Slashdot Mirror


New Trojan Threatens Windows XP SP 2

lightdarkness writes "Symantec is reporting about a new virus called Phel (Anagram of 'help') which is a Trojan which spreads via a HTML file. All the user needs to do is go to the page, and it takes advantage of the vulnerability in the IE Help control component files. This allows the attacker to download malicious programs on to the machine. Worst part is, this is one of the exploits that even effects SP2. Microsoft is said to be working to stop the spread, and to release a patch." The exploit is apparently not the same as the help file problems disclosed last week.

241 comments

  1. Microsoft happy with IE? by Quasar1999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh... yeah... IE is great... no need to change it until longhorn...

    so what exactly processes HTML in windows again? Some third party plugin? No... IE? ahhh... what a shame... and here I thought that there was no need to do anything to IE as it is so perfect...

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by teg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh... yeah... IE is great... no need to change it until longhorn...

      In all fairness, that statement was about features. Not security.

      They'll keep on patching this Swiss Cheese after-the-fact for a long time yes, and know it.

    2. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by too_poland · · Score: 5, Funny

      Injecting Exploit 6.0 =]

    3. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      so what exactly processes HTML in windows again? Some third party plugin? No... IE? ahhh...

      Which means that the only way to avoid IE and its holes is to not use Windows at all. Microsoft's decision to make IE an integrated part of Windows is bearing fruit...

    4. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by Ckwop · · Score: 1

      Oh... yeah... IE is great... no need to change it until longhorn...

      I wont repeat Ghandi's famous adage because comparing the strugle for Indian freedom to that of free software isn't remotely the same as the battle between proprietary and free software..

      However, there is a strong symmetry between the two. Microsoft all too often has ignored the competition and then nearly missed the boat only to use it's desktop dominance to muscle back in on the action.

      The problem is that this time, they've already played that card. We already have IE in windows. If people start switching to Firefox and stay switched to Firefox what good is Longhorn going to do?

      simon.

    5. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by Moulinneuf · · Score: 5, Funny

      Please ! dont insult the Swiss Cheese by associating it with IE , the Swiss Cheese as less hole and far more valuable content and as an excellent quality control , unless you dont read the date marked "best before" before eating it. ;-)

      --
      I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America
    6. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      I've said it before and I'll say it again.

      It seems that MS holding onto IE is simply to save face, there is no real value in IE any more, Mozilla is producing the better browser plain and simple and nobody in thier right mind can argue against that.

      Microsoft should either get out of the browser market completely, or make IE7 based around Gecko, with a compatability API if they really want to support legacy cruft. I'd prefer the later, otherwise we'll end up like the IE on Mac situation where lots of people just keep using the old version even though it's been superceeded.

      I just don't see the sense in MS persisting with IE, I can't imagine how they can justify the expenditure when Gecko is sitting there, 10x better, and is going to cost them MUCH less than developing IE in the long run.

      Wishful thinking I suppose.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    7. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by mm0mm · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In all fairness, that statement was about features. Not security.

      huh? that was "about features?" I don't think there has been any major new features added to IE since mid/late-90's. sure, it's up to date in the auto industry's development cycle.

    8. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by Albinofrenchy · · Score: 1

      I've always considered security a feature. Actually, it is the feature that made me pickup Mozilla. The addiction to tabs and extensions came later.

      --
      "A man is but the product of his thoughts what he thinks, he becomes." -Mahatma Gandhi
    9. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by teg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems that MS holding onto IE is simply to save face, there is no real value in IE any more,

      Yes, there is. Customer lock in. Making moving onto non-MS platforms harder and more costly. And keeping MS as the dominant corporate desktop platform is their spearhead into the corporate server space as well.

    10. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
      You know, I have to believe that even within Microsoft, the IE team must be extremely embarrassed.

      There is constant egg on their faces, some new young competition is eating up their market share at astonishing rates, and they are always in the bad part of the news.

      Microsoft has a cult-like culture, and this type of constant bad news does NOT go over well in those types of cultures. I'd love to hear from someone on the IE team... I bet they're wishing that they were on the Office team or something like that.

      --
      Berto
    11. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      "I've always considered security a feature."

      Most don't. Most consider "does this browser work with my banking site" as a feature. If it doesn't, they pass up Firefox/Opera/Safari.

    12. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      huh? that was "about features?" I don't think there has been any major new features added to IE since mid/late-90's.

      Yeah, well I think that was the point of everyone laughing about what Microsoft said in that article.

      The guy you're responding to is pointing out that Microsoft never stated they wouldn't be releasing security updates for IE. Clearly they have been and will [need] to continue to.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    13. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by naelurec · · Score: 5, Funny

      unless you dont read the date marked "best before" before eating it. ;-)

      Microsoft should have the same thing for Windows...

      • Best before plugging into a network..
      • Best before being turned on..
      • Best left in the box..

      In all honesty, when Windows is isolated (or on an isolated network) and locked down (ie users don't have any way to install new software, etc..).. its not too bad.. Unfortunately, everyone wants to plug it into that dang Internet.. hheh..

    14. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by rpozz · · Score: 1

      I've heard that MS hires the best programmers they can possibly find, straight out of MIT etc. How the hell can an enormous corporation like that, with the best talent they can find, make such frequent and enormous cock-ups? Anyone from Microsoft care to comment?

    15. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So - has anyone reported a complaint to the IFCC (or other) website, complaining that Microsoft should be investigated for creating hugely buggy code and then blaming everyone else for the security holes?

      That has to be worthwhile, surely!

      - hoz

    16. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by NoMercy · · Score: 1

      "that statement was about features"

      I still don't think M$ understands why were screaming at them to update IE, we don't want features we want it to work properly.

    17. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      M$

      Congratulations. All your past and present arguments and opinions are now null and void.

    18. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by What'sInAName · · Score: 2, Funny


      That reminds me of what I do when I get a new box that has a "Designed for Windows..." sticker on it. I always take that little sticker off and put it on a trash can...

    19. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by geekboy642 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Best programmers or not, straight out of $UNIVERSITY directly equates to inexperienced.

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    20. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by cbr2702 · · Score: 1
      "I've always considered security a feature."

      Most don't. Most consider "does this browser work with my banking site" as a feature. If it doesn't, they pass up Firefox/Opera/Safari.

      People don't consider that a "feature", it's a requirement. Features are things like bookmarks, history, tabbed browsing, and saved passwords. Features are things that are nice but not nessicary. To get the best product you look at all the ones that meet the requirements (the ones that work for your bank site) and then compare them on features (and price).

      --


      This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
    21. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FEWER holes!!!

      Why can't anybody get the difference between "fewer" and "less"?

    22. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should compare it to the albert hall?

      --
      What?
    23. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is all you linux geeks writing windows worms to make microsoft look bad.

    24. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wish microsoft would stop spreading virii

    25. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by SoulMan · · Score: 1

      SP2 Internet Explorer Feature List

      Don't get me wrong, Firefox is still head and shoulders above IE, but to say "there [haven't] been any major new features added to IE since mid/late-90's" is just not true.

      --
      what?
    26. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by Com2Kid · · Score: 2, Informative
      • so what exactly processes HTML in windows again? Some third party plugin? No... IE? ahhh... what a shame... and here I thought that there was no need to do anything to IE as it is so perfect...


      The purpose of using IE is that it enables Windows to have a single HTML renderer loaded up into memory for a wide variety of tasks. By switching over to HTML based help, Microsoft has consolidated various rendering engines into one (HTML, specifically IE), all while reducing the overall memory footprint used up by the system.

      Now this is all good and fine, and should work perfectly, just so long as the system properly maintains what security level a given file is in.

      This is a key issue, apparently MS keeps screwing this up...

      Aside from that (doh!), IE integrated into the system is very convenient.

      VERY convenient! With a sufficiently fast Internet connection, the difference between the Internet and one's own computer is quickly blurred.
    27. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by sepluv · · Score: 1

      They want to destroy the WWW and replace it with their own proprietary versions of HTTP and HTML.

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    28. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by Patoski · · Score: 1
      Oh... yeah... IE is great... no need to change it until longhorn...
      In all fairness, that statement was about features. Not security.

      Security is a feature, especially when you think about it in today's terms. Microsoft has been pushing security enhancements as a feature since they started talking about XP SP2 many moons ago. Security enhancements have been the center piece of OS enhancements we've seen from MS lately.

      If the rumor is true, MS is making a *huge* mistake by delaying IE enhancements until Longhorn. Firefox will have a very respectable share of the browser market by then and will be very difficult to dislodge. It would seem that MS will be getting a pop quiz on how they will compete with Open Source Software in the very near future... Probably much earlier than they expected.

      The next few years it be very interesting to see how Microsoft reacts to a competitor they can't bleed dry (bankrupt).
      --
      G. Washington on Government "it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."
    29. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by spruce · · Score: 1

      MOD PARENT UP

    30. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      It seems that MS holding onto IE is simply to save face, there is no real value in IE any more, Mozilla is producing the better browser plain and simple and nobody in thier right mind can argue against that.

      I just don't see the sense in MS persisting with IE, I can't imagine how they can justify the expenditure when Gecko is sitting there, 10x better, and is going to cost them MUCH less than developing IE in the long run.

      The same arguments could have been made about Netscape/Mozilla back in the 1998-2002ish timeframe as well. Aren't you glad those developers didn't stop then ?

    31. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by SCVirus · · Score: 1

      Also this vuln was publicly 0dayed before that statement was relased.

    32. Re:Microsoft happy with IE? by NoMercy · · Score: 1

      Well I could argue that the reason we havn't seen IE updated is the $, there's no $'s to be made in updating IE for old customers, hence why it seems any updates are tied to longhorn, an updated IE for that might bring in some $.

      Microsoft are depressingly money driven, if they demonstrated a larger care for there customers instead of only the care for $'s they might not have the image of the big nasty evil company that they have.

      Alternatively M$ is a corporate disease, MS is a chronic autoimmune disease.

  2. Yep. Firefox is not a threat. by BigFire · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Microsoft's entire attitude towards its browser competitors can be sum up with: Who Me? Worry?

  3. Well.. by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well at least I know reading Slashdot will be sa...

    1. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So where are all the reports on Linux security vulnerabilities?

      Funny how they're NEVER, EVER reported.

    2. Re:Well.. by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

      you forgot: .....[NO CARRIER]

      --

      $cat /dev/random > Sig
  4. The attackers are downloading malicious programs? by bwcarty · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does that mean they're trying to copy IE from the victims?

    Upload to...download from.

  5. Windows Help....bah humbug by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Isn't Windows Help a virus on its own? I mean, any time I use it is accidental, and I sit there and wait forever while it takes over my hard drive and 2 minutes of my life loading The Obvious, while I swear at it and frantically click the oblivious exit button....grrrrrrrrrrrrr...

    My Kingdom For A Windows-Help-Uninstall-Program! :D

    1. Re:Windows Help....bah humbug by PeterPumpkin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe in Windows XP theres a Help and Support service that you can disable, although that may be Compaq-specific. I've never tried killing it.

    2. Re:Windows Help....bah humbug by DoraLives · · Score: 1

      It is undead. It will come back to life on its own. Kill it all you like, it doesn't care.

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    3. Re:Windows Help....bah humbug by Loren_Burlingame · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To tell you the truth, the help system in XP seems to be much better than in past versions. I have actually used it a few times to learn about command syntax or to find obscure configuration tabs.

    4. Re:Windows Help....bah humbug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      start/control panel/services/ disable help

      works for me

    5. Re:Windows Help....bah humbug by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      To tell you the truth, the help system in XP seems to be much better than in past versions

      You're right about that. We've just started getting our first XP boxes (Dell won't sell us Win2k pre-loaded any more), and I was amazed when installing our ancient version of the GroupWise client when an alert popped up. It said that the version of Windows Messaging that shipped with that version of GroupWise wasn't compatible with XP. That alert had a link to Windows help which not only had a full explanation of what was going on, but it had URLs to the Novell knowledge base article covering the topic and a link to the proper download.
      I haven't been so impressed my anything from MS since a Win2k bluescreen actually told me the real reason WHY it crashed and how to fix it.

  6. Re:The attackers are downloading malicious program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Upload to" when they're pushing data onto the machine. They're "downloading to" the machine if they make it fetch the data, which is the most likely scenario. But then, you might be convinced you had to upload slashdot to your browser to view this comment.

  7. affect/effect! by o0zi · · Score: 5, Funny

    " Worst part is, this is one of the exploits that even effects SP2."

    Oh, it causes SP2? That's absolutely terrible - it must be stopped!

    1. Re:affect/effect! by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, in effect, the article is saying Windows Update is a trojan that spreads through mangled HTML? Makes perfect sense to me.

    2. Re:affect/effect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Worst part is, this is one of the exploits that even effects SP2."

      Well, at least one person has has fallen for the "SP2 makes windows secure" line.

    3. Re:affect/effect! by Linker3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I once called the customer service team of a major UK railway company and said they needed to change their new safety posters because they had put "Opening train doors before the train has come to a complete stop can effect your safety".

      I explained it carefully to the bemused agent a couple of times and eventually got a half-hearted agreement that she'd pass on my comments to the marketing team - but I knew in my heart that she thought I was completely mad and that she was going to close the call as soon as I was off the phone.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    4. Re:affect/effect! by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      "Opening train doors before the train has come to a complete stop can effect your safety"

      So opening the doors would make the passengers safer? Strange, I would have thought the opposite would be true..

  8. I wonder how much market share... by lordfener · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...Microsoft will lose before it manages to put out a new and more secure version of IE (assuming that is even possible ;-)). I keep hearing from friends who work as IT managers that they are systematically blocking access to IE and installing Firefox on their corporate clients (although that doesn't really shut IE down). IE's getting a really bad rap even in those environments where Microsoft marketing used to have more influence than cold hard facts... and if they don't do something decisive about it rather than releasing ad-hoc patches they're going to have a hell of a time restoring confidence in their product. Then again, they've been able to boounce back before... and it's not like they don't have the money to spend on marketing!

    1. Re:I wonder how much market share... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      On my two main sites (barcoding and digital photography) with 80/20 Windows/Mac users IE now stands at about 60%. Back in September it was about 80%.

    2. Re:I wonder how much market share... by eyeball · · Score: 3, Informative

      Microsoft will lose before it manages to put out a new and more secure version of IE (assuming that is even possible ;-)).

      Or a lite version. They're fighting an uphill battle -- they need to keep their code compatible with the buttload of non standard features they've introduced over the years (mainly things like activex windows-specific plugins) that people have build applications on top of. If they were to release something that was stripped down (yet retained all the functionality of something on the level with Firefox) and gave the user a choice to install the backwards-compatible mess, they might get out of this situation.

      Of course they won't because that gives people a migration path off IE (and eventually off Windows).

      --

      _______
      2B1ASK1
    3. Re:I wonder how much market share... by naelurec · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I don't think it matters much. They could take a huge market share drop, but when they release longhorn, it will come with the new version of IE .. if that IE is "good enough", everyone will simply jump back on the bandwagon (I mean, it does come with Windows .. why have two programs that do the same thing when one of them (IE) is ALWAYS taking up resources..)

      The longer they hold out, thats one more reason people will want to upgrade to longhorn ..

    4. Re:I wonder how much market share... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming that microsoft would lose market share, where would the users go? linux? right.

    5. Re:I wonder how much market share... by jerw134 · · Score: 1

      IE isn't taking up any resources unless it's running. Stop spreading FUD.

    6. Re:I wonder how much market share... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      isn't hard disk space a resource?

  9. Basically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't use IE.

  10. The... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...worst places in Phel are reserved for those who can't spell.

  11. More appropriate name for Internet Explorer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    IE - Internet Exploiter

  12. Adequate bash.org quote by b374 · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Adequate bash.org quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is it even possible to make a vacuum cleaner than it is?

    2. Re:Adequate bash.org quote by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      I've found only a single Microsoft product that doesn't suck. Some of their mice were just great. I still have a 7-year old Intellimouse Plus (it did cost as much as if it was made of gold, though), and even after all those years it's still better than most mice I see these days.

      Oh, wait... we were talking about software, right?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:Adequate bash.org quote by JNighthawk · · Score: 1

      Visual Studio works fine for me.

      --
      Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
    4. Re:Adequate bash.org quote by XMyth · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think you're at the wrong website, sir.

    5. Re:Adequate bash.org quote by DJStealth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Where I did my undergrad, they decided one day to replace all the 'ball mice' with optical mice to prevent the mouse balls from going missing or being stolen. They made the bad choice of going with MS mice. 2 Days later, half the mice in the room didn't work because they were overheating!

    6. Re:Adequate bash.org quote by b374 · · Score: 1
      I think you're at the wrong website, sir.
      That's because of all flaws / vulerabilities / exploits in IE. How else could have he reached /. when all he wanted was to browse the MSDN??? :)
    7. Re:Adequate bash.org quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notepad rocks. Some people just try to find problems even where there aren't any. 640MB files should be enough for anyone. PS: All you Linnux peopel, yes it works on WINE (a Windows emulator!), before you start flaming me.

    8. Re:Adequate bash.org quote by datadriven · · Score: 1

      I especially like all the little black boxes in my files that have unix line endings.

    9. Re:Adequate bash.org quote by justforaday · · Score: 1

      I like how Notepad puts in additional spaces in lines if you have wordwrap enabled. Or how it sometimes doesn't redraw the text right if you remove sections...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    10. Re:Adequate bash.org quote by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

      Or how files over a certain size can't be opened in it.

    11. Re:Adequate bash.org quote by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      Why's this moderated as "Funny"? It's a true story!

    12. Re:Adequate bash.org quote by WeblionX · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it is a funny story?

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
    13. Re:Adequate bash.org quote by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but their vacuum cleaners just blow ;-]

    14. Re:Adequate bash.org quote by JNighthawk · · Score: 1

      Actually... I'm using XP SP1 with Firefox while I listen to music on foobar. I've never gotten a virus or been exploited maliciously, etc. *shrugs*

      What were we talking about again?

      --
      Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
    15. Re:Adequate bash.org quote by Wild+Wizard · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if you upgraded to a real version of windows instead of that 16bit hack that runs on DOS you might not have that problem

  13. Screwing for Virginity by Spinlock_1977 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Relying on Windows for security is like fighting for peace, or screwing for virginity. 'Nuff said.

    --
    - The Kessel run is for nerf herders. I can circumnavigate the entire Central Finite Curve in a lot less than 12 parse
    1. Re:Screwing for Virginity by Moulinneuf · · Score: 1

      Or the US homeland security saying they where not at war so they did not have to hunt for terrorist ?

      --
      I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America
    2. Re:Screwing for Virginity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...though it's not like spending 30 seconds typing out trite phrases to whore-up your karma.

      Insightful?!?!

    3. Re:Screwing for Virginity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Relying on Windows for security....

      > ...though it's not like spending 30 seconds typing out trite phrases

      Having dealt with the-pile-of-poo offered off and on for nearly 20 years, yeah, its pretty much like 'spending 30 seconds typing out trite phrases.' On the other hand your point about karma-whoring and Insightful is also pretty spot on.

    4. Re:Screwing for Virginity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except fighting for peace actually makes a ton of sense.

    5. Re:Screwing for Virginity by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes, in 1942 we saw how stupid it was to fight for peace.

      Oh... whoops.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    6. Re:Screwing for Virginity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1942? ah I forgot, damn yanks bottled the first 3 years. How exactly did we get peace after WWII anyway? It lead into the cold war with near nuclear warfare, and has lead into the current situation with bin laden who trained / trained his people using US paid for camps.

      When you find the peace, please tell the rest of us.

    7. Re:Screwing for Virginity by angrist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Where did you think virgins came from?
      A magic stork?

      oh wait.... this is /.

    8. Re:Screwing for Virginity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you meant to say, "peace on our terms," i'm sure

    9. Re:Screwing for Virginity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's too bad we didn't let Hitler rule the world. It would be a much better place after killing all the Jews.

      P.S. I'm not being sarcastic.

      The world will never be at peace because somebody always wants something that somebody else has. Wealth, money, land, resources, etc.

    10. Re:Screwing for Virginity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet your one of those guys who visits Aushwitz and rolls around in the dirt to get their
      rocks off. And all time thinking "If only he had lived".

    11. Re:Screwing for Virginity by hermi · · Score: 1
      The world will never be at peace because somebody always wants something that somebody else has. Wealth, money, land, resources, etc.

      There can be a day when nobody claims the land to bis his anymore

      and honestly, who wants money? All people I know who want money just want it to buy something with etc.

      ps, why would it be a better place without jews?

    12. Re:Screwing for Virginity by BarkerJr · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Microsoft make a router/firewall?

    13. Re:Screwing for Virginity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I can see his point there, if genocide doesn't bother him. Without the Jews, there'd have been no need for resolution 181 and no present-day conflict between the western world and the Muslims. However, this sort of solution is a lot like eliminating teen pregnancy by killing all the female teenagers.

  14. [OT] Source code for phel ;-) by asliarun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry, couldn't resist the anagram. Here's the source code for the phel trojan. This trojan is written in a very high level language. By a strange temporal accident involving a singularity, an anagram, and MS's open-door policy, the source code closely resembles a certain song lyric that goes by the same name.

    The lyrics are kinda fitting, don't you think? ;-)

    [snip]
    When I was younger, so much younger than today,
    I never needed anybody's help in any way.
    But now these days are gone, I'm not so self assured,
    Now I find I've changed my mind and opened up the doors.

    Help me if you can, I'm feeling down
    And I do appreciate you being round.
    Help me, get my feet back on the ground,
    Won't you please, please help me.

    And now my life has changed in oh so many ways,
    My independence seems to vanish in the haze.
    But every now and then I feel so insecure,
    I know that I just need you like I've never done before.

    Help me if you can, I'm feeling down
    And I do appreciate you being round.
    Help me, get my feet back on the ground,
    Won't you please, please help me.
    [/snip]

    - Help by The Beatles

    1. Re:[OT] Source code for phel ;-) by ThJ · · Score: 1

      *sings along* I'm a big Beatles fan! :D

    2. Re:[OT] Source code for phel ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I think we've made a love connection! Make sure to post excerpts of your steamy 'cyber sessions.

  15. Trojan Condoms? by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 2, Informative

    Who says trojans are bad?

    You can pull one over your case and stop the spread of windows and aol. Shipping a trojan condom with AOL cds could also help stop the reproduction of aol users. Way to go Trojan! You set a good example for the rest of us. Windows XP std2 is a threat to us all, and with your help, we may just annihilate it yet! Of course, then you are still at risk for penguin gout, and gnu herpes.... but that's a post for a different story(most likely the double posting of this).

    1. Re:Trojan Condoms? by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      I don't think they'll do any good if you've got WiFi...

    2. Re:Trojan Condoms? by ShagratTheTitleless · · Score: 1
      This message is automatically generated in the case of an attempt at humor.

      Are you wondering why your semi-humorous post on Slashdot(tm) received a lowering rating than expected? In the future, follow these suggestions:

      You likely did NOT quote Richard M. Stallman in your comment. This alone could cause the loss of several mod points.

      If english is not your primary language or your comment is incoherent for other reasons, be sure to include an original, witty insult of US President George W. Bush such as "Bush is Stupid". No matter how many times a mod sees that comment it always strikes them as fresh and clever and indicates your post is better than it first appeared.

      Puns involving Microsoft projects or initiatives are comedy and mod points gold. The more overused or hackneyed the better! If mods have not been bombarded with the same witticism several hundred times they may not yet recognize its brilliance.

      Any non-sequitor mention of a conspiracy (With link for more "Information") is encouraged. Many mods browse the forums with tin foil protective gear and will appreciate that you are one of them.

      --
      Sometimes at night I imagine the darkness is filled with horrible things with too many teeth, like Julia Roberts.
  16. Re:Yep. Firefox is not a threat. by Randy+Wang · · Score: 1

    "What me, worry?"

    or, possibly "Bah, humbug."

    --
    --- Egads, I glow in the dark!
  17. I wonder ... by basvdlei · · Score: 5, Funny

    if this is what they meant with "extensible platform": http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/30/185323 2&tid=113

  18. Wow!, please! by xcfx · · Score: 2, Informative

    Quite frankly, I can't understand why people get "impressed", I mean, let's look at history for a while... it isn't something new -- for the past probably, let's say 7 years Microsoft has been making the same mistakes over and over. It's nothing new that every vulnerability that is found affect their "benevolents" Service Packs, happened with Service Pack 1 and now 2 in Windows XP, happened with all the Service Packs on NT, and then Windows 2000... seriously. All I have to say is, Microsoft is like a teenage girl -- you never know what you're gonna get --JR.

    --
    WARNING: DO NOT LET DR. MARIO TOUCH YOUR GENITALS. HE IS NOT A REAL DOCTOR!
    1. Re:Wow!, please! by adeydas · · Score: 1

      so are we expecting SP3?!

  19. Re:Yep. Firefox is not a threat. by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

    Yes, I was thinking he might mean What- me worry?

    --
    No reason to lie.
  20. Number of vulnerablities aside... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    ...how many working worms/viruses affecting Mozilla/Firefox have been written already?
    How many for MSIE?
    What's the ratio?

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Number of vulnerablities aside... by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 1

      99999999999999:0

    2. Re:Number of vulnerablities aside... by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Almost 100 trillion explots for Firefox? Holy crap, I better switch to IE as soon as possible!

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  21. Re:Yep. Firefox is not a threat. by klang · · Score: 5, Insightful

    nope, Firefox is not at threat to Internet Explorer .. Internet Explorer is a threat to Internet Explorer!

  22. Uncle uncle Merry Xmas ;-) by Moulinneuf · · Score: 1

    Knoppix ?

    */me ducks and run for cover*

    --
    I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America
  23. And though it's been said... many times many ways. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft SUCKS!

  24. He's a poet and he don't know it! by Zorilla · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Reminds me of Faxanadu:

    "If you're going to see the king, take this ring."

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  25. The problem isn't JUST Windows... by ral315 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem is, the end users who will visit these types of sites, especially in IE (the same users who will open e-mails for free Vioxx or Rolex watches)

    1. Re:The problem isn't JUST Windows... by b374 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The problem is, the end users who will visit these types of sites

      not quite... there are some cases in which a compromised web site can serve as a 'launch pad' for malware. There are "some" cases like this and not "a lot" because the vast majority of attacks are done by script kiddies who have no fsking idea what and how they are doing it.

      I had one server compromised because of a web application vulnerability... and after finishing to diagnose, fix, patch and check I could only say: "Thanks God it wasn't someone who knew what and how to ... [all my nightmares here]"

      especially in IE (the same users who will open e-mails for free Vioxx or Rolex watches)

      While I agree with what you say, I can't stop myself to ask: "How can you delete an email which might be full of malware without seeing it?". (I'm sure some might say it can be done... I even did it under OE by shift selecting the previous and next message, deleting all of them, undeleting the others) But the idea is that no potential malware should be executed automatically.

      Users shouldn't be made responsible for design flaws or implementation faults.

    2. Re:The problem isn't JUST Windows... by fmobus · · Score: 1
      [...]I even did it under OE by shift selecting the previous and next message[...]
      Another option is to close the previsualization pane. Which is not a good practical idea though. Actually I don't see WHY people need HTML'd e-mail messages. That was a bad standard pushed by M$. e-mail formatting should be transmitted in simpler ways, say, a wiki-like formatting.
    3. Re:The problem isn't JUST Windows... by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      • Actually I don't see WHY people need HTML'd e-mail messages.


      I see the need for HTML in e-mail, just not a full subset of HTML. HTML 2.0 or so should do just fine. :)
    4. Re:The problem isn't JUST Windows... by Dracos · · Score: 1

      The parent's title I agree with. Yes, users are uneducated. Whose fault is this? Microsoft.

      Widows users are quite simply left to fend for themselves after making all the color-coded peripheral connections and pushing the power button. If there's a problem, who provides support for windows? The OEM, not MS (more likely its done by a good samaritan friend/relative). Combine this with a product whose sole design goal is to be user friendly (not secure, well architected, empowering, or sufficiently documented), and it's no wonder all these issues exist. MS has silly amounts of resources available to fix these problems ($60B cash), and yet it chooses not to.

      Among the major OSes, there are three types of people:

      • *nix: users
      • Mac: fans
      • Windows: victims
  26. They always want to catch the bad guys... by borfast · · Score: 4, Informative

    Microsoft is working to forensically analyze the malicious code in Phel and will work with law enforcement agencies to identify and bring to justice those responsible for the malicious activity, he said.

    They always want to catch the bad guys but Microsoft itself is never held responsible fot the damages their crippled software causes.

    As a software developer myself, I know it's almost impossible to make a big software product 100% bug free but come on... Microsoft's software is becoming ridiculous!

    1. Re:They always want to catch the bad guys... by Create+an+Account · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...becoming ridiculous?

    2. Re:They always want to catch the bad guys... by Loren_Burlingame · · Score: 1

      I always think of it with the analogy of a bank that leaves it's vault door open/unlocked. The criminal who steals the money is certainly to blame for breaking the law, but shouldn't the bank bear some of that blame too?

    3. Re:They always want to catch the bad guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree....why should taxpayers money go towards MS tracking down a problem they didn't have the foresight to fix. Or at the least they should pay the law enforcement agency for their time!

    4. Re:They always want to catch the bad guys... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft's software is becoming ridiculous!

      It's been there for quite a while...

      The only good thing is that constant media coverage (it's even *slowly* trickling into mainstream media) makes more and more people aware. Few of them will look for alternatives. Many of those make the switch to firefox (because it's easy and has the added bonus of suppressing these banner ads) but only a small number actually looks for another OS - because the only viable desktop alternative is still the mac and those are expensive.

    5. Re:They always want to catch the bad guys... by Doppleganger · · Score: 1

      I dunno about you, but the last thing I would want is a legal climate where security bugs are punished through the courts. What's next.. coder's malpractice insurance? What will that do to OSS?

      Much safer to get the word out that Microsoft is bad at handling these issues, and that their EULA specifically protects them from any responsibility. Luckily, they seem to be doing a very good job of doing that on their own..

  27. Re:Jeezus people! by Moulinneuf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Man , Wizard ! How many time do I have to tell you ? Windows XP CD is an OS its not a doughnut , stop eating it with your coffee and milk in the morning , shisssh ;-)

    --
    I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America
  28. Re:The attackers are downloading malicious program by zobi · · Score: 1

    yes, plus XP SP2 is installed as well.

  29. What? by Albinofrenchy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Trojans in IE counts as news still? Its like someone throws us a surprise party every three months and we feel obliged to keep acting surprised.

    --
    "A man is but the product of his thoughts what he thinks, he becomes." -Mahatma Gandhi
    1. Re:What? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      If someone gave me cake and presents every three months, I'd at least try to act surprised. Unfortunetly, trojan infections rarely involve cake.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:What? by daveaitel · · Score: 1

      Hahahah. Why isn't this modded up? :>
      -dave

    3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try everyday

    4. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderators on cake?

  30. And All this Time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I thought security WAS a feature

  31. OSS , GNU/Linux VS Mircosoft by Moulinneuf · · Score: 2, Informative

    There would be a fix by now if it where an OSS , Gnu/Linux project.

    --
    I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America
    1. Re:OSS , GNU/Linux VS Mircosoft by dfiguero · · Score: 1

      There would be a fix by now if it where an OSS , Gnu/Linux project.

      coder1: ok so how do we fix this?
      coder2: hmmm...
      coder3: hmmm...
      coder1: hmmm...
      coder2: ok then it's settled. Take the icons dump the rest.

      --
      My penguin ate my sig
    2. Re:OSS , GNU/Linux VS Mircosoft by Moulinneuf · · Score: 1

      No , It would go like this :

      Red Hat Security dev : A shit whe got a trojan better call in some reenforcement. "special OSS signal on a special chanel on a special software" ;-)

      Debian Security dev : Yes I know about it , whe already have traced back the software.

      Slackware Security Dev : and whe now have the source !

      Linspire Security Dev : heu , does this affect root ?

      Xandros Dev : Yes , Linspire

      Knoppix security Dev : after some test the trojan seem to have those effect , list of effect follow.

      Novell/SuSe Dev : I scanned the source and this code seems to be a start of a solution

      Mandrake Security Dev : Yes , I tought so too here is the patch I made.

      MSG to security list /forum / etc

      everyone use there download manager to get the patch.

      Its a summary , and not accurate some name where changed to keep secret the real life identity of some of the participants and Linspire dont have security Dev ;-)

      --
      I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America
    3. Re:OSS , GNU/Linux VS Mircosoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You jackass. Shows how little you know about development on large scale. Don't comment if you don't know what you're talking about.

      Do you realise the depth and size of code of IE? Althought it probably takes quite a while to debug such a project, they already know how to fix it.
      (At this point the OSS community releases a "patch" which is, as standard, untested).

      But Microsoft has to ensure the new code is completely backwards compatible and especially ensure that it will work on a hundred-million different configurations of Windows all across the world and won't break any other programs.

      That's where the real time is spent - testing.

    4. Re:OSS , GNU/Linux VS Mircosoft by kneeless · · Score: 1
      Do you realise the depth and size of code of IE?
      Ah! So when kernel developers release a patch for a kernel exploit only a few hours after it hitting Bugtraq, it's because the kernel is only a few lines long? Of course, how silly of me.
  32. grammar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shouldn't it read "an HTML file" :D?

    1. Re:grammar? by lightdarkness · · Score: 1

      You only use an if the next word starts with a vowel.

    2. Re:grammar? by Ann+Elk · · Score: 1

      Would you say "HTML" starts with "a H"?

    3. Re:grammar? by rokzy · · Score: 1

      > You only use an if the next word starts with a vowel.

      wrong.

      consider: an honest person, and sometimes an historic event.

    4. Re:grammar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or sounds like a vowel. For example, the Judge made an honorable decision.

    5. Re:grammar? by lightdarkness · · Score: 1

      I have been proven wrong!

      Quick! Someone e-mail michael and DEMAND he fix the typo.

    6. Re:grammar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HTML is pronounced 'Aitch Tee Emm Ell', therefore the an is required.

    7. Re:grammar? by PaneerParantha · · Score: 1
      I am no grammarian, or linguist, or lawyer.

      In "honest" and sometimes in "historic", the sound of 'h' is that of a vowel. Therefore, they have an "an" in front of them.

      Sometimes, even a certified vowel is pronounced as a consonant, such as the first 'u' in "unique." In that case, there should be no "an" in front of it. Some people, however, see a 'u' and blindly place an "an" in front of it, such as, "an unique event."

      Hence, the placement of "an" is determined by the sound the letter will produce.

  33. Re: Jeezus people! by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Windows XP is overall a lot better than linux, you people just bitch about every litte thing to take everyone's attention off that fact.

    Good for you! But with all these vulnerabilities and resulting spyware bogging down your Windows install, the shit creeping in before you manage to download & install the latest patches, I am really impressed you actually get any work done (and managed to make this Slashdot post).

    ...about every litte thing...

    I don't consider yet another worm 0wning my box and handing it over to a spammer, a little thing. But okay, YMMV.

  34. How about .. by sunsrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    XPLite to remove the darn thing !

    1. Re:How about .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your expertise seems to be in investing, and looking at your articles, about people buying stock and getting suckers to buy it, then dumping the stock when it gets nice and high. Considering you recommend a variety of stocks on the same blog, you are probably doing this too, eh?

      So since it appears you are recommending things for your own benefit, why would I trust this xplite program? You probably own it without disclosing that fact, or benefit from it in some other way, such as through reseller fees, advertising, etc...

      tsk...tsk...

    2. Re:How about .. by sunsrin · · Score: 1

      Looks like you hardly trust anyone or you have been cheated by a lot of people.
      I dont use the xplite program nor use Windows except when forced to - infact I use Linux ! And I recommend people to use Linux and ONLY LINUX!
      I posted that link because I had come across the link some time back and one of my friends used it ! I think commenting on stocks will be offtopic, why dont you post it on my site and I will reply.

  35. duh by Heem · · Score: 1

    http://www.mozilla.org

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
  36. Browsers are meant to browse by Moulinneuf · · Score: 1

    Browsers are meant to browse , separate the instant instalation from the browsing , and voila ! No kidding , I hope Microsoft release a LiveCD for Browsing ! this way your sure you system is not compromised , I am on sp2 and the number of time I hear ba bling trying to warn me from something that whant to instal is astronomical.

    --
    I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America
  37. I like John Valby's take on the Beatles, myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Here's Dr. Dirty's version of "Yesterday". May this ring in your head for all eternity every time you hear "Yesterday":

    Leprosy
    All my skin is falling off of me
    I'm not half the man I used to be
    Oh, how did I get leprosy

    Syphilis
    It all started with a simple kiss
    Now it hurts to even take a piss
    Oh, how did I get syphilis

    Why her box was sick
    She didn't say
    Now, my dripping dick won't get thick
    Like yesterday

    Yesterday
    My cock was always coming out to play
    Now it needs two weeks to hide away
    Oh, I believe in yesterday.

  38. Gandhi, not Ghandi by PaneerParantha · · Score: 1
    I wont repeat Ghandi's famous ...

    You probably meant Gandhi. Try to say the 'd' while making the 'h' sound as in "hale", just as some people pronounce "when" as "hwen." This way you will never forget that it is Gandhi and not Ghandi.

    1. Re:Gandhi, not Ghandi by fuck+nwbvt · · Score: 1

      Thank you! That always bothers me.

      In college I took a class on Gandhi's life and legacy (taught by the lovely Janaki Bakhle) and, come midterm time, fully half the students in the class spelled his name "Ghandi" on the exam. Honestly, what the fuck?

      Janaki just about blew her lid the next day in class. It was really hot.

  39. All The More Reason to Use Firefox!!!!!! by lunpa · · Score: 1

    You mean you're still using IE? Well maybe it'll convince you to switch this time.

  40. phel I need help by helicologic · · Score: 1

    A: PHEL
    Q: What do you say when you call 119?

    1. Re:phel I need help by Sirch · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd call 191 - "Phel" is the reverse of "help" as much as "Sirch" is the reverse of "Chris".

    2. Re:phel I need help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, no, no...
      help:phel :: chris:schri

  41. hmm by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't MS just be better off writing a new browser instead of wasting all this time trying to fix IE? Surely they relise this..

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they should write more than a new browser...

    2. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be a great solution, but unfortunatly they have to learn how to write their own software first.

  42. Quick.. Need a virus that installs P2P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Since this is so easy to catch, someone needs to write and distribute a version of this that installs a P2P client, to give the people that are being sued by the *AA's an 'out'...

    Posting Anonymously, for obvious reasons...

  43. Offtopic, I know. Damage Control. by Bozzio · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hi, I'm also a proud Canadian, and I agree that it's silly for a nation to call itself 'America' (a group of continents!) as if it was the only country IN America. BUT, I don't agree with your 'real' American bit. Don't make the same mistake with which we're unhappy. And also, if you're going to make radical statements, make sure your grammar and spelling are correct, otherwise, your message loses all credibility.

    --
    I just pooped your party.
  44. New Trojan threatens Windows XP SP2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Apparently, not only does Duke suck, but USC does as well.

  45. Wasting our tax money by max+born · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Customers in the U.S. who believe they have been attacked should contact their local FBI office or post their complaint online at www.ifccfbi.gov

    Non MS users should contact the FBI and tell them we don't want our tax dollars to go to phel. Let Microsoft deal with it.

  46. The MSFT Party Line by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The problem is, the end users who will visit these types of sites...

    That's good, blame the victim. Just what sites are those? Where's the big list of sites you shouldn't visit? We might know where to avoid, but how is Joe User going to know?

    Typical MSFT response. Instead of fixing their busted ass software they blame the victim. How's the weather in Redmond today?

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:The MSFT Party Line by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      No blame the people that write the Trojan. I have no love of microsoft but there are people that are trying to cause these problems for there own reasons. Yes Microsoft does need to improve it's security but it is not like Microsoft enjoys these bugs. For once they are not the bad guys.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  47. Trojan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New years present from Microsoft

  48. Firefox by subzerorz · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I use firefox instead of IE. I'm never using IE anymore.

    --
    Subzerorz
    More Articles
  49. Mod parent down! by JNighthawk · · Score: 1

    How in the hell is this modded informative? I mean, come on.

    Besides, trojan condoms are extremely ironic. The trojan horse was something that let men get into an enemy town and then break open and hundreds of men rushed out from it.

    --
    Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
    1. Re:Mod parent down! by el_chicano · · Score: 1
      Besides, trojan condoms are extremely ironic.
      Just ask Alanis Morissette!
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
    2. Re:Mod parent down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, trojan condoms are extremely ironic. The trojan horse was something that let men get into an enemy town and then break open and hundreds of men rushed out from it.

      Ignorant people amuse me.

  50. Hey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Symantec is reporting about a new virus called Phel (Anagram of 'help') which is a Trojan which spreads via a HTML file. All the user needs to do is go to the page, and it takes advantage of the vulnerability in the IE Help control component files.
    What, no link?
    1. Re:Hey... by lightdarkness · · Score: 1

      In the portion you quoted, there are 2 links. One to the explination on Symantec.com, and one to where I got the story from.

    2. Re:Hey... by BarkerJr · · Score: 1

      But they don't seem to be infecting me...

  51. good example of IE design flaws by roca · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a good example of why "IE only looks bad because it has the most market share" is at best dubious, and why IE is going to continue to struggle with problems that don't affect other browsers.

    In particular, here we have problems in a scriptable ActiveX control for presenting Windows Help files. It's nice to have that available for Windows integration, and maybe for intranet Web applications (though regular Web pages are fine for the vast majority of online help), but people don't need it for regular Web surfing. There have been tons of flaws in these preloaded ActiveX controls, but Microsoft seems unwilling to change its policy to reduce this attack surface.

    1. Re:good example of IE design flaws by emmenjay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > This is a good example of why "IE only looks bad
      > because it has the most market share" is at best
      > dubious.

      Yes and no.

      The market share is certainly not the whole problem, but it is definitely part of it.

      1. In retrospect, trying to bind IE so tightly into the OS was a big mistake.

      2. The security model chosen for IE was poorly thought out, and is probably the single biggest cause of problems. However, because so much 3rd party software relies on IE behaviour, changing the security model will be a nightmare.

      3. The quality of coding and of testing was very poor. MS have done a *lot* to improve that, but they are still crippled by poor legacy design.

      Notwithstanding the above, if (when?) Firefox captures enough market share (40-60%) to gain the broad interest of the bad guys, I will be surprised if we don't see a large number of problems.

      Firefox, being much newer, seems to have much better design. We've seen some of IE's worst mistakes and avoided them. It remains, however, to be seen if we have created some whole new classes of mistakes.

      Don't mistake my intention: I use Firefox and recommend it to anybody. I hope I'm wrong and it proves completely bullet-proof. However long experience in software projects makes me tend to the pessimistic side. :-)

  52. But to those fools, it IS just a little thing by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    ...about every litte thing...

    I don't consider yet another worm 0wning my box and handing it over to a spammer, a little thing. But okay, YMMV.


    But to Windows users and Microsoftie trolls, apologists, and astroturfers, having your system 0wned by a sp@mmer and infecting 10,000 other computers with the latest Microsoft Worm, Virus, or Trojan is just a little thing. Hardly worth mentioning, often beneath their notice.

    No one likes having their stupidity pointed out to them ... least of all when they really are that stupid.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  53. OS or Browser vulnerability? by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a browser vulnerability such that you'd be safe if you were using Opera or Firefox, for example. Everything in the articles says it's an OS vulnerability, though. What I want and need to know is: Am I safe if I'm using Firefox as my default browser?

    --
    -Rich
    1. Re:OS or Browser vulnerability? by BarkerJr · · Score: 1

      I don't know the technical details, but I can't imaging that it'd affect Opera or Firefox. The article says it's an HTML parser error, and neither of those browsers use the IE HTML parser.

  54. Entice? by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 1
    For the exploit to succeed, an attacker would need to entice a user to visit a malicious Web site

    Why do they always try to make this sound difficult?

    Hey everybody, I've got pictures of Natalie Portman naked!

    1. Re:Entice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried your link but it doesn't work. Please fix it.

  55. Enough is enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good bye Windows! I am enjoying Linux alot and those of my friends who were still using Windows are now really fed up with it and are either buying Macs or installing Linux. If you had asked me a year ago I would not have thought that Linux is becoming a mainstream desktop OS that quickly. My girlfriend also became a big Linux fan and I even installed Gentoo Linux on our notebook - it rocks!

    1. Re:Enough is enough! by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      At one time, the MacOSX help system could also be manipulated remotely to execute arbitrary bash scripts, though not as root.

  56. Right on time! by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

    Considering that ever since SP2 all Windows Updates "fail" to install for me. The fun never stops.

    1. Re:Right on time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear crap like this all the time and can't help but wonder what kind of retard you have to be to have something like this happen?

      What kind of obscure hardware configuration do you have?

      How many weather monitors and stock tickers do you have running?

      Did you do periodically unplug the computer during the OS install?

      What was it? I've installed win2k on no fewer than 20 machines of varying configurations and winxp on at least a dozen and the only ones that have ever had any issues are the ones that were given to people that could fuck up a steel ball and these people will fuck up a Dell and they'll fuck up a Mac and they'll fuck up any Linux box that they ever touch because they, like you apparently, are fuck ups.

      Honestly... If "ever since SP2 all Windows Updates "fail" to install" for you, maybe you should think about re-installing the OS and then come bitch about having to reinstall your OS. At least then, you would have a more secure/functional machine while you were ignorantly whining about problems that are nobody's fault but your own.

    2. Re:Right on time! by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      I hear crap like this all the time and can't help but wonder what kind of retard you have to be to have something like this happen?
      Geez. I'm sorry I don't magically know why something stopped working. Blaming it on SP2 might have been knee-jerkish, of course. But so is assuming everyone who has something like this happen is a retard.

      How many weather monitors and stock tickers do you have running?
      None. Neither Ad-Aware, nor Spybot S&D, nor AVG, ClamWin, McAfee or whatever the fuck else I tried over the years ever found a single piece of malware.

      Did you do periodically unplug the computer during the OS install?
      No, it bluescreens all by itself during the OS install. Yes, I guess I do have an "obscure hardware configuration" (or something's broken.)

      and these people will fuck up a Dell and they'll fuck up a Mac and they'll fuck up any Linux box that they ever touch because they, like you apparently, are fuck ups.
      Well, that of course explains it adequately. We excrete an ethereal fuckupogenic substance that seeps into operating systems. It's purely coincidental if it lies dormant until SP2.

      If "ever since SP2 all Windows Updates "fail" to install" for you, maybe you should think about re-installing the OS and then come bitch about having to reinstall your OS.
      It's a deal. Bye.

    3. Re:Right on time! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      If you install Windows XP then install SP2 right away - which it sounds like you have done, it usually works fine. If you try to install SP2 on a XP system that has been used, configured, and has various pieces of software installed (no, not spyware), SP2 may or may not work. Atleast that's what I have seen.

    4. Re:Right on time! by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's been through some er... improvements already. I'm actually ready to format/reinstall, just don't feel like reinstalling and -configuring a thousand apps right now

    5. Re:Right on time! by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Mh, I guess you were talking to the AC.

  57. Here is some help for all IE trojans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    1. Stick in a the Slackware live CD

    2. Mount dev/hda

    3. Run this command as root;

    • dd if=dev/urandom of=dev/hda

    Bingo no more trojans virii or XP trouble period.

  58. Re:Yep. Firefox is not a threat. by Vega043 · · Score: 1

    Luckily for Internet Explorer suicide is not a crime anymore.

  59. Virus/Trojan problems for Microsoft go way back by totallygeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those interested, check out this source code. Virus and Trojan problems seem to just gravitate toward Microsoft products. So, Microsoft is the problem.

  60. just remember by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1) the list of FORMER competitors of MS is a long one..anyone remember DR-DOS, which always got better reviews in the trade journals ? Lets add borland, lotus, star office, etc etc. A rationale person has some humility and or fear when confronted with a proven champion, regardless of the methods the champion uses.

    2) Unlike other companies, MS can survive a disaster - (either DOS 4 or 5) was a dog that would have killed any other company; MS survived to fight another day (eg, borland died when they were late with one product). I'm sure /. readers can supply many other examples of companies that died when there single flagship product was late or buggy; only MS can live to fight another day, with its cash flow and monomply posistions.

    3) IMHO, MS has developed an unusual corp ability - the ability to throw money at a problem and solve it. IF gates and ballmer were really interested, they could release a new IE next year.

    4) Gates is laughing at /. and firefox cause they are playing the wrong game. I don't think he cares a flying f*ck about technical superiority, or bloat or stuff like that; he cares about market share. For all we know, he may be happy that the 10% of the market consisting of geeks is distracted by linux and firefox - it never makes economic sense for a biz to care about more then 80% of the market.

    5) there is something kinda pathetic and geekish and teenagerish in this constant gloating about bugs in MS products. Maybe worm writers don't write for *nix because that is not where the market is - if you r interested in making money, an not tech bragging writes, why wd u care about the geeks using linux. no money and hard to cheat - just not a soft target (the same principal by which "insurgents" choose unarmored Iraqis over armored mobile americans.
    Untill there is some reasonably similar user base, any comparision of worms or bugs or whatever you want to call them, between nix and ms, is meanignleess. Its sort of like comparing gas mileage between GM and solectra. Just not a comparison that has meaning in the real world of sales and market share.

    6) Since the game gates is playing is market share and sales and PROFITS, maybe he is not that interested in the OS or the browser - maybe they think OSs and Browsers will become commodity objects, and the money is in apps.
    think about ibm selling its pc division - companies exist to make money, not technically superior produdts. Sometimes you can win on technical superiority; sometimes not

    1. Re:just remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      point 5 is useless. look at the share apache has vs IIS. which one would you trust to run a high load website?

    2. Re:just remember by Strudelkugel · · Score: 1

      (4) is an good point, but I think there is more to it as well. Once companies reach a certain size, they gain the attention of political people of all stripes. The attorneys and lobbyists are probably telling Gates to get IE down to 60% market share. That way there is still a reason for web developers to write to its specialized features/defects (whatever one wants to call them). The lower market share will provide decent defense against the "monopoly" witch hunters, and so becomes an important business consideration.

      One has to observe the legal system up close at some point to understand how important perceptions can become. One of Judge Jackson's reasons for finding against Microsoft in the IE decision was that including IE was harmful to the consumer, because it took too much disk space! He also opined that there was no reason for having a browser on a PC if it wasn't connected to a network. Mind boggling, but it is the reality. There are plenty of other nefarious *cough*software patents*cough* examples to think of which are not technical but rather political/legal in nature.

      As for security, just wait. There are lots of kids running linux boxes which are poorly managed. One of these days a swarm of them will be hacked with much negative publicity. It will be interesting to observe the reaction.

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    3. Re:just remember by jerw134 · · Score: 1

      There are lots of kids running linux boxes which are poorly managed. One of these days a swarm of them will be hacked with much negative publicity. It will be interesting to observe the reaction.

      The reaction will be to blame the users for not patching. This is Linux here! It's not like we're talking about M$. M$ is evil, and even when something comes out that takes advantage of a vuln that was patched months ago (I know that the vuln discussed here is not like that, so everybody just sit back down) it's M$'s fault. But when the same thing happens with Linux, it's the user's fault. You see, it all makes perfect sense!

  61. No IE for Mac :(( by elecngnr · · Score: 4, Funny

    /begin{Sarcasm}



    You know, when I found out that Microsoft would no longer develop IE for Macs, I was so sad.



    \end{Sarcasm}

    --
    Having done so much with so little for so long, I now can do anything with nothing at all.
    1. Re:No IE for Mac :(( by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      At least with Mac OS X, I do have the option
      of totally and completely removing the included
      MS IE. And that is one of the very first things
      that I recommend new Mac owners do, and install
      the F/OSS FireFox & Thunderbird software.

      With all the problems and vulnerabilities that
      are associated with Microsoft OSes, one must
      wonder why any US government agency (like the
      US Navy and the Dept. of Homeland Security) would
      even consider a MS product, let alone to base
      their agencies on.

    2. Re:No IE for Mac :(( by elecngnr · · Score: 1

      When I converted to Mac, one of the first things I did was eliminate MS IE, which for some reason was bundled on my machine. All my Mac friends run either Safari, Firefox, or Mozilla.

      Personally, I now use Firefox about 90% of the time--maybe more and Safari sometimes if I am Googling or looking for technical papers because I find Safari is faster when I might be moving between sites quickly. I finally found a decent plug-in too that eliminates the need to download every pdf link I click. That was a huge bonus for me considering that sometimes I might be looking at 20-30 papers to find a few that pertain to what I am researching. This plug-in loads into both Safari and Firefox, which is great.

      I have not switched to Thunderbird yet. I am comfortable with Apple's Mail, but I have been happy with the other Mozilla products, so I am intrigued. Do you use Thunderbird and, if so, what would be the benefits of it over Mail?
      --
      Having done so much with so little for so long, I now can do anything with nothing at all.
  62. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, that would do diddly shit for people like LokiTorrent. Secondly, the people being sued have BROKEN THE LAW. Whether or not you agree with the law or think it is unjust is irrelevant. As it stands, "sharing" copyrighted works without permission is a civil offense (probably a criminal offense soon). If you don't want to get sued, don't share copyrighted shit without permission. At least not by the gigabytes.

    To me, what you suggest is akin to someone pleading temporary insanity to murder (although murder is obviously much worse than copyright infringement). Sure, some minority of those people might have truely been temporarily insane, but the majority of them are just trying to reduce their sentence. Similary, some minority of users might have truely been affected by this virus, but the majority of them know what they are doing is illegal (at least questionably illegal), and pleading "it was teh virus" is just a weak attempt to save their ass.

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My post has nothing to do with sites such as loki or SuprNova. They should not be held legally responsible for anything anyway, considering THEY DONT HOST ANY INFRINGING FILES. Its pretty simple..

      Secondly, it *would* be a valid defense, considering that in this day and age it is highly likely that you are infected with something, if you are using a Windows machine..

      Also most current home wifi routers uses ( now ) breakable encryption..

      How can you be held responsible for what an infection or cracker, neither of which is under your control, does?

      Until we require licensing to be online, and *require* a certain level of testable competency, then you cant be held responsible ( beyond your ISP cutting you off of course ).

      This would be similar to buying a car that has a defect beyond normal legally expected bounds.. You wouldnt not be liable for the damage it caused as it blew up due to a fault manufacture part/process. Now, if you didnt keep your brakes kept up, that would be considered reasonable knowledge and you would be held liable.

      So, since the burden of proof is on the state in criminal issues ( which copyright infringement becomes at a certain trumped up dollar level ) its the states responsibility to prove it wasnt a virus ( or someone directly breaking into your PC or WLAN )

      I also speak from experience, some years ago my linux router was rooted.. They setup a irc server and ftp server hosting kiddyporn.. Was i responsible for their actions? No. I did however catch it that same day during my daily audits, and shut it down.. But you can no expect an untrained user to do this. Or evenunderstand what is going on. No, legally you cant.

  63. Payload? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eye-opener worm (RFC):

    1. Do the usual spreading (outlook address book has proven effective)

    2. Perform the usual tricks to knock out active virus scanners
    (I have seen that work on McAfee and AntiVir with my own eyes)

    3. Incrementally scramble files on all available network-drives;
    every hour or so go and seek the oldest 100 [by access-time] files that
    haven't been scrambled yet and overwrite parts of them somewhere in the
    middle. Overwrite instead of unlinking ensures the files cannot easily be
    "undeleted". Make sure to overwrite with a random pattern (use a *fast*
    homegrown RNG, just using localtime() should suffice) to make it a little
    harder for virus scanners to identify corrupted files.
    The n least accessed files are chosen in order to go undetected for
    as long as possible. You may increase the rate of destruction to something
    like "pick the last 1000 files" when the system clock says "it's Saturday".

    3a. Send some of the files via E-mail to random recipients from
    the address book every now and then. Prefer .xls and .doc for
    broadcasting. Send the scrambled version (no free backups here) or
    implement a very simple version of antiword to extract the meat and
    send as plain ascii.

    4. Start performing the same procedure on the local harddrive only after the
    network volumes have been >50% done with. Only go for "My documents" and
    such, do not scramble system files in order not to kill your host.

    5. Last stage (when done with everything) would be the great haikiri -
    overwrite local drives.

    The various mechanisms would ideally be balanced out so that complete
    obliteration of a company network happens in approx. 4 days.
    The worm would be set free on a friday night (EST) in multiple
    locations.

    This description was only for educational/research purpose and I do not encourage anyone to do such a malicious thing.

  64. apology accepted by aichpvee · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would like to take this moment to accept the apologies of all the assholes who said things like, "windows is secure, just upgrade to sp2." I'm sure that all of you feel much better after saying that you are sorry and admitting that you were wrong.

    --
    The Farewell Tour II
  65. Re:effect/affect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, you look like a moron. Someone can effect change (there's effect used as a verb) or have a disagreeable affect. (affect used as a noun)

  66. Outlook & Outlook Express by ManuelKelly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Won't this also occur in email with Outlook and Outlook Express? They use the same control that IE does to process the html.

    This could make for a much worse case than having to visit a web site. Just have the preview pane open with these apps and get a spam than contains the exploit.

  67. re-duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.opera.com/

    Yeah, yeah, I know... "Oh no, it's not freeware, run!"

    It's actually a decent browser too.

    As for the ads, well, let's just say my hosts file is just a few lines bigger. ;-)

    1. Re:re-duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just download a key file and you wont have to block ads

      or buy it, i did. i love opera, ive been using it for years

  68. Re:Offtopic, I know. Damage Control. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Actually, (and I'm just being technical here) we call ourselves "The United States of America". People use the term "America" as shorthand, like "United States" or just "The States". The name America was taken from a great Italian navigator by the name of Amerigo Vespucci: Google for him, it's an interesting bit of history.

    But I agree with your comment about the parent poster. Interestingly, a number of people seem to think the way he does. There's one word I can think of (again, I'm just being technical) that applies here ... it's "hypocrisy." But hey, there's no accounting for taste.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  69. read the rest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the user would have to download an .html to their machine.

    In other words, this trojan requires you to download content from the internet. That's a lot higher bar than just typing in a random URL.

  70. The machine is remote ... by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

    This allows the attacker to download malicious programs on to the machine.

    Does anyone use the word "UPLOAD" anymore?

    --
    Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    1. Re:The machine is remote ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Does anyone use the word "UPLOAD" anymore?"

      Yeah, the upload to download ratio 'round here is terrible...

  71. Re: The above link has been slashdoted. by vettemph · · Score: 1

    The above link has been slashdoted.

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  72. silver bullet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And M$ thought they could slay all their security problems with one silver bullt, Data Execution Protection. Ha, security is more then silver bullets and magic pixy dust, its an all encompassing effort.

  73. You think that's bad? by caferace · · Score: 1

    Our buddy Amerigo must be rolling in his grave when he looks down and sees the "modern" version of the Vespa.

  74. Re:Offtopic, I know. Damage Control. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
    Conquistidore:
    What about the seven cities of gold? Phoenix, Tuscon, Las Vegas...
    Elder #2:
    Uh... This is gold...
    Conquistidore:
    What's that?
    Elder #1:
    Corn.
    Spaniard #1:
    Hey, corn! Now we can make tortillias!
    Spaniard #2:
    We've been waiting for this for hundreds of years!
    Spaniard #3:
    I just invented tacos!
    Conquistidore:
    So this is all you've got?
    Elder #1:
    Yes... but, aren't you the True White Brother who's supposed to come and live with us in peace?
    Conquistidore:
    Chore! Therefore, I claim this rich, verdant pasture land in the name of the Empire of Spain!
    Spaniard #1:
    Hey, Capitano, the rain, she's a stop to fall, and the corn, she's all dead!
    Conquistidore:
    Shut up, Vespucci! I claim this stinking desert in the name of the Empire of Spain forever - let's go!
    All Spaniards in chorus (to the tune of God Bless America):
    God bless Vespucciland! Mmm, mm, mm, mmm...
    Priest:
    Oh, by the way, you're all Catholics now, Domini, Domini, Domini, God bless you and...
    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  75. Symantec's Threat Assessment by westlake · · Score: 0
    Symantec's Threat Assessment:

    Number of infections 0-49
    Number of sites 0-2
    Geographical Distribution: Low
    Threat Containment: Easy
    Removal: Easy

    Virus Definitions: (Live Update) Dec 29

    Payload: Exploits system vulnerabilities and may degrade performance.

    I hope you'll pardon me for saying that this rates as something less than headline news, even over a long holiday weekend.

    1. Re:Symantec's Threat Assessment by jerw134 · · Score: 1

      How dare you sir! This is Slashdot, the home of M$-bashers worldwide. If anything comes out that portrays Microsoft in a negative light, it is absolutely headline news! It doesn't matter if the number of infections is 0-49, or if the threat barely even exists. It is negative, so it is good!

  76. new trojan threatening windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this supposed to be some kind of news forum?
    "trojan threatening windows ..."
    What's new about that ???
    Guess /. ain't what it used to be.

  77. MS bad practices by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    It is simply difficult to keep a Windows based machine secure, no matter how diligently a person visits Windows Update.

    Yesterday I updated DirectX on my w2k machine. So I went to Windows Update and first downloaded all the new critical updates. So now my machine is "secure" (as far as MS is concerned). So I proceed to have Windows Update install DirectX 9.1. So now I have a secure box with the latest DirectX, right? Nope. I just happened to go back to Windows Update searching for something else, and see a new critical update has appeared - to patch the DirectX I just installed! Doesn't MS have the resources to pre-patch something like DirectX?

    If that's too much work for them then shouldn't they at least notify the user that the software they are installing has known security issues?

    Now I can understand that security issues will be discovered after a product has been released, however to distribute software with known security problems, without at least warning the user, should open the door for some lawsuits.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:MS bad practices by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      This just proves that there is not one person in Redmond that can even spell security, much less actually do something about it.

      If M$ would ever start with a clean hard drive and write their next OS from scratch, they might fix most of this. Instead they just add to the exising buggy crap they've had for fourteen years.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  78. Re:Offtopic, I know. Atomic Cheese Bomb exploding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your acronym building abilities (or lack thereof) are horrible... in both English and Canadian French. Yuck.

  79. How Does Symantec Determine The Threat Metrics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to Symantic, all three metrics it uses for threat assessment (Wild, Damage, and Distribution) are low.

    I don't have any specific knowledge of the 1st and 3rd metric, but from reading Symantec's own description of the Damage component:

    # Payload: Downloads and executes remote files.

    How could this rate low??? What could possibly be more damaging than a trojan that downloads and executes remote code?

  80. Re:Offtopic, I know. Atomic Cheese Bomb exploding by secretsquirel · · Score: 1

    Oh come on, Canadas not even a real country.

  81. Wow! Great point! by xeno-cat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is what is known as a "negative external" in economic lingo.

    Basicaly, Microsoft does not care about the costs of security because it does not effect it's bottom line. The costs are "external" to MS.

    So, why does the government (meaning we, the people...) allow MS to cost industry, government and citizens billions of dollars without sanction? If this was Exxon spilling oil all over baby seals they would have to pay (a fraction) of the clean up costs and get all sorts of bad PR. With MS it's just Busines as Usuall.

    Kind Regards

    --
    "A few great minds are enough to endow humanity with monstrous power, but a few great hearts are not enough to make us w
  82. Scandinavian origin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A tip for the law enforcement is to look for the evil hacker somewhere in scandinavia. Besides being an anagram for help, "phel" is also swedish hacker dialect for the word "fel" (which means error). It's a clever name for a virus exploiting an error in windows help.

  83. expensive you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty tight with my money, and considered very frugal by my friends (read cheap), but I'm still enjoying my iMac DVSE from 1999. A G3 that is able to run my photoshop, movies, music, golive, web, email, and play starcraft. Granted most of my software is from 1999 as well. I bought a second one for the office for a steal. Check out the Apple store... I was recently tempted by a G4 eMac w/ a dvd burner for $799 refurbished. I think I'll wait and see if the budget Apple computer rumor is true though. Don't get me wrong, I'd love a G5, but I'll take whatever their base to medium computer is, and use it until it becomes unreasonable(such as my Macintosh classic became once the web replaced bulletin boards).

  84. windows server 2003 by mshurpik · · Score: 1

    If you didnt know that Microsoft makes an alternative to XP called Windows Server 2003, now is your time to find out.

    It is the most no-nonsense version of Windows I've seen since 2000, perhaps more so.

  85. IE cannot be fixed by IchBinEinPenguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Security has to be part of the initial design, you can't retrofit it.
    A motorcycle will always be inherently less save than a volvo, no matter what else you do to it. (sure, a safe rider can be safer than an idiot in a volvo).
    The design decisions that went into IE make it impossible to secure, no difficult, not expensive, but IMPOSSIBLE.
    ActiveX is the most obvious example where functionality/usability/ease-of-use totally overrode security in the design. You can't fix that, just like you can't make a motorcycle safe by adding seatbelts (more here: http://sans.org/rr/whitepapers/awareness/1509.php) .
    Saying it's the users fault is like giving someone a book of matches in a dynamite factory and saying "it's your fault for lighting the match".
    IE is a wonderful inTRAnet explorer, filling out timesheets in a low-risk network. Using it on the inTERnet is like entering a demolition derby on a motorbike.

  86. RIAA response: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To whom it may concern:

    It has come to our attention that the following copyright work(s):

    "Help", by Lenon/Macartney in ASCII format

    has appeared on your website without relevant approval or authorization. Please remove the offending page immediately, or Michael Jackson will get really cross and hold his breath until he turns blue.

    Well?

    We're waiting...

    He can't hold his breath forever, you know!

  87. Just wait a minute here... by front · · Score: 1

    I went to the FBI site quoted above and I can't find any Federal request for help on this.

    "Computerworld" (an IDG company(Symantec)) are the ones who are requesting that people contact the FBI.

    http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/secu ri ty/holes/story/0,10801,98636,00.html

    So if I go to the FBI website and make a comment that they should use our money "more wisely" (as in not supporting a buggy OS/Browser)... will they know what the fsck I'm talking about?

    cheers

    front

  88. What's your point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...the MacOSX help system could also be manipulated remotely to execute arbitrary bash scripts..."

    Which is of little practical use, since it the exploit has to be run from a local file that has been specifically mapped to be opened by the help viewer (which means no serving from PCs). From memory that particular exploit was fixed within two weeks of notification.

    "...though not as root."

    Which means at worst the user's home folder could be deleted without warning or a couple of binaries might be installed (though not executed); the system would remain untouched.

    So what you're saying is that Apple provided a timely fix for a minor flaw that was near impossible for anyone not actually in front of the machine to exploit. And this compares to Microsoft...how exactly?

  89. I warned everyone early enough by mcbain942 · · Score: 0

    I found this code with the help of pail. We did warn listservs and microsoft of this early. See www.michaelevanchik.com

    --
    I will not disclose a 0 day again I will not disclose a 0 day again I will not disclose a 0 day again I will not disc
  90. yawn by suezz · · Score: 1

    is this suprising - they just keep doing the same crap over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over. can't wait till longhorn so I can laugh at all the fricken CEO's , Marketers , and other managers that force Microsoft's crap software on companies just in the name of getting their job done and have to hire all those expert MCSE's to help clean it up - meanwhile I still be running my linux servers doing the real work like DNS, DHCP, and the applications that actually run the business. Maybe someday these ceo's will realize what a scam microsoft actually is.

  91. NMC.ZINS also... by crusher-1 · · Score: 1

    This ZINS variant is essentially a keystroke logger used by those infiltrating bank sites via stolen passwords and logins'. The point is that this new variant came out right after the 1st of the year, and was found by a F/OSS built for windows spybot finder. According to Symantec this changes settings in the ever wonderful microsoft master list *aka - the registry (gawd I hate it).

    And Symantec gives intructions where to look and how to remove it. Funny thing though, it wasn't there. Could this spyware progie be kludged? ...could be! But upon performing a search of said registry I sure enough found it. It was in the "google" search entries!!! Oh, great.

    It only took "one" time, "one" use, in a windows environment to get attacked on this level. I do online banking from time to time -nothing fancy. I "almost" always do so in Linux using Konq or Moz, and for just such reasons than to avoid what happened. But being a musician that discovered DAWS systems with programs that only run in windows systems I have to keep a dual boot system. Well, I get careless (aka "stupid) and I use windows (firebird in win, FYI) one time to visit a "secure" bank site and BOOM!

    Essentially, from and end-users point of view with a modicum of knowledge about computers, Microsofts patches mean didly! All I can say is...

    Ya, OK. That was fun.