I wasn't aware that new versions of sshd allowed you to restrict what commands are allowed; that sounds like it would make scponly obsolete.
I've used chroot'ed scponly to only allow sftp (and scp) to servers - it's not that tricky, but you end up copying the binaries into each home directory. Works a treat.
Again - it's not having monopoly wielding power that's illegal, it's abusing it that's wrong. AFAIK Apple haven't abused any of their monopolies (although I don't think Apple really have a monopoly in any of their markets - there's decent alternatives to everything they sell). By the way, I'm not an Apple fan myself, I've never bought anything Apple as I think their stuff is overpriced.
What Microsoft is doing wrong is abusing a monopoly in one market to gain dominance in another market. That is what is illegal. Just having a monopoly isn't illegal - it's the abuse of it that is wrong. Apple aren't abusing their monopoly on iPods to gain a market.
As having 6 fingers on each hand is somewhat rare in the general population, it would have to give a significant advantage (i.e. lots more surviving children) for it to supplant the more usual 5-fingered variety.
Also, it may be that having 6 fingers doesn't hurt the individual, but could cause dramatic problems with their offspring. By the way, do people inherit 6 fingers, or is it more due to unusual womb conditions?
Sky broadband provide a "MAX" package that allows unlimited bandwidth at speeds of up to 16Mbit - costs £10 a month if you have other products with them.
When I've set it up, I've had to write grub to the secondary boot sector manually, but I don't normally set the boot partition to be RAID1 as it's tricky to get grub to boot from a RAID - I load the modules in the initrd.
He'd be much better off with full mirroring (RAID1) done with software RAID so that he can just use standard drives and connections. Using software RAID means that can you survive a motherboard failure by simply dropping in a new one that can talk to the drives and away you go. Otherwise, you'd be tied to the chipset used for the RAID.
Also, RAID5 requires at least 3 disks, so you're actually increasing the chance of hardware failure compared to a 2 disk RAID1 (plus RAID5 sucks when a drive fails and puts additional stress on the remaining drives during a lengthy rebuild process).
You can setup grub to boot a fallback partition if the primary partition isn't available - no problem at all in software. Software raid gets round the problem of having to find a compatible raid controller if the controller fails - that can be a problem if the machine is 10 years old and you're running some old bus technology.
The only downside of software raid is that the machine stops if a drive fails and it's not hot-pluggable, but a quick power cycle should solve that problem (provided you set up grub properly on both disks).
Somone working in a shop could ask to see photo id for age verification purposes and surreptitiously copy the photo. How about a hidden camera in a public place - take random shots and if you get a suitable picture, follow the target and steal their laptop.
I was thinking about this myself recently and managed to find fwknop - http://www.cipherdyne.org/fwknop/
It's an advanced version of port knocking that uses single packet authentication to get around the problem of replay attacks that plagues other port knockers.
How does it make other media cheaper? Sky is funded by advertising and subscription - they don't get any license funds. If Sky show a BBC show, they have to pay for the privilege.
Also, I'm not a fan of BBC news, they always seem biased to me.
Babies can't control their poops, so why should I?
I wasn't aware that new versions of sshd allowed you to restrict what commands are allowed; that sounds like it would make scponly obsolete.
I've used chroot'ed scponly to only allow sftp (and scp) to servers - it's not that tricky, but you end up copying the binaries into each home directory. Works a treat.
Have a look at http://sublimation.org/scponly/wiki/index.php/Main_Page for providing sftp sessions in a restricted shell.
Outer space is only there because it's scared to be on the same planet as Chuck Norris
That word doesn't mean what you think it means. What's the past tense of 'loose'?
Again - it's not having monopoly wielding power that's illegal, it's abusing it that's wrong. AFAIK Apple haven't abused any of their monopolies (although I don't think Apple really have a monopoly in any of their markets - there's decent alternatives to everything they sell). By the way, I'm not an Apple fan myself, I've never bought anything Apple as I think their stuff is overpriced.
What Microsoft is doing wrong is abusing a monopoly in one market to gain dominance in another market. That is what is illegal. Just having a monopoly isn't illegal - it's the abuse of it that is wrong. Apple aren't abusing their monopoly on iPods to gain a market.
So... reading this post without paying for it when the author intended for you to pay for it... is OK?
I'm calling bullshit on that - where's your citation?
As having 6 fingers on each hand is somewhat rare in the general population, it would have to give a significant advantage (i.e. lots more surviving children) for it to supplant the more usual 5-fingered variety.
Also, it may be that having 6 fingers doesn't hurt the individual, but could cause dramatic problems with their offspring. By the way, do people inherit 6 fingers, or is it more due to unusual womb conditions?
Sky broadband provide a "MAX" package that allows unlimited bandwidth at speeds of up to 16Mbit - costs £10 a month if you have other products with them.
When I've set it up, I've had to write grub to the secondary boot sector manually, but I don't normally set the boot partition to be RAID1 as it's tricky to get grub to boot from a RAID - I load the modules in the initrd.
You load grub on both boot sectors, so grub will be loaded from the boot sector of drive 1 when drive 0 isn't available.
Quick question, why aren't you replacing the broken disk if the machine is important enough to warrant a 3-way RAID1?
Never use RAID5!
He'd be much better off with full mirroring (RAID1) done with software RAID so that he can just use standard drives and connections. Using software RAID means that can you survive a motherboard failure by simply dropping in a new one that can talk to the drives and away you go. Otherwise, you'd be tied to the chipset used for the RAID.
Also, RAID5 requires at least 3 disks, so you're actually increasing the chance of hardware failure compared to a 2 disk RAID1 (plus RAID5 sucks when a drive fails and puts additional stress on the remaining drives during a lengthy rebuild process).
You can setup grub to boot a fallback partition if the primary partition isn't available - no problem at all in software. Software raid gets round the problem of having to find a compatible raid controller if the controller fails - that can be a problem if the machine is 10 years old and you're running some old bus technology.
The only downside of software raid is that the machine stops if a drive fails and it's not hot-pluggable, but a quick power cycle should solve that problem (provided you set up grub properly on both disks).
I though fusion is the clean one, with fission creating radiation?
Or you can try Xubuntu for the ppc - they now simultaneously release for the ppc architecture.
What's Lord of the Rings got to do with this?
Oh, wait - you said "toking".
You're right - these rules should apply to all the companies found abusing monopolies.
Oh, wait a minute, that's just Microsoft, isn't it?
Somone working in a shop could ask to see photo id for age verification purposes and surreptitiously copy the photo. How about a hidden camera in a public place - take random shots and if you get a suitable picture, follow the target and steal their laptop.
I'm reading/posting this on a HP 2133 mini-note (1280x768) and it ships with a 120GB disk - standard sata 2.5.
I was thinking about this myself recently and managed to find fwknop - http://www.cipherdyne.org/fwknop/
It's an advanced version of port knocking that uses single packet authentication to get around the problem of replay attacks that plagues other port knockers.
What's the point of rhetorical questions?
How does it make other media cheaper? Sky is funded by advertising and subscription - they don't get any license funds. If Sky show a BBC show, they have to pay for the privilege.
Also, I'm not a fan of BBC news, they always seem biased to me.