Not everybody does what they do because of the topic. That's a silly proposition. Some do it because of the challenges and the kind of solutions that yield results. There's far more portion of the land of Maybe in software than in physics.
So what would be the principle that demands a physicist to go ahead and try to figure out these details even if there is no empirical evidence? Feynman must have been on crack to have found a similarity between spin and a wobbling frisbee.
Software theorists are much better than physicists at modeling because they are taught to use both principle based rules, and constraint based rules.
Coloumb's Law versus Gauss' Law. Gauss was clearly in the wrong field because he could take on a topic from the outside not just the inside. Physicists can't see the forest for the trees.
Actually it is a good reason. One, you need to reach the speed of light first where you will be dividing by zero. Two, taking the square root of a negative number gives you a result which does not map to the number system you are using to determine energy in the first place. It's like saying your birthday is Feb 31st.
640K years is enough to discover fire, cement, slavery, gov't, religion, science, literature, war, peace, entertainment, decadence, and final self-destruction.
Which do you think would come first? Rosa Parks, or Bus Boycotts?
There's a relationship. Rosa Parks represents a statistic. It says that on that day at least one person would be ready to cause change. Once a few people were able to stand up for themselves like Rosa Parks, the Bus Boycotts were more likely to succeed.
Not everybody does what they do because of the topic. That's a silly proposition. Some do it because of the challenges and the kind of solutions that yield results. There's far more portion of the land of Maybe in software than in physics.
Linux drivers?
I'm saying Gauss' understanding outclassed Coulomb's piecemeal approach. Gauss would have been in software today.
What kin of geeks are you people?
Everyone mentions Pinky and the Brain. No one mentions the rats of NIMH.
So what would be the principle that demands a physicist to go ahead and try to figure out these details even if there is no empirical evidence? Feynman must have been on crack to have found a similarity between spin and a wobbling frisbee.
Software theorists are much better than physicists at modeling because they are taught to use both principle based rules, and constraint based rules.
Coloumb's Law versus Gauss' Law. Gauss was clearly in the wrong field because he could take on a topic from the outside not just the inside. Physicists can't see the forest for the trees.
I'll counter that comment with the fact it was mathematics which predicted the existance of the positron and also the existance of neutrinos.
The only thing that would make it possible to pass the speed of light is an expanded context and understanding of velocity, energy, etc.
As for mathematics being there to describe, ye are of little faith.
Particular equations may be limited but mathematics is not.
So what does Energy that's rotated 90 degrees look like?
Actually it is a good reason. One, you need to reach the speed of light first where you will be dividing by zero. Two, taking the square root of a negative number gives you a result which does not map to the number system you are using to determine energy in the first place. It's like saying your birthday is Feb 31st.
You learned to be a comic from a Chevy, right?
640K years is enough to discover fire, cement, slavery, gov't, religion, science, literature, war, peace, entertainment, decadence, and final self-destruction.
That's why you pitch it to the people who make devices first.
The amount of backflips one has to do to make a suffixless design makes them quite useful.
Those are called tripe.
A measly 68k CPU with hardware that was autonomous.
A measly MIPS with hardware that is autonomous.
The only thing they need is to sync to the TV set.
Those will be robots too. Or so they'll tell us.
I wonder how many people downloaded it even though .999999 was working just fine.
It says Number of users exceeded.
Frankly I think it's lame.
Yet another reason for using cron-apt. It got here just in time.
Please stop gloating Larry.
Priorities? Like? I don't know paying off those college loans sounds good to me.
It's great that everyone thinks this is such a simple mistake nowadays but back when Milli Vanilli did it the backlash resulted in a suicide.
How did Oliver North get involved in this?
And what's a NADA Contract.
Giveaway: Think GEEK!
Slashdotters do not care about profit.
Look at #3 again.
1. Find something remotely related to P2P, DMCA, and EULA
2. Copy the entire text of the article without attribution
3. Watch the mod points come in
Which do you think would come first? Rosa Parks, or Bus Boycotts?
There's a relationship. Rosa Parks represents a statistic. It says that on that day at least one person would be ready to cause change. Once a few people were able to stand up for themselves like Rosa Parks, the Bus Boycotts were more likely to succeed.