No. No. No! You use illegally obtained evidence to lead you to legally obtainable evidence, just like the police do! Keystroke log his ass to find out when they are meeting then show up and videotape it!
Oh No. The Climate is changing. Just like it always has and always will. The sky is falling, the sky. BTW, shouldn't NASA be working on rockets instead of meteorology. If they have fucking climatologists on the payroll that money came out of improving orbiters. Sure, share any usefull data, but leave the analysis to others and build space hardware NASA.
Unfortunately the entire LA Times is an opinion piece these days. They are like the boy who cried wolf; Even if it's true, if it's in the times, I can't take it seriously. They tweak polls until they come out right and did their best to throw the gubenatorial election. I like my media political operative free!
I think it's time for some guerilla warfare. Google should block all connections from any IP addx in France. Maybe re-direct to a nice message asking them to contact their government if they wish to use google again. The French people would sort out the judge in no time! I think google could take that financial hit and it would be worth it to remind a large government that they serve the people and not the lawyers. Imagine this precedent applied in other ways. For instance what if Coca-Cola decided grocery stores should not be placing Pepsi NEAR their trademaked product.
Where the Fuck did the Engineers go. If the space shuttle is too fucking dangerous to use, redesign it or stop using it. I do not understand why it has not been refined over the years in major ways. If it is too dangerous to visit the Hubble, then it is too dangerous to visit that ISS erector set shit. I know, if something went wrong the shuttle would be in the wrong orbit for the ISS. Well fill the empty shuttle bay with fuel and make a burn to change orbit. Shuttle can't do it..then redesign that loaf so it can. If the hubble is not worth a possible death then have the balls to say so instead of coming up with ridiculous cost estimates to prevent a mission. And by the way...when you go to colonize the moon and visit mars, men will die. They do everytime something extremely hard is tried. Consider it a miracle if they do not. If you can not come to grips with this truth then please resign from NASA.
A couple of disagreements with points you made since I consider myself conservative and we are somewhat rare around this place:
Who said it was unpatriotic to disagree with the war in Iraq? I remember thinking it was hatefull to vote against aditional funding for the war after voting to okay the war in a bid to score political points for an upcoming election. And I do think it was unpatriotic for several citizens and hollywood folks to go visit and support Saddam the mass murderer as we prepared to invade. This man was gleefull at the deaths of their fellow citizens on 911. That is distastefull to me. Calling GWB a war criminal is not discourse. The word Haliburton is not an argument. If EVERY action of a politician who has powerfull or rich friends is suspect we can have no more politicians. Clintons every move was not to enrich his friends and neither is Bush or Cheneys.
It is impossible to debate the merits of the presidents chosen strategy with those who can't get past marking him as the anti-christ. For fucks sake please argue about whether we should have more troops, less, or go home. Whether a stable Iraqi democracy will decrease terrorism. Did the invasion create more terrorists? But this turrets-syndrome littany of buzzwords is useless. Bush won the election and will choose the policies but reasonable argument can sway and improve them. Venom will achieve nothing. Do not believe all conservatives are sure of the outcome for the course bush has chosen. Kerry however offered no alternative. To me his rhetoric amounted to "Bush has done everything wrong. I will do essentially the same and not end the occupation, possibly with more troops. But I would have had a better plan."
The Repubs didn't need better marketing to combat that kind of stupid message.
Clinton and Blowjobs. Brilliant. I will let you know what an actual conservative thinks on the matter. Choose to believe me or not. The media made it about sex. It sells well and most americans left, right, center don't want the gov in their sexual affairs so it was a good way to get people to dissmiss the whole thing. What should have bothered poeple was the president of the united states using his power and influence to besmirch and destroy private citizens who might bring out an embarassing indescretion. That reeks of an abuse of power and was ugly to me. Personally I was much more interested in the Whitewater thing. That was a payoff for favors. Hillarys never ending line about "A real-estate deal that we lost money on" was just hillarious. The exact details escape me but it was something along the lines of The Clintons became like 50% partners in a land deal that they paid like 2% of and the partner recieved some questionable favors from the governor and hillary. Hillarys line came from the fact that the land deal turned out to be shit so her payoff was pretty worthless. Most conseratives didn't care a whit about willys blowjobs.
Democrats and Religion. Uh, yeah, lots of democrats go to church and everyone knows it. My most church going neighbors are dems. My conservative ass hasn't seen the inside of a church in 15+ years. I'm not religious. So much for stereo types. Americans are generally religious. Nationally visible Repubs don't seem to hate religion. Many Nationally visible Dems seem to equate religious folks with hate, small-mindedness and stupidity. This is not the work of republicans but they will benefit from it.
About that politically segregated church. I guess we should nuke the state. One example does make a trend does it not!
my posts never mod up so I'll stop arguing now.
I bet those fools at Blizzard wish the Bnetd team would distribute server software to offload players to private nets now. Of course they would lose some revenue but I think that is going to happen now anyway!
Answer: Typical Leftist policies of support of the unsustainable enacted by both rightists and leftists who have presumably been bought, hoodwinked, or just don't grok free market. Wait; that was a rhetorical question wasn't it?
That is a feature. Linux and Other Communist Operating Systems do not have these advanced extensibley-scalable enterprise self-healing solutions. So you will see that M$ has the only true solution for total remote administration of storage systems.
-William Fucking Gates
Operating System is a registered Trademark of Micro$oft Corporation.
Hey! You're made of a Dangerous Chemical Cocktail. And You Leak. And you are chock full of that dangerous carcinogin Carbon. YOU COULD CAUSE CANCER IF I GET SOME OF YOU ON ME! WE NEED TO RETHINK THIS DANGEROUS PRACTICE OF BURYING HUMANS IN THE GROUND!
I better go join earth first or something now.
I will concede that this is not a grab at the right to own guns *IF* you allow me to introduce a 9 month waiting period on abortions and concede I am not trying to outlaw them. (Really I'm not. Please abort your children. In fact some of your offspring that lived should have been aborted.) Fucking Nazis. My Venom is getting all over so I'll stop now.
This message is automatically generated in the case of an attempt at humor.
Are you wondering why your semi-humorous post on Slashdot(tm) received a lowering rating than expected? In the future, follow these suggestions:
You likely did NOT quote Richard M. Stallman in your comment. This alone could cause the loss of several mod points.
If english is not your primary language or your comment is incoherent for other reasons, be sure to include an original, witty insult of US President George W. Bush such as "Bush is Stupid". No matter how many times a mod sees that comment it always strikes them as fresh and clever and indicates your post is better than it first appeared.
Puns involving Microsoft projects or initiatives are comedy and mod points gold. The more overused or hackneyed the better! If mods have not been bombarded with the same witticism several hundred times they may not yet recognize its brilliance.
Any non-sequitor mention of a conspiracy (With link for more "Information") is encouraged. Many mods browse the forums with tin foil protective gear and will appreciate that you are one of them.
And who knows how long before those jack-booted government thugs start banning firearms. Oh wait, that happened before the terrorists. Our rights have been eroding since long before the public knew about those wahabi goatfuckers. And that will continue as long as people are grandstanding about such things as illegal foreign combatants not getting the protection of the geneva convention (which they are NOT entitled to) and the US constitution (Does not apply outside the US ; mind that imperialist attitude!) instead of noticing the politicians they vote for slowly removing rights that apply to them.
I still use mozilla because the firefox uh, how to put this diplomatically, Zealots, remodelled the new tab button of the tab bar. I have used mozilla for years now and my brain is hard wired to click that little button. I understand the firefox folks want to remove cruft and excess UI but the button is less junky than the interface they have now. Right now you can double-click empty space on the bar for a new tab UNTIL you have several tabs and there is no more empty space. That is inconsistent. Save code space by ripping that shit out or fix it by always leaving blank space on the bar. Another way to get a new tab is for you to right-click and traverse a popup menu. A function I use in frequency just behind "close tab" and "back" should not require navigation of menus! No doubt someone will jump in and tell me I can use a key combo to create a new tab. That is inconsistent for people who browse using visual controls for every other frequent function though. The argument for code size is a joke also as you CAN add a new tab button to the navigation or bookmarks bar but just not to the tab bar where it belongs as the ying to the close tab's yang.
Before someone yells extension; yes there are extensions to add a new tab button, however, I use a different skin so it looks like ass, doesn't change graphics on click like the original button, and is often disabled by version upgrades. I still use the mozilla suite even with its banged up bookmark handling for this simple reason. And before anyone who jerks it thinking about firefox trys to tear me up, Please consider my reasoned arguments for the UI and try to debate them instead of hurling an insult OK?
I notice it is always "fears" of climate change. That would mean that we have the best possible climate right now and every other climate situation would be worse. What are the chances of us lucking out like that statistically? (Yes we are adapted to it but we are adaptable)
I am not blind to dire possibilities but when every possibility but the status quo is dire my reason rejects that.
But if you are in terror then march on Earths Protectors and after we have stopped climate change and extinction of species then perhaps we can work on erosion. Because I "fear" that if we don't do something, "soon" all land masses will slide under the waves. Because of GWB. Singly. Maybe Dick helps.
"President Bush has reiterated his opposition to the Kyoto Treaty despite President Putin's acceptance of the treaty"
Not being Putin is a good thing. If president Bush followed Putin's lead, John Kerry would have been put in jail for daring to run for President. So remember kids...Don't be a Putin.
Slashdot Mirror
No. No. No! You use illegally obtained evidence to lead you to legally obtainable evidence, just like the police do! Keystroke log his ass to find out when they are meeting then show up and videotape it!
...it should really be DICK.
The Kyoto treaty is about one thing: Punishment of First World Nations.
Oh No. The Climate is changing. Just like it always has and always will. The sky is falling, the sky. BTW, shouldn't NASA be working on rockets instead of meteorology. If they have fucking climatologists on the payroll that money came out of improving orbiters. Sure, share any usefull data, but leave the analysis to others and build space hardware NASA.
Thats funny because it's true...oh wait.
Unfortunately the entire LA Times is an opinion piece these days. They are like the boy who cried wolf; Even if it's true, if it's in the times, I can't take it seriously. They tweak polls until they come out right and did their best to throw the gubenatorial election. I like my media political operative free!
I think it's time for some guerilla warfare. Google should block all connections from any IP addx in France. Maybe re-direct to a nice message asking them to contact their government if they wish to use google again. The French people would sort out the judge in no time! I think google could take that financial hit and it would be worth it to remind a large government that they serve the people and not the lawyers. Imagine this precedent applied in other ways. For instance what if Coca-Cola decided grocery stores should not be placing Pepsi NEAR their trademaked product.
Where the Fuck did the Engineers go. If the space shuttle is too fucking dangerous to use, redesign it or stop using it. I do not understand why it has not been refined over the years in major ways. If it is too dangerous to visit the Hubble, then it is too dangerous to visit that ISS erector set shit. I know, if something went wrong the shuttle would be in the wrong orbit for the ISS. Well fill the empty shuttle bay with fuel and make a burn to change orbit. Shuttle can't do it..then redesign that loaf so it can. If the hubble is not worth a possible death then have the balls to say so instead of coming up with ridiculous cost estimates to prevent a mission. And by the way...when you go to colonize the moon and visit mars, men will die. They do everytime something extremely hard is tried. Consider it a miracle if they do not. If you can not come to grips with this truth then please resign from NASA.
A couple of disagreements with points you made since I consider myself conservative and we are somewhat rare around this place: Who said it was unpatriotic to disagree with the war in Iraq? I remember thinking it was hatefull to vote against aditional funding for the war after voting to okay the war in a bid to score political points for an upcoming election. And I do think it was unpatriotic for several citizens and hollywood folks to go visit and support Saddam the mass murderer as we prepared to invade. This man was gleefull at the deaths of their fellow citizens on 911. That is distastefull to me. Calling GWB a war criminal is not discourse. The word Haliburton is not an argument. If EVERY action of a politician who has powerfull or rich friends is suspect we can have no more politicians. Clintons every move was not to enrich his friends and neither is Bush or Cheneys. It is impossible to debate the merits of the presidents chosen strategy with those who can't get past marking him as the anti-christ. For fucks sake please argue about whether we should have more troops, less, or go home. Whether a stable Iraqi democracy will decrease terrorism. Did the invasion create more terrorists? But this turrets-syndrome littany of buzzwords is useless. Bush won the election and will choose the policies but reasonable argument can sway and improve them. Venom will achieve nothing. Do not believe all conservatives are sure of the outcome for the course bush has chosen. Kerry however offered no alternative. To me his rhetoric amounted to "Bush has done everything wrong. I will do essentially the same and not end the occupation, possibly with more troops. But I would have had a better plan." The Repubs didn't need better marketing to combat that kind of stupid message. Clinton and Blowjobs. Brilliant. I will let you know what an actual conservative thinks on the matter. Choose to believe me or not. The media made it about sex. It sells well and most americans left, right, center don't want the gov in their sexual affairs so it was a good way to get people to dissmiss the whole thing. What should have bothered poeple was the president of the united states using his power and influence to besmirch and destroy private citizens who might bring out an embarassing indescretion. That reeks of an abuse of power and was ugly to me. Personally I was much more interested in the Whitewater thing. That was a payoff for favors. Hillarys never ending line about "A real-estate deal that we lost money on" was just hillarious. The exact details escape me but it was something along the lines of The Clintons became like 50% partners in a land deal that they paid like 2% of and the partner recieved some questionable favors from the governor and hillary. Hillarys line came from the fact that the land deal turned out to be shit so her payoff was pretty worthless. Most conseratives didn't care a whit about willys blowjobs. Democrats and Religion. Uh, yeah, lots of democrats go to church and everyone knows it. My most church going neighbors are dems. My conservative ass hasn't seen the inside of a church in 15+ years. I'm not religious. So much for stereo types. Americans are generally religious. Nationally visible Repubs don't seem to hate religion. Many Nationally visible Dems seem to equate religious folks with hate, small-mindedness and stupidity. This is not the work of republicans but they will benefit from it. About that politically segregated church. I guess we should nuke the state. One example does make a trend does it not! my posts never mod up so I'll stop arguing now.
I bet those fools at Blizzard wish the Bnetd team would distribute server software to offload players to private nets now. Of course they would lose some revenue but I think that is going to happen now anyway!
Answer: Typical Leftist policies of support of the unsustainable enacted by both rightists and leftists who have presumably been bought, hoodwinked, or just don't grok free market. Wait; that was a rhetorical question wasn't it?
-William Fucking Gates
Operating System is a registered Trademark of Micro$oft Corporation.
Hey! You're made of a Dangerous Chemical Cocktail. And You Leak. And you are chock full of that dangerous carcinogin Carbon. YOU COULD CAUSE CANCER IF I GET SOME OF YOU ON ME! WE NEED TO RETHINK THIS DANGEROUS PRACTICE OF BURYING HUMANS IN THE GROUND! I better go join earth first or something now.
I will concede that this is not a grab at the right to own guns *IF* you allow me to introduce a 9 month waiting period on abortions and concede I am not trying to outlaw them. (Really I'm not. Please abort your children. In fact some of your offspring that lived should have been aborted.) Fucking Nazis. My Venom is getting all over so I'll stop now.
Any word on whether it can remove Internet Explorer. It's harder to get rid of than Cool Web Search.
And when the cameras fall off and destroy the shuttles ability to re-enter??
Are you wondering why your semi-humorous post on Slashdot(tm) received a lowering rating than expected? In the future, follow these suggestions:
You likely did NOT quote Richard M. Stallman in your comment. This alone could cause the loss of several mod points.
If english is not your primary language or your comment is incoherent for other reasons, be sure to include an original, witty insult of US President George W. Bush such as "Bush is Stupid". No matter how many times a mod sees that comment it always strikes them as fresh and clever and indicates your post is better than it first appeared.
Puns involving Microsoft projects or initiatives are comedy and mod points gold. The more overused or hackneyed the better! If mods have not been bombarded with the same witticism several hundred times they may not yet recognize its brilliance.
Any non-sequitor mention of a conspiracy (With link for more "Information") is encouraged. Many mods browse the forums with tin foil protective gear and will appreciate that you are one of them.
And who knows how long before those jack-booted government thugs start banning firearms. Oh wait, that happened before the terrorists. Our rights have been eroding since long before the public knew about those wahabi goatfuckers. And that will continue as long as people are grandstanding about such things as illegal foreign combatants not getting the protection of the geneva convention (which they are NOT entitled to) and the US constitution (Does not apply outside the US ; mind that imperialist attitude!) instead of noticing the politicians they vote for slowly removing rights that apply to them.
I still use mozilla because the firefox uh, how to put this diplomatically, Zealots, remodelled the new tab button of the tab bar. I have used mozilla for years now and my brain is hard wired to click that little button. I understand the firefox folks want to remove cruft and excess UI but the button is less junky than the interface they have now. Right now you can double-click empty space on the bar for a new tab UNTIL you have several tabs and there is no more empty space. That is inconsistent. Save code space by ripping that shit out or fix it by always leaving blank space on the bar. Another way to get a new tab is for you to right-click and traverse a popup menu. A function I use in frequency just behind "close tab" and "back" should not require navigation of menus! No doubt someone will jump in and tell me I can use a key combo to create a new tab. That is inconsistent for people who browse using visual controls for every other frequent function though. The argument for code size is a joke also as you CAN add a new tab button to the navigation or bookmarks bar but just not to the tab bar where it belongs as the ying to the close tab's yang. Before someone yells extension; yes there are extensions to add a new tab button, however, I use a different skin so it looks like ass, doesn't change graphics on click like the original button, and is often disabled by version upgrades. I still use the mozilla suite even with its banged up bookmark handling for this simple reason. And before anyone who jerks it thinking about firefox trys to tear me up, Please consider my reasoned arguments for the UI and try to debate them instead of hurling an insult OK?
I notice it is always "fears" of climate change. That would mean that we have the best possible climate right now and every other climate situation would be worse. What are the chances of us lucking out like that statistically? (Yes we are adapted to it but we are adaptable) I am not blind to dire possibilities but when every possibility but the status quo is dire my reason rejects that. But if you are in terror then march on Earths Protectors and after we have stopped climate change and extinction of species then perhaps we can work on erosion. Because I "fear" that if we don't do something, "soon" all land masses will slide under the waves. Because of GWB. Singly. Maybe Dick helps.
If you fire at the sensor first are you free to commit crimes then? Which makes me wonder if anyone has ever gone postal on those red light cameras.