Actually this is untrue.
I got a bug in IE on Win2000 which causes the IE crash when it displays a tooltip.
Once this bug appears, i have to log out from the user (exiting IE6 doesn't fix it) to make it disappear.
What does this mean: some rendering dll (which is responsible for the tooltip) remains in memory, and causes segfault in IE6.
You mean, when i copy my own work from one media to another? Because now i pay for this!
Copying any RIAA crap (stuff protected by the riaa) is illegal (according to them).
This patch is 'free', M$ made it available as a security upgrade.
I saw it a while ago, it was something like: 'after this patch access cannot have excel spreadsheets linked in'.
I was pondering if it is a security upgrade or a feature upgrade, but it turns out it was a license downgrade:)
Btw, the patent is quite ridiculous. Both access and excel is m$ crap, why would anyone get a PATENT for this obvious trick. I'm not talking about copyrighted source code, this is a method/concept stuff.
On the other hand M$ loses more than if they simply bought the idea in the first place.
I more or less agree, but an "nsca self-made cluster" is not the same as "ms is into clustering".
While their stuff isn't well suited for clusters, not even for networking, i'm sure they can achieve better if they put some money into it.
Re:CipherTrust? nothx.
on
Spam from Taiwan
·
· Score: 2, Informative
If a mailer manages to supply those crippled IP's then the mail is definitely fake, and most likely spam (or virus).
Don't confuse a legitimate subnet mask with a fake IP.
Re:I predict future malware will take the shape...
on
Predicting Malware
·
· Score: 1
He gets rashes from Firefox.
Why don't you start with Jesseca Meron?
It is high time to replace Bill the Borg with Ballmer the King Kong, no?
The russians just lost 18 satelites at launch.
Actually this is untrue. I got a bug in IE on Win2000 which causes the IE crash when it displays a tooltip. Once this bug appears, i have to log out from the user (exiting IE6 doesn't fix it) to make it disappear. What does this mean: some rendering dll (which is responsible for the tooltip) remains in memory, and causes segfault in IE6.
Nah, it will provide enough power for the Stargate so we can hop over to another galaxy to escape the Ori.
Microsoft forgot to disclose this important information.
How does Millennium Falcon sound then, you insensitive clod.
They also brought her back :)
Vikings ARE humans.
If you don't know what is it, or whom is it, it isn't for you.
Being called "Vista killer" this stuff might strike fear, uncertainty and doubt in Steve Ballmer :P
There was a difference. Terry's brain cells died. This man's brain cells didn't die, and developed new connections. Big big difference.
Haha, i thought the same, a pity, i couldn't mod you up as insightful :)
/me puzzled.
You mean, when i copy my own work from one media to another? Because now i pay for this! Copying any RIAA crap (stuff protected by the riaa) is illegal (according to them).
Maybe no more schools are needed for people working and dying in mines or assembly lines?
This patch is 'free', M$ made it available as a security upgrade. I saw it a while ago, it was something like: 'after this patch access cannot have excel spreadsheets linked in'. I was pondering if it is a security upgrade or a feature upgrade, but it turns out it was a license downgrade :)
Btw, the patent is quite ridiculous. Both access and excel is m$ crap, why would anyone get a PATENT for this obvious trick. I'm not talking about copyrighted source code, this is a method/concept stuff.
On the other hand M$ loses more than if they simply bought the idea in the first place.
Admitting employment of black hats is admitting a crime. Or, if they did a legal work, they are not black hats. Or, the article is messed up.
Why the fuss, there should be a similar chipset without all this bother.
Point 1 is already messed up.
I more or less agree, but an "nsca self-made cluster" is not the same as "ms is into clustering". While their stuff isn't well suited for clusters, not even for networking, i'm sure they can achieve better if they put some money into it.
If a mailer manages to supply those crippled IP's then the mail is definitely fake, and most likely spam (or virus). Don't confuse a legitimate subnet mask with a fake IP.
Stupidity is the major vector, though.
You sell a lot, do you? And of course you already sold your Vista capable computer...