Slashdot Mirror


The Average Movie Theater Has Hundreds of Screens

theodp writes "The "average" movie theater reportedly has a capacity of 200-300 people. Which, thanks to the wonder of mobile devices, means that it also has hundreds of screens. And — thanks to Facebook, Twitter, and texting — hundreds of potential annoyances. Which prompts NY film critic David Edelstein to ask: How Should We Treat Texters and Talkers at Movie Theaters? 'Has our culture become so private that no one knows how to behave anymore in public?' Edelstein wonders. 'Is selfishness the rule rather than exception? Are people who say, "Shut up and turn off your phone" today's version of "You kids get off my lawn"?' Jason Bailey argues that the only way to solve movie theaters' talking and texting problem is to give in to it, perhaps with anything-goes phone-friendly talk-amongst-yourselves screenings in the seven and eight o'clock hours coupled with no-tolerance shows later in the evening. Any other ideas?" You could always throw it.

924 comments

  1. Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, because phone screens are way too bright and blind the people behind them.

    1. Re:Too Bright by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Two words...Faraday Cage

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    2. Re:Too Bright by redmid17 · · Score: 2

      I haven't had that issue when people have taken out their phones to text or check the time.

    3. Re:Too Bright by markdavis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >"I haven't had that issue when people have taken out their phones to text or check the time."

      It greatly depends on a variety of factors:

      * How long it was used
      * How bright the screen is
      * How far away other people are
      * How dark the theater is
      * How dark the movie screen is at the time it was used
      * How sensitive the people are around you
      * How the phone is being held (this is a big one)

      Generally, it is rude to use a phone at all in a theater because it has the great *potential* to annoy others around the user, just like talking does. I speculate 95% of the texting seen in theaters is totally unnecessary-it is not urgent or something that can't wait until after the movie. But to check the time or for an urgent text, the impact can be greatly reduced by:

      * Doing it as quickly as possible
      * Turning down the brightness
      * Holding the device close to you and never facing in a way someone can see the screen

    4. Re:Too Bright by redmid17 · · Score: 0

      Like I said, it hasn't bothered me when people do it, and I've seen people texting through an entire movie. They were a few rows away though

    5. Re:Too Bright by markdavis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >"Like I said, it hasn't bothered me when people do it"

      I don't doubt it doesn't bother you (nor perhaps many other people), but not everyone is the same. Things that bother one person might not bother someone else at all (and in reverse). As a society, we have to understand that people are different and make a reasonable effort to prevent annoying others, even when it is not something that annoys ourselves.

    6. Re:Too Bright by breaddoughrising · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Two words...Faraday Cage

      Exactly! Or just line the inside of the theater with dental blankets. No signal, no phone... at least communication. Your still going to have asshats playing apps that don't require signal.

    7. Re:Too Bright by asmkm22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would support this. Just have the mesh around the theater rooms, rather than the whole building, and let people go out into the hallway if they need to make a call. If they to be available to receive a call, in case of an emergency or for work, then maybe they should go rent a movie instead.

    8. Re:Too Bright by redmid17 · · Score: 2

      The movie theaters already do this by warning people not to use their phone during a movie. They are perfectly capable of ejecting people who violate the rules. Given that they generally do not, I guess whether or not it's annoying or reasonable to accomodate has largely been decided. I'm guessing the management doesn't really want the bad press around ejecting people and the small chance that what would normally be a quiet occurrence could become a much louder altercation that ruins the movie for *more* people.

    9. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No no no. People still need the ability to call 911.

      Pretty sure we there was a time, not long ago where we were able to go out without constant ability to dial 911. If there is an emergency then you can easily go to the counter and have the staff call.

    10. Re:Too Bright by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would support this. Just have the mesh around the theater rooms, rather than the whole building, and let people go out into the hallway if they need to make a call.

      Ditto for airplanes: just line the cabin, and let people step outside if they need to make a call.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    11. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      EMP Pulse.

      Warn people before the come in of course, but radiate the place just before the movie starts. Problem solved.

    12. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why would you even care on an airplane anyway? Does someone using an app bother your view of the back of the seat in front of you?

    13. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The counter is on fire! Quick, someone call 911!

    14. Re:Too Bright by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This. I will support with my money any cinema that forcibly removes patrons who use their phones or other gadgets during the movie, or who loudly talk during the movie. If somebody makes a cinema without popcorn -- it smells to me like burnt rubber -- I'll happily pay twice as much. The future for me is cinemas with a large number of comparitively small but extremely high quality screens, good audio, properly calibrated and using equipment I cannot afford at home, and at most 6-8 seats which I can reserve in full. (And better still, I can start the movie at my chosen time, pause it if there's a distraction, rewind it, and so forth, simply paying by the hour.) Sadly, the movie industry is a dinosaur, and this kind of change will not happen on a large scale any time soon -- and so they will continue to very seldom receive my money.

    15. Re:Too Bright by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why? Did the world change so that now you need 200 phones able to call 911 immediately as opposed to walking out of the theater like everyone did before cell phones? Or were we in a pre-civilized barbaric society before cell phones removed all need for social manners? Yes, person next to you has a heart attack; stop the movie, turn on the lights, turn off the phone jammer; and simultaneously with using the phone ask if there's a doctor in the audience. Don't use a remote 911 possibility as an excuse to be an asshat, you're just answering the phone because you're addicted to it.

      I have actually been at a movie premier, full theater, movie is actually running and past the opening credits, when the guy in front of me gets a phone call. After lots of shushing he says loudly enough for everyone to hear "I have to go, I'm in the middle of Star Trek". There is no possible way that the phone call can be that important. If someone is actually worried about some incredibly vital call, they should stay home and sit staring at the phone.

    16. Re:Too Bright by breaddoughrising · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No no no. People still need the ability to call 911.

      Leave the theater and call. The ability to call 911 from anywhere is not guaranteed, nor is it a right. But if it makes you feel better, they can put emergency hard line phones on the end of every row.

    17. Re:Too Bright by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      I have. Tap, tap, tap, bleep, tap, tap, bleep, tap, tap, tap.

    18. Re:Too Bright by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The ushers should escort the phone users from the theater. Stop the movie first and turn up lights so that everyone can see who it is and provide sufficient negative reinforcement. If you don't let the puppy pee on the carpet, then why not use the rolled up newspaper on the mentally incontinent as well?

    19. Re:Too Bright by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's good press though. Austin Drafthouse even use the outraged drunken phone call from an ejected patron as part of an advertisement.

    20. Re:Too Bright by redmid17 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I feel like stopping the movie and turning the lights on would bother more people than someone or multipel people texting during the movie.

    21. Re:Too Bright by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... but it would only happen once. Frankly, I like the idea. I actually have very little tolerance for disrespectful, selfish, self-centered, oblivious, inconsiderate #@ckheads who use phones in theaters. Death penalty for violators would suffice.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    22. Re:Too Bright by redmid17 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Austin Drafthouse is also completely different from most movie theaters.

    23. Re:Too Bright by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      But theaters that do this also get increased business.

    24. Re:Too Bright by redmid17 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Any real proof to that assertion?

    25. Re:Too Bright by Angeret · · Score: 2

      So, after you've fired off your ElectroMagnetic Pulse Pulse and the projectionist is tearing his hair out looking at all his fried electronics, you'll be happy?

    26. Re:Too Bright by Nyder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No no no. People still need the ability to call 911.

      They can do that out in the hall.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    27. Re:Too Bright by redmid17 · · Score: 0

      I think it would happen more than once given the number of alleged offenders.

    28. Re:Too Bright by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      It would also knock out the project.

    29. Re:Too Bright by anarcobra · · Score: 1

      They can't eject people if no one reports them.
      Usually they have a number you can (ironically) text to report people being obnoxious on their phones.

    30. Re:Too Bright by murdocj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      then why are you at the theater????

      Really. You are paying $10 or more ... to play sudoku on your phone? When people are in a theater, why can't they just watch the movie? Or leave if they are bored? Are attention spans really that short?

    31. Re:Too Bright by murdocj · · Score: 1

      How far is it to the door to the theater?

    32. Re:Too Bright by murdocj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Being jammed into a seat for 6 hours listening to multiple phone conversations would be hell on earth... or in the skies.

    33. Re:Too Bright by murdocj · · Score: 1

      It would be one short inconvenience instead of a distraction that lasts the entire movie.

    34. Re:Too Bright by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      ... but it would only happen once

      ... in every movie. Maybe the populace would learn after a while, but it would take months, and then ten years later there will always be some teen with their first phone who never experienced the "movie shutdown and public shaming", so it would start up again later.

    35. Re:Too Bright by gnoshi · · Score: 2

      We get it. It isn't a problem for you, and thus anything that is done to address it for those who it is a problem for is (doomed to fail | more trouble than it is worth | etc). Furthermore, anyone who it is a problem for should be (paying attention to the big screen | ignoring it | not going to movies | etc ) because they are (inattentive | reflecting an outdated view of society | whining).

    36. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would go there.

    37. Re:Too Bright by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Alamo Drafthouse seemed to get a good bit of business from it, but then it's not typical. People I presume will not want to return to a theater that has lots of interrupts, and return to those that doesn't.

    38. Re:Too Bright by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      EMP Pulse.

      Is that one of those technologies that was sponsored by the US Department of Redundancy Department of the US? (aka USDRDD Department of the US.)

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    39. Re:Too Bright by peragrin · · Score: 1

      The thing is if you line the theater walls, the interior hallways will also be blocked.

      However once upon a time there was a thing called a Pay Phone. It had a cord.

      There are very few things that happen in theaters that require immediate assistance. However I have always preferred the jammer solution. That could easily be turned off by theater personnel in an emergency.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    40. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to go that far. Just make it a fineable offense to use a phone in the theatre. After all, the person using a phone is disrupting the paid for entertainment of everyone around and is essentially stealing their money.

    41. Re:Too Bright by s0nicfreak · · Score: 0

      Many people have the mental capacity to both watch the movie and play Sudoku...

    42. Re:Too Bright by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      How are phone conversations more annoying than the multiple in-person conversations that would happen if the people didn't have other forms of entertainment?

    43. Re:Too Bright by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      No no no. People still need the ability to call 911.

      Because you just can't call the usher or theater manager - they wouldn't know how to call 911? Are you so addicted to that phone that you cannot let it go for a moment? Somehow helping a person is too hard, we'll have 300 people call 911 -

      Bet you're a blast in the countryside where there is no service. Or are you like a dog with a shock collar, never venturing outside into the forbidden zone, to remain in the safe confines of cell coverage?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    44. Re:Too Bright by BitZtream · · Score: 2

      Well, the few seconds you take to go into the hall will allow you to calm down before your freaked out ass babbles incoherently at the operator. You clearly overreact if you think the 5 seconds it takes you to get outside the theater is going to be relevant compared to the fact that someone is going to have to put down their sand which, and drive the ambulance to your ass. They aren't going to rush either, its in fact, part of their training to not over react and rush ... because more shit goes wrong than right in those situations.

      While you're flipping out, the medical emergency is going to continue on and those seconds are going to be lost on you.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    45. Re:Too Bright by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So does some fsking common sense. Let's not drive cars. let's confiscate steak knives. Let's get rid of lawnmowers. Life is about risk management, not risk avoidance.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    46. Re:Too Bright by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Any real proof to that assertion?

      Hard to say. I don't go to theaters any more - too many distractions.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    47. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In an emergency, seconds count. They fucking count.

      Which is why theatergoers died by the thousands before the invention of the cell phone. It's how movie theaters got the nickname "the popcorn mausoleums" back in the day. Back then, you put your life on the line whenever you wanted to see a movie, and since most of them were Roger Corman films and general Universal releases, most people felt it wasn't worth the risk and killed themselves afterward. Thankfully, with the invention of the cell phone, people could finally go see a movie without nearly as much risk of death, something that was literally impossible beforehand.

    48. Re:Too Bright by zippthorne · · Score: 2

      What kind of nice, quiet airplanes do YOU fly on? There is plenty of white noise to drown all of that out. The only noises that people make that I can ever hear over the din of the plane itself from more than a seat or two away are the piercing cries of babies with nasal congestion who can't be taught the valsalva maneuver and have no other way to equalize pressure than to cry out in pain for hours.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    49. Re:Too Bright by murdocj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most slashdotters *think* they are multitaskers. Turns out they are wrong.

    50. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, after you've fired off your ElectroMagnetic Pulse Pulse and the projectionist is tearing his hair out looking at all his fried electronics, you'll be happy?

      Actually, I'm a little bit worried about the guy in the back row with the pacemaker. Or rather without, now that the EMP has been used.

      Someone should probably call 91... Oh, crap...

    51. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your problem isn't that the movie industry is a dinosaur. Your problem is that you want a $100k+/screen investment amortized over 6-8 seats. When people are prepared to pay $50/person to watch a movie, that might work.

    52. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, at one point all the mental health experts were suggesting Internet addiction should be treated (they may still). This never seems to be applied to all the teens that are addicted to their phones though.

    53. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The counter is on fire! Quick, someone call 911!

      So, you are already near the counter, is running a few steps outside the theater to either find another store to call 911 (if in a mall), or use your phone (you are outside, your phone works now) too much of a delay?

      Gosh! How do people survive emergencies before everyone have a phone?!

    54. Re:Too Bright by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have actually been at a movie premier, full theater, movie is actually running and past the opening credits, when the guy in front of me gets a phone call. After lots of shushing he says loudly enough for everyone to hear "I have to go, I'm in the middle of Star Trek".

      Yeah, the obliviousness of some people to others knows no bounds. I was once at an opera, where everyone had paid at least 4-5 times what one pays per person to go to the movies (and many quite a bit more), and the guy in the row in front of me -- in the middle of the opera -- answers his phone after it rings and begins talking loudly: "Hello!? Yeah. I'm at the opera! [speaking louder] I said I can't hear you, because I'm at the opera!!"

      Everyone for rows around was glaring at this guy. At this point, a seeming stranger next to the guy (who had been shushing him) yanked the phone from his hand and turned off, then handed it back.

      And sometimes the effect simply destroys the entire event. I was at a symphony concert a few years back where a 90-minute piece ended with a slow gradual dissolution of the music, gradually getting softer and softer, fading away over a period of some 10 minutes. (Some people may find such a thing boring, others sublime, but obviously most people at such a concert probably are closer to the latter.)

      Most people here had probably paid at least 10 times what a movie ticket costs... a couple thousand people in the hall. For the last few minutes of the concert, you could have heard a pin drop (almost literally).

      About 3 minutes before the end of the piece, a cell phone starts going off loudly. It keeps going off -- for about a minute as a guy in the fifth row from the front or so gets up and actually works his way out of the hall (these rows were not spaced to allow people to pass while everyone was seated, so it took some time)... all the while with phone blaring.

      The concert was completely ruined for the orchestra and the entire audience -- the profound effect of the music was lost.

      This event was so notorious that it actually got written up in major newpapers. If I remember correctly, the guy actually came forward (anonymously) and apologized -- explaining that he had just received an iPhone as a gift in the past couple days, had someone else put it into "sleep" mode, had it on vibrate, but somehow had mistakenly set an alarm... which he didn't realize could sound aloud even when the phone was on vibrate or "asleep." When it sounded, he was too unfamiliar with the device to figure out how to make it stop.

      Since that event, I ALWAYS turn my phone and any other devices COMPLETELY OFF at important events. An accidental alarm or other noise just isn't worth ruining an experience for thousands of other people who may have paid hundreds of dollars each.

      A movie theater may not quite be like this, but a similar etiquette principle applies on a smaller scale.

    55. Re:Too Bright by pthisis · · Score: 0

      It's not the outgoing calls, it's the incoming. My dad relied on his pager 24/7 3-4 days a week even back in the 70s to let him know when he had to head into the hospital, and it's not uncommon in a small town for doctors to have a similar call schedule these days. Put the theater (and symphony, and theater, and wherever else the same sorts of arguments apply) in a Faraday cage and he spends more than half his life not being able to partake in any public performance. Which might be okay, I don't know, but it's a complicated call.

      IMO the best thing to do is just let the market handle it--if "adult" quiet showings make money, they'll do them. If Rocky Horror style shows where people yell and throw stuff at the screen are popular, they'll do those. And while they aren't quite IMAX with 7.1, home theaters have come a long way: high-def with THX surround is leaps and bounds ahead of DVD on Trinitron, let alone the VHS on crappy tubes that people watched in the 80s. And it allows you to set whatever absolute rules you want if the cinema's decisions aren't to your liking.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    56. Re:Too Bright by pthisis · · Score: 0

      You're essentially saying "doctors shouldn't move to small towns, and shouldn't have lives if they do". That's shitty. My dad spent literally half his days on call when he was active, which is very common for any kind of specialist outside of big cities (if you're one of two eye surgeons in the local town, you're on call half the time--you might rarely get called but when you do it can be life-or-death, or at least blindness-or-sight quite frequently).

      Saying "go rent a movie instead" is glib. You're right that big flat screens and home surround are changing the calculus for movies, but that just shifts the argument slightly--if other places of public performance took that approach, such doctors could almost never go to the symphony, live theater, etc. The problem isn't the technology, it's the assholes abusing it.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    57. Re:Too Bright by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      How are phone conversations more annoying than the multiple in-person conversations that would happen if the people didn't have other forms of entertainment?

      The absence of sidetone (or the presence of reduced sidetone) on many mobile phones means most people speak much louder than they need to, which makes them annoying. When I talk on my mobile I usually have to consciously modulate myself. Most people lack this skill.

    58. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a town is so small that they only have two eye surgeons, they will be lucky if they have even 1 movie theater, much less anything else like a symphony.

    59. Re: Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should looky

    60. Re:Too Bright by Krishnoid · · Score: 1
      I had a Nokia 2610 that had a 'timed profiles' feature, which would switch to a given profile (in this case, the silent one), then switch back to the normal profile at a specified time. Perfect for meetings and movies.

      None of my other phones have had this feature built in, and I have to wonder why this isn't included in the base feature set on all phones.

    61. Re:Too Bright by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 2

      I own and operate a movie theatre. I do eject people who violate the rules and one of the rules is "turn off your cell phone". I have a notice posted at the entrance to the auditorium, and I play a policy trailer before every show which says the same thing (with a little cartoon).

      I'll tell you once to turn off your phone. The second time, you're leaving.

      I rarely have to actually throw people out, though.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    62. Re:Too Bright by slugstone · · Score: 0

      In small towns they do not have ushers? I would think that giving the pager to the usher in a small town would not be a problem. I am sure there can be something worked out if somebody needs to get ahold of you.

    63. Re:Too Bright by slugstone · · Score: 0

      In small towns they do not have ushers? I would think that giving the pager to the usher in a small town would not be a problem. I am sure there can be something worked out if somebody needs to get ahold of you.

    64. Re:Too Bright by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1

      Wrong. A screen for 6-8 people is not going to cost anywhere near $100k. There are already companies doing *most* of this, they're just few and far between. But there is very definitely a market, and people who would pay the cost, which would be nowhere near $50/person.

    65. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Between this and commercials on the big screen, its simply not "worth it" to go to theaters anymore.

      The "theatrical experience" is simply not what it used to be.

      Now, its just another marketing opportunity for the theater to make me wait in line to purchase pricey tickets, then have me wait through all sorts of non-entertaining ads, then start the actual movie 15 minutes after the stated time. I wish I could reverse bill them for ads watched.

      Machines provide a valuable function in the modern business world because they, and the people who run them, will have their asshatery tolerated. If they have the moxie to start the movie after 15 minutes of ads and previews, at least they could provide the snacks. But nobody leaves their seat, heads for the counter, and expects a snack in return for the delay in the start of the feature presentation. We are so conditioned to be obedient to business that we put up with damn near anything and take what we get.

      The phone is a special thing. Its ingrained in us since childhood, when "being on the phone" meant you were special and were not to be disturbed. Its OK to ignore anyone, not be doing what you were supposed to be doing, whatever, if you were "on the phone". You know... "Can't you see your mother is On the Phone!"

      It is more important than you are. That's for sure. Sacred.

      The phone has a special place in our lives. One can wait in line for hours personally to speak so someone, but if his phone rings while you finally get the opportunity to speak, the phone trumps all. The phone is our ideal excuse to blow off anyone because in our society, its so rude to let a call go unanswered - even if its a telemarketer. Thats why we spend hundreds of dollars a year to maintain phone connectivity. Its the perfect excuse for being an asshat because "its a machine" and you have a socially acceptable inanimate object to blame the asshatery on. Business loves machines because the machines can do asshatery things humans would be hated for.

      I am sorry, your coupon just expired five minutes ago, and the register won't accept it. Do you think the CEO of the fast food chain gives a damn that the customer got so mad that he's nauseated every time he remembers the encounter at the cash register? The machine saved the counter person from the disappointment of the customer, the least valuable part of a retail establishment.

    66. Re:Too Bright by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and as proof that I'm not talking out of my rear, consider this: http://www.dickclarkproductionstheater.com/facility.html Just one example found on Google in less than five minutes. Twenty seats, *extremely* sophisticated setup (it might even be considered overkill), and the cost? According to: http://www.refinery29.com/best-screening-rooms-la?page=2 ...that runs you just US$24 per person, for 20 people. Reduce the size, reduce the seating from leather lounge chairs, and take away the free drinks and popcorn, and even retaining the majority of the opulence that proves you could easily manage an eight-seat room for under $50 a person. Likely well under, if you dialed back the opulence (while still offering something far better than a full-sized cinema does.)

    67. Re: Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The jammer solution is complete junk. Blanketing the theater without adversely affecting reception off theater property is insanely hard* and therefore will not be done -- they'll be affecting random passersby as well as those who've agreed (implicitly or explicitly) to suspend mobile use for the duration of the movie.

      *The exception, of course, is if you put up a Faraday cage to keep the jamming signal in. But then, you don't need the jammer any more, do you?!

      The solution, if you really must grant theatergoers the ability to connect to the mobile network in "emergency" situations (or simply when the movie's over and the lights are up), is a Faraday cage (or one cage per screen, for multi-screen complexes) with a microcell inside -- turn it off, turn it on. It will be expensive to get set up right, but that's the cost of having those capabilities without fucking over everyone in the neighborhood, and it's still cheaper than doing jamming so selectively (with a bunch of highly directional transmitters) that it's a negligible hindrance to others.

    68. Re:Too Bright by macbeth66 · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

    69. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hello,911 Emergency.
      Hello,I was at a theater watching a movie and someone collapsed and stopped breathing.
      OK, sir, please stay calm. I've dispatched an ambulance. In the mean time, can you help give first aid? I'll talk you though this step by step; just follow my instructions.
      OK.
      Now, first I need to you .
      Uh, sorry, I can do that right now. See, the theater blocks cell phones in the theaters, so I'm in the hallway and can't really reach the guy to do that. ...

      In this case we are balancing the people being slightly annoyed vs. being able to give faster, higher quality, first aid to people with health issues, potentially saving a life. Now everyone can make their own moral and ethical judgement on which is of greater importance based on the severity of the problems and the likelihood it will occur. If one believes the latter is of enough rarity, it may be sufficient to justify placing the former at higher importance. Personally, I probably wouldn't. I mean, I get annoyed with people all the time; you just deal with it. So, I wouldn't place annoyance at as high enough issue to justify even a low probability loss of life or serious injury.

      Sure there could be technical solutions that would allow only 911 within the theater, but then it becomes a business decision for the theater whether the cost (and potential liability if it doesn't work 100% of the time) outweighs a potential loss in revenue.

      At the end of the day, this is generally falls into the category of thing people don't like, but aren't will to pay more to avoid. It would be easy to have more isolated individual small rooms rather that rows of seats packed together (in fact, some theaters do this in Asia), but then you would have less seats so would need to charge more per seat. Based on how most theaters are laid out in the US, I would say most people wouldn't be willing to pay for this, so I dismiss their complaints of annoyance as selfish and arrogant, which I am also guilty of sometimes.

    70. Re:Too Bright by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Two words...Faraday Cage

      ...and an artificial bolt of lightning that fries the offender by entering through his cell phone, going through his ear canal, and exiting his body through the rectum.

    71. Re: Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to a concert once in a non-smoking venue, and some people still tried to light up. The solution that the staff employed was simply to shine a very bright, very precise spotlight on the offender. Worked a treat.

    72. Re: Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words: kill them.

    73. Re:Too Bright by hankwang · · Score: 2

      "I ALWAYS turn my phone and any other devices COMPLETELY OFF at important events"

      I used to have a Nokia N82 that would wake up from the "completely off" state to sound an alarm. Only removing the battery would do the job.

      Fortunately I didn't discover this while attending a concert (or worse: while being one of the performers in a choir).

      I'm actually not sure whether Android doesn't do this. Nowadays I always check that there is no alarm set at an inconvenient time before going to silent mode.

    74. Re:Too Bright by mitcheli · · Score: 2
      "So is some dickhead is bothering your movie experience, complain to the manager. Immediately. Demand they either enforce their rules (and they have them) or give you your money back. And if they don't, make it clear they've lost a customer, and anybody else who you can tell about it."

      Absolutely agree. But I think this article is hinting at a bigger problem. Time Magazine did an interesting article that analyses the upcoming generation and there is some truth in the analysis. (Cue flame war in 3... 2... 1..). But the key here is the analysis on the view of authority and the introspective narcissism that is much more prevalent. These factor in when we consider things like cell phones on in the theater.

      I am also friends with a number of high school teachers and they echo the issues raised in the Time Article.

      --
      Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
    75. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get one of those super bright flashlights. Shine it in the face of the perp for as long as it stays on the damn phone.

      Don't you have just as much "right" to annoy it with your flashlight as much as it has the "right" to annoy everyone else in the theater with the call?

      Besides, it wanted to be the center of attention with the damm phone - let it have its way and make it the center of attention for the whole theater to see.

      I betcha as soon as it becomes a fad to illuminate the perps, we will see some serious curtailing of phone use in theaters.

    76. Re:Too Bright by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      That happend to a friend of mine. (When we went to the Opera, so that's no friend-of-a-friend story, but an I-got-embarressed-along-story)

      Of course she switched off her phone completly before entering the theatre. What she didn't know was that some phones (I think it was a Nokia, but the same thing happend to me once with an old Siemens) still have the ALARM TIMER running in the background and that the alarm clock will still work, even if the phone is switched off.

      --
      bickerdyke
    77. Re: Too Bright by Rational · · Score: 1

      You haven't really thought this through. People who annoy you with their screens are sitting in front of you, so unless you move to a seat in front of them, you aren't going to blind them with a flashlight.

      --
      "Be nice, veer left, and never stop thinking" Iain Banks - Walking On Glass
    78. Re:Too Bright by crakbone · · Score: 1

      " I've seen people texting through an entire movie." So you paid on average 7.50 for the ticket and 4.50 for a drink and another 5 to 7.00 dollars for popcorn to watch a person text through an entire movie. Personally I like to watch the movie. I like to take family and friends and yes I normally pay for them. I spend close to 50 to 60 dollars per movie. And I would really like to watch it without a flash that drags my attention from it because some selfish prick wants to pay $17.00 dollars to text in a dark room full of people to find out "I just gave myself a sponge bath with your sock. I hope you don't mind." ( courtesy of Texts from Last Night)

    79. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check the time.

      Why would you do that? The length of the movie is advertised; you know when the next one runs.

      Would they get this bored and apathic they wonder how long it will last but just can't leave?

    80. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people bring this story up without linking the hilarious commercial that Alamo Drafthouse did with the angry customer's voicemail?

      If I routinely went to the theater (not likely) and lived in Austin (less likely) they would get my patronage.

    81. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was too unfamiliar with the device to figure out how to make it stop.

      And so ends the tale of the lost art of rtfm.

    82. Re: Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have sure had them next to me yapping away on the phone.

      I even had a flashlight with me.

      Problem is I did not have the guts to use it in this manner.

      But, if it becomes a game, like the ritual of cutting off men's neckties in some restaurants, where it becomes socially acceptable, maybe expected, for anyone to illuminate a phoner in a theater, I'd do it.

      Well, this is Slashdot. Rituals have to get started somewhere. If one can cut off someone's necktie in a beer joint, why can't someone simply illuminate the source of a public annoyance in theaters?

    83. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Naah. It's just co-operative multitasking. A process gets a timeslice when another voluntarily gives its own up.

    84. Re:Too Bright by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Stop the movie first

      Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, mate. You want to interrupt my movie-going experience to tell me you're doing a bang-up job throwing out people who interrupt my movie-going experience?

      Approach the guy quietly, remove him from the theater, and say nothing more about it. We will all notice it happen, don't you worry.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    85. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is America (for the most part). Selfishness is a requirement as part of your society. I don't know why this is a surprise.

    86. Re: Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shine it at their screen. Solved

    87. Re:Too Bright by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Bingo.

      Faraday cages around the rooms. A payphone to call 911 right outside.

      That being said, I wonder if this will drive the final stake in a movie theater's heart?

      Do people still build movie theaters? All the ones I know have been around since I lived in the areas and just change hands every 5 years or so.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    88. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess... Mahler's Ninth, 4th movement? That would probably be the most inappropriate time in any symphony ever for a cell phone call.

    89. Re:Too Bright by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I'm not one to make an annoyance of myself, but my phone is on buzz for emergency calls. Anyone trying to correct my etiquette ,will be met with a fist to the face and worse, I charge for my time and unscheduled tutoring, so the contents of your wallet are coming with me as well. Just remember folks, when you're out there making P.C. cops of yourselves, not everyone recognizes your authority or appreciates your bleating.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    90. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, no link?
      FTFY - and yes, it's a good one.

    91. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? When a society agrees upon rules, it should teach those rules to its offspring??
      Outrageous! Where's my freedom from thinking!!?!

    92. Re:Too Bright by Andtalath · · Score: 1
    93. Re: Too Bright by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      You mean get up and leave the theater and miss the movie and hope the guy is still playing on his phone when you return with the manager? Yeah right. They need a way so I can text the manager discreetly and alert them to the problem so security can catch them in the act and escort them from the theater. Maybe dimly lit signs at the front saying "text 5551212 if there is a problem with this theater". Would also be useful if the movie has no sound or other problems with the movie itself.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    94. Re: Too Bright by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Then two guys behind you text that you're texting. Then four guys behind them, then 8, then we may as well all go home.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    95. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put in the Faraday Cage, then have a cell repeater inside each theater.
      When the movie starts, the repeater switches modes to 911 only.
      Your device will work until the commercials start.

    96. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Pagers weren't invented in the 70s. People who needed to be contacted in an emergency used to tell the hospital (or someone at home) where they were going & leave their name at the ticket office.

    97. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wikipedia begs to differ.

    98. Re:Too Bright by asylumx · · Score: 1

      That sound you hear might be the wooshing of air past your head as you stand on the wing trying to make a call.... or maybe it's just the sound of the GP's joke going over your head.

    99. Re:Too Bright by Holi · · Score: 3

      You annoy me at the theater because you can't get up out of your seat and move yourself the hallway then you threaten me. Be prepared to wake up in the hospital. So while I am no PC Cop. I payed to enjoy the movie. You are stopping me from enjoying said movie. You are free to use your phone until it becomes a hardship on others, then it's time for you to show consideration to your fellow man.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    100. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ooh, a tough guy on The Internet. You don't see that every day.

    101. Re:Too Bright by pruss · · Score: 1

      Some people in movie theaters are parents accompanying their children. And bored by the movie but unable to leave.

      Personally, if I am going to use my phone in the movie theater, I like to switch it to the same red-pixels-only mode (using an open source app I made for it), which I normally use for amateur astronomy not to disturb dark adaptation. I don't think dim red screens disturb much. Such modes should be available on all phones, not just some rooted ones. :-)

    102. Re:Too Bright by Endo13 · · Score: 2

      24/7 3-4 days a week

      So then you don't go on those 3-4 days a week. Problem solved.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    103. Re:Too Bright by Endo13 · · Score: 2

      When you're sitting next to someone who's on the phone non-stop for the entire flight... and you're unfortunate enough to have no headphones and no earplugs.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    104. Re:Too Bright by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Actual tests show otherwise. They only think they're doing both. They're actually time-slicing and taking the resultant hit in performances.

      None of which ameliorates their being assholes for doing it in a theater.

    105. Re:Too Bright by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Dude, your keyboard/pad clicking skills *do not* translate to street fighting.

    106. Re:Too Bright by eth1 · · Score: 1

      No no no. People still need the ability to call 911.

      Pretty sure we there was a time, not long ago where we were able to go out without constant ability to dial 911. If there is an emergency then you can easily go to the counter and have the staff call.

      I don't think we should be blocking or jamming the cell signals, but not because of emergency calls. This is a social problem, not a technical one, and just disabling the devices won't address the real problem. Single the people out, bring the lights up enough so that they're not anonymous and are embarrassed, and kick them out. (with a flogging down in front first, preferably)

    107. Re:Too Bright by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the management doesn't really want the bad press

      Who says it would be bad press? I'd be much more likely to choose theaters with zero tolerance polices. I think most people would actually switch off their phones if there was a big on-screen announcement that they absolutely WILL be booted out if it rings or they try to use it in any way during the movie.

      If not ... watching somebody who's that self-entitled being told where to get off is probably better entertainment than what's on the screen. They can always pause the movie while they do it.

      http://theoatmeal.com/comics/movie_theater_layout

      Another idea is for each seat to have a row of red LEDs in front of it which gradually light up when people talk. If it reaches LED number three, out with them.

      --
      No sig today...
    108. Re:Too Bright by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      In an emergency, seconds count. They fucking count.

      Which do you think would be more beneficial to the person in need of help ? 1 person taking 10-20 seconds to dial 911 from the hall, or 200 people calling 911 simultaneously for the same event ?

    109. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me know the next time you go see a movie. I'm going to sit behind you, then halfway through I'll unzip my pants and piss out the 64 ounce soda I just drank, all over your head and your phone. It doesn't bother me when people do the same to me because I like golden showers. Why should you have a problem with it if I don't?

    110. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the Alamo Drafthouse doesn't let douche bags text and talk on their phones the entire movie and the management actually takes complaints about rude behavior seriously.

    111. Re:Too Bright by Bayoudegradeable · · Score: 1

      But you are welcomed to attend my grammar class; it might be good for improving your lackluster skills.

      --
      Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
    112. Re: Too Bright by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      Overhead surveillance! Individually addressable seat zappers! Violators will be shocked. Screams amongst the audience enhance some horror movies, particularly when unexpected with respect to what's happening onscreen.

      It would be helpful to have a quick, discreet way of reporting annoyers without having to leave your seat.

      Mostly, I just want people receiving messages/calls to get out of the seating area quickly and yap/text all they want in the lobby. Over time, it would be helpful to have theatres designed to allow quicker, less disturbing ingress/egress. More space between rows, more aisles, direct exits to hallways blocked from the line of sight of the seating area.

    113. Re:Too Bright by DriveDog · · Score: 2

      I was actually thinking of a remotely steerable limelight overhead, illuminating offenders. There are a few who will go the extra mile to receive this treatment, however.

    114. Re:Too Bright by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Personally, if I am going to use my phone in the movie theater, I like to switch it to the same red-pixels-only mode (using an open source app I made for it), which I normally use for amateur astronomy not to disturb dark adaptation. I don't think dim red screens disturb much. Such modes should be available on all phones, not just some rooted ones. :-)

      Is this in the same vein as streetlights capturing drivers attention more than stoplights, or are you going to make an exception for people who have been trained to pay more attention to red than to white? You know, like everyone who drives their car at night?

    115. Re:Too Bright by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And this is why iPhones should have a removable battery.

    116. Re:Too Bright by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      It's okay, it would need a PIN number to activate, just like at your ATM machine...

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    117. Re:Too Bright by hhacklub · · Score: 1

      Technology, especially new to us, can make anyone seem insensitive, or worse, actually make us so ... I blame myself for having more fear of embarrassment than courage to help stand for higher civil standards in the sensibilty of shared acceptance requirements for our personal technology. Things that can make us feel like we suddenly, through no fault of anything but hoping for a wonderful experience from a technology tool, like we are suddenly standing out in public - with our ass bare ! ;)

    118. Re:Too Bright by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I agree. In fact, I died in no less than three theaters back in the 80's.

    119. Re:Too Bright by ravenscar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I read an article on this once. Unfortunately, I'm unable to find the link, but I'm sure enough searching would turn it up if you're interested. The article referenced a study that found that people experienced an increased level of distraction when they could only hear one side of a conversation taking place around them. The writer of the study believed this was due to the fact that your brain feels the need to "fill in" the part of the conversation that it can't hear. Doing so requires a greater degree of mental resource and, thus, leads to greater distractioin.

    120. Re:Too Bright by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      Same here Between the talkers, texters, and the cost I never go anymore. I can buy a pizza and drinks and then buy the movie, watch it once and throw it away and it would still be cheaper than taking my family to the theater anymore. My home theater is much nicer than the theater experience now. I can wait the six months to see a movie.

    121. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be surprised when the rest of us take your phone away from you and shove it up your ass, you inconsiderate prick.

    122. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Did the world change so that now you need 200 phones able to call 911 immediately as opposed to walking out of the theater like everyone did before cell phones?

      Yes, the world has changed. For instance, movie theater mass shootings now exist.

    123. Re:Too Bright by nigelo · · Score: 1

      I suppose we could fix this by calling it a PI Number, but then every idiot will have 3142 as the combination for their luggage.

      --
      *Still* negative function...
    124. Re:Too Bright by sexconker · · Score: 1

      So, after you've fired off your ElectroMagnetic Pulse Pulse and the projectionist is tearing his hair out looking at all his fried electronics, you'll be happy?

      Our projectionist has a pacemaker, you insensitive clod!

    125. Re:Too Bright by sexconker · · Score: 1

      >"Like I said, it hasn't bothered me when people do it"

      I don't doubt it doesn't bother you (nor perhaps many other people), but not everyone is the same. Things that bother one person might not bother someone else at all (and in reverse).

      I'm so happy!
      Aha! happy go lucky me!
      I just go my way,
      Living everyday!

      I don't worry!
      Worrying don't agree,
      Things that bother you,
      Never bother me!

      Things that bother you,
      Never bother me
      I feel happy and fine!
      Aha!
      Living in the sunlight,
      Loving in the moonlight
      Having a wonderful time!

      Haven't got a lot,
      I don't need a lot
      Coffee's only a dime
      Living in the sunlight,
      Loving in the moonlight,
      Having a wonderful time!

      Just take it from me,
      I'm just as free as any daughter.
      I do what i like,
      Just what i like,
      And how i love it!

      I'm right here to stay
      When i'm old and gray,
      I'll be right in my prime!
      Living in the sunlight,
      Loving in the moonlight,
      Having a wonderful time!

      Just take it from me,
      I'm just as free as any daughter.
      I do what i like,
      Just what i like,
      And how i love it!

      I'm right here to stay,
      When I'm old and gray,
      I'll be right in my prime,
      Living in the sunlight,
      Loving in the moonlight,
      Having a wonderful time!

    126. Re:Too Bright by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      If they fly with that luggage it would be "pi in the sky"...

      Sorry.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    127. Re:Too Bright by yusing · · Score: 1

      Texting is not that disruptive. In-house jamming is another option. Pretty hard to DF if it's intermittent enough. Very annoying if the signal is properly-modulated. Tech wins wars. Arise o ye chosen ones.

      --

      "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

    128. Re:Too Bright by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Oops. I seem to have conflated two occurrences in my mind. I was actually at a different concert with a different orchestra (of the same piece, though). The concert I described probably happened a couple years before this. I remember reading about the NYC thing and being astounded that it happened yet again at a major orchestra.

      My description of the guy coming forward with the apology may have been from this event... I can't find documentation of the concert I described with a couple quick searches, but I do remember some write-up about it; nothing like the attention the NYC one got, though. In my case, the conductor continued, and the piece ended, but during the applause you could see he was seething.

    129. Re:Too Bright by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      First world problems? Hell, 1% problems? The humanity... One time, at the Hamptons...

      I know I shouldn't even respond to this... but, for the record, I'm not in the 1%, nor can I afford a house in the Hamptons (and likely never will be able to).

      I happen to like certain kinds of music and will save up to go hear some good performances a few times each year. Some people spend as much or more to go see some mega rock concert. That's their choice too. Other people spend that kind of money for tickets to some major pro sports game, or a nice steakhouse... whatever. Everybody gets to choose what they enjoy.

      And many of the people I know who save up to do these other things aren't in the 1% either.

    130. Re:Too Bright by treeves · · Score: 1

      "24/7 3-4 days a week"

      Wouldn't that be "24/3 - 24/4"? ;-)

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    131. Re:Too Bright by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Two words...Faraday Cage

      One word : politeness.

      I'm trying to think of a single occasion when I've heard anyone talking on a mobile in a cinema, once the feature has started (OTOH, who wants to listen to the adverts?) I've seen a couple of people shuffling rapidly out of the auditorium and looking worriedly at their mobiles, but that's a correct response to the device being on vibrate. Having been the person making the call on the other end, with million-dollar problems happening in real time, now, answering their phones is what we pay those people for, but not to the detriment of other people. If we've got time to make a phone call to them, instead of hitting the blind-shear rams and run-don't-walk to the upwind lifeboat stations, then they can take the 30 seconds to walk out of the cinema.

      I told one off for ananswering her phone while driving last week. Naughty employee!

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    132. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about dental dams?

    133. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you've described is not negative reinforcement. Negative reinforcement is when you reward a desired action by removing a negative stimulus. For example, your seatbelt alarm is negative reinforcement - it stops buzzing once you buckle up.

      You've described punishment instead. Punishment is when you inflict some form of harm on another individual in response to an undesirable action.

      Negative reinforcement is an effective tool in training. Punishment is generally not effective, as it breeds animosity and actually trains the learner to find ways of circumventing the punishment to achieve their goal.

      Lots of people mix the two concepts up, but they're completely different.

    134. Re: Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every row!? I'm pretty sure one per theatre or what they have at the counter is more than enough.

    135. Re:Too Bright by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      That sounds similar to the iPhone's "do not disturb" mode, though slightly more advanced (the iPhone only lets you set one such schedule).

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    136. Re:Too Bright by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      iPhones don't turn themselves on if you have an alarm set. Just turn the phone off.

      (There are other reasons iPhones should have removable batteries, though.)

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    137. Re:Too Bright by omnichad · · Score: 1

      There's no reason not to leave a phone on vibrate - especially if you dismiss soon after it starts going off without pulling it from your pocket. Assuming iPhone has it - my dumbphone does. Most of the time, that won't be a distraction. In fact, I leave my phone on vibrate 24/7 to avoid ever having it go off out loud when I don't want it to. And since I would forget to silence or turn it off otherwise anyway.

      But also for water damage, yes. Not being able to remove the battery seriously decreases the phone's chances for survival.

    138. Re:Too Bright by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      A hit in performance at watching a movie... is that suppose to be a bad thing?

    139. Re:Too Bright by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I, too, recall this study. I think I learned of it from a link at Fark.com. Anyhow, here ya go:
      http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0058579

      I believe that is it.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    140. Re:Too Bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for this comment. I frequent Broadway shoes and tickets in the center orchestra run 100. and up, all the way to 500. for premium seating. I the last 10 years or so, manners have gone severely downhill. People talk through shows, eat and drink through them, have crinkling bags, talk or text with their phones.

      I did not just pay 200. on average (train to NYC, ticket cost, possible souvenir booklet) to have a full third of the show ruined by some selfish prick with his/her phone.
      A friend and I actually walked out of a recent matinee! It was a child friendly show and the children had been taken to the M&M store prior to the show.

      Can you imagine the fresh hell of some 150 children, crinkling bags, whispering amongst themselves and texting?

      Thankfully, the House Manager comped us tickets for the next day. She was incredibly apologetic. while we recognized it was not her fault (and we told her so) she stated the ushers were powerless because the chaperones were just as bad as the children.

      I had never walked out of a show prior to that, ever. And I sat through some god-awful shows!

    141. Re:Too Bright by flyneye · · Score: 1

      An emergency is an emergency, I'm on my way out the door anyway, with your wallet apparently, as well. Was your temporary burst of testoterone worth missing teeth and a ruptured teste? Only your credit card knows for sure.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    142. Re:Too Bright by flyneye · · Score: 1

      But...my security, bouncing, debt collection experience and skills make it no fight at all.
      I'm polite enough not to make a loud ruckus and obviously the victim here, so what's the problem?
      I have feelings just like the next guy, just a lot less tolerance for random critics and hecklers.
      Learn a lifes lesson, cut people some slack, just like we do in the supermarket and the highways and anywhere else.
      The tech is here with all it's caveats, people are gonna get calls at work, at the movies, during coitus, bowel movements, church and all sorts of uncomfortable situations. Get used to it or lose teeth. Not everyone out there is as thick skinned as to take public heckling without some blood sacrifice.
      I mean, what's next, you gonna gang up on the fat lady in the middle of the theater and beat her for farting?

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    143. Re:Too Bright by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      This is the sad part, if you are paying for the experience of going out to see a movie, but you want to do other things at the same time... what you really wanted was to pretend you were going to see a movie so you could tell other people about the parts you actually watched.

    144. Re:Too Bright by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      Are we really pretending to have a fight in a pretend scenario in some pretend theater?

    145. Re:Too Bright by flyneye · · Score: 1

      We are pretending to illustrate the real demographic ,generational, cross-section of people who make activism without thinking, a worse scenario than the problem it addresses.

      Other scenarios;
                Harry scores some donated movie tickets at the shelter, he hasn't seen a movie in years and is really looking forward to it with zeal. Harry is a schizophrenic on state aid who lives in a hotel room long enough each month to have an address to count toward receiving assistance. He has an SRS provided cell phone to keep in contact with his social worker, who happens to call during a quiet moment in the movie. He has been off his meds for a while and your display of displeasure and confrontations turns a can of whoop ass loose on you for your contribution to society.

                Mary, whose bridge club are down with the flu, left her with nothing to do one afternoon, goes to the moving picture show to see that handsome Brad Pitt.
      Mary, parks her scraped up LTD in the parking lot, and with her cane makes her way into the air conditioned theater. She doesn't see or hear too well anymore, so she sits down front, not far from you. Her Simplicity phone goes off, it's the service reminding her to take her blood thinners. You go ballistic over your superior position as a consciencious cell-phone constable and in her confusion at this young whippersnapper trying to mug her in a theatre, she almost grabs her lipstick, instead of the pepper spray, but not quite. You will never see this movie today or much of anything else for a few hours.

                Andre Rufus Damon is sittin' with his homies, yo! They jacked an Escalade just to come see SuperFly meets Rocky Horror 3D and dude is stylin his diamond case Iphone so new, no one else have it yet, word. Now when his biatches text his macho ass every 15 seconds, you cop a tude and step up.
      Dude, can't back down in front of his homies,so he kneecaps you with a 9mm and escapes with the screaming crowd. But, you did your best to not mind your business and stand up for what you wanted; to control the behavior of others.

      Get my point yet?

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  2. if someone threw my phone... by jwinterm · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd probably just sit there and be quiet.

    1. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps a theater could offer a velvet roped like V.I.P. membership to some of its screens for those who would prefer to just sit there and be quiet without the throwing of phones. Membership can require a common code of conduct so members can finally get a polite and quiet screening with like minded patrons. The rest can use the general public screens.

    2. Re:if someone threw my phone... by nemui-chan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We have that. We call those places, "Movie theaters". People need to learn manners.

    3. Re:if someone threw my phone... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I'm not sure why people would shell out $10 for a ticket, plus the cost of parking and any snacks they want, then spend most of the movie texting or talking on the phone.

      People who want to text while watching a movie have less expensive options.

    4. Re:if someone threw my phone... by johnsnails · · Score: 1

      $18 in Australia, $12 on cheapskate Tuesday

    5. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Informative

      What would be better is the *reverse* - a soundproof glass enclosed room at a premium price where people can smoke, talk, and be on their cell phones all they want while the rest of the theater gets to watch a movie in peace.

      Or maybe the mainstream theaters could just just get some balls and do what Alamo Drafthouse did...

      http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/texas-movie-theater-makes-example-psa-texting-audience-170925090.html

    6. Re:if someone threw my phone... by rockout · · Score: 1

      Because they're kids. And they want to get out of the house, not sit there with their parents and watch a movie while texting. They want to get out, go out with friends, text other friends, and have an excuse to do so. A $10 movie ticket is still the cheapest night out there is, and one of the few options available to under-21 folks.

      "to text or not to text" while watching the movie doesn't even enter into it - it's a given; they're going to be texting and checking facebook no matter where they are. The only option you have is to do what I'm doing - go on Mon, Tues, or Wed nights, after a movie's been out for a couple of weeks. And in the summertime, even that doesn't work. So I torrent summer movies once an HD version hits the net and my wife and I watch it on a 60" plasma with a $1 bucket of popcorn that tastes 10 times better than the one at the movie theater anyway.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    7. Re:if someone threw my phone... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Thing is with the MPAA etc the way they are, wouldn't it be risky to use your phone obtrusively while the movie is going on? They might think you're trying to record the movie: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/01/AR2007080102398.html

      --
    8. Re:if someone threw my phone... by slick7 · · Score: 1

      We have that. We call those places, "Movie theaters". People need to learn manners.

      Well, good luck with that. A better idea would be to nail the offending device up on a wall outside the theater to impress upon the violators or would be violators, the need for courtesy in public places. You know, like your parents should have taught you.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    9. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have that. We call those places, "Movie theaters".

      People need to learn manners.

      Well, good luck with that. A better idea would be to nail the offending device up on a wall outside the theater to impress upon the violators or would be violators, the need for courtesy in public places. You know, like your parents should have taught you.

      That's theft and destruction of property.

      It would be nice if they would just eject those people (Management is always free to ask you to leave, if you refuse then they can have you arrested for trespassing), but that won't happen because they're both too lazy and too afraid of driving away future customers. [The theater only cares that you paid, not what you get for that money]

    10. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 0

      Or a Faraday cage around the building - stops all those issues except for the talking.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    11. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Until cars have a chip in them which limits them exactly to the speed limit of the road - people will speed.
      Until cell phones have the capability to be turned off by theaters and other public gatherings - people will have them on, without the ringer turned to silent, and sometimes even be gabbing away on them.
      Until every packet is encrypted on the internet - governments and companies will spy on everything you do.
      Humans will do as much as they can physically get away with, barring the securing mechanism is sufficiently complex to avoid them deactivating it.

    12. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would be better is the *reverse* - a soundproof glass enclosed room at a premium price where people can smoke, talk, and be on their cell phones all they want while the rest of the theater gets to watch a movie in peace.

      Like a drive-in theater?

    13. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps a theater could offer a velvet roped like V.I.P. membership to some of its screens for those who would prefer to just sit there and be quiet without the throwing of phones.

      There's a theater in the area that has a $28/ticket screen right next to their $12/ticket screens. Seats are slightly nicer and they bring a concession stand card in during ads/previews, but otherwise it's basically the same.

      It does do a good job of ensuring that everyone in that room is there to see the movie. The people who just want to talk, text, fuck around, fuck, etc won't pay extra.

    14. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ONLY people who require a cell phone during a movie are doctors and drug dealers (plus the lawyers who represent them).

    15. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A $10 movie ticket is still the cheapest night out there is, and one of the few options available to under-21 folks.

      The food court at the mall is still free.

      Your friend's basement is still free.

      The park is still free.

      Going somewhere to do something that annoys other people and wastes their time and money, just because it's cheap for you, isn't acceptable behavior even from "kids".

    16. Re:if someone threw my phone... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Humans will do as much as they can physically get away with, barring the securing mechanism is sufficiently complex to avoid them deactivating it.

      You say that as if it's a universal truth. But it's not. It didn't used to be this way. Back a few decades and people knew they should be quiet in theatres and libraries, and used to be pretty good at respecting that.

      Not that all "The Good Old Days" were like this. Back in the 19th century and earlier, many theatres were places of noise and debauchery. Theatre etiquette was fought for and won. It could be won again.

    17. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I wonder if this is more of an "American" issue. In Canada I don't notice it being much of a problem. I have not heard a phone ring or been annoyed by a distracting lit phone screen during the last dozen or so movies. In fact I can't even remember the last time it happened. Perhaps this is just the effect of the specific American culture and its trumpeting of individualism above all else? I mean we here believe in the supreme importance of personal liberty, but somehow it doesn't end up in the rude behavior we see south of the border.

    18. Re:if someone threw my phone... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      What would be better is the *reverse* - a soundproof glass enclosed room at a premium price where people can smoke, talk, and be on their cell phones all they want while the rest of the theater gets to watch a movie in peace.

      The problem is those assholes wouldn't pay a premium price. They'd expect the well behaved people to pay to get their silence.

    19. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Well, if you want to solve the problem with technology, I can think of solutions that would be a lot more fun! I'd go for an usher with night vision goggles and a switchboard seating chart in an overhead booth allowing him to apply a mild shock to the seat of anyone he sees using a cell phone.

    20. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I'd probably just sit there and be quiet.

      Oh, I wouldn't, but then again I'd mostly be up in arms about why some jerk decided to reach into my pocket and grab my silenced cell phone from out of my front pocket in the first place. Bad touch! Bad touch!

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    21. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who frequents alamo drafthouse, I fucking love them for this.

    22. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Alamo Drafthouse is a fine institution and those PSAs are always fantastic. There are many reasons to want to move out of Texas...the Alamo would be one of the few things I'd miss.

    23. Re:if someone threw my phone... by rockout · · Score: 1

      I never said it was acceptable. The question was "why would anyone shell out $10 for a ticket....then spend most of the movie texting or talking on the phone." Yes, they also do this at the food court at the mall. Yes, maybe they'll do it at their friends' basement if their parents aren't home. And maybe they'll even go to a park, although that seems less likely for a teenager than a movie theater. $10 is nothing, especially when their parents give it to them just to get 'em out of the house for a few hours. So sometimes they're also going to a movie, because it's cheap, and they'll text through it, because they do that ALL THE TIME, wherever they are.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    24. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Oatmeal has a pretty good idea of how movie theaters should be laid out:

      http://theoatmeal.com/comics/movie_theater_layout

    25. Re:if someone threw my phone... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Damn you, I of course followed the link and as usual spent the next half hour clicking "Random Comic"...

  3. I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have never, ever noticed this, not in a single movie. Talking on the phone would definitely be a problem, but I've never seen this either. Frankly I don't really give a shit if people are texting or surfing on their phone during the movie. I'm looking ahead at the screen. I find it hard to believe that it should really bother someone that much.

    1. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by taustin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've never seen it either, in 50+ years of life in three states. The theater I normally go to has a warning at the beginning that they will throw you out. Given that I have never seen anyone with a phone screen on there, I can only presume they mean it.

      This is a trivial problem to deal with - for the theater management. They will quickly get a reputation of not tolerating that kind of idiocy, and as they do, for every texting asshole they lose as a customer, they'll pick up two or three who will drive the extra distance to get to a theater that enforces their rules. If it's a problem in the first place.

      So is some dickhead is bothering your movie experience, complain to the manager. Immediately. Demand they either enforce their rules (and they have them) or give you your money back. And if they don't, make it clear they've lost a customer, and anybody else who you can tell about it.

      If it's a problem in the first place. I've never seen it.

    2. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am surprised. I go to a fair amount of movies and do you have any idea how bright an iphone screen is, when it is facing you from either the front or sides in a dark theater?

    3. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by tibbetts · · Score: 1

      It's annoying when it's someone sitting next to or in front of you; otherwise, it's not noticeable. Oh, and clicky sounds when typing are a big distraction.

      --
      :wq
    4. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by markdavis · · Score: 2

      >"I have never, ever noticed this, not in a single movie."

      Well good for you. I have in several movies and it was EXTREMELY annoying and distracting to have someone in front of me light up their damn phone every 5 to 10 minutes. And the people I was with were also annoyed.

      And now there are no less than THREE separate sequences before each movie telling people to turn off and/or not use phones during the movie. Added to the previews and such, it takes 20+ minutes for the movie to start.

    5. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've found I rarely hear anything because the sounds of the movie generally drown out any ambient noise. The volume for movie theaters is usually far louder than necessary in my experience, but that is a different conversation entirely.

    6. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by markdavis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >"If someone is bothered by a phone screen's brightness during a movie, it sounds like they aren't paying attention to the right screen."

      And that is just a typical "everyone is like me" attitude. Just because it doesn't bother YOU doesn't mean it doesn't bother anyone else. This is one of the biggest issues with society- many people are simply unable to imagine that other people are more or less sensitive/annoyed by things. Even worse are the people who simply don't care that what they do annoys others because the world revolves around their own selfishness.

    7. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by wickerprints · · Score: 1

      I have gotten my phone out of my pocket during a movie in two situations: (1) when the movie is supremely boring or it's dragging on, and I want to check the time--which I do as stealthily as possible so as not to let the illumination of the screen be obtrusive to others around me; and (2) the exceedingly rare situation where someone has dropped something important on the floor or it fell out of a pocket (like a wallet) and we have to find it. This is usually done only at the end of a film, though.

      I have seen others text/tweet/facebook etc. during a movie, however. It does happen, and it generally affects you if you're sitting in the row immediately behind the offender, and it's not stadium seating. On one occasion I have seen someone use a laser pointer on the screen--that is really annoying and completely unacceptable.

    8. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      I do not have access to a chainsaw, rusty or otherwise, so I will have to miss out on that experience.

    9. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      Yeah a laser pointer would be really unacceptable.

    10. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Rockoon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What movie theater do you frequent? I'll make sure to shine a flashlight in your eyes and tell you your attention span sucks and that maybe instead of complaining like a little girl that you should just go back to watching the movie.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    11. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 2

      Any of the theaters in downtown Chicago. I regularly attend all screenings of every movie, so feel free to walk into every show and look for me.

    12. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by markdavis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >"What movie theater do you frequent? I'll make sure to shine a flashlight in your eyes and tell you your attention span sucks"

      You are either an uncooked teenager or just don't give a damn about anyone around you. Perhaps karma will catch up with you one day.... one can only hope.

    13. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Texting/surfing is just as annoying if not more so, today's super bright screens are a glaring annoyance when people use them in the cinema, I actually find it more annoying than making a call as at least people are suitably embarrassed when that happens and usually get up and leave to talk.

    14. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope I see you using your phone the next time I go to a movie.

      You will be shopping for a new phone soon afterward.

    15. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but there are consequences for your rudeness.
      Expect a punch to the face for being a dick.

    16. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 0

      I don't use my phone during the movie .... because I am watching a movie and giving my full attention. If I'm going to pay $12 to sit in a room for two hours, it makes sense to get my money's worth.

    17. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by asmkm22 · · Score: 1

      What's annoying is when you're watching the screen in front of you, only to have some idiot blind everyone around him (including you) with his phone as he checks for messages or something.

    18. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 0

      That's what the movie is for.

    19. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 0, Troll

      For watching the movie, leaving my phone in my pocket, and not talking to anyone? Someone is going to punch me in the face for that? Man I really need to recalibrate my views on rudeness and societal expectations.

    20. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      I'm often on call. Even when I'm not on call, I'm always a "call me if you need help" resource for various projects. So I'm afraid that I do have to leave my phone on, but I get up and step outside the theater precisely to avoid bothering others with the sound, or lights.

      It's actually a much worse problem with modern cell phones than it used to be with small pagers, because of the larger screen.

    21. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Rockoon · · Score: 0

      Why should I care about the people around me>? Listen to this pro-cell-phone-in-movies fucks right here in slashdot.. if they dont need to care, then i dont either.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    22. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm annoyed at your failure to be annoyed.

    23. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 0

      I've had that happen. Didn't bother me as I had my eyes on the movie screen after the briefest of glances at the person.

    24. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 0

      I don't think anyone who's posted has actually expressed a "pro cell phone in movies" sentiment. There seem to be a large chunk of people, myself included, who either don't think it's a problem or are ambivalent about it.

    25. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      It's annoying when it's someone sitting next to or in front of you; otherwise, it's not noticeable.

      I usually wait until a movie has been out for 2+ weeks, to have a good choice of seats. I find the handheld screens *very* distracting in the darkened theater before the movie starts. However, I've never noticed one during the movie itself. I don't know whether that's because people are polite enough not to use them, because I'm absorbed in the movie, or simply because I don't get out enough.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    26. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Rockoon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't think anyone who's posted has actually expressed a "pro cell phone in movies" sentiment.

      You did about 9 times now in 9 different posts on the subject, in the span of about 9 minutes.

      What are you trying to cover for there chief? So many posts, telling people they must have a shitty attention span, telling people to just watch the movie regardless of how you behave right in front of them, and so forth... what gives chief?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    27. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by RogL · · Score: 2

      Read the post the parent was replying to.
      They're not advocating annoying flashlights in theaters, they're pointing out that most people would find that annoying. Drawing a parallel to cellphone backlights.

    28. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 0

      I'm not the guy who called you an uncooked teenager, by the way, in case that is why you want to come across as macho and hostile. That was markdavis. However, I am not pro cell phone in the theater. I just don't care, and I don't have a problem with it. To be "pro cell phone in theaters," I would be advocating that they should be in theaters or should be allowed in theaters with their use going unpunished. I am not doing that.

    29. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by AxemRed · · Score: 0

      People need to understand that phone use, even silent phone use, distracts some people, and it should be kept to a minimum. But on the other hand, people also need to understand that when they're in a room with 200 other people, there are going to be distractions. And there are some scenarios where, in my opinion, it's perfectly acceptable to turn on your screen for 10 seconds to see who is calling and then either turn it off or excuse yourself to the lobby. There has to be compromise and understanding on both sides.

    30. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by LVSlushdat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just the fact that this is a problem, AND the fact of the astronomical prices of movies (and the crap they sell in the snack bar), I wait till the movie comes out at Redbox, and then rent it and watch it on my tv.. The last movie I actually went to a theater to see was the last Starwars installment, and THEN I was so pissed off at the admission price, snack price AND noisy damn kids, I swore I'd never set foot in a theater again... Its been however many years since the last Starwars installment.. Forgot just when that was.. Even though I love the Bond and Startrek franchises, I wait for Redbox on them... Just aint gonna waste my hard earned money on theaters...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    31. Re: I go to a fair amount of movies by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 1

      Good for you. You must be very proud of yourself

    32. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teflon bullets to the face is what you get in return!!!!

    33. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      I live in an apartment building. There's really no place to leave a chainsaw for me to safely retrieve it a few days/weeks later. It would be picked up be a cleaning crew or some other employee. Sorry I can't fulfill your demand.

    34. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by KernelMuncher · · Score: 1

      I live in NYC and it's been a problem here for at least 10 years. I can't tell you the number of times I've had people near me talking on their cell phone ("Yeah, I'm watching this movie and it sucks. What are you doing ?"). Texting is extremely common. If you sit toward the back on can see the glow of a half dozen smartphone screens at any given time (or more). Having them constantly light up in your field of vision is a annoyance. It's so bad that I basically don't go to movies anymore.

    35. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      I'd have been way more mad at the general suckiness of those movies versus the price/noise/snack prices.

    36. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      It's not my fault you have a crappy attention span and are easily distracted by shiny things.

      Whose fault is it that you're an asshole, but are drawing breath anyway?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    37. Re: I go to a fair amount of movies by Elbereth · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're an asshole, but you're a moderately funny asshole. That kind of makes up for being an asshole. But you're still an asshole.

    38. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      What movie theater do you frequent? I'll make sure to shine a flashlight in your eyes and tell you your attention span sucks and that maybe instead of complaining like a little girl that you should just go back to watching the movie.

      Flashlighting most adults who've asked you to shut the fuck up and stop wrecking the film will likely end up with said adult grabbing your pimpled teen ass and hauling you out of the cinema faster than you can blink.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    39. Re: I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      Asshole is not the preferred nomenclature. Sphincter, please.

    40. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by wallsg · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've never seen it either, in 50+ years of life in three states. The theater I normally go to has a warning at the beginning that they will throw you out. Given that I have never seen anyone with a phone screen on there, I can only presume they mean it.

      2:15 pm June 25 showing of Star Trek Into Darkness at the Peoria, AZ Harkin's Theater. Twice during the show a woman three rows down pulls out her phone for about 30 seconds each time. Full brightness.

      While stadium seating gives much better view of the movie it means that you can see every phone in front of you.

    41. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Assholes are hard to ignore. They're purpose in life is to make people notice them.

    42. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think they need an announcement on the screen at the start. Should read:
      "Attention. Parolees from the state correctional facility are in this theater as part of a program to help reduce their unpredictable rage. For your own safety, please do not use your phone."

    43. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by MightyMartian · · Score: 0

      Let me guess. You also support Ron Paul.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    44. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by gfxguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No. If you're so important you MUST leave the phone on during the movie, then maybe should wait for the Blu-Ray.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    45. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by macshit · · Score: 1

      Most phones throw out a huge amount of light from their screen when in use... this isn't noticeable in normal situations, but it's extremely noticeable in a dark theater, especially during dark scenes. It's very annoying when the guy next to pulls out his portable searchlight / phone and lights up during a tense moment in the movie for an angry-bird break...

      The real answer is social, of course—people should stop acting like entitled children and show some consideration. In many other countries, peer pressure serves to enforce such unwritten rules, but in the U.S.'s violent and self-focused culture, it's a bit scary even to just ask someone to turn off their phone...

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    46. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by gfxguy · · Score: 2

      Similar experience... I've gone to see some things on opening night and wanted to throttle some people, but I haven't done that in years. I haven't had many bad experiences lately... it used to be more common. I think enough people complain about it that perhaps it happens less often, and when you wait a couple of weeks to see movies in practically empty theaters, there's much less of a chance of there being a complete jerk present when there's only 12 people as opposed to 250.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    47. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Golden_Rider · · Score: 1

      I have gotten my phone out of my pocket during a movie in two situations: (1) when the movie is supremely boring or it's dragging on, and I want to check the time--which I do as stealthily as possible so as not to let the illumination of the screen be obtrusive to others around me

      Whatever happened to wrist watches? I feel like an old fart for actually looking at my watch when I want to know what time it is. Now get off my lawn.

    48. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 0

      Erm no. I'd prefer to vote for someone who isn't half insane and has a chance to win some type of national election.

    49. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by pspahn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I just don't care, and I don't have a problem with it.

      Neither do I, though, I haven't been to a movie in the theaters in many years. Before cell phones, they were already very loud, full of obnoxious teenagers, some guy with big hair and a loud laugh, and so many other annoyances that going to a movie theater is the last place I'd like to go to enjoy a film.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    50. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG that is amazing Trudy has to know about this tik tik tik tik

    51. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by pspahn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you sit toward the back on can see the glow of a half dozen smartphone screens at any given time (or more).

      I was fortunate enough to see Roger Waters at the LA Coliseum last year. Fucking amazing show. The most brilliant bit was during "Run Like Hell". Across the sea of audience, you could see thousands of phone screens, everyone taking video, snapping pics, etc. Meanwhile, Waters is mocking all of these people with images of people wearing the white ear buds on the giant projection screen (as well as a few comments before the song).

      And then.... AND THEN!!! Everyone starts singing along and doing the overhead clap thing... "RUN! RUN! RUN! RUN!!"

      The irony was completely lost on them. I sat and watched and just couldn't believe my eyes. Hitler would have loved these people.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    52. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by anarcobra · · Score: 2

      Why would I carry a separate device for telling time when I have my phone with me anyway?
      At this point, as far as I can tell, a wrist watch is mostly a fashion statement.

    53. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Trogre · · Score: 2

      Not all of us are blessed with tunnel vision.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    54. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer to vote for someone who isn't half insane and has a chance to win some type of national election.

      Wait, so which is it?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    55. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to know a guy that zoned out watching movies. Movies put him in a trance. You could make sudden noises and he wouldn't even flinch. He wasn't really that bright though.

    56. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Richy_T · · Score: 3, Funny

      On the other hand, if she had done it during the first one, you wouldn't even have noticed it.

    57. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Fishchip · · Score: 1

      Are you a fan of rusty chainsaws?

    58. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Yes. God forbid you would vote for the guy who didn't win.

    59. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by swillden · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've only seen it once, and I only had to give the girl one warning. She called me a fucking asshole and told me to get the fuck out of her face, but she put the phone away and did not use it again. I almost complained to the management just for her language (this was a family movie), but decided just to let it go unless she pulled the phone out again.

      However, I have also noticed that while the theater's pre-movie warnings used to be friendly, gentle reminders, they've changed to pretty stern warnings making clear that phone usage will not be tolerated and that offenders will be kicked out, not receive a refund, and potentially be asked never to return. So there has obviously been enough trouble to warrant the sterner warnings.

      Come to think of it, I think that single incident was during the "friendly reminder" era.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    60. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      The volume for movie theaters is usually far louder than necessary in my experience, but that is a different conversation entirely.

      I wear earplugs, which also helps remove ambient noise.

    61. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Two part solution:

      1) make it clear that cell phones and pagers must be kept OFF if taken into the theater. "You agree to hold harmless anyone taking your functioning phone or pager away from you, including any accidental or intentional damage to said device."

      before we get to #2, 911 IN the theater room is not necessary. you probably can't call 911 when you're swimming in the public pool for example. It's not a civil right. If you think that it is, then I challenge you to force your local pool to find a way to accommodate this right. Cellular/landline access to 911 is only relevant when there are no other convenient ways to summon help. Being 40 feet from the theater lobby is NOT too inconvenient. I can probably sprint to the lobby faster than you can fumble for your phone in the dark and dial 911. Maybe you should insist on them leaving the lights on in the theater so you can dial 911 faster? Seconds count! now put that silly argument away.

      2) theaters could offer a silent pager, similar to what you find at many restaurants. Check your cell phone or pager at the lobby and get a pager. If your phone goes off, they will vibrate your pager. Theaters should not be required to offer this, and would almost certainly charge for it to prevent half the theater from checking their phones. If you need to be on call 24/7, don't go to a theater that doesn't offer this service. (and don't go for a swim) There are some things you simply can't do if you're on call. You're probably being compensated for this inconvenience. Deal with it, it's not my problem.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    62. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by kermidge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, then, you're probably an old fart, as am I. There seem to be a number of generational things less seen out and about these days - wrist and pocket watches, good manners, modestly good grammar, attention span, ability to focus or pay attention, fewer interruptions, knowledge of and respect and appreciation for quiet - and the capability for being quiet, for a few.

    63. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      There's a little more to it than that. I don't have to plug my watch in to charge every day (or, indeed, ever) and I can shuck my sleeve and check the time in an instant in virtually any situation, it's waterproof to 100m (tested to 30) and requires almost zero consideration when it comes to protection from the environment (though it does have the dings and scratches to show for it).

      On the other hand, I readily confess that it's something of, well, I hesitate to say fashion but certainly style statement. Then again, I got my first watch for my 5th birthday (Timex, simple hour, minute, second deal) and have always had something of a fascination for them. I actually have a Commodore watch somewhere. I imagine that might be worth something. But I'm digressing...

    64. Re: I go to a fair amount of movies by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Isn't sphincter a little ambiguous though.

      Not that you're either for it not bothering you. It bothers me but it's not beyond my comprehension that there's people it doesn't

    65. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps all these so-called "movie lovers" are going to films where there isn't stadium seating or something. And the seats are arranged in some way that the tiny screens are both bothersome, somehow.

      Although I suspect they're just looking for a reason to be angry, and carrying on from when people used to forget to turn off their ringers, and also received calls and had conversations, sometimes, and also were rich enough to own a cell phone back when cell phones were the size of small bricks or something, so there was some class envy going on, too.

    66. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by pete6677 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thank God for loud movie sound! Its the only thing that drowns out the inane conversations of the "average American" who won't shut up even during a movie. Why can't people go just two fucking hours out of their day without talking?

    67. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by wickerprints · · Score: 1

      Not everyone likes wearing things on their wrists. Years ago, I tried wearing a wristwatch, but I found it gets in the way. It makes typing uncomfortable for me, and I have several hobbies for which wearing anything on my hands would mean they'd get dirty or damaged, or be a safety hazard--so I also do not wear any rings on my fingers. From a functional standpoint, I already have a device that does what I need it to do--my phone.

      As for being "an old fart," I should point out that people used to have pocket watches before wristwatches were common.

      Just because a dedicated device exists for doing something, doesn't necessarily mean that it is a better solution.

    68. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Well I would ask if you have ever actually had someone text in a movie because it sounded like you hadn't but you addressed that in your post. You better believe it's that annoying. A phone screen is often brighter than the theater screen. It's like a flashing blue flash light in your eyes. There is a reason you can use your cell phone screen as a flash light to find your way around a dark room. They have to be bright enough to compete with daylight!

    69. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those sequences aren't there for the reason you think. You notice they're always sponsored by a cell phone company?

      People are already polite enough not to use their cell phones while a movie they paid to see is running. The "don't use cell phones" is just a reminder that cell phones exist and that other people will notice when you have one....

    70. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Yeah a laser pointer would be really unacceptable.

      In some countries doing that could land you in jail and/or paying a hefty fine. See here.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    71. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have. It entirely depends on the median income of the crowd.

      The poorer and more urban the audience, the more likely you'll see this. It was this way _before_ cellphones, but cellphones made it worse because it just added to the number of annoying things people could do in the theater. Want to see it at its worst, go to a theatre in a poor inner-city neighborhood. Cellphones, shouting, whatever...

      This isn't a racial thing, although because of racism and institutionalized poverty people associate this with black neighborhoods. If you went to the Union Station AMC in Washington, DC in the 1990s, before gentrification really rocked the Capital Hill area, you had to deal with all kinds of disturbances.

      When you're broke and have nothing else to do (poor, or just young), you hang out in a theatre, if you have one. But the value to you is far less than someone who works and sees the theatre as quality entertainment time. It's a simple matter of economics and its effect on cultural expectations.

      I watched Iron Man 3 in the Mongolian capital, Ulaanbaatar, 6 weeks ago. Mongolia is extremely poor. Not even the filthy rich Mongolians have adopted the bourgeois ethics of the modern Western middle class, nor have they any cultural inheritance of the stereotypical quiet Asian demeanor. The whole experience was annoying, but predictable. People flashing cellphones was the least annoying out of all the shouting at the screen, walking around, and general talking.

    72. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

      My definition of people using cellphones, or talking, in movie theatres...

      A teachable moment.

      --

      Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    73. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      Depending on where someone's sitting and how they hold their phone, everyone sitting behind them can have an annoying white glow in their vision while they're trying to watch the movie.

      But yes, I think this is massively overblown. It's happened to me once; after half an hour I just got up, walked down, tapped the guy on the shoulder, and asked him to stop using his phone. He did. Problem solved. And like you, I see quite a few movies. Columnists just need something to moan about, I guess.

    74. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're the one who's checking his phone in the middle of a movie, but the other guy is the asshole?

      Wow...

      An overwhelming compulsion to check your phone just because somebody called you is not normal. It's, sadly, not particularly abnormal. But on the whole most people have the capacity to resist the urge. Unless your mother is in the hospital, or you're on the cusp of closing a million dollar account, I can pretty much guarantee you that it's not so important it can't wait 2 hours.

      If you're checking your phone like that, I can also guarantee you that you're not the kind of person who would be worried about million dollar accounts. Not unless you had a diagnosed psychological disorder like ADHD. Success in life is strongly correlated with the ability to moderate your behavior. In fact, the capacity to delay gratification is more than correlated; on the whole its causative of increased wealth.

    75. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it impossible to ignore the incorrect use of "they're" you asshole! (That was supposed to be a joke, but c'mon. It isn't that difficult)

    76. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get distracted by a lit screen at the corner of my vision, especially when the scene is dark and/or it's a pivotal image. It hardly happens at all to me either but when it has happened it's been a little bit more than an annoyance. I paid hard earned cash for this seat and now some teenager with a flip phone is part of my movie memory.

      If it's come to the point where this is something that will never go away, I'd prefer to have certain shows be texting okay and texting prohibited, at different hours or days. We prefer the early evening shows.

    77. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi,

      I think it just boils down to etiquette, really. Some people just aren't taught manners, whether by their parents or their peers.

      It's like the theatre, or a restaurant, or a meeting - there are some places where it's just bad form to play with your phone.

      Look, unless you're on call (my partner is a vet surgeon, and she is on-call sometimes), if you want to go see a movie, turn off your phone or put it on silent.

      Or if you do happen to be on call, put it on vibrate, and then excuse yourself to take the call.

      Sure, there are exceptions, and I understand sometimes you can forget, but it should be the exception, not the norm.

      Cheers,
      Victor

    78. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I just set my phone to vibrate only. If it vibrates, I step out into the hall to check it.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    79. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Years ago, I tried wearing a wristwatch, but I found it gets in the way. It makes typing uncomfortable for me

      Agreed, wrist watches are uncomfortable. For everyday carry, I have a clip watch clipped to a beltloop. It's far easier to check the time there than to dig my phone out of a pocket, plus I have also clipped a keychain-style LED flashlight to it. It's occasionally useful just to have a light-duty carabiner at hand. And I'll take it running or biking, when I usually leave my bulkier cell phone home.

      For fancy dress, have some real style and get a pocket watch.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    80. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Maybe your perephrial vision is failing. I can see someone *behind* me on the phone. Yes, while watching the movie.

      And I spoke to a guy once, "Do you mind?" He proceeded to threaten my life. Because someone pointed out his rudeness.

    81. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my home town, I've never seen anyone talk on the phone during a movie. But somewhere in northern Pennsylvania, I went to a movie in a real shithole of a movie theater, and three different people took calls and had loud conversations during the movie. I've never seen anything like it, before or since, but I think it has to do with where you live.

      I do sometimes see people check their email, and whether it's annoying or not really depends on how the theater is laid out. There are definitely angles where the bright phone screen becomes severely distracting. However, even this seems to be under control in my area - I occasionally see it, but it's quite rare.

    82. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So is some dickhead is bothering your movie experience, complain to the manager. Immediately. Demand they either enforce their rules (and they have them) or give you your money back.

      I've done that, they gave the refund and showed me out. They had a posted "no saving seats" sign, and on opening day, some guy was saving an entire row for people who never showed. Theater management is unwilling to enforce their posted rules. (Century 16, Anchorage, AK)

    83. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to "Do one thing well"?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    84. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kill yourself, retard

    85. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's really too bad worthless fucks like you don't get shot in the head more often

    86. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      That has been my experience. Theaters take a no confrontation stance, and if you force the issue, they will consider YOU to be the problem. That is one of the many reasons I don't go to theaters anymore.

      What theaters should really be doing is taking a queue from churches. Put a sound proof booth in the back for those that can't help but disturb the people around them. That means people with babies, people who want to talk during the show, or people who absolutely must use their cell phone. If the number of people who want seats in the noisy room start outnumber the ones that want quiet, they can just switch where the two groups sit.

      Of course, either way the theater should be dealing with disturbances. It is unacceptable that they expect the customers to deal with it themselves.

    87. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by taustin · · Score: 1

      However, I have also noticed that while the theater's pre-movie warnings used to be friendly, gentle reminders, they've changed to pretty stern warnings making clear that phone usage will not be tolerated and that offenders will be kicked out, not receive a refund, and potentially be asked never to return. So there has obviously been enough trouble to warrant the sterner warnings.

      I gotta wonder if it's that there's more complaints, or if theater managers just see more stuff on the internet about it being a problem (like here), and think it's a problem. I don't recall it ever being an issue, from people talking before cell phones came around to the early days when cell phones were new, to now. On the other hand, I live in the big city, and there are probably 50 theaters (not screen, theaters) within close enough driving distance that I'd be willing to go there for a better experience, so maybe competition has something to do with it.

    88. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by taustin · · Score: 1

      And if you've ever gone back, then you have agreed that their management decisions are prefectly acceptable.

    89. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And if I've never gone back?

    90. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If I'm going to pay $12 to sit in a room for two hours, it makes sense to get my money's worth.

      And if your experience is reduced because of someone talking or shining a light close to you, why do you defend such behavior, and not indicate that the offender should be more conscientious?

    91. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by stenvar · · Score: 0

      This is one of the biggest issues with society- many people are simply unable to imagine that other people are more or less sensitive/annoyed by things. Even worse are the people who simply don't care that what they do annoys others because the world revolves around their own selfishness.

      Or maybe they simply don't care about some of the things that annoy you because your particular annoyance is petty and silly. You know, things like "chemical sensitivity", "EM sensitivity", and "private sexist jokes". You don't have a right not to be annoyed.

    92. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I haven't been to a theater in years, but I personally experienced shithead behavior twice. Once a group of teenagers clearly were more interested in talking than watching the movie. Some dude's girlfriend eventually asked them to be quiet and they left. The other time some stupid girl's cell phone rang, and she sat there talking for about 30-60 seconds, mentioning that she was in the theater and couldn't talk, all while talking loud enough for the entire theater to hear her.

      This was in a reasonably sized city.

    93. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Raenex · · Score: 3, Funny

      Come on, the last Star Wars film was decent.

    94. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Raenex · · Score: 1

      But I'm digressing...

      That tends to happen as you get older ;)

    95. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 0

      I don't suppose you've ever gone to a movie while on call for something?

      Or are you saying that IT staff / firemen / doctors should never go to movies?

      Moron.

    96. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      I don't get it.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    97. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      I've already said talking is not acceptable. It doesn't reduce my experience if people text or surf on their phone while I watch the movie. Beside the non-distracting nature of the behavior, I rarely see it after the movie starts. I don't really care about the credits.

    98. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      Um both

    99. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Evtim · · Score: 0

      How did you see it? I though the light from the phone would be lost in all the lens flare....(sorry, could not resist)

    100. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      I've voted for plenty of people who've lost an election. I just don't particularly support someone who isn't electable on the national stage or whatever level they are running at. If the person I'm willing to vote for doesn't win, it means someone I like less is going to hold that office.

    101. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      It's not that annoying and your cell phone makes a pretty shitty flashlight. That's why they have flashlight apps which use the camera flash as the light and not the screen.

    102. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      My vision can't get much better unless I get Geordie's visor from TNG

    103. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by WolfTheWerewolf · · Score: 2

      My entire lawn for mod points to give you, good sir.

    104. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by unrtst · · Score: 1

      What theaters should really be doing is taking a queue from churches. Put a sound proof booth in the back for those that can't help but disturb the people around them.

      This, plus physically block cell reception in the quiet area.

      IMO, the only downside to making each theater a faraday cage is the edge cases where some people need to be able to get a text, page, call, etc (ex. doctors, on call IT, etc). Put those folks in their own section, and cage everyone else off.

      I only go to the movies once every couple months, but I've seen and heard phone calls multiple times a year, and these are nice theaters (ie. not the dollar shows). I'm sure some areas/theaters/cities/chance visits/etc see it more or less frequently or not at all, but it does happen, and it happens too much. It makes for a very awkward and frustrating social situation. If it happens, and if there is a confrontation, it's not going to go nicely (99% of the time - my made up stat), and if no one says anything to that person, then their behavior won't be curbed at all, and some others may even thing it's ok or feel justified in doing the same. Add to it that the movies are often a date or group outing place, and it makes it all the more ugly as the rest of that group will often defend their own. We have the tech, and it's far more simple and cheap than a single projector - just use it.

      FWIW, texting doesn't really bother me, as long as the ringer was on silent or a vibrate that wasn't annoying as hell. It's a little annoying, but not enough for me to bitch about it. I've also been there when someones phone rings, they hold it up, stare at it, and just let it ring and ring and ring. WTF? There's absolutely no excuse for that. They can just hit the volume key to turn it down, send it to voicemail, hook flash, or answer it, and all of those are less annoying.

      I'm rambling on too long now, but there is also a precedence for this stuff - strip clubs. I haven't been in ages, but back when I did go and camera phones were becoming the norm, they started holding them at the door. I hated it, and I wouldn't go through with that for a movie, but I don't remember seeing anyone opt to leave (except to drop the phone off in their car). Say what you will about strip clubs, but once a place enforces the social norm (don't use your phone in a $place), they'll lose few people, and make far more people more comfortable. I'm *ok* with rules like that, as long as it isn't a civil/criminal law such as what happened with smoking, which *should* have been solved by the bars and restaurants (let people vote with their wallets).

      In other words, physically or strictly blocking it based on company/showing policy will work just fine, but should not be made a law, and compromises such as a the noisy room/section would easily accommodate the edge cases.

    105. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Why is it your preference is the only one that matters? Others don't mind the talking but can't stand the lights from phones.

    106. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Trogre · · Score: 1

      You appear to be suggesting that there exists someone who isn't half insane and yet still stands a chance of winning a national election.

      I'll believe that when I see it.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    107. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yet you can't see a bright light one meter in front of your face. They portrayed Geordie's vision to be better than that.

    108. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa, I really liked your story until you Godwinned it!

    109. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly are you doing in this thread? You said yourself you're not part of the problem.

    110. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Nicely played, Sir; right into his hands.

      I commend you on demonstrating the unwritten corollary to markdavis' point: "everyone is like me.. and if they're not, they're an idiot."

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    111. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Chas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No. They just shouldn't do it while they're on call.

      If they can't be incommunicado for a couple hours, they should stay home and watch Netflix, or take a jog in the local park.

      Sneaking into a midnight showing with your phone turned on "just in case" is discourteous (in the extreme) to fellow theater patrons.

      Yeah it's "only" a $10-20 ticket. So what?

      If you buy a burger at McDonalds and someone comes by, grabs it, and smashes it into a pulp before dropping it back on your tray, is that okay? The burger is still edible.

      Going to the theater, you're paying for atmosphere and presentation. Some jackass yakking on his phone or texting incessantly at full brightness ruins that.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    112. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I've never seen it either, in 50+ years of life in three states.

      Watching an artsy movie by yourself during a senior Tuesday early matinee doesn't count.

      If you want to experience what some of us are talking about. Drive to a bad neighborhood on a late Friday night, and go see the most idiotic blockbuster action movie you can find. It also helps if the manager of the movie theater makes minimum wage and there is extremely high employee turnover.

    113. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Patman64 · · Score: 2

      I'm surprised I haven't seen the famous ad for the Alamo Drafthouse linked yet. It's what I think of whenever I hear this topic brought up.

    114. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      This is what I've been thinking... I've gone to a lot of movies and sure, it happens (a mere few times in my entire 27 year lifetime), but the actual problem in my experience has been seriously exaggerated. All it takes is one person making a mistake to perpetuate the myth that every movie is ruined by dozens of people.

    115. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't agree with blocking reception. If my phone vibrates, I want to have the option to get up and take the call outside. The theaters need to handle it in a non-technical way. The reason is that cell phones are just one of many ways that rude patrons can ruin the movie for everyone else. I want them all handled, and not have the theater decide that they will only stop cell phones because they believe cell phones are evil.

    116. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was at a local theater for a showing at 5:00pm in the afternoon. The guy was what appeared to be at least 65-70 years old, with a niece or such. He insisted to sit two rows behind me and talk through the entire movie, we were the only ones in the theater. I turned around a half dozen times and yelled a good number of times to be quiet. He yelled back at me to mind my own f.... business. I went out to the management and told them. They said they would take care of it. They never did. Movie ended and the guy was waiting for me in the lobby, and wanted to get violent about it until his companion pulled him away. Mgmt at theater did nothing. They said they were going to call the police but didn't. I don't know what was worse... the patron or the theater management. From then on, if someone is talking, I immediately go out, request a refund INCLUDING the money I spent on concessions and leave.

    117. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by goose-incarnated · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually, if you read the posters history in this story (redmid17), you'll see that he pretty much defends this practice in every one of the posts he's spamming to this story. It's safe to say that he is an asshole who routinely uses his phone in theatres, and is now trying to convince everyone that it's no big deal because it doesn't bother him.

      I'll bet dollars to donuts that he's done this in the past

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    118. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Comen · · Score: 1

      I am not sure why people are getting this upset, talking on the phone should not be allowed inside the theater, but you should be able to get up and take a call right outside the theater right? Also I am not that bothered by a person texting really, if they keep the phone down in their lap it does not bother me at all, but if others are that bothered by it, can there not be some kind of low light "movie mode" on phones maybe that would let you read some texts with only maybe gray text on black background or something so the light is very low? The reason I say this is because when I go to a movie theater now a days, someone else is watching my young child, and I HAVE to be able to be contacted at all times... period, if people do not understand that, then they have never had kids, or other reasons that far outweigh the importance of a movie. People seem to have the attitude everyone texting is a kid texting about silly shit, but I just need to simple check a text if I get one while watching a movie to make sure things are good at home, and I do not get many silly nonsense type texts, since I am in my 40's.

    119. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by julesh · · Score: 1

      Come on, the last Star Wars film was decent.

      You're right. The Return of the Jedi was a decent film. Not up to Empire Strikes Back standards, but with Lucas writing rather than Leigh Brackett, what do you expect?

    120. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by rockout · · Score: 1

      I use the screen as a low-level flashlight all the time. It's plenty bright. And if some kid has the brightness turned up all the way on their phone, which most of them do because hey, it's there, why wouldn't I want max brightness? then it's extremely annoying even 3 rows and 4 seats away in a movie theater.

      So if it's a summer movie, I wait a few weeks for the HD torrent version to appear online and I watch it on my couch. I'd gladly pay $20 for that option (2 tickets), but what I won't do is pay $20 to get annoyed by people the manager doesn't want to, or doesn't care about, throwing out for being rude. So they lose my business, except on Mondays thru Wednesdays during the school year.

      They don't care. Last I checked, Hollywood gross revenue increases were still outpacing inflation, so why do they need my measly business? Easier to employ 4 people in the entire megaplex and pay them nothing and let people like me stay away. If there were enough people that cared about watching movies without distractions, they would do something about it, but there aren't, so they don't.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    121. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by rockout · · Score: 1

      The one time I asked politely for someone to stop talking during a film, one row ahead of me and about 5 seats away, I heard: "You can't tell me what to do!"

      It's nice that you had a different experience, but I would believe in my part of the country, that'd be the exception.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    122. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by SuperDre · · Score: 1

      I guess it also depends on what kind of person you are.. People who tend to not use a mobile phone that often will propably complain faster than someone who is using it all the time (and propably also would use it during a screening)..
      Personally I hate it, because there is NO reason why you should use your phone during a movie, you've got all the time you need up until the movie itself starts (and during intermission if there is any), although even during trailers I find it annoying..
      I go to the movietheater regular these days, and I see it almost every showing that there's at least one person playing around with his/her phone, it's just very annoying.. If it were up to me, the should even block the phonesignal in the theater itself, and if you really REALLY need it, you can get a special pager (or IMHO just don't go)..

    123. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded.

      People who text or have phone calls in the theatre itself are selfish assholes, obviously. However in the era of texting (and emails for that matter), if I receive an actual phone call on my mobile phone then it is usually somewhat important. I'll press answer, walk out of the theatre and then start talking. And if I see another patron doing the same then I'll have no problems with it whatsoever. Sure it's a slight distraction, but everyone has things they need to do, and that shouldn't get in the way of fun. Or are cinemas only reserved for the minority of people with no lives?

    124. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's called having a seizure... ;)

    125. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're so unimportant that you never have to worry about receiving a phone call when you've planned to see a movie then I genuinely feel sorry for you.

    126. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by tFunc · · Score: 1

      When I lived in AZ I saw it too. A lot. Damned annoying.

    127. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going to the theater, you're paying for atmosphere and presentation. Some jackass yakking on his phone or texting incessantly at full brightness ruins that.

      That's deviated quite a bit from what the great grand parent was actually talking about, straw man.

    128. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      The issue I've hit in the past with this is that phone screens are bright. Someone texting in the seat in front of you is really distracting.

    129. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It vastly exceeded my expectations given the previous two, but it isn't even half way to 'decent'.

    130. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by crakbone · · Score: 1

      You could try renting the chainsaw from home depot and leave it in salt water in your bath tub. That I am sure would provide enough oxidation to fulfill his requirements.

    131. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      You are claiming it's petty and silly?

      Perhaps you should learn some anatomy. Go and read a book on how the eye works, and about the psychology and psycho-psyicality of vision.

      You will rapidly come to the conclusion that the human visual system is exceptionally adept at giving very high priority to unexpected motion in the peripheral vision. This is an entirely autonomous response and is therefore almost impossible to suppress.

      The main problem is simply that people seem incapable of thinking outside their own pivate little world to see how their actions might affect others. You are aparently one of those.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    132. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Or are you saying that IT staff / firemen / doctors should never go to movies?

      If they're incapable of acting like dickheads then yes.

      Back in previous days, they had pagers and could discretely check them without annoying anyone. Prior to that they stayed at home.

      These days phones are more than capable of giving different vibration alerts from different callers. Heck, my old Nokia dumbphone 10 years ago could do that. If they are unable to set that up or unable to find someone to set it up for them then yes, they should stick at home, or find a different job if they really MUST go to the cinema.

      Oh, and round here on-call firemen don't generally go to the cinema, they hang around the firestation so they can get going within seconds if required.

      Just because you have a job which sounds important (and really, IT staff? Lives are at stake?) doesn't give you the right to trample over everyone else for your own entertainment.

      Moron.

      Touche.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    133. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by crakbone · · Score: 1

      Audience reaction to a movie does change the experience quite a bit. A good example is Avengers with the Hulk beating down Loki. The way the audience reacted to that one scene was enough reason to see the whole movie.

    134. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Frankly I don't really give a shit ...

      Kind of says it all.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    135. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by crakbone · · Score: 1

      But you did have a brief glance. It did distract you. And while not being annoying to you it is to others that pay quite a bit to actually see a movie where that specific distraction is mentioned on a giant screen requesting people not do it. I know, I know, they probably did not see it as they were probably texting. at the time.

    136. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Why can't people go just two fucking hours out of their day without talking?

      Or texting.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    137. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by stenvar · · Score: 1

      No, I simply said that not every pet peeve and annoyance people have needs to be indulged.

      I said nothing about using phones in movie theaters.

    138. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Dan541 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or a sign that says "This theater is equipped with phone jamming. If your phone rings during the movie, a member of staff will come and jam it somewhere."

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    139. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blocking reception is definately a no-go. My friend is a volunteer firefighter and as such needs to be reachable 24/7. If the local movie theaters started blocking his reception, he'd have to quit going altogether.

    140. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I replied to a previous post already, but I'll reply to this one too on the subject of VOLUNTEER firefighters.

      Many small towns and communities cannot afford to staff a fulltime firefighting party. People from the community agree to be able to be contacted 24/7 in the case of an emergency. They are compensated for time it takes for training and the time responding to an emergency. When they aren't responding though, they do not sit around a fire house. Instead they go to their regular jobs, attend college classes, spend time with their family, and just generally do what normal people do, including going to the theater.

      Yes they should put their phone on vibrate. That is what my friend does. However several people purpose jamming signals as part of the solution. This practice, other than being illegal in the U.S., would severly limit the ability of these community heros to go to the theaters.

    141. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I said nothing about using phones in movie theaters.

      Given the thread topic and the wording you used, it was not a terribly unsurprising inference to draw, especially as this thread is about a pet peeve and annoyance for many people.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    142. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if your device that we for some reason call a phone is so indispensable for you then you do not have to go to the cinema. It is your decision to spend 2 hours in a room with some other people watching the movie. If for some reason (that can be and I can imagine myself having such situation too) you cannot turn the 'phone' away then you just do not go to the movies. I do not see a problem there at all. I do not expect the phone working when I am sitting in the loo, taking a dump either. Not that I want to enforce anything but if owner of the cinema wants to make things easy on him/herself then blocking access is a way of doing it. They lose some custom but they do not get the trouble with people talking on the phone or doing some other stuff with it either.

    143. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Zenin · · Score: 2

      If my phone vibrates, I want to have the option to get up and take the call outside.

      If your phone vibrates, and you get up and climb over half the row of people and block/distract the view of everyone behind you, you're still a huge distraction.

      Unless that text message says your wife's in labor or your child has been hit by a car, you're officially an asshole.

      If you can't handle being incommunicado for 90 minutes, rent a DVD. You simply shouldn't be in a public theater, that's all there is to it. If it was a stage play chances are you would be physically barred from reentering the theater if you left mid-act for any reason, even if you paid $500 for the seat.

      Seriously, just turn off the fucking phone.

      --
      My /. uid is better then your /. uid
    144. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Petty and silly to you, which is the problem. You are assuming everyone is like you, which they are not. It doesn't take much to simply be courteous to your fellow humans.

    145. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by stenvar · · Score: 1

      Courtesy isn't as simple as "don't offend people". When I visit your home and know that you believe to have "chemical sensitivities", it would be discourteous for me to wear cologne. When you go out and demand that spaces be "cologne free" because of your supposed chemical sensitivities, then you are being discourteous. You have a right to expect that people don't offend you in private; you do not have a right to expect that the entire world shapes itself to your will so that you aren't offended or inconvenienced.

    146. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Kilo+Kilo · · Score: 2

      NnnnoooooOOOOOoooooooooo!!!!!!

    147. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how you post this all like "well other people get on facebook and THEY suck but I'm cool cause I can't be bothered to wear a watch, and I mean if I find the movie boring and all it's ok"

    148. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm often on call.

      That's nice. You wanna know what my mother, a nurse, did when she was on call? She stayed at fucking home. She made the sacrifice to be available to her work, not everyone else in the goddamned theater.

      Even when I'm not on call, I'm always a "call me if you need help" resource for various projects.

      That, again, sounds like a personal problem, not one you need to inflict on everyone in the theater.

      So I'm afraid that I do have to leave my phone on

      Well I'm not afraid to say that I'll have to get you kicked out of the theater.

      but I get up and step outside the theater precisely to avoid bothering others with the sound, or lights.

      Well at least you're not a total douche. Hopefully you also pick your seats with regard to needing to get up and leave the theater without disturbing others.

    149. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm often on call.

      No-one's problem but yours. You get paid to be on call and be available, so stay out of the cinema and stay in places that don't care if your phone rings.

    150. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Chas · · Score: 1

      BFD. I'm responding to the post parent of my reply.

      And I did it under a real name, as I'm not afraid to express real convictions.
      As opposed to some masked troll.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    151. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or are you saying that IT staff / firemen / doctors should never go to movies?

      If they are on call, yes, they should not be going to movies.

      My mother, a nurse, has never gone out when on call. Because she knows that it is she who made the sacrifice to be available to her work, not everyone else in the goddamned theater.

      Entitled prick.

    152. Re: I go to a fair amount of movies by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 1

      We're not talking about sphincters that came over and built the railroads.

    153. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Golddess · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (Ignoring for a second the catch-22 of "I won't vote for someone that is not electable")

      While in general there are two electable people on the national stage, if you live in a non-swing state, there is really only one electable person that you personally can vote for. Everyone else, even "the other guy", all unelectable. And in such states, it is actually voting for "the other guy" that is equivalent to throwing your vote away. A vote for a third party, while it may not add up to overthrow "the guy who is guaranteed to win the state", there is at least a non-zero chance that it will be noticed.

      "Oh look, the guy guaranteed to win the state won, and the other guy came in 2nd. Big shocker." isn't gonna do anything.
      "Huh. The guy guaranteed to win the state won, and the other guy came in 2nd, but not by as much as he usually does." may make people notice.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    154. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Depends on the IT industry. Supporting servers that Emergency 911 run on might be considered 'lives at stake' when you're on call (redundant, redundant, redundant though). Technically, when I'm on call I don't go to the movies. I have a 15 minute response and 15 minutes to get the computer up and logged in (I've had VPN issues and had to drive in occasionally so it's good I'm 5 miles from work :) ).

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    155. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      When you go out and demand that spaces be "cologne free" because of your supposed chemical sensitivities, then you are being discourteous.

      Depends. If you were to go on the tube at ruch hour and and wear a whole bottle of "essence of strongly allergy inducing pollen", I'd say that you were being discorteous. I think there's something of a continum. If you have strong allergies to very common things, then you can't expect the world to accomodate you the whole time. On the other hand, wearing something that many people are seneitive to in a crowded place is still deeply antisocial.

      Or another take on it: if you wear something in public that people are known to be allergic to, you can't expect not to be sneezed on. The amount of being sneezed on increases with the likelihood of people being allergic to whatever you wear.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    156. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by SomewhatRandom · · Score: 1

      Although I am all for not having your cell phone out in a theater, I have to disagree with your 911 point. If someone opened fire in a theater one of my family members was in, I wouldn't want to have to go to the lobby to make that call. I would like them to be able to duck for cover and call 911 right away.

    157. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Jon_S · · Score: 1

      Or are you saying that IT staff / firemen / doctors should never go to movies?

      Yes. My wife is a doctor and she doesn't go to the movies when she is on call for exactly this reason!

    158. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This whole thread, and the parent in particular, are unreal. Seriously, you have got to be a major mouthbreather IRL. Get over it.

      People aren't going to go to any movie theater that does this, or prevents connectivity. The only people there would be wierdos like you, and you are in the EXTREME minority.

      Seriously, this isn't as big of a problem as it's made out to be on this thread. Just say "shut the fuck up". That'll have the desired effects.

    159. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by nbritton · · Score: 1

      The last movie I actually went to a theater to see was the last Starwars installment

      What do you do for dates then... oh wait, this is slashdot nevermind.

    160. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by sjames · · Score: 1

      Some people have functional peripheral vision.

    161. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by sjames · · Score: 1

      I have gone to movies while on call and in doing so, I understood that me being on call wasn't the problem of the person next to me. So yes, I set the phone on silent and if I got a call I went out to the lobby to check it.

    162. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      before we get to #2, 911 IN the theater room is not necessary. you probably can't call 911 when you're swimming in the public pool for example. It's not a civil right. If you think that it is, then I challenge you to force your local pool to find a way to accommodate this right. Cellular/landline access to 911 is only relevant when there are no other convenient ways to summon help. Being 40 feet from the theater lobby is NOT too inconvenient. I can probably sprint to the lobby faster than you can fumble for your phone in the dark and dial 911. Maybe you should insist on them leaving the lights on in the theater so you can dial 911 faster? Seconds count! now put that silly argument away

      I've never been to a pool that prohibits phones. You are free to bring your phone into the pool. The reliability of your phone is not the concern of the pool, feel free to take it for a dip.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    163. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily non-technical. At the very least - what about a signal that forces all phones into vibrate mode? Non-intrusive, can be opted out of, but would at least silence accidental ringers.

    164. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That's why theaters serve popcorn - makes a nice projectile reminder.

    165. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      I never understood the cellphone video at a concert thing. The volume of the concert is going to be overloading the mic on the phone, the video is going to be over/undersaturated, unbalanced color, and wobbly, with a view of 60 degrees from the stage, partially obscured by the head and arms of the person in front of the recorder, who is also holding up their phone to record the shot.

      It's not like these aren't popular artists in the first place, a professionally shot version of the concert is going to be on Youtube soon enough. I just don't get it.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    166. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2) theaters could offer a silent pager, similar to what you find at many restaurants

      Great, and now we'll have people coming and going during the entire movie. "Excuse me, excuse me, excuse me".

      Some people will never understand the meaning of personal responsibility.
      Being on call is a choice you make, if you really need to be able to answer your phone at all times, then you'll have to give up some activities - some for technical reasons (swimming or taking the metro) and some for social reasons (cinema, theatres, classrooms).

      It's like people with babies who think they can still do everything they could before they had children.
      I don't have a problem with you taking your baby to a cinema, theatre, concert or wherever, as long as you understand that when that baby starts crying, it's your responsibility to take him out of there until he quiets again, even if that means that you'll miss a bit or the entirety of the performance.

      Or like smokers. It's sad that we had to create laws to force people not to smoke near others when they know perfectly well it bothers a sizeable percentage of society.

    167. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Believe it. I've seen it many times in a number of cities.

    168. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Holi · · Score: 1

      Gee, I wonder what they did before cell phones. I am sorry but going to a movie is not a right. If you can't go without your phone for the two hours then you shouldn't go period. If you are on call then maybe the movie theater is not the best place for you. Go on a day when you are not on call and you don;t have to annoy everyone.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    169. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Amazing how through 100 years of cinema people were unimportant enough they could go to the movies without a phone... what were they thinking?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    170. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      That's all I'm saying...

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    171. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      We have a volunteer fire dept here in So Mo. They don't all call each other when there's a fire. They rotate being available and are *there* at the station. Your friend's dept sucks, IMHO.

    172. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      I've seen one incident of a person using a phone in a theater. The time I did see it the person (middle aged man, white male if that matters) using the phone actually took a call while sitting in the theater. The theater was about three quarters full and his phone started ringing. Immediately people started with the "Come on man, take it outside". He ignored everyone, answered the phone, and started a conversation sitting right there. There was a short pause as everyone kind of took in the fact that he was going to do that and then it literally blew up. People started yelling at this guy. Someone got up to go get an usher and the guy using the phone turned halfway around and said something I couldn't hear to the people directly behind him. The "big guy" (of which there is one everywhere) got up, walked down to him and said something else I didn't hear. The man started to argue with him and just then a couple of ushers came in and got middle-age phone guy out of there. He shouted "Fuck you" to I think the whole room or maybe just to the big guy who talked to him as he left. I think general peer pressure is worse than anything the theaters can do and will work for most people. Some people are just going to do what they want and "Fuck you" to the rest of us.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    173. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Oligonicella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dude, he's in a theater posting to /. *now*.

    174. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I have seen more than my share of texters in the theater {or maybe they were surfing the net who knows} but that doesn't bother me as much so long as they are quiet. What really annoys me is when I go to a store and the clerk is texting between customers and not paying attention to what they are doing. When you are talking to someone and they stop mid sentence to respond to a text and then just continue on like nothing happened. I saw someone make a left turn on a red light while texting the other day, they can be glad there was no other traffic at the time sure they will probably be having an accident soon.

      I feel sorry for my son because his girlfriend comes over just sits on her phone every second texting and posting to facebook eventually he gets bored and goes to play the xbox. She doesn't even notice and will still just sit there texting and posting on facebook until she leaves. If I was him I would break up with her on facebook while she was sitting right next to me and ignoring me.

       

    175. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      No, you're merely taking a condescending attitude towards those who want to enjoy the evening they paid for and addressing them as if it were somehow a failure on their part that those interruptions annoy them.

    176. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Holi · · Score: 1

      Maybe not, but there are repercussions for being inconsiderate of others.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    177. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      As much as I hate undoing my mods, are you saying parents of children with special needs should never go to the movies? If I sit on the aisle and have my phone set to vibrate & hit the silent key to check to see if it is the sitter (mind you, if I had a smartphone, I would be smart enough to set the screen brightness to automatic, as is, my flip phone screen is not bright at all & I can see who is calling on the small outer screen), how am I diminishing your experience? If it is the sitter, I can leave the room and either answer, or if it is too late to answer, call her back.

      TL;DR Some people are so important they need to be reachable and sometimes these people need to get out and decompress at a movie. The key is not being a rude a-hole about it, many people seem to fail at this.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    178. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's always Craigslist. If you check the right section, you're sure to find someone with one that is happy to come over and assist you.

    179. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Holi · · Score: 1

      Wow, you get to be rude and insult people just so you can continue to be a dick. Sorry but you are not that important that people cannot wait 2 hours to hear back from you. If you are in the situation where you need to take that call then don't go to the movies.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    180. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Sedated2000 · · Score: 1

      I've seen it several times. Once it was someone who answered a phone call and continued talking for at least two or three minutes without getting up to leave the theater. Another was someone who kept getting phone calls with a loud ringer and refused to turn it off or turn off the ringer. Twice was at two separate viewings. Teenagers who insist they must take pictures of themselves at the theater to show all of their friends they're seeing a movie.

    181. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Holi · · Score: 1

      If you could teach that to my girlfriend I would be in your debt forever. My god she just won't shut up ever.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    182. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Maybe because I can just glance at my wrist rather than fumbling in my pocket and dragging my phone past my wallet, keys, and loose change without spilling it.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    183. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by v1 · · Score: 1

      It's like people with babies who think they can still do everything they could before they had children.
      I don't have a problem with you taking your baby to a cinema, theatre, concert or wherever, as long as you understand that when that baby starts crying, it's your responsibility to take him out of there until he quiets again, even if that means that you'll miss a bit or the entirety of the performance.

      I think the core of that problem is that people are overlooking or choosing to ignore their prior decisions when they have a problem. "I have to have a cigarette." "I can't make my baby stop crying." "I can't help if they ring me when I'm on call."

      They're all overlooking/ignoring the decisions they made in advance, and the consequences and additional responsibilities they were volunteering to take on. "I chose to start smoking addictive cigarettes." "I had a baby." "I took a job that required me to be on call."

      And then they also overlook/ignore the next round of choices they have made. "I attended an event that lasts longer than I can go without a cigarette." "I took my young child to the theatre." "I went to the movies while on call." Somehow they don't see their decisions as relevant to the problem, and thus not their responsibility to deal with. "it's not my problem. it can't be helped." NO. It is your problem, and it could have and can be helped. Accept responsibility for the consequences of your decisions.

      I think they're just in denial. And the rest of the world just has to suffer for it.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    184. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is so important that they should be getting phone calls in theaters. Its just that some deluded morons ~think~ they are. But they are just fruitcakes.

    185. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by matfud · · Score: 1

      Pocket watches lost favour when people stopped wearin waist coats with pockets to put such a watch in. As far as I am aware arms have not gone out of fashion.

    186. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that 911 IN the theater is incredibly necessary. 911 is reserved for emergencies. Chances are, if 911 is needed, it's probably MUCH more important than the movie. Stuff like a fire, life-threatening injuries, or stuff that requires immediate police response. You know, typical 911 stuff.

    187. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Where do you live? It's more of a problem in the cities. But it's always been a problem in the cities. Billy Crystal had a bit over 15 years ago about going to Times Square to see movies because it was more entertaining, with people shouting at the screen. It made Demolition Man even better, IMO.

      At Silence of the Lambs (yes, a million years ago), there was quite a bit of talking, and lots of weed smoked a few rows in front of me. But then, it was Center City Philadelphia.

      But cellphones, Jesus Christ, everywhere, including at the modern dance performances at U Penn, at plays and the Orchestra in town. People texting, lot of old people reading their programs by cellphone light, etc.

    188. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry for my previous comments, I don't know what got into me. There was no call to insult you so childishly. Maybe I forgot to take my meds this morning.

      Whatever the reason, I apologize for being a tremendous douchebag, and will endeavor to act more civilized in the future.

    189. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by SpeZek · · Score: 1

      So, what, when someone has to use the bathroom do you expect them to bring a bottle (funnel optional) so that they don't distract you from the movie?

      A dark figure getting up and walking out is not all that uncommon nor distracting when compared to someone yanking out their iPhone with the brightness set to 11, lighting up the entire theatre as they tap out, painstakingly slowly, a 5 word tweet about how good the popcorn is.

    190. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      When my (physician) wife was a resident, and then a fellow, we didn't go to the theater, even the movie theater, when she was on call. It's just too inconsiderate, and some limits to social life just came with the job.

      I'm not saying you're a bad person, but disturbing people in a movie theater with your phone, even on buzz, even if you only look at the illuminated screen for a moment, is kind of rude. Also, always on "call me if you need help"? One of the best lessons I've learned over the decades is that no one is that indispensable.

    191. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Frankly I don't really give a shit if people are texting or surfing on their phone during the movie. I'm looking ahead at the screen. I find it hard to believe that it should really bother someone that much.

      Do you do it?

    192. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Just because you are hearing about it on the internet does not make it imaginary. If you haven't been effected by it, and do go to the cinema reasonably often, then you've been lucky. Lots of us have been affected by it many times. It certainly exists.

      It does vary by area and neighbourhood, as does all forms of anti-social behaviour, so maybe you've been lucky. I've never been robbed in the street, but I don't deny it exists.

      Or it could be that you are less sensitive to it than other people are. Some people are disturbed by auditory and visual distractions when watching a movie. Other people get so engrossed in what's happening on the screen they block everything else out.

    193. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It depends where you live (or more specifically where you go to the theatre), and it depends how tolerant you are. And in this case intolerant is not a bad thing, it's just the nature of how distracting you find other people's noise and bad behaviour is.

    194. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      I don't defend it at all. I'm saying it doesn't bother me and I never even take my phone out of my pocket during a movie. I just paid $12 to be entertained for two hours. I'm not wasting my money.

    195. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      IMO, the only downside to making each theater a faraday cage is the edge cases where some people need to be able to get a text, page, call, etc (ex. doctors, on call IT, etc).

      No need. People on call have plenty of other options. They could go bowling for example.

      Remember, the world managed perfectly well enough before there were mobile phones and pagers. It's never a necessity.

    196. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      No I can see it. They just don't distract me. You all are massively overblowing the frequency and severity of the problem.

    197. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I can't agree with blocking reception. If my phone vibrates, I want to have the option to get up and take the call outside.

      The entire problem is one of people thinking that their personal behaviour line is the one that is right. When your phone vibrates, it makes a noise. When you get up and leave the theatre you disturb all the people around you. When you come back you do it again. And you think that that's OK. Because you do it.

      It's not OK. Those rude patrons you talk about ruining movies. Well the unpleasant truth is that you are one of them yourself.

      Of course no one ever accepts that they are part of the problem. And you won't either. You'll believe you're just as entitled as all the people who are talking and texting do.
       

    198. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      Well, I suppose I do live in Canada...

    199. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      I'm doing nothing to exacerbate the problem. I just don't think it's a big deal, nor should it be for anyone else with an attention span longer than a gnat. If this were a serious problem, movie theaters would have hammered down on it. People either don't report it to management because they don't want to miss parts of the movie -- implying that it's not a big deal -- or management does nothing about it and people continually come back to the theater -- implying, once again, that it's not a big deal. I'd actually prefer a place like the Alamo Drafthouse. A movie with dinner and some beer sounds great, and their strict no-cell policy wouldn't affect me in the slightest. However there is not one or anything like it close to where I live, so I go to normal AMC or Regal theaters.

    200. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      No I leave my phone in my pocket. Movies are too expensive to waste my time fiddling with my phone. If the movie is that bad I will just leave the room.

    201. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      So, what, when someone has to use the bathroom do you expect them to bring a bottle (funnel optional) so that they don't distract you from the movie?

      No. You expect them to go before the movie. And to hold on for the end of the movie, or a loud, action part if nature calls whilst they are in there.

      If they do get caught short during the movie, then that's a fact of life. They will disturb everyone around them, but there's no alternative short of wetting the seat. We live with it.

      There is an alternative to all the disturbances involving phones. Turn the damned thing off when you go into the theatre, as you are supposed to. If there's some reason you can't do that, then don't go to the theatre that night. Hundreds of people shouldn't have to put up with a disturbance because of your bad choices.

    202. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you don't. I've been distracted by people texting (or some other phone using activity) many times.

    203. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I am not sure why people are getting this upset, talking on the phone should not be allowed inside the theater, but you should be able to get up and take a call right outside the theater right?

      Not right, no. The vibrate may disturb people, you getting up and going out and coming back *will* disturb other people.

      The reason I say this is because when I go to a movie theater now a days, someone else is watching my young child, and I HAVE to be able to be contacted at all times... period

      How old are you? How do you imagine parents managed before there were mobile phones (or pagers). There's no period there. You are putting your desires over and above the right of possibly hundreds of people to watch a movie (or a stage show) without being disturbed.

      other reasons that far outweigh the importance of a movie.

      If you don't WANT to be out of contact with your babysitter, then don't go to a theatre. Do something else. The movie might not be very important to you, but it's important to others. You're being selfish. And people being selfish, and thinking their wants are more important than other people's is the entirety of the problem.

      since I am in my 40's.

      Me too. And people in their 40s are just as capable of being selfish shits as any other age range.

    204. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You're doing a good job of convincing people here you're exactly the kind of selfish person that does these things.

    205. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blocking reception is definately a no-go. My friend is a volunteer firefighter and as such needs to be reachable 24/7. If the local movie theaters started blocking his reception, he'd have to quit going altogether.

      People who are on call are not supposed to go to a movie theater on days in which they are on call. Your friend is extremely irresponsible.

    206. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      And there are some scenarios where, in my opinion, it's perfectly acceptable to turn on your screen for 10 seconds to see who is calling and then either turn it off or excuse yourself to the lobby.

      The entirety of the problem is with people deciding their own standards for what's acceptable, and what is not. And of course everyone draws that line based on what they themselves would do. So the couple talking loudly, they have the opinion that is acceptable. The girl texting; the guy taking a phone call - the all thing their personal behaviour is acceptable.

      How do we get around this? We have society standards for what's acceptable. And ANY type of phone use whilst the movie is playing most breaks that. Short of a fire or a heart attack in the auditorium.

      If you can't be without the phone for 100 minutes, then find something else to do other than going to the theatre.

    207. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      I prefer, "do many things well." Remember Heinlein's quote, "...specialization is for insects."

    208. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Or are you saying that IT staff / firemen / doctors should never go to movies?

      No one should have a job when they are on call 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. It's not reasonable.

      All such people I've ever come across have days when they are on call and days when they aren't. If it's different where you are, then perhaps you need some legislation. Meanwhile anyone taking such a job is doing it by choice. One of the aspects of that choice is that they won't have the legitimate option of going to the cinema.

      The moron would be the person on call who chooses to go to the cinema.

    209. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      As much as I hate undoing my mods, are you saying parents of children with special needs should never go to the movies?

      What do you imagine parents of kids with special needs did before mobile phones?

      TL;DR Some people are so important they need to be reachable and sometimes these people need to get out and decompress at a movie.

      No. Some people think they are more special and important than the hundreds of other people in the cinema. And they can write their own rules because of it.

      Different places have different standards of behaviour. If for some reason you can't abide by the standard of behaviour, then you shouldn't be in that place. You're kid might have special needs, that doesn't make you special, and doesn't give you a right to ignore those standards.

    210. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Exactly this.

      Your vote is your voice. If you're not willing to use it to express your conscience, you're throwing it away whether you vote for someone who wins or someone who loses.

    211. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      1) How often does someone open fire in a crowded theater? I can think of once. It's along the lines of a meteor striking a crowded theater
      2) If someone DOES open fire in a crowded theater, the noise and/or rampaging crowd running out will certainly alert staff to the fact there is a problem.

      There are many things in life where we DO balance perfect safety for convenience. The key is understanding the chance of an outlier occurring.
      For example, on airplanes, would it not be much much safer if people were strapped into pods and kept there for the duration of the flight?

    212. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      No, it's you that's lying about the problem. At best (trying to make you anything other than a bald face lying pig), it's a regional problem, and you are an inconsiderate idiot for assuming your regional experience to be universal.

    213. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If this were a serious problem, movie theaters would have hammered down on it.

      Movie theaters do hammer down on it. I know a few with a no-warning if your phone is seen, you are ejected without refund policy. Given that movie theaters *are* hammering down on it, that proves you wrong, by your own words.

    214. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by rockout · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you should've mentioned that at the start. That situation would go down a whole different way here, 95% of the time.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    215. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How was his siting on an aisle, flip phone set to vibrate, not answered in the cinema violating some standard of behaviour? Sounds to me like he was being quite respectful of those around him.
       
      I can't speak to special needs parents, but it seems to me everyone should be able to get to go out now and again, better than bringing the tyke with him (as so many do!).

    216. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't a big enough font for the "whoosh" your post has earned.

    217. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different AC here. Grandparent post was not in any way trolling. Nor is the fact that it was made anonymously in any way relevant to the topic or reflective of its quality or of the poster's character.

      And you know it.

    218. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by anarcobra · · Score: 1

      I guess I see your point.
      Personally I just put my wallet in my right pocket and my phone in my left.
      Checking the time isn't really something I do often enough to justify carrying an extra device around just for that.

    219. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes you can infer from context. Here, it was crystal clear what I listed.

    220. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by adolf · · Score: 1

      I feel sorry for my son because his girlfriend comes over just sits on her phone every second texting and posting to facebook eventually he gets bored and goes to play the xbox. She doesn't even notice and will still just sit there texting and posting on facebook until she leaves. If I was him I would break up with her on facebook while she was sitting right next to me and ignoring me.

      That's just the behavior that you see. Perhaps it is an entirely different game when there isn't anyone else around. (I was young once, too.)

    221. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Indispensable? Perhaps not. "Able to charge billable hours and make the client or partner happy"? Yes, indeed, and such factors are part of why I can pull in the salary I have. It's why I can _afford_ to go to a movie occasionally.

      Also, I don't "stare at the screen". I go outside and check it. The buzz for the phone ringing is distinct from the text message buzz.

    222. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Comen · · Score: 1

      I do not think you understand, I would not get a text message unless something is up, there is a issue, or a emergency.
      I am sorry but if there is a good reason for someone to contact me, while watching my child, I should have the right to get a stupid message in a movie theater, its not a big deal, its a simple text message, or a vibration that I can walk outside to check on. People go out to use the restroom, and that must bother people, but its seems to be ok.
      I am not a rude asshole, I constantly put myself in others shoes in my life and try not to trample on others, but I am just saying if I am in a movie and something bad happens at home I want to be able to be reached.

    223. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I would love if Google and Apple would implement a 'request to go silent' feature. The only problem is that all of the neo-luddite jerks would ruin it. There would have to be some way to be sure that it is only used legitimately.

      Off the top of my head, the way I would implement something like this is:

      * Use Bluetooth for the Request For Silent transmitter. With an approximately 30 foot range, you wouldn't constantly be in range of 20 RFS transmitters.
      * Have a device name prefix that tells the phones that they are seeing a RFS transmitter. Label the devices RFS-XXXXXXXX with XXXXXXXX being the owners label. * If possible, get the Bluetooth standards committee to reserve a block of addresses for this purpose, as it would be more efficient than using the device name. * When a new RFS transmitter is spotted, the device would give the owner a notification that a RFS transmitter is requesting silence. This could be a ringtone, a vibration, or any other method that we currently have for notifications. * The device owner then selects how to respond to this RFS transmitter's request. Accept/Ignore * If the user selects accept, the mobile device pairs with the transmitter, and the transmitter issues a public key for later authentication. This would be needed to prevent neo-luddites from abusing the system. * If the user selects accept or ignore, the device adds the RFS transmitter's address to it's internal list so that it knows how to respond to future requests from the same transmitter. * From that point forward, any time a transmitter with a known address comes into range, the mobile device could either ignore the transmitter, or pair to the transmitter, authenticate the transmitter, switch to silent, and unpair. * Once a RFS transmitter is no longer in range, the device should return to its previous state.

    224. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I am fully aware that it is all shades of gray. The question is do you recognize that you are also just a point in the gray scale?

    225. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The did the same thing they did before they had movie theaters. They dealt with the fact that they lived in a less technologically advanced time. Guess what? Having a quiet movie theater is also not a right. This isn't a discussion about right. Maybe if you can't handle the fact that people on call don't sit at home waiting for the call, a movie theater isn't the place for you.

    226. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      That is simply incorrect. There is no universal rule on where someone on call is supposed to be. Thinking that there is is simply ridiculous.

    227. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Or, if you are so disturbed by someone getting up out of their seat to leave a theater, YOU should rent a DVD. The goal is to find some kind of compromise that gives the most people the most enjoyment of their experience. The first way to do that is to always behave better than what you would expect from anyone else. No doubt there are exceptions, but my experience is that the cult of the anti-phone do not follow this golden rule. Their goal is to control public environments and force everyone else to adhere to their standards. (Standards that they frequently don't adhere to themselves.)

    228. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      A few, not the majority, not even a negligible amount according to the bitching in the thread. Try again.

    229. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      There are dozens of other people discussing how they never see it, and they are spread across the country. Try again

    230. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Not bad. I like the idea of using Bluetooth. On the other hand, I keep mine always off to save battery. And to keep it from lighting up when I'm at Applebee's, even though they swear they disconnected their Bluetooth marketing device.

    231. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by unrtst · · Score: 1

      You couldn't even read the second sentence I wrote?

      IMO, the only downside to making each theater a faraday cage is the edge cases where some people need to be able to get a text, page, call, etc (ex. doctors, on call IT, etc). Put those folks in their own section, and cage everyone else off.

      There. Problem solved. Anyone that feels they can't go without service for 2 hrs can deal with all the other inconsiderate folks. Oh, and if you're on call somewhere, then don't go, or at least sit in the back on an isle seat so you're not walking past everyone anytime you get a txt (which would be like putting them in this box, so this should work fine).

    232. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      It's still rude. But I'm happy for you that you pull in such a handsome salary. Do you know what your manager makes?

    233. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Sure. But that doesn't mean our behaviours are equally valid. If in the classic fashion, white is well behaved at the theatre and black is badly behaved, I'm a shade of grey that's very nearly white. My phone is off, and I don't chat whilst the movie/show is on. Nor do I come and go, other than the couple of occasions when I've been caught short. Which is what makes me slightly grey rather than white.

      But you're significantly more grey than I am.

    234. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I've been with parents who have got phone calls and texts from their babysitters. And I can't remember it once being important enough for the parents to leave the social event. So your assurance that it's only "an issue, or an emergency" carries no water for me.

      Maybe you have a babysitter that won't get in touch with less important things. But plenty of others have babysitters that will. And having the phone on means that any other call or txt, from people other than the babysitter will also disturb the theatre.

      Then beyond parents there are plenty of others who think they have a special need to be contactable in emergencies.

      No. None of you have a NEED. You have a WANT to both be able to get calls and sit in a theatre. And if you're as empathic as you claim, you should realise that's a choice. A choice to put yourself (and your kids) above the rest of the audience.

    235. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      If you close a million dollar account you should buy everyone in the theater popcorn to celebrate! Everyone wins! :D I would have them pause a movie briefly if they started throwing Benjamins into the crowd in celebration.

    236. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth is about as low power as we are going to get. From my experience, leaving it on doesn't affect battery life in any noticable way. Of course, YMMV.

      I am curious about the Applebee's comment though. I have never had any kind of unpaired bluetooth advertising pushed to me. I'm not even sure what the mechanism for that would be. Can you enlighten me a bit on that?

    237. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Probably less difference in gray than you think. I don't get many calls in the theater. Probably far less than the number of times that you have been caught short. So, even by your standards, you are likely a bigger disturbance than I am. On the other hand, I am far more accepting of my place in public than you are. Theaters are not places of no disturbance. They are places of low disturbance. The sale of food and bladder busting drinks are evidence of this. Being overly controlling of those around you can move you to that darker shade of gray, just as easily as making noise.

    238. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Not unpaired - but on my dumbphone, if I decline to pair, it keeps prompting over and over and over again. I never accepted, so I don't know what's next.

    239. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do know what he makes. He's on call even more than I am and works harder: I get to go to a movie occasionally.

    240. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Gotcha. My crazy RFS (Request For Silence) scheme would likely only be useful for smart devices, given that it would keep a list of all declines bluetooth address to prevent exactly what you are going through.

    241. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      For salary? Sounds like you both got taken. Being on call and working "extra" hours is only legitimate for short periods of actual need. My team delivers outstanding quality to the company, and I protect them (and me) by limiting overtime appropriately. It's unfair, and almost always unnecessary, to place the kinds of demands you describe on employees. I won't stand for it, and I still cover all necessary operations for my company's current business and growth.

    242. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Probably far less than the number of times that you have been caught short.

      What a silly thing to say. First of all you have no idea how many times it's happened to me. And secondly it's just as likely to happen to you as me. Your phone calls are on top of the chance that you might get caught short.

      Being overly controlling of those around you can move you to that darker shade of gray, just as easily as making noise.

      My thoughts on rude people around me have no effect on the rude people around me. Unfortunately.

    243. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      My thoughts on rude people around me have no effect on the rude people around me. Unfortunately.

      Until your thoughts become actions. Perhaps Slashdot is the only place that your thoughts become action, but without any other information, I will assume it is not.

    244. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      You know, I've always left my bluetooth off to save power (but of course wifi and GPS are left on), but I've never bothered to check to see how much power it actually uses.

    245. Re:I go to a fair amount of movies by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      Then you... don't... agree?

  4. Why do people go to movie theaters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like my living room a whole lot better than some movie theater. The popcorn is a lot cheaper, too.

    1. Re:Why do people go to movie theaters? by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      And your feet don't stick to the floor...

    2. Re:Why do people go to movie theaters? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      And you can go to the bathroom without missing that crucial plot twist...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Why do people go to movie theaters? by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      I have no idea. I much prefer watching at home and I don't even have a great setup. It costs so much and you get so little extra.

    4. Re:Why do people go to movie theaters? by oobayly · · Score: 4, Funny

      I put double sided sticky tape on my carpet for that authentic cinema feel.

    5. Re:Why do people go to movie theaters? by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Yup... LOVE that "pause" control via Redbox/DVD player...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    6. Re:Why do people go to movie theaters? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      I like my living room a whole lot better than some movie theater. The popcorn is a lot cheaper, too.

      3D picture and the awesome sound system is the reason why I go. We've got an old CRT TV with a single speaker at home but it's hardly ever on - any movies get watched on laptops and headphones normally, so I'm not going to spend $500 on a 3D TV (or much more on a big one) I'll almost never watch and probably much more on a sound system when I can spend $100 on movie tickets for the family once or twice a year and go out for a meal etc and make a night of it.

    7. Re:Why do people go to movie theaters? by Deadstick · · Score: 2

      ...and get another glass of wine on the way back.

    8. Re:Why do people go to movie theaters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put some popcorn into an oven with dirty socks for an authentic cinema smell. Age candy in a car's glove box for a couple days to get authentic cinema taste. Get an old free couch through Craigslist, then put two large stuffed animals on both ends with balognia smeared on them for aut... ahh to hell with it, it's easier to just go to a theatre at that point.

    9. Re:Why do people go to movie theaters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to buy the large soda, the one with free refills, and sit in the back row. I get a refill just before the film gets into the last half hour so that I have a nearly full cup of sugar soda when the credits roll. Then, just before everyone gets up to leave I set the soda on the ground so that a slight tap on my way out of the row will tip it over and spill sticky soda all the way down the sloped floor. If anyone ever notices I can just feign ignorance or apologize for "accidentally" spilling the soda. So if you ever wondered why the floor feels like flypaper the next time you're in the theater, well now you know.

    10. Re:Why do people go to movie theaters? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 3, Funny

      And you can pause the movie while you pack the bong.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    11. Re:Why do people go to movie theaters? by Pokey.Clyde · · Score: 1

      And you can go to the bathroom without missing that crucial plot twist...

      How old are all you people that you can't go 1.5 - 2 hours without having to go to the bathroom?

    12. Re:Why do people go to movie theaters? by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      56. And I drink a lot of liquids.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    13. Re:Why do people go to movie theaters? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If I'm paying $6 for a fountain drink, I'm drinking ALL of it!

  5. People still go to theaters? by singingjim1 · · Score: 0

    The answer is don't go if you are bothered by it. Just spend a few bucks on a good home entertainment system and then Pay Per View on VUDU or whatever in HD when it's available.

    1. Re:People still go to theaters? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      Exactly. I still only have a 30 inch tube TV, but still enjoy watching movies at home way more than going to the theatre. I'll go 3 or 4 times a year at most. It's just really not worth the cost of going. When I do go, I make sure I pay a couple bucks extra for AVX, primarily because you can reserve specific seats, but also because everybody is paying a little bit extra, so you tend to keep out the people who are going to ruin the experience anyway. That may sound a little "classist" but places that charge a little more tend to have less people who are just there because they have nothing else to do, and not because they really want to see the movie.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:People still go to theaters? by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

      No, the answer is don't go if you don't give a shit about the movie or the other people around you and just want to live in your little texty world with your "friends" who also, BTW, can't stand you either.

      --

      Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    3. Re:People still go to theaters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the MPAA will of course attribute dwindling ticket sales to piracy, not shitty theater experience...

  6. Faraday cage by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've always liked the notion of enclosing the theatres in a faraday cage. In any new construction, it should be relatively cheap to include a mesh around the theatre itself -- and then you don't have to worry about people's manners. At least not as far as cell phones are concerned.

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    1. Re:Faraday cage by jwinterm · · Score: 1

      I don't think this would really work. People could still check the time. People could still play angry birds. Etc.

    2. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need for mesh. Just a new paint job with the right paint.

      But then the FCC would probably have a problem with this.

    3. Re:Faraday cage by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      But then the FCC would probably have a problem with this.

      The FCC gets no say in what building materials you use. They can (and do) prohibit jammers, but they don't have anything to say about building a faraday cage.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    4. Re:Faraday cage by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

      Such materials are commercially available as wallpaper for years. (See http://blogs.wsj.com/ideas-market/2012/05/25/wallpaper-that-blocks-wi-fi/)

      But I'm afraid the FCC will become upset because it can _block_ signals outside the movie theater. The shadow of the cage itself is a noticeable dead zone. And I'm afraid that it will only take one litigious parent whose baby sitter is trying to reach them, or one doctor who can't be paged, to create a dangerous lawsuit for for any theater that tries this.

      I have seen it done for certain conference rooms, that were clearly marked this this way, and even then people became quite upset at not having their cell phones work.

    5. Re:Faraday cage by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Great. With your vision, doctors (or anyone else who needs to be pageable 24/7, like a sysadmin) can never go to a movie.

      I'm pretty sure doctors have been going to the cinema every decade from they invented movies up until they they invented pagers, how about you have time on call (where you can't get smashing drunk, go hiking in the mountains or if this is done, go to the cinema) and real time off like in a civilized work relationship. That you in a real emergency might try calling anyway is fine, but nobody should ever really be on 24x7 call, even if you're the CEO you should have some kind of second in command that could step in if you for any reason is indisposed. If things would go that wrong without you the business is a disaster waiting to happen when you really can't be reached.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until you have another shootout and people can't call 911.

    7. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OB/GYN, when you patient is about to give birth they want YOU there, not the guy on call they have never met.

      Some jobs you are basically on call 24x7 and nothing can be done about it.

    8. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FCC will still not have a say about an RF opaque building as it's not radiating anything. If you have a USC or CFR reference, I'd like to see it.

      The theater only has to post a notice at the entrance warning that the building is an RF dead zone and anyone who needs to be reachable 24/7 should not enter.

    9. Re:Faraday cage by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      or one doctor who can't be paged

      This has been a long running refrain on /. and it's wrong.
      Anytime a Doctor is on call, there's a backup.

      Next time you see your GP, ask them about it.
      They'll tell you the same thing.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    10. Re:Faraday cage by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      That doctor should not be at the movies then if on call. That parent should hire a baby sitter who knows how to dial the doctor or 911 first. Remember, we had movie theaters before we had mobile phones, and this did not cause society to collapse. Most hospitals are a far bigger signal blocker than any movie theater, as they are likely to have their own faraday cages, or metal lined walls, because of the equipment they have.

    11. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that emergency calls to 911 can't be made in a movie theater? Good luck with THAT!

    12. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until the next theatre shooting, and the cable news stories for a week are "Moviegoers prevented from calling 911 by cell jamming theatre." There is no theaterowner in her right mind who would ever agree to something like this.

    13. Re:Faraday cage by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Who the heck pays for a movie ticket to play angry birds.

      I mean there's plenty of people who pay for a movie ticket for the associated free parking, but they aren't in the cinema, or pay for a movie ticket for a bit of private fun but they sit in the back row.

      But who pays for a ticket to get bored out of their mind and play on a cellphone?

    14. Re:Faraday cage by DoninIN · · Score: 1

      I would have you believe it's my heroic abilities and self idealized individual ruggedness that allowed me to survive the first thirty-four years of my life, and then the last two (Voluntarily) with no cell phone, but hey, really it's no big deal. The actually spun before twitter and facebook as well, although I'm not sure it wasn't all cannibals and dinosaurs, asteroid impacts and human sacrifice before /. but my memory of that dim before time is pretty vague.

    15. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sucks to be them then.
      I'm on vacation. Suck it bitches.

    16. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's great until somebody has a heart attack and people trying to call emergency services can't get a signal. In a life-threatening situation, every second counts, and the time it takes you to realize you need to step outside to get a signal could mean the difference between life and death.

      There's a good reason the FCC doesn't allow jammers. Go ahead, kick people out of theaters for texting during a movie, and be as strict about it as you want, but leave discretion and enforcement to security. Physically blocking a signal isn't worth it.

    17. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets say something happens in the the theater "itself", some has a heart attack, some serious medical condition, a fire or worse. Then what? The person(s) that have a cell phone can make a call much faster then the movie theater staff. Saving minutes off of the staff being notified then calling using a land line or them and or a patron being smart enough to run outside to make a cell call (for your faraday caged theater) , compared to a cell phone in the hands of someone right next or near the the person in distress.

      Not to mention when the emergency staff need to use there radios, or cell phones, while inside the building.

      That leads to the FCC having rules in place over not allowing public venues to use material that block radio/cell signals.

      It was a nice idea!!!

    18. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cell phone doesn't work worth a fuck in Walmart. Am I supposed to sue Walmart?
       
      Lots of stuff can block signals, natural and otherwise.

    19. Re:Faraday cage by CodeBuster · · Score: 2

      Who the heck pays for a movie ticket to play angry birds.

      Have you seen the sort of crap that Hollywood has been pooping out lately? Who would pay $10+ to see any of it? The kind of people who would play Angry Birds in the theater instead of actually watching it, that's who. And what does that say about the intelligence level of the average American, especially those who buy movie tickets? Nothing complimentary I'm afraid.

    20. Re:Faraday cage by c0lo · · Score: 1

      But who pays for a ticket to get bored out of their mind and play on a cellphone?

      E.g. men dragged in by their former-GF-freshly-upgraded-to-Wife1.0?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    21. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then they don't get to go to the theater. They're big boys and girls, I'm sure they can live with the lives they chose.

    22. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, maybe nobody does it intentionally. But I've certainly been to movies where 30 minutes in, Angry Birds would start to seem like a better option.

    23. Re:Faraday cage by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      And yet large parking garages do just this and there isn't a complaint there.
      A huge mound of concrete with steel rebar does quite a number on cell phone signals.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    24. Re:Faraday cage by jklovanc · · Score: 0

      There are also on-call shift workers. If the boss can not contact them they lose the shift and the boss calls the next in line.

    25. Re:Faraday cage by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Men (and women) need to grow up and learn to say "You go and see [insert girly flick here] with your friends, and I'll go see [insert action packed bloodbath here] with mine."

      Just because people are either going out, or married doesn't mean they should be forced to endure each other's crap tastes if they don't overlap.

    26. Re:Faraday cage by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes I have. I actually pay the sort of crap that hollywood has been pooping out lately. And so do millions of people all over the world who quite frankly disagree with you.

      Sure there are crap movies like the abortion known as Total Recall (the new one obviously) pumped out endlessly by the sequel machine that everyone is beginning to think is all part of George Lucas's evil scheme to brain fuck the world, but I actually enjoy and pay for movies like the original take on Snow White (despite the acting quality), or the Avengers, or the Batman retake.

      Not every movie needs to be an epic masterpiece of the art. Some just need to be fun, and given the gross earning stats for some movies which have come out in the past year, you're by far in the minority if you think everything new is crap.

    27. Re:Faraday cage by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Men (and women) need to grow up and learn to say "You go and see [insert girly flick here] with your friends, and I'll go see [insert action packed bloodbath here] with mine."

      Oh, they learn it eventually. But until they learn, the partner that advances the idea of watching [insert girly flick here] will inflict [insert action packed bloodbath here] onto the other... at least the first times when receiving the suggested answer. If the other partner survives, there'll be chances of some learning over time.

      (small voice: no dear, I don't keep posting on /. ... only... no, I didn't mean that... yes, dear, I'm done if you say so...)

      (ducks)

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    28. Re:Faraday cage by rockout · · Score: 1

      Yes, let's allow people to talk and text in movie theaters because of on-call shift workers that might lose a shift to the next person in line. Makes total sense.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    29. Re:Faraday cage by rockout · · Score: 1

      If you're in the same theater as the person who's playing Angry Birds, then I suppose you're paying the same $10 for poop that they are.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    30. Re:Faraday cage by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Who the heck pays for a movie ticket to play angry birds.

      Parents for one.

      I like certains of films (provided they're good) that are aimed at kids. Things like quite a lot of Pixar (Toy Story 3, Ratatouille, etc), Wreck it Ralph, and heck, the recent Muppets, that kind of thing. The sort of film which is simply really good, suitable for kids, but has much of it squarely aimed at the adult adience, and not in a euphemistic way.

      There are plenty of really stupid parents who seem incapable of realising that such films have merit. So they take the kids and because it's a "kids film" it must be below them (Oh, the irony!) so they spend the entire bloody film checking faceook, playing some game or whatever.

      I assume they do this too at the bad kids films too.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    31. Re:Faraday cage by crakbone · · Score: 1

      Doctor or a sysadmin should have a phone with the VIBRATE function. You then step out of the theater and check your phone. It's simple and does not bother anyone in the theater. Props to you if you choose an aisle seat so you can get out faster and with less fuss.

    32. Re:Faraday cage by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      There are no 9-11pm sessions of these movies where you live? I am a great fan of these movies too and I can say with certainty that there was no one under the age of about 20 in the cinema when I saw the Ice Age or Toy Story sequels.

    33. Re:Faraday cage by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      There are no 9-11pm sessions of these movies where you live?

      Depends on the cinema. I generally prefer to be home a bit earlier if possible and it seems that they type of parent who is happy to browse facebook through "Wreck it Raplh" doesn't mind taking the kids to a 9-11 screening anyway. Fortunately some cinemas have started instigating over 18s screening for non 18 rated films which does greatly improve things, and some cinemas are a little more upmarket and attract different clientel.

      Naturally, I've come to try to avoid screenings with such behaviour, but I was offering some insight into who would do such a thing.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    34. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they don't have backup for when they are off duty then they are already a disaster waiting to happen.

    35. Re:Faraday cage by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      They're not deliberately blocking the cell phones, they're not as effective as the "Farady cage" like wallpaper, and you're not being invited to sit in the garage for several hours at a time. It's a very different situation.

    36. Re:Faraday cage by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      I do believe I described this. Even when not officially "on call", I'm often the target of technological emergency calls due to specialized knowledge. The same thing happens to specialists or truly skilled medical personnel all the time, because having a backup is never the same thing as having the primary and more actively maintained system available. The time spent enabling a backup can be critical.

      I'm not suggesting it would be a common occurrence for tragedy to occur, but what theater would take such a risk.

    37. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or one doctor who can't be paged

      Coming from a family that recognizes the responsibility and sacrifice one undertakes when being on call, I for one would welcome such a lawsuit.

    38. Re:Faraday cage by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      There are seventeen million sole proprietors in the US. Many of those are on-call.

      Fortunately if you can run a business, you're smart enough to figure out how to use an app like Shush! and mute your phone.

      I don't think these are the people who are causing trouble though. If you have a couple of free hours and cash to enjoy a movie, you're going to do that.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    39. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're on call and it's so important that they are able to be contacted, then why are they going to a theater? Isn't that kind of a stupid, self-centered thing to do?

    40. Re:Faraday cage by sjames · · Score: 1

      Sure they can, they just need to set their phone appropriately so it only vibrates for a really important call and then if it vibrates they can take the call in the lobby like a civilized person.

    41. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So?
      Some professions will limit what you can do on your spare time. Presumably these super important doctors who can't watch a 2h movie without the possibility of being interrupted are already limited from participating in many other activities. Swimming? Can't use your phone. Going into any building with bad network reception? Forget it. Taking a small trip? Even if people are able to contact you, you're too far to come quickly.

      I say, we faraday-cage all theatres, and if it really turns out that this is a problem for society, we make exceptions for doctors and sysadmins - they can get pagers at the entrance and sit near the exits so they don't disturb anybody.
      Ah, but no returning once you leave. After all, the call is so important it should last long anyway, and even if it doesn't, the value of the call outweighs the value of the ticket.

    42. Re:Faraday cage by neurogeneticist · · Score: 1

      I already do that with my pager, but the topic of this thread was using Faraday cages to prevent signal transmission during movies. That would thwart the efforts of anyone who needs to quietly maintain a connection.

    43. Re:Faraday cage by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      Doctor or a sysadmin should have a phone with the VIBRATE function. You then step out of the theater and check your phone. It's simple and does not bother anyone in the theater. Props to you if you choose an aisle seat so you can get out faster and with less fuss.

      Doctors or sysadmins should have other people that can cover for their duties and be able to enjoy a few hours of peace uninterrupted.

    44. Re:Faraday cage by sjames · · Score: 1

      I can see that as a problem. It's unfortunate that there are enough people being rude that Faraday cages and illegal jammers start to look good to theater managers.

      Louisiana passed a shoot the carjacker law to make it clear that lethal defense is acceptable in that situation. Perhaps we need a "spike the cellphone" law to clarify reasonable reactions to rude people in the theater :-)

    45. Re:Faraday cage by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Lets allow people's phone to vibrate in movie theaters because of on-call shift workers that might lose a shift to the next person in line.

      FTFY
      Whether or not they leave the theatre before they answer the phone or text is another question. Cutting off all phones due to a few idiots is not the answer. Another issue is that if someone has a medical emergency in the theatre EMS radios would not work and EMTs would lose communication with the hospitals.

    46. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most live theater shows in my area require doc's and others on-call to leave their pager / phone with the box office. If they get a call, an usher notifies the patron and he can step outside to take the call. Couldn't that work in a movie theater?

    47. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm thinking using very large, prominent signs saying "Entering wireless dead zone. If you have any responsibilities this may intefere with, please return your ticket for a refund" along with a notice before the movie starts saying the same thing.

      That is, put it on the patron. A faraday cage has a localized effect, it can't spread beyond its specific container. If the patron decides to enter said container despite said warnings, it's not the theatre's fault.

      Or, if it is that vital, perhaps there should be some sort of cell phone check service, like coats. That would, of course, require some sort of method to notify the person in the theatre, which means they'd need to have an assigned seat.

    48. Re:Faraday cage by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Back in the olden days, before cellphones and pagers, doctors on call might leave word of their whereabouts with a secretary, who in the event of an emergency would phone the theatre, which would send an usher in to seek, and if need be call out for the doctor.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    49. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I'm afraid the FCC will become upset because it can _block_ signals outside the movie theater.

      There's no such law.

      They're not deliberately blocking the cell phones, they're not as effective as the "Farady cage" like wallpaper, and you're not being invited to sit in the garage for several hours at a time. It's a very different situation.

      No, because there's no law against passively blocking radio waves. Intentionally or otherwise. No law. Ever.

      And you're not really blocking them anyway, they're just bouncing off stuff.

    50. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are these things called "doors" you're welcome to use. You might even be able to get your ticket refunded.

    51. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that would require assigned seating, which movie theatres don't seem to have.

    52. Re:Faraday cage by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

      What about those of us IT people who can be paged or called into work? I set my phone to vibrate and I don't whip it out at a movie theater -- I still, however, need to be "connected". I work for a hospital and downtime is rarely an option.

    53. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, in the event of a gunman who opens fire while you're watching Star Wars VII, you'd rather have to allow someone to escape before they can dial 911?

      Yeah.

      Taking matters into your own hands can likewise lead to taking a fist (or worse!) to the face.

      And as to the two items presented, I give you a third: Why didn't David Edelstein name the theatre explicitly? He's a critic, for god's sake! Walk out, tell the manager, "You aren't going to police those people, I'm leaving. My review will be both incomplete and name your theatre as one in which I couldn't finish watching the movie."

      Place where you go won't police the audience? Leave. Don't go back. Tell the manager they've lost your business. It's not like there aren't other theatres where you live. And that happens enough, maybe the managers change their policies.

      One last little thing.... David Edelstein waited, and waited, and waited. Don't wait. Leave the room, find the staff. Do so after someone won';t shut up after five minutes, let alone however long it was.

    54. Re:Faraday cage by jeffporcaro · · Score: 1

      I'm a cardiologist in real life, when I'm not lurking here, and this is not correct. I've taken call in 4 different systems, and in none of them was there ever a "backup" person. If the person on-call isn't reachable, either patients try again later, go to the ER, or die. FWIW, I don't go to movies when I'm on call (typical call would be one night out of 4, and one weekend out of 4 so not a tragedy). I also didn't bring my kids to restaurants until they were old enough to behave (and we left if they didn't behave). I used to smoke, and I never smoked by the only entrance or exit from a building. I'm completely comfortable asking people to stop talking and using their phone in movies, and I find I need to do that frequently. I'm jealous that there are apparently places where people don't confuse the movie theater with their living room.

      --
      It is not the doing of things that is difficult. What is difficult is getting in the right mood to do them. ~~ Brancusi
    55. Re:Faraday cage by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Both phones vibrating and people leaving the cinema are also distractions.

      Another issue is that if someone has a medical emergency in the theatre EMS radios would not work and EMTs would lose communication with the hospitals.

      Were you born yesterday? There was a time before mobile phones. And even now there are places where there is naturally no cell signal. Cell phone signal is not a necessity, it's a convenience. And if people go on being selfish about it, it'll be a convenience that will be increasingly cut off.

    56. Re:Faraday cage by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The more people who seem to think they are special and have the right to ignore the no mobile phone rules in theatres, the more I become certain that the only real solution is technical - faraday cage or jammer.

    57. Re:Faraday cage by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Home theatre. Or one of the many other kinds of nights out where phones aren't banned - e.g. bowling.

      Other people shouldn't have to suffer your rule breaking which you justify by your choice of job.

    58. Re:Faraday cage by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      But I'm afraid the FCC will become upset because it can _block_ signals outside the movie theater.

      Show us the law against building faraday cages.

    59. Re:Faraday cage by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      WTF has your feelings of being special and irreplaceable in your job got to do with it?

      It's a matter of choice. If you choose to take a job where you feel irreplacable 24/7/365, then you've also made the choice not to go to theatres, other than in your vacation.

      Anything else is you being just as rude in disregarding the civil standards and rules of the theatre as those kids that also believe they are special and above the rules.

    60. Re: Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean that I can ask for limits on the kinds of entertainment you seek because of something I don't like?

    61. Re:Faraday cage by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      Well, although I don't believe in the whole "24/7 connectivity is required" mindset (somehow society survived for thousands of years before it became an option), if you insist on being connected at all times, a theatre that implements this wouldn't be an option for you. Your options would be to patronize a different theatre, or choose a different form of entertainment.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    62. Re:Faraday cage by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Both phones vibrating and people leaving the cinema are also distractions.

      Getting up to go to the washroom is also distraction. The idea is to minimize distraction not eliminate them.

      There was a time before mobile phones

      A Faraday cage that will block cell phone coverage will also block most other radios as well. Radio coverage is a necessity for EMS.

    63. Re:Faraday cage by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Getting up to go to the washroom is also distraction. The idea is to minimize distraction not eliminate them.

      Absolutely. And minimising them is the reason why the "vibrate on, leave if there's a telephone call" plan is unacceptable. In an audience of say 500 people, in a 2 hour period, how many people would get calls, would you imagine? Easily enough for the stream of people to be leaving and returning to be constant.

      The reason that it doesn't happen is that most people are so rude and selfish as to do that.

      A Faraday cage that will block cell phone coverage will also block most other radios as well. Radio coverage is a necessity for EMS.

      And is available just outside the theatre. Or in the case of a jammer could be switched off.

    64. Re:Faraday cage by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. And minimising them is the reason why the "vibrate on, leave if there's a telephone call" plan is unacceptable.

      Your line of acceptability is not the only line. My line considers leaving to answer a call to be acceptable.

      And is available just outside the theatre.

      So the unconscious patient has to me moved from the theatre so the ECG can transmit back to the hospital and the EMTs can talk to the doctors? I am talking about the EMT communicating with the hospital while tending a patient.

      Or in the case of a jammer could be switched off.

      Jammers are illegal in the US as their influence can not be contained in a building. Faraday cages can not be turned off.

    65. Re:Faraday cage by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Your line of acceptability is not the only line. My line considers leaving to answer a call to be acceptable.

      It's not a case of each person making their own standards. You may not have noticed that the rules of the theatre are invariably "switch off your phone", not leave your phone on and walk out if there's a phone call. I've pointed out why. If everyone did as you do, there would be a constant stream of people leaving and returning. And that's a distraction.

      So the unconscious patient has to me moved from the theatre so the ECG can transmit back to the hospital and the EMTs can talk to the doctors? I am talking about the EMT communicating with the hospital while tending a patient.

      I'd have respect for your hypothetical if it wasn't constructed specifically to enable you personally to continue to be rude to your fellow theatregoers by breaking the rules regarding phone calls.

      Jammers are illegal in the US as their influence can not be contained in a building. Faraday cages can not be turned off.

      Absolutely. And both are preferable to the current state of play of selfish people ruining theatres for other people.

    66. Re:Faraday cage by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      That's a fair point.

      And as for the shadow outside- you kinda make my point there. You don't' sit outside of theaters for hours missing any potential calls. And there are many other causes of cell phone shadow areas.

      I think it should be easy and legal for theaters to say, "If you want to enter this theater, you won't get a cell signal while watching a film". Past there, I say let the free market decide. Make some theaters cell phone proof and see if people prefer them or not.

      It could be that lots of people want their cell phones to work and they will avoid the deadened theaters. However, in my experience it's about 1% of people who are the problem in the theater. Most people do NOT get calls, do NOT call their friends and tell them about the movie while it's showing, do NOT play video games, etc.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    67. Re:Faraday cage by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      So to overcompensate for rude people you will let people die. Excellent compromise.

      I think you are exaggerating the "constant stream of people leaving and returning". The people I am talking about are very few in number and don't get important calls very often. I doubt very much if one would get more than 5 people leaving and returning during a film. The main issue is people talking and texting during the movie not coming and going.

      If you read most theatre policies they ask you to turn off your cell phones and say to leave the theatre if you must use your phone. Turning off you phone is not a requirement.

      I'd have respect for your hypothetical if it wasn't constructed specifically to enable you personally to continue to be rude to your fellow theatregoers by breaking the rules regarding phone calls.

      That is an excellent assumption and way off base. I usually turn my phone off at theatres as I do not need to be contacted. I also know that there are others who do need to be contacted while in a theatre and see a benefit in allowing it to happen. Everyone is not like you. Just because you don't need radio contact while in a theatre does not mean that others don't. It is not all about you.

      By the way, please preview your posts as multiple quotes can cause issues.

      The crux of the issue is that we can either kick out the few idiots who abuse their cell phone privileges or we can remove the privilege from everyone. As someone who has an issue with penalizing people who did nothing wrong I prefer the former.

    68. Re:Faraday cage by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      I was very cautious about that language. The difference between the FCC "becoming upset" and "prosecuting" is a very real one. I'd anticipate the FCC changing its regulations on passive blocking very, very quickly if such passive jamming became widespread in movie theaters.

    69. Re:Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such materials are commercially available as wallpaper for years. (See http://blogs.wsj.com/ideas-market/2012/05/25/wallpaper-that-blocks-wi-fi/)

      But I'm afraid the FCC will become upset because it can _block_ signals outside the movie theater. The shadow of the cage itself is a noticeable dead zone. And I'm afraid that it will only take one litigious parent whose baby sitter is trying to reach them, or one doctor who can't be paged, to create a dangerous lawsuit for for any theater that tries this.

      I have seen it done for certain conference rooms, that were clearly marked this this way, and even then people became quite upset at not having their cell phones work.

      Such materials are commercially available as wallpaper for years. (See http://blogs.wsj.com/ideas-market/2012/05/25/wallpaper-that-blocks-wi-fi/)

      But I'm afraid the FCC will become upset because it can _block_ signals outside the movie theater. The shadow of the cage itself is a noticeable dead zone. And I'm afraid that it will only take one litigious parent whose baby sitter is trying to reach them, or one doctor who can't be paged, to create a dangerous lawsuit for for any theater that tries this.

      I have seen it done for certain conference rooms, that were clearly marked this this way, and even then people became quite upset at not having their cell phones work.

      How could you call 911 if (wink wink) happened?

    70. Re:Faraday cage by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      So to overcompensate for rude people you will let people die. Excellent compromise.

      A hypothetical that someone might die is not enough to stop mankind doing things. Even the actuality of it isn't. Otherwise if we were driving cars at all, they'd still have a man walking in front of them waving a red flag.

      Entire audiences have been killed in theatres. Through fire and collapse. But it's considered worthwhile. We don't want to give up the pleasure of theatre for the microscopic chance of death.

      It's a statistically ignorant argument to say that faraday cages shouldn't be used in theatres, because of death risk of not having radio signal. Theatres have far bigger risks than your hypothetical already.

      I think you are exaggerating the "constant stream of people leaving and returning". The people I am talking about are very few in number and don't get important calls very often.

      I'm sorry, but that's just you are more important than other people. You're not. And it's this widespread arrogance that causes the problem.

      If you read most theatre policies they ask you to turn off your cell phones and say to leave the theatre if you must use your phone.

      What part of turn off your phone don't you understand? I've never come across a theatre who says the later thing, but if they exist, the only way to interpret it is if you have to MAKE a phone call. Perhaps because you or your companion is unexpectedly feeling ill. It can't be to receive a phone call, because you can't receive one when your phone is off.

      TL;DR: I don't believe for one second that there is any theatre policy that says anything other on the subject than "Please switch off your phones." and the please is only being polite. It's not an option.

      That is an excellent assumption and way off base. I usually turn my phone off at theatres as I do not need to be contacted.

      i.e. You turn it off only according to YOUR convenience, not because you owe it as respect to the rest of the audience. I'm not the slightest bit off base.

      Everyone is not like you. Just because you don't need radio contact while in a theatre does not mean that others don't. It is not all about you.

      You're the one who thinks the world revolves around you. It's simple. If you feel you can't be away from the phone for 2 hours, don't go to a theatre. If you go anyway, and have your phone on, you're a selfish jackass.

      The crux of the issue is that we can either kick out the few idiots who abuse their cell phone privileges

      The crux of the issue is that they are no different than you. They think their own behaviour is justifiable, even though it's against the rules and against civil standards in a theatre, just as you do. It's a lack of empathy, and you share it.

      It's because there are many people like you and like them that technological means are required. I don't care whether it's Faraday cages, jammers or some mobile phone protocol that switches phones off in the presence of a beacon.

      (Yes, the jammer solution would require a change in the law.)

    71. Re:Faraday cage by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      We can't run the world on what you anticipate some government agency might feel.

      Being able to shield oneself and one's property from EMF of any and all descriptions should be a right, if it isn't one already.

    72. Re:Faraday cage by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      There are two option to deal with rude people in theatres; kick them out or make radio frequencies unavailable in theatres. I prefer the former you prefer the latter.

      I think you are exaggerating the "constant stream of people leaving and returning". The people I am talking about are very few in number and don't get important calls very often.

      I'm sorry, but that's just you are more important than other people.

      I do not see a few extra people leaving the theatre for a few minutes as a major distraction. I bet if you talked to a few other people they would say the same thing. You have no evidence to the contrary. It seems that your desire for a completly undisturbed theatre experience override other people's desires. It seems that you think you are more important than other people. That is why I talk about compromise, allow phones to be on in the theatre and require use to be outside the theatre. It is not perfect but accommodates everyone.

      Here is the policy from Granite Cinema;

      We ask that you turn off your cell phones or other devices during the show. If you must answer a call or send a text, please do so in the lobby. Cell phone use or texting in the auditorium will result in you being asked to leave without a refund.

      Notice they say "answer a call".

      Even Drafthouse, who is cited in one of the linked articles, does not say to turn off your cellular phone;

      We have a zero-tolerance policy towards talking and texting during the movie. If you talk or text, you will receive one warning. If it happens again, you will be kicked out without a refund.

      Notice that they do not even ask one to turn off the phone. All they require is not talking or texting during the movie.

      They think their own behaviour is justifiable, even though it's against the rules and against civil standards in a theatre, just as you do.

      Is it against "civil standards in a theatre" to go out of the theatre for a few minutes and then return? People do it all the time to go to the restroom. Whether it is nature's call or a buzzing phone makes no difference to me.

      It's a lack of empathy, and you share it.

      You also have a "lack of empathy" for people who are on call. I see the minimal disturbance of a few people having to leave a theatre to pick up a shift as a minor inconvenience compared to never allowing shift workers to go to the movies.

      Yes, the jammer solution would require a change in the law.

      That will never happen as jammer signals will interfere with nearby radios.

    73. Re:Faraday cage by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      > We can't run the world on what you anticipate some government agency might feel.

      On what I, personally, anticipate? Of course not. On the history of lawsuits and shifting governmental regulation as applied to project planning, architecture, and finance? It happens every day.

    74. Re:Faraday cage by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Notice they say "answer a call".

      Notice they say "in the lobby". Shortly after "turn off your cell phones or other devices during the show." This is not ambiguous. You're OK with calls in the lobby, you must have you phone switched off during the show.

      does not say to turn off your cellular phone;

      They choose to make their distinction elsewhere. But then they are a cinema that serves meals during the show, so they have different standards to most theatres.

      Is it against "civil standards in a theatre" to go out of the theatre for a few minutes and then return? People do it all the time to go to the restroom. Whether it is nature's call or a buzzing phone makes no difference to me.

      The number of times it happens makes a difference. One hopes that most people try to avoid needing the toilet during a show. But nature cannot be switched off and sometimes people are caught short. It does disturb other people, but a the odd person having to do that cannot be avoided. It's not deliberate.

      If people are going out to deal with incoming calls and messages then it happens far more often, and people are disturbed more often. And this time it's by CHOICE of the rude people that do it. Rather than trying to avoid it, they've taken action to make it happen.

      That you can't see the difference just indicates that you are lacking empathy, as I mentioned before.

      It seems that your desire for a completly undisturbed theatre experience override other people's desires. It seems that you think you are more important than other people.

      Bullshit. At the end of that line of reasoning is saying victims of robbery are being selfish for complaining about it. This is about singular people disturbing hundreds of people's enjoyment, usually against the conditions by which they bought a ticket. It's about civil standards, not what I personally want.

      Just stop arguing the toss with me, and consider your behaviour. You're not always right. Sometimes you do things without thinking them through. And this is one of those cases.

    75. Re:Faraday cage by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      And this time it's by CHOICE of the rude people that do it.

      It is also the choice of entitled people to make a big deal about a minor distraction.

      There is a huge difference between people having cellular phone conversations/texting and people leaving a theatre to take a call. By lumping both together you show lack of empathy.

      At the end of that line of reasoning is saying victims of robbery are being selfish for complaining about it.

      That is like equating overfilling a gas can and the Exon Valdeze spill. They are orders of magnitude different. If you can not deal with a few people leaving a theatre then you have a problem.

      Just stop arguing the toss with me, and consider your behaviour. You're not always right. Sometimes you do things without thinking them through. And this is one of those cases.

      There is an old saying "when you point fingers at someone else there are three pointing back at you". Everything in that last statement could be applied to you as well. I have thought it through completely and I do not see a few people leaving a theatre for a few minutes as a major distraction.

    76. Re:Faraday cage by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      There is a huge difference between people having cellular phone conversations/texting and people leaving a theatre to take a call. By lumping both together you show lack of empathy.

      Now your defensiveness is making you say silly things. This is not constructive.

    77. Re:Faraday cage by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Strange how you can accuse me of "lack of empathy" but when I accuse you of the same thing it is defensiveness. Why is it defensiveness in my case but not yours? How about you read you own posts before accusing others. Again, everyone does not think like you which is why I try to find a compromise. The position of "My way or the highway" is very egocentric.

    78. Re:Faraday cage by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Again, everyone does not think like you which is why I try to find a compromise.

      Of course not everyone thinks like me. That's the point of the story. The theatres are full of rude and selfish people. That's no reason to compromise with them.

      If you're under any delusion that most people agree with you, then read all the messages under the story.

    79. Re:Faraday cage by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      The theatres are full of rude and selfish people.

      The theatres have a few rude and selfish people. If they were "full of" then majority rules and no one would be bothered. Exaggerated statements do not help you argument.
      I consider it selfish to not allow someone to leave a theatre to answer a phone call or text.

      That's no reason to compromise with them.

      There is no reason to compromise with someone who insists on talking/texting/gaming in a theatre. There is a reason to compromise with people who need to be in contact while on call. There was one post from a person who carries an emergency services phone. If there is a building fire and the displaces residents need food, shelter, etc the emergency phone gets called. It does not happen very often but when it does it is important. I would like to find a way for him to go to a theatre and still be on call. Allowing phones on vibrate will accommodate that with minimal disruption.

      I have read the other messages under the story. Can you find many that have issues with people leaving the theatre to answer calls/texts? I looked and could not find any. The issue is talking/texting/game playing in the theatre not leaving and returning.

      By your standard anyone who is on call can not go to a movie theatre. That is why they invented vibrate mode. Perhaps you need to learn to compromise a bit.

    80. Re:Faraday cage by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      There is no reason to compromise with someone who insists on talking/texting/gaming in a theatre. There is a reason to compromise with people who need to be in contact while on call.

      There is no fundamental difference between the two. Only one of he degree of their selfishness and rudeness. Every single one thinks that what they do is OK and justified, but there are some OTHER people that do something that is unacceptable.

      The on-call thing is a red herring. People doing on-call jobs are not normally on call 24/7/365. If they are, they have bigger problems than a lack of cinema - they have an abusive employer. But if they are on such an arrangement then that is their CHOICE. And part of that choice to to only go places where mobile phones are acceptable. The theatre is not one of them.

      You are behaving exactly as the typical yob in a cinema. You won't accept your fault, and you'll just keep on justifying yourself. You confuse having the last word with being right.

      Have the last word. You're still in the wrong.

    81. Re:Faraday cage by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      There is no fundamental difference between the two.

      There is no fundamental difference as you see it. Whether or not there is a difference is an opinion and not a fact. Your opinion is different than mine and my opinion is just as valid as yours.

      Every single one thinks that what they do is OK and justified, but there are some OTHER people that do something that is unacceptable.

      That is demonstrably false as many people are embarrassed when caught doing something they know is unacceptable.

      The on-call thing is a red herring.

      My daughter worked shifts at a pharmacy. If someone called in sick she would get a call. If she didn't answer, they went to the next one. I was an on call ambulance driver. I would carry the pager for 4 days at a time. Should I not be able to go to a movie during those four days? You don't understand emergency services and how the callout systems work. On a simpler scenario, say someone leaves a child with a babysitter to go to a movie and there is a medical emergency. Should the parents be out of communication during the three hour movie?

      You are behaving exactly as the typical yob in a cinema. You won't accept your fault, and you'll just keep on justifying yourself. You confuse having the last word with being right.

      You are behaving exactly like the entitled youth of today who must have things their own way. You will not accept that other people have differing opinions and keep insisting on your desires. You are confusing being opinion with fact.

      The world is not as black and white as you seem to see it. Different people have different wants and needs and the best thing to do is compromise.

    82. Re:Faraday cage by anethema · · Score: 1

      Yeah then tough luck. If you can't be somewhere where your phone can be off, stay out of the movies, get the big screen you can likely afford, and watch movies at home.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  7. Easy. by Dj+Stingray · · Score: 1

    Most people won't use their devices if there is no connectivity. Just start building theaters with built-in Faraday Cage technology.

  8. Get off my lawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never once understood going out with a group and sitting silently in a straight line. Seems silly to me.

    1. Re:Get off my lawn by Deadstick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      An acquired taste that we no longer have much reason to acquire.

    2. Re:Get off my lawn by crakbone · · Score: 1

      Go to a theater with assigned seating and order online. No lines except maybe snacks. Some theaters you can even order your snacks when you go to pickup your tickets.

  9. Stop going to theatres. by Elgonn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just stop going entirely. It is expensive and isn't even as nice as watching at home or with friends. There's certainly no chance that social conventions will make it palatable again within our lifetimes.

    1. Re:Stop going to theatres. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      At least where I live (a city of 200K people in the US), phones in theaters aren't a major problem (I've rarely ever seen someone pull one out and talk on it or even turn it on so that it shines in the eyes of the people behind them; they're always careful to cup it so that the light doesn't escape much and then they put it away quickly), and it's actually cheaper for me to go to either of the two nice theaters we have in town for a brand new movie than it is to rent an HD video that came out last year on iTunes/Amazon/whatever, as strange as that sounds. And while I do take pride in having put together a decent entertainment setup, I don't have enough seating available for the number of friends with whom I typically go to the theaters.

      Long story short, the value proposition is still there for some of us, and it sounds like you just need to find a theater where the management actually polices their policies and removes people who are talking or texting during the film. When they do it consistently, it's not a problem.

    2. Re:Stop going to theatres. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just stop going entirely. It is expensive and isn't even as nice as watching at home or with friends.

      There's certainly no chance that social conventions will make it palatable again within our lifetimes.

      Well... but then I don't have an excuse to eat a whole box of chocolate junk and jug of coke by myself.

      Also, movie theater etiquette actually keeps family/friends in line too. No pausing while someone takes a piss, no answering phone calls, no couch commentary, and nobody does the damned laundry. Granted, I'm guilty of some of those too, but the movie theater experience is 100% watching a movie, and in the home, well it's cheaper so we treat it as such.

    3. Re:Stop going to theatres. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, right? What kind of lame ass loser goes to a movie theater nowadays. You get a much better picture and sound at home and you can hit pause whenever you feel like it. And you can get snacks as cheap as hell right in the next room. I haven't been to a filthy, smelly, disease ridden, annoying as hell movie theater in decades.

    4. Re:Stop going to theatres. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As fun as watching a group of my friends enact the latest broadway play in my living room sounds, sometimes it's nice to go watch professional actors act.. the phone throwing didn't happen in a MOVIE theater it happened at a play...

    5. Re:Stop going to theatres. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Quite. The munchers, the chatters, commentators, the high prices and the crappy seats have all conspired to make movie-going terrible for a couple of decades at least.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Stop going to theatres. by rockout · · Score: 1

      At least where I live (a city of 200K people in the US),

      That's a largish town, in the area of the US that I live.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    7. Re:Stop going to theatres. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a nice independent theatre (“no 3D, guaranteed” being their slogan) here (Bordeaux); it's inexpensive, shows original soundtrack movies (this is rare here), has no commercial ads (I remember an article recently where everyone was amazed that these were skipped once) and a relatively civilised clientèle to boot. Good cinemas exist, really. Just look harder.

    8. Re:Stop going to theatres. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make it a point to pull out my phone when they show those "no phones messages". The bright light of your phone attracts a few onlookers and they see me putting it into Airplane mode often prompts a few of them to do the same or put into silent mode.

      Also, going to a movie when it has just started screening, people usually go to those because they want to see the movie and are much more attentive and considerate of making sure their phone is off.
      Going during the last few days of which it is screening, or on a Sunday afternoon usually results in being surrounded by kids and parents who aren't really there to see the movie.
      Know your audience and planning is better than dealing with it, wouldn't you agree?

    9. Re:Stop going to theatres. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I neither said nor implied that it was a small town. I was merely providing context. ;)

    10. Re:Stop going to theatres. by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Why should I stop going to movies because you are an inconsiderate asshole? (I am assuming you are defending the practice of using a phone during a movie. I apologise if this is not what you intended.)

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    11. Re:Stop going to theatres. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Every once in a while I forget how miserable I am at movie theaters and I go. Every single time there are asshats everywhere lighting their cell phone screens during the movie, chewing with their mouths open right behind my ear, kicking the seats, talking, cracking peanut/sunflower shells through the whole movie, and on and on. The whole movie all I can think about is stabbing the asshole in the neck and watching him bleed out on the floor while he cries for his mother. I can't focus on enjoying the movie.

    12. Re:Stop going to theatres. by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Huh, I wouldn't have thought 200K was a city, I would have said town. But then I did some searching, and there's no consistent measure for town vs. city. There are 5 people cities (every municipality in ND is a city), and towns with hundreds of thousands of people.

      However, my on-topic thought is that 200K is still rather small and intimate compared to places like NY, Boston, L.A., Philadelphia, Miami, etc. Go to movies in any of those cities, and you're in for a festival of cell phone usage and other, more "exotic" behaviors.

    13. Re:Stop going to theatres. by rockout · · Score: 1

      You implied the opposite, that it was a city. I was saying that it seems such behavior in theaters are more of a problem in cities. Real ones.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    14. Re:Stop going to theatres. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Ah, I gotcha. I inferred your meaning incorrectly in your last comment, hence my reply. I thought you were suggesting I was underselling it, not overselling it.

      Anyway, yeah, if you dropped us next to a major city, we'd fit right in alongside the other suburbs, probably, at least in terms of population. But because we're in between three major cities, rather than being next to them, we're officially recognized as a metropolitan area in the US (the 171st largest!). :P

      Anyway, that's quite possible. Good behavior is strongly encouraged in this area, much more so than it ever was in the "real" cities and suburbs where I grew up (LA, Houston, Boca Raton), so that likely does play a favor, but I still think it's mostly an enforcement issue. Kick enough people out and they'll stop doing it.

  10. the "god bless america" solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gb7XlUoEKtE

    2nd amendment for the win?

    1. Re:the "god bless america" solution? by PPH · · Score: 1

      But please, silence your firearms during the performance. And pick up your brass and dispose of it in the proper receptacle.

      Thank you. The management.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  11. Regional/cultural issue? by Etcetera · · Score: 2

    Leaving aside racial stereotypes, is this more of a regional or cultural problem? In San Diego, I virtually never see people texting /during/ a movie, and I don't think I've heard a cell phone go off (eg, ring) during a showing any time in the last five years. About the worst thing that happens is people (myself included, occasionally) leaving a phone on but silent (no vibrate).... A flicker of a bright screen might show up if they have their phone facing outwards in a thin pocket or something, but that's it. Anyone who actually talked during a show would be told to stfu by the movie-goers, no doubt...

    FWIW, I'm normally just going to the local AMC20 or 18; nothing fancy or unusual, so I have to assume my observations are typical for this area.

    Is San Diego just a nice town, or are other places like this too?

    1. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      It's like this in Chicago at most of the movie theaters I have gone to

    2. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had good experiences in both San Diego (the Edwards off the 15 in mira mesa especially) and Denver (I think its a united artists theatre?). My local "at the mall theatre" in Michigan is full of trashy people who do talk on the phone and throw shit at the screen. However when I go to our discount movie theatre everyone is well behaved. So I used to think it had to do with the quality of the place, but since our discount place smells slightly like urine it miust just be a clientel thing.

    3. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by mlts · · Score: 1

      Here in Austin, the Alamo Drafthouse gets rid of the texters posthaste. This isn't a typical theater, but one with tables so one can get decent food as well as decent beers. Text, and the ushers will be coming by to give the offender one warning, the second, they are escorted out, no refunds given.

    4. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Is San Diego just a nice town, or are other places like this too?

      Yes, Yes, it is.. Lived there till 1996, then wife and I moved to Las Vegas.. Wish I was back there.. (117F here today...)...
      The last time I went to a theater here in Vegas, I swore I'd NEVER go back... High ticket prices/snack prices/squalling kids/sticky floors/texting... All the famous
      reasons to stay the F out of theaters.. This last time was when the last Starwars installment was released.. Haven't been back since.. Not all that hard, since 95% of the crap out of Hollyweird is just that... CRAP... When a new installment of the Bond or Starwars franchise comes out, I wait patiently till it hits Redbox and watch it on the home tv... perfect..

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    5. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only see two or three movies a year in the theater, but I've never seen a problem. Detroit area. I often wonder why so much fuss is made. Presumably, I just don't go to movies enough to see it.

    6. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same in Austin, like you might see someone messing around 1 in 10 movies. People inflate this problem I think. It's not that big a deal, just movie nerds freaking out over their "infringed" rights.

    7. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I was at the Alamo, they even played an irate phone message from someone who called up their theatre to cuss them out after running afoul of this policy and being ejected with no refund. It was hilarious because the offender took no responsibility for their actions, blaming the theatre for having a bad policy and poor communication of said policy.

      Oh hey, look at that. They uploaded it to youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L3eeC2lJZs. (Explicit language. It's even better than I remembered :-) )

    8. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by metrix007 · · Score: 0

      A very shitty policy.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    9. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it shitty? It's a well known policy at this establishment, with them having gone as far as getting Danny DeVito and Chuck Norris to record clips for their pre-movie message. To be clear the staff won't throw anyone out unless someone else complains first, so you've got to be sufficiently annoying first.

    10. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've seen this type of behavior before, but only in theaters that are located in lower income parts of town. It seems to bring out the thuggish quality of some people. If you have little power in your life, you peacock for all you are worth whenever you get the opportunity. This means playing your music in your car so loud it rattles windows on the street sets off the alarms of cars it passes by, talk on your phone in theaters, and take up multiple seats on public transportation by putting up your feet and giving shit to anyone who asks for the seat.

    11. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You mean a good one. It's in everyone's best interests for that person to no longer be in the theater: the other theatergoers will no longer have their entertainment disrupted, the management will maintain a reputation for ensuring a quality experience, and the person who got kicked out will finally get to go take care of whatever it was that they thought was so important, without having to deal with the distraction of a movie or people around them telling them to stow the phone. Everyone wins.

    12. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Gadget27 · · Score: 1

      Actually, best policy ever.

    13. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Frobnicator · · Score: 1

      is this more of a regional or cultural problem?

      Yes. It is a cultural thing. It is also an enforcement thing. Combine the two and interesting effects happen.

      We have a local chain of theaters that is really good about enforcement.

      In the lobby there are many posters and signs that you will be thrown out for cell phone use during a movie or during previews. At the start of a movie is a warning that you will be thrown out. There is a large food court and multiple eateries (not just popcorn), and if you sit out there for more than an hour or so you will see somebody being escorted from the theaters due to phone use.

      I love going to the chain, but a few weeks ago I saw a movie at a different theater. It seemed like everyone had their phone out. I walked out and talked to the usher, they said they couldn't do anything.

      Even in a region that has a problem with phone use, theater management absolutely can take control and fix the problem if they choose.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    14. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Citation Needed]

    15. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they meant shitty because they don't throw them out on the first strike?

    16. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to open a movie theater.

    17. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same deal in DC, I assume it's like this everywhere I don't think this is a real issue.

    18. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by traveller9 · · Score: 1

      We see this rude behavior in central Texas too. Typical of those feeling entitled and self absorbed, demonstrating a complete lack of respect for others and no evidence of civil manners. At the very beginning of the movie, before the advertising, many of the theaters clearly set expectations that cell phones will be powered off and no talking. One regional chain (maybe more) has zero tolerance of disturbing the audience as the offending parties will be escorted OUT, usually to delight of the other movie goers. Prior to movie start, one theater chain ... name reminds me of the Alamo ... airs a telephone recording of a disgruntled X customer that was publicly escorted out. .... actually quite humorous recording ... better than the cartoons! Oh, and for those inquiring minds, on second offense ... well you know, BANG ! ...yes we do ... it is Texas.

    19. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I first came here in TN going to the movies was like looking at oncoming traffic, with all the screens on. A guy once even had a loud conversation. However, like another poster said I haven't seen much more of this since the warnings went from "friendly reminder" to "we'll play back the footage of you getting kicked out for the next audience".

    20. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not generally a problem in the Seattle vicinity either, at least not after the actual movie starts. (Maybe an average of one "oops" per movie, and you usually here the person mumble something to the effect of, "Aw, crap!", then either promptly silence the device, or take it outside).

    21. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess San Diego is staying classy.

    22. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      No, it's shitty. If someone can't handle seeing a dim tiny screen for a few seconds, they have a problem, not the person with the screen.

      Going to the movies isn't some sacred experience where the rest of the world must be entirely muted. It's just a movie. People should be considerate and respectful, not talk, not make phone calls, ont have bright screen etc. But really, discreetly texting isn't a problem.

      I'm fine with the alamo cinemas...it's just a busines model. They're catering to the pretentious douchey customers who need the world muted to enjoy a movie, and so good for them.

      That crap shouldn't extend to other cinemas however.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    23. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I've seen folks at my local theater who are careful to cup the screen and hold it close to their body so that the light doesn't shine right into the eyes of everyone behind them (the only reason I could even see them was because I was to their side; had I been behind them, I'd have seen nothing). I'm actually fine with that sort of thing. If someone is doing it discreetly in such a fashion, then the usher will never see it, nor will the other patrons be disturbed and fetch the management.

      As such, I had assumed we were talking about the sort of person who was doing it obviously enough that they were disturbing other people. If that's the case, then we're no longer talking about someone who is being considerate and respectful. Rather, we're talking about someone who is being disruptive and rude.

    24. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There's nothing in the policy against getting up multiple times. If you absolutely *must* text, get up, go to the lobby, text, go back in. I've seen plenty of other places with such a policy, but I've only ever seen them enforced at theater-bars (Grenada in Dallas, Alamo Drafthouse in Austin, and one nobody would have heard of in Alaska Beartooth - Yes, I lived in TX before Alaska).

    25. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      No, it's shitty. If someone can't handle seeing a dim tiny screen for a few seconds, they have a problem, not the person with the screen.

      If someone can't handle having the person next to them whistle loudly at random quiet moments in the movie, the problem is with the listener, not the whistler.

      Nope, the problem is with the person using the screen, not the person who sees it.

    26. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      Where do you draw the line? Eating certain candy can be loud. What about coughing or sneezing? What about whispering the odd comment to a friend?

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    27. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with kicking out people being disruptive and rude. I do have a problem assuming everyone texting is automatically disruptive and rude, when they could be doing it discretely and courteously. I don't like the Alamo because to them, the latter is non existent.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    28. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Where do you draw the line?

      Why are you dodging the question and turning it back on me? Should I take that as a concession and apology?

    29. Re:Regional/cultural issue? by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      What question am I dodging? The post I replied to contained only statements.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
  12. easy solution by marcle · · Score: 1

    Just don't bother to go to movies. They're expensive, dumb, and annoying, with or without the foibles of your fellow movie fans.

    The sound is louder, the previews are more irritating, and the movies are more mindless. This is fun? The occasional good flick can be viewed in comfort and privacy in your home theater (or other device) on your own terms.

    1. Re:easy solution by afgam28 · · Score: 1

      Wow you have a home theater that you only use for the "occasional good flick"?

    2. Re:easy solution by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Wow you have a home theater that you only use for the "occasional good flick"?

      I am fairly sure he means a decent sized HDTV a BD player and a good 5.1 or 7.1 sound system all which can be purchased for less than $1000.00 although you could go to extremes and spend many times that. Before the comments of I am a poor "insert excuse here" my reply would be "and you can afford a family movie ticket and in many cases dinner".

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    3. Re:easy solution by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the occasional good flick, and much better stuff like HBO series "Game of Thrones" and the like. It's better than most movies, much better.

    4. Re:easy solution by unrtst · · Score: 1

      I am fairly sure he means a decent sized HDTV a BD player and a good 5.1 or 7.1 sound system all which can be purchased for less than $1000.00

      NOTE: I'm not the original poster

      I went the projector route a few years back. Only got a 720p, but it also does 3d, cost about $450 - $500, and easily puts out a 120" image. You can get a 1080p famous name brand for ~$700 these days. Whole system still less than or around $1000, and plenty of screen real estate to make a living room feel theater-like. Downsides:
      * it won't last as long (I'll probably get 4-6 years out of the bulb)
      * It uses more power (I don't care)
      * Have to turn off/down room lights or it's washed out, though still watchable (this really isn't that bad... only sucks a little when eating dinner and watching tv)
      * my ceiling fan light used to get in the way - I removed it.

      I'd recommend it to anyone with a similar budget. I ended up getting a screen too, but only so I could hang stuff on the wall and roll it up when not in use. The picture was damn near the same on a plain wall (even used it on a maroon painted wall, and color calibration did a great job dealing with it).

      I don't mean this as bragging.. just saying that a home theater can be quite the theater like experience for about the same price that most people plop down on a big HDTV.

    5. Re:easy solution by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Wow you have a home theater that you only use for the "occasional good flick"?

      I browse internet with my home theater. definitions of what is a home theater vary, but a decade ago this would have counted as a very nice high end home theater.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:easy solution by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I have what I consider to be the decent range - it costs more than $1,000. And I'm not paying for audiophile level quality - just better than basic.

      TV - $500 or more for a decent sized screen. Probably more if you want it to look good. Blu-Ray player - down to $60 now. Audio receiver is about $150 if you find the right brand/model, but usually $200. Subwoofer is near $100. Center channel is important, so that's another 100. And then you have another 4 speakers to buy for 5.1 - and the decent ones start at around $50/speaker. Then there's the speaker wire and other cabling. So you're looking at $12-1300 at the absolute minimum. Probably more.

      A theater-in-a-box set is NOT decent. It's barely above poor.

    7. Re:easy solution by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Now consider that I bought a top-end 56" tv for watching sport and old films (in HD, although it supports 3D too) already anyway.

      Incremental cost to get cinema grade sound? Not a whole lot.

      Sure, it's "only" 56" and not 120". I don't have 120" of wall anyway, and I don't have to turn my head. I'm also sat reasonably close to it.

      So yes, of course, total price is high. Incremental price? Nope.

    8. Re:easy solution by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Incremental cost is under $1,000. That doesn't mean it's cheap. It's still more than half that.

    9. Re:easy solution by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Actually for me it's sod all - I'm slightly deaf and my neighbours get upset at noise so there's no point buying expensive sound systems.

      On the flipside it means I still need to go to the cinema for a full sound experience :)

    10. Re:easy solution by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Or get a good 5.1 headphone system:
      http://www.amazon.com/Zalman-ZM-RS6F-surround-sound-headphones/dp/B0001OYMFO

      Though you might still need a subwoofer hooked up for that to sound right. But since that's less for the ears and more for feeling, that should work just fine.

    11. Re:easy solution by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I have a good 7.1 / 5.1 headset for gaming. Just not something I want to wear when watching TV.

  13. Zero tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't be without your phone for the length of the movie, don't go to the movie. We don't need to change society for pretentious self-absorbed assholes that can't part with their phone. You aren't that important that you need a phone 24/7.

    Theaters should collect the phones at the door, and you get it back when you leave.

  14. I never found it a REAL problem by DadLeopard · · Score: 0

    I have never found it to be a REAL problem, and even if it might annoy some people, you can not make a blanket prohibition, there are people that just might need to take that emergency call, Doctor, EMS, Volunteer firemen, Parents with a sitter and a hurt kid! So the selfish and self absorbed get to skate by! So all that on top of the fact that a theater that deployed a cell blocker, just might be on the wrong end of a whopping law suit, all I can say is suck it up and cope!

    1. Re:I never found it a REAL problem by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Your argument is stupid, because if you need to take a talk, you can get up and walk the fuck out. If you can't, you probably aren't qualified to be a Doctor, EMS, Volunteer firemen (or even just one fireman) and if your sitter can't handle the situation in which your kid is hurt, you need a new sitter. And if you can't get a sitter that good, stay home and invest in a big screen. It's cheaper than going to the movies ten times.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:I never found it a REAL problem by LVSlushdat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      *IF* I were to go a movie theater, I'd do the same thing I do with the smartphone at Church.. put it on vibrate. Yeah.. I know, why take your phone to Church? I volunteer with the local Redcross chapter's Disaster Action Team (DAT Team) and am often oncall over the weekend and have to respond quicky.. We're the guys/gals who provide food/clothing/lodging from the Redcross for people whose house/apartment burns down. Normally we have two volunteers oncall from Friday night to Monday morning for the weekend shift, but Las Vegas had a very large apartment fire (70 people displaced) several weekends ago, and we had to call out additional volunteers to get everybody taken care of, and since I was the primary oncall person, and I was in Church at the time, I had to leave kinda suddenly...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    3. Re:I never found it a REAL problem by Fierlo · · Score: 1
      You know, I am sure that the Red Cross does many good things, like you mentioned, however I am often conflicted about large humanitarian / philanthropic organizations. They just seem like they have many layers of management.

      I am always glad to hear about the 'normal' folk who provide immense value to these organizations.

    4. Re:I never found it a REAL problem by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      *IF* I were to go a movie theater, I'd do the same thing I do with the smartphone at Church.. put it on vibrate. Yeah.. I know, why take your phone to Church?

      That wasn't what I was thinking. I'm just surprised slashdoters still go to Church anymore.

      Churches are just like movie theaters, they're an anachronism in this day and age, where you can watch sermons on youtube and paypal your way out of hell.

    5. Re:I never found it a REAL problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that's church.... If I've paid money to see a movie, it's cause I'm expecting something worthwhile....

  15. Rude? Yes by markdavis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >"'Has our culture become so private that no one knows how to behave anymore in public?"

    Yes it has. A large percent of the population are very rude regarding phones. And the younger the generation, the more rude.

  16. We need more screens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised the idea of the miniplex hasn't caught on. Instead on one big room with 300 morons, have 30 rooms that seat 10 each. Most people want to watch a movie by themselves or with friends; they don't care about sitting in a room full of strangers. With digital distribution, each room could show any movie, and showtime is whenever a room is available. Yes, in the end it's just a fancy home theater, but many people don't have the money or the room for a decent home setup.

    1. Re:We need more screens by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"I'm surprised the idea of the miniplex hasn't caught on. Instead on one big room with 300 morons, have 30 rooms that seat 10 each"

      That is a lot less economical for the theater. Plus it is likely to sacrifice screen size. That said, when I want to see a movie in the theater, I intentionally wait until it has been out quite a while and then try to pick times/days/theaters in which attendance will be low. Generally that seems to work out pretty well.

      I have a good home theater, but I still like to go out to see them on the "even bigger screen", especially if it is 3D and shot in good quality. Probably my biggest complaint about theaters (other than annoying people and endless previews) is that most are simply WAY too loud. Jacking the sound volume up is not a replacement for quality sound, and louder is not better.

    2. Re:We need more screens by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised the idea of the miniplex hasn't caught on. Instead on one big room with 300 morons, have 30 rooms that seat 10 each.

      They probably have to pay per screen.

      Yes, in the end it's just a fancy home theater, but many people don't have the money or the room for a decent home setup.

      You could be watching blu-ray at home on 40" or more for under 300 if you score it all used.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:We need more screens by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Movie theatres pay the film companies a percentage of each ticket sold. (I happen to own a theatre.)

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  17. Not at all a novel problem by William+Ager · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is hardly a novel problem. All manners of talking, noisemaking, and other disturbances have been problems in theaters for centuries; phones are simply another type of potential disturbance.

    Yes, it is to some extent a cultural problem. I also think it tends to be a problem of lack of any enforcement of reasonable etiquette in theaters, perhaps from a concern for repercussions and retribution, but also, at least in many movie theaters, from a lack of staff.

    But I think it is only through enforcement by venues, and cultural unacceptability, that disturbances like these can be minimized, especially in this case. I don't think anyone particularly wants to be in a theater full of other people on phones; the people who use them in theaters would likely be upset about others using them were they not using them at that particular time. There are already venues for watching movies on large screens while being able to talk and generally be more casual, and perhaps we could use more of those, but that's not the problem here: the problem are people who are selfish. If someone wants to be able to disturb others, but not be disturbed by others, then letting everyone cause disturbances isn't going to help: everyone will go to the no-tolerance shows, and become upset if they're thrown out.

    1. Re:Not at all a novel problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True about the hypocrisy in it. Also, drive-ins are nice, open air, venues, where someone yapping on their phone won't be much of a bother.

    2. Re:Not at all a novel problem by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      This is hardly a novel problem. All manners of talking, noisemaking, and other disturbances have been problems in theaters for centuries; phones are simply another type of potential disturbance.

      I recall that on-campus movie showings back in the 80's used to flash a slide on the screen saying "NERDS - SILENCE YOUR WATCHES". Because, you know, they used to have these digital watches that would beep on the hour, back before everybody used their cell phones to tell time.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
  18. You mean you actually tolerate that crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, here in Brazil one pretty much has to turn the damn things off, otherwise people will kick them out of the screening room. Texting with very _low_ light and absolutely no noise might be tolerated, but don't count on it.

    All the theaters (movie and live-action) tell you right at the beginning of the session to shut the cells off. They _have_ the right to kick you out if you don't... but they don't even have to, the people right behind you or next to you will make your life hell until you run out in fear of losing your annoying gadget.

    1. Re:You mean you actually tolerate that crap? by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Umm... I don't turn my phone off, except to change batteries.. If putting it on vibrate isn't enough for anybody, well you can kiss my butt...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    2. Re:You mean you actually tolerate that crap? by metrix007 · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Brazilians needs to learn tom ind their own business.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
  19. Other Ideas by Roderic9 · · Score: 1

    An EMP works for me.

    1. Re:Other Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With digital projectors? I guess if you take out the projector people won't be there to see the movie, so they won't be disrupting anyone else, LOL.

  20. My lawn by LMariachi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why has “get off my lawn” become code for cranky senior citizen? What the fuck do those kids think they’re doing tearing up my meticulously-mown property, and why is it unreasonable to object to trespassers?

    I mean, if you’re just picking up a wayward frisbee or something, fine, but other than that, unless I invited you, seriously, stay off my lawn.

    1. Re:My lawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or maybe you're an asshole with no sidewalk on his lot. i'm mean you definitely are an asshole, probably have the diagonal-cut lawn and sprinklers that dampen the sidewalk (if you have one), thus soaking pedestrians. you're lucky i haven't bleached "asshole" on it yet, asshole.

    2. Re:My lawn by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Why has “get off my lawn” become code for cranky senior citizen?

      About the moment you clicked submit on that post.

      Would you like a free application for membership to AARP?

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    3. Re:My lawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't own property man...

    4. Re:My lawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get out the metal detector and find the survey stakes. It's probably not even his lawn those kids are walking across, it's part of the road allowance.

    5. Re:My lawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He just needs to say it with authority... something like a shotgun being cocked should suffice.

    6. Re:My lawn by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Why has “get off my lawn” become code for cranky senior citizen?

      I reckon the main reason for which objections to trespassing by younger generation is uncommon is most of them don't own one or don't have enough time to appreciate meticulous lawn-mowing (being busy to earn enough to pay the mortgage for one).

      (in other words: just remember that "cranky is in the eye of beholder" and you should be able to enjoy your lawn without remorse...and raise the "why the crankiness" point only as a philosophical/rhetorical one)

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    7. Re:My lawn by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Seriously! And really, even if you let your kid/dog run across my lawn on their leash on a nightly walk, I can live with that. But when you let that kid/dog shit on said lawn and don't pick it up don't be offended when said shit is sitting on your front step the next morning. And don't try to deny it afterwards, HD night vision cameras are cheap and plentiful these days. All hypothetical, of course...

    8. Re:My lawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've actually seen the random old person that got super angry if people walked on his lawn. to the extent he was screaming at a 3 year old who didn't know any better and was excited he got halloween candy. So it happens, its not making fun of the old man yelling at people tearing up his lawn, its the 3yr old in sneakers walking on it.

    9. Re:My lawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once redirected a pedestrian soaking sprinkler that got me by surprise into the window of the house. I guess nobody was home as it was still dumping water into their living room an hour later on my return trip.

    10. Re:My lawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMEN! Dude, my neighbor's kid decided is was OK to ride his bicycle over my plants. Not grass, mind you ... plants. He would just ride up the driveway and then proceed to ride into the yard, running over plants. What makes it extremely aggravating is that these aren't plants from Home Depot or Lowe's: I'm a plant nerd and I have a lot of local native plants that are rare or endangered, and many of them were painstakingly grown from seeds collected in the wild. If one of them dies I have to wait up to a year for the next seed season, hike my ass to a known specimen, collect seeds, and spend the next year giving intensive care to delicate seedlings. Then this fucker just runs them over because his parents are worthless sacks of shit that don't teach any respect.

    11. Re:My lawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "plants" you mean "marijuana", right?

    12. Re:My lawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a plant nerd and I have a lot of local native plants that are rare or endangered

      Assuming you're not just blowing smoke and are actually growing protected species, then you should ask an attorney who specializes in the Endangered Species Act about whether or not said actions constitute unlawful taking. You could then threaten to report him to the feds if threatening trespass with the local cops isn't good enough.

      But you might want to make sure your own actions don't constitute unlawful taking first.

    13. Re:My lawn by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      install cacti. Or put in slots between plants that catch the bike tires.

  21. CVEs assigned by seifried · · Score: 0
  22. Advertise 2 different types of audience by Snotnose · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One is "I wanna watch the damn movie", use a cellphone or talk too much and you get tossed out. The other is "I wanna be with my friends", anything goes. Run the experiment a couple months, see which gets the bigger audience. / Last movie I saw in a theater was Return of the King, due to talkative asshats // Second to last movie was The Two Towers

    1. Re:Advertise 2 different types of audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As stated in a previous thread, the "I wanna watch the damn movie" theater will be full up, and contain the usual cell phone users, talkers, and texters, behaving as they usually do. The anything goes theater will be empty. It's a denial issue - no one sees themselves as part of the problem, and why would they voluntarily go to the theater where someone might interfere with their moviegoing experience?

  23. The theater is dead. by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The entire movie theater industry is dead.

    Even if cell phones were eliminated (which in my experience have been more or less a non-issue in theaters) you've still got the fact that its $8 for a ticket and then $5 for a popcorn, $5 for a soda, $5 for a box of Junior Mints... Its simply too expensive for the 2 hours of (possible) enjoyment, especially when a couple of months later you can watch the movie on Netflix or pay $1 for it at Redbox. It used to be you could offset this by the fact that you were getting a higher quality picture and sound, but anymore a HDTV and surround sound are pretty common. 3D is simply a gimmick, its fun for a movie or two but doesn't really add much to the experience. I mean, other than for a midnight premiere, does anyone actually go to the movies anymore?

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:The theater is dead. by redmid17 · · Score: 5, Informative

      $8 for a ticket. Where are you going? I might need to move there. Cheapest I've found for a non-matinee is $11.50 or $12. Hell even my hometown, a mid-size Midwestern city, clocks in with $10 per theater.

    2. Re:The theater is dead. by sribe · · Score: 1

      ...you were getting a higher quality picture and sound...

      Not to mention that at home you get the sound of only the movie you are watching, not the ones to the left and right of the theatre you're in...

    3. Re:The theater is dead. by webdog314 · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen $8 movie tickets for a normal showing in San Diego for almost five years, hell, maybe ten. Eight bucks *might* get you a small popcorn and a small drink, but most standard shows are around $11.50. $13-15 if it's 3D, which every freaking movies is these days.

      But you're right. We stopped going to the theater. I mean, I can take my family of three to a show for around $50-60, OR, I can pay for 5 months of DVD/streaming-all-I-can-watch Netflix and make my own popcorn.

    4. Re:The theater is dead. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Based on some of the prices you are citing, I'm going to assume that you haven't actually been to a movie since roughly the turn of the century.

    5. Re:The theater is dead. by splitsevin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      $8.00 for a movie ticket? My god.

      Where I live (big bad city), it's $14.00 for a single adult ticket, plus a $1.00 fee to buy online.

      Oh, you want to see "A Scientologist Actor Saves the World 3D?"

      That'll be $19.00 for the "3D ZOMG1!1!!!" experience, plus a $1.00 fee to buy online.

      I do the math and realize I have a pretty big HD tv and a penchant for Usenet and all of the sudden that cellphone-manners-fight-waiting-to-happen doesn't seem so appealing.

      --
      The enemy of my enemy is quite possibly also my enemy. I've made a lot of enemies.
    6. Re:The theater is dead. by michaelmalak · · Score: 2

      The entire movie theater industry is dead.

      I just started resuming going back to the movies, and I like it. It costs me well over $100 each time, including babysitting, IMAX 3D tickets, and popcorn. I couldn't afford it during the GFC. I'm enjoying the high-production cost, 3-D experience, and I don't mind the high ticket prices at all -- they pale in comparison to the babysitter. In combination, I always go to the first non-midnight show on the first day, when other true fans go -- again at the IMAX 3D, and I've never had a problem with other people's cell phones.

    7. Re:The theater is dead. by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      He's probably getting the Senior Citizen discount,
      Get off his lawn!

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    8. Re:The theater is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Waco, it's $5 for a matinee/student/senior/kid/military, $8 for adult.
      Popcorn is $4.50-$6 depending on size, Soda is $4-5.50 depending on size, Candy is $3 to $4.
      I'm a consultant who travels there one week every other month and there's not much else to do in the off hours, so I tend to see 3-4 movies whenever I'm down. Plus, I'm on a per diem for food, so it's not like it costs me anything other than the $8 ticket price.

    9. Re:The theater is dead. by kova.lee · · Score: 1

      It depends on when and where you go. In my area (LA and OC suburbs), the major chain theaters have early bird specials where shows before noon are $6 (for Edwards) or $7 (for AMC). Thus, I tend to catch an morning show, have lunch after (thus skipping theater food costs), and then I can on my way.

      Matinee, though, jumps up to $9.50 so I only pay that for movies that I REALLY want to see.

    10. Re:The theater is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, is the construction that cheap in the theaters you go to? Never noticed that problem in the theaters I frequent (or rather used to), and I do pay attention to sound.

    11. Re:The theater is dead. by turkeydance · · Score: 1

      $100USD per movie. here's the breakdown: two tickets/babysitter/restaurant/parking/etc. ( yes, if we're getting a babysitter, we ARE eating OUT ) my HDTV and Blu-Ray has MADE me more money than Apple stock. babysitters amalgamated union, sorry about that. we don't need you.

    12. Re:The theater is dead. by crossmr · · Score: 1

      He is apparently channelling old grade 6 math text books as searching for "$8 for a ticket and then $5 for a popcorn" gives a top result of an elementary school text book and some blog posts from 2008....

    13. Re:The theater is dead. by turkeydance · · Score: 1

      you win. i posted the same thing. yours is better. glad for you.

    14. Re:The theater is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Privately owned theaters generally charge less. My go-to theater is $5 all the time. I think they give a free small popcorn during the weekdays. There is also a community non-profit theater that also charges $5, and has a $3 matinee. The community theater is a renovated theater and only has one screen. It is "rentable" for functions. Two churches hold services there, one on Sunday and the other on Thursday. They show only one movie at a time for 3 or 4 weeks. They had limited showtimes; Friday 7pm and 9:30pm, Saturday 3pm, 7pm, and 9:30pm. Other events are random. Since it is not for profit, they sell popcorn for a couple bucks and cans of soda for $0.75. This week they are showing the recent OZ movie. I think they have occasionally done some midnight showings.

      The problem is the chain theaters and their business model.

    15. Re:The theater is dead. by HockeyPuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

      $5 for a popcorn, $5 for a soda, $5 for a box of Junior Mints...

      Might I suggest eating before you go to the movies?

      Really, can you really not go two and a half hours without a meal or intaking 2000 calories and 500mg of salt?

      The reason why it's so expensive for you to go to the movies is that you're not going to the movies and getting a snack, you're going to dinner and watching a movie. a $12 ticket plus $15 worth of food.

      It used to be you could offset this by the fact that you were getting a higher quality picture and sound, but anymore a HDTV and surround sound are pretty common

      You're 50-60-70in TV with 5.1 surround isn't the same quality is what the theaters have. Sure maybe so really cheapo theaters but the standard AMC theaters have over a dozen channels along the sides alone. And yes watching a movie on a 50ft wide screen is considerably different than on a TV.

      Again, you're spending almost $30 to go to the movies... Try eating beforehand and then compare the experience to a $12 ticket or...

      Go to the matinee show. Tickets are usually half price...

    16. Re:The theater is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I went to see a movie I paid 1 dollar (per 5 minutes) and there was noone bothering me with cell phones as I had the only seat avalable. The place looked a bit filthy though..

    17. Re:The theater is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entire movie theater industry is dead.

      Yeah, seriously. If not for that, Hollywood would be raking in quintillions of dollars every year from theaters. As it stands now, they have to scrape by on the meager scraps they earn now. It's sad, really. How can you look at those poor, starving faces in movies and not feel pity for them? Please, for the sake of all of them, support copyright extension. It's the only way to save Hollywood.

    18. Re:The theater is dead. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      If you move to College Station, TX (pop: ~200K, home of Texas A&M University), you can enjoy your choice of two theaters: the local Cinemark 18 charges $4 for a matinee showing, while the local Premiere 16 charges $4.75. Both of them are decent theaters that offer all of the usual amenities you'd expect, and those prices are before you apply any senior citizen or student discounts (yep, they offer student discounts...in a college town. I have no idea how they stay in business).

      To say the least, when going to the theater costs less than an HD rental from iTunes or Amazon, it makes it pretty easy to justify going out for a quick movie after dinner with friends, particularly during the summer when the college students have cleared out of town and the blockbusters are coming out every other week.

    19. Re:The theater is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't forget the sounds of the neighborhood, dogs barking, kids playing, traffic, emergency vehicles, your home phone, your cell phone, your wife or kids or friends talking to each other or on the phone cause its a relaxed environment and personal space is more easily ignored....

    20. Re:The theater is dead. by c0lo · · Score: 1

      He's probably getting the Senior Citizen discount,
      Get off his lawn!

      Not for his grand-children, no.
      Plus: Junior Mints for them at $5 are expensive.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    21. Re:The theater is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have you considered not going for popcorn, soda and mints? If you cannot bring yourself to watch a movie without candy, maybe bring your own.

    22. Re:The theater is dead. by Mousit · · Score: 1

      $8 for a ticket. Where are you going? I might need to move there.

      C'mon down to Central Texas. $5 matinee (anything before 6pm, seven days a week), $7 regular adult admission. Discounts for seniors, students, children. That's at a fully digital theatre too, 100% of their screens. Even better, most of their screens are 2D as they've found 3D isn't all that popular. They also offer online ticket purchase with no add-on fees; you can even buy up to a week in advance.

      Sometimes it feels odd to realize a relatively small, somewhat pokey almost cow-town actually has good things to offer the modern world. We even have some of the best broadband speeds and prices in all of Texas. Maybe the town ought to be renamed Twilight Zone.

    23. Re:The theater is dead. by Delarth799 · · Score: 1

      As a comic once put it:
      "Excuse me there seems to be some mistake. I bought a movie ticket and some popcorn and now I have no money"

    24. Re:The theater is dead. by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I own and operate a movie theatre. My ticket prices are: Adult $8, child 12-and-under $6. Add $3 to those prices if a movie is 3D.

      Popcorn prices are $3, $4 and $5. Soda pop prices are $2, $2.50 and $3. Chocolate bars and candy are $2.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    25. Re:The theater is dead. by Pokey.Clyde · · Score: 1

      $8 for a ticket. Where are you going? I might need to move there. Cheapest I've found for a non-matinee is $11.50 or $12. Hell even my hometown, a mid-size Midwestern city, clocks in with $10 per theater.

      You do know that not everyone lives on one of the coasts, right?

    26. Re:The theater is dead. by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      I live in the Midwest, Chicago more specifically. And as any literate mouth breather could note, I grew up in a mid-size Midwestern city. Tickets there haven't been 8 bucks since I was in high school ten years ago

    27. Re:The theater is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adult tickets in Australia are $19.. Children $14.. i mock you people complaining about expensive movie tickets for $8..

    28. Re:The theater is dead. by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      The reason why it's so expensive for you to go to the movies is that you're not going to the movies and getting a snack, you're going to dinner and watching a movie. a $12 ticket plus $15 worth of food.

      While I agree with everything you said, my OCD compels me to point out that "$1.87 worth of snacks being sold for $15" isn't the same thing as "$15 worth of food".

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    29. Re:The theater is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking a date to the movies and then telling her she can't have popcorn is, well, counterproductive.

    30. Re:The theater is dead. by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Don't disagree with some of your complaints, but they are nothing new, and the same complaints people have had for decades. And CLEARLY they do not in fact significantly dissuade people from going to the theater, as 2012 was the biggest box office gross in history, and 2013 is on par to match or exceed it. Yes, SHITLOADS of people still "go to the movies", to the tune of almost $11B in ticket revenue last year...

      http://www.boxofficemojo.com/yearly/

    31. Re:The theater is dead. by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

      Taking a date to the movies and then telling her she can't have popcorn is, well, counterproductive.

      (Dinner and a movie) != (Dinner at the movies)

    32. Re:The theater is dead. by dkf · · Score: 1

      Even if cell phones were eliminated (which in my experience have been more or less a non-issue in theaters) you've still got the fact that its $8 for a ticket and then $5 for a popcorn, $5 for a soda, $5 for a box of Junior Mints.

      There's your problem. Try not buying any of that stuff and you'll find your movie-going experience to be far more affordable.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    33. Re:The theater is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now don't go trying to apply logic to the situation. That's just how it is.

    34. Re:The theater is dead. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Do you spend more than two hours at your desk without eating? Then you can do it in a movie theater. Put the hotdog down, leave the nachos behind the counter, don't go for the jumbo popcorn. Your arteries will thank you in later life.

      Saying that, your idea of "Stay home and watch the movie" is appealing to me, but my SO likes "the experience". Shame she doesn't see that "the experience" is sitting in a crowded hall on cheap seats listening to other people masticate during quiet scenes and check the time on their phones when they're bored.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    35. Re:The theater is dead. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The US is apparently dirt cheap. I went to see Man of Steel and it was the equivalent of $20 per ticked in 2D. Major metropolitan area too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    36. Re:The theater is dead. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You're 50-60-70in TV with 5.1 surround isn't the same quality is what the theaters have. Sure maybe so really cheapo theaters but the standard AMC theaters have over a dozen channels along the sides alone.

      But you can sit in the sweet spot at home, where at at the cinema you end up off to one side or too far back/forwards. Plus the fidelity is wasted when the guy next to you is munching away, usually during the really emotional scene where everyone is whispering.

      I also find some cinemas are just too loud. My hearing is pretty good and I want it to stay that way.

      And yes watching a movie on a 50ft wide screen is considerably different than on a TV.

      My Panasonic plasma has a THX certified picture mode. I find it easier on the eyes and no less engrossing. Most movies deliberately go for poor picture quality anyway now - there wasn't a single steady shot in Man of Steel, it was all shaky-hand-cam. I find it less annoying on a smaller screen where I can more easily take in the whole scene instead of trying to pick out details that are constantly jiggling about.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    37. Re:The theater is dead. by bestalexguy · · Score: 1

      you've still got the fact that it's $8 for a ticket and then $5 for a popcorn, $5 for a soda, $5 for a box of Junior Mints... It's simply too expensive for the 2 hours of (possible) enjoyment?

      If you travel to Europe don't miss our theaters, where people are not forced to buy popcorn, soda and Junior Mints (whatever the latter are). 8$ is reasonable.

    38. Re:The theater is dead. by steg0 · · Score: 1

      I mean, other than for a midnight premiere, does anyone actually go to the movies anymore?

      I rarely go to the theater to see a single movie, but I very often visit themed (e. g. Japanese / splatter / Japanese splatter / etc.) film festivals where you can watch five or six movies a day, over a period of one or two weeks. These offer value that I don't find elsewhere. The movies are not going to run in town later. They often wouldn't even be released on DVD in my area, meaning I would have to import them, which could mean $50 each. Some of them later run on subscription TV but you can't be sure of that in advance. Streaming might be an option someday, but my country really has a lot of catching up to do there.

      That said, people using their phone is pretty much a non-issue there. The more common nuisance are glass beer bottles tipping over, which is unfortunate if your bag was standing next to them on the floor. But really this can happen to anybody, you can't be mad at them.

      But yeah, I'm not sure about the future of the mainstream movie theater industry either. 3D might be its swan song.

    39. Re:The theater is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sound in 12+ speaker theatres is rubbish. There's almost zero sense of space and positional sound regardless of where you sit. Screens, regardless of size, 4K digital, or lieMAX are extremely uneven and washed out. A $1k plasma will crap all over the latest screen in a movie theatre. If you have any interest in a quality viewing, going to the movies is the absolute worst thing you can do short of pulling a CRT out of a dumpster.

    40. Re:The theater is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree with you about the food, but not the matinee price part. Around here it's $18 for a normal ticket, and _only_ $15 for the matinee/senior ticket.

    41. Re:The theater is dead. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Move out of the city. I live in the St. Louis Metro East (Illinois side) and tickets are $7.50 on weekday evenings at the local AMC. Saturday mornings, tickets are $5 before noon. And this is in a 12 screen theater.

    42. Re:The theater is dead. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I don't think many people have a problem with the places where you can get actually fifteen bucks worth of food.

      but if the dinner portion is one and a half bucks worth of food for fifteen bucks.. it starts feeling like a bad deal. of course in most places you can just bring your own, around here anyways.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    43. Re:The theater is dead. by Jahoda · · Score: 1

      Culturally a popcorn, soda, and box of candy is traditionally seen as part of the movie going "experience". So is an evening at the movies, so is an afternoon with the family. I suppose that everyone could just go to matinees. Anyway, what I take from your post is that "people who eat at theaters are stupid and also they are stupid for not going to a matinee show". Real high quality /. awareness-of-public-at-large there, sir! I commend you.

    44. Re:The theater is dead. by Alastor187 · · Score: 1

      You're 50-60-70in TV with 5.1 surround isn't the same quality is what the theaters have. Sure maybe so really cheapo theaters but the standard AMC theaters have over a dozen channels along the sides alone. And yes watching a movie on a 50ft wide screen is considerably different than on a TV.

      Yes, watching on a 50ft screen is different, but not necessarily better. If someone just wants to watch a movie on the biggest screen possible, then great go to the theater or get a projector. But the brightness, contrast ratio, and color reproduction on the big screen is sub-par compared to a modern HDTV. It is these characteristics, not size, that are most important for a clear and crisp image.

    45. Re:The theater is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky, I was looking at taking my wife and daughter to go see a movie a few weeks ago. Would have cost $55 just for the 3 tickets. Add in extra for 3d goggles (wife doesn't like 3d though), some drinks and snacks from the concession and we were looking at nearly $100. And that's for the cheap seats, they have silver, gold and platinum seating as well.

      At that cost, it would be cheaper over-all to actually go buy a big ass tv (or a decent projector + screen) and a home theatre system with bluray on credit and pay it off. Only issue then is the neighbours complaining if you put the volume up to theatre levels...

    46. Re:The theater is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does anyone actually go to the movies anymore?

      No one goes to the movies anymore... It's too crowded!

    47. Re:The theater is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I don't live in the sticks (Orlando, FL) and I just paid $14 for two people to go see Lone Ranger (don't judge), $5 for popcorn and $8 on soda. It was an afternoon showing ... so I guess that made it cheaper.

  24. Re:Rude? Yes by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0

    And the younger the generation, the more rude.

    Speaking as a 52-year-old...

    My personal experience has been that the most egregious offenders in this regard are middle-aged women. Followed by men in the 25-40 demographic.

    The young'uns are mostly texting. It's annoying if you're attempting to converse with one of them, but otherwise it's not a big deal.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  25. Drug abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mandatory dose of Rittalin and a punch to the dick.

    1. Re:Drug abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mandatory dose of Rittalin and a punch to the dick.

      Tell this to the next ADHD chick you hear in a movie theater.

  26. First.. world... problems.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the kind of nonsense that makes you cringe at what bothers people.

    1. Re:First.. world... problems.... by jamesh · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is the kind of nonsense that makes you cringe at what bothers people.

      Anyone who mentions "first world problem" is setting themselves up for a humiliating game of reductio ad absurdum. A game they won't win.

  27. Rethink the concept by northernalbertapolic · · Score: 2

    I think they need to rethink the concept of the movie theater. The value of "going to see a movie" in this digital age is that you are going out to see a show. So get rid of the "lines of chairs facing the screen" thing, change the layout so that groups are further apart, with more comfort.

    Serve booze - they do it at baseball games! That would both offset the cost of the new concept and make the experience more enjoyable for adult audiences.

    Nobody really needs movie theatres anymore. They have to make it something out of the ordinary that people will be excited about.

    1. Re:Rethink the concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats why I like the local place that has sit down dinner and drinks with a movie that has already had its run. Cheap tickets, fair priced food, good value (imo).

    2. Re:Rethink the concept by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      with a movie that has already had its run.

      The one near me has first-run movies. It's a very expensive movie, but a moderate-priced dinner-and-a-movie.

  28. is it really that big of problem? by AxemRed · · Score: 2

    I go to the theater about 5 times a year. I admit that I'm not an avid movie goer. But out of my limited experiences at the theater, I don't think I have ever been so annoyed by someone else's phone that I gave it a second thought after the movie. I see a lot of people talking and texting through the previews, but once the movie starts, people seem to stop. I have seen one person answer their phone and run out of the theater. And I see people checking their phones or texting here and there but not constantly and not with sound. Sometimes I wonder if I just live in a more polite region or if people are just anal.

    1. Re:is it really that big of problem? by Fierlo · · Score: 1
      Answering your phone and leaving the theater means it was probably important.

      However, checking your texts and responding??? Texts are never important. If they were that important, it wouldn't have been a text (no guaranteed delivery time, and no feedback that it was received). It would have been a phone call, and taken care of by the above scenario.

      The fact that you see people checking their phones and texting (here and there...) during the movie does not mean that you live in a more polite region, it just means that your definition of polite has shifted dramatically during the years.

    2. Re:is it really that big of problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you're sitting in stadium seating and behind the offender, it's pretty damn noticeable. The last time it happened to me the asshole was looking at his phone every 2-3 minutes. I tried, I really tried, to block it out, even physically with my hand in between my eyes and the phone in question. After about 40 minutes of this uncomfortable posture, I tapped him on the shoulder and asked him if he could please turn his phone off. To his credit, he did, but for my trouble he told me: "don't EVER tell me what to do with my fucking phone" after the show.

      Try focusing on a movie in front of you while a light blinks in your peripheral vision every 2-3 minutes.

    3. Re:is it really that big of problem? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I went to a movie last week where the feature had started, and a group of people came in, very noisily, and then when they got into the seating area, which was sparsely populated due to being a Sunday morning show, yelled out "Is there anybody in here"? My friend told them to please keep it down, and then they started backtalking. Fortunately, they went up to the back of the movie theater and we didn't hear from them for the rest of the movie.
      However, about 3/4 of the way through the movie, a cell phone started going off a few rows up and to our right. It rang about four times and then, incredibly, somebody picked up the phone, and started having a conversation. I don't know about what, because it was in a foreign language. But this went on for about 3 or 4 minutes, before he stopped. Fortunately, he quit before my friend got agitated enough to go grab the phone from him and throw it away.
      Some people just have no concept of common decency.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    4. Re:is it really that big of problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Living in a city big enough to offer a variety of theaters, I have found my experience in the movies varies wildly. Seems to depend on the cultural make up of the area and how active a role theater management takes in running their theaters.

  29. Two words... by nemui-chan · · Score: 1

    Oh Hell no... Fine, that was three.

  30. Yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something is very wrong if the movie cannot keep people entertained enough to stay off the fucking phone.

  31. More of the same... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a band director, and we've got the same problem at music concerts. A few years ago I was at the national music teacher's convention and went to one of the sponsored concerts. Essentially everyone there was a music teacher. Right as things were getting started, a cell phone rang a few seats over from me- you could hear the muttering from angry concert goers for several rows. When the lady had the audacity to actually ANSWER her phone (rather than just sheepishly turn it to silent) people literally stood up and turned around to give her the stink eye. I believe she was very nearly lynched that night.

  32. I admit to checking my phone... by dkuntz · · Score: 1

    But I pull it only half out of my pocket, hit the button, see if the text I got was from my kids or if there's an urgent issue requiring me to leave the theater to make a call, or go home/work. So maximum exposure time is less than 3 seconds, and any light would be directly to my left (so, the stairs, or my wife...), or reflected off my pants.

    --
    OMG... I have a sig?
    1. Re:I admit to checking my phone... by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      But I pull it only half out of my pocket, hit the button, see if the text I got was from my kids or if there's an urgent issue requiring me to leave the theater to make a call, or go home/work. So maximum exposure time is less than 3 seconds, and any light would be directly to my left (so, the stairs, or my wife...), or reflected off my pants.

      Well, commander. Don't get me wrong - we appreciate your being on call in case of alien attack or a "broken arrow" scenario. Your fellow cinema goers, and indeed the entire world, would be happier to see you delegate some of this responsibility so we can sit down together and enjoy a film without these flashes of light from your trouser region. If worried about your children, you could avoid placing them in a room full of fireworks, matches and broken glass. That way they just might survive the two hours necessary for us to enjoy a film and be in the presence of the world's last great hope.

      Commander, I salute you.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
  33. How to treat movie goers talking on their phones by FuzzNugget · · Score: 4, Interesting
  34. I don't support the Movie Industry by Nyder · · Score: 3, Informative

    I find that supporting the Movie or Music industry is like giving money to my local mafia. Something I will NOT do.

    So going to theaters is out of the question.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:I don't support the Movie Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But even in a hypothetical situation, you watch a movie in your massive living room screen with your imaginary friends, would you hurl their phone if they were texting their chums?

    2. Re:I don't support the Movie Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you will not support them, you do know that theater ticket sales is not their only source of revenue? In fact, it probably isn't their largest in many cases. Consider the toy and clothing sales for Marvel. I hope you're boycotting them all, otherwise you look kind of foolish.

    3. Re:I don't support the Movie Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but I'd pause the movie, look over at them, and wait 'till they're finished. If it's intermission time, I might go and offer to make a round of hot chocolate or coffees for everyone else.

      Hasn't been a problem for a few years now. But, we still do the hot chocolate intermission. And I always pause at a cliff hanging moment (and rewind a bit before restarting when we're ready to continue).

      I just tell friends what I'm watching and when, and I always get at least a couple of them invite themselves over.

    4. Re:I don't support the Movie Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aaaaaaaaaaand we don't care. I still enjoy the movie, just don't buy the popcorn and soda and you'll be fine.

    5. Re:I don't support the Movie Industry by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      I find that supporting the Movie or Music industry is like giving money to my local mafia.

      It might be nice if it was actually like that.

    6. Re:I don't support the Movie Industry by Nyder · · Score: 1

      But even in a hypothetical situation, you watch a movie in your massive living room screen with your imaginary friends, would you hurl their phone if they were texting their chums?

      no because I don't watch TV/Movies in the dark in my home.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    7. Re:I don't support the Movie Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that supporting the Movie or Music industry is like giving money to my local mafia. Something I will NOT do.

      Yeah, why give money to the local mafia? Wouldn't it be better to just steal from the movie/music industry by being the local mafia?

    8. Re:I don't support the Movie Industry by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, and I support your stance, but what about theatres in general?

      Will you not for example attend live performances or recitals in your locale?

      I would say the topic (phones detracting from the main event) is as relevant there as in MPAA-backed motion pictures.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  35. Not a problem, if you can wait... by LordRobin · · Score: 1

    My wife and I are going to see the Star Trek movie tonight, six weeks after it came out, on the last showing on Sunday. I'm guessing there will be maybe 10 people in the theater. I'm not expecting to hear any of the other customers, but if I do, it will be pretty easy to move away from them.

    ------RM

  36. Rental lockers by sandytaru · · Score: 1

    Have little mini rental lockers, like safe deposit box size, with keys. Charge a quarter. Tell people to put their phones in them. Present the key for the rental locker for $1 off a 32 oz soda at the snack bar. Net cost to consumer: +75 cents, a drink, and diabetes. Net cost to theater: -75 cents on big gulps, but potential increased sales and happier customers all around.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:Rental lockers by frovingslosh · · Score: 2

      Yea, I use those lockers all the time. Get a buck off my $8 big gulp. Keep my phone in my pocket so that I don't miss any calls. That way I don't have to waste time getting my phone out when the movie ends and the crowds all try to claim their phones. And I get a nice locker key out of the deal too. If I remember to bring it next time I can even use it for another huge savings off of my reasonably priced drink without having to buy another discount key.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  37. Make them into Faraday Cages? by Ogre332 · · Score: 1

    Prevent the phone from transmitting and receiving signals inside the theater and put a disclaimer on the ticket. Anyone who doesn't like it is free to not buy a ticket. If you feel such a great need to send or recieve calls or texts, you simply need to step outside to the concession area to do so.

    --
    Shut up brain or I'll stab you with a Q-Tip. - Homer Simpson
  38. I'm too nice by Robotech_Master · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was watching G.I. Joe: Retribution in a theater with a "zero tolerance" cell phone policy, and the jerk in front of me took his phone out and texted several times during the movie. I considered asking him to stop, but I just don't like getting into confrontations. I further considered going and telling a staffer, but I didn't want to miss part of the movie to do it. Also the guy was there with a kid, and I didn't want to be responsible for ruining the kid's movie experience.

    I'm just too nice. :P

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    1. Re:I'm too nice by Krishnoid · · Score: 2

      I further considered going and telling a staffer, but I didn't want to miss part of the movie to do it.

      Maybe you should have just texted one of the staffers :-|

    2. Re:I'm too nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing

    3. Re:I'm too nice by gknoy · · Score: 1

      "Sorry kid, maybe next time your dad won't ruin everyone's movie by texting..."

    4. Re:I'm too nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During one movie someone behind me pulled out his phone and started talking. The audience took care of it with a rain of m&m's, popcorn, and jelly babes. He got the point and walked out.

      Do not tolerate rude behavior.

    5. Re:I'm too nice by asylumx · · Score: 1

      How can you even see the guy's screen? I'm 6'8" tall and I still can't usually see what the person in front of me is doing within their seat past their head and their seat-back. Was the guy holding it up to his face like he forgot his glasses or something?

    6. Re:I'm too nice by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      depends how the chairs are laid. around here older theaters you had no way of seeing.. but newer theaters have steeper incline, so you could see.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:I'm too nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you, a total man child? Sounds like he's a normal guy, trying to pass time while being forced to watch a shitty movie targeted to adolescents.

    8. Re:I'm too nice by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Ah yeah, that's a good point, most of the theaters around where I live are pretty shallow-sloped.

    9. Re:I'm too nice by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      My suggestion.
      Grab the phone, throw it against the wall, stand up proudly and say " And now you know. And knowing is half the battle".

  39. And take advantage of Impulse buying habits by Marrow · · Score: 1

    Design a shirt, keepsake, or sticker that is emblematic of the show. Have it on display, and offer it for sale to viewers on the way out. You dont have to stock the merchandise, just have people use their cards and offer free shipping to the card's address. That way you can take the most advantage of the "high" a movie generates....while they are in the moment. Offer a discount on the DVD if they order it right then and there.
    You can then fairly accurately target the quantities you will have to manufacture and pin the price breaks on production.

  40. Gotta agree with you there by LordRobin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I cannot drag myself to the movie theater anymore, unless it's something I desperately need to see, or the wife really wants to go. Together, both situations add up to maybe two or three times in a year. I'm just so spoiled when it comes to entertainment. Why should I drive to a movie theater to see a movie that starts at a specific time, paying for both myself and and my wife, when I can watch Netflix, or movies on HBO or Showtime on demand, or rent via the cable box or iTunes? The movie starts when I want to, pauses if one of us has to go to the bathroom, and I don't have to pay twice.

    Like others have said, the picture and sound are really the only reason to go to the movie theater anymore, and I have HDTV and surround.

    The movie theater experience sucks. The only thing keeping it in business is people's impatience to see movies NOW.

    ------RM

  41. Movie horror stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stopped going to theaters after some incidents like teens speaking on the phone very loudly, or speaking to each other about the movie also loudly. I talked to them, even screamed at them, and still they they acted like nothing happened, as if it was their right to do it. Since then, any time I go to the movies is very late at night, when there are only 10 or so people attending.

    Another big problem still remaining is that some theaters turn up the sound volume too high. Even after plugging my ears with napkin paper I still get out of the movies with buzzing sounds in my ears that last for days.

  42. grasshopper by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    Ah! Grasshopper! When you can snatch the phone from my hands it will be time for you to leave.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  43. The Drafthouse will kick you out! by FairAndUnbalanced · · Score: 1

    The Alamo Drafthouse theaters (now in many major cities and expanding) famously has a very strict no talking and no cell usage policy during all movie showings. Here's an example of their strict policy in action from their corporate blog: http://drafthouse.com/blog/entry/she_texted._we_kicked_her_out

  44. babysitters by Freedom+Bug · · Score: 1

    I instruct the babysitter to SMS me if they need to. I will ignore vibrations from phone calls and emails, but an SMS is rare enough that it's probably the baby sitter, and I will answer it.

    But if it is the babysitter, I probably need to leave anyways, so go ahead and kick me out. It would suck if it wasn't the babysitter, but that movie is probably costing me over >$100 because I have to pay the babysitter too, so I get really annoyed at those who ruin it for everybody...

  45. Texting? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    Texting should be OK. You do not need any noise to text. And in a pitch black room the screen brightness should always be minimal. yes a cell needs to pump out a lot of lumens to be readable in the noon day son, but there is no excuse for a cell with a camera attachment to be a noticeable detraction in a movie theater.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:Texting? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Texting should be OK. You do not need any noise to text. And in a pitch black room the screen brightness should always be minimal. yes a cell needs to pump out a lot of lumens to be readable in the noon day son, but there is no excuse for a cell with a camera attachment to be a noticeable detraction in a movie theater.

      Texting does make noise, beep when they're received (cmon, you honestly expect us to believe that someone inconsiderate enough to text in a theatre isn't inconsiderate enough not to put it on silent) and the constant "tick, tick, tick" from pressing keys can be heard.

      Finally, one particular popular brand of smartphone has terrible light sensing abilities. I used to have to carry an Iphone for work, when it beeped in the middle of the night it would fecking blind me at full brightness in pitch black darkness. So I dont phones will not automatically be at minimum brightness.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:Texting? by wisnoskij · · Score: 0

      But it is not inconsiderate to text silently and with minimal light. Either automatically or using settings any decent phone can do this.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  46. rudeness is not just for kids by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was having dinner with an old friend of mine (I'm early 50's and he's early 60's). you might think its only kids (relatively speaking) who are rude and will break out their phones and start thumbing thru stuff while in the middle of a dinner conversation, but NO - here he was, dinking around with his stupid iGadget while I was trying to carry on a conversation with him. yes, it really annoyed me.

    I don't do that to others. when I'm with someone, I won't whip out my phone and start messing around with it. not sure why people think this is the 'new normal'; its new but its still NOT polite and should not be considered acceptable social behavior.

    its bad enough that you cannot find people walking on the street looking where they are going, anymore; they all look down and are thumbing thru their phones and wearing earbuds while walking. car drivers, too! I see so many people wearing earbuds while driving. so unsafe! but do they care? of course not.

    I don't like the direction all this is going in. and I realize I'm in a tiny minority, on this subject matter ;(

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:rudeness is not just for kids by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on that. When dining or otherwise in a conversation, it seems polite to excuse oneself before going away to fiddle with a phone.

      And yeah, this affects all ages. I've seen plenty of adults incessantly fiddling with phones in cinema auditoriums. Same with people who pull out their phones during conversation and begin tapping away. May as well be pulling out a fucking newspaper and having a read in mid-conversation.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    2. Re:rudeness is not just for kids by nbritton · · Score: 1

      I was having dinner with an old friend of mine (I'm early 50's and he's early 60's)... dinking around with his stupid iGadget while I was trying to carry on a conversation with him. yes, it really annoyed me.

      Have you considered that maybe he's just not that into you or a crappy friend? I don't have time for people that don't have time for me. Don't enable them.

    3. Re:rudeness is not just for kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will second this emotion. Mike

    4. Re:rudeness is not just for kids by nine932038 · · Score: 1

      If someone does that while I'm talking to them, I just stop talking and wait for them to finish. Usually does the trick; they typically catch on after a few seconds of silence.

  47. Or do what the Alamo Drafthouse does... by Kenosti · · Score: 2

    Throw the offender out and don't give them their money back.

    I also say bring back the jamming technology to stop any signals coming in and going out.

    Want to talk/text? Go outside, go to a cafe, or stay home. Want to watch the movie? Shut up and watch the movie.

    1. Re:Or do what the Alamo Drafthouse does... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Want to watch the movie? Shut up and watch the movie.

      Unless it's a Master Pancake / Quote Along / other relatively rowdy event. Then it's ok to be obnoxious while sucking down Shiners and eating pizza.

    2. Re:Or do what the Alamo Drafthouse does... by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 1

      Why was this modded down? It's perfectly relevant and truthful. The writers of the article need to have words with the Alamo Drafthouse because they have such a hard-line ruling against said annoyances, and it works great. the only time said annoyances are a non-issue is during the types of events the above poster mentions.

    3. Re:Or do what the Alamo Drafthouse does... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      It wasn't modded down. It's an Anonymous Coward. They start at zero. Nobody has bothered to mod it up. Including me, even though I have mod points.

  48. Faraday cages ... by Jamz · · Score: 1

    ... in the cinema walls are the answer.

  49. Not a problem in Australia by jonwil · · Score: 1

    I have gone to the cinema many times and in all cases that I can remember they have big signs in the lobby saying "turn off your phone when in the theater" and then they have a message at the start of the movie (during the ads and previews and stuff) also saying "turn off your phone". No reason why movie theaters in the US couldn't simply make it a condition of entry that you turn off your phone or dont use it in ways that distract other people.
    If you cant be without your phone for a couple of hours, go to the cinema (or session) that doesn't restrict phone use.

  50. My simple fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I quit going to the movies because the theater refuses to deal with the cell phone problem. When I do go, it's during the week while everyone is in school or at work.

    Eventually, I'll either quit going completely, or take the evil path once again and buy another jammer. They work VERY well to keep texting / calls to a tolerable level.

    Don't like my evil approach ? TOUGH SHIT. Perhaps you should mind the requests to TURN YOUR FUCKING PHONE OFF DURING THE SHOW. Since you have no issues pissing everyone around you off to the point of violence, I have no issues removing your ability to do so to begin with.

  51. It's an easy problem to fix by msobkow · · Score: 2

    Wait for the DVD or Blu-Ray to come out and watch it at home without all the annoyances.

    I don't understand why anyone still goes to a theatre today with all the rude behaviour from the audience. You can't enjoy a movie at the theatre any more.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:It's an easy problem to fix by Le+Marteau · · Score: 2

      " You can't enjoy a movie at the theatre any more."

      Yes, you can, if you go to a weekday matinee.

      Some movies are better on a big screen. I'm thinking the latest Star Trek, which I caught in 3D about a week after it opened with about 20 other people in a gigantic theater. It was great.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
  52. Solution by DSS11Q13 · · Score: 1

    Throw nickels at the heads of anyone talking or with a bright screen out.

  53. I honestly have never seen this problem by maliqua · · Score: 1

    I'm in western canada, you see people doing it during the ads and bullshit before the movie, but i've only noticed it happen may be once or twice during the movie, and the occasional forgot to turn phone off, but those people always react quickly and seem ashamed of there mistake

  54. today's version of "You kids get off my lawn"? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    And yet "You kids get off my lawn" had (has) its merits too. If someone's doing something risky on your property (usually the cause for "get off my lawn"), then there are liability issues. If they're tearing up the lawn (the other possible cause), then it makes sense then too. Just because teenagers think the old man is stupid (because they can't grasp the reasons) doesn't mean he's wrong.

  55. Hell is other people by Le+Marteau · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Hell is other people" - Sartre

    That is all.

    --
    Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    1. Re:Hell is other people by fonske · · Score: 1

      This notion is originally from the play "huis clos" by Sartre.
      The three persons in this play may have a very different background, but since they are dead we could say they are now equals.
      Still they build up such devilish action that the play ends with Estelle wanting to kill Inès - the realisation of the futility of this, remember they are all dead already, fills them with laughter.
      Now what Sartre meant is that the judgement others will bring forth upon our actions is hell.
      "le bourreau, c'est chacun de nous pour les deux autres"
      Sartre never meant it to be a passive undergoing of a devilish behaviour of others.
      It is simply a necessity to become "the other" and a realisation of existence.
      And note how funny it is that Sartre illustrated a notion that is only important for living people by bringing dead people to the scene.

  56. Alamo Drafthouse by Coppit · · Score: 2

    Besides being able to drink a nice beer, you can be sure that you won't see phones out at the Alamo Drafthouse:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L3eeC2lJZs

  57. heres the thing by XaXXon · · Score: 1

    with home theaters getting better and more affordable movie theaters need to be better. giving in would make me even less likely to go.

    its a dying business but no need to hurry it up.

    1. Re:heres the thing by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Don't have a 4K TV yet. Can I borrow yours?

  58. Re:Rude? Yes by Trogre · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The current generation is taught through the education system a great deal about their rights, but very little about their responsibilities.

    Consequently we get a very inward-focused generation with a false sense of self-entitlement and, rudeness in general.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  59. Re:Rude? Yes by markdavis · · Score: 0

    +1

    And also the "instant gratification" factor where they seem to expect and demand everything instantly, with no effort, no waiting, and no research.

  60. Phone Detector by jsm300 · · Score: 1

    A lot of people are suggesting faraday cages as the answer. I'm not sure that is really as cheap as people think it would be, and I really don't care if people are using their phones during the pre previews or previews. I'm thinking that a zero tolerance policy along with a phone detector system is a better answer. My guess is that once the lights are out, an HD camera mounted in the ceiling over the audience will easily be able to pick out any light coming from the audience. With a one time simple calibration (putting a light in the end seats of each row and telling the software how many seats are in the row) the software can probably report the exact seat location, or close enough. Then after some threshold, say 30-60 seconds of light, the system could report the theater number and seat location of the light source to theater staff. An usher could then be dispatched to observe the behavior and throw the customer out, or at the very least cause the customer to quickly put their phone away when the usher walks into the theatre.

  61. Use the Alamo Drafthouse PSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2011/06/booted-texters-angry-voicemail-message-becomes-dont-text-during-movies-psa

  62. Re:Rude? Yes by swillden · · Score: 1

    The young'uns are mostly texting. It's annoying if you're attempting to converse with one of them

    Or if they're sitting in front of you in a darkened movie theater.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  63. Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My solution is to watch movies on Netflix (streaming or disc). I stopped going to theaters long ago. Mostly because the movie industry is in bed with the MPAA, which I despise.

  64. EMP is the answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turn off your phone, pull the battery, then set off the EMP and watch the poor Apple fuckers cry.

  65. Front Row by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you sit in the front row you will not be bothered by 96%+ of the other patrons. Bring a neck brace.

  66. How often does this happen? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    I maybe go to 5 movies a year and *maybe* once I've seen someone talking on a cell phone. I think it's really rude, but the "yapping in a movie" thing is almost a meme that doesn't seem to warrant the attention.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:How often does this happen? by Shados · · Score: 2

      I don't know where you live, but in big city's downtowns, these things are big problems. One or two people yapping on the phone, 3-4 newborns crying themselves out, countless teens yelling at each other continually, a bunch of people hitting the back of your head with their feet while "getting comfortable" and leaning them on your seat, the bunch taking pictures or camcording the movie to post it on the net, and the countless people playing with their phone at max brightness (super distracting)....

      Every additional bad habit that comes up just pile it up. And in this day and age, you won't get any support for complaining about it, no matter how polite (or not) you are. Everyone is either being an inconsiderate prick, or have been dealing with inconsiderate pricks for so long that they stopped trying.

      Its not just in theaters either... Living in an apartment or condo without ultra restrictive rules and expecting to be able to sleep is not happening, even in high tech ultra insulated places. And even if they have the rules, without lawyers getting involved, they may as well not be there.

      I'm not even that old (I'm 30), but its seriously getting ridiculous. Part of it is I'm from Canada, and it was seriously a cultural shock when I moved south of the border, how in every city I went, people were just dicks all around and would never be reasoned with. Even Toronto has nothing on the likes of Boston or NYC. Its easier to find peace and quiet in the middle of a mall in downtown Montreal than it is to find a theater where you can actually watch a movie or an apartment/condo where you can sleep in pass 7:30.

  67. Re:Rude? Yes by Idou · · Score: 1

    "And the younger the generation, the more rude."
    More rude, or just practicing a different set of values than you? Remember what the old folks used to say about Rock-n-Roll? Now WE are those old folks . . .

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  68. agreed by anyaristow · · Score: 1

    Agreed. Detroit area and it rarely happens. I think the problem is over-blown by people who so can't stand to be inconvenienced by the presence of other people that they lose perspective.

  69. In to the dome by srwood · · Score: 1

    http://theoatmeal.com/comics/movie_theater_layout

  70. Re:Rude? Yes by Anachragnome · · Score: 2

    " A large percent of the population are very rude regarding phones."

    To the point of driving a car while texting, subjecting everyone sharing the road in their immediate vicinity to a much greater risk of injury/death, much like someone that has been drinking. Yet, for some reason, laws regarding texting while driving are effectively neutered compared to DUI laws. Why is that?

    I suspect the "guvment" doesn't want to clamp down on cellphone use in any way as cellphones/smartphones are apparently the most used means of gathering data about everyone--"The Goose that laid the Golden Egg" sort of thing (although it appears the Goose just shit in their collective lap).

  71. Leave it to the afterlife. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 0

    How Should We Treat Texters and Talkers at Movie Theaters?

    Paraphrasing Shepherd Book (Firefly):

    They'll burn in a very special level of hell. A level they reserve for child molesters and people who talk at the theater.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  72. there's a reason why history repeats itself.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cause the kids and hate to say, less civilized societies, are so stubborn that they want to repeat history. Period.

    Even in Hollywood context, much like sequels and repeats stories are the raged nowadays in the theaters, the people have spoken. They crave it.

  73. Re:Rude? Yes by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

    "And the younger the generation, the more rude."

    More rude, or just practicing a different set of values than you?

    Umm, "rudeness" by definition is "practicing a different set of values."

    Politeness is simply a social construct -- there is no absolute objective standard. That said, there are social conventions that have little effect on others if violated. For example, for many decades it was considered important to come to a black-tie event wearing a black bow tie. In the past 10-15 years that convention has turned into black buttons, other clasps, and most recently long black ties seem fashionable. (Of course, at some events these variations may be more or less likely.)

    Such a change in polite etiquette doesn't really have any broader effects other than a personal fashion choice. I may think someone looks idiotic in some faux "tuxedo," but it's not going to do any harm to me or probably anyone else except in unusual situations.

    Similarly, your example of music choice probably doesn't harm anyone else, except if the sound is actually disruptive to others -- but you could be playing a Mahler Symphony too loud and also have that same problem... the actual choice of music isn't usually problematic.

    On the other hand, one of the main reasons people go to a movie theater and pay the extra money is to experience a high-quality sound and visual experience on a large screen.

    If you're shining a bright screen in a theater, you're degrading others' experience. Same thing with talking through the whole movie.

    Violations of social conventions that have substantial effects on others are generally seen to be more disruptive than a personal choice that has little impact. "Rudeness" of this fashion is actually a bigger change in our culture than simply picking a different song to play on your stereo for your own experience.

  74. Yes, I have another idea by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    Stop going to the movies. I'm being serious. You have to put up with the manners of strangers, cell phones, 6 dollar popcorn, no pause button for bathroom breaks, curiously uncomfortable seating, and the godawful commercials they force you to sit through before the movie.

    Seriously. Screw that. Get a DVD/Blueray player and a big screen TV. Wait for the disc and invite some friends over. And you can have a beer while the movie is on. That's a million times better than the current "sit in a gigantic uncomfortable closet with random bits of humanity" movie model.

    Of course there are exceptions. If you can find an actual real theater go to that by all means. Things to look for? Red velvet curtains beside the screen, a balcony, decor from the 50s, one screen only, and an usher. If you can find a movie joint like that, go there. But as for these 20 screen megaplexes? Avoid those like the plague. You shouldn't be surprised that they treat you like crap there. Because they are treating the movie experience in general like crap, so you shouldn't expect anything different for yourself.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Yes, I have another idea by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If you can find an actual real theater go to that by all means. Things to look for? Red velvet curtains beside the screen, a balcony, decor from the 50s, one screen only, and an usher. If you can find a movie joint like that, go there.

      Last time I did that, I got a headache. First, the lens was scratched to bits and the movie was out of focus. Add to that the 72Hz flicker, and scratches on the film and I'm done.

      I have no nostalgia for film projection - give me 4K digital projection. 3D is optional. It's edited in digital anyway - why format shift it to something inferior?

  75. Make better movies. by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    That's all.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  76. Seriously, the movies suck. by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    That's the main problem. I would still shell out to see a big screen rendition of Blade Runner, or Apocalypse Now, or even half of the Hitchcock canon, or even some of the (non-animated, mid-century) Disney canon.

    But every film now has the sheen of sameness about it and just isn't worth the cash. They're spending more and more, and meanwhile I want to spend less and less. I spent *a lot* of dough putting together a home theater so that I could see some classic greats. The last several times we shelled out for the theater for myself and my wife, I left thinking that I could have spent that $30-$40 much better elsewhere.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Seriously, the movies suck. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      You complain about sameness but watch the same classics over and over again? Why is Blade Runner any better than Inception? You've got a serious case of nostalgia and classics filter going on, forgetting all the not-so-memorable films that were out at the same time.

  77. Faraday cage and jammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, a Faraday cage isn't that tough to build (three layers of metal door screen separated by a thin rubber insulator, where the outside two are grounded and the inside one is a white noise generator. Next, you attach one or two cell phone jammers inside the theater, and another in the lobby. "Whoops, no signal here hon! I guess we'll have to go outside to check on the babysitter". Seriously, people went to movies for 50+ years before cell phones. *SOMEHOW* they managed to sit with their yaps shut and not text or know everything under the sun. No yapping, no texting, no gaming. You are here to watch a film. Everyone here is here to watch a film. If you don't want to watch the film, shut up, get the hell out, and let those who paid to watch the film, watch the fucking film (If it's a fucking film, that is, if its Disney you won't see any of that).

  78. One possible technical solution... by Gadget27 · · Score: 1

    Realizing that having ushers patrol all the screens would both impractical and expensive, I propose each theater complex keep just 1 or 2 people on staff to handle these cases. They can operate out of a central, 'security' type room which has video feeds from each auditorium. The cameras would be positioned near the back of the theater, pointing down at all the patrons. Anytime a phone is operated, its screen is activated and puts out a detectable amount of light. Special software analyzes the incoming video feeds and senses a phone activate by its light output. After a certain configured amount of time (say greater than 5 seconds to rule out any 'accidental' phone usage), an alert can be sent to one of the staff members along with the auditorium and seat number. Staff member will then deal with the problem according to theater policy. The best thing about this is that if people learn about it, they may be able to defeat it by ensuring they don't shine their screens up or back, effectively solving the problem. Of course, this too would probably be too expensive as well.

  79. Just stop going to movie theaters by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    That is what I do, and for just the reasons this article mentions.

    Prices are too high, most movies are not very good, and then I have to listen to some asshole run his mouth through the entire thing.

    I would rather wait a few months, and watch the movie on pay-per-view, or something.

    Home theaters are good, and affordable. I can stop the movie when I like. I do not have to pay $15 for popcorn and soda.

    I used to go to movies all the time, but not anymore.

    1. Re:Just stop going to movie theaters by ockegheim · · Score: 1

      I suppose I rarely see films at theatres these days, and when I do go it’s to see films that idiots would avoid. If they made a “use your phone” rule I would never go again, but it’s an economic thing– how many people can’t do without their phones vs. how many people absolutely wouldn’t tolerate them. A low-attention-span idiot’s money is as good as mine to the cinema.

      Of course it would be possible for the cinemas to have different sessions for different people.

      --
      I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
  80. Who scored this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you been to a modern movie theatre in the last 5 years? They know they are hurting and are making the experience better. Yes you have ads before the movie, but you have threatre seating that is pretty damned nice. leather chairs with wide arms, cupholders, and some even recline. Some even recline automatically (serious AMC, that was awesome.) Its a huge screen, houses are getting smaller, not bigger, you have a uptake of new theatre experiences such a fine dining while watching the movie, drive ins with FM broadcasting so you don't have to leave the window cracked, 3d, IMAX, etc....

    They know they are in trouble and while prices may still be going up, they are finally starting to give you more in return. Watching at home is overrated. Yes you save money cause you rent instead of pay for tickets, you buy groceries instead of buying at concession, and yes, your friends are there, and they talk, check phones, ask you to pause while they go to the bathroom, your phone rings cause you didn't turn it off before the movie, the neighbors are loud, dogs are barking, sirens wail nearby, your neighbors complain when you crank the sound up...its almost comparing apples and oranges, yeah they both have a rind but you can eat it on one of them, they both have seeds and you don't really want to eat them, both have an inedible core but one is much smaller an easy to deal with, one can be sectioned by fingers but the other has to be cut into pieces. They are both fruit but they are also different experiences.

  81. Standing applause!!!! by rts008 · · Score: 2

    Hear! Hear!.....Bravo! (I just finished using all my mod points on the previous Fine Article)

    While I find the sound level of the musical scores annoyingly too loud, I would rather hear that distraction, than to put up with being subjected to the inane conversations within earshot.

    I guess I'm sub-consciously paranoid that stupidity is transmissible...*Hint: There is a valid reason why the President's speech writers have to write the speeches targeting an 8th grade educated audience in the USA...*

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    1. Re:Standing applause!!!! by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Hear! Hear!.....Bravo! (I just finished using all my mod points on the previous Fine Article)

      That's ok, mod points don't mean "I agree with this post" anyway.

  82. Faraday Cages don't stop people from talking by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Nice try.

    It is not just cell phones and texters, it's the jackass who runs his mouth though the entire movie.

    1. Re:Faraday Cages don't stop people from talking by macbeth66 · · Score: 1

      Oddly, the only people I've heard talking in a movie theater these days, are doing so on their phone.

      And worse are the crying babies at a 9PM R rated movie. Hey, take that thing outside. I have two kids and never once took them out to a movie that wasn't for their sake. If you can't afford a sitter, then you certainly can't afford to go to the movies. Wait for it on DVD. Pirated or otherwise..

    2. Re:Faraday Cages don't stop people from talking by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Crying babies really shouldn't be at any movie. I went to see Monsters University yesterday. The movie was loud. The baby in the row right behind us was clearly terrified almost constantly by all of the noise. Every 5 minutes one of them took the baby into the hall for a minute, and then came right back in. It was just plain annoying.

  83. Re:Rude? Yes by Idou · · Score: 1

    "One of the main reasons people go to a movie theater and pay the extra money is to experience a high-quality sound and visual experience on a large screen."
    According to the MPAA, the "Age Group" with the highest propensity for movie going are teenagers (12~17). I seriously doubt that the above is their main reason for going to see a movie. . . It is probably to get away from their parents so that they can text in peace. . . : )

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  84. No sarcasm intended, nor implied.... by rts008 · · Score: 1

    Everyone seems quick to complain when things go wrong, but too few people lavish praise when something is done right.

    Allow me to attempt to correct this here....

    Thank you, two thumbs up, and an "Atta boy/girl", for your display of courtesy and social responsibility.
    That behavior and attitude seem to be less common lately.

    Very reassuring and refreshing, indeed!

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  85. Very simple by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

    Beat the living shit out of them. Male - female - what evs. If the audience pounces on these assholes EVERY TIME, these self absorbed dumb fucks will quickly get the clue that it's not cool, and stop doing it.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:Very simple by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      How are you doing to do that if you have to run back home to your keyboard, Mr. Internet Tough Guy?

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  86. The good ole days....;) by rts008 · · Score: 1

    Wow, I would have been fooled by your UID...that's what I get for assuming!

    Welcome to the Geritol Corner. We guard the the Hallway to the Elders (5 digit UID's), keeping the whippersnappers off the lawns.
    But we are not old enough yet to tell them to "Turn that CRAP down!"

    Where was I? Oh Yeah...I agree 100%

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    1. Re:The good ole days....;) by rockout · · Score: 1

      “Our youth now love luxury. They have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for their elders and love chatter in place of exercise; they no longer rise when elders enter the room; they contradict their parents, chatter before company; gobble up their food and tyrannize their teachers.”

      -Socrates, maybe. (origin is disputed)

      What's not in dispute is that from the beginning of time, and until the end of time, old people will complain about the bad manners of young people, conveniently forgetting that when they were young, old people were saying the same thing about them, and only the numbers on the calendar have changed. It's a phenomenon that someone should really do some serious research on.

      Also, now it's your turn to say, "yeah but these kids are DIFFERENT", thus proving my point while being blissfully unaware of it.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    2. Re:The good ole days....;) by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Nah, I can dig it, and I do remember; convenient forgetting is not a luxury for me. I had that old dude in mind, but it's easy enough to type with tongue in cheek. Besides, the criticisms are still valid, even over a millenium or two.

      Only this time it's different because.... teh interwebs. [snicker, and running]

    3. Re:The good ole days....;) by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Funny thing about the Geritol - my mother and her three sisters would gather for the holidays at gramps place, make sure he had food in the cupboard and fridge, check on laundry, do a bit of cleaning up. I recall one year they teased him a bit about his habit of starting the morning with his infamous strong coffee and taking a slug of Geritol tonic - until they checked the label and noticed the 12% alcohol. Then they understood how he could be so chipper in the early morning.

  87. Water Pistol by argee · · Score: 2

    I brought a water pistol. A nice small one that fit up my sleeve. Not even those around me noticed
    when I beaned the bastard in front of me with the screen full bright. But did that guy jump! Went
    back to texting, and one more squirt. He quit texting and turned the phone off. Milk instead of
    water is also good.

    But you need one that doesn't leak or seep. Otherwise when you leave the theater you look as if
    you peed yourself. Or worse.

    1. Re:Water Pistol by Xibby · · Score: 1

      Warning to the rude person in front of me: This theater offers refills on their large bucket sized drinks.

      --
      I'm going to go back in my box and will think within the limits of my box: MS Sucks Linux Good I read too much Slashdot.
  88. Better option: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never had an issue with people on phones. As in, no one uses them in the theatre.

    The conversations happen sometimes, but there is a solution for that. Drive-ins. It's so much better not worrying about other people, you can actually enjoy a movie with someone instead of sitting beside them.

  89. Two words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Faraday cages.

  90. The best solution by vilanye · · Score: 1

    Stop going to the movie theater. Why spend all that money on a remake of a reboot of a remake of a ripped off story line? I haven't set foot in a movie theater in at least 10 years and am better off for it. Same for airlines, I haven't flown anywhere since 1998 and did it then under protest. Stop supporting these business that rip you off.

  91. Re:Rude? Yes by markdavis · · Score: 2

    >"It is probably to get away from their parents so that they can text in peace. . . : )"

    And now we have come full circle. The teens (and even young adults) don't NEED to get away from their parents to text in peace, they text constantly, all the time, regardless. And they do it at the dinner table, while you are trying to talk to them, in the car while driving, in the classroom, at a wedding, in a theater, in church, just about anyplace they want and often where it is rude and/or unsafe.

    And that is not a matter of just having a different set of values". Most of them KNOW it is rude or unsafe and just do it anyway.

  92. quick addendum by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to mention that this is only a problem in places where people are complete assholes to each other all the time. You know, New York, California, most of the south, etc. Here in Wisconsin, everyone is quite polite at the theater.

  93. Easy automated solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have a camera detect the number of grlowing cell phone screens in the theater. After a certain threshold, lock the doors and release the Zyklon B.

  94. Re:Rude? Yes by Idou · · Score: 1

    Yes, of course. . . you and I, through years of life experiences, know this to be true . . .

    However, when you and I are long dead, and today's teens are the old-farts, such behavior will no longer be rude (though, I am sure they will be complaining about some other "rude" behavior that the teens of that time will be doing . . .).

    Admit it . . . you are old. Just buy a nice home theater with your social security money and get over it. : )

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  95. It's easy in a movie by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    You walk behind or past them and accidentally spill your super large 64 oz big gulp and then apologize profusely for the accident, never recognizing that they were using a cell phone in any way.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  96. Zero tolerance or why am I paying? by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    I don't have to go to the theater.

    Try talking on your phone or annoying texting in a play and see what happens. They will kick you out and not refund your money. And if you're obnoxious about it, you'll get banned.

    That is the solution right there. The problem is not that people are texting and talking on the phone. The problem is that the theater's aren't stopping it. And they can very easily.

    Theaters have become disgusting. The seats are gross. The food is gross. The movies are gross. The people that go to see the movies are gross. Its a disgusting experience. And on top of that, the price has well exceeded the rate of inflation by a factor of three or four. So you know what... I don't need to go to the movie theater.

    maybe that's what we're really seeing here. The death of the movie theater. I've got a 60 inch flat screen at home. Explain why I should go to the theater and deal with their garbage? I don't see the attraction.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  97. Playing games by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

    A couple of months back, I was at a movie and the lady in front of me had a child on her lap. I didn't see it, at first, because I was directly behind her, but it was bothering my wife: the child was playing a game on the lady's phone. He was too young for the movie, so the mother was letting him play a game, instead. Of course, I told her to put it away and just ruined the movie experience for her child. She was quite annoyed at me.

  98. Alamo Drafthouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makes me think of this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L3eeC2lJZs

  99. Not seeing this in Silicon Valley by Animats · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen this at a Century theater in Silicon Valley in the last year, and I see about two movies a month. Even at the Mountain View theater complex, which is surrounded by Google's campus, it doesn't happen. Century runs two warning messages, a cute one from Sprint ("When you turn off your phone, does it dream?") and a hard line one from Century ("You will be asked to leave the theater.") I've seen people using a smartphone when they're running commercials (not trailers), before the house lights go down, but not once the theater goes dark.

  100. quick fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a mobile jamming device I got on ebay. Fits in my pocket. Seems to have about a 30-yard range. Works great.

  101. Re:Rude? Yes by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

    Umm, "rudeness" by definition is "practicing a different set of values."

    Rudeness to me is starting anything, anything at all, with "umm" or similar.

    It is a construct from modern comedies, where the speaker, and the audience, know the speaker is correct. In this forum, you have no such certainty, unless you are ignorant enough to assume you are correct in all things. Already, your attitude toward what is rude is in question, no matter your point. Keep a civil tongue in your head and it will serve you well. Fail to, and you will serve it many times over.

    Forgive me if I ignore your point - if it is valid, someone will make it without the antecedant gutteral.

  102. Annoying food sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing that annoys me is the sound of people crinkling their packets of crisps/nuts/sweets or whatever. Seriously, can't you go 2 hours without having to munch on something?

  103. Re:Rude? Yes by mvdwege · · Score: 1

    laws regarding texting while driving are effectively neutered compared to DUI laws. Why is that?

    I think because most DUI laws were enacted in a time that legislation of public life was still socially acceptable.

    These days, whenever there is any hint of legislating public behaviour, no matter how well proven the negative impact of said behaviour, a howl comes up from a mass of mean-spirited, egotistical, entitled shitheads. Enough that no politician is willing to brave the brouhaha.

    For an example I refer you to the various Slashdot threads on DUI and texting while driving. All of them replete with 'get the government out of my life' as an excuse for their arsehole behaviour.

    --
    "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  104. Re:Rude? Yes by Dahamma · · Score: 1

    Umm, "rudeness" by definition is "practicing a different set of values."

    That's a bit of a cop out. There are plenty of examples of "rudeness" that are pretty much universally acknowledged (in which case you could probably just call them "selfishness" or "self-absorbtion"). But even if not universal, the VAST majority of the time the "rude" person was not some recent transplant to a social situation and clearly knew the local "values", they just didn't care...

  105. Maybe that's why James Holmes went psycho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too soon?

  106. N'ah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We could just tazer them.

    'Has our culture become so private that no one knows how to behave anymore in public?' Edelstein wonders. 'Is selfishness the rule rather than exception?

    It's the other way around. Society has become a public toilet. You have to share everything with everyone, if you're not elite. You have to share your neighbors crap upbringing, his social networking, smoking, bars, movie theaters. Not private enough.

  107. Or... by matunos · · Score: 1

    ...or, they could have a zero-tolerance policy for all screenings and people who can't put their phones away during a movie can take their 'private screen' and go elsewhere.

  108. Completely Useless Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The posted article and comments thereafter are completely pointless. This problem has been solved in many countries around the world with Cell Phone signal jammers. They are extremely cheaply available from hundreds of Chinese manufacturers, just Google them. Walk into many theaters OUTSIDE the USA and you get 0 signal. No more calls, texting, bbming and whatever else people tend to do on their phones that make noise. Very rarely do people actually play games with the volume on in a theater so 99% of the nuisance is gone. For those thinking about what people would do in emergency situations, the theater operator has an emergency cut off switch for the jammers in the event of something haven gone awry, just like a bank employee has to sound the alarm during a robbery.

  109. Signal Jamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would say just to be on the safe side the cinema should install signal jammers that cover ther screens and place it so i only covers the screens and not the loby and outside that would just sole all the phone problems as in no singal not txting or calls

  110. The Movie-goer's Code of Conduct by sp1nl0ck · · Score: 1
    --
    War is God's way of teaching Americans geography
  111. Re:Rude? Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just turned 25 yesterday, you insensitive clod...

  112. 'Murica by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 1

    gotta love it

  113. Rest in the satisfaction... by YalithKBK · · Score: 1

    ...that people who talk in the theater are going to a SPECIAL hell.

  114. Other needs by xenobyte · · Score: 1

    Where I live things like pagers have gone the way of the Dodo... Everybody uses text messages on cellphones instead.

    Now it shouldn't be hard to realize that while emergency calls can be made by the staff from hardline phones if necessary, some people need the ability to *receive* messages while in the theater. They may be on call 24/7 and thus cannot just pick another time to watch a movie - they'll still be on call.

    So active or passive shielding isn't the solution - and it would not prevent people from gaming or similar.

    What is needed is reaction and punishment. Basically something along the lines of being kicked out immediately, having to refund the tickets of all the people disturbed and have the phone confiscated. That will force the offender to buy a new phone before he or she will be able to bother other people again, and having to pay everybody elses tickets ensures that it will be a lot harder to afford a new phone any time soon.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  115. Maybe Someday... by rally2xs · · Score: 1

    ...movie screens will be active LED screens, with no projector, and the theater will not need to be darkened. Then, the little gadgets will not be so disturbing to others.

  116. " 'Is selfishness the rule rather than exception?" by Tomsk70 · · Score: 1

    In America, I thought this was law rather than the rule.

  117. I have never seen this as a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That could be because every theater I go to these days has the surround sound cranked up so loud that I can't even hear a conversation going on in the seat next to me.

  118. How Should We Treat Texters and Talkers at Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > How Should We Treat Texters and Talkers at Movie Theaters?
    Have you seen the film "god bless america" well thats how :)

  119. Legal liability by mangu · · Score: 1

    The concert was completely ruined for the orchestra and the entire audience -- the profound effect of the music was lost.

    That guy should face civil and criminal responsibility for his acts. You can't just go and ruin a concert that cost thousands of dollars to enact.

    Considering that people had been preparing and expecting that experience for a long time, it wouldn't be too much to make him pay, let's say, $5,000 to each person in the audience plus $100,000 to the production.

  120. How to deal with them by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Set them on fire.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  121. Bathroom breaks by Misagon · · Score: 1

    I don't understand people who want to gulp down gallons of soda while they watch movies.
    Your bladder gets full and you have to either sit there for two hours in discomfort or scuffle out to get to the bathroom to relieve yourself having inconvenienced half the row on your way out.

    If I want to eat candy at the movies, I bring my own. The selection is not always that good at the theatre, and the prices are horrible.

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  122. Re:Rude? Yes by shilly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You do realise that the older generation has been saying versions of this complaint about the younger generation for all of human history, right?

  123. Huge problem in my area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've started only seeing movies at the alamo drafthouse theaters. They tell you many times, they WILL throw you out without a refund for texting, talking, or being disruptive. They even play voicemails left at the customer service hotline (before the show) with outraged customers who didn't think it was right they they were ejected for disrupting someone elses movie.

    The other day I went and saw Hangover 3 at an AMC theater (Drafthouse sold out) and I walked out. I couldn't stand it - an entire row of chatty girls behind us. One carried on a 20 min phone call during the movie. Complaining to the manager did nothing. I wasn't issued a refund. I'll never go back.

  124. Re:Rude? Yes by shilly · · Score: 1

    Being a pompous prick and using phrases like "antecedent gutteral" in an attempt at intellectual willy-waving is also pretty rude. Unfortunately for you, "gutteral" is actually spelled "guttural".

  125. Be a cinema vigilante... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... with one of these cellphone signal blocker

  126. Make your own theater. by Domini · · Score: 1

    I find it far preferable to create a theater experience at home. We don't switch on our TV unless there is a film we want to watch.

    At home I have better (and cheaper) popcorn, no disturbances, no cellphones (we can pause the movie if we need to as well). Not to mention NO ADS and cheaper tickets. We have a nice surround sound system and a projector (the only way to go).

    And to those that think it's cool to suggest Faraday cages. As parents I need my cellphone for babysitter emergencies, not to mention medical and other emergency calling. Will never work, not even if we tried.

  127. My jammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple. Early last year I bought a jammer that stops cell coverage for an area the size of the average theater or restaurant. Only when someone is being an ass do I turn it on, and as soon as they've given up and put it away I turn the jammer off. I use it only rarely, and try to be as tolerant as reasonably possible. I've never yet needed to have it on longer than 5-6 minutes. I know it's technically illegal to even have the thing, but until threre becomes some better way to deal with idiots, I'll choose to avoid needless confrontations and just turn my lil gadget on briefly.

  128. Kill them burn their homes to the ground by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Tear their heads off and stuff them on pikes. Genocide is the only answer. Was THAT the answer you're looking for? Because there's always going to be people who wake up every day looking to go Genghis Khan on some such trivial nonsense no matter what.

    Personally? I think the people on the ticket line who are slow and confused and can't make up their mind should be sodomized to death with road flares while their children are thrown off the roof of the theater.

  129. That scenario has gotten better by me, but... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2

    Honestly, the cellphone thing has gotten *better* by me. It used to be pretty bad; maybe 10 years ago people would talk on the phone and stuff or have TXT chats back-and-forth with the thing beeping each time. Now I guess the people that do / did that are either more discreet or realize that it sucks and stop all-together.

    But, what still annoys me... bringing an infant to a 10PM+ showing of a loud / scary movie. What. The. Hell. You're ruining the experience for lots of people, which is inconsiderate as hell. Obviously the infant isn't to blame, it's just a child.

    Whenever I bring this up people treat me like the Devil, but it's flippin' annoying when some parent brings their kid to a 10PM or 11PM showing of a loud and scary movie. The infant inevitably freaks out at some point and starts crying and crying and CRYING. And only half the time does the mother carry the infant outside to try to calm it down. Of course the whole theater lets out a collection sigh or F-bomb because the parent is being inconsiderate.

    Listen, I get it... you're a parent and you still want to have a life. Well, having a kid means making some changes: you don't get to get to the Bahamas every year, you don't get to go out drinking every Friday night, and you shouldn't bring your infant to a 10PM airing of a horror flick. They have matinee showing of colorful and cheerful movies for kids: learn to the theaters then. Wanting to have a life doesn't mean you get to poop on 100+ people's evening.

    So either get a baby sitter, ask a relative to watch the kid, go to an earlier showing, or wait until the DVD.

    The same kind of goes with fancy restaurants... if your kid is too young and/or you can't control them then please don't ruin the experience for the whole place (or just the surrounding tables).

    1. Re:That scenario has gotten better by me, but... by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      True enough. Crying babies in restaurants—age old problem. My friends, relatives, and I always took the child outside if crying began. Just the price of going out to eat with an infant. Go out with others who want children but don't yet have them. Then either they volunteer to carry the child out while you eat or decide against having children or both. Win-win-win.

    2. Re:That scenario has gotten better by me, but... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      You see, I'm cool with that. Restaurants are full of enough noise/static that so long as the family calms it down quickly or takes it to the bathroom/hallway/etc to calm it down then it's cool.

      But being seated at the table NEXT to a family that has the baby cry and cry and cry and they do nothing about it... well that sucks. I get responses "it's only for 5 minutes" and I say "no it's been longer"

      My favorite is "we learned to live with it, so you can too." Umm, it's your kid so you're supposed to get used to it. I'm not related so I don't have to get used to squat.

  130. Solution to theater cell phone use: AGM-88 by MTEK · · Score: 1

    Install downward pointing finger-sized AGM-88s on the theater ceiling. Man, I'd sit through a 3hr movie called "The Life of Jar Jar Binks" just to see that used.

  131. This is a problem? Maybe near a high-school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because wherever I go whether it's in the Us or in the Philippines, I never encounter this as a problem. Rarely will anyone whip out their phone during a movie and if they do, they have their screen set on minimum brightness. Typically people turn off their cells as soon as the movie starts. In the philippines there's a new anti-camcording law that came out and you're not supposed to even use your phone because they can detain you since you can record movies with it. Sounds reasonable enough but it's the philippines... Nothing really gets enforced, in fact right next to the movie theater there's a bootleg store full of pirated movies within the same mall.

  132. Depends on where you live but... by couchslug · · Score: 1

    ...I don't go to theatres because the audience can't shut up.

    Many if not most people where I live who go to theaters are nasty, loud, backward trash who babble on their phones and yell at the screen. If James Holmes lived where I do he'd have snapped sooner!

    If you live where the social experience at theaters is actually FUN, for fucks sake support those establishments. Small and specialty theaters need audience support to survive being overwhelmed by commercial suckage.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  133. In DC it varies by time and theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The megaplex near the fast-food strip is full of distracted teenagers at early evening shows.
    Around the corner is an 'artsy' theater where people in general behave very well.
    Actually, even at the megaplex last time I was there people were pretty good
    about keeping quiet.

    Nothing beats the local early music concerts though. Near silence from the audience.

  134. Maybe it shows how bad recent movies are by zaax · · Score: 1

    Maybe the quality of movies has gone down. When I went to the movies I should not take my eye and ears off the screen, even if the person in the next seat was crunching peanut brittle.

  135. Re:Rude? Yes by asylumx · · Score: 1

    someone mod parent up! Damn kids and their *insert current toy here*!

  136. 2 problems causing perfect storm by asylumx · · Score: 1

    There are two types of people that cause this problem to be bigger than it should be:

    1. The people who are either too dumb or too rude to turn off their phone while in a theatre.
    2. The people who make way too big a deal out of it when other people are dumb or rude.

    Both of these types of people make the rest of us uncomfortable and break the movie experience for us. I see a lot of type #2 commenting on this thread. I guess the summary is asking for it, though.

  137. It is very simple... by Jawnn · · Score: 2

    Theaters that don't enforce no-talking/no-texting rules don't get my business anymore. If I go out to see a movie anymore, The Alamo Drafthouse gets my business. They don't set texters on fire, unfortunately, but they do deal effectively with those inconsiderate fucks.
    Give in to it? No. Not now. Not ever.

  138. Big-Screen Video Gaming by Vegan+Pagan · · Score: 1

    A Canadian company Time Play has the audience use their smartphones to play word games with each other on the big screen. Years ago a company in Spain set up a LAN party in the movie theater but they're out of business now. Any news of something like this happening in the States, aside from one-time theater rentals for console gaming?

  139. Re:Rude? Yes by sjames · · Score: 1

    There is a difference. I may or may not appreciate the music the kids are listening to (it's not all bad) but it hardly matters to me what they choose to listen to. That's just different tastes.

    OTOH, yakking on your phone while others are trying to watch a movie or while a cashier is trying to complete your transaction is rude to all around you. That is, you are actively intruding upon everyone else's time for a purely personal matter.

    Texting while driving is beyond rude. Now you are actually putting others in harm's way.

    Fun game of differing values though, It seems to me that if you are making sure I hear a conversation by yelling into your phone on the train, you must want my input :-)

  140. Why no technical solution? by badzilla · · Score: 1

    I am not keen on the light from people's screens but I can tolerate that so long as doesn't get too ridiculous. What I really hate though is people yakking all the time, whether into their phones or to the guy in the next seat. How come the movie theatre is not able to broadcast the sound channel somehow so you can take along your favourite wireless headphones? You can get a really nice bluetooth stereo headset for not much money.

    --
    "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
  141. Better than a faraday Cage by smutt · · Score: 1

    I see a few posts recommending faraday cages in theatres.
    This has 2 obvious problems:
    1) Faraday cages require an actual cage. Doors and other openings might prove problematic.
    2) 911 calls. The FCC would not be cool with blocking all access to 911.

    I have a better idea. Mandate all phones sold in the USA MUST prioritize joining a specific theatre carrier over all others. We'll call this carrier STFU and whenever a phone sees this carrier it must join to it instead of any other operator(AT&T, Sprint, etc) it might otherwise prefer. Our STFU carrier will then blackhole all traffic not destined to 911. Then put a low power antenna(cell tower) in each theatre covering all available frequencies. All SMS, internet and voice traffic not destined to 911 is then black-holed. Only outgoing calls to 911 work in the theatre. Everything else simply doesn't work. The theatre can then route all 911 calls via it's existing land-line. Which emergency services prefer anyway because they get an immediate address when the call comes in.

    --
    The Information Revolution will be fought on the command line.
  142. Where is the MAFIAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the hefty percentage we already pay the MAFIAA, why can't they send some enforcers to keep order in theaters, so we will continue to happily pay them $12 a ticket? People would get a lot less upset if they started cracking down on people texting in movies instead of old ladies with unsecured wifi.

  143. Re:Rude? Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't make them wrong, right?

  144. Dim! by DriveDog · · Score: 1

    Where are the auto-dimmers on the phones? Talkers, bad, but texters really only bother me because of the light coming from the phone. Why don't they sense the ambient light level and adjust accordingly? Or, since so many are location-aware with fairly high resolution, dim and go silent when in a theatre automatically?

  145. Re:Rude? Yes by Idou · · Score: 1

    Look, personally, I understand because I am also an old-fart, like you. However, I can see also see how this is a technology problem easily solved with technology. So, I see you a gripe and raise you four:

    -Why are you watching movies in the dark with total strangers, WHEN YOU NO LONGER HAVE TO? Home theaters are cheap these days, thanks to technology. Take advantage of it.
    -Why are you still paying a cashier? You should be paying ONLINE. You are old. You have less time remaining than everyone else, and your bones are brittle. When you go outside, make sure it is for a reason that is important and not a result of being "stuck in your ways."
    -There are plenty of idiots on the road. How do you know that the texting is making them any stupider? It could be making them drive better, for all you know. They are idiots, nonetheless, irregardless of their texting habits. Get a dashboard mount for your cellphone, install Daily Roads, record evidence that they are too mentally slow to drive, and forward said evidence to the local authorities. Make the world a safer place.
    -Use your smart phone to record people being "rude" on their's. Upload to Youtube. Tweet it. Make it go viral. Hurt them where it counts. Just beware of old-farts mistaking you for "part of the problem."

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  146. I about walked out of World War Z because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I about walked out of World War Z because of two people sitting behind me talking the entire time of the movie. Obviously, its a noisy and loud movie so much of the movie drowned out their talking. It was really frustrating during the not so loud parts.

  147. I see this opera, ballet, concerts too by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Soem yuppie-type MUST read their message immediately a nd distract their neighbors. I saw this in the NY Metropolitan Opera house last month.

    I've seen a scientist take a message while delivering a paper a conference.

  148. I live with lower expectations at some theaters by peter303 · · Score: 1

    People watching outdoors concerts and movies occasionaly talk and use phones. And to a certain degree at "dollar" theaters. I keep my expectations low then and try o live with it.

  149. usage inverse to movie quality by peter303 · · Score: 1

    If the movie is turning boring, I see screens light up like fireflies. If te action is really good or requires a fair amount of attention, I see minimal usage. Someone should start a data mining company around this behavior.

  150. Huh, what is a movie theatre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't been to a movie theatre in over 8 years. Just not worth it anymore. Most titles are out on on-demand within a few months of hitting theatres. Not only do you not have to deal with talkers and phone ringing, but you pay 1/3 of the price and can sit comfortably on your couch or in a nice chair.

    Just not worth it to go to the movies anymore.

  151. Talk to a manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time I have encountered this type of annoyance, I told a manager and they told the person to stop or leave. Someone in a suit telling you to be mindful of your surroundings is a lot more powerful than me in my CTRL+ALT+DELETE YOU t-shirt whining at someone to be quiet.

  152. Re:Rude? Yes by sjames · · Score: 1

    I don't go to movies anymore, I wait for the DVD.

    I prefer to buy groceries at the store so I can see what I'm actually getting. This is particularly true of produce.

    There is plenty of research and common sense to back up the idea that if you're looking at your phone and pressing buttons on it, you are not securely holding the steering wheel and watching the road.

    As for the youtube thing, if I record them in the movie theater, I *am* part of the problem.

  153. Re:Rude? Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice theory, but DUI laws continue to get more harsh. My theory is it's a puritan thing. Texting is like working. Drinking is like having fun. You only punish having fun.

  154. I solved this by simply not going to theaters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I miss going and seeing new release movies on the big screen, but between the outrageous ticket prices (let alone concessions) that we have all loved to hate for a decade or more now, at least, the almost unbelievable rudeness and total lack of consideration from fellow patrons has made it a losing proposition. I watch movies a year after they come out, on Netflix, with my 5.1 surround and my little 40" LED TV and you know what? It ain't so bad. I can pause and go take a piss. If I darken the living room and turn up the subwoofer, it's pretty darn theatrical. And nobody sitting two rows behind me is arguing loudly with their girlfriend on the phone in the middle of a quiet dialog-heavy scene.

    Why go to the movies anymore?

  155. in response to what jason said by montemike72 · · Score: 1

    so what jason is really saying is to do nothing, if the theaters really cared, they would get strict and kick out the offenders, without a refund. or heres another idea, how about installing cell phone disruption devises, they are available through british channels, I used to have one on the roof of my house, the faa hates them as do the cell phone providers

    1. Re:in response to what jason said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to have one on the roof of my house, the faa hates them as do the cell phone providers

      As does anyone who has ever needed to call the paramedics because their loved one is bleeding out and your device is jamming their signal.

      Upon finding out you were doing this, my solution would be to "disrupt" electrical power to your domicile. With an axe.

    2. Re:in response to what jason said by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      As does anyone who has ever needed to call the paramedics because their loved one is bleeding out and your device is jamming their signal.
      Upon finding out you were doing this, my solution would be to "disrupt" electrical power to your domicile. With an axe.

      Guess the age of this coward. clearly too young to remember a world where cell-phones weren't universal. Cell signals are not oxygen or water. They are not an essential and shouldn't be thought of as a right.

    3. Re:in response to what jason said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm older than you most likely. Lets just say I remember when Michael Jackson was a young black boy and not an old white woman.

      I also recognize that technology changes over time. to deny that cell phones have almost completely supplanted landlines outside of business is to have your head stuck in the sand. when was the last time you used a payphone? hell, when was the last time you saw one? Where did pagers and boom boxes and 56k modems go? Faxed much lately? Got a stack of carbon paper in your office? Technology marches on. I heard a news story just this morning about 911 call centers ramping up to support texts (stupid idea to text instead of call in my opinion, but they recognize the widespread adoption of cell phones now).

      Again, electricity isn't essential and shouldn't be thought of as a right either, but I bet if I purposely "disrupted" your electricity, your life would be pretty different, no? but people lived without universal home electricity until less than 100 years ago, so I'm sure you will be able to revert back to that with no issues, no?

    4. Re:in response to what jason said by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      But not old enough to have a registered Slashdot account!

  156. An isolated problem by arctus · · Score: 1

    I encountered this problem more in cheaper theaters when I lived in a more impoverished area in a smaller sized town. It was mostly teenagers that had nothing better to do than sit in the back of a sparsely populated theater and troll its occupants by talking and laughing obnoxiously. It had nothing to do with the technology. I won't comment that these teenagers are normally of a specific minority or on the details of they the said area was impoverished for the sake of political correctness or that this so called "problem" is really a by-product of something much larger and really shouldn't be treated as a separate issue. But in summary, I live on a white side of town with expensive theaters with nice bars (the kind that serve drinks) and dine in areas and this problem doesn't exist. If someone's on their phone, I certainly don't notice and no one would pay the prices my theater charges to sit and chat in the middle of the movies.

  157. No problems in Megaplex theatres by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I go to the Megaplex theaters in Utah. You can reserve your seat. They have commercials reminding you to turn off your phone and then remind the audience again right before the movie starts.

    I've not seen a problem in a theater in years. I assumed this issue was mostly solved.

  158. Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just stop going entirely. It is expensive and isn't even as nice as watching at home or with friends.

    There's certainly no chance that social conventions will make it palatable again within our lifetimes.

    Just wait till it hits Vudu and you can buy it for slightly more than the cost of one ticket or rent it for 1/3 the cost of a ticket. Although a theater does have better sound and screen then what most people have, the "magic is lost" when you have numerous screens and flashing indicator lights, vibrator buzzings, etc.

  159. Use a pico cell-site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Set one up that allows for E911 SMS/calls and blocks any incoming or outgoing SMS/calls. Course, you'd need a provider concession as well as a site for each carrier/band in use.

  160. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  161. two words: by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    SIGNAL JAMMERS.

    They already use infrared LEDS in the auditorium to blind the cammers, let's complete the experience of going out to watch New Jack City on a forty foot screen without having to take your own gun, 'cos I swear if I see another fucking mobile screen in a theatre while the movie's on I'll be using the hand that's holding it for fucking TARGET PRACTISE!

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  162. Re:Rude? Yes by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

    The previous generation has exploited my generation since before we were born. The increasing of educational costs nearly threefold since the 70s, the increase of healthcare 5-25x what it was in the 70s, and the killing of the economy by simply being too greedy. Not to mention the costs of 2 wars, a bank bailout, and an automotive bailout. Meanwhile that same generation who always goes back to "whaaaa this new generation is rude and selfish" is trying to kill social security (but still make sure THEY get what THEY put into it and yet not seeing how that's not screwing the rest of us over).

    You're so right, we're just SO selfish.

  163. Easy solution by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

    I no longer go to the MegaPlex. Why?
    Smaller, independent theaters (at least in my town) have big screens, comfy seats, better food, *and* they give their employees the power to remove stupid people.

    There isn't anybody on the phone at my local theater. I still don't go that often, but I go more frequently than when I went to chain theaters. Also, avoid theaters in the mall.

  164. Re:Rude? Yes by Idou · · Score: 1

    "I prefer to buy groceries at the store so I can see what I'm actually getting."
    Use self checkout, then.

    "you are not securely holding the steering wheel and watching the road."
    Fine, still the same solution applies. You may need a smart-phone with a very good camera to see that the person is texting, but it still is possible with today's technology (personally, I would focus on capturing the poor driving, irregardless of what the stupid person is doing).

    "if I record them in the movie theater, I *am* part of the problem."
    Since you wait for the DVDs, I guess the solution is that movie theaters will eventually cease to exist. Problem solved.

    Technology. . . the cause and solution to all of life's problems.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  165. Re:Rude? Yes by sjames · · Score: 1

    How does self checkout help? Same jackass talking on his phone halfway through checking out.

    You advocate that I take my eyes off the road and hands off the wheel to video tape someone supporting my complaint that he had his eyes off the road and hands off the wheel? That seems wrong somehow.

  166. Obligatory by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1
    --
    \u262D = \u5350
  167. Just stop going, problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really don't care what they do in the theatre, since the cost is so high and the experience so terrible (smelly rooms filled with smelling screaming idiots, forced to watch brainwashing commercials for movies and products I don't want) what's the point? There's nothing I need to see so badly I just don't wait to get it on disk or via stream and watch it at home. Why bother to go?

  168. Re:Rude? Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that every generation has said it does not make them wrong.

  169. There are ways to deal with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was at a Shakespeare in the Park performance over the weekend, when someone's cell phone went off. The entire cast charged into the audience to try to find it. Don't know what they would have done with it had it not been quickly silenced and hidden.

    At our local yearly sing-along Messiah, the MC always makes a point of saying that if he hears a cell phone, he'll use it to order pizza for the entire audience. He's never had to make good on that threat.

  170. Re:Rude? Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do realise that the older generation has been saying versions of this complaint about the younger generation for all of human history, right?

    I am 68 years old and you, sir, are full of shite. If you think there is any comparison between now and 60 years ago you obviously weren't there. The social destruction of America has worked quite well.

  171. Re:Rude? Yes by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

    You're ascribing malice to the government, in that they deliberately avoid or even kill efforts to outlaw texting while driving and enforce those laws.

    As usual, the real causes are more complex, but one of them is lobbying by the phone companies... no texting while driving reduces their income streams. Is greed a more evil motive than lust for power? I'm not sure.

  172. EMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A device that produces a powerful electro-magnetic pulse. Fry everything electronic - less the shielded theater equipment.

    Let them figure it out.
    :)

  173. Re:Rude? Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It could be that every generation makes this claim and that every generation is right.

    Of course, every generation bears some responsibility for the subsequent generations decline.

  174. Re:Rude? Yes by shilly · · Score: 1

    It doesn't make them wrong, but it is self-evidently very unlikely that every generation is a decline from the preceding generation. Occam's Razor suggests there are more credible hypotheses to test, such as "human beings are attached to the social mores of their youth". But if you feel you have some actual rigorous data to back up a hypothesis that human beings have inexorably declined since time immemorial, I'd be interested in your posting it.

    I think you'll find it's just a fact-free meme though, along with the companion meme about the march of progress.

  175. Re:Rude? Yes by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    And maybe they've usually been right. You see people change as they get older. Usually they get wiser. (Though not always.)

    But that's not to say that each young generation has the same faults.

    For sure the complaints the older generation made of my generation were true. I didn't realise it at the time, but I appreciate it now. For example our generation were still quite bigoted. The younger generation now, so much less so.

    But the idea that you could ignore the rules, and then argue back in the face of the adult or authority figure that took you to task about it. That's something that the current youth does that we didn't.

  176. Do what they do here in Australia by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Here in Australia all of the movie theaters I have been to have a list of conditions of entry (which is perfectly OK since its private property and they get to set the rules for entering that property). The rules vary from theater to theater but they all have a rule about not using your phone in the theater. The theater usually also has a reminder/message about it at the start of the film saying "please turn off your phone". And people are generally very good about turning off their phone when the actual movie starts and not distracting people with it.

    And since its in the conditions of entry, the theater staff are within their rights to go up to someone using their phone in a way that is distracting and tell that person to switch it off or to eject that person from the theater.

    In one case I remember (not sure which film but it was something really big and it was opening day) the staff were actually checking bags and stuff before going in and making people switch their devices off before they went inside (although I have a sneaking suspicion that the checks may have had more to do with looking for people who planned to use unauthorized recording equipment to make illegal copies of the film than about people being distracting with their phones)

  177. Re:Rude? Yes by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile that same generation who always goes back to "whaaaa this new generation is rude and selfish" is trying to kill social security (but still make sure THEY get what THEY put into it and yet not seeing how that's not screwing the rest of us over).

    Your complaints seem to be about conservatives. Conservatives are both old and young, as are liberals.

    Another difference between the 1970s and more recent times is that back then, the youth used to be politically motivated and fight against the things you mention. In recent decades, not so much. Though there's some hopeful signs of a return to political action with the "occupy" movement for example.

  178. Re:Rude? Yes by shilly · · Score: 1

    I *love* this comment.

    I think of myself as having a decent comic imagination, but the idea that someone would try to convince me and everyone else that the younger generation is ruder than the old generation by calling me names....well, let's just say you've conclusively proved that there's at least one American who does irony. Even if they're too stupid to recognise they're doing it.

    Now, on to the substance:
    1. You are on the internet. The internet consists of more than just America. Talking about the social destruction of America in response to a clearly universalist post is absurd.
    2. Just to make my point: Pliny the Younger bemoaned the younger generation 1900 years ago. In Rome. "But in former times (so my elders tell me)
    no youth, even of the best families, was allowed in unless introduced by some person of consular dignity. As things are now, since every fence of modesty and decorum is broken down, and all distinctions are levelled and confounded, the present young generation, so far from waiting to be introduced, break in of their
    own free will."
    3. I agree that there is no comparison between the America of 60 years ago and the America of today. The America of 60 years ago was a place in which it was unremarkable to beat wives, hate and exclude African Americans (and every other minority you can name), persecute gay people, ridicule divorcees, ostracise atheists. And the people of the day didn't call you "sir" while beating the living shit out of you for being a woman, black, Jewish, gay, etc. They called you vile names instead. In other words, they were rude beyond imagining compared to today -- just about different things.

    If you want to remain unchallenged while you romanticise your youth, or refer to the end of any of the disgusting prejudices I outlined above as "the social destruction of America" you're SOL doing it here. You need to go somewhere more bubble-like.

  179. My own mother. Geez... by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    I have never, ever noticed this, not in a single movie. Talking on the phone would definitely be a problem, but I've never seen this either.

    My own freaking mother did this once in a theater and talked for 2-3 minutes. My father and I were appalled. IT was embarrassing, and she didn't really understand that what she did was wrong at first.

    Frankly I don't really give a shit if people are texting or surfing on their phone during the movie. I'm looking ahead at the screen. I find it hard to believe that it should really bother someone that much.

    Not all of us have tunnel vision, and cell phone screens are bright. Someone texting out of the corner of your eye can be very distracting even if you can't see the screen and only see the glow, especially in stadium-style theaters where multiple rows are easily visible. Plus, even phones on vibrate make distracting noise when text after text comes in.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  180. The solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wi-Fi and Cell signal blocking paint. There would be no use to have your mobile out if you had no connection....

  181. Re:Rude? Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suppose they all were right? ...
    On the other hand, maybe this is more of a cultural problem. I live in the Netherlands and I have encountered this problem exactly once, about five years ago. I now go to the pictures fairly regularly because of this newfangled three-dee thing and the audience tends to be well behaved.

  182. Doesn't seem to be a big problem to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I go to the movies probably at least once a month and overall I think people are pretty good. Occasionally you'll see a phone light up but it normally isn't for very long and it's not too distracting. The only time I've gotten pretty annoyed is when I went to a shitty horror movie and a bunch of teenage girls were there and they just screamed the whole time and overreacted to every shock moment. However, the movie was pretty bad and they were just having fun being scared. They were experiencing the movie more as a ride than as serious film which is probably the right way to approach a movie like that.

  183. I bring a cellphone jammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice having a cone of silence!

  184. I see it too often by bobvious · · Score: 1

    I see it about every other movie I go to, if not more. Maybe a button could be at every other seat that alerts the folks in the control room that someone is on their phone. That would likely be abused too though.

  185. I paid to see the movie, not your phone display... by realsilly · · Score: 1

    I am one of those people who pay to see the movie for the big screen movie experience.

    Those patrons who feel the need to constantly talk to another person (in person or on the phone), play games or text, I have to ask you, why the heck did you spend the $12+ to go sit in a dark loud theater if you aren't watching the movie?

    I paid hard earned $$ to go enjoy a movie on the big screen, not see all of your phone displays. If I wanted to watch all of you on your phones I'd just go sit in the food court for free at the mall.

    When you go to the movies, put your phones away, if you must take a call, leave the seats and go around the wall, allow the rest of us to enjoy the movie we paid for.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
  186. Go ahead, make my day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go ahead and light up your phone in the theater I'm in. It make it easier for me to target you with the 20oz Coke grenade I'm going to throw at the back of your head.

    It's the people who chat in movies that bother me more. They're a bit harder to lock on to if the theater is dark.

  187. Re:Rude? Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never heard such drivel in my life. Barge in on someone making love and push them apart so you can take over. Manners change a little from place to place, and you can pick out some things that are surprising when they change, but not that many. Interrupting people who are trying to watch something will always be considered rude. I can't imagine a complete moron like yourself would understand that, because you've probably never concentrated on anything for ten seconds in your life. I rather imagine you plagiarized your entire post.
    I'm sure that didn't offend you, because you understand that what seems like rudeness is just a different set of manners.

  188. Re:Rude? Yes by shilly · · Score: 1

    Bit confused. Are you saying the older generation said your generation was more bigoted than they? Seems unlikely (and not true in developed countries).

    On this second point, there are a ton of Robert Heinlein's juvenile novels that involve breaking the rules and sassing the teacher, and they date back to the 40s, 50s and 60s. I'm pretty sure that this is a universal.

  189. There are a FEW movies that won't work for by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    Life of Pi is a recent example. Avatar also. I also think Les Mis was much better seen in a cinema than just at home. Yes they're rare, but they do exist...

  190. Life of Pi and Les Mis by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    both outstanding films in the past year. Sure most of it's rubbish - but it keeps the proles entertained, so let's not care too much. However just occasionally there's something special; don't give up looking out for it.

  191. Cell phones & conversation in movie theaters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gosgog:
    Hey, the solutions staring y'all in the face....a great investment opportunity .....Bring ' em back .....DRIVE-IN MOVIE THEATERS!! EAT DRINK, TALK CALL 911, HAVE SEX OR WHATEVER...IN YOUR CAR!!

  192. Re:Rude? Yes by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    This also doesn't mean that each successive generation isn't more of an ass than the last...

  193. Re:Rude? Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm...this guy is right.

  194. Get a laser-pointer with sights. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will allow you to point the laser directly at the phone or the seat right in front of them, before you press the momentary-contact button to turn it on. As soon as the asshole starts to turn around you let your finger off the button and it will be impossible for them to tell where you are because they have night-blindness from looking at their phone. This is what they call giving someone a taste of their own medicine.

    I would love to hear them complain. It would be like when my little sister once said of my other little sister: "Moooomm! She hit be baaaaackk!"

    If they persist, you switch to an infrared laser just powerful enough to burn a few bad pixels into their screen.

  195. Re:How to treat movie goers talking on their phone by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, I was going for +x Funny, but whatever...

  196. Smoking/Non-smoking - Mobile/Non-mobile by kbx911 · · Score: 0

    Have two screens, 1 for those who will surrender their phones at the reception, and one for those who like to blabber on the phone and light it like a torch in a dark movie theatre. Solved.

  197. Re:Rude? Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or you could say the younger generation are more tolerant. Having grown up with them, they don't even notice when someone else is texting on their phone.

  198. on-call by phorm · · Score: 1

    Some people are pretty much perpetually on-call, but there are lots of other situations that can be fairly long-lasting.
    For somebody with a seriously ill family member, a movie might give some sense of normalcy in life, but you're still going to want to be contacted in the event of a sudden change in medical condition. Put the phone on vibrate, sit near the aisle, and it's shouldn't be a major inconvenience to anyone (any more than a bathroom break).

    Is that going to be a common thing? No, but it's still important.

    The phones issue is similar to those that illegally park in handicap stalls, leave shopping carts strewn about a parking lot, take 25 things through the express 12-item checkout, or big trucks through the "cars only" gas pump. The problem is exacerbated by a lack of enforcement or caring on the part of the establishment. If jerks can get away with being jerks, then they will. If businesses were more willing to deal with jerks they'd be less inclined to take advantage.

    You don't even have to be hostile in doing so. In regards to the express checkout, the best response I heard from a clerk was "and which 12 of these items are you checking out today, ma'am".

  199. Re:Rude? Yes by phorm · · Score: 1

    Maybe some things have been going slowly downhill throughout human history...

  200. Easy Solution by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Make a big scene.
    Demand the Theatre refund everyone's money.
    Theatre is encouraged to recoup they losses from offending party.

    2000-3000$ or talk on the phone, your call... :)

  201. I found the solution by Kuruk · · Score: 1

    I won't be there.

  202. Two options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A) 20mg methylphenidate administered at ticket booth

    B) Tickets include the cost of, and come in the form of, an extra large bag of greasy popcorn

  203. Well get the hell off my damn lawn then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look I pay $30+ to take 3 people to the damn movies and having people texting and talking during the movie ruins the experience for me if you want to text and talk during the movie then you OWE everyone in the theater the price of their admission.

    I don't strictly limit this to texters and talkers. This also applies to bad parents who take their 3 or 4 year old kids to a 10PM movie. Many of us go to see movies that late strictly to avoid noisy whining kids at the movies. That being said I never took my son to a movie after 5pm out of respect to others until he could sit quietly for 2 hours.