Slashdot Mirror


The Case for Free WiFi?

lgreco writes "Recently I was trying to convince a business man who is about to open an Internet Cafe, to provide WiFi at no charge. I argued about increased business and royalty and proposed that the infrastructure cost these days is reasonable and the recurring cost, along with the amortized payoff of the initial investment, can be recovered by adding a few cents to each beverage, etc. In spite of the numerous discussions on the merits of free WiFi v. paid at coffee shops, restaurants, etc, I was interested in hearing what do you think about the issue and if there are solid examples of successful businesses that offered free WiFi." If you were going to argue for or against this issue, what arguments would you use? "A lot of proprietors seem to be concerned about the maintenance issue. Not so much about the hardware maintenance than software: auditing etc. Some are also concerned about legal ramifications if their customers are caught downloading music or movies illegally.

I am not aware of any Internet cafe or similar business that got hit by our beloved RIAA but what if their lawyers subpoena a small proprietor for download records? If you are running a shoestring infrastructure with a cable modem with an Airport base station what kind of logs could you possibly proviide? If a kid walks in for a lemonade and starts downloading porn what do you tell the parents when they sent their lawyer to pay you a visit?

It would seem that if you let a provider offer the WiFi service at your place of business for a fee, they can deal with liabilities, maintenance etc, so this is one less thing to worry about when setting up the business. Yet expecting your customers to pay $6-$10/hr for WiFi is so ridiculous and such a turn off for them."

576 comments

  1. Panera... by garcia · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was interested in hearing what do you think about the issue and if there are solid examples of successful businesses that offered free WiFi.

    Panera has the largest (or one of) free wifi network out there.

    1. Re:Panera... by Kolisar · · Score: 3, Informative

      For what it is worth, a friend of mine does a lot of his business related work in Paneras in the area because of the free WiFi. He also spends a reasonable amount of money there as he is more likely to eat there since he is already there checking email, etc... And, so as to not feel guilty, if he is not there around meal time he will at least purchase a beverage. The free WiFi brings him there as opposed to going to StarBucks or other locations that charge for WiFi access.

    2. Re:Panera... by ooby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think that by slightly increasing the cost of each other product to offset the cost of providing a free service that not everyone uses is very cost effective. When you go into a cafe with free WiFi, you never see a notebook in front of every patron. One can suspect that the bandwidth demand is small, so the proprietor of such an establishment would not need to spend extra money on a wider pipeline. You provide a feature few will use and everybody says, "They've got WiFi." They go there and think, "This place has WiFi, if I ever had a laptop and a need to check my email while drinking my coffee, maybe I'd bring it here."

    3. Re:Panera... by op12 · · Score: 1

      as to not feel guilty, if he is not there around meal time he will at least purchase a beverage

      Moral of the story: Make wi-fi free and charge $10 for a beverage.

    4. Re:Panera... by krgallagher · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Panera has the largest (or one of) free wifi network out there."

      Without wanting to sound like a drunk, I prefer my free wifi in bars. Goose Island in Chicago and Two Rows in the DFW Metropex are two great examples.

      --

      Insert Generic Sig Here:

    5. Re:Panera... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have read somewhere that coffee shops were realizing higher revenue by NOT have internet.

      The model says if you turn over your seats quicker, you make more money.

      Internet nets you customers that are there longer, doing work, checking email... and nursing ONE coffee.

      Just what I read... no links to back it up

    6. Re:Panera... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, and we can call it StarBucks (okay, and we'll charge for the WiFi too!)

    7. Re:Panera... by bharat1478 · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere that in Seattle one cafe offered free WiFi and the sale went down. The reason was people will come get a coffee (any maybe free refill) and will stay there for hours thus discouraging "normal" customers to come to the crowded cafe.

    8. Re:Panera... by brakk · · Score: 1

      Maybe near the coasts. But if you move farther inland, coffee shops don't do as well. Free WIFI helps generate more business. You have to fill up the seats before you can turn them over.

    9. Re:Panera... by Romeozulu · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is a coffee shop here in Portland that has free wifi and it's filled with people with laptops. That is all that is there, and there is never a free table. I stopped going there for my afternoon coffee.

      I think there is a downside to it being free. I'd like to see a simple system where I get 30 minutes free with a drink. Not sure how that would work, but it would keep the free loaders out.

    10. Re:Panera... by jekewa · · Score: 1
      Moral of the story: Make wi-fi free and charge $10 for a beverage.

      That's why the drinks are so 'spensive...

      I agree with you about adding a bit, but don't go overboard. I don't mind a nominal increase (read pennies) to all of the items to pay for the nice things (read appropriate lights, comfy chairs, clean tables, and even WiFi) whether I use them or not. If I'm grabbing take-out, I know that some of the price includes rent on the real estate necessary to have a table and chair available for me if I desired, even though I know I'm not using it ('cause I'm grabbing take-out, remember?).

      Same for WiFi; don't bust my bank just because I shop there and you want to offer a service to some people. Knowing that even a nickel has been added to every item in your purchases just so the vendor can pay for their Internet connection, WiFi gear, and maintenance could be counter-productive.

      That could just as quickly drive me from places that avertise "Free" WiFi.

      --
      End the FUD
    11. Re:Panera... by IAmTheDave · · Score: 1

      Not to mention it's stealing.

      (It's sarcasm, in case anyone is confused.)

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    12. Re:Panera... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


      The great thing about Goose Island is that a really good antenna can get you a connection in Sam's Wine & Spirits right behind them. When I come across an new small batch Rye or single barrel Bourbon, I can do some quick googling and find out that whether it is just another re-branded big distillery batch, like Rowan's Creek (yeah, sure, a "new" micro-distillery suddenly has 12-year-old on the shelves...), or something actually worth paying for.

    13. Re:Panera... by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Heck, here in Austin, even the local Italian restaurant has free Wi Fi.

      Restaurants that don't have it free just don't get any Wi Fi business, period.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    14. Re:Panera... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 2, Funny

      People are probably more likely to drop $50 on beer over the course of sitting there than they are to drop $50 on coffee, too.

      Though my coding gets pretty sloppy after a few pints of Bass or glasses of wine.

    15. Re:Panera... by coldincalifornia · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Easy enough to fix, just don't provide any power outlets. Most laptop batteries will be dead in 2 hours, and they'll have to go home.

    16. Re:Panera... by seelevarcuzzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ive seem some places use 'coffee cards' where they give you a code you enter in to their browser-authentication which gives you x amount of time.

    17. Re:Panera... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see a simple system where I get 30 minutes free with a drink. Not sure how that would work, but it would keep the free loaders out.
      Easy. Peel off stickers on all of the beverage cups. Underneath those, a logon that will only last for x hours. Force logon to connect, voila!

    18. Re:Panera... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Portland or other major metropolises (metropolii?) in the US I can see where free WiFi might be a bad idea, but in other cities and towns it might be a GREAT idea! For instance, my wife did lots of studying for the Bar with her laptop, books, and A LOT OF COFFEE at Panera because it was 1) Free wireless access so she could take 10 minute "surf" breaks now and then 2) was not the house and therefore noisier than the house or library just like the real Bar exam and 3) access to snacks.

      And yes, her expenditures definitely made up for the limited amount of Internet time she logged while at Panera. On the other hand, I know of another coffee shop proprietor here in town who charges like $5 for 2 hours of internet on his WiFi network - that's crazy! But he's also in a richer part of town so maybe he does actually make some money that way, but I doubt it's enough to pay for the cable connection on a monthly basis.

    19. Re:Panera... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      The free WiFi brings him there as opposed to going to StarBucks or other locations that charge for WiFi access.

      I believe that's a valid rason to offer WiFi for many businesses. Adding a few cents at most per drink, sandwich, or anything else the customer consumes on premise. Most people won't notice the difference in price and yet having free Wifi can bring in more customers. The costs of providing WiFi shouldn't be that much depending on the location.

      Falcon
    20. Re:Panera... by tonsofpcs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Panera prices were high enough [at least around here] in the first place to warrant the free service. If you would stop going there for 5 cents more on an item, you wouldn't have been going there in the first place.

    21. Re:Panera... by prgrmr · · Score: 4, Funny

      Plus the added entertainment value of wathing the cheapskates in the business suits digging through the trash for coffee cups with unused WiFi logins!

    22. Re:Panera... by johnjosephbachir · · Score: 1

      coooool. where did you see this? do you happen to know the company that sets up the infrastructure?

    23. Re:Panera... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a coffee shop here in Portland that has free wifi and it's filled with people with laptops. That is all that is there, and there is never a free table. I stopped going there for my afternoon coffee.

      I guess I don't understand the problem.
      For years, there has been a popular restaurant
      in Atlanta which serves thousands every day.
      Once your plates are empty, or someone notices
      you've been there a while, you are politely but firmly asked to 'hold your business meeting elsewhere' - people are waiting.

      As far as I can tell, they've never lost any
      appreciable amount of business by doing that.
      Why not: 'I see your coffee is cold; here's a
      fresh cup TO GO.'

    24. Re:Panera... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been thinking about opening a place where people can do just that. Sit down, order a coffee, and get free (well, subsidized, but marketed as free as far as the "consumer" is concerned) Wireless Internet Access.

      To prevent freeloaders etc, I think the best way is to integrate the Point of Sale system with the Wireless system.

      Essentially it would work like this: Someone comes in and orders a coffee, which say, costs $1.50. They'd get their coffee and a receipt with an access code. When they open up their web browser on their laptop, it'll go through a gateway that requires them to enter their access code, which will enable internet access for a period of time to be calculated based on the total of their order.

      For instance, $1.50 * 5 = $7.50. Just turn that into Minutes, as-is (yeah, funky math). 7:50 minutes of Internet access, maybe plus 5 courtesy minutes since they may want to find a seat, set up their laptop, or what have you.

      If such a place would offer meals (think Applebee's) a steak for $17 would buy you ($17 * 5 = $85.00) 85 minutes of Internet access. You can eat your steak, and after the meal unwind and probably still browse the web for another what, 45 minutes.

      Viable? Possibly. The odd part is that you'd need to pay for your items up front in order to receive the access code. That's not a problem if you order a coffee at the counter and then sit down, but it's sort of awkward in a nice sit-down restaurant.

      On the other hand, gas stations want you to prepay these days as well. So who knows.

      -MDW

    25. Re:Panera... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I prefer my free wifi in bars. Goose Island in Chicago and Two Rows in the DFW Metropex are two great examples

      And JT Whitney's in Madison, WI.

    26. Re:Panera... by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      You read that right here on slashdot, and the story was that profits went up by turning wifi off on weekend nights, when the place was busy enough with people who'd rather actually talk to each other than read slashdot from a coffee house.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    27. Re:Panera... by heli0 · · Score: 1

      "I'd like to see a simple system where I get 30 minutes free with a drink. Not sure how that would work, but it would keep the free loaders out."

      It could work the same way that gas stations sell car washes. When you make a purchase over $X it would print a code on the receipt that can be used within Y hours/days.

      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    28. Re:Panera... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Without wanting to sound like a drunk, I prefer my free wifi in bars.

      I think the Slashdot editors agree with you on that score.

    29. Re:Panera... by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      The reason was people will come get a coffee (any maybe free refill) and will stay there for hours thus discouraging "normal" customers to come to the crowded cafe.

      There's a counter-point to this; offer them free wi-fi, but not free electricity.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    30. Re:Panera... by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

      That is McDonald's model - if you buy a value meal at a WiFi restaurant, you can get a scratch-off card with a code that gives you some amount of time for free.

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
    31. Re:Panera... by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Moral of the story: Make wi-fi free and charge $10 for a beverage.

      Charging $10 for drinks wouldn't be needed. To make it easy for a qick calculation, say the cafe is open 10 hours and sells 50 items an hour. That comes out to 500 items a day, adding 5 cents per item will mean $25 per day or using 30 days per month $750 per month in extra income. On to costs of providing the service. Say a server setup with WiFi is $2000, though an actual system should cost much less. Next is the internet access, again for ease say it's $100 per month. Next you need someone to maintain the system. If you're lucky there may be a 2600 meeting, User Groupmeeting, or other meetings can be found in the area where a person who's capable can be found that will be willing to maintain the system for say $500 per month. Including the system cost the first 14 month's cost would be $10,200 and revenue $10,500. By the fourteenth month the system is paid for and there after is extra profit. Now if sales increases the system will be paid off earlier. Of course this may not include all of the costs being as it was quick but the point is that it doesn't take $10 drinks to pay for WiFi service.

      Falcon
    32. Re:Panera... by afroloop · · Score: 1

      I agree. If you offer free access it is good but you will also get all these moochers who buy a cup of coffee for a buck then stay there for six hours leeching your WiFi. On the other hand there will be people who may buy more drinks and if they stay long enough some food too so you will get some good paying customers and some flat out moochers too. There is a trade off.

    33. Re:Panera... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Panera prices were high enough [at least around here] in the first place to warrant the free service. If you would stop going there for 5 cents more on an item, you wouldn't have been going there in the first place.

      Though I don't know the prices at Panera as I've never been to one even there are some in the area, I used to spend a bit of both money and tyme in cafes in both Barnes and Noble and in Borders, so I know they can eat your money. Eventually to cut what I spend there I started making my own espresso at home and would fill up a thermos to take with me. I could of just stopped going but I read a lot there.

      Falcon
    34. Re:Panera... by magarity · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why do you need a company to set it up?
      D-Link has out of the box wireless access by fee/free/timer/whatever complete with a little printer that gives out a code to put in the gateway web page. A shop owner can give out a ticket for x minutes with a drink purchase or a few extra bucks or whatever scheme you think up. Just hook it up to a business DSL or cable and away you go.

    35. Re:Panera... by Slipped_Disk · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Apple. Eye. Book.

      6. Hour. Battery. Life. . . . . BITCH!

      (Okay it's more like 5, but still, long enough to make a nuisance of myself).

      --
      /~mikeg
    36. Re:Panera... by magarity · · Score: 1

      Parent poster is on to something; the coffee shops with the students taking up tables all night also have electric sockets that they help themselves to. In some coffee shops the tables with the sockets next to them are highly prized and are occupied forever. Putting a locking cover on them would help move people along.

    37. Re:Panera... by CritterNYC · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think there is a downside to it being free. I'd like to see a simple system where I get 30 minutes free with a drink. Not sure how that would work, but it would keep the free loaders out.

      I agree with the downside, especially in some locations. My local coffee/tea shop gives you 30 minutes of time with each drink you order. It's only $2 an hour after that. And they even have about a half dozen repurposed laptops with Ubuntu loaded on them available.

      There are a few people that work from there for an hour or two (or more) during the day. They just had a going-away party for a regular who was leaving the country.

      freezepeach.org

    38. Re:Panera... by Skater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last Saturday, I went to lunch at Panera specifically because I knew they had free wifi access, and I needed to look some things up on the web (and couldn't wait until I got home; it's a long story). That's a meal that Panera probably wouldn't have sold otherwise. Surely I'm not the only one.

    39. Re:Panera... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Meh, I like the place but they're so damn intrusive about providing a "free" service. It's not like you can just fire up the laptop and go while sipping your coffee, no, you have to agree to all these disclosures and disclaimers and TOS agreements, anf god forbid you're running a bunch of security apps...I never bring my laptop to panera.

      I prefer a place where I can go and sit anonymously without a gateway app glomming onto my MAC address like somethign from Alien. I'll drink tea and munch muffins for a couple of hours if I like the place though, so I'm sure they make their money back.

      If you can't bring in 50 bucks a month in business by adding WiFi you put your coffee shop in the wrong place.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    40. Re:Panera... by JeremyALogan · · Score: 1

      are you talking about backspace? they seem to do wonderfully well and they only charge if you want to use their computers.

    41. Re:Panera... by whovian · · Score: 1

      Easy enough to fix, just don't provide any power outlets. Most laptop batteries will be dead in 2 hours, and they'll have to go home.

      Whether by design or coincidence, our campustown Panera does just this.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    42. Re:Panera... by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      Apparently, Panera doesn't shut down their hotspots after they close. I don't know this first hand, but a friend IM'd me while he was connected to the internet in a Panera parkinglot at 11:30 PM. Of course, the fact that he was doing that is probably more strange then them not shutting down the hotspot.

    43. Re:Panera... by Lershac · · Score: 1

      Ya know your numbers are WILDLY off... say $100 a month for business DSL... and $100 for a wireless access point or router. Thats it. If your an electronics nincompoop.. another $200 to get a rent-a-geek to set it all up.

      And the revenue model ya have there is a little optimistic. 50 items average an hour is a biiiit high methinks for your average coffee shop.

      --
      Chuck
    44. Re:Panera... by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? I'm an okay programmer while sober, but I'm a master programmer while tanked!

      I write code so good, I don't even understand it, and it's so ahead of its time, it doesn't even compile!

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    45. Re:Panera... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      which is why you start the time from the momenbt they make there order.

      So you get an hour from the time of purchase, and an hour to use whenever.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    46. Re:Panera... by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Asking a question like this on /. is like asking defense contractors if they think the Iraq war was a good thing.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    47. Re:Panera... by Bob_Geldof · · Score: 0

      One of my favourite pubs in Austin, TX called the Draught House does precisely this. I've never seen that many people using laptops, but then again I only ever go at night when it's beer drinking time and not surf the webtime. It's all about priorities. I think they also use a portal of some kind to keep tabs on how long you've been online. I don't live in Austin anymore so I only go a couple times a year now. boo hoo.

      --
      887321 = 337*2633
    48. Re:Panera... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I've been to places that do exactly this. Either you pay up front for access, or it's free with a purchase.

      A less-severe alternative, which would just keep people from leeching bandwidth outside the coffee shop itself, would be to enable WEP and change the username and password frequently. (Yes, I know WEP can be cracked, but if you change the pass frequently and use a long key, it ought to be OK.) Then post the username and pass up on a chalkboard someplace in the shop. Customers get their wireless, and you still get to seem like the good guy -- which might be important if the shop is playing for a certain bohemian ambiance.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    49. Re:Panera... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      That's very cool.

      Certainly a bit more of an initial investment than your basic $100 home AP/router/firewall, but if you're at all concerned that you might destroy your business' ambiance with freeloaders, this is definitely the solution.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    50. Re:Panera... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      D-Link has out of the box wireless access by fee/free/timer/whatever complete with a little printer...

      Yeah- for just 900 bucks!! The printer alone is 400!! Yikes.

    51. Re:Panera... by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      If I stuck two high end batteries in my Powerbook G3, even with the PCMCIA Wifi card I could probably go 10-12 hours between charges.

    52. Re:Panera... by two_stripe · · Score: 1

      I think free wi-fi in bars is a great idea. E:55 in Melbourne is a great little bar that offers free wi-fi. Everyone i see using the wifi has a beer or two on their table, so it cant be hurting business. Its great to be able to leave work for the day and send those last few emails while having a beer instead of sitting in a depressing empty office, its handy for settling those drunken arguments that always happen later in the night. They also have a few kiosk style PC's set up which you can pay to use, and its its cheaper if you buy a beer.

    53. Re:Panera... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Avoid Dlink. Their products are flaky and unreliable, and their tech support is marginal at best.

    54. Re:Panera... by darkonc · · Score: 1
      Not that much of an investment.. You could put up the infrastructure with an old P2, and a new ($40) hard disk (the one likely failure point). You can do all sorts of things with Linux or BSD firewalls to control who does what for how long. If you can connect to the POS system, you could just print a serial number on each ticket.

      When someone wants some extra time, they just need to type in the serial number and bill amount for another 1/2 hour. (or $2/hour for pure time).

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    55. Re:Panera... by Mark-Allen · · Score: 1

      There is a small auberge, "L'Acacia" in Marly, Switzerland (outside Fribourg) that has wireless access for the rooms. I asked the owner, Sammy, if he could install a WAP in the restaurant area so I could do some work and check email while having my Sat/Sun cafe and beers. Two weeks later, it was installed and I am here every weekend; even sending this via his wifi network.

      Super fast, protected, and maintained, I find weekends more enjoyable by being around all my friends from the village.

      And it's free. I "pay" for the service by drinking a couple of extra cafes each morning, and beers in the afternoon. Ball-park calculation: CHF 20.00 extra per weekend = 80-100 per month. More than enough to pay for 2 months of access.

      So, he gets more money, I get access and beer, plus I get a chance to see all my friends over a drink instead of staying all weekend at home.

      A win-win situation for sure. But maybe this isn't like the States.

      Mark-Allen

      --
      If you can stay calm, while all around you is chaos... then you probably haven't completely understood the question.
    56. Re:Panera... by magarity · · Score: 1

      Yeah- for just 900 bucks!!
       
      Spoken like a true home user.

    57. Re:Panera... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Other than the fact that your numbers are all made up, and that after fourteen months most small cafes would be bankrupted by the initial costs, and that putting up the prices would probably lower sales, and that everytime there was a technical problem which knocked off the wireless half your customers would go somewhere else, you're spot on.

    58. Re:Panera... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Who'd take a laptop to a bar? It'd just get robbed when you went for a piss. And who goes to a bar just to sit on the computer rather than talking to other people? You may as well stay at home and save money.

  2. If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... then what is the difference between if the customers have free access to wired terminals, or if there is free WiFi?

    1. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by ICLKennyG · · Score: 3, Informative

      The cost.... a WAP - a good one at that costs less than $300 US... a single terminal is at least that much. And then there's the fact that there is only one... and you have to maintain them. Laptops abound, let them just bring them in and use them.
      Additionally I would say if you could do an automatically generated access code for paying customers then it definatly would outwiegh paid WiFi in the long run. Just look at it as this...
      $5/hr - maybe 300 people use it all month... $50/Day
      1000 beverages a day 10cents each.. $100 day...

    2. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by obdulio · · Score: 1

      To use my notebook.....

      --
      PENAROL: Seras eterno como el tiempo y floreceras en cada primavera.
    3. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Much higher cost for the business to have terminals (coffee getting spilled into them seems like an obvious problem), less conveience for the customers (how do you arrange the machines in such a way to have a healthy social atmosphere?)

      businesspeople will also not be able to log into their corporate VPNs without their laptops or do most business related tasks.

      i'll take free wifi any day over terminals

      --
      Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
      Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
    4. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by RedSteve · · Score: 1

      Very simply, it's more expensive to provide free terminals than it is free access points. Wired terminals mean that computers are already in place -- which have presumably been bought and installed by the owner of the establishment. With WiFi, however, the owner only provides an access point, and the customers supply the computer.

    5. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by EggyToast · · Score: 4, Informative
      Free access to wired terminals means you need to support the hardware, maintain the hardware, and administer the hardware. If it's a cafe, that means you get to replace keyboards every week, as people spill on them.

      Free wireless means you maintain just the router, which is generally a "turn on" situation. Everyone brings their own hardware.

      I'd say that's a pretty huge difference.

    6. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by michrech · · Score: 1

      I've posted about this once but cannot see all of my posts in my personal page, so...

      What you want *can* be done, and rather cheaply, I think.

      Check out D-Links "Airspot" line. It includes a code-printer. All you do is push a button and a code is spit out. In the router (a seperate item) you configure the paramaters for the code and all is set!

      --
      telnet://sinep.gotdns.com -- TW2002 and LORD registered!

      --
      bork bork bork!
    7. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by ICLKennyG · · Score: 1

      I guess I was using 'could' in a more - does it make sense for your business model/employee intelegence level. It sounds ridiculous, but you wouldn't expect McDonalds employees to hit an extra button on every order.... they just wouldn't do it.... but to have it auto with each order... even if the technology does exist, it would still have to fit with your existing business model/location. But thanks for the info.

    8. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by michrech · · Score: 1

      I hate it when people make excuses for the lazy.

      It's one button.

      One.

      You hand the customer a receipt for their purchase. If they ask for internet access, you hit one button and out pops a code; a code pre-configured by the management/IT guy/Hired IT Help, and hand THAT to the customer.

      I don't know how much more simple you'd like to make it without integrating it into whatever P.O.S. software is being used which will undoubtedly make the software cost FAR more than it already does (speaking of SubShop from my own experience. $3000 for a 'register' that is nothing more than a Pentium 233mmx or a K62?! )

      Anyway, any employees not doing their job get talked to and/or fired. Simple as that.

      There should no excuses for an employee not doing their job.

      --
      telnet://sinep.gotdns.com -- TW2002 and LORD registered!

      --
      bork bork bork!
    9. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by MsGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      F/OSS solution for metered hotspots:

      http://www.publicip.net/

      Very cool.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    10. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by ICLKennyG · · Score: 1

      but if you don't integrate it, then they people will likely start getting pissy about the fact that they really don't 'have' to buy anything, they just 'want' them to buy something....

    11. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by uncqual · · Score: 1
      Yep - it's got to be integrated with the POS so there's no special training/effort required by the minimum wage counter droid.

      It would seem to make sense to make WiFi something you buy for a very nominal fee with any purchase over some amount. For example, with every purchase of $3 or more, you can buy one hour (and maybe up to ### MB) of WiFi for 25 cents. The counter droid just keys it in like it were a Big Mac. The access code would be printed on the receipt and expires in two hours. If you print a code on every receipt, freeloaders would pick up receipts that are lying around and use the access codes and by charging a nominal fee, it discourages patrons who are not going to use WiFi from asking for it anyway and handing the receipt to someone else.

      Of course, once you begin to charge anything for it, service expectations go up (Customer: "Hey, this access code doesn't work, your system is broken."; Employee: "Well, no, that access code is all used up from MAC address ### which is NOT your notebook." OR Customer: "Hey, I couldn't of downloaded more than the 100MB limit yet - in fact, look right here at 'netstat -e' which shows I haven't."; Employee: "Sir, as 'systeminfo' shows, you rebooted your computer 45 minutes after your first access to the system so 'netstat' doesn't show activity before the reboot.") so technical support may become a cost that exceeds the revenue from the nominal charge...

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    12. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by michrech · · Score: 1

      You are making this out to be SO MUCH more complicated than it is, or needs to be.

      You buy something -- counter droid hits a button, out pops a second receipt.

      If they cannot handle that, what other parts of their job can they not handle? Simple as that.

      Mike

      --
      bork bork bork!
    13. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by michrech · · Score: 1

      This is when you tell the customer "Sorry, I cannot give out free tickets. I will get fired if I do." People need to quit being so spineless.

      All you, as owner of the establishment, needs to do is post a sign stating the policy.

      --
      telnet://sinep.gotdns.com -- TW2002 and LORD registered!

      --
      bork bork bork!
    14. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by uncqual · · Score: 1
      If you're going to charge a nominal fee for it, it has to be part of the POS system. Else, inevitably, the number of "WIFI receipts" printed won't match the number paid for - even IF the counterdroids are smart (and especially if they are smart, enterprising, and less than honest).

      Anyway, the last thing that is needed is another printer to maintain (paper jams, paper supplies, perhaps ink supplies, perhaps ribbon supplies) and find space for in the area. Integrating them for a mom-and-pop may not be worth it, but for chains, it is probably a requirement.

      Clearly totally "free" is easier, but it has the problem of non (or low) paying customers hogging space.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    15. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by BitchKapoor · · Score: 1
      If you're going to charge a nominal fee for it, it has to be part of the POS system. Else, inevitably, the number of "WIFI receipts" printed won't match the number paid for - even IF the counterdroids are smart (and especially if they are smart, enterprising, and less than honest).

      The beverages aren't part of the POS system, you have to physically prepare them. How is this any different, except that the WiFi receipt system may actually have its own accounting feature, which can be checked periodically?

    16. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by BitchKapoor · · Score: 1

      Then let them buy the ticket on its own for a higher price. The WiFi ticket is just another product, and free with purchase just another promotion, problem solved!

    17. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by lightningrod220 · · Score: 1

      I agree with the replacing keyboards every week when it's a cafe...

      I went to the University of Tennessee a couple summers ago. In their library, they had a Starbucks, and a limited number of computers over to the side. A couple of those computers had some really sticky, barely useable keyboards. I dunno if they've done anything about that, as that was the only time I visited the place. Nice school, and great facilities, but I didn't like using the computers in the library cafe.

    18. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by uncqual · · Score: 1
      The beverages aren't part of the POS system, you have to physically prepare them. How is this any different, except that the WiFi receipt system may actually have its own accounting feature, which can be checked periodically?

      I don't know what coffee shops do with accounting for beverages. But to the extent they don't at chain stores, it's just because they haven't figured out a cost effective way to do so. I'm sure they keep fairly close track of other inventory (such as coffee makers).

      I don't know how widespread it was, but many years ago at least one fast food franchise I went to knew they couldn't count beverages very well -- but they sure as heck could count cups - and that is just what they did. The number of beverages sold was compared to the number of cups used. I assume there was a bit more acceptance on this being slighly out of balance than the till being out of balance, but I don't know this for a fact. This was actually somewhat annoying because if you returned a soda because it was "flat" they had to account for the cup you returned to them which took an extra second or two.

      Certainly there are some very large bars that have gone to the expense of accounting very carefully for beverages.

      Anyway, the integration (or lack there of) is an individual business decision rather unrelated to introducing a "token" charge for WiFi to prevent abuse. If one has a lot of free counter space, low employee turnover, and few POS stations, they would be more likely to accept a non-integrated system.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    19. Re:If it is going to be an "Internet Cafe"... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      The big difference to a business owner, IMO, would be that having free terminals versus Wifi attracts two entirely separate demographic groups of customers.

      For a Wifi AP to be of any use, you need to own a laptop and have it with you. This means students, travelers, businesspeople, etc. A kiosk is available to anyone, which means you might attract the sort of people who can't afford a $3 cup of coffee, much less a wireless-enabled laptop.

      Go into any public library in a big city and ask the librarians about the people they get using their free internet computers regularly. Where I used to live, they had a significant problem with homeless men coming in and spending hours looking up porn.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  3. Would you have to card users? by donleyp · · Score: 1

    A couple of points RE: potential liabilities.

    Maybe you should card customers before allowing them to use the WiFi. This would at least make it so that you didn't have to worry about the very touchy subject of minors accessing adult material.

    One solution might be to secure the network with WEP and hand out the key to people who identified themselves and signed an EULA.

    Parental controls could be used, but that might be inadvisable because once you start filtering, you may take on legal responsibilities.

    All-in-all, I don't see a compelling argument for it that would outweigh the potential legal ramifications in our litigious society.

    --
    You got any karma man? I really neeed it. Just a little hit! Come on!
    1. Re:Would you have to card users? by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      I've seen many internet cafes (LAN shops, whatever you want to call them) and I've never seen one card or run parental controls. I think the better idea would be just to require that people get a uname/pwd at the front counter before they use it so you can avoid having the neighbors filch your ph4t p1p3.

    2. Re:Would you have to card users? by tighr · · Score: 1
      One of my most frequented bars is adjacent to an ISP in town. They offer free wi-fi to all their customers, which most likely only gets used during the school year or during the dead periods after lunch but before night. I have seen some guys in there playing counterstrike and drinking a few beers, having a good time.

      Free wi-fi probably hasn't increased traffic to the bar, but I'm sure it has played a role in getting some customers to come and stay for a while.

    3. Re:Would you have to card users? by Nosferatu+Alucard · · Score: 1, Interesting
      A local Internet Cafe in my area used to have wifi available, and they worked on the honors system, that if you bought something, you could use it, but they didn't enforce usernames and passwords. The wifi was too abused though, so they just removed it.

      The center has 30PCs all designed for gaming, and you need a username and password to get on them. I have no clue if they plan to bring back the wifi access.

  4. The case against by HyperChicken · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I do remember a coffee shop discontinuing free WiFi on the weekends due to people coming in, using the WiFi, hijacking tables, and not buying anything. http://wifinetnews.com/archives/005325.html http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/26/234225 6

    I'd suggest "free WiFi with purchase". Buy something and a WiFi access code is printed on your receipt good for an hour or two. The customers get what they want and the freeloaders can go else where.

    Granted, it is a slight hassle for the paying customer, and I'm sure dedicated freeloaders will dig through trash to find half-used access codes (or eventually figure out how you're generating codes), but it's still better than smelly nerds hogging tables for head-to-head D&D play over the access point.

    --
    Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    1. Re:The case against by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a local cafe that is implementing that very system due to a problem with freeloaders. Seems reasonable - 10 dollars of purchases gets you 4 hours of time.

      They had an "honor system" before, but it was abused.

    2. Re:The case against by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would I go there when there are numerous other coffee shops that require nothing of the sort?

      Less than a mile from my home is a Dunn Brothers Coffee shop and another mile from that is a Panera. Neither require a purchase to use their network but it's fairly rare to see anyone not at least having a coffee while they're there.

      Open it up for all those that enter or suffer the consequences of those that can and do offer it free.

    3. Re:The case against by daeley · · Score: 1

      I'm not arguing for or against, but equally probable is that the freeloaders will move from the restrictive cafe over to the non-restrictive ones, thus cascading the problem.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    4. Re:The case against by rczik · · Score: 1

      Having helped to create one of the first Internet cafes (Cybersmith) way back in 1995, getting access with a purchase seems to me to be a sane and resonable approach.

      r

    5. Re:The case against by RoadWarriorX · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. This sounds awfully familiar. I just can't put my finger on it....

      --

    6. Re:The case against by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      "Granted, it is a slight hassle for the paying customer, and I'm sure dedicated freeloaders will dig through trash to find half-used access codes (or eventually figure out how you're generating codes), but it's still better than smelly nerds hogging tables for head-to-head D&D play over the access point."

      Given the relatively small number of people who would be using this service at a given time, I wouldn't think it'd be too big a deal to authenticate against a database back end to prevent misuse. The register could just generate the code (or have a cheap computer right there, all the employee does is hit a button), log it into a database containing two fields: the code, and when it expires. Then use that database to drive something like RADIUS for the access point authentication.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:The case against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There's a local cafe that is implementing that very system due to a problem with freeloaders. Seems reasonable - 10 dollars of purchases

      $10 - that's what, about half the price of a low-fat
        fraapacappamochahulazappahunkahunaaburninwhapacho oespressolatte with chocolate shavings, isn't it?

    8. Re:The case against by garcia · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's our area but I haven't seen much "freeloading" for WiFi. Within a mile of that Panera I can name 4 other places that offer free WiFi: Old Chicago, Buffalo Wild Wings, Starbucks, and Dunn Brothers Coffee. I also happen to know that within 2 miles you start hitting residential neighborhoods (including my own) which also offer plenty of free WiFi.

      So perhaps, once the availability is there the "freeloaders" drop?

    9. Re:The case against by HyperChicken · · Score: 1
      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    10. Re:The case against by Nugget · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What exactly is the "consequence" which would have to be suffered through? The absence of people who aren't going to spend any money anyway?

    11. Re:The case against by rczik · · Score: 1

      Having helped to create one of the first Internet cafes (Cybersmith) way back in 1995, getting access with a purchase seems to me to be a sane and reasonable approach.

      r

    12. Re:The case against by temojen · · Score: 1

      How about just setting a daily time limit on how long each MAC can stay connected. After 2 hours, they're booted off the network or firewalled off from everything but a page requesting they buy airtime.

    13. Re:The case against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I go to a cafe with similar problems.

      Unfortunately, its not with their customers -- its the folks that live in the apartment complex next door that have all taken to using their free service. Considering the cafe is an upscale place and the apartment complex is a low rent crack den that the neighborhood keeps trying to get rid of, its much more of a problem for their customers than anything else.

    14. Re:The case against by adam31 · · Score: 1

      1) charge 1 coffee to connect.
      2) Another per usage of the bathroom key.
      3) Profit!

    15. Re:The case against by Romeozulu · · Score: 1

      Starbucks does not offer free Wifi. You pay via T-mobile, unless your store is special.

    16. Re:The case against by BaudKarma · · Score: 1

      Whats the consequence in this case? The freeloaders go somewhere else, opening up more tables for paying customers? I wouldn't be afeared of those consequences none at all.

      That being said, I'd at least try the "free access for everyone" model first. Requireing a purchase, printing access codes on reciepts, etc all add another level of headaches and problems to the whole wi-fi thing. It's probably cheaper to put up with a moderate amount of freeloading then to implement restrictions.

      --
      It's the land of the brave, and the home of the free
      Where the less you know, the better off you'll be.
    17. Re:The case against by LehiNephi · · Score: 1

      There's a much simpler solution: A Faraday cage. A small investment in chicken wire grounded to an outlet or pipe would immediately eliminate access from outside the shop. As for those who just sit around and leech without buying? Kick 'em out.

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    18. Re:The case against by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Why would I go there when there are numerous other coffee shops that require nothing of the sort?

      You might have no reason to go there, but some of us who aren't penny-pinching corporate whores may go to the little guy, even if we have to pay a bit for it.

    19. Re:The case against by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Just to make it clear, you are saying, "Coffee shops will lose business because people won't go there, because they can get free internet elswhere. Also, people who will only go where there is free internet buy stuff, so although this wouldn't effect them anyway they continue to go out of there way to avoid it."

      This is a specious argument. If you are going to buy the coffee anyway, you don't care if you HAVE to buy it, unless you are making some retarded statement.

      The only people who will avoid going there are the people who either just want internet for free, or people who want to buy a coffee and sit there for 6 hours taking up space that could go to another customer. Frankly, I'll gladly let these kinds of people stay away.

      Why would I go there when there are numerous other coffee shops that require nothing of the sort?

      1. Because it doesn't affect you, since you are a paying customer.

      2. Because the shop is less crowded with freeloaders.

      3. Because you have internet at your house, so you must be going there for something besides internet, like coffee or girls (or guys?).

    20. Re:The case against by garcia · · Score: 1

      What exactly is the "consequence" which would have to be suffered through? The absence of people who aren't going to spend any money anyway?

      Yup, the possibility of lost revenue due to people taking their bodies elsewhere.

      You are all assuming entirely too much if you believe that everyone using WiFi is freeloading.

    21. Re:The case against by Nugget · · Score: 1

      There is no lost revenue if you drive away nonpaying people.

    22. Re:The case against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Considering the cafe is an upscale place and the apartment complex is a low rent crack den that the neighborhood keeps trying to get rid of, its much more of a problem for their customers than anything else.

      I hate low rent crack den apartment dwellers with wi-fi enabled laptops. I hate them.

    23. Re:The case against by lelio98 · · Score: 1

      I would also limit bandwidth to individual machines. Make it enought to check e-mail or surf a little, but slow enough to become slightly frustrating. Perhaps this would bring in customers who like having free access, but they wouldn't want to spend all day surfing on a limited bandwidth connection.

    24. Re:The case against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are a first-class ass-bugler.

    25. Re:The case against by TheUnknownOne · · Score: 1

      D&D is a pen and paper game... does not require an internet connection... we can hog the coffee shop table without free wifi thank you!

    26. Re:The case against by pokka · · Score: 1

      Why would I go there when there are numerous other coffee shops that require nothing of the sort?

      Less than a mile from my home is a Dunn Brothers Coffee shop and another mile from that is a Panera. Neither require a purchase to use their network but it's fairly rare to see anyone not at least having a coffee while they're there.

      Open it up for all those that enter or suffer the consequences of those that can and do offer it free.


      Coffee shops are just as much about ambience as they are about coffee. The shop mentioned in the parent post (Victrola) is one in which the owners want a warm, social atmosphere. They experimented with wi-fi, and in their specific case, they found that it destroys the atmosphere that they've enjoyed for the past five years. So they're taking a step back and trying to figure out how to offer wi-fi as "freely" as possible without turning the shop into every other nameless coffee shop with free wi-fi.

      The social aspect might not interest you personally, but it is certainly important to others, so the market exists. And if the success of a coffee shop depended on its assimilation into some standard internet cafe, I'd bet that the owners would rather shut the place down and start a new type of business.

    27. Re:The case against by itomato · · Score: 1

      Those are chain stores.

      You're welcome to go to any of them you like. There is a significant percentage of the population that wants *nothing to do with corporate coffee*.

      Mom & Pop coffee shops need to offer the service to compete. Mom & Pop shops don't have centralized support for their system.

      Their consequences are failure. Failure at Free Wi-Fi, and perhaps failure at the thing that put them in business in the first place - a friggin' cuppa Joe.

      Coffee is somehow synonomous with Wi-Fi now days. There is a serious need for a Wi-Fi co-op to offer services to non-corporate entities that wish to use it as an incentive for customers.

      What Would Jerry Do?

    28. Re:The case against by Anti_zeitgeist · · Score: 1

      Two things about that...i know because it was actually the first thing i thought about.

      1 - MAC spoofing
      2 - What if someone comes in for breakfast....then later on for lunch and before dinner. Like a college student who is working on something and pounding down those juicy caffeinne bevs. (But i guess you could reset the mac address log every few hours....ehh)

      --
      If it wasn't for C, we would be stuck using BASI, PASAL and OBOL.
    29. Re:The case against by deprecated · · Score: 1
      better than smelly nerds hogging tables for head-to-head D&D play

      What isn't better?

    30. Re:The case against by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      If I were the owner of the cafe, I'd just turn on WEP in my router, and then change the password frequently.

      That ought to keep the neighbors out -- or at least force them to either 1) come downstairs and hunt around for wherever you post the password daily, or 2) crack the WEP to discover the key daily. Unless you've got some pretty ambitious crack hounds where you come from, option 2 is pretty unlikely. And at least option 1 gives you, the owner, a chance to see/confront/throw them out when they come searching for the password every morning.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    31. Re:The case against by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Yeah but really, what percentage of the potential freeloaders are really going to go to the work of spooking their Wifi card's MAC address? I'm sure there are people out there who would do it, but it's a very small percentage of the problem population.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  5. Free Wi-Fi? by DotNM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't it be possible that people would come and use the free Wi-Fi instead of coming and paying to use the desktop computers?

    --
    There's no place like localhost
    1. Re:Free Wi-Fi? by temojen · · Score: 1

      It would be possible that people that own laptops would. But these same people are unlikely to use the desktops. They'd just move on to a cafe where they can use their laptop, instead of staying and ordering a latte and a muffin.

  6. Observations at a local Coffeeshop by bigwavejas · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I have no idea about the legalities in question, but I can offer you some insight to my observations at a local Coffeeshop.

    The owner initially set-up a "pay as you go" internet connection, where you could either use his computers, or he'd give you a temporary username/ password to access his wireless router. Initially, this worked well for him, as he was the first Coffeeshop in the area to offer internet access. As time went on and other Coffeeshop's started to offer "free" internet (to draw in people), I noticed the volume of people diminished. At that point he made the decision to offer "free" internet for those with wireless laptops, yet continued to charge if you opted to use his computers. I personally feel with all the free WiFi Access Points you're going to have a hard time finding someone who will pay.

    One thing to keep in mind if you decide to offer "free" internet is you're going to get people who campout on their laptops and take up table space for hours at a time. Some people even stay there all damn day like it's their personal office space. This might lend itself to loss of business from patrons just wanting a quick cappuccino or dessert and having no seats available. I'd make sure to designate certain tables with time limits or as "No Internet." Good luck!

    --
    "Simplify, simplify, simplify!" Thoreau
    1. Re:Observations at a local Coffeeshop by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Instead of a solid time limit, you could just reserve the right to kick out people who haven't made a purchase in the last thirty/fourty minutes or so.

      If I end up on the internet for an extended period of time at a coffeeshop/cafe, I generally make it a practice to keep buying drinks. It generally keeps the people running the place happy.

    2. Re:Observations at a local Coffeeshop by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One thing to keep in mind if you decide to offer "free" internet is you're going to get people who campout on their laptops and take up table space for hours at a time. Some people even stay there all damn day like it's their personal office space.

      A valid concern, to be sure. If one goes as far as giving out temporary usernames/passwords with the purchase of items, you could combat this by having the logons expire after a certain period of time. That way, they'd have to keep buying to stay online (at least until they learn to hijack an open session by cloning the mac address).

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    3. Re:Observations at a local Coffeeshop by earnest+murderer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I've been to a number of pool halls that basically require you to have a "beverage" at all times. If you are found to be empty you either have to buy another or leave. This seems to have worked out alright and is easy for customers to understand.

      No tickets, recipts, servers, tech support or other crap to deal with.

      I think a lot of people overlook this most obvious answer. That is asking the people in your shop that if they aren't going to buy anything, make room for someone who will.

      --
      Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
    4. Re:Observations at a local Coffeeshop by drooling-dog · · Score: 3, Insightful
      you're going to get people who campout on their laptops and take up table space for hours at a time.

      I'm guessing that most people (myself included) go to coffee shops mainly to hang out there. Anyone who owns/runs a coffeeshop knows that table space is their critical asset, and they probably measure revenue in $/table-hour rather than by the product they sell. Therefore, why not rent the table space, and sell your coffee at a reduced or nominal fee? That way, anything that people do there is paid for, WiFi access included.

      Of course, you'd have to resolve the sensitive issue of how to gently remind people that their time is up (or to pay for an additional hour). Perhaps an electric shock of progressive severity, or metal spikes rising out of the chair, would do nicely...

    5. Re:Observations at a local Coffeeshop by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      "One thing to keep in mind if you decide to offer "free" internet is you're going to get people who campout on their laptops and take up table space for hours at a time"

      I personally don't see a problem with this unless you run out of tables. I know I am pretty uneasy if I walk into a restaurant and the place is mostly empty. I figure there must be something wrong with the place. Granted, I don't want to wait for a table while some guy is just camping out.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    6. Re:Observations at a local Coffeeshop by MasterThis · · Score: 1

      The best way to minimize "campers" would be to limit the number of electric outlets available. If you run out of power you won't be surfing too long.

    7. Re:Observations at a local Coffeeshop by manno · · Score: 1

      I'd make sure to designate certain tables with time limits or as "No Internet."

      I like that advice

    8. Re:Observations at a local Coffeeshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      talk about your 'no internet' tables... In an internet cafe - or anywhere else - can you imagine how friggin' COOL it would be to have a few tables inside a faraday cage?

    9. Re:Observations at a local Coffeeshop by zelbinion · · Score: 1

      What about changing the model?

      Charge for WiFi access, and give out free coffee? Run it like one of those all-you-can-eat buffets or maybe a gym:

      You want to come in? Okay, swipe your card and clock in. Once in, you get "free" WiFi, coffee, muffins, etc. When you leave, you "clock out" and are billed the hourly rate for using the place, drinking coffee (or not), eating muffins (or not), etc.

      Maybe set up a combination of open space/tables/couches for people who want to hang out (don't put any electical outlets here) and cubicle-like areas for people who want to work but don't want to be AT work (provide fixed lan/WiFi/outlets/desks/proper chairs/etc.). Give discounts to frequent customers. Unlike standard free WiFi, customers who hang around all day will actually pay for it. Of course, those sorts of people probably won't come to your shop, which might not be a bad thing.

      You might have to sell it as renting urban office space rather than as a coffee shop... You won't get anyone poping by to meet a friend for a quick coffee, but you might make more from the business crowd (depending a LOT on location.) [Sell the service to area business at corporate rates for their employees.]

      Put a "To Go" counter up front for people who just want to get coffee and go. Don't put any tables/chairs up there. (Hard to use a laptop if you have nothing to set it on.)

      It wouldn't really be a coffee shop anymore, but it might work as a business...

    10. Re:Observations at a local Coffeeshop by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      This might work, but it is only because people are stupid. I'll just order a (insert cheapest beverage here) and carry it around all night half full. Are they going to taste it to make sure it isn't warm? Fuck them.

    11. Re:Observations at a local Coffeeshop by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      I assume using the pool tables was free, then? Kinda silly to kick out people who are renting a pool table just because they don't drink...

      -Z

    12. Re:Observations at a local Coffeeshop by IEEEmember · · Score: 1
      One thing to keep in mind if you decide to offer "free" internet is you're going to get people who campout on their laptops and take up table space for hours at a time. Some people even stay there all damn day like it's their personal office space.

      This describes me. I have issues working at home being distracted by my toddlers. I often work at Panera in 8 or 9 hour blocks. I wish I had the exact wording, but one Panera flyer invites customers to use the store as a second office.

      I have done the same at a Baker's Crust that also offers free WiFi. At both places I have spoken with the managers who tell me that they would rather have my regular business than worry about someone who doesn't buy lunch one day because the store is crowded.

      I do tend to work at a Panera that is less busy for this very reason, I also buy my lunch just before the rush so that I am eating when the place is busiest.

      In addition I was told by Panera's help desk that some Bakery-Cafes turn off WiFi during the lunch rush.

    13. Re:Observations at a local Coffeeshop by thedward · · Score: 1

      One of my favorite local shops solves this problem without explicitly labelling any spots off limits to computers.

      Only about half of teh tables have power outlets nearby.

      I'm not sure if it is intentional or not, but either way it seems to work at keeping a good balance. Though as laptop batteries last longer, it might not be as effective

      --
      Remember, no matter where you go, there you are.
    14. Re:Observations at a local Coffeeshop by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Another way to discourage lingerers: No public restrooms.

      Or "pay-as-you-go" restrooms. :)

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    15. Re:Observations at a local Coffeeshop by earnest+murderer · · Score: 1

      Coin op.

      --
      Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
  7. Loitering outside by zhevek · · Score: 1

    Well, the prospective place of business would have more people loitering outside getting free wireless at least!

  8. free or not, any idea what his liabilities are? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm thinking about 2 sources of liabilities:
    1) users.
    2) his bandwidth provider

  9. More expensive coffee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should everybody pay for something a few use?

    1. Re:More expensive coffee? by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      That's what prices are for. If you don't like the price, don't pay it. Businesses will learn very quickly if spreading the cost out across all of their products is better than charging those that use the service. In this case, I suspect the minor (if any?) increase in price per product doesn't result in a significant drop in the # of buyers to warrent charging outright for the service, and in fact may result in more buyers meaning that no increase in price is required.

    2. Re:More expensive coffee? by Dav3K · · Score: 1

      It's not something end customers should directly pay for. Free WiFi is becoming another condiment like ketchup, salt and sugar. Wanna go to coffeeshop A because they have richer cream? Wanna go to coffeeshop B because the sweets they offer taste better? Oops wait - coffeeshop A also has free wifi...mebbe we will go there. That sort of thing.

      It is becoming a cost of doing business, not a surcharge dealt to the end customer. A buddy of mine uses a can-tenna to access the wifi at the local coffeshop while at home. They let him, because they know he frequents their store every morning like clockwork.

  10. Royalty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I argued about increased business and royalty"

    Wait...so you mean to tell me that if I give out free wi-fi, the queen will show up?

    Keen gear!

  11. free pr0n = good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    porn arguement wins

  12. Let them know the cons, too. by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

    If you're going to try to convince someone to offer free WiFi, make sure they know that they might be liable for things customers use it for if they don't take the proper steps beforehand.

  13. Here's my (evil) argument by demonic-halo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can setup a proxy server which will intercept http: traffic and insert ad banners into the web pages it serves.

    1. Re:Here's my (evil) argument by fbartho · · Score: 1

      have a smarter proxy server that will just replace every single piece of normal advertising with your own ads... :) that way the ads look normal on the page.

      --
      Gravity Sucks
    2. Re:Here's my (evil) argument by madscientist003 · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is an evil argument at all. The decision whether or not to offer free wireless Internet access has to be based on pure capitalism. If it's not profitable to offer the access, coffee shops (or any other establishment) will simply not offer it. The idea of printing codes on the receipt or inserting ads on the served pages are both good when it comes to the business owner receiving a financial benefit in return for this offered service.

    3. Re:Here's my (evil) argument by fsterman · · Score: 1

      It would be legal too. A company paying for it through Mal-Ware companies won a case brought by a competitor.

      --
      Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
    4. Re:Here's my (evil) argument by melikamp · · Score: 1

      Enter the Adblock

    5. Re:Here's my (evil) argument by Alsee · · Score: 1

      have a smarter proxy server that will just replace every single piece of normal advertising with your own ads... :)

      In which case it's pretty amusing to consider the pointless chain of events if users are running Proxomitron proxy filter on their own computer and filtering out the replaced ads. LOL

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  14. No Case. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Wi-Fi and Coffee shops don't always mix. Sure it works for big chains like starbucks. But sometimes people want to get coffee and get away from work for a while. Also there is the issue of people just sitting their and no drinking coffee and just working. So if you are going to have a coffee shop with Wi-Fi you probably need an informal so many drinks an hour or please get out. Also if people come for the Wi-Fi if the connection goes down. The guy looses buisness.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:No Case. by BrowserCapsGuy · · Score: 1

      What if you charged for the WiFi access by the hour and gave the customer a free coffee with each purchase?

      --
      Alright! I know I'm in there! If I don't come out, I'll have to come in after me!
  15. My Wife by hexed_2050 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd get my wife to argue with him. Somehow she won the arguement to delete WoW from my hd.

    --
    Valkyrie is about to die! Wizard needs food -- badly!
    1. Re:My Wife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!!!

    2. Re:My Wife by manno · · Score: 1

      HAHAHAHA... Ahhh man I needed that. That's the funniest post I've read yet.

  16. common carrier? by MasterD · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is a coffee shop going to be held accountable if somebody sells drugs using the public phone next to the bathroom? Or discusses an illegal business deal at of their tables? Of course not, so why should they be help responsible for what people do over their Internet connection?

    1. Re:common carrier? by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 1

      The question is whether or not you are doing something you know is dangerous... nobody can cause a lot of damage from a public phone. A lot of damage can be caused by leaving a loaded gun lying around out in the open. An open Internet connection is somewhere between these two.

      --
      evil adrian
    2. Re:common carrier? by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because computer are new and strange. Normal laws do not apply. Because it is with those magical computers that are thinking brains. Sience you own the thinking brain and it does illegal stuff thereforth you are responcible.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:common carrier? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      There is probably tons of legal precedent wrt a public telephone and who is liable for what happens. As much as using the internet is an incremental technological step from using the telephone to us, it is a gigantic leap in the legal sense.

    4. Re:common carrier? by bcattwoo · · Score: 1

      Because here in lawsuit-happy America if some kid's parents found out he was looking at porn at the coffee shop they might sue the coffee shop, it's ISP, the maker of the computer, and the provider of the coffee beans. They would probably manage to get a settlement out of at least one of them too.

    5. Re:common carrier? by rjelks · · Score: 1

      Because, when the crime is committed, the IP address is what it's going to be tracked to. It's all good to claim that it wasn't you, but someone else using your computer - - it's just not a very strong defense. Someone should be responsible for what's going on with that connection. If you don't hold the owner responsible, who is?

      I think that's why providers of WiFi should set up some kind of authentication system with customers' real names...it would give them some level of protection.

    6. Re:common carrier? by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They would probably manage to get a settlement out of at least one of them too.

      Which is why it's so important to have legislation that shields people like manufacturers from the actions of their products' users. It doesn't occur to too many people to sue GM over the actions of a drunk driver, but political correctness makes it attractive to sue, say, gun makers when someone decides to commit a crime. There's legislation pending right now to prevent frivalous suits like that, and we can only hope that equal doses of rationality kick in for router manufacturers, coffeeshop owners, and so on. The "it's everyone's fault except the person who actually did the bad thing" nonsense has got to stop, and there's a little light at the end of the tunnel.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    7. Re:common carrier? by shawng · · Score: 0

      Of course not, so why should they be held responsible for what people do over their Internet connection?

      You are obviously not thinking like a lawyer.

    8. Re:common carrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      nobody can cause a lot of damage from a public phone

      Apparently somebody's never heard of Mitnick...

    9. Re:common carrier? by D.A.+Zollinger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The pay phone is provided by the phone company. They may rent the space from you, but it is the phone company's responsibility and liability. An Internet connection is provided by the business owner, who might assume resonsibility and liability for actions taken by patrons who use that service.

      On a side note, if a local ISP were able to find a way to make money off a free WiFi connection (earlier comments mention a proxy server replacing all banner ads), they would be able to absolve small shops of any liability by providing the service for them, and may be able to work out a deal where the ISP pays no rent for their service. The ISP would attract patrons with their service, and the shop owner would not have to maintain the system (one less hassle).

      --
      I haven't lost my mind!
      It is backed up on disk...somewhere...
    10. Re:common carrier? by MasterD · · Score: 1
      You are obviously not thinking like a lawyer.

      I am. I am saying there is precedence regarding postal, telephones, or other utilities with common carrier status. Common carriers have no legal liability for the contents of what they carry:

      Wikipedia's take

    11. Re:common carrier? by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 1

      Ok it is DRAMATICALLY LESS LIKELY that someone is going to use a public phone to cause damage. Is that better?

      --
      evil adrian
    12. Re:common carrier? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Because here in lawsuit-happy America if some kid's parents found out he was looking at porn at the coffee shop they might sue the coffee shop, it's ISP, the maker of the computer, and the provider of the coffee beans. They would probably manage to get a settlement out of at least one of them too.

      AH! Now some people may understand why I dislike Ralph Nader (and subsequently Senator John Edwards) so much. As much as Ralph Nader did to make the auto industry safer, the backlash was now everyone and anyone will sue you for anything.

    13. Re:common carrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

    14. Re:common carrier? by MasterD · · Score: 1
      Which is why it's so important to have legislation that shields people like manufacturers from the actions of their products' users

      This really depends on what they manufacture. If you knowingly manufacture something dangerous, say a toy that is a choking hazard for young children, you may be held responsible (if you don't label, etc).

    15. Re:common carrier? by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      Well put.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    16. Re:common carrier? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      This really depends on what they manufacture. If you knowingly manufacture something dangerous, say a toy that is a choking hazard for young children, you may be held responsible (if you don't label, etc).

      Right... we're talking about products and services that do what they are supposed to (say, knives that cut, cars that go 60mph where you point them, internet connections that carry packets, etc), but which are still sued just for being "involved" in a crime that a criminal chooses to commit. Oily lawyers and dumb juries too often draw the wrong causal relationships.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    17. Re:common carrier? by wkcole · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the US, Internet access providers have repeatedly been deemed to NOT be common carriers by regulators, courts, and the Congress. Network operators are responsible for the traffic coming from their networks, no matter how ignorant of that traffic they choose to be.

      One solution for that might be (and frankly, I hope WILL BE eventually) for providers of open wireless systems to wrap their networks with very strict firewalls that severely restrict what users inside can do. VPN, SSH, and maybe HTTP/HTTPS. If the users want to do anythingmore arcane than web surfing, let them 'go home' virtually and work through a tunnel where the free wireless provider isn't going to be on the hook for generating evil traffic of whatever type.

    18. Re:common carrier? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Because computer are new and strange. Normal laws do not apply. Because it is with those magical computers that are thinking brains. Sience you own the thinking brain and it does illegal stuff thereforth you are responcible.

      Dude, I was using a computer before you were born.

      Um, gee, I hope it wasn't your mom I met that drunken night at SFU ...

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    19. Re:common carrier? by Lulu+of+the+Lotus-Ea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, in the USA laws are not nearly so rational outside of computer usage either. For example, police and congresscritters with little respect for civil liberties have imposed draconian arrest and imprisonment of organizers of "rave" dances; with "facilitation" charges against, e.g. people who sell or give away glow sticks (i.e. under topsy-turvy fascistic thinking, drug paraphenelia).

      Busts have included charges under the 'Ecstasy Awareness Act' (2003 H.R. 2962), or even RICO charges. Mind you, these aren't busts of people selling drugs, but simply of people who, e.g. rent spaces and audio equipment for dances where "drugs *might be* sold" by others.

      So yeah, find a local DA or police chief who wants to run for statewide office, and it's not at all unlikely that a coffee shop gets raided for having a public telephone on which "drugs might be sold."

    20. Re:common carrier? by BrowserCapsGuy · · Score: 1

      Isn't the problem really exacerbated by the punitive damages? If those damages had to be given to a charity in toto wouldn't these lawsuits come to a halt fairly quickly? If the lawyer doesn't get his cut of the big award there won't be many lawyers willing to take on cases like this.

      Sorry to drift a bit OT.

      --
      Alright! I know I'm in there! If I don't come out, I'll have to come in after me!
    21. Re:common carrier? by vertinox · · Score: 1

      But, if it has a thinking brain, I thought we could just throw the computer in jail!

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    22. Re:common carrier? by shawng · · Score: 0

      That was just kind of a half-joke on my part, you know how lawyers like to file extremely frivolous lawsuits.

    23. Re:common carrier? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Isn't the problem really exacerbated by the punitive damages?

      Sure, but plenty of lawyers would happily sue for their 30% of the "actual" damages.

      If those damages had to be given to a charity in toto wouldn't these lawsuits come to a halt fairly quickly?

      Not really, because many of these suits are brought by activists who can't solve their perceived problems legislatively. For example, people who don't think you should be able to own big kitchen knives (don't laugh! there's a movement in Britain to ban them!), or people who don't like SUVs or pickup trucks, or people who don't like guns, or petrolium products, or don't think people should eat cheeseburgers. They're happy if the "proceeds" of the suit go anywhere as long as the entity they're trying to beat up has to part with a big pile of money. In fact, if a jury knew that the output might go to a charity, they might be even MORE inclined to rule insanely. Because, you know, who doesn't like charities, blah blah.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    24. Re:common carrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with your statement is that you are applying logic to a situation where anti-logic prevails. The anti-logic I am speaking of are organizations like the RIAA and utterly moronic laws that can get you incarcerated for disclosing security flaws (ala Cisco).

    25. Re:common carrier? by HikingStick · · Score: 1

      They may be able to get out of a conviction, but when the Feds barge in and want to grab all computer equipment because they traced the source IP from a kiddie porn ring down to the local access point, who has the resources to argue. I recently switched hotel chains to gain free Internet access. The other "luxury" chain lost a frequent customer because it wanted its $6 per day for Internet access. The other chain provided free access (wired and wireless), but users had to click through a EULA screen once every 24 hours. The EULA (specifying acceptable use and all that jazz) may provice the businesses some additional protection in those cases. I don't think the question is "if" these cases will come to be, but "when."

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    26. Re:common carrier? by rossdee · · Score: 1

      " It doesn't occur to too many people to sue GM over the actions of a drunk driver, but political correctness makes it attractive to sue, say, gun makers when someone decides to commit a crime."

      However the main purpose of an automoble is to transport people from A to B. The main purpose of a (hand)gun is to kill people. Therefore the manufacturers do have some responsibilty.

    27. Re:common carrier? by Watts+Martin · · Score: 1

      While this is straying pretty far from the topic of free wifi in coffee shops, I think limiting access to the courts is a terrible idea -- even when the intentions behind it are quite good and sincere.

      I think most people would agree that sometimes corporations are bad actors (just like individuals, and for that matter, governments). We're not just talking about suing GM for drunk drivers -- we're talking about Ford knowing safety hazards with the Pinto's fuel tank and actually running the calculations to determine that the costs of lawsuits resulting from the deaths of their customers would be likely to be less than the cost of fixing the problem, and deciding that was sufficient justification to let a certain small number of their customers die due to a preventable defect. Sometimes it really is the business who actually did the bad thing.

      There are really only two ways to address these situations: to try to do it proactively through regulation, or to try to do it retroactively through the legal system. The thing is, both these checks are under assault right now: regulation is frequently seen as "too oppressive," and lawsuits are frequently seen as "too frivolous." This is a dangerous combination, because the outcome could easily be giving bad actors free reign to commit profitable abuse with very little consequences.

      A lot of times regulations may well be too oppressive, and a lot of lawsuits certainly are frivolous. But suppose a shield law written to protect gun manufacturers from lawsuits resulting in deaths caused by their weapons passes, and a few years down the road the death that's caused by a gun is that of a police officer due to a manufacturing defect. Should the gun company really be shielded from that? I can guarantee you if the gun companies are involved in writing the shield laws, they will be shielded from that -- and as a practical matter, the law really can't take into account every exception.

      I understand why it seems to make sense to protect manufacturers, but I'd really rather trust the legal system to junk most frivolous lawsuits. Remember, the "outrageous" ones you hear about are the rare exceptions, newsworthy precisely because they are rare exceptions.

    28. Re:common carrier? by h4rryc4ry · · Score: 1

      Your network carries their data. Thus you are no different than an operator on the phone relaying the message. Thus making you part of any criminal offense that may be ocurring.

    29. Re:common carrier? by BrowserCapsGuy · · Score: 1

      Sure, but plenty of lawyers would happily sue for their 30% of the "actual" damages.

      The punitive damages are, I guess, only part of the problem. If the award for damages is large enough I guess there will be lawyers willing to work on a contingency basis.

      Not really, because many of these suits are brought by activists who can't solve their perceived problems legislatively.

      Fair enough. I was wondering about this more than offering a solution.

      Thanks for taking the time to post a nice reply.

      --
      Alright! I know I'm in there! If I don't come out, I'll have to come in after me!
    30. Re:common carrier? by Detritus · · Score: 1
      Is a coffee shop going to be held accountable if somebody sells drugs using the public phone next to the bathroom?

      If it's a chronic problem, quite possibly. If the owner knows that there is a problem, and doesn't take any action to correct it, there may be legal consequences. The local government can revoke liquor and business licenses, and condemn property.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    31. Re:common carrier? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      saddly all legislation created to limit 'frivolous ;lawsuits' favor the people with the money.

      So all they have to do is present a lawuit in a manner which makes it appear as frivolous. This is bad.

      as a side note, I have been looking into lawsuit that make the news. Many of which got presented as frivlous were really frivolous. Many of the actually awarded amount(if any) were far less then the intial reports. So I don't think frivolous lawsuits are nearly as rempant as I once did.

      Interesting, the ones that I looked into that were clearly frivolous where tossed out immediatly.

      Bear in mind that they are the only recourse the people have against corporations, short of blood shed.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    32. Re:common carrier? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Unless we get to the point where an ISP is liable for all of its customers actions, I don't think that the coffee shop would be liable for anything its customers do.

      After all, the coffee shop is acting exactly like an ISP: it's just doing it for a very small group of customers. The likelihood of the shop getting successfully sued is probably about the same as the DSL provider getting sued, and on and on up the chain.

      If I was going to run a shop, I think I'd just have the system log connection times and durations versus MAC addresses. They're unique identifiers, and thus reasonably helpful to the police, but not intrusive on individual users. However if the police come asking questions, you at least have something you can turn over and act like you're interested in being helpful.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    33. Re:common carrier? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Interesting, the ones that I looked into that were clearly frivolous where tossed out immediatly

      But some of these suits are brought against companies that only employ 20 or 50 people. Even if the court throws out the suit, it can cost the company hundreds of thousands of dollars just to get their outside lawyers ready just in case. Many times, that's the purpose of the suit - just to cost money, to hurt the company. And it's not just companies - similar suits are brought against non-profit organizations, schools, and individuals, too.

      Bear in mind that they are the only recourse the people have against corporations, short of blood shed.

      You're forgetting about two other recourses:

      1) media coverage - it can be very powerful

      2) just don't do business with the company - if they don't sell anything, they have no resources

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    34. Re:common carrier? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      However the main purpose of an automoble is to transport people from A to B. The main purpose of a (hand)gun is to kill people. Therefore the manufacturers do have some responsibilty

      Why? I own a handgun for the sole purpose of self defense. It cannot hurt anyone unless I pick it up and use it. The guy who makes the gun has absolutely no influence over the events that would cause me to use (or not use) their product. GM makes products that hurl 2000 pounds of metal down the road at 60+mph. They also have no influence over whether or not you jerk the wheel to the right and run down a kid on the sidewalk.

      And what about knives? They exist to cut things. To separate material into two pieces. The maker of the knife has no control over whether you use it to chop carrots, or cut someone's throat. Should they get dragged into court when someone does? It's ridiculous.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    35. Re:common carrier? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Remember, the "outrageous" ones you hear about are the rare exceptions, newsworthy precisely because they are rare exceptions.

      But just gearing up to defend against such a suit is enough to ruin a mid-sized business (say, one that makes speciality target pistols, or one that makes custom kitchen knives). We're not talking about maintaining the right to sue a company for being neglectful or deceitful in the way they're doing business. We're talking specifically about heading off lawsuits from the vicitims of crimes against the manufacturers of the tools that the criminal illegally used. I think that distinction is crystal clear, and any judge that even sees such a suit should consider charges against the plaintiff.

      This issue is espcially galling when it's the government pressing the suit (like a city council, etc., looking for a windfall like the tobacco settlements so they don't have to raise taxes that year).

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    36. Re:common carrier? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Why? I own a handgun for the sole purpose of self defense. It cannot hurt anyone unless I pick it up and use it. The guy who makes the gun has absolutely no influence over the events that would cause me to use (or not use) their product.

      Sure they do. If they didn't make it, then you (or whatever kid finds it in the house) wouldn't have been able to pick it up and shoot someone with it.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  17. Incresed buisnes outways the cost by Ossus_10 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a friend who runs a bagel shop (coffee, sandwiches, bagels, etc...). He is moving to a larger location in order to provide free WiFi. The reason hes moving is because he experimented with WiFi before, and his old building was not big enough to accommodate all the extra buisness he recived when providing free WiFi. That to me sounds like a huge reason to provide free WiFi over paid. Ossus

    1. Re:Incresed buisnes outways the cost by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      his old building was not big enough to accommodate all the extra buisness he recived when providing free WiFi.

      Business or people? As others have mentioned, I'd be wary of how freeloaders impact things. Also, too many wireless users have the effect of turning a vibrant coffeeshop into a dull, cube-less office.

      If it was me, I'd do free wireless during the week, and try to get local musicians in for the weekends.

    2. Re:Incresed buisnes outways the cost by Speefnarkle1982 · · Score: 1

      I know myself that if I'm out of town on business or wherever, it's a great thing to be able to walk into a place and buy a coffee and some fat kid food and do some work or check email. It gives me a degree of freedom that wasn't available earlier. Right there, WiFi access keeps me coming in. Otherwise, I probably wouldn't spend as much time there and not eat as much fat kid food!

    3. Re:Incresed buisnes outways the cost by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      I think you're right. It's easy to say that you'll get a place full of freeloaders but I think in the long run you'll gain business. Right down from REI in Denver is a little two-room coffee shop. It's actually a decent design since you can go back into one quieter room and spread out. I don't think this was by design, but it probably works out well.
      Again, in the long run, the more people that occupy space at a coffee shop the more coffee you'll sell. When others see this, they'll wonder what the fuss is about.

  18. It's a losing proposition by Sarojin · · Score: 0, Insightful

    unless you really enforce that people buy drinks while they're there. It may not be so bad once WiFi is ubiquitous, but as it is, frugal people (ie people that won't want to pay for drinks) will flock to wherever has it.

    --
    HOW'S MY POSTING? CALL 1-800-POSTING
  19. Panera Bread Does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Panera Bread offers free WiFi.

    http://www.panerabread.com/locations.aspx?WiFi=1

    They seem to be doing fine. The big companies like the RIAA and MPAA like to go after the little guy who cannot defend himself in court because of the costs. If they ever challenged a company that can defend itself they might lose.

  20. My town by Sheepdot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In my town, we have free Wifi at Panera Bread and about 5 crappy little cafes.

    How about instead of Wifi you just get up and go ask her out instead of watching her and pretending she's hotibunni27 on your IM?

  21. Non paying users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think one of the biggest problems would be people who take up space just to use the free internet, but don't actualy buy anything.

  22. Just let him try it by chuck · · Score: 1

    It sounds like you want to use logic to win an argument. In my time on this planet, I've found that never works. You can try your hardest, then just let him do it his own way. Once he finds that customers are turned off by being treated like a criminal, he'll do it the Panera way.

  23. free beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Charge for the Wi-Fi and make the beer free.

  24. why not a token system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you buy a cup of coffee, and on your receipt is a number which allows you to login to wifi for 8 hours or something like that. the number is some sort of hash based on time/date (among other things) so it's not prone to abuse

  25. charging != no liability by Myko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Charging would not alleviate any liability that you mention, and would actually add more. By receiving money, they now have a vested interest in the actions of the customers and are more responsible than if it were free.

    1. Re:charging != no liability by rjelks · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about that. In the case of p2p lawsuits, they can only go after the IP address. If you set up a charge system like tmobile's, you have every customer's name, address and cc #. If you get sued, you can have records as to who was using your connection at that time. If it's all free and open, the owner of the connection is pretty much screwed. What if the crime was bigger than stealing mp3s? Think cracking, child porn, etc...I wouldn't want to be responsible for others' actions on the Internet.

      I guess another solution would be to get driver's licenses and set up usernames/passwords.

  26. Arguments Against by Ieshan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While it's practically painless to set up these days, a big argument against WiFi in any business is the type of client you attract.

    Remember that you're likely to attract businessy types too busy to do anything but work during lunch, or student/cheap types too cheap to pay for highspeed access themselves (and therefore, unlikely to spend $30 a month on coffee). Is this really the atmosphere you want in your business?

    It also depends what type of netcafe you're opening. There are netcafes primarily for gaming, and those primarily for getting a cup of coffee while surfing the net. I've worked in one where people are basically gaming straight up, and the atmosphere is radically different than the local coffee shop.

    If you want a social, living coffeeshop, I'd say cut off the internet access. People go to a coffeeshop to relax with friends, listen to jazz, or curl up in a comfy chair with a big book. As much of a netaholic as I am, there has to be a balance somewhere.

    1. Re:Arguments Against by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      It's a shame that these places can't be partitioned somewhat, so that you can gravitate towards areas that are more conducive to out-of-office work, casual socialization, tabletop gaming, or quiet reading. Don't wall them off up to the ceiling, mind you, but just array the areas around the coffee bar in the center, and find some clever way of delineating space.

      Then again, real estate isn't free. But it'd be pretty cool.

    2. Re:Arguments Against by utexaspunk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      or student/cheap types too cheap to pay for highspeed access themselves (and therefore, unlikely to spend $30 a month on coffee)

      in my student experience, it was the other way around. i could afford to either have a high speed connection or buy coffee and hang out the coffee shop regularly. with the coffee shops offering free wifi, it was no longer either/or, so i opted to ditch the high-speed at home and just go to the coffee shop.

    3. Re:Arguments Against by chadjg · · Score: 1

      The Zone CD seems to offer easy setup and admin for a free public access point. I'm wondering if there is a similiar product that would let the owner introduce random and variable jitter and lag into the AP such that gaming would be annoying but ordinary web surfing would be no problem. That discourage one class of high maintenance, low spending freeloaders. Maybe not?

      --
      Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
    4. Re:Arguments Against by MrLee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "If you want a social, living coffeeshop, I'd say cut off the internet access. People go to a coffeeshop to relax with friends, listen to jazz, or curl up in a comfy chair with a big book. As much of a netaholic as I am, there has to be a balance somewhere."
      BAH! I don't know if I can disagree with this more. The coffeeshop that I frequent has all of the above AND a good number of customers who get online. There is almost NO gaming and NO JAZZ.
      It's not a beatnick hangout for those with receding hairline pony-tails and Birkenstocks(oh, if you are reading this and are offended, good!) It's a coffee shop for people to get together or study or read or play games or get online!
      Plus, since when do those type of people you described spend tons of money? Stopping in to get a half-caff soy latte with nutmeg on top before you catch the latest screening of Fellini's Satyricon does not break the bank!
      Sorry, I meant that buying a small hazelnut coffee and a scone then reading Bukowski for four hours is NOT going to give any shop owner fat pockets!
      Simply put, value added services like free WiFi can only help this type of business...when offered wisely!
      My rant is finished! Be online or be damned!

      --
      -- Now more the mirth, scrape here in the face...
    5. Re:Arguments Against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've worked in one where people are basically gaming straight up, and the atmosphere is radically different than the local coffee shop."

      No kidding. I love the mortified look on some 50-year old woman's face as the two teenagers on either side of her are playing Counter-Strike and screaming (at the top of their lungs, it seems) at each other "YOU'RE SO GAY!!" and "YOU FUCKIN FAG!!" every single time they get killed.

    6. Re:Arguments Against by BioCS.Nerd · · Score: 1

      You make some good points, but I'd like to examine the last point you made:

      If you want a social, living coffeeshop, I'd say cut off the internet access. People go to a coffeeshop to relax with friends, listen to jazz, or curl up in a comfy chair with a big book.
      The irony is that these same people are also unlikely to spend money. A local Starbucks in the mall here (Windsor, ON) is situated in the Chapters store (it's our version of Barnes & Noble). Numerous people grab a book and plunk themselves on the couches without ever buying anything at Starbucks. Computers, or books, people are just as likely to try and use your accomadations for free.

      For the record, I'm more likely to go to a coffee shop with wireless when I want to get work done, but will also go to the same place. I will not, however, go to a coffee shop without wireless when I want to get work done. I spend the same amount of money regardless of where I go, and whether or not I am doing work. In summation: yes it's worth it, yes people will download illegal things, and just block bit torrent on your firewall and you'll be okay for the most part (don't block MSN/AIM/etc., that's just annoying).

    7. Re:Arguments Against by Macrat · · Score: 1

      jazz? reading?

      I thought coffee shops were for buying coffee?

    8. Re:Arguments Against by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      You seem to describe our coffee shops here in Columbia, MO to a T. A bunch of the professors and professor-wannabe TAs and academics at the university hang out in their Birkenstocks (with socks, natch), drink mochafrappahazelnutchinos and talk about how the Bush administration can be overthrown. I personally hate the coffee shops. I don't like the academics much as they seem way too full of themselves. I don't like coffee much either. I prefer to use my computer in the privacy of my apartment with my own, faster connection.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    9. Re:Arguments Against by gwait · · Score: 1

      I think this brings out a very good point. From all the comments, it seems like at least a few of the schemes can be successfull (in that the coffe shop is full of paying customers all the time). I'd guess the proprietor indeed should decide on the atmosphere and mood, then design the business model to match, and don't try to be all things to all people, else they will satisfy no one.
      Also, the old market survey must be done - if there is a whole lot of free WiFi in the area, then free WiFi won't be a big selling point, but you'll also be less likely to fill up with non paying squatters.

      If there's little free access, then going free will definitely fill up your shop, but a minimal charge might still fill your shop to capacity and keep out the freeloaders.

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    10. Re:Arguments Against by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Don't like coffee?

      Don't like people?

      You're not in the target demographic, nor are you likely to understand those who are. Hence, your opinion on this matter isn't very relevant.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    11. Re:Arguments Against by sjvn · · Score: 1

      "People go to a coffeeshop to relax with friends, listen to jazz, or curl up in a comfy chair with a big book."

      And to write, check their e-mail, and chat via IM.

      A coffee-shop in my area--Asheville, NC--once offered free Wi-Fi and did a fine little business. It also had live music, comfy chairs and welcomed groups of friends and readers.

      Then, they stopped their Wi-Fi on grounds similar to what you describe.

      They were out of business about three months later. A direct connection?

      Maybe, maybe not. I just know that I and several other people I knew stopped going there because they no longer offered Wi-Fi.

      Steven

    12. Re:Arguments Against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree whole heartedly. There are times at the local Starbucks when there isn't a connected device in sight. Just people talking, enjoying their caffiene buzz, and chilling out. Other times the place is jammed with people hunched over their laptops pounding a keyboard. At those times there is no place to sit down, because those little round tables barely accomodate a laptop. So there might be six or eight empty chairs, but no empty tables, so you have to hold your coffee and pastry. Neither the local coffee bar across the way (NoJoe) nor Zebu down the street ever has that problem, just people dropping in to snack and leave.

      I go to all three, different products for different moods, but I never go to Starbucks when it is full of laptops, the Karma is just no good.

    13. Re:Arguments Against by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Bull. You're telling me your budget was so tight that you could only spend $30 total, yet you had high speed internet? Either you're an idiot who is fantastic at staying on budget or more likely you're making things up.

      I mean honestly.

      "I could only afford bread and water or shoes, that is until footlocker started serving crackers." But wait, you weren't even choosing among necessities!

      "I think it's a good idea for people selling (luxury unecessary product) to offer (high end unecessary service) for people who are so dirt poor they can only scrap enough money together for one. THAT is the demographic you want to target to get rich!"

    14. Re:Arguments Against by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      If he wants to attract business types, then he should supply free internet, but use a temporary password and...here's the big one...turn on encryption. I love Panera when I'm on the road, but I usually tunnel back through SSH to my cable modem in order to have at least a modicum of security. Obviously the restaurant proprietors could sniff unencrypted web traffic, but I'd like it if the script kiddies outside the restaurant couldn't follow what I was doing.

    15. Re:Arguments Against by evoltap · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're the idoit. I don't think the poster was being as literal as you think. If he had high speed internet, he wouldn't find as much cash in his pocket for coffee.....I don't think he meant a budget to a T with EXACTLY 30 bucks for coffee. Somehow I don't think you've ever been poor.

    16. Re:Arguments Against by Moofie · · Score: 1

      What's the real difference between reading a book and reading a news article on Slashdot? How is one more "living" than the other?

      People go to a coffee shop for a bunch of different reasons. Shockingly enough, they might go places to do things that you think they shouldn't do so much. Fortunately for the rest of us, it's none of your business. Pardon the pun.

      Strike your own balance. Leave me out of it.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    17. Re:Arguments Against by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      They're both luxuries. I could have surfed the web for free at the library, but that wasn't the fun, comfortable atmosphere of the coffee shop, and my friends didn't hang out there. Not having to pay for broadband at home meant I had more disposable income to blow on coffee. Having WiFi at the coffee shop meant I didn't have to have broadband at home, and thus I ended up blowing more of my disposable income on coffee. What's illogical about that?

    18. Re:Arguments Against by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Let me explain something to you. You could afford to do both. You chose not to, probably because it would have cut into your drinking.

    19. Re:Arguments Against by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Kid, you don't know poor.

      When I was a boy I lived on Government cheese and whatever people donated to the church. Whenever my mother didn't blow the foodstamps in the first three days of the month on shrimp and steaks for her dirtbag boyfriend things were a little better, but that was rare. I've gone to bed hungry having not eaten a thing for an entire day while my piece of crap mother literally fried shrimp.

      I know more about poor than almost anybody.

    20. Re:Arguments Against by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      exactly

    21. Re:Arguments Against by fieldmethods · · Score: 1
      The thing is, I think these "free place to read" cafes are really a dead end from a business point of view.

      People come in and they "curl up" in a whole chair for hours on end. And sometimes they just buy one drink. And they sit there and read.

      Talk about anti-social! One time I tried to start up a conversation with this girl who was reading, and she actually got pissed at me! I mean, seriously, aren't cafes supposed to be places where you, you know, talk?

      I think what we need to do is implement some sort of "page number per drink" or "chapter per drink" limit. Obviously, some real hardcore literary types will bring in heavy Russian novels in a tiny font, but overall I think this would really cut down on the "free reading" freeloaders.

      Commies.

    22. Re:Arguments Against by joedoc · · Score: 1
      curl up in a comfy chair with a big book.
      What is this "book" you speak of?
      --
      Joe Dougherty, Florida, USA
      The words I thought I brought, I left behind. So, never mind.
    23. Re:Arguments Against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This might sound crazy, but you can make your own coffee. Really, no kidding!

    24. Re:Arguments Against by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      going to a coffee shop is not just about drinking coffee (although their professional grade espresso machine makes much better coffee than anything i could afford) it's about getting out of the house and being in a comfortable environment with your friends...

  27. Freeloaders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My concern is how to handle the freeloaders who spend 6 hours in your shop using your internet, yet only paying for one cup of coffee.

  28. Free WiFi = More Customers by americamatrix · · Score: 0

    I like the idea of free WiFi. Having to pay for WiFi may discouage some customers from even going into the cafe. As was stated in the comment, raising the price of items in the store a few cents to pay for the initial cost isnt a bad idea. The more customers that go into the store...the more likely they will be to buy something...

  29. Against by Karma_fucker_sucker · · Score: 1
    There's a cafe like this around where I live. I was talking to one of the employees and she told me that a lot of people who come in are sales people or some other road warrior type who just order one coffee, stay for hours and just use up bandwidth.

    The place is always filled with people, but I've noticed that very few of them have had anything other than a drink. I think Starbucks, Borders, etc., use T-Mobile or some other pay service for that reason.

    --
    Evil people don't think they're evil. - George Lucas, Making of Ep III
    1. Re:Against by wmelnick · · Score: 1

      The problem with this argument is that these same salespeople/road warriors are going to sign up for the $40 per month unlimited use account, and then you really have no recourse against them when they sit doen and hog the table for hours. If you provide truly free internet access, put up a sign that says "Wifi is for paying customers only. Limit 60 minutes with food/beverage purchase." You may not get rid of all of the freeloaders, but most would pay attention to something like that.

  30. Hrmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 1: Provide free WiFi.
    Step 2: ...
    Step 3: Profit!

  31. Outsource the Wifi by ramannoodle · · Score: 1

    Isn't that what outsourcing the Wifi is for? That way the outsourced company can handle the liability issue, gets paid by the business, the business can offer for free, and both reap the benefits.

  32. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, I think this betrays a lack of understanding about business - people are in business to make money - not provide you with something for free.

    Places that have offered free WiFi have had people leeching it all day and not buying a thing - its why cafes don't do it anymore.

  33. $6-$10/hr? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What? Marriot doesn't even get away with prices like that. There's a coffee shop down the street that's going to profit from his pricing scheme...

    If he's concerned with freeloaders, have the cash register print out a code on the receipt that you can enter into a nocat captive portal to authenticate against a RADIUS server. Give them an hour for each purchase, for instance. Tie the code to single MAC address, etc.

    But consider the cost of integrating your cash register, running the server, dealing with the tech support, etc. vs. the cost of sticking a WRT54G on a wire and letting a few freeloaders on the 'net.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:$6-$10/hr? by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you're going to charge for access, two or two fifty an hour makes more sense, especially if (like most coffeeshops I've seen) your clientele is composed largely of college students who probably get paid about that much an hour at work.

    2. Re:$6-$10/hr? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      It might be simpler to have an morning, afternoon and evening code each day instead of integrating everything. You could change 3 passwords pretty easily on two systems.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    3. Re:$6-$10/hr? by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The cost of freeloaders is not bandwidth, but table space. I say just put up a sign saying "if we run out of tables and you're sitting there surfing while not having bought anything recently, we reserve the right to kick you out in favor of paying customers."

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:$6-$10/hr? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      If he's concerned with freeloaders, have the cash register print out a code on the receipt that you can enter into a nocat captive portal to authenticate against a RADIUS server. Give them an hour for each purchase, for instance. Tie the code to single MAC address, etc. But consider the cost of integrating your cash register, running the server, dealing with the tech support, etc. vs. the cost of sticking a WRT54G on a wire and letting a few freeloaders on the 'net.

      You don't need to prevent ALL freeloaders, just discourage most of them. To avoid expensive system integration with the cash register and admin costs, you could just run an open WAP. When someone connects, record their MAC and give them one hour of free access. After one hour, block them for say 5-60 minutes.

    5. Re:$6-$10/hr? by bitkid · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are two linux-distros for the Linksys WRT54G that are meant to help with setting up hotspots:

      EWRT Linux http://www.portless.net/menu/ewrt/ and the hotspot-zone project http://sourceforge.net/projects/hotspot-zone/. Both use nocat as the captive portal, the later offers radius authentication patches for nocat.

    6. Re:$6-$10/hr? by jlseagull · · Score: 1

      Out of all the ideas, I think that this one is the best, as it avoids:
      - Having a server tell someone they're a freeloader.
      - Having to admin a complex ticket-based system
      - Having to charge at all

      Good on ya, mate.

      --
      'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    7. Re:$6-$10/hr? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      When someone connects, record their MAC and give them one hour of free access. After one hour, block them for say 5-60 minutes.

      And what if they're buying $5 lattes every 20 minutes?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:$6-$10/hr? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      If you only block them for 5-10 minutes, they can take a bathroom break (and they'll need one after drinking 5 lattes/hour). 5-10 minute blackout period is not a big deal if someone is working at your cafe for many hours, but it would be enough of an annoyance to freeloading teenagers playing DOOM3 or whatever that they might leave.

      My system was designed to be admin-less, but if you really wanted you could have a whitelist feature that let a cafe employee whitelist a regular customer.

    9. Re:$6-$10/hr? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      thanks! Now I'll have to go patent it, so no one can implement it. :)

  34. How come all the laptops get to have all the fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    btw whats the name of the cyber cafe? hmmm makes me want park my car infront of your cyber cafe with my wireless enabled desktop on a power inverter ;)

  35. The Fine Print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This Paid Slashvertisment brought to you by Garcia

    1. Re:The Fine Print by garcia · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I wish I got paid. Even if they gave me free coffee so I wouldn't have to pay every Sunday when we go there.

      I'm not an employee, happy customer, or otherwise. I'm just pointing out that Panera offers free WiFi and happens to be one of the largest (if not the largest) free WiFi providers out there.

  36. re: WI FI and Coffee Shops by SR71Blackbird · · Score: 1

    Im in still in High School and during the lasts 2 weeks of the semester I pratically lived at starbuchs. I was very suprised that they did not have free internet and it upset me very much, I love the idea of a coffee shop with free internet, even if it is added into the price of the coffee :)

  37. Most hotels have an EULA by georgeha · · Score: 1

    to access their WiFi you have to click on a EULA, which probably has the usual legal crap about copyrighted material.

    Sounds like a start.

  38. Resource Suckers by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    This is a serious issue for businesses like coffee shops that have table space and depend on people actually purchasing stuff to survive. While there are exceptions, "Table squaters" take up valuble space but produce very limited income for the shop owner, and generally just "can't understand" why there is anything at all wrong with sucking up free resources without returning something like a purchase every so often. A single purchase of a cup of something does not entitle people to plant themselves at a table all day.

    Another issue is that people who do this do not add anything to the attractivness of the business as a social gathering place.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  39. Excellent example, but a double-edged sword... by Shoten · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the Adams Morgan neighborhood of DC, there's a coffee shop called "Tryst" (I like them, so I won't post a link here. Poor guys would get slashdotted into oblivion!) that has free wifi. Now, Adams Morgan is NOT a cheap place to have a business, and Tryst is simply huge. The place is full of sofas, loveseats and easy chairs...not a single mass-produced cafe chair can be found in the place, in all truth, so it actually has a relatively low density as far as customers per square foot. They do solid business, though, because they are reknowned as a great place for students, consultants, etc. to work. Go in there at night, and it's social. But go there during the middle of the day, and it's STILL busy, and looking like a forest of laptops. The people take advantage of the free wifi, and they buy coffee, beer, and food at the same time. I used to live mere blocks from them, and actually wrote most of my book in some of those comfortable chairs while racking up a tab consisting of caffeine and beer in alternating amounts. The place has this incredible buzz to it that makes it perfect to work in, and this in turn is the key to their being busy all day long, every day.

    There's a flipside to this, though. It's no secret that in some cases, coffee shops that offer free wifi end up with nothing more than wifi freeloaders, who go in, power up and sit down to work without ordering a thing. I honestly don't know how the flip comes about, but Tryst doesn't do anything to require that people purchase, it just takes care of itself. Part of it could be the quality of their food and drink...their coffee is just unbelievable. It's Seattle-good, to put it as a couple of my friends from there did.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:Excellent example, but a double-edged sword... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Friggen yuppies.

      http://www.trystdc.com/

    2. Re:Excellent example, but a double-edged sword... by Brunellus · · Score: 1

      I've never been at Tryst during the daytime. I will confirm for the slashdotting public that Tryst is really quite sociable at night, with nary a laptop (of the electronic kind anyway) in sight.

      And if that's too high-tech for you, you can always go have a few drinks at Millie & Al's--last time I was there, the TV was tuned to WJLA-7, and, judging from the fuzziness, was connected to an old pair of rabbit ears somewhere....

    3. Re:Excellent example, but a double-edged sword... by Ruprecht+the+Monkeyb · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that there are a lot of places in Adams Morgan where you could sit at another establishment and still have access to their signal.

    4. Re:Excellent example, but a double-edged sword... by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      If memory serves, Tryst disables their WiFi On thursday-Saturdya night.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    5. Re:Excellent example, but a double-edged sword... by anaesthetica · · Score: 3, Informative

      A few months ago Tryst started a policy of not offering Wi-Fi on weekends, precisely because of freeloaders taking up all the sofa spots and being anti-social. They allow free wireless on weekdays because it helps them maintain volume through the weekdays, but on the weekend (when they're packed to the gills regardless) I think they'd rather have social (read: paying) customers instead.

      However, Tryst is hands down the best hang-out coffee shop in the city, and perhaps even on the eastern seaboard.

      Nice to see another DC /.er. Cheers!

    6. Re:Excellent example, but a double-edged sword... by Shoten · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. I've checked it myself; because of the placement of the AP in the back of Tryst, the construction of the buildings on either side of it, and the alleyway behind it, the only way to get their signal is either to be inside, or on the sidewalk in front. The establishments on either side get really crappy signal and the one across the street (a bar known as "The Reef"...another fav of mine) gets none at all.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  40. increased business and royalty? by jginspace · · Score: 1

    increased business and royalty

    Nah ... don't want them ... you'd have a never-ending smell of wet paint around the place.

  41. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It costs more to charge for wifi than wifi is worth.

    1. Re:simple by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Most of my friends prefer a bar that has free munchies. Likewise, I know where the free AP's are and go there before I'll go somewhere and pay for access.

      That's how 'just not a lot' 90% of us are. Sad, but true. Most folks arent' constantly scheming about improved net access like I am, either.

      I saw this at a breakfast/lunch bistro with free wifi, downtown 2 nights ago: some guy sitting on the park bench outside, surfing. A tourist. He'd have been inside, if they'd been open at 8pm.

      As it was, their net-published entry in a free wifi database probably gets a few dozen customers a month that they wouldn't otherwise get, since my town's on a major tourism route and they're off the main drag. And the bistro's owners (friends) are the type that wouldn't hesitate to walk up to an utter freeloader and say 'Um, buy something or beat it.' That's what I'd do, too. Rather than futz with all this angst and administrivia, just step up to the table and politely/firmly tell them to either buy something or vacate 'your' table for customers.

      As for the other concerns (unruly gamers, wankers-seeking-porn, bandwidth hogs), more of the same... house rules and a willingness to politely deny service to people you don't want as customers are all that are needed.

  42. Bringing in customers by CuratorTom · · Score: 1

    I recently ate at a Country Kitchen in order to get free WiFi. That's right, a Country Kitchen. Obviously, free WiFi brings in customers.

    1. Re:Bringing in customers by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I recently ate at a Country Kitchen in order to get free WiFi. That's right, a Country Kitchen. Obviously, free WiFi brings in customers.

      Are you in AARP? [south park reference]

      Just wondering, although when I visit relatives in Santa Barbara, I hang out at some diners like that, cause it's a place I know has food at all hours and has free WiFi ...

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  43. It's more profitable to make it free by monopole · · Score: 1

    A post a while back in boing boing (http://www.boingboing.net/2003/07/27/wifi_is_too_ expensiv.html)
    noted that the added cost of administering and accounting for a pay wifi site ($30) versus a free site ($6) made the profit very difficult. In comparison a free site was cheap enough to easily make a net profit from the increased traffic it drew.

    So simply show then the money.

  44. WIFI ruins coffee shops by samuel4242 · · Score: 1

    I hate to rain on the free parade. Lord knows I've used free wifi a lot. I even leave my home access point open to help anyone in the neighborhood. But I think free wifi has ruined my favorite coffee shop. It turned everyone into a bunch of droids with their eyes glued to the screen. The place is like a branch office for telecommuters, not a hip, fun place to relax. And I can see why the management is a bit peeved. Many folks don't consume much more than one cup of coffee every few hours. (And it's a good thing too. People would be overweight and overcaffeinated.) I would rather have a place with reasonable prices for food and beverage. We don't need that many calories in the day. It's silly to tie calorie/caffeine consumption to WiFi. Keep the world Orthogonal!!!

  45. Cafe? How about a pub! by KhaymanUCSD · · Score: 1

    O'Briens Pub in San Diego

    They have a great beer selection and the food is pretty good too. That brings in most of the customers. I and a few friends have often decided that we were going to "work" from there and used the free wi-fi and our VPN connections. I can guarantee you that Tom's (the owner) investment has more than paid for itself.

    If you're in the San Diego area you should stop in.

    --
    Kneel before Sig!
  46. Advertising by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Free Wifi, with paid computer rentals, is advertising for a restaurant or hotel or other business. It should be looked upon as such.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  47. Personal Experience by demon_jr808 · · Score: 1

    I work in a computer store that offers free Wi-Fi along with free Internet Access on our demo computers. In my opinion, what end up with is increased traffic, but mainly for the sole purpose of taking advantage of the free internet access. In terms of Wi-Fi, most people just sit outside our store to use it, without even stepping inside once. In my opinion, the amount of traffic your store will have will increase dramatically, but in terms of actually sales, there will probably not be much increase. In fact, the increased traffic may even be a detriment. The more people in the store, the less likely someone will be able to be serviced or helped or comfortable. If the store is filled up with people who are just there for the free Internet Access, it will be that much harder for real customers to be helped or make purchases.

  48. Well by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 1

    He's running an internet café, so his principle business is presumably selling computer usage. This is not a coffee shop where the money is made in keeping a steady stream of customers around to pay $3/cup.

    I assume this guy is probably planning to sell snacks/drinks/coffee to bolster his bottom line, but let's not forget that his business is not a coffee shop. Approaching this like Panera Bread or even the local mom and pop coffee place isn't necessarily the most intelligent way to go.

    Additionally, I sincerely hope this guy isn't trying to setup a true internet café in the US, as I've only seen a few that were successful. Unless you're in a high-traffic area of a major tourist locale, I've only seen gaming centers and the like last longer than a year or so. Don't take that as gospel truth or anything, it's just been my (admittedly limited) experience.

    Can the cost be recovered? Sure, that's not tough at all, and most people don't notice the difference between a $1.29 or $1.59 fountain drink. Will it drive business, though? That's the real question: should he give away wi-fi when his core business is selling internet access (and a computer with which to use it). Wouldn't a reduced rate be more feasible?

  49. who is liable ? by Atreide · · Score: 1

    If you come at my cafe and hack pentagon from it, who will be charged ?
    Will I be able to have a secure system that prevents hacking of my system ? Will I know how to log and protect my logs to cover myself in case someone sue me ?

    --
    The world belongs to those who get up early. - I'm far from being the king of Earth then :-(
  50. I argued about increased business and royalty by mmmuttly · · Score: 2, Funny

    I argued about increased business and royalty and proposed that the infrastructure cost these days is reasonable Lemme get this straight - You put in WiFi and suddenly royalty wants to patronize your coffee shop? Who knew the Queen Mum was into wireless? Is she a java junky and the whole tea thing is just for the tourists? Hell, she's probably lurking on Shashdot as we speak, waiting to drag out some "In Soviet Russia..." cliche.

    1. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by KenAndCorey · · Score: 1
      I argued about increased business and royalty...
      I, for one, welcome our new HIFI-loving Royal overlords to my local Internet Cafe.
    2. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by kelzer · · Score: 1

      Who knew the Queen Mum was into wireless?

      She doesn't have much choice. They generally don't run ethernet cable to coffins.

      --

      ---------------------------------------------
      SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    3. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by null+etc. · · Score: 1
      She doesn't have much choice. They generally don't run ethernet cable to coffins.

      I thought that rich people got what they wanted?

    4. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by mmmuttly · · Score: 1

      So that's why she quit returning my calls. I thought she was still pissed about that china I broke.

    5. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by anaesthetica · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      In British Empire, Soviet Russia cliche drags out you!

      (I apologise)

    6. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by toph42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, WiFi freed you! Oh wait...

    7. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by bigman2003 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Okay- Royalty mis-typing aside...

      The entire article just screams, "I have never owned a business!"

      See, the businessman sees this as a potential revenue stream. If he wants to run a successful coffee shop, he is thinking about ways to make money.

      Going to businesses that make money is great- because they will be around for a while, and are generally nicer to be in.

      The coffee shop owner may be thinking: "I only have seating for 12 people. If 5 people sit here for an hour, sucking up my bandwidth...where will the other customers sit?"

      Ever go to a coffee shop in a university town? It sucks. Students claim every table, and spread out their laptops, papers, books, backpacks etc. Then they sit there for hours nursing one drink.

      Sure, it is great for the students- but what about the business? A lot of other customers are scared away. There are two coffee shops in the town I work (university town) that I have not stepped foot in for about 3 years, exactly for this reason. Even the local Borders Books suffers from this problem.

      Making $3.50 per table every 2 hours will not keep them in business. It's all about getting drinks out the door.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    8. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by LordSnooty · · Score: 2, Informative

      Making $3.50 per table every 2 hours will not keep them in business. It's all about getting drinks out the door.

      MOD PARENT UP. Tha's the reason that the whole free wifi thing has struggled to take off in coffee-shop-type situs, except where a flat fee is paid or it's Starbucks, who can take the hit (maybe one Starbucks in a a locale goes wifi, so the overspill can be accomdated in the other 4 within 10 mins walking distance). Note I live in the UK. However we were promised an always-connected utopia.

    9. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by Snoflayke5 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's alot of hyperbole around this issue and some substantive facts:

      -Very good points on the need to look at the hard business "benefits" Very on target.

      -No Cafe owner has ever been sued by the RIAA. The RIAA uses lawsuits for marketing; they want to cut off end users, ie reformed 12 year olds in pepsi ads, not cafe owners. There's not alot of "marketing payoff" in expending legal resources on cafe owner ip lawsuits.

      -Costs are the $40 a month for a dsl line from the phone co. Modem/Routers rarely wear out under heavy use.

      -From my vantage point here in San Francisco working @ a free wireless cafe, prior points aside,I'd say wifi is a mixed bag for cafe owners.

      In the spirit of this thread, my favorite cafe discontinued free wifi a few months back because customers "stayed too long." Often these customers stayed w/o continuously buying drinks and food.

      Sooo, if you run a cafe that, w/o free wifi, already has hordes of loyal impassioned customers and quick turnover, your business already does what a successful cafe should do (coffee sales being a great driver of profits--$1.50 on 4 cents of supplies). --Don't take the chance that freeloaders like me (I tip very generously) will crowd up those seats for hours.

      The ideal application for free wifi is to turn it on only during otherwise slow hours and post those hours prominently. This way you can use it as necc to hopefully drive business.

      -Paid wifi: kind of dumb business model. Great if you need it and mainly work at the same place, but #'s of users are usually pretty few. Won't drive revenues for an otherwise flailing cafe.

      Hope this helps!

    10. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by MAdMaxOr · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's why my favorite coffee shop has some couches and tables designated as study-free zones. If an employee walks by and you have a laptop or textbook out, you'll be kindly asked to move.

      I think this works out well for everyone.

    11. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by BlogPope · · Score: 1
      Making $3.50 per table every 2 hours will not keep them in business. It's all about getting drinks out the door.

      As I had drilled into my head in B-school, Starbucks is not about moving coffee, its about creating a "atmosphere" people enjoy. $4.00 cups of coffee is just how they derive revenue from that creation. So they want folks sitting around enjoying coffe, but they want them doing so in a social manner, nat heads buried in a laptop grunting over market moves. Pretty much the same reason people go to bars to pay $5.00 for a beer they could get for $1 at the Wholesale Club.

      --
      My other car is a Popemobile
    12. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that the "study zone" should be segregated and the size of that section should be as much of your establishment as you can afford and still turn a profit from those customers. Personally, I don't pay a dime for internet usage at these establishments. Either I can get a connection from a close by open connection from another establishment, or I ad-hoc off of someone else. Eventually, the businesses that don't charge and do it right so the economics are there will thrive and the business that depends on charging their customers won't be able to handle losing that source of revenue that they are used to. In my opinion, depending on that revenue is suicide in the long run.

    13. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by JimBobJoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      The coffee shop owner may be thinking: "I only have seating for 12 people. If 5 people sit here for an hour, sucking up my bandwidth...where will the other customers sit?"

      I remember reading somewhere that McDonald's had purposefully designed the seating in its restaurants to become uncomfortable after about 10-15 minutes. They don't want people hanging about (and they definitely don't want homeless hanging about. Wendy's has more comfortable seating, and I see homeless in there all the time.)

    14. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by mrsteele · · Score: 1

      There is, of course, a difference between just trying to sell a lot of coffee, and developing a 'cafe' atmosphere and loyal clientele. If the only way to make money was to simply sell as much coffee as quickly as possible, there would just be a bunch of small coffee stands around. There are other ways to make a store profitable.

      And I'm guessing you mean Cafe Roma and Mishka's? ;)

    15. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell kind of university town only has 2 coffee shops? The university town where I live and go to school has half a dozen not counting the corporate joints, and we are barley on the map. Every last one of the coffee shops has free WiFi and none of them seem to be hurting for it. As an additional up side they manage to cover the downtown area pretty well... I don't think I'v ever seen a coffee shop that wasn't crowded with students and other such low life's, it's like complaining about the mothers at a toy store. You've obviously never run a business if you think the best way to do so is to harass your customers and re-invent the revenue wheel.

    16. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by WebCrapper · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I seem to remember there being some software that would cause the POS and router to interact so that it would allow you to connect when you purchased something. Basically, you buy something and your free password to the system is on the receipt. After X amount of time, it will disconnect you, causing you to buy something else. Using this, you could basically keep your product rates the same and watch your average person either clear out when their time is up, freeing up space - or cause them to run over and buy something else real quick. The military (ok, MWR) is currently using the same type of sessions on their computer equipment for soldiers to use, most places you get a half hour to an hour and you're done unless someone ups the time for you.

      I know this technically goes against the "free" part of it all, but it is a way for the system to work and free up the tables of people nursing one drink every 3-4 hours. It would also keep others on the outside of the shop from leeching on the connection as well.

    17. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by angrytuna · · Score: 1

      I think this is part (if not all) of the reason why these places never run any power strips. If only three of the tables in the place have access to power, you can get: !) people sharing tables that would otherwise not be inclined to, consolidating tables for you, 2) people running on battery only that eventually have to leave if there's no free outlets, 3) No bad rep for having no outlets. I'd be unlikely to go to a coffeeshop with no power outlets. I WOULD go to one where they were a finite resource. It's touch and go if I'll get a coveted powered spot or not, but I'll probably get a coffee nonetheless. Just my $.02

      --

      It is a solemn thought: dead, the noblest man's meat is inferior to pork.

    18. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by bigman2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mr. Steele,

      Good job...yes..those are the two (or 3 in the case of Cafe Roma. I don't know which location is worse, but I think the one by campus with the couches that sit out in the rain would be the winner).

      My original point was that the businessman was doing what he thought he should be doing, based on his own business plan.

      'Free Wi-Fi for Everyone' is not a necessary, or even desirable, part of all coffee shop business plans.

      I used to own a print shop. Everyone told me I needed to have copiers, because it was so convenient, etc. etc.

      They didn't realize that copiers cost a ton of money, and did not attract the clientele I was looking for. Grandma coming around and making her 10 copies each month was going to do nothing for my sales- yet grandma wanted the same level of service as customers ordering $10,000 of printing.

      I made money, and grandma went to go drive my competitors nuts. I was very happy.

      Some coffee shops thrive on the people who are going to sit there for hours, while others want to provide a nice atmosphere, but get you out the door a lot quicker.

      Find out which ones are making real money, and emulate that.

      If you are not opening your coffee shop in order to make money...then just invite your friends over to sit on the porch and drink coffee. You'll have a lot fewer hassles, and lose a lot less money.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    19. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like free wifi at my favorite SF cafes. To be sure, I don't hang in those cafes during peak hours regardless of if I'm reading a magazine, book, or using the wifi. It's rude, and more importantly, I like the places. Too much of that behavior and they'll die and be replaced with something nasty like a Starbucks. Peak hours are for revenue generation. I mean, a little respect for the guys who run your favorite place.

      I think the idea of free off-peak makes a lot of sense.

    20. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had the tech to set it up, then you could do something like buy a coffee and get 20 minutes free wifi (or more or less time as the business deems appropriate). The receipt for the coffee/food could have a code on it to grant you access.

      Amazon will probably patent this idea in about 3 minutes.. so use it while you can.

    21. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by sd_diamond · · Score: 0

      -Paid wifi: kind of dumb business model. Great if you need it and mainly work at the same place, but #'s of users are usually pretty few.

      If those users spend all their time sitting in front of a computer, I'd bet their #s are pretty high.

    22. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

      Meh. None of the shops at my college town have wifi (execpt the chains). It doesn't hurt because there is so little wifi around there anyway that nobody expects it. People still bring laptops. I used to bring my own internet back in the palm.net days. The old Viix with it's antenna sticking up and the folding keybaord got some odd looks.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    23. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      A few years ago when I was in Budapest, I saw that a lot of the fast-food joints had internet kiosks that you could use for free ... after you'd bought food. On your receipt was a code that you had to type in, to get access.

      It wasn't unlimited, either. I think it was 30 minutes for each meal purchased. Which seemed to me to be pretty fair -- especially when you're talking physical kiosks instead of Wifi, a time limit keeps people moving.

      In that vein, wouldn't it be possible to write some code that uses the MAC-type address of each Wifi client to limit the amount of time it can connect for? Say an hour a day or something?

      Or maybe something more complex, where you get an hour free, but then can extend for another 30 minutes with each purchase. Thus you can sit there as long as you want, as long as you're buying a cup of coffee every 30 minutes. (For those who don't want the coffee, maybe you could just pay a fee -- 75% of a cup of coffee, perhaps -- for internet alone.)

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    24. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someone should mod the parent up.

      Everything he said is very true: except in rare cases, just tossing an AP up in your coffee shop isn't going to do anything good for business, assuming the shop already has an established clientele. Especially in an urban area, where people can just sit on the street outside the door and get access, or across the street using a directional antenna, you might not get a single new customer from it.

      However, if you are just starting up a business and trying to draw new customers, and especially if you're in an area that's not teeming with people, free Wifi might be a cheap way to attract and establish a customer base. You can always switch to a system that requires a receipt-printed code or something later, if the place starts to resemble an Internet addict's opium den. But if you're just getting started, there's not a whole lot to lose in trying: the investment is fairly minimal, and you might get some good customers out of it, depending on the demographics of the area.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    25. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by ockegheim · · Score: 1
      Sooo, if you run a cafe that, w/o free wifi, already has hordes of loyal impassioned customers and quick turnover, your business already does what a successful cafe should do

      Paid wifi: kind of dumb business model. Great if you need it and mainly work at the same place, but #'s of users are usually pretty few. Won't drive revenues for an otherwise flailing cafe.

      Yes, a good café will be all about the coffee and atmosphere. To integrate wireless and let people surf or work without spoiling this atmosphere is the big challenge.

      --
      I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
    26. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by buswolley · · Score: 1
      I work at a small coffee shop in a Californian city of about 100,000. Upon my sugestion the owners made wi-fi complimentary.


      We are the first cafe in this town to offer this and, it has given us a much needed edge upon our competitors.

      "Bandwidth" of customer seating may be a problem to already successful cafe's. However, many cafe'swould love to have that problem. Our problem is lack of filled tables rather than tales filled with freeloaders.

      Another thing, Nothing attracts a crowd like a crowd. . If you go by a dead empty cafe, and a bustling busy cafe.....Which one do you choose. You might try the empty so you dont have to wait in line, but you also might very well choose the busy one simply beacuase other people have already made that choice. If other people think that one cafe is better than the other, it is a good bet that it really is better. Like ABoos

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    27. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 1

      The ideal application for free wifi is to turn it on only during otherwise slow hours and post those hours prominently. This way you can use it as necc to hopefully drive business.

      That's a good idea, but what if you did things a little differently? Offer free access, but cap it at 5KB/s. Paid access could have a higher cap. Maybe between 20 and 40KB/s, since that's plenty fast to surf most of the web.

      Whatever the submitter does, I hope they don't just hook up a cable modem and a wireless router. If they do that, they won't be able to cap bandwidth (unless it's an awesome router) and they won't be able to filter access at all. (There are a lot of things the owner probably doesn't want patrons to be browsing in plain sight.)

      --
      "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
    28. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      There's a major problem with this argument, which is to say that it doesn't really work that way in real life, at least not for coffee shops.

      In my experience there are essentially three types of coffee drinkers, people who take coffee away, people who eat, and people who sit.

      The take away crowd is usually an interval crowd, you either have lines out the door or you have none of them, they show up in the early mornings before work, during staff breaks etc, they are high turnover.

      The people who eat are largely a lunch time and occasionally breakfast or dinner crowd and go to cafes. The amount of time they can spend is usually restricted by their schedules. They spend a reasonable amount of money because they buy lunch as well as coffee.

      The remainder of customers tend to sit, whether they use wi-fi, or read, or study, or chat with friends. They spend a reasonable amount of time, and reasonably little money though they are sometimes quite regular.

      Your average coffee shop is really only looking at two of these groups as cafes are really almost a seperate type of business. The take away group is the highest turnover/highest profit group, but it doesn't really use the seating so it doesn't interfere with those who do.

      Now you might ask why does a coffee shop have seats if the highest turnover group doesn't need them. The reason is that there is a lot of gap between the high turnover groups. The purpose of the sitting group is to bring in enough money to cover the operating costs of keeping the place open, and hopefully make a bit of money on top. So even if you only pay $2.50 for a three hour stop, it doesn't really matter so long as the operating costs are covered.

    29. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by dogganos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ever go to a coffee shop in a university town? It sucks. Students claim every table, and spread out their laptops, papers, books, backpacks etc. Then they sit there for hours nursing one drink. Then you can still offer free WiFi but in another model: Using a unique code on the drink/whatever receipt, the customers can surf the internet for so and so time. Then its over. Either go, either buy another drink! Voila!

    30. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by streamheat · · Score: 1

      This entire article screams, "I have never patronized a business !" If firms are trying to maximize profit, consumers are trying to maximize utility. When confronted with non-free wi-fi, we must either pay at least $6 an hour to the establishment itself, or, worse, $30 to a company that is one component of an oligopoly and therefore only covers one of our local hangouts. Either is a waste of time. You can tell because you never see anyone using them. In Europe, providers are beginning to blanket city centers. Here, there's very little movement in that direction. As for university towns, I don't know where you went to school, but when I visit my alma mater, the coffee shops are devoid of laptop users because all of campus is available to them, including six floors of comfortable furniture in the library. Besides, the people who give this excuse all act like: A) this problem is new to coffee shops; and B) their employees are nervous about asking loitering customers. Neither have ever been true. And I know that business owners will not be held liable for piracy on their premises because the older form of venue called the internet cafe has already dodged liability on this issue. As for maintenance, a $30 WAP with a $43/mo. cable service doesn't have any maintenance. If it stops working, you call the cable company. That approach works for the businesses in my area (has universities but not really a college town) who offer free wi-fi. The reason most of them have done it is because it draws more affluent customers, and richer customers spend more money and are nicer to the employees, which drives down the turnover rate, which saves a hell of a lot more money than $30 plus $43/month. I'm sure there are reasons not to offer your customers the contemporary definiton of a welcoming environment, but the ones you named are certainly not the real ones. I think it's mostly an example of the American prejudice against offering someting for nothing.

    31. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      The important points I got from your message were:

      A- You went to a school where kids are more likely to hang out in the library than a coffee shop.

      B- You don't understand that a few simple line-breaks would make it a lot easier to read your message.

      If you *really* think that Americans don't like to give something for nothing, then you have very little experience either in America, or other countries.

      Perfect example: You have to pay for ketchup at McDonald's in Europe. And, what about the 'all you can drink' soda fountains?

      --
      No reason to lie.
    32. Re:I argued about increased business and royalty by streamheat · · Score: 1

      A - No. B - I put paragraphs in the post. they didn't post. C - There is not one substantive point in your reply, so I turned notification off. I'm done.

  51. Bidwell & Elmwood Buffalo NY by cthulhuology · · Score: 1

    Case in point. I am here almost every day of the week. I spend around $500 a month here. I work from the cafe because of their wireless. If they didn't have it, I wouldn' be here blowing $15 a day on food and drinks. $6000 a year at the cafe. Office away from home. Works for me.

  52. Joshua Cup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 of them here in Macon, GA. Both of them have had free Wi-fi for awhile. They often get lots of students

  53. Free WiFi by burtdub · · Score: 1

    The kickbacks they could get from the mob for leaving the WiFi network unencrypted would easily offset the startup costs.

  54. Liability is a major concern by realmolo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If one of the wireless users is sharing movies and crap, there is a distinct possibility that the MPAA will notify the ISP. The ISP is then legally required to either get rid of the file from the user's machine, or *shut off* that user. Which means the coffee shops access will be killed by the ISP.

    Major hassle. Not to mention that the coffee shop will basically be an ISP. There will be users screwing the local network up with viruses, users who can't figure out how to get on and want help...all of which requires somebody who knows the tech side to keep things running well.

    Not worth the trouble. AT ALL.

    1. Re:Liability is a major concern by PhoenixRising · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but IAASA*

      I don't agree. First off, read 17 USC 512. A coffeeshop with an open WAP isn't going to be held monetarily liable for something some user does (section (a)); about all a court could do is say "don't let Jim Q. User on your network" (section (j)), provided they can ID Jim Q. User, which they probably can't. Legal issues aside, a coffeeshop isn't a place where major distribution of copyrighted materials is going to occur, because the users are transient. It's not worth anyone's time to go after one.

      As for the tech support side, all you need to do is get DSL/Cable, plug your $30 wireless router into the modem, and change your WEP key periodically. That's all the tech savvy you need.

      Look around. Lots of coffeeshops apparently think it's well worth the trouble.

      * I Am A System Administrator

    2. Re:Liability is a major concern by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Considering the **AA only goes after those who are distributing their copyrighted materials, it wouldn't be very difficult to prevent outgoing data on certain ports. If the person can get around that, the **AA isn't going to find them anyway, they stick to big name distribution services.

      Really the only ports you need to provide access to your customers in such an environment is HTTP related ports, FTP, E-mail, and SSH. Maybe some others, but those are the key ones. If someone leaves because they needed access to something else, you probably could do without the trouble.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Liability is a major concern by Ecks · · Score: 1

      If the coffee shop only has an access point then the ISP will have no trouble verifying that the offending material has been eliminated. Since it has been eliminated they will probably not shut off the coffee shop. Consider that by the time the MPAA has notified the ISP and the ISP has notified the coffee shop the user's laptop will be long gone.

      My local coffee shop downtown features wifi access. I put in two or three sessions a month for about 2 hours at a session. My coffee shop want's people hanging around chatting and in general adding to the landscape. The offer no services with the wifi. The attendents only know that there is wifi access. If you cannot figure out how to connect then you cannot use the wifi. They won't even reboot the access point. The cost to them is the monthly cost of a DSL line. They seem to have absorbed this a part of the fixed cost of doing business. When I'm there the place is mostly empty. I don't know how many customer's like me it takes to offset the fixed cost. I've seen other wifi users there on several occasions and as the cost of DSL is probably a fraction of a percent of their rent and other operating costs, I'd imagine that they are making their money back.

      -- Ecks

  55. Time limited accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine opened a small coffee shop here in town and for every cup of coffee you get 1/2 hour of access for free. On the reciept there is an access code for the account created for your cup of coffee, that expires after a half hour. You can extend that time by buying another cup of coffee and getting more credit, or purchasing more time.

    The biggest problem he found when he first installed his system was squaters. People who bought one cup of coffee and sat there for an hour or more without purchasing anything more. It made is table space really inefficient and cut into his profits very noticably. Maybe it won't be a problem for a shop that doesn't fill completely up often, but volume is the name of the game anything that hurts volume is bad.

  56. Can i setup a captive portal easily ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    we have free wiFi but we have a lot of freeloaders (students) at the weekend who buy nothing (or 1 coffee per table of 5)

    so to stop this are there any easy (free/simple) software we can run (Win2k/XP/*nix:we are _not_ linux gurus) that can give access to patrons for determined times (say 2 hours with purchase of a coffee, buy another cofee and access is restored from the till) to stop the majority of freeloaders sucking our bandwidth
    as always with free things its the minority or spoil and absue it for the majority and we wouldnt want to discontinue it because of jerks

    thanks

    James H
    Orange Cafe
    Croydon, UK

  57. People will not pay for it. Period. by cmefford · · Score: 1
    There isn't much more to add. If he thinks he can charge, he's flat out wrong.

    As to the liability, use a redirect gateway, with an end user agreement click through.

    You can be sued for anything, the eua goes a good distance to showing due diligence.

  58. Off the top of my head by Locke2005 · · Score: 1
    Argument against: people outside the cafe can probably access the free WiFi as well

    Argument for: The control systems and maintenance required to make sure people are paying for their WiFi connection probably cost more than any additional revenue you can get from it. I know if I had a laptop, I'd keep looking until I found a place with open access, just to avoid the hassle.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  59. World Cup by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    World Cup in Portland has free WiFi. The last time I checked, they were doing OK. They have two locations (that I know of). Both are downtown. One of a coffee shop and the other is the coffee shop inside Powell's main downtown location.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    1. Re:World Cup by meatball_mulligan · · Score: 2, Informative

      World Cup has at least three locations:

      • 18th & Glissan in NW
      • EcoTrust in the Perl
      • Powell's

      They all offer free WiFi via Personal Telco and seem to be doing very well. It might be because they also have great coffee, a nice atmosphere, and friendly staff. It might be because almost every coffee shop in town other than Star*ucks offer free WiFi. I especially enjoy:

      • all the World Cup shops (best coffee in town)
      • Anna Banana's, NW 21st (kinda hippie, but nice)
      • Coffee Time, NW 21st
      • Sultan Cafe, NW 18th (hookahs!)
      • Java Vivace, NW 23d (mmm, crepes)
      • Stumptown, Downtown 3d & Oak (good coffee or beer!)
      • Palio, Ladd's Addition (cool little neighborhood hangout)
      • Fireside, SE Powell & 12th
      • Sueña, Hollywood (though their tables & chairs suck)
  60. Free, Almost Free, Pay Per Drink, and Pay Big Time by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    The choices aren't just free or not free.

    The real choice is:

    Free - this works best for a destination place, where you don't have competitors within easy range, as people will tend to congregate where the signal is strongest, and people with WiFi laptops and Blackberries and such tend to be willing to spend money where they hang out.

    Almost Free - secure with a password that changes that you get when you shop there, or with a subscription you renew periodically. Then you can nurse a drink along or you can not, but it's less of a hassle to maintain. This works where you have many competitors at close range with equal signal strength, and you just change it once a week or so - so the WiFi for free guys will either ask their friend for the password or buy a drink once in a while, but the overhead is low. Still a nuisance tho. Gathering places should be easy to get to, which is why many cafes are near parks and water/green places. Also works for bookstores - you get a quarterly card or annual card as a member and everyone has the same password but it's on the card so easy to maintain.

    Pay Per Drink - works for terminals but such a hassle for WiFi laptops that people will get angry at you and go buy drinks at your competitor.

    Pay Big Time - hourly charges, secure networks, where you offer a WiFi provider portal at your site but they basically buy service from them - good for things like Starbucks where all the chain stores have the same exact setup and same provider, but still a pain and the price upsets people who would otherwise hang out and drink your coffee drinks that cost too much.

    Free works best, IMHO. But that's cause I live near three places that provide it, so I don't pay for WiFi at home (have DSL and Cablemodem but rarely use them ...). I try to buy drinks at the places that give it, and recommend them to friends tho, so I guess it does work in growing their customer base. And I am a customer, so it's not a total loss.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  61. simple by aggieben · · Score: 1

    My argument would be simple:

    Why make it free when 90% of people would pay $1/day for it?

    Maybe if you have regulars, you could offer discounts, like $0.25/day, but the idea here is just like with music downloads: people will pay for it, just not a lot.

    --
    Don't become a regular here, you will become retarded. -- Yoda the Retard
  62. Free access by midifarm · · Score: 1
    I make it a point to only frequent shops that provide free net access as opposed to places that are "T-Mobile" hotspots ($30/month). It's worth it to me.

    Peace

  63. Retailer Mentality by mpapet · · Score: 1

    In this case, the retailer thinks he's going to do well reselling internet access. Giving it away for free doesn't really fit into his business plan.

    I'm guessing the guy isn't technically savvy either if you had to explain the whole wireless thing to him.

    Other Retailers:
    The average coffee retailer may not be so sophisticated as to understand loss-leader pricing. Loss-leading is a financial disaster if it isn't executed well. This might lead to the camping-out characters.

    It seems simple to most ./'s. Set up cable/dsl account, connect wireless access point and be on your way. But it's a black art to many, especially someone focused on selling coffee.

    OT Panera
    We have a Panera and a Starbucks near us. If I'm not mistaken, you still pay for access at starbucks and that place has people with laptops in it all the time. Meanwhile panera has a couple of laptop users now and again, but is otherwise busy with people buying food. That's what Panera had in mind and I'd like to know how they execute that to keep it that way.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  64. I'm by mangus_angus · · Score: 1

    sitting outside of a wifi cafe right now....accross the street that is ;)

  65. Good idea, but how ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    great idea but we (those who work in coffee shops) dont want to be compiling kernels
    how could we achieve that very idea of yours for easy/cheap ?

  66. "Royalty"? by brockbr · · Score: 1

    ...is this busniess in Japan?

  67. Free loaders tear it all down by ShatteredDream · · Score: 1

    All it takes is a few dedicated free loaders to make it not worth it for most coffee shops. Starbucks, Panera, our local chain called the Daily Grind and others don't mind people coming in and sitting down for a few hours if they buy at least something modest there, but the people you have to worry about are the cheapskates that buy nothing and still mooch off the wifi.

    I would have no problem paying $1-$2 for a few hours of access on top of buying an espresso drink, and I can't really say that our local Starbucks' (yeah we have only 1, inside a B&N store) policy of charging $4 for 2 hours of access is unreasonable. The service is good, AFAIK unrestricted and pretty fast. Panera's is free, but it is slow as hell around here and it's filtered to an unacceptable degree. I couldn't even post blog updates because apparently my blog got listed as a porn site by their filter vendor. I know their reasons, and don't fault them, but for-pay wifi IMO is the way to go.

    I see free loaders at our Starbucks all the time because I see other college students going there to study and not buying anything. They go there just because they like the atmosphere, but guess what people? Starbucks needs to make money in order to provide you with that. The least you can do is drop them a few bucks here that there. Don't give me that poor college student routine either. Most of the college students out there can afford $3 for a drink here and there. My family is now probably no more than half, probably closer to 1/3 or 1/4 as rich as most of the families that send their kids to our college. I have to work during the summer and year to pay for my expenses and even I can afford to pay my way when I go to Starbucks. Sell off that new Chevy Suburban or BMW that mumsy and daddykins bought you, if that's what it takes.

    It's the same problem with file sharing. Most of the people I knew that were into it hardcore were people from richer families where they had the income to buy the music and movies. Ironically, it's usually the working class students and middle rung middle class students like myself and some others I know that actually pay consistently for such things. In fact, the people with the largest bootleg IP collections I've seen at college, tend to drive very expensive cars and have great apartments that they couldn't possibly pay for on their own without a lot of assitance from their parents.

    1. Re:Free loaders tear it all down by blake3737 · · Score: 1

      Daily grindy? This wouldn't be in bridgewater, ma would it?

    2. Re:Free loaders tear it all down by blake3737 · · Score: 1

      and by grindy I meant grind.

  68. Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's a lot of coffee shops around me ( Washington DC ) which have pay wireless access. I've never felt the need to do so -- even though 90% of the time I spend working on my personal programming projects is done in coffee shops in the morning before work, and internet access would be helpful ( looking up documentation, etc ).

    What I've done, instead, is ride my bike around to find coffee shops which either provide free access, or which are near or beneath offices with "default" or "linksys" WAPs without passwords.

    In fact, it's gotten to the point that I know off the top of my head about a half-dozen free WAPs in my area which I can use. I see no reason to pay for access when I can just ride my bike down the street to a place where the inept sysadmins don't know any better.

    In fact, at one of these coffee shops, ( Caribou Coffee, Pennsyvania Ave & 17th ) there was at one point so many unsecured WAPs that I had to use the "Air Traffic Control" Dashboard widget to select the one I wanted, since there were, literally, four WAPs named "linksys" running on ( I think ) channel 11. The Airport menu bar selector didn't work very well in that situation.

    Charging for wireless is basically a fool's errand. Few will use it, and, I have to assume, you'll be lucky to make up the outlay for the service, unless you roll your own billing machanism.

    --

    lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    1. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's your call, I'm not going to stop you from leeching bandwidth. However, may I urge you and fellow slashdotters to be ethical about it. I mean, if you really need net access and just plan on checking e-mail for a moment, then I suppose it's alright. But please, for the love of God, don't be pulling shit from IRC or saturating the connection with Bittorrents. If you need that kind of bandwidth, do it at home on your OWN connection.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100%. I check my mail, and now and then do some googling for technical matters. The last thing I want to do is abuse it -- it's like the story about killing the goose that laid the golden eggs.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    3. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      Yo DC /.er! Represent, big ups, what what, shoutout, keep it real, holla at my dog, etc. Tryst is where-it's-at for free wireless.

      BTW, I work about 2 blocks from the Caribou Coffee you mentioned, over at a think tank on K St.

      All the best.

    4. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by timbob_com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I seriously hope you are kidding, just because someone doesn't secure a connection you think that gives you permission to use the network? What kind of ethics are we going to have in 20 years when this mentality penetrates even further into our society?

      You guys can't be serious, can you?

      By your logic:
      - I'm walking down the street and I see a bike leaning up against the wall, well as long as I don't go very far, and I am not gone long I can ride it to the store to pick up my groceries. The owner of the bicycle was "inept" in not securing so I deserve to ride it.
      - My neighbor left his front door unlocked so I am going to sneak in and watch a little TV since he has HBO and I don't. I'm not going to take anything, just sit on the couch and watch Sopranos. Why would the owner of the house be upset? He left the door unlocked.

      If we want to make the world a better place please start by not being a leech (on society, on others)

    5. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite the same, because the owner and you can't use his bike at the same time.

      If you could both use his bike to go to different locations at the same time, but when you did, he couldn't ride quite as fast...

      Hey, that'd be sweet!! :-)

    6. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by jwdb · · Score: 1

      Your biking analogy is flawed - him using their unsecured wifi does not prevent them from using it, whereas stealing someone's bike most certainly does. The TV is better, but again you're taking up a spot in their couch.

      The most accurate analogy I've found is watering your lawn with a hose attached to the neighbor's faucet. It doesn't preclude them from using water at the same time, but it does reduce their available pressure and will cost them more...

      Jw

    7. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't the water analogy only work if water were free? I would think most owners of WiFi systems do not pay by the byte for bandwidth. Using someone else's wifi would slow them down, but not increase their cost any.

    8. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by don.g · · Score: 1

      If you need net access so badly, why not (shock, horror, gasp) pay for it? What's so ethical about saying "I only steal internet access when I absolutely have to check my email"?

      I have a pre-pay account with one of the hotspot operators here (CafeNet), and still haven't used all of the credit I put on my account when I signed up a year ago. There are places where I can and do legally get free access; there are places where there's no WiFi. In extreme cases, I may use the horrendously expensive GPRS service, or just go without.

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    9. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by timbob_com · · Score: 1

      OK, to use your analogy of hooking up my hose to my neighbors spigot (using a "Y" adapter I supply) I am using a resource of the other party without their permission.

      How is this not stealing?

      Your analogy is probably not all that great in this situation either because (at least in every municipality I have lived in) water is a metered item, where my cable modem is not.

      Would you not be upset if your neighbor was watering their lawn with water coming from your spigot? Even if you have a well and do not pay a charge for the amount of water consumed? I know I would be pissed if I pulled into my driveway today and saw my neighbor using my spigot to water his lawn.

      People need to get one thing straight, if you are taking something of someone else's (whether it is their car, an MP3, bandwidth, water, a spot on the couch) and you do not have their permission it is stealing, plain and simple.

    10. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by dollargonzo · · Score: 1

      is it just me, but that cafe is sorta in the middle of nowhere, isn't it? it seems to me that attracting any sort of customer would be good for them. my point is that it all depends on how much space you have and whether you care about the kind of customer you get. no offense, but most places don't want leechers like yourself.
       

      --
      BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    11. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. But being that I leave my WAP wide open, I don't mind if people use it but not abuse it.

      Think of it as "bandwidth karma" ;)

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    12. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hose analogy is flawed also because there is a variable cost to buy an ounce of water but the cost to exchange a couple of megabytes with the internet usually completely fixed. My cable internet bill is $50.00 / month no matter how much data I transfer. Attaching an appropriately firewalled access point to my network doesn't practically hurt my use of my internet connection.

      That said hopping on an access point when you're not sure that the owner is cool with it is wrong. Period. Especially when you could hop on an equally open access point that someone has explicity given permission for you to use. The reason it's wrong is that I'm sure that my cable company feels that they are harmed by the wide-open appropriately firewalled access point connected to my cable modem. The difference between my access point and my neighbors is that I'm aware of the risks that I'm taking and I have accepted them. My neighbor, who's wide open access point still has an ssid of linksys, is probably completely unaware that he is in violation of his service agreement with the cable company.

    13. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But please, for the love of God, don't be pulling shit from IRC or saturating the connection with Bittorrents. If you need that kind of bandwidth, do it at home on your OWN connection.

      Sheesh. What sort of dork downloads things on their laptop directly? Real dorks use the web interfaces for eMule or ABC to tell their computer(s) at home on the real internet connection to do the downloading. Who wants to sit around a coffee shop waiting for a download to finish before they can leave?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      The most accurate analogy I've found is watering your lawn with a hose attached to the neighbor's faucet. It doesn't preclude them from using water at the same time, but it does reduce their available pressure and will cost them more...

      An even better analogy is installing a drinking fountain at the edge of your lawn, facing the sidewalk. What do you suppose the police officer would say if you called the police station to report that passers-by were stopping at the drinking fountain and "stealing" your water?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    15. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by jacks0n · · Score: 1

      I leave an unsecured AP with throttled bandwidth open for general usage in downtown Boston. Obviously that's in front of a firewall behind which my network lives.

      Your claim that there is some ethical violation happening assumes that resources are scarce, and that the owner cares. Children who pick blackberries and swim in a creek on a many-acre rural farm are not commiting any ethical violation. Only a tight New York asshat up from the city, living in a world of lawsuits would care. Decent people would understand that in whatever sense that law says the land is owned by the farmer, clearly that did not include the occasional blackberry.

      In reality, all those linksysers don't care. If they cared, they'd say something. They don't. They share access points. They don't worry whose box they connect to. It is a vast, vast river and anyone with a boat can use it, anywhere they like.

      Lighten up.

    16. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 1

      The coffee shops I frequent get *plenty* of money from me. I'm not just some ass who walks in and opens his laptop. I buy coffee, I buy breakfast. I pay for refills.

      And, "middle of nowhere"? You mean, one block from the world bank? One block from the whitehouse? Two blocks from farragut west? If by middle of nowhere you mean the _Heart_ of downtown business-district DC then, by god, you must live in New Delhi.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    17. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by don.g · · Score: 1

      Do you indicate in any way to the users of your AP that they can use it freely and you don't mind? Or do you just leave it open and assume they they'll assume it's okay?

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    18. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But please, for the love of God, don't be pulling shit from IRC or saturating the connection with Bittorrents. If you need that kind of bandwidth, do it at home on your OWN connection.

      .

      But at home I get two 'default' and three 'linksys' and I never know which one will connect first.

      Better go see how STTNG_season_1-7_complete.torrent is coming along.

    19. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by argent · · Score: 1

      I leave an unsecured AP with throttled bandwidth open for general usage in downtown Boston. Obviously that's in front of a firewall behind which my network lives.

      What's your SSID? "linksys" or "free wifi"?

      Children who pick blackberries and swim in a creek on a many-acre rural farm are not commiting any ethical violation.

      Children get a lot of slack in many communities. When I was a kid we used to run all over the neighborhood, didn't pay much attention to fences, if we met the property owner they might chase us off, or they might talk to us. There were several old retirees who we were on regular speaking terms with.

      But I don't think they'd be as happy about college students or middle aged geeks pottering around their yards. They might be birdwatchers or they might be casing the joint.

      When I was crewing for hot-air balloon pilots, we were always careful to try and contact the landowner before attempting to land a balloon and walk it out, and this WAS out in the country and people generally like HABs. Because you can't assume they know you're chasing, because it's only common courtesy.

      In reality, all those linksysers don't care. If they cared, they'd say something. They don't.

      If they knew, they'd probably care. If they don't say anything, you can't assume they know.

    20. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      also, when I need to sleep, I just go house to houser until I find an open door(or window), then I sleep there. I mean there going to pay the same either way, right?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It worked for Goldielocks. But those damn bears....

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    22. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Frequently it is not 'inept' sysadmins, but free access points provided in board rooms, isolated from the corporate nets.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    23. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by debest · · Score: 1

      What sort of dork downloads things on their laptop directly?

      Dorks that are downloading really illegal shit over someone else's wide-open WiFi and don't want to be tracked, that's who!

      --
      Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    24. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by jwdb · · Score: 1

      Depends. I have a bandwidth cap, for instance, so if someone else uses some of it up, I have to pay to increase it.

      Jw

    25. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by jwdb · · Score: 1

      Our cable modems aren't metered, but I know mine has a bandwidth cap and I have to pay to raise it, which is effectively the same. Fat pipes don't have a cap, but the larger the pipe the more likely it's metered is what I've always heard.

      Indeed I would be ticked off if my neighbor watered his lawn, washed his car, filled his pool etc... with my water, as that would become a significant portion of my bill. This is equivalent to connecting to someone's wifi and firing up bittorrent. But I'd have no problem with him using it for a moment (he went for a run and wants to hose himself down, for example), which is similar to logging on for a minute and checking email.
      As long as they don't use up a significant portion of my bandwidth I don't mind sharing a bit. And if I don't want someone using my access, I turn on the security features.

      Jw

    26. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by jwdb · · Score: 1

      Well, you're one of the lucky people with unlimited service. In my case, although my cable modem isn't metered, it does have a cap which I have to pay to raise, which is effectively the same thing.

      I agree it's not nice to take advantage of someone who doesn't know any better. On the other hand, assuming your a decent person and your neighbor is a decent person, do you think he'll mind if you use it for a moment to check email and grab a few stock quotes? Firing up bittorrent is a nono, but I personally wouldn't mind sharing my access a bit.

      Jw

    27. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by jwdb · · Score: 1

      Most certainly fitting for those who purposely leave their access open. There is also the group of people who don't know any better - their fountain was installed by linksys and they don't realize or don't know how to turn it off.

      It's an issue of user education and saner defaults. Plug and play is a bad thing in my mind - the router should not be functional until the owner has set up his own password and security details.

      Jw

    28. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by dollargonzo · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize there was more than one Caribou Coffee in D.C. i was thinking of the other one, which is closer to logan circle. obviously nowhere in D.C. is really "the middle of nowhere." the one i'm thinking of is just a bit off the path, although i'm sure it gets plenty of customers, too. point taken, though
       

      --
      BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    29. Re:Why pay, when "linksys" and "default" are free? by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Granting an IP via DHCP is implicit permission to use the network. The client requests an IP, the DHCP server allocates it (knock on door, be invited in).

      Allowing open access lets you connect to the DHCP server. Like walking down someones pathway and knocking on the door.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  69. Same as case for free road system. by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 1

    For wireless (and internet in general) we are currently in a mostly toll-road type of system. You pay to get on at home, and you pay to get on at the coffee shop.

    Some stores, offer free internet to customers, because it is relativly inexpensive, draws customers in, and differentiates them from the competition.

    Some cities are starting to offer free internet for the same reasons. It is relativly inexpensive to offer, and draws the interests of potiental residents and businesses. This is similar to why a city would provide paved roads. Except that roads are much more expensive to maintain. Of course, the companies that offer the info-toll-roads (phone/cable/cell companies) are against such a public good, as it would mean the end of much of their business.

    "This new information super highway should not be a toll road" -Al Gore.

  70. Squatters by BrK · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of "squatters" at Starbucks, Beaners, Panera, etc that will sip a single $2.00 coffee for 3 hours just to sit there and surf the net.

    I think a system that worked like the gas-station car wash would be best. With every purchase (or every $8.00 spent) you get a code worth 1 hour of access time.

    --
    -This sig intentionally left blank
  71. Free WiFi brings in business! by MrLee · · Score: 1

    I have to plug Panera Bread for their free WiFi.
    Why? Because I am currently sitting in one of their locations in St.Charles, MO using their FREE WiFi connection!
    Why did I choose Panera when I could have tried to find another, closer hotspot? Because I knew that they have free WiFi(thanks, /.!), I made the trip a couple of miles to a Panera(Ok, St.Louis Bread in the STL area) and got lunch here BECAUSE OF THIS ADDED SERVICE.
    I don't think that I am the minority here, either!
    It's really nice to know when I am traveling, I can get online at a Panera Bread. Plus, I don't think twice about buying something while I am here. It's just the right thing to do.

    --
    -- Now more the mirth, scrape here in the face...
  72. Java Johns by mr.+mulder · · Score: 1

    Our local shop in the East-Cleveland, OH area is Java John's at http://www.javajohns.com/. It's a very cool setup with free WiFi and great coffee. It's in a lower-income area of town so it hasn't benefitted from the yuppies stopping in all the time.

    Hopefully it won't go out of a business - it's a very cool place.

  73. Here's an idea by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Offer free WiFi but put meters on the electrical outlets. That limits customers to the battery life of their laptops, generally a couple hours.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  74. little sign by golden+robot · · Score: 1

    if the business fears legal ramifications then they can put a little sign on the door saying "We're not responsible for the actions of our users we just provide free access" i mean say terrorists use the wifi spot to crack the fbi datatbase, the feds go to the manager, all the manager has to say is read the sign. I mean the little sign on the door gives laundromats licenses to steal, so i dont see why it wouldnt clear a business of legal responsibilities in this case.

  75. Simple by Rinisari · · Score: 1

    Use a login system that makes everyone fill in their name and telephone number when they first attempt to connect to the 'Net from the shop. When the name and tel are submitted, the script gets the IP address, connects it to a MAC address and puts it in a database.

    From there, have all traffic in or out be logged. The traffic won't be that high, really. Set up a spare box with a Dual-Layer DVD burner and a nice sized hard drive to hold the logs. Burn stuff off any time you have the 9.5 GB (or however big DLDVDs are). I highly doubt you'll burn off more than one CD a week unless you get some serious traffic.

    If things come back to you in a lawsuit (be it a subpoena or even someone looking for evidence), you've got your logs. If someone falsifed information, they've committed a crime of a different kind - one for which you can't be responsible.

    Wait, did I just describe a simplified version of NoCatAuth?

  76. My solution. by FireFlie · · Score: 1
    I was setting up the equipment for a local coffee shop (I know the owner). He wanted to charge for access, and I thought it would be beneficial to become a free hotspot. We met in the middle, and he offers free wifi for an hour with any purchase.

    Seems like a pretty good solution to me for those out there that are worried about lost revenue. (The possibility for someone to do something illegal, however is another matter.)

  77. Ideas by Protocron · · Score: 1

    Overall I would say that it depends on the area that the coffee shop is in and what sort of customers the owner is hoping to attract. I say that kids in general will appreciate the wireless access but will most likely ignore it or abuse it. Business customers would definately use it and would appreciate it, but there comes a point when they will start to abuse it.
    My idea would be to set up something like a nocat http://nocat.net/ setup and base the autentication on something that can be added to the receipt. Obviously not 1,2,3,4 but some random number generator or something. I leave that up to your imagination, because it would be simple or hard depending on your implemenetation of a cash register. Give each number an expiration of a certain time. You can only log on from that time on of issueance of the passkey. So I buy my Latte, on the receipt is my passkey. Use it or loose it. Heck you could vary the expiration time based on traffic.
    I would also hang a sign that gave some general guidelines. No illegal activity, nothing indecent, no taking others Internet time.... And put something to the effect that violators will be banned. Physically and by mac addresss (well I wouldn't put that in the sign.)
    Other than that, I would block all traffic except web. Secure administration policies, and no access to the equipment by the beverage servers.

    That's all I have.

    --
    CAPS LOCK: ITS LIKE THE CRUISE CONTROL FOR AWESOME
  78. Leaches by sterno · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a common policy of many coffeeshops I know of to have minimum purchase requirements. Even before the times of Wifi, cool coffeeshops were where a lot of the young and broke kids would hang out. Invariably they'd try to get away with buying a small cup of coffee then lingering for 3 hours.

    The problem with codes or any sort of regulation of the access is that it creates a support problem. So you're slinging coffee and somebody gets a code that doesn't work. Now you have to take time away from making coffee and worry about tech support. It doesn't take too many things like that to screw up the cost/benefit of it. Does your barista know how to fix a WiFi network? Probably not.

    Free WiFi became a popular concept because people don't demand much from a free service. If they log on and it doesn't work or it's slow they won't complain because they didn't pay for it. Those who can cope with it will use it and be happy, those who can't don't become a burden to you.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:Leaches by dacom · · Score: 1

      Why not reverse the business? Free WiFi + 1 drink + 1 snack on a hourly basis fee per table or person.

    2. Re:Leaches by calzones · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you are near a university, the students probably already have all the free broadband they need. Why would they come to your coffee shop just for free internet... unless: they want ambience and good food and beverages. The fact that you offer free WiFi makes you that much more attractive than the other coffee shops that don't. Besides, university kids will loiter in coffee shops for hours regardless of WiFi.

      Starving artists? If they have a laptop, they can afford a cup of coffee. If they love you, they will buy many cups of coffee. If they can't afford the coffee, and people of this type somehow manage to comprise the majority of your clientele, then you picked a bad location. Free WiFi is not your problem.

      If you are downtown or near a business park, business people will come in to get away from the office. They also have broadband at work, so no big deal there either, they are coming again for ambience and something to consume. These people generally have schedules to keep, so no fear of freeloaders here. They may bring clients to meet with, but that means more purchases and free advertising for you. Sounds like a win.

      I don't know how much Starbucks makes from each T-mobile purchase, but when I used it once, I know I felt like I had paid my 11 bucks for the day and I was entitled to every last minute without having to buy anything from the shop. I sat next to an outlet for a large part of the day. This is because I was traveling and the hotel I was at had no internet access. So unless Starbucks gets a kickback from t-mobile, this can be counted as a potential loss. Had Starbucks been providing the access, I would have felt like buying something from them to support it.

      Other random tidbits:

      My netgear router let's me block specific websites.

      If free WiFi loitering really does become a problem (meaning paying customers don't come anymore because non-paying customers are using up all the resources), post a sign that says 'no loitering; internet access, seating, and restrooms reserved for paying customers only; 1hr time limit.' Enforce it like any other food and drink establishment does: monitor the customers and gently ask them to leave if they aren't consuming anything.

      If you were to turn off access for 20 minutes after every so often, people relying on the WiFi would be left with nothing to do for 20 minutes. They could buy something and wait, or leave. It would be pretty obvious who was there 'just for the WiFi' in that case.

      --
      Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
    3. Re:Leaches by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      They have a term for that, it's called a "cover charge."

      I'm not certain, but I think you'd probably be taking a big risk instituting something like that in a business where people aren't used to paying upfront for a seat. Personally I don't even like to go to bars that charge cover, much less a coffee shop.

      But maybe if you made it a really sweet deal, you could attract people.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  79. ValuePoint has a neat feature for this by zeet · · Score: 2, Informative

    They have 'cafe accounts'. Basically it's X amount of free access per 24 hours. The first login is a redirect to whatever page you want, and with a little code fragment on there someone can turn on WiFi outside of the walled garden. Their default built-in page only works with IE but the code fragment is browser-agnostic.

    Anyway, seems like a reasonable solution ... if people want to freeload, they can, just only for X amount of time per day. We're setting it up so that people can also sign up for full-day or full-month unlimited access at a reasonable rate. Put in your CC# on our walled garden server, set your username, get a password, and you've got instant access for however many days you bought.

  80. Transaction costs by overshoot · · Score: 1
    Basically, it comes down to the fact that the cost of charging for access is greater than the access is worth to most customers.

    Some people have a hard time with "giving (it) away" but when they try charging for (it) they end up spending a fortune on lockdown tools, auditing, system maintenance, cashier time, customer delays getting coffee, etc. Never mind the good/ill will issue, it's just difficult to justify at a basic cost-of-doing-business level.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  81. Leachers by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    The main reason not to offer free WiFi is to avoid leachers. You know, the type that will come in, buy hardly anything, use the connection for hours, all while tying up a table a paying customer could be using.

    I'd recommend a "free" connection tied to a minimum purchase price with a maximum time limit. That'd keep real customers happy and get rid of the leaches.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  82. Economics by fenris_23 · · Score: 1

    Bandwidth and the number of tables on which one can set a laptop and comfortable use the WiFi access are limited and therefore become a commodity. Any scheme you can think of to mitigate these issues always comes down to deciding who gets bandwidth and for how long (including the usage of a table). Because of this, there is no way WiFi provided by a restaurant using 802.11 technologies can ever be considered free. There is always a cost to be paid somewhere. If the business just set-up an unencrypted network, then the establishment would be flooded with squatters. Even paying customers would sometimes stay longer than usual without purchasing anything. Various schemes I read in other posts merely attempt to redirect these costs but they simply just change the market a little bit. In the end, price is the only way to balance out the supply demand imbalance when you are dealing with the limited bandwidth and range of 802.11.

  83. argument against free wifi by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    Given that WiFi using people are mostly male geeks, it's going to turn the business and the surrounding area into a "sausage fest".

    And don't get me started on the other female repellent attributes...

  84. The case is quite simple by Etyenne · · Score: 1

    Really, the case is quite simple. If you charge for WiFi Internet access, I will not patronize your business. Why would I pay for a service provided free elsewhere ?

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:The case is quite simple by CarrionBird · · Score: 1
      Except it's not free, the cost is passed on in some way. Unless you never buy anything, but why would I want you there in that case?

      (remember that the cost of broadband for commercial use is at least double the consumer rate)

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  85. Simple: Give him a WiFi AP by ishmalius · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's what I did. The local pub had business Internet access, but was totally neutral whether or not he provided wireless access to his customers. He just didn't want the headache of setting it up or running it. So I purchased a nice cheap 802.11g access point for about $45 from the web about 15 months ago. I just gave it to the pub owner. I set it up, gave it an easy-to-remember WEP code, and that was that. He has never needed to worry about it at all since then. I have had free access there for 15 months now, so that comes out to $3/month for me, and $0 for everyone else. With the occasional beer someone buys me in thanks, I have come out way ahead.

  86. liability by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1
    If a kid walks in for a lemonade and starts downloading porn what do you tell the parents when they sent their lawyer to pay you a visit?

    Well if you are providing WiFi and not computers there isn't alot they could do. Who provided the laptop w/wireless capability? If you are just providing a connection with a wireless modem. I don't see an issue. You agree to let the ISP give the RIAA/MPAA any logs and give them your ISP's phone number. Whether the ISP actually releases the logs is not your concern, you are being helpful. The RIAA isn't gonna waste money on trying to sue you unless they think you are trying to 'protect' someone or promote illegal use. Also many wireless routers have a built in firewall, just make the attempt to block standard p2p ports and you have a pretty good case your not promoting illegal copyright infringement.

  87. People don't understand advertising. by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    90% of such coffee/food businesses is just getting people in the door. If the coffee/food is so expensive or so bad that that potenital customers that own a WiFI device won't buy from you, you are doomed anyway.

    Advertising, perhaps you have heard of it? You pay for TV for everyone in exchange some people will watch your 30 second ad and then buy the product. Are the people that watch the ad but don't buy the product freeloading?

    No. They have been exposed to your product, as you desired, and choose not to purchase it. Same thing with free wifi. Your Free WiFi is an advertisement. I am not talking about advertising the WiFi, I am talking about the 'freeloaders' you don't like.

    They are in your shop, useing your tables, see your food, smell your coffee, etc. etc. If you can't convince people SPENDING THEIR TIME INSIDE THE SHOP to buy your product, then your business sucks and you will go out of business no matter what you do.

    Liability issues make more sense, but only because the business owners don't understand the legal issues so they are spooking about things that are not really scary.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  88. Open wifi is a bad idea for cafes. by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    For the following reason: cafes have limited seating / serving space, and therefore depend on turnaround for profits. So unless you have table service (which is an expense most small cafes don't have) pestering you to stop loitering, you are gonna have to be the bad cop and roust loiterers yourself.

    Or, which IMHO is the right choice, implement a system that prints, say, short passphrases on receipts that offer, say, 15 minutes of access per purchase. When your lease expires and you're prompted to login for access to the network, just buy more stuff and get another receipt. I'll be damned if this couldn't be done with an opensource POS solution coupled with a suitably hacked linksys.

    Tedious, yes, but less so than going out of business from all the non-coffee-drinking limpets out there...

  89. Use a fraudulent argument of course... by Glasswire · · Score: 1

    The best way to convince him to do it for free is to take a linksys or other generic access point, configure it as wide open (leave the name "linksys") and plug it into your inverter attached to the cigarette lighter in your car. Park outside the cafe in question, turn on you access point and go inside with your WiFi laptop. Show him how pointless it is to try to charge for wireless when there's a least one other free acess point already in his neighborhood.
    Seriously, it's only a matter of time until this is legitimately true - he'll only be deluding himself, and hurting his business plan if he counts on a wireless revenue stream.

  90. simple.. by Danzigism · · Score: 0

    Everything on the internet is free as it is.. You can get free internet access at libraries.. It should simply be offered as means of convenience.. It would easily attract customers, as long as you promote it.. But you should also have some kinda of "log book" that logs each person who comes in and uses the net.. because people could get away with "trading child porn" or other means of anonymous surfing.. hrmm.. i don't know.. running myself in circles here haha..

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  91. Inevitable by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    "Renting switching equipment is not a good business model when switching equipment is ubiquitous"
    -Eben Moglen

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  92. How? by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    I would imagine a bar code printed on the original receipt that is tied to a MAC address (have to get it off the laptop... somehow) And everytime a drink or product is [re]ordered use a bar code reader to reactiveate tthe MAC for an hour. You can even let the user keep the recipt to aviod asking for the MAC address every day. Your wait staff enforce it by manually scanning the bar code.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:How? by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      I would like to use this at a bar, and use a 10 minute time out, you know, to prevent beer from getting warm. ;-) That would be the place to be!
      (If you want puke on your shoes... "We have to drink to keep the internet connection alive!")

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  93. Re:Arguments Against (hipster Segregation) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The internet cafe that was near me until it was shutdown for a campus expansion drew both types of people you refer too. The key was to seperate the gamers from the emo kids.

    The quake faithul were banished to the basement of the place. Down there they had free access as well as 12-15 computer gaming stations setup on a pay to play basis. The place was built on a hill the basement had its own back entrance.

    The hipsters stayed upstairs comparing horn rim thicknesses.

  94. My experience (before WiFi) by willwinter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This reminds me of a time before wifi when I would go to a coffee shop at night that hosted some of the best bands in the local music scene. They would charge a low cover, hoping to make it up in bar sales. The majority of the young (pre-high/highschool) kids would go in and only ask for water, which was tap water on ice in glasses) and they would continue to linger.

    One evening they switched to bottled water.

    Now when a kid ordered water they got a $2.00 bottle of water instead of the free glass. Needles to say, the crowds dissapated a bit and atmosphere in the place improved as well. And the shop made more money than before.

    So my opinion is to remember you are running a businness. Do what you need to do to have a quality product, provide a reason for people to be there in the first place, but don't ignore what will keep you in busineess. Freeloaders will not keep you in business.

  95. A simple solution by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 4, Interesting

    An easy way to keep people from staying for more than a couple of hours is to not provide power outlets at the tables intended for laptop users. Short of somebody coming in with a fully charged spare battery or two, most laptops will chew through the battery in a couple of hours. Some will last longer but most won't.

    You'll find this is true at the larger free wifi providers like Panera. You can use their wifi for only as long as your battery holds out at which point you can still sit and stare at a blank screen if you so desire.

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
    1. Re:A simple solution by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      Things will get real fun when more laptops have a battery life of 7-8 hours, rather than 2-3 hours.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    2. Re:A simple solution by jkhuggins · · Score: 1

      Dunno about anyone else ... but at the couple of Panera's that I visit, there's plenty of power outlets available. In fact, a couple of them specifically have cute little signs above them indicating their availability for laptop users.

      --
      Jim Huggins, Kettering University, Flint, MI
    3. Re:A simple solution by k8to · · Score: 1

      Like, in the past?

      --
      -josh
    4. Re:A simple solution by jj110888 · · Score: 1

      You'll find this is true at the larger free wifi providers like Panera. You can use their wifi for only as long as your battery holds out at which point you can still sit and stare at a blank screen if you so desire.

      I hope this isn't an official policy...........I've asked the panera people where a power plug is, and they tend to perfer helping me find a half-hidden plug then sweeping up pastry crumbs

    5. Re:A simple solution by Electrum · · Score: 1

      most laptops will chew through the battery in a couple of hours

      The 12" iBooks and PowerBooks last 4+ hours on a fully charged battery. I tend to see a disproportionate (compared to total market share) number of Apple laptops at places like coffee shops.

    6. Re:A simple solution by Klaruz · · Score: 1

      I ate lunch at a Panera today and watched a guy set down his 10 pound xp laptop, hit the power button, grab the AC adapter and plug it into the wall.

      Course, this is in the midwest, maybe people are more considerate here...

    7. Re:A simple solution by perlwolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thats what the jokers did at a Panera near my former apartment in Chicago suburbs, so I started frequenting another Panera branch where they had power outlets... who wants to pay $8 for a sandwich when you're going to use WiFi for only 90 minutes? :)

    8. Re:A simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what. I think I'll bring the spare UPS device in and plug my laptop to that. 6 hours before the UPS dies (my laptop draws one-third that of a server), and three more before my laptop battery dies.

    9. Re:A simple solution by n.yusef · · Score: 1

      I agree with the above statement. My iBook can get 4+ hours with the AirPort on, and I see like 25% of people surfing the net in coffee shops using Apples.

    10. Re:A simple solution by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1
      I tend to see a disproportionate (compared to total market share) number of Apple laptops at places like coffee shops.
      For some people, there isn't much reason to own an Apple if noone can see that you do. But I doubt that alone would explain the whole difference.

      --

      (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

  96. Why offer free internet by blonde+rser · · Score: 1

    I really don't get the motivation for free internet unless you're in a highly competitive area where you're fighting for every customer. If that's the environment why are you opening a café there. If on the other hand there is a wealth of customers your main focus has to be turn around. Certainly you don't want to discourage customers from hanging around but you don't really want to encourage them either with free services.

    Why not offer the reverse for those who do want a drink or two but really just want a place to use their laptop. Ie charge them an hourly rate for the internet but while they are their you keep them comfortable and offer them free pop and coffee (and maybe discounted machiatos)?

  97. 'FREE' WiFi by PenrosePattern · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered why Linksys & other hardware providers don't just offer a plug-in to enable 'fee'-based services. You could sign up at a location and freely move from one hot spot to another. It would be admined from the machine itself. Individuals could then open their hotspots the same way. They'd get some credit for usage.

    Seems obvious to me. Anyone want to form a company to do this?

    --
    Seuss - I'm telling you this 'cause you're one of my friends. My alphabet starts where your alphabet ends
  98. As a fun response to this troll... by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1

    Why not vote libertarian and make some sort of difference instead of voting for the republikrats, who are both the same side of the same coin. Either of the two major parties just fight over the same bone, and still screw us out of our money and work... lets oust them and make a difference then?

    (Bush or Kerry would've been equally bad... bush got us in this shit, might as well let the idiot run the gamut and fuck us completely till 2008, I pity the sucker that follows the moron, since he or she will be doing MASSIVE cleanup duty both economically and politically.)

    -----

    In regards to a cybercafe... I've war walked with a wireless PDA before, and I can promise you that it is VERY easy to steal bandwidth. This is the biggest concern. I can hook up my laptop and hang around in a parking lot or in a neighboring parkinglot and steal your shop's bandwidth. Not that I'll do it, but it CAN be done and WILL be done by some kid too unhappy with his parents keeping dialup or forcing him to watch christian videos instead of the kinky porn he wants to see. And if that kid has a wireless laptop, you're not going to stop him, not even with WEP.

    --
    " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
  99. You have to address the "bad customers" problem. by arete · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you have infinite tables, Free Services are great, and often better than metered services, because metering is a pain.

    But you don't have infinite tables, and somebody sitting on your wifi for an hour with a cup of coffee might be LOOSING you money.

    If I could wave a wand and create whatever system I wanted I would have BOTH. This way you get to have the best of both worlds.

    A free system that had capped bandwidth (50k, perhaps) and was turned off during periods of peak patronage of the cafe. You start out with a sign that says "may be turned off during peak hours" - and then you turn it off whenever you're getting too full.

    A paid system that doesn't have bandwidth caps or has much higher ones and never goes off. This should cost less than using one of your workstations, but not necessarily that much less.

    Setting both up is pretty easy; just install two access points.

    Also, if you're going to put in a nice system be sure to offer it to all your nearby business and residential neighbors to make a few extra bucks.

    I am not a lawyer, but I don't think you have an obligation to keep those records. You have an obligation to turn them over if you have them, and an obligation not to selectively destroy them AFTER you know something bad happened. But I don't believe you are required to track all the details.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  100. Reselling Starbucks/T-Mobile can get near free. by team99parody · · Score: 0, Troll
    I know a guy with a wireless relay set up in his van who parks at Starbucks; buys the day-pass for T-Mobile; and then re-sells that bandwidth back to users in the coffee shop (they all connect to his wireless access point, and he connects to Starbucks's).

    It's almost free - he charges 1/2 what T-Mobile charges - so if he gets 3 people using it over a day he makes his money back.

    If more people would sign up, his service would converge on free.

    1. Re:Reselling Starbucks/T-Mobile can get near free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just showing that T-Mobile's prices are ridiculous. Last time I checked, their monthly plan was more than I pay for DSL. I imagine the daily plan is a good bit more than one day's share of that.

    2. Re:Reselling Starbucks/T-Mobile can get near free. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I think before it ever "converged on free" to use your term, that he'd run out of bandwidth. I assume he's using 802.11b from his truck to the t-mobile AP...so that's 10Mb/s: how many people can he really have on that before it gets saturated? Maybe quite a few if they're all just doing email or low-bandwidth web browsing, but if a bunch of them at once decided to check out some video, it might get tight in a hurry.

      Despite that, I applaud your friend's entrepreneurship.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    3. Re:Reselling Starbucks/T-Mobile can get near free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the idea is that it's free for him, not for the other guys.

  101. Starbucks by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    Starbucks sucks becaue they dont have free wifi. While in the city i intentianally goto Panrea bread of Espresso Royale for coffee becasue they have wifi.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  102. It's not about loyalty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I too, once suffered from the thought that an internet/wifi coffee shop would be a good idea...

    Repeat after me:
    Profitability in the retail food service industry is not about encouraging long-transactions by customers who take up space for extended periods of time...

    It is about serving a larger number of customers in a smaller period of time. It is about table-turnover. What is going to pay your mortgage: someone who buys a slightly more expensive cup of coffee for the free wifi and stays for an hour, or having 3 sets of people use that table in the same period?

  103. Will he charge for sugar? Creamer? No? by wernst · · Score: 1
    I think he will find that the expense for creating free wifi is cheaper than his monthly expenses for sugar and creamer. Does he charge for these condiments?

    No, of course not. Wifi should be thought of as a condiment - free to use with purchase. Setting a purchase policy is up to the owner of course, but it be good to go.

  104. So, what's the business model here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait- internet cafe... as in a place that makes money by selling internet access? And you're having trouble convincing the owner to give it away for free instead?

    Hmmm.

  105. Better still, limit the number of connected IPs by kesuki · · Score: 1

    Just limit to say 4 or 5 users logged in, if you're a really small shop limit it to 2-3 users. If someone has been sitting in your store too long, have the employees ask them if you're going to make a purchase ;) Most restraunts have a policy against loitering, it's just rarely enforced, because normally you don't need to unless they're causing a disturbance, or table space is really limited.

    Way better than access codes, it's free, but only so many people can use it, plus when you limit it to 1-2 people you can get a really slow dsl line like 256k/256k and save a lot of money.

  106. Universal WiFi? by doodleboy · · Score: 1

    WiFi is becoming universally available anyway because the vast majority of folks don't know how to secure their routers. Naturally I thought this was a very bad thing at first and when I configured networks for my non-techie friends I made sure to turn all the encryption on.

    But lately I've been looking at WiFi as more of a commons. There are water fountains everywhere, why shouldn't there be WiFi? It's only going to get cheaper and more plentiful, and it's hard to imagine businesses putting a lot of money into authentication, metering, etc., when there are a half dozen open connections in the area to choose from.

    But if we all offer it when we have it, it'll be there for everyone.

  107. A way to implement this: Zyxel access point by TurkishGeek · · Score: 3, Informative

    Zyxel sells an access point designed for just this purpose: ZyAir B-4000. Much easier than implementing it yourself, unless there is already on Open Source solution based on NoCat or something similar.

    http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1650238,00.as p

    http://www.zyxel.com/product/model.php?indexcate=1 060053881&indexcate1=1085450334&indexFlagvalue=102 1876859

    --
    Zigbee Central: A Zigbee weblog
  108. Free WiFi for me! by ichin4 · · Score: 1

    I'd tell your businessman friend that I really like free wifi, so I would come to his shop. I probably wouldn't buy his coffee or food, but I'd bring lots of friends and we'd play first-person-shooter games and yell taunts across the cafe at each other. Really, I think the goverment should implement free, universal wifi because... Well, because I want it. Then I could check my email when my car is stopped at a traffic light.

  109. Make it available to high-value customers by davidwr · · Score: 1

    First off, don't make it free for everyone - make it free for "high-value" customers. For example, if you are a coffee shop, anyone spending more than $20 in a 2-month period gets free Internet for the next 30 days or something. Otherwise, charge a nominal fee of $1/half-day or something. This will keep the freeloaders off and help secure criminal convictions for war-drivers who want to trade k1dd13 p0rn.

    Second, require ID or at least keep a photograph handy in the FBI comes calling. The only reason NOT to do this is if you are specifically making yourself available as a "come one, come all, do anything you want just hide your screen if you are viewing porn" place of business, like some public libraries are. If you ARE doing that, then unless you meet the legal definition of a common carrier, for goodness sake do NOT earn money from it in any way or you could be in hot water as an accessory as soon as some idiot downloads k1dd13 p0rn.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  110. Re: rebuttal to your points by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Actually, you make very sound arguments that I hadn't even completely considered before. But I will say this:

    1. If you *are* going to offer wi-fi net access, I'm with the people who think it should be a free "bonus" of patronizing the shop. Considering the offering of reasonably high speed data networks by cellular services - the days are really numbered where anyone would even see any point to paying $6.00/hour or more to use the net. With my Treo 650 phone, not only can I pick up and send email and do basic web browsing right on the phone - but if I need more than that, I can establish a dial-up networking connection via bluetooth and use my cellphone as a wireless modem for my laptop. If I already pay for an "unlimited data" package on my cellphone, I'm not going to pay again for wi-fi at some coffee house!

    2. Maybe it depends on the area, but my previous coffee house experiences tell me that they're usually kind of "dead" around lunchtime. If free wi-fi draws in a bunch of busy businesspeople during their lunch break, so what if they're not your "ideal patrons"? They're coming in at a time when you may as well take any customer you can get. Just offer some good *food* so it's worth their time to eat lunch there, like Panera Bread does - and you'll get some money out of their pockets even if they're not really into coffee.

    3. As a corrolary to my last item; your coffee house should cater to the idea that different times of day and night, you can attract different crowds. Your late evening crowd probably *is* a bunch of students who want to socialize and "hang out", so why not run things a little more "business-like" during the day, and change gears to a more "fun, social" atmosphere after dark? If wi-fi is hurting this, set it up so it's automatically disabled after a certain time of night until the next morning.

  111. What's His Primary Business? by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
    I think your 'friend' (or yourself...whatever) needs to determine what his primary business is. Is he a cafe owner who provides net access on the side, or a net access provider who sells coffee on the side? If the first, he wants to attract customers, and what better way than offering something for free? Also, many cafes these days offer free access anyway: just to compete it might be a good idea.

    If, OTOH, he's an access provider, then it doesn't make sense to give away his primary business. But if that is his business, he's probably in trouble: what with all the other free ways to access the net, access providers are going the way of the dodo.

    My thought is that computer use should cost, but wireless shouldn't. But that's just me.

  112. Free as in Wi-Fi by goldspider · · Score: 1

    Free, meaning you don't pay for something directly, but are charged through a related purchase.

    In this case, the charge comes from more expensive coffee. "Free" municipal Wi-Fi (paid for by taxes) is another example.

    Not to be confused with "Free as in Herpes".

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  113. Austin Wireless City Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Austin, TX, you'd be hard pressed to find a coffee shop that could stay in business without free Wi-Fi. Many places just offer open access points, but there is also a group called Austin Wireless City http://www.austinwirelesscity.org/ where participating locations have users log in for free Wi-Fi. In turn, the businesses are able to advertise on the log-in screen.

    Having a log-in might allow the cafe's owner to advertise specials or new drinks and discourage the users from accessing illegal / questionable materials (since they might at least think that they could be identified). With users being registered, I think this would still allow the owner to offer free internet but still encourage users to be reasonable about content and time.

  114. Many smaller cafe's are removing WiFi by siberian · · Score: 1

    They found that people would order a coffee and then work all day long, decreasing their per customer revenue dramatically.

    1. Re:Many smaller cafe's are removing WiFi by wytcld · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They found that people would order a coffee and then work all day long, decreasing their per customer revenue dramatically.

      Other cafes are cutting access only at high-traffic times. When you can fill your seats without it - say, Saturdays, why not? But when you can fill otherwise empty seats with it, why not? People partly come to see other people - the hard core coffee drinkers have espresso machines at home after all. So if wifi gets people there to be watched, even if there's no direct profit from them there's profit from maintaining a space where the people watchers - and those who just like the background of humanity for their own reveries - can be fulfilled. And they are your profit center.

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    2. Re:Many smaller cafe's are removing WiFi by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      You've hit on a key point...

      While an extremely busy shop is a deterrent to customers, so is an empty shop. If the wifi keeps people in some of the seats, they'll bring in paying customers

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  115. WiFi wants to be free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not an expert in this area, but I can't see how the cost and hassle of setting up a billing system could possibly pay itself back. WiFi is just not intrinsically designed for "pay for play". Unless you have a captive audience (such as an airport), I don't see how billing for WiFi could make economic sense for someone that doesn't make a core business out of it.

    Even for someone who does make a core business out of it (such as Starbucks' deal with t-mobil) probably has pretty marginal economics.

    That leaves Wifi as a loss leader to drive traffic. Since the infrastructure cost is so low, this probably wouldn't cost much. On the other hand, if your cafe is pretty full most of the time, it won't add much benefit, either. Nor will it build a structural competitive advantage (since there is no barrier to entry for competing cafes and no switching costs for your customers). So it won't generally build customer loyalty over the long run.

    My instinct is that WiFi will become a simple cost of doing business, like disposable cups and free cream. My advice: don't be the first one on the block to get it. This keeps your costs down. When your competitor gets WiFi, then you get it too. The next day.

  116. Electrical considerations.... by myvirtualid · · Score: 1

    If serious about this, your friend should ensure the shop has sufficient conveniently located plugs for all those laptop users.

    My favourite coffee shop with free Wifi (downtown Ottawa) has too few plugs, and one really great convenient table. The other tables are too far from the plugs, and the best plugs are near the bars along the windows, which aren't really wide enough for laptops.

    --
    I'm here EdgeKeep Inc.
  117. The problem of people who stay too long by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Funny
    Panera have a solution to the crowding problem, they turn off the WiFi at lunch time. We go there every Monday while the cleaners are doing the house. We do not spend any longer now they have WiFi than before but I do go at other times during the week and I frequently hold business meetings at Paneras.

    If a coffee shop has a problem with people who stay too long they need to look at what they do at peep shows. They should have a Faraday cage around each seat with a little flap that stays open while you feed coins into the meter. As soon as your time runs out you get shut off.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  118. US$ 25k for pr0n by famazza · · Score: 1

    Here in Brazil we already have a case where a Cyber Cafe has to pay fines (about US$ 25.000) for letting to teenagers (16 and 17 years each) access porn from their computers.

    Sorry, links in portuguese

    --

    -=-=-=-=
    I know life isn't fair, but why can't it ever be un-fair in MY favor!?
  119. limit the use to simple stuff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I think that the best solution is probably to offer free wifi, but no power outlets, or better yet, free wifi, but limit the bandwidth so that the power users can play, but are better off at home.

    The situations that you *don't* want are nonpaying 'customers' complaining about the service, or users planting themselves in one spot for 8 hours. ...or worse, both.

    I think that if you implement the suggestions above, you'd support people who want some basic access and still get some turnover.

  120. Attracts a proffesional crowd by asv108 · · Score: 1
    While people keep discussing the bottom of the barrel, I think the majority of customers who would be attracted by WIFI spend more than the average cafe customer.

    In my case, when I was working on a proposal for a few weeks(without an office), we spent quite a bit of time working in local cafe that offered free wifi. During a multiple hour session, we easily spent $20 per person on lunch, soda, coffee, and snacks. If the wifi did not exist, we would be somewhere else.

    Besides people working on grant proposals or people starting a biz without office space, free wifi attracts business clientèle. Locations with wifi are preferred for longer lunch meetings. Most of these meetings would previously be spent in a conference room, but now people can get out of the office and remain connected.

    Sure, your always going to have some punky looking kid who likes to sit there for a few more hours than he should, but its worth it in the long run.

  121. freeloaders by SnickleFritz · · Score: 1

    I know of one local shop that removed all of the power outlets so that the laptop guys didn't linger all day. Yeah, some guys bring in several batteries, but it still made for a decent turnover of tables.

  122. The local cafe by Eil · · Score: 1


    Here in Lansing, a new cybercafe called Gone Wired opened up a few months ago. It's probably too early to judge whether they are a success or not, but they offer free wifi and judging from the amount of foot-traffic I see, they can't be hurting too badly.

    In the end, I don't think free wifi has much to do with the overall profitability of a cafe business. All you really need for wifi are decent broadband, a flexible router, and an access point. Much more important are location, atmosphere, and product quality in that order. You only need to be concerned with table-squatters if the cafe is really jumping AND space is at a premium. At that point, they can probably be ticketed for loitering or something if they refuse to either buy a beverage or leave when asked politely. If idiots are hogging bandwidth with p2p, then simply spend a little extra cash and man-hours to configure a firewall that can penalize bandwidth hogs.

    The Gone Wired Cafe offers free wifi, but charges some insane amount if you use their computers. I wouldn't even bother with more than 2 or 3 cafe-owned stations depending on the size of the venue, as I've only ever seen one person use one in the dozens of trips that I've made to the place. (Obviously, it would be idiotic to spend top dollar on brand-new computers when almost any old PC will browse the web just fine these days. KDE in Kiosk mode would be excellent for this, btw.)

    Most of your customers are going to have enough common decency to buy a drink before settling down to use your wifi. Our local LUG meets at Gone Wired and this is something of an unwritten rule among us. (We have an agreement with the managers that lets us bring our own pizza, of course.) The drinks are a tad expensive, but free wifi makes up for it. We wouldn't be meeting at the cafe and buying drinks if the wireless internet access wasn't free. And we are far from the only computer-oriented group that meets there.

    Bottom line: free wifi will definitely help rather than hinder as long as long as the rest of the business is kept in line as well. I'd recommend telling your business man to give the owners of Gone Wired (linked above) a call. From what I can tell, they're pretty friendly and would probably be happy to lend some advice as long as he doesn't plan to set up shop in Lansing. :P

    1. Re:The local cafe by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Here in Las Vegas, we've had the usual $$$ suspects, like $tarbucks, Borders, for a long time, but lately, we've recently gotten a lot of new freebie locations, along with 4 new Panera Bread locations, and several chains of coffee shops with free access. In fact, I'm typing this at my favorite, the 'Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf' branch across the street from the University Of Nevada @ Las Vegas.. From where I'm sitting, there is at least two $$$ AP's, and several freebies (according to Stumbler).. I've started a webpage to track the increasing number of free ap's in Las Vegas.. http://lvfreewifi.net/

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  123. Travel WiFi by magician · · Score: 1

    Having WiFi available at a coffeeshop is a major selling point for travelers that frequent certain areas (or even have the foresight to do a little Googling beforehand).

    For example, I used to travel frequently between school in San Luis Obispo to see my girlfriend in Fresno. When her work schedule changed to put her in the office on the only days I could come over, I opted to simply wait her out in a coffee shop and do homework. The coffee shop we frequented for this purpose (biweekly or so) had free WiFi, which made me working from there possible.

    The point is: I would not go to that coffeeshop and buy coffee (I purchased several drinks and some food during each 8 hour stint) unless it had free WiFi.

    Just a thought,
    Sean

    --

    Cheers,
    Sean
  124. Be sure to offer a VPN! by mveloso · · Score: 1

    If you do offer WiFi, are you going to offer a VPN so they don't broadcast their stuff everywhere?

    www.hotspotvpn.com
    www.publicvpn.com
    www.witopia.net

  125. Looks like it'd be bad for business by cp5i6 · · Score: 1

    For people who are looking into the market of gourmet coffee.. I would imagine the type of people you're trying to attract are the ones who have the money to buy a drink sit and chat with perhaps a client/business colleague for a few and head out.

    Those types of clients most likely will be utilizing devices like blackberrys or palm treos that inherently already have built in internet.

    Offering free wifi really just attracts one type of person, the squatter. Usually someone who buys one or no cups of coffee and squats there for multiple hours while real paying guests come and go because there's no room around.

    As an alternative example is the star bucks at my barnes and noble.
    it's ALWAYS packed because people just bring the books there and start reading. I see at most people buying a cup of coffee and finishing entire novels at a time. Is that good for business? most likely not in a volume based business. You're looking for more volume, and offering things that just make people sit there longer is not it.

    If on the other hand you added a special promotion where only people who are extremely attractive get free wireless, then you dont mind if they sit there as long as they want because they'll pull in more volume..

    regardless free wifi is never worth it for the cafe/coffee shop.

  126. Re:Panera... Goose island, EQ available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've lived in Chicago and trolled for wireless locales for my laptop.

    I've gone to Goose Island and loved it. They dont ask you to buy anything (though I tip my server always) and have spent a lot other times when I was hungry or thirsty or both. The connection is good and fast.

    The information I have to add here is that Goose Island will loan you a PCMCIA wireless card if you need one. Now that is a service I havent seen elsewhere.

    Daaltje

  127. Slow poke. They already do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  128. Free WiFi does tend to attract customers by Phred+T.+Magnificent · · Score: 1

    There are several locations in this area that have free WiFi provided by a local ISP, and the general feeling is that the free service attracts customers and is good for business. (I've also heard and read blog postings from several customers of those businesses who claim that the wireless service is one of their reasons for choosing those businesses over competitors.)

    --
    Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
    Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?
  129. Re:You have to address the "bad customers" problem by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There's an easy way to solve that. Put your store across from a park and use a directional antenna to provide localized coverage with your business name on it. People can sit anywhere, not just in the coffee shop. Unless it's raining, a lot of folks will choose to sit outside instead, given the opportunity.

    Even better, since the business name is on the hotspot AP, you'll draw in people from the surrounding businesses over time.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  130. Advertising before access by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    Im know fuck all about networks but couldnt there be software that runs on a laptop that seeks out hot spots where you are and then when it finds one it launches an advertisement from the Wi Fi owner before it lets you accesss the newtwork. So the network would listen in for a connection request from the hot spotter and let him/her in once the advertisement has been seen.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  131. Will somebody please think of the children?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one ever thinks of the children!

  132. It's all about power by xjarodx · · Score: 1

    The way to keep people with laptops moving is to limit the number of power outlets available. Eventually, laptops will run out of juice, and, if the place is packed, the freeloader will have to move on.

    Of course, somebody could bring a power strip (or an extra battery)... but I've yet to see someone go to that extreme.

  133. I own a cafe with free Wi-Fi by cmause · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My wife and I own a little outdoor cafe in Tempe, AZ, and we offer free Wi-Fi. I work as a software developer during the day, and my wife runs our restaurant. We would have paid the approx. $35 per month to Qwest for a 1 Mbps DSL line anyway (to use our computer), and the DSL modem had the wireless router built right in. So why not offer it for free? I checked around to see what if any companies wanted to put in service and maintain it. The hassle factor was way too high, and I know my customers would have been irritated at the prospect of paying. For about $1 a day (I sound like Sally Struthers), I can get people in the door to buy my coffee, sandwiches and/or beer. When they're done surfing the web, they'll stick around for the live music. We don't get too many squatters. When we do, the server (the human who brings you your food, not the one that delivers HTTP content) just reminds the offender that the internet is free for our CUSTOMERS. I thought about a technological solution, but I think that the human touch works a little better. Generally people will buy something if reminded, rather than leave if they just get cut off. I get plenty of positive feedback from my customers about the free internet. On the other hand, I have never had anyone suggest that we start charging. There will be people who abuse anything you give away. We have had customers take handfuls of sugar packets and stuff them in their purses. We have kids take a dozen packets of crackers to feed the ducks (we're on a lake). I can't tell you how many times people have stolen our soap pumps out of the bathrooms. These are all things you have to put up with when you own a business that serves the public. But when you start nickel-and-diming people to death (gee, $1.50 for the coffee, plus 2 Sweet-and-Lows at 10 cents each... your total is $1.84 with tax), people get irritated and don't come back. And that's how people feel when you charge them six bucks an hour to surf the web.

    1. Re:I own a cafe with free Wi-Fi by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      I would tend to agree and I like your solution.

      As I've said before, solve people problems with people. Solve technology problem with technology.

      If you have squatters, ask them to either buy something or leave. "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" means that. And, frankly, if they're not buying something, they're not customers. And, if they get huffy and don't come back, you haven't lost a whole lot.

      At the very least, if the person has been sitting there without ordering anything for the last hour, have your wait-person come up every five minutes to say, "Can I get you anything else?" If nothing else, it will be so annoying that the customer will leave on their own.

    2. Re:I own a cafe with free Wi-Fi by TuneShark · · Score: 1

      I think it boils down to why you provide the internet access in the first place. Is it a draw to get more customers for your core business (coffee and sandwiches) or are you installing it as a source of additional revenue?

      I live in a college town where freely provided WiFi in coffee shops, bars and some restaurants is becoming ubiquitous. We have both a Panera and a Borders (with their silly $10/day, $30/month tmobile internet access). You can guess where the locals and the students go to hang out and get their cafeine and internet fix.

      I've noticed while travelling that Starbucks and most Airports with wireless are the same as the Borders. You pay for your wireless. But I'd argue that this is a different situation. Their theory is that you didn't "choose" that airport or to go to Starbucks just so you could access the internet. You were destined to go their anyway. So they charge extra for the service and make some additional revenue.

      Can't say I like it - but it makes business sense.

    3. Re:I own a cafe with free Wi-Fi by Ydna · · Score: 1

      I wish you owned several large incumbent telcos and taught them how to stop nickel-and-diming their customers.

      --

      "The great thing about multitasking is that several things can go wrong at once." -me

    4. Re:I own a cafe with free Wi-Fi by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      If I ran a cafe, I think I'd give out free internet, but you'd have to plug in for it. Maybe have 4 booths with jacks.

      Whenever we wanted to play tennis growing up, we'd always just sit along the fence if the courts were all used up. Very quickly someone would feel like it was time to move on and let us in. Maybe having a visible net connection would do the same thing.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  134. My experiences... by jafo · · Score: 1

    I've heard stories of adding free wireless generating a few thousand dollars per month of extra business, but those are second-hand. I can't point to anything proving that. However, I do have quite a lot of experience with using free wireless. Perhaps that helps.

    I work at home, and really enjoy the ability to have a change of scene. I've been spending a lot of time at coffee shops for about 3 years now. Also, I often go out for meetings with my partner and we usually will go to a place that has net so that we can do whatever we need while we're talking.

    In our area, we have only 5 restaurants that have wireless, and two of them are pretty foul. Our favorite we will on average go to twice a week. They have good food, but if it weren't for the wireless, I'd probably only go there once or twice a month. The restaurants around it I haven't been to in probably 2 months.

    3 years ago I basically spent nothing at coffee shops. I have never really liked coffee. Today I spend around $300/month at coffee shops on mochas (light on the chocolate), teas, and chais. I also tend to meet with one of the other guys in our business frequently at coffee shops, and also clients, which probably generates another $200/month in revenue, and have set up a couple of regular meetings at coffee shops as well, generating another $200/month.

    The common complaint is that people come in, hog tables, don't buy anything. I spend a LOT of time at almost all of the local coffee shops that have wireless. I have seen that, but it's pretty rare around here. When people complain about that, I wonder if it's just a regional thing, or if it's really a problem at all. I haven't seen it. Usually when a coffee shop is full, it's either students studying for midterms, or it's a bunch of people being social.

    There's also a statement that people on computers just sit there in front of the terminal and grump, not talking to anyone else. I've met around two dozen people, from just being regulars and saying "hey, how's it going?" to helping people fix their networking, to people asking me about stickers on my laptop. I haven't seen evidence that it's isolating.

    What are some businesses that have successfully used free WiFi? Panera Bread comes to mind. We don't have one here yet, but the last time we had some time to kill in the large urban center an hour away, that's where we went because of the Free WiFi.

    When we travel we will often stay at Holiday Inn Expresses, because they tend to have free WiFi, even though they're more expensive than the places we would normally stay otherwise. Free WiFi is the primary selector we use for places to stay when we travel, if we can't get that we go for free wired net. If we have lots of selection, we will tend to select the place that most proudly displays "Free (whatever) Internet" on their billboards or building. I kid you not. It's important to us, and therefore it's important to us to support it.

    Remember about 8 months ago when slashdot reported that state parks in Texas were adding free WiFi? My wife and I used it as an excuse for a vacation in January. We stayed at a Holiday Inn Express in Rockport (roughly mid-way between Corpus Christi and a park with WiFi), that had free WiFi. The park was pretty vacant when we were there, because it was very much the off season, but they got all this business simply because the state park added wifi.

    So, does free WiFi help business? I haven't seen any evidence that it hurts it, and have quite a lot of personal evidence that it helps quite a lot. (He says, writing this from a restaurant who's Free WiFi is broken, so he's using lowly CDMA.)

    Sean

  135. Schlotsky's by MonkeyT · · Score: 1

    Schlotsky's representatives are saying 6% of customers surveyed in their wi-fi enabled restaurants considered the free wi-fi access critical to their decision to eat there, and up to 40% said it was a factor in the decision. I've seen statistics that said revenue per customer was up to 16% higher in wi-fi locations because folks stay longer and buy more.

  136. It can work by scooterphish · · Score: 1

    Out here in BFE, there is a small coffee shop that has one computer, open wifi and a 4 port for customers to access the internet. Their prices aren't any higher than any other coffee shop that DOESN'T offer free wifi internet.
    Another coffee shop in Portland offers hardwired ports and wifi, the only thing they ask is that customers buy at least ONE beverage/food item.
    I visit both shops regularly and I often see the same people taking advantage of the wifi and plugged-in, as well as new faces, too.
    Even though the coffee shop here in BFE doesn't ask that customers buy something, I always do.

  137. Internet cafe? I want an Internet BAR! by vertinox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, I'd like an Internet Bar where I can bring my laptop and then drink alcoholic beverages. C'mon guys... Hurry up with the idea! I'm tired of having to bring my vodka flask to coffee shop.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    1. Re:Internet cafe? I want an Internet BAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why hasn't this been modded up? It's the first freakin' sensible reply on this topic.

  138. free by dotpavan · · Score: 1

    I guess it has to be free, because it is pointless to have it paid, and I might say that even WEP is kinda losing its value, because in a recent announcement, our univ (UNM) announced that they wont have any more WEP or restriction to wifi by registering mac adds, and hence its open to all.. though we might have to log-in using our IDs (at some point later, I "guess")

  139. availability issues... by infiniter · · Score: 1

    the reason that people sit in there with their laptops is scarcity. if every restaurant and coffee shop had free wireless it'd cease to be an issue. further, loitering=loitering, whether you're doing it with a laptop open or not. people taking up spaces inside businesses is nothing new - what about sheltering from rain or cold? i've seen it many times.

    the key, as i see it, is to just kick out those who are just loitering. i can't afford to pay for wireless, i would say many people can't, so i for one am glad to see places with free wireless.

  140. free wifi works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The local coffee shop "Common Grounds" in Davis, CA provides free WiFi and they appear to be very successful. I for one spend a lot of time (and dollars) there.

  141. The Incredible Lightness of Coffeeshops by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    One thing to keep in mind if you decide to offer "free" internet is you're going to get people who campout on their laptops and take up table space for hours at a time. Some people even stay there all damn day like it's their personal office space. This might lend itself to loss of business from patrons just wanting a quick cappuccino or dessert and having no seats available. I'd make sure to designate certain tables with time limits or as "No Internet." Good luck!

    Wait. It's a coffee shop. It has a door. Any business owner can ask someone to leave his establishment, so long as it's not done in violation of some law.

    I've been asked to leave a crowded store when it was obvious I wasn't buying - the coffee shop can always do that. I seem to recall one time I had a laptop at a coffee shop - visiting relatives - the store employee (or maybe the manager) asked me if I could either buy some coffee or vacate the table for paying customers.

    It's like a bookstore or comic shop - some people will read the whole issue of a magazine or comic from cover to cover if you let them - store owners always can refuse their business/browsing.

    Next!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:The Incredible Lightness of Coffeeshops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet if you had been following the issue more widely, you would have read that a number of coffee shops do not want to turn their baristas into wifi police. They are busy enough as it is. Their job is to make coffee, and if wifi limits cause them to add another task to their job description, "kicking people out," then the value of staf-enforced wifi limits as a solution is called into question and another solution must be entertained.

  142. Wifi an incentive by Trebonius · · Score: 1

    Wireless internet is certainly an incentive for me to patronize a coffee shop. But I also want coffee. If I wanted to freeload, I'd just to go the public library, which also has free wireless.

    The longer I'm at these coffee shops, the more I buy.

  143. Victrola Coffee by Cray · · Score: 1

    Victrola Coffee in Seattle has a lot of experience with this. They shut off their wifi on the weekends. It might be worth contacting them to find out their thoughts.

    1. Re:Victrola Coffee by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      This was also posted on Engadger. You can read some of the comments on there. You could just kick people who aren't buying anything out of the store.

  144. A successful case by prof.morbius · · Score: 1

    The Flying Star chain of cafes in Albuquerque, NM http://flyingstarcafe.com/ is an example of a success. They offer free wireless in all their restaurants (including the Satellite chain of coffee shops). It's obviously working for them, since they're constantly expanding.

    I think they contract with Qwest to do it, but that's from an employee who wasn't real sure.

    --
    "A plan's just a list of things that don't happen" -- Mr. Parker, "The Way of the Gun"
  145. avoid responsibility by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



    If you don't charge, you don't have any responsibility for problems. No support required. If you charge, you've got to have staff able to answer questions about DNS, firewall, blah, blah, blah.

    As for the liability issue, it's a red herring. Service Providers aren't liable for the behavior of their users. If the cafe offers a phone for free local calls and the person calls in a bomb threat to the local city hall, the cafe is not responsible. Same with people downloading pirated content. This doesn't hold true if people are DDOSing a host due to a trojan-conquered zombie laptop, though. The coffee shop's upstream provider might chop their service.

    Seth

  146. Zone CD... by vwjeff · · Score: 1

    http://www.publicip.net/

    Check out Zone CD. It works great for small shops. I set up an old PII box for a local shop. All you need is a computer, CD-Drive, two NICs, and an access point. It's great. Did I mention it's FOSS?

  147. A case FOR...and AGAINST by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

    As a business traveler, finding WiFi is key. Being the frugal businessman that I am, I of course prefer free. I've kept tabs on which location provide free WiFi and those are the places I will frequent. This, of course leads to more money to the establishments I frequent.

    Case in point: When I moved back to CA I was waiting for my cable (Internet) to be set up. I asked a friend which nearby coffee shop had free WiFi and I found myself there every day checking emails (and deleting spam) and taking care of business. They certainly made a pretty penny off my coffee purchases (I generally make my own coffee and tea at home when I'm not needing a coffee shop for a specific reason).

    That was obviously a case FOR. By simply having free WiFi, they collected money from me and countless others. I use the same methodology when booking hotels. HOWEVER, the system can be abused. I didn't have to buy coffee. The place could have been loaded with freeloaders who wanted free WiFi but didn't want to buy anything.

    I would start by offering free WiFi. That's it, no required purchase or anything. Watch to see how the traffic grows and what kind of traffic it is. If you're lucky, you won't have to place any restrictions on it. If you're getting loads of freeloaders, implement a "purchase required" policy or have some sort of time limit (one hour? Two hours? Only the shop owner will really know what's best for their particular shop).

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  148. I lead by example: by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    I siply don't use the Wireless connexion in a shop that charges for it (such as Starbucks). I also don't buy coffee or munchies in them either (unless I have no other choice).

    The places that DO offer free WiFi I DO patronise. And I make it a point to do so, and I spend much more time and money in such places as well.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  149. Free WiFi coffee only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only go to coffeeshops that offer free wireless. Period. I've already spent at least $500 for coffes/frappucinos/cake etc. this year and I know that at least most of my friends are the same way. Also, based on my experience the places that offer free wireless are almost always crowded to the max with people surfing the web and getting one coffee after the other plus slices or cakes, cookies, etc. This means dramatically increased revenue for coffeeshops with free wifi. No question. Just look around and see it for yourself.

  150. free wireless in oaxaca, mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, there's definitely a case for coffeehouses with free wifi-

    I'm currently reading slashdot from Cafe Las Cuiles in Oaxaca, Mexico - this place has become my office, specifically because they have free wireless, and they've gotten a lot of my business because of it.

    I've been doing this traveling / bartering photography gig for a while ( see http://www.jjtiziou.net/fieldtrips ) and whenever I get into a new city, the first thing I do is seek out a place with good coffee, a nice atmosphere, and free wifi. And in Philly, I don't have an office, I just work out of local coffeehouses (a while back there was another slashdot story about a seattle software company working exclusively out of a local coffeehouse)

    Having been a coffee wench for six years, I completely understand that there is potential for problems with free wifi when customers come in and hog table space, loiter around for hours while only buying a tiny cup of coffee, and stare at their screens instead of participating in the social atmosphere that one would want in a coffeehouse.

    This coffeehouse has addressed this potential problem head on, probably the way I would if I ran such a place, by putting signs up- they're totally clear and honest and logical:

    "Los Cuiles provides free wifi for it's customers. We ask that you be conscious that food and drink are what pay our bills, and we encourage you to share a table with another laptop user if tables are short" -

    So yes- I'm all in favor of the free wifi- and if you're ever headed to Oaxaca, Las Cuilas is one block south of Santo Domingo. If you need a travel office in Philly, try Kaffa Crossing in west philly, Old City Coffee, or the Ground Floor in northern liberties. When in Minneapolis, the SpyHouse is great. In Omaha, there's a small place called the Blue Line, and a bigger spot called Caffeine Dreams that I quite liked. And plenty more elsewhere....

    take care,
    -jj

  151. Why free wifi? by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

    If it's an Internet cafe, then the customers will be paying to use the wired terminals. Why should they get wireless for free? Charge them the same as for the wired terminals. Keep things simple, and make everything work the same.

  152. Change your frame by cheesebikini · · Score: 1

    I've heard this question a hundred times and it all boils down to how you -frame- the question. Don't think of this as: "Should I offer free wi-fi." It's not a question of free or not free. It's a question of whether you charge people for the wi-fi through (1) the prices you charge for coffee and food, or (2) itemizing wi-fi access. You don't ask "Should I offer free electric light?" because you realize that's an absurd question. You could install a coin-operated lightswitch at each table in the cafe, so that people have to pay 25 cents for each 10 minutes of light. But that would irritate your customers, it would damage your brand (make you seem stingy) and it would add tremendous transaction costs. You have to purchase and install, repair and maintain the coin machines, you have to collect and count the coins, etc. So you just figure the overall monthly cost of electricity and bundle that into the cost of the food and coffee.

  153. this is what my boss thought by Fortun+L'Escrot · · Score: 1

    he could provide wireless or even wired access for about half the price you got at regular internet cafes. or you get free access with a purchase where access was limited to 1-2hrs where the customer could extend that if the coffee agents were nice :)

    but as it turns out it is better to provide free yet limited access for the entire street provided by the city. with store owners giving out temporary yet faster and longer connections with purchase. the hard part is getting the city to provide free access to an entire street.

  154. What about the guy down the street. by fizzup · · Score: 1
    If you do have free WiFi in a cafe, you have to tie it to purchases. An identifier on the reciept is good. Otherwise, I'll rent an apartment down the street, mount a cantenna on my balcony, and point it at your café.

    The scheme to generate the identifier doesn't have to be all that clever. There's a few bits of entropy in the purchase price, after all.

  155. My case for free WiFi by DyingBreed · · Score: 1

    There is a restaurant (little diner) that I go to for lunch 2 to 4 times a week. If they didn't have WiFi I might go a couple of times a month. Simple as that.

  156. Eh. by rwaliany · · Score: 0

    The thing that stops me from buying coffee and going to coffee shops is the lack of free internet...

    --
    - Ryan
  157. The Case for a Free Blowjob? by Momoru · · Score: 1

    Recently I was trying to convince a woman who is about to open a brothel, to provide blowjobs at no charge. I argued about increased business and royalty and proposed that the infrastructure cost these days is reasonable and the recurring cost, along with the amortized payoff of the initial investment, can be recovered by adding a few cents to each handjob, etc. In spite of the numerous discussions on the merits of free bjs v. paid at coffee shops, restaurants, etc, I was interested in hearing what do you think about the issue and if there are solid examples of successful businesses that offered free blowjobs." If you were going to argue for or against this issue, what arguments would you use?

  158. The one-coffee, 6-hours guy by cheesebikini · · Score: 1

    How to deal with the "one-coffee, 6-hours guy" - the guy who spends $1.50 and then takes up a table all day? Yes there are technical ways to attack this problem. Time-limited access codes printed on receipts. Often-changing WEP keys or captive-portal passwords. But at the heart of it this is NOT a technical problem, it's a social problem. A small percentage of any group are jerks, regardless of whether they're carrying laptops. Cafe owners also have some few people come in who read a book or draw or write for hours, taking up a table w/ one coffee. But that's called rudeness. We've evolved -social- means for dealing with rudeness. The barrista can ask "can I get you something else" a couple times and then finally say "sorry, if you're not buying anything you'll have to clear that table for our customers." Better yet, the regulars in the cafe can give the guy dirty looks or tell him to buy something. Social means are effective and they were business-as-usual in successful cafes long before laptops. People, please try the simple, effective -social- methods before telling cafe owners to implement complicated -technical- methods for dealing with a social problem, methods that will annoy the majority of laptop-using cafe patrons who aren't jerks, and that will add new maintenance and transaction costs and hassles for the cafe staff and owners (who are usually overworked as it is and often not technically inclined).

  159. Ritual Coffee Roasters in SF by berndtj · · Score: 1

    I'm sitting here right now doing my work, and procrastinating on /. using their free wi-fi. Honestly, the place is packed with laptop users. And there always seems to be a line for the counter as well. Granted the usual clientel, me, does stay for a while, but I do try to get an extra cup of coffee or a brownie just out of respect for their business.

    I much rather code here with other people around than work at home.

  160. Don't offer WiFi. Offer a number of network ports. by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

    Put several ethernet plugs along a long table so that people can plug their laptops in (for a fee). Set up a router that offers port 80 access, maybe POP3, maybe FTP (but leaves no other ports open).

    The router is a Linux box. When a user starts his session, you call a script "startUser" which does an ifup on the ethernet card he's connected to, then crontabs bringing the ethernet card back down after a half hour, or hour, or whatever. If the user pays for more time, you run startUser again, and it extends the crontab time limit.

    It's simple, it isn't possible to freeload, and it keeps people away from the seats reserved for COFFEE customers.

    --
    Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  161. Ask a local ISP by pyite69 · · Score: 1

    Advertising is the American way.

    Many local restaurants and such have free wifi - which includes a few posters around the building for the ISP. I'll bet you can find a similar arrangement with someone there.

    1. Re:Ask a local ISP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an ISP I couldn't agree more. Most restaurants we ASK to let us pay to put a hotspot in just tell us they don't want the seats being hogged.

  162. Silly Question by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1


    Quick question: Do these places that provide wi-fi also provide the ability to plug into power?

    I have an edge card for my laptop with an OK connection from just about anywhere, not hi speed or anything -- but faster than a typical dial up...But usually it endes up being mostly a novelty if I can't plug in to power, since battery life divided by the time it takes me to boot up and getted logged in * 100 usually equals NOT WORTH IT.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  163. WiFi hotspots will become obsolete by geekee · · Score: 1

    When WiMax or the successor to 3G becomes widespread, mobile users will subscribe to these services and get broadband wireless without needing a hotspot.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  164. WiFi in cafes by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    "This place has WiFi, if I ever had a laptop and a need to check my email while drinking my coffee, maybe I'd bring it here."

    I know when I had a good laptop, and when I get a new one, I frequently spent and will spend tyme in cafes with it. I actually got more work done there than anywhere else. Of course when I went with my laptop they didn't have WiFi and I stop by before and/or after classes.

    Falcon
  165. WiFi in bars is essential... by raehl · · Score: 1

    WiFi is essential for making sure you don't accidentally meet any women.

    1. Re:WiFi in bars is essential... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      WiFi is essential for making sure you don't accidentally meet any women.

      From experience and observation I'd say it's the opposite. While sitting in a cafe working on my laptop I've had others both men and women come and ask me something, what I was working on, about my laptop, or about something else. I've seen the same happen to others with laptops. When I did before my laptop broke I'd be working on a class assignment or project doing a webpage or applet and would be asked something like "Ooh you can do that?" And I may end up having a discussion with them.

      Falcon
  166. My argument... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a coffee shop, hotel, marina offers WiFi or via a 3rd party offers WiFi for a fee, when it doesn't work, they will face angry customers expecting them to fix it. The higher the fee, the more swearing.

    If the WiFi is free, the screaming, swearing will at the very least, be minimal.

    My $0.02

  167. WiFi w/ your Coffee by malachid69 · · Score: 1

    Coffee People (Beaverton,OR) has free WiFi. When you first connect (before you mark it as a preferred network), you will notice that the for-charge Starbucks WiFi across the street is available too. IE: You can access either one from either coffee shop.

    Realistically, that means that which wifi you want to use will not affect which coffee shop you use (baring the shops turning into faraday cages)...

    However, if Coffee People were charging money for usage, I wouldn't pay. I would just wait till I got home or try to connect to one of the other 3-4 networks it detected.

    --
    http://www.google.com/profiles/malachid
  168. Tip Jar? by Chaostrophy · · Score: 1

    Why not a tip jar for the wifi?

    As for me, my favorite cafe charges for wifi. I only go there if I'm planing on leaving my laptop at home, I go to two closer places if I think I might want to use the laptop, because they offer free access.

    If my fav place offered free access, I'd always go there.

    --
    Plato seems wrong to me today
  169. Nomad Cafe by spamania · · Score: 1


    Allow me to waste a bit of bandwidth here to plug Nomad Cafe in Oakland, CA.

    Not only do they offer free WiFi to the masses, but the owner installed a LAN throughout the cafe, so your never more than a few feet away from an ehternet jack.

    They are also active in the community and sling some dope, fair-trade, organic joe.

    That's what I call a business model.

    --
    My other .sig is a troll.
  170. Free Coffee by Ticklemonster · · Score: 1

    It's like having a Starbucks that serves unlimited free coffee. No brainer. Dude wants to make money, he should not sell one product and give another one away for free.

    --
    Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
  171. They'll never go after the coffee shops ... by skitheboat · · Score: 1

    Where do you think the people from the record companies and particually their kids go to download music? Based on what a few friends in the industry have told me coffee shops are sort of a safehouse and this is a very common practice for the younger people in the biz. They just can't risk it at home or the officeor they will lose their job not just the $3000 settlement. Steamboat Springs

  172. different business model? by globaljustin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Making $3.50 per table every 2 hours will not keep them in business. It's all about getting drinks out the door.

    obviously, you dont' understand the reason why people go to 'coffee shops'

    If all you want is a quick cup of really good overpriced joe, just go to Starbucks or make your own at home for pennies. Locally owned coffee shops usually go for the tradition coffee shop crowd: freegans, beatnicks, hippies, students, artists, punks, emo kids...in general the 'hip' people. The kind of people who would be ashamed if their friends saw them going into evil starbucks.

    Having free WiFi attracts these types b/c by definiton, living outside the mainstream usually means being poor in relation to the hyper consumer mainstream.

    Now, by going for the 'hip' kids, it attracts all those who are curious, intrigued, bemused, etc. in the company of said 'hip' kids.

    If you're looking for big black lines of profit from a traditional coffee shop, just move on, b/c that's not what it's about...it's about establishing a place that artists and whatnot can be artists, nurse one coffee for hours, and get free internet, adn THEN profiting off of all the WANNABE 'hip' people. It won't ever go public, but it will last, and be loved by it's patrons

    So, to have a good, true 'coffee shop' you have to be willing to sacrifice some profit, but not a fatal sacrifice. And in return you get hours of amusement from your patrons, and they love you for it.

    Maybe there's a way to just charge the wannabe's like you for wifi, while letting us punk beatnicks get our wifi for free.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:different business model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the flip side, he might be looking to make a buck off the productive members of his community, not a handful of pretentious losers.

    2. Re:different business model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      not a handful of pretentious losers.

      Just because he thinks he deserves free stuff because he thinks other people are so desparate for his comapny that they drink substandard coffee?

      He's a prime example of cognitive dissonance; He's a penniless loser who's convinced that everybody else wants to be him.

    3. Re:different business model? by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      You criticize weirdos, hippies, punks, and artists as 'unproductive members of the community'.

      Ok, that's granted, but in order for you to be consistant, you must never buy, download, look at, read, or enjoy anything that artists do.  Because if you do ever access/enjoy those things, then you prove your own 'unproductive' point wrong.  Now your life is really boring, huh?

      If you stop to think about it, most of the things you enjoy were created by these 'pretentious losers'

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    4. Re:different business model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The pretentious losers at my local "hip" coffee shop have never recorded an album, painted a painting, written a book, or sculpted a sculpture. They're all too busy being seen hanging out at that same "hip" coffee shop and getting wired on free refills.

      And I'm willing to bet a vin-tay mocha latte' that you're just another one of those no-job, lives-in-mom's-basement, no-talent losers.

      As for the shite coffee they serve at those places, I'd rather have a cup of stale coffee with the consistencey of used motor oil dredged from the bottom of last night's pot at Waffle House.

    5. Re:different business model? by CarrionBird · · Score: 1
      You don't understand the reason why people start a business. (like a coffee shop) They want to be able to make a living doing what they love. That pretty much requires making ends meet. You don't have to be setting the woods on fire, but you do have to make enough profit to pay the bills and put food on the table.

      If they can find a way to do free internet and still keep going that's great, but they aren't there solely so you don't have to pony up for some inetrnets.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    6. Re:different business model? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Having free WiFi attracts these types b/c by definiton, living outside the mainstream usually means being poor in relation to the hyper consumer mainstream.

      And these non-consumerist poor people have laptops?

  173. the disadvantage by v1 · · Score: 1

    It's been awhile so I can't quote the source, but I recall reading about one business that ran into problems as a result of this. It was a small restaurant/cafe with an outdoor cafe seating area. Not getting a lot of business, they decided to offer free wifi. This had an unexpected effect - customers would come over and sit down with their laptops and get to work. Often times they would not even order a coffee, or would bring their own food and beverege. Many of them would order a coffee (free refills) and that was it, they'd sit there for hours sipping on coffee and browsing the internet,. So now these squatters are taking up his valuable seating area and bringing no benefit to his cafe. Any restaurant owner will tell you that carry-out customers are much more valuable than eat-in because they don't take up your valuable resource of available seating space. Wifi squatters can take up seating that paying customers would have taken if the cafe were not so "busy" that they skip past it to the one down the block.

    I talked with some friends about this problem, and the solution we came up with was a technology solution. Each customer receives a recipt when they purchase something. On that ticket is a 6 digit number that is a temporary code for the access point, good for an hour, or perhaps good for the entire day. That's required to login to the access point. Maybe just make it the ssid and turn off broadcast. (yes I know, you can sniff, we're talking average ppl) This makes wifi "free to paying customers". Really a business should not be offering perks to non paying customers.

    Lots of truck stops around here have a pay wifi setup. You see their AP and login but it redirects you to their "stop into the counter to sign up!" screen. You go in, pay $5 and get a temp login that's good for an hour. That's the other way to go, but in that case I think they're using wifi not to attract business, but as a source of revenue. Depending on your market, that can also work. Truckers are a nice captive audience and will pay a premium for internet access from their rigs.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  174. free wifi is a MUST by justncase80 · · Score: 1

    I refuse to get coffee in places that charge for wifi. Free wifi is like free cable tv at a bar. Plain and simple: if I have to pay extra for the open internet at a coffee shop, I will leave and never EVER return. Cheap bastards.

    Also, if you're concerned about authentication then its really easy require a free signup where a user will give there name and contact information in echange for having their laptops MAC address added to the allow list in the router. Easy. You can also turn WEP on give them the key for free. This is not so tough.

  175. really low monthly charge... by capsteve · · Score: 1

    i helped a friend set up wireless in her coffee shop. we discussed the pros/cons of free vs charged wifi, and after some discussion, her decision was to charge a low monthly fee, equal to a couple of hours at starbucks(which incidentally just opened down the street from her).
    the whole point of providing bandwidth is to give an additional service to your patrons. free bandwidth will attract new and repeat business, but it doesn't always turn into an increase cash register activity. the whole point is to get folks to eat and drink at your establishment. free wifi might end up in a loss of sales, and a bunch of users who'll milk a latte for a couple of hours while surfing at your establishment, taking up chair and table real estate that a paying customer could have used.

    --
    three can keep a secret, if two are dead - benjamin franklin
  176. Paying for Wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd charge for my wifi, but then my wife would plug into the router and I'd have a cable running across the floor. That would just be annoying.

  177. Free Wifi -- by samalex · · Score: 1

    Where I live we have a Barnes and Noble, Starbucks, and Panera Bread all in the same little shopping center. I personally visit Panera because of the free wifi quite often, and though I do like the coffee variety at Starbucks and Barnes and Noble, the free wifi is the deciding factor for me. I personally know what it costs to offer wifi access, and to charge $$$ an hour to use is a rip. Panera here is always packed in the evenings and even mornings with students and folks with some time to burn, and I never see moochers. Everyone with a laptop always has a plate of food and coffee in hand.

  178. Free wi-fi, charge for electricity! by iamnot · · Score: 1

    Internet cafes should go British-style, have coin-operated electricity plugs for those hard-core wi-fiers. An extra income stream for cafe owners, and a good alternative for those wi-fiers who are shaking from too manys coffees, and relatively headache-free compared to paying for wi-fi. (Of course, auto-disconnects or time-outs after half-an-hour on the wi-fi connection would be good too, makes playing WOW mid-battle a wee bit more difficult!)

    --
    sig? what sig? i didn't see any sig...
  179. This comment is without value by k8to · · Score: 1

    I can't stop myself though.
    It's "losing" not "loosing".

    --
    -josh
    1. Re:This comment is without value by arete · · Score: 1

      yes, yes it is.

      I stopped previewing my /. comments long ago : )

      --
      Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  180. Water Fountains by tomdarch · · Score: 1

    When is the last time you put a coin into a water fountain to get water? Like me, I'll bet your answer is 'never'. It costs money to install the plumbing and the fountain. It costs money to maintian the building's plumbing. You could charge for water, but you don't. You have now seen the future of WiFi.

    1. Re:Water Fountains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll stick to buying bottled water.
      Before you got here some homeless guy was washing his ball in your fountain.

      You have just experienced the future of 3G/EDGE.

  181. hacking? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    If someone uses illegal activity using WiFi while in your cafe, you can put yourself into serious trouble.

  182. Why no free Wi-Fi utopia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 words: Human Beings.

    We are dishonorable, deceitful, selfish, twisted, callous..... All the things that help a wild animal survive. And more.

    You can have your comfortable little internal philosophical arguments about the 999 people. Yeah they're generally tolerable, and sometimes even lovely. The definition of "lovely" is an exercise left up to the reader.

    The other 2 of the 1001 will still throw the metaphorical brick and molotov.

  183. time limit for users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, to keep people eating/drinking instead of taking up valuable space at the cafe, i'd print some individual password on the receipt for their order, which would validate their use of the network for some time. Eventually, people who would take the products I want to push or simple spend more money than average would get more free time.

  184. Methods for Discouraging Freeloading by fossa · · Score: 1

    How about instead of putting a password on everyone's receipt, just have a screen, only visible from the cash registers, with a password (a real word, easy to remember from just a glance). This password would rotate every hour or so. The newest and second-to-newest passwords would work (so as not to screw customers arriving just before a change). This lowers the complexity, but is a deterrent to freeloaders. It may not lower the complexity enough though, or be enough of a detterent to make a difference ("hey neighbor, what's the password?").

    Anyway, I think some social shaming would be more effective and less annoying than the technical password on the receipt scheme. Anyone have some better ideas?

  185. Not enough people pay by lphuberdeau · · Score: 1

    From the stats I've seen, very few coffee shops actually make profits from wireless access since very few customers actually think it's worth paying 6-10$ per hour simply for internet access. Most don't even have one paying customer per day.

    If your goal is to have customers actually working in your coffee shop and buying food/drinks once in a while, offering free access is probably a good way to keep them as they won't have to leave to send an email (which they would probably do if sending that same email would cost 10$ while they could do it for free at home).

    Internet access is cheap and wireless routers too. There is simply no maintenance to be made if you just leave it wide open.

    There is a user group maintaining wireless access points and working on various free-wireless related stuff in Montreal. You might want to check their website to get informations and arguents: Ile sans fil

    --
    Qui ne va pas à la chasse n'a pas de gibier
    PHP Queb
  186. Doesn't make sense by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    No coffee shop makes much money on the people sitting in the shop. Coffee shops make money primarily from their take out customers. Even assuming that people sitting at the tables buy a new cup of coffee every hour, how many takeout customers can the shop serve in that time?

    Tables, chairs, sofas, books, papers, music, and yes, Wi-Fi, serve to create an atmosphere that enhance the overall perception of value. It's why they can charge $3.00 for a fucking cup of drip coffee.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  187. Re:Panera...time limt by Kruid · · Score: 1

    Actually, where I am now (Lausanne, Ch) there is a nearby cafeteria which does exactly this. You can log on for x amount of time per 24 hour period. It's free, and plenty power outlets should you need one.
    -k

    --
    Your mind moves quicker than a nun's first curry. - A. Rimmer
  188. uncomfortable by ams5995 · · Score: 1

    Just have a waitperson lingering around offering beverages/food/whatever to people. About the 4th time around the freeloader is going to feel uncomfortable and leave.

  189. trustafarians by globaljustin · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The pretentious losers at my local "hip" coffee shop have never recorded an album, painted a painting, written a book, or sculpted a sculpture.

    THAT YOU KNOW OF!!!!!!!!

    Your point is completely moot b/c you don't even KNOW any of these people personally, so you therefore have absolutely no grounds to claim anything about their work (or whether it exists). The truth is, you would be nervous and self conscious talking to these people, especially the chicks

    you're just another one of those no-job, lives-in-mom's-basement, no-talent losers.

    I'm not, I am a high school social studies teacher, p/t newspaper writer, p/t grad. student, snowboarding instructor, and i live alone. I loathe these kinds of kids as much as you do...pretending to be poor artists whilst chowing on mom's meatloaf at 6 every night...those people are not poor, not artists, and do not need free wifi...they need to move out of the damned house and get a job.

    we have a name for these kids...trustafarians...and they are the ones who make the coffee shops profitable enough, spending their parent's money, so they are kind of a necessary evil

    still think you're right??? a good friend of mine wrote her book (which has been picked up by an agent and will be printed next year) entirely at "Penny Lane" coffee shop on Pearl Street in Boulder, Colorado...why "Penny Lane"???

    free...internet (and she lives alone too, w/o major parental funding)

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:trustafarians by sundog61 · · Score: 1
      . I loathe these kinds of kids as much as you do...pretending to be poor artists whilst chowing on mom's meatloaf at 6 every night...those people are not poor, not artists, and do not need free wifi...they need to move out of the damned house and get a job.

      I could not agree more.

    2. Re:trustafarians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...a good friend of mine wrote her book (which has been picked up by an agent and will be printed next year) entirely at "Penny Lane" coffee shop on Pearl Street in Boulder, Colorado

      Not to flame, but it's been my experience that Penny Lane is exactly the kind of pretentious "see-and-be-seen by the hipper-than-thou" type of place that attracts the Trustafarians you refer to.

      And here's what I've noticed: a great number of Trustafarians do live alone (or in patchouli-clouded group dwellings)-- not chewing on Mom's meatloaf and living in her basement. But, I'll grant you, they definitely live high on the hog of mommy and daddy's money, even if those families are ensconced in their snooty old-money estates back east while their fuckup hipster kids pretend to be artists in Boulder or {insert progressive upper-middle-class college town here}...

      Ok, maybe I flamed just a little...

    3. Re:trustafarians by CarrionBird · · Score: 1
      He doesn't "know" 100%, but the odds are in his favor.

      Bah, at any rate, coffeshops where I'm from have done just fine without wi-fi period. The schools are pretty well covered, and the dorms all have ethernet. Based on my observations, a small precentage of patrons in my particular college town are studying/laptoping as opposed to just hanging out.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    4. Re:trustafarians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're making assumptions about my assumptions. FWIW, once upon a time I was a coffee-shop type. Then I grew up. Graduating, getting married, and getting a job tends to force that.
      Your point is completely moot b/c you don't even KNOW any of these people personally, so you therefore have absolutely no grounds to claim anything about their work (or whether it exists). The truth is, you would be nervous and self conscious talking to these people, especially the chicks

      By "chicks" I assume you mean women? Hrm...someone who lives alone is telling a married man he'd be nervous talking to "chicks." Okay.

      I know most of the old-timers at the local Stone Cup and Greyfriar's. Most of them can be described in one word: Flake. Only one has made a significant effort to do anything creative. She writes bad science fiction, and has a stack of rejection letters from Asimov's and Interzone to prove it. She's also a Jedi by faith, having previously tried Wicca, Druidism, and Buddhism. She even wears a padawan braid. Seriously. But at least she has a day job at the Post Office and doesn't live with her parents, so that puts her a notch or three above most of the coffee house crowd.

      If any of the local coffee house people had been published or had any pieces on display at a museum, they'd have jumped at the chance to tell me about it. Repeatedly.

      The only nervousness I'd feel at the Stone Cup or Greyfriar's would be fear that all the freeloaders there would ask if I could cover the tab for their overpriced swill.
      I am a high school social studies teacher, p/t newspaper writer, p/t grad. student, snowboarding instructor, and i live alone.

      What with all that time you spend teaching, writing, and studying, how do you find the time to hang out at coffee houses?
      still think you're right??? a good friend of mine wrote her book (which has been picked up by an agent and will be printed next year) entirely at "Penny Lane" coffee shop on Pearl Street in Boulder, Colorado...

      Got an ISBN? Or a title? I happen to manage a bookstore and we're always on the lookout for new authors to try out. Even if it's by a smaller printing house, so long as it's picked up by the big 2 wholesale book vendors (Ingram Books and Baker & Taylor). If it's published by iUniverse, Vantage, AuthorHouse, or one of the other vanity presses, though, they generally don't make it past the print-on-demand stage, so it's harder to order a copy for the shelves.
    5. Re:trustafarians by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      ok, so if I present proof that I'm not BS'ing about this friend and her book, will you conceed your point?

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    6. Re:trustafarians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't say or imply that you were BS'ing. I'm genuinely interested in it. I'd like to check it out - it may turn out to be of interest to one/some/all of my customers.

      Since it was written at a coffee shop, it may be of particular interest to the local "trustafarians" who might want to have people see them reading it at the Stone Cup, or to have people see it on their coffee tables. I may therefore like to order a copy of it for our shelves. That's why I asked for an ISBN - not because I doubted that you have a friend who wrote a book at a coffee shop. I've seen many stranger things happen - hell, there was a slashdot story a few months back about some software company whose incredibly popular Mac app was written at a coffee shop.

      BTW, since you do seem to be employed and not living with a parental unit, I owe you one vin-tay mocha latte'

      Or if you prefer cappuccino or even regular coffee, we happen to have a regular drip coffeemaker and a cappuccino machine at my bookstore.

      I'm going to stop typing now, as I have to open the store in 7 hours :-P

  190. The WiFi is free but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So charge $5 an hour to use the power outlet, or free when you spend $4 dollars. For someone who is there for an hour or two, this is not a problem as the usual battery will sufice and a cup of coffee will get them an extra hour.

    For the people who want to leach free net access all day, they are planing to pay for the coffee, nor will they be willing to pay for power. It will keep the leaches out of the place.

  191. Benefits vs. risks by adrienlamothe · · Score: 1

    Regarding the chance of a cafe owner receiving a subpoena, it won't happen, because the cafe owners don't provide the service. Cafe owners pay a fee to an internet service provider. The ISP places a wireless router in the cafe. The cafe then either sells access, or allows free access. So, any subpoena will be served on the ISP.

    Offering free wireless access can be either good or bad for a cafe, depending on the business climate. If the cafe enjoys good business, then it is probably better off charging for access. This is because wireless users tend to spend less over the time they sit in the cafe. If business in the cafe is slow, then offering free access is a way to bring in a little extra income, while also creating an appearance of popularity (an old trick in the restaurant business.)

  192. "linksys" and "default" aren't "free wifi"... by argent · · Score: 1

    If someone sets up an access point with an SSID like "free wifi" then it's reasonably to assume they are happy for you to leech off them.

    If someone sets up an access point and leaves everything set to the default, then you can't assume they're willing to let you use their access. That's like someone not bothering to lock their backyard gate: if you come in and lounge by the pool... you're trespassing even if you never use anything but the sunshine.

    I don't know what the law specifically says about this kind of thing, but it's only common courtesy to ask... or to refrain if you can't find out who's responsible for the AP. If you're not prepared to extend that basic consideration to people, then you're a pretty low kind of worm in my book.

  193. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  194. Re:You have to address the "bad customers" problem by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

    I've generally accepted the reality that most people don't know when to use lose and when to use loose. So I seldom bother to comment. But there it is typed out in all capital letters: ... might be LOOSING you money ...

    I wish I understood why this confusion is so nearly universal. Lose and loose are two different words and they are not interchangeable.

  195. Free wifi in coffeshops in Iceland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think almost all coffehouses in Iceland have free wifi internet accses provided by Vodafone, dont know if it is the same anywhere else, but they call it hotspots, if you go to iceland, these are the coffeshops where free wifi is available..
    http://www.ogvodafone.is/index.aspx?GroupId=2920

  196. the balance seems to be table service. by admactanium · · Score: 1
    at the coffee shops that i've seen with free wi-fi there is definitely a bandwidth squatter problem of people taking up tables but not contributing to sales. however, most of those places also have counter service only. table service where a server constantly comes by and asks you if you need anything else would solve a lot of those issues as squatters would be made to feel uncomfortable about using the space for such a long time. people who sit in coffee shops all day at a table with only one drink know that they're doing something that hurts the shop's business. but as long as they aren't forced to deal with any employees directly, they can sort of hide away and not feel guilty about it.

    if i were going to offer free wi-fi at a coffee shop that i owned, i'd want to restructure the whole thing to at least get some value out of those multi-hour users.

  197. Limit the times the service is available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make it free - but only during the 'down' times of the day. When business is peaking (say 11:30am to 2:00pm) shut it down so that the skulkers have to go soemwhere else and it does not intefere with paying customers.

    Alternatively make it free - but only if customers are 'members'. Setup a coffe club card of some type, and when you buy a coffee you get a time-limited access right that expires soon.

  198. Free WiFi no problem by FuzzyHead · · Score: 1

    Coffee shops always have people in them for long periods of times. That's what they are designed for. Why would they put comfortable chairs and couches in them? This isn't the fast food or fast coffee starbucks. Also, most coffee places don't make the majority of their money on people who come in to chill and drink coffee. Most money comes in from people that need their morning coffee. They are on their way in the morning to work.

    Yes the WiFi can be abused. However, if you can facilitate an increase in people WiFi in coffee shops is great. The average person will buy a drink or two while they are there. There will always be someone to try to work the system. Just remember, businesses have the right to refuse service to anyone at any time. You just make sure that your baristas look for those types and confront them. They either will spend some money on coffee or leave. If asked a few times those customers typically will not come back.

  199. I hate the food @ Atlanta Bread but eat anyway by adzoox · · Score: 1

    I hate the food at Atlanta Bread, but I eat there regularly anyway because of the free WiFi

    I try to go to Panera Bread (free WiFi) if I can. Much better + they have Jones Soda - Green apple Soda yummmmmmm

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  200. this post will probably be moded redundant... by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

    This post higher up here in this very same thread notes a system for doing this. If parent gets Score 5, Interesting, then the guy I'm linking to should get some mod notice too!

    Go ahead and mod me redundant (I deserve it, I'm linking to a post within this very discussion!), but first mod the other guy up!

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  201. WiFi Summer by photojunkie · · Score: 1

    I think that the idea of charging for wi-fi access is rather unfortunate, not because of the cost to consumer but because of the cost to do business in this way, infrastructure and maintainance are not the average barista's forte... and, sexist though it might be, I'd much rather have a cute girl serving me my coffee than a ragtag collection of guys in "got root?" t-shirts.

  202. What is the point? - Free access everywhere. by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Every coffee shop I have visited has a paid service that nobody uses, since there is at least one other free access point available from nearby company boardrooms.

    So, if you have a paid for service that nobody uses, you can just as well make it free.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  203. more people sitting around != more business by farble1670 · · Score: 1
  204. What are people doing on their laptops!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm curious what most of these patrons who stay on their laptops for 3-5 hours at a time are doing with the wifi? Checking email? surfing internet? doing their taxes?

  205. Really? by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    Around here, bar owners are liable if the premises are used to sell (illegal) drugs.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  206. let see by geekoid · · Score: 1

    first you claim those students will casue coffee shops to go out of business,
    But then you say they have been around for three years.
    Perhap you are wrong? perhaps You used to mooch space and assume everyone does it?

    just a thought.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  207. Why not..... by tmortn · · Score: 1

    Just have a wi-fi entre ? Post that anyone using a table for Wi-Fi access rather than eating may be charged for the wi fi entre.

    A restraunt is a place where you sell food but in general it is about making money. Generally you make that money turning tables and serving meals. But if you can make that money just having people pay to have access that should be fine too. I would put it on the menu as an entre with similar pricing and post some rules. Access complimentary with any entre and if you do not order one and you are using the wireless your are then choosing to purchase the wireless 'entre'. Be real nice and include some simple cheap ass bottomless dish like chips and salsa and a soda and an hour or two limit at which point you will be charged again.

    Really the only time that you should have to do this is if there are people waiting for a table and the wireless hogs are holding up the space. Then a waiters comes over and informs that person they have three options. purchase an entre, be charged for the wi-fi entre or vacate the table.

    If you do not have paying customers waiting then any revenue stream the wifi users are creating is more than an empty table even if its just the occasional coffee or soda.

    --
    I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
  208. NYC Subway as an example (bear with me) by bgfay · · Score: 1

    This posting reminded me of an article I had read way back when (I couldn't remember) about why the NYC Subway System should be free. I found the article and was surprised. It's by Cringley and was, I think, posted on /. It's how I started reading Cringley's column. Here's a snip:

    When I visit New York City, I like to ride the subway. It is the fastest way to get around town and stay out of the weather at the same time. The New York City subway system is a remarkable engineering achievement, but there is one aspect of it that I can't understand -- why they charge people money to ride it.

    If, like me, you had literally grown up covering city council meetings for bad newspapers, you'd know that just about every transit agency in America claims that ticket sales cover only 10 to 15 percent of the actual cost of providing their service. The rest of the money apparently comes from government and from annoying transit ads. And if you bothered to wade through those transit committee budget reports, you'd make the startling discovery that the cost of creating and selling transit tickets followed by carrying the money here and there also costs 10 to 15 percent of the actual cost of providing the service. So if we eliminated the money infrastructure from our transit systems, they would run faster and simpler than they do today, nobody would have to buy a ticket, and it would all still cost the same.

    Why, knowing this, do they still charge to ride the subway? Part of the reason is that Federal transit money is often configured as matching funds, and the Feds like to match against ticket revenue. No revenue (no tickets), no Federal matching funds. Now that's a silly reason. Another reason is a Puritan work ethic that says people just ought to pay to ride the train, darn it. Of course, there are transit unions that don't want their members to lose their jobs. And finally, there is the argument that making the subway free would lead to its overcrowding with rowdy folks generally going nowhere. Having lost MY work ethic way back in the Summer of Love, I find all these arguments bogus. If people are already paying for the service through their taxes, then they are paying for the service, not freeloading. And the freeloaders can think of many places more comfortable than the subway.

    So I think all transit should be free. Poor people could get to work and back, kids could get home easier in the dark, there might be less driving and more fuel efficiency. And the very fact that it would be easier to get to work might make more people inclined to go there, leading to greater economic development. This isn't socialism, it's trickle-down transit.

    The rest of the article is here:

    http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20010208. html

    Go read it and while you're at it, read the rest of his stuff. He's smart, he write's well, and he admits when he's wrong. When someone has those three attributes, he or she is deserving of our time.

    Of course, whether or not you think any of this has anything to do with free wi-fi is up to you. Me, I access the web on a 33.6 modem and don't have a laptop, alas.

    But I've got a four-digit /. ID. So there.

    --
    Yeah, I'm as old as my UID would suggest.
  209. Re:You have to address the "bad customers" problem by stev3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mod parent up.

    Being a college student, I know of all the local places that provide free WiFi, and I also know of the places that have net access outside of the actual building, and allow you to use it. These are the places that are consistently busy with people during nice weather, and it is a "free" advertisement for their business.

    I'm far more likely to visit a business that is less restrictive (ie free unlimited WiFi) because I never know what kind of work (or play) I will be involved in when I get to a cafe.

  210. In Soviet Russia... by SupaKoopa · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, the government provides free internet for all, for the benefit of the workers. Of course, all the workers of the nation must share one 56k modem, but that's beside the point...

  211. Starbucks in Chicago by SpiritGod21 · · Score: 1

    In Springfield, MO. where I live, wifi is free everywhere that has it. There aren't enough techies around here that there would be a point in charging. The few laptop carriers there are will just go elsewhere for internet access if you charge. However, offering free wifi in a city like this works because one might choose to go to a place that has wifi over one that doesn't.

    The same applies in larger cities. On a recent trip to Chicago, I was appalled when I sat down in a Starbucks that charged for wifi. After checking my scan, I just connected to the Macintosh store across the way. Charging for wifi might bring in a bit of revenue, but I find it's better used as a draw than as a source of income.

  212. You could do the opposite... by Timewinder · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think it would be nice to have a "work free" place to go to.

    I can just see it now...

    Now at Local Coffee Place!
    No Internet!
    Crappy Cell Phone reception!
    No Loud Music!
    Nice soft seats!
    No Work!

    God that would be great (just like my basement though.)

  213. No worries by Neoncow · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those people will be dead by the end of the day.

  214. Re:Here's my (goatse) argument by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    After 30 minutes, let your proxy replace all pictures with goatse. That will cause a rapid turnover of table space.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  215. rural by zogger · · Score: 1

    I live out in rural bubba land, so there aren't any coffeeshops like as described, but the nearest truckstop has paid-for wifi and also ethernet connections at some of the indoor dining tables. They charge by the hour, day or year. If I lived close enough to get a signal I would have bought a year, 100 clams, decent deal. Anyway, they also have a couple of boxes set up kiosk style that take dollar bills. Every time I've been in there that stuff was getting used, truckers like their email and weather and road reports, etc. When we first moved here before I got my net connection I used to drive over twice a week or so just to get some surfin time in. (much closer than the nearest freebie public library net connection). It seems to be another niche product that makes the truckstops money in that regard, I can't imagine it costing them that much for it to get it set up.

  216. Free or Pay by CherniyVolk · · Score: 1


    Down town San Diego, is dotted with so many private and business, free access, WiFi spots that it's literally impossible to walk from City College to Seaport Village and not have free internet access the entire way through.

    Starbucks, in such circumstances, must compete. Many of the coffee shops in the Gaslamp area, provide free WiFi.

    In cases where there isn't free WiFi, such as further away in La Jolla, a Starbucks and T-Mobile combination only serves to entice an urge to simply hi-jack someone elses paid connection. Regardless of how you feel about this sort of activity, it would be the very thing to describe honest crime if crime at all. Besides, who sits in a Starbucks for any significant amount of time, only to have to pay that much for something practically akin to sand on the beach.

  217. Look at Best Western by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    The Best Western hotel chain has made it a companywide policy to provide free WiFi (and, in many cases, hardwired Ethernet) Internet access to any guest, at any of their locations, that wishes to use it. Granted, not all locations are online as yet, but they're working on it.

    I can't speak for them, of course, but this amenity is certainly a major reason that I've made BW my 'Lodging of Choice' whenever I'm on the road. I rarely stay anywhere else, and when I do, one of the first things I ask is if they have WiFi or broadband Internet available. If they don't, they get bumped to the bottom of my list.

    I don't think anyone can say that the cost of providing such an amenity has hurt BW in the least. In fact, I think it has earned them a lot more business than they might otherwise have gotten.

    Keep the peace(es).

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  218. free, then pay by Manara18 · · Score: 1

    here's an idea: Tier pricing. First 20 minutes is 50 cents, and the price per 20 minutes increases by 50 cents as you go on. That way people can still check their email/news, and you wont get people hogging one table all day. Comments?

  219. tier pricing by Manara18 · · Score: 1
    here's an idea:

    Tier Pricing.

    Start out with 50 cents/20 minutes and add 50 cents per 20 minutes to the per-20 minutes charge. So it'll be something like this:

    0-20 Minutes: 0.50USD

    20-40 Minutes: 1.50USD

    40-60 Minutes: 3.00USD

    etc.

    and... tie the per-20-minute tier to a creditcard that's reset everyday so people don't cheat the system and disconnect at 19 minutes, then reconnect again only to pay 50 cents again.

    That way people can still check their e-mail/news/etc without hogging bandwidth to chat with their friends/trade music.

    Comments?

  220. Our setup by wosmo · · Score: 1

    Not sure this has much impact, but here's our setup. $6 hour .. most employees are liberal enough to break that down to $1/10min. We have a small following of vacationing offices (tourist town) (particularily those who can bill it to expenses), but for the most, they pay their way. It's not as cheap as the cities, but it's a convenience for them, without being a loss for us. As far as I'm able to discern, it's supply and demand. We have the market for short-term vacationing offices, not full-time leeches.

  221. The Ultimate solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, here's what I think they should do. I like the idea of the freeloader zone where you have half of the cafe roped off for freeloaders, but that half gets crowded and you have the chance of causing a scene. A better idea in my opinion is to create a simple password system whose passwords expire after a certain time period... you get a password on your sales receipt and it's only good for say an hour. It's user specific and only good for one MAC address. Once your time is up, you have to buy something else to get a new password or you're cut off. Simple as that.

    1. Re: The Ultimate solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Along with the expiring password, the coffee shop should sell monthly passes for $5 and annual wifi passes for $50... all mapped to the MAC address of the computer or have permission for that one password to allow one MAC on the network. If people go to the shop enough, they will pay $5 for unlimited monthly wifi!

  222. Free WiFi by klept · · Score: 1

    I think Borders and some other large bookstore chains in some locations provide free WiFi Even if a third party vender is providing the service, the place of business/location / store, etc., would still be libal. As far as being free or not, really is anything free? Even you said the price of the beverages would have to go up. Seems like this would drive away some potentional customers that might not want to use wireless services. Better in my opinion just to stick to quality services and food at a good price. I think that would generate the most business and profits.

  223. Re:I own a cafe with free Wi-Fi [why this works] by foobarb · · Score: 1

    My theory: It's the human who brings the food and beverages to the table that makes such a place successful.

    Think about it. Are you going to leave your laptop on the table to go juggle wet and sticky stuff across the room? Might you lose your seat if you take the Powerbook with you? Can you get coffee, sugar, your bag and your laptop back to the table easily? And now what about that sandwich?

    You might not think about it consciously, but it's a lot easier just to sit there and continue playing. Wouldn't it be great if someone brought you some pie?

    Oh my.

  224. College Towns by ryanov · · Score: 1

    I don't know of any coffee houses or restaurants in New Brunswick surrounding Rutgers that charged for access (maybe Starbucks). Many students I know went to coffee houses to study, and if any of them HAD charged for access, it would have been emptied out of the study crowd. In certain locales, there's just no way to provide something other than free -- people will use if it's free, and perhaps pay for something else like coffee or food, or they'll do without or go elsewhere. In other places (airports, etc.) or places with fairly cheap business models (Verizon Airfone ain't bad... about $6 for the flight -- the little you can do is enougn for me), paid wireless can survive, but not in others.

    The other thing that, IMO, hurts paid wireless is that everyplace has a different provider. Starbucks uses one, this place uses another, SFO and EWR use different ones... I'm not paying 5 companies for wireless access, so what are my options?

  225. You know... by misterye · · Score: 1

    I resent being called a droid!

    1. Re:You know... by michrech · · Score: 1

      Read the thread. Wasn't me that called you a droid. I was the one fighting for the benifit of the doubt OF you droids! :)

      Mike

      --
      telnet://sinep.gotdns.com -- TW2002 and LORD registered!

      --
      bork bork bork!
  226. Electric lights vs pay toilets. by landley · · Score: 1

    Does this idiot begrudge his customers the cost of electric lights? Does he charge people if they want to read a book while they're there using the light he pays for? Does he make them register to use his light?

    This is a fixed-price convenience like air conditioning. Restaurants do not have little vending machines for the napkins, straws, and condiment packets because A) it would make them look bad, B) the effort to regulate it would cost far more than the thing itself.

    Trying to go with the "pay toilet" model for this will just convince the users that the guy's a money-grubbing bastard intent on nickel and diming them to death.

    This one's OBVIOUS.

  227. Hips by batje · · Score: 1

    In Kampala, Uganda, we always go to the pub to drink a local bananagin with tonic, and skype to europe for free in a place called The Blue Mango. Pool, couches, nice weather all year round. And Wifi!

    Just never try to use your notebook in the pool.

    http://www.bluemango-uganda.com/

  228. Common courtesy by schmookeeg · · Score: 1

    I run a pilot lounge/flight school at a busy Los Angeles-area airport. I haven't seen much mention of service-oriented businesses such as mine -- but I personally think it's silly NOT to offer this courtesy.

    I understand retail businesses (coffee shops, restaurants, pubs, etc) being reluctant, because they rely on high retail turnover -- but if you have service situations, especially where your customers may be waiting (say, car wash, mechanic, hairstylist, others) -- then why *not* provide this service for your patrons?

    I've never had to make a cost analysis to justify a public hotspot -- it just seems like a nice thing to do.

  229. WiFi cafe by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Ya know your numbers are WILDLY off... say $100 a month for business DSL... and $100 for a wireless access point or router. Thats it. If your an electronics nincompoop.. another $200 to get a rent-a-geek to set it all up.

    And the revenue model ya have there is a little optimistic. 50 items average an hour is a biiiit high methinks for your average coffee shop.

    Maybe you missed it but in my calculation I did use $100 for access. The cost of the wap or router is included in the $2000 systems cost, which I believe is high, a hacker or your "rent-a-geek" should be able to setup a system with WiFi for not much more than $1000, $1500 at most using Linux or BSD. I also included $500 per month for a "rent-a-geek" which should include setup if you'er an "electronics nincompoop". As for the 50 item per hour, that's less than one item a minute. I've frequently seen groups of people from 2 to more than 10 come in and each order at least one item taking but a few minutes. I also used 10 hours per day the cafe is open however the ones I've been to are open 12 hours and where I used to go they were open 14 hours a day except Sundays. Admittedly it's been some years since I went into any cafe outside of Barnes and Noble or Borders but even a small cafe could possibly afford to provide free WiFi or provide X amount of tyme for each purchase.

    Of course I could get better figures by talking to my sister, a CPA who along with friends started their own accounting firm, and my brother-in-law a CFP, Certified Financial Planner. Though not much of one, in my family I'm the geek while they are the business people.

    Falcon
    1. Re:WiFi cafe by Lershac · · Score: 1

      Your main cost in your scenario is maintenance... I guess I am just salivating to luck into a $500 a month maintenance contract on something as simple and maintenance free as a wifi setup. Hell if you arent going to charge for it, it just means a $39 wifi router and thats about it.
          Technical problems with the proposed setup are between slim and none, barring a hardware failure.

      Gee, my brother is en engineer for shell and my sister belongs in an asylum... and my brother in law is an aircraft mechanic, but what does that have to do with what I am talking about?

      I am just an engineer/entrepeneur (successful to boot).

      You helpfully told me all about your family, but nothing about yourself?

      --
      Chuck
    2. Re:WiFi cafe by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Your main cost in your scenario is maintenance... I guess I am just salivating to luck into a $500 a month maintenance contract on something as simple and maintenance free as a wifi setup. Hell if you arent going to charge for it, it just means a $39 wifi router and thats about it.
      Technical problems with the proposed setup are between slim and none, barring a hardware failure.

      I'm guessing now that you get my point, that it shoudn't cost much for a cafe to offer free WiFi.

      Gee, my brother is en engineer for shell and my sister belongs in an asylum... and my brother in law is an aircraft mechanic, but what does that have to do with what I am talking about?

      The reason I brought up my family is was to show that though I don't personally have experience starting or running a business other than when I was in the JA, Junior Achievement, I have access to those who do have business startup and financial experience. Your brother in law's an aircraft mechanic? So was my dad, he retired from the Air Force but while in he was a mechanic on B52s. Guess that's in part why I love flying and want to get my private pilot's license as well as build my own plane though I doubt I ever will.

      You helpfully told me all about your family, but nothing about yourself?

      Currently I'm a student. I'm just finishing a degree in web programming from a technical college. However I'm planning to transfer to my local university, UM Twin Cities. There I'll work on a multidiciplary major or Program for Individualized Learning where I can choose a major field of study, probably EE (electrical/electronic engineering), CE (computer engineering), or IT (information technology). Then one or more areas of minor study, maybe one or more of the following as I haven't decided yet what, business, economics, finance, international business, and international development. One thing I know I'll take there is Portguese as I want to go the Brazil as a study abroad student and the university's program requires 2 years college-level Portuguese or Spanish or 1 year Spanish + 1 year Portuguese.

      Having said the above it may seem I'm a youngster but in fact I'm over 40. I'm in the difficult position of having to start my life over again after having an accident I almost died from (and it would of been better if I had). The accident left me with a TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury. As some of the therapists I had used to say, "you're alive because of stubborness", and I don't want to live a meaningless life.

      Falcon
  230. Do it. by pontifier · · Score: 1

    I'm responding from a cafe I stopped at that advretised free wireless. I'm just passing through and I was already going to get something to eat, but came back here because of it...

    --
    -John Fenley
  231. Re:You have to address the "bad customers" problem by arete · · Score: 1

    My "confusion" isn't exactly about which word to use. I compose /. posts at about 50 wpm. When composing and typing like that my fingers sometimes insert homonyms and near homonyms, even to words I clearly know the difference between.

    It is somewhat like my fingers have a substantial word-vocabulary but are hard of hearing.

    I don't usually bother rereading my posts, because I don't care enough :) Sorry.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  232. Re:You have to address the "bad customers" problem by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

    ...I clearly know the difference...

    I believe you do know the difference. As far as I could tell there was nothing else that was misspelled or grammatically incorrect. I apologize if my observation was too harsh. However, now that this common error has been brought to your attention you will also be doomed to seeing it everywhere. It is almost ironic that one of the words we lose by this process is the word lose.

  233. the book by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    well, thanks for your kind response...i think my friend might be interested...she's still taking offers from publishers, but from what I know, she pretty much has the offer she wants and is now jsut seeing what else comes up...

    I will talk to her, and if she's interested, she can talk to you directly...email me at globalepperly@yahoo.com if you're still interested

    where is your bookstore btw?

    _j

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  234. free wi-fi restaurants, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paris on the Platte, Denver, Colorado, at one time offered free wi-fi service. I know, because I helped him set it up when he upgraded bandwidth. It was several years ago that I was there, but I doubt he's changed the policy.

    And, I think he was making money at it (off of the food and coffee - I don't know about the coffee, but the food was excellent).

    A number of places also offer free wi-fi near where I live now. For example, the Holiday Inn Airport in Visalia, CA offers free wi-fi. There's a restaurant in Fresno, near Fresno State, that offers wi-fi free if you buy a meal there (Boca Cabana, I think it's called).

    I don't know of any others, but I'm sure there are some.