Only if management actually believes said study. At any large organization, there will exist some people people who believe that any given schedule is too optimistic, and will say so. To argue that because some people in an organization expressed concern about a schedule, but management overruled them, that this is criminally actionable, would be to argue that almost any delayed project where anyone protested is actionable. What matters is whether the decision makers believed their own schedules. Aka, the case would be to argue that Musk has no record of excessive optimism about schedules.
Yeah, good luck with that. We're talking about a guy who literally just the other day just fired his Starlink managers because he felt their schedules were too pessimistic.
It's very simple: Have they delivered the cars or not?
It shouldn't take more than 10 minutes to investigate that, which is why I don't believe this story is anything more than YAEMSC paid for by the competition.
If we only had a craft able to fly up there and refuel and fix/upgrade it... oh wait we DID! NASA really should have kept 1 space shuttle for just this kind of mission. Sigh. Oh well.
It's almost as if you don't know where this thing is orbiting.
Clue: Shuttles aren't designed for deep space missions.
The biggest snag is the tendency of getting bloated code from developoers not aware of what C++ does behind the scenes.
Doesn't the Linux kernel have a whole army of people approving code changes? They could be aware of what C++ does behind the scenes even if the developers aren't.
(But seriously: Do you think a Linux core developer is incapable of using C++ properly or knowing what it does behind the scenes?)
Slashdot Mirror
Yep, it's just a name that was given to an observation.
There's lot's of things called "XXX's law" that aren't physical laws of the universe. Get over it.
Yep. Noon should be when the sun is in the south.
Anything else is stupid.
pasting multiple CPU modules together is about YIELDS, and getting 64 cores on a single die sucks for yields.
Simple: There will be 48 and 32-core versions which are made from 64-core dies that had bad cores during testing.
It's Intel that licenses the 64-bit instruction set from AMD.
I usually laugh when Americans use grams to tell me how much fat is in (eg.) a 12oz steak.
https://www.google.com/search?...
Chakra is open source. What do MS have to lose by githubbing the rest of the browser?
Simple: Somebody might recompile it without all the user-spying and data-gathering code.
maybe not, but a fuckload more comfortable than wearing headphones.
Here's a nickel kid, try getting yourself some headphones made after 1974.
the brand new iPad with USB-C is faster than one of the mid-spec MacBooks in benchmarks.
a) Yes, MacBook integrated graphics are rubbish at 3D/gaming.
b) Does it make the slightest difference to anything you do on a tablet?
You'd wrong. Iâ(TM)m on my second iPad
Try getting something that can type an apostrophe next time around. OK?
Doesn't sound better than headphones.
Fuck Linux. Linus Torvalds is a total retard.
being sketchy even a fraction on real numbers is not.
Sure, but investigating "real numbers" takes about ten minutes.
Is there a single salesman ever who hasn't mislead the customers?
Even the first used-brontosaurus salesmen were at it.
Only if management actually believes said study. At any large organization, there will exist some people people who believe that any given schedule is too optimistic, and will say so. To argue that because some people in an organization expressed concern about a schedule, but management overruled them, that this is criminally actionable, would be to argue that almost any delayed project where anyone protested is actionable. What matters is whether the decision makers believed their own schedules. Aka, the case would be to argue that Musk has no record of excessive optimism about schedules.
Yeah, good luck with that. We're talking about a guy who literally just the other day just fired his Starlink managers because he felt their schedules were too pessimistic.
It's very simple: Have they delivered the cars or not?
It shouldn't take more than 10 minutes to investigate that, which is why I don't believe this story is anything more than YAEMSC paid for by the competition.
(Yet Another Elon Musk Smear Campaign).
It will end up on eBay or something.
If we only had a craft able to fly up there and refuel and fix/upgrade it... oh wait we DID! NASA really should have kept 1 space shuttle for just this kind of mission. Sigh. Oh well.
It's almost as if you don't know where this thing is orbiting.
Clue: Shuttles aren't designed for deep space missions.
If it's not designed for refueling then there won't be a filler cap. Or anywhere to grab onto.
And it's probably impossible to do without destabilizing the orbit.
.
Look on the bright side: It is made of 100 percent recycled aluminum now!
Heh, although I'd put both at a lower tier of evil than a lot of the tech Left.
However, from what I've read elsewhere, this boils down to Apple claiming patent exhaustion.
Yeah, wouldn't that be a wonderful business model if it was possible.
If Apple signed a contract they should honor it, not take the goods then welch on the deal when it's time to pay for them.
Fracking isn't the answer to everything and its get you gas not oil. Oh and earthquakes.
Don't forget the poisoned groundwater.
It's still the pot calling the kettle black.
Any self respecting country would break relations with both of them.
But The Donald likes the Saudis, he gets along well with them.
(Translation: He likes the way they spend money when he's around...)
So what are we gonna do?
What "development" is that?
Clue: There's no way to sign blockchains that have 100 million transactions a second
The biggest snag is the tendency of getting bloated code from developoers not aware of what C++ does behind the scenes.
Doesn't the Linux kernel have a whole army of people approving code changes? They could be aware of what C++ does behind the scenes even if the developers aren't.
(But seriously: Do you think a Linux core developer is incapable of using C++ properly or knowing what it does behind the scenes?)
It's almost as if you don't know that std::vector can use a custom memory allocator, eg alloca().
The sensible thing to do would be to use std::vector, but nooooo....