You don't think you inferred it when you lumped them together with the phrase "sick people both"?
Seeing the world in absolutes, black/white, either/or instead of as various shades of gray is itself often a sign of mental illness.
Interesting. Anyway, resorting to swearing often means you have too poor a vocabulary and insufficient intelligence to express your "thoughts" any other way. But enough about you.
By the way 'infer', the word I used above, means to say something without saying it, to hint at it in a roundabout way. You probably get it confused with 'imply'.
The reason that so few people do well is because it takes knowledge, diligence and being closely related to the CEO to recognize the true value of stock
If 'X' is a tens digit, then it functions in context identically to our own tens digit: 0.
If it's just a straight substitution s/0/X/ (and/or a conversion to base 11?) then what's the point?
Whatever base you use then there could be a number with none of a particular power of that base so you'd need something to act as a placeholder. Unless you went with something like the Roman system.
Perhaps I'm missing something?
Perhaps. But bear in mind the pareto principle (20% of your customers usually give 80% of the profit) and also economies of scale (the overheads on a $1000 sale aren't 100 times those of a ten-buck one).
So the assertion that driving small sellers away is losing them money is by no means certain. It could well be the case that the the little guys just aren't worth dealing with.
Of course there's also the phenomenon where the more users there are, the more attractive it is to other users. There's a buzzword for it that I forgot.
1) They'd suck, 2a) Then they'd get bought out by Microsoft 2b) or by Yahoo and then by Microsoft 3) And continue to suck at least as much, and probably more.
There might be profit at step 2, for the original owners.
Korea spends a lot of its time being nationalistic (just look at the anti-U.S. mad cow demonstrations happening now), yet they send I-don't-know-how-many-billions of dollars to the U.S. for Windows XP every year.
You must bne right. I mean it's a long way from China. In fact I don't know why I mentioned that, since China isn't the intergalactic centre for piracy at all.
The white collar, resort type?
You don't think you inferred it when you lumped them together with the phrase "sick people both"?
Interesting. Anyway, resorting to swearing often means you have too poor a vocabulary and insufficient intelligence to express your "thoughts" any other way. But enough about you.
By the way 'infer', the word I used above, means to say something without saying it, to hint at it in a roundabout way. You probably get it confused with 'imply'.
Rest assured he was on the internet within minutes, registering his disgust.
Fixed.
Do you think they're equally sick? Because as far as I can see one group aren't actually harming anyone.
At last, global warming debunked!
You're just jealous because he went one better than you. Right, Hans?
IANAL, but I suspect that if you skip bail, you don't get the money back. The man keeps it, man!
Maybe it's for the benfit of the Yurpeans. I here they have metric time over there.
For some reason, your post made me think of Hans Reiser.
Fixed that for you.
If it's just a straight substitution s/0/X/ (and/or a conversion to base 11?) then what's the point? Whatever base you use then there could be a number with none of a particular power of that base so you'd need something to act as a placeholder. Unless you went with something like the Roman system. Perhaps I'm missing something?
Perhaps. But bear in mind the pareto principle (20% of your customers usually give 80% of the profit) and also economies of scale (the overheads on a $1000 sale aren't 100 times those of a ten-buck one).
So the assertion that driving small sellers away is losing them money is by no means certain. It could well be the case that the the little guys just aren't worth dealing with.
Of course there's also the phenomenon where the more users there are, the more attractive it is to other users. There's a buzzword for it that I forgot.
How would you represent a number that had zero as one of the coefficients, i.e if I subtracted 6 x X (or indeed, 4) from 13X64?
Also how does one resolve the ambiguity of 31X? Is that three X cubed plus 1 X squared plus ten units? Or is it three X squared plus twenty units?
Slashdot readers are all roadies?
Probably because morality and religiosity, even if they aren't entirely orthogonal, are most definitely not the same thing.
I'm sure you have a cite for that.
Confucius, he say: "Profit proportional to size of customer; work proportional to number of customers".
1) They'd suck,
2a) Then they'd get bought out by Microsoft
2b) or by Yahoo and then by Microsoft
3) And continue to suck at least as much, and probably more.
There might be profit at step 2, for the original owners.
A mix of propane and butane - pootane?
You forgot about:
candidate C - some relative of a C*0.
candidate D - who has massive boobs.
Fuels from bodily waste. Will you choose peesel or shitroleum?
You must bne right. I mean it's a long way from China. In fact I don't know why I mentioned that, since China isn't the intergalactic centre for piracy at all.
Is it the Tannhauser gate?
Nothing, asshole.
True but is it that much of an issue anyway? It's a fictitious setting so they could have called it "Inventium" if they'd wanted.
[strokes beard a little] Of course that wouldn't have generated any free publicity, would it?