Intel 8088-compatible processor running at a speed of 8 MHz. It advertised the systems in national computer magazines for sale directly to consumers, and custom-assembled each ordered unit according to a selection of options. It would seem the retail thing started in 1987, two years later.

    7. Re:Dell direct sales by CG_Man · · Score: 1

      Maybe Dell got started in some computer stores, but at least as far back as 1987, they were selling machines direct. I bought mine from Dell ("PC's Limited", I believe, at the time) while still in college (8Mhz 80286 w/ a huge 8MB of RAM; can't remember how big/tiny the hard drive was; monochrome graphics, but should have sprung for the color display). A little later on I bought a Dell 80386-based desktop off the shelf at CompUSA -- shoulda built my own, but we make mistakes, even when we're old and wise in our 20's.

      CG_Man

    8. Re:Dell direct sales by jsight · · Score: 2, Funny

      The mall kiosks are also the source of one of the funniest direct mail goofups that I've ever seen by a large company like this, as well. The back of one of their advertisements once included a map of the US states along with all of the states with the kiosks highlighted. For some reason, it caught my eye that NC wasn't highlighted, even though I knew that there was one in Concord, NC.

      Then I noticed that W. Va. was highlighted but the store address list above didn't say anything about W. Va.

      It really impressed me seeing the little "NC" inside of W. Va. on their map.

      I guess their marketing department's geography skills were a bit rusty that week. :-)

    9. Re:Dell direct sales by frostband · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dell got their start [before] the invention of the WWW


      And Dell exponentially expanded when it went to the Internet. I think someone owes Al Gore a thank you. *cough* Michael *cough*

    10. Re:Dell direct sales by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Speaking of which.. is there any prevailing opinion on "burn in?" anymore? Used to be, the local dealers would advertise the time they allegedly ran the computer or something (I never really understood it.) as proof of its not-a-lemon-ness.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    11. Re:Dell direct sales by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing Dell 486 computers for sale in CompUSA in the early 90's. It was a large tower case with a small LCD on the front of the case that was scrolling the words "I am stuck in side a Dell, buy me to release me" or something along those lines.

  4. Two Words, or is it one word? by xactuary · · Score: 1, Insightful
    CostCo. I used to find Dell PCs in CostCo, but not for a while now. Dell should have a permanent pile of lower-end boxen on display whenever I walk into the place. Power users will always need to interact with the sales process I suppose.

    --
    Say hello to my little sig.
    1. Re:Two Words, or is it one word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lower-end boxen

      Why are you using the German plural of the word "box", rather than the English plural? The rest of your post is in English.

    2. Re:Two Words, or is it one word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      boxen sounds 1337 I guess. It's one of those online terms that popped up a few years back and caught on in hacker-wannabe circles.

    3. Re:Two Words, or is it one word? by lordmatthias215 · · Score: 1

      nah dude, it's a call back to that oldie but goodie, Oregon Trail. the plural of Ox is oxen, so all the older gamers honor the game with "boxen." you obviously wouldn't know because you weren't cool enough to have played it.

    4. Re:Two Words, or is it one word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or old enough, I suppose. I still have fond memories of Oregon Trail, Carmen Sandiego, and a bunch of Scholastic Microzine edutainment games.

    5. Re:Two Words, or is it one word? by pchan- · · Score: 1
      It was English. However, I don't think that word means what the OP thinks it means.

      Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary
      Boxen - \Box"en\ (b[o^]ks"'n), a. Made of boxwood; pertaining to, or resembling, the box
    6. Re:Two Words, or is it one word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it is the same situation as I've seen in the past with Costco having iPods and iMacs. I recall seeing them selling the iPod Mini after the Nano (which replaced it) had been introduced. Similarly they had G5 iMacs after the Intel units were shipping. Perhaps they are only carrying some of these types of products when they're getting a bit of an extra price break to help clear slightly out of date product from the channel.

    7. Re:Two Words, or is it one word? by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      I believe the current relative popularity of "boxen" is related to Brian Regan's routine. All of his stuff (just 1 CD and 1 DVD as far as I can tell) is highly recommended.

      --
      I come here for the love
    8. Re:Two Words, or is it one word? by mackyrae · · Score: 1

      Uh, plural for virus is viruses. It'd have to be virius to pluralize to virii. But yeah doesn't "boxen" go back to the old hackers? Boxen and unices (instead of unixes). Boxen is in the Jargon File / Hacker Dictionary: http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/B/boxen.html

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
  5. Enclosures matter in notebooks... by tomocoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's not forget the fact that while Dell laptops are oftentimes nice machines, their enclosures are hideous, clunky pieces of plastic that can't hold a candle to Thinkpads or Macbooks.

    1. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Meadowhog · · Score: 1

      You're exactly right on that. Macbooks are a little too slick for me (I personally like how professional most of the Thinkpads look) but they're both miles ahead of the cheap plastic I've seen on Dells. With the amount of money a laptop costs and the amount of time you're going to be spending using it, it's definitely worth spending that little bit extra for a nice-looking machine that you can take some pride in.
      --
      CashCrate: Earn money for filling out surveys/forms, real info not required

    2. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by DrDitto · · Score: 1

      Agree. The LCD hinges on my $1500 Dell notebook busted in about 18 months...the metal literally sheared off. They are replaced, but 6 months later, they are starting to make creaking noises again. What am I supposed to do? Squirt some oil in there?!

      I've been trying out a Macbook for the past week and am impressed with the build quality and some of the little details. For example, why doesn't my Dell have 2-finger trackpad scrolling? That feature is great! And why does it take my Dell notebook 2-3x longer to re-establish the 802.11 connection? In fact the Macbook even keeps my ssh sessions alive when I close the lid! Some of these things might have more to do with the OS than the build...I wouldn't mine buying a Macbook and then installing Windows Vista if I could (sorry, OS-X is really really slick, but in some ways I prefer Windows and I have some Windows-only apps).

    3. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by ACalcutt · · Score: 1

      The college I work for promotes dell latitude laptops. I agree that the enclosures weren't that good. The casing on our d600s d610s seem a little on the ugly side. They also seemed to dent easily. With this year's models (laptops and desktops) that they are trying to fix this. My new d620 is extremely solid compared to my old d600. I also like how they look. They're mostly black instead of the ugly grey they had. I was really happy with my d600...but it always was in good condition cause of my dell certification :-). The new optiplex computers also seem to be a lot better in quality. I'm glad to see them gettings some AMDs in their line.

    4. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      Latitudes suck.

      Inspirons, on the other hand--I have an Inspiron E1505, and I actually like the two-tone case. Unlike some other laptops, the plastic is the color through and through; I type on this thing a LOT and the plastic's wearing down (a touch slower than my last laptop, a Thinkpad), but it hasn't lost its color.

      I have noticed intermittent trouble with the wireless, but it only happens on Windows (doesn't on Linux), so I assume that it's just driver trouble. My only real beef with the laptop is that it doesn't have a nipplemouse, but since that's more or less an IBM thing I can't fault them heavily on it.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    5. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by marcosmota · · Score: 1

      I agree that the Thinkpads are the best (for me) looking machines out there. Even newer models feel good, but the all-time best model was the Thinkpad 600E. It's clunky by new standards, but it feels really good to type on it. The Macbooks just don't have the same keyboard feel of the IBMs and for $1,200.00+, I expect more. Dells have always seemed like cheap plastic with poor presentation of the machine inside. M

    6. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      You say you're using Windows. Why not just set the power option to do nothing when you close the lid? Or do you want it to sleep AND keep the ssh session open? If so you should know that the Mac doesn't exactly sleep like a normal PC might; it apparently keeps the CPU running to some degree and this comes at the cost of using the battery, and losing your session entirely, if you're unplugged.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    7. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

      Some of these things might have more to do with the OS than the build...I wouldn't mine buying a Macbook and then installing Windows Vista if I could (sorry, OS-X is really really slick, but in some ways I prefer Windows and I have some Windows-only apps).


      I'll assume that you know you can do exactly that so what's stopping you?
      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    8. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      when function is the priority, you get an ugly business workstation. when form is the priority you get a nice conversation piece that takes over 20 minutes to copy a 17 meg file

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    9. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Meadowhog · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for him, but it's a pain in the ass using two OSes at once instead of keeping everything in one. Convenience matters.
      --
      CashCrate: Earn money for filling out surveys/forms, real info not required

    10. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Let's not forget the fact that while Dell laptops are oftentimes nice machines, their enclosures are hideous, clunky pieces of plastic that can't hold a candle to Thinkpads or Macbooks.

      I have never seen a Dell machine that has made me think 'I have to have one of those'. I suspect that the laptops are designed to sell in bulk to corporate customers rather than stand on their own merits.

      I certainly would not buy a laptop from a company with the customer service reputation Dell has acquired of late.

      Laptops I have seen that I liked are the upmarket Apple models and the Thinkpad X60. For some reason nobody really seems to have gone after the PC market with design cues as strong as Apple's. Sony have come close at times but my experience is that their stuff is fragile.

      In the desktop area everyone I know buys Dell because they are the cheapest brand offering an acceptable level of reliability. I bought my son a machine for $500 including the flat panel monitor. Thats much cheaper than the previous one I built for him myself.

      Main problem with the Dell's is that they are horribly noisy. This is not something that reviewers think worth a mention for some reason. And when you do find comments they can be useless. If you look at any of the bulletin boards for reviews of high end machines there is always a post from some poor slob who claims to have invested his college fund in an Alienware or the like which came in the wrong shade of green and they took two years to fix it attached to the very latest model.

      The PC market seems to be dominated by the DIY aesthetic. Real men don't buy ready made machines. They buy the parts and fit them together. Time is a much more scarce resource for me than money and I don't want a machine that looks like a kit. Thats probably why people by the Voodoo elemental, they just get fed up having to explain to people that they don't need to save $500 building the machine themselves from parts so they drop $3500 having a $7000 machine gold plated. I bought the baseline BAM model and told the wife how much I saved by not going for the 'gold plated' edition, she still thinks it was a figure of speech. Good thing she doesn't read either Slashdot or the Amex bill.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    11. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by garbletext · · Score: 4, Informative

      why doesn't my Dell have 2-finger trackpad scrolling? Apple has a patent (http://www.macobserver.com/article/2006/10/09.2.s html/) on that, and would likely enforce it. Actually, some new synaptics touchpads support the feature in hw, although the functionality isn't there in the windows drivers; check out the X11 synaptics option "TwoFingerScroll".
    12. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by morari · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer Dell over any of the Compaq laptops I've seen...

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    13. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by DrDitto · · Score: 1

      Well the Macbook also gets more battery life too. So maybe Mac OSX is able to keep the CPU running while "sleeping" because it is so good at descheduling background tasks that HW power management keeps the impact on battery life to a minimum? I don't know...just speculating.

    14. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by NeilTheStupidHead · · Score: 1

      If the 1505 has the same case as my 1501, I like it too. The white and silver finish reminds me of the sets in late 70s/early 80s SF movies.

      --
      Lose: misplace or fail || Loose: not bound together
    15. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're praising the Inspirons over the Latitudes? Unless something has changed in the 4 years since I bought my Inspiron, I can't imagine how you could say that... my Inspiron was a clunky piece of crap.. the Latitudes aren't much better, but they look more professional at least. Oh, and some Latitudes have (or at least did have) the mouse nub.

    16. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i've never understood why dell does this. they've had other models with very nice cases (like the latitude c400 that i'm typing on now) that weren't continued for some reason.

    17. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just clunky, but dangerous. On the last batch of Dell laptops we bought some of the mold lines are sharp. I've seen several pairs of pants, especially wool suit pants, ruined by them. Pissing off suits with crappy plastic is a very fast way to lose customers in large chunks. The CEO of the company just switched to a MacBook because he was tired of ruining pants with the Dell garbage. Unfortunately the rest of us have to use Microsoft's .Net crap so we can't move to Apple hardware so the developers here are all stuck with ruined pants and cuts on our legs from when we try to use the laptop as a laptop.

    18. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      I can speak for me, and I run OS X and Windows simultaneously on both my main computers. It's painless. If I want to check my mail with Outlook, I click the Outlook icon on my OS X Dock, and Outlook opens up in a window on my OS X desktop.

    19. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by MojoStan · · Score: 1

      Dell laptops are oftentimes nice machines, their enclosures are hideous, clunky pieces of plastic that can't hold a candle to Thinkpads or Macbooks. I think it's important to differentiate among the cheap Dell Inspiron home-oriented laptops, the more reliable Dell Latitude business/pro laptops, and the high-end Dell Precision mobile workstations. The Inspiron line also differs in quality/looks from their "basic computing" models to their "enthusiast" models (their enclosures are much different).

      Thinkpads aren't in the same class as the cheaper Lenovo 3000 series notebooks. The MacBook Pro is not in the same class as the MacBook (non-Pro). A MacBook (non-Pro) can't hold a candle to a Dell Latitude D620. That's an unfair comparison, but your comment seems to say that all Dell laptops are crap.

      Anectodal comparisons vary. Comparing a three-year-old Inspiron to a brand-new MacBook (instead of an iBook) will make Dell look bad.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    20. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by DrDitto · · Score: 1

      See my previous comment in this thread about the hinges breaking on my $1500 Dell laptop. It is a D600, which is not far off from a D620

    21. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

      The way I read the original post is that the poster would prefer to use Apple hardware but run Vista natively...using Boot Camp, you can do exactly that. I've never used Boot Camp, preferring to do my Windows tasks on a Win2K installation under Parallels, so you might have to have at least a token OS X installation; after you have everything set up the way you want it, use the Vista installation on boot and ignore the OS X installation.

      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    22. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by MojoStan · · Score: 1

      See my previous comment in this thread about the hinges breaking on my $1500 Dell laptop. It is a D600, which is not far off from a D620 The Dell Latitude D600 was released over four years ago, and I assume (I could be wrong) that the quality of the current D620's (released one year ago) enclosure is better. The quality of current MacBooks shouldn't be compared to the shoddy quality of the MacBooks when they were first released with overheating, fading paint, whining fans, etc (which have all been supposedly fixed). That's why I said anectodal comparisons vary.

      That said, my comment was a bit off-topic. I was responding to a comment that was all about enclosures, but I ranted on my pet peeve of comparing home PCs to pro PCs. Mod me down, folks.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    23. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      The only reason I DIY is that I often find the tradeoff between quality and price on any of the prebuilt ones.

      If I buy a cheap machine, I find the components to be cheap (duh) and by the time I price out a quality machine I could do it myself because they start charging an arm and a leg (and from the prebuilt I'm not always assured I get quality components as they often list features, not models - like motherboards, etcetera).

      I wish I could find someone that is reasonable - I don't don't mind paying a small premium...

    24. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      My Inspiron 2200 looks excellent; it's not one of those glossy screen silver abominations, I've had people comment on how good it looks, and the call-out support has been excellent. When some of my memory failed support came out the next day to replace it.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    25. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      It's funny that you say that. I'm on a Thinkpad 600E right now. It is indeed one of the best I've ever had to type on. It may be slow but it's my only computer at this point, and it's performed flawlessly for me. I'm not sure what you mean by clunky... it /is/ a bit heavy, but not too bad. I like them to have a little bit of weight to them -- if they don't, they're much easier to break :)

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    26. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by tooyoung · · Score: 1

      If so you should know that the Mac doesn't exactly sleep like a normal PC might; it apparently keeps the CPU running to some degree
      Incorrect. Power to the CPU is cut off, but power is kept on for the RAM. From Apple's site:

      The Operating System uses the power management hardware to shut down power to the CPU, the ROM, and some of the control logic. Sufficient power is maintained to the RAM so that no data is lost

    27. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by JeffElkins · · Score: 1

      Boot Camp isn't permanently required, nor is an OS X partition. If you set your hard drive to BIOS mode, you can install Windows or Linux, . or dual-boot between the too. You will need the driver disk for Windows that Boot Camp produces, but it's not required otherwise.

      --
      Why is all the good stuff already modded 5, when I have mod points?
    28. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by RudyHartmann · · Score: 1

      Well, I agree that making your own machine will get you exactly what you want. That is, if you know. But candidly, if you're a word processing, spreadsheet only kinda person, almost anything at 1GHZ and above will smoke. And guess what. That's a huge segment of the market. So manufacturers have to create new reason for you to upgrade. Multi media and games are the biggest reason. Oops. But consoles do a good job at that. I like doing 3D modeling and rendering too. But, how many people do that? So, the PC companies have to invent reasons to upgrade. My laptop is a Thinkpad A30 with a 1.2G PIII. It works great still. If it ain't broke don't fix it. But I use it for email, web, and word processing only. That's 90% of the market. Would I like a 10GHz 8 core monster with 64G of RAM? Sure! But that's a luxury. Necessity is filled by my lesser machines. Everybody in the business is trying to convince you otherwise to justify their existence. Rudy

      --
      Oh, yeah! Wise guy, huh? Woob woob woob woob! Nyuk! Nyuk!
    29. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Divebus · · Score: 1

      I'll second that - we had about 6 Inspirons in our company and they all degraded into spare parts within 12-18 months. Enough. After that, we bought iBook G4s and some PowerBooks. They've lasted so long we're selling these 4+ year old iBooks to the staff and buying new MacBook Pros. You can pound nails with the iBooks but the PowerBooks were a little more fragile - still outlasting the Inspirons by several years and still working fine.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    30. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Razed+By+TV · · Score: 1

      The PC market seems to be dominated by the DIY aesthetic. I think I disagree with this. It may be that the DIYers are the most vocal, and the most likely for us to encounter online, but I do not think that they dominate.

      The reason I think this?
      The average person doesn't need a custom built pc. If someone needs a PC for internet and office suite, they don't need a computer with handpicked components. This is probably the majority of corporate computer use, along with who knows how many home users who just need something that works. I would argue that these two groups dominate, and both only require a trip to Dell's website. It is unreasonable for a company to DIY 3000 computers unless they are in the business of selling computers. It is unreasonable for mom or pop, with minimal requirements, to DIY a computer when they could get a low cost dell and some sort of tech support package. Sure, they aren't getting the most bang for their buck, but my point is that they don't need to if they just want something that works.

      On the other hand, you have your general DIY crowd which is made up largely of gamers. Among the gamer crowd, Alienware and other commercial gaming PCs are not nearly as reviled as they used to be. Despite this, gamers still often build their own PCs, as commercial gaming PCs are expensive, and configuring a Dell just doesn't get most gamers close to what they desire. (For instance, I just built a gaming PC because the options offered by Dell were very few and they had nothing in the way of a microATX with room for a big GFX card.) These gamers are likely the people we encounter in tech/game/hardware reviews/forums, and these same people are more likely to bring up their PC in day to day chat than your average Joe.

      The gamer market seems larger than it really is because of the lack of input from the technical novice. Though their voices are more often heard, I do not think gamers/DIYers outnumber the corporate + general home computer users.
    31. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Arterion · · Score: 1

      Time is a much more scarce resource for me than money

      Must be nice.

      I build my own machines because I can usually only afford to get it a part at a time, and so I can overclock a relatively cheap part to perform at the level of a relatively expensive part.
      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    32. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      The 1505/1501 looks considerably snazzier than the older Inspirons.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    33. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they won't break apart in 2 years when you drop them.

      Thin light notebooks are shit. They're expensive, their cheap plastic breaks down within a year, and they just generally don't hold up against the environment. What's worse is shits like you come to me expecting miracles to happen when you split the LCD in half or break a screen joint or you spill coffee on it, or a million other things. Then I hand you an estimate for $800 and you freak.

      "How can this happen"
      "What makes it so expensive"
      "You're trying to rip me off"

      Blah blah fucking blah. I'm tired of your bitching; here's your breakdown, good luck finding someone with a better price.

      You people usually come crawling back once you realize $800 is a nice price to fix a 3 month old $3000 laptop you smashed the LCD on.

      I remember taking apart a sony notebook once; the screen had the thickness of about 1 centimeter. The keyboard had come loose and the customer complained; the thing wasn't even 6 months out of production and it had a side of the keyboard out. I fixed it with a paperclip but that'll only hold it together for another 6 months until the hinges the paperclip are on break.

      HP's are notorious for the casing breaking apart within a year. Toshiba's and Fujitsu's are more of the same. The only laptops I see that hold their salt are fully built laptops made to last; every manufacturer makes them at some point or another. The ONLY manufacturer that I know of that always does a good job is Apple; their laptops have been known to make it through multiple trips through Iraq and Afghanistan (with proper care).

      Give me a 10 pound laptop any day of the week. Gimme something made of hardcore rubberized plastic that uses screws to hold things together, with an aluminum frame. Gimme something that can handle 2 hard drives, that's stable and made to last. Forget these light trendy pieces of shit you assholes buy and expect me to fix. I want a laptop that'll last for a minimum of 4 years.

    34. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Falladir · · Score: 1

      I have a d600, and so do many of my friends (university deal, like yours). Several had the plastic shells deteriorate, and generally the build quality wasn't consistent over four years. The d620 does look better though. I started shopping intending to get something more solid than my d600, and I was suprised to find that the d620 is exactly that.

    35. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Main problem with the Dell's is that they are horribly noisy. This is not something that reviewers think worth a mention for some reason. And when you do find comments they can be useless. I'm surprised to hear you say this. I've generally found my Dells to be quieter machines than most of my others and/or most others that I've worked on in the past. Most machines that I have here seem to have loud, noisy fans and loud hard drives that make that horrible whining sound and of course make a lot of noise when actively reading/writing to the computer. My Dells have typically had better quality hard drives that make less noise, and slightly higher quality fans with built in temperature sensors to throttle the fans as necessary. I always found my current primary machine (Dimension 8300) to be quiet enough until I had to replace the power supply with some off the shelf unit from CompUSA.

      That said, they can't compete with a home built machine with quality fans. Dell has to cut costs somewhere and it doesn't make sense for them to toss in a couple of Panaflo's when the average consumer won't know any better. They just have to be slightly better than the rest, and in my experience they are. (Actually, my queitest machine of all of them is my Dimension 8100, but that's probably because it has a bad motherboard.)
      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    36. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      I think I disagree with this. It may be that the DIYers are the most vocal, and the most likely for us to encounter online, but I do not think that they dominate.

      Even the ready-made PCs have the DIY look about them.

      Why can't I buy a PC that is as small and neat as a mac mini? The shuttle is huge in comparison.

      Part of the reason is that we insist on 'expandability' but that is now a crock. Unless you are going to buy a machine and replace the graphics card within a year the bus is going to be obsolete by the time you get to do it.

      The only time I upgraded a graphics card was when I upgraded a machine to XP and discovered that the 3DFX Voodoo card that was in the box was no longer supported. As it turned out the reliability problem that was the reason for moving from Windows 98 disappeared as soon as I replaced the video board.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    37. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Dunno about that. I suspect my machine's PCI express bus to have stuff being made for it for maybe 10 years, at least.

    38. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Do tell.... details man!

    39. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Knara · · Score: 1

      The D600/610 and the D620 series have completely different enclosures.

    40. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing this isn't a lattitude? Dell's lattitude notebooks are as good or better then anybody else's, I can't speak for the rest of their line.

    41. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by DrDitto · · Score: 1

      Dell Latitude D600. Mechanically a piece of junk.

    42. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Razed+By+TV · · Score: 1

      Even the ready-made PCs have the DIY look about them. But DIYers aren't interested in buying from Dell because they can't get what they want. I looked at dell before I built my computer, but I didn't think the options they offered, for the price they offered, was worth taking them up on. However, marketing cases to DIYers in an attempt to get their money has the side benefit of making flashier cases that might mean one more person buys a Dell rather than a Gateway, or whoever. I don't think DIYers dominate the market, but I do think they influence it.

      Why can't I buy a PC that is as small and neat as a mac mini? The shuttle is huge in comparison. How is the comparison of the shuttle to the mac mini relevant? Do you know of a PC maker that mass builds shuttle PCs for corporate use?

      Maybe you can't buy a non-mac PC as small as a mac mini. However, dell does offer small form factor computers. Though they probably aren't as small as a Mac Mini, it beats a mini-tower.

      Part of the reason is that we insist on 'expandability' but that is now a crock. Unless you are going to buy a machine and replace the graphics card within a year the bus is going to be obsolete by the time you get to do it. As I said above, small PCs are out there. If you don't want expandability, you don't have to have it.

      Unless you are going to buy a machine and replace the graphics card within a year the bus is going to be obsolete by the time you get to do it. [. . . ] The only time I upgraded a graphics card was when I upgraded a machine to XP and discovered that the 3DFX Voodoo card that was in the box was no longer supported. As it turned out the reliability problem that was the reason for moving from Windows 98 disappeared as soon as I replaced the video board. So, your graphics card went bad, and because of expandability, you were able to easily replace it.

      I have my own reasons for wanting expandability, and I'm not going to go into the "i want to build/upgrade my computer as i go" and "i want a good cheap video card which means no dx10 card but i eventually want to upgrade to a dx10 card when windows releases it for XP or i finally switch to vista,", etc. You're right that computers are probably bigger and clunkier than they need to be. On the other hand, you never know when expandability will be useful, and thats why we have it. It would suck to have to buy a new pc because you filled your hard drive.

    43. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Actually, the d600 is crap. When dell first introduced the d-series they sucked, the c-series were rock solid. The original c-series were crap also. I think dell takes a couple generations to get everything right when they make a major change. I had a c-610 (ok, durability problems), c-640 (spectacular machine), d-600 (POS), d-810 (nice machine, kind of unpolished), d-820 (really nice machine, looks good too). I'm dreading when they switch to what I assume will be the e-series.

    44. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Regardless, it wouldn't be able to keep an existing SSH session open if the CPU isn't doing something about it.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    45. Re:Enclosures matter in notebooks... by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      I run Windows on my Macs using Parallels:

      www.parallels.com

      The seamless integration I describe is referred to by Parallels as "coherence mode".

  6. seems worse by Original+Replica · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How do you stock up to date hardware in brick and mortar stores? I never buy from physical stores because everything is lagging 3 months behind in price and technology.

    --
    We are all just people.
    1. Re:seems worse by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      There should at least be demo units, so you can get a feel for the keyboard and track pad; those features often vary by manufacturer, and they are vital to a good user experience.

      I hate-hate-hate the Toshiba inverted upside down "L" enter key. It's impossible to work with. So, I stay away from *all* Toshiba laptops online, because I don't have the tactile in-person guarantee that I will find their keyboard acceptable.

    2. Re:seems worse by Propaganda13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dell does have kiosks in malls to show some of their product already.

    3. Re:seems worse by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How do you stock up to date hardware in brick and mortar stores? I never buy from physical stores because everything is lagging 3 months behind in price and technology.
      Thus putting you somewhere near the 99th percentile of the general pool of home PC purchasers. For everyone else, they won't even notice the difference. That's one reason why HP has been kicking Dell's ass in the home pc market recently.
    4. Re:seems worse by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I actually ran into this in another product. I was looking at new USB thumb drives on Newegg. roughly $40 for a 4 gig, $80 for 8 gig and $150 for a 16 gig drives.

      while out shopping I stopped in at CompUSA. 4 gig was on sale at $60, and the 8 gig was on sale for $110.

      Gateway has already tried the direct box order from our shiny store routine, and it killed them. Then again i wouldn't cry if dell died out too.making 1/2 a percent profit on hardware alone will kill anyone. Yep That's right Dell makes 1/2 of a percent on there machine while MSFT makes 300-400% percent on XP, less on vista but then again it is new.

      And that's why a monopoly is bad.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    5. Re:seems worse by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Thus putting you somewhere near the 99th percentile of the general pool of home PC purchasers. For everyone else, they won't even notice the difference. That's one reason why HP has been kicking Dell's ass in the home pc market recently.

      Couldn't it be more along the lines of the Hp/Compaq at Walmart/Best Buy/Office Depot that is doing it? My mom bought an HP at walmart on sale for $450. I recently assisted someone buying a Compaq desktop for $700 out there. I didn't notice any Dell brand desktops or laptops in stores. Some people make impluse computer purchases and want the computer that second after picking it out. Dell doesn't have an option in the stores, so isn't even considered in this market. I'd bet Toshiba is leading against Dell in this market simply because I see Toshiba laptops in all these stores as well. If you see, Compaq/Toshiba every day in your shopping, but only hear about or see Dell on TV ads, which would you think that your average shopper would just pickout to buy?

    6. Re:seems worse by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Trouble for me with HP is, I utterly hate their colour scheme. They're kind of like the new Ford - you can have any colour you like, as long as it's black-with-silver-trimmings. I wish they'd figure out what colour is, black depresses me. I am not a goth.

  7. Wonder why they haven't done this sooner... by Darundal · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...considering how your average Dell customer is probably not the most tech literate, might have boogeyman type issues with buying something online, and might not have a Dell booth at a mall near them.

    1. Re:Wonder why they haven't done this sooner... by needacoolnickname · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking it's a lot easier to up sell the person on the phone or with highlighted text on the web site than it is when your computer is one of many in a retail store that isn't yours.

  8. Dell the Unstoppable by robbiedo · · Score: 0

    Remember the days when tech journalists were drooling all over themselves, and predicting the end of all other computer companies because Dell had found the Holy Grail to ever increasing sales and growth? Today... not so much. /Love my Dell Axim x51v. Best PocketPC ever, and paid only $325 dollars. Couple that with a bluetooth phone and StowAway Bluetooth keyboard, best portable PC ever.

    1. Re:Dell the Unstoppable by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 1

      I find my HTC Hermes to be a pretty good device for the money. Paid $400 for it. It's a phone, a pocket PC with WiFi G, and it has a qwerty keyboard that slides out. (If you want to add your stowaway keyboard you can, but I find I have no trouble with using the slide-out one). I also has a 2.0MP camera and of course a MicroSD slot so it has replaced my iPod completely, which I am thankful for because I despise iTunes. It synchronizes with my Outlook appointments flawlessly. It's just.. slick. I wish I had the GPS reciever one, but I'll get that one next.

      TLF

      --
      I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    2. Re:Dell the Unstoppable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... paid only $325 dollars. Are you sure you didn't pay $325? You actually needed the redundant "dollars" added onto the sentence?
    3. Re:Dell the Unstoppable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read /. all the time....I before E exept after C you blithering english spelling idiots....sorry

  9. To me, it says more about the laptop market by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is harder to custom configure notebook computers, so they had to be manufactured in advance

    I think that this might have to do with the shift to the laptop market. A shift that I am not convinced is permanent. And if the shift to the laptop is permanent, there will have to be changes.
    This might seem like an overly harsh judgement, but to me the major reason for adopting laptops is sex appeal. Most people who want laptops seem to be impressed by how sleek they look, and by how cool it is to hang around in a coffee shop with a laptop. I know there are plenty of people who need laptops for their jobs, but I still think the majority of people are looking at them as an accessory. And most of these people don't know what they are getting into, because after a year or so, when the proprietary screen cracks, or the proprietary power supply goes dead, or any of the other little pieces no longer work, people are very surprised that they have to spend time and money searching for a replacement.

    I think that as the laptop market matures, and people have this happen, there may be some demand to standardize laptop parts. This will change both how easy it is to custom make laptops, amongst other things.

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    1. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, the reason laptops are popular with employees is that you can work any time you want.

      The reason laptops are popular with employers is that you can work any time they want.

      The reason that desktops used to be popular is that they used to much cheaper, and they were easier to repair which is important when computers are expensive. Neither of these apply so much. It is quite practical to replace laptop every two years or so, which is about right given technology cycles driving hardware requirements, and the fact that you've been working every waking moment.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is for this reason that I factor the cost of a 3 year warranty into the price of the laptop automatically. I never purchase hardware warranties for any other item, but laptops are expensive, hard to fix, and new parts are usually impossible to find. (Used laptop parts from places like eBay seem more trouble than they are worth, unless you are a repair business that can absorb the cost of duds.) Exceptions include RAM and disk, which come in standardized formats, and I regularly swap those out of laptops. For anything else, there's no hope.

    3. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by realmolo · · Score: 1

      I think notebooks are here to stay. The market will only get bigger.

      The thing is, even the low-end notebooks are powerful enough for almost anything, except modern games. And they're CHEAP. And you can surf on your couch with a wireless router. And you can take it with you on vacation. There are just a million advantages. And, of course, you can plug in a real keyboard/mouse/monitor if you want.

      Notebooks are really how computers *should* be. Yes, they are hard to repair, but so what? They're cheap, and they last long enough if you don't abuse them.

      As far as standardization of notebooks goes...they're already pretty standardized in many ways. I think what you are hoping for is a way to "custom order" a notebook and get exactly what you want. There are a few places that do that, kind of. The problem is, notebooks are hard to assemble, and case design and motherboard design are dependent on each other. And once you've got the motherboard/case picked out, what else is there to add? Not much. It just doesn't make sense to offer notebook customization. Not until all the innards are so tiny, and battery power is so huge, that it just doesn't matter what you stuff into the case.

    4. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While you list valid issues with laptops vs. desktop, a lot of consumers just don't care that much. Computers have become a commodity good, and people toss them aside as such. It doesn't matter if it dies in 2 years, because by then people want the latest and greatest anyways, and when you can get one that does everything you need for well under a grand, a lot of people won't hesitate to get a new one, whether or not it's the most economical and efficient thing to do.

      I think standardisation of laptop parts isn't that likely to happen any time soon, mostly due to hesitance on the part of the manufacturers. They use those non-standard parts to squeeze the most they can into tiny spaces, and differentiate themselves from their competitors, since they can't do so on features very much. Why pay more for Lenovo's build quality if it's the exact same parts as HP's, or why pay more for Sony's design if the cases are available elsewhere? (examples obviously)

      --

      My other sig is funny!
    5. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, they are hard to repair, but so what? So I've had to pay a guy $150 for different repairs, where if I'd been using a desktop, I would have done it myself.

      So it's difficult to upgrade the CPU when something better comes along. (Socket? We don't need no stinkin' socket.)

      So it's difficult replace the optical media drive if it breaks, or if I just want to be able to burn dual-layer DVDs instead of just CD-Rs. And forget about getting the right faceplate...

      About the only upgrades I've been able to perform on my laptop without assistance are replacing the battery, adding RAM, and adding a miniPCI wireless A/B/G card. And the laptop didn't have an antenna in it, so I'm going to need to get in touch with a friend who knows how to add one.

      Laptops are a PITA for anyone who's tasted the power of self-service.
    6. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by dank+zappingly · · Score: 1

      That's funny because when I think of the reason that most people use laptops it isn't "sex appeal" it's portability. At universities, people use them to take notes in class. In the office, people use them to do computing away from their desk. In coffee shops, people bring them along so they can computer and socialize with other humans. I don't see desktops taking over anytime soon, unless they start putting them everywhere, but at that point the proprietary screen and power supply don't seem so expensive anymore.

    7. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must only talk to folks who have macs. We (yeah, I'm maried, I'm not a slashtard) have laptops because we don't want to pay double to heat the house and cool the house with a quad-core pentium when we don't need more then a 2 year old thinkpad will do. It's also very nice to be able to pick up the computer and go outside and watch the kids while doing homework.

      John

    8. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I kept my last computer for 7 years. It was a PII-266. I did do a couple upgrades on it, RAM, video card, hard disk, but only minimally, and the only reason I got a new one was because I had some RAM chips die, and buying SDRAM was almost as much as buying a new computer, so I figure it was time to upgrade. Now I have an AMD64 3200+. This computer should last me another 7 years, unless my needs change drastically. Which I suspect they won't. I don't many games, I have a console for that, and I don't really see why people see the need to purchase a new computer every 2 years.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      ubiquitous wi-fi is what made the laptop market grow.

      also the fact that 900 will get you a nice one and 6-700 will still get you something useful.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    10. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "About the only upgrades I've been able to perform on my laptop without assistance are replacing the battery, adding RAM, and adding a miniPCI wireless A/B/G card. And the laptop didn't have an antenna in it, so I'm going to need to get in touch with a friend who knows how to add one."

      That's too bad. You shoulda gotten a Mac; I've upgraded the hard drives in both of my Mac notebooks in addition to the other upgrades you already mentioned.

    11. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's a nice little anecdote. Unfortunately, everyone in the world isn't you, and as such, some people may have differing computer needs. I edit high definition video...a PII-266 wouldn't cut it, nor would your new AMD64 3200+. It's worth it for someone like me to buy a new computer every six months..the tech is advancing fast enough that the latest CPU will be a noticeable upgrade (quad core made a heck of a difference over dual core from six months earlier, for video editing), and the old machine can still find a nice home in a cluster for rendering the effects.

      --
      Stasis is death. Embrace change.
    12. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anecdotes are nice aren't they. I like yours too. However, I think more people have similar usage patterns to me more than you. I check email, do some programming, browse the web, edit some photos, write up documents, manage my finanaces, and play a few simple games. None of those require high powered computers. And while I see the need for having very powerful computers for tasks such as HD video editing, I think that 90% of the general computing population could do without that much computing power, because nothing they do requires that much power. So while I see why you may need to upgrade every 6 months, I don't see why the average computer user would have to upgrade more than once every 4-5 years. I admit, I stretched my last computer a bit, because I didn't have much money for a new one.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    13. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Laptops are a fassion excessory. So what. We shouldn't let ourselves beleave that they shouldn't be. I have a new Shny MacBook Pro. Mostly because I like OS X over Windows and Linux (my preference) and I do a fare amount of graphical work, and I work with systems on different Evnroments Unix one day Windows the next VMS the third day and Mac OS does a good job playing middle of the road in compatability, espectailly with Parrales running, it has a good CPU and Good memory and a decent video card. But why else did it Get it because it looks cool. I could be in a place where everyone is using a laptop and a person out of the blue will go up to me and complement me on my Mac Book and they ask questions about it, this happends usually once a month. I use this as an opertunity to explain what I do for work, perhaps give them my business card, and generally be friendly with people who are being friendly with me.
      This is why Apple has been dooing a steller job lately in the Notebook market. But there is room for other systems too, and I know not everyone will want an Apple, I have seen some interesting modded PC Laptops that has gotten attention from others too. Yes a screen can break and a power supply fail (a lot less likely because the AC to DC Conversion is done in the power brick, which you can normally get a non 3rd party replacement for....) But for most people who take decent care of their laptops they usually last 3 or 4 years. My previous Laptop Lasted me 4 1/2 year before the screen got dammaged, and I had to replace a harddrive (indrustry standard) a year or so before that. No laptops are not super geek friendly because you just cant easilly pop them open and fix the problem, but if you are going to use the system without buying upgrades every so often then Laptops are fine, and if you look good all the better.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    14. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I should clarify, that those upgrades were with my current laptop, a Compaq Presario 2100. My previous laptop, a Thinkpad 760XL, was flexible enough that I was able to upgrade the hard drive, though I never did use the CD-ROM drive.

      As for getting a Mac, well, I'd like to. I love the hardware and the software. But you don't come across decent iBooks and MacBooks used. The Thinkpad was a gift from my parents when it was already a five-year-old computer. The Compaq was a gift from my brother on the promise that I lose weight.

      Hell, even my desktop PCs were obtained cheaply. My first desktop, a Packard Bell Pentium 75, was a Christmas present. My second, a home-built AMD K6-200, was sold to me for $200. My third, a Compaq Presario 750MHz Duron, was another Christmas present. My current desktop, a P4 2.4GHz, was bought for $50.

      Each of my desktops underwent substantial subsequent tinkering and upgrading. My laptops, not so much.

    15. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      Very interesting. -if I may post offtopic.... I'm an amateur (technically...) but I sure do a lot of video. I haven't upgraded my board/chip for something like 3 years.

      What kind of render time improvement did you see moving to quad? What did you have before?

      What about for the last few upgrades you did, from what to what and how much did it help? (sorry if I'm asking to much, a wag is fine)

      I did a comparison rendering a benchmark .veg file on my main edit box, an athlon XP 2500+ and then did the same on my laptop, a dell (maybe I'm not offtopic now) inspiron with a core duo 1.66 ghz. The laptop was (only?) twice as fast. I would attribute part of it to hard drive, but the benchmark barely used the HD.

      To post on-topic now - I once purchased a gateway laptop from a gateway store. This was PRECISELY because I had a special application and very much needed to choose the product in person to guarantee it could do what I wanted. I have also purchased a dell desktop online. The application for that box didn't matter a whit, I knew the dell would be fine. In most cases a computer is like a toaster. It only really matters if you're really into toast.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    16. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Junta · · Score: 1

      Assuming your opinion is more reflective of reality, it isn't all that appealing of a world for a complete system vendor to target. If usage is still predominantly desktops, that still says nothing of sales. The very advantages of desktops that are called out (upgradeability, maintainability) work against a company trying to sell new systems.

      Now, your described usage pattern further explains why the laptop market would be the dominant one sales-wise. Looking at systems that are 'good-enough' in the traditional measures (memory, processing power, etc), other metrics start coming into play (portability). Laptops have come into the price range considered appropriate for dekstops, and while desktops have been driven further in price, it's hard to justify upgrades from even two-year-old systems utilized ~40-50% to new systems that would be utilized ~10-15%.

      Laptops are a hardware vendors dream as it stands today. All-in-one pieces that generally are not suitable for significant upgrades, or when they are, upgardes only from the vendor originally purchased from. Ditto for service parts. Display goes bust on your laptop out of warranty? Either buy a new laptop or buy from your original vendor a replacement part, and probably the service to go with it. The vendors are enjoying a harder lock-in with laptops, whereas before it was a fairly tenuous situation of things technically working, but threatening to withhold support from those buying unapproved third party items.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    17. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by arminw · · Score: 1

      ......About the only upgrades I've been able to perform on my laptop......

      Why upgrade a computer any more than a refrigerator or TV set? Computers have become appliances you just replace when they break or no longer do some job you wish to use them for. Alternatively. find a dedicated use for them. An old broken freezer makes a mouse proof feed container for horses.

      One of our 2001 Apple laptops makes a great video/music player. It also works great for listening to Internet radio. I wouldn't use it for photoshop or video work however. A new Macbook does that kind of work.

      --
      All theory is gray
    18. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter if it dies in 2 years, because by then people want the latest and greatest anyways

      That was the same attitude Detroit had about cars for several decades after WWII, until the Japanese learned how to make more reliable cars for the same money or less. By then, there was no simple fix in Detroit.

    19. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Computers have become appliances you just replace when they break or no longer do some job you wish to use them for. Because I can't afford it? I make $6k a year as a college student. I spend more on classes, food and housing than I actually earn. Buying a new computer haid to wait until after I bought a washer that stopped adding water to the tub when it's full.

      Also, it was much cheaper to add a SATA controller card and hard drive to my desktop than to buy a computer with a larger hard drive.

      The computer-as-appliance model won't be worthwhile until computers are standardized like game console systems. If people really wanted a computer that they could replace on a whim, don't you think you'd have been able to get an office software suite for the PS2? It worked for the Tandy Coco, Commodore and Amiga, and the PS2 had USB ports.
    20. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      More like anywhere.

      If my boss needs to send me to out to another plant, I take my laptop home for the weekend. If I need to show some information off at a meeting, I just take my laptop and plug it in. All my data is on my computer. I don't have to worry about a few different versions of the same file. Heck, if I'm sitting at my own desk and I feel like sitting on the other side I can pick my computer up and move it.

      I don't think I could ever get used to the idea of going back to a Desktop, even for personal use. I'm typing this right now as I watch movies. If I feel like sitting on the couch tomorrow, I don't need to do anything but move my laptop. If I make something in the kitchen I take my laptop to the kitchen and pull up the recipe. My Macbook Pro has more power than any computer I've ever had before. 80 GB is more than enough for all my 'main' stuff. All my movies, music, pictures, are all on a debian 2TB server.

      Other people are realizing this too. The laptop market is just going to explode.

    21. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by solafide · · Score: 1
      I dunno, is your keyboard messed up? 16 misspelled words [I love "dooing"], at least 5 punctuation marks missing or wrong, and 5 mis-capitalized words in 355 words.

      Laptops are a fassion excessory. So what. We shouldn't let ourselves beleave that they shouldn't be. I have a new Shny MacBook Pro. Mostly because I like OS X over Windows and Linux (my preference) and I do a fare amount of graphical work, and I work with systems on different Evnroments [Where'd the commas go here?] Unix one day Windows the next VMS the third day and Mac OS does a good job playing middle of the road in compatability, espectailly with Parrales running, it has a good CPU and Good memory and a decent video card. But why else did it Get it because it looks cool. I could be in a place where everyone is using a laptop and a person out of the blue will go up to me and complement me on my Mac Book and they ask questions about it, this happends usually once a month. I use this as an opertunity to explain what I do for work, perhaps give them my business card, and generally be friendly with people who are being friendly with me.

      This is why Apple has been dooing a steller job lately in the Notebook market. But there is room for other systems too, and I know not everyone will want an Apple, I have seen some interesting modded PC Laptops that has gotten attention from others too. Yes a screen can break and a power supply fail (a lot less likely because the AC to DC Conversion is done in the power brick, which you can normally get a non 3rd party replacement for....) But for most people who take decent care of their laptops they usually last 3 or 4 years. My previous Laptop Lasted me 4 1/2 year before the screen got dammaged, and I had to replace a harddrive (indrustry standard) a year or so before that. No laptops are not super geek friendly because you just cant easilly pop them open and fix the problem, but if you are going to use the system without buying upgrades every so often then Laptops are fine, and if you look good all the better.

    22. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know a graphic designer who does the same (with Macs). Always needs the latest and greatest to run the Adobe Creative Suite, says they *need* that extra power to do their work. But I ask, do you *really* need to upgrade every six months, and is it worth the thousands of dollars that is costs? Really? I'm not a designer, but I find the argument hard to believe.

    23. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      Well, from my own experience, users do care about laptop parts being proprietary and expensive. They just are currently in the process of caring AFTER they go bad.

      I work at http://freegeek.org/, which mostly focuses on rebuilding computers for volunteers and community use, but also sells a good amount of computer equipment. And one of the most commonly asked for items is laptop parts, which we don't often have. But lots of people who buy laptops thinking about how awesome they are, don't have the money to pay for parts and repairs. Of course, I am only in a position where people come to me with failures, but from what I have heard, it is often enough.

      Anyway, I do have to say, for most people, 1000 dollars for a new laptop, or even 500 dollars, is not a trivial amount of money. I am sure that there are many people who can spend that type of money, but for a lot of people (including myself), I can't spend 1-3 months rent on a laptop. If it is because of a small problem, like the inability to change keyboards. I think eventually consumers will realize that it would be much easier if things like the keyboard and screen were made to be interchangeable.

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    24. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by toddestan · · Score: 1

      For laptops, it isn't that unreasonable. Corporate laptops are often heavily used, and the users generally don't take as good of care of them as they do if it was their personal laptop. And then there is support - they want to be able to get the machine repaired, and repaired quickly. While this is pretty easy for old desktops, given similar older machines to cannabolize, it's much harder for laptops. It's just easier to replace them every 2-3 years.

    25. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by drix · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you are saying (I used my last computer until it literally would not start, which unfortunately was only 3 years) but man are you in the wrong place. You will not find another sympathetic ear for that kind of argument around here. Prepare to be flamed by about a gazillion self-righteous geeks who use phrases like "digital lifestyle", "my work is my play" and/or "beast rig." May the force be with you.

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    26. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF man, you have no budget yet bought a SATA controller card + HD instead of an IDE HD that costs the same as the SATA equivalent?

    27. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Commoditizing notebook parts such as boards depends on commoditizing form factors. A tower case doesn't matter because you can give generous room to everything. As such, there was only one real form factor, ATX. It was more or less a one size fits all, with only some variation on tower height depending on how many drive bays you want. Just one major case factor was easy to deal with. I can think of a need for maybe five major form factors needed for notebooks. There's only so far you can go, I've never seen such a compact device have an industry standard form factor where you can swap all parts in between just about any brand. I think that ATX/BTX may be the end of that line. I can't even say that it's realistic. An AMD-based system and an Intel-based system would likely have different board arrangements with respect to memory, chipset and CPU, affecting the arrangement of the cooling system as well. Maybe it can be done, but given how cookie-cutter the desktop industry became, maybe I'd rather not.

      Replacement panels aren't that hard to come by, I know someone that replaced the panel in his Toshiba by looking up a part number on the panel itself and found a supplier that sold that panel. Panels are usually used by more than one maker and more than one model. It's easy to find parts on eBay too.

    28. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Falladir · · Score: 1

      ...maried,...

      ...more then...

      You sound like exactly the kind of slashtard who becomes an editor, if you can just learn to end your posts with polarizing, tangentially-related questions.

    29. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      What does replacing hard drives have to do with having a Mac? I dunno about Macs, but the hard drives in "PC" notebooks are interchangeable these days. Of course you have to deal with getting your data/programs from the one to the other, but hardware is not a problem.

    30. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      If you get 3 months rent out of a 1000 bucks, much less 500, I need to know where you are livin' man. No joke... I just might move there.

    31. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      The SATA controller only cost $30, and I've been unable to find a 500GB IDE drive.

    32. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Never heard of service plans have you?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    33. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Land of the Free [nowthatsfuckedup.com]

      Just to be sure, I take it you're commenting on the fact that Polk County Sherriff's Office seems to have shut that site down?

    34. Re:To me, it says more about the laptop market by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      That's irrelevant, dude. The point is, he typed it on a cool laptop. Don't you get it?

  10. No question about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    My wife is an absolute novice to PCs. Heretofore, she used a WebTV unit,
    and the prospect of "migrating" to a PC was very daunting to her. Plus,
    the fact that she's an inveterate skinflint, she was very reluctant to
    spend a lot of money on a laptop for herself.

    We shopped at the Apple store in Town Center, Boca Raton, and while we
    liked their product line very much, we felt that it was too expensive.

    We visited the Dell kiosk in the same mall and got a (slightly) lower price,
    for equivalent hardware and Windows XP, making sure that it would be upgradeable
    to Vista (allegedly).

    We then went to a local Staples, and ended up buying an HP laptop with the
    same processor, memory and disk capacity as the Dell, with Windows XP, for
    about 35% less than what the twit in the Dell kiosk quoted us, which appeared
    to be basically the same price I'd obtained the evening before over the net
    from the DellDirect web site.

    This all took place between Thanksgiving and Christmas.

    I used my EPP discount on the HP website and bought myself a nice(r) HP laptop
    as well.

    Now, we all know the games that are played during the Christmas buying season,
    but this, IMNSHO, ranks as about as ridiculous as it gets. It didn't surprise us
    when the industry reports started oozing out in late January and into February
    showing that HP had trounced Dell during the Christmas season. They lost on price,
    and their reputation in the Consumer Reports ratings didn't help, either.

    (Parenthetically, I wanted to be able to get my wife an Apple, but she didn't
    want to see $2k plunked down on a 15" 1.73GHz Intel laptop that she might not be
    able to learn how to use. Apple's features and look-and-feel were stupendous, and
    they deserve a lot of credit - it's a beautiful product, but it costs too damned much!!)

    BTW, the laptop that I bought for myself was made in (P.R.)China, and I was able to
    track its journey from the factory near Shanghai to my front door via FedEx's web site.
    Kind of mind blowing for this computer industry (DEC-CPQ-HPQ) retiree...

    There is something wrong with Dell's business model and/or cost structure and Mikey
    needs to fix it yesterday if he's to have a credible chance of turning Dell Computer around.

    1. Re:No question about it by Osty · · Score: 1

      We then went to a local Staples, and ended up buying an HP laptop with the same processor, memory and disk capacity as the Dell, with Windows XP, for about 35% less than what the twit in the Dell kiosk quoted us, which appeared to be basically the same price I'd obtained the evening before over the net from the DellDirect web site.

      Dell has some awesome deals, but they're not very well published. The trick is finding the right coupon code and configuring the machine to have only what you want. You can usually do $100-200 cheaper than the lowest price Dell lists on their site, without having to send out for mail-in rebates or the like.

    2. Re:No question about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used my EPP discount on the HP website and bought myself a nice(r) HP laptop
      as well.


      As somebody who repairs and supports hundreds of laptops a year, and drawing on that experience I'm going to tell ya: you screwed up. HP and Compaq are both abysmal with respect to build quality over the long term (that is, unless you're going to get another laptop every year to eighteen months). You should have bought the Apple... or maybe a Fujitsu.
    3. Re:No question about it by Cadallin · · Score: 1
      If she's such a novice why did she need a >$1500 notebook? Or a notebook at all? Its not like Apple doesn't make cheaper notebooks you know. Yes, when you buy a high end business class machine with an all metal alloy case, it carries a price premium, there's a shocker for you. She needed to be looking either at a Macbook, or preferably a Mac Mini. There's nothing she would have wanted to do that the Mini couldn't.

      Also I've had to do tech support on a cheap recent HP notebook, and IMO it was piece of crap. My father bought one for my sister who's in college. The Compaq he bought for my mother has likewise been no end of trouble.

      My personal experience tells me that Thinkpads are definitely the machines to get if you need a windows only (or Linux) notebook. All of them I've ever encountered (I've had one, my father has upgraded through several over the past decade) have been very nice, reliable machines. I've not worked with one built since the Lenovo purchase, but from what I hear they're still very solid.

    4. Re:No question about it by jcr · · Score: 1

      Dell has some awesome deals, but they're not very well published.

      Dell has a very bad habit of playing a shell game with the customers. Try pricing a machine on Dell's web site, and try pricing a machine at Apple's. Dell is acting like an airline, trying to sort the customers by how much they're willing to pay, and keep them from finding out what they could be spending if they took a different route through Dell's web maze.

      There's nothing intrinsically wrong with direct sales; it's working out quite well for Apple and many other companies as well. What's wrong at Dell all comes down to them having such miniscule margins that they actually need the money they get from loading crapware, the money they save (in the short term) by substandard customer service, and most of all, the dismal quality of their hardware.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:No question about it by arminw · · Score: 1

      ........Apple's features and look-and-feel were stupendous, and
      they deserve a lot of credit - it's a beautiful product, but it costs too damned much!!.....

      Generally, you get what you pay for. You'll be replacing your cheap machine in about half the time that the Apple would have lasted you, so your costs will be the same. With the HP you get the added bonus of spyware and viruses unless you spend extra $$ to protect your machine against that sort of garbage. For the extra money to protect it you get to run a whole raft of software ALL the time, that will do nothing but slow your computer down, making your whole experience that much less. You spent less money up front, but will be paying for it the whole time you have that computer. Did you REALLY save money? Of course, on paper you did.

      --
      All theory is gray
    6. Re:No question about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you are happy that, along with the $800 or so you paid for your laptop, you are personally responsible for sending a bunch of American jobs over there with it.

  11. That is a mistake by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Informative

    What they need is to have new models. The difference between theirs and say a cheap chinese model is minimal. They need to start innovating again. If they start selling Linux, that is to their advantage. If they developed new ideas, rather than just rebranding others, that is to their advantage. But as it stands, Dell will continue losing ground esp if they start selling their system via regular sales channels.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:That is a mistake by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      If they start selling Linux, that is to their advantage.

      Yes, it is to their advantage from the viewpoint of the 1% of the consumer PC market that demands it. Linux hasn't been to the advantage of a consumer PC maker any time it's been tried, what has changed since the last time? Linux servers probably sell pretty well, but that's a different game.

    2. Re:That is a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, linux has all the market advantage (and the same marketshare) as vista and we know how that's going.
       
      linux isn't going to bring as much new business as getting these on the shelf of best buy.
       
      i really wish you linux fags would get off of the whole "if linux was on mainstream boxen..." bullshit. it's simply not true. there is no obsticles to stop anyone from running linux aside from a few driver issues and peoples desire to use it. if joe sixpack really wants a linux machine he'll have it.

    3. Re:That is a mistake by swimin · · Score: 1

      This is simply untrue. The average technical user is able to install linux, but if you had the average I-can't-burn-a-cd user attempt to install linux it would never work. If you told the average user to re-install windows, or upgrade to vista, they would find it incredibly difficult, possibly moreso than installing linux. Being pre-installed, with all drivers working, and manufacturer pushed updates is a serious advantage for the average user.

  12. Dell's slide... by raydobbs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Coming from someone who used to work at a retailer who serviced machines - Dells are the WORSE. The quality of their product has gone downhill ever since the late ninties - and now are just horseshit. Specialized cheap hardware with crappy support. They reap what they sew in this case. People have stopped shopping with Dell not because they are direct-to-customer - they have stopped because the product is poor, and there are better alternatives now.

    1. Re:Dell's slide... by bilbus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bullshit, dell is just as good as anyone else ... they use the same components as hp and ibm. Hell everything has broadcom now. I have never had a problem with a dell .. that was not easly fixed. As for service you do know EVERY maker outsources their support to local repair shops. So if you have a problem its the local serivce shop thats to blame, talk to your rep and get that fixed. I like dell because i can call one person/team to order, ask questions or get support. Try that with IBM. With Toshiba if you bought it from a store you need to find your paperwork before anyone will help you. With HP you can get support from them directly but you need to buy from resellers .. and dell's prices are almost always better. As for the earler poster ... dell has been a little behind in invoation, but the ultra highend server market is not where dell wants to be. Their servers are aimed at the low to mid range markets ($1,000-$20,000). If you want a ultra high end server IBM/HP is the leader. As for linux ... are you kidding me there is NO market for linux on the desktop. As for servers why would they preinstall linux for you, you are going to format and install your choice on there anyhow, you can get the servers with no os installed.

    2. Re:Dell's slide... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bullshit, dell is just as good as anyone else ... they use the same components as hp and ibm. Hell everything has broadcom now.

      Using the same chips alone doesn't mean that the entire systems have comparable build quality, if that's what you are implying.

    3. Re:Dell's slide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are pretty cheap. I was able to configure an Core2 Duo laptop with 2G of RAM for about $400 less than other manufacturers. But you're correct that the build quality is pretty much crap. I have 3 Dells now (two Inspiron E1505s and a 600m), but unless there's some huge sale, I won't be buying another one. Their support sucks donkey balls too. But they are cheap and for a relatively stationary laptop, it's actually fine.

    4. Re:Dell's slide... by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I refurbished Dell laptops and desktops at one of their buildings in Austin, TX (six month contract during the tech depression). I found it interesting that the parts they use are no different then what HP, Compaq, IBM, and Gateway have used as well. For example, the LCDs were LG or Samsung brand. Power supplies were LG, Lite-0n, or Delta brand. CDROM drives were provided by the above mentioned brand and then some...

      Basically, the failure rate on Dell machines are probably no different as the entire industries uses the same low-bidder shit for parts when it comes to the desktops. Laptops are different however. Usually the problems are not random failures, but consistent failures due to a bad design flaw (flexing PCB, thermal related, voltage regulation problems, etc)

      These days, it's pointless to have brand loyalty with regards to reliability. It's all the same in the industry. Instead, base your purchase decisions on warranty, price, and rated customer service satisfaction. If you judge on anything else, you're splitting hairs.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Dell's slide... by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      So if you have a problem its the local serivce shop thats to blame, talk to your rep and get that fixed. I like dell because i can call one person/team to order, ask questions or get support. Try that with IBM.


      I did. Worked out pretty well. I bought a thinkpad in 2004 and it didn't come with windows reinstall/restore discs. I called up IBM's support number, spoke to someone who actually speaks english in a matter of minutes, and they sent me the restore discs via overnight shipping for free.

      Now not only was this machine bought used and refurbed, it was bought off of ebay from a mom & pop shop.

      Sadly with Lenovo running the show these days I'm betting that would not happen again. So moot point maybe...

    6. Re:Dell's slide... by value_added · · Score: 1

      I found it interesting that the parts they use are no different then what HP, Compaq, IBM, and Gateway have used as well.

      May true from a wide perspective, but you negelected to mention (or didn't notice during your work) that Dell is notorious for mixing and matching parts on identical models.

      While that may not be a big deal for the average Windows user, if you're running something other than Windows, and discover that those servers you ordered don't all work as expected, or that the last batch of laptops contain different wireless chipsets than you ordered, you end up with a far more realistic and nuanced notion of things.

    7. Re:Dell's slide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think you are wrong... me and my bussiness partners has used several laptops... all of them failed in about 12 to 14 months of heavy usage...
      Since 2005, we all get thinkpad t42, and guess what...???
      WE ARE USING THE SAME LAPTOP, AND ONLY 1 OF 5 NEEDS THE HD TO BE REPLACED
      (fortunately, it was mine, so i get a new 7200 rpm hdd laptop, the run like champs!!).
      if you need a reliable laptop, get yourself a thinkpad, they are not the most beautiful, but they're the best..

    8. Re:Dell's slide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would window fags like yourself, have a clue as to whether Linux on the desktop will sell or not?
      As an earlier poster pointed out, that companies who installed Linux on the server sold like hotcakes once it was installed on top servers. Yet you window fags want to say that Linux will not sell on the desktop. You will just have to Pray.

    9. Re:Dell's slide... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Dell is notorious for mixing and matching parts on identical models

      Notorious? Hell, we did it all the time when refurbishing a machine. It wasn't because we wanted too, but because we had no other choice. When it came time to pick a part from inventory, we had to choose what was in stock at the time.

      That's the nature of OEMers. They'll purchase a stock of parts from the lowest bidder on the market. While they are tested and/or ordered to spec before hand, it's not uncommon to see five different brands of power supply units available for use on the same machine. Same goes for drives, NICs (unless onboard the MB), Modems, WiFi cards...etc. I can't speak for their server line however, I was never assigned to work on those.

      I can only imagine how much of a PITA this must be Linux users, but that's never a problem for Windows. Dell has the install scripted to machine specification after the hardware audit post device installation on the factory floor.

      BTW, that job sucked ass. Standing in front of a desk 8 hours a day was PAINFUL. I wish there was some OSHA regulation against it... Oh well, I'm just glad I'm not doing that gig anymore.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    10. Re:Dell's slide... by bilbus · · Score: 1

      I will never buy another ibm .... it took Lenovo 3 weeks to get me a damn cpu fan .. we had to buy another computer. We ended up usng the ibm for something .. but thats not the point. Lenovo is bad.

    11. Re:Dell's slide... by Joelfabulous · · Score: 1

      Correction. With HP, you don't have to buy from resellers. I bought my laptop direct from them and talked the salesperson into giving me a discount and free shipping on a business class notebook since I'm a student. Since I was spending a bit more on warranty and buying a higher end notebook, the margins weren't as slim. Yes, anecdote isn't statistic, but still. HP does sell direct.

      --
      Sometimes I wonder if I think too much.
  13. Yeah, super idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Creating a retail chain? Didn't Gateway do this (and fail soon thereafter)?

  14. Yeah, they're butt ugly. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, I find it really odd that while the rest of the world seemingly moved on, Dell still makes laptops that are vaguely reminiscent of plumbing fixtures.

    Squarish corners, clean, straight lines, and monotone color schemes are in; Dell's laptops all cheap and plasticky compared to Apple's or IBM/Lenovo's. In particular, the two-tone color scheme they seem to like just emphasizes the seams in the case, rather than minimizing them like a single color (white, black, silver -- doesn't really matter) would. And round corners say 'toy' while square ones say 'tool,' which I think is something they ought to be going for.

    What's particularly odd is that although (at least in the black color), the better IBM/Lenovo laptops really haven't changed too much in external appearance over the years -- their styling is pretty consistent -- Dell's somehow end up looking more "dated," even though they've presumably been designed more recently.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Looks to me like Macbooks have rounded corners too. In fact, I think the thinkpads are the only ones with the really square edges. Although I can't really pinpoint the problem, I have to say that I find Dell notebooks to be really ugly, especially compared to the most appealing Apple notebooks.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple design has always revolved around the Rounded Rectangle. They've flirted with gumdrops and clamshells, and the edges got a bit pointed during the non-Jobs era, but the original Mac's UI and case design were based on the rounded rectangle, the OS API has always contained primitives for drawing rounded rectangles, and the industrial designs keep coming back to that shape. Look at the current iMac, the front view of the Mac Pro, the top view of the Mac Mini/AppleTV, the full-size iPods and iPhone, or any of the MacBooks: rounded rectangles. Sic semper.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Well, it boils down to a subjective determination either way, but the difference IMO is that the Macbooks look pretty "square," overall, in terms of being composed of straight lines, only with beveled edges to take off the sharp points. The Dells, on the other hand, not only have rounded corners but also seem to have some rounded design elements too (particularly right in front, although I suppose this is intended as a wrist rest) and this is emphasized by the two-tone plastic.

      I admit that I'm probably biased, since I find the Macbooks more attractive overall, but when I just try to concentrate on "squareness" and "cleanness," the Dell seems to be lacking something that the Macbook has.

      Anyway, to each his/her own. At the end of the day it's probably like comparing wristwatches or other objects that are fundamentally a combination of function and image.

      Dell: http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetail s.aspx/inspn_1501?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19 (Inspiron series)
      Apple: http://www.apple.com/macbook/macbook.html and http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/
      IBM/Lenovo: http://www-05.ibm.com/se/news/archive/images/compu ters/thinkpad/ThinkPad_T30/TH008889.jpg (this is the older IBM design) http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/9513.jpg (the newer "3000 series" Lenovo design, which looks like ass in comparison)

      Personally I like the looks of the old-school IBMs most of all, just because they seem to have really followed the form-follows-function approach and the geek in me appreciates that; but the Apple ones are admittedly very sleek.

      On the whole ... the Dells just radiate mediocre, and that's the last thing I'd want to project as an image.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    4. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by moosesocks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      IBM decided on a minimalist design, and went with it for 15 years, and so far it's served them very very well. If you look at trends in industrial design, it's pretty obvious that minimalism and sleek likes have been a "safe" choice for the past few decades. If your design is simple, there are very few elements of it that can appear dated with time.

      Likewise, the build-quality of IBM's enslosures tends to be among the best in the business. The type of plastic they use combined with the rubberized coating holds up very well to wear and tear. Over time, this has only gotten better as they've improved upon the plastic formulation and reinforced the laptop chasis with a Titanium frame.

      Pick up a Dell laptop with one hand. It's heavy and you can feel it creaking under its own weight. Do the same with an IBM or Apple machine, and you'll feel the difference instantly.

      Dells haven't always been crap. Every now and then a legitimately good design slips through. A while ago, I had a Latitude LS, which was an early PIII machine. It was an ultraportable, and weighed even less than my 12" Powerbook (due to its lack of optical drive, which also made it super-thin). The frame and external enclosure were both made of a durable scratch-resistant metal, and it still looks just as good as my Apple. Why Dell chose to abandon this design and continue to produce laptops based upon the Latitude C-chasis (from the early PII days, and still used in some form today) is beyond me.

      It's basically the same reason why you can tell the difference between a Benz and a Trabant.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    5. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Lenovo looks like a 7 year old Toshiba.
      And the old ThinkPad looks like and old ThinkPad. The Thinkpads have _never_ looked modern, never hideously ugly, but never particularly attractive either.

      Whilst I'm no fan of the current Dell designs, IBM and Lenovo are hardly an ideal to which others should be aspiring.

    6. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by debest · · Score: 1

      Pick up a Dell laptop with one hand. It's heavy and you can feel it creaking under its own weight. Do the same with an IBM or Apple machine, and you'll feel the difference instantly.

      I have only anecdotal evidence (two machines) to base this on, but I have two IBM laptops: a T22 (built in 2000) and a marginally larger R52 (built in 2005). The T22 is still as solid as a single chunk of metal, while the R52 has always been more "creaky". Perhaps IBMs are not as well built as they once were?

      The real test is to pick up a laptop by one of its front corners. My T22 does not make a sound when you do this. It is a wonderfully engineered laptop, and durable as hell.

      (I hear Apple makes very well-engineered laptops as well. I wish I had one so I could comment :-)
      --
      Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    7. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by dosquatch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Thinkpads have _never_ looked modern, never hideously ugly, but never particularly attractive either.

      But - and I consider this the more important point - they are built like tanks.

      I've provided support for quite a lot of Dell machines. I even reccommend them if for the budget-minded, They perform well, and (if you stay away from the Inspiron line) they hold up fairly well... but they just don't feel that durable. If I'm going to invest in a machine, I'd just as soon buy something that I know is built really, really well, and not only does the Thinkpad feel like that machine, I have reason to believe that it is actually that well... having seen one survive being backed over by a salesman and be none the worse for wear (note that I do NOT advocate repeating this experiment with anything less than a toughbook)

      Looks be damned, I'll take the machine that I know will live to die of old age rather than wear and tear.

      --
      "Hey, the third matrix movie would have been good except for the plot,story, and acting." --AC
    8. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by dosquatch · · Score: 1

      And round corners say 'toy' while square ones say 'tool,'

      Really? That's not the asthetic read I get. Rounded corners say "fit and finish" in my mind. Oh, well, to each his own.

      --
      "Hey, the third matrix movie would have been good except for the plot,story, and acting." --AC
    9. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The R series is IBM/Lenovo's budget line up, and is not as solidly built as the T series. It's no surprise that you find the T22 so solid. Though don't get me wrong on the R-series, while they may be the least sturdy Thinkpad, they are still better than the most everything else out there that isn't a Thinkpad.

    10. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      Tis true. When my R52 lease is up, a new T6x will be replacing it. I found the R5x series to be a run of the mill ThinkPad - it was by far more classy and rugged than the high end Dell laptops I've been given to use (some may argue that's an oxymoron... ).

      The T series does shed some weight and bring a little more omph to the table or lap, as the case may be. And the available WAN connection is just plain sexy.

    11. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by threephaseboy · · Score: 1
      --
      .
    12. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

      One of my coworkers has still his Apple notebook from 2004, since he got it he used to throw it on the ground regularly to show us how sturdy it was (I know, he is a strage fella), it still works aside from some cracks because of the repeated shocks ...

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    13. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      Perhaps IBMs are not as well built as they once were? You got to keep in mind that the R-series are cheap budget machines while the T-series are expensive professional ones.

      (I hear Apple makes very well-engineered laptops as well. I wish I had one so I could comment :-) I owned a IBM T20 and a Apple Powerbook Ti-G4 at the same time.
      The IBM hardware kicked Apple-hardware ass in *all* aspects. Quality, Looks, Ergonomics, Performance, you name it.
      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    14. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Buy a Dell desktop-replacement notebook. It's weighs as much as a tank too...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    15. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      Rounded corners always reminded me of the rounded ends of safety scissors that we give children to use.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    16. Re:Yeah, they're butt ugly. by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Agreed. IBM machines do tend to be ridiculously well-engineered.

      I will say, though, that the quality of Apple's lineup has greatly improved since the Ti-G4 days. The first few models in the Aluminum series were a bit iffy, but the 12" Powerbook G4 I've had for the past year and half is absolutely rock-solid.

      I agree that for "normal" 14"-15" notebooks, that IBM may still have a slight edge, but when talking about the compact models, Apple wins hands-down.

      One thing though: I miss the pointing stick. Although two-fingered scrolling makes the trackpad a lot more bearable, nothing quite beats the pointing stick (real mice included)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  15. The inverted-L enter/return key. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I hate-hate-hate the Toshiba inverted upside down "L" enter key. It's impossible to work with. So, I stay away from *all* Toshiba laptops online, because I don't have the tactile in-person guarantee that I will find their keyboard acceptable.

    I'm pretty sure that's not just a Toshiba thing, or at least they didn't really invent it. I used to have a Panasonic electric typewriter (one of the very late, high-speed, daisy-wheel ones) that had the same thing. I was never clear on what its purpose was, or if it was a Japanese thing or a legacy of some older typewriter keyboard. (Oddly enough, though, modern Panasonic computers such as the Toughbooks don't have it.)

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:The inverted-L enter/return key. by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Wyse supplied us some keyboards with that format for our 5150 and S50 units ... we sent them back. Our users hated them.

      One or two made it out "into the wild", though, and those particular users never complained. So I guess people can get used to it. But man ... programming on that would be a pain in the butt. Especially with the short shift key on the other side.

    2. Re:The inverted-L enter/return key. by alexhard · · Score: 1

      what? you don't have the inverted L in the US? Here in Europe it's rare to see one with a small enter, and I find them extremely uncomfortable (the small enters that is)..

      --
      Infinite time means everything that can happen, will. You being you is absolutely incidental. You do not exist.
    3. Re:The inverted-L enter/return key. by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of preference and which you prefer probably depends on what's popular where you are because that's what you're used to.

      I prefer a smaller non L-shaped enter key but only because the usual way space is made for a bigger enter key is by moving the backslash/pipe key up next to the backspace and making the backspace key the size of a regular key. I'd rather have a larger backspace key than a ginormous enter key.

    4. Re:The inverted-L enter/return key. by bbcisdabomb · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd guess that those Europeans don't make as many mistakes as us stupid Americans.

      --
      Please put some pants on before you post again.
    5. Re:The inverted-L enter/return key. by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      Or they're not as interested in correcting them.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    6. Re:The inverted-L enter/return key. by smeette · · Score: 1

      Small enter = US or International
      Inverted L = UK/Ireland

      I suppose some companies may have created their own custom layouts if they want a single 'english-language' machine...

    7. Re:The inverted-L enter/return key. by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have a larger backspace key than a ginormous enter key.

      Never understood why you Yanks like that. Enter's one of the keys I press most on the keyboard, and I strike it quite authoritatively, usually. Nice to have a big target to aim at. As someone who grew up with the large Enter keys, I find the smaller rectangular ones *extremely* annoying. I think I even came across an Enter key once that was the size of a regular letter key, but that was rare. :-)

  16. brainstorming here - one thing Dell could do is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... liquidate the company's assets and distribute the proceeds to the shareholders.

    1. Re:brainstorming here - one thing Dell could do is by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      No, your thinking of Microsoft. Close, but no cigar.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:brainstorming here - one thing Dell could do is by reidconti · · Score: 1

      I love your Monty Python "taunt you a second time" signature. Unfortunately you are the one who missed the boat this time.

      Michael Dell has, at least once, said that Apple should liquidate all of their assets and give the proceeds back to the shareholder. That is why his comment is funny. Or was, before it had to be explained.

      Also you used "your" in place of "you're."

      Neither are major miscues, but for some reason your signature (while taken in good humor) prompted me to reply when I would not have otherwise.

    3. Re:brainstorming here - one thing Dell could do is by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...... liquidate the company's assets and distribute the proceeds to the shareholders........

      That's what Michael Dell suggested for Apple a few years ago. Now he's in the same boat like Jobs was, namely to try and save the company he started. Maybe he can a lesson from Jobs. To start with, Dell might make a better product. Quality does sell.

      --
      All theory is gray
  17. I am not an apple fanboy but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    but it costs too damned much


    No it doesn't. Apple's stock price just shot through $100, they are making 35% profit on them.
    If people weren't buying macs, Apple would be going out of business.
    It may be they cost too damned much for you, ever heard the expression 'buy cheap buy twice' ?

    1. Re:I am not an apple fanboy but... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      It may be they cost too damned much for you, ever heard the expression 'buy cheap buy twice' ? And an excellent expression for the computer industry it is, too! You will always end up with a better system in the end by buying a midrange PC and then buying another midrange PC in 18-24 months, compared to buying a top of the range system and keeping it.

      I had exactly this debate with a (non-computer-literate) friend of mine. He'd decided he was sick of upgrading his computer so often (every two years or so), so he was going to lay down the cash for a top end Apple G5 desktop. He basically put all the options on the web site up to 11, and ended up with a total cost of around AU$6500. We (an Apple-fanboi friend of mine, and I) managed to talk him into at least dropping down to second-best CPU and hard drive, and using the difference to upgrade the monitor to a nice one. Sadly, though, it was impossible to get through to him the fact that in two years' time, $3000 will buy a helluva lot better computer than $6000 will now.

      Computers aren't like houses or furniture, twice as expensive is only half again as good, and they depreciate like mad things. Buy cheap, buy often, is the way to win. And as for the GP's post, it WAS too damn expensive, for him. I didn't see him claiming it was too expensive for everyone.

      Exception: Don't be afraid to splurge on interface devices. Get a bigass monitor, nice keyboard/mouse, and some sweet speakers. These things don't depreciate as much and you keep them when you upgrade the box.
      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  18. ...but this was one thing I LIKED about them! by steve-san · · Score: 1

    I just helped a friend configure/buy a Latitude D620 notebook (wouldn't typically recommend the Inspiron bricks) through the Dell website for the express reason that it DID allow so many detailed configuration options!
    You can specify everything, from RAM sizes per stick and hard drive speed right down to varying partition options.

    Lack of such options was *the* primary factor that pushed me away from HP or Toshiba (ugh, that was a horrid site), which mostly locked you into preconfigured models.

    (FWIW -- I'd still go with Thinkpad T or Z series if budget allows.)

    --
    What you want is irrelevant; what you've chosen is at hand! - Spock, ST VI
    1. Re:...but this was one thing I LIKED about them! by DFENS619 · · Score: 1

      i have no idea what you're talking about. as a former hp home and home office employee, I can say the website for hp gives you just as many options. The only difference is that the website layout for dell is deisgned to be confusing so that customers on the website will be more likely to call into the sales center where they will be pressured into cross sells and upsells

    2. Re:...but this was one thing I LIKED about them! by steve-san · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about this:
      http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF04a/3219 57-321957-64295-321838-89315.html

      Only 3 of the 7 HP models listed have the "Configure PC" option.
      You may have a point with regards to the other configurable models (that weren't of interest), but that obviously didn't help me much.

      And I didn't find the Dell site confusing. The entire purchase took about 10 minutes, with no phone calls involved.

      --
      What you want is irrelevant; what you've chosen is at hand! - Spock, ST VI
    3. Re:...but this was one thing I LIKED about them! by DFENS619 · · Score: 1
      actually I was refering to this:

      http://www.shopping.hp.com/notebooks?jumpid=re_R32 9_prodexp/hhoslp/psg/notebooks

      all the notebooks are the same as the ones you would find in store, only customizable.

  19. Better case. Push environmental angle by delire · · Score: 1

    I had a Dell Inspiron i8k. While it was a beast to lug around, I loved the thing. I took it around the world 3 times - my back has less fond memories - but never have I sat at a laptop since with such a reassuring feeling of robust design, right up there with the Apple G3 but with a better keyboard. I dropped it several times, tipped fortified wine all over it, used it in clubs and bars on a world tour and suffered upon it all manner of other sins to the soul of electric things.. yet never did it yield. There was once a problem with a screen artifact but Dell service was next day and on-site. I was very impressed by this.

    Admittedly however, the laptop looked fairly hideous.

    Dell has (supposedly) the best record for building systems that do the least damage to the environment and really ought to push this angle in the marketplace. That, coupled with a case that doesn't try to look like an unmanned autonomous aircraft - and offering Linux preinstalled (Ubuntu ideally) - would do well to the ends of lifting Mr. Dell out of stagnancy.

  20. Power consumption, portable, wireless ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not just slick styling. Laptops are powerful machines, portable, use less power, and you have easy wireless connectivity. Most of the people I know prefer laptops over desktops. I went to the iMac which is a nice desktop system made out of laptop components, and besides the very nice 24" screen I kind of wish I had got a MacBook instead just so I can take it with me if I wanted too...

  21. They do ... just not in the US by taniwha · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here in New Zealand I see low end Dells in "the Warehouse" a vaguely costco-like warehouse chain

    1. Re:They do ... just not in the US by zurtle · · Score: 1

      Ah you beat me to it... I was about to post the same thing.

      Not only that but The Warehouse also sells Alienware laptops at their Stationery stores (not stationary before some smartarse makes a joke). I haven't paid too much attention to the specs but they're selling them at fairly reasonable prices.

      I was quite amazed and impressed. Normally they sell junk... ermmm and Dell isn't? (self-correction algorithm kicking in... must... hit... submit)

      --
      Couldn't stand the weather
  22. Still more PR; Dell's tried "the channel" plenty by postbigbang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Whenever sales go into the crapper, it's every direct-model vendor's sworn duty to look at "the channel". I can't tell you how many times Dell's announced that they'll do right by "the channel" who uniformly hates Dell's very existence for sins over two decades. Dell's advertisements dissed "the channel", and each time Dell tried to bolster sales by stuffing alternate channels with product, the price dropped out like a rock, no one made any money, and Dell got a nice looking quarter to report to Wall Street. Yet people fall for it every time.

    It's like the Look-Mikey Uses Linux PR that so many swallowed hook, line, and sinker.

    Dell was built on direct sales. They do it very well. They found that they can't do support out of India for domestic North American consumption, and so their costs are up. Once again, they'll have to squeeze somebody to make their quarter look good to Wall Street. Guess who it is this time.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  23. ObLisaSimpson by sharkey · · Score: 1

    While initially no specifics are given, the thought seems to be than eventually the company will begin working with a retail chain.

    I know all those words, but that statement makes no sense.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  24. Dell Support needs OVERHAUL if they sell non-PCs by JoshDM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Every time I call Dell service, I get some guy who requests a number from my PC.

    I OWN TWO DELL MONITORS

    Actually, I did buy a PC on my account, but I bought it for my parents and it is 7 states away.

    So when I call in for technical support for my monitors, one of which had a short circuit last weekend, it takes at least an hour to even begin actioning the call. I have to explain that this is in no way related to the computer that I don't actually OWN, and it relates to DELL monitors that are not associated with a DELL computer in any way, shape or form.

    It was like pulling teeth. They did replace the monitor though; with one that has a large line of dead pixels straight down the middle. So they're replacing that one too. :( And once you open up an action, they won't stop calling you with updates. And the guys on the other end are telling you to "wait 5 minutes" and then you say "Ok" and they tell you to "wait 5 minutes" and you agree and they tell you to "wait 5 minutes" and then you say "I will wait 5 minutes" and then they finally put you on hold.

    Pain in the ass.

  25. Dell already has the solution by vux984 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Around here, they have Dell kiosks in the mall to showcase their products. Sort of like the sony stores. You can go an touch and see a Dell, and then order it up and it gets delivered to your door.

    Its good marketing. Even if the kiosks never actually sell a unit, just having them out there will give the 'i wanna touch it' crowd that security so they can go home and order online with confidence -- and hey I'm not mocking them, I am in that crowd. You really have to feel a laptop to determine its weight, get a sense of its build quality, feel the keyboard and trackpad, evaluate screen viewing angle, brightness etc.

    Plus it strengthens the brand recognition, and can put a human face on the transaction.

    All these things benefit Dell.

    1. Re:Dell already has the solution by MojoStan · · Score: 1

      Around here, they have Dell kiosks in the mall to showcase their products. Sort of like the sony stores. You can go an touch and see a Dell, and then order it up and it gets delivered to your door. Information on the kiosks are a little difficult to find on Dell's web site, but Dell calls them Dell Direct Stores. I think they sound great (I don't mind waiting for delivery), but my problem with the kiosks is that there's not enough of them. It's much, much easier to "touch and see" an HP (they're everywhere). Where I live, it's easier to drive to an Apple Store than find a Dell Direct Store (I guess this varies with location).

      Having never gotten around to visiting a Dell kiosk, do they have their business/pro models available for "touching and seeing"? I really have no interest in their Dimension and Inspiron lines, but those models are the only ones pictured on Dell's Direct Store web page.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    2. Re:Dell already has the solution by kallisti777 · · Score: 1

      Full disclosure: I run a Dell Direct Store. Insert disclaimers here.

      The kiosks are part of the consumer division, so we currently only demo and sell Dimensions, Inspirons, and XPS systems. We also have a decent cross section of printers and TVs on display. The business side is completely distinct at present but, as indicated by the article, all options are on the table. What the future holds is WELL above my pay grade.

      --
      Vanya's Law: "In any culture without irony, fart jokes will be the highest form of humor."
    3. Re:Dell already has the solution by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The often-stated problem is not being able to just walk out with a unit. In general, I just don't think the type of people that are willing to go to the mall are the type that want to order and get it a few days later.

    4. Re:Dell already has the solution by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I just don't think the type of people that are willing to go to the mall are the type that want to order and get it a few days later.

      I'm willing to go to the mall. Its closer than most of the whitebox dealers I usually buy from. And I usually have to place orders if I want anything specific.

      Sure it might not appeal to the guys that only buy computers when a dippy salesrep tells them is a deal, with its CD holder, cup holder, and ashtray built into the case, bundled with over priced cables, and covered in stickers -- but so what? Those fools weren't going to buy a unit online either, so its not like Dell is losing a customer if they pass on the kiosk.

  26. Google is your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.google.com/search?q=CostCo

    It answers your question. It tells you which letter is/isn't uppercase. Google is your friend.

  27. Re:Enclosures matter to some... by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Personally, I could hardly care less what it looks like.

    What matters is: is it easy to use? Can I use the mouse with my thumbs? Is the screen readable in sunlight? Is the 'enter' key big enough that I can't miss it? Does it have a caps lock light so that I don't shout inadvertently? Does it have a fast processor? And lots of RAM? Oh, and does it have Linux?
    Give me all of that for a reasonable price and it can look like a dog turd for all I care.

  28. Costco? Shopping malls? by torklugnutz · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, I applied to work for a shopping mall kiosk where people could get hands-on with Dells and purchase them as well.

    Costco has been selling Dells for years.

    I buy 20 or so Dells each year and I've always done it through their website. I'd never go to the store and buy a pre-configured computer unless it was really well configured and/or really cheap.

    --
    Often in Error, Never in Doubt.
    1. Re:Costco? Shopping malls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I buy 20 or so Dells each year"

      You know... you could trim that number down if you just realize you shouldn't go scuba-diving with a computer. Oh... and getting MRIs with one is probably not a good idea either.

  29. not a good option by zx-15 · · Score: 1

    Selling through retail chain would probably backfire for dell at some point, since the customers, able to examine and touch dell laptops before buying would see for themselves how crappy Dells laptop keyboards are.

  30. How do you know? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    If a major company like this pushes Linux on the desktop, can you guarantee that they will get no sales? Back in the old days, when Compaq, IBM, HP, Dec, and SGI were not supporting Linux on their systems, everybody claimed that it would never sell. Once these companies started selling it on servers, they saw major jumps. Point is nobody really knows what will happen.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:How do you know? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      While servers and workstations with Linux were offered successfully, the difference is that consumer computers with Linux has been tried a few times and failed every time. If a megacorp such as Walmart finds they couldn't push Linux on the desktop, then why do you still hold such hope? I know HP has offered a notebook with a Linux option, that option was eventually removed. I know there are others.

    2. Re:How do you know? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      And as I pointed out, the servers were assumed that they would never sell, but once the push was started, them jumped up to top sellers. But it was not the no-names (think wally world) that was able to make them sell. It was HP, IBM, etc that gave it validity. Then everybody started jumping on board. Now, companies like Walmart say that they will offer it, but is it on their shelves? Nope. Never has been. It is sold ONLY through the net. The interesting thing is that Microcenter sells them. The sales ppl tell me that they sell fast (well in Denver). Several have told me that they believe that the Linux will be replaced with windows. Several others have told me that most of the buyers tell them that the buyers LIKE the windows on it. Who is right? Well, until a major company starts selling it for real, we will not know. BTW, the HP laptop was never a serious option. It was not advertised at all. In addition, it did not have good support via HP. So, not really a good test.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  31. People will be happy to hear this by mangus_angus · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I worked at Best Buy I can't tell you how many people I had come up to me and ask me where we kept out Dells. After I told them that we didn't sell Dell computers, they would walk out.

    1. Re:People will be happy to hear this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You suck, Angus Angus Ass! You're an ass for working @ BB, ASS! You ASS! I'm drunk you ASSS!!!!!!!11!

      Ok, after all that, you're still an ASS for working at BB. Full disclosure, I'll be applying there soon. Ass.

      Ass.

      Love,

      Ass (what'd you expect???)

      Bite my shiny metal

      Antiqueing?

    2. Re:People will be happy to hear this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ass! YOu do suck bitch! Eat an Ass, dick! You suck! Kill yourself.

      Suck it! Love it!

      Malachi Crunch "Burn"

    3. Re:People will be happy to hear this by mangus_angus · · Score: 1

      Guess it's a good thing I quit after I found out how things really were.

  32. It doesn't much matter... by Marnhinn · · Score: 1

    Most people that buy a Dell (your average consumer), are not aware that the hardware lags three to four months behind. They simply want a machine that can run latest game x or be used for college course y or whatnot.

    They aren't going to know the difference unless it is something major. Dell knows this. They also know that consumers who want the latest items and prices are usually smart enough to look online. By working with retailers they will reach a larger consumer market.

    --
    There is always a frontier where there is an open and willing mind
  33. Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As another poster commented, Dell is just as crappy as the others; and vice versa. In that regard they have changed. Dell was, for a while, a lot better. The idea was that you could buy a Dell online or by phone or mail and you would have no problems. If people think they will have problems they want someone local to scream at. The only way Dell could sell the way they did was by making a product so good people would trust their quality completely.

    Not only has Dell's quality slipped, their service has become really miserable. I was thinking about buying a notebook from them so I did some Googling. There were lots of horror stories. It would take months before people could get permission to return machines with obvious hardware problems. Naturally, I gave up on the idea of buying a Dell. I bought a used Thinkpad instead.

  34. another reason for the shift by DFENS619 · · Score: 1
    I use to sell computers via phone for hp home and home office and we ALWAYS beat dell on price for notebooks. But dell usually beat us on price for desktops. The reason being that in order to make notebooks cheaper, you need to make many of them in order to get the discounts required for the components of the notebook.(this doesn't play as nearly large a role in desktops)

    As for the reason for the rise in notebook sales... Notebooks have always been a better soloution then desktops to typical consumers. They can do anything a regular pc can, plus they are portable. The difference is that over the past few years the price of notebooks has droped so much that they are usually only a $0-$300 more than a desktop with the same features.

  35. ezpz by Shanoyu · · Score: 1

    Step 1: prove to me your computer is not a lemon
    Step 2: give me financing
    Step 3: profit

  36. Why I don't buy Dell... by petrus4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...and probably never will.

    I am on a disability support pension, and get around $500 AUD for hardware upgrades, once every 12 months. There is a local (relatively small) computer repair place near where I live, which I go to every year. Because I went there last year, and am almost certain to go there next year, the guy there realises that although it isn't much, my money is a relatively sure thing for him. Not only that, I've managed to get him some additional business from other family members at times as well.

    Due to the above however, I am able to get a new case, motherboard, processor, and ram from him for that $500 (maybe $580) each year. This also means that I can buy a box one year, and a monitor the next, at the rate that I can afford it.

    If I went to one of the chain stores here and asked for a Dell, I wouldn't be quoted a price of much less than $2,000, and the only way I could hope to pay for that would be on credit, which being on a pension I probably wouldn't be able to get. Due to the precarious nature of my financial situation I also wouldn't want it, even if they were willing to give it to me.

    Dell (and the other big OEMs) are a bad thing, in my mind. In addition to the inflexibility on price, I've known a couple of other people who've bought complete systems and been given faulty hardware; I myself got burned on that score the one time I was able to do it. Not only that, Microsoft's monopoly only really exists because of people like Michael Dell; his profit margin per unit is so small that they are able to bully him in terms of the price of Windows, and dictate that people pay such things as the "Microsoft tax," as well as making it as difficult as it is for other operating systems (such as Linux) to enter the market.

    I realise that for some people, technical knowledge and other reasons prevent them from going to the little guy and buying parts; but if you can do it, I advocate it. Not only will it be cheaper in most instances, in my experience you have less chance of getting faulty hardware, and you also don't end up supporting one of the big corporate behemoths that I know people on Slashdot hate so much. ;) It's a win all around.

    1. Re:Why I don't buy Dell... by eebra82 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am sorry to hear about your disability and what it means to your economy, but without sounding too harsh, you are not the reference customer Dell is going for.

      Dell isn't the cheapest alternative you can get, but there is more to it than just price. For example, a lot of people care more about the on-site support and such. And I really can't say they are that expensive either. Surely, a pre-configured computer is almost always cheaper, it is rarely everything you want.

      You say that Dell and other big OEM:s are a bad thing. I have to disagree there. Without them, we would have fewer industry standards and we would probably end up having regional settings to everything. At least these giants push to unify hardware. Also, they do bring a lot of competition to the table, which is always a good thing for the customer. A zillion small retail chains around the world would also eventually turn into a few after some time, simply because one would eventually do better than the other, buy the latter one and continue with its expansion. That's how it works.

      My company has been buying computers from Dell for years. I don't know how your friends would end up with faulty hardware like that, but it is a rarity here. Of course computers fuck up every now and then, but Apple's batteries explode, the Volvo cars get tire dents and your shoe laces will be torn eventually.

    2. Re:Why I don't buy Dell... by Oldav · · Score: 0

      "If I went to one of the chain stores here and asked for a Dell, I wouldn't be quoted a price of much less than $2,000,"

      I am on DSP in Aus too, working a bit too,part time as a network Admin, I just bought 19 new Dell Desktop systems for $aus 1090inc GST, 990 ex!

      Core2 Duo, 1 gig Ram, 120g drive, 17" LCD. Where on earth did you get $2000 from. If your local supplier is doing boxes for $580 you are getting cheap and nasty, current wholesale cost for Core 2 Duo is around $800 for the same spec as above. MB, chip and RAM alone is more than $600 for quality parts wholesale!

    3. Re:Why I don't buy Dell... by businessnerd · · Score: 1

      You're post left me a little confused for a variety of reasons. I'll start with your economic situation. First off, buying a middle performing Dell, is cheaper than building it yourself, especially if you want to install Windows on it (not that I would recommend it). If you walked into a retail chain and asked for a quote on a Dell, they would say, "Sorry, we don't sell Dells." As stated in the article, you can only buy a Dell over the phone, internet, or through a mall kiosk. Now if you go onto the Dell website, you can configure a middle performing desktop with a flat panel monitor for about $500. So instead of just buying a motherboard, CPU and RAM, you can buy a whole new computer including that monitor you were going to wait a year to buy.

      In regards to why you hate Dell because it is a large OEM, you should really be kissing their asses. The reason you can even afford a computer at $500 is because of Dell and only Dell. When Dell hit the market, they began selling computers well below what HP, IBM, Compaq, etc. were offering. In fact, it was below what they could even afford to offer because Dell changed the way computers were sold. By selling only direct, they cut out the overhead costs of having their own stores and the re-sale markups associated with chains. They didn't stop there though. Dell used their new found clout to make the parts manufacturers bend over backwards for Dell. Dell insists on their suppliers to have plants and or warehouses no more than several miles from Dell's assembly facility. There's more, and the story is a standard case study for anyone in business school. But what this did to the PC industry as a whole, is change the computer from a high margin luxury item, to a very low margin commodity. Dell's margins, and now every PC maker's margins, are razor thin. This is why you can afford a computer. Remember when your average PC costs upwards of $3k?

      In regards to the article, I don't think distribution is where Dell is failing. Demand has been slumping in the past couple years as their reputation has also slumped. Their designs don't scream "BUY ME!" and their bargain models are crap. They need to up the quality in their lower-end machines. The price differences should be based on performance and features, not quality.

      If laptops are not fitting into their just-in-time inventory and distribution scheme, then they need to redesign the laptop. They need to design their laptops in a way that their assembly workers can easily put one together based on a customer's exact specifications in the same way they do with a desktop. While their at it, they need to redesign the look and pay attention to quality.

      --
      "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
  37. Maybe it's time by kahrytan · · Score: 1


    Maybe it's time for standardized components for laptops like cases and motherboards. The market is now here to allow people to build their own.

    Desktop market is not dead. They are still wanted for hardcore gamer rigs, HTPC, and budget computers.

    --
    \
  38. Oh, it can and is done... by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

    I worked at CompUSA for 2 years, and while that is true for some products, other times it is not. With desktops and notebooks, we usually had models in the store before the manufacturer even had them listed on their website. (this was true more for gateway/emachines and sony than HP/compaq though). And some other products were hit and miss. The Nokia 770 for example was around for a good 6 months before I even saw the major geek sites covering it. But then we wouldn't get in a line of Canon cameras until 4 months after they were available online. Logitech was very odd...somtimes we got products months before the release date (the G15 keyboard was nearly 2 months early), or several months after (the G7 mouse was about 3 months late).

    Much of our product came directly from the manufacturer (via our FedEx account), and didn't go through a CompUSA warehouse...most of our generic product, memory, and software came through the warehouse. So we could have products within a couple days after a manufacturer had them available. And then we just keep relatively low on hand quantities, and clearance price older models.

    So it would be no issue for any major electronics retailer to have new product on the shelf...as long as things are coordinated properly on both ends, and with desktops and laptops, that is usually not a problem.

    --
    As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
  39. Airport Kiosks by mcferguson · · Score: 1

    Dell has actually had "brick and mortar" kiosks inside airports for a couple years now. Their salesmen are always dressed in blue Dell polo shirts and khaki pants. The kiosks seem to get a lot of foot traffic, but I have no idea what kind of sales they bring in. I imagine if Dell opens up inside another retail store, they'll probably opt for the same type of setup.

  40. Well, sure ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In addition, consumers were showing a preference for touching and feeling a notebook PC before buying it.

    No kidding ... if you buy a desktop system and decide you don't like the keyboard or mouse you just replace them with something better. Don't like the keyboard or pointing device on your laptop? Just replace the whole laptop with something better.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Well, sure ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went shopping with my wife for a notebook that she would use for her job as a freelance editor. I was checking out the specs, but really the main thing she cared about was that the keyboard was comfortable for typing... since she was going to do a lot of typing. She rejected the mail-order option.

  41. Can I punch.... by reidconti · · Score: 1

    ... the first person who accuses Dell of copying Apple's sales model of they go retail?

    I'm a big Apple fan, but I still expect some retard to make some comment like that.

    I wouldn't place Apple and IBM (Lenovo) in the same camps in terms of design -- plenty of people find the Thinkpads to be pretty ugly, and it is true that their design has not changed much in a long time, where Apple's are considered to be very attractive.

    Where they both shine is in build quality. You can pick up any Apple notebook or Thinkpad (save perhaps the huge 17" ones) by the corner, and carry it like that. Try that with a Dell, the thing bends like a wet noodle (except it creaks more).

    Personally, I find the Thinkpad to be attractive *and* well-built. Not quite as solid as my old 12" iBook, but the Thinkpad X60 I have is a 15", so that's the main reason. IBM could stand to fix some of the obnoxious little issues (waking from standby, screen occasionally deciding to switch to external-only for no reason, poor performance when undocking, the annoying IBM popups telling me how to undock, or eject a device, or whatever), but the hardware is a real winner. Some of the hardware/software behavior may be Microsoft faults, or faults of the general PC architecture in general, so I won't go too hard on them.

    1. Re:Can I punch.... by xSauronx · · Score: 1
      ive got an inspiron 1000 that has taken a surprising beating, and is quite sturdy. *grabs it by the corner* yeah. no problem.

      of course, its ugly as hell. and oldish, but it works fine and its been dropped 2 or 3 times without a problem. *shrugs* maybe i got lucky? i probably did, but, whatever, it works ;)

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    2. Re:Can I punch.... by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      You sure that's an X60? All the X60's Ive seen on their website are 12 inch screens. Mabye you're thinking of a T60?

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  42. Re:Dell Support needs OVERHAUL if they sell non-PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    > requests a number from my PC.

    Ahhh the service tag trick. Dell has been pulling that ridiculous stunt for years. We've had quite a few employees give-up when trying to get Dell to replace garbage hardware when they demand the service tag for hardware that doesn't have a service tag. The Indians always play that game so that they don't actually have to do anything. I think they're judged on the amount of money they cost Dell so they try very hard to not do their job. Dell has not accountability so their employees get away with this type of thing.

    Most recently I bought ten 20" widescreen monitors from Dell. $219 each was too much for me to resist. Of course less than half worked out of the box. The Dell moron played the "but I need the service tag to do an RMA game." I finally wore them down after about two dozen phone calls, and then I got tripped-up when they asked for the model number of the monitors. It is not on the monitor! There is no model number. The model # listed on the invoice and the box is E207WFP, but they don't use that number internally. So now you have to play the service tag game along with the model number game. I'm still fighting them over getting the six monitors replaced. As always, any money you save by buying the Dell garbage is more than wasted when they screw you over.

  43. So, what's the draw? by camperdave · · Score: 1

    When I am buying a machine I am not buying stock in the company, so stock price means diddly-squat, as does the profit margin. What matters is price for similar machine, bang for the buck. A 2GHz CoreDuo MacBook with 1G RAM and 80G hard drive costs $1299.00 while the 2GHz CoreDuo Dell Inspiron with 1G RAM and 80G hard drive costs $899, which is two thirds of the price. Now the Dell has a 15.4" screen, whereas the MacBook has a 13" screen. So, I wind up spending more money on a smaller machine. If I went for a 15" MacBook, I'd be spending $2000, or over twice what the Dell costs. So, what am I paying the extra $$$ for? What's the draw? $2000 could buy me a powerful Dell laptop with a port replicator, flat screen monitor, digital camera, and a good flash drive. So why should I buy Mac?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:So, what's the draw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ability to have a machine that is actually portable.

    2. Re:So, what's the draw? by squarefish · · Score: 1

      So why should I buy Mac?

      1) better support
      2) better design and a functional os
      3) a machine which will last you 2-3 times longer
      4) ??????
      5) profit!

      I bought my first mac in 02 and now I buy one every year- I alternate getting a new laptop/desktop each year and sell the old one at a much higher rate than I could ever get rid of a pc, which heavily subsidizes my upgrades. I'm also a perpetual student and take advantage of the once a year education discount on a new mac. I just can't see myself ever buying a system that isn't made by Apple. Once you have one, you'll be hooked for any number of reasons. The fact that they now have Intel processors makes it all the more reason due to the simplicity in using a wider variety of operating systems.

      It now makes more sense than ever to buy a Mac and the price difference really isn't that much when you look a the quality, support, and resell value. A used Dell is basically a doorstop at any price.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    3. Re:So, what's the draw? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      3) a machine which will last you 2-3 times longer...

      ...and now I buy one every year. That doesn't exactly inspire confidence.

      Better support is only needed if the machine breaks down. I don't know what the likelihood of breakdown is, but I've theoretically saved the cost of an entire machine by choosing Dell over Mac. So in the event that something breaks, I can replace the machine entirely and still be ahead. As far as a better designed and functional OS: The fact that they now have Intel processors makes it all the more reason due to the simplicity in using a wider variety of operating systems. If I'm going to be replacing the OS, then I'd still be better off with the less expensive machine, wouldn't I?

      It seems to me that by going to a Mac, I'd be entering a whole new Cathedral and Bazaar situation. You've told me nothing that justifies the extra expense.
      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:So, what's the draw? by squarefish · · Score: 1

      I buy a new one each year and rotate the systems on a two year basis mainly due to the fact that I'm a geek, like to have the latest and greatest, get a decent discount, and the discount helps reinforce and justify the purchases in conjunction with the high resale values macs have.
      It's entirely your decision, I'm not telling you what to do, but people that switch, even hardcore programmers and geeks, find themselves better off and the cost difference worth it.
      The trick about support is if you need it, it's there and apple is very highly regarding in that respect, Dell is not.
      The best part about apple support is that they answer their phone pretty quickly, speak clear English and will assist with even dumbest questions instantly- I would say a lot of issues where you spend time screwing around with trying to search for an answer, they can provide it much more quickly and easily.
      I'd also much rather pay twice as much once than to assume I'll have to spend that amount twice and migrate and re-setup a system- I want to just work and Apple's offer that in spades. I personally always recommend my clients buy the extended service plan for any closed system from any vendor- the costs of those plans has gone down significantly over the years and cost of parts and service have sky-rocketed.
      I can usually fix it myself, but I simply don't have time and prefer to just have it taken care of, even if there is a small expense involved.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    5. Re:So, what's the draw? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I'm a geek, like to have the latest and greatest

      Granted. Who wouldn't? And, I understand how coupling your student discount and selling off your older systems can get you the latest and greatest for next to nothing. Great! Awesome! Good on ya , Mate!

      Apple may indeed have better support. I haven't heard anything about that, one way or the other. The problem is the need for support should be rare, and issues good and bad tend to be anecdotal. Furthermore, support costs are above and beyond the cost of the machine, although, I suppose one could argue warranty specs.

      I was looking for more tangible justifications, like the batteries last twice as long, or the machine only weighs half a pound, or the screen resolution is higher even though the display is smaller, or stuff like that. A quick (non-thorough) look at the hardware specs makes the Macs seem hideously overpriced.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:So, what's the draw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A quick (non-thorough) look at the hardware specs makes the Macs seem hideously overpriced."

      Depends what you're planning on buying. If you're comparing an entry-level Inspiron against
      a MacBook Pro (for example), then sure: there's a big price difference.

      However, I personally specced myself a work laptop last year, using a 15" MacBook Pro as
      a baseline. I then went to the Dell website & specced up one of their business-class Latitude
      machines to match the Mac's hardware as closely as possible, and the price was within $50
      of the Mac. That's not factoring in the added value of what I feel is a superior OS
      (the primary reason I now buy Macs for myself when I get the chance) and included software
      bundle.

      However, if minimizing the cost required to obtain a machine that's capable of fulfilling
      your required tasks is the primary consideration for a purchase (rather than, say, some other
      aspect such as some personal build quality requirement), then yes: you could certainly get a
      low-end consumer Dell/HP box for less money than an entry-level Mac. Apple simply doesn't
      make anything directly comparable to the low-end consumer machines that Dell or HP do. And
      that's OK - if the consumer HP (or Dell) machines that you can get for less money still do
      everything you'd them want to, then great: they're clearly the machines for you.

      The bottom line is that Apple has chosen not to compete in that segment of the market,
      in the same way that (usual dodgy car analogy ahead) Porsche and the like have chosen not
      to compete in all the same markets as Ford. And that's OK too: some people want a sports
      car, whereas others want a pickup truck.

      Personally, I really like modern Apple machines for a bunch of reasons: I'm a longtime
      Unix/Linux user, & I find OS X to be the nicest Unix(-ish) OS I've used so far (and I've
      used quite a lot of them over the years). I love the reliability & comparative security
      of the OS. I like the ability to run MS Office & other such big-name industry standard
      apps natively. I find that the industrial design & construction of Apple's machines
      is generally excellent. And while I love tinkering about with various Linux distros, obscure
      OSes & so on, and I like the idea & ideals of Free software I prefer to keep that as a
      hobby these days, & by & large, my Macs "Just Work". However, I totally acknowledge that
      my Unix+MS-Office/aesthete/etc. criteria for machine choice are probably not shared by the
      majority of the computing world, so if your HP boxes work for you, then great: you made
      the right choice.

      (Obligatory note to mitigate any apparent Mac fanboyism: I'm sufficiently platform-agnostic
      these days that this was typed on my work desktop machine, which happens to be a generic Dell
      box running Whitebox Linux, which is also a very nice OS environment in its own right).

    7. Re:So, what's the draw? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      OK, so it is just the entry level machines that are disparate. I just specced out a 17" MacBook Pro vs a 17" Dell XPS, and the prices were only $116 apart...

      Now if I only had the money...

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:So, what's the draw? by squarefish · · Score: 1

      The xps 12" is 1199 and the similarly spec'd macbook is 1224. both have the same memory, hdd, and proc.
      The thing about apple is that they don't really sell low-end systems at all. Apple prices used to have much higher price tag, but that difference has really started to disappear over the last couple years. Ant in two years time, you'll be able to sell that macbook at twice what the xps would get. I'm not really sure why, but the used mac market is a totally different animal. I use that difference in my favor every year.
      Applecare on the system is 249, Dell's closest plan is 377 and only has 30 days phone support. Apple provides full phone support for all 3 years under applecare.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    9. Re:So, what's the draw? by squarefish · · Score: 1

      Oh, one more thing, also check the buying guide before buying anything apple. Many a first time mac user has been upset when they didn't realize how soon the next model was coming out and they just miss a big update.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  44. Re:Dell direct sales - non-direct tried early 90's by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    Sold direct from founding in 1984, then in 1990 tried sales through warehouse clubs and "computer superstores", but by 1996 was on the web and and back to direct mostly

  45. Hey Dell! Here's one for ya! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about an upgradeable open laptop? Customer buys it, two years later or whatever, they can turn it in and it gets new "stuff", an internal refurb, plus fix anything that needs fixing, plus new battery. Like a new mobo with a better chip, new ram, upgraded hard drive, better vid card, whatever new tech is there at the time that the customer wants, use the same checkbox for features deal you already have. WITH choice of OS or "bare", whatever the customer wants, dual or triple boot for that matter. They get "their" laptop back, but it is primarily "new" now, they save serious money but are still getting a "new" laptop, you still have made a sale, everyone is happy.

    Hey, it's a new business idea, think about it. It's "greener", too, this way, nice advertising push in today's "changing climate", pun intended.

    I know laptops are the hot market, but they SUCK because they aren't upgradeable easily! So here's a way to get them on the market cheaper, plus get more customer loyalty (sell more in other words), plus be environmentally aware,so what's not to like? You make your loot on high volume, low margin, so that still fits.

    1. Re:Hey Dell! Here's one for ya! by couchslug · · Score: 1

      I'd like a standard, upgradeable form-factor, but I don't buy new machines.
      Laptops and toasters are disposable. The labor rate plus parts to work on them makes buying a new one a good choice for most people.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Hey Dell! Here's one for ya! by pavera · · Score: 1

      I doubt this would be much cheaper, if any cheaper. upgrading PCs got prohibitively expensive when intel and amd started building a new socket for every chip rev. Also, the whole AGP 1x, 2x, 4x, 8x upgrade cycle killed alot of PCs. As soon as you are upgrading the motherboard, you are upgrading RAM, processor, maybe hard drive, and video card. what is saved? the case? that maybe costs $50, and after 2-3 years I want a new case cause the old one is dented, dirty, and nasty looking. The other thing I want upgraded in a laptop upgrade is the monitor (1024x768 -> 1280x1024-> 1600x1200). Besides the labor to take out all the old parts, put in new ones... and maintain compatibility in form factor for years across multiple parts... I'd say its a non starter.

  46. hint (latitude = inspiron) by svallarian · · Score: 1

    same parts, just different plastics on *most* models.

    I know this because I've got a dell tattoo CD that will flash the bios of a mobo to either say "Inspiron" or "Latitude" depending on what you pick when you boot off the CD.

    It absolutely killed me to spend the extra money for "Business-ready" Latitudes that I KNEW had the exact same parts as the inspiron models in them.

    --
    I patented screwing your mom. But it got revoked for "prior art."
    1. Re:hint (latitude = inspiron) by steve-san · · Score: 1

      Uh, I guess you could say latitude=inspiron, in that they're both x86 machines. But if you value:

      - Easily removable components, such as optical drives that pop out with the flick of a switch instead of a screwdriver
      or
      - "Different plastics", such as (sometimes) greatly improved form factor (both in thickness and weight)
      or
      - Managed hardware, which can be critical if you're deploying the same device over multiple roll-outs, and you want the guts to be *exactly* the same between buys

      ... then you'd better go Latitude.

      --
      What you want is irrelevant; what you've chosen is at hand! - Spock, ST VI
  47. Why didn't Dell forsee this? by eebra82 · · Score: 1

    Dell is a great choice, but it has its flaws. In fact, I am surprised they didn't foresee this need long ago. The indications of an increase in laptop sales has been somewhat apparent to most of us.

    The reasons people prefer to see the laptop in real life before purchasing it are very simple:

    - You cannot hide it in a locker if it's ugly.
    - The keyboard and screen must feel good - it's irreplaceable.
    - The hardware must meet your demands - most of it is irreplaceable.
    - You want to know how the laptop construction feels.
    - It is hard to visualize if its weight is appropriate.
    - Pictures are easily edited and cannot be trusted. You want to see it irl.
    - No manufacturers provide info on heat problems - it must be experienced.
    - Unless you get a ruler, it is difficult to picture the size of it.
    - And other reasons I didn't come up with.

    Lets face it. None of the above really matter with a stationary computer. People suddenly have to become very picky, because buying a laptop mostly means that there is no room for regrets (aside from RAM and HDD). As with stationary computers, they can be hidden, modified, add monitors, mice and keyboards and become very customizable.

    Also - and I have no facts to back this up - I think that a lot of young people are switching from stationary computers to laptops, simply to combine school and home entertainment in one package. This generation of iPod freaks (I'm part of it) is likely more picky about the design and feel.

    What Dell should do, unless they plan to open up stores or add it to outlets, is to select a few major cities, build a shop in every city and stack each and every consumer model in that store, and then let consumers order each specific computer directly via the previewed computers. Think of it: you see a computer you like, but you want to configure that particular computer. You then check the preloaded site on that computer, edit the specifics, enter credit card info and wait a week to have it delivered to your home or to the store.

    1. Re:Why didn't Dell forsee this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just described the Gateway Store. In case you haven't heard it didn't quite work out for them.

  48. They don't necessarily have to make the big jump by managerialslime · · Score: 1

    The article refers to the fact that many consumers who might buy a desk-top through the mail want to touch and examine a laptop before purchasing.

    Think about how many laptops have too-small keys, mushy keyboards, and unusable pointing devices. At the same time, think about how much more limiting many LCD screens are with regard to brightness and angle-of-view-ability (yes, I know that's not really a word). I know that I don't want to buy a laptop I haven't first touched.

    I went to an Apple store in a mall in Maryland not long ago an was amazed by the job it did at getting consumers comfortable with the product line. (While you could buy iPods and iPod accessories there, I think most of the PCs, laptops, and monitors had to be ordered.

    If consumers could count on all the current Dell products being "touchable" at their local mall (at a kiosk) or even on a wall at their local Starbucks, I think they could continue to sell via web.

    But from the tone of the article, it sounds like they are open to a slice of Comp-USA or Best Buy a la Apple and eMachines.

    --
    Live Long and Prosper - Thanks Leonard. You are missed.
  49. Walmart does up-to-date hardware by dj245 · · Score: 1

    for all the crap walmart takes, their laptops are actually a decent deal. I got an Acer 5610Z for $650 a month ago when my 4 year old dell inspiron 8500 died. What does $650 buy you? It came with 1gb of ram, Core 2 duo at 1.6ghz, DVDR/RW and a beautiful 1280x800 15" screen. It also has all the major cardreaders built in, and the best wifi antenna I have ever seen in a laptop (I think the antenna goes up the screen). At that price, you get intel integrated graphics, but since the screen resolution isn't too high, I can run all the GTA games at native resolution without turning much down. Oh, it did come with Vista, but since the Acer 5610 has all the drivers for XP, downgrading to XP Super Student Arrr! Edition was a snap.

    If I were to buy such a computer at Best buy or any other store, it would probably come with 512mb of ram and a core solo at that price point.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Walmart does up-to-date hardware by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      I almost bought an Acer laptop from CostCo - until I actually saw it in person and tried the keyboard. The screen was horrible and you couldn't read it unless you were directly in front of it. It was barely bright enough in the store, forget going outside. The keyboard felt cheesy. The keys had poor feel and the entire keyboard flexed every time you tried typing. I bought a nice Sony Vaio FX series that Staples had on clearance that had more memory, faster processor, way better screen, a solid feel, and only cost $50 more. I've had nothing but problems with Acer desktops crapping the bed after 6 months at work.

    2. Re:Walmart does up-to-date hardware by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      their laptops are actually a decent deal. I got an Acer 5610Z
      A contradiction I see. I bought an Aspire 3003 in October 2 years ago. A little over a year later, the screen died. A few months after that, the DVD drive tore up any disc I put in it. Then, the RAM went bad, causing general instability.
      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  50. Sales not the only issue by careysb · · Score: 1

    I had a Dell Inspiron 8200 note book that was fully loaded (2.4GHz, 1600x1200, 2G-RAM). It was heavy to haul around but it worked well - that is until recently. First the video card on it went out, no problem it was still under extended warantee. So I sent it back, when I got it back, video was fixed but now would only boot with battery removed from the system. Back it went again. Now it doesn't boot at all and warantee period is over. Thanks for the great service Dell. Bought me new computer at Gateway because I refused to give Dell any more money. Don't know if Gateway is any better - we'll see.

    1. Re:Sales not the only issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it won't be- I had an $1700 eMachine(same as Gateway the Cow Company (god how much i missed the nineties)) laptop.

      5 RMA in 2 years! And it's only 5 because my warranty ran out, otherwise it will be 6+. 5 RMA later, my laptop monitor still drop dead after 10 minutes. At the end I have to go on ebay and buy the damn 2nd hand lcd panel.

      It wasn't a hard problem to solve (inverter problem), but somehow those clowns think that if they drag on long enough, maybe I won't notice the problem untill warranty runs out.

      Needless to say, I sold that PoS the way I got its screen fixed.

      I don't know how incompetent anyone can be, but emachine/gateway showed me the limit.

  51. I've always been impressed by Dell support by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    Whenever anything breaks on one of my dell machines - which has been a little more frequent than I'd have liked, they'll have someone at either my home or office the following business day to do the repair.

    I've had a screen replaced for dead pixels months after i bought the machine. I had a battery replaced because it's life deterioated unacceptably. They replaced a piece of plastic round the keyboard that had cracked on a 2.5 year old machine. My company recently spec'd out a desktop and the website let us configure it with two monitors but only onboard graphics, they are shipping a complimentary dual-dvi graphics card to us.

    One of my friends with an HP laptop actually had to send it in to be fixed and was without a machine for almost 2 weeks.

    Their products may not be perfect but I am continually impressed by the way they support them.

  52. financing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do people really have enough problems that they can't pay upfront for a relatively low-end computer? I'm not saying $800 to $1000 is insignificant, but if you can't manage that then you probably have bigger problems to worry about. It might make sense on more expensive configurations, but otherwise it seems like you are either giving them more rope to hang themselves with or ripping them the fuck off (Blue Hippo).

  53. I actually like my dell laptop by tknd · · Score: 1

    I have a 600m I purchased more than 2 years ago and I don't think I'll be replacing it until I can find another laptop with equivalent features in the same package size and for a pretty darn cheap price. I actually paid less than $800 for it and I still haven't seen anything come close to the specs I have on it even from dell.

    Sure, the thing doesn't look at clean or sleek as other laptops but it's not a piece of jewelry, it's a tool.

    Also, one thing Dell has gotten right about how to build computers is making the computers easy to take apart. For example I bought a cheap slimline DVD burner and taking out the old drive was surprisingly easy and fast after you figured it out. You'd simply push the little button/lever thing, then it'd popout and then you pull on it and the entire drive comes out with no pain or tools! Had my new slimline drive came in the same packaging, I could swap the two in the drive bay in seconds without any extra tools. In fact, often times I thought about buying the modular bay secondary battery and using it instead of a DVD/CD drive. But I always thought it would be a pain to swap out. Well apparently not! Changing the main battery on the thing is also tool-less. The ram cover, mini-pci cover, and hard drive container(?) are all one screw away from being removed but that's ok. I don't think I'll be swapping those components on the fly. The only component I'm not sure about is the hard drive but given how easy everything else on the thing was easy to manage I have no doubt it'd be just as easy.

    So I don't care about looks as long as I'm getting something equally useful out of my computer. For others they can't be bothered with it, but I for one would like to see Dell start selling PC computer cases compatible with many PC parts standards like ATX sized motherboards. I'm tired of seeing all of these case manufacturers get it wrong over and over again while Dell manages to make a laptop way easier to upgrade than my own PC.

    1. Re:I actually like my dell laptop by Falladir · · Score: 1

      (boy do you sound like a shill :P)

      The bay that you're talking about is supposed to be swappable with no tools. I don't have firsthand experience with any other laptops, but I highly doubt that swapping out the optical drive on an IBM or HP laptop requires a screwdriver.

  54. Perhaps a hybrid model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps Dell would sell via a hybrid model where they can place the PCs and notebooks in retail store, customers can then order the PC/notebook right there online.

    That case customer get to 'touch' and see. Order on the spot and get delivered to their doorsteps.

  55. Why Dell fails against HP by caywen · · Score: 1

    HP's really got the right formula. HP really has taken a page from Apple's book. 1. HP's products are just sexier than Dell's. Dell has been on the same hardware design for years, but HP has been through 3 redesigns. Look at how sexy an HP laptop is compared to Dell's and you'd want one too. 2. HP lets you *see* how sexy their stuff is at all major retailers. CompUSA, Best Buy, Circuit City - HP's foo just dominates the space. Dell's stuff is getting crufty, and you don't even get to see how crufty it is until it arrives at your doorstep. 3. HP's PR/marketing staff is doing their job swaying reviewers to award their products higher ratings. They are winning the reviews and getting press. Dell has not done jack. Dell needs to do all of the above. Dell needs to sex up their hardware and shove it right under our noses. That's how you sell. The immense mindshare they would get would translate directly into increased consumer and business confidence, and their phones will start ringing off the hook again.

    1. Re:Why Dell fails against HP by Zo0ok · · Score: 1

      I have an HP nc6200 laptop and I cant agree with you. The display is very poor. The touchpad is to the left of the center so after a while I have pain in my hand. It does produce noise. It looks like some piece of military equipment compared to Apples design (my private laptop is a 5 years old PowerBook).

    2. Re:Why Dell fails against HP by kaiwai · · Score: 1

      I bought this HP because it was the best value for money at Harvey Norman; NZ$2599, its fast, reliable, and once Ubuntu was installed on it, I was as happy as larry.

      Oh, and quality, I can actually pick up the machine with one hand without the whole thing creaking as with the situation with the el-cheapo Dell machines.

      Oh, and price wise compared to Dell, HP came out on top. Better still, I could actually try out Linux on the machine before I bought it, I knew that all the hardware would work as expected.

  56. Dell ripped Apple's retail stores in 2001! by unassimilatible · · Score: 1
    Maybe Michael Dell's ego wouldn't let him admit he was wrong when asked about retail stores in 2001:

    Dell poo-poos retail stores.

    "We have stores; we call them online stores. Dell.com will generate close to US$20 billion in revenue for us this year. We think the best computer store in the world actually is at dell.com. Physical stores have been tried by a number of our competitors, and generally, actually I would say universally, that strategy hasn't panned out."

    Nice shot at Apple, but who's laughng now?

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  57. Made to order notebooks rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After my old notebook died recently I did a little of research and here is why I went with a made to order notebook made by Dell:
    - being able to get this great 1920x1200 display for a couple of extra bucks is extremely important for code monkeys like me
        especially when developing code for graphics or UI related things
    - Linux runs great on this thing (even in 64bit)
    - it is not too difficult to get a refund for an unneeded Vista+Works
    - the Wireless-N for a few extra bucks is terrific, even for 802.11b/g networks because due to MIMO technology
        even in non-N mode the throughput is much better and/or the range is almost doubled
    - the notebook is completely silent when writing text or code and the harddrive is spun down

    In my neck of the woods it is almost impossible to get something with a WUXGA screen or Wireless-N off the shelf, because they cost a little extra and it is difficult to explain an average buyer the benefits. Though these little extras make such a tremendous difference for productivity, that I really would not want to miss them. Direct-Sales notebook models from Dell would most probably also just have the basic features.

  58. Now we'll be able to meet in *person* by mtec · · Score: 1

    someone who calls himself 'Larry' but whose real name is Rajesh. The Dell(ple) Stores will be easy to find. They'll be right next to your friendly neighborhood Indian restaurant.

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  59. Alternate approach... by argent · · Score: 1

    "It can be hard to custom-configure notebook computers".

    Maybe that's the problem?

    Make the notebooks easier to work on with fewer unique modules across the product line.

    IBM was doing very well with that approach for a while, swapping out a hard drive in a Thinkpad T23 is a matter of unscrewing one big easy thumbscrew and pulling out a sled... the only tool you needed was a coin... and to change the RAM it didn't even take that much. Hell, I'd rather upgrade the RAM in a Thinkpad T-series than in a lot of the Dell *desktops* I've worked on.

    So extend that a little... come up with a standard form factor for compact internal add-on cards, and make them easy to get to, and it'll be just as easy to custom-configure notebooks as desktops.

  60. Modular notebooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The market has certainly shifted from the desktop PC to the laptop/notebook. As the intro points out, however, desktop boxes are modular, notebooks aren't. They should be.

    The PC revolution was driven by an open modular computing platform. There was competition in every aspect of a PC's design. If the move to notebooks takes that modularity away, I'm afraid we're heading back to the bad old days of proprietary hardware.

    Component manufacturers have the most to lose. They should all start cooperating ASAP on several standardized component architectures for laptops, notebooks, and subnotebooks. Replaceable keypads, for example. Why does every battery and and every removeable drive have to have a different form factor? Why can't I just slip in whatever video card I want? Why can't I pop a new display on and off? Why can't I choose from amongst any number of clamshell designs to stuff all these parts into? You want a cheap laptop - you build it. You want all the best - you build it. Etc.

    The current situation is like buying a digital camera that doesn't take standard AA batteries - you get reamed for the proprietary battery instead.

    Dell, Apple, etc. would rather remain proprietary; but there is a real opportunity here for a newcomer - if only the component manufacturers cooperate. If they do, they can sell more parts, and be less susceptible to the whimsy of Dell, Apple, etc. - so it's in their interest to do so. Seems to me that market forces make this scenario an eventuality - I just hope it gets here sooner than later.

  61. The latitude line isn't bad... by ClarkEvans · · Score: 1

    After 4 years of brutal usage, I finally retired one /w only minor problems (they replaced the keyboard). I replaced it with another latitude (this time, a D820) and it is quite nice.

  62. But he does have a point by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

    Which is that people's choices are mostly influenced by marketing and "everyone knows" type garbage, rather than any real facts.

    Specific to this issue, the truth is that for the overwhelmingly vast majority of general office workers, modern laptops are total overkill for what they need. Most people need word processing, spreadsheets, powerpoint (puke), Outlook or whatever email, and web browsing for their day to day work. Most people do not do much beyond that, to the point where a good percentage of the population doesn't realize there is anything else they can do with a computer.

    For these people, a one gigahertz machine, maybe one point five, should be sufficient, with say half a gig of RAM. Their computing needs simply aren't that demanding. But with glorious advertisements about PRODUCTIVITY and EFFICIENCY they rush out and buy these dual core, two gig systems with all kinds of bells and whistles, and what do they do with it? Same thing they were doing before: Running Office and IE.

    Really, the extra resources just means they can run more spyware and other useless or malicious garbage -- it isn't helping them any. A clean 1.5ghz system would be FINE for most people -- they just think it's slow because it's dragging all kinds of other crap along with it.

    I know there's always special cases where someone does some high end work where more power is better, but really, you have to admit that the majority of people aren't getting any more "productivity" out of faster machines. But their malware sure is.

    --
    mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
  63. ACK! Grammar Nazgul! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
    Also you used "your" in place of "you're."

    I hate it when I do that. Blame on caffeine insufficiency. Anyway you're also right about my wrong. A bit of the old "whoosh" effect - I forgot about Micheal Dell's quote. Need MORE coffee!

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  64. I got sick of mail-order by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    I got sick of mail order. I usually want something "now", and I don't want to wait, (or pay $50 for overnight shipping). Now that Dell is so big, they can't afford to ignore people like me.