Odd-numbered days are reserved for being half Apache helicopter and half Abrams tank... a flying, tanking, confused, multipurpose paperweight the MIC doesn't actually need but built experimentally anyhow for the money.
And why only women? Why not one black, one Asian, one Hispanic, all required by law?
(and with a minimum mixture of gender identities among them, of course)
I can see one immediate problem: If there's only three members on the board then which group gets priority? There's obviously no answer to that so we have to require a minimum number of board members, too. Make sure nobody is left out.
The problem with left-wing politics is that there isn't a clear line which says "we went too far" when you cross it.
Can we also have laws requiring firefighters to be 50% female? And construction workers, truck drivers and lumberjacks?
How about sports teams? Shouldn't they be mixed, too?
That would be affirmative action but I don't see many people campaigning for it. They only want to cherry pick the 'good' stuff for themselves.
(although I'm not sure what's so great about working all the hours that a big company CEO works, maybe the reason there's not many female CEOs is that they're not psychopathic enough)
Care to share some details? If for no other reason than for the rest of us who are getting screwed to be able to take this example to publicly shame our own ISP's who keep fucking us?
Or IRIX. I had my first 64-bit desktop machine around 1996 (SGI Indigo).
And apostrophes aren't a warning: "Look out, here comes an 's' at the end of a word!"
If we're going to pass laws like this then shouldn't we require an equal mix of POTUS?
That would mean that the next election would require only women candidates.
I find myself strangely attracted to that idea, not because they're women but because it would throw the status-quo into turmoil.
Every board must have people of both genders.
"Both" genders? Are you implying there's only two?
Odd-numbered days are reserved for being half Apache helicopter and half Abrams tank... a flying, tanking, confused, multipurpose paperweight the MIC doesn't actually need but built experimentally anyhow for the money.
The Osprey?
They're not saying 50%.
Yet.
And why only women? Why not one black, one Asian, one Hispanic, all required by law?
(and with a minimum mixture of gender identities among them, of course)
I can see one immediate problem: If there's only three members on the board then which group gets priority? There's obviously no answer to that so we have to require a minimum number of board members, too. Make sure nobody is left out.
The problem with left-wing politics is that there isn't a clear line which says "we went too far" when you cross it.
That will soon be a requirement for boards of director, too.
At least one homosexual and one trans-gender on the board.
Can we also have laws requiring firefighters to be 50% female? And construction workers, truck drivers and lumberjacks?
How about sports teams? Shouldn't they be mixed, too?
That would be affirmative action but I don't see many people campaigning for it. They only want to cherry pick the 'good' stuff for themselves.
(although I'm not sure what's so great about working all the hours that a big company CEO works, maybe the reason there's not many female CEOs is that they're not psychopathic enough)
I'm disappointed there's no link to the "famous poem".
What's the liability laws for something like that in the USA?
How will you finance it?
That's an awful lot of track to build before moon visits can begin.
First of all: What's a "device"?
That sounds like a weasel-word if ever I heard one.
The whites are quite keen on those dogs, too.
Who are you going to believe?
The people who released him initially - before the USA went on a fishing expedition to find a way to get him to the USA no matter what.
PS: An Interpol arrest warrant issued for a crime committed in a single country? That's corruption at the highest level.
Um, he isn't a rapist.
Obviously they didn't go around arresting anybody on the street wearing a Casio (duh!). ...but In some cases the watch was the only hard "proof".
Nobody makes it all the way to detention at Guantanimo Bay for merely wearing a watch.
Casio watches were submitted as evidence in many arrests:
eg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
* And citations to secondary sources with background information. Do the homework.
The "unathoritative" page gives names and details. It should be easy to refute, right?
That page wasn't particularly supposed to prove any points.
You want more info? Search for "Casio" on this page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Count how many times it says, "Detained for wearing a Casio F91W digital watch".
You can get $20 Fitbits for that, and Fitbit clones for even less. No need to spend $1200.
There's actually people in Gitmo where the only evidence against them is wearing a Casio F-91W.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Yep.
PS: All the talk about "fall protection" is a crock. This is a device that needs charging to even keep working. A LOT of charging.
Care to share some details? If for no other reason than for the rest of us who are getting screwed to be able to take this example to publicly shame our own ISP's who keep fucking us?
Please, please, please....
Simple: I live in Europe.
If your family is pulling in $130,000 and you can't afford an education then the problem's in the Universities.
Maybe those $100 million sports facilities and plasma TVs in every bedroom aren't really needed.