Stopping donations,would show them how "notable" their policies are. I wish wikipedia would split off into many websites,each focused on one large category(e.g. Astronomy wiki) and central search engine to get the information from this wiki network.
Simply creating a script which drops all idle connections after 15 minutes(and blocking/removing RST functionality) would solve it as well if implemented on both ends.The problem is the remote end. RST/FIN is useful in "non-hostile" networks.
Excellent post.I'd add only that scientific method is more trusted then any other research methods and experience,because its officially supported by the scientific institutions.The "Mainstream Science" is ridden with bureaucracy and dogmatic thinking.Their power is "power by decree", They are very organized and wield alot of influence on every aspect of science(and receive the majority of funding for it).
Lies. #no monthly fee! rent/mortgage/insurance # massive world to explore : if you have enough of the virtual currency.Otherwise you have to stay in your state. #incredible NPC AI:Oh really? Didn't notice that. #fully PvP:only in Africa,the rest have laws and rules which limit PvP. #Highest resolution graphics; If you have perfect vision and only look around you.
I've read on heavy metals and lack of some fatty acids
can influence brain development heavily. Common sense:The more healthy the person is,probability of crime is less.
Pong has great replay value yes,but today its niche is overtaken by arcade flash games and whatever is invented 20 years ago can be replicated in flash. Today game have more content,and use the graphics which pong cannot exploit to have better gaming expirience. A 8bit pong game and 3d,lightmapped pong with full physical 3d models would be the same concept game.This concept has it time,like tetris.The fad is over. If anyone wanted to play pong he would goto miniclip or download an old ROM. Replay value=Does not means people will spend their lives to play some crappy but addictive game(although some do). In meantime,the replay value and novelty ceases to be dominant and it becomes another old game.The pong just doesn't suffer as badly as other games because of simplicity.
Like searching chess positions or recognizing text? I was under the impression it very limited and requires specific types of input with restrictions on which operations can be used.
I wouldn't call that incomprehensible.You have to be in special conditions and environment to "progress".When day-to-day survival is #1 priority,research and production of technological artifacts would be severely limited.Their life quality could be on the par of central africa today.Besides it requires a leap in thinking to "invent" methods which would work.
Agriculture and technology would be common sense to us,but not to them. They probably just thought of it as edible plants.
If i wanted clear articles and order i'll read britannica or dictionary.com.I want facts, more= better. Removing information because its written in bad style/non-notable/original research is one of major mistakes of wikipedia and will eventually lead to its decline. All it requires is a server cluster,a copy of wiki, minimum rules and some advertisement.
Its more "can I afford to download this and that without running out of space" even with modest broadband you can get 20-30 Gigabytes daily,with disk space being the only limit.Movies,music,games and miscellaneous userdata which tends to grow unbounded with each new program(e.g. photoshop drafts) .
Slashdot Mirror
Stopping donations,would show them how "notable" their policies are.
I wish wikipedia would split off into many websites,each focused on one large category(e.g. Astronomy wiki) and central search engine to get the information from this wiki network.
Simply creating a script which drops all idle connections after 15 minutes(and blocking/removing RST functionality) would solve it as well if implemented on both ends.The problem is the remote end.
RST/FIN is useful in "non-hostile" networks.
Only if you round up somewhere.
Excellent post.I'd add only that scientific method is more trusted then any other research methods and experience,because its officially supported by the scientific institutions.The "Mainstream Science"
is ridden with bureaucracy and dogmatic thinking.Their power is "power by decree",
They are very organized and wield alot of influence on every aspect of science(and receive the majority of funding for it).
"family dines around the computer monitor."
Have you ever seen this?
Lies. :Oh really? Didn't notice that. :only in Africa,the rest have laws and rules which limit PvP.
#no monthly fee! rent/mortgage/insurance
# massive world to explore : if you have enough of the virtual currency.Otherwise you have to stay in your state.
#incredible NPC AI
#fully PvP
#Highest resolution graphics; If you have perfect vision and only look around you.
You forgot :
5.Building an insecure system from the ground up and expecting the users to fix it.
I've read on heavy metals and lack of some fatty acids :The more healthy the person is,probability of crime is less.
can influence brain development heavily.
Common sense
Pong has great replay value yes,but today its niche is overtaken by arcade flash games
and whatever is invented 20 years ago can be replicated in flash.
Today game have more content,and use the graphics which pong cannot exploit to have better gaming expirience.
A 8bit pong game and 3d,lightmapped pong with full physical 3d models would be the same concept game.This concept has it time,like tetris.The fad is over.
If anyone wanted to play pong he would goto miniclip or download an old ROM.
Replay value=Does not means people will spend their lives to play some crappy but addictive game(although some do).
In meantime,the replay value and novelty ceases to be dominant and it becomes another old game.The pong just doesn't suffer as badly as other games because of simplicity.
Like searching chess positions or recognizing text? I was under the impression it very limited and requires specific types of input with restrictions on which operations can be used.
Tahoma is better and more readable then all of them,though consolas is decent.
This= +7 Funny material.
yeah,Its just small bribe to encourage him to work this way.Corporations pay much more.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Dodd#Campaign_contributions_from_Enron_and_Arthur_Andersen
Well,usenet is still around.
Fake quote is fake.
I wouldn't call that incomprehensible.You have to be in special conditions and environment to "progress" .When day-to-day survival is #1 priority,research and production of technological artifacts would be severely limited.Their life quality could be on the par of central africa today.Besides it requires a leap in thinking to "invent" methods which would work.
Agriculture and technology would be
common sense to us,but not to them.
They probably just thought of it as edible plants.
Flash games? Most are 2D as most webgames.
Board games?2D.
Emulated Nes/mega/snes games? Mostly 2d.
I don't see any decline in these categories.
If i wanted clear articles and order i'll read britannica or dictionary.com.I want facts, more= better. Removing information because its written in bad style/non-notable/original research is one of major mistakes of wikipedia and will eventually lead to its decline.
All it requires is a server cluster,a copy of wiki, minimum rules and some advertisement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bread_and_circuses
Its more "can I afford to download this and that without running out of space"
even with modest broadband you can get 20-30 Gigabytes daily,with disk space being the only limit.Movies,music,games and miscellaneous userdata which tends to grow unbounded with each new program(e.g. photoshop drafts) .
Most people aren't going to be private pilots,like most computer users aren't kernel hackers.
i'm afraid his "exaggerated" claims are much closer to reality then most climate models.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/10/11/94854/280
Except it will become obsolete in few years
as software and hardware improve.
Older avatars would look primitive today.
Think of 8-bit sprites.
Its easy to understand VB6 has huge market share in development.VB2003 is new.
They have to support it.
Hes speaking of Windows Genuine Advantage?