Slashdot Mirror


User: kelzer

kelzer's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
273
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 273

  1. Dueling Oxymorons on Pro PHP Security · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow "Pro PHP" and "PHP Security" both in the same title! (Just kidding! I know PHP is really the web development platform of choice for professionals, and is incredibly secure!)

  2. Re:The Big Bang on NASA Public-Affairs Appointee Resigns in Disgrace · · Score: 1

    Has the Big Bang been established as scientific fact? Not saying it isn't, just would like some more info.

    The fact that this post got modded up as both Insightful and Interesting is proof that there is no such thing as a stupid question - but there is such a thing as stupid moderation.
  3. Re:Uh-oh! on Head First HTML with CSS & XHTML · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As to the book itself, I looked at the sample chapter and it's in the random, jumpy style that marks the modern MTV generation.

    That's what I thought, too, until I read the preface to Head First Design Patterns. Turns out that the pictures, humor, etc., have actually been proven to improve learning and retention.

  4. Re:No! God did it! on Humanity Responsible For Current Climate Change · · Score: 1

    A bigger source of CO2 will be naturally occuring forest fires which according to some estimates already make up for nearly 50% of the world's C02 production. Forest fires are a much overlooked source of pollution.

    Where'd you read that, Bush's justification for "thinning" forests, also known as "leave no timber company behind"?

  5. Re:The Dumbing-Down Of America, part XXVII on Darwin Evolving Into A Tricky Exhibit · · Score: 1

    How in the world could you be a Christian and not take the Bible literally? If you don't think that what is in the Bible is literal, you CAN'T be a Christian.

    Hold still, I think there's a plank in your eye.

  6. Re:Everyone else is clamping down on their IP righ on White House Cease & Desists to The Onion · · Score: 1

    Any person could lok (sic) at it and asume (sic) it was a press release form (sic) the white house because the seal was being used.

    From the freakin' Onion?

    With that post, you really lived up to your username.

  7. Re:one caveat on Searching for a Directory Service Solution? · · Score: 1

    Senior Mgmt wanted to move from eDirectory to AD due to some price breaks on desktop os and MSOffice for over 50000 employees

    Microsoft has been doing this for years with large corporate accounts. It still amazes me that when the DOJ was investigating them, they never touched upon this anti-competitive practice.

  8. It would be nice to get a view from the other side on Best Software Writing I · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not everyone is a fan of Joel's. This reviewer obviously is. It would be interesting to get a more objective viewpoint.

  9. Re:Fascinating! on Seagate Momentus 120GB 2.5" HD · · Score: 1

    You sleep with your hard drive, don't you?

  10. Re:Fascinating! on Seagate Momentus 120GB 2.5" HD · · Score: 1

    These hard drives do indeed have a new feature: increased capacity over previous drives.

    No, that's not a new feature. That's the same feature that every fscking new drive has had relative to its predecessors. Hence, it's not newsworthy.

  11. Re:Fascinating! on Seagate Momentus 120GB 2.5" HD · · Score: 1

    You realize this is news, correct?

    No, when somebody comes out with an article that says "we've finally hit the size limit for hard drives that use existing technology - they just can't get any bigger than this" - that will be news. New, bigger hard drives in not news - it's a given, just like the sun rising in the east.

    Even though we know there will be new releases of the Linux kernel in the future . . .

    I'm not the biggest fan of Slashdot kernel articles either, but at least they generally discuss new features. If Slashdot were a newspaper, articles about new bigger hard drives sure wouldn't belong on the front page. It would be more appropriate for them to be buried on page H-29 in the "Boring Hardware News" section.

  12. Fascinating! on Seagate Momentus 120GB 2.5" HD · · Score: 3, Funny

    These Slashdot hard drive articles never get old.

    I can hardly wait for the upcoming artlcles about Maxtor and Western Digital coming out with 2.5 inch 150GB drives.

    I'm on the edge of my seat!

  13. Re:Well duh on Flying Reptile The Size of A Small Airplane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, but the evolution of planes is... intelligent design :-)

    Unlike the evolution of automobiles.

  14. Re:Get over yourself ESR! on ESR Gets Job Offer From Microsoft · · Score: 1

    There's one more thing. Raymond was given $36 million in VA Software stock (LNUX) at their IPO as compensation for being on their board. See this article. Hence the comparison of MSFT and LNUX.

  15. Re:Yeay! Security plus portability minus cost... on Comparison of Java and .NET security · · Score: 1

    Smalltalk

    Doesn't seem to have an actual working version at the moment.

    I think they have an actual working version, just not a demo version. Sounds like the current demo version has expired.

    Pascal

    Modula-2

    Oberon-2

    These seem to be based on translating the source into Java.

    No, go back and look again. There are 2 versions of each - one that compiles to Java source, and a 2nd that compiles to bytecode.

    It works, I suppose, but not really a true compiler.

    Even ignoring my previous response, this statement is incorrect. From page 1 of "the dragon book" - "Simply stated, a compiler is a program that reads a program written in one language - the source language - and translates it into an equivalent program in another language - the target language."

    For example, the original C++ compiler, cfront, compiled C++ source to C source.

    Python

    That's an interpreter running in Java rather than a bytecode compiler like the .net equivalent.

    TCL

    Logo

    Prolog

    All interpreters, though the same is probably true of any .net implementations with these particular languages. But a language running through an interpreter is always going to be a worse choice for many situations, . . .

    And it's always going to be a better choice for many situations, too. ;) In particular, those cases where you want to be able to dynamically script something at runtime. Jython is often used for this.

    All in all, more than I'd thought, but it still seems a poorer selection than for .net

    Not sure how you came to that conclusion, given that I clearly stated "Here are just a few of the available languages for the JVM." There are many more lesser known languages for the JVM, most of which nobody's ever heard of.

  16. Re:Heh! on Comparison of Java and .NET security · · Score: 1

    . . . as Java continues to dominate the enterprise server space.

    Web Services Journal, which is platform agnostic, has a Readers Choice poll going on right now. It's interesting that .NET is currently getting pummelled by Java in the polls:

    Best App Server for Web Services

    Best Web Services Platform

  17. Oops on Comparison of Java and .NET security · · Score: 1

    That was supposed to be Scheme, not Schema. Sometimes my fingers have a mind of their own.

  18. Re:Yeay! Security plus portability minus cost... on Comparison of Java and .NET security · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can write in lots of nice languages for it, wheras Java afaik only has Java and Ruby.

    No offense, but I guess you don't know much. Here are just a few of the available languages for the JVM:

  19. Re:Visa problems for the authors on New, Faster Attack against SHA-1 Revealed · · Score: 1

    Oh, I must be tired: Shamir is, of course, the *S* in RSA. Crikey.

    Hmmmm, the old "double the karma by posting a followup correcting a mistake in the parent" trick. I gotta remember that one!

  20. Re:That's what a stock split is for. on Google Files to Sell 14.2 Million More Shares · · Score: 1

    Google is allowed to do a lot of things that most companies can't, because their prospectus actually says that their stock price isn't supposed to do well.

    That's pretty standard in a prospectus. No company is going to claim that their stock will do well, because that creates an implied warranty to do well.

  21. Re:You fuckin' dumbass on IE7 Bugs and Reviews · · Score: 1

    Thanks for yet another wonderful contribution to the Slashdot community, and mankind as a whole. Your posting history should be copied verbatim into Wikipedia because of its incredible value.

  22. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty on The Case for Free WiFi? · · Score: 1

    Who knew the Queen Mum was into wireless?

    She doesn't have much choice. They generally don't run ethernet cable to coffins.

  23. Re:Morons on IE7 Bugs and Reviews · · Score: 1

    Gee, I didn't realize Google was the Firefox help system. Maybe they should get rid of the Firefox Help dialog and just go to Google when you pick Help from the menu. :)

  24. Re:Morons on IE7 Bugs and Reviews · · Score: 1

    Guess you'll have to resort to using the incredibly difficult esc key.

    Thanks for the information. You can shove the sarcasm, though.

    Using the escape key isn't difficult, but neither is it intuitive. And here's what Firefox help says when you search for:

    animated: [No matching items found.]

    animation: [No matching items found.]

    GIF: [No matching items found.]

  25. Re:Morons on IE7 Bugs and Reviews · · Score: 1

    That function (stopping animGIFs) should not be linked to the 'halt page loading' button, it should be a preference.

    It's not linked to the 'halt page loading' button, it's linked to the 'Stop' button. Seems natural to me to use the Stop button to stop things, whether it's page loading or GIF animations.

    Your solution doesn't meet my requirements. Not all animated GIFs are evil. Some are useful.

    Therefore, there's no one setting that's perfect. Invariably, if you turn off GIF animation all-together, you'll find some site that uses an animated GIF to demo something that you want to see. Or, if you set it to only run the animation once, invariably the final "frame" of the animation will be a blank image. I haven't found those preference settings to be desirable. And it's too inconvenient to have to go into preferences and change a setting just to view a particular page the way you want to, and then have to remember to set it back when you're done.

    I like the ability to click STOP to STOP the animations. I'd also like a context menu item for animated images that says "Stop animation".