Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates to Finally Receive His Harvard Degree

coondoggie writes "It's not like he needs it to beef up his résumé, but the world's richest college dropout finally is getting his degree. Bill Gates, chairman of Microsoft, will speak at Harvard University's commencement ceremony in June and, like all commencement speakers, will receive an honorary degree from the institution. It's hard to guess if Gates, the wealthiest person in the world and co-founder of a company that brought in $44 billion in revenue last year, cares. But the programming whiz who once dropped out of Harvard will likely feel some sense of satisfaction."

336 comments

  1. Rich man's GED by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I tend to view the bachelors degree as the high school diploma of the 21st century...
    so I guess that makes the honorary degree something akin to a rich man's GED.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:Rich man's GED by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a drop-out-done-good myself (probably doing better than anyone I ever went to school with as well as the teachers and administrators), I would probably react to an honorary degree with a big fuck you. Like someone who stuck it out on their own and made something great for themselves in the world inevitably need some stamp of approval from a bunch of nose-in-the-air academic snoots?

    2. Re:Rich man's GED by neonmonk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Stamp of approval?

      It's an honorary degree, it's more like saying "we recognise you as being prominent in this field and here's the proof."

      Not: "omglolwtf u didnt get a degree heres one now ur one of us!!1 lol"

    3. Re:Rich man's GED by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Making more money then university faculty or administrative staff isn't very hard to do. You get into that line of work because you're making and impact and or getting solid benefits, not because you plan on owning a winter home in Aspen.

      And as for the "stamp of approval..." ... well, if you're attending a university for a stamp of approval you are, at the very least, not utilizing that resource properly.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    4. Re:Rich man's GED by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 5, Funny

      Which field? I didn't know there was a subject called "monopology".

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    5. Re:Rich man's GED by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      This isn't out of the blue. He's speaking at Harvard commencement, and commencement speakers get honorary degrees. That's just how it works; refusing the degree would be a slap in the face.

      Asking him to speak at commencement is more than just a stamp of approval: he's giving the last official speech to Harvard graduates before they leave the university. That's not only a big honor, it's a chance to make a difference to a generation of graduates.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    6. Re:Rich man's GED by joshetc · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Most people strive to become sucessful to spite the fact that they have no degree. Myself included. I would absolutely refuse one should someone attempted to offer it to me.

      That said, being Bill Gates might be a different story. Hes got enough money to buy the damn school.

    7. Re:Rich man's GED by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Re: Your sig...

      I believe he said, "There's computers..."

      Be excellent to each other... and Party on! /me wiggles fingers in air guitar flourish

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    8. Re:Rich man's GED by x2A · · Score: 1

      no, it's in the field of itsatrap!!!ology, of cause!

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    9. Re:Rich man's GED by neonmonk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but he's giving a talk to people who are striving to get a degree. So he obviously sees it as something that's relatively worthwhile. He even tried to get one himself.

      I think you're putting too much stock into this "honorary degree," it of course isn't worth the paper it's written on and everyone knows that, including him.

      It's just nice to get recognition, who cares who it's from.

      That's all it is, recognition. If you're too high and mighty with your 'I did well in spite of having a degree Ha Ha Ha society take that!' then I think you're missing the point (and it's probably a good thing you didn't bother spending 4/5 years attaining a degree).

    10. Re:Rich man's GED by StarvingSE · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why does there seem to be such a big hatred for college degrees here on slashdot? I'm not trying to flamebait or anything, but it seems that every time there is a story about college (especially computer science programs), there's always a bunch of people who chime in on how a degree is useless.

      It's not useless. Most companies require it for you to be able to work for them. A college degree (earned, not necessarily honorary) is valuable in that it shows that you can dedicate yourself to something and accomplish it. Also, for most people it's the first time they are on their own to figure out their own lives. At least for me, the life experiences during college are more valuable than the actual education. The college experience can be invaluable for discovering yourself and finding out how you want to live the rest of your life.

      --
      I got nothin'
    11. Re:Rich man's GED by Sobrique · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Easy answer? Sour Grapes.

      More indepth answer? If you assume a degree is synonymous with 'being qualified' you are incorrect. There are a large number of graduates who have yet to learn the 'tough lesson' that their degree doesn't actually carry much weight. So the Slashdot community is helpfully trying to get them focussed on the fact that a degree, or lack thereof, isn't a binary state factor. It's an enabler, and it's useful, but then... so is having spent 3 years 'in the industry' whilst everyone else was off getting their degree.

    12. Re:Rich man's GED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Asking him to speak at commencement is more than just a stamp of approval: he's giving the last official speech to Harvard graduates before they leave the university. That's not only a big honor, it's a chance to make a difference to a generation of graduates.

      Apparently you never attended a college commencement ceremony. Almost none of the graduating seniors are listening to the commencement speakers. Some are laughing and partying with their friends, others are still hung over from the night before, and aren't in any condition to hear, much less understand, what the speakers are saying.

      At best, the commencement speakers help to convince the graduates' parents that their tuition payments were well-spent.

    13. Re:Rich man's GED by rikkards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stamp of approval?

      It's an honorary degree, it's more like saying "we recognise you as being prominent in this field and here's the proof."

      Not: "omglolwtf u didnt get a degree heres one now ur one of us!!1 lol"


      Actually honorary degrees are more of a "we need someone to speak at our graduation and we will give you one as payment". Nothing more, nothing less. Kind of cheapens what the real graduates are getting IMHO.

    14. Re:Rich man's GED by Skater · · Score: 1

      At my commencement (not at Harvard, at a relatively small school in Pennsylvania), we had the guy from Adelphia Cable speak and he received an honorary Doctor of Public Services degree.

      Oops.

      I don't remember much about what he said, so hopefully I won't end up like he did...

    15. Re:Rich man's GED by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      Apparently you never attended a college commencement ceremony.

      You're half-right. I graduated Harvard last year. I went to the main ceremony, but only one of the speeches. Almost all the seniors went to the ceremony itself, because after spending 4 years there, you really want some pomp and circumstance to cap it all off. So to speak.

      Almost none of the graduating seniors are listening to the commencement speakers.

      About half of them were at the commencement speech, from what I hear. It was raining, but maybe their parents forced them to go. Who knows if they were paying attention. More of them saw the class day speech, but fewer were physically there, because it was telecast to dry places.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    16. Re:Rich man's GED by smchris · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's an honorary degree, it's more like saying "we recognise you as being prominent in this field and here's the proof."

      Yup. He better not try to pass it off as a real degree on a job applicaton or he'll be in trouble.

    17. Re:Rich man's GED by asninn · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's any real hatred for college degrees on Slashdot, at least not in general - there's just lots of hatred for Bill Gates (and thus everything associated with him).

      --
      butter the donkey
    18. Re:Rich man's GED by timeOday · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's an honorary degree, it's more like saying "we recognise you as being prominent in this field and here's the proof."
      Is Bill Gates prominent in some academmic field?
    19. Re:Rich man's GED by nharmon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It isn't that there is a hatred for college degrees, or even an attitude that they are completely useless. I think the attitude is that college degrees have unnecessarily become a "basic education" credential where the absence of carries with it a certain stigma. And I can certainly understand why people would be upset about that.

      Certainly college degrees aren't useless, but in the same respect they aren't completely necessary. I have a fairly well paying job without a bachelor's degree. However that being said, I am a part-time student pursuing a bachelor's degree, so obviously I do not view it as useless.

    20. Re:Rich man's GED by seanadams.com · · Score: 1


      It's not useless. Most companies require it for you to be able to work for them.


      That argument makes no sense. It's like saying "Daylight savings time is not useless. It is used all over America and Europe, and if you didn't obey it, you would be getting in to work at the wrong time every day!"

      Just because something has become engrained (or legislated) into our culture doesn't make it inherently good or useful. I would expect that anyone arguing against the usefulness of a degree would also argue that employers should not require them.

    21. Re:Rich man's GED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile in the real world, a paper qualification is no indicator of aptitude. This is what those without degrees, who are unwilling or unable to enter formal education know only too well. What's more, influential people in many fields drop out of formal education before they ever receive their degree.

    22. Re:Rich man's GED by Serpentegena · · Score: 1

      Well, if you can use one as an asset to get a job, then the degree is inherently useful - for that.

      --
      Microsoft put the "sucks" in "success".
    23. Re:Rich man's GED by pedalman · · Score: 1
      One could view a degree as a "basic education" credential, but it is also becoming a de facto "union card".

      As human nature dictates, we tend to gravitate towards those who have something in common with us. In the workplace, the degree is that that common link; a "secret club handshake", if you will.

      --
      Friends don't let friends line-dance.
    24. Re:Rich man's GED by Raffaello · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Programming "whiz" [sic] is right - like cheese whiz. It was Paul Allen who was the wizard programmer, not Gates, who was always the businessman. Of course they wanted the colloquial abbreviation "wiz."

    25. Re:Rich man's GED by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      I would say that many here have a similar experience to mine. I worked my way through school and thus before I had my degree I was working in the field. This experience made me the team lead over fresh out of school CS BS. They were taught how to please there prof's not how to code or the theory behind coding. This leads to seeing a working prototype as job done. CS courses seem to be very week in the other 66% of the job documenting and testing. Very few understood how to code as a group or the value in breaking up complex problems into smaller pieces so the work can be pieced out and the job completed on time. My experience at uni reinforced what I saw in the work place to much emphasis put on simple code that one person could write little to no group projects or time allowed to deliver proper documented reliable code. It takes years to un-train these traits, the government here has a good guideline each year of uni is equivalent experience to 6 months of work in field. HR policies generally make it hard to hire somebody in school the rare exception seems to be companies with senior coders that teach at night cherry picking candidates from there classes.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    26. Re:Rich man's GED by Cylix · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah he started this little company a while ago.

      Not really sure what happened with it.

      Apparently, it's a big fuss in some circles... go figure.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    27. Re:Rich man's GED by Raffaello · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify the parent and grandparent, at Harvard Commencements, the speaker will receive his honorary degree at the main ceremony, but his/her address will take place later on at a separate afternoon event where attendance often reflects the popularity of the speaker. The main ceremony is always packed to the limit because that is where the various graduates (BA, MA, PhD, MD, JD, etc.) process in their robes, etc. These then retreat to various venues (undergrads to their Harvard houses, MAa and PhDs to Sanders Theater last I checked, JDs to the Law School, etc) for lunch and to receive their actual diplomas. The commencement speaker speaks after all this and his/her address is often poorly attended. I imagine Gates' address will be well attended simply because of the national/international interest it will inevitably raise.

    28. Re:Rich man's GED by jmyers · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "A college degree (earned, not necessarily honorary) is valuable in that it shows that you can dedicate yourself to something and accomplish it."

      A college degree (or any other certification) only shows that you had X amount of time and X amount of money and are reasonably literate.

    29. Re:Rich man's GED by everphilski · · Score: 1

      Why does there seem to be such a big hatred for college degrees here on slashdot? ... Most companies require it for you to be able to work for them.

      Because in a lot of fields, it isn't enough anymore. Just getting your college degree gets you into the ranks of 'hireable' ... but your master's or Ph.D. puts you in the ranks of 'desirable' (with additional pay and perks to boot).

    30. Re:Rich man's GED by 0123456789 · · Score: 1

      Still no honourary degree offer yet Steve? Bill.

    31. Re:Rich man's GED by merlin262 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it's just part of the slashdot demographic.

      Let me illustrate an average slashdot poster. I met a friend of a friend. The conversation went like this.

      "So, where do you work?"

      "I'm actually not right now"

      "Oh, so what school are you going to?"

      "I'm not going to college, the school messed me up"

      "Oh, ok"

      This person lives w/ their parents, and claims to enjoy "intelligent conversation". When you consider the number of self-styled experts that know everything on a subject, I'd say you have a large number of people like this here. They are too smart for school, too good for a job, and thus live at home w/ their parents. They explain this meaningless existance by posting on slashdot and talking about why these things don't matter.

      In short, the reason why that is often posted: Virgins.

    32. Re:Rich man's GED by tyresyas · · Score: 1

      You so clearly either a) did not get a degree, b) got a very easy one, c) got one that was substandard or d) didn't bother to apply yourself (choose all that apply). If none of those are true, then you're viewpoint makes no sense. I can tell you right now that getting a higher degree (eg a PhD) is much much more difficult that merely being literate...

    33. Re:Rich man's GED by jmyers · · Score: 1

      I don't have a degree, went to college for 3 years full time. I worked the whole time to pay living expenses and paid all my tuition with loans. I have lots a friends that graduated, they all had family money paying the way or BEOG grant. They partied and had a blast, I worked my ass off.

      No doubt a PhD means a lot more that a BS. I just have had lots a co-workers with 4 year degrees and I stand by my original comment.

    34. Re:Rich man's GED by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      You seem not to understand the meaning of the word "inherent". A degree is sought by many employers because they have assigned a very specific value to the thing - they've made it a requirement for particular positions. As an employer I could just as easily _discredit_ you for having a degree if I wanted to. Indeed, I will often pass over a resume very quickly if it is weighted heavily towards academic accomplishments as apposed to creative skills or real-world experience. If you consider the degree for it's _inherent_ properties, what does it really represent? It certifies that you have completed the requirements for a program. It is no guarantee that you will be suitable for a job. For my parents' generation, a degree effectively granted one gainful employment for his entire career, but that is a custom that society has all but completely dismissed.

    35. Re:Rich man's GED by lpcustom · · Score: 1

      I don't feel that a college degree says that you are qualified. I'm currently working on earning a BS degree at the ripe age of 29. I can tell you that, though a degree doesn't make a person qualified, the lack of a degree mostly means you won't even be considered. At least with a degree you'll get an interview.

      --
      Beer! It's what's for breakfast!
    36. Re:Rich man's GED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No doubt a PhD means a lot more that a BS. I just have had lots a co-workers with 4 year degrees and I stand by my original comment.


      A PhD does not mean that much more than a BS in the real world. I've worked for two tier-1 universities here in the states and will tell you that you're average academic CS type knows very little about anything outside his or (rarely) her area of specialization.

      A very good friend with a PhD in CS teaches two courses on operating systems, and we were talking about general database design. He was so clueless it was alarming. Another CS prof who specializes in computer architecture didn't understand postbacks in ASP.NET. He just doesn't get that modern web programming is event driven in many cases; he thinks it's still done with Perl and forms. My point is this: a PhD knows a whole lot about a very specific area. Most of them (not all) would croak if they actually had to work on an engineering team and create something worthwhile (i.e. not a school project). I've been told by more than one CS prof that they don't recommend anything above a masters for anybody who intends on working in the real world.
    37. Re:Rich man's GED by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And as for the "stamp of approval..." ... well, if you're attending a university for a stamp of approval you are, at the very least, not utilizing that resource properly.

      If you need the "stamp of approval" and that's all you need, then the employers are not utilizing the resource properly.

      But if the employer requires that I have it, then I am taking what I need if I go out and get that piece of paper which otherwise wouldn't even be good for wiping my ass because it's too scratchy.

      I got a two year degree in general studies just to get a degree. Along the way I took some neat classes and learned some cool things, most of which haven't helped me in my work but are wonderful to know. I learned about auto body and paint, black and white photography, machining, and air conditioning while I was there. Not to mention I took a nifty class that ended up giving me a brief history of western theology, which is both very interesting and useful in understanding the mindset of the brainwashed.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    38. Re:Rich man's GED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What "hatred"? This, my friends, is a straw man. It gets modded up because everyone agrees with it, since no one really does "hate" degrees.

    39. Re:Rich man's GED by SquareVoid · · Score: 1

      The IT field is littered with positions that do not require a degree in Computer Science (or the newly created "IT" degrees). I've said many times that about 80% (generous estimate) that are in CS right now don't need to be there. They want to be programmers or Network/System administrators. These people are better off either working themselves up the ladder or getting a vocational degree where more hands-on experience is given.

      A degree in CS was never meant to spit out programmers. I remember running in the opposite direction of a school I had attended the pre-orientarion where they show you around and let you meet professors and ask questions. When I asked what kind of lessons were being taught, they replied "We have classes that teach you how to use SQL and a class for Javascript. We have a professor that teaches 3 levels of Java programming." I heard their responses and ran the other way because I didn't want to learn the latest thing right now. I wanted a real CS degree, which meant more theory then practical knowledge.

      I am not trying to knock that type of education though. Some people are better off learning what the industry is doing right now rather then the general knowledge and theory behind what is used. If all you want to do is be a programmer, then get a vocational degree in that field, get certified in whatever language you want and find a job using those easy-to-get credentials. If you are good, you will survive. A CS degree is meant for people that will go into Computer Science. Computer Science != Programming. Programming is only a small fraction of Computer Science.

      I am sure there are tons of programmer/sys-admins here that started off with CS and then thought "wtf" when they saw the courses they were taking. I am sure that the slashdot anti-degree mentality comes from this. But it isn't the degree's fault. What is at fault is a misunderstanding of what Computer Science meant to them.

    40. Re:Rich man's GED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. It's not the piece of paper, per se. Yeah, you can learn a ton of stuff in the field...you can learn a ton in school too. Are you trying to say there's no fiduciary value to education? That's a little myopic, if you are.

      If you regard a degree as an exponent of another's learning, then it should be a simple matter for the oh-so-knowledgeable dropout to ascertain the strength of that degree, as measured against their own experience. Society has abandoned the simple method of equating a degree with competence, because we know that all-too-often, completion of a degree may be the result of any number of social engineering techniques designed to escape the personal responsibility of learning. That doesn't mean professors don't have anything to say.

      And you sit there on your high horse, "pass[ing] over a resume...if it is weighted heavily towards academic accomplishments". You're reinforcing the cycle, bud. Besides which, it's not even remotely professional to maintain that kind of bias. You might have learned that if you had better role models (you know, teachers).

      Maybe kit-bashing your skills works in IT, but it generally won't cut the mustard elsewhere.

    41. Re:Rich man's GED by kdfosterjr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      College degrees pretty much say "I can be taught." It does not say what you were taught, nor does it say what you know. Just last week I had to instruct a person with a PhD in his title along with the position of "Chief Technology Officer" on how to read an e-mail header. I do not think that everyone is against degrees, I feel that most are against what Corporate America places on degrees. I myself have worked in the IT field for about 30+ years, I dropped out of college after my second year. I have worked for my present company for 17 years. If I were to apply today for my current job I would not be qualified. I do not have a degree. That is what erks everyone. Bill Gates is not qualified for the position he currently holds. His own company would not hire him if he were to apply today. He does not have a degree.

    42. Re:Rich man's GED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they balk at the degrees because they don't see them as being testament to skill, just because you have a degree doesn't mean you have skill, just because you don't have a degree doesn't mean you do not have skill, the reason why they don't like them is because companies tend to not hire people with out degrees, which to people at slashdot doesn't make sense because people should be hired based on merit, not on some superficial criteria

      they don't place value in them because other people require them to, they are not required or indicative of skill or merit, and they cost allot of money....

      that or because they all read the hackers manifesto one to many times and to it to seriously

    43. Re:Rich man's GED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I tend to view the bachelors degree as the high school diploma of the 21st century..."

      Your loss, since you forget to look at the people holding the degree. Not all bachelors degrees are created equal. I've seen many with BAs with honors in their major/concentration and in their overall record that had final or honor project papers that easily better most Master's theses I've read.

      Then again, most Master theses in biology are for those people in a hurry on their way out the door and hardly polished....

    44. Re:Rich man's GED by HungSoLow · · Score: 1

      I suppose I'm heavily biased, but a bachelor's degree in engineering (applied science) is still quite significant (at least in Canada). No other single degree can get you on the track to become a professional (again, in Canada). Teaching, Law, and Medicine all require a previously obtained degrees before being admitted to their respective programs.

    45. Re:Rich man's GED by eln · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Business is an academic field.

    46. Re:Rich man's GED by imikem · · Score: 1

      The IT field has a couple of "tribes" that go back a long ways. There's a tribe of traditionally trained university folk, and there's a tribe of hobbyists-gone-professional. There is some overlap and/or fuzzy edges between, but some of the hobbyists are just louder and easy to notice in these sorts of discussions.

      Feeding into the stereotypes, the geek crowd often wouldn't have a much better university experience than high school - poor social skills, massive hours spent with 'pute instead of hanging out with friends, etc. As a result, whether or not they completed their studies, many would come away with negative attitudes toward college, and surprise, since they spend much of their time on the internet, their opinions circulate widely.

      Also, non-grads often have some insecurity about this, and devaluing college education is a defense mechanism. Similarly, some grads believe their achievement should outweigh real-world IT experience and get snotty.

      --
      Perscriptio in manibus tabellariorum est.
    47. Re:Rich man's GED by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to say there's no fiduciary value to education?

      No, that's not what I was trying to say. Did you learn that word in college?

    48. Re:Rich man's GED by rantingkitten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That employers require a degree of people is not evidence that a degree is useful. HR departments are especially notorious for wanting to see degrees for jobs that don't require them, and in any case, the fact that "a degree" is often all that's needed is good evidence that it's useless. "You have a four year degree? Great, welcome aboard!" Of course, it's a degree in, like, anthropology or something, and you're trying to get jobs in the IT sector, but nobody cares, as long as you have a piece of paper proving you sat around for four years learning just enough to pass some tests and then forget it forever. And do I really need to get into the "business" degrees that are so shit-hot right now, where you take four years to learn corporate crap that would take you six months to absorb by experience in an actual job? Yes, you get a lot out of the "life experience" of college, but you also get a lot out of kicking around on your own for a few years and seeing what the real world is like. A formalized education is a tool, and not one that everyone needs -- I'd go so far as to say it's one that most people don't need. We have a completely artificial expectation set by employers who are aware that it's an employer's market and they can get as choosy as they want.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    49. Re:Rich man's GED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No doubt a PhD means a lot more that a BS.

      No, it's the same BS, just Piled Higher and Deeper.

    50. Re:Rich man's GED by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The college experience can be invaluable for discovering yourself and finding out how you want to live the rest of your life.

      I don't see how that relates to the degree.

      I went to college (well, I went to a university). I went for 2 semesters and dropped out because it felt like the same crap that I was going through in high school. The college experience, I feel, helped me out immensely with my social skills and I learned a lot of things about love, life, and technology.

      During those 2 semesters, I spent all my time learning java and playing with linux and learning about TCP/UDP networking on the dorm network as I saturated our 10mbit pipe for weeks downloading, uploading and experimenting and I got to see how the campus's network was put together when I had to have a meeting with the network admin about my rampant use of his network (so rampant, I might add, that professors and TAs couldn't log into their grading system).

      And although I wasn't paying for college after that, I lived just off campus and continued going to classes with my 3rd, 4th, and 5th year comp-sci friends so I could help them with their assignments and learn more for myself.

      Now, about a degree being worthless, it's not. It's your foot in the door at many companies, however, just because you have that piece of paper doesn't prove that you can do the work that's expected of you or that you actually know what you're talking about. I know people who majored in comp-sci and graduated with their bachelors and still have no clue how to code. They have a basic understanding of the difference between TCP and UDP but have absolutely no clue what they're used for or how their used.

      At the same time, me, and several other people I know who didn't go to college, and one guy who is a high school dropout, know more than most people with their degree. I've got a friend who just got his CCNA and is working as an assistant network admin at my old university and he only just graduated high school last year.

      Now, I'm not saying that no one needs college. College isn't for everybody, and it can be helpful as a guide; you learn about a lot of things, they have a structured learning schedule for learning about the network OSI model and sorting techniques, etc, but just going doesn't magically make you better than someone who didn't go.

      When you can show what you've done, what you can do, and what you're capable of picking up, a college degree is just a piece of paper. Actions speak louder than paper.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    51. Re:Rich man's GED by Saint+V+Flux · · Score: 0

      The ones complaining about how a college education is useless are the ones that are 40 years old, living at home, and have a 100% accurate replica of the original Enterprise in their basement to play in. They have their own "business" doing some basic HTML / XML programming.....it's not much, but it's enough to buy their action figures each month.

    52. Re:Rich man's GED by malevolentjelly · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bill Gates used to write compilers. I'm sure he's an above average coder- people who used to work at Microsoft in the 80's/early 90's have described Bill Gates' problem solving abilities as pretty solid. He'd help people solve a code issue every now and then.

      In the original software giants, a lot of the people up-high are solid programmers. Just because they're rich doesn't mean they're not self-made.

    53. Re:Rich man's GED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you only read the title, but the story is about an honorary degree, not a real one.

    54. Re:Rich man's GED by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      No. You have to actually pass the exams to get a GED.

    55. Re:Rich man's GED by Thuktun · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yup. He better not try to pass it off as a real degree on a job applicaton [sic] or he'll be in trouble. I know you're trying to be funny, but I don't think Bill Gates will ever need to apply for a job again, much less work for a living.
    56. Re:Rich man's GED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice post! I tend to agree that most who complain about the school system missed the point about degrees. Its about learning how to be responsible and commit to something. It sounds like those who complain are just plain too lazy to work through it and tough it out. Move out of your parent's basement people.

    57. Re:Rich man's GED by koreaman · · Score: 1

      Being a successful businessman doesn't mean you're an academic expert in the field of business.

    58. Re:Rich man's GED by koreaman · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter, because most people with PhDs aren't going to be working in the real world anyway.

      Also, the fact that modern scientists are ultra-specialized is just a consequence of the advancement of science; it isn't some sort of problem with the educational system. If PhD candidates were forced to become an expert in every part of their broad field, they would never complete the program and we would run out of academics.

      ~A high school student who wants to become a professor.

    59. Re:Rich man's GED by koreaman · · Score: 1

      American high school diplomas do suck compared to the rest of the world, but were they ever better at some point in time? I'm not saying they weren't, I'm seriously asking the question.

      And, although American high schools are mediocre at best, American universities are generally agreed to be the best in the world. I can guarantee you that no high school diploma ever reached the level that you get from four years of college, even if that level is not quite what you wish it were.

    60. Re:Rich man's GED by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      It's business school, and everyone there dreams of being the next Bill Gates and founding a company as ruthless and successful as Microsoft has been.

    61. Re:Rich man's GED by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      A PhD is normally someone who's specialised. Specialisation is the process of learning more and more about less and less until in the end you know everything there is to know about nothing.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    62. Re:Rich man's GED by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      he'd qualify for a business degree...(being richest guy in the WORLD at one point). Getting a monopoly and piles of cash is what it's all about... in that sense he's done OK without one.

      Although, I tend to view these as useless hypocrisy. After all, it's Gates always making statements about NOT having enough educated people, life ain't fair, etc.. yet HIS company puts all sorts of artificial hoops up dependent on such arbitrary and petty status even he never bothered for. As opposed to "honest hard work" that he claims as his success.

    63. Re:Rich man's GED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not useless. Most companies require it for you to be able to work for them.

      Yes, exactly.

      At least for me, the life experiences during college are more valuable than the actual education.

      I think that's an excellent point as well.

      And let's not forget the 50 kazillion College Graduates who can't solve fizzbuzz. If most companies only hired programmers with blue eyes, would you start to resent them?
    64. Re:Rich man's GED by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Have to concur, partially.

      I guess Dave Wendy was an ignorant business man, because he didn't finish high school, until shortly before he died. Oh wait, he proved his understanding, by _doing something_, that is, creating a very successful fast food business. Maybe he received a honorary PhD in Business because he was making all the "arm chair professors" look bad. :-)

      --
      Educate comes from Latin 'educere' -- meaning to draw out, not "fill up with useless facts."

    65. Re:Rich man's GED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that earning a degree can help get interviews in certain situations though a degree is not always necessary. I am finally completing an undergraduate degree; only 24 years after graduating from high school and a successful IT career. I am completing the degree primarily for personal achievement at this point in life, although it will help me get into a graduate degree programme.

    66. Re:Rich man's GED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well put. I've noticed on this thread and elsewhere that little distinction is made between degrees from selective schools and rigorous programs, and non-selective schools and programs. A lot of people attend overcrowded, non-selective state universities and that colors their perception of higher ed in general. I am also starting to notice that a lot of people who didn't graduate or never went are deficient in basic reading, writing, and math skills.

    67. Re:Rich man's GED by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

      Actually honorary degrees are more of a "we need someone to speak at our graduation and we will give you one as payment". Nothing more, nothing less. Kind of cheapens what the real graduates are getting IMHO.

      I disagree. Perhaps that is what Bill's diploma represents, however my grandfather received one for his lifetime of research committed to the preservation and restoration of ancient documents. In fact, some of his techniques are staples of today's document restoration process. He never went to college and dropped out of high school to help support the family. He started an apprenticeship with RR Donnelley & Sons learning about the printing trade. Working during the day, he went to night school till he acquired his high school diploma. Shortly after retiring from RR Donnelley, he received an honorary degree from the University of Chicago. My grandfather was a scholar, training himself daily, which didn't stop because of retirement. He continued to write, read, research, lecture, and consult after retiring. His library, of which he read every book, compromised two floors of the house. In my mind, he obviously deserved recognition for his scholarly pursuits.

      Which begs the question, is Bill Gates' degree recognizing his out-of-class scholarly pursuits or his world-wide business success? What major innovation(s) has Bill Gates ever been credited for regarding technology?

      --
      No sig for you! Come back one year!
    68. Re:Rich man's GED by rifter · · Score: 1

      Most people strive to become sucessful to spite the fact that they have no degree. Myself included. I would absolutely refuse one should someone attempted to offer it to me.

      In any other field than IT, you'd be really striving. Even in IT a degree probably helps at least a little. In any case, I would refuse an honorary degree for the complete opposite reason. Just as much as living life without a degree is a challenge requiring hard work by virtue of the fact you've handicapped yourself, perhaps cutting off your nose to spite your face, getting a degree can be a challenge as well. Probably the most challenging aspect of it is the simple act of perseverance required to slog through several years without any other compensation than your degree.

      In my opinion there should be no honorary degrees; they dilute the value of the real thing even more than "paper MCSEs" diluted the value of certification, and cast a bad light on the institution itself. Shame on Harvard for bowing to pressure and giving degrees who could not or would not earn them. If I were offered an honourary degree I would turn it down because it is an insult to all those people who earn their degrees; I prefer to get what I have through hard work like everything else I have achieved, preferably without pissing on those who are working harder than me to get the same thing.

    69. Re:Rich man's GED by rifter · · Score: 1

      Actually honorary degrees are more of a "we need someone to speak at our graduation and we will give you one as payment". Nothing more, nothing less. Kind of cheapens what the real graduates are getting IMHO.

      Some institutions have rules against letting people without degrees speak in certain settings, and have given honorary degrees in order to get around this problem when it comes to famous dropouts like Larry Ellison, Bill Gates, Michael Dell, etc. In some cases the degrees were given in order for the famous dropout to teach a class/ give a lecture; it was an end run around the problem of having to lower academic standards in order to have someone famous show up.

    70. Re:Rich man's GED by rifter · · Score: 1

      Why does there seem to be such a big hatred for college degrees here on slashdot? I'm not trying to flamebait or anything, but it seems that every time there is a story about college (especially computer science programs), there's always a bunch of people who chime in on how a degree is useless.

      Quite apart from the fact that the IT industry slashdot serves is replete with dropouts, there is the fact that Slashdot is forthe most part a US-oriented site. At some point the US developed an antagonistic relationship with academia and the idea of education in general. This only got worse after the violent clashes of the 1960s which not only were blamed on academics at the time but became part of the history we are taught. The fact that the slant becomes part of the story we are taught is strange because it results in baby boomer academics being forced to teach a history that is unsympathetic to academics and baby boomers. In any case you then have the neoconservative view that pretty much everything bad in the world was caused by hippie academics, which is reinforced by the media and to a certain extent the education system itself. Add to that the yearly flagellation of our school system and the perception that education sucks anyway (and makes you gay!) and it is a wonder there are any schools left in the US at all.

      This kind of attitude has always been more prevalent among those who either never attended college or do not have a degree. They have no idea what college is about (or a great many other things) but they believe that they do since like Colbert they think with their gut. Their gut says that college is rotten and they did not need it anyway; anyone who disagrees is a fool who deserves to have his money wasted for a piece of paper.

      It's sad that this kind of attitude is prevalent in the US. It's even more sad since IT people should know better because their field requires increasing knowledge, is dependant on science, and follows what is essentially the academic/scientific method of exporation in its execution. In any case this anti-academic attitude is a major issue and at least contributes to all of our worst problems; it's an accident of demographics which makes it seem more prevalent on slashdot.

    71. Re:Rich man's GED by rifter · · Score: 1

      More indepth answer? If you assume a degree is synonymous with 'being qualified' you are incorrect. There are a large number of graduates who have yet to learn the 'tough lesson' that their degree doesn't actually carry much weight.

      A college degree is not a certification from a trade school. If all you want is proof you can do a job, you are seeking a certificate from vocational/trade school.

      A college degree is proof of a level of academic achievement in a given area of study and is not truly the end goal of a college education in any event. The journey is its own reward, for in the pursuit of a degree one becomes more aware of the world around them, what has gone before, what is being done now in a given field, and how to make a difference. The point of going to college is not a job, but rather to become an initiate to the priesthood of academia and gain better tools for discovering, processing, and understanding data. It's also deliberately broad because a truly educated person should at least know a little about some other fields other than the one in which they earn their paycheck.

      People get sour grapes about college because they don't understand what it is. Even people who manage to get a degree often don't have a clue about this. Getting a degree does not mean you know everything about that subject. It does mean you have studied the subject in some detail and might have a better idea about what you do not know. In any case, both those who have degrees and think they know everything and those who do not and likewise think they know everything are wrong; both should go back to school and see if they cannot learn something this time.

      A degree is only worthless to someone who does not value it. Likewise a college education. A #2 phillips screwdriver is lousy for nails and won't get you a job as a carpenter, but try and take a computer apart without one. A dual pentium box with 512MB RAM and a 2GB HD is useless for video editing but is more than adequate as a BSD router. A college education and/or degree is only useless to people who fail to understand their purpose and value.

    72. Re:Rich man's GED by rifter · · Score: 1

      He just doesn't get that modern web programming is event driven in many cases; he thinks it's still done with Perl and forms.

      So does Commander Taco. :D

    73. Re:Rich man's GED by sadler121 · · Score: 1

      You must have a degree in...nameology.

      For those of you who don't know, that is a reference to this movie.

    74. Re:Rich man's GED by lpcustom · · Score: 1

      Well you probably got into IT when it didn't necessarily require a degree. These days it's pretty difficult to land even an interview without a degree.

      --
      Beer! It's what's for breakfast!
    75. Re:Rich man's GED by MECC · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates used to write compilers.

      Which ones?

      I'm sure he's an above average coder

      From which projects you've worked closely with him on?

      --
      "We are all geniuses when we dream"
      - E.M. Cioran
    76. Re:Rich man's GED by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      He did extensive work on many of the original BASIC compilers. The last actual code check-ins he made were on the BASIC compiler for the TRS/80. I'm lead to believe he provided some technical direction on DOS, as well. He used to write evangelist articles on the necessity of Operating Systems in personal computers. Visionary stuff.

      All I know is from what I've read.

      If you want to take the "you don't know unless you've experienced it" approach, then I challenge you to prove to me, personally, that the Earth is round. Good luck, enjoy your journey.

    77. Re:Rich man's GED by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates used to write compilers.
      Which ones?

      BASIC.

      (Okay, so it's an interpreter -- close enough! Besides, some versions of QBASIC could compile to stand-alone .EXEs.)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    78. Re:Rich man's GED by deblau · · Score: 1
      It's not that the degree itself is useless -- it looks nice hung on the wall. What's becoming less useful is what it represents: a top-notch education, earned through pain and sweat, that distinguishes its earner from the unwashed masses. To get that now, you need a PhD, and even that buys you less and less every passing day. In a lot of ways, getting a PhD is worse than not getting one, because a lot of employers don't know what they can give you to do that requires that kind of education (and higher pay), especially in Computer Science. Most of them are just looking for code monkeys.

      Employers don't care how 'rewarding' your college experience was for you, they want to know if you can hack it working for their high-pressure business. A college degree used to mean that you had a much better chance than someone without, but it doesn't any more, because people can get a degree by coasting through and not actually learning anything. A lot of people choose which college they go to based on how much of a 'party school' it is. For me that's an automatic (-1, slacker) in any interview. If I see someone who never went to college but who wanted to learn the trade and worked hard at it, that's (+1, motivated) and another (+1, hard-working).

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    79. Re:Rich man's GED by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I think the attitude is that college degrees have unnecessarily become a "basic education" credential where the absence of carries with it a certain stigma. And I can certainly understand why people would be upset about that.

      Those people should be glad they're not civil engineers, then -- within the next few years, the ASCE is planning on making a Master's degree the minimum required to become a licensed professional engineer!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    80. Re:Rich man's GED by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Just last week I had to instruct a person with a PhD in his title along with the position of "Chief Technology Officer" on how to read an e-mail header.

      The "PhD" indicates that he has enough research skills that he could figure out how to read the e-mail header himself. The "Chief ... Officer" indicates that he knows better than to waste his time doing so, when it's more efficient just to ask you instead.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    81. Re:Rich man's GED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of cheapens what the real graduates are getting IMHO.

      Everything looks kind of cheap standing next to Bill Gates.

    82. Re:Rich man's GED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monopolology ??
      I guess there's a subject called that now, and he's written several more chapters in the textbook on the subject.

      (Hint, There's a "lol" in the middle) ;-) (him and me)

    83. Re:Rich man's GED by MECC · · Score: 1

      >If you want to take the "you don't know unless you've experienced it" approach, then I challenge you to prove to me, personally, that the Earth is round. Good luck, enjoy your journey. Actually, I wanted to see something more than a rumor as a claim to credibility, particularly in the case of bg, someone for whom rumors of programming prowess seem at times strained. However, if you want to take the "I think your method might not work regarding one straw man example, so you're wrong about everything forever and ever infinity and so don't ever ask for substance", you can go right on believing the earth is flat.

      --
      "We are all geniuses when we dream"
      - E.M. Cioran
    84. Re:Rich man's GED by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      It does if you maintain a level of honesty and integrity and succeed as a result of the application of business and management skills. Lying about you product and abusing a monopoly (I wonder who held the degrees at the 2 I's that gave that business away) hardly denotes an understanding of business just a level of amoral greed. If we all behaved in that manner, we would all be far worse off.

      As for those who scoff at degrees, ponder your ignorance next time you visit a doctor, after all what could be wrong with a self taught medico, who learns upon a trial and error basis, as long as they generate a huge profit and can afford to pay PR B$ers to cover up their 'er' practice subjects. Ahh, imagine the joys of a hospital run like the Microsoft Corporation, would you want to go there?

      Being a good liar does not make you a good business man, although you might get rich, you would still be an ass hat.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    85. Re:Rich man's GED by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      Why would the idea of an original in the software development scene of the 80's being a decent programmer be seriously disputed? When he used to write articles for BYTE, it was pretty clear he had an in-depth knowledge of what he was talking about. I believe Ballmer was the business man.

      Just because you don't like Microsoft doesn't mean it wasn't started by programmers.

    86. Re:Rich man's GED by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure your comment is a troll or flamebait, but hey I'll bite.

      Meanwhile in the real world, a paper qualification is no indicator of aptitude. This is what those without degrees, who are unwilling or unable to enter formal education know only too well.

      This statement is just wrong on so many levels. A "paper qualification" does indicate a certain level of aptitude. Let's use computer science as an example. I went through an entire bachelors and masters program in computer science, and never did I take a class that only taught a technology (ie Oracle database, Java, C++, etc). I took classes in database theory, data structures, and all the other mathematical topics behind computer science. We were expected to learn the technologies to do the assignments on our own with some help outside of class from others or the instructor. So, in order to do the assignments, we learned technology on our own... which is the equivalent of what most people who don't go for the degree do in order to become adept at it. As for being unwilling to get a degree, that's your own problem and your own choice in life. As for being unable, no one is unable in this day and age. I didn't come from a privileged background, I just took out thousands of dollars in student loans like the rest of the world.

      What's more, influential people in many fields drop out of formal education before they ever receive their degree.

      Show me a CEO besides Gates and his silicon valley ilk that doesn't have a college degree.

      A college education is not about learning technology (as a previous poster said, go to trade school). A college education teaches you about an area of in-depth study that goes above and beyond, say, programming in Java, for example. Ask one of those people unwilling to get the degree (again, in computer science as that is the running example) to explain a turing machine, and you'll realize the difference a college education can make. The extra theoretical background can prove useful in solving difficult problems.

      --
      I got nothin'
    87. Re:Rich man's GED by nharmon · · Score: 1

      I can see where some professions you would want to require a certain level of education credential. Doctor for sure. Lawyer most likely. Civil engineer perhaps because the penalty for incompetence can be measured in human lives... but Network Administrator? :-)

    88. Re:Rich man's GED by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Is Google hiring Bill(ion)-level people?

    89. Re:Rich man's GED by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Running a business is not academics. There are academic fields relating to business, but Bill Gates has little to do with them. Awarding Bill Gates an honerary doctorate in business or computer science is like awarding Mike Tyson an honorary doctorate in exercise physiology.

    90. Re:Rich man's GED by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      That may well be the first time I've ever seen someone get the joke without getting the joke.

    91. Re:Rich man's GED by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      the fact that "a degree" is often all that's needed is good evidence that it's useless.

      If that's good evidence of uselessness, then I've been misunderstanding the word useless for a while now...

    92. Re:Rich man's GED by volpe · · Score: 1

      You mean Dave Thomas. The restaurant chain was named after his daughter.

    93. Re:Rich man's GED by MECC · · Score: 1

      Why would the idea of an original in the software development scene of the 80's being a decent programmer be seriously disputed? When he used to write articles for BYTE, it was pretty clear he had an in-depth knowledge of what he was talking about. I believe Ballmer was the business man.

      Do you have any pointers to those articles - I'd really be interested in checking them out.

      Just because you don't like Microsoft doesn't mean it wasn't started by programmers.

      That's a fairly obvious straw man.

      --
      "We are all geniuses when we dream"
      - E.M. Cioran
    94. Re:Rich man's GED by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      A lot of his older articles can be navigated to through this cleverly constructed tag cloud.

      http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/tags/

      If you can't read, which seems rather plausible at this point, you can ask for a friend or relative to help you find the article a few days back on slashdot where Bill Gates gives a University address in 1989. It includes audio. You can use your sleuthing skills to draw context clues from it on Gates' technical background.

      It's not a straw man- it just seemed like a waste of time to google around for articles for people who have a selective understanding of the history of the personal computing market. Nobody just 'sits around and takes all the credit' in a tiny 2-person software operation.

      I'll go ahead and create a more slashdot-friendly timeline:

      1971: Steve Jobs invents the computer. Wozniak helps.
      1975: Microsoft sucks d00d, lol.
      1983: Richard Stallman creates GNU and they write the best tools because free things are always better than things that cost money.
      1990: GNU creates HURD. Although it's better than windows, further down the timeline they eventually gave up on it because of how sweet Linux was.
      1991: Linus Torvalds creates Linux. Within hours of its creation, it becomes the best operating system ever.
      c. 1997: music becomes free. the internet rejoices.
      2000: The government takes away everyones right to free music. Legions rise against the new corporate Nazi regime but are defeated with the help of Microsoft.
      *Apple cures hunger by ripping off Mach and BSD in order to recreate NeXT, thus revitalizing the computing industry. Apple Computers proceed to make people more creative.
      2006: Microsoft creates the Zune, but they're wrong.
      2007: Microsoft tries to destroy the world by creating Vista. Linux is better than it. Nobody buys it. Linux wins.
      *Steve Jobs offers to get rid of DRM, but pesky music execs make up a lie about how Apple perpetuated proprietary DRM with total vendor lock-in. Slashdot knows better. This obviously wasn't a marketing stunt following the consumer rejection of Vista's DRM system.
      *Bill Gates given honorary Harvard degree- Slashdot users cleverly point out that he doesn't deserve it, since he's just a rich guy that people gave money to because he's evil.

      I guess you're right now.

    95. Re:Rich man's GED by MECC · · Score: 1

      f you can't read, which seems rather plausible at this point

      By graduating to personal insults, you actually detract from any credibility you might have recovered, since the substance of your argument is now entirely comprised of "I'm right not because of logic or fact, but because my 'opponent' is stupid."

      --
      "We are all geniuses when we dream"
      - E.M. Cioran
    96. Re:Rich man's GED by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      By graduating to personal insults, you actually detract from any credibility you might have recovered, since the substance of your argument is now entirely comprised of "I'm right not because of logic or fact, but because my 'opponent' is stupid." I'm not the one approaching non-disputed information with "reasonable doubt". I provided you a link and even a fun slashdot-safe timeline as a bonus; I am done with this "debate". I invite you to contemplate other obvious facts with your free time. Consider this: was the original Apple really a computer? Could have been a toaster.

      I am only insulting you because you are clearly an idiot. If I wanted a serious discussion, I wouldn't go to slashdot. Slashdot is for fun flames with religous technologically-stunted maniacs and children pretending to be open source developers.

      The internet is not the place to go for scholarly debates, discussion, or information for the most part... look at wikipedia.
    97. Re:Rich man's GED by MECC · · Score: 1

      I am only insulting you because you are clearly an idiot.

      The timeline was sort of interesting. The good merits you bring into the discussion are completely soiled by the grade-school personal insults, and you single-handedly lower the caliber of the entire thread.

      --
      "We are all geniuses when we dream"
      - E.M. Cioran
  2. Relevant anecdote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    It was the holiday season. She and her husband had decided to attend a performance of King Lear. It was their first night out together in months. During the second act one of the performers became ill. The manager of the theater walked onto the stage, and asked, "Is there a doctor in the house?" Her husband stood up, and shouted, "I have an honorary degree from Anderson College!" It was at that moment when she decided not to get him anything for Christmas.

    --Snoopy

  3. Already has several others by Cocoshimmy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bill Gates has already received honorary degrees from several other institutions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates#Awards_and _recognition

    Yawn!!!

    1. Re:Already has several others by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Yawn!!!


      That's probably what I'd do at the commencement - read his book and heard his many interviews - it's discouraging that such a top figure in computing really never had anything inspirational to say - at least pertaining the field.

      Anybody else feel the same way? I mean, he's an okay speaker but not really that interesting.
    2. Re:Already has several others by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it's discouraging that such a top figure in computing really never had anything inspirational to say - at least pertaining the field. Gates' major achievements are as a businessman, not as a computer scientist. Not saying that he's stupid in that area; quite the opposite (e.g. given the speed he apparently designed MS BASIC with, he clearly has skill). However, he didn't actually invent BASIC (as a language) or even write MS-DOS originally. On the other hand, who can deny that he's a very skilled businessman?
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    3. Re:Already has several others by xtracto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      quite the opposite (e.g. given the speed he apparently designed MS BASIC with, he clearly has skill). However, he didn't actually invent BASIC (as a language) or even write MS-DOS originally

      But, how /many/ people do you know that have "invented" or wrote original software?, I know I wont be very popular saying this over here but *even* Linus Trovalds took Minix as the basis for Linux, and he didnt *wrote* all of the Linux kernel you know. Technical people should not only be judged by the number of lines they write but by the *overall* influence they have to their field.

      Bill Gates has had a really HUGE influence to the field (some good, some bad, but in my opinion, more good than bad). I would think that he deserves more like a Master degree... maybe *even* a PhD (although maybe he is not familiar with research methodologies).

      I know here in slashdot more than 50% of people do not like him but I think overall, after he dies he will be nicely remembered as the guy who introduced computers to the masses.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    4. Re:Already has several others by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Gates' major achievements are as a businessman, not as a computer scientist. Not saying that he's stupid in that area; quite the opposite (e.g. given the speed he apparently designed MS BASIC with, he clearly has skill). However, he didn't actually invent BASIC (as a language) or even write MS-DOS originally. On the other hand, who can deny that he's a very skilled businessman? I'd say his only achievements are as a businessman. There is no proof anywhere that Billy Gates did anything other than a little bit of BASIC programming as a teen.
      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    5. Re:Already has several others by Dogtanian · · Score: 1
      That's true; but I'm saying that if you take Gates' CS achievements (or at least those relating to IT) versus his business achievements, the latter are the most significant. Or put another way, viewed in isolation, would his fame be anything like as great viewed solely on the basis of his CS work?

      I know here in slashdot more than 50% of people do not like him but I think overall, after he dies he will be nicely remembered as the guy who introduced computers to the masses. Undoubtedly the ability to run MS-DOS (and later Windows) on generic hardware contributed to competition in the PC market and the corresponding freefall in prices. Whether this was Gates' intent is debatable; sure, he may have had the reselling of MS-DOS in mind when he signed the deal with IBM, but was he thinking "Hmm... this'll result in competition, bringing more powerful computers to the masses?" Or was he just thinking he'd be able to sell more copies of Windows.

      I'm not even sure if Gates knew that PC clones would become a significant part of the market; he certainly sold *versions* of MS-DOS to other companies in the early days, which was probably his intent, but these machines weren't PC-compatible as such. So they weren't competition for IBM.

      And the price of computers are such now that even a cut-price Windows "tax" can make up a significant proportion of their cost. If anything, using Linux would make the most significant difference now, particularly in developing countries. Sure, Linux has issues; thing is, many of them are support, and the reason Linux is less supported is that Windows has a near-monopoly on the desktop- chicken and egg. Haven't MS taken action (direct or surreptitious) against manufacturers too enthusiastically supporting Linux?
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    6. Re:Already has several others by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates was not the guy who introduced computers to the masses - certainly not in countries like Britain. It was really a combination of Clive Sinclair (with the Sinclair Spectrum) and the BBC (with the Acorn BBC Micro) who introduced computers to the masses in Britain, by providing an AFFORDABLE computer (when the Spectrum was on sale for £125, a Microsoft-based PC cost over £2000). Neither the Spectrum nor the BBC had a single byte of Microsoft code; the Spectrum ROM was written by a company called Nine Tiles (which still exists), and the BBC system software was written by Acorn. While in the United States, Microsoft was involved in the Commodore BASIC interpreter, people will remember Commodore et al. for introducing the masses to computers, not Microsoft.

    7. Re:Already has several others by fsmunoz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed, the same happened here in Portugal. The Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48k was what introduced computing to the masses, even to lower middle class people. It was relatively cheap, and had lots of games. Many people started programming on them (I did... "10 REM MY FIRST PROGRAM"). About 60% of the people that I know still remember the "(c) 1982 Sinclair Research Ltd" greeting. The Timex clones were also popular - I hear that especiall in Poland and Portugal, but I can only vouch for the latter. I remember buying UK magazines with code listings, and soon lots of domestic stuff. The market in Europe was different from the North American one: the Apple ][ was rare in here, and even the C= 64 was *at most* a distant second to Sinclair's offering. The PC's were incredibly expensive, and quite honestly no value for the money at the time. The first platform that enjoyed equal popularity in both Continents was the Amiga I think... This "PC for the masses" crap is a bit distant from reality.

    8. Re:Already has several others by Vortran · · Score: 1

      Dan Bricklin and Peter Norton are 'programming whizzes' in my book. Bill Gates just did something obvious with CP/M.

      --
      Knowledge is like ignorance.. too much can be just as bad as not enough.
    9. Re:Already has several others by koreaman · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that anyone could read Slashdot for a reasonable amount of time without understanding this concept, as it's repeated so often here in every discussion about computer science degrees. Computer science is not programming. Being a good programmer, while it does require knowledge of some computer science principles, is not the same as being a good computer scientist. Bill Gates may have the knowledge expected from a Bachelor of Computer Science, but saying he deserves a Ph.D is ridiculous.

    10. Re:Already has several others by johansalk · · Score: 1

      I would think that he deserves more like a Master degree... maybe *even* a PhD (although maybe he is not familiar with research methodologies).
      Bill Gates spends billions per year on Microsoft Research, which even employs Hoare and other very notable computer scientists. He also spends billions through his foundation on medical research. As far as I know, he likes to get very involved in what he spends money on. So I'd guess that he's very clued up on research methodologies.
    11. Re:Already has several others by tonigonenstein · · Score: 1

      But, how /many/ people do you know that have "invented" or wrote original software?

      Here is a (very) small list of software innovations in different domains:
      • Thompson and Ritchie, UNIX
      • Knuth, TeX
      • Alain Colmerauer, Prolog
      • Alexey Pajitnov, Tetris
      --
      The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.
    12. Re:Already has several others by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      The Times machines were not clones, they were the real-deal, some kind of branding partnership as near as I can remember. My first machine was a Timex-Sinclair 1000, which was really a rebadged ZX-81 with an extra K of RAM.

      > The first platform that enjoyed equal popularity in both Continents was the Amiga I think...

      I don't know about your neck of woods, but every Commodore fan here WANTED an Amiga, but nobody bought 'em, 'cause the PC clones were about the same price (or cheaper if you were resourceful) and far more useful in terms of readily available warez.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    13. Re:Already has several others by ccp · · Score: 1

      I know here in slashdot more than 50% of people do not like him...

      And the Understatement of the Year Award goes to...xtracto!

      Cheers,
      CC
    14. Re:Already has several others by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      Yes, I didn't meat clones in that sense. Timex licensed the technology and it was the real deal, only with better keyboard and other niceties. As for the Amiga, as I said around here there wasn't a strong C64 community - the 48k was everywhere. The Amiga was somewhat expensive, true, but in the late 80's/early 90's it was so far ahead in terms of graphics, sound, games and usability that people got PC's because their parents wanted to run Lotus 1-2-3. Heck, it was around the time IIRC that the PC's available were things like "EuroPC Schneider", "PC1 Olivetti" and "IBM PS/2" - I had the Olivetti briefly - , and this were the entry level stuff. Horrid stuff, with CGA graphics. The Amiga at the time - probably due to the fact that the PC's sold here were crappy - had a lot of marketshare and most of the stores that sold Spectrum games started selling Amiga games, and not PC. This was came to the end we all know though, by 1993 the writing was on the wall :(

  4. huh? by User+956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's hard to guess if Gates, the wealthiest person in the world and co-founder of a company that brought in $44 billion in revenue last year, cares.

    Well, he certainly must care, as he's obviously not doing it for the money.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:huh? by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Honorary degrees are never awarded to anyone with any likelihood of having a job interview or seeking a teaching or research job.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:huh? by eric76 · · Score: 1

      Honorary degrees are never awarded to anyone with any likelihood of having a job interview or seeking a teaching or research job.

      Never?

      Then why do they typically specify "earned degrees" in the position announcements?

    3. Re:huh? by hackathology · · Score: 1

      Absolutely agree to this. Money can't buy everything and now no one dares to say bill gates is without a degree. :)

      --
      http://hackathology.blogspot.com
    4. Re:huh? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > Then why do they typically specify "earned degrees" in the position announcements?

      It's a polite way of saying "Don't bother applying if your degree was signed by Sally Struthers".

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  5. how good a programmer is he, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    his company makes him seem like an asshole, but i have the impression he was/is actually very good.

    1. Re:how good a programmer is he, really? by Paolo+DF · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think so.
      Recently somewhere I read that there was a 'driving game' in some msdos distribution, and that it was awful (at best). Well, BillyG thought it was good enough to stamp his name in the credits for programming.

      --
      Pumbaa! I don't wonder; I know.
    2. Re:how good a programmer is he, really? by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      It's MS-DOS. You don't really expect MS-DOS to run a driving game as realistic as, say, Initial D, do you?

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    3. Re:how good a programmer is he, really? by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      IIRC it was an OpenGL based game that was included with Windows 95, it was on the CD but not listed in the add/remove programs, or windows install options... Kind of like that Weezer AVI file...

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    4. Re:how good a programmer is he, really? by Paolo+DF · · Score: 1

      I'm back: this is the link
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DONKEY.BAS
      Now, it was 1981 and, well, Atari was doing just a little little little better than this, with very very very less-powerful machines, you know? ;-)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:A2600_Pole_Posi tion.png
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:A2600_Breakout. png
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:A2600_Space_Inv aders.png

      --
      Pumbaa! I don't wonder; I know.
    5. Re:how good a programmer is he, really? by Paolo+DF · · Score: 1

      Well, Pole Position was extremely realistic at that time.
      please see also my next post.

      --
      Pumbaa! I don't wonder; I know.
    6. Re:how good a programmer is he, really? by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Okay, I was thinking of something different, and more recent.. I remember the game on the win95 cd that I referenced.. didn't know about donkey. :)

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    7. Re:how good a programmer is he, really? by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm just an old timer, but Pole Position still is very realistic to me...

      Thanks,

      Mike

    8. Re:how good a programmer is he, really? by lord_mike · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, he and Allen wrote BASIC for the MITS Altair 8800 by scratch on an emulator and cross-assembler with no documentation to go by.

      But, from what I understand, Gates was the Steve Jobs of Microsoft, while Paul Allen was the Steve Wozniak. Gates took care of the business and marketing, mostly, while Paul did most of the coding.

      Thanks,

      Mike

    9. Re:how good a programmer is he, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He may not be a game programmer, but I still think he's pretty good. In the early days, Microsoft was well known for BASIC interpreters. When the company was very small, he was one of the top programmers they had.

      I heard a story that he was upset about the lack of a full-screen editor in MS-DOS. EDLIN was a pathetic joke, bordering on unusable. The team told Bill that MS-DOS would not fit on a floppy if they had to include a full-screen editor. Bill then proceeded to write the EDIT program for MS-DOS, proving them wrong.

      He's probably better at programming than management, although I must give him credit for making lots of money selling other people's ideas (and sometimes their code). At the same time, he has to take some of the blame for the mediocrity of the products that followed MS-DOS. With the resources at his disposal, he should not be losing the security and stability war to Apple and Linux.

    10. Re:how good a programmer is he, really? by nowhere.elysium · · Score: 1

      That's not strictly true: although he was definitely the most business-minded of the two, Gates did have a significant, if not equal role in the coding itself. The main reason that everyone stated to despise him was the 'Open Letter to Hobbyists', not any lack of coding capability. While I don't dig the whole stance on software sales that he cultivated, I do respect his coding abilities, much as I respect anyone that can code competently. The thing that everyone seems to forget is that while Bill Gates and Steve Wozniak are both geeks, they went down the two most obvious divergent paths: Wozniak is the geek's geek: he's just in it for the love of computing, while Gates saw the financial possibilities, and ran with them. I don' think that he's left his geekiness by the wayside, but his lucrative decisions have spawned several entire corporate generations of fools like Steve Ballmer.

      --
      http://xkcd.com/313/
    11. Re:how good a programmer is he, really? by rs232 · · Score: 1

      he and Allen wrote BASIC for the MITS Altair 8800 by scratch

      More like cloned a version of DECUS BASIC Gates obtained from a DEC users group. They wrote it on DEC PDP-8/L at the Lakeside school.

      --
      davecb5620@gmail.com
    12. Re:how good a programmer is he, really? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      You were thinking of Hover!

      (Aside: "landmark in home computer development?!" The Wikipedia article was written either by a shill or an idiot.)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  6. An honorary degree by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 4, Funny

    doesn't count! He'll never be able to get a CS job with that!

    1. Re:An honorary degree by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Funny

      He'll never be able to get a CS job with that! No, but he's one of the few people who might conceivably be able to meet such job requirements as "Window Vista (5 years experience)"...
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:An honorary degree by CaptainBJones · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You say that like its funny... I got a call from some recruiter (who saw my resume online w/ vista listed) that had a job opening (for a "major national software & storage company") that required a minimum of three years managing a mixed Windows Vista, XP and Linux envrionment. When I challenged him on the vista part since it has not been out that long he said he would call his client and see if the would be willing to waive the vista requirement. The recruiter called back the next day and said his client was admimant about the three years of vista experience and more was a plus. I thanked him for the offer but declined it. I bet that company will be looking for a couple of years to find someone...

    3. Re:An honorary degree by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      You say that like its funny... True, but in the words of Homer Simpson, "It's funny because it's true". I haven't come across anyone asking for that specific Vista experience, but I've certainly seen companies making equally ludicrous demands.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:An honorary degree by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've seen them too. At first I thought they might be a way for recruiters & HR droids to build a blacklist of known bullshit artists. Then I told myself there's no way they'd be that smart.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:An honorary degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's so that they can outsource it to India. Businesses routinely post ludicrous requirements like that because for some reason they need to look locally first, then take the paperwork back to management & show that they can't fill the slot here so they outsource it (& change the requirements in the meantime)

  7. Programming Whizz? by Demena · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh! Please! If he was one Windows would have been better. THe idea that you would compliment him on his programming is offensive to those that do program. Did you ever see any of his code?

    1. Re:Programming Whizz? by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates' programming has nothing to do with how good Windows is. I don't think any of his code has been included in a released product since 1989 at the latest.

    2. Re:Programming Whizz? by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

      What about you ? Did you see any of his code ?

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    3. Re:Programming Whizz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what are you saying? with a real degree windows would have been constantly bogged down to perfection instead of slapped together as cheaply as possible to turn a buck?

      It does present an interesting question. Is the reason no one can seem to beat Microsoft simply because of the lack of degree/education places Gates on a different playing field? Could it be that Microsoft not only plays dirty but by a different set of rules all together? Maybe someone should get some poker playing dropouts to form an OSS company and push the software before it is ready and see how well it does with competing against MS. Granted the industry has changes some since they got thier start.

      Wouldn't that be the irony of it all to end all. Failing to compete with or topple the software giant because your company is too intelligent?

    4. Re:Programming Whizz? by AnotherUsername · · Score: 2, Funny

      You've seen his code? I think we have a problem here...

      Gaining unauthorized access to code is a violation of the DCMA. Please turn yourself in to your local police station and await charges there. I believe the RIAA wants in on this one, too.

      --
      I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
    5. Re:Programming Whizz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Programming Whizz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WFT is the DCMA?

    7. Re:Programming Whizz? by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      You can read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DONKEY.BAS

      Back then, I did.

    8. Re:Programming Whizz? by westlake · · Score: 1
      If he was one Windows would have been better.

      Windows is a commercial OS designed and priced for systems which are entry-level or mid-line at the time of its release. The $500 Vista Basic laptop from Acer. The $900 dual-core Vista Premium laptop from Toshiba.

    9. Re:Programming Whizz? by Demena · · Score: 0

      I never said a word about Windows. I was talking about Gates. Don't be paranoid.

    10. Re:Programming Whizz? by Demena · · Score: 0

      Okay, correction, I did say a word about Windows, but I truely meant the original and I did not mean his code contributions. Coding teaches you how machines work, what is easily possible and what is difficult to achieve. Many 'design decisions' in Windows have been severely broken for a long time, not that the same thing is not true about Linux. I'm not trying to sow OS discord here, I am just inslted by the thought that anyone thinks Gates is a progremmer.

  8. Inside BillG's head before the ceremony starts: by bluemonq · · Score: 1

    "Suckers!"

    1. Re:Inside BillG's head before the ceremony starts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No. It's: "Eeeexellent...".

  9. Not a doctorate? by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I though that was the usual honourary gift to the successful.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Not a doctorate? by greenguy · · Score: 1

      You have to go in order. First, you get your honorary bachelor's, then your honorary master's, and finally, your honorary doctorate.

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    2. Re:Not a doctorate? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. Apparently, people who get honorary doctorates already have real master's degrees.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Not a doctorate? by Error27 · · Score: 1

      Gates already has 3 honourary doctorates. It's probably funnier to give him a bachelors because that's what he was trying to get when he dropped out.

  10. With those credentials by joeflies · · Score: 5, Funny

    now maybe he could get past the resume screeners and get a job at Google? It's good to see him do something with his life now.

    1. Re:With those credentials by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 2, Funny

      now maybe he could get past the resume screeners and get a job at Google?
      I think wikepedia suits his qualifications better.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  11. Honorary licenses by owlman17 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, Harvard University has just been granted 10,000 honorary Vista licenses and 10,000 Office 2k7 licenses...

  12. Surprise surprise, windows slashdotted by Ace905 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Looks like the site has been slashdotted. Lol. I've mirrored the article here if anybodies having trouble getting it.

    http://www.douginadress.com/news/2007/032207-bill- gates-to-finally-receive.html

    --

    Ace
  13. degree is done, man by pchan- · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally his parents will get off his back to go back to school and do something with his life!

  14. "programming whiz"? by nyet · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hardly. He was just the whiny wannabe PHB who wanted to get paid. Allen did all the work originally; the rest was ripped from Gary Kildall (RIP).

    1. Re:"programming whiz"? by WaZiX · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bullshit, he wrote Clippy!

    2. Re:"programming whiz"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, if i could only moderate...

    3. Re:"programming whiz"? by westlake · · Score: 4, Informative
      Hardly. He was just the whiny wannabe PHB who wanted to get paid. Allen did all the work originally; the rest was ripped from Gary Kildall

      Gates began programming at age thirteen, at fourteen, he was clearing $20,000 a year at this game. In 1973 he co-authored and published a paper a paper on algorithms with computer scientist Christos Papadimitriou. Bill Gates That is moving damn fast and damn far for a "whiny wannabee."

      Microscoft was founded in 1975. In Japan in 1978.

      Microsoft was dominant in programming languages for the microcomputer in 1980 and not an unknown quantity to IBM. Gates promised to deliver a serviceable, low-cost, OS in time for the scheduled launch of the PC. Nothing more. But these were the words IBM needed to hear---and they weren't coming from Kildall.

      You snooze, you lose.

    4. Re:"programming whiz"? by Bozdune · · Score: 1

      Exactly. You can say what you like about Gates, but dissing him for his IQ, or his technical talent, or his management of what is arguably the most successful business story of all time, is totally off base.

    5. Re:"programming whiz"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of those achievements hardly make him a standout among the array of nerds of the day. Compared to his contemporaries (Woz, Joy, etc), he was on the extreme low side of the technology achievement ladder. It was his connections (he was already a millionaire from his parents wealth, and his mother was on the board of directors of IBM when it chose Microsoft DOS for the pc) and his low-standards for business ethics that made him what he is today. Hardly what I would call a shining example for kids to emulate, unless you are of the opinion that the only thing that matters in the end is money.

    6. Re:"programming whiz"? by nyet · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about his IQ or management skills.

      I was talking about his technical abilities. Even if he HAD contributed significantly to MS's software during the time he was "techinical", his abilities *are* certainly under question.

      DOS and Windows 3.1 were total garbage. His sample shell (aka. "command.com" and later, "command.exe") was a disaster, a joke.

      Their attempts at networking services were laughable; you had to use a 3rd party TCP/IP stack until win98 (since WfW was a total mess)!

      Perhaps you aren't a programmer, or, more likely, you are too young to remember the absolute crap that MS churned out in the 80s and 90s.

      BTW, this also indicates his IQ isn't as high as you make out. Thats an opinion though, and I concede that its debatable.

      And i have a tough time respecting anybody with only "management" skills if they are incompetent at every thing else they try.

    7. Re:"programming whiz"? by nyet · · Score: 1

      None of what you say mean anything to me.

      So he made money? Lots of people make money scamming the stupid and easily impressed. Publishing papers? Since when does that have anything to do with programming skill, especially when only being a co-author? You have NO idea how much Gates himself contributed, if anything.

      "Gates promised to deliver a serviceable, low-cost, OS in time for the scheduled launch of the PC"

      And it was a total piece of crap. Junk. A low rent ripoff of CP/M. Just because it met IBM's requirements doesn't make it technically worthwhile.

    8. Re:"programming whiz"? by nyet · · Score: 1

      >Compared to his contemporaries

      Don't forget Kerhnigan and Ritchie, without whom the modern C compiler wouldn't exist.

      Compared to those two (and Thompson and McIlroy) Gates was a dim bulb.

      MS didn't even know what an RFC was until the late 90s.

    9. Re:"programming whiz"? by Bozdune · · Score: 1

      ...more likely, you are too young to remember the absolute crap that MS churned out...

      I remember. I was working on my degree in CS while Gates was dropping out of Harvard, so I know our Microsoft friends quite well.

      What I'm told (by people who should know) is that Gates is smart and he's technical. Just because you didn't like DOS (who did?) and you are annoyed at MS and their slow pace of "innovation" (who isn't?) doesn't mean that everyone at MS is stupid, or that Gates is stupid. That's just a stupid inference.

    10. Re:"programming whiz"? by nyet · · Score: 1

      >What I'm told (by people who should know) is that Gates is smart and he's technical.

      Useless and purely apocryphal. Furthermore, even if this was verifiable, I know plenty of people who think the dumbest people are "smart and technical".

      Unless I see evidence to the contrary, from what I know of the technical merits of DOS and the rest of the circa 1980 software coming out of MS, he was a barely competent programmer.

      Unless he didn't actually do any programming by that time, in which case those products don't represent his skill set accurately. In that case, Paul Allen is the one who should be blamed for shoddy software design, and Gates' brilliance lay in convincing people to give him money for horrible software (if only because there was no other practical alternative).

      Either way, it doesn't matter; there is absolutely NO objective evidence supporting the assertion that Gates was a "programming whiz."

    11. Re:"programming whiz"? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      From a business perspective, yes, the only thing that matters in the end is money. In the business world, Gates isn't given respect for his technical prowess, he's given respect based on how fantastically successful Microsoft has been. Quality of the product is a non-issue, all that matters is how well the company has done.

  15. Is Harvard doing it for the money? by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm cynical, but Gates isn't getting any younger or any poorer and the $22 billion endowment Harvard has doesn't mean they would turn down a "1% to my beloved alma mater" line item in his will.

  16. And his next degree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next he will become an honorary East Indian.

  17. Let us mod submitter blurbs. by Jartan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The submitter blurbs have always been horrible but calling Gates a programming whiz really takes the cake on the worst ones I've seen recently.

    1. Re:Let us mod submitter blurbs. by tsa · · Score: 1

      Huh? I heard from many people that Gates was a good programmer way back in the 1970s.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:Let us mod submitter blurbs. by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to accept the assertion that he knows how to program. But I think we had all best withhold proclaiming Mr Gates a "whiz" until we see his CVS check-ins.

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    3. Re:Let us mod submitter blurbs. by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      It's not all that different to Linus' code. Yes, he created the Linux kernel. Yes, he did a great thing. I would think he is far from a "whiz programmer" (whatever that is) though. Linus, like Bill, is great at selling a product and motivating others to do the work. The only real difference is that Bill wanted to cash in. BTW I am not a WindowsFanBoi; I am typing this on a Fedora box and avoid MS products with a passion. If anything, Bill IS a whiz because he managed to fool almost the entire world.

    4. Re:Let us mod submitter blurbs. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I dunno. Linus had done some good patches for the Gnome project. I'm not sure if they did anything with them though. according to the source, it supposedly fix quite a few things and made it run faster.

    5. Re:Let us mod submitter blurbs. by MostAwesomeDude · · Score: 1

      The stories about his programming escapades are quite epic. He supposedly wrote a BASIC interpreter on a plane once, on the way to a presentation. The story goes that he forgot to write a BASIC interpreter, so he hammered one out on the plane without any testing or debugging, and it magically worked when the presentation was given. He wrote all kinds of interfaces and adapters back when he was a code monkey. It's just that he has been in a primarily administrative position for over twenty years, and hasn't coded much.

      --
      ~ C.
    6. Re:Let us mod submitter blurbs. by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

      I did not draw the comparison between St Torvalds (we're on /.) and Rich Guy Bill and I don't agree with doing so. However, since you did draw the comparison...

      You don't have to "think" (as in "conjecture without a scrap of insight"): you can see Linus's code if you make an effort. You can make a real decision for yourself. No one can see anything that Bill has coded. Declaring him a "whiz" in programming has no substantiation.

      Their leadership styles differ. Torvalds is in fact a good, unpretentious communicator with some wit.

      As for areas in which Bill may perhaps be a whiz, cue all the ignorant /. participants who say that Money = Genius. Let simmer. Add salt and enjoy. Even Madonna, Trump, and Britney make that low grade.

      Bill certainly isn't a genius when it comes to communicating with the public (when he talks, he is lame; when he hires ghost writers, the result is lame) or in picking a successor.

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    7. Re:Let us mod submitter blurbs. by skeletor935 · · Score: 1

      If founding the world's most popular operating system doesn't qualify you as a programming whiz, I don't know what does.

    8. Re:Let us mod submitter blurbs. by the+linux+geek · · Score: 1

      He didn't write it. He's primarily a businessman.

  18. To be fair by Mr.+Lwanga · · Score: 1

    Did it come with an overly restrictive EULA?

  19. Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by gavink42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure, going to college for 4 (or more) years can teach a person some good information. But the skills learned from life experience are usually much more important!

    I have no degree but take college courses (adult continuing education) that interest me. At some point in most of them, the prof will usually add a remark like: "...but of course we know that's not how it works in the real world."

    I'm not saying that they're teaching the wrong things in college, just that the average 18 year old will be learning mostly best-case theory. Most of the actual skills are learned during the early years in the workplace.

    Seems like it would be a better process to work in your desired field for a few years, then go for the degree. Or, at least participate heavily in an apprentice program. But I do realize that some career fields are not compatible with this paragraph.

  20. Internet Degrees by mrbluze · · Score: 1

    Maybe he got this one on the web. You know the ones, "no prior study required, degree based on your current achievements, just give us all your personal details and and send in $100".

    --
    Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
  21. Yep, he earned it, I'd say. by Rob+Bos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Love or hate the guy, he's certainly earned degree equivalency. Business Administration, most likely; they said in the article that Harvard doesn't announce which subject in advance.

    If it's computing science, then I'd probably have a few words to say.

    1. Re:Yep, he earned it, I'd say. by mutterc · · Score: 1

      Don't they usually make up a subject, like Doctor of Letters or something? From Wikipedia's entry on Kermit The Frog:

      Kermit was awarded an honorary doctorate of Amphibious Letters on May 19, 1996 at Southampton College, where he also gave a commencement speech.
    2. Re:Yep, he earned it, I'd say. by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1

      Wait, Kermit has a freaking doctorate!? Just great. Nice to know that after all the hard work, I'll get a title that a hand puppet already has.

      Then again, Kermit has probably done more good for the world than me...

      --

      (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

  22. Re:Good for him by belmolis · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I think you've swapped Dershowitz and Said. Said's academic claim to fame was his stupid book on Orientalism, which revealed his ignorance of the history and scholarship of the Arab world. His political claim to fame was his defense of terrorism and bigotry. Dershowitz on the other hand is a distinguished civil libertarian as well as one who has told the truth about Arab bigotry and terrorism and has defended the only free, democratic country in the Middle East.

    Nader is a curious case. He did indeed do some great work in exposing corporate misbehaviour, but I lost respect for him when his hopeless runs for President took votes away from the Democratic candidates that might have saved us from Bush.

  23. Man thats going to be dull... by Upaut · · Score: 4, Funny

    At Bently College, when we gave Jerry from "Ben and Jerry's" ice cream and honorary degree, he brought with him a truck of free ice cream. So much so that every student and proffessor willing had a freezer stuffed with the stuff afterwards... What will Gates do, give all the students copies of WIndows Vista? Thats a bit like someone dousing the students with STD infected blood...

    Now who should get an honorary Harvard degree is Hugh Heffneir, for his buisness empire... Maybe he would pass the bunnies around...

    --
    3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
    1. Re:Man thats going to be dull... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Funny

      How choice that you mention dousing students with STD infected blood and passing the playboy bunnies around in the same post. Me thinks you haven't thought your cunning plan all the way through =)

    2. Re:Man thats going to be dull... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Not to worry, the Gates Foundation is working on a cure.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Man thats going to be dull... by Convector · · Score: 1

      Finally, a mission for the Stephen and Melinda Gates Foundation!

    4. Re:Man thats going to be dull... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Me thinks you haven't thought your cunning plan all the way through

      Well, there's cunning stunts, and then there's..

  24. You see? That's what's wrong with society today.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... Degrees being handed out without the work! Like it's... an entitlement or something...

    I say make him sit through those droning lectures! Force him through those assignments that will actually make him a decent programmer.

    This just cheapens the BS degree for everyone else...

    Okay, so it took me 10 years to get my degree (interrupted by a military stint, working full time, getting married and having 4 kids under 8 by the time I finished up)

    I just think we'd be denying Bill a proper sense of accomplishment if he received it without all the work. Wouldn't that truly put hair on his chest? (which he probably needs, too. :-) )

  25. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by sarahbau · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seems like it would be a better process to work in your desired field for a few years, then go for the degree. I originally dropped out of college, and worked a few jobs somewhat in my field, but when I wanted to move into anything more, I always got responses like "while your resume shows a lot of the experience we're looking for, you don't have a degree." I wouldn't even get interviews most of the time, just because I didn't have a piece of paper that said I know how to learn. It didn't matter that I had 2-3 times the experience they were looking for. So I decided to go back to school. Now that I'm more mature, and more experienced, I think I'm getting more out of school than I would have if I had stayed in the first time around.
  26. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1
    I couldn't agree with you more. When I was 17, I dropped out of high school (right before Senior year started). I was tired of the bullshit and unchallenged. I was working part-time at a web design firm as their sole Sysadmin (desktops and servers). 7 years later (I turned 24 last November) I'm running a hosting division at a large consulting company, managing a team of people and 1000s of servers (and a network infrastructure most lust after). I have no certs and no college degree (although I have some gen. ed. credit as well as credit towards an Aviation degree I'm doing for fun) and learned everything I know from books, trial and error, and a series of mentors.

    Today, family and friends ask me to not mention any of this to their kids finishing high school/starting college. Go figure.

  27. Re:Good for him by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    I think you labeled some things backwards. Half of the people haven't even been charged with a crime in a competent court let alone convicted. And when I say competent, I mean one with jurisdiction not some protest court trying to make a political argument.

    Or is this just one of those just for fun things the other generations end up seeing and take for fact?

  28. Re:Good for him by delirium+of+disorder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Half of the people haven't even been charged with a crime in a competent court let alone convicted.

    It's nice that you assume that the Administration is innocent until proven guilty. I just wish they would return the favor and practice due process with their victims instead of engaging in rendition, torture, indefinite detention, disappearances, and etc all before any legal trial. I'd rather live in a republic than a junta.

    --
    ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
  29. At least Bill Gates married a programmer by giafly · · Score: 1

    Remember Microsoft Bob?

    --
    Reduce, reuse, cycle
  30. Nose-in-the-air academic snoots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a drop-out-done-good myself (probably doing better than anyone I ever went to school with as well as the teachers and administrators), I would probably react to an honorary degree with a big fuck you. Like someone who stuck it out on their own and made something great for themselves in the world inevitably need some stamp of approval from a bunch of nose-in-the-air academic snoots? <rant>
    Let's not forget that while Bill Gates is a shining example to college dropouts everywhere, he still did not get to where he is today by his wits and ruthless business strategies alone. He also had to stand on the shoulders of the engineers and programmers that wrote Windows, MS Office, etc. and most of those people were precisely the type of nose-in-the-air snoots with a college degree who didn't follow his example and drop out. Now you can probably defend your self by pointing to the quality of Windows, MS Office and other Microsoft products, which is perceived to be rather low in some quarters and argue that Bill hasn't been well served by those programmers and engineers anyway. I'd say that any shortcomings in Microsoft products are probably more the fault of Microsoft's management and it's history of practicing an approach to development and product testing schedules where marketing issues outweigh quality and proper development practices (i.e. Just develop it really fast... And who needs thorough software testing anyway?? It burns up to much time and drives up costs.) than they are the fault of the programmers and engineers who have to abide by them. I can remember what Windows 3.x and 98 used to be like, I can see how much of an improvement Windows XP and Vista are today. Neither is perfect mind you, my chief complaints with Windows 98 for example used to be: stability, lousy security and a UI that almost drove me insane with useless questions and endless 'Apply' buttons followed by far to many obligatory reboots. Microsoft has now more or less tackled the stability issue, they seem to be getting mildly serious about security but their UI still sucks although there are fewer reboots these days which is a plus. So Micosoft's management has learned quite a few painful lessons about the importance of professionalism and discipline in software development over the years since Windows 3.x and 98 came out, they have learned it the hard way and they seem to be learning mostly by falling on their faces.
    </rant>
  31. Re:You see? That's what's wrong with society today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just cheapens the BS degree for everyone else...
    It's an honorary degree, numnuts.
  32. But, can he refuse it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be kewl....

  33. What it also says by Swift2001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We notice you've made a lot of money and are therefore wise. We also notice you're not getting any younger, and you're giving away money. If you see anything you'd like to endow, please be in touch."

    1. Re:What it also says by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      If you see anything you'd like to endow, please be in touch.

      So many possible puns, so little time.

  34. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    People who never went to university almost invariably always miss the point. You do not go to a challenging school to learn direct skills you would need to do any particular job, and that is true even for ultra specialist disciplines like a pediatrics.

    It is comparable to saying why go to a gym and work out every other day, lifting weights in some prescribed motion and good form, when you know that loading up a truck will never use those same motions.

    Replace muscle above with brain and you get the idea. You go to a challenging school to do gymnastics of the brain, to learn to think, to learn to do your own research, to discover, to grow, to become better than just the skills a corporation may want today.

    I went for a degree in pure math, and subsequently masters in pure math as well. Will I ever actually use any of that skill in my job (software developer)? Not in a million years. But, did I ever encounter a problem that I felt my brain just wasn't ready to cope with and could not think of a solution in my daily job? No, never. Actually, programming itself is absolutely un-challenging compared to math study.

  35. Re:You see? That's what's wrong with society today by HCLogo · · Score: 1

    This just cheapens the BS degree for everyone else Absolutely true!
    What about all the people who put in long hours and hard work EARNING their degree?
    I'll admit that Mr. Gates is a successful man, but I'd be willing to bet that he couldn't make it through a degree program the way the rest of us would have to.
  36. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by drsquare · · Score: 1

    Seems like it would be a better process to work in your desired field for a few years, then go for the degree.
    How do you get the job without a degree?
  37. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by drsquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Today, family and friends ask me to not mention any of this to their kids finishing high school/starting college.
    That's because nearly all dropouts end up working deadend menial jobs their entire lives.

    It's not the dot-com era anymore, companies aren't going to hire 17 year old dropouts as sysadmins. Your case was a complete one off, you may as well advise people to buy lottery tickets for a living.
  38. The writeup is right ! by bytesex · · Score: 1

    He doesn't need it for his resume. Last I heard Mr Gates had started his own company.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  39. Re:Good for him by welshsocialist · · Score: 1

    You forgot the Kennedys. Joe Kennedy Sr, Joe Jr, JFK, RFK, and EMK attended the college at some point in their lives.

    --
    Support the Chagossians
  40. In which field? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    An honorary degree in "programming whiz"/CS, business/economics or what he actually enroled for, law?

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  41. Bill should get a real degree in philospophy... by cute-boy · · Score: 3, Funny



    Then maybe he'd have a better understanding of Ethics.

    -R

    1. Re:Bill should get a real degree in philospophy... by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

      he'd drop out again
      then start a business, destroy all competition with any means neccessary (legal or illegal - who cares, just pay some dollars several years later)
      and as soon as MicroConscience (MC) rules the philosophy market

      He'll hold a speech and get the degree for it...

      --
      The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
    2. Re:Bill should get a real degree in philospophy... by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Then maybe he'd have a better understanding of Ethics.


      That's right. If he had a better understanding of the "Ethics" everyone else lives by, then he'd really know how to screw us over.
  42. Thanks Bill for the nice building by Framboise · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From this page everything becomes limpid: http://www.siel.harvard.edu/2003/about/tour/classr ooms/maxw.jsp : "The Maxwell Dworkin building was built with funds donated by Microsoft Chairman William H. Gates III and Microsoft President Steven A. Ballmer, both members of the Class of 1977, in memory of their mothers, Mary Maxwell Gates and Beatrice Dworkin Ballmer. Maxwell Dworkin building opened in 1999 and, with its extensive office and laboratory space, will allow Harvard to double the size of its computer science faculty over the next several years."

    1. Re:Thanks Bill for the nice building by westlake · · Score: 1
      From this page everything becomes limpid

      To put this in perspective, Harvard's endowment fund is worth about 30 billion dollars.

    2. Re:Thanks Bill for the nice building by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I bet the building contains lots of chairs.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Thanks Bill for the nice building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and 8 years later they decided to give him an honorary degree? give me a break.

  43. This is gonna ruin his SPAM joke. by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 3, Funny
    Bill gates, in a speech about fighting SPAM:

    An important thing about SPAM, if you're trying to filter it out, is that it's usually poorly targeted.
    (Slide of Bill Gates' inbox comes up, showing "Ref1nance your morgage!").

    However, sometimes they hit just by random chance.
    (Next message in inbox is about "U.N.I.V.E.R.S.I.T.Y.D.I.P.L.O.M.A.S").
    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  44. Honorary Degrees Outside Commencement by RWarrior(fobw) · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Now if you really want to be somebody, get an honorary degree from Harvard outside of normal commencement exercises. You join this list of luminaries (plus a few others nobody born after World War II has heard of):
    • George Washington
    • Marquis de Lafyette
    • James Monroe
    • Andrew Jackson
    • Winston Churchill
    • Nelson Mandela
    That's real company.
    --
    Remove the caps and hold to a mirror.
  45. The "programming whiz" ha ha ha ha by gig · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    > But the programming whiz who once dropped out of Harvard will likely feel some sense of satisfaction.

    The "programming whiz" part of Bill Gates resume is pure padding.

    1. Re:The "programming whiz" ha ha ha ha by CharlesEGrant · · Score: 1

      The "programming whiz" part of Bill Gates resume is pure padding.

      Actually he was a fairly skilled programmer back in the 70s. Writing the MITS Basic interpreter was not a particularly noteworthy achievement,
      but to write the interpreter he and Allen first had to write an 8080 emulator on the Harvard mainframe. Writing an emulator that was good enough that the BASIC interpreter ran the first time when put on the actual hardware was not too shabby for an 18 year old.
    2. Re:The "programming whiz" ha ha ha ha by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      The "programming whiz" part of Bill Gates resume is pure padding.


      That depends on what was meant by the word "whiz"
    3. Re:The "programming whiz" ha ha ha ha by nyet · · Score: 1

      >"he and Allen"

      i.e. mostly Allen. As others have already pointed out, Bill was the money grubbing whiner, not the technical whiz.

    4. Re:The "programming whiz" ha ha ha ha by CharlesEGrant · · Score: 1

      i.e. mostly Allen. As others have already pointed out, Bill was the money grubbing whiner, not the technical whiz.

      Sure. Allen invited Gates into the project and split the company with him just because he's so pretty.
  46. Re:Good for him by freedom_india · · Score: 1

    Yup. Saddam was also reelected with a 98% majority before US invaded.
    The fact that you are not convicted is not a case you are not guilty.
    Enron's ex-CEO's conviction was overturned once he died between appeals.
    Does that mean he was as innocent as a feather?
    Does it mean all the people who he led down the drain were figments of their imaginations?
    Is lying to your own people about reasons for a war and then justifying it with a lame excuse OK for you?
    And don't go countering "oh, so removing a dictator is not good?" , because SA has a king, who is not even elected. Did we do a "regime-change?"
    Heck closer, NKorea has known dictator. What did we do to him? Paid him $25 million to "probably" destroy his nukes....

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  47. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by atamyrat · · Score: 1

    Seems like it would be a better process to work in your desired field for a few years, then go for the degree. We tried this, and it does not work.

    Few years ago, education system in our country changed. Students after graduating from high school had to work for 2 years in order to be eligible for college application. Exteremely low rate of students getting job without degree resulted to de-motivation of high-schoolers. Who would want to study if you're not eligible for college application and it's so hard to get job?

    Thank god they removed that restriction this year.
  48. Just great by CriminalNerd · · Score: 1

    Just great...now asian parents all over the world have another reason to push their kids overseas into the American education system...

    "Because the world's richest man also got a degree from Harvard."

    Watch as cheating on the SATs rises exponentially from South-Eastern Asia.

  49. Re:Good for him by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    I never said anything about the administration. You listed people outside this administration too. And I don't speak for them either. But if it is due process you are looking for, due process is what they are giving. It just isn't the same due process your or I would expect.

    I'm going to go on a limb here and assume you are talking about the enemy combatant issue. There is a process for review that determines if they are who we think they are, it determines if the are enemy combatants in accordance with the Geneva conventions that we are signatory to, And if they are not, then they go threw the regular criminal justice system. IF they are, then they are treated as such according to the same treaty that we are a signatory too. And in case your wondering, We didn't sign onto the last version or two.

    Due process is guaranteed in the constitution. However, nowhere does it define what that due process is. And the idea of due process today is definitely different then when the constitution was made and during our history in between. The constitution left it up to the courts and congress to determine how due process is defined. Basically, anything congress employ though regular law could become due process at any time. There are some exceptions were it might infringe upon other rights protected by the constitution.

    You may not like any redefinition of due process. You may not like the suspension of habeas corpus. But it is legal and the way the country was set up to run. Your statement of I just wish they would return the favor and practice due process with their victims Would be more accurate if it said something to the effect of I just wish they would return the favor and practice the same due process they enjoy with their victims.

    However, I'm not here to argue on their behalf or start another war of words over something that has been settled time and time again. I could if you wish, change your list to more accurately describe a centralist/moderate view instead of a hard sided political one if you wish. I have no problem calling a spade a spade (which is a reference to a card game- no racial inference at all). But I object falsities to further a political point. If you cannot win support on the truth then you deserve no support. And yes, I'm not limiting this to supporters on the democrat or republican sides or to politics in general. A lie is a lie without regard to who told it or why it was told. IF you cannot say anything without concocting something then do exactly that: not say anything at all.

  50. Most dishonorable honorary unaccredited degree by mrnick · · Score: 0

    Even though it's an honorary degree, a nice way of saying a degree you did not really earn, I don't think he deserves even that. To me he will be the most contributing factor in stifling technology in human history. An being such I don't think he should receive any fame, he has assured his place in history in the infamous catalog and that's where he belongs.

    The one thing good about him getting it from Harvard is that Harvard is not an accredited university. So, to some point this is fitting that at least he doesn't have an accredited degree. I'm sure he could have gave the University of Phoenix some Vista licenses and gotten a degree from there.

    Nick Powers

    --

    Encryption: I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to encrypt it...
    1. Re:Most dishonorable honorary unaccredited degree by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's definitely not true. Not sure where this sort of thing comes from.

    2. Re:Most dishonorable honorary unaccredited degree by jjthegreat · · Score: 1
      The one thing good about him getting it from Harvard is that Harvard is not an accredited university.

      Man, after all this time, I thought people went there just for fun!

    3. Re:Most dishonorable honorary unaccredited degree by micromuncher · · Score: 1

      I disagree. A local politican and his wife here got Hr. degrees from our university, and now they get around calling themselves Dr.

      Honarary degrees are abhorent and marginalize anyone who actually Earned their degree.

      --
      /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  51. Ethics? by __aajwxe560 · · Score: 1

    Yet further proof that business ethics is an oxymoron, and one that business schools are at best one to pay lip service to? It would have been a more powerful statement had they considered him and refused to give him a degree based on how he has profited on his organization's unethical accomplishments. Not that I expect any other publicly traded company to be in it for the good will of the people, but Microsoft has certainly been rather flagrant about its practices. Apparently these are the values that Harvard holds up for all of its students to esteem to achieve.

    My company was recently found guilty of anti-competitive behavior, and now Europe is currently, and has been, trying to impose penalties on my companies behavior. Oh, thanks for the honorary degree Harvard.

  52. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What skills are involved in admining boxes?

    Things I learned in college

    1. algebra
    2. calculus
    3. data structures
    4. algorithms [sorting, searching, etc]
    5. compiler theory
    6. numerical analysis
    7. and a host of practical courses, etc.

    And what do I do for a living? Software developer in the field of cryptography. So I need the math, algorithms, etc, etc. Yeah, granted I too taught myself a lot of my skills [like crypto], but to say college was a total waste because I had to sit through a "intro to C" class is ignorant.

    Maybe if you had a job that required talent you'd be talking differently. I'm sorry, but setting up servers, changing network settings, etc, isn't exactly a skilled labour. I mean it's a job, but don't pretend you're some tech god because you can make Apache start and host a page.

    Sorry for knocking you off your high horse, but you're advice is ignorant and misleading.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  53. you forgot by Punch-Drunk+Slob · · Score: 1

    conan o'brien

    --
    By the pricking of my thumbs, Something wicked this way comes: Open, locks, whoever knocks!
    1. Re:you forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...not to mention a disproportionate number of other Simpsons writers.

  54. Re:Good for him by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    The fact that you are not convicted is not a case you are not guilty.
    In the US, yes it is. You are only suspected until you are found guilty. Did you notice that when we found Saddam, we didn't execute him on the spot? Nope, we let the Iraqis hold a trial and convict him under their own judicial system then saw him executed.

    Enron's ex-CEO's conviction was overturned once he died between appeals.
    Does that mean he was as innocent as a feather?
    I'm not sure what innocent as a feather is. A feather can be a bad thing at times. But if the conviction was overturned on appeal, the it means he wasn't guilty of the crime he was previously convicted for depending on the reasons his appeal was granted. If the state errors in prosecuting him to get the conviction, does that make him more guilty?

    Is lying to your own people about reasons for a war and then justifying it with a lame excuse OK for you?
    I'm not sure who you are talking about here. So far there hasn't been any lies that I know if unless your talking about Saddam's insistence he had weapons he didn't in order to make it appear like he could defend himself against his enemies. Or maybe your talking about iraqi bob who was swearing we weren't in Baghdad when we were showing video of troops setting up camp in the airport. OR maybe you are talking about all the wrong intelligence that we had leading up to the war. The same intelligence that was once disputed by several countries including the ones that gave it to use but then changed their position when we discovered their cover up was because the had secrete oil deals with Saddam against the UN sanctions and stood to lose billions of dollars if we invaded?

    Please explain this one a little more. Maybe some factual sites would be helpfull too?

    And don't go countering "oh, so removing a dictator is not good?" , because SA has a king, who is not even elected. Did we do a "regime-change?"
    lol.. I don't know what your talking about again. Who is SA? and who is the king? And who isn't elected?

    Heck closer, NKorea has known dictator. What did we do to him? Paid him $25 million to "probably" destroy his nukes....
    Are you suggesting we goto war with NKorea instead? I have a better idea, Stop monday night armchair quarterbacking and run for office. Then you can change everything to your liking and will never have anything to wine about again. HOw does that sound?

    And in case your wondering, the problem with going to war with North Korea isn't North Korea. It is the standing Chinese military that handed us our asses when we got too close to them the last time we played that game. Maybe your too young to know that. Maybe your to young to pick up a book about it. Maybe when you get older you can look for one in the history or reference sections of the library, the fiction sections only get you upset about stuff that isn't true. Then when you know a little more about it, why don't you come back and talk.
  55. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    I never finished college (changed majors too many times to have enough credits for any one of them) yet my position lists an MIS and/or MBA as 'required'. It's called being good at what you do and working your way to the top.

  56. Woz on the other hand.. by clickclickdrone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Went back to collage under a pseudonym and got his own damned degree.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    1. Re:Woz on the other hand.. by maxume · · Score: 1

      Was Jobs in the picture?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Woz on the other hand.. by bkr1_2k · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Went back to collage under a pseudonym and got his own damned degree."

      Yeah, but a degree in Photoshop only takes you so far.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    3. Re:Woz on the other hand.. by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      Oh well played sir!

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  57. Re:Good for him by Sobrique · · Score: 1
    So out of interest, who _would_ have jurisdiction over, to take a random example, alleged war crimes against the President of the United States?

    The problem with things like 'war crimes' is that they tend to be international level problems. So you can almost always write off those attempting to prosecute as 'protest courts' and say they have a political bias. You may well be correct, but the question becomes whether they're more or less interested in 'justice' than the alternatives.

  58. Re:Good for him by freedom_india · · Score: 1

    Let me clarify a few details: Enron's CEO was not acquitted BECAUSE he was innocent. He was acquitted because of a technicality that if you die between appeals, the law allows you to be removed of all convictions, much like annulment of a marriage. So he was not innocent.
    SA= Saudi Arabia. You should really stop watching only Fox news.
    We invaded saddam's Iraq because none of our oil majors could get a cut like the europe's oil companies. And we could not do another S.Arabia against them (using their own oil to build roads at inflated cost). Have U noticed any EU major company bidding and winning major contracts in SA? (You should read the books "Corporation" and "Confessions of an economic hit-man")
    As regards the intelligence, it is well known cheney and his cronies delibrately twisted intelligence to claim a white lie that saddam HAD nukes capable of launching in 30 mins, even when EU intelligence agents did not say so.
    Why did we withdraw our motion to the UN Sec Council to invade Iraq? Because bush feared it would be vetoed and attacking a nation after a UN veto would mean violating laws locally (See US laws).
    Do you remember companies like halliburton claiming Iraq could pay for its own reconstruction? A country which had the most advanced infrastructure (roads, telephones, hotels, museums, etc) before 1991, which were built by EU companies which rankled US corporations a lot. An advanced modern society where girls wore short skirts before 1991 and even christians prayed freely (unlike SA).
    In fact cheney even lied (lies now) that saddam had a link in 9/11. However the truth was a SA charity linked to an SA princess of the ruling family had donated substantial amounts to it, and that charity was used to fund 9/11 (read the 9/11 comissions' report).
    Even today why do all rebuilding contracts go to US companies only? Do EU companies have no ability? Why can't iraq's constitution allow open bidding where EU companies to win bids to reconstruct.
    Bush claimed he liberated the people. In truth he liberated them from one dictator to a group of corp dictators.
    NKorea: We very well knew they were far more dangerous than saddam since they had already sold missiles to other countries. If we were so hell-bent on cleansing this world of dictators, we should have attacked them first. And don't give reasons about China. Are we a bully that can't fight an equally armed adversary? Are we so fragile that a mighty army which defeated the SS Waffen cant rid the world of another dictator?

    I may not be old, and i may not be well read, but i do know we once had a mighty army which fought against equals and not against a weakened ragtag band of poor guys.
    Since our prez (president) seems to be guided by hand of God and actually "talks" to God (both candidates for being declared mentally ill), then the God should have told him to fight like a man, and attack an equal.

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  59. Re:Good for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, couldn't you find a 9/11 Truther for your list of heroes?

    Asshole.

  60. Re:Good for him by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    So out of interest, who _would_ have jurisdiction over, to take a random example, alleged war crimes against the President of the United States?
    Pretty much any country that has signed the same treaties we have concerning war crimes. But they could only do it to the extent of the treaty revision we have taken too and if they were involved at the same time.

    Take the Geneva convention, There are countries that have signed on during the later revision that we didn't adopt. They would not have competent jurisdiction. Also, any country attempting to use current language that we did not adopt wouldn't be either. This is of course working under the assumption that no other country can take judicial rule over a sovereign nation unless that nation has made provision for it or a war presided them with jurisdiction. And Iraq as well as Yugoslavia were members of the Geneva treaties.

    The problem with things like 'war crimes' is that they tend to be international level problems. So you can almost always write off those attempting to prosecute as 'protest courts' and say they have a political bias. You may well be correct, but the question becomes whether they're more or less interested in 'justice' than the alternatives.
    Not if there is a system or mechanism already in place. International level problem have international level fixes. They are usually called treaties but often entertain and resemble war. The ones attempting to prosecute and are protest courts are the courts that are taking local laws with no other basis or provisions of international treaties they have signed but the US hasn't and going with them. Holding another country liable for a crime they did not agree to abide by can only be enforces if that other countries sovereignty has been compromised or they are in agreement with the law.

    I believe congress has taken a look at these accusations and received several opinions to the fact that the claims of war crimes are being touted over treaties we never signed or enacted. If this is true, then the only recourse would to be engage in war and subject us to their system or remain protest court with political objective..
  61. talk about PR stunt by DaMattster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These honorary degrees are nothing but another PR stunt. Hey, maybe this is troll material, but having Bill Gates as a potential wealthy donor on your side never hurt anyone. Give him the honorary degree, make him feel very good, and donations, donations, donations. Had Bill Gates not risen to become the chairman of Microsoft, Harvard would have paid him no more mind than a fly on the wall. As other slashdotters have pointed out, Steve Wozniak went back to college and earned his degree.

  62. Like all commencement speakers..... by smart2000 · · Score: 1

    ...will speak at Harvard University's commencement ceremony in June and, like all commencement speakers, will receive an honorary degree from the institution... Not quite. There is still one place where you have to earn your degree.

    --
    To purchase it is not like spending money but rather it is an investment in the future in a blow against the empire
  63. Also in the same story... by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 4, Funny

    "At the same ceremony Harvard honored Steve Balmer's Contributions by giving him a Chair."

  64. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

    Yes, but never finishing college isn't the same as never attending.

    I have yet to finish school, and I've been working in a "degree required" position for 10 years. My current position states "Master's degree required" and pays me well. I got my job based on my experience and my connections, but I never would have gotten started if I hadn't done some college.

    --
    "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
  65. No Respect for the League of Ivy Gentlemen by db32 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wow...so here we go yet again. Honorary degree's for people worthless in their field. Bill Gates is an excellent marketeer, monopolist, and theif. He is trash in IT. He makes the most innane "predictions" and MS products are constantly playing catchup in terms of innovation (well, maybe not catchup, so much as embrace, extend, extinguish).

    Let us not forget...Bush got his from Yale. Ahh...Once again excellent business and legislative skills have earned him a pretty ticket. Well, if you count absolute contempt and disregard for the law. War, wiretaps, refusal to answer to any kind of subpoenas and the like. Ahh...

    These colleges seem to be getting more and more worthless and just sucking in big name people to prop their notoriety up. Fact is people are getting excellent educations in the real world and non brand name colleges.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    1. Re:No Respect for the League of Ivy Gentlemen by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Honorary degree's for people worthless in their field.
      Do you have one in punctuation?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  66. why not computer science by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    there are many sub fields within it and I do not doubt he would qualify for many.

    it isn't all about algorithms and considering what some schools teach in CS these days...

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  67. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you are using calculus to admin boxes, you are doing it wrong.

  68. Ack, damn typos... by AnotherUsername · · Score: 1

    This is going to come back to haunt me in 20 years, I can feel it...

    --
    I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
  69. Non sequitur? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But the programming whiz who once dropped out of Harvard will likely feel some sense of satisfaction.
    Good for him, whoever he is. But what does that have to do with Bill Gates?
  70. He's already an engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why should he want a computer science degree. He has already
    claimed that he is an engineer.

  71. Why? Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why does there seem to be such a big hatred for college degrees here on slashdot?

    Lots of reasons:

    • Many people in our industry don't have them. People tend to dislike and mistrust others who aren't like them. (Aside: In my experience there's a slightly positive correlation between ineptitude and the lack of a college degree. I've seen all kinds, though -- everything from top dogs to... people who, in a logically ordered universe, would be shlepping dog food at WalMart.)
             
    • They are, unfortunately, required for lots of jobs. That's not fair, and people realize it.
             
    • You can make a good case that an aspiring techie would be better off, at 18, taking a solid tech job and supplementing his/her knowledge with, say, O'Reilly books. This scenario wouldn't be realistic for other jobs. To put it another way, degrees aren't as necessary in our industry as they are in others. People realize that, too.
  72. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sorry for knocking you off your high horse, but you're advice is ignorant and misleading.

    The GP didn't give advice but rather related a set of personal facts.

    The GP fully admits to be working towards a degree - for his own personal betterment ("for fun").

    This raises the question, why does your reading comprehension suck so much ass?

  73. Will it be a PHG*? by woohootoo · · Score: 1

    *Doctor of Geekiness

  74. any volunteers here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to be the gentleman who warmly congratulates Bill and Melinda in the back room on their magnificent accomplishments, particularly in the philanthropic field.... then looks Bill in the eye and asks for a $400 million donation?

  75. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hence "pretty much everything".

  76. not as bad as giving Shrub an honorary degree, but by quixote9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am not happy. That's my alma mater. (Well, not so alma, and not so mater either, if you get right down to it.) I'm glad that's not my graduation year. Imagine having to sit there and listen to this guy gas on about the value of hard work while he's kneecapping as many companies as he can get at, pushing for as many cheap H1-B workers as it'll take to put those nice little Harvard grads right out of a job, and generally just being Bill Gates.

    (I'll admit the Gates Foundation does good philanthropic work, but for that I credit his wife. I never heard of him doing that stuff before he got married.)

  77. Re:Good for him by Sobrique · · Score: 1
    I'm pretty certain that there's really a very short list of people who've been found to have commited war crimes, that actually signed up to treaties that said they 'shouldn't do that'.

    Which I suppose is the way it goes really. There's not really any 'international justice' just people you're more afraid of than others. If you're lucky, the guy with the most firepower and enthusiasm is also the one who's interested in 'high standards' in terms of war crimes and human rights.

    Hmm, never really thought of it that way. Declaring (as a nation) that you've found someone under a different jurisdiction to be a war criminal, I suppose it _is_ a protest. One which they might acknowledge and do something about, but ... well if the government does 'back' whoever's found as a criminal, then you fall back to the other options, of hoping they come to visit, and kidnap them, or letting rip with the war machine.

    Ain't RealPolitik fun?

    And oh boy, did this get offtopic :)

  78. Industry experience harder to substantiate by Serpentegena · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The other day my bf B. was telling me about a low-level tech candidate he had interviewed for some support work in his department. The guy had a great-looking resume that consisted mainly of "in-the-industry" experience. He "implemented" this, "organized" that...B. asked him about 20 questions in all. Mix-n-match. From very basic, to very complex issues, and no theoretical, textbook stuff. You had to be there to fix it. It was appropriate, given that this dude ws claiming most of his qualifications from field experience.

    He managed to answer from 20, oh, about one question. He got stumped on 19 other problems that he was supposed to be at least familiar with. His resume was a hoax. The "implementation" entries apparently meant that he carried PCs around for some project. No, really.

    It's hard to properly qualify this type of candidate. This is how sometimes morons get hired into companies, and end up being a drain of resources and a problem waiting to happen, that most often their peers or boss will have to fix. Morons get stuck into jobs in the next cube beside people like you and me and they entail an ugly and exhausting cycle of damage control. All this to say, a college degree will at least indicate that the candidate is not a bum-off-the-street building a CV on fabrications, trickery and subterfuge. Saves time for most employers IMO. And if the person has proved that they can learn in school, they can likely learn and train to do well on the job.

    --
    Microsoft put the "sucks" in "success".
    1. Re:Industry experience harder to substantiate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this to say, a college degree will at least indicate that the candidate is not a bum-off-the-street building a CV on fabrications, trickery and subterfuge.


      Two issues:

      Firstly, you're assuming that the human resources department is diligent enough to ensure that a degree listed on a CV actually has been awarded and that it is not from a diploma mill.

      Secondly, while we'd all like to think that a university education implies a certain level of critical thinking skill and cerebral performance, it does not. I've worked with folks who have degrees from the US, UK, Canada, China, and India who were duds. Boneheads. Morons. Whatever you'd like to call them. Sure, if you came out of Waterloo with a CS degree or Georgia Tech with an undergrad in EE you're not likely to be a complete idiot, but the mass majority of universities are suited more to mere mortals.

      My point is that yes, a degree does count for something, but I don't believe it holds the weight that think it does.
    2. Re:Industry experience harder to substantiate by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 'cause college graduates don't ever over-inflate their resumes. I certainly don't work with people *right now* who clearly did that.

      The interview process is to determind qualifications for everyone. It's not a way to make sure that college dropouts are as smart as college graduates. At least, I've never seen an interviewer who said "bring your diploma and we can just skip this whole process"...

    3. Re:Industry experience harder to substantiate by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      All this to say, a college degree will at least indicate that the candidate is not a bum-off-the-street building a CV on fabrications, trickery and subterfuge.

      I fail to see how a college degree precludes (or even lowers the chances of) someone being exactly this. I find it interesting that you found out the guy was a loser from the interview, and not from a piece of paper issued by an authority.

      --
      AccountKiller
    4. Re:Industry experience harder to substantiate by mbrod · · Score: 1

      asked him about 20 questions in all. Mix-n-match. From very basic, to very complex issues, and no theoretical, textbook stuff. I don't see how low level detailed questions help discern a good candidate in any way. High level scenarios give you a much better feel for the mind behind the person.

      And if the person has proved that they can learn in school, they can likely learn and train to do well on the job. The key part of this is how do you judge if a person learnt in school, is a good learner, still is interested in learning more, is reasonably enough humble to learn from others, etc.?

      I'll take someone on my team who is reasonable at communication and writing, then likes and is interested in what they are doing over someone who can do well at 20 questions any day. The job at hand of course is pertinent but in my view of IT over the last 10 years the ones who have yielded the best return to their respective employers have fallen into the first category.
    5. Re:Industry experience harder to substantiate by Rone · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you came out of ... Georgia Tech with an undergrad in EE you're not likely to be a complete idiot

      Indeed. With a degree like that, you're probably a hell of an engineer. Maybe even a helluva, helluva, helluva, helluva, hell of an engineer.






      .

      (For mods who'll "Off Topic" me if I don't spell out the reference.)

    6. Re:Industry experience harder to substantiate by rifter · · Score: 1

      Secondly, while we'd all like to think that a university education implies a certain level of critical thinking skill and cerebral performance, it does not. I've worked with folks who have degrees from the US, UK, Canada, China, and India who were duds. Boneheads. Morons. Whatever you'd like to call them. Sure, if you came out of Waterloo with a CS degree or Georgia Tech with an undergrad in EE you're not likely to be a complete idiot, but the mass majority of universities are suited more to mere mortals.

      Speaking of which, the situation does beg the question of what happened with President Bush. I mean, as much as people, including himself, make fun of his poor academic performance, the guy has a law degree from Yale and an MBA from Harvard. Supposedly you cannot get much better than that. Yet he managed to cock up quite a bit, including things in his own field. Constitutional law comes to mind.

      If you want a real mindfuck think of this. If Bush has degrees from Yale and Harvard, but you don't, yet you think what he is doing is stupid ... what if it is *you* who are stupid. After all he's the one with the degree.

      Thankfully it does not work that way. Intelligent people can make mistakes, especially the ones who give out degrees.

    7. Re:Industry experience harder to substantiate by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      And yet, you won't be able to find an EE job. I have three friends in the electrical engineering field; two with engineering degrees from Tech and one with an "engineering technology" degree from DeVry. The DeVry guy is doing on-site electrical stuff for Siemens, but the other two have jobs coding Java or something. Weird, eh?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:Industry experience harder to substantiate by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      the guy has a law degree from Yale and an MBA from Harvard. Supposedly you cannot get much better than that.

      From what I've heard, the only hard thing about most "ivy league" schools is getting in in the first place. Bush had connections, so that would have been easy (even discounting that he likely went to some grade-inflating "prep school").

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Industry experience harder to substantiate by biovoid · · Score: 1

      It's hard to properly qualify this type of candidate.

      As hard as asking them 20 questions?

      And if he had answered all 20 questions would he have been hired?

  79. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    Yeah, he's doing a degree "for fun". Right. Or maybe he sees the writing on the wall. Not saying admining isn't a good job. But let's not pretend that you're some creative genius or have lots of room to grow [intellectually and career-wise].

    It's the sort of job that exists, for the most part, because people are too busy/lazy to do it themselves.

    In general, I find people who tell the "I dropped out of school at 16/17 and look how I turned out" fall into one of two camps. Those who are already fairly smart, have an aptitude to learn on their own [and do so]. Then there are those who set the bar just a bit lower than others. But usually the "I'm above schooling" attitude is a sign of someone who really isn't worth talking about, maybe 1 of every 100K dropouts is actually cracked up to be a somebody in their respective fields. The rest work retail or other sorts of jobs.

    Which, I should add, aren't bad, but just don't pretend like you're living the high life thumbing your nose at everyone else.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  80. Re:Good for him by Mo+Bedda · · Score: 1

    Dershowitz on the other hand is a distinguished civil libertarian

    Distinguished as a civil libertarian who justifies torture. I guess that would be a fairly distinguishing trait among civil libertarians.

  81. Re:Good for him by pedalman · · Score: 1

    but then again, Harvard also produced: Russ Feingold (the only Senator to vote against the PAT RIOT act) Ralph Nader (the best alternative to corporate rule we've had over the past 20 years) Irene Khan (Secretary General of Amnesty International) Samuel Adams (held a nice tea party)
    Samuel Adams' tea party? Meh, he was all about the beer.
    --
    Friends don't let friends line-dance.
  82. Take Minsky Off The List by littlewink · · Score: 1

    He set neural network research back 20 years for starters.

    One scientist said that no significant paradigm change can occur in a science until the previous generation of researchers die off. It certainly appears that little progress will be made in AI until Minsky retires.

  83. Re:Why? Well... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    You're right there is not a strong correlation between a having college degree and not being an idiot. I was convinced, having received a BS in Computer Science in 1987, that someone with enough people skills could obtain a similar degree, at least where I went to University, which was Virginia Tech, without being able to code his way out of a wet paper bag.

    After 20 more years of the dumbing down of our education system, where a CS degree in at least some cases is merely training in Java programming, I can only imagine that it's worse.

    Although many of my CS classes were very good, the most valuable classes I took in college were often not even CS, or even technical. I tried to round myself out by taking non-technical things that interested me, as much as possible. In fact, I wasn't too far from an English minor or a psychology minor. I also took a year of Music Theory and Spanish. While these don't necessary help me as a code monkey in any way, I do believe they contributed significantly to me as a whole person. Actually, the Spanish came in handy when working with some folks in Mexico a few years ago. I can't exactly talk or listen well in Spanish, but I was told that my written grammar was excellent.

    This is the part of a university degree that people need, as much or more than the "training" in their particular field. While I feel like I barely got a well-rounded education in the Arts & Sciences department, at least at the time, it would have been almost impossible in Engineering. Education is not training and training is not education. I think real "education" contributes more in the long-term than how to write C or Java programs. BTW, at the time we worked mostly in Pascal, a language I've never used on the job, but that never caused me any problems.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  84. Too many variables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's difficult to make judgments based on one perspective. I think it all depends on the CS program you are in and the professors you have. I started my own business in High School but left it and still continued to obtain my BS in CS. I then worked for a couple of different companies as a programmer and absolutely hated it each one. Now, I'm teaching CS at the secondary level where I think the greatest need lies. The other skills obtained by earning your BS are more important in the long run. There are too many people in the tech field without solid social and communicating skills.

  85. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    Our stories differ slightly then. My first IT job was repairing PC's ages ago, which at the time required no degree at all (still doesn't since it's actually an order of magnitude easier these days). I can say I learned a lot of interesting things in college over my on and off years attending, but nothing applied to or helped me get my start in the industry. In my case I started building with and coding on Z80's when I was about 9 or 10 though, so the knowledge I took into my career was self taught long before graduating from high school.

  86. Imagine the possibilities... by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

    Just think what he could have accomplished if he had actually gotten his degree! ;-)

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  87. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    you seem to miss the point in college...
    It's not preparation for "the real world" - that would be apprenticeship
    college is for _science_...

    you see - there are for example pretty good algorithms that work very well in practice - but cases exist where these algorithms are very slow or might even not terminate at all... those cases are rare, you don't stumble upon them in practice, therefore you just ignore them in practice ("...but of course we know that's not how it works in the real world."), but they EXIST - and thats what we are dealing with... we are not satisfied with "it works pretty well most of the time", we want to know more and we want a proof ;-)

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  88. He freeloaded on a DARPA computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The machine that Gates designed the emulator on was a DARPA-sponsored PDP-10. There was a story going around at the time that he got into some trouble for using a machine paid by the federal government for private commercial work.

    I was there at the time, but never got to know Gates.

    BTW, Harvard has one of his original code listings on display.

  89. Re:Good for him by daigu · · Score: 1

    I think you need to learn more about Dershowitz. Perhaps this little blurb from Beyond Chutzpah will suggest itself as useful reading.

    The core analysis of Beyond Chutzpah sets Dershowitz's assertions on Israel's human rights record against the findings of the mainstream human rights community. Sifting through thousands of pages of reports from organizations such as Amnesty International, B'Tselem, and Human Rights Watch, Finkelstein demonstrates that Dershowitz has systematically misrepresented the facts.

    It sounds to me that with phrases like "Arab bigotry and terrorism and has defended the only free, democratic country in the Middle East" that you have an agenda on this issue. Further, anytime you paint an entire group with the same brush (with the possible exception of groups that are defined solely by bigotry - which is not the case with Arabs), you yourself are being a bigot.

    I don't have an agenda. I can see that both Arabs and Jews are doing terrible things that should stop. I also recognize that there is a huge difference in power - with Israel getting U.S. military support and apparently applying the same standards of morality (that it is okay for the U.S. or Israel to commit acts of terrorism because they are really defending themselves from the terrorism of others). I'm sorry but that dog won't hunt.

  90. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    algebra? compiler theory? numerical analysis?

    How about no.

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  91. They had SO much in common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a shame: Lunis Torballs didn't have a degree from Harvard, either.

    Guess this is yet another way Lunis will be chasing Bill's tail lights.

  92. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

    Somewhat different, true. I still believe that, while college degrees are overly hyped in the US they definitely can be a help. I think the problem is the emphasis on the degree instead of capability. The degree proves you can learn, that's all. If you've proven that through experience and a resume that got you an interview and you did well on the interview, odds are you'll do fine in the job. Problem is, these days, unless you have a huge amount of experience or know someone inside, most companies won't look at you except for very low level positions at crap wages. We've been trained over the last couple of generations to think we're "above" low level positions and crap wages though, which points at a whole other socio-economic issue, and why jobs are leaving.

    --
    "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
  93. Programming whiz? by seandiggity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Programming whiz"? I've heard others say this also, but what exactly was Billy boy so good at (besides sending nasty letters to early innovators)?
     
    I'm under the impression that he made his mark by announcing vaporware and then coming up with something quick (primarily using someone else's work), before showing it off to potential buyers (e.g. QDOS, Altair BASIC interpreter).

    --
    Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
  94. Why college is useless by orclevegam · · Score: 1

    A college degree under the strictest definition is not useless, and even in some fields is quite beneficial, however, in IT this is not always the case. The biggest issue is the Computer Science field itself. To put it bluntly, it's too broad. Under the heading of Computer Science you have everything from network engineers, to web developers, to programmers, and even some IT managers. I'm not even saying that all of these fields don't require some sort of education, just that none of them are properly being served by a Computer Science degree. The problem with Computer Science is that it takes a little bit from all of these various fields, and then sprinkles it heavily with some advanced maths, which is really not meeting the needs of any of these. Computer Science needs to be more finely broken down. The way things are now, it's as if you lumped Chemistry, Physics, Metalurgy, and Astronomy all under something like a Bachelors of Physical Sciences degree. Sure it would probably help a little with all of those, but it wouldn't provide all the knowledge any one of them needed, and would probably frustrate the hell out of all of them.

    The second issue that compounds all of this is the opinion that HR seems to promote whenever possible that the type of degree a person has is the primary determination in the salary that individual is worth. A piece of paper is all well and good when trying to decide who you should interview, but in terms of salary what a person knows and can do should count for much more. Unfortunatly that's not usually the case, all HR cares about is making sure everyone with X degree in field Y makes about the same amount, otherwise in their eyes it wouldn't be fair.

    This is why college degrees here arn't thought of well, not because they are bad on their own, but because the IT field is so terribly represented by the degrees that can be had today.

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    1. Re:Why college is useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The biggest issue is the Computer Science field itself. To put it bluntly, it's too broad. Under the heading of Computer Science you have everything from network engineers, to web developers, to programmers, and even some IT managers."

      I disagree. These fields are not subsets of CS, these fields are possible because of the work that is done in CS/EE. The idea that these fields are subsets of CS is because CS has the word computer in its title, so therefore it is commonly thought anything to do with computers must be part of the CS curriculum.

    2. Re:Why college is useless by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      That is exactly my point though. It's that attitude that has screwed up the CS curriculum. I couldn't believe all the junk classes I was expected to take when I went to get my BS in comp. sci. from UCF. I'm a programmer, and I have been for a long time. I enjoy some of the theory classes a bit, and even some of the Math, but I really use almost no math at all in my day to day job, and certainly nothing past at most calculus 1, yet the CS degree from UCF is only 2 classes short of a math major. That's just plain ridiculous. In a similar vein, there were some distinctly EE classes in the curriculum that really didn't need to be there. At most, they should be electives, cause honestly, even if I'm doing assembly programming, I really don't care what the circuit diagram of the processor looks like at all.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  95. You and Bill have a lot in common. by twitter · · Score: 0

    I would probably react to an honorary degree with a big fuck you.

    Mr. Gates has a similar disdain and reaction to those who endorse his products by purchasing them. His PR team will be able to keep him in check and force him to say something nice and his customers get the same kind of glad handling.

    Take what it gives and you will be happier. No one ever has to do anything for you. When they do, take it for what it's worth. Gratitude does not require servility.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  96. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by Valdez · · Score: 1
    What skills *aren't* involved in admining boxes?


    1. Proper usage of the contraction "you're"

    Sry, couldn't resist ;)

  97. He is NOT a dropout; he is on a leave of absence! by hajo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Harvard does NOT consider one a dropout if you have passing grades (Which he did; he did quite well actually). I'm in the same boat. When you have passing grades and you leave you are officially on a leave of absence. (I guess they can't fathom that anyone with passing grades would ever drop out of their venerable institution)
              Oh and on all the comments about him being a lousy coder: I call bullshit on that. I have worked on PDP11's, CPM machines etc... Virtually non-existent documentation, cosing in assembly, extreme memory constraints etc... This is the guy who rewrote a basic interpreter on the plane to his customer using paper and pen....
              You might not like the guy (I wonder why, I've never met him so I'm fairly neutral on the whole thing; Also how many people do you know giving billions of dollars to charity?). but one does not become that wealthy by being an idiot!

    Hajo

    --
    Hajo Monogamy: Belief so strong that millions of people end perfectly good relationships in order to start a new one.
  98. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    ya I noticed that 4 seconds after I posted it. Oddly enough, writing wasn't a big part of my college program. [maybe it should have been hehehe].

    Only thing I can do well in the morning [when I posted that] is Piano. I guess if I had a lady friend I'd switch majors... :-(

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  99. Tough time to be a recent grad by jjohn · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope Mr. Gates understands that life is difficult for recent graduates. His first job post-degree will likely be an entry-level position without glamour or sufficient compensation. The dog-eat-dog world of corporate America isn't for everyone. Perhaps he won't get too put off by the whole thing.

  100. Bill Gates wasn't a drop-out by oringo · · Score: 1

    According to a university professor that once taught Bill Gates in Harvard, he did not drop out of school. Instead, he was *kicked* out of school for going over his computer usage time. He later paid Harvard to fix that record to say that he dropped out. And no, this is not a joke.

    1. Re:Bill Gates wasn't a drop-out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you could get kicked out of Harvard for trying to learn too much?

      Sounds like a steaming pile to me, but keep spreading it: maybe the flowers will grow better.

  101. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  102. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by Laxitive · · Score: 1

    > Today, family and friends ask me to not mention any of this to their kids finishing high school/starting college. Go figure.

    Unlike the other response to you, I'm not going to berate you or belittle your accomplishments. If you've done well for yourself, then that's something to be proud about. On the same token, it's legitimate for family and friends to ask you not to give their children the impression that your path is something they should explicitly follow.

    At the end of the day, a college degree is a very useful tool for starting out in life. It doesn't make you or break you, but it does give you more opportunities than you would have if you didn't hold a degree. Simply because you didn't utilize that tool to build your life doesn't mean that it's not extremely valuable for your younger family members. It also doesn't mean that it wouldn't have been a useful tool for you, either.

    Having a CS degree from a reasonably prestigious university, I can attest that it has opened many doors for me which would otherwise have been closed. The same is true of many friends who graduated with me.

  103. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    Oh I didn't mean to imply that degrees are worthless; I just meant that they are not the absolute requirement some think they are. It takes a lot of luck on top of a certain amount of talent and a *lot* of hard work to get anywhere without one in many fields.

  104. Could you mean ``programming wiz'' by General+Lee's+Peking · · Score: 1

    as in ``programming wizard'' as opposed to ``to take a ...''?

  105. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A good college education enables you to push the state of your field, either by preparing you to get a PhD or giving you the knowledge to extend the tools and techniques used in industry. I would want to hire both experienced programmer and experienced computer scientists for most projects, but the experienced computer scientists are harder to find == higher salary == glad they studied up in college.

  106. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by koreaman · · Score: 1

    Where are you from? If you don't mind me asking.

  107. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Well, I got all of that in high school (Industrial Electronics). In my last 2 years of high school, I learned programming PIC's, microprocessors in ASM, C and some high-level educational programming language as well as PID regulators (Integral and Differential regulators), logic ports etc. etc. practical applications, I studied and improved a commercial solar panel setup (research version from a local energy company)

    I also need maths and algorithms as a developer, but I also learned the real-life lessons of programming and .com business while I was earning money to learn the good way to do it (as programmers do) as well as the quick way to do it (as managers like you to do) and you were paying money to learn how you theoretically could apply that to a real situation.

    Thus I have now more than 6 years of experience and making over 60k, not a college degree, but learned enough in High School and learned even more during 2 year 'schooling' as a Support Engineer, managing every single object you can find in a datacenter as well as planning to build a new one. In the mean time, you have some type of degree and merely 2 or 3 years of entry-level experience.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  108. Wow a Harvard degree by milatchi · · Score: 0

    A degree from Harvard: the universal center of plagiarizers and pretentious assholes.

    --
    Slashdot = -1 Redundant, Asperger, kdawson FUD, Libertarian, and Linux
  109. Re:Why? Well... by Rakarra · · Score: 1
    You can make a good case that an aspiring techie would be better off, at 18, taking a solid tech job and supplementing his/her knowledge with, say, O'Reilly books. This scenario wouldn't be realistic for other jobs. To put it another way, degrees aren't as necessary in our industry as they are in others. People realize that, too.

    That's a pretty hard case to make, and requires a good amount of luck, both personal and with the job market, in addition to the usual hard work.

  110. Bad assumption/generalization by anothy · · Score: 1

    ...like all commencement speakers...
    it's worth noting that this simply isn't true of all commencement speakers; it's entirely at the school's discretion. i know of some schools (such as Bryn Mawr College) who see it as cheapening their degrees to simply give them away. i've got a lot of respect for that principle: you want a degree, do the work!
    of course, if they offered me one, i'd accept. would make my mom happy. ;-)
    --

    i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
  111. This reminds me of Mike Lazarids by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 1

    Mike Lazarids is the founder of Research in Motion. He was enrolled as an undergraduate student in U of Waterloo. He founded RIM after securing a contract from General Motors and dropped out, just two months before he graduate. In 2000 he was given an honorary Doctorate of Engineering in UW and is now the chancellor.

  112. He should decline their offer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry but I strongly believe that degrees should be earned in the classroom.

  113. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1
    I appreciate that you didn't berate me like the other posters, especially the one who relegated my job to simply setting up servers and running network cable (considering I do the same work as a CCIE, just without the actual certification).

    My whole point was that if you're sufficiently intelligent, a college degree is unnecessary. Will it help? Depends. I interviewed at Google to run part of their infrastructure, and they scuffed that I didn't have a degree. They also would have only payed me a third of what I'm making now.

    At the end of the day, your intelligence and adaptably is what will carry you.

  114. Sort of a slap in the face... by Etherwalk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You'd think it would be sort of a slap in the face to everybody in the audience who'd actually spent four years *working* for their diplomas. Yes, Gates did all this cool stuff, but he didn't actually complete the requirements of a single major, did he? Well, maybe computer science, one would hope, in terms of how much he learned over the years. Still... a slap in the face, really.

    Except, of course, that a good set of the kids at Harvard are smart enough to realize that a diploma's just a piece of paper, and I'm sure that the graduating students have already been asked to donate to the school, so they're not all caught up in the illusion that the school's above giving honorary diplomas to rich drop-outs.

    "In all fairness to Mr. Mellon, it was a very big check." --Dean (of the college) Martin, Back to School

  115. Honorary Degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watching the likes of Bill Gates receiving his honorary degree is ridiculous.

    A university in Louisiana gave Tim McGraw one and he was a college dropout. They even limited the number of attendees to the graduation to ONLY 2 or 3 immediate family members as I understand it.

    I think the idiots need to go through the program just like the rest of us to get the f*cking degree. I don't care if they are successful or not. Seems like a slap in the face for the rest of us.

    In the end, who gives a sh*t.

  116. Re:Why? Well... by qwijibo · · Score: 1

    It's actually a pretty decent plan if it's phrased right. Someone with a background in technology looking to get an entry level technology job is going to expect a lower salary than a college graduate, increasing the probability of finding a job. Someone just out of high school would not be disserved by getting some real world experience to see if they really enjoy the field before committing to spending 20+ years working in it, or even going to college for 4+ years to get a degree.

    Someone going to a community college part time while trying to learn on the job would probably be in the best position to try this. How many employers are going to consider working your way through school to be a bad thing? That's basically what I did, but I didn't end up finishing college. Not having a degree may have closed off some options for me, but since I started working as a programmer in high school, a lot of professional experience is compelling to those who want to see a degree. At this point, I don't find anyone asking me why I don't go back and get my degree to supplement my 19 years of professional experience.

  117. It wasn't for going over his time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was for stealing time on someone else's account. He had racked up a five figure bill before they caught him. This was in the seventies when that was a lot of computer time and really a lot of money. He should admit it now and tell the whole story. It would help to humanize him and make him a more sympathetic figure to the public. Covering up his youthful misdeeds is bad public relations.

  118. Completely unnecessary by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

    Why do this when Microsoft can just acquire Harvard, rename it "Microsoft Office Live University", and print off degress by the thousands using a niffty template and spell-checker?

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  119. innovation through analysing and stealing .. by rs232 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    'what exactly was Billy boy so good at'

    Innovating Windows by analysing the Mac system ..

    'we should be analysing the Mac system as it evolves and improves and innovating what makes sense'

    Innovating the NetPC, by copying it ..

    was Re:Programming whiz? 'We go nuclear and release our own WBT spec, press release with our own OEMs, and directly counter the Intel spec'

    Innovating Iexplorer by cloning Netscape ..

    I think we should have to do even more cloning (esp. LiveScript) of Netscape

    Innovating msOffice by stealing features from ClarisWorks ..

    Our biggest competitor. We should remove all reasons anybody might have for sticking with this product rather than upgrade to Office. What features do we need to steal?

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  120. Re:Good for him by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty certain that there's really a very short list of people who've been found to have commited war crimes, that actually signed up to treaties that said they 'shouldn't do that'.
    The person himself doesn't need to sign the paper, His country as an authority does. This could have happened by leaders long since gone like in the case of the US. And on the other case, they could be subjected to it by terms of defeat.

    Which I suppose is the way it goes really. There's not really any 'international justice' just people you're more afraid of than others. If you're lucky, the guy with the most firepower and enthusiasm is also the one who's interested in 'high standards' in terms of war crimes and human rights.
    Generally, there is a central power of ideals. This is to say that treaties have defined in which ways we interact on apposing levels and common grounds. But action against some country's wishes really would take the greater of powers or collective powers to enforce it. This is whyb WW2 had happened and the same with Iraq. No one was willing to enforce terms of the treaties that obligated both sides to certain practices or prohibitions. Well, In the later, the US was finally willing to enforce it but the rest of the world still seems to be unwilling in enforcing it.

    One which they might acknowledge and do something about, but ... well if the government does 'back' whoever's found as a criminal, then you fall back to the other options, of hoping they come to visit, and kidnap them, or letting rip with the war machine.
    There is a real problem with this. It is a disconnect from reality associated with Idealism. You see, If the country isn't willing to goto war to enforce it's principles because the entirety of the other country backs a certain person, then the kidnapping is likely going to cause a war in response. If they are trying to avoid war, then any normal person would believe they wouldn't do something that would create one. But more importantly, There is a question of honor and diplomacy. It is traditionally prudent that another country doesn't enforce it's laws onto diplomatic officials visiting their country. You may have heard of the concept of diplomatic immunity before now. They can remove them from the country, use their action to break off relations with that other country and a host of other things but kidnapping a diplomat and holding a mock trial would be an act of war anyway you look at it. Further, it will hamper that countries ability to remain diplomatic with other countries. It is likely the other countries in the area will support the country who has had their official kidnapped over the principles of the kidnapping country because of how crucial it is for diplomats to be available to resolve conflicts. Just look at WW1.

    One of the most scariest effects might be the loss of the ability to negotiate terms of surrender, or terms of peace. It would revert our clean wars to older kill'em all wars were the only way to win is to destroy the conflicting idealism completely and force change by placing a person in fear of losing their life. I could see an action like this being one of the few means to justify using Nukes. Not that using Nukes with the knowledge we know now is justifiable, but this could be the one exception to anyone who is sitting over them.

    And yes, It is sort of fun. And yes, it did go off topic. Sorry about dragging you along on this journey.
  121. Harvard today just an expensive Phoenix University by vision33r · · Score: 1

    Harvard is no different than Phoenix University Online that sells degrees.

  122. Re:He is NOT a dropout; he is on a leave of absenc by xenocide2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If Gates is such a great coder, he should release the source to prove it!

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  123. Re:Degrees are overrated... Skills are important! by drsquare · · Score: 1

    If you don't get a degree then how do you get a job? You won't have any experience because you haven't got the job in the first place.

  124. cheap degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess they give one to anyone these days.