Look into the "modulo" operator (Wikipedia has a somewhat cryptic page about it). Basically, your multipleof3 function can be replaced by (0 == (i % 3)). Your main loop contents is somewhat messy and redundant, too.
But it look like it'd work.
Male lions are known to kill the cubs of male lions they killed, so that they can impregnate the female lion, which will then spend her time taking care of his kids, instead of the kids of the now deceased lion.
Nature gives quite a few reasons for murder, really.
"Mr Musk said that the cost of producing the current European rocket would kill it as a commercial entity."
Translates as "Give us a subsidy US military or we can't keep competing on price!"
Fairly sure by "it" he means the Ariane, not SpaceX. I.e. the Ariane is too expensive to be cost-effective.
Yes and no. You cannot travel through space faster than light. However, space can expand at any speed it wants to. Then end result is that distance between start and finish increases, making it look like faster than light travel (if you'd take the distance at the end divided by the time taken). However, at no time during the travel between start and finish can the object travel faster than the speed of light. (If you'd take the distance at the start divided by the time taken, the object will seem to have travelled slower than it actually did.)
Same here. One of the things I like is the "Allow Cookies From This Site" option. I can just disable all cookies, and if I want to allow a site to set cookies, it's in the menu. In Firefox I have to go to options, and then either copy/paste or type in the domain name. There's dozens of things like that.
I'm at 2.0.14, mostly because the Gecko engine (as seen in Firefox) had a issue where it rendered images incorrectly (wrong colors, seems to be fixed now). I was also a bit afraid they'd add things to make it more like Firefox. From this thread I guess I should be safe to upgrade it \o/
A couple celebrating their 75th anniversary was asked if they ever considered divorce. "Divorce?" said the one, "no, never. Murder, sure, but never divorce."
Those colors are really hard to match. Am I right in reading that recorded revenue is down for both labels and artist, but much more so for labels? And that artists get a heck of a lot more for live revenue than they get for recorded stuff?
Because more often than not it's the caller who wants to contact you. Since they're the one in need of the product, why should someone have to pay the price?
Especially for texts (which you can't, AFAIK, refuse), it's downright maddening to consider the idea that someone else could charge you for capacity you don't want to use.
It's been trimming password to the first 16 chars for a while now. I only found out because Messenger only allows 16 chars in the password field, and when I would paste from KeePass my (longer) password I had set in the website, I'd get a beep.
They are REALLY EASY to share though. You can't do that so easy with a HTML file with embedded image. If it's so popular, maybe we should design an image file format it that makes the text parseable by browser and search engine. Though really, who'd go through the trouble to use that?
Bad laws, good laws. What's good for you is bad for someone else. You made it sounds like "It's a good idea when it helps me it but a bad idea when it helps others."
First we could hack the source code, and now we can hack the law too? If this goes on like this, someone will make it possible for us to hack the planet!
which is intended to function and serve the same purpose as this new process in Finland. It's been abused repeatedly to pass laws that had far less chance of being enacted through the traditional process.
I'm a little confused. I thought passing laws that have less chance of being enacted through the traditional process is the purpose of this new process?
Slashdot Mirror
You can always get blown up. That's what shoulder-based missile launchers are for.
And Spotify.
Actually, yes, a few. Like here, at 1m11s. Not the first one I've seen, just the first one that popped up on Google.
So, translation would be: "We banned someone and got smoked in the media, UNDO UNDO UNDO"
Look into the "modulo" operator (Wikipedia has a somewhat cryptic page about it). Basically, your multipleof3 function can be replaced by (0 == (i % 3)). Your main loop contents is somewhat messy and redundant, too.
But it look like it'd work.
Male lions are known to kill the cubs of male lions they killed, so that they can impregnate the female lion, which will then spend her time taking care of his kids, instead of the kids of the now deceased lion.
Nature gives quite a few reasons for murder, really.
"Mr Musk said that the cost of producing the current European rocket would kill it as a commercial entity."
Translates as "Give us a subsidy US military or we can't keep competing on price!"
Fairly sure by "it" he means the Ariane, not SpaceX. I.e. the Ariane is too expensive to be cost-effective.
Yes and no. You cannot travel through space faster than light. However, space can expand at any speed it wants to. Then end result is that distance between start and finish increases, making it look like faster than light travel (if you'd take the distance at the end divided by the time taken). However, at no time during the travel between start and finish can the object travel faster than the speed of light. (If you'd take the distance at the start divided by the time taken, the object will seem to have travelled slower than it actually did.)
Same here. One of the things I like is the "Allow Cookies From This Site" option. I can just disable all cookies, and if I want to allow a site to set cookies, it's in the menu. In Firefox I have to go to options, and then either copy/paste or type in the domain name. There's dozens of things like that.
I'm at 2.0.14, mostly because the Gecko engine (as seen in Firefox) had a issue where it rendered images incorrectly (wrong colors, seems to be fixed now). I was also a bit afraid they'd add things to make it more like Firefox. From this thread I guess I should be safe to upgrade it \o/
A couple celebrating their 75th anniversary was asked if they ever considered divorce. "Divorce?" said the one, "no, never. Murder, sure, but never divorce."
Assuming you can smuggle a second computer into the country after the border patrol verifies all digital equipment to match the signatures.
Those colors are really hard to match. Am I right in reading that recorded revenue is down for both labels and artist, but much more so for labels? And that artists get a heck of a lot more for live revenue than they get for recorded stuff?
Because more often than not it's the caller who wants to contact you. Since they're the one in need of the product, why should someone have to pay the price?
Especially for texts (which you can't, AFAIK, refuse), it's downright maddening to consider the idea that someone else could charge you for capacity you don't want to use.
It's been trimming password to the first 16 chars for a while now. I only found out because Messenger only allows 16 chars in the password field, and when I would paste from KeePass my (longer) password I had set in the website, I'd get a beep.
Do we get a search modifier / term for that? So we can find sites that have get high numbers of these notices?
:)
You know, for, uhr, research purposes?
They are REALLY EASY to share though. You can't do that so easy with a HTML file with embedded image. If it's so popular, maybe we should design an image file format it that makes the text parseable by browser and search engine. Though really, who'd go through the trouble to use that?
And then another armed citizen, who didn't see what happened (dark after all), and sees they're sitting next to a shooter....
And if you're that paranoid, you shouldn't have any CAs in your browsers anyhow.
Wouldn't the tape then count as evidence?
Bad laws, good laws. What's good for you is bad for someone else. You made it sounds like "It's a good idea when it helps me it but a bad idea when it helps others."
Hack the law!
First we could hack the source code, and now we can hack the law too? If this goes on like this, someone will make it possible for us to hack the planet!
which is intended to function and serve the same purpose as this new process in Finland. It's been abused repeatedly to pass laws that had far less chance of being enacted through the traditional process.
I'm a little confused. I thought passing laws that have less chance of being enacted through the traditional process is the purpose of this new process?
I'm curious, why was it closed down? Tried searching for it, but couldn't find much about it (in English at least).
Stop making it sound like a good thing...
You wanted debate? That's two doors down the hall on your left. This is slashdot.