Slashdot Mirror


IT Salaries to Grow 0.5% in 2005

halfacrayon writes "According to Robert Half Technology 2005 Salary Guide, average base pay for IT professionals overall will rise 0.5% in 2005. Data security analysts will command the highest salary (up to $93K), while system auditors will enjoy the highest increase compared to 2004 rates (5.1%). IT instructors are holding the bottom spot in terms of gross revenues (salary could go as low as $43,250) and business systems analysts will barely notice the increase of 1.9% that they should expect in 2005."

407 comments

  1. better colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  2. Screwy economics by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work for a company that consistently gives 4% a year. Last year I made considerably more with a salary adjustment. Is this not the norm?

    1. Re:Screwy economics by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 4, Informative

      I should forward this story to my boss. Then again since I work ar EDS I'm just happy to be one of the contracts thats not NMCI

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    2. Re:Screwy economics by phaetonic · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think the norm, at least for people who do billable work, is to get a pay raise based on their billable hours, or get a decent base pay plus bonus based on performance.

    3. Re:Screwy economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you're averaged in with the folks whose jobs are about to be outsourced and hence will grow -100% this year.

    4. Re:Screwy economics by beakerMeep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would make sense since cost of living is around there (3% I think) but with a study like this there would be many other factors, especially across an entire industry. Some of these might be like the value of the dollar, outsourcing and the turnover rate for the positions. wish i could read the fine article though - they might even explain it in there :)

      --
      meep
    5. Re:Screwy economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It depends. I recently quit a job where since 2000 I had no increase in pay, two co workers quit and I was required to take over their duties.

      I'm OK with being the "loyal employee" to a degree, but as the one man support in a mixed win/linux shop I can't also be expected to do offsite support and work as a courier driver. I quit because it was considered more cost effective to bring all web development in-house... only because it was decided I could do that too.

      I'd love to see the job advertisement for my replacement. (yeah I'm bitter, but I'm also in a similar paying job but back to only doing what I do best)

    6. Re:Screwy economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm a software engineer for a largish company out here in Vancouver and I got 10% last year, and I am hearing that a similar increase will apply this year. On top of that I got ranked well by my manager and will be looking at a 10-15% bonus. Times are good, I hope it lasts.

    7. Re:Screwy economics by Xerp · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Wow. You get a pay rise every year! The norm for our company is to get a review every year to first of all see if anyone gets a rise at all. Most years we don't. Last year I was lucky and got 3%.

      The company I was at previously did give a rise every year, but more of the order of 7-10%. On top of that we had quartely bonuses of between 1 and 2 thousand. One year I got a rise of seven thousand, with bonuses totaling nearly the same amount.

      Why did I leave the previous job? Why, why, why..

    8. Re:Screwy economics by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      My raises are also contingent on a review, but people very rarely *not* get the raise. The only time they wouldn't is if they have a particularly negative review.

    9. Re:Screwy economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did you ask for a raise as your responsibilities increased? We grunts have to do this, else employers won't get the message. They probably just brought in a different soul to do what you wouldn't. That won't affect change where it is needed.

      At least you had enough sack to draw the line.

    10. Re:Screwy economics by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      Yes, pretty much. I was like "look, I'm doing Y, but I'm only being paid for X". I work hard, and they recognized it -- that's how I got the salary adjustment.

      I'm also spending some of my own money on education: an MBA (yeah, yeah, I know). They perceive this as an employee worth more, and to be honest I'm learning some "people" skills I don't normally get to exercise working on the servers.

    11. Re:Screwy economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I work for a company that consistently gives 4% a year. Last year I made considerably more with a salary adjustment. Is this not the norm?

      This is average salaries, not raises. This is saying that IT people, on average, make a little more this year than last year. It does not say that an individual person's salary increases at that rate. For example, In year 2003 person A makes $50k, person B makes $60k and person C makes $70k. In 2004, A gets a raise to $60k, B gets a raise to $70k and C retires. A new person, D graduates from college and gets a job making $50k. Everyone here got well over 10% in raises, however the average salary did not change

    12. Re:Screwy economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you guys hiring?

    13. Re:Screwy economics by sasha328 · · Score: 1

      I work for an IT company with only two letters in it's name.
      This is my story, salary wise, over the last 4 years.
      First off, there was a global freeze on salary increases (supposed to have been only short term)
      Then, some part of the company (and the outsorced contract we worked for) lost a fair bit of money, so we were asked to "work half an hour less a day" and cut our wages by about 12%.
      Then after about 4 years working through an agency, I was absorbed into the permanent workforce. As a result, my oncall rate was reduced by about 70% which meant that I lost about 30% of my monthly wages in real terms.
      Finally, we were withdrawn from the outsourced contract, and I changed positions. I currently do not have any oncall, or overtime work. This is a further 20% reductions.
      I am now earning what I was earning in 2000.
      It sucks, but at every stage the market was quite depressed in Australia, and looking for a suitable job was daunting. I have had my review recently, and in a month or so I'll find out if my salary has been increased. If not, or if not to a satisfactory level, then I'll have to let my boss know that I'll be moving on.

    14. Re:Screwy economics by dnoyeb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the USA, any phrase issued by a company including the word 'freeze' immediately red-lines my bullshitometer. Its just another way of saying, were only giving it to our friends and relatives now.

    15. Re:Screwy economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is not the norm. For instance, Sun Microsystems (formely employed 42,000 people in 2000 and now employs around 24,000) has had a pay freeze for most of the last four years. Pay-raises are usually given just after their annual reviews but they've been frozen three out of the last five years. This is easy to enforce when you're busy laying thousands of people off every 18 months. Your employees suddenly become thankful to have a job at all, much less even entertain the idea of a raise.

    16. Re:Screwy economics by barzok · · Score: 1

      My employer, until it was bought out last year, consistently gave 2%-3% per year, for at least 18-20 years. If I happened to get a promotion at the same time as my annual salary review, it would end up being more like 7-8% total.

      We got stiffed in 2004. First management said "we'll hold off on doing that until the merger is done, since the new company will likely want input", then they said "forget it, we're just not going to do it at all. Oh, and that annual performance-based bonus? That'll be half of what you're used to, if we do it (I think they did it, I don't recall now)."

      I realize that the company may not be obligated to give anything, but when you see the same increase every year for 20 years, to start to expect it'll always be there. Then to dangle a carrot in front of us, only to rip it away like that, is just absurd. Can't wait till I'm out of there.

    17. Re:Screwy economics by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      Programmer/analyst $52,500-$83,250 3.6%

      That doesn't look so bad...

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    18. Re:Screwy economics by SunFan · · Score: 1


      That marine in the picture looks like he really enjoys NMCI. I don't understand your sarcasm. </sarcasm>

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    19. Re:Screwy economics by SunFan · · Score: 1

      My father-in-law works in manufacturing. His salary has been frozen for years. Consider yourself fortunate.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    20. Re:Screwy economics by SunFan · · Score: 1


      (formely employed 42,000 people in 2000 and now employs around 24,000)

      Please explain why Sun currently lists "Approximately 35,000 worldwide" as the number of employees.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    21. Re:Screwy economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was on a desktop install team for NMCI at Pax River. That was a fucking clusterfuck. I'm going to stay anonymous so that the captains and other Navy officers don't track me down and kill me...

    22. Re:Screwy economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please explain why Sun currently lists "Approximately 35,000 worldwide" as the number of employees.

      They're using Intel chips and it's a rounding error?

    23. Re:Screwy economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      so we were asked to "work half an hour less a day" and cut our wages by about 12%.

      I would've worked 40 hrs/wk * ( 1 - 12% cut ) / 5 days/wk = "an hour less a day".

    24. Re:Screwy economics by timeOday · · Score: 1

      2-3% really is not a raise at all, just keeping up with inflation if you're lucky.

    25. Re:Screwy economics by andalay · · Score: 1

      You work for Raytheon

    26. Re:Screwy economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      EDS:

      Every
      Day
      Sucks

    27. Re:Screwy economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      two letters in it's name

      "its".

    28. Re:Screwy economics by uberdood · · Score: 1

      Yes, why *would* you work for a company that *doesn't* give you a pay raise every year? Are you passive aggressive?

      --
      "Population 1,656"
    29. Re:Screwy economics by barzok · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that one should expect this annually, regardless of the company's financial condition & other events?

      Interesting. I really want to agree with that.

    30. Re:Screwy economics by timeOday · · Score: 1

      If a company is doing OK and the employee's performance is OK, the baseline should be at least an inflation-sized "raise." In reality there are ups and downs and sometimes pay must be cut, which is what "no raises" is. I'm simply making the point that the difference between making "more" and "less" than last year isn't at 0%, it's at about 2.5%, or whatever the inflation rate is.

    31. Re:Screwy economics by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Every
      Damn
      Saturday

      I had to wait till I got home to type this one.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    32. Re:Screwy economics by Stopher2475 · · Score: 1

      Yes. You should expect a raise unless there are extreme circumstances. You better believe that if you're consulting the rates your employer charges for your services go up for the same reasons. If they don't pass that along to you they're lying to the clients. I got a 3.5% raise this year. Didn't make up for the cost of living. You know your employer is not keeping up when your raise doesn't even cover the raise that public transportation gave themselves.=)

    33. Re:Screwy economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extremely
      Deep
      Shit

  3. Half by Half by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Not surprising. Where I work people only seem to get pay increases by moving up the ladder, there's been no COLA of any sort for a few years. Other places I've worked in the past 10 years have only mustered 2% if anything at all.

    That, however isn't just the IT depts but entire organizations, with the notable exceptions at a few places where executives cut nice retro-active deals, even as the ship was foundering around them.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Half by Half by jskiff · · Score: 4, Funny

      there's been no COLA of any sort for a few years

      Did you at least get Mountain Dew???

      --
      It's "no one," not "noone." Who the hell is noone anyway?
    2. Re:Half by Half by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiot. Cost Of Living Adjustment.

    3. Re:Half by Half by jskiff · · Score: 1

      Yes...see...that's the joke! He meant cost of living adjustment, but the double entendre of COLA vs cola is what makes it funny, get it?

      Thanks, AC.

      --
      It's "no one," not "noone." Who the hell is noone anyway?
    4. Re:Half by Half by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. When the cost of living is at least 3% per year and your company has pay-freezes for three, four or five years straight - how big of a fucking deal is it if there's a half percent increase? The way I see it, 15% cost of living increase after five years with a half percent raise still leaves you earning 14.5% less (in buying power) today than you did four or five years ago in the same job.

    5. Re:Half by Half by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Heh. I worked for a company that had a 4% COLA. Of course, my rent rose 6% a year in Santa Barbara. I left the company to work for a former boss (he was "resigned" a year prior). I had to take a small pay cut.

      Shortly after I left, the company issued a new policy: take one day off without pay and one day of PTO (that's vacation+sick+holiday rolled into one) a week until your PTO balance runs out. That lasted a few months. Most of my friends left the company during that time. I'm very happy to have my current job (and my old boss).

      Interesting thing: everyone I know who left the company on their own accord left for a lesser paying job and never regretted it. Heck, even most of those who were fired or "resigned" don't regret it.

    6. Re:Half by Half by fupeg · · Score: 1
      there's been no COLA of any sort for a few years
      Well that's probably because inflation has been minimal the last couple of years. There was even borderline deflation for awhile there.
    7. Re:Half by Half by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disposable heroes of the Hiphoprisy:

      Well, the only cola that I support
      would be a union C.O.L.A.(Cost Of Living Allowance)
      On television

      BTW, I thought your joke was ok. :-)

  4. US Job Market by colinramsay · · Score: 1

    How do the /. feel the US job market is going these days?

    As someone who recently explored the UK market, it seems like there are a lot of options for programmers here. What makes the US so different?

    1. Re:US Job Market by ravenspear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As IT has matured it seems that the people who stand to gain are those already employed in the field. Lots of people on here will tell you there are no more IT jobs available in the US, but that is just plain wrong. Check any of the jobs sites or staffing firms and you will find plenty listed. However, most of those are looking for experienced professionals who have several years experience working in industry. If you have that, there are plenty of opportunities out there.

      What more people usually bitch about is how the relative difficulty of entering the field has increased for newcomers.

    2. Re:US Job Market by cubicledrone · · Score: 1, Insightful

      the US job market is going these days?

      Imagine dropping a 100 lb. block of lead into a toilet.

      W-4 employment is obsolete. Business insisted it be that way.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    3. Re:US Job Market by dilvie · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the US in general, but IT people in Utah seem to struggle with the market here.

    4. Re:US Job Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H1-b is the culprit. Huge supply of cheap educated labour willing to work for lower wages.

    5. Re:US Job Market by Tsugumi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What more people usually bitch about is how the relative difficulty of entering the field has increased for newcomers.

      Right... it's gotten harder to waltz in to an industry with very little to bring to the table. I interview a lot, predominantly grads into a fortune 100. It has gotten *easier* to hire people who are good, not because the market is saturated, but because I am getting less people who are pursuing a career in IT purely cos they think it will make them big bucks. I don't want those people, I want people who are interested in what they do. Otherwise, ultimately they are wasting my time, and their own careers. They won't stay long, and they won't enjoy the time they do spend.

      Taking some of the "glamour" out will be better for the industry, and it will be a better fit for the people who choose to do this. Money is, or should, be a secondary concern for everyone involved - there are bigger priorities here.

    6. Re:US Job Market by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Carly, Welcome to Slashdot! Enjoy your stay.

    7. Re:US Job Market by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ok, sometimes IT includes programming/development, sometimes IT is maintainance, support, and administration. Which is it? When they say IT salaries are increasing, what do they mean by IT? Can we come up with some more accurate terminology? As a software engineer, I usually am categorized into Engineering, as opposed to IT - but there seems to be no consistancy.

      Regarding the US job market for programmers - there seems to be jobs here in the Silicon Valley/SF area, but they just put you through a ringer during the interview process (3-4 interview sessions of 2-3 hours each), and then give you a lowball offer. If you have a specific domain knowledge that is valuable to someone, the situation becomes a lot better. I wouldn't really be interested in relocating, so I have no idea what is going on outside the Bay Area, but I keep getting people asking if I'm interested in BREW/J2ME positions, since very few people actually have experience with that technology. Not that it's a particularly difficult domain to understand/learn.

      A lot of companies seem to think that the bad economy means that hiring top notch developers should be cheap and easy. But, in reality, these are not the people that stay unemployed forever. Most of your top talent doesn't stay on the market very long, leaving you to sift through thousands of resumes and hundreds of interviews. At my last company, we got some smart people coming in and not getting the job because they felt they could do better, or that they didn't want to pay much. It was a tiny company, which has less leeway for supporting people who can't do their job well, but I remember a couple people who I thought were really good and my boss decided against them for, I felt, trivial reasons. I think those decisions were justified either consciously or subconsciously by the economy.

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    8. Re:US Job Market by Tablizer · · Score: 1


      W-4 employment is obsolete. Business insisted it be that way.

      I don't know why any distinction is made between "perm", temp, and contractor in the laws. It is meaningless to differentiate these days. The distinction should be tossed.

    9. Re:US Job Market by Dasein · · Score: 1

      Taking some of the "glamour" out will be better for the industry, and it will be a better fit for the people who choose to do this. Money is, or should, be a secondary concern for everyone involved - there are bigger priorities here.

      I don't agree. See, I think the computer industry is one of the most demanding (in many ways -- not all). People who have the dedication to work in the industry and do well want the same things that everybody else wants. To expect them to take a vow of poverty because "there are bigger priorities here" isn't going to fly. It's going to end up that the really smart and talented people end up going into other fields.

      So, in the end, you end up throwing the baby out with the bath water. Good people who were dedicated to the profession give up because they aren't content working for the same wages as someone who lives with a much lower cost of living.

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    10. Re:US Job Market by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Well, mabe if SCO...

      nah.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    11. Re:US Job Market by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      From a business perspective a lot of companies seem to have lost their way recently. Even IBM, which in the past has had a very strong sense of direction where all the employees worked toward the company's common goals, seems to be suffering from this malady somewhat. I'm not sure what's causing this. Perhaps the customers aren't being as forthcoming about what they need anymore. Perhaps we've already picked all the low-hanging fruit. Perhaps the old guard are losing their relevance and are soon to replaced by younger, more energetic companies.

      That being said, I'm seeing more jobs being posted again. We went through a stagnant period with the bubble bursting followed immediately (or caused by) the 9/11 incidents. That really screwed our economy over for a couple of years. Companies have only started rolling again in the past few months.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    12. Re:US Job Market by Tsugumi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm sorry, but I work crazy long days, do stressful work, and don't get paid *nearly* as much as the people who are actually performing business roles (I work in the financial sector, not a tech firm). But jeez, even if I just look at professional jobs, doctors and teachers do have it much worse, get less pay, are in more demanding positions, and imho do more good.

      But that aint my point. I'm in IT cos I enjoy it. I'm a technologist, and I'm fascinated and motivated by what I do. Money isn't irrelevant, of course it isn't. But I have a good working life because I enjoy what I do, and my employer gets (hopefully) a better return because a happy worker produces better work. This isn't about a vow of poverty, this is about valuing the 40-70+ hours a week you spend doing something more than the cash you get for doing it.

      So I will continue to look for those traits in the people I hire - you want people who believe in the cause, not mercenaries. Of course you want to reward the people who do good stuff, but we shouldn't promise everyone riches just for passing GO.

      It's going to end up that the really smart and talented people end up going into other fields.

      Isn't it better - for everyone - that people go into the fields they actually have a talent for?

    13. Re:US Job Market by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      It's not really an issue of willing, but an issue of unable to do otherwise. I really personally don't mind competing with other educated candidates so long as I'm competing on a fair playing field. H1-b don't offer this because bosses know that the person wanted to live in the US and that if they lose their jobs they won't get to stay.

      Continued residency becomes part of the salary package meaning that they have to work for much less, and even if I'm willing to work for that the employer will assume(probably correctly) that 3 years down the line I won't be anymore, whereas someone on an H1-b visa has to.

      The way I figure it is that we open up the damn doors, it's not like we've got to worry about providing government health benefits or anything like that because the US doesn't do that, let em all come, they'll have to fight for work on the same level as the rest of us.

      For that matter if we could smack the world bank and the IMF for being asshats, prevent US companies from buying up everything in the 3rd world some of them might want to stay at home and build a better economy there.

    14. Re:US Job Market by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

      Priorities? Like? I don't know paying off those college loans sounds good to me.

      --
      The message on the other side of this sig is false.
    15. Re:US Job Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This could be just my experience, but at my company, the so-called heavy-hitters we hire for 40+ an hour seem to produce less results than the 10+ an hour people we hire. Just goes to show ME that the more experience you have doesn't necessarily equate to the value you bring to the table.

    16. Re:US Job Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      this is about valuing the 40-70+ hours a week you spend doing something more than the cash you get for doing it.
      Work != Life. Would you work there for free if you didn't need the cash, because you value the time spent there so much? I very wise boss of mine, at a dot com no less, once said, "it's only a job". That doesn't mean you don't do your best, and put in extra hours on occasion when needed, but don't be a sucker. Unless you're getting some incredibly valuable experience that will net you a humongous raise at your next job when you leave there in a year.
    17. Re:US Job Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lots of people on here will tell you there are no more IT jobs available in the US, but that is just plain wrong. Check any of the jobs sites or staffing firms and you will find plenty listed. However, most of those are looking for experienced professionals who have several years experience working in industry. If you have that, there are plenty of opportunities out there.
      I don't know if "plenty" is the right word.

      Lots of things work to lower the number of Real openings to be much lower than the number of posted openings. Things like this happen, for instance:

      • Companies will *claim* to have an emergency opening that must be filled in days, have a bunch of recruiters start looking for people, and then decide a month later that they're going to go with an internal person instead.

        This is a company abusing the process, doing a bait&switch with an opening that never exists.

      • Recruiters will often have a policy of *not* canceling out job board openings that they fill, meaning that you might see twenty openings for that recruiter in some area, with only one of them being real--the rest being false advertising.

        This is a recruiter also doing a bait&switch, though that sort of thing almost fits in the job board guidelines of not advertising nonexistent openings, since at the time it was posted, the client said the opening existed.

      • Some recruiter websites even show false jobs--because of "programming bugs" or problems with their vendor or some excuse, those jobs don't match up to any of their openings.
      So please don't assume that just because these job boards make it look like there are openings out there for anyone sufficently skilled, that those openings really exist, or that a skilled person could be expected to have, oh, an 80% chance of getting a job through one of these boards in a reasonable amount of time, (say a year or so.)

      To put this another way: Firstly only a fraction of the posted positions you qualify for are real, existing openings. If you contact the company or recruiter, then your cover leter and resume represents one out of maybe 1200 responses or so. If it catches the recruiter's eye, you could be one out of maybe 40 or so people to get a phone interview. Maybe half of those will be interviewed with the client--I'm assuming they'll start with phone interviews too. Then you may be one of eight people physically interviewing.

      Only if they haven't already hired someone before your interview (yes, that happens), or have cancelled the opening (that happens too), will you even have a chance at really convincing them to hire you.

      Hardly anyone gets their job through job boards, compared with networking. The numbers just don't work out well for the applicants, compared to "did you know so-and-so was looking for someone to do thus-and-such?"

      Granted, things have improved TREMENDOUSLY over the past few years. Recruiters will actually return phone calls and respond to emails nowadays. (In 2001 that was *not* the case.)

      However, the fact that nowadays you can look through a huge list of job openings on these boards and say to yourself that you can do these jobs well, that you're very qualified, that you've had years of experience, etc., does *not* mean that if you were actually out of work that you'd have more than a miniscule chance of actually being able to *get* any of these listed jobs openings within a year or so.

    18. Re:US Job Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It matters if you are a government contractor. It matters if you want to collect unemployment. It matters if you are a publicly traded company (people evaluate employment levels just like any other technical indicator).

    19. Re:US Job Market by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1
      Money is, or should, be a secondary concern for everyone involved - there are bigger priorities here.

      I am having a very hard time imagining higher ups in the corporate structures buying into this line of thinking, so why should I? For them it's almost always about the bottom line, else why would they incorporate in Bermuda, outsource, and automate in order to get rid of workers? Why is the worker expected to take the noble view while the management is out to make every last nickle they can?

      I agree that money cannot be the only motivator, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't expect to be remunerated at the highest level we can possibly get.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    20. Re:US Job Market by fupeg · · Score: 1

      You are totally right. I changed jobs last year because I was tired of traveling a lot. I posted my resume and got tons of responses. I picked out seven places to do phone screens with and got interviews at all seven. I got offers from five of the seven and was able to pick out the best. I probably could've gotten two of the places in a bidding war, but the place I liked the best also made me the best offer, so I was pretty happy with the outcome.

    21. Re:US Job Market by danielrose · · Score: 1

      I think money is the only motivator. Sure I enjoy IT, but no more than anything else. I've been thinking about moving to some type of outdoor profession.
      I have a friend who stacks fruit at a grocer, he makes 5k a year more than I do (I do desktop/lan support and programming).

      I know which job is easier (and the bastard gets a terrific perve all day long)

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    22. Re:US Job Market by batemanm · · Score: 1
      I think money is the only motivator.

      A lot, if not most of the people I work with are motivated by their curiosity (or perhaps ego :-)). Almost all of them could get better paid jobs elsewhere if they wanted. Then again I work in a university.

    23. Re:US Job Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liking your job doesn't necessarily mean you think work = life...

    24. Re:US Job Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Money is, or should, be a secondary concern for everyone involved - there are bigger priorities here.

      While I agree you should never go for a particular career simply because you think you can make a lot of money at it, you should love what you do, how can you say there are bigger priorities than money?

      Money pays your mortgage, puts gas in your car, and allows you to save for your retirement. There is no bigger priority, except family, which, you guessed it, takes money to support.

      Money is #1, doing what you love #2. I am fortunate enough to do what I love and make enough money doing it to support my family. That's enough for me. Ask anyone's spouse if money is more important than them doing what they want to... Of course money isn't very important to those who have it, and are independantly wealthy, but for the rest of us who live paycheck to paycheck, it's critical.

    25. Re:US Job Market by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who's been a paid programmer for over 20 years, I have to say I am now completely mercenary. I finally learned after dozens of projects and companies that no one is looking out for me but me, and no one cares whether I love my work or not. I have a set of skills, a large toolbox of remembered algorithms, and the temperment for maintenance programming. I've seen the new technologies come and go, I've seen new ideas come and go, and I've put my heart and soul into projects becase I was a "true believer" in them.

      No more. Companies have taken advantage of me as a result, projects I've slaved over have folded, and I won't put up with it anymore. Money is not some abstract thing that would be nice to have, money is security, freedom, and power. Companies make money off of my work, my skills, my time, and if they make more as a result, I expect my share. If you want me to put in 70 hours of work this week, you had damn well better be prepared to pay me for each one. As a senior software developer, each of my hours is more valuable because I can do more in less time than I could when I was younger and less skilled. And I will evaluate what my time is worth, because it is the time I would otherwise spend on myself and others of my choosing. If you as a business manager don't agree, fine, that's business. I have something I'm selling (time out of my life) and named a price for that time, and if you feel it's worth it to you, we'll talk!

      I no longer have a "love" for an industry that has no "love" for me or my concerns. I work to live, only.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    26. Re:US Job Market by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It matters if you are a government contractor. It matters if you want to collect unemployment. It matters if you are a publicly traded company (people evaluate employment levels just like any other technical indicator).

      I know it legally means something, but I meant from a practicality standpoint it does not mean much. It is just a way for companies to be officially stingy.

    27. Re:US Job Market by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      Some recruiter websites even show false jobs--because of "programming bugs" or problems with their vendor or some excuse, those jobs don't match up to any of their openings.

      Yeah, this happens a lot. I remember last autumn when looking for a job I came across the same jobs advertised again and again, particularly from one notorious company, for at least six months. According to the job centre it's the result of trying to create a false image for shareholders; you make like you're trying to expand, but just somehow you can't find anybody to fill the posts. Seems that company had crashed six months beforehand and dumped half their workforce, so they were trying to address their image problem as cheaply as possible.

      Avoid companies who do this; generally it means they're cruising for a bruising in some way or another.

    28. Re:US Job Market by Dasein · · Score: 1

      Nicely said. I too am an "experienced" developer. I've had the same experience as you. I've worked my ass off building products and digging companies out of trouble.

      Am I well compensated? yes -- primarily because, like you, I refuse to accept less. Has any employer's stock option given me enough money to retire -- nope. Will they ever? I doubt it. So, I'm pretty mercenary about what I do.

      But here's the funny thing, I have love for this industry and I absolutely hate what some of these "business types" are doing to it.

      So all this "passion" talk is really code for "willing to work like hell just because it's fun". Given that, experience comes along with a life outside of work what this really translates into is "we'll work you hard, convince you it's fun, and when you wise up we'll hire someone else who we'll dupe just like we did you."

      The end effect is that, inexperienced children end up running the show in many places. On the one hand it's good because, well, someone has to be highly paid to clean up the mess. On the other hand, I'm pretty sick of being the "software janitor" who has to clean up after these folks.

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    29. Re:US Job Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gotta say that I think its great. I moved from North Dakota where there is no opportunity to North Carolina. After the first of the year I was getting so many calls for interviews, that it I almost couldn't fit any in.

      If you are actually worth anything, put your resume on monster.com and you'll get called in no time. I had got 2 calls and 2 replies (within the first week of the new year) and 3 offers. I accepted one and had a 3rd call shortly after.

      My experience I'm guessing isn't the norm, but I say the US economy is growing again. (most of the jobs I was being considered for were new positions, not even previously downsized jobsf)

    30. Re:US Job Market by NateTech · · Score: 1

      These "business types" of which you speak know nothing of true business if their company is not making a profit.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  5. I asked for and got 50% raise this year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All options though. :(

  6. Well this year I just got about 5%... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but then I am a software engineer who only gets $40K per year because the company I work for has me working for 3 years on H1 visa. If I leave I have to leave the country and life I have made here for myself because I have no permanent visa. I should be getting at least $60K, so my 5% feels kind of crappy. I guess it's better than nothing though or having no job at all.

    1. Re:Well this year I just got about 5%... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here come the 50000 anti-H1 rants.....

      wait for it.....

      wait for it.....

      GO!!!!!!

  7. In other news by cubicledrone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Home prices have increased 40%, inflation is over 3% and despite the tax cuts, about 1/3 of the average paycheck goes to taxes of one kind or another.

    One step forward, Chapter 7 steps back. Thanks boss.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word on home prices. I've been looking into buying my first home (I'm single, go figure), and I'm in shock. I realize rates are relatively low, but fuck me, homes are anything but. I'm not looking for anything palatial, and I live in an affordable area of the U.S. as far as cost of living goes. But $200,000 buys a shit house in a shit part of town that won't appreciate for shit.

      It is discouraging. I'm open for suggestions and insight.

      Discuss.

    2. Re:In other news by Tsiangkun · · Score: 3, Funny

      WHAT ! Didn't you receive the $200 Bush tax rebate/payoff that changed lives and allows everyone to become a homeowner ?

    3. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think you've got it bad? Where I live $200,000 won't buy you a shit from a homeless person, let alone a shit house in a shit part of town.

    4. Re:In other news by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Inflation is not "over 3%". The government doesn't include things like gas, food, health care premiums, and housing in inflation calculations - so it's definitely much higher than 3%.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    5. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taxes - paaleeese. My expexted out of pocket medical costs (no children, early thrities, relatively healthy - just a couple of prescriptions, a few checkups, etc.) has risen 1000% over last year. Last years $200 is now $2000 - not including the 13% increase in premiums. I did get a 3% raise, though.

    6. Re:In other news by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 0, Troll

      They have homeless people in Marin County?

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    7. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stay in an apartment, save your money and invest. When the housing bubble bursts, you'll be in a great position, because you'll have more money to buy something that is lower in price. Most people want things now, now, now. Live below your means, save, and invest. That's what I'm doing.

    8. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing same here, but almost more because my current job situation is so unstable. I don't want to buy a home, lose the job, and then not be able to make payments.

    9. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not knowing where you live it is difficult to comment, but I can make a few suggestions about a house.

      If you are a handy person with tools buy a "fixer upper" house & repair it. It takes a lot of time & effort but that is the best way to have a house gain value. My brother-in-law is on his second house in 5 years. The first one he sold for a 30% gain in profit and it is in a poorer section of town. The downside is that he had to spend every waking moment working on it, but he enjoyed it.

      If you are like me and can't hammer a nail into wood without breaking a window, I'd recommend staying in an apartment & saving until you have a good down payment.

      If you can put down 20% (yes it will be hard) you avoid a lot of hidden costs on a house. Typically if you put down less than 20% you have to pay private mortgage insurance. The amount varies on the size of the loan & the downpayment but it can easily be a few hundred a month. Staying in an apartment a little longer and avoiding or lessening that expense can pay off in the long run.

      A hidden upside to a larger down payment is that if interest rates drop you can more easily refinance. If you only have 5% in a house you may pay through the nose in fees.

      I'd also recommend going down to one or two credit cards and keeping the balance low if possible. It will help you get approval for a lower interest rate. Remember that even a 1% difference is a huge amount of money over 30 years when you are talking about a $200,000 loan.

      There is also the option of moving to a cheaper area of the country. It probably isn't the easiest thing to do but it is an option.

      When shopping for a house don't be in a rush. Look at lots & lots of houses. Take months & have a pre-approval loan so you know how much you can spend. I built my house so I can't really comment on this but I've heard there are two times to look at a house. Look at it when it has been on the market for only a few days or weeks. You may find a house you feel is undervalued. Sometimes people who are in a divorce just want to get rid of the house so they can start over. I've also been told that another good time is to watch a house that has been on the market a long time. If it doesn't sell you may be able to make a low offer & the person will grab out of despiration. A few friends of mine did this & got good deals. It will take time.

      Good luck.

    10. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

      mod parent up !

      most funny thing ive read all day :D

    11. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks!

      I live in Lexington, KY but have roots in Cincinnati, OH and Kansas City, KS/MO. It just so happens that my best friend has a business of buying condemned property and foreclosures for renovation in the greater Cincinnati area. We've talked at length about home prices, and he's all but begged me to head up there and trawl for a good property to fix up. Unfortunately, the job market has been soft here and there, so I'm stuck sharing walls and ceilings with other people (apartment living).

      Definitely in agreement on the down payment. I likely won't be able to make more than a 20% down payment (assuming $200,000 or so), but that's what I am planning for.

      I have no doubt I'll eventually get into something I like for the *right* price. Yet, I've played a game with myself where I'll browse properties and homes with a number in mind without actually seeing the asking price, and the asking price has been one and half to two times the number I had in mind! The disparity between one home and another is wild.

    12. Re:In other news by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 2, Informative

      Inflation for the year 2004 is given based on the Consumer Price Index from the Labor Department. Excluding energy and food, it was 2.2%. Housing alone was listed at 2.5% for the year and is included in the reported 2.2%. Energy is what caused the spike that averages overall inflation to 3.3% - alone it makes up for a 16.6% increase. With overall salaries (in all industries combined) making for only a 0.5% increase, most of us are paying more this year than last - and not earning enough to make up the difference. (Apologies in advance to those who aren't earning anything.)

      --
      I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    13. Re:In other news by SunFan · · Score: 1


      Yeah, real estate is out of control. When we bought our house, the previous owners cashed in to the tune of a 100% profit in ten years. That is just the market, right now. I feel really bad for people trying to save up for their down payment. 20% is nearly impossible for most people, leading to all the funky low-down-payment mortgages banks offer, now.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    14. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inflation is not "over 3%". The government doesn't include things like gas, food, health care premiums, and housing in inflation calculations - so it's definitely much higher than 3%.

      You are an idiot. "Over 3%" != "higher than 3%"? Just STFU and stop posting nonsensical crap, please.

    15. Re:In other news by SunFan · · Score: 1


      Consider a double-wide mobile home, and have it put on a foundation. If you get the right bank and insurance company, it will be no different, credit-wise, than owning a regular home. Nicer ones come with regular vinyl siding, asphalt shingle roof, and eaves, etc. Really not bad at all. (I have no affiliation with any mobile home compnay, just my 2 cents)

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    16. Re:In other news by SunFan · · Score: 1


      In the fine print, the home GWB is talking about is sold at Toys'R'Us, retail price only, one unit per family, delivery and assembly extra.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    17. Re:In other news by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, tell me about it. I've been saving for 4 years. I'm buying a place now, but it's my grandma's old house and I'm getting a pretty good deal on it.

      She's making about 500% on a 35 year investment, though.

    18. Re:In other news by SunFan · · Score: 1


      One thing I've noticed is that rent on a non-suck-ass apartment is equal to or more than a mortgage payment for a livable house. I lived in an affordable apartment once. Once I realized my neighbors were drug dealers and the other reasons there were two cops on duty at night, I moved. Fast.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    19. Re:In other news by SunFan · · Score: 1


      Make sure you read the fine print on a foreclosure contract. They are downright scary (as-is, where-is). You really have to know what you are getting in to, even if it requires paying for an inspection before entering into a contract.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    20. Re:In other news by SunFan · · Score: 1


      Oh, one thing I forgot to mention: I've developed the opinion that realtors, mostly those in cities, are a scam operation. On one transaction, I figured our realtor was getting well over 100 dollars an hour to put out a sign, make an MLS entry, and a color brochure. The house basically sold itself, as most in that area did. No wonder the realtor was always smiling.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    21. Re:In other news by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      Okay, I really don't like the idea of mobile homes, but I have to say that they are no longer 'aluminum boxes'.

      They actually build a lot of them in the city I live in, and the entire process was just like building a regular home. Better in many regards.
      take a look.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    22. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way off topic here...
      One thing to consider when buying a house for income purposes or considering riding the market. It is not as easy and as profitable as many would like you to believe unless you pay cash for the house. Example..
      Inital price $150K. You paid roughly ~$1500 month for escrow + mortgage for those 5 years for a total of $90K paid into the house. Assuming you sell in 5 years for $270, that leaves you with $35-40K (you principal will only go down about $5K on a 30 year mortage) and of that you will pay realtor costs (typically 3% or $8100) and repairs on the house. If you do not put that "profit" money into the cost of another primary house for yourself (not a second investment property), you will also pay capital gains taxes on it. Soo.. even with a 40% increase in housing value, you are not making much at all. Of course if it was your primary residence, you got to live there instead of pay rent to someone else. Many many other side tracks and factors but big picture, don't blindly believe the hype. If you want to consider a house as an investment, you better hope the value goes up at least the by the amount of interest you are paying on it per month and remember the interest is not detuctable if it is not your primary residence either.

    23. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Join the military for 4 years. You will get the benefit of a VA home loan (no money down) even after getting out. You still need to qualify but the VA will back up your loan. I used it and would not have been able to get a house without it. Luckily the housing prices in my area did not shoot up until after I bought my house. I refinanced and used the newer higher value to achieve the 20% requirement and now I have a regular 15 year loan (no VA) with a much lower interest rate. Since I did not take extra money out, my payment is only $200 more a month but for 15 less years.

    24. Re:In other news by Electrum · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've developed the opinion that realtors, mostly those in cities, are a scam operation. On one transaction, I figured our realtor was getting well over 100 dollars an hour to put out a sign, make an MLS entry, and a color brochure. The house basically sold itself, as most in that area did.

      Just like charging $100 an hour to, say, fix someone's computer is a scam? If it's so easy, why didn't you do it yourself?

    25. Re:In other news by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      I think he meant that the CPI is not >= 4% officially, but in reality its more like 8-12% if you ask the average joe 6 pak on what his expenses are.

      Remember, a super average of a massive area is meaningless, its just an average of all combinations which really is no one. So you have have a CPI for joe6pak, a CPI for Mr200k+ manager, and one for unemployed joe1pak.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    26. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe, just shows how much you know fucknut, the days where you can charge even $50 an hour for 'home service' of systems has long since gone. :P

    27. Re:In other news by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      A $100/hr to fix a computer *is* a scam.

      It's uneducated work that 16-year-olds can typically do. Charge money to drive out there, and then $30-50 an hour (depending on whether you plan to pay taxes, naturally :), ought to be enough for anybody.

    28. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $200K for a shit house? Seems like it already appreciated- what makes you believe it won't any further?

    29. Re:In other news by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      You realize that "500% on a 35 year investment" is only about 4.7% interest per year?

    30. Re:In other news by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Home ownership in the US is at an all-time high, about 68%...

    31. Re:In other news by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      Move to the midwest. House prices here aren't going up much at all. I bought in 1994 for $87,000, put $10,000 into the house (new plumbing, new windows, new roof, refinished floors), and then sold it for $108,000 in 2001. And then I had to buy out my ex wife for $10,000.

    32. Re:In other news by stephenbooth · · Score: 1

      Which is still better than what you get on a lot of savings accounts. Plus if you suddenly need a lump sump you can't secure a mortgage on your savings account.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    33. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Home ownership in the US is at an all-time high, about 68%...

      Oddly that coincides with the government giving away money to buy a home. Expect to see massive foreclosures in 3 years when people's ARMs suddenly become expensive to pay.

      The real beneficiary in all of this is the banks as they've been able to move more product and they get to keep the house in the end.

    34. Re:In other news by st0ner1 · · Score: 1

      Tsiangkun and anyone else who is paying to little in taxes can go ahead and send me your rebates this year if it will make you feel better.

    35. Re:In other news by leshert · · Score: 1

      In reality, it's far, far more than that.

      If you put $100,000 in an account that gives you 4.7% interest a year, in 35 years you get 500% return. But you don't get to _use_ that money for those 35 years. You get the use of a house for that time.

      If you really want to boil it down to economic terms, you have to add in what _renting_ the house out over those 35 years would bring in. That's a bit more than 4.7%.

    36. Re:In other news by llefler · · Score: 1

      It's better than what a saving account earns now, but not necessarily more that it would have earned in the past.

      And yes, you can take out a loan against a savings account. I have known people who did it in the past when they had difficulty building a credit record.

      However, a saving account doesn't appear to be able to keep the rain off your head or give you a place to store all of your toys.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  8. 15% raise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a 15% raise this year, but I am still getting paid well below standard for my position.

  9. Too bad for you by Moby+Cock · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unfortunatly inflation is around 2%, so you are all going to get a little poorer.

  10. Too many security analysts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Storage being cheap these days, It has gotten so bad when all these companies store info on their own servers and hire people to make sure it's secure, and then the companies fuck it up later anyway. It'd be better, and overall cheaper, if there were a few security storage companies handling all your info. I would put more faith (well, a little more) in a company whose business model surounds being a secure storage company, rather than have my data secured as a precautionary afterthought of most companies these days.

    1. Re:Too many security analysts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are blaming this all on cheap hard drives?

    2. Re:Too many security analysts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be better, and overall cheaper,

      and have a much bigger target painted on it,
      and would likely not be used by any one concerned with the security of the security of their data (how are you going to get that information to the secure location? how are you going to get it back? what sort of turn around do you expect with getting your secure data? who does that company trust who you are now trusting as well?).

      honestly, it's a nice thought but it really doesn't make security-sense.

    3. Re:Too many security analysts. by Green+Salad · · Score: 1

      It'd be better, and overall cheaper, if there were a few security storage companies handling all your info.

      We here at Microsoft agree. We will work dilligently towards reducing the number of "other security companies" also attempting to handle all your data. If you fail to keep up with your license subscription fees, we'll even secure all your data from unauthorized access by YOU.

  11. Woo-hoo! Mansion, here I come. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wait. .5% on AVERAGE. Damn. Cottage here I come.

    1. Re:Woo-hoo! Mansion, here I come. by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Oh wait. .5% on AVERAGE. Damn. Cottage here I come.

      More like Mobile Home, here I come!

      Ob Python Four Yorkshirmen, "Luxury. We used to have to get out of the lake at six o'clock in the morning, clean the lake, eat a handful of 'ot gravel, work twenty hour day at mill for tuppence a month, come home, and Dad would thrash us to sleep with a broken bottle, if we were lucky!"

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  12. Only in major cities by shuz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am a Linux Systems Administrator of 20 machines for a small time company in a small town of 50,000(which is the county seat). I command a salary of $28,000 and I am told to like it. A combination of corporation in big cities and the economy drive the average wages. Unless my current town is so drastically different these wage studies must only take into account large cities of 100,000 or more.

    --
    There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
    1. Re:Only in major cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the average wage of workers in these types of studies tend to include workers living in horribly expensive places like San Francisco, thus the average wage tends to be higher than what you are probably making, unless you live in a place where $500,000 buys you a tiny plot of land with a shoe-box sized house.

    2. Re:Only in major cities by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

      Dude, you need to move. Seriously. You should be making 2 times that, more so since you are a linux admin.

      --
      We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    3. Re:Only in major cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should work for free, since Linux is all about free-dom.

    4. Re:Only in major cities by shuz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      *sigh* agreed. My programmer and graphic artist are all in the same boat. The current fear though is that I'll never again be able to have full control over all the aspects of my jobs, systems, security, and networking. I get to dabble in being a mail admin, cisco admin, DBA, WebAdmin, perl guru, shell scripting guru etc. I am worried that by leaving I'll get a much better paying job but that I'll need to start from the bottom again and do more mundain work of creating users all day. I am also forced to learn very broad topics every single day. Something that I am told doesn't happen in corporate america. Though I think the loss of control and general paranoia is the biggest thing keeping me from leaving. Also I have only seen about 5 systems administration type jobs in Minnesota in the last 3 months. I swear that the jobs still are not out there!

      --
      There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
    5. Re:Only in major cities by Namlak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You should be making 2 times that, more so since you are a linux admin So why should he be paid more because of Linux? Isn't the TCO of Linux supposed to be *lower* than other operating systems, particularly Windows? Everyone knows that system administration accounts for far more cost than the initial purchase price of the operating system and now you're saying that Linux administraton should cost more? And, yes, he should be making more than 28k. Significantly more. It amazes me how cheap companies can be when their entire operation is on the line. In auto racing, when someone finds an "awesome deal" on a helmet we tell them "$50 helmet for a $50 head".

    6. Re:Only in major cities by kaustik · · Score: 1

      I work as a Systems Manager in San Francisco. The majority of the people working in the heart of this city actually live in the suburbs. The crash of the dot-com era drove everyone to find more affordable housing. Granted, I have to sit in a train for an hour and then walk a mile or two every day, but I get to trade that for the higher city salary without paying the incredibly ridculous city mortgages. $600,000 here buys you a small one bedroom condo. My suburb townhouse ran me $275,000 and I even get parking spots and my own hot tub.

    7. Re:Only in major cities by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Not to mention the average wage of workers in these types of studies tend to include workers living in horribly expensive places like San Francisco, thus the average wage tends to be higher than what you are probably making, unless you live in a place where $500,000 buys you a tiny plot of land with a shoe-box sized house.

      Try Santa Cruz, shoebox wedged into a lot with hardly a yard, no garage (as it was probably turned into another room or is full of stuff, so you park on the street) $600K and up. Try to find a job here, though. For central coast Calif, $65K household income is considered the poverty line.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:Only in major cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you expect your admin'ing linux, if you worked for a real company that can afford solaris or nt, they can afford to pay you well. Go to salary.com and which adjusts to you locality. BTW, all the unix admins that I know in my city make at least $100k, but they deal with solaris and because the companies can afford a real enterprise OS.

    9. Re:Only in major cities by kaiser423 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Stay there for a couple of years, learn one hell of a lot and get a ton of skills. Then leave. Think of it as investing in your future. Learning a lot now so that you can score that big job down the road.

    10. Re:Only in major cities by archen · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest consideration is how much money do you have left over at the end of the month. My job is pretty similar to yours although I live in a cluster of towns that adds up to about 250k people. I'd be living large if I made the low end they talk about. I'm not exactly paranoid about moving, but I'd say I really enjoy my work - and seriously, how many jobs in larger cities really offer anything that isn't being stuck in a cubicle doing not so interesting tasks. To me the variety makes my job interesting more than any particular task.

      Knowing that section of the midwest, I'd say you should still command above $30k per year, especially considering your experience. Well it's better than the $19k a year job listing a saw for a C++ programmer with at LEAST 3 years experience. =)

    11. Re:Only in major cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he should be making a lot more. A typical Linux admin can accomplish a great deal more in a far shorter time. Where I currently work at, they are starting to move desktops to Linux. As part of that, they think that they will be able to cut about 1/3-2/3 of their current admins and help desk and still do a better job. Based on several other operations, I think that they are right.

    12. Re:Only in major cities by ProppaT · · Score: 1

      It all depends on where you live. Aditionally, I still don't understand why network admins think that they are in a high paying field. During the IT spike in the 90's, when very few people where knowledgable to be competent IT people, yes...you could demand high salaries. These days you could go to any given high school and find students that know enough to be good IT people.

      I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the IT field isn't as specialized and elite as it once used to be. It's not like you're programmers. And you demand programmers salary. I've worked as a system admin before. Currently I work at a technical writer. Let me tell you, talk about an underpaid field. A lot of experienced tech writers make less than entry level system admins. Having worked both fields, system admin is a cake walk.

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    13. Re:Only in major cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $28,000 is a ton for only 20 machines. I used to do 600 machines as part of a 3 person team (200 apiece on average) and we were considered "too many" people. Now the company averages more like 300 - 400 machines to an admin

    14. Re:Only in major cities by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      Gov't jobs are low pay, especially state and local. Some Fed jobs are pretty well paying. there are probably some other opportunities in a town of 50K, but probably not many Linux ones. I live in a town of 110K, mid-america, and work in a town of about 1/4 that, but it's a worldwide company that happens to have a dev office here. (btw, I make about 2.5 times that as a programmer with about 9 years exp.)

    15. Re:Only in major cities by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      Crazy, huh? Looking at property here in the Bay Area I discovered that with an income of about 62k, I qualify for low-income housing assistance in a lot of towns here. Truely absurd.

    16. Re:Only in major cities by DanteLysin · · Score: 1

      If you only know Linux Administration, I can see that finding a better job could be difficult. Our UNIX Administrators must know Linux, Solaris, AIX, and HP-UX. Each Administrator is responsible for approximately 200 servers. Salaries and benefits are very good though.

    17. Re:Only in major cities by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting the productivity of the Linux admin. They can administer more servers than can Windows admins, especially when comparing servers of similar productivity. This is of course an average estimate, but the inherent networking of Linux means more admin (probably all) can be run over the network in batch and scheduled, rather than using the console. So paying a Linux admin more, to do a lot more, contributes to the lower TCO. Linux is not unique; most large or complex organizations have long preferred Unix to Windows for the same reason.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    18. Re:Only in major cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      These days you could go to any given high school and find students that know enough to be good IT people.


      Really?

      The myth of the high school IT wunderkind has come and gone. What I see coming out of high school with respect to I.T. (and please note that there are exceptions):

      1. lack of general IT knowledge (tend to master the hell out of whatever they think is "cool" though)
      2. lack of professionalism
      3. they don't have a depth of knowledge even in the subjects in which they purport mastery
      4. lack of organizational skills

      And don't even get me started on so-called "programmers"... Being a .net monkey isn't exactly compiler design. Where I work (as a system admin) a working knowledge of programming in a few languages, DBA, SQL, and the law (with respect to IT) is assumed. Hell, when we're not out there troubleshooting everything from DDOS to user error, we're kicking Active Directory's ass via ADSI (using aforementioned C# code monkey tools).

      Sure, you code C, C++, and assembly, then spit, shit and dream algorithms... then you're worth your weight. Otherwise, stand in the corner and STFU.

      In fact I had a high schooler the other day explaining to me the merits of replacing AIX and Solaris heavy iron with Linux driven pee-cees. Marvelous.
    19. Re:Only in major cities by shuz · · Score: 1

      My living expenses equal about $20,000 /year including taxes paid. That leaves me with 8,000 / year to spend on myself. Now I choose to save this money as much as I can. But if you figure at least another 1,000 a year in unforseen expenses that gives you 7,000. The average starter house around here is $130,000.

      Now maybe I have to high of expectations but I am unwilling to buy a house until I can afford to pay it off in 10 years. I am fiscally tight and everyone I know tells me I am insane to try live that way.

      --
      There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
    20. Re:Only in major cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average starter house around here is $130,000.

      You're probably making less, because you don't live on either of the coasts. There are more jobs and higher pay on the coasts. Of course, the cost of living is higher, too. For example, in Portland Oregon, you can expect to spend around $200k for a starter house. Probably $500k in San Francisco.

      A lot of people will tell you "so find a city with cheaper houses" when you're complaining about the expense of homes. They tend not to take into account the fact that the places that housing is so cheap, is cheap precisely because there's not much of a job market in those places. People want to live where there are jobs, so they flock there. And then those places become more expensive. So your solution is low-pay or unemployment and a cheap home or a high cost of living and high pay.

    21. Re:Only in major cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should move to Portland, OR.

      Down the street, they just built a huge apartment complex for section-8 residents. The apartments are all from three to five bedrooms each. They're huge. And they all have (as required by state law, apparently) free internet. Free BROADBAND internet access. In every apartment.

      So now, not only do these people who have four or five kids that they can't afford get to have a big place to live on a sliding scale (I've heard of people in this town paying $30/mo for a $800/mo apartment), but they get their cable internet access on my tax dime (it's not like they can't go to the library and use them!).

      Meanwhile, down the street, I have to pay for my rent and internet access. And don't try to tell me "well, they need it for work". I gaurantee these lazy fat fucks are using the internet as something to keep them busy between soap operas to chat with new guys to become their baby-daddy rather than hunting down employment oppertunities.

      Oh - and most of the cars in that apartment complex are newer and more expensive than any of the cars in my apartment complex, where the rent is between $600 and $1200/mo.

    22. Re:Only in major cities by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I am a Linux Systems Administrator of 20 machines for a small time company in a small town of 50,000(which is the county seat). I command a salary of $28,000 and I am told to like it.

      Sounds alright to me. That's a lot more than average, and you're sat down all day, it's not like you're really working, and you get decent hours rather than 12 hour night shifts. What is there to complain about? I'd swap my position for yours in a heartbeat.

    23. Re:Only in major cities by supremebob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Small town living has it's advantages, trust me! I work for a huge mega-corporation near a big city, who's IT department is so under-staffed that we don't have time to make necessary system improvements or update our skills. Anything more than emergency security patches and software upgrades is a luxury right now. At last count, I was administering a mix of over 60 Windows, Linux, and AIX servers. I get paid a lot better than you, fortunately, but the cost of living is so high that do litle more than break even at the end of the year. Not that I have any free time to spend it, anyway.

    24. Re:Only in major cities by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      Dude, you need to move. Seriously. You should be making 2 times that, more so since you are a linux admin.

      Dude, you need to learn a term called "cost of living". Seriously. It's impossible to say what someone "should be making" without knowing where they live.

      These "national" survey results are always heavily skewed toward big cities with a high cost of living, mostly with an ocean nearby. By contrast, in the region where I live (west Michigan), the salary figures these surveys usually cite are pure fantasy. (And have been for the two decades I've been working; it's not just a phenomenon of the current economy.) And that makes sense, because a studio apartment doesn't cost $1K/month here, either.

      $28K for sysadmining a fairly small Linux shop wouldn't be unheard-of in this area, and depending on what kind of organisation it is (e.g. non-profit, manufacturing, education, healthcare, high-tech, government, etc.) it could be considered rather low or rather high. It depends.

      Of course this dramatic difference kinda makes me wonder why businesses keep looking overseas to outsource jobs, when they could be looking more at the flyover states and retain the benefits of shared language, monetary system, daytime hours, etc.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    25. Re:Only in major cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're high. I admin that many servers, as well as do network admin and some development. I make more than twice that.

    26. Re:Only in major cities by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      Problem is, you're dumping a lot of money down the drain on rent I'm sure, and you'll have nothing to show for it when you move. Buy a house, even if you have to borrow, and you're paying toward something you own. Get a 30-yr mortgage, pay it off early, and maybe you don't get it paid in 10 years, but it's better to drink from a fountain and let some water trickle down the side of your mouth than to just turn the faucet on over the drain :)

    27. Re:Only in major cities by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1
      You describe exactly what I get to do all day long. Grant it some of it is constrained (we have a network group which gets mad when we log into their switches and make configuration changes, like activate a port for a specific subnet, etc., and there is a "security team", but they don't actually know anything about the technology, which really leaves it up to us to really be the security administrators).

      I have had to learn perl, php, mysql, java, javascript/html, C/C++, oracle, ingres, and shell scripting. I get to play on beowulf clusters. I work for a Fortune 500 Co, and I get to do all the fun things there are to being a Systems Administrator, and am paid more then 2x the prive you quoted. I did work my way up a little, but there is a learning curve at any new system/network layout before you really know what is going on. If you truely know what you are doing, you should quickly be able to pickup the new setup within 3 months. You already know how to do things, and any possition you accept should be aware of that fact and place you accordingly. Any decent company want to use their assets (i.e. "you") to their fullest capability, they are paying you for that, so they want to get the most out of you. If you really know what to do, they won't want to waste you doing mundain tasks when you could be solving why system X freezes when user XYZ starts a certain process, but doesn't freeze when user ZYX starts the same process, or need to configure 20 new nodes to add into the beowulf cluster and "test" them ;)

      --
      We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    28. Re:Only in major cities by hendridm · · Score: 1
      Now maybe I have to high of expectations but I am unwilling to buy a house until I can afford to pay it off in 10 years. I am fiscally tight and everyone I know tells me I am insane to try live that way.

      So it's all or nothing? You'd rather pay your house off in 10 years than piss money away on rent for the long term? I don't get it. So what if you have to get a 30-year mortgage. At least you get to keep some of your payments, and there's no stopping you from selling it if you change your mind before the 30 years (assuming you keep it for at least 5 years).

    29. Re:Only in major cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an example of a city-dweller, I make about $250K per year. My rent is $2,800 per month ($34K per year). My taxes are about $100K per year. I donate about 15% to charities ($37K per year). There are various other costs, but I'm pretty sure I come out ahead.

      There are great jobs out there, but you need to know both business and tech. (I made my own position, and I make sure that for every dollar I get paid, I bring my company five dollars.)

      Ask not what your company can do for you, ask what you can do for your company - because you will quickly rise through the ranks as you answer that question!

    30. Re:Only in major cities by Protocron · · Score: 1

      Here's your goal for the next year. Get a better paying job. Here is what I did. I said that I am going to do better and get more money and be treated better. I started at a company were I was capping out at 38k a year. The benefits sucked and work was a nightmare. I was berated, yelled at.... I was getting very depressed. I quit. I found another job. Granted, the pay was almost half but it was being a sysadmin in a crazy ISP tech support environment. I touched everything. I worked as hard as I could. Came in really early left late all the time. I had a two hour commute each day. I made manager in 4 months. By 8 months I was burned out, By 9 months I decided it was time to get a real job. for two weeks straight I located every company in the area that even hinted at having tech jobs. Specifically ones with Linux/Unix. I wrote targeted resumes for those companies. Anything that I did (and I did almost everything) I detailed in that resume. 1 week later I had a new job offer. $45k starting 50 k after the first 6 months. With benefits. Not great but I took it. Why? 8 minutes to work on a good day. My worst day is when I get more than 5 phone calls. Noone ever tells me that I have to do it and like it. Try it

      --
      CAPS LOCK: ITS LIKE THE CRUISE CONTROL FOR AWESOME
    31. Re:Only in major cities by shuz · · Score: 1

      You all have very good points. The biggest problem is that I don't want to be in this town in 5 years. I don't see a future in maybe grossing 45k by the time I retire in 35-40 years. Please no one respond back with cracks about retirement age. Anyways the house will come as well as the fair wage and job I enjoy. It all takes patience which is something I have an abundance of.
      -peace

      --
      There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
    32. Re:Only in major cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There *are* companies that value skilled generalists, and believe in on-the-job education and training. I work for one of them. In fact, everyone in the software division at IBM is required to write up their individual plans for education and personal career development during each year, and report back on what they actually learned at the end. There are tons of free online courses, online reference libraries, and in-person learning at major sites. There's a mentoring program too, for on-the-job training.

      In the last month I've hacked on some Perl, written end-user documentation, prepared and delivered a presentation, answered support questions, admined a couple of servers (including responsibility for security), staffed a booth at a conference, done a proof-of-concept project with handheld devices, worked on some web site design, helped out at a hands-on Linux course, and today I was writing Java code for a J2EE project.

      If you can speak business people's language, and you're flexible enough to solve all kinds of problems, then I think you'll always be in demand. If anything, I think big companies are more likely to have a wider variety of dysfunctional behaviors and problems that need solutions and workarounds.

    33. Re:Only in major cities by danielrose · · Score: 1

      I make 30,000 AUD (22,000 ish USD) doing desktop/lan support in Brisbane. The houses where I rent START at about $205,000 (this is around 1 hour drive from the city.
      If I wanted to, and had enough cash for a deposit, on my wage, I could get a loan of less that 100k. With mine and the girlfriends wage combined, we could borrow 150k max.
      Its allllll bulllshittttttttttte

      The companies fuck us over, its time we fucked back

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    34. Re:Only in major cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you knew the English language and had proper grammar skills, you might have a chance at a job!

      I'm just judging off your post and your home page though. If that is representative, I don't wonder why you can't find a job. There's plenty of qualified tech jobs that I've seen around here...

    35. Re:Only in major cities by wayward_son · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, $28,000 where he is may actually buy more than twice that in places with high costs of living, like Silicon Valley.

      I met someone here on Slashdot who actually makes slightly more than I do, but lives in metro L.A. I live comfortably, he is barely scraping by.

    36. Re:Only in major cities by scumdamn · · Score: 1
      I think you need to invest.

      If you have free time you should get certified in as much as possible. If you have the knowledge you can go through the classes/tests/whatever and show it all on your resume. Use this time to build skills etc!

    37. Re:Only in major cities by Deideldorfer · · Score: 0

      Because you administer Linux instead of Windows, it is obvious that there are far fewer calls to the help desk (you) to fix problems. This deceives the owners/users into thinking that you are not valuable to the company. Maybe you need to have some carefully planned computer problems occur during the week when you are on vacation to remind them of how smoothly you keep things running.

      I am in a similar situation to you, but I keep a couple of Windows boxes around so that I have things to fix. I am also lucky to have a boss who realizes that fewer calls to me means that I am doing a good job of keeping the rest of the employees productive (which I consider my primary task).

      --

      Power off before disconnecting connecting connector. Seen on a cash register
    38. Re:Only in major cities by shuz · · Score: 1

      Built my first Beowulf cluster when I was 20. One of my pride sections of my resume and often talked about in past interviews. I have to say I found it difficult when I tried to put it together by hand without a distro. Then I used scyld and things because quite easy and fluid.

      Thanks for the reply.

      --
      There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
  13. 30k here by namespan · · Score: 2

    I'm making in the mid thirties and was out of work so long I feel lucky. Felt lucky, anyway. Geez.

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
  14. I knew it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Capitalism is dying--Marx confirms!

  15. It won't get better for awhile by Shamashmuddamiq · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The problem with most companies is that they learn to be miserly penny-pinchers when they go through bad times, and it's something they get used to and never grow out of. Even when things get better, salaries, bonuses and benefits often *don't* (except for the upper management, of course).

    I like the company I work for, but unfortunately, I may need to go someplace else if I want my career (and salary) to advance...

    --
    ...just my 2 gil.
    1. Re:It won't get better for awhile by SupremeTaco · · Score: 1

      I second the parent, and the preceding post. I'm an admin for about 30 (now) W2K boxen on a NT4 LAN. We just (as in this week) started migrating to W2K from Windows 95 (not a typo). Several new PC's later, we're FINALLY making the move. I still have to download updates/drivers/software in another town 25 minutes away, coz they're 2 cheap to get high speed access. Some owners/managers are just too cheap, or they don't understand the impact that IT has on an organisation. Mechanics get sent to school, accounting personnel take classes, but a $300 CBT set for the IT guy or a $150 community college course gets shot down!!
      At the end of last year, here's my review with the owner:

      "I don't know what you do around here, but the PC's work, so here's a .06% raise."

      Literally, folks. Now I'm living large at 32K. It's a different world out here in Bumpkinville. Computers are viewed in a WHOLE different light with regard to their role in the organisation.

      Maybe I'm wrong, but I beg someone else who works in Small-Town America for a local company to differ.

      --
      You have a constitutionally protected right to be wrong, and I the right to ignore you.
    2. Re:It won't get better for awhile by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      i'm in the same boat, but atleast it seems to have stopped sinking

    3. Re:It won't get better for awhile by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      I'll differ. If you know what you're doing and the company values IT (and your contribution to it!) you can do just fine in the stix.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  16. Ugh by christoofar · · Score: 1

    Considering RHI Techonolgy specializes in temping and most of that large portion of temping (ok... "termed contracts") is on the low end, I would imagine that salaries would remained depressed.

    When I retire I think I'll make good money as a cab driver.... in Bangalore.

  17. H1-B still holding down American salaries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Clinton administration's multiple expansions of the guest worker program continues to keep salaries down. We won't see salaries keep pace with inflation until the program is cut back to 1980's levels.

    1. Re:H1-B still holding down American salaries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just H-1b, but L-1 has been expanded.

  18. WOW!!! by devhen · · Score: 1

    0.5%?!?! Great! So, basically, my commission is being doubled!!!.... grrrr

  19. Big Increases! by joeszilagyi · · Score: 1

    Oh boy, we almost got that keeping up with inflation thing LICKED! w00t!

    --
    Dude, where's my packet?
  20. Other things that to grow in 2005 by ShatteredDream · · Score: 3, Funny

    The national debt
    The interest we will have to pay on the national debt
    Inflation

    So basically you can think of an average 0.5% growth as your petty little cost of living increase. Enjoy the Bush tax cut while you can because as he spends like a crackwhore with a stolen credit card, each person's "share" of the national debt will blossum. that means a bigger budget every year and eventually taxes will have to go up big time to keep the leviathan from choking on its own excess.

    How about this. Why don't a bunch of IT companies set up shop in Costa Rica and pay their employees to move there? The advantages are enormous. Cheap cost of business, you're close to America, exotic location for the young employees (and exotic women for the young geek men ;) ) and if everyone goes expatriate, the tax benefits are totally worth it.

    1. Re:Other things that to grow in 2005 by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 1

      From that subject, I totally though you were going to make a spam joke.

    2. Re:Other things that to grow in 2005 by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      Why don't a bunch of IT companies set up shop in Costa Rica and pay their employees to move there?

      They speak English in Belize, while in Costa Rica, Spanish is the official language.

      From the fact book (Belize): ``Per capita GDP - per capita: purchasing power parity - $4,900 (2004 est.)''. If a company would pay me half my U.S. salary, I'd happily pay my own relocation expenses.

    3. Re:Other things that to grow in 2005 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They speak English in Belize, while in Costa Rica, Spanish is the official language.

      I don't know if it's funny or sad that you need to cite the CIA World factbook to back up your claims of the official language.

      Since you mention it, I would put my vote to Costa Rica.

      Higher life expectancy, lower mortality rate, lower HIV, better economy and less poor people.

      I haven't been to Belize, so it might be a really nice place to set shop. I guess I'll have to visit some time to have more concrete knowledge.

      AC

    4. Re:Other things that to grow in 2005 by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Belize is quite beautiful. It has the largest barrier reef in the western hemisphere. The most beautiful parts have hurricane risks, though.

      Saying "they speak English in Belize" is oversimplification. Belize has three official languages: English, Spanish, and Garifuna. They are all widely spoken.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    5. Re:Other things that to grow in 2005 by burns210 · · Score: 1

      Why not have IBM just out right BUY Cuba. Fidel has a price, I gauratee it.

    6. Re:Other things that to grow in 2005 by CharAznable · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's already a big IT industry in Costa Rica. Pretty much all my cousins are programmers, and earn decent money. And it's not just writing boring database apps, they write custom programming languages and stuff like that.
      The biggest obstacle to IT growth, however, is that there is only one big state-owned ISP, and it sucks farts out of dead chickens. My parents pay like 40 bucks for 512k down cable modem. But at least there's cable.

      --
      The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
    7. Re:Other things that to grow in 2005 by dlt074 · · Score: 0

      isn't the top cash crop besides drugs and coffee, kidnaping gringo's?

    8. Re:Other things that to grow in 2005 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fidel has a price, I gauratee it.

      Yaha, if you could spell, I wouldn't doubt it!

  21. Make them pay what you're worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a 47% increase in pay last year, by threatening to leave. I wasn't making bad money before hand, now I'm overpaid. If you're valuable to a company they'll pay what ever it takes to keep you there.

    1. Re:Make them pay what you're worth by MSBob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Insanely bad idea. Now that you blackmailed them into a raise you'll be let go as soon as a suitable replacement is found. Mark my words.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    2. Re:Make them pay what you're worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fair, they let me go no big deal, one can always get another job. How do you think I was able to say I was going leave? Jobs are out there, but they take some work to get. I honestly believe those who are currently un-employed are that way by choice.

    3. Re:Make them pay what you're worth by boodaman · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If they haven't been paying you what you're worth up til now, what makes you think they'll appreciate being blackmailed?

      They know exactly how much you're worth, they're not stupid. They made an offer, and you took it. It takes two to tango.

      Not only will they let you go as soon as they find a replacement, they'll make you train him/her in the process.

      If you're worth more in the market than you make now, about the only way you're going to actually make that much is to actually put yourself in the market. At least, if the person controlling your salary has half a brain.

  22. Hmm...inflation is at about 3% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, I'm happy with my 6% raise that I got last month.

  23. slashdotted by joeszilagyi · · Score: 1

    Anyone got a mirror?

    --
    Dude, where's my packet?
  24. only 0.5%? by DeathByDuke · · Score: 1

    ah well, at least it'll pay for an extra pack of DVD-Rs then.

    1. Re:only 0.5%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah well, at least it'll pay for an extra pack of DVD-Rs then.

      Wait till you get a $10 rebate special from CompUSA and you'll be rolling in it!!! Well maybe in 4 months when they send you the check, if ever.

  25. robert half studies on /. .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

    Sounds like a Datamation article from 1986.

  26. Very happy in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm doing pretty well north of the border. Lost my job on Xmas day 2003 and found my next gig in March 2004. With a 25% wage increase :-)

    Most of my peers (experienced J2EE developers) make at least CDN$75K and I clocked CDN$90K in 2004. All this in one of the cheapest provinces (Nova Scotia).

    Canadian wages are very decent compared the the cost of living here. I used to work in the UK and despite making more money there according to the conversion rate, the purchasing power of a CDN$ is just so much greater in Canada that it felt like getting an 80% salary hike.

    1. Re:Very happy in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was happy. Then I was outsourced to a clueless American company and my career came to a screaching halt.

      Now I just have a job.

      (well, unless this gets moderated too high)

    2. Re:Very happy in Canada by pumpkinescobarsof2 · · Score: 1

      i live in halifax ns, and i'd be real interested to hear which company you are working for that will pay you 90K / yr here

      my consulting company subs to companies in ontario so i can work on larger projects than i'd typically see in ns, but i'd drop it in a second if i could find someone local that could pay me as much as i'm making now

    3. Re:Very happy in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still looking for an IT job in Ontario (Greater Toronto Area). Not much available for those who don't have a lot of experience (I graduated in 2003).

      If I had the money I think I would just go back to university and study something completely unrelated to IT.

    4. Re:Very happy in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't name the name because the company is too small (30 people). The vertical we're in is growing rapidly and even peons like me get to reap the benefits. I also realize that my income is higher than a developer's average but not by a huge margin. I think the average hovers around 70K right now for someone with real experience.

    5. Re:Very happy in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of my peers (experienced J2EE developers) make at least CDN$75K and I clocked CDN$90K in 2004.

      Don't be fooled, fellow Americans! This poor sap only makes around $10K/year in U.S. dollars.

    6. Re:Very happy in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      i live in halifax ns, and i'd be real interested to hear which company you are working for that will pay you 90K / yr here

      "Oh, so sorry, sir. We were hoping to hire someone who actually knows how to use a 'shift' key when typing. Those capital letters are all the rage, you know! That, plus your apparent lack of knowledge on how to use punctuation to end a sentence, pretty much had everyone who interviewed you saying 'looser' after they caught their breath from the laughing fit."

      "Cheer up, though. I saw a 'Help Wanted' sign at the Tim Hortons down the street. You'll do well there if you don't bother to put on another amazing display of grammatical incompetence."

    7. Re:Very happy in Canada by Musagetes · · Score: 1

      Are you a SalesBoom developer? 8^)

    8. Re:Very happy in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had the same experience in the midwest (also in Java programming). I quit my job and took another within 3 months (after waiting close to 2 months before looking). I even got a sweet raise (a little better than your 25%, but I was a bit underpaid before this job). Houses are cheap, even near the cities. Cost of living isn't high, and almost 2 years later, the recruiters are still bothering me.

      The only downside - none of these companies are tech companies. Most are programming jobs for manufacturing companies (internal apps, processing, qa, and the occasional web app).

    9. Re:Very happy in Canada by superflippy · · Score: 1

      Most of my peers (experienced J2EE developers)

      Any of them interested in coming down to South Carolina? It's nice and warm here, the food is good and housing is cheap. We also have a dearth of Java programmers, experienced or not.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
  27. Same old news for me... by stealth24 · · Score: 1

    We lowly IT instructors just can't seem to climb in that IT salarie hierarchy. I think I'm going back for my masters. :/

    1. Re:Same old news for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try being a schoolteacher. No matter how much Latin, calculus, or CS you know and can teach, you'll be lucky to make that $40K mark before you're forty years old.

    2. Re:Same old news for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who can't do, teach.

      Those who can't do either, get MBA's.

  28. IT salaries devalued by outsourcing by andrewzx1 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    One of the affects of IT outsourcing is a downward pressure on US IT salaries. With many IT jobs going overseas the affects are multifold. the jobs that are sent overseas creates a surplus of workers here in the US, and so workers don't have to offer premium salaries to fill positions, they can offer less.

    The indirect affect is that the perception of value of the IT work is lessened as well. Managers and owners hear that overseas IT workers will charge much less, so outsourcing is always an option if salaries rise too much. They will bring this up in salary discussions.

    I had a future career as an IT worker/manager. I decided the future was bleak enough to get go back to school and get a Master's degree in management, not IT management. I now know enough about planning, finance, reporting, cost structure, leadership, supply chain, knowledge management that I can feel confortable mooving into another field.

    Which is sad because I love IT. But I don't want to be around when all the jobs disappear. Like what happened to textiles, aerospace, and manufacturing. Sometimes its good to hedge your future.

    Good luck everybody.

    1. Re:IT salaries devalued by outsourcing by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Which is sad because I love IT. But I don't want to be around when all the jobs disappear. Like what happened to textiles, aerospace, and manufacturing. Sometimes its good to hedge your future.

      Yep. I left IT for law school, and don't regret it at all. I'm sure eventually they'll find some way to outsource lawyer jobs (they're starting to outsource physician jobs), but hopefully by that time I'll have made enough money to retire on.

    2. Re:IT salaries devalued by outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, and good luck effecting the change so that you get the desired effect in your career.
      We hope it affects the quality of your writing, too.

    3. Re:IT salaries devalued by outsourcing by servognome · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which is sad because I love IT. But I don't want to be around when all the jobs disappear. Like what happened to textiles, aerospace, and manufacturing.
      I work in electronics manufacturing, and the jobs haven't all disappeared. Although, you can't just pick up "PCB assembly for dummies" manual and expect to get in. If you're motivated and dedicated then the jobs are there. There are also advanatages for a constricted job market:
      1. Your coworkers are talented and really want to be in that field. You don't have to worry about fixing the mess your coworkers make because they are completely clueless and/or unmotivated.

      2. The type of work you get is more interesting. While most production is done in other countries, the R&D is still done in the US. So although there are overall less jobs, they are the higher paying, and more fulfilling ones.
      The problem with IT right now is it got saturated with "cash grabbers" who didn't care about the industry, they just saw big money with little work. So the supply of "qualified" people is much larger than the demand. Over time it will be much easier for somebody like you who truly loves the field to get a job, although I know it's no consolation for the bleak short-term outlook.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    4. Re:IT salaries devalued by outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did same thing, dropped IT like a bad habit. I just saw my salary going down and the number of hours I worked going up. I also began to hate being in front of a PC.

      As far as outsourcing lawyers. Never. Who controls entry to the bar?

    5. Re:IT salaries devalued by outsourcing by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The problem with IT right now is it got saturated with "cash grabbers" who didn't care about the industry, they just saw big money with little work.

      But what I obvserve is that those types generally talk and think like the PHB's doing the hiring, giving them an advantage. They may not excel at tech, but they have "people and business skills".

    6. Re:IT salaries devalued by outsourcing by ph1ll · · Score: 1
      I've been dealing with outsourced relationships for the last 4 years. Invariably, the projects I saw were:
      • more expensive and
      • of lower quality
      than in-house work. So, why do people outsource?

      Outsourcing is not an excercise in cost-cutting. It's an excercise in risk management.

      The risk in question being mainly to an exec's career. If an in-house project fails, the exec's head is on the block. If the outsourced project fails, the exec is safe in the knowledge there is somebody else he can blame.

      BTW, I'm amazed that it seems nobody has ever done a study into why outsourcing IT is a flawed business model (Ok, it's not exactly in Gartner's interest to do so...). It's blindingly obvious to the poeple on the ground that a company that has to maintain a huge management overhead is going to cut corners on developlment work and/or charge extremely high fees.

      In contrast, by far the cheapest and effective way of doing development is to hire contractors (total cost of additional management overhead: $0).

      I think people are starting to see this. That's why the software development market is doing well in my part of the World (yup, not all Slashdot readers are American...)

      --
      --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
    7. Re:IT salaries devalued by outsourcing by nomadic · · Score: 1

      As far as outsourcing lawyers. Never. Who controls entry to the bar?

      Only problem is it's the government who lets the bar associations regulate the profession. They could change their mind.

    8. Re:IT salaries devalued by outsourcing by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Only problem is it's the government who lets the bar associations regulate the profession. They could change their mind.

      But who runs the government? Lawyers.

    9. Re:IT salaries devalued by outsourcing by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Not anymore, it's businesspeople, who tend to be anti-lawyer. Look at the renewed interest in tort reform.

  29. What about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    meta-systems analysts
    we can't even find a job, let alone a raise

    there's just no future aside from the details

  30. look elsewhere by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think I would like to survey IT salaries of other universes at this point. Maybe in another universe the damned Brits never touched India, and they instead speak vietnamese in reverse or whatnot.

  31. Re:Need Linux Help (Slightly OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this supposed to be a joke? Or the typical linux arrogant response?

    Its not the gtkhtml file or whatever, its gtk-x11-blah blah.

    Like i said, the file it is complaining about (libgtk-2.00-- blah blah) actually IS sitting right there in /usr/lib or somewhere like that.

    Is the problem that I am running Ubuntu x64 version?

  32. In related news... by JessLeah · · Score: 1

    IT employment to grow -50% in 2005.

  33. It's all relative by ari_j · · Score: 1

    Your "small town" of 50,000 would make it the third largest city in my home state. The county seat of my home county, which is geographically twice the size of Rhode Island, only has 1,500 people.

    That said, I don't think that, in a similar position if it existed there, the salary would be any less. You are almost certainly getting hosed, but with IT unemployment as it is you probably can't really threaten to leave and expect a raise. That's how economics work, and sometimes they suck.

    Incidentally, why don't you move to a larger city? There certainly may be factors like a wife and kids involved, but it wouldn't hurt to look around a bit. I administered a lot less than 20 Linux boxes for a lot more than $28,000 in 2003.

    1. Re:It's all relative by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      How cold did it get in North Dakota?

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    2. Re:It's all relative by ari_j · · Score: 1

      (I assume that you are not a relocated Nodak. If my statistically insignificant chance of being wrong in that assumption is made good, I apologize.)

      There is a very good reason that North Dakota is the 4th least populous state in America (AK, VT, and WY have fewer people). When I was home over Christmas (as I was smart enough to leave the state to work after college and now for law school), the coldest it got when I was awake was -41F without the wind chill. But it does get colder than that sometimes.

      The real problem with ND is not how cold it gets, but rather that it has an enormous temperature range. Real temperatures, not corrected for "how it feels" due to humidity (which we lack) or wind (which we have in spades), range from -60F in a bad, but not horrendously rare winter up to 110F in a bad, but not horrendously rare summer. Phoenix, AZ gets up past 120, but rarely below 40. The North Pole may get well below -100, but rarely above -20. In each case, you have an 80-degree-Fahrenheit range of temperatures over the course of a year. North Dakota has more than twice that range.

      That over half a million people tolerate it on a continuing basis confuses and infuriates the potentates of Omicron Persei VIII.

    3. Re:It's all relative by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      Iowa - and we were about -15F last week. That's bad enough.

      I agree on the temperature variation - heck we had a 30 degree F swing this week alone!

      We say in Iowa - "There are places colder than here and hotter than here - but there few places colder and hotter than here"

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    4. Re:It's all relative by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Yeah...after about -15 or so it really stops mattering.

      "There are places colder than here and hotter than here - but there few places colder and hotter than here" ... and North Dakota is one of them. The good thing is that there's not a climate in the world we're not adapted to.

    5. Re:It's all relative by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Somehow we went from 75 last thursday (don't ask me how it got that hot here in January, the weather's been weird. It also figures that I had to wear a suit that day), to teens and 20's this week.

      It's not -15 (for which i am glad), but that's a change of 50 degrees. It was insane. But, then again, Ohio is a bizare place.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    6. Re:It's all relative by mrlpz · · Score: 1

      That's not necessarily the answer either. Because in a big city like Miami, programmer salaries are the worst I've ever seen them. Sure you can go "boo-hoo on you" to me, but the fact is that being in the industry for about 20 years, and being able to demonstrate proficiency in .NET && Java && MFC && etc.etc. just to meet a mocked up Job Req ( because HR Depts. LOVE buzzwords ) isn't any help. When you get down to discussing $$$ amounts with any recruiter or HR dept, you will invariably get amounts that are 15-20% LOWER than they were prior to 9/11.

      And I don't mean in IT overall, and I don't mean for doing work at a "trumped up" .Bomb company either. I mean as a Team Lead ( where you best know your shit ), or even one of those ( All of your American Programmers need to "become" )Architects positions.

      It doesn't matter that IT ( Geez, I wish /. would just for ONCE f$king present research for software engineers as well as IT workers, instead of glomming both fields together ) salaries "MIGHT" grow 0.5%, when the salaries are already depressed considerably more to begin with.

      I spoke with a recruiter the other day, and despite being fawned over because of my background, the bottom line is that it came down to $$$. Her "defense" was that "there are still lots of people out there willing to work for less". My answer: "And most of those people are the ones who chased after the .Bombs of the world".

  34. ELE? by locokamil · · Score: 1

    I'm an electrical engineer with a strong background in computer engineering/programming. Does anyone have any idea what the outlook is for people like me? ::worried as graduation nears::

    1. Re:ELE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      I see a series of name tags and hair nets in your future.

    2. Re:ELE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly? Not good if you don't have something lined up by now. In the past 2 years, I know if two ECE (Electrical and Computer Engineering) and an ME that had terrible times finding a job even though their grades were good and from a very good schools (Big10 for all). Two were even women. Out of the 3, one is still looking, one has a programming gig, and the 3rd works at a license branch. Normally, a company at which I work would have hired them in a minute. The problem? Easy - offshoring. This company used to hire only new college grads. Worked hard, learned fast, knew the latest in technology, and usually didn't have to go home to a family at night. Now? 25% of the company is in India, where all of the new hires are. One office here has lost 75% of its people.

      Now if you have had an internship, you might be in luck, otherwise, Godspeed. Its not too late to go to school and get a job that can't be shipped overseas.

    3. Re:ELE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just read Dilbert - that about covers it.

    4. Re:ELE? by LighthouseJ · · Score: 0

      I'm in Computer Engineering myself (graduating in May myself). I don't think I'll be frying bacon or anything. I've looked at jobs and companies like Intel and Siemens are looking for fresh college grads, as well as smaller firms.

      I've been looking for jobs in the Boston area and they have the same aforementioned jobs with Intel, Siemens and such, however they also have smaller firms that were put together by MIT graduates that are also looking for EE/ECE graduates fresh out of college.

      So in conclusion, I'm not worried. I'm aware I won't have a glorious 6-figure salary in July, I know that, I know I need to pay my dues as far as job quality, but it's not like Computer Engineering will be obsolete in 5 months. I'm so far upstream past the IT/CS people that I can land practically anywhere in computing I want, but I'd rather be in computer engineering because the work is more engaging than anything else.

      Don't worry about your degree, brother/sister, you won't "make it big" instantly after you graduate but you'll be just fine.

    5. Re:ELE? by ravenspear · · Score: 1

      I'm so far upstream past the IT/CS people

      On behalf of all CS majors, I take offense to that. ;)

    6. Re:ELE? by LighthouseJ · · Score: 1

      heh, you shouldn't, I just envision technology to be an assembly line.

      1. Someone has an idea.
      2. The EE's and I fabricate it.
      3. You CS guys make it perform it's purpose.
      4. IT guys make sure it keeps performing it's purpose.

    7. Re:ELE? by Hank+Scorpio · · Score: 1
      1. Someone has an idea.
      2. The EE's and I fabricate it.
      3. You CS guys make it perform its purpose.
      4. IT guys make sure it keeps performing its purpose.

      So, you're saying that the EE guys build something that doesn't work, and it takes a CS guy to make it work? Sounds like the CS guys are the most important link in that chain! :)

    8. Re:ELE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What in the world have you been doing with yourself all this time? Didn't you take the time to get a summer internship or two while you were in school?!

    9. Re:ELE? by LighthouseJ · · Score: 1

      Not so fast...

      It'll work but it's not a finished product without the CS guys. Likewise, the CS guys wouldn't have a job if it weren't for us EE/ECE guys to provide new technology for the market.

      It depends on what you're making too. I interviewed for a popular internship with a company called Leitch. Their local office created a PowerPC-based multichannel video communication system for use in hospitals and anyone that wants to make a television signal with a custom channel lineup. The product used basically only EE/ECE people because there would be an extremely minimal interface for the end users.

    10. Re:ELE? by Bill+Walker · · Score: 1
      I know a girl who graduated last year with a Masters in electrical engineering (5 yr. program). She couldn't find anything in the field, but ended working for patent lawyers who specialize in her area of expertise (something about optics, maybe? it's all Greek to me).

      She kind of stumbled into it, but maybe you should check for that kind of job. Based on the salary figures IT people are posting, it pays a lot better, too.

      --
      Please, for the love of God, no more car analogies.
    11. Re:ELE? by seb249 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more - would you like fries with that ?

    12. Re:ELE? by servognome · · Score: 1

      Actually should be
      Step 2. The EE's design it
      Step 3. the MatE/ChemE/MechE fabricate it
      etc.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    13. Re:ELE? by tuxtomas · · Score: 1
      No, he means an electrician that does the installing and maintenance. I've already applied for an apprenticeship 'casue like the OP stated.....it can't be outsourced. Electricians are hands on. EE's and ME's work can be done over the web.

      Until the robots replace us that is...
      Honestly though, it's a good gig. IBEW apprentice are paid fairly well and it gets better as you accumulate time. There is a shortage of skilled trades forecasted as everyone immediately goes to college to get that BA. While India is cranking out 1 million MBA's a year. I plan on working on my journeyman's card.

      --
      Open source- the greatest equalizer mankind has ever seen.
    14. Re:ELE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't despair. EE's are still one of the best paid professionals on the market. Just think about refocusing your skills.

      A strong programming background open the doors to work on the EDA segment of the market. There is fierce competition between the leaders of EDA/CAD so finding a good job there is possible.

      Think about polishing your skills on HDL languages like Verilog/VHDL, also enter into the system level design (SystemC, SystemVerilog). And finally polish your Numerical analysis skills (they are used in the design of analog/digital simulators).

      With any look you can start with +70K, and with experience, your salary will go above the 100k (I make around 130K).

      Just think, semiconductors are not dead yet.

      Cheers.

    15. Re:ELE? by ufnoise · · Score: 1

      As an electrical engineer, think about domain knowledge and how it may help you get your next job. Did you take any extra courses outside of programming? Do you like DSP, embedded systems, or circuit design? Its tougher to get jobs right now, so you have to be persistent in your job search.

    16. Re:ELE? by CommanderData · · Score: 1

      You should get into systems integration and industrial automation. There is demand for people with strong electrical and programming skills (more PLC programming than computer programming, but that has been changing). I run a consulting business, and I know two others that have their own businesses as well. We can never find good people to fill positions!

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
    17. Re:ELE? by locokamil · · Score: 1

      That I did... I made bloody sure I was well versed in Finance. I also have a very strong dual concentration in Optics/RF, as well as System Theory. :)

  35. Yeah but in India... by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1
    Salaries grew 14% in 2003.

    Summary: Indian workers are doing great, American corporations are doing great, American workers are doing lousy.

    Oh and tech companies are still lobbying hard for more H1B visas.

    1. Re:Yeah but in India... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Oh and tech companies are still lobbying hard for more H1B visas.

      That's because they can lie through their teeth and we don't do anything about it (collectively). In a world where labor and brains are cheap and plentiful, the political game is the only thing left to keep us from spiraling down into 3rd-world terms. We better learn to fight fire with fire.

    2. Re:Yeah but in India... by rifftide · · Score: 1

      If you're an American IT worker you hope that offshore salaries and buying power (from the weakened dollar) will increase to near parity with the US, when comparing similarly skilled workers. The other equilibrium scenario is much worse.

    3. Re:Yeah but in India... by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      true, except for the fact that India and China have such huge populations that the equilibrium point will probably be their average standard-of-living rising a little bit while ours falling dramatically.

    4. Re:Yeah but in India... by MochaMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whoa, hey, hey, hey. Don't blame India for doing well. Blame America for being a capitalist country, where profit is valued over its citizens livelihoods. India is doing what's right for itself and it's turned out incredibly well for them. Good for them. Perhaps America should figure out how to improve its own situation rather than blaming everyone else for the mess it's gotten itself into.

      H1Bs fit very nicely into a capitalist society, where the goal is to attract talented workers from all around the world and retain the best of the best. If you can't compete with that talent, perhaps you should look at another career, move to a country with policies that better reflect your worldview, or fight to have your country's policies changed.

      Note that one of the prerequisites for an H1B is that the worker is paid on par with what an American worker at the company is paid and that documentation has to go through INS review. I know this from the experience of having gone through the long, slow process of getting one to work two years in California (originally from Canada, but have worked in the US, Mexico and now live in Japan). There are obviously exceptions, but in my experience, us visa workers were paid on par with our American colleagues. Ensuring that this is the case is not the job of corporations, it's the job of the government. Have a word with them if you suspect a company of violating your country's laws.

      In any case, even if companies could get away with paying lower salaries to H1B workers, you can't blame them for taking advantage of a programme that expands the pool of talent available to them, made available to them by the government. It is also the INS's job to ensure that H1Bs are only issued for positions where a qualified American worker could not be found (or didn't apply). In any case, if you don't like the H1B programme or globalization in general, I suggest you address your complaints to your local congressperson or the INS, who are responsible for this sort of thing rather than complaining on slashdot.

    5. Re:Yeah but in India... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Don't blame India for doing well. Blame America for being a capitalist country, where profit is valued over its citizens livelihoods.

      If the H-1B program was held to a vote, I don't think it would pass. It is corporate bribery (compaign donations, lobbying, etc.) that put it in place.

      Note that one of the prerequisites for an H1B is that the worker is paid on par with what an American worker at the company is paid and that documentation has to go through INS review.

      The INS have no time nor knowledge to minitor actual work. They mostly look at papers, not people doing actual work. I have seen manipulation with my own eyes. Here are 7 ways to trick the federal government:

      1. Resume Templating - Add every skill that a given H-1B candidate has on his/her resume into the "needed skills" line of the application form. That way the "needs" profile will never match a citizen above the probability of winning the Instant Millionaire lottery. Government inspectors are usually too overworked and/or not knowledgeable enough to check and follow-up on actual skills used on the job, especially if there are more than a few. (This approach was also covered in another message.)

      2. Undocumented Experience - Claim a highly experienced H-1B applicant is really only a beginner, and thus a company gets experience at beginner rates. Inspectors cannot realistically check somebody's skill background as obtained inside a foreign country. If they do find out, claim you didn't know. Just make sure the experience is not on your "official" copy of the visa worker's resume. It is an easy lie to get away with.

      3. Take Advantage of Situation - Work the H-1B overtime or weekends without extra pay. Complaining risks getting the H-1B sent home, so they usually keep quiet. Plus, they may not understand how our legal system works or be intimidated by a process foreign to them. (US money is worth more to them due to exchange rates when they eventually go back home, and thus they often just live with labor abuses without complaint in order reduce risk while obtaining their financial nest-egg.)

      4. Tinker with Titles - Information technology (IT) titles are often vague, inconsistent, and overlapping. It is hard to penalize a company for using the wrong IT title on an application form because there practically is no such thing as an objectively "wrong title" in IT. Plus, most IT work involves a mixture of a lot of different skills, such as programming, analysis, debugging, customer support, documentation, etc. There are no consensus metrics for categorizing these based on ratios or percentage of usage.

      5. Outsource the Buck - A big company can contract the H-1B from a small, fly-by-night company that keeps a portion of an H-1B's pay, delays paychecks, does not pay overtime, etc. The big company that contracts out is then not exposed to the risk of dubious activity. They can claim that they did not know the contractor was abusing the visa workers (and may not know). Such small contracting companies are often staffed by people from the H-1B's originating country such that if they are caught or risk being caught, the company folds up and goes back to their home country where they can do other business. The risk of real penalties is very small. (Cross-country white-collar crime investigation tends to be poorly coordinated between countries involved.)

      6. Shred Citizen Resumes - Companies applying for visas are required to place an ad in a typical job listings source and review received resumes or applications for qualified citizens. Government inspectors may ask to see such resumes. However, if somebody takes citizens resume and shreds them, nobody besides the shredder will ever know they existed.

      7. Lopsided Interviews - Government inspectors don't sit through most live interviews. Thus, a company trying to weed out citizens can simply ask tough questions when interviewing the citizen, but be easy on the visa candidate.

    6. Re:Yeah but in India... by hanshotfirst · · Score: 1

      This is the nature of a "global" economy as opposed to the nationalistic economy of days past. If you treat economy on a global scale... free trade, etc... The work will go to where it is cheapest, and those where the jobs leave MUST adapt or go back to burger flipping and hunter-gathering. Its good for the economy where the jobs go, bad for the economy where jobs leave, and really nets the "global" economy -0-. It continues to boggle my mind that we cry for a global economy and desire to join a global community, but then gripe when it happens because the impact is a lowering of the lifestyle we are used to from our nationalistic history.

      --
      Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
    7. Re:Yeah but in India... by ivlad · · Score: 0

      Well, I've heard Bush told, that world-wide freedom (whateve that means for him) is the task number one. Not the good economic in his country. I've probably missed the moment when USA president became the world president... ;)

    8. Re:Yeah but in India... by yic · · Score: 1
      The company I will be working for doesn't treat their employees on H-1B visas in any different way than the others. I also have friends on H1B at many companies (some: Microsoft, Amazon, Oracle, Microstrategy, ATI) that are not treated in any way different from American PR or citizens. As for pay, of course I don't have absolute numbers, but as anecdotal evidence, I'm being offered pay that is in line with the average salary range for my experience.

      If the H-1B program was held to a vote, I don't think it would pass. It is corporate bribery (compaign donations, lobbying, etc.) that put it in place.

      I don't know about this, but I believe allowing H1Bs helps grow the American economy significantly. And anyway, in the current job market, most small companies are not sponsoring H1B visas anymore -- I know this because I was job hunting this year. The only companies that are sponsoring H1Bs are those big corporations that have the money and absolutely want top talent. So the hiring differentiator is not really the pay or how hard the employee can be slavedrived, imho.

    9. Re:Yeah but in India... by esanbock · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would only fit with capitalist nature if everyone in the US could get a work visa in India and other countries. Free trade should work both ways. Since it doesn't, H-1B ammounts to a labor subsidy. TIn case you know who Milton Freedman is, I'm almost quoting his views on H-1B. This isn't about free trade, it's about subsidized corporate labor and destroying the middle class.

    10. Re:Yeah but in India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but in India...

      people don't eat beef so no thank you.

    11. Re:Yeah but in India... by metlin · · Score: 1

      Tell me, what is stopping you from going to India?

      It's just as easy for you to get a job and move in to India -- one of my good friends married an American and he's now settled in Bangalore with her.

      There is nothing stopping Americans from packing up their bags and going to India - except for the culture shock and difference in lifestyle.

    12. Re:Yeah but in India... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I don't know about this, but I believe allowing H1Bs helps grow the American economy significantly.

      That is utter bullshit. It may make some ugly trinket cost $2.94 instead of $2.95, but put a lot of techies out of work. Significant my ass.

      Why not then open up the borders and let every Tom, Dick, and Hari flood every profession, not just IT? Fuck lawyers and doctors also, not just programmers.

    13. Re:Yeah but in India... by esanbock · · Score: 1

      There was already an article on this. It's almost impossible to get a work Visa in India. They're rightfully protective of their labor.

    14. Re:Yeah but in India... by metlin · · Score: 1


      Have _you_ tried?

  36. Sad to see security so high by Gothmolly · · Score: 0

    when the security weenies that work for my company are among the lamest, most rigid, least intelligent or intellectually curious technical people I've had the misfortune to work with. Give me an old crusty Unix admin over some alphabet soup Security Professional any day.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  37. What about un-employed hackers? by agent · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about un-employed hackers?
    five percent of zero is still zero.
    Damn you Bush for making me work for a living.
    http://www.wom.cc
    Proud Owner!
    Peace.

    1. Re:What about un-employed hackers? by llefler · · Score: 1

      What about un-employed hackers?
      five percent of zero is still zero.


      Well since you asked so nicely, we'll give you a 25% raise this year. You can be the leader in the industry.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  38. Stupid Liberal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Liberal's are o so whiny. The way a real man prevents each person's "share" of the national debt from increasing, while still allowing Bush to spend like a crackwhore, is to fornicate like crazy. Then you cut more pieces of pie. It's simple stupid!

    1. Re:Stupid Liberal! by SoupaFly · · Score: 1
      The way a real man prevents each person's "share" of the national debt from increasing, while still allowing Bush to spend like a crackwhore, is to fornicate like crazy. Then you cut more pieces of pie. It's simple stupid!

      This is why Social Darwinism doesn't work. Stupid people breed too fast.

  39. 0.5 - 0.5 = 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0.5 increase in wages and 0.5 increase in prices equals 0.

  40. Offshoring Jobs and Salary by reporter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I stopped at a hi-tech job fair today in Los Angeles. Most of the recruiters with whom I spoke told me that their management is currently exporting most of their information-technology (IT) jobs overseas. The most popular destinations are India and China. What is interesting is that the job tables (at the fair) having Indian immigrants tended to praise the benefits of offshoring to India. Meanwhile, the job tables having Chinese immigrants tended to praise the benefits of offshoring to China.

    Even more interesting is that engineering jobs requiring minimal training are also being offshored. A good example is quality-assurance (QA) software engineers. A Chinese engineer, with a horribly thick accent, told me that his company does not hire any American QA engineers because doing QA is much cheaper in mainland China. So, when his company completes a major software package, the management ships it via Internet to mainland China, and the Chinese QA engineers will then test the package.

    In this never ending offshoring, what is the next "bottom rung" (of engineering) to leave America? Verilog engineers?

    1. Re:Offshoring Jobs and Salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, buddy, those people you're calling "engineers"? They're not engineers. Real engineers do not have nearly as much to worry about.

    2. Re:Offshoring Jobs and Salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let that be a lesson to you... The obvious solution is to modify your resume to indicate how much experience you have in preparing test cases! Write up good test cases so that the outsourced teams can test the software. There's a niche.

    3. Re:Offshoring Jobs and Salary by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that Indians in Bangalore can't get a PE license?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Offshoring Jobs and Salary by Deideldorfer · · Score: 0

      It has to stop at Sanitation Engineers. You can't email your garbage to India ...

      --

      Power off before disconnecting connecting connector. Seen on a cash register
  41. Re:Need Linux Help (Slightly OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ln -s /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.200.2

  42. I'll throw in one other factor. by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If you lose enough of the low-paid jobs to India, the average salary goes up, even if nobody who stays employed ever sees another cent.


    For that matter, if you lose all of the low-paid jobs, and cut everyone else's salary by less than half the difference, the average salary STILL goes up.


    The US has outsourced a LOT of the lower-paid jobs, but relatively few of the higher-paid ones. To achieve a paltry 0.5%, there must be an unbelievable downward pressure on wages. And both bosses and the Government will be keen to see that figure stay low, as it will reduce the inflationary pressures.


    The days of "a fair day's pay for a fair day's work" have passed, and everyone is joining in the game of massaging the statistics.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  43. Got nothing last year. by gelfling · · Score: 1, Funny

    So some lucky bastard brought up the average with a whopping 1% increase.

    1. Re:Got nothing last year. by servognome · · Score: 1

      It was me... sorry, its just because they raised the minimum wage

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  44. Does IT include progammers? by LS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because $93k doesn't seem that much for a top notch programmer.

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    1. Re:Does IT include progammers? by bwy · · Score: 1

      Because $93k doesn't seem that much for a top notch programmer.

      $52,500-$83,250 for a programmer according to the article. Hell, they have a B.A. down for $56,000-$80,500 which is basically the same range. I've never known a B.A. to make anything above the low end of that range but I also know programmers who make above the top end of their range.

      I see no info on what kind of sampling they did to make these projections.

    2. Re:Does IT include progammers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a BA and make 84k as a programmer. Also have a MA too.

    3. Re:Does IT include progammers? by bwy · · Score: 1

      B.A. = Business Analyst

    4. Re:Does IT include progammers? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      $52,500-$83,250 for a programmer according to the article. Hell, they have a B.A. down for $56,000-$80,500 which is basically the same range. I've never known a B.A. to make anything above the low end of that range but I also know programmers who make above the top end of their range.

      Interestingly, business analyst is something that is supposed to increase in demand under offshoring. If it is increasing in demand, apparently it's not in pay.

  45. Careful! by rackhamh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know the parent is a joke, but it's important not to confuse average pay increase with your annual raise amount. It's possible for the average pay to increase only 0.5%, with most people getting 5% raises.

    Fictional scenario
    -------

    Before:
    Employee 1 - 10,000/yr
    Employee 2 - 20,000/yr
    Employee 3 - 300,000/yr

    After:
    Employee 1 - 10,500/yr
    Employee 2 - 21,000/yr
    Employee 3 - 300,150/yr

    In this case, the two worker bees each got a 5% raise, while the mega-rich CIO got a measly $150 (it's an improbable example on many levels, but just to prove a point). The average pay only increased 0.5%, but MOST people got 5% raises.

    1. Re:Careful! by Fred_A · · Score: 2

      In real life though, the CEO probably tripled his salary while the thousands of employees took a cut. Hence the average 0.5% raise.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    2. Re:Careful! by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      Could you give me some real life data to corroberate your claims? Or is this an example of real life speculation designed to support an inherently emotional world view?

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    3. Re:Careful! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Not at 3:20, however there have been numerous occurences of CEOs getting huge raises while simultaneously lowering wages or laying off hundreds or thousands of workers.

      It has happened a lot here in Europe and I don't see why it wouldn't in the US.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    4. Re:Careful! by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      Fair enough.

      Although I definately think that the high-ups in a corporation should be the first to accept a salary reduction, the numbers don't add up to any signifcance. Meaning, if I drop salaries $5,000 a year for 2,000 workers, and give myself and my 10 colleagues a $50,000 raise, I've saved the company $10 million and taken away $500 thousand.

      In other words, it can't be said that I'm lowering people's salaries to give myself a raise.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    5. Re:Careful! by metamatic · · Score: 1

      graph of top 1% of earners' pay vs average worker pay

      'nuff said?

      I thought the widening income gap was common knowledge; just do a Google search for "CEO pay" or "income gap" and you'll find a ton of studies and pages of statistics to back them up.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    6. Re:Careful! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      It's more the principle of the thing than the economic side. But then, who has ever heard of a CEO with principles ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    7. Re:Careful! by stephenbooth · · Score: 1

      What I've seen a lot of is that director and senior executive level management will not have a payrise themselves (to justify giving the employees no rise, a very small rise or even a pay cut) then give themselves a big bonus.

      As a variation on this theme, in one certain large public sector body here in the UK the salaries of directors are all a proportion of the Chief Executive's salary. A number of years ago he froze his salary and went on a bonus scheme set up so that he was getting between 10 and 20% more per annum. He announced to the other directors what his projected income for the next year was (not telling them the split between salary and bonus) and they all expected a 10% pay rise themselves. There was much wailing an gnashingof teeth when they discovered what he had actually done, by which time they had already accepted their salaries for the next year.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    8. Re:Careful! by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Combine that graph with this one (the one under "Who Pays Income Taxes?") and you'll see why I'm still not convinced.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    9. Re:Careful! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      So the one who can afford to pay taxes pay taxes ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    10. Re:Careful! by metamatic · · Score: 1

      This isn't a discussion about income taxes, it's a discussion of whether average wages or top 1% wages are growing. Good attempt at distraction, though.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    11. Re:Careful! by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      No my point is that if we combine our data, the top 20% aren't actually making any more money; their raises are only keeping their net income even. If they didn't give themselves raises, they'd start losing money because of higher taxes.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    12. Re:Careful! by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      Posted from my other response:

      No my point is that if we combine our data, the top 20% aren't actually making any more money; their raises are only keeping their net income even. If they didn't give themselves raises, they'd start losing money because of higher taxes.

      I don't understand why this isn't relevant.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    13. Re:Careful! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Oh, well, it's possible, although I haven't seen any data to support this. And the level of raises and bonuses I've seen reportes would suggest huge taxation then...

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  46. wanna stop outsourcing? Hang some politicians! by Cryofan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    After indicting and trying in a court of law them for treason, of course. I am not advocating any lawlessness.

    But I just bet that would do wonders for the IT job market.

    Just my opinion!

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  47. Does that include by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

    The poor sots like me who got laid off, and managed to find a new job but at a 10% pay cut?

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  48. Re:Need Linux Help (Slightly OT) by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

    Is the problem that I am running Ubuntu x64 version?

    It could be. Using x86_64 to run 32 bit compiles (such as your thunderbird) will require 32 bit libraries for compatibility. Unfortunately apt-get/synaptic isn't architecture aware.

    Your best bet is to use synaptic and find libgtk 32 bit, it may be labelled differently. Install that, or wait until Ubuntu finally upgrades to Thunderbird 1.0, using the system installed thunderbird for now.

    --
    Can I get an eye poke?
    Dog House Forum
  49. Source? by c0d3r · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The source is robert half technology. They are a head hunting firm that agressively robs its consultants. I think they just want to pay less to engineers so are posting these bogus rates. In the silicon valley you can add 20k to each one of those numbers easily.

  50. good luck by bobalu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Think "electrician".

    I started as a tech, spent the last 27 yrs in all manner of developer-consultant gigs, and I'm seriously thinking of applying for a journeyman electrician job.

    Intellectually it's cake, it can't be outsourced, and they make the same money.

    Cheers...

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
    1. Re:good luck by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Actually, blue-collar trades are doing fairly well. Unions and/or physical location needs help keep them from being devalued from global competition.

  51. Good news by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2, Funny

    for the 73 IT people left in the United States

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  52. Not too bad... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A 0.5% isn't too bad. At the last company I worked at, my boss gave me a $0.05/hour increase and he thought that was a big deal. He got mad when I reminded him that the company five years ago -- under better management -- routinely gave me 40% raises.

    Anyway, I found out his nickel was bigger than mine since he was able to build a house on the coast when most people couldn't afford to buy a house in Silicon Valley.

  53. H.R. 5413 by esanbock · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-NJ) introduced a bill to reform the H-1B visa program titled the "Defend the American Dream Act of 2004". His strong letter to the editor of the New Jersey Herald indicates that the bill will be re-introduced in the 2005 Congress. I can't recall the last time I have read a written statement from a public official that was so highly critical of H-1B.

    To review the American Dream Act follow these instructions:

    1) go to http://thomas.loc.gov
    2) enter H.R. 5413 into the search engine

    Pascrell's website is at:
    http://www.pascrell.house.gov/

    Click "Contact Bill" to give them feedback.

  54. Thanks Boss? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL, you must be a liberal, blaming others. Take responsibility and work for yourself.

  55. Choco rations increased to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...25 grams! Double-plus-good Winston!

  56. At a finance company in Canada by standing_still · · Score: 0

    I really lucked out - I got almost a 29% increase (28.something)

    I'm the proud owner of 69,000 a year (barely 5 yrs. experience).

    1. Re:At a finance company in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      brag on loser. we believe you.

      NOT.

      You are making 6 $ an hour at Micky Ds

    2. Re:At a finance company in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's about $56K USD. I made (as a SE) right around that at about that same experience level. During the dot com boom. Things must be really hopping in Canada.

    3. Re:At a finance company in Canada by orasio · · Score: 1

      You Canadians and your silly changing dollars.
      What is that in a strong currency?
      How many euros is that?

  57. inflation this past year was over 3% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and this didn't include housing price increases..

  58. Who uses those titles anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know we sure don't. I've never met anyone with those titles in my 13+ years in paid IT.

  59. Same old news for me...Back as Backwards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We lowly IT instructors just can't seem to climb in that IT salarie hierarchy. I think I'm going back for my masters. :/"

    I find it telling that the job that teaches the other "rising" jobs, itself isn't being paid much.

  60. Re:Need Linux Help (Slightly OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for the information.

  61. Should read: "from the LESS-in-the-pocket dept." by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 2, Interesting

    IT salaries to rise 0.5%? That's great...

    ...until you factor in inflation, to get the *real* salary growth rate, rather than the nominal rate.

    Consumer price inflation (CPI) is around 3.26%.

    Basic microeconomics (the Fisher Equation) says you take the wage increase rate and subtract the inflation rate, in order to get the real wage growth.

    0.5% - 3.26% = -2.76%

    So, assuming your wage increases with this 0.5% rise, you're still not increasing your pay enough to outpace inflation. This means your real purchasing power will be decreasing this year, by 2.76% if the figure above remains anywhere near accurate.

    Salary rising by 0.5% this year? Quite a shitter, if you ask me. But, of course, it could be worse (we could be seeing negative growth).

    (The data security guys still come out ahead though: 5.1% - 3.26% = 1.84% real pay increase. At $90k/year, that's another $1656 in purchasing power they can afford, in real terms.)

  62. Source?-Robert Half Technology==EDS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " The source is robert half technology. "

    I'm glad you said that. I've noticed and replied to many of their job listings over the years. Glad I didn't succeed.

  63. you make even more if.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you only had a brain :)

  64. Raise? by glockNine · · Score: 1

    In other news Inflation was 3.3% last year according to the CPI.

    http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cpi.pdf

    so, accounting for inflation, this "0.5% raise" is an effective 2.8% drop in average IT wages. Just goes to show that statistics can say anything, but their meaning is often obscured.

  65. ARRGHH now my BOSS may find out. by lordmage · · Score: 1

    Stop posting forcasts of incredibly low pay figures. Only put rosey forecasts out so my boss will give me a better raise.

    Why do you think the raises get low? They read the pessimistic journals.

    Blah.

    --
    I can program myself out of a Hello World Contest!!
  66. What about support workers by ToadMan8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is no mention in the article about wages for support workers - I am a support analyst at a medium-large (17,000 undergrad) University and they are doing a wage study - I wonder if I'll be making more than I do now. We have lots of money at the University. We don't just do support either; we do project work too and clean machines / administer Perfigo, etc. Any ideas what the average wages of us is?

    --
    I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
    1. Re:What about support workers by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I heard the new apartment-style housing is being funded by salary cutbacks in IT Services. Hiring the two new analysts is just a red herring ;)

    2. Re:What about support workers by ToadMan8 · · Score: 1

      Grrrrr. :-P ;)

      --
      I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
  67. Re:Not fair! We can't even buy armor for soldiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod parent up... this was not flame bait, it is the truth !

  68. there's tradeoffs by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    Living in major cities costs more. Sure, he could probably make twice as much in Silicon Valley--but he might well have expenses so much higher than he'd actually end up with less money left over.

  69. In other news... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ...an entire R&D department was staffed in Bangalore for the price of a new microwave oven.

    Kinda hard to compete when lunch a Whopper costs more than an average daily salary over there.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  70. In other words . . . by jhylkema · · Score: 1

    Salaries are only increasing 0.5%, which means they aren't even keeping up with inflation.

    In other words, IT salaries are actually dropping in that they're not keeping up with the ever-increasing cost of living.

    In other words, start typing your resume and get ready to train your Indian replacement hired under the pretext of a "labor shortage."

    1. Re:In other words . . . by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      ---Salaries are only increasing 0.5%, which means they aren't even keeping up with inflation.

      Wow, government speak!

      ---In other words, IT salaries are actually dropping in that they're not keeping up with the ever-increasing cost of living.

      In other words, when the governmnet doesnt spend as much as it thought they should, it's a Tax cut. Yeah, I see this similar funny logic.

      And I didnt know that you were required to get a raise.

      ---In other words, start typing your resume and get ready to train your Indian replacement hired under the pretext of a "labor shortage."

      Oh, come on. Who's going to trust a foreginer for their network maintenance? Or can they crawl under their desk to diagnose Cindy's network connectivity problems?

      Guess what, not every job can be 'shipped out'. Figure out what jobs those might be, and get em.

      --
    2. Re:In other words . . . by jhylkema · · Score: 1

      And I didnt know that you were required to get a raise.

      Well, seeing as how the CEO gets a 40% raise even when the company loses money . . .

    3. Re:In other words . . . by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      If you want to be treated like a CEO, get a CEO job. Whose fault is it if you're not willing to do what it takes to get one of those jobs?

      Personally, I wouldn't want one of those jobs. Simply doing my job well (sysadmin/programmer/etc) and looking for ways to help the organization make more money or save money they're already spending all contributes to my value to the organization. I'd rather do things related to my chosen profession and make a decent living than have to do what a CEO has to do.

    4. Re:In other words . . . by suresk · · Score: 1

      ---Salaries are only increasing 0.5%, which means they aren't even keeping up with inflation.

      Wow, government speak!


      No, that isn't government-speak, it's called economics. If a .5% raise makes it so you can't afford as much as you could the previous year, you have lost purchasing power and your real wage has decreased.

      ---In other words, IT salaries are actually dropping in that they're not keeping up with the ever-increasing cost of living.

      In other words, when the governmnet doesnt spend as much as it thought they should, it's a Tax cut. Yeah, I see this similar funny logic.


      You are comparing apples and oranges, the original poster's observations were 100% correct from an economic standpoint. It is you who is displaying a stunning lack of logic.

  71. Re:Ugh - Don't get involved with RHI by Spicerun · · Score: 1

    You aren't kidding. Its amazing that they're the ones doing these surveys showing how low pay is for the IT sector, and they're the ones doing the lowballing. I pity the poor contractor who has to work for them.

    I did work for them and just about went bankrupt in a crappy job paying 50% of my normal salary while trying to stay employed. They not only lowballed me, but they took the client company for a higher rate for my services than any other contract house I've ever worked for (easily triple my normal salary).

    Be very skeptical of what they pass off as factual statistic.

  72. Treason? by Millennium · · Score: 1

    How do you figure they've done anything that they could be convicted of treason for, then? I suppose it depends on the country, but in the US treason is very narrowly defined, and can only come from two actions: committing acts of war against the US, or aiding and abetting those who are.

    Last I checked, India wasn't at war with the US. Quite the opposite, actually. Given that, I'm not sure you can make a treason charge stick.

    Now, there are other nations with less-strict definitions of treason, and you might be able to make it stick there. Then again, how many of them are involved in the outsourcing stuff?

  73. Our BSA's.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    should be happy that they are still collecting a paycheck with the dismal job they did in '04. Had to increase my team's time estimates for job completion by 50% to cover the work our BSA's aren't doing.

    1. Re:Our BSA's.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is a BSA?

      Also, you should fire them and hire fluffers for the remaining staff.

    2. Re:Our BSA's.... by hyperstation · · Score: 1
  74. Excellent! by dr_eaerth · · Score: 1

    Excellent! .5%! That means 5 cents more an hour. Hooray for my ramen budget!

    1. Re:Excellent! by iamatlas · · Score: 1

      So, if 1/2 of 1% gives you 5 cents more an hour, you're only making $10 an hour, in the IT sector. You're practically working for over-seas wages already- why not just move to India and do the same job and live like a king? or Maharaja?

  75. Union Pressure by Bruha · · Score: 1

    Our salary's keep rising around 4-6% a year but our company is not union, but if they killed our raises especially since were extremely profitable unions could get a toehold.

    I for one am against our company unionizing it would only ruin the apmosphere.. glad I'm in Texas where it's right to work.

    1. Re:Union Pressure by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It sounds like unions are providing some good indirect bargaining power for you, yet you spite them.

  76. Mortgage! by Descartes · · Score: 1

    Although I respect you wanting to buy a house in 10 years, you could probably buy a house right now without changing your yearly savings rate. Find an online mortgage calculator and do the math, $130k sounds cheap to a city dweller like me.

    It depends on what you're paying in rent but I'll bet you can pull it off and if you've got some downpayment you could probably get a rate that isn't much above inflation.

    Even if you decide to move in a few years, if you are carefully about the place you choose to buy you could probably turn a profit on selling it.

    1. Re:Mortgage! by Descartes · · Score: 1

      Crap, OT. I meant to add that the only problem is that salaries aren't going up faster than inflation :(

  77. locations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone doing php/related web development in south florida? what you would expect in salary for mid-senior level developers?

  78. Could be worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least you don't work at Qwest...

  79. Whoop dee frickin' doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was unemployed for 15 months, took a $7,000 paycut on my current job and lengthened my commute by 18 miles. A 0.5% raise wouldn't even cover my mileage.

  80. Re:Need Linux Help (Slightly OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well thanks for the info. Looks like I am going to have to download and compile strace? This is going to be another set of headaches I'm sure?

  81. Salary does not make happieness by InfusionX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm going to contradict the wage increase. I haven't seen a wage increase in almost 2 years. I won't complain. How many of you actually enjoy going to work? I look forward to my daily experience dealing with the joys of being a programmer, support tech, etc. We'd all like to see a raise, but be real. The average wage going up does not mean you like the job. Choose happiness at work before the extra nickel.

    --
    It's all about RTFM.
  82. A funny thing happens when you double your salary by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    Depending on the circumstances, you can triple, quadruple, or even infinitely increase your taxes.

    I make decent money, and my biggest single annual expense is, without a doubt, TAX (yes, twice as much as my mortgage).

    So, before you blithely recommend moving to a bigger city for a better salary, you need to consider lots of things that go into "quality of life".

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  83. No Salary Growth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What seems to have escaped many people (I think)
    is that the software sevelopment sector has
    not only seen declining salaries in recent times
    but even more troubling is that salaries have
    remained flat for a decade. No meaningful salary
    increases in that amount of time translates into
    a lot of lost income. While your income has
    remained flat the cost of a typical home in a
    typical metro area has probably risen at least
    $40k to $60k.

  84. No! Dont! by prakslash · · Score: 1
    Electrican Salary

    Software Developer Salary

    You can check out salary.com for salaries of other IT personnel such as SW Engineers, Network Support Techs, Programmers, etc. All make more than Electricians.

    1. Re:No! Dont! by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      wow thats still alot better than au

      Average call centre pay = $32k AU
      Avereage software = 45k-65k based on common adds

      Those 70-90k ones are rare as astranaut jobs

      Though here we get plumbers, cabinet fitters, which after working overtime and extra hours can earn 100k easy. So much for brains=dollars.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    2. Re:No! Dont! by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1
      So much for brains=dollars.

      According to the logic of the market, one wonders who really has the brains.

      (Please note that I'm criticising the logic of the market, not you!)

  85. Our politicians should be tried for Treason by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    You wrote:

    How do you figure they've done anything that they could be convicted of treason for, then? I suppose it depends on the country, but in the US treason is very narrowly defined, and can only come from two actions: committing acts of war against the US, or aiding and abetting those who are.


    From wikipedia:

    "In law, treason is the crime of disloyalty to one's nation. A person who reneges on an oath of loyalty or a pledge of allegiance, and in some way willfully cooperates with an enemy, is considered to be a traitor. Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as: "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]."

    These politicians took an oath to be loyal to America and to protect America from harm and injury. Yet they have sold our jobs overseas and allowed foreigners to come in and take them and drive down wages. THey have cooperated with the corporate enemy and are guilty of treason.
    I maintain that this is extremely injurious to the nation, and that they should therefore by treason, and if found guilty, be hanged.

    The American legal system is flexible and subject to interpretation. Now you know my interpretation....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  86. I second that vote by ThoreauHD · · Score: 2

    When IT and labor has fired and offshored most of it's workforce, .5% for the few left that got demoted or overworked doesn't make my day any brighter. I sure as hell don't see it doing 3 jobs.

  87. It's amazing by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

    As smart as so many /.ers are, it seems most of the vocal would rather moan about what they're not getting than properly and actively manage what we *are* getting - it's not how much you get, it's how much you keep and what you do with it... Wy wife and I *together* only gross a touch over $50k - in salary and wages. Investments? ah, yes...

    --
    Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
  88. $43,250 by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

    The bottom?

    When to I get my pay rise!!!!

    1. Re:$43,250 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DEAR boss,

      I Desirve a pay rise!!!

      Sined,
      TOny Hoyle

  89. Sounds like an infomercial by shuz · · Score: 1

    Does this new mystical job that I can get in 2 weeks also come with a special spatula that is dishwasher safe?

    OK I digress,
    Yes I have identified at least 13 sysadmin jobs near me in Minnesota just tonight. This is a heck of a lot better then a year ago when I was job searching. Now I just have to get rid of my fear of retaliation from my boss if "she" (yes she) were to ever find out. *sigh* Cest La Vie

    --
    There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
  90. Huh? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
    The difference between paying down 5% versus 20% is less than you save by paying PMI and investing the 15% in other ways. If your goal is to buy a house outright, then putting down as much as possible may be the way to go.

    If, on the other hand, you just want a place to live and want to build up a bit of equity, putting down the least amount as possible is better.

    --
    Yeah, right.
  91. USE vs India by Wizarth · · Score: 1

    I assume this is for the USA. What you need to worry about is: How much will wages go up in India? If its less, well then... how would you like to train your replacement today?

    1. Re:USE vs India by adityapk · · Score: 1
      http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/articl eshow?msid=278438/

      From the article :
      NEW DELHI: Double digit salary increases are back with a bang in corporate India. On average employees in private corporate sector in India got 10.38% salary increments during 2003 compared to just 9.7% during 2002. The increment is projected to further go up to 11.02% during 2004. Moreover India has topped the Asia Pacific region with highest salary increases among 11 countries followed by Korea, Philippines and China.

    2. Re:USE vs India by Wizarth · · Score: 1

      Wow, thanks, that really says something about the differing economies strengths.

  92. Re:ARRGHH now my BOSS may find out. by Bellyflop · · Score: 1

    Yeah like Robert Half doesn't have an incentive to post a less-than-rosy outlook so that their candidates will accept whatever will keep their clients happy? I don't trust them one bit.

  93. US Job Market-McLove. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Taking some of the "glamour" out will be better for the industry, and it will be a better fit for the people who choose to do this. Money is, or should, be a secondary concern for everyone involved - there are bigger priorities here."

    Hehe. Well the present growth in the fast food, retail, and hospitality industry must be because everyone's doing it "for the love."

  94. Teksystems by CiXeL · · Score: 1

    Want to know whats really driving down the wages? Check this out:

    > Do you think that TEKsystems got to be one of the
    > biggest based off of their salespeople and their new
    > suits...try it was due to providing the best service
    > and the best candidates.

    They typically hire the cheapest contractors you can find, and you get what you pay for. They prefer H-1Bs because they can hire them for less than Americans, and they know that H-1Bs work under the strain of not being able to withstand being fired from a job because their visa will expire.

    http://www.cedaily.com/bbs/horror/index.cgi?nofr am es;read=3383

  95. In other news-A blustery salesman. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Really not bad at all. (I have no affiliation with any mobile home compnay, just my 2 cents)"

    But you do have an affiliation with the tornado, and hurricane coalition.

  96. good luck-Unions found beaten and stabbed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Unions and/or physical location needs help keep them from being devalued from global competition."

    "Unions" are under attack in the US.

    "Physical location" is sneaking over the border.

    1. Re:good luck-Unions found beaten and stabbed. by Tablizer · · Score: 1


      "Unions" are under attack in the US.

      Only outside of manufacturing.

  97. AU Job Market is crock of shit by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    10 years + experience and good experience too, not just stuffing around, but making real global stuff, and its still hard to get a job. The problem?

    1. most jobs are .net/java web front ends to sqlserver back ends, not real high tech C++ stuff
    2. the rest are oracle/dba crap
    3. and the final is some manager stuff/tech support crapola
    4. with 1% perhaps something interesting in C/C++ thats technical
    5. with so many sub fields, its difficult to get any where unless you have the exact experience/history, which personaly makes for another bored out of his mind employee, you need someone skilled and smart but not necessarily someone who has done it before so that they arent bored shitless doing the same thing again.

    WHY? because 99% of companies dont do much R&D any more, the tax reductions for R&D have dropped. Also most companies would rather just buy something from USA or ASIA rather than do any real work to make it. Very Very lazy businesses here.

    Yes Australia is mainly mineral exports, food exports, financial services exports, construction, and administration. Real R&D? well 2% of GDP, most peoples attitudes are "the usa can do it better, why should we bother, its easier just to order it and get a tax expense discount"

    Once everything is really really well automated and gui friendly, and super easy configurable, you'll see massive IT unemployed. Thankfully, attacks, spyware/viriss' cause enough problems to keep IT staff busy, but thats just Admin, not development.

    Games market is crap too, why ask for degrees when I bet the people that started those companies have none, or had none when they started. So that market is left to just grads starting out or people with 3 years + on their belt. No new commers welcome, unless you know the startup execs personally.

    And you wonder why more and more people are slipping into the underground economy of the underworld and untaxed cash world.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  98. Excellent!-Ketchup career. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the rest of America. May I take your cap and cane?

  99. just be thankful you don't work in Florida by DragonTHC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FL has the lowest salaries in the country as far as IT goes. Especially south FL. one recent job posting asked for a linux support tech with pay of $7 per hour. Pc technicians with 4 years of experience can expect $10 hourly. Forget health benefits.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
    1. Re:just be thankful you don't work in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Florida also has no state income tax, and a much lower cost of living than somewhere like New York or California.

    2. Re:just be thankful you don't work in Florida by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      what's a "linux support tech"? i live and work here as a developer and salaries for skilled IT people are not "the lowest in the country".

    3. Re:just be thankful you don't work in Florida by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      and a much lower cost of living than somewhere like New York or California.

      although there is no state income tax in FL, you obviously have no idea what you are talking about, if you're referring to south florida.

  100. %25 Increase Here by soul_hk · · Score: 1

    this year I opted for the following option - - %25 salary increase - shorter working hours At the expense of - - not having to solve customer problems - not needing to work crazy IT hours - not needing to work in 'off peak' times such as weekends By moving out of the IT department into one of those customer facing kiss-ass jobs.. good for a change at least i think!

  101. I dont see CEO in any MIT course by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    yeah but doing that doesnt deserve a $50000 raise, since any 12 year old could easily compute that logic/maths in class.

    The amount of maths/logic decision trees that any programmer has to go through daily is 50x more than any CFO/been counter.

    A better way is to do this;

    A) Company A creates a 50million dollar investment fund, and transfers all employees homeloans to it at a reduced rate with nofees, therefore the employees save, and the company saves and makes a profit too.
    B) Company A makes its own credit card, again no fees, just lower rates.
    C) Company A creates a bulk dvd purchase system run by the employees, so all staff can buy dvds at 50% below retail cost.

    There are many services that a big corporate can do which costs NOTHING and makes profits but can offer them at below market levels but only to employees. This creates extra savings for employees which then dont need pay rises because the company is helping reduce their costs.

    Sure this solution isnt pro capitalism since it reduces costs/expenses and pools resources to save money like a mini commy nation, but who cares. This solution is whats worth a $50000 raise to the CFO, not some grade 6 math and simple simluation experiements in some spread sheet which any moron can do.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  102. They will learn when labor market tighten again by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Penny-penching companies learn the hard way the true cost of that strategy, when the entire workforce is chomping at the bit to leave and will if they can.

    Somehow I suspect companies like Google are not as miserly as others, even though many people are clomoring to work there.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  103. Odd by SuperKendall · · Score: 1


    From looking around at companies I have been in, I would swear it's the other way around!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  104. I fear for Santa Cruz by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    Try Santa Cruz, shoebox wedged into a lot with hardly a yard, no garage (as it was probably turned into another room or is full of stuff, so you park on the street) $600K and up. Try to find a job here, though. For central coast Calif, $65K household income is considered the poverty line.

    No doubt. As someone who grew up in SC County, left, and came back a few years ago, I can tell you all signs indicate to me that Santa Cruz is fast becoming another Carmel. My friends in real estate tell me that the majority of the people looking for homes here are retirees from out of the area who have already made their money and don't have to worry about income. One friend just sold his house and moved out of the area altogether, and of the six offers he received, all but one were from out of the area. Two were from out of state!

    The county and city government bodies don't do anything to help, because they're so fixated on maintaining Santa Cruz as it was back in the '60s and '70s, before it was "discovered." Mardi Wormhoudt thinks using the clogged Highway 1 is a "lifestyle choice" and Mark Primack has had a bitch of a time convincing people that mixed housing is better than the class-segregated zoning we have now. The same coterie of ageing hippies has been in power since the 1980s, and their hostility to businesses (other than those that cater to tourists on the Pacific Garden Mall) makes the irony of Santa Cruz's situation that much more appalling.

    A huge number of Santa Cruz county inhabitants commute over Highway 17 every day to work in the bowels of Silicon Valley, yet the government in Santa Cruz (re-elected like clockwork in large part because of the UCSC voting population) refuses to understandd that it is possible to maintain slow growth and build a tech business climate at the same time. They just keep arguing that it's a zero-sum game, because they bought their houses long ago when they were easy to buy, and they've long since paid off their mortgages. They don't care about real diversity or real economic sustainability. "If you want to make big money, go live in Silicon Valley," seems to be the mentality. Unfortunately, you need big money just to survive here.

    If I sound frustrated, it's because I am. I ride my bike to work. I want Santa Cruz to stay weird. I love the fact that we protect the environment in our community. I have friends who wear suits and friends who live to surf. But Santa Cruz the tolerant, vibrant Santa Cruz of old is turning into a bizarre mixure of college town and retirement community. If you're in your 20s, 30s, 40s, or early 50s (unless you've made a ton of money in Silicon Valley), you'll only find work in Santa Cruz maintaining other people's houses or selling them coffee at Lulu Carpenter's. The middle class is being squeezed out, and quickly.

    This week's Good Times (or was it the Metro) has a great article about the whole Santa Cruz affordable housing quagmire. I know this sounds like a rant, but I feel so passionate about it because I just hate to see Santa Cruz going down this path.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  105. lol mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would if I had points.

  106. Salary reduction reverted by DollyTheSheep · · Score: 1

    For 3 years now, my salary has not increased but diminished. A whopping 15% reduction in the whole year 2004 will eventually be reverted by 2005. Has anyone similar experiences?

  107. HGV1 by Savio998877 · · Score: 1

    The situation is worse in the UK than it sounds in the USA, over here I could quit my job as a CCNP, retrain in 1 month to become a HGV1 driver and earn well over £30,000 a year, much more than working my socks off in it.

  108. In India... by Shome · · Score: 2

    The average salary hike for IT workers was 12% in 2004. It is estimated to be 12-14% in 2005.

    --

    ~Once you have your choices narrowed down, the rest will fall into place.
    1. Re:In India... by koekepeer · · Score: 1

      ~When in Rome, do as Romanians do.

      "salut! ce faci?" -> bunch of italians looking at you weirdly...

  109. How to boost your pay by 20-40 per cent by ph1ll · · Score: 1

    Don't say you're an IT guy. Sell yourself as a business person who specialises in IT solutions.

    Outcome: you do exactly the same work but for much more money.

    I did this in my current position (software developer). I'm doing the same work as my last job but for a lot more money. I even get more respect.

    Remember that business people look after their own.

    --
    --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
  110. True - Enconomie sof Scale by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Don't feel too bad - despite what it may seem like on /., many others are in the same boat.

    But just ask them what their power bill and rent payments are. Or how much they pay for meat.

    People in smaller cities generally make less, but they generally also have less expenses. I live in a small area, and compared to people I know who live in a large city, I make only 60% of their salary.

    Then again, I own a 3 bedroom house, and my mortgage payments are less than 1/2 of what they pay on their 2 bedroom apartment.

    It is not so bad - you can't judge your progress in life by your salary alone. There are many factors to consider before moving to a larger job market. Real estate prices, food prices, traffic, pollution, privacy, and manners, all come at a premium in a big city. Then again, in a small city, you often need to wait a bit longer to get new products and services.

    It is all a tradeoff.

  111. Looks like University of Illinois! by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    hmmm according to the survey results, entry-level jobs right out of college are paying about 50k/yr. Since most of the recruiters I've talked to are telling me jobs are paying in the 30s and 40s, maybe I should get my BS all over again! (I graduated in the dark days of 1986)

  112. I wish. by saintlupus · · Score: 1

    IT instructors are holding the bottom spot in terms of gross revenues (salary could go as low as $43,250)

    Try ~$2,500 per class, per semester. I'm glad I only teach because I like it and I have a day job as well.

    (Ah, the wonders of working in the high pay, fast paced world of a Catholic college!)

    --saint

  113. How about the UK IT markert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really involved in the field but curious to know what sort of salaries people can expect? Is it like the US where it's hard to get into - what about graduate salaries etc?

  114. Funny... by Atrophis · · Score: 1

    I have yet to see any change in IT reflected in my Salaries. :^/

    --

    i cant seem to come up with a sig.
  115. Maybe if you're still in the same job... by poit420 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After being laid off (again) a year ago, I started a new php programming job near Cleveland, OH in November. My new job pays LESS THAN HALF of my previous salary, coming in at USD $33k. I don't know about the rest of the nation, but I competed with dozens of people for this position, and commute 90 minutes each way.

    When it came time to negotiate it went like this:
    "This position pays $33k, and we'd love to have you on board."
    "I'd really like to join this company, but that salary is extremely low by any measure. The minimum I could accept is $45k."
    "I understand this may be less than what you're used to, however we predetermined our rate of pay prior to holding interviews. We have great benefits and.... BLAH BLAH BLAH... the position pays $33k"

    I've never negotiated for a position and gotten NOTHING... shows to go ya its still very much an employer's market.

    I was hired, I'm sure, because the company is confident that I'm not going to find a job elsewhere (and haven't so far).

    It would be interesting to see these figures adjusted for regional cost of living - they just don't seem to jive with reality in the Midwest.

    1. Re:Maybe if you're still in the same job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was hired, I'm sure, because the company is confident that I'm not going to find a job elsewhere (and haven't so far).

      I don't get that attitude by employers trying to low ball people. For that $10k in "savings" they get:
      • An employee who is pissed off
      • One that will be looking for a new job in 6 months
      • One that won't put in extra hours

      Maybe they think you're just an interchangable cog, like someone on a factory line?
  116. Costa Rica is not a bad idea... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


    How about this. Why don't a bunch of IT companies set up shop in Costa Rica and pay their employees to move there? The advantages are enormous. Cheap cost of business, you're close to America, exotic location for the young employees (and exotic women for the young geek men ;) ) and if everyone goes expatriate, the tax benefits are totally worth it.

    No thank you.

    It's that whole rule of law thing.

    Go to another country, even a US protectorate. You will see what happens if someone has a criminal issue anywhere near you.

    Good luck with this paradise you call Puerto Rico.

    1. Re:Costa Rica is not a bad idea... by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      From the CIA World Fact Book:

      =======
      Country name:
      Definition Field Listing
      conventional long form: Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
      conventional short form: Puerto Rico
      Dependency status:
      Definition Field Listing
      commonwealth associated with the US ...

      National holiday:
      Definition Field Listing
      US Independence Day, 4 July (1776); Puerto Rico Constitution Day, 25 July (1952)
      Constitution:
      Definition Field Listing
      ratified 3 March 1952; approved by US Congress 3 July 1952; effective 25 July 1952
      Legal system:
      Definition Field Listing
      based on Spanish civil code and within the US Federal system of justice
      Suffrage:
      Definition Field Listing
      18 years of age; universal; island residents are US citizens but do not vote in US presidential elections
      Executive branch:
      Definition Field Listing
      chief of state: President George W. BUSH of the US (since 20 January 2001)
      head of government: Governor Sila M. CALDERON (since 2 January 2001)
      cabinet: Cabinet appointed by the governor with the consent of the legislature
      elections: US president and vice president elected on the same ticket for four-year terms; governor elected by popular vote for a four-year term; election last held 7 November 2000 (next to be held 2 November 2004)
      election results: Sila M. CALDERON (PPD) elected governor; percent of vote - 48.6%
      ======

      Other points show that PR is hardly a paradise (GDP per capita at $16,800 for example) but it hardly looks like a place with no 'rule of law'.

    2. Re:Costa Rica is not a bad idea... by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      I'm confused.. are you talking about Puerto Rico, or Costa Rica

  117. Rent vs Mortgage by llefler · · Score: 1

    I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, but there is more to it than 'lost to rent' and 'building equity'. I heard that argument a lot before I bought my home, I have a friend that used to be a realtor. But it's really more complicated than that.

    I went from a one bedroom apartment at $600 a month to a home with a $1000 a month mortgage payment. I paid ~$150 a year for renters insurance and I pay $1100 a year for homeowners. I now pay $1200 a year in property tax. Roughly $500 of my monthly payment goes to interest and $40 is lost to PMI. I do get to write off the interest and property taxes on my income taxes, but the amount that it saves me barely covers the cost of maintenance. I also went from a maximum $50 a month electric and $40 a month gas to a level pay $130 a month gas/electric plus $30 water/sewer/trash. Not to mention the bonuses of having to shell out $1000 for new guttering or coming home to a broken water heater. You can save money by doing repairs yourself, but some of that will be offset by the new tools you need to have.

    The money factor isn't as good as people make it out to be. You have to look and see if other factors are important to you. Home ownership, investment, freedom to make changes (such as rewiring the computer room or painting the walls). BTW, you can still have noisy neighbors, but now you have no Apt manager to deal with them. Thump, thump, thump. "are the windows supposed to rattle like that?"

    --
    It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  118. Re:ARRGHH now my BOSS may find out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That assumes that your boss is geek enough to read /.

  119. Not bad by slapout · · Score: 1

    salary could go as low as $43,250

    Wow. That's almost $10,000 more than I make as a programmer.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  120. at least SOMETHING is oncreasing this year.. by Entouchable · · Score: 0

    IT salaries to oncrease 0.5% on average in 2005 I guess I just have a tough time trusting a news article with a typo in the TITLE.

  121. Thanks by agent · · Score: 1

    Here you ago. Everything old, is new again!
    http://www.revengeismydestiny.com/
    How log should I wait before I ask the .gov for all of my money back?
    $10 bucks says http://www.whitehouse.com will be a dating web site.
    Peace.