Copyrights and patents are given to authors and inventors exclusively. Exclusive as in monopoly. The government gives them.
Which is different from any other property laws in what way, pray tell? I suppose the prohibition of theft can be derived from fundamental trigionometry? Or perhaps it just fell out of the sky?
A free market is one where the seller is free to sell (or to not do), the buyer is free to buy (or to not do) at a price they find mutually acceptable. You seem to be confusing it with a free-for-all.
Choose which you prefer... Free Markets, or copyrights and, or patents. If you decide to have copyrights or patents, your free markets are gone for works or goods protected by either.
Choose which you prefer... Free Markets, or locks and, or policemen. If you decide to have locks or policemen, your free markets are gone for works or goods protected by either.
This "menu" is known as the "Task Manager" in XP and above.
That's illogical. If one of the things the menu leads to is task manager, how can it be task manager? Task manager manager would make more sense. Or senior VP of tasks.
Nice one! At the very least, they should bill Viacom for the wasted time. At overtime-plus rates.
So you're a mac user?
I quite like his New World Symphony. On the other hand, I never really got on with his keyboard. Overall, I'd say I'm neutral.
What, no profit?????
You'd have 2 * 0.5 lives. Unlike most of us here.
A free market is one where the seller is free to sell (or to not do), the buyer is free to buy (or to not do) at a price they find mutually acceptable. You seem to be confusing it with a free-for-all.
Thanks. Now make a note in your diary so that when it gets to December, you don't forget to inform us all that reindeer can't actually fly.
As Juvenal wrote[1]: Quis moderatiet ipsos moderates?
[1] or surely would have, if Alanus Gorea had been around to invent intarwebs back then.
Maybe it can catch people who walk on the cracks in the pavement? If it saves one old lady...
I guess they were just men, not cavemen - at least until they'd evicted the previous occupants.
I don't care what you meant, I'm not a mind reader - I responded to what you wrote. You screwed up, you got called - get over it.
Re: Pointless name calling - I demand you immediately withdraw that groundless and malicious accusation or put up some evidence.
I have two questions: one, who are these independent organisations. Two, are they hiring?
That might well be the law. It might be relevant to this case too, if Illinois courts had jurisdiction over the UK.
Which field? I didn't know there was a subject called "monopology".
Third possiblity: c) he's a she.