It would be dicey. In affect you are violating the Gag order by writing a contract clause that gives you an indirect means of notifying the customer or preventing the monitoring. I am no lawyer but that too me sounds like a whole boat load of legal trouble to invite on themselves.
We are not talking simply a drastic increase in computing power here, There would need to be some truly astounding new understanding and application of hereto unknown physics to overcome the computation workload. We aren't talking about just an amazing increase in power but a complete reworking of physics out current understanding of physics.
You don't seem to have any concept of just how much processing power it would require to brute force. Even if we continued exponentially growing compute power for the next 50 years it still won't be a feasible attack vector.You are talking trillion's of years of computing time for something like the address space in 256bit AES and it would only be that quick if you could process trillions of keys a second.
It's not about need. It is about being comfortable. I don't want to be standing on top of my family, I don't want to have to leave the house to get quiet time or some space to myself. I have lived in an apartment of around 900 square feet and a townhouse that was slightly bigger, It drove me insane, I would stay out late or find any excuse to leave the house as their simply was nowhere you can have peace and quiet. a house isn't just somewhere I to sleep and eat, I want to live their, that means relax, enjoy myself without feeling like I am being confined or compromising. Why is it so hard for people to understand that just because you can live in something tiny that it is not appropriate for everyone.
Actually MS followed the standard, but the people at the standard were pissed that MS implementation meant most people would be protected if it was honoured so like all fucked up bodies they changed the standard to screw over users.
People don't like living in shoeboxes. I would love to live in a sustainable estate or city, but if it meant living in a 850 sq foot shoebox then you can keep it. I don't need a massive house, but 850 sq feet would feel more like a jail cell.
I debug code every day, can't say the last time I read machine code though. Just because it is utilizing binary doesn't mean it has to be read that way, hell even my network tools include a raft of utilities to ensure I don't have to remember and understand every bit I see on the wire. It doesn't make sense for a computer to computer protocol to be bloated and slow just so someone can read it directly if they need to.
shoddy system for shore. but there is no circumstance where telling a lie about the books being balanced is an acceptable response in this scenario no matter how painful the system or process is, It just makes the problem 10 times worse.
It is staying, but definitely going backwards in many countries, cinemas are putting on more 2D sessions and less 3D with the popularity waning somewhat. Their is probably enough core people that enjoy it for it to hang around though (I am not one of them)
Getting around region encoding isn't illegal. It does breach some companies ToS but that is hardly illegal. Geo Fencing via IP is a poor mans security fence, most of the providers only do it as a token gesture to the media companies, hence why it is still so easy to get around. I use Hulu and Netflix from Australia, even with the insane costs of bandwidth and data here plus the cost of the VPN service I still save roughly $50 a month by not being raped by our local content provider foxtel. It is sad really, I am happy to pay for my content, yet fucking media companies insist on making it as difficult and unpalatable as possible.
TechNet was not for developers. That is MSDN and hasn't been changed. TechNet was for product evals only, It has been abused by many as a cheap way to get software and keys for which they usually fool themselves into believing they paid for TechNet therefore they aren't breaching any licensing.
Texting/surfing is just as annoying if not more so, today's super bright screens are a glaring annoyance when people use them in the cinema, I actually find it more annoying than making a call as at least people are suitably embarrassed when that happens and usually get up and leave to talk.
In this instance it is critical to differentiate, certificates have not been broken/compromised at all, underlying implementations of the infrastructure and the people handling that infrastructure have been compromised or broken. Certificates in general are an excellent solution to many security issues, however it does require good PKI infrastructure and management otherwise they are pointless. For many of their uses you don't even need to trust or rely on any external authority, you can run your own which no fukker has access to except those you specifically grant access and trust, for instance we run a PKI infrastructure where I work, not exposed to the internet and the CA itself is segregated off and heavily secured. We rely on no external party.
funny but I actually have the opposite approach. Even since the brothel of bugs and bad drivers and frustration dealing with Nvidia support a few years ago I have never since been willing to buy another Nvidia card or even recommend one to a friend. All my machines I have built for the last 3-4 years have AMD GPU's in them and while their drivers certainly aren't trouble free I have had far less pain than I suffered under Nvidia.
Normally I doubt the influence world public opinion has on moronic pollies, But I suspect in this instance this is actually correct. The current government has tried to get other orwellian legislation passed including internet filters so them actually being against it themselves is unlikely. I think Snowden has highlighted how unpopular such ideas are and with a government that is almost certainly getting thrown out for incompetence come september they hardly need another nail in their coffin.
and? not sure what your point is. So it is equal to current AMD CPU's. why not just skip the locked down hardware specs and build your own with an 8 core AMD desktop CPU, infinitely more flexible and still cheap as.
You have someone that believes it is a backdoor despite all the evidence to the contrary, is it really so surprising that such a tinfoil hat wearer fails to use basic logic?
If you are concerned about the NSA then their is no secure browser as the browser is only as secure as the ISP's and content providers you are accessing and given what the US Government is demanding they share that means no browser is secure.
There are a lot of articles in the press lately trying to talk up Apple, a lot of people that have invested a lot of money in apple shares on the dream of them continuing to go higher with no end in sight and are trying there utmost to save their investments.
The real problem here is the standard is just plain retarded. Even though I hate Apple I think their approach is the lesser evil. The default should be don't cache, web servers should then be able to enable caching if they want to sacrifice some security for performance (assuming the user hasn't explicitly disabled caching). It would be nice to be able to rely on users having well managed machines or the internet being made up of mostly well managed servers but lets face it that aint happening anytime soon in anything but well run enterprises and IT literate end users.
He was convicted, We don't know whether the Jury used it as evidence or completely disregarded it. All we know is it was entered as "PART" of the evidence against him.
It would be dicey. In affect you are violating the Gag order by writing a contract clause that gives you an indirect means of notifying the customer or preventing the monitoring. I am no lawyer but that too me sounds like a whole boat load of legal trouble to invite on themselves.
We are not talking simply a drastic increase in computing power here, There would need to be some truly astounding new understanding and application of hereto unknown physics to overcome the computation workload. We aren't talking about just an amazing increase in power but a complete reworking of physics out current understanding of physics.
You don't seem to have any concept of just how much processing power it would require to brute force. Even if we continued exponentially growing compute power for the next 50 years it still won't be a feasible attack vector.You are talking trillion's of years of computing time for something like the address space in 256bit AES and it would only be that quick if you could process trillions of keys a second.
I just want to see the Summer Glau Terminator fembots. I can die happy then.
It's not about need. It is about being comfortable. I don't want to be standing on top of my family, I don't want to have to leave the house to get quiet time or some space to myself. I have lived in an apartment of around 900 square feet and a townhouse that was slightly bigger, It drove me insane, I would stay out late or find any excuse to leave the house as their simply was nowhere you can have peace and quiet. a house isn't just somewhere I to sleep and eat, I want to live their, that means relax, enjoy myself without feeling like I am being confined or compromising. Why is it so hard for people to understand that just because you can live in something tiny that it is not appropriate for everyone.
Actually MS followed the standard, but the people at the standard were pissed that MS implementation meant most people would be protected if it was honoured so like all fucked up bodies they changed the standard to screw over users.
People don't like living in shoeboxes. I would love to live in a sustainable estate or city, but if it meant living in a 850 sq foot shoebox then you can keep it. I don't need a massive house, but 850 sq feet would feel more like a jail cell.
If they supported encryption how could they provide open access to government for your data?
I debug code every day, can't say the last time I read machine code though. Just because it is utilizing binary doesn't mean it has to be read that way, hell even my network tools include a raft of utilities to ensure I don't have to remember and understand every bit I see on the wire. It doesn't make sense for a computer to computer protocol to be bloated and slow just so someone can read it directly if they need to.
shoddy system for shore. but there is no circumstance where telling a lie about the books being balanced is an acceptable response in this scenario no matter how painful the system or process is, It just makes the problem 10 times worse.
It is staying, but definitely going backwards in many countries, cinemas are putting on more 2D sessions and less 3D with the popularity waning somewhat. Their is probably enough core people that enjoy it for it to hang around though (I am not one of them)
Getting around region encoding isn't illegal. It does breach some companies ToS but that is hardly illegal. Geo Fencing via IP is a poor mans security fence, most of the providers only do it as a token gesture to the media companies, hence why it is still so easy to get around. I use Hulu and Netflix from Australia, even with the insane costs of bandwidth and data here plus the cost of the VPN service I still save roughly $50 a month by not being raped by our local content provider foxtel. It is sad really, I am happy to pay for my content, yet fucking media companies insist on making it as difficult and unpalatable as possible.
TechNet was not for developers. That is MSDN and hasn't been changed. TechNet was for product evals only, It has been abused by many as a cheap way to get software and keys for which they usually fool themselves into believing they paid for TechNet therefore they aren't breaching any licensing.
Texting/surfing is just as annoying if not more so, today's super bright screens are a glaring annoyance when people use them in the cinema, I actually find it more annoying than making a call as at least people are suitably embarrassed when that happens and usually get up and leave to talk.
You guys do realize they are making Kinnect for Windows available separately right? who gives a shit if you can't plug in the one from your Xbox.
In this instance it is critical to differentiate, certificates have not been broken/compromised at all, underlying implementations of the infrastructure and the people handling that infrastructure have been compromised or broken. Certificates in general are an excellent solution to many security issues, however it does require good PKI infrastructure and management otherwise they are pointless. For many of their uses you don't even need to trust or rely on any external authority, you can run your own which no fukker has access to except those you specifically grant access and trust, for instance we run a PKI infrastructure where I work, not exposed to the internet and the CA itself is segregated off and heavily secured. We rely on no external party.
funny but I actually have the opposite approach. Even since the brothel of bugs and bad drivers and frustration dealing with Nvidia support a few years ago I have never since been willing to buy another Nvidia card or even recommend one to a friend. All my machines I have built for the last 3-4 years have AMD GPU's in them and while their drivers certainly aren't trouble free I have had far less pain than I suffered under Nvidia.
Normally I doubt the influence world public opinion has on moronic pollies, But I suspect in this instance this is actually correct. The current government has tried to get other orwellian legislation passed including internet filters so them actually being against it themselves is unlikely. I think Snowden has highlighted how unpopular such ideas are and with a government that is almost certainly getting thrown out for incompetence come september they hardly need another nail in their coffin.
and? not sure what your point is. So it is equal to current AMD CPU's. why not just skip the locked down hardware specs and build your own with an 8 core AMD desktop CPU, infinitely more flexible and still cheap as.
You have someone that believes it is a backdoor despite all the evidence to the contrary, is it really so surprising that such a tinfoil hat wearer fails to use basic logic?
If you are concerned about the NSA then their is no secure browser as the browser is only as secure as the ISP's and content providers you are accessing and given what the US Government is demanding they share that means no browser is secure.
There are a lot of articles in the press lately trying to talk up Apple, a lot of people that have invested a lot of money in apple shares on the dream of them continuing to go higher with no end in sight and are trying there utmost to save their investments.
The real problem here is the standard is just plain retarded. Even though I hate Apple I think their approach is the lesser evil. The default should be don't cache, web servers should then be able to enable caching if they want to sacrifice some security for performance (assuming the user hasn't explicitly disabled caching). It would be nice to be able to rely on users having well managed machines or the internet being made up of mostly well managed servers but lets face it that aint happening anytime soon in anything but well run enterprises and IT literate end users.
I guess you haven't watched Sony financial news over the last couple of years, I think they WISH people could write it as $ony
He was convicted, We don't know whether the Jury used it as evidence or completely disregarded it. All we know is it was entered as "PART" of the evidence against him.