I think everyone missed my point. Huawei makes some very good phones. Phones that will take away market share from Apple. Apple must be trilled that Huawei can't sell in volume in the USA. Stepping back, if Huawei can't sell here, Apple wins, but Samsung is biggest winner.
Apple's stock goes up on their ability to be complacent. Tim Cook announces another great leap in innovation by Apple since Jobs' passing. The next iPhone is going have more RAM and a slightly different camera!!!!
And Apple's political contributions just went up. Again.
Once something digital is out of your control it is gone. Everything from electronic medical records to the new AC/DC cd. Gone. Trying to regulate it into a box is futile. Collecting, copying, storing, sending costs almost nothing. No barrier. Everything will eventually be leaked or hacked. The answer is to keep the electronic records/data from being created in the first place (offline storage= very very good). That means someone like me will never use or touch Facebook and will block every IP address connected to Facebook. Even if that means I can't watch a few videos.
Let's say I work for AT&T. Can I use this to publish ads for underage sex on a competitor/enemy's website. Fake ads, but I don't think anyone really cares. (On the darkweb you can buy weapon's grade plutonium. It's true because a reporter saw an ad) Since I control the network, I have godlike powers. I can be very very hard to track down.
Can I use this to cause my competitor/enemy to come under crushing legal scrutiny? Seized servers, fines, etc.
So a study of a bunch of studies (run by industry insiders) that showed antidepressants work showed that after analyzing these studies that antidepressants work.
So studies that individually come to a positive result also collectively come to a positive result? I think this is a phenomenon we need to study!
How about a novel approach. Have people who understand statistics, medicine and psychology (but have no links to drug companies or reason for bias) try to recreate the results of past studies or run large-scale, carefully controlled new studies. And don't use drug company money to fund the study.
Contrary to popular opinion, people did learn things in the days before web-enabled-group-assignments. Now we have teachers ready give you the answers to any hard questions so that your sense remains at permanently elevated levels.
Strange. To me, 53-47 for Android One is huge win for Xiaomi flavored OS. That's a small spread. Xiaomi is close. Try the poll with Microsoft's OS vs Android. Then you will see what losing looks like.
Why don't users have the option to store everything on their computer? No cloud update. I'm still using an old Polar Heart rate monitor because it comes with a Windows program (Polar ProTrainer) to store and display all my workouts. I love the fact that my data isn't in the cloud. That is a HUGE selling point for me.
Don't give AT&T what they want and... AT&T and the NSA might just end your career. No. I don't have any proof, but it does seem in the range of what is possible.
Hard to see how cell phone signals causes cancer. These frequencies are not ionizing. A bit like saying the warmth from holding someone's hand is going to cause cancer. Makes no sense. There needs to be a mechanism for the radiation to do damage (knock off electrons), but there is none.
Slashdot Mirror
Seems Gates is just now learning this one.
I think everyone missed my point. Huawei makes some very good phones. Phones that will take away market share from Apple. Apple must be trilled that Huawei can't sell in volume in the USA. Stepping back, if Huawei can't sell here, Apple wins, but Samsung is biggest winner.
"fines of up to 4 percent of global annual revenue for infractions"
Revenue = 12.97B
4% = 518 million
https://www.google.com/search?...
Apple's stock goes up on their ability to be complacent. Tim Cook announces another great leap in innovation by Apple since Jobs' passing. The next iPhone is going have more RAM and a slightly different camera!!!!
And Apple's political contributions just went up. Again.
Once something digital is out of your control it is gone. Everything from electronic medical records to the new AC/DC cd. Gone. Trying to regulate it into a box is futile. Collecting, copying, storing, sending costs almost nothing. No barrier. Everything will eventually be leaked or hacked.
The answer is to keep the electronic records/data from being created in the first place (offline storage= very very good). That means someone like me will never use or touch Facebook and will block every IP address connected to Facebook. Even if that means I can't watch a few videos.
We have a winner!
Tim Cook takes cheap shots at anyone in tech who is a Billionaire and isn't Apple.
The question isn't if he is right or wrong. The question is - what is his motivation?
How about "already are a greater surveillance risk than Facebook "?
This year Slashdot is off to a strong start!
Let's say I work for AT&T. Can I use this to publish ads for underage sex on a competitor/enemy's website. Fake ads, but I don't think anyone really cares. (On the darkweb you can buy weapon's grade plutonium. It's true because a reporter saw an ad) Since I control the network, I have godlike powers. I can be very very hard to track down.
Can I use this to cause my competitor/enemy to come under crushing legal scrutiny? Seized servers, fines, etc.
So a study of a bunch of studies (run by industry insiders) that showed antidepressants work showed that after analyzing these studies that antidepressants work.
So studies that individually come to a positive result also collectively come to a positive result? I think this is a phenomenon we need to study!
How about a novel approach. Have people who understand statistics, medicine and psychology (but have no links to drug companies or reason for bias) try to recreate the results of past studies or run large-scale, carefully controlled new studies. And don't use drug company money to fund the study.
Frank K. Dickman Jr. Elementary. Has a nice ring to it
20 years ago. Buy a book:
https://www.amazon.com/Structu...
Learn to program.
Today. Believe it or not it is still possible to: Buy a book and learn to program!
https://www.amazon.com/Structu...
Contrary to popular opinion, people did learn things in the days before web-enabled-group-assignments. Now we have teachers ready give you the answers to any hard questions so that your sense remains at permanently elevated levels.
Strange. To me, 53-47 for Android One is huge win for Xiaomi flavored OS. That's a small spread. Xiaomi is close.
Try the poll with Microsoft's OS vs Android. Then you will see what losing looks like.
Why don't users have the option to store everything on their computer? No cloud update.
I'm still using an old Polar Heart rate monitor because it comes with a Windows program (Polar ProTrainer) to store and display all my workouts. I love the fact that my data isn't in the cloud. That is a HUGE selling point for me.
Much better now.
"You Spend Nearly a Whole Day Each Week On the Internet"
(Subject line has a max of 50 characters)
These people (not 100%, maybe 90%) are in these jobs for a reason = mostly an inability or unwillingness to learn more valuable skills.
What to do with them is a problem. The US is an expensive place to live.
Don't give AT&T what they want and...
AT&T and the NSA might just end your career.
No. I don't have any proof, but it does seem in the range of what is possible.
I've been doing most this with my Nokia since when? 2002? As long as my phone holds up I'll b
He used the opportunity to shamelessly self promote. Free advertising for himself at Time's expense. Nice move.
Best CS101 course ever!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Love it? You have the heart and mind to succeed in programming.
Confused by it? Go learn WordPress or pick something more in line with your talents.
The greatest thing to happen to those in power. The perfect blank check to get the public to agree to slavery.
It tripped. It didn't slow down.
If a power source goes offline, wouldn't you see a slump in voltage? Why the decrease in frequency?
Hard to see how cell phone signals causes cancer. These frequencies are not ionizing. A bit like saying the warmth from holding someone's hand is going to cause cancer. Makes no sense. There needs to be a mechanism for the radiation to do damage (knock off electrons), but there is none.