Slashdot Mirror


EBay Deal Irritates Individual Sellers

Dekortage writes "EBay's recent deal with Buy.com appears to be seriously irritating its veteran individual sellers. The deal allows Buy.com and other large fixed-price retailers to list millions of items on eBay without paying listing fees, and appears to be the direction that eBay will follow in the future. Understandably, individual sellers are outraged. 'I've paid eBay many hundreds of thousands in fees over the past several years and believed them when they talked about a level playing field. And they just plain and simple are going back on their word.' This comes after the dire prediction that eBay is losing its popularity."

382 comments

  1. No competition by N8F8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With no real competition in the online auctions and micropayment system, I don't see things getting better. Craigslist auction anyone?

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:No competition by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Google auctions, more likely. Craigslist's business model is ridiculous.

      --
      .
    2. Re:No competition by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

      Craigslist's business model is ridiculous

      And just what alternative do you suggest that provides all of the listing of a normal classifieds section and the "value added" services of casual hookups and marijuana dealers? ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:No competition by Notquitecajun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Many of the hard-core ebay whiners on its website are practically BEGGING google to open up an auction site, mostly because it will have practically millions as a buyer base overnight. Ebay's other competitors can't match that yet.

    4. Re:No competition by mr_mischief · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think Craigslist's business model is fine. Although they're registered as a for-profit business, they have no desire to become a large commercial enterprise. They're doing very well at not becoming a large commercial enterprise, I think.

    5. Re:No competition by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Don't think that to be possible... mostly because I doubt that it would fit all to well with CL's local feeling.

      I can however see someone like Google (as sibling mentioned) or one of the until-now-unknown competition sites growing a pair and doing something that captures enough attention to draw away eBay's customer base.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re:No competition by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      You must work for Oracle? ;) I've not seen anyone describe the CL model as "ridiculous" so can you elaborate?

    7. Re:No competition by Wister285 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They have a business model? What is it?

    8. Re:No competition by yorkrj · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I think the time is right for some enterprising developers to come up with the next killer e-commerce app to eclipse eBay.

    9. Re:No competition by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, there is gunbroker.com which lets you buy/sell things fleabay won't (anything gun related, etc). And they have several domains pointing to them as well (forthehunt.com, a few others). No listing fees for basic listings, they do picture hosting for you, and if you don't "upgrade" your listings, you only pay when the item sells.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    10. Re:No competition by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Your forgot the hookers.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    11. Re:No competition by Gewalt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Their model is to *not* sellout. They are doing quite well at that.

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    12. Re:No competition by Cerberus7 · · Score: 1, Funny

      In fact, forget the casual hookups and marijuana dealers!

      --
      I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
    13. Re:No competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Man, what are YOU smoking?!

    14. Re:No competition by Waterppk · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are lots of auction services out there - Reviews from 2008 of reasonable eBay competition

    15. Re:No competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And where can I get some?

    16. Re:No competition by harrkev · · Score: 4, Informative

      They have a business model? What is it?

      From Craigslist Factsheet:

      Q: How does craigslist support its operations?
      A: By charging below-market fees for job ads in 10 cities, and for brokered apartment listings in NYC.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    17. Re:No competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about ebid.net ? it appears to have many listings and forms of payment...

    18. Re:No competition by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But no guns. Heaven forbid you buy a scope on craigslist :)

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    19. Re:No competition by Idbar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Given that I don't like EBay, I must say that that's mainly the main reason I don't use Google Products (or whatever name it has now). It's amazing the amount of results aiming to unreal prices of 0.01 dollars you get when you try to look for something there.

      If I could talk to Google, I'd like to know that I can block undesired sites in my product search, permanently!.

    20. Re:No competition by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      1) They'd suck,
      2a) Then they'd get bought out by Microsoft
      2b) or by Yahoo and then by Microsoft
      3) And continue to suck at least as much, and probably more.

      There might be profit at step 2, for the original owners.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    21. Re:No competition by Broken+scope · · Score: 2, Informative

      They also provide a nice list of FFL's so you can get your gun shipped to you.

      --
      You mad
    22. Re:No competition by swb · · Score: 1

      Amazon is about as bad, although I think accessories and related items are allowed, just no receivers, barrels, cylinders or other "gun parts."

      I think if you could somehow clone Craigslist but as "BrowningsList" that allowed guns, you'd have a real success that would probably bankrupt GunsAmerica and GunBroker, especially for those states that allow person-person transfers between residents.

    23. Re:No competition by LWATCDR · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Ebay owns a chuck of craigslist.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    24. Re:No competition by Khyber · · Score: 1

      In what way is it ridiculous? The fact that it's FREE? The fact that you can find some entertaining posts on there? The fact that you've got a better chance of selling your possessions online than thru a newspaper, which not many read nowdays?

      Maybe it's ridiculous because you work for Google and you're just shilling. One thing is certain, you're talking out of your ass.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    25. Re:No competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think that "Google Checkout" was designed just as a way to give you $10 off your purchases and a few percent of the meaningless (read: small) purchases you make? It is quite obvious that Google has designs for some sort of future auction type site. The payment system is probably one of the most important aspects and Google would not want to use PayPal (for obvious reasons). As with most Google products though, one day it won't be there and the next day it will. (And it will be free, thanks to Adware.)

    26. Re:No competition by dougisfunny · · Score: 5, Funny

      Check craigslist

      --
      This is not the funny you're looking for.
    27. Re:No competition by N8F8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The trouble is that eBay is the "market maker". They provide the best market for selling used goods on the internet. Sure you could use another service, but you probably won't make as much money since their market is much smaller.

      --
      "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    28. Re:No competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      craigslist

    29. Re:No competition by s.bots · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Their model is to *not* sellout. They are doing quite well at that.

      The last entry on the craigslist fact sheet

      Q: Is there a connection between craigslist and eBay?
      A: eBay acquired 25% of the equity in craigslist from a former shareholder in august of 2004.

    30. Re:No competition by EdIII · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not only their business model. Their staff are mentally challenged too. Craigslist has the MOST restrictive mail servers I have EVER SEEN. I think military email servers on the edges of their networks are less stringent on who they receive email from. If you have an ISP email account or a free email account from one of the big providers, you don't have a problem. If you operate your own mail server, you may have a problem.

      Craigslist requires that you have a ReverseDNS on the connecting IP address that matches the domain in the FROM HEADER, not the HELO/EHLO. That's insane. Only large corporations can do that in the first place.

      I bugged those people for over a month and they would not budge on anything. Their policy does not even make SPAM impossible either. It just makes it impossible for any small business with their own domain to email Craigslist at all. You can only get through on the Postmaster account, not even staff accounts. The funny part, that their staff is not smart enough to understand, is that SPAMMERS can hijack whole network address spaces and add any ReverseDNS that they want. They actually think ReverseDNS is some sort of super shield they can hide behind to eliminate all SPAM.

      The frustrating thing is that even businesses offering hosted email services cannot communicate with Craigslist since they are demanding a wholly separate IP address with a corresponding ReverseDNS for EVERY domain that you service. So it is legitimate people that get hurt, not the SPAMMERS.

      Craigslist is aware of the problem. Their solution? Get a free email account at Google. What I love about that little gem of customer support wisdom, is that the user then calls me up and asks why I am so incompetent that I cannot even deliver an email to Craigslist. I have to carefully explain to them that Craigslist is refusing their email and why.

      Maybe I am just ranting here, but I seriously doubt Craiglist is going to scale up in the future when they have people like this running their networks in the back rooms.

    31. Re:No competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I could talk to Google, I'd like to know that I can block undesired sites in my product search, permanently!.

      For web searches, Google has a "Dissatisfied? Help us improve" link. Sadly, it's not there on product searches.

    32. Re:No competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see eBay adding erotic services any time soon...

    33. Re:No competition by Pancake+Bandit · · Score: 1

      craigslist didn't have any control over that, from my understanding

    34. Re:No competition by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time, ebay was just an auction site that let people buy and sell informally. Now that they have mixed in retail sellers, it's not any longer an auction site anyhow. When you sell an item for a fixed price, as many retailers do on ebay, it's not an auction, sorry.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    35. Re:No competition by cleverhandle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Craigslist requires that you have a ReverseDNS on the connecting IP address that matches the domain in the FROM HEADER, not the HELO/EHLO. That's insane. Only large corporations can do that in the first place.

      Wowee zowee... I never realized that my half-dozen computers and my big, lazy butt qualified as a large corporation. But since I've had proper reverse DNS on my mail server for that last 5 years, that's obviously the only explanation.

    36. Re:No competition by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      Precisely - I'm not paying eBay to show a little page with my listing on, I'm paying them to show a little page with my listing on where thousands of potential buyers will see it. I don't sell enough volume to justify spending my eBay fees directly on advertising instead yet, so for now I'm more or less stuck with them.

    37. Re:No competition by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Sure, but what a beautiful website design!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    38. Re:No competition by MagdJTK · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah! What kind of crazy world do we live in where sex is legal and killing people isn't?!

    39. Re:No competition by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I shoot paper, not people. Sometime in the future, I may shoot deer, I dunno. All that (and people too) are legal to shoot depending on circumstances.

      But yeah, casual hookups for free is a valuable service, although I doubt the M/F ratio is near 1:1

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    40. Re:No competition by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1
      That's exactly it. We Americans have a very distorted perspective.

      Used to be you could open a little produce shop, live above it, sell produce at a reasonable price and provide personalized service to your customers, and by that make enough money to support your family and pay your bills... and that was all you needed - you were successful, your business was successful, and you were happy.

      You did that until you retired, and if your kids took over the store, great - if instead they went to college and became doctors or accountants or opened up a used furniture store and did like you did - great.

      The American dream, you were all happy and successful.

      NOW, if your produce store doesn't become "FRUITCO," with thousands of locations, grabbing the most market share and beating out "GREENSCO" to become the biggest produce corporation on the planet with diversified subsidiaries, then you're "failing."

      Nationally we seem to have an all-or-nothing mentality.

      --
      This space available.
    41. Re:No competition by rhizome · · Score: 1

      I'm paying them to show a little page with my listing on where thousands of potential buyers will see it.

      This raises a question: how many potential buyers do you need to see your listing in order for you to make the listing? If you don't know what this number is (or even why it's not "fewer") then your attachment to EBay would seem to be irrational.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    42. Re:No competition by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Same here, although mine is a leased dedicated box. In any event, getting RDNS set up for a legitimate mail server that's running anywhere other than your residential ISP account is generally trivial, and VPS accounts on which to run that server aren't expensive at all.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    43. Re:No competition by Knara · · Score: 1

      I can't be Alyson Hannigan's neighbor if I'm not supar-rich, though.

      Well, I could be, but *officially* a big refrigerator box doesn't count.

    44. Re:No competition by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's exactly it. We Americans have a very distorted perspective.

      Used to be you could open a little produce shop, live above it, sell produce at a reasonable price and provide personalized service to your customers, and by that make enough money to support your family and pay your bills... and that was all you needed - you were successful, your business was successful, and you were happy.

      You did that until you retired, and if your kids took over the store, great - if instead they went to college and became doctors or accountants or opened up a used furniture store and did like you did - great.

      The American dream, you were all happy and successful.

      NOW, if your produce store doesn't become "FRUITCO," with thousands of locations, grabbing the most market share and beating out "GREENSCO" to become the biggest produce corporation on the planet with diversified subsidiaries, then you're "failing."

      Nationally we seem to have an all-or-nothing mentality.

      Actually, I think that one of the bigger obstacles to small shops as you describe are the infrastructure requirements and costs to be in the market. The laws, legal liabilities, and regulations regarding any sort of business these days is centered around a large corporate entity.

      Complying with regulations and laws regarding things like records, reporting requirements, insurance, certified inspection and licensing, zoning permits, labor laws, taxes, etc etc, on and on, cost a large corporation only a tiny fractional percentage of their gross income, but the percentage does not scale down linearly to small shops and is prohibitive. Not saying that all or any of the above is good or bad per se, just that in total, the costs of all of the burdens that are put in place to regulate and restrain the behaviors of big corporations are beyond the means of many small operators.

      Cheers!

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    45. Re:No competition by Blackknight · · Score: 1

      What business model? I still can't see how they manage to pay their bills.

    46. Re:No competition by Blackknight · · Score: 1

      Why does it have to be Google, couldn't some other company start their own auction site? There's even open source scripts to start your own, not sure how they would scale with millions of hits though.

    47. Re:No competition by EdIII · · Score: 1

      That sounds a little sarcastic. However, try running multiple domains at the same time. You can only have one rDNS associated with an IP address. You obviously have a static IP address too which most businesses would and is not that unusual for private entities either. I think you are making it sound a bit easier than it really is.

      I don't think most ISPs are allowing rDNS on business accounts. At least not any that I have had dealings with. In any case if you are trying to service several hundred domains with email service it's hardly feasible to have a separate public IP address for each one with an associated rDNS entry. Are you colocated? How is your mail server connected to the net? How much do you pay per month?

      My experience is that Craigslist was checking the domain in the FROM header against the rDNS from the connecting IP address. If they did not match then I received an error code from the mail server and the SMTP session was terminated. That is what makes them pretty unreasonable.

      rDNS is not a very good indication of trustworthiness in the first place. You are better off using SPF to verify that the IP address of the remote mail server is authorized to send email on behalf of that domain. Of course since that is not always defined, or often left wide open you have to use other methods in conjunction with SPF. Like Policy Block Lists, and Drop Lists in general.

      There are many ways to fight spam and rDNS is not really that effective of a tool in the first place. There are ways around it, which have already been done in some cases. It does not help that Craigslist is using it incorrectly too.

    48. Re:No competition by Eil · · Score: 1

      I rarely use eBay for selling my miscellaneous junk anymore. They've made it so difficult and raised the listing fees so high that it's just not worth it. They also do little to prevent fraud (because they make money off it anyway) and they also have no problem taking down your auction and refusing to refund the listing fees if some giant software house in Washington doesn't want you to resell legitimate software.

      Craigslist has gained enough critical mass that I can sell just about anything right here in my city. The listing is free, there's no shipping, and I'm MUCH less likely to get ripped off by the person who shows up at my front door to hand me cash versus some anonymous address on the other side of the country.

    49. Re:No competition by greymond · · Score: 1

      Ya competition is a big issue.

      Lots of people complain about Ebay and it's freeze all accounts happy pet PayPal. Yet neither has a viable alternative. For Ebay you can go with either Overstock or Paypal, but while CL may have a huge following their isn't any of the benefits to a business such as sale tracking and record keeping that Ebay has somewhat of a capability to do. Also you have to deal with people or competitors flagging items and a system that automatically removes them after some time that just creates a lot of problems for companies (not so much individuals).

      Overstock on the other hand is very similar to Ebay, but there is just nowhere near the consumer traffic - which isn't too surprising considering it was a middle aged blond lady who could be my mom telling me about the website in a dress that I suppose should have been sexy, but...it's like my mom.

      As far as PayPal there seems to be no one who's even close to offering anything like it. And the alternatives on the anti-PayPal sites are all bullshit, because I've tried to use some of them and I either have to pay some type of monthly fee, on top of a transaction fee or it's a significant higher cost per transaction.

      Oh well, maybe google will come up with a real answer soon.

    50. Re:No competition by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      I don't really see what you mean - why should there be a specific number? Unless I'm making some massive logical fallacy here, the more potential buyers seeing a listing, the better. There are far more users on eBay than any other online auction system, therefore I use eBay.

    51. Re:No competition by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Gunsam3rica did have a craigslist style system with some nice features. They ripped it out and went to the crap they have now. It's execrable and slow since they will not upgrade their servers or their bandwidth and they pretty much just tossed every account from the old system.
      I don't know how many accounts were stolen in the transition.

      Auction arms spammed every account holder for a total scumbag.

      I still use Gunbroker, they've kept a clean system that's easy to use and haven't ticked me off yet. There are the gun boards where you can buy and sell but with some risk of fraud and the online gun dealers.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    52. Re:No competition by TheSeer2 · · Score: 1

      The whole thing about online auctions is, it's a natural monopoly. It's in people's best interests to have one service because that service will also have the largest range of items to buy and the largest range of people to sell to. So... if you offer particularly bad service it'll take a while for to fall. But it will happen.

    53. Re:No competition by longacre · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would think a firearms auction site would be the last place scammers would want to fuck around.

    54. Re:No competition by longacre · · Score: 1

      They charge $25 for help wanted ads in a few markets and $10 for broker-marketed apartments in New York City. Revenue estimates from a few years ago when they started charging for job ads were around $10 million a year, now that most help wanted is done online, plus the hundreds of NYC broker ads that go up every day, and you're easily north of $20 million, probably more.

    55. Re:No competition by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I shoot paper, not people.

      Which is fine as long as you keep in mind what is behind the paper.
      I've seen to many people who don't think about what is behind the paper (and the stopping power of paper) and really they should have their weapons shoved up their ass sideways.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    56. Re:No competition by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      But yeah, casual hookups for free is a valuable service, although I doubt the M/F ratio is near 1:1

      Or maybe the M/F ratio is near 1:1, but the M/F _weight_ ratio leans heavily toward the latter?

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    57. Re:No competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offence but if they're rating eBay as number one then I don't think they have much credibility

    58. Re:No competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dealt with Gunbroker once years ago and they still send me a "Monthly Statement" with new charges on it. WTF?!

    59. Re:No competition by DiarmuidBourke · · Score: 1

      Ah screw the whole thing!

    60. Re:No competition by scribblej · · Score: 1

      I pay $9.95 a month for a VPS, and that gets me /two/ IP addresses /with/ proper reverse DNS.

      FEAR MY CORPORATE POWER!

    61. Re:No competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well seeing as how Ebay owns part of craigs list you are only feeding the same company in a different way.

    62. Re:No competition by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Which is fine as long as you keep in mind what is behind the paper.

      Concrete. If I have to shoot a person, .40hp has relatively low overpenetration, and .223 frangible shatters if you look at it funny.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    63. Re:No competition by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      The legal firearms market in the US is enormous. Scammers are trying to make a fast buck constantly and this market has their share. Because of the laws it's hard for them to get a 'legally non-antique' firearm so they'll go after antiques, money, accessories and anything else not as regulated.

      Auctions sites are in most cases very good. There's quite a bit more protection than walking into a local store. If an online auction dealer screws up enough they lose. The local store may never have that problem no matter how badly they treat people if they have enough traffic.

      The trading facilitated by discussion forums does have some draw backs but someone who isn't bone headed stupid can do ok. You just have to work harder at it.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    64. Re:No competition by rhizome · · Score: 1

      Unless I'm making some massive logical fallacy here, the more potential buyers seeing a listing, the better

      You didn't say that, you said that you're paying EBay money to put your listing in front of X number of visitors. Implicitly there is a point at which the number of visitors to an auction site is not worth the money you would have to pay to put it there. I was just wondering what that point was.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    65. Re:No competition by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      If I'd meant a specific number I would have used a specific number - "thousands" could just as easily have been replaced by "lots" or even "as many as possible". I simply used "thousands" as an approximate and unscientific estimation of the kind of numbers passing through any particular eBay search category.

      Basically, you've just taken the wrong point from my original post. What I meant when I said "I'm not paying eBay to show a little page with my listing on" was that the page hosting and checkout services are not what I want from an auction site, access to the large user base is, thus it makes sense to pay those fees to the site with by far the largest. I'm treating it more or less as an advertising service. That chart way back up at the top of the comment tree was comparing all of the technical features of the various auction sites, and I was simply agreeing that, in my opinion, they'd missed the point and that as long as an approximate baseline is met I don't really care what technical services I'm getting for my money, I care about maximising the potential views.

    66. Re:No competition by alexo · · Score: 1

      >But no guns. Heaven forbid you buy a scope on craigslist :)

      It's a problem if you live in Canada.

      I got a set of Lazer Tag "guns". They are lots of fun but my son complained that he cannot hit with them.
      So, I got a holo (red dot) sight to mount on his gun.
      Problem is, the LCD screens interferes with the mounting so I needed to buy a riser.

      This is not a gun nor a weapon of any kind, not even a scope. Just two pieces of machined metal held together with a screw. Worth about $10 online.

      Not a single store I could find agreed to ship to Canada.
      And don't talk to me about postage. Wherever the warehouse is, Ontario is closer to it than at least 5 states.

  2. everything is about money by A+little+Frenchie · · Score: 0

    and it will never ever ever change

    1. Re:everything is about money by hostyle · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're forgetting about Peak Money and also failing to take into account the effects of Global Earning! Wheres Al Gore when we need him ...

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    2. Re:everything is about money by Warhawke · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'd say hunting for Manbearpig, but sources tell me his MASSIVE home energy consumption is fueling its containment cage.

  3. First post by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

    Even though, this being about eBay, having the LAST post is the only one that counts.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:First post by xonar · · Score: 0, Redundant

      ok

  4. Bottom Line by Hyppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless it is in a binding contract, with severe penalties, you should never expect a company to "keep its word." This is especially true when keeping said word affects the almighty Bottom Line. Cash is king, peon.

    1. Re:Bottom Line by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You hear that kind of excuse a lot, just like when a politician does something particularly egregious (e.g. Obama's FISA vote) you hear people explaining, "Oh, that's just a compromise to get more votes. He can't do anything if he isn't elected."

      The problem with the stock explanation is that it's very often just wrong. Ebay's current emphasis on big sellers at the expense of individuals is losing them money, just like Obama's FISA sellout is losing him votes. Piss off your core market to chase some other potential market, and odds are you won't do well with either. By all means, businesses should try to expand their customer base and politicians should try to appeal to more voters. But when you abandon the people who got you where you are in the first place, you're almost guaranteed to suffer overall.

      Businesses that do well are those which build a steady, loyal customer base that keeps coming back for more. This is particularly true in the online world, where changing to a competitor is very, very easy; the few success stories to come out of the dot-com mania of a decade ago show how to do it right. Amazon, for all its evil, still does a damned good job of selling books. Google, no matter what else it does, remains far and away the best general-purpose search engine. Until a couple of years ago, I'd have counted Ebay among those success stories, but now it looks as though they were just as flaky as any HowFastCanWeBurnVentureCapital.com site; they just took longer to show it.

      Suits and their sycophants love to talk tough about how they serve the bottom line ... but in the real world, the suits are wrong more often than not, and here's a sterling example.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Bottom Line by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      While in general that's true, there is a concept known as promissory estoppel. IANAL, so I can't say it can be applied here or give legal advice to those who feel wronged by this turn of events.

      The basic concept is that if someone promises you something and you act in good faith based on that promise, then they are bound to keep the promise. I seriously doubt that people can[t hold eBay responsible for past auctions or auctions they haven't listed yet. Auctions listed before this announcement that have yet to close might be an issue.

    3. Re:Bottom Line by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

      Unless it is in a binding contract, with severe penalties, you should never expect a company to "keep its word." This is especially true when keeping said word affects the almighty Bottom Line.

      But there are no listing fees. As you note, "Cash is king"--so how is Ebay making money off this deal? I don't know the aswer to that question. But even though there aren't listing fees, Ebay is certainly charging buy.com money. It might be, for example, a monthly sum--this would be the equivalent to purchasing listing fees in bulk. Divide whatever Ebay does charge buy.com and divide that by the number of listings it posts, and that is it's listing fee--it isn't really $0.00. So the playing field isn't quite as skewed as it initially appears (though it's still probably skewed, unless Ebay really screwed buy.com on whatever it does charge, or if buy.com really screwed ebay and gave them little or nothing).

    4. Re:Bottom Line by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, you shouldn't just let it go if they break their word just because there's no binding contract with severe penalties. A company should keep their word, and if they break it, pointing that out to people and trying to convince them to take their business elsewhere is fitting punishment.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    5. Re:Bottom Line by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How was what I wrote a "political rant"? I'm talking about the effectiveness of business and political strategies, not about the merits of political positions. The Obama/FISA analogy naturally occurred to me because, as a Democrat, I pay attention to what my candidate is doing; I'm sure a Republican could have come up with a similar analogy involving McCain.

      Apparently you missed the actual point of my post, so I'll say it again: businessmen, like politicians, very frequently do really dumb things, and they always have sycophants who will explain that they're doing those dumb things in pursuit of getting more of whatever they're interested in (money in business, votes in politics) while ignoring the fact that they actually end up with less of whatever it is they're after. So yes, it is just making excuses instead of actually looking at (to borrow a phrase from another hot topic) the facts on the ground.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    6. Re:Bottom Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Careful how your phrase that. "Severe Penalties" make a contract unenforceable. In fact, "Penalties" can make it questionable. Predetermined contract damages must be fair and equitable, as determined from the time a contract is entered into. If I contract for $10k of your services, plus $10k liquidated damages if you fail to hold up your end, the contract probably won't be enforceable.

      Even the notorious US mobile phone contracts have run into problems enforcing their more egregious terms.

    7. Re:Bottom Line by moderatorrater · · Score: 2

      I disagree, at least with the spirit of the post. Most market-leading companies will do very well keeping their promises for a while, then they'll build a user base, refine on their core business model, and become very good at what they do. At some point, they'll fuck it up (like ebay's doing now, like google's nearly done with privacy many time) to the point where a large portion of the user base leaves. EBay's done very well for its sellers for a long time now, and it's only in the past year or two that it's started to get into serious trouble. If you count this deal as the time when they fuck it up, they've been serving people quite well for over a decade. That's pretty good in my book.

    8. Re:Bottom Line by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      There's another part (which is lacking): relying on that promise causes harm or detriment of some sort.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    9. Re:Bottom Line by mosinu · · Score: 1

      Unless it is in a binding contract, with severe penalties, you should never expect a company to "keep its word." This is especially true when keeping said word affects the almighty Bottom Line. Cash is king, peon.

      IANL; But I would think that if Ebay stated something to the effect of a level playing field this would fall under a "gentleman's agreement" or verbal contract. Having reneged on that agreement wouldn't they now be in breach of contract? I've seen people get sued for breaking off an engagement, so I would think you could apply the same here.

    10. Re:Bottom Line by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      Ebay's current emphasis on big sellers at the expense of individuals is losing them money

      I'm sure you have a cite for that.

      Confucius, he say: "Profit proportional to size of customer; work proportional to number of customers".

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    11. Re:Bottom Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10k liquidated damages sounds about right. I want 10k worth of services done, you don't do them, you need to pay for me actually getting those done (Actual damages may be reduced by taking into account services already rendered and add the cost to get someone else to do them etc ).

    12. Re:Bottom Line by z80kid · · Score: 1
      > I'm sure a Republican could have come up with a similar analogy involving McCain.

      Heh heh. You think?

      You'd have trouble finding only one. That's why he's not very popular with the republican "base".

    13. Re:Bottom Line by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Worse yet, if you have many little customers, you control them. If you have few big ones, they control you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:Bottom Line by Kurt+Granroth · · Score: 1
      Your analogy between eBay's behavior and Obama's FISA vote is very apt but I believe you got the final conclusion exactly wrong. In both eBay's and Obama's case, the recent egregious behavior will likely have no noticeable effect on the bottom line. Why? Because in both cases, there isn't a viable alternative.

      Let's look at eBay. Say you are a small business owner selling on eBay and are (justifiably) upset about eBay's current emphasis. What are you going to do about it? Go somewhere else to sell your goods online? Where? There's really nowhere else you can go with the same reach and pull that you have on eBay.

      The Obama situation is identical. Say you are furious about his FISA betrayal... what of it? Your only choices are him or Bush again (in the guise of McCain).

      As long as there aren't viable alternatives, the only thing the little guy can do is stomp around yelling until he feels better.

      sigh

    15. Re:Bottom Line by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      The Obama/FISA analogy naturally occurred to me because, as a Democrat, I pay attention to what my candidate is doing; I'm sure a Republican could have come up with a similar analogy involving McCain.

      Like claiming to be pro-FISA and pro-immunity but not actually voting for the bill!
      How screwed up is that?

    16. Re:Bottom Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because Obama's core constituency is a bunch of whiney Digg and Slashot retards who have never had an original thought of their own. Get over yourselves you narcissistic liberal fucknuts.

    17. Re:Bottom Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These decisions only seem dumb to outsiders. In both cases, the entities involved have decided that they will get more of what they want by doing what they did. That you disagree with that decision, doesn't make it a dumb one, it generally means they have more information than you do.

      Never attribute to stupidity that which you can attribute to your own lack of information.

    18. Re:Bottom Line by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Well. I stopped selling on eBay years ago and sell on Amazon now.

      It IS possible to sell well on Amazon, it just takes a little more work to get started and you have to make adjustments, possibly change merch, etc.

      And Obama has lost my vote over FISA to a write-in. I do not like to be told I have no other choice but to bend over and take it.

      --
      This space available.
    19. Re:Bottom Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. tl;dr: assholes often try to pass off cynicism as realism, claiming that negative or soulless actions are "necessary." Although shitty things sometimes must be done, being shitty does not make an action necessary.

    20. Re:Bottom Line by magicbutton · · Score: 0

      You've hit the nail on the head.

      Running a business is not a social experiment where the business sits around hand wringing over whether or not they are living up to some nebulous ideal that some of it's customers may or may not have in their pea brains.

      They exist to make money. Period.
      Note that I'm not saying 'make money at any cost'.
      My comment to those griping about eBay negating the fees for the bigger customers: Get over it. This happens every day and it's how commerce works. Don't like this policy? Don't use eBay.

      This is no different than someone going in to Costco and getting a discount for buying the same bacon you can buy down the street. Everyone loves to get a discount for themselves but they get pissy when they see someone else getting one. [rolls eyes]

    21. Re:Bottom Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That excuse for Obama is ridiculous. He got this far by NOT catering to the very small group of people in support of shit like FISA. Obviously it wasn't about getting more votes.

    22. Re:Bottom Line by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. But bear in mind the pareto principle (20% of your customers usually give 80% of the profit) and also economies of scale (the overheads on a $1000 sale aren't 100 times those of a ten-buck one).

      So the assertion that driving small sellers away is losing them money is by no means certain. It could well be the case that the the little guys just aren't worth dealing with.

      Of course there's also the phenomenon where the more users there are, the more attractive it is to other users. There's a buzzword for it that I forgot.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    23. Re:Bottom Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > and politicians should try to appeal to more voters.

      No they shouldn't. Politicians should stand up for what they believe in. If lots of voters happen to agree with those beliefs, or admire the politician's integrity*, then great. If they don't then the politician should be looking for another job.

      Many of the evils in the world today can be traced back to politicians disingenuously chasing voters. That's where all those broken pre-election promises come from.

      *I threw up a little in my mouth when I typed that.

    24. Re:Bottom Line by FritzTheCat1030 · · Score: 1

      The problem with the stock explanation is that it's very often just wrong. Ebay's current emphasis on big sellers at the expense of individuals is losing them money, just like Obama's FISA sellout is losing him votes.

      Sure, but not necessarily a NET loss. How do you know the extra money Ebay is getting from the big sellers isn't more than what they're losing from individuals? How do you know Obama's shift toward center on the FISA issue isn't gaining more votes than he's losing? And these questions become even bigger unknowns when you look at their long-term implications as opposed to only the immediate consequences.

  5. The harder they fall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ebay has name recognition. That's all. Everything else they do can be done by another business following a similar model. It's not like they invented auctions, after all.

    1. Re:The harder they fall... by initdeep · · Score: 0

      why do people insist on calling ebay an auction site?

      it's not

      auctions dont end at a certain time.
      the end when the bids are no longer increasing.

      plain and simple

      an auction site would have a time limit for the bids to be increased.
      not some arbitrary deadline where the last person to enter a bid before the cutoff "wins".

    2. Re:The harder they fall... by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 1

      LOLWHUT? Stop sniping?

    3. Re:The harder they fall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      why do people insist on calling ebay an auction site?

      it's not

      auctions dont end at a certain time.
      the end when the bids are no longer increasing.

      plain and simple


      Wrong.

    4. Re:The harder they fall... by Hyppy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Methinks you need to review the definition of "auction," troll.

    5. Re:The harder they fall... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are many kinds of auctions. Accepting the highest bid by a certain time is one type. Lowering the price a particular amount at regular intervals until the first person present bids is another. An auction with no set ending time is a third.

      Webster's definition says nothing about a time limit.

    6. Re:The harder they fall... by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well there are silent auctions that work that way. But I agree the ebay system is rather ridiculous.

      Though you do need a time limit for advertising reasons. I think an interesting solution to all this would be bidding doesn't end until 6 hours after the last bid or the initial time limit was reached whichever comes last. And the seller could always opt to end it early if they really need it to stop on the day they wanted it to stop. Heck most sellers would even agree to a per day fee if the auction went long.

    7. Re:The harder they fall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, it is an auction, and a fixed time length.

      One thing eBay should do to fix one of the major problems of their auctions is that every time a bid is entered, and there is less than 5 minutes left on the auction, the auction time should be extended to 5 minutes.

      That way, there is none of this nonsense of waiting until 10 seconds before the end of the auction and then bidding furiously. If you knew that each time you bid you would extend it 5 minutes to give other's a chance, items would be selling for realistic values and not trumped up values in the last few seconds of an auction.

    8. Re:The harder they fall... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      auctions dont end at a certain time. the end when the bids are no longer increasing.

      You describe one type of auction. There are others that are used, such as the Dutch Auction. Just because eBay does not meet your idea of one type of auction does not make it not an auction site.

      One could also argue that auctions don't have a time before which they will not end -- in other words, offline auctions don't have a minimum time to run.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    9. Re:The harder they fall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because they call it an auction...

      http://pages.ebay.com/help/buy/buyer-auction.html

    10. Re:The harder they fall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why do people insist on calling ebay an auction site?

      it's not

      auctions dont end at a certain time.

      The same reason why people call /. a news site, I imagine--because it's close enough.

      Also, why is craigslist's personals a personals site? Personals are printed on paper and you dial a 900 number and punch in a 6-digit code.

      Bah.

    11. Re:The harder they fall... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what DabsExchange was doing ten years ago (although they extended it 10 minutes). I never understood why eBay didn't adopt the same idea.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:The harder they fall... by bdcrazy · · Score: 1

      What makes you think ebay wants to change it? Higher priced items give ebay more money. The trumped up values could be what ebay wants. Not saying this is the case, but it makes sense to me. The other two things it seems are that people fail to realize is the cost of something and how also ebay's systems work through proxy bidding, but that is a very different 28d6 fire damage.

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
    13. Re:The harder they fall... by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've said it before, I'll say it again: eBay is a broken sealed-first-price-auction where suckers are allowed to show their hand before conclusion. Anyone who bids in anything but the last few seconds of an auction is a _sucker_. Why announce to the world what you're willing to pay so that competitors can re-evaluate their bid and then one-up you?

      Also, uBid does exactly what you say. I've won quite a number of auctions on there because of people used to the eBay system who snipe in the last minute or so and then don't pay attention to the auction after that.

    14. Re:The harder they fall... by alexgieg · · Score: 1, Insightful

      an auction site would have a time limit for the bids to be increased. not some arbitrary deadline where the last person to enter a bid before the cutoff "wins".

      I don't see a problem with this system. People who follow this pattern you describe are trying to game the system to somehow get the item for less than what they're willing to pay. If you yourself refuse to play the game and approach these auctions differently, it doesn't cause you any trouble.

      For example, when I bid on something, I ask myself:

      "How much is this thing worth to me? Would I pay $100 for it? Yes. Would I pay $110? Yes. Would I pay $120? Hmm... yes. Would I pay $130? No! $125? No! $124? Hmm... no. $123? Hmm... yeah, I guess it's worth $123."

      Then, now that I know how much I'm REALLY willing to pay, I simply fill "$123" and let the auto-bidding thing play on itself.

      If later I discover I won the auction at $110, hey, great! I got the item and saved $13 from what I was willing to pay!

      If I win at exactly $123, great too! It was exactly what I was willing to pay!

      And if I lose because it sold at $140, hey, this is also great! Why? Because I already knew I didn't value that thing over $123.

      Thus, the trick is simple: fill the box with what you are willing to pay, not a cent more. Then let it run. What you won, you won. What you didn't, you're not missing it at all.

      But if you are missing it and thinking "I should have bid $x instead.", it was your error, because you didn't bid what you were REALLY willing to pay for it. Be always absolutely honest with yourself and the "guilty factor" will never happen.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    15. Re:The harder they fall... by nwf · · Score: 1

      Except I've noticed that people will bit up to some maximum, and if you bid higher well before the auction ends, they will up their bid. Your model only really works if everyone follows it. Sniping can result in a lower cost because people constantly bid up just by the minimum or slightly over. By bidding at the last second, you prevent them from re-bidding. I've used it many times to get items for less that what they sold for previously for on closed listings.

      Lastly, for rare items, I may not so much be concerned about the price. I just want the item, and there aren't many. In this case, you can often get a lower price sniping.

      Another good reason is for very common items. I can snipe, and if I miss, go to the next one instead of worrying about multiple bids and the like.

      Sniping is generally the best bid method on eBay, and that's why I hate eBay (that and it's become a retched hive of scum and villainy.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    16. Re:The harder they fall... by theguru · · Score: 1

      I like the idea of an anti-sniping system like this. Auction ends at Xo'clock on Y date, or 15 minutes to an hour (give the seller some control here) after the last bid is received, which ever comes later.
      You could even change the minimum bid-raise amount once an auction goes into "overtime", maybe 1% of the current price rounded to the nearest whole dollar amount. $490 TV would require $5 minimum bid increments after the initial close.
      Seller should always have the option to close an auction and accept the current high bid after the initial scheduled close.

    17. Re:The harder they fall... by strelitsa · · Score: 1

      I really don't accept what is apparently the conventional wisdom that sniping is a bad thing. The ability to not be sniped is always in the user's hands - simply bid more than the other guy is willing to pay. Besides, I get a woody woodpecker every time I snipe somebody at 0:01 who bid 5 days previously for an item. Its part of the game and part of the fun.

      --
      No mod points, no meta-moderating/Firehose/all the other free work Slashdot wants me to do.
    18. Re:The harder they fall... by dissy · · Score: 1

      One thing eBay should do to fix one of the major problems of their auctions is that every time a bid is entered, and there is less than 5 minutes left on the auction, the auction time should be extended to 5 minutes.

      No, the way to fix that (and quite a few Other problems) is to run it like a real auction.

      Every user can place one bid and one bid only. If you get out bid, you are simply out of that auction. There should never ever be any posting of multiple bids, and bids of other members should Not be detectable before the auction is over.

      If you bid the most you are willing or able to pay for that item, and win, it will still only be $5 over the next highest bid.
      However if you bid the most you are willing/able to pay, and someone bids more (before or after doesn't matter, you don't find out till the end of the auction) then you lose. And this is fine, because why would you need to make a second bid??? You clearly don't have more money for this item, otherwise you fucked up the first time it asked you what the most you are willing to pay, by not putting in this number then when you had the chance.

    19. Re:The harder they fall... by LatencyKills · · Score: 1

      I've heard this point of view roughly a thousand times, and every time I hear it, it seems more insane to me. I'm entering an auction with an amount that I'm willing to pay fixed in my head. If someone else wants to outbid me 3 seconds, 3 minutes, 3 hours, or 3 days before the auction is over that is their win - they were willing to pay more than I was. The stupidity is people who get involved in bidding wars far exceeding what they were willing to pay. Ebay works in a marketplace where everyone puts in what they're willing to pay, and the guy who bid the highest price first wins. Any other approach is purely nonsensical. That said, I haven't used Ebay in years -- something about verifying my Paypal account with my bank information. You've already got my credit card. Good luck with that.

      --
      Jealously hoarding mod points since 2007.
    20. Re:The harder they fall... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Extending 5 minutes is unfair to buyers and overly beneficial to sellers.

      The only way it hurts sellers is in case they need the item sold by a certain time frame.

      It allows opposing bitters to keep extending the auction, results in it being bid up to a higher price.

      Moreover, that's 5 extra minutes for thousands of other people to discover the listing before the auction closes.

      Free additional listing time. And if there is a constant stream of bids, the auction may close days later than expected.

      IOW, I would much prefer to find and bid items on eBay, than any auction site that adopted that change.

    21. Re:The harder they fall... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem is not all bidders are willing or able to decide in advance how much they'll pay.

      You must consider the psychology of the situation. You may be influenced and convinced to be willing to pay more, based on seeing how much other people are willing to pay.

      If they were willing to pay "$1000" before, and someone sets a maximum bid of $1005, bringing it up to 1004.

      The first person may be convinced by the other person's bid that they are in-fact willing to pay $1005 after all (What's $4?).

      This is why bidding outside the last minute or so of an auction is risky. Your bid may be the thing that convinces another player that they are in-fact willing to pay Your max bid+$1

      Maybe they weren't even in the auction before, but your high bid convinces them of the item having value.

      They'll brute-force your maximum by repeatedly adding $1 until they exceed your maximum.

      (They won't set a high maximum in the first place, for fear of adding unnecessary cost)

    22. Re:The harder they fall... by ejecta · · Score: 1

      Our local ebay alternative www.oztion.com.au does this and it works well. If people try and snipe the auction is extended to give the others a chance.

      Shame it doesn't work so well for those who are at work or what not however.

      --
      Two Parts Swash, One Part Buckle
    23. Re:The harder they fall... by thyarcher · · Score: 1

      Another idea that I have toyed with is to have quasi-fixed length auctions based around how much someone is willing to pay. You display a list of possible bid amounts bounded by a (un)reasonable minimum and maximum. Then depending on how much is bid, end the auction at an earlier time. So if a two week auction has a range of $0 - $100 of possible bids, if someone bids $50, then the auction ending is shortened to half the time left, or a week. If someone bids $95 to $100, the auction is shortened to hours away or even a "buy it now" option respectively.

      The cool thing about this is it naturally makes bid sniping worthless, gives value to bidding more, and allows people to get things quicker on average, so it increases the volume of sales and customer satisfaction at the same time.

    24. Re:The harder they fall... by bmorton · · Score: 1

      And just imagine all the wonderful ways that could be abused.

    25. Re:The harder they fall... by Cramer · · Score: 1

      That all fine if people are bidding what they genuinely want to pay for something. It doesn't work when people intentionally outbid each other well beyond their intended limit. Sniping works because you can see what the current highest bid is and will outbid it. I've done the snipe a few times, but it's usually due to my returning to a computer late. The times I've done so intentionally was where I know people will constantly resubmit their bid to outbid me.

      eBay is(was) a useful thing, but it's been increasingly annoying for many years... an ever growing den of theives.

    26. Re:The harder they fall... by Cramer · · Score: 1

      patents + lawyers (stupid as all hell, but that stops a lot of good ideas.)

    27. Re:The harder they fall... by dargaud · · Score: 1

      You mention uBid. I remember using it as a buyer years ago, but only businesses could register as sellers at the time. Has this changed ?

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    28. Re:The harder they fall... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I disagree, I find bidding in the last few seconds is the way to avoid driving the item to "trumped up values".

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  6. eBay may be losing its popularity... by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but what alternative is there when it comes to actual auctions? I can see the buy-it-now categories being replaced by other online retailers, but there simply is no better website (by better, I mean with as much variety and as many different purchase options) out there at the moment for people to sell each other things on an individual level. So maybe due to things like this buy.com deal, the era of the eBay power seller is over, but a lot of people, including myself, sell at least a handful of things on eBay every year and have since the site debuted. Other than maybe recycler.com and craigslist, both of which are more localized and filled with scammers, I don't see another good option.

    1. Re:eBay may be losing its popularity... by Wister285 · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested to find out if eBay is losing popularity or if online auctioning is losing popularity. Remember that that has been a crackdown by some state governments to collect taxes. This could discourage people from continuing their activities.

    2. Re:eBay may be losing its popularity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I don't do online auctioning as a buyer or a seller anymore, but that's entirely thanks to eBay. There's no real alternative. So if eBay is losing popularity, so is online auctioning.

      Now online classifieds on the other hand...

    3. Re:eBay may be losing its popularity... by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      How is Craigslist being full of scammers any worse than eBay? I stopped using ebay ages ago in exchange for craigslist. It's much better to inspect the stuff in person before you buy it... You can't do that with eBay. You're more likely to get screwed on eBay than you are on Craigslist.

      eBay is ridiculous now anyway. Everything is "buy it now" and part of some store. It's not even an auction site anymore. It's just a giant discount retailer. eBay was fun when you were buying stuff from other people and there was a real auction - you actually got some decent deals. Now you might as well just buy your stuff elsewhere for the same price without the hassle.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    4. Re:eBay may be losing its popularity... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      eBay's business isn't "auctions." It's pretty much the same market as "classifieds."

      They choose to use an "auction" style to help determine the market price for goods which are no longer commodities by virtue of their used-ed-ness, and more importantly to drum up excitement to convince people to participate.

      And they do bring something to that market that is useful: they are much better organized than craigs list.

      But they are not well organized. They have a decent database with which to drill down to individual items, but either they're scraping the text, or the people filling in the values are ignorant/maliciously entering in useless values or no values.

      But that's all you need. eBay's pricing is way out of line with the marginal cost of their product, so there's a real market opportunity here for someone with the resources to kickstart it. You can even do the auction-type business if you want, but you can snap the fat right out from under eBay if you are willing to operate like a classified site and charge for bandwidth rather than final price.

      Now, granted, bandwidth-pricing suggests commoditization of the online classifieds market, so your company would have pretty thin margins, but the benefit to society would be enormous.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:eBay may be losing its popularity... by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I generally don't go to eBay to buy a current piece of computer hardware, book, etc., but when I need something that isn't readily available in stores today or is very expensive new, eBay is the place to go.

      I don't mind that some people have fixed-price-only listings there, but if the price isn't good, they won't get my business, and generally anything "current" isn't a good deal on eBay. I don't really understand how some sellers make even one sale when they are selling things that can be purchased at Amazon, Newegg, or even the local WalMart for less after you factor in shipping and taxes.

      But, when you are trying to purchase a 48-port managed switch so you can do some configuration testing and learning at home, $200 from eBay is a lot better than $800 new.

    6. Re:eBay may be losing its popularity... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Remember that that has been a crackdown by some state governments to collect taxes. This could discourage people from continuing their activities.

      There has? I must have missed it. I've seen state governments whining and complaining about "lost" tax revenue, and talking about "fixing" this somehow, but I have yet to see any concrete action which actually affects online buyers and sellers. I still don't pay any sales tax on out-of-state purchases.

    7. Re:eBay may be losing its popularity... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I agree entirely. When I'm looking for a used 6-year-old laser printer that used to be used in an office, and is obsolete by today's standards but more than good enough for home use, Ebay is the place to get it: you can get them for $50 on there. Or if I want to buy some 40-year-old Nixie tubes for an electronics project, Ebay is the place to go, where I can buy them from sellers in Russia for very cheap prices.

      But why anyone would look for new, mass-market items on Ebay is beyond me. It's cheaper to get them at online specialty stores.

    8. Re:eBay may be losing its popularity... by Wister285 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure I read an article in a newspaper about people having to register as auctioneers because of their volume of business. It's hard to argue with. Why should a normal business have to pay taxes when an eBayer only has to pay eBay? It might seem lame, but what's fair isn't always popular.

    9. Re:eBay may be losing its popularity... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure I read an article in a newspaper about people having to register as auctioneers because of their volume of business. It's hard to argue with.

      Actually, it's easy to argue with. If I list an item on Ebay, that doesn't make me an auctioneer, it makes me a seller. Ebay is the auctioneer. It's no different than giving a bunch of items to an old-fashioned auctioneer to sell. You're not the one up there auctioning them; he is. This just sounds like more local and state governments trying to collect money for nothing.

      Why should a normal business have to pay taxes when an eBayer only has to pay eBay? It might seem lame, but what's fair isn't always popular.

      How are eBayers not paying taxes? If you derive income from selling things online, you're legally obligated to report that income on your income tax form and pay taxes for it. If you do it as a business, your business has to keep records and pay taxes. There's nothing fair about adding extra taxes on something just because it's on the internet.

    10. Re:eBay may be losing its popularity... by Wister285 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's easy to argue with. If I list an item on Ebay, that doesn't make me an auctioneer, it makes me a seller. Ebay is the auctioneer. It's no different than giving a bunch of items to an old-fashioned auctioneer to sell. You're not the one up there auctioning them; he is. This just sounds like more local and state governments trying to collect money for nothing.

      I'll take the guess work out of it. The link to the Philadelphia Inquirer article that I was talking about is in it too. Here:

      http://techdirt.com/articles/20080201/021626147.shtml

      How are eBayers not paying taxes? If you derive income from selling things online, you're legally obligated to report that income on your income tax form and pay taxes for it. If you do it as a business, your business has to keep records and pay taxes. There's nothing fair about adding extra taxes on something just because it's on the internet.

      Simple. They either don't know the laws or don't report! I'm not saying that they got hit with extra taxes from the government. It's just that they may have been paying no taxes at all.

    11. Re:eBay may be losing its popularity... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'll take the guess work out of it. The link to the Philadelphia Inquirer article that I was talking about is in it too. Here:

      http://techdirt.com/articles/20080201/021626147.shtml

      The writer of the article is exactly right. The suit is stupid, and the state should be punished for bringing it. Figures that it was Pennsylvania; of course it'd be some stupid northeastern state that would do such a thing.

      Simple. They either don't know the laws or don't report! I'm not saying that they got hit with extra taxes from the government. It's just that they may have been paying no taxes at all.

      Not paying taxes has nothing to do with being an auctioneer or not. If someone isn't paying taxes on their income, that's tax evasion. There's already laws against that. Punishing everyone who sells on ebay for it is stupid and wrongheaded. It doesn't matter to the IRS where your income comes from, as long as it's reported properly. They certainly don't care if you have a license to auction goods (which any sane individual would know you don't need for using ebay, since as I said before, Ebay is the auctioneer, not the sellers). Next thing you know, some farmer selling his tractor at auction is going to be sued by Pennsylvania for not having an auctioneer's license, even though he didn't conduct the auction.

  7. Losing Popularity to Whom? by cptnapalm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where are these former eBayers going?

    Or is it a case of a fad (ooh, I got it from eBay!) settling down and it becomes just one way to get something (I could have gotten it cheaper on eBay, but if I need to return it, it would be a big hassle)?

    1. Re:Losing Popularity to Whom? by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      Not far. There are some sites that are decent, but the buyers are mostly staying with ebay. There are a few good non-auction sites like iOffer or Blujay that are decent, but ebay doesn't have a serious competitor with a similar model.

    2. Re:Losing Popularity to Whom? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Where are these former eBayers going? Or is it a case of a fad (ooh, I got it from eBay!) settling down and it becomes just one way to get something

      It's possible that both buyers and sellers of specialty items are becoming more Google-savvy such that buyers are going strait to specialty sites, bypassing the auction as a middle-men. Plus, specialty sites often have specialty-related content, such as blogs, show photos, etc.

      This is how it started out, then swung to auctions, but may be swinging back as "Web 2.0" makes website building easier via semi-standard "web components" such as discussion groups, blogs, wiki-based editing, store-fronts, and so forth.
               

    3. Re:Losing Popularity to Whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time someone says "Web 2.0" a kitten dies.

    4. Re:Losing Popularity to Whom? by cptnapalm · · Score: 1

      Web 2.0 Web 2.0 Web 2.0 Web 2.0 Web 2.0 Web 2.0 Web 2.0 Web 2.0

      I hate kittens.

    5. Re:Losing Popularity to Whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EBay is losing popularity to regular online shops. Most of the sellers on eBay are professionals who need eBay only as a form of aggregation service. Buyers flock to eBay because "everybody" sells there and can be found with one simple search. That's why eBay courts big shops with free listing. After all, the tide of price comparison engines is rising. Individual sellers have no alternative, so they still have to pay for every item they list.

    6. Re:Losing Popularity to Whom? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Every time someone says "Web 2.0" a kitten dies.

      The term has kind of been coopted to mean what one wants it to mean. I gave examples to hopefully clarify.
           

  8. From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to a recent MSN-Zogby poll, only 31% of Americans plan to buy or sell anything on the auction site in the next year. That's down from 40% who said they bought or sold something on eBay in the last year.

    WTF?! Those numbers are huge! I wouldn't have guessed that 40% of the population has ever bought or sold anything online.

    I sure wouldn't cry over mind/market share like that if I were eBay.

    1. Re:From the article by Hyppy · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to a recent MSN-Zogby poll,

      WTF?! Those numbers are huge!

      MSN-Zogby, IIRC, conducts online polls. Online polls tend to violate a wide array of rules regarding statistical bias.

    2. Re:From the article by pla · · Score: 1

      MSN-Zogby, IIRC, conducts online polls. Online polls tend to violate a wide array of rules regarding statistical bias.

      If you expect the results to generalize to the offline crowd, correct.

      If, however, you want to know primarily what people-who-answer-online-polls think, then they work simply wonderfully - You wouldn't want a truly "random" sample in that case.

      Selection bias only matters when it gives you an unrepresentative subsection of your target population.

    3. Re:From the article by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      If, however, you want to know primarily what people-who-answer-online-polls think, then they work simply wonderfully - You wouldn't want a truly "random" sample in that case.

      A representative sample needs to be random for almost any reliable statistical analysis of the target population. For your analogy to be correct, your target audience would have to be people-who-answered-MSN-Zogby-polls-pertaining-to-EBay-usage-and-who-read-the-websites-presenting-these-polls-on-a-regular-enough-basis.

  9. first post? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I tend to agree that having a sort of long history with ebay, and not a pleasent one at that, why don't they just stop all fanfare and just post a .05 cents per post which when they try to argue that they have to pay for their staff, sorry bub, you offer no real support and you already make more on paypal transactions, so why worry about the auctions as well, it would make this level to everyone and also be competitive to the ones lik craigslist or kijiji etc.

    I haven't auctioned on ebay for about 2 years now,
    last impression being a bad taste in my mouth (could almost think it was the CEO!)

    I just can't stand someone like M$ or Ebay that try to stiff you all the time.

    1. Re:first post? by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      I don't know who ebay is paying. Getting assistance or support with anything is like finding the holy grail.

  10. Ebay on the way out by WillDraven · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Things like this, creeping fees, attempting to wrangle everybody into using paypal, and their generally horrid customer service is driving ebays userbase away in droves. Even my dad has commented on how the volume of craigslist ads has been increasing lately. Naturally it will take quite a while for such a juggernaut to die out, but my personal suspicion is that the age of ebay has ended.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Ebay on the way out by avandesande · · Score: 1

      The problem is with the array of fees involved it's just cheaper/easier to dump it on craigslist.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:Ebay on the way out by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes but Craigslist is far from perfect.
      It is hard to search nationally. Suppose I need a gas tank for a 78 CB750K. I don't care if it is local or not. Craigslist isn't as good as Ebay for that kind of thing.
      As to BUY.com and other companies putting products up I just don't see that hurting to many people
      I hardly ever look on Ebay for new stuff. I look for stuff I can not find any place else.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Ebay on the way out by lessthan · · Score: 1

      if they wake up, they may survive. If they sat down and listened to their users, then made the fixes, they'd be set. All the problems appear to be simple stuff. Add a huge ad campaign when they are done and they may make a comeback.

      --
      Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
    4. Re:Ebay on the way out by harl · · Score: 1

      I have one in wineberry.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    5. Re:Ebay on the way out by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Thanks but I have a good tank. I was just using it as an example. Now what I really need is a left side panel. You happen to have one of those?
      And boy is this off topic:) Slashdot meets the SOHC4 forums

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Ebay on the way out by harl · · Score: 1

      Kind of. It's cracked though.

      I have a whole bike. Hasn't been taken out for 4 seasons. Stored inside. No rust in tank. Needs carbs cleaned, new tires, plugs, chain, and one fork seal. Been meaning to fix it up but haven't had the time.

      I haven't checked out SOHC4 yet.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    7. Re:Ebay on the way out by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      My tank seems clean but there is some surface rust on the outside. I am going to use some evapo rust and them POR on the tank to be sure.
      The frame has some surface rust so I need to figure out what to do about that.
      Missing one side panel.
      And the other stuff you also have wrong.
      Mine is black.
      It is a project at this point.
      SOHC4 is sort of slashdot for SOHC Hondas. Except they seem to have better manners and less flame wars.
      I am on there as LWATCDR of course.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  11. Duh by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know several people who used to do a lot of business on Ebay who are rapidly becoming disgusted with it because of its clear preference for giant sellers over individuals; I'm not at all surprised to hear that this is a general trend.

    Why is it that so many executives feel the need to destroy a successful business model? Ebay started as an online auction house where individuals could find a worldwide audience for cool, quirky stuff, and it was wildly successful as such. If its executives want to start a site for selling commercial products with free-floating prices -- which is essentially what they're turning Ebay into -- then fine, but why are they abandoning the business that made them successful in the first place? Ebay was one of the few real success stories to come out of the dot-com boom. It's really sad to see them throwing that away now.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:Duh by CowTipperGore · · Score: 1

      Why is it that so many executives feel the need to destroy a successful business model? Ebay started as an online auction house where individuals could find a worldwide audience for cool, quirky stuff, and it was wildly successful as such. If its executives want to start a site for selling commercial products with free-floating prices -- which is essentially what they're turning Ebay into -- then fine, but why are they abandoning the business that made them successful in the first place? Ebay was one of the few real success stories to come out of the dot-com boom. It's really sad to see them throwing that away now.

      Some of it is simply natural business processes - as eBay was more successful it attracted larger sellers. By tying the all-important reputation to the number of transactions completed, these large sellers quickly gained an advantage. As a business, eBay no doubt gets more money (and a more stable income) from large sellers than a collection of grandmas selling their Tupperware.

    2. Re:Duh by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1

      Yep, I've been avoiding them for quite awhile. Even when I try to take my money/business to eBay, I can't find what I want. If I'm on eBay then I'm not looking for a new in the box, full price (sometimes even higher than the normal full price) product which I also have to pay shipping on and wait a week for it to show up. If I wanted the new in box one at full price I'd just drive to wal-mart, best buy,e tc. and get the product without having to pay shipping or wait for it to show up.

      I've been saying the same thing as you for awhile now. If they want a place for actual business to load ton of new crap at full price on there, that's fine, but make a new site. I want a place where I can go look for a used product being sold by joe average who just doesn't use theirs anymore or bought an upgraded one or whatever and pay him 10%-50% of what it would cost me to buy a new one.

      Of course there's still craigslist for that, but honestly, I prefer the auctions and functionality of searching and arranging the sales via eBay moreso than craigslist, which is effectively just online want ads like in the newspaper.

    3. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because most executives are STUPID.

      They only care about how it looks RIGHT NOW. They dont give a rats ass how it looks 8-12 months later. And they outright ignore you if you talk about 5 years out.

      After a company goes public and the idea behind what made the company dies, the Executive in charge ride the corpse into the ground, some making it go down faster.

      Examples? AT&T, Comcast, Enron, etc...

      And yes I have NEVER met a smart CEO outside of the guy that became CEO after he incorporated his own business.

    4. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I know several people who used to do a lot of business on Ebay who are rapidly becoming disgusted with it because of its clear preference for giant sellers over individuals."

      About 10 years ago I sold my old Celestron telescope on eBay. It was a good experience and I kept it in mind for the next time I had to sell something like that. In that same time period I also bought a couple of things on eBay. About 2 years ago I wanted to sell a couple of my collections and I went to eBay. The experience was so awful I ended up not listing with them at all. They were difficult to the point of being abusive. The site made it clear that if you weren't a professional eBay seller or company that would do regular business you could just F*** off. I do not sell on eBay. More importantly I will not BUY through eBay again either.

      eBay began as a place for small time collectors to buy and sell odd one-off items. Talk about stabbing the people that got you started in the back...

    5. Re:Duh by faust2097 · · Score: 1

      why are they abandoning the business that made them successful in the first place?

      When you're a publicly traded company in today's market being profitable isn't enough. You need to be more and more profitable year after year or else your stock tanks.

  12. I based my business model... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... entirely on a single corporation with major incentive to see me succeed, and now it turns out that they aren't acting in my interests!

    Some people really make me wonder about humanity.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  13. Ebay not going away, but changing... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm getting a little more and more irritated about this stuff with ebay, and I would honestly jump ship if there was another decent auction-style competitor that is close to the ebay of the early 2000s.

    Ebay is doing some SERIOUS wrong by the small seller (mostly through their fee issues, I don't think the feedback issues are as bad as some sellers try and make them out to be), and despite their platitudes, is turning into Amazon-lite. I have no huge problem with this, but they really need to make a decision on who they want to cater to and either split into two divisions or send the small-time buyers and sellers somewhere else.

    I completely understand that businesses need to make money, and the buydotcom route may be one way to do that. However, ebay is WIDELY opening a door for another company to undercut them in the small seller market, and those of us who collect, buy, and sell anything used on a small scale and aren't interested in just shopping online for new stuff that we can get down the street at Wal-mart or wherever.

    1. Re:Ebay not going away, but changing... by Skapare · · Score: 1

      So here is your big business opportunity to start that small seller auction site you've always wanted to do. This way you can get rich off the smaller sellers for a few year before you, too, wander on over to the fixed price markets to move beyond the millionaire level.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Ebay not going away, but changing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're looking for a decent auction-style competitor, check out Flippid.com... they don't even charge to list or sell. I don't know how they make their money but they are smarter than the average bear.

    3. Re:Ebay not going away, but changing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would go somewhere else in a heartbeat.

      I tend to buy in a single area of goods, so I would be happy with a site that specialized in auctions and items that I was interested in.

  14. Why I quit EBay by Skapare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I no longer use EBay because of the increased risk of dealing with people that don't keep their end of the deal (e.g. sellers that don't deliver the product or don't deliver a product that was described in the auction), and the fact that EBay was taking no steps to effectively deal with the issue.

    Since then EBay has begun pushing PayPal harder, and that might also have been a reason for me to not use EBay.

    The dilution of the auction space with fixed-price retailers is a big annoyance. Maybe it might also be a reason to quit.

    If EBay wants to be in the business of aggregating retailers, then maybe it should register a new domain name and set it up, and provide links between it and the EBay site.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:Why I quit EBay by mark72005 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree with this. Formerly there were lots of great deals to be had on Ebay.

      Now, the discounted items you used to be able to get from private sellers have given way to hyper-volume sellers with more or less fixed prices.

      Ebay is not really an auction site anymore. It's really nothing more than a circular where any questionable web merchant can post advertisements.

    2. Re:Why I quit EBay by ejecta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find their public paypal statements absolutely fascinating. They claim it offers additional security for you as a buyer yet if you using paypal;

      - You don't have the persons name or company name (ala Bank Deposit)
      - You don't have a contact point to start investigating from (ala Bank Deposit)
      - If they are a fraudster they aren't going to leave the funds in their paypal account which makes paypals buyer protection useless as there a tiny small print item which says if the money isn't in the account even if they find in your favour you get zippo.
      - Rubbing salt in your wounds, even if they find in your favour they respect the privacy of the now proven fraudulent seller and won't release their information to you.

      It's laughable.

      Paypal gives dodgy people protection to defraud you whereas the same people are less likely to do so via the Bank as they lack the chops to defraud a bank and generate false papers to open a fraudulent bank account and won't use their own bank account as you'd get their name. But they can like their own bank account to paypal & paypal will keep them nice and safe from you, the victim.

      --
      Two Parts Swash, One Part Buckle
  15. Their gun policy made me bail on them by m0nkyman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Their anti gun policy made me stop using ebay years ago....

    --
    ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
    1. Re:Their gun policy made me bail on them by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      Pretty lame that you can't buy magazines on there. You can buy them anywhere else.

    2. Re:Their gun policy made me bail on them by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Their anti gun policy made me stop using ebay years ago....

      Looks like they lost D. Cheney's business also.
           

    3. Re:Their gun policy made me bail on them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gunbroker.com is better than ebay ever was anyway.

    4. Re:Their gun policy made me bail on them by flimflam · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, did you quit eBay for political reasons, or because you were actually buying or selling guns (or firearm-related items)?

      --
      -- It only takes 20 minutes for a liberal to become a conservative thanks to our new outpatient surgical procedure!
    5. Re:Their gun policy made me bail on them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me it was their anti-used-panties policy that made go. Its been all downhill from there.

  16. Not just a prediction... by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anecdotal, I know, but even in the past few months, some of the not-so-mainstream stuff on auction (e.g. computer parts) have seemed to dry up.

    My missus used to be able to buy (and occasionally sell) a lot of antique and classic toys on eBay as a hobby. There were literally dozens of pages of auctions for the stuff at any one time for her to pick and choose from. Nowadays, there's only a handful of pages in motion at best, and little is selling (not just on her part, but in most of the auctions concerning antique and classic toys).

    Poking around, I see similar patterns for other, similar things.

    I don't think it's just recent policies, either (though they certainly don't help) - eBay is (just IMHO) getting one hell of a reputation as a giant fence for stolen goods, a hotbed of scams, and a place where you can't quite get the deals that you used to get.

    Recently, they've tried to boost things by having $1 listing fees for certain items, and I'm sure they've been doing some offline marketing (but again, not like they used to).

    I dunno... these are just personal observations, but I strongly suspect that they are indicative of a larger shift away from eBay... and the Buy.com deal kinda shows me that the company is getting a bit nervous about its long-term prospects.

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Not just a prediction... by Trojan35 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree, although have a slightly different opinion of why it is.

      So many reasons I believe ebay is not going to continue to grow at its current pace:

      1) Everyone already cleaned out their garage junk on ebay.
      2) Diminishing quality control on products makes easy exchanges an important retailer feature (frys)
      3) Used prices on ebay are just way too close to new prices. (what happened to half.com being half price?)

      And, most importantly for me:

      4) It's too freaking expensive. By the time you pay 10% to ebay, 10% to paypal(ebay), 20% to USPS, 10% to gas, selling that $40 item for $20 in "profit" just wasn't worth the hour of your time. There's businesses out there where you can drop off your product and they'll take care of all the hassle for you, but then is giving up your $40 item for only $3 or $4 even worth it?

      It's not just the $40 items either. I look at ebay and the cheapest (barely used) macs I can find are only 5-10% off getting a brand new one at Fry's. I haven't used ebay in a long time because their listings, fees, and policies suck. Maybe that's why they are going with Buy.com stuff; they know it.

    2. Re:Not just a prediction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to overlook current economics issues.

      A slow down in the overall economy will keep people from buying non-essentials, like your antique and classic toys.

      While times are tough, they aren't tough enough to force the collectors to liquidate their collections either.

      When the market suddenly expands and people still aren't buying is when times have become very tough indeed.

    3. Re:Not just a prediction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know a guy who sells almost exclusively antique and classic toys on ebay. He makes a killing going around to auctions and estate sales in his area and unloading the stuff on ebay.

    4. Re:Not just a prediction... by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "This seller currently has no items for sale." - the last toy he sold was nealy three months ago.

      I'm honestly not poking fun at you (or him), just that your link helps to illustrate my point exactly.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  17. ...losing its popularity by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    That would seem to be the best way to "regulate" them. In a genuine free market, where newcomers could spring up overnight, the effect would be immediate. In the present system of protected monopolies, as demonstrated in the entertainment industry, it's another story.

    --
    What?
  18. Anyone take a look at financials?? by geekmux · · Score: 4, Informative

    From vaporware to $7.6B in revenue in 2007(a $2B increase from 2006), basically done within a decade. I think the word I'm searching for is 'quitcherbitchin'. On it's way out? Not likely.

    1. Re:Anyone take a look at financials?? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Question is, where is that money coming from? Is it growth in PayPal, income from the Buy.com deal, income from external investments, stock issues... what?

      It also doesn't augur for eBay's future growth.

      Not saying that it's going to die tomorrow, but eBay (as in, the auction site) isn't quite the hot buzz-worthy item it used to be...

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:Anyone take a look at financials?? by jandrese · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ebay has always had a solid financial base in taking a cut of every sale and not spending it on customer support or anything else. It's one of the few dot coms that was a smart investment way back in 2000, because they had a solid revenue stream that wasn't dependent on online advertising or other such voodoo sources.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:Anyone take a look at financials?? by eeek77 · · Score: 1

      No kidding. $7 billion is a lot of money. How could any company THAT big crash that fast. There's no way. They're just too big. They'll be around for a while. No company that big can fall that fast. History has shown us that... (bzzzrrrppp)

      In all seriousness, Ebay probably does need to be mindful of their business model. But remember, the reason they struck this deal was for the money. Obviously, it was in their financial interest to do so. What remains to be seen is if this really does become a tradeoff (if they have to give up all individual sellers to gain big company business), and which side is more lucrative.

    4. Re:Anyone take a look at financials?? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      because they had a solid revenue stream that wasn't dependent on online advertising or other such voodoo sources.

      Jealous of Seregy at little are we?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Anyone take a look at financials?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. They probably aren't on their way out.

      However, what it will become, is both a highly grey area for niche goods, and just another online store-front. It does both of these now, but will become even more-so due to this behavior change.

      I've only every used ebay once, and even that was on someone else's account, for someone else's computer I was fixing. Until such time that they tie into the credit reporting and CC infrastructure, I will NEVER use them.

    6. Re:Anyone take a look at financials?? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Did you seriously just refer to advertising as voodoo? The same advertising that's been funding network television since... well... practically since it was invented?

    7. Re:Anyone take a look at financials?? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Internet advertising in the year 2000? Voodoo was actually a pretty nice way of describing it.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    8. Re:Anyone take a look at financials?? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Well, if advertising is voodoo, I think you've just demonstrated the existence of magic... at least, judging by how well Google (and other advertising-based services) have fared.

  19. eBay is a shareholder in Craigslist by sjbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't see things getting better. Craigslist auction anyone?

    You do know that eBay owns a stake in Craigslist of over 20% of outstanding shares? Craigslist will not get you away from eBay.

    1. Re:eBay is a shareholder in Craigslist by longacre · · Score: 5, Insightful

      eBay's stake in Craigslist does not allow for any management input on eBay's part, and based on Craig's previous behavior I don't think he'd have any qualms about competing with them.

    2. Re:eBay is a shareholder in Craigslist by ejecta · · Score: 1

      Whilst they currently don't have the ability to do so it's only partially true.

      It is possible that they could try to rustle up via purchasing arrangements or alliances another additional 30.1% of voting stock, then all bets are off.

      Having a hostile shareholder can be a very dangerous thing, even if they are a minority.

      --
      Two Parts Swash, One Part Buckle
  20. Ebay simply doesn't care by antifoidulus · · Score: 2

    It has been a den of thieves for all but the most esoteric items for a while(try searching for xbox or iPhone, I bet you will come up with more scams than normal auctions) and ebay has shown that as long it collects fees it doesn't really give a rats ass about anything else. This is just further icing on the cake. Ebay thinks that people will not go anywhere else, so they don't have to police their network, they don't have to treat their sellers fairly and they can force paypal down our throats and we will just sit there and take it. Its been a looooooooooong time since I bought anything off ebay and I would have to be pretty desperate to find something before I would even consider using it again.

    1. Re:Ebay simply doesn't care by Dekortage · · Score: 1

      ...they don't have to police their network...

      And today a judge said they really don't have to -- "the online retailer does not bear a legal responsibility to prevent its users from selling counterfeit items on its marketplace."

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  21. Natural monopolies by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ebay has name recognition. That's all...

    Sadly that is not all eBay has. EBay has network effects working for it which makes it VERY hard to displace them no matter how much money and talent is thrown at the problem. Buyers go where the sellers are and vice versa. Amazon and Yahoo both tried to take market share from eBay and both failed miserably. There are lots of other auction and e-commerce sites out there but none of them are likely to displace eBay anytime soon.

    That's not to say eBay won't cut their own throat (they might) but that's pretty much what it will take to make a real dent in eBay's market share. Ebay's business tends towards a natural monopoly as do many marketplaces.

    1. Re:Natural monopolies by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      REally? I am buying moreand more from Amazon.com than Ebay lately. I've been looking at items and what they sell for on ebay and then snap them up for 5-15% less on amazon. and this is for electronics, cameras, etc.. not just books.

      I've noticed recently that ebay has become rather expensive with lots of dumb bidders bidding things up past a sane price (sane being what I can get it for at an online retailer.)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Natural monopolies by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Ebay has name recognition. That's all...

      Sadly that is not all eBay has. EBay has network effects working for it which makes it VERY hard to displace them no matter how much money and talent is thrown at the problem. Buyers go where the sellers are and vice versa.

      Isn't that what name recognition is? You just explained why having name recognition is so important. You didn't mention anything eBay has that others don't that isn't due to name recognition.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Natural monopolies by sjbe · · Score: 1

      I am buying moreand more from Amazon.com than Ebay lately.

      Depends on what you are buying. For books, CDs, DVDs and new electronics, Amazon is a better place to buy usually. You have to remember that eBay is primarily a secondary market You don't go to eBay to buy new stuff or if you do you should not expect unusually low prices. For used or old stuff, you can frequently get prices on eBay around 1/3 to 1/2 of retail - in other words wholesale/liquidation pricing.

      I've noticed recently that ebay has become rather expensive with lots of dumb bidders bidding things up past a sane price

      Odds are those aren't "dumb" bidders but rather shill bidders. Against eBay's rules but it happens all the time.

    4. Re:Natural monopolies by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      That's nice, and I agree with you that Amazon is better than Ebay for both buying and selling. EBay have been a bunch of greedy, nickel-and-diming, laurels-resting monopolistic tossers for a long time now, which is why I rarely use them.

      Even so, if your comment was intended as a rebuttal/counter-example to the GP's point (which seemed to be the intent), it's wrong.

      The effect of your individual choice is negligible on the scale of Ebay's millions of users, and unless you have good evidence that it's part of a pattern of disgruntled users, it has zero statistical significance.

      Even here, when discussing major companies/websites/etc, the self-reinforcing opinion of Slashdotters appears to sometimes blind them to the fact that they (even as a whole) are typically *not* as representative of the customer base as they'd like to think.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    5. Re:Natural monopolies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buyers and sellers used to be one and the same at eBay. The place used to be "the worlds biggest garage sale" and great deals could be found every day. Not anymore. Now it's a great place to sell things because each and every item will gravitate to the highest possible selling price. Unfortunately, that makes it the worst place for buyers to go.

      The only thing eBay is good for anymore is to find rare items that you can't find through normal channels.

    6. Re:Natural monopolies by bob_herrick · · Score: 1

      The only used books I bought in the last decade or so have been from Amazon, not eBay.

    7. Re:Natural monopolies by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      I've noticed recently that ebay has become rather expensive with lots of dumb bidders bidding things up past a sane price (sane being what I can get it for at an online retailer.)

      nothing new there. i've often seen people bidding MORE for a refurbished item, a 3 year old digital camera for one example, than it costs to buy it NEW. WTF? People get into a bidding mode where they MUST WIN. NOW! whatever.

    8. Re:Natural monopolies by sjbe · · Score: 1

      The only used books I bought in the last decade or so have been from Amazon, not eBay.

      Likewise. EBay is a terrible marketplace for book sales - even the unusual or rare. Amazon on the other hand is pretty good most of the time. My only real quibble with selling through Amazon is that they force sellers to use non-traceable shipping methods such as USPS Media Mail which just invites fraud. Otherwise Amazon is a pretty decent way to sell books and unopened CDs/DVDs.

    9. Re:Natural monopolies by Cramer · · Score: 1

      You don't go to eBay to buy new stuff

      Except this is exactly the sort of shit that's ruining everything. eBay has had "stores" for many years. Yet, now, these STORES are allowed to list their entire f'ing inventory as AUCTIONS. If the only option is "Buy It Now(tm)", then it's not a damned auction. If you're listing your store inventory on eBay and continuing to see the same item in your actual store, then it's not an auction. How much shit has been "sold" on eBay that the seller didn't even have? I've grown tired of counting.

      Now we have buy.scum polluting the place with a half million auctions. They, apparently, have been a member since '02, however, yesturday was the first time the filthy little [censored] have ever shown up in any of my searches. Now, they show up everywhere. And there's NO WAY AT ALL to filter this shit out. (I hate Buy.Scum with the fire out a thousand suns. They are, hands down, the most incompetent, inconsiderate, unprofessional [censored] on Earth, possibly in the entire universe.)

    10. Re:Natural monopolies by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      In eBay most sellers are also buyers: if the sellers leave then eBay looses both sellers and buyers.

  22. EBays Focus is Terrible by llZENll · · Score: 1

    I rarely find anything on EBay cheaper than at a normal etailer, addin the worry of dealing with a shady seller and there is little motivation in buying anything _NEW_ on EBay. EBay needs to focus on what its good for, USED, CLOSEOUT, or RARE items. I have saved thousands of dollars getting great deals on close-out or nearly new items, of course they are hard to find due to all the new item listings.

    If you are paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees then you have no business being on EBay. You should open your own website, even if your sales significantly decrease you will still make more profit, and your job will be easier with lower volume.

    1. Re:EBays Focus is Terrible by mweather · · Score: 1

      That's what my company did. We got fed up with FeePay, built a shopping cart and never looked back. Sales dropped off initially, but the lack of listing fees more than made up to it, even with PPC ads factored in.

    2. Re:EBays Focus is Terrible by S-100 · · Score: 1

      Some sellers don't expect to make money from eBay, but instead use their eBay auctions to drive traffic to their own web sites. It's worked (on a small scale) for me.

    3. Re:EBays Focus is Terrible by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Someone else needs to come up with an alternative online auction site which is just like what Ebay used to be: focused on used, closeout, or rare items, making it a good place for small sellers. The problem with Ebay is that they went public, and shareholders demand growth. You just can't keep growing with a website that's basically an online flea market; there's a limit to that market, and Ebay reached it. But instead of just maintaining a nice business, they got greedy, and sold out by going public. What we need is an alternative that is privately-held, and will never go public.

  23. Exactly by Collective+0-0009 · · Score: 1

    "Instead of focusing on being an auction business, we are looking at what it takes to create the best marketplace out there."

    This is what happens when a company gets too big. ebay can't see that it won such wide adoring attention though being an open auction house. Adding buy it now was cool, as sometimes I didn't want to wait 5 days just to get outbid.

    Now they are trying to create a marketplace inside a marketplace. They want everyone to be part of *THEIR* marketplace, that they control, they assess the taxes and fees and keep the peace.

    --
    I finally updated my sig, but now it's lame.
  24. Excellent by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    EBay degenerates into an alternative, inconvenient way to buy from major retailers (WHY would they list on eBay instead of their own websites anyway?) and somebody will set up a real auction site where you can buy used stuff from individuals and small companies. You know, like eBay used to be.

    1. Re:Excellent by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      (WHY would they list on eBay instead of their own websites anyway?)

      Because it allows them to reach more of their market?

      Lots of shoppers prefer like the advantage of having competing products from different retailers available on a single site, since it makes comparison shopping easier.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Excellent by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Inconvenient? I got my Wii from the Best buy outlet on eBay. Not one hassle minus the fact it was one of the Wii models with the problem with Super Smash Bros Brawl, but it came with warranty and Nintendo replaced the faulty unit no questions asked.

      And they would list on ebay instead of their own site because on ebay they stand a chance of making a higher profit off of an item, you know, idiots will pay the price for something they want badly enough.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:Excellent by Myopic · · Score: 1

      WHY would they list on eBay instead of their own websites anyway?

      Because there are people who shop on eBay who don't visit Buy.com; thus, by listing on both sites, Buy.com will reach more customers.

      I think you could have come up with that explanation yourself, if you'd tried. It's pretty obvious.

    4. Re:Excellent by johnthorensen · · Score: 1

      The best people for this job would be the Craigslist folks. They have proven themselves superhumanly immune to selling out.

    5. Re:Excellent by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You had to send it to Nintendo to get it replaced, hey? I'd much rather drive down to the local Best Buy and swap mine for one that worked. That would take ten minutes.

      Selling an item like a Wii on eBay must violate some agreement regarding suggested retail price that Best Buy has with Nintendo. Expect to see them punished for things like that in the future.

    6. Re:Excellent by tonto1992 · · Score: 1

      You know, like eBay used to be.

      I also recall the day when MTV actually showed music videos, those were the good ol' days.

    7. Re:Excellent by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      And TV shows shot more than ten new episodes per year. And you had to hurry if you were going to go to the bathroom during commercial breaks.

    8. Re:Excellent by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Have you seen buy.scum's website recently? If I wanted to do business with them (which will NEVER EVER happen), I'd run screaming from their horrible website to eBay with cash in hand. For God sake, they have google text ads all over their listings. (in violation of Goggle Ads policies, I might add.)

    9. Re:Excellent by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Find me a Best Buy in North America that actually has a Wii on it's shelves. There are 5+ Best Buys with a dozen miles; none of them have had any Wii's on the shelves for a long time (since before Christmas.)

      Best Buy (et.al) tend to push open-box, and returns to eBay because they can get near retail or better prices for them. If they put them in the store, they have to mark them down. (I've seen very few open items on the shelves around here in several years.)

    10. Re:Excellent by Cramer · · Score: 1

      ... and there are people who intentionally avoid Buy.scum. Suddenly seeing their 500k+ "auctions" littering every corner of the place is revolting.

    11. Re:Excellent by Cramer · · Score: 1

      *pfft* Commercial breaks. That's what Tivo's for.

  25. uctions by tepples · · Score: 1

    why do people insist on calling ebay an auction site?

    it's not

    Especially when it does a significant chunk of its business through fixed-price listings such as these.

    auctions dont end at a certain time.
    the end when the bids are no longer increasing.

    One big reason that eBay makes money is that auction-style listings of a fixed duration are less regulated than traditional auctions.

  26. It's interesting by jayhawk88 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How far eBay has strayed from it's original purpose of being the "garage sale of the Internet" to now just essentially being an outlet mall. Perhaps it's just an inevitable result of gaining too much popularity; regardless something tells me there's money to be made in picking up the slack.

    There's your entrepreneurial idea for the day kids. I'm sure garagesale.com is already taken (and isn't a Web 2.0 name anyway), but just go read a Klingon dictionary and I'm sure you'll find a good alternative. Your tagline is "What eBay used to be", at least until you pop up on their lawyers radar. Market it as specializing in collectibles, unique trinkets and such, and in your literature equate eBay with Wal-Mart.

    1. Re:It's interesting by stubob · · Score: 1

      slogan: Why Go into Wal-Mart When You Can Buy It From Someone in the Parking Lot?

      --
      Planning to be moderated ± 1: Bad Pun.
    2. Re:It's interesting by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      WhatItUsedToBe.com is available :-)

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
  27. No one buys on eBay anymore by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Why buy on eBay and go through the auction hassle when you can get the same thing for cheaper from Amazon.com ? And often with free or discounted shipping?

    If I was a seller I would seriously be moving to Amazon as fast as my legs could take me. everyone I know has moved from buying on eBay to buying on Amazon. The recent fee hikes only made things worse. eBay really needs to cut its base fees and get back to its roots or else it will become obsolete.

    1. Re:No one buys on eBay anymore by Itninja · · Score: 1

      Wow. That's a textbook Yogi-ism (e.g. 'no one goes to that restaurant because it's always so crowded').

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    2. Re:No one buys on eBay anymore by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Amazon's not much better. Their fee (last I checked) was something ridiculous like 15% (INCLUDING SHIPPING). Bah. There's less and less reason to buy through these aggregators online, since just about anybody can open their own online store.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
  28. Ebay losing popularity? by Jason1729 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I used to do about 150 ebay auctions/month all in the $5-20 range, but I stopped a couple of years ago. They kept raising prices to the point I was making them more money than me (especially after paypal fees), and even then they were pushing aside the individual seller. They've raised fees since I stopped using them too. Just recently I wanted to sell some computer equipment, and found their fees to be so high I'm better off not wasting my time listing it. They've priced themselves out of the market and alienated their core customer base at the same time. And they're surprised they're losing popularity?

    1. Re:Ebay losing popularity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Unable to list weird parts and spares, as it is not economical, especially if used or 2nd hand and or low margin.

      OTOH New stuff gets listed from China. If buy one item and you are on their mailing list - no more fees for ebay, plus the overseas postage angle is better when drop postage is used.

      As someone said, a place to find out what things are worth, then go shopping elsewhere. The nature of the beast means that mytical bargain is just not there anymore.

  29. Shutting out the little guys by CowTipperGore · · Score: 3, Insightful
    eBay was wonderful back in the day, but has been on the decline for years. They've made decisions that increasingly shut out the individual reselling used items, which once formed the core of their business. The eBay of today hardly resembles the place where I bought a used guitar in 1998. I looked through a few hundred guitars each week, nearly all of which were used instruments listed by an individual. Now you're likely to find ten times the number of guitars but 90% or more will be listed by a wholesaler or huge pawn shop. Some of it was to be expected - as eBay succeeded it attracted more businesses that could do more volume than any individual, and directly tying an individual's reputation to the number of transactions benefited those large sellers.

    However, the seller policies were modified over the years in ways that benefited the larger sellers. For example, many small sellers left when eBay wholesale surrendered to big business efforts to ignore the legal rights protected by the first-sale doctrine. My smart-card programmer listing was pulled without explanation, which I finally figured out was apparently due to DirectTV claiming that it could be used to "hack" their equipment.

    Unfortunately, each time I looked, I found no viable alternative. There are plenty of small auction sites, but none with a fraction of the buyers and/or the buyer and seller protections offered by eBay. Has the Web simply been too commercialized now for someone to make a new eBay that caters to individuals again?

  30. Fraud Problems by StevisF · · Score: 1

    Their anti-fraud measures seem inadequate. My account was hacked a year or so ago. I hadn't used to sell in over a year and I hadn't used it to buy anything in almost as long. All of a sudden someone posted several hundred iPods on my account. I'd never sold items on my account in this manner. Just a few, different items here and there, like most individuals. I was surprised that a company like eBay wouldn't have fraud prevention software. Anyway, I canceled my account and I'll never use eBay again.

  31. Different company by S-100 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ebay will continue to make money, but as a different company. The millions of people (such as myself) who labored long and hard to make eBay a viable marketplace are being brushed aside so that eBay can transform itself into another Amazon.

    I stopped selling on eBay earlier this year, and I'm focusing on my own e-commerce site which I've had even before starting with eBay. I've noticed that my "My eBay" stored searches for certain collectibles have been returning fewer and less meaningful results, which is partially the result of eBay's new "intelligent" search engine and the fact that fewer people are listing unique items any more.

    But when I need to shop for a commodity item, it's often on eBay (as well as Amazon and other places). eBay is shaking off its unique aspects and spitting in the face of the people that worked to bring them to where they are today.

  32. The Need for Growth by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know several people who used to do a lot of business on Ebay who are rapidly becoming disgusted with it because of its clear preference for giant sellers over individuals; I'm not at all surprised to hear that this is a general trend.

    The only sellers that should be disgusted are ones with their head in the sand. EBay's costs mostly fixed so they grow through volume. You get volume through larger customers who can provide that volume. Economic inevitability.

    EVERY non-regulated company I'm aware of besides eBay provides volume discounts in some fashion for larger customers. I was an individual seller as well as a high volume power seller. One of the (many) reasons I no longer sell through eBay is precisely BECAUSE they provided no incentive for me to bring additional business to them. They kept raising rates instead of providing incentives to bring additional volume. Basically they priced me (and lots of others) out of their marketplace. It was too expensive as an individual or a business to continue to sell on eBay.

    but why are they abandoning the business that made them successful in the first place?

    The short answer is that they decided a long time ago to become a publicly traded company and the growth demands of being public is the deal with the devil you make to get equity funding. That's why companies don't really want to go public unless the owners are either cashing out (private equity) or they have no other choice. Had eBay remained a privately held company they could have chosen to stay their present size.

    Businesses out grow their original business model all the time. Some businesses simply do not scale beyond a certain point. Amazon started as an online bookseller that had no warehouses of their own. That only scaled to a point. IBM got out of the personal computer business not long ago. That particular niche of the industry just didn't hold enough growth/profit potential for them anymore and was more of a distraction than an asset. When you are a publicly traded company shareholders demand growth and eBay has hit a wall with being the world's premier online flea market.

    1. Re:The Need for Growth by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Informative

      The IBM and Amazon examples don't really work here: Amazon still sells books (whether they have their own warehouses or not is basically invisible to the customer) and the PC, no matter how huge its impact may have been, was never more than a small fraction of IBM's revenue stream. If Amazon stopped selling books entirely, or IBM abandoned their mainframe business, then their shareholders would be up in arms, and rightly so.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:The Need for Growth by avandesande · · Score: 1

      volume sellers don't cost them any less per transaction than the average joe.
      Why the need for a volume discount?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:The Need for Growth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the (many) reasons I no longer sell through eBay is precisely BECAUSE they provided no incentive for me to bring additional business to them. They kept raising rates instead of providing incentives to bring additional volume. Basically they priced me (and lots of others) out of their marketplace. It was too expensive as an individual or a business to continue to sell on eBay.

      In other words, inflate your prices until your high volume customers leave, then reel them back in with discount rates whilst the small guys still suffer. Two words: SLEE ZEE.

    4. Re:The Need for Growth by mochan_s · · Score: 1

      Ebay's growth doesn't have to be by squeezing the sellers. For example, they bought Skype and they could do something with it to grow their company. They have a tremendous product search experience and they could go into a google shopping style thing to expand. Look at Amazon - it was place to buy textbooks at first but now it's to buy even food, see ratings and reviews and everything else. The fact is that the ebay sellers are an easy target since ebay is a monopoly. The least riskiest way of expanding for ebay is to squeeze the sellers for more money - at least in the short term. Amazon has had to innovate like crazy to make money but ebay hasn't.

  33. The last time I used ebay... by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    About 2 years ago, my wife and I bought used cellphones. Nokia N-series phones that you couldn't buy in the US.

    We paid a lot for them.

    Her n70 was actually a sales demo. It wasn't supposed to be sold. The seller claimed ignorance all the way to the bank.
    My n80 was an asian market phone instead of the eu market phone it was supposed to be. Again, different seller claimed ignorance all the way to the bank.

    That's the last time I used ebay. Shortly after that, my paypal account got hacked.

    Ebay is a thieves' bazaar. It's a way to push crap or stolen goods with little or no consequences. There are some who have setup mini stripmalls in ebay to push dollar store crap. You just can't trust ebay anymore to protect your interests.

    I think ebay is definitely on its way out. I can now buy stuff on amazon that before I could only find on ebay. ebay just isn't necessary anymore.

    craigslist can now help you broker private deals.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  34. Not death, but suicide by austexmonkey · · Score: 1

    I don't see EBay so much as dying, as committing a very slow suicide. In an attempt to increase revenue, they're shafting people who use Ebay for what its best at: being a world wide garage sale.

    No other site is even close in its ability to connect buyers and sellers of used/rare/collectible items. This is what Ebay is best at, and also the market EBay has been marginalizing.

    Adding ump-teen thousand listings from huge online retailers adds no value to customers at the core of the Ebay business. They can find the same crap at any one of dozens of online retailers. All this will do aggravate folks who use EBay to buy/sell in secondary/specialty markets.

    And EBays customer service is atrocious. I can almost accept this when the company is viewed as basically a renter of flea market stalls. They don't have a change competing against reputable online retailers like Amazon.

    What a stupid, stupid idea. You don't destroy your core business in order to expand your revenue a bit.

  35. Google doesn't want the liability by sjbe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Many of the hard-core ebay whiners on its website are practically BEGGING google to open up an auction site, mostly because it will have practically millions as a buyer base overnight.

    Google doesn't want the liability. If anything kills eBay it's going to be getting sued by every luxury good maker on the planet. EBay claims they want to ensure authentic goods but is unwilling to take the steps needed to ensure authenticity - namely physical inspection of items and their paper trail. Such physical inspection is completely outside Google's business model so they would be in the same boat eBay is liability-wise.

    All that of course assumes Google could take marketshare from eBay where Amazon and Yahoo failed. That's a BIG assumption.

    1. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by torkus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well the big difference is that eBay tries to act like wal-mart. Making everything fit their ideals, extra safe, family oriented and nicey nice ... as long as they can squeeze out the extra .01c per transaction.

      Is it me or has the size of eBay become the other half of the downfall. I hate searching for something and finding a million junk auctions or ubsurd shipping (which ebay is mostly to blame for anyhow) on many others. People that list 1000's of items simultaneously all for 'buy it now' aren't auctioning anything - they below in a store. Perhaps part of a larger, searchable multi-store "online mall" but still.

      Ebay is trying to move away from 'auction' and towards 'online store front'. Meh.

      Give me a google auction site and maybe i'll start doing online auctions again. Or better, convince Visa, MC, AMEX, or anyone to offer a realistic e-payment system that supports micropayments and fees somewhere close to reality. Seriously.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    2. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Ebay is trying to move away from 'auction' and towards 'online store front'. Meh.

      Online auctions without verification are lousy. On a site like eBay, someone's bound to get screwed. Either the buyer (by getting ripped off) or the seller (getting scammed by buyers disputing legitimate auctions.) I've had friends on each side of that. Every time, people partially blame eBay for the issue.

      If I were in charge of eBay, I'd be doing my damnedest to get away from auctions, too. That may be what got them started, but it's not the way of the future. There's just no trust, and virtually no way of avoiding scams.

    3. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It just occurred to me that P2P networks have the same problem as eBay. They just want to be a connection broker...but the law wants to push them into taking greater responsibility.

    4. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All that of course assumes Google could take marketshare from eBay where Amazon and Yahoo failed. That's a BIG assumption.

      A big assumption? Hardly. Amazon and Yahoo were competing with eBay when is used to be viable. That was very hard to do, VERY HARD. Amazon was really only good for literature and music anyways and they seem to be moving in that direction still.

      I used to search eBay for items FIRST . I would get an idea of what the prices were, how much I could bid, how long to win, etc. I got many a laptop at 60-70% off retail prices for my clients doing this. I sold my cars on eBay, even though I never actually completed a sale. I just got leads.

      Once eBay forced to me to offer PayPal I instantly canceled my account and told them why. I have not even used eBay as a buyer since then at all. In fact, I don't remember even visiting their website in quite some time. I now use Google Shopping quite a bit to locate good prices on the equipment that I need.

      Google could have a user base millions strong overnight, and not by taking active eBay users either. They would have those millions that are waiting in limbo for the next big auction site to service their needs better than eBay.... like me. As soon as another company comes along that offers anything close to eBay I will give them a shot. I doubt that I am alone.

      As for sellers, eBay just committed the final act of suicide. I cannot understate that. Inking a deal with a major outfit like Buy.Com is a big move, and without listing fees, a fatal one. The Power Sellers will not stand by and "compete" with Buy.Com in a one-sided unfair fight. That's ludicrous. How could they? Buy.Com could compete with volume alone and with the savings that no listing fees represent it force regular sellers to destroy their own profit margins to stay afloat.

      No, I don't think it is a big assumption at all. I think you underestimate just how pissed off people are, both buyers and sellers alike. eBay is losing market share to the VOID . People would rather be doing anything but eBay, even if that is nothing at all.

      eBay is losing both buyers and sellers at a pretty fantastic rate. Only they really know, but I bet they are being tight lipped about it. Probably even lying to themselves that they don't need those people or that they will be back. eBay is becoming less and less relevant as an online auction site for the common man. That is how they started it, and they have forgotten their roots. Perhaps they want to push to become something bigger and new, but they can't do it without the people that started it. When Joe Blow can't sell his stuff on eBay anymore, I don't see how he will continue to buy stuff either.

      Personally, I thought eBay was going under after the PayPal scandal. With this new development.... start the death watch today, July 14th, 2008.

    5. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by stewbacca · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ebay is trying to move away from 'auction' and towards 'online store front'. Meh.

      I stopped using eBay two years ago once the online stores overtook the individual sales. Try searching for used drum gear, and IF you can get past the 50 or so posts from stores listing their "auctions" for retail price, you "might" find a deal in the form of used gear from a fellow drummer.

    6. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by sjbe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As soon as another company comes along that offers anything close to eBay I will give them a shot. I doubt that I am alone.

      You aren't alone but I think we are both going to be waiting quite a while. EBay for better or worse is going to be very hard to displace.

      No, I don't think it is a big assumption at all. I think you underestimate just how pissed off people are, both buyers and sellers alike.

      Underestimate? I have over 10,000 feedbacks and sold literally millions of dollars of merchandise through eBay. I no longer sell anything through eBay because eBay policies ended up costing me tens of thousands of dollars.

      EBay basically made it impossible to do business with them and choked the life out of a company I worked very hard to build. You think I don't understand how pissed off people are? I understand better than almost anyone you'll ever meet.

      eBay is losing both buyers and sellers at a pretty fantastic rate.

      Really? You know that for sure? Because there is almost no financial data I can find to support that hypothesis.

    7. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Same here,although I never bothered to sell on eBay,I always went to eBay FIRST for my used computers and parts. After they started forcing the scam that was Paypal down everyone's throats I haven't been there since. I will pretty much shop anywhere BUT eBay. They have just become a haven for scammers and thieves,with eBay as one of the worst offenders with Paypal. So I would be happy to move my business to Google. But as always this is my 02c,YMMV

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by EdIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well I guess you are pissed off and rightly so. As for the financial data, well... that is a little naive. I am not insulting you or flaming you either. Those bastards LIE. LIE, LIE, and LIE some more. It's always worse than what they are telling you, and I am sure some pretty fancy "Arthur Anderson" type accounting can hide how many users they have lost.

      Of course that is easy for me to say and not a very strong argument. However, you WERE a big seller, and I WAS a dedicated buyer. Does the financial data even reflect the amount of user base you would have expected to have disappeared by now?

      Everyone I talk to does not visit eBay anymore now. Your the first big seller that I have personally heard that left eBay. It would seem logical that based upon my limited experience, which is 100% of people leaving eBay, that eBay has to be suffering serious losses and most likely hiding it.

      They recently increased their fees substantially. Perhaps the people that are still left are keeping the numbers afloat giving that the increased fees allows less users to achieve the same cash flow. Give it another 18 months and look at the financial data. I expect a meltdown to occur inevitably as eBay cannot operate without buyers and sellers and I don't see a reason to stay.

    9. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      IMHO, "liability" shouldn't even be a factor. This reminds me a lot of the "mom and pop" ISPs like a buddy of mine used to run. He tried to cater to a customer base that included several churches and religious organizations from the small town he was born in ... and wound up creating a big liability mess where none existed initially.

      (He decided to start censoring out Usenet groups he deemed as having "unsuitable content" for said customers. Well, as soon as you take that first step of voluntarily censoring ONE group, you lose all hope of protection as a "common carrier". People start holding you to your promises, stated or implied, and every time something slips through - it's a potential legal problem for you.)

      If auction sites would simply leave it up to the USERS to police auctions (the way Craigslist does), providing the service itself, without any attempt to "police" what's there, I think they'd have a "best possible scenario".

    10. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      I no longer sell anything through eBay because eBay policies ended up costing me tens of thousands of dollars.

      And I no longer work because taxes were costing me tens of thousands of dollars. :V

    11. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by FLEB · · Score: 1

      The thing that differentiates CL, though, is that it's locally oriented. You're far less likely to be scammed from someone at a local address, because it's much easier to inspect and reject bum goods. Users can police themselves because they have the practical power to enforce-- they can sniff-test the deal in person, and can back out if it's a scam.

      On Ebay, though, transactions are being made miles away, over messageboards, credit cards, and shipped product, so there needs to be binding agreements, policing, and enforcement, otherwise the anonymous nature of the site would have it overrun by scammers and have an unfloatable reputation.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    12. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the evidence you need is the fact of how they are restructuring certain things around the site/corporation. Fee increases, loopholes that benefit them, attempting to force PayPal, etc. Why else would they do this unless they are actually losing customers and are attempting to make up for it with increased fees, etc. Not a very clever way to hide financial problems I might add. That tactic failed the airlines and mortgage industries as well.

    13. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by SubComdTaco · · Score: 1
      Well the liability threat just decreased a bit after the ruling in the Tiffany vs eBay case.

      In a long-awaited decision in a four-year-old trademark lawsuit against eBay brought by the jeweler Tiffany and Company, Judge Richard Sullivan of the Federal District Court in Manhattan ruled Monday that the online retailer does not bear a legal responsibility to prevent its users from selling counterfeit items on its marketplace.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/15/technology/15ebay.html?_r=1&ref=technology&oref=login

    14. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am not insulting you or flaming you either. Those bastards LIE. LIE, LIE, and LIE some more. It's always worse than what they are telling you, and I am sure some pretty fancy "Arthur Anderson" type accounting can hide how many users they have lost.

      Again, nothing surprising to me here since professionally I'm a degreed industrial engineer and a certified accountant. When I'm not trying to be an entrepreneur I'm in the business of operations consulting so I need to know every sort of problem I'll run into including cooked books. I know all about the games that can be played with the numbers as well as the operations.

      If you want the the short version of my opinion on eBay's prospects, I think eBay is on the verge of some serious problems but they aren't there yet. It's sort of like Microsoft in a way. Few people really love them but they haven't quite pissed everyone off enough to really torpedo their business. I think the biggest threat to them actually is litigation from luxury goods makers. That has the potential to drastically increase their costs and open the door to other marketplaces. But I don't expect anything in the near future. I expect eBay to remain a cash cow for the next several years at least.

      But hey, here's to hoping eBay goes down like the Titanic...

    15. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by Knara · · Score: 1

      The other thing that differentiates CL is that their users are goddamn flaghappy.

      Being able to nix posts anoymously, as much as you want, with no recourse at all is ridiculous.

    16. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by EdIII · · Score: 1

      I think we both agree that eBay has problems, I guess we disagree on the ETA to the grave. I had not really considered the luxury goods lawsuits. I guess I never shopped eBay for those kinds of items. Mostly high tech gear and electronics over here.

      As for Microsoft, well they have a stranglehold on the industry that cannot really be compared. It's not like the ISP's push people towards eBay by default.

      Interesting that I got the flamebait mod on the last post though :) I thought I was clear that I was not insulting you at all, just that it relied too heavily on honesty in Wall Street, which I think is pretty scarce lately :D

      I 2nd the motion for eBay to go down like the Titanic, but remember... the Titanic had survivors. I hope the sellers are the ones surviving and the captain once again goes down with the ship.

    17. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by XHIIHIIHX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't really see who's suing who here. I bought some of those christian audiger hoodies and that got shipped straight from china to me. So sue me? Or the guy in china. Best of luck with that. These overpriced designer labels are getting what they deserve. Produce quality goods and we'll pay a premium, otherwise stay in bollyhood.

    18. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >All that of course assumes Google could take marketshare from eBay
      >where Amazon and Yahoo failed. That's a BIG assumption.

      "you mean that's a big IF". Where'd you go to journalism school anyway?

    19. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by r1_97 · · Score: 1

      Many of the hard-core ebay whiners on its website are practically BEGGING google to open up an auction site, mostly because it will have practically millions as a buyer base overnight.

      Google doesn't want the liability. If anything kills eBay it's going to be getting sued by every luxury good maker on the planet. EBay claims they want to ensure authentic goods but is unwilling to take the steps needed to ensure authenticity - namely physical inspection of items and their paper trail. Such physical inspection is completely outside Google's business model so they would be in the same boat eBay is liability-wise.

      All that of course assumes Google could take marketshare from eBay where Amazon and Yahoo failed. That's a BIG assumption.

      E-Bay just won the case in which the court held (I don't have the cite) that it was not liable for counterfeit goods sold by an unrelated ebay seller.

    20. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by sjbe · · Score: 1

      Interesting that I got the flamebait mod on the last post though :) I thought I was clear that I was not insulting you at all, just that it relied too heavily on honesty in Wall Street, which I think is pretty scarce lately :D

      No offense taken on my part. I thought the flamebait mod was way out of line as well. You were just stating a reasonable opinion and I thought you were pretty clear about your intentions.

    21. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Amazon and Yahoo both failed due to incompetence, I think. Amazon never had a real auction format like Ebay, to my recollection. Yahoo did, but it sucked.

      More importantly, back in the days that Yahoo still had auctions, Ebay wasn't as hated as it is now. It was a lot smaller, still privately owned, fees were lower, and they hadn't done all these things yet which have pissed off sellers so much. It was still a big "online garage sale" as I like to call it, where regular people could sell each other their old junk rather than throw it in the trash, or try to sell it in a yard sale for $0.10. It wasn't yet a place where commercial sellers would unload giant quantities of junk from China with huge shipping fees. Craigslist didn't even exist yet.

      Things are different now. Lots of people are tired of Ebay's antics. Ebay gained a monopoly position (whether it earned it or not is debatable), but it's heavily abused that position, especially since going public IMO. Craigslist has become a very popular alternative, especially for goods traded locally. I think the market is ripe for a serious Ebay competitor.

    22. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 1

      Google doesn't want the liability. If anything kills eBay it's going to be getting sued by every luxury good maker on the planet. EBay claims they want to ensure authentic goods but is unwilling to take the steps needed to ensure authenticity

      Not really true. Ebay used to be essentially immune to that sort of liability. Remember "eBay is just a venue"?

      The way to avoid liability is to avoid sticking your nose into things so that you become liable for "what you know or should have known".
      If you have no reasonable way to know you can't be liable for not knowing something. Note this may not apply in French courts run by lunatics.

      Now however eBay is knowingly taking on the responsibility for ensuring authenticity. That will be their downfall. Their old lawyers were smart, there was a line eBay didn't cross. With the new and incredibly stupid regime over there they are crossing the line and getting enormous liability, liability they avoided all these years.

      Just wait, some of their big sellers who are paying their seller fees based on the anonymous "Detailed Seller Ratings" will sue eBay. In discovery will come out which of their buyers gave them lower DSRs and are costing them money, and then they will add those buyers to the lawsuit in place of the John Does. Ebay will be a defendant along with those eBay members, and they will find out what real liability is. I'd love to be involved. It'd be a hoot. Heh.

      Back to Google, they are not responsible for the contents of Google Base, which contains billions of products, some likely completely fake. But Google doesn't know and shouldn't be expected to know. So they are essentially immune to liability. If they started an eBay competitor they would be careful what they pry into. Something eBay used to be careful of, but not anymore.

      --
      .
    23. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      I've just recently started selling on eBay and an interesting thing I found is that the majority of my buyers are sellers themselves.

      If indeed eBay is loosing sellers (I myself am looking at listing my company's products in other venues, since eBay is expensive and has too many listings in the categories I sell in) then they are also loosing buyers.

      The networking effects (sellers go to where most buyers are, buyers go to where most sellers are) are what propelled eBay to success and form a large barrier to entry for it's competitors. When those which are simultaneously sellers and buyers leave they remove people from both sides of the equation - a perfect counter to the networking effects that had helped eBay.

    24. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      Cry me a bleeding river. The number of times I've been sniped by a power seller who then goes on to resell the item is ridiculous. Ebay shouldnt be an alternative to getting a job. And they certainly dont have an obligation to support the business models of these parasitic individuals. I liked it when it was casual auction site. And it hasnt been that way for a LOOOONG time.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    25. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The thing is verification is going to drive up prices a lot. There will be two sets of delivery costs (deliver to the verifier and then to the buyer) and you will have to pay the verifier for thier services.

      Personally I think the cost of all that would be a lot higher than the cost of the occasional transaction gone wrong.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    26. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by Kaukomieli · · Score: 1

      Google doesn't want the liability. If anything kills eBay it's going to be getting sued by every luxury good maker on the planet. EBay claims they want to ensure authentic goods but is unwilling to take the steps needed to ensure authenticity - namely physical inspection of items and their paper trail. Such physical inspection is completely outside Google's business model so they would be in the same boat eBay is liability-wise.

      You can't be serious with the idea that ebay should physically inspect items and/or the paper trail. Ebay is a platform, it is not even part of the contract between seller and buyer. Ebay is as responsible for fake products sold on that platform as a road-builder is for some drug-transport, or as an ISP for copyright violations by its users.

      If Ebay is made aware of auctions that violate some sort of copyright that auction has to be taken down. If the seller gets prosecuted they will have to disclose his profile to the police. It is the business of the rightsholder to fight counterfeits.

    27. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      A little Craigslist story:

      Just last week, my friend had his car broken into and his ipod was stolen among other things.

      It was auctioned on Craigslist shortly afterward, he met with the seller, and pretty much as soon as he brought out the ipod he recognized it(He uses an unusual case). After he had it in hand to inspect it, he told the thief it was his and the thief ran off. It's nice to be able to meet and do the deal in person.

      The original plan was to have his roommate come up from behind with a potatoe bag so they could give the thief a sack party, but he got away. They were able to get the plates at least, so maybe the police can actually do something now that he's got evidence to prove a theft, might have been good that the sack party didn't occur since he stands a chance at getting the wallet back now.

    28. Re:Google doesn't want the liability by eyendall · · Score: 1

      "If you have no reasonable way to know you can't be liable for not knowing something."

      Define "reasonable". Wilfull ignorance is not a legal defense anywhere.

      Also, the courts have not said the last word on the luxury goods case. I am sure the recent decision will be appealed.

  36. another angle by hurfy · · Score: 1

    Everyone is talking about the ebay side of this...

    While ebay is not what it used to be, what does it say about buy.com?
    There would seem to be no need whatsoever to go there, is there?
    Ebay is almost the same anyway and this would seem to cement the deal.

    I think both had their place but now they are one and the same and don't fit so well with all the fat in either those places anymore :(

    I rarely buy 'NEW' stuff on ebay, and now i rarely buy stuff i wasn't already looking for because sorting thru the chaff is too much work for very little (if any) gain.

    1. Re:another angle by Cramer · · Score: 1

      what does it say about buy.com?

      That they're desperate for customers, don't know how to maintain a website, otherwise have no clue how to do business? By using eBay, they don't have to really run hardly any company at all (which is convenient since from my chair they don't even know how to wipe their own ass)... throw everything on eBay's servers and automate it all -- which is exactly what they're doing... you MUST use paypal; you have 6hours to pay; after 12hours, the "auction" is canceled and you are a "non-paying bidder"... all 100% automatic.

      If you aren't paying attention, you might not realize you're doing business with Buy.Scum. I'm sure a lot of people who don't do business with them, are now through eBay.

  37. Ah, there goes the best retro-shop in the world... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    eBay - my main addiction in life, it will be sad to see it drown in commercial trades.

    The one thing I like about online auctions is that they are by and FOR average joes like me, not a bunch of insurance sellers trying to outbid eachother with gibberish.

    I find it hard to believe that the average Joe's have a declining interest in eBay, it should be the other way from my own experience. Oversea eBay shopping has NEVER been bigger in eg. Denmark these times.

    My experience with new used sales on the net is that it is exactly the average joe sales that make them grow in popularity because you get a real chance to get something that you really want from yesteryears and not some useless gimmick from merchandise companies that compete for the cheapest lanyards...

    If eBay get filled up with nick-nack offers from commercial companies - organized...then eBay will decline severely in popularity- in fact...I'm willing to bet that it will KILL eBay entirely over 2 years and make it another alibaba outlet because the average joes sales can't be found by the other average joes... ...pretty much like Google today. Back when they didnt censor so much, and back when the commercial companies didnt work on outsmarting the google searches - there where a real chance of finding interesting stuff - fast. Today you need to be a real whiz with knowing how to "filter out" all the annoying "watch-me-buy-me-now" for just about anything you search for.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  38. Corrections by mpapet · · Score: 1

    Ebay isn't especially suited as a micropayment system. At best, they are about average as far as transaction processing goes.

    I'd be *very* interested in knowing how many of their transactions are 100% in-network value transfers. For the payment technology ignorant, that means a transaction where the source funds (buyer's payment) is stored in the PayPal system.

    My guess is it's *very* low compared to their Visa/MC processing.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:Corrections by mitgib · · Score: 1

      I'd be *very* interested in knowing how many of their transactions are 100% in-network value transfers. For the payment technology ignorant, that means a transaction where the source funds (buyer's payment) is stored in the PayPal system.

      My guess is it's *very* low compared to their Visa/MC processing.

      I'd actually be surprised if it wasn't actually the opposite. 90% of my sales arrive via PayPal, 10% via e-gold. I then spend that paying bills by either making a direct PayPal payment to my vendor, or by using my PayPal debit card. Only my apartment rent do I have to head to the ATM to make a cash widthrawl, but never need to send funds to or from the bank.

      It is an interesting question, but doubtful we would ever find eBay releasing the real thruth

      --
      Being a spelling & grammar Nazi is a sign you do not poses the intelligence to contribute to the conversation
  39. Ebay is dead, the body hasn't hit the ground yet. by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

    Their original market was bringing a community of sellers to a community of buyers and using time based auctions to decide who gets what.

    This worked on the "fea market" model, where people could find a buyer for their property they no longer used. What happened to EBay was scammers. People buying things cheap on sale, and seelling them at full price plus "shipping."

    Then followed the people who built whole business models on selling on ebay.

    The geeks have pretty much stopped going to ebay because there are no more deal to be made. The people who don't know better are just now starting to see it for the scam it is.

    Craigslist is the next ebay. Ebay knows this and that's why they tried to sue craigslist.

    IF you want to make money, create a site that provides escrow services and dispute resolution to work in conjunction with Craigslist and/or ebay.

  40. Missing the point by sjbe · · Score: 3, Informative

    The IBM and Amazon examples don't really work here:

    You are missing the point. The point is that companies often exit businesses that they were successful in. Even if they keep them they become a much smaller piece of the pie. I can come up with other examples if you like. How about Nintendo which started as a card company? Or 3M which originally sold corundum for grinding wheels? The point is that lots of businesses exit particular marketplaces all the time.

  41. Learn about Net Present Value by sjbe · · Score: 1

    If Amazon stopped selling books entirely, or IBM abandoned their mainframe business, then their shareholders would be up in arms, and rightly so.

    Shareholders care about FUTURE free cash flow. If there is a good business case for exiting those businesses then the shareholders will be fine with it. General Electric is looking to sell off their lighting and appliance divisions right now. Why? Those divisions can no longer provide the demanded return on capital.

  42. Selling on ebay by Rinisari · · Score: 1

    I sell lightly-used computer hardware (mostly PSUs and cases) on eBay when I'm done using them for a brief period of time. I usually sell things for approximately 25%-40% off of the new price. I have two items which I've listed several times, and neither has sold, even after cutting one down to nearly 40% of its original value. It's not a commodity item, nor is it not in-demand.

    eBay just isn't doing it for me any more. I'm going to try Craigslist from now on if I can simply sell things the various forums I peruse.

  43. where else by jaimz22 · · Score: 0

    But where else where we buy crap that we really don't want just to find out that it's broken when we get it. that of course is after we've paid $0.01 and $23.99 shipping on a $20 item (if you can even find it)

  44. eBay and Paypal by xpuppykickerx · · Score: 1

    It seems with the new way the rating system 'works', that eBay almost wants their users to file Paypal complaints rather than having eBay deal with the problem directly. This poses a problem when items aren't sent on time and the 45 day limit expires.

    It seems now the seller always wins over the buyer when the auction goes poorly.

  45. Re:Ebay is dead, the body hasn't hit the ground ye by exley · · Score: 1

    I love it when people declare things "dead" just because they want them to be. Just like you always see with MS or any other "big name" that's declined from their top spot. Sure, they're not what they used to be, and probably never will be again, but that doesn't mean they're disappearing anytime soon.

  46. Yahoo by DogDude · · Score: 1

    I bet that Yahoo's got to be kicking themselves for shutting down their auction site in the past few weeks. Too bad. I liked their system *much* more than the mess that is eBay.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Yahoo by rhyder128k · · Score: 1

      They had an auction site several years ago. It was pretty good, and I used to use it before Ebay gobbled everyone else up. If memory serves, they sold it to Ebay, who shut it down. They must have had some sort of agreement along the lines of "we agree not to open an auction site for five years".

      So, the one that just shut down wasn't the first Yahoo auction site.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
  47. Use AuctionArms.com for guns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their anti gun policy made me stop using ebay years ago....

    That is why I switched to Auctionarms.com for all my gun related auctions.

    They even have penny auctions. Just 500,000 pennies for a matching 1911A1 and M1A.

    Please note that this is legal since a federal licensed gun dealer is required to ship and do background checks for transactions as required by law for interstate gun purchases.

  48. Compare to Google Product Search by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Google doesn't want the liability. If anything kills eBay it's going to be getting sued by every luxury good maker on the planet. EBay claims they want to ensure authentic goods but is unwilling to take the steps needed to ensure authenticity - namely physical inspection of items and their paper trail. Such physical inspection is completely outside Google's business model so they would be in the same boat eBay is liability-wise.

    But what's the difference? Google already offers a fixed-price marketplace called Google Product Search, powered by Google Base and Google Checkout. How does this incur any less liability than giving buyers 7 days to name their own best offer?

  49. Funny you mention that.... by tacokill · · Score: 1


    Here is a link to Ebay's stock chart.

    Coincidentally, it correlates very well to my experiences. From the beginning through 2004-2005ish, I liked Ebay a lot. Since that time, they've done just about everything wrong.

  50. I can understand the reason for those, though by phorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Guns, alcohol, and many others can be a regulated or restricted market. There are age-limits, and various others (permits required, restrictions against owning a firearm, etc) which makes the whole thing rather complicated. When your business is general-auctions, some things are best left to the specialists.

  51. Ebay digging its own grave by Pietzki · · Score: 1

    I know, I know, they're powerful and all, but when a company becomes too ignorant and irritates its customers too much (by that I mean the sellers) they inevitably give the competition (even if they're only small start-ups) a huge chance to start taking over. Here in Australia, alternative sites like Oztion have started to become much bigger since ebay started screwing its sellers. It is getting to the point where they are nearly a local alternative for sellers (especially for sellers who don't sell overseas anyway). Especially since evays little paypal experiment many sellers are looking for alternatives. In New Zealand there's Trademe, and it is also becoming bigger and better every day. As ebay becomes more and more reckless, sites like Bidtopia, eBid, OnlineAuctions, WeBidz and uBid will start seeing more and more sellers flock to them as they are getting sick of ebay screwing them around. Serves 'em right...

  52. ebay? Who cares. by crivens · · Score: 1

    Never used ebay myself so I don't care what happens to it. I can't be bothered to face the hassle and worry of using it.

    A relative bought my daughter a present through ebay. No problems with the seller, but it was weird how the item's price was low (and minimal activity) until she placed a bid. It was almost as though someone noticed her bid then placed their own bids to artificially inflate the price. She "won" the auction but who was she really bidding against?

    1. Re:ebay? Who cares. by gauauu · · Score: 1

      That's how ebay works. People place their MAXIMUM bid, but it only bids them up enough to beat the other competition. So if only one other person had bid on the toy, and placed a maximum bid of $10, it may still be listed at $1. If you come along and place a maximum bid of $20, it will jump to $10.50 or something, and you'll be the winner. Unless someone comes along and places a bid for $25, at which point it will sell for $20.50 or something like that.

  53. Ebay is missing some seriously needed features. by pecosdave · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One thing eBay seriously needs is an individual blacklist. Set it up so that you can mark certain sellers (or buyers) as Bozo's and never see their auctions again. There's certain sellers I've never done business with I would like to blacklist for various reasons. 30 point blinking font in all caps on a contrasting background and excessive use of the word "rare" would be some valid reasons I can think of, along with working in names of completely different items into a description. If I could just eliminate sellers who do this serially one by one it would make searching a lot easier.

    A nice addition to this would be a notation field that shows up next to people you have done business with that quickly links you to feedback you left for them in the past so you know who's good or who you may not want to mess with again if you can chose someone else.

    More shipping info would be nice. Who the heck does "ground based shipping provider" mean? If it's (certain types of) DHL or USPS that has to go to my PO Box in my case, if it's UPS or FedEX it has to go to my house. The fact these retards don't read notes half the time doesn't help matters.

    Instead of preventing sellers from leaving retaliatory feedback, there should be a seller review option. If you get retaliatory unexplained feedback check the retaliatory button, both feedbacks get removed temporarily, after the seller gets 10 or so checks, an actual eBay employee takes time out of their day to investigate. If it turns out the seller (or possibly buyer) is a serial feedback abuser they lose their right to leave bad feedback for a while, maybe even their account.

    Identity verification needs to exist. Something to prevent any one person from having more than one account.

    Make a few changes to get rid of the common dipshit, or at least filter them out, and eBay may be worth using again.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:Ebay is missing some seriously needed features. by Cramer · · Score: 1

      One thing eBay seriously needs is an individual blacklist

      AMEN!

  54. Ebay is worthless right now by bill_kress · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is absolutely no point in bidding before the last 5 seconds of any auction. This makes it really irritating.

    I'd really like to see them say "Bidding will continue until at least (some time) plus up to 24 hours (randomly set).

    Paying them as much as they want is also kind of silly--craig's list gives you the ability to meet the person you are buying from and examine the product. You can also avoid shipping.

    Ever notice how a bunch of stuff on ebay is $0.02 + $5.00 shipping?? Honestly that's got to be a scam--someone is getting a cut of that shipping cost. Another nice policy would be that a buyer always has the option to arrange all shipping himself--(For instance: Just put it in an envelope and drop it in the mailbox, I'll take the responsibility, or "I'll have UPS show up at your door" or "I'll pick it up myself").

    1. Re:Ebay is worthless right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah - the ebay snipping is rediculous. They should extend the auction another minute/hour/day/etc if there is a bid made in the last minute. That's how real auctions work anyway - they keep going until no one wants to bid any more.

      That would help get the average joe back into bidding...

    2. Re:Ebay is worthless right now by Waste55 · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of sellers also do this to reduce the fee associated with the final price of the auction.

      It is still annoying to browse and search by price when you then discover the $20 shipping charge on a pez dispenser.

    3. Re:Ebay is worthless right now by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bidding will continue until at least (some time) plus up to 24 hours (randomly set)

      I've used auction sites that did a variety things to extend the auction time, including what you suggest as well as adding time past the last bid. They sound great when you have lost an auction to a sniper, but in reality they have much more severe drawbacks than Ebay's system. Ebay's fixed end time is by far the best online mechanism I have run into. Online auctions really are not the same as outcry auctions, and work much better if different rules are used.

      Ebay has a LOT of problems but this is not one of them.

      Ever notice how a bunch of stuff on ebay is $0.02 + $5.00 shipping?? Honestly that's got to be a scam

      Yes it is a scam, against Ebay. EBay charges a percentage of the selling price not including shipping. Sellers try to keep their Ebay fees lower by inflating the shipping costs. It is strictly in violation of Ebay terms of service.

      I'd strongly suggest going into the Ebay message boards and spending some time there before buying and selling on Ebay. You will understand the site much better, which will lead to a far better experience.

    4. Re:Ebay is worthless right now by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's policy violation in many cases. However, eBay doesn't give a rat's ass as long as they get their fees. I used to report them, but since eBay doesn't do jack shit, why bother; if other people are stupid enough to fall for it...

  55. Fraud-friendly by phorm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had an item which I was bidding on, but got a bit too pricey for me. About a week later, it popped up again in a second-chance, offer, so I snagged it.

    Now, apparently the second-chance offer was a scan wherein somebody hacked the seller's account and was trying to get people to pay with an alternate email address. However, I paid through the proper channels (pay by paypal button) etc and the money went to the *correct* seller's account.

    Of course, about an hour or two later the seller's account was temporary closed, and the auction removed. So I called the seller, who indicated that his ebay account had been hacked. I pointed out that I had paid to *his* (not the hacker's) paypal account, which was not hacked, and he offered to refund my money.

    2 days later, no refund

    So I had to go through hell with a bunch of the morons at paypal (who will thoroughly disclaim that they work with the same company, though ebay owns them now), pointing out that *EBAY* had closed the auction due to the hacked account. They told me that I could only file a 'did not receive' or 'not as expected' claim, but if I filed did not receive and then something arrived (even if it was a load of bricks), I could not later put in a "not-as-expected" claim. I also couldn't put in a "did not receive" claim yet because I had to give the seller time to send the item (which came from a bad listing, go figure).

    So time goes by, and finally after days of calling them, they put the damn dispute in. Another several weeks I spent waiting while the seller simply ignored the dispute and didn't respond at all, and then it went in my favor. I got my money back - actually, less than my money back, did you know that on both a purchase and refund Visa will service-charge your ass for changing currencies, that's another story though - and was able to look laptop shopping *outside* of ebay.

    The sad thing, that seller's account is still active, and he's happily still selling laptops. I couldn't even leave negative feedback because the auction I had been screwed on had been taken down by ebay.

    So maybe the seller's account wasn't hacked, so he didn't commit fraud that way. He sure as hell did by keeping my money though, and forcing me to fight to get it back.

    What does that tell me? Ebay, and paypal, support fraud, and they support fraudulent sellers. Screw them.

    1. Re:Fraud-friendly by GregGardner · · Score: 1

      At least you finally got your money back. I had a similar issue like that on Ebay/Paypal and ultimately just got the shaft and I'm out $400.

      I bought some sold-out concert tickets on Ebay (I know, not a good idea, but I really wanted to go and they were sold out in 2 minutes of course). I won the auction through Buy-it-now and was required to pay all the money up front via Paypal. After about a week after I won the auction there was an announcement that the concert was postponed because the drummer was injured. I contacted the seller and he said I could get a refund or we could wait until the postponed show was announced and if I could still make it then, he would still sell the tickets to me. I decided to wait.

      A month or so goes by and they announced that the postponed show will be about 6 weeks after the original one. I contacted the seller and told him that I was still interested in the tickets. I didn't hear back from him and wrote him another email and called the phone number he had given me and left a message. I finally heard back from him about a week later and he said that he was busy because he just had a baby and that he would send me the postponed tickets as soon as he got them. I never heard from him again.

      By the day of the concert I know that I got ripped off, so I go to Ebay to complain and try to fill out their fraud form. They helpfully tell me that I can't complain because the auction closed over 45 days prior! So I go to Paypal who transferred my money to this thief and fill out their fraud form and the next day they close it saying it is invalid because it doesn't meet their criteria because I didn't complain in time. The auction had an image at the bottom proclaiming that it was guaranteed by Paypal for up to $200, so I tried to follow up on that detail and was told that in the fine print it says that that only counts for physical goods and not tickets even though the image was clearly listed on a ticket auction by Ebay/Paypal! I tried calling Ebay and Paypal to get a hold of someone who would listen to my complaint but was not able to get a hold of anyone without being a seller.

      So yes, Ebay and Paypal (now the same company) really don't care very much about fraud because because of the cost so they make the absolute minimal effort required. I can see how Ebay can get away with "buyer beware" on their auctions, but Paypal is actually involved in the banking transaction and wants to collect the fee without any responsibility for the fraud. I mean, their statute of limitations is like a month and a half. If it takes you that long to realize that you got ripped off they don't even let you *register* your complaint!

    2. Re:Fraud-friendly by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Rule #1: NEVER BUY LAPTOPS ON eBay!

      50% are stolen, and the other 50% are scams.

      Rule #2: NEVER TRY TO SELL A LAPTOP ON eBay!

      See rule #1. (odds are very good you'll end up scammed out of the laptop without any cash. worst case, you'll end up in jail for cashing a bad check.)

    3. Re:Fraud-friendly by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      They also support fraudulent buyers.

      I was selling silver bars on ebay, sold one to someone in Brighton and shipped it to their PayPal address (got a signature on delivery). A few days later PayPal tell me the buyer claims their credit card was stolen and ask PayPal to reverse the payment. I object but PayPal doesn't respond and 2 weeks later steals the money from me to pay the thief. I had no recourse or opportunity to make sure I wasn't ripped-off, PayPal simply stole from me.

      I don't sell anything on eBay any more.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    4. Re:Fraud-friendly by phorm · · Score: 1

      Back in the day eBay was actually pretty a good place for laptops, or at least parts and accessories. But you're right, now it's crap. If you buy one, hope you don't get a P-P-P-P-Powerbook :-)

  56. I don't know about you guys, but by C_Kode · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't know about you guys, but nothing makes me feel more warm and fuzzy on the inside then finding an item I'm looking for at a great price on Ebay then seeing that the seller is charging 10x the actual shipping.

    1. Re:I don't know about you guys, but by kimgkimg · · Score: 1

      That's a byproduct of eBay's wonderful fee hikes. Sellers do this to avoid having to pay the exhorbitant final value fees (which aren't charged on shipping.)

    2. Re:I don't know about you guys, but by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      I usually buy very small-value items (MTG Cards), and shipping fees are twice to three times the value of the actual item, and vary between sellers (some charge as much as U$ 3 per item, for a basically weightless item !).

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  57. Was it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who read this as Ebay Deal Irradiates Individual Sellers?

    Frankly, it was more interesting.

  58. I am the seller mentioned in the NYT article by BenelliShooter · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am the technology products seller mentioned in the article. I have a BS in Comp Sci. from the University of Maine, 95', and have been a Software Engineer at several .com's until I wrote the code that is running my website (http://www.teckwave.com/#showMostViewed), eBay Store (http://stores.ebay.com/TECKWAVE), Amazon, and Google Base accounts. It's written in Java using the Google Web Toolkit for the website and several Web Service API's for integration with the various marketplaces, distributors, and warehouses. It runs on Amazon's EC2 compute cloud and uses S3 for image hosting. My intention from the start was to create a scalable software platform to make selling online easy, and I think I've about done it. Buy.com coming into eBay and getting their backroom deal has accelerated my plans. No hard feelings though, business is business. If anyone's interested in helping me scale this platform please email me... tlibby *at* TECKWAVE.com

  59. Re:Ebay is dead, the body hasn't hit the ground ye by mlwmohawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Think what you wish. I said the same thing about Wang, DEC, Pr1me, and others.

    EBay will be dead and buried in less than 5 years, It will be acquired and destroyed by some giant like Microsoft, Google, or possibly even a rebounding Yahoo (long shot).

    EBay doesn't add any real business value to the large customers it is currently targeting.

    Paypal is a good idea, but FedEx, UPS, or even the USPS could offer shippers and receivers escrow and verification.

    With Craigslist existing and growing, EBay doesn't have a viable business model.

    If you disagree, please tell me what ebay brings to the table that Craigslist does not also offer? (And no, auctions are dead, people are sick of them.)

  60. Contribution margin by sjbe · · Score: 1

    volume sellers don't cost them any less per transaction than the average joe.
    Why the need for a volume discount?

    You have to understand fixed costs versus variable costs. Most of eBay's costs are fixed meaning they do not change for better or worse regardless of the number of transactions. EBay has to (in the short run) pay their staff salaries and the electric bill regardless of how many items are sold on eBay. However this means that eBay's unit cost DECREASES with each additional unit sold.

    EBay so far has taken the approach to increase unit prices instead of decreasing unit costs. Both increase contribution margin but you can only increase either one to a point. eBay has raised rates about as far as they can so the only alternative is to increase volume which requires incentives for sellers to sell more. This is where volume discounts come into play. EBay basically trades some of their savings from the reduced unit costs in the form of incentives to sellers to sell more stuff. That's how every large retailer on the planet makes a profit.

  61. How best Buy has been scamming on E-bay by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe this is actually some sort of devil's bargain to put an end to the scam best buy has been running on e-bay for years. Best buy has this network of 2nd parties like "2ndTurn" and "DealTree", that simply sell-off Bestbuy closeouts. The scam is that they don't disclose they are best buy agents. So when you get to the check-out you suddenly see this whopping charge for local taxes you were not expecting.

    2ndTurn lists it's address as Texas on all it's auctions so people outside of texas don't expect to pay tax since there's no @ndTrun brick and mortar stores.

    But 2ndTurn is just BestBuy in sheeps clothing. Since they are one and the same they have to charge the brick-and-mortar state taxes. Yet all the complaints and abuse never gets connected to best buy.

    It's a screw because people take this into account when they bid and then wind up paying 8 to 10% more than they bargained for. So best buy makes more money.

    Moreover 2ndturn is vicious and aggressive about people who refuse to pay after they disclose this.

    So maybe this is just

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:How best Buy has been scamming on E-bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize that this article is about eBay and buy.com and that buy.com is not Best Buy, yes?

    2. Re:How best Buy has been scamming on E-bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are aware that you are obligated to report your online purchases to your state to pay "Use Tax" on them if the store did not collect your state sales tax right?

      I know that it is not enforced, and no one pays it (myself included), but it is not a scam by BestBuy to collect state sales tax for YOUR state.

      And why wouldn't they be upset with you after you tried to weasel out of the binding bid you placed on their items? Did you think to email them first, as they are obvoisly an online retailer, to ask about sales tax and your liability for it? No? You didnt? Then I think it is your fault for not counting on paying taxes on an item, just becuase you thought you could pull on over on your state.

  62. Honestly EBay is not longer what it once was by kingsack · · Score: 1

    EBay started as a means for people to sell things to one another person to person, a virtual and nation/world wide classified add section akin to that found in newspapers. This was a good and truely valuable service. What began it's downfall was the transition from what was basicly a P2P service into B2P service. As it evolved it grew to include an unfortunate collection of scam artists with little to no interference from Ebay. Buyers and Sllers alike were and are @#$%^& over by these people while EBay showed indifference at best. From there it has further evolved into the Internet version of the Home Shopping Channel while still including the scammers it had aquired along the way. Add to this the fact that EBay has continually tried to squeeze more and more blood from the little guys and you can see they wich to be little more then an collection of online storefronts. Given the fact that I would never really consider buying something from THSC even though I could be fairly certain of at least getting the questionable item being advertised, why in the world would I consider ordering one from a place that doesn't even offer that faint reassurance? The answer is ... I wouldn't! In it's present form the chances of me purchasing something via EBay is precisely ZERO. PS - I have never sold anything via EBay but did purchase a number of items before it went down the tubes so I am not some disgruntled seller. I also avoided being scammed both through due dilligence but I was probably lucky as well as there have been numerous cases where a seller/buyer with a sterling rep was just setting up for a kill.

  63. Separate yourself from the "level play field" idea by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    There is no such thing. Big companies will always get more favorable deals than small ones. First of all, because big contracts have little more over head than small ones but mean a lot more profit. That in turn gives them a lot more leverage. Especially in non-manufacturing fields. Whether I buy 10 or 10,000 licenses is different from buying 10 or 10,000 cars.

    The game goes on into every kind of trade, right down to your minimum needs for opening an office. You need power, water, internet, plumbing and so on. With all of those you can negotiate far better deals when you're a big player, using a lot of resources. Hell, if you're big enough your local public transport department might put a stop right in front of your factory (happened here with Siemens).

    So please don't believe in that "level play field" theory of a free market. There is no such thing.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  64. Pricewatch and other shopping search engines by erice · · Score: 1

    Pricewatch, Pricegrabber, and Google Product Search are much more effective for comparing and buying fixed price goods than eBay. The exception is that sometimes (not always, but sometimes) eBay is better for small retailers selling unusual goods.

    But it sounds like eBay is pushing them out. So, why again, would one use eBay?

    1. Re:Pricewatch and other shopping search engines by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      The last two times I bought expensive consumer electronics, Pricegrabber and Google Product search wasted hours of my time. Once I ordered from Newegg (a nice 3-CCD videocam, at $200 below competitors' prices) and the other time I ordered a DVD player from Buy.com.

      Both times my order was back-ordered indefinitely; I had to cancel my orders and ended up making the purchases in a bigbox store. The nice thing about a site like Ebay is that they are offering the item for sale on that site; if they are out of stock on a listed item, it violates the ToS for Ebay. It's anecdotal, and just my experience, but I feel items on Ebay (from reputable sellers) are more likely to be in stock.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Pricewatch and other shopping search engines by Cramer · · Score: 1

      it violates the ToS for Ebay.

      And this means what? Absoluting, f'ing, NOTHING AT ALL. I long ago stopped counting the number of times sellers have sold shit on eBay they didn't have. (One might assume they never had it in the first place.) The seller still pays the listing and final sales fees, so eBay never gives a damn about this "violation".

  65. Of course they want away from the small guys by Debased+Manc · · Score: 1

    The small guys are the ones with the biggest risks of dodgy gear attached. They attract larger sellers, ones who they can foist responsibility for legit goods on, the happier they'll be.

    Sure, they're throwing out the baby with the bathwater, but the way they see it they've got another baby in reserve!

    As for competition, if Google allied itself with a physical business with a presence in most communities, then yes. They could do a drop-off system where goods could be checked for legitimacy. The seller can either set up the auction details before dropping it off, or let the drop-off point handle all that for them.

    Chances of that ever happening though are minimal.

  66. Network effects by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Isn't that what name recognition is?

    Nope. What eBay has is the largest marketplace with the greatest network effects. Don't get me wrong, their brand is very very important to the equation. They aren't completely separable issues but I submit that name recognition is not the underlying driver of their success. You can have great name recognition without being a successful business.

  67. e-wants it anyway. by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I started lossing intrest in e-bay as soon as they stopped being a place for normal people to sell thier junk and became a place for 'business' to make a killing (driving up the price and complicating the search). I want to buy online for stuff that is cheaper then I can get it for in the store , because buying online requires greater risk ( identity theft, shipping , getting shafted,inability to easily return, etc.). So if I can't get it cheap because it's basically something someone is trying to get rid of or it is something so hard to find I can't get it in my area, why would I buy it on e-bay.

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
  68. And the reason I don't use uBid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is exactly the reason you give, they extend that auction. Considering they are the sellers, themselves, how do I know they aren't running a shill bidding program to try to extract a higher price? All those bidding opponent, they are nameless, nametext on a screen. I can't see their accounts, their histories, contact them, etc. uBid's transparency doesn't give me confidence using their site.

    1. Re:And the reason I don't use uBid... by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Considering they are the sellers, themselves, how do I know they aren't running a shill bidding program to try to extract a higher price?

      Even if they were, what difference does it make to you? As long as you're paying what you consider to be a fair price, you win. If you bid higher than you're willing to pay, or higher than you think you can get on another auction site, it's your own fault.

  69. Placing Your Max Bid Early by davidpfarrell · · Score: 1

    I believe that betting the maximum you are truly willing pay, early, is the best approach.

    I would love to see some discussion on this topic, but I'm relatively confident that most alternate scenario's break down to one of

    * I don't want to pay as much as I'm willing to pay (what?)

    * I don't know how much I'm willing to pay (what?)

    --
    Cube On! (http://stores.ebay.com/PuzzleProz)
    1. Re:Placing Your Max Bid Early by remmelt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      An argument against that:

      People are emotional beings. Let's say we both want to buy an item. You want to spend $200, I want to spend $210 max. In a perfect world, the auction would go to me for $205 (or something like that.)

      We both place our bids, you see the $205 amount and think "Hey, I can spend another $10 on that." Bidding war.

      Then there are the people who really don't want to lose because only losers lose. It's all very emotional.

      Best would be if all the people would just place a secret bid, then afterwards the price is announced, but that will never happen because it keeps prices down.

      The proposed 5 minute extension after a bid in the last 5 minutes of an auction is good as well.

    2. Re:Placing Your Max Bid Early by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Or the third, most obvious option:

      * I know how much I'm willing to pay, but I'd love to pay less if I can.

    3. Re:Placing Your Max Bid Early by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      * I don't know how much I'm willing to pay (what?)

      What do you mean, "what?" Our desire for, and estimated value of, goods and services is luenced by information about how others value those goods and services. It's what makes it possible for "luxury brands" to sell at premium prices despite little or no difference in actual quality. Welcome to human nature.

      When you enter your maximum bid, you're letting others know that you value the item. That influences their estimate of the value of the item. Somewhere in your competitor's brain, there's a voice saying "davidpfarrell is willing to pay $25 for that old Barry Manilow LP? Then it must be worth at least that much!", he bids $26, and you lose. (I'm not saying that voice in your competitor's brain is a rational one. But anyone who thinks human beings act rationally is not familiar with the species.)

      If you snipe, your competitor doesn't get influenced by your estimate of the value; he estimates a lower price, makes a lower bid, and you win.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    4. Re:Placing Your Max Bid Early by davidpfarrell · · Score: 1

      When you enter your maximum bid, you're letting others know that you value the item

      Just to make sure, you do know that just bidding your maximum bid does not set the current bid to your max bid?

      Your actual bid is set to whatever is just enough to become the highest bidder, up-to your maximum bid.

      So, your true max bid is not actually known by anyone, unless there is at least one other person willing to bid the same amount

      there's a voice saying "davidpfarrell is willing to pay $25 for that old Barry Manilow LP? Then it must be worth at least that much!"

      In this argument the competitor falls into the "I don't know how much I'm willing to pay" category.

      And trying to outsmart the dumb bidder who doesn't know what the item is worth only works as long you are bidding ONLY against dumb bidders who don't know what the item is worth.

      So holding off on making your max bid, and trying to fool the dummies, falls apart as soon as one other bidder who knows exactly what he's willing pay makes is bid early.

      If you snipe, your competitor doesn't get influenced by your estimate of the value; he estimates a lower price, makes a lower bid, and you win.

      This falls apart as soon as there is one person who knows what he's willing pay and makes his bid early.

      If the sniper was already willing to pay more than the early bidder, then he is not receiving any benefit vs making his max bid early, just a lot more stress and the possibility of not winning.

      If the sniper was NOT already willing to pay more, then again the strategy provided no benefit against stating your max bid early

      Thanks for sharing your opinion, I look forward to more discussion.

      --
      Cube On! (http://stores.ebay.com/PuzzleProz)
    5. Re:Placing Your Max Bid Early by davidpfarrell · · Score: 1

      None of this really holds up against a bidder knowing his max bid and making the bid early.

      If you lose the auction by $3 and say "I could easily have paid $4 more", then you fall into one of the 2 categories I mentioned:

      * I don't to pay as much as Im willing to pay

      Since you were actually willing to pay the $4 more, having made your bid would have put you that much closer to actually winning the item. Next time make your true max bid, early.

      * I don't know how much I'm willing to pay

      Lesson learned, do your research next time and make a well-informed max bid, early.

      re: "It's all very emotional"

      Exactly why placing your max bid early is the best strategy.

      With any strategy you employ to combat an emotional bidder or a sniper, you forget that all it really takes to defeat that strategy is just one bidder who has a max bid larger than yours and makes his bid early.

      --
      Cube On! (http://stores.ebay.com/PuzzleProz)
    6. Re:Placing Your Max Bid Early by davidpfarrell · · Score: 1

      That just breaks down to a fundamental rule of buying anything:

      "I want to pay as little as I can for it."

      But if you actually bid less than you are truly willing to pay, then you just fall in to the "I don't want to pay as much as I'm willing to pay" category (by definition).

      ** READERS PLEASE NOTE : On eBay you are not obligated to pay your max bid - Your actual bid is whatever is just high enough to be the highest bidder, up to your maximum bid. Please make sure you understand this.

      So to clarify my position:

      There is no strategy that will help you pay less than you are willing to pay that works any better than just making your maximum bid, early.

      Thanks for the replying, I look forward to more discussion.

      --
      Cube On! (http://stores.ebay.com/PuzzleProz)
    7. Re:Placing Your Max Bid Early by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Just to make sure, you do know that just bidding your maximum bid does not set the current bid to your max bid?

      Doesn't matter - if your current bid is $25, other bidders know that you value the item at at least that much, which will inflate their estimate of the value. And if bidding is at all competitive, the current bid will get up close enough to the max bid, or you'll simply be out-bid.

      In this argument the competitor falls into the "I don't know how much I'm willing to pay" category. And trying to outsmart the dumb bidder who doesn't know what the item is worth only works as long you are bidding ONLY against dumb bidders who don't know what the item is worth.

      The bidder who is influenced by the bids of others is not "dumb". Most bidders fall into this category. Indeed, it might be argued that it's a bidder who completely ignores the valuations of others, who is acting dumb.

      Say, for example, I'm at a flea market, and I come across a guy selling baseball cards. I know nothing about baseball cards, but on impulse figure I'll buy one. I pick up a card at random and say, "I'll give you a quarter for this." Another guy runs up and says, "I'll give you all the cash I've got...five dollars for it!" I can pay $5.01 for the card and beat his bid. Should I?

      If this guy will pay $5 for it, odds are good someone will pay more than $5.01, and I can make a profit. And if the guy's a goofball, I'm only out $5. So I'd go for it.

      Now he says, "Wait a minute!" and runs over to a friend, gets the friend to lend him some cash, and comes back over to offer $105. Should I pay $105.01 to beat his bid? In this case, the risk is higher; if I lose, I'm out enough to hurt. So I'd pass. Still, I'd have to guess the card is worth more than my initial estimate of $0.25, no?

      Now, depending on what sort of item you're bidding on, this might not apply. If I'm buying a item that's available from regular retail outlets, I can Google for prices and set a limit. It's dumb indeed to bid more on eBay for a 1 GB SD card than I could buy one for at TigerDirect.com. And of course if I was buying baseball cards on-line I'd consult a price guide.

      But a lot of times there's no simple way to determine the value of an item, and it's sensible to take other people's bids into account. How much is a used Linksys WRT54Gv3 worth? What's it worth to me to get one now, rather than wait for another to be offered in a couple of days or weeks? If I initially estimate a value of $30, and see the opportunity to pick one up for $31 - an opportunity that may not come again for some time, if at all - it would be foolish to pass it up.

      Indeed, maybe that's the key point here: we often enter into the process with an estimate of the value of an item, not a precise calculated amount.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    8. Re:Placing Your Max Bid Early by remmelt · · Score: 1

      I see what you're saying, and all the problems I described in my post are mitigated by placing your max bid at the last moment.

      Or am I missing your point?

    9. Re:Placing Your Max Bid Early by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      ** READERS PLEASE NOTE : On eBay you are not obligated to pay your max bid - Your actual bid is whatever is just high enough to be the highest bidder, up to your maximum bid. Please make sure you understand this.

      Ahh, now that's a detail I wasn't aware of.

      In a pure auction scenario, you're wrong. But if this is the way eBay works, then you're absolutely right (at least, I think you are :). You should just enter your maximum bid, and then allow the auction system to take care of the rest.

  70. I don't see any examples at all by D.McGuiggin · · Score: 1

    All you did in that post was rant about eBay and state your unsupported opinion about what is currently happening at eBay.

    If you have some sources that support your claims, I'd love to see them. Nothing would make me happier than eBay losing money. Until then, you're just blowing smoke, and somehow getting modded to +5.

    The mod system is broken.

    1. Re:I don't see any examples at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mod system is broken.

      Looks like it's working to me, D.McGuiggin. You still rarely get upmodded.

    2. Re:I don't see any examples at all by D.McGuiggin · · Score: 1

      And you still make shit up and post it without references.

      I'll stop when you do.

  71. It's not political, but it is a useless rant by D.McGuiggin · · Score: 0, Troll

    As I've already said, you did nothing but fire off unsupported, unsourced opinions with not one single shred of evidence making your case.

    "businessmen, like politicians, very frequently do really dumb things,"

    Well, in case YOU failed to notice, that was not your point. Your point was that you THINK what eBay has done is influencing their bottom line negatively, but again, provided not one single shred of evidence to demonstrate that you are doing anything more than talking out of your ass.

    Some people here eat that up, but some of us see right your commentary as the empty useless ranting that it is.

  72. No, actually, he doesn't by D.McGuiggin · · Score: 1

    And it doesn't matter to the mods that he's making shit up, so no mater how many times you and I and others like us insist on requesting real evidence in place of a strongly worded opinion masquerading as evidence, we'll be ignored.

    I, however, have no intention of letting these people get away with making shit up.

  73. Ebay proxy bidding: a tutorial by Cassander · · Score: 3, Informative

    You seem to be confused about how eBay's proxy bidding system works. That's OK, you're not alone. Based on the prevalence of "sniping" programs and people complaining about losing auctions due to "sniping", it seems nobody understands proxy bidding.

    Here's how it works: You bid what you are willing to pay. No more, no less. eBay then bids ONLY AS MUCH AS NECESSARY to make you the winning bidder. Competitors DO NOT get to see your maximum bid. The seller DOES NOT get to see your maximum bid. The only person who knows is you, and maybe some admin at eBay.

    Example: You are bidding on an auction. You decide that you are willing to pay exactly $21 for the item (you want to beat people willing to pay the nice round figure of $20, but $22 is just plain outside of your budget). Let's say the current high bid stands at $17. If you bid $21, you will be the winning bidder at $18. Even if you bid $10,000,000 your visible bid will only be $18 (until someone else bids higher than $18, that is).

    I have participated in many auctions on eBay, and the only ones I have ever "lost" were due to the simple fact that someone else was willing to pay more than I was for the item in question. Sometimes they do it in the last 4 seconds of the auction (which is admittedly annoying), but they still have to be willing to pay more than I am.

    It seems that a lot of people care more about winning the auction (like it's some kind of contest) than they do about getting the merchandise for an acceptable price. To me, THEY are the suckers.

    --
    Knowledge != Intelligence
    1. Re:Ebay proxy bidding: a tutorial by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, just because you don't understand the complaint doesn't make it invalid. Yes, the people who care more about winning than about getting the merchandise at a decent price are suckers. The reality, however, is that because there are so many of those people, all of whom bid with bots, the odds of anyone -ever- buying -anything- at a reasonable price on eBay rapidly approaches zero, making it a waste of people's time to even bother bidding unless it is at the last second in hopes that your random snipe bot might generate the lucky closing bid and do so at a price that is still under your personal maximum for the item.

      Also, searching for items on eBay takes time. If that auction is then snatched by somebody else at the last second for only a dollar more than your high bid, people naturally feel cheated---not because they didn't bid what they felt the item was worth to them, but because the amount of extra money somebody else paid was so small that the value of the time they have to spend searching for another one and bidding for it exceeds the amount of extra money they would have had to pay to win the auction. That's what makes the last-second bidding thing absolutely suck for buyers.

      Finally, there's the problem of snipe bidders who then turn around and resell the products on eBay. They calculate the average selling price minus fees and shipping costs and effectively guarantee that no product will ever sell below that price. In effect, this creates an artificial supply shortage and drives up the average selling price of goods for everyone. Of course, eBay doesn't want to stop that because they rake in money from fees every time somebody does it.

      And then there's the issue of shill bidding---somebody bidding against you to find out what your maximum bid is and make you pay as much as possible. Of course, they might accidentally go too far on occasion, but odds are somebody will outbid them, and if not, they could always retract the bid (and then rebid as a different user for just a little less than your maximum bid). It's probably safe to assume that such things happen far more than eBay would like us to believe.

      I have participated in many auctions on eBay, and with only one or two exceptions, the only ones I have ever "won" were because I bid low initially, then sniped against myself and the other snipers at the end (and even then, success is limited). The system is utterly broken as it stands now, and I have basically stopped buying anything through eBay unless it has either a "buy-it-now" option or an "or-best-offer" option.... Either every bid should require you to key in the text from a CAPTCHA or bidding should be extended by five minutes every time someone bids within the last minute of the auction. Either one would fix the problem. Until the problem is fixed, eBay is, IMHO, an utter waste of my time.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Ebay proxy bidding: a tutorial by mysidia · · Score: 1

      The problem with proxy bidding, is you can strategically discover an opponent's maximum by brute force. By setting a maximum bid $1 over the current bid, then $2, then $3, until you exceed the maximum bid, then you know what the maximum was.

      The ONLY proxy bid whose maximum will not be discovered during the auction, is the winning bidder's.

      because they didn't bid what they felt the item was worth to them, but because the amount of extra money somebody else paid was so small that the value of the time they have to spend searching for another one and bidding for it exceeds the amount of extra money they would have had to pay to win the auction. That's what makes the last-second bidding thing absolutely suck for buyers.

      Due to proxy bidding, you DON'T KNOW how much more you would have to have bid to win teh auction.

      Suppose you set your maximum bid to "$100", and the winning bidder won the item for "$101".

      You have no idea whether their maximum bid was "$101" or whether it was "$10,000"

      In the former case, you lost the item by $1, in the latter case you lost the item by $9,900.

      But the winning bidder ultimately paid the amount as if they only bid $1 more than you.

      If you had succeeded in raising your bid, you wouldn't have got the item, it would have just cost them more.

      You just have to accept the fact that you don't know how much the winning bidder was willing to pay that you weren't.

    3. Re:Ebay proxy bidding: a tutorial by XHIIHIIHX · · Score: 1

      It seems you don't understand proxy bidding very well. If I want to see your max bid, I just bid with another account and then cancel the bid afterwards.

      Making a bid prior to the last few seconds of the auction will definitely drive the price and the number of people interested in the item up.

      Scenario 1:

      You bid 25
      Person X bids 6
      your proxy bid is 7
      Person X bids 15
      your proxy bid is 16
      Person X gives up

      Person Y arrives. Sees auction is at 16, decides it's worth 20 based on that. Bids 20. Your proxy bid is 21. Gives up

      Person Z arrives. Seeds bid at 21. Sets snipe for $31.

      You lose auction. They get it for 26.

      Scenario 2

      You put in snipe for 25. Auction price is at 5.
      Person X bids 6 and is happy they are winning.
      Person Y bids 10 and is happy they are winning.
      Person Z puts in snip for 16 figuring they'll win. Your snipe wins auction for 17 at 3 seconds to close.


      Which scenario do you like better? You get it for $17, or someone else gets it for $26?

    4. Re:Ebay proxy bidding: a tutorial by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

      I have participated in many auctions on eBay, and the only ones I have ever "lost" were due to the simple fact that someone else was willing to pay more than I was for the item in question. Sometimes they do it in the last 4 seconds of the auction (which is admittedly annoying), but they still have to be willing to pay more than I am.

      The problem with this approach is that the psychology of valuation depends very much on seeing what others value for the same widget.

      If someone thinks it's worth $40, but then sees that someone else values it more (because his bid of $40 was 'instantly' outbid by the other person's higher limit), then he is very likely to increase his estimate of this widget's value.

      I use sniping tools for two primary reasons: 1) to give my competitors less opportunity to change their mind about what something is worth and 2) to give MYSELF less opportunity to change my mind about what I'm willing to spend.

      It's actually very satisfying to find 8 equivalent auctions and use a queue on JBidWatcher to say "this thing is worth $60 to me ... keep sniping $60 until I win one". Then I can put it out of my mind and get automatically notified of a win by email. No temptation to overspend!

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    5. Re:Ebay proxy bidding: a tutorial by XHIIHIIHX · · Score: 1

      > Until the problem is fixed, eBay is, IMHO, an > utter waste of my time. Not true. Just put in snipes for half what you think it's worth. You may win, and it costs nothing to try.

    6. Re:Ebay proxy bidding: a tutorial by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but then again, eBay doesn't know how much the winning bidder was willing to pay, either, at least in the case of sniping, since it usually is rapidly cranked up by repeated competing submissions by a dozen bots hitting the servers in rapid succession.... :-) Besides, I'm not saying it is entirely rational to look at it as having lost by a dollar over a $750 bid, but it certainly is human nature to do so even if the sniper sent a bid in the last second for $1,000.

      That said, the argument that non-snipe bidding is foolish based on the way eBay currently works seems like a valid argument. The run-up bidding is inherently capped by random network bandwidth variations. Most sniping behavior I've seen has involved sniping at a percentage above the current price, not at some insanely high maximum reserve, followed by sniping higher if it detects that it has been outbid. That's why I've been able to out-snipe snipers by hand on occasion. With that in mind, if you know that the majority of bids will happen in the last five seconds and is likely to be based on the price a few seconds prior to the end of the auction rather than some predetermined maximum bid (as would be the case if everyone simply entered a proxy bid and walked away), it is therefore in the best interest of everyone (except the seller) for no users to bid until the last five seconds. That way, the run-up bidding starts as low as possible and when eBay arbitrarily cuts off the run-up bidding at the predetermined time, the person who wins will do so at a lower price than if there were bids prior to the last five seconds....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    7. Re:Ebay proxy bidding: a tutorial by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      I know exactly how it works. I left out one significant detail, which another person has detailed below, which is that you can figure out what the highest proxy bid is by continuously bidding a dollar more until you beat them out. The problem with this is, because of the "game" aspect of the auction, as soon as someone sees that they are losing, they re-evaluate how much they are willing to pay. You get a whole group of people doing this and they are feeding off each other jacking up the price.

      Here is why sniping is superior from a buying point of view:

      * you deprive other bidders of the ability to see what you are willing to pay, depriving them of the ability to mentally re-evaluate how much THEY will pay and outbid you. Most people don't put in the ACTUAL largest amount they'll pay, and you don't let them go temporarily crazy in the heat of battle and bid way more than they should have.

      * correspondingly, by avoiding that bidding war you are depriving yourself of buyer's remorse from having bid way too much. You just learn how to properly evaluate how much you are willing to pay, you put it in your sniper program, and maybe you win or not.

      * In most cases, this results in the sale price being significantly lower. Nothing any of you say will convince me otherwise because I have experienced this myself, repeatedly. There is no doubt.

      Every user should snipe. It helps EVERYONE but two people: the seller, and morons who pathologically outbid you to fill some psychological need.

    8. Re:Ebay proxy bidding: a tutorial by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Example: You are bidding on an auction. You decide that you are willing to pay exactly $21 for the item
      right, now lets assume that someone else is bidding against you. They really want to pay about $19 for the item. They also have very little self control. In my experiance this is a reasonable assumption. They place an initial bid of $15 a day before the auction ends.

      If you place your real maximum bid a long time in advance they immediately find out thier bid was too low, they keep thinking "just a little more" and before you know it they have pushed the auction price over your maximum.

      If you place your maximum bid an hour or so before auction closure they get an email notifying them that you are winning, they keep thinking "just a little more" and before you know it they have beaten your maximum bid.

      If you place your maximum bid in the last few seconds then by the time they get the email that ebay sends to sucker them into bidding more the auction is over.

      This was a simple example assuming only one competitor lacking in self control but the principle holds that all placing your real maximum bid early does is encourage those lacking self control to drive the price over it (it also gains you an advantage in the case of a dead tie of maximum bids but afaict that is a relatively rare situation).

      but they still have to be willing to pay more than I am.
      No they just have to be suckered in to paying more than you are willing to pay.

      It seems that a lot of people care more about winning the auction (like it's some kind of contest) than they do about getting the merchandise for an acceptable price. To me, THEY are the suckers.
      Indeed, but if you encourage those suckers to drive the price to unreasonable levels then you won't get the item at a reasonable price.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    9. Re:Ebay proxy bidding: a tutorial by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Never even thought about it that way. Under the normal system if you just simply bid $60 with days left to go you'd have to wait several days to find out you were overbid before you could bid on an identical item for $60.
      Personally this is why I only looked at fixed price / buy it now. If its a popular item just checking ebay for that item every so often you'd often find someone who just posted a fixed price / buy it now for about what your willing to pay.

    10. Re:Ebay proxy bidding: a tutorial by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You seem to be confused about how eBay's proxy bidding system works.

      You seem to be confused as to how bidders work. If bidders were rational, then the proxy system would be perfect. Look up what you want, bid what you are willing to pay, and move on. But bidders are people, and thus necessarily not rational. They don't want to let everyone know what their max bid is up front. They donn't want to feel like they were cheated. People will adjust their maximums by small percentages in order to win something. People would rather be the last bidder than the first. Because of such irrational behavior, proxy bidding is broken. That makes it such that the only successful strategy is to snipe. That maximizes ones chances for winning the item at the lowest price. Sniping pisses off everyone that isn't a sniper. And thus, the system now is working for bots and pissing everyone else off. The system is perfect if humans are, we aren't, so the system fails in practice.

      I know how proxy bidding works, and it is a bad system. Because it is a theoretically perfect system that I think is bad is not proof I don't understand it, but evidence that I understand a bidding system must take its bidders into account.

  74. Free market at work. by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    So the news here is that bigger companies can negotiate better deals and offer lower prices?

    That is the end-stage evolution of any free market - businesses get bigger, consolidate, sell for cheaper because of efficiency gains, and eventually the small sellers can't compete.

    Did these same sellers complain when Borders forced their local bookstore out of business? I suspect most just enjoyed the lower prices.

    Whether this is a good thing or not is irrelevant to the discussion- whenever there's a completely free market, it will happen.

  75. Cooperate with Sellers by sjbe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ebay's growth doesn't have to be by squeezing the sellers.

    Exactly my point. EBay would do a lot better in the long run if they treated their sellers like genuine partners instead of cows to be milked. They cannot and should not try to please everyone but their solution to increasing profits so far has just been to raise prices on sellers and frankly they're just about at the point they cannot do that much more.

    For example, they bought Skype and they could do something with it to grow their company.

    Skype to my mind is the most retarded thing eBay has done to date. It has zero fit with their current business model or with their skill set. It's probably the clearest signal that the eBay management is seriously lacking in talent or discipline. Of course that's why they had a $1.4 billion write down on their purchase of Skype.

  76. Search by individual sellers by IdahoEv · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One feature alone would instantly pull me from eBay to whatever competitor there is: search and filter by "used item" vs "new item" and also "individual seller" vs. "large retail outlet".

    When I go to online auctions, I'm looking for a deal on something used. I'm tired of living in a society where paying full priced new is the only option: it means individuals who'd be happy with a used widget have to spend more and our landfills fill up with still-useful widgets.

    When I search eBay now for (tools/computers/whatever), I get 90% listings from large businesses selling new, usually crappy knock-off, items. I don't want a cheap chinese $20 wood router that barely functions. I want a used porter-cable router from some hobbyist who is downsizing his garage or upgrading to a newer tool. But the floods of cheap chinese crap are all I can find on eBay!

    --
    I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    1. Re:Search by individual sellers by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      I hear you, but you can at least filter results by new/used if the seller used pre-filled item information, and you can also filter results by country I think.. But I do agree it's annoying. I just had to buy a new casing for my Blackberry and it was damn difficult to find one that wasn't in Hong Kong where I'd have to wait 2 weeks for it.

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    2. Re:Search by individual sellers by Tetsugaku-San · · Score: 1

      You can search for used vs new. You always have been able to.

    3. Re:Search by individual sellers by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      a quick tip, IIRC you can (or at least used to be able to, it's a while since I used ebay) search for items within a specified distance of a city, this filters out places that don't exist (such as "hong kong, united kingdom")

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  77. Re:No laughs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We really need to do something about the moderation system to avoid situations like this: the punch line is currently at +4, but all the build up lines are at 0, so we get to see the punchline first and then have to click to reveal the other lines. Which comedy school did the Slashdot programmers go to? This is like reading Abbot and Costello, but with Abbot modded to oblivion.

  78. Death Spiral by Dash+Hash · · Score: 1

    eBay is in a death spiral. They have been for a while now, and each step they take to try and ensure their survival, they alienate more of the people who made them the powerhouse they once (and still, for now) are.

    Eventually, they will hit the ground, but they are doing their best to stay aloft and profitable.

    As for the "millions" of users "overnight" for any good competing auction house (or even Google), let's be a bit more rational. Yes, there are a good number of people who are pretty upset with eBay as of late, but let's not be hasty to state that what could simply be a loud minority are "millions."

    I could be completely mistaken, as I haven't paid much attention to eBay in a long while, but I have seen far too often when people have said that a vocal minority are the majority, simply because they are the most heard.

    After all, if you have 100 apples, 99 of which are red and 1 of which is yellow, one generally notices the 1 yellow much more easily.
    Vice versa, if one has 100 apples, 99 of which are yellow and 1 of which is red, one will usually notice the single red much more easily.

    That being said, giving a site such as Buy.com the ability to list stuff without listing fees does seem to be, well, damning.
    We'll see how this plays out over time, I suppose.

    --
    Calling a sword by a pretty name is no more than adding perfume to poison.
  79. double edged Cutco L@@K NIB by boarder · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that would help keep down the escalating prices, but it would also ruin any chance for a deal. That's the whole point of an auction, right? Finding a low price?

    Why would ANYONE ever go to ebay if they knew all the stuff they bought would be the same as paying retail or, at best, online prices? The reason for the sniping at the last second is to get the LOWEST high bid in before someone can outbid you.

    Your plan is stupid and is probably why you don't run a multi-billion dollar company like eBay.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
  80. the lazy always lose by boarder · · Score: 1

    Yes, that is one way you can walk away "happy." Another way is to realize you don't necessarily need that exact item this exact moment and try your hardest to get it for as cheap as possible.

    If you don't follow your current line of thinking, you can wait for the next auction and possibly spend less. Keep your set maximum of $123, but try your hardest not to spend that much. With 30 sec left, only bid $80... if that fails, up it to $90 or $100.

    There are different personality types in the world, and you are of the type that are satisfied with doing very little and getting what you want at a reasonable cost. There are others that would rather put in some time to get what they want for less money.

    It is also financial. Is your time worth more than your money? Most of the snipers on eBay are housewives and college kids with no income and free time.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
  81. China's Ebay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.taobao.com

    China's Ebay!

  82. Just like the flea markets by thewolfe · · Score: 2, Informative

    You know, the swap meet/ flea market used to be fun. You could go thru peoples junk (from their own garage) and find cool stuff and great deals.. Then during the late 80's, it all started turning to Chineese junk and dealers of it. The last time I went to a swap meet, there were like 30 rows of "import" crap and only one row of garage sellers. Ebay is headed that way. RIP

  83. Use a craigslist search engine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  84. eBay seller by br00tus · · Score: 1
    I am a seller on eBay. In January of this year I decided to really go all out (in terms of the time and capital I can spend). I called up a reseller and asked for a good price for a large order and sold $1500-2000 a month mostly of an item which sells in the $40 range. Then they jacked their fees up and there was a sellers strike for a week, which I participated in. Then buying seemed to slack off (not just for me but my competitors). Then all my suppliers began raising their fees - USPS, Uline (which sells shipping supplies like boxes) and finally my reseller, who supposedly had the manufacturer jack up their fees so my item costs went up. Then eBay announced you would not get a discount break if even a small handful of your customers thought you charged too much for shipping, which is fine, but they did it retroactively. I jacked up my price and lowered shipping, which means eBay gets the rest of my money. I am doing this after work with a small amount of capital, large companies who do this thing on a regular basis are able to charge lower prices. I can't compete with them, in this area anyhow.

    .

    I can't complain that I didn't expect this to happen. Things tend towards monopoly. One definition of a monopoly is rates can be raised unilaterally and the company will not suffer ill effects. eBay just did this, did they suffer ill effects for this? The big sellers will crowd out the small sellers, this is capitalism. Anyone who isn't expecting this or thinks it is unfair - go to your local evangelical church and hook up with some Amway/Quixtar MLM nonsense about being your own boss. I work, at night I work on my degree, and I do this side business as a lark. I have had a positive partnership relationship with some people, and have some tricks up my sleeve in things I have been doing with the one edge I have - my computer (programming/system) skills.

    This doesn't mean I don't think unfair things are happening - rich people, many of whom inherited and didn't earn a dime of their money, are screwing over everyone else in a multitude of ways. But I have to laugh at people who whine about how big companies competing with them or not wanting to deal with them are killing their dream of running their own business and being independent, or even more laughably, rich. You sound as deluded as those people at evangelical churches who go in for that MLM "be your own boss" nonsense. You will become a servant to capital sooner or later, in one way or another, whether it's at a W-2 job, or you begging banks or suppliers to give you a credit line, or begging for angel, VC and IPO money. Otherwise you might as well pick up a red flag and go around like Che Guevara. Serviam or non serviam.

  85. Re: Litigation from the Lux Mfrs. by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    A few stories over, the news is in: Ebay won their suit vs. Tiffany in a manner that is being reported as fairly strong precedent.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  86. Re:No laughs by yoyhed · · Score: 0

    We DO need to do something. It's called making an account and clicking on Preferences, then choosing a threshold of 0 or lower.

    --
    WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
  87. Not just annoying for sellers by worldcitizen · · Score: 1

    Am I the only buyer that is annoyed by it too? When looking for certain items, I'm now getting a lot of "noise" overpriced items from "Buy's internet superstore" and no easy way to filter them out.

  88. No surprises by BubbaJonBoy · · Score: 1

    I am amazed by the number of people bitching about the shipping costs. To the buyer it's a "scam". To the sellers it's simply a way to keep profits out of eBay's hands. eBay has gotten so damned greedy with their fees that the sellers are seeing reduced profits. Since there are a gazillion people selling the same sorts of goods, they have to be able to sell low to stay "competitive". Thus the bump in shipping charges which avoids the eBay fees.

  89. Ebay is turning into scammer central by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you noticed the "Make Money on Ebay" infomercials? Better yet the "Learn to Make Money on Ebay" tutorial CD? It is turning into a house of scammers and one big pyramid scam. Here is how it's supposed to work. You find ultra good deals on items on Ebay. Then, before you even pay for them you repost them for auction with a reserve. You hold off on paying the original seller until your resale is done and then have the original seller ship directly to your customer. They even recommend that you jack up the S&H charge for an added bonus.

    How long is it going to be before the legitimate sellers rebel against that and jump ship?

  90. Did you use Visa? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Had a similar issue with paypal where my complaint was put in on day 45 (item arrived very late, but also turned out to be crap... advertised as silver but actually a rusted POS).

    Paypal was happy to inform me that while *they* will only refund within 45 days, Visa will do so within - I believe it was - 128 days, and a Visa chargeback goes right to the seller, with some extra bad points added by Paypal :-)

    1. Re:Did you use Visa? by GregGardner · · Score: 1

      No, and that's how I learned I should have done the paypal transaction with my credit card rather than my bank account. Interesting to find out how the chargeback works in the paypal system, thanks for the tip.

  91. I will not buy from buy.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy.com burned me years ago - after I was a loyal customer too... They nearly imploded, went private again, got rid of all their phone lines, and I practically had to sue them to get them to refund the $$$ on a package which they shipped, that never arrived!

    I vowed never to buy from them ever again... I turned to Ebay for a lot of purchases - I've had pretty good luck (no worse than in meatspace), but now that they're in the picture, I'll do whatever I can to NOT buy from those schmucks...

    eBay is cutting their own throat

  92. Re:No laughs by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1

    Who's modded to oblivion?

  93. and TADA by xmvince · · Score: 1

    ive always hated ebay ever since they perm banned me for listing "too many" of the same item. Not sure why that is against the rules, but hey, if they wanna lose the business it's not my problem. and then their little (not so little anymore) paypal fiasco. I wonder when paypal will get shut down? They have the worst support and policies.