a) If you can demonstrate your ability to detect low level radioactive contamination under reasonable experimental conditions, they'll consider your case. b) If you can't demonstrate you ability to detect low level radioactive contamination under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance, you owe the plaintiff the same amount you are seeking.
This is assuming you don't use any external devices naturally, since I'm fairly certain anyone can detect electromagnetic fields with external devices.
The presumption is that privacy is the best solution against tyranny. Right now, I believe accountability is a preferred method of handling such threats, seeing that the world is globalized sufficiently to give everything an open view to the majority (your mileage may vary).
Well, marketing people and bureaucrats are generally not taken seriously, and hence reduces the gravity of the situation.
However, lawyers are pretty darned smart, and also tends to increase the gravity of the situation. Note that this also occurs if a bureaucrat makes a point which is (possibly coincidentally) valid.
"I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species. I realized that you're not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment, but you humans do not. You move to an area, and you multiply, and multiply, until every natural resource is consumed. The only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet, you are a plague, and we are the cure. "
Stop making MMOs which is based on simple damage manipulation
For instance, there are several game types which doesn't require (or avoids the requirement) healers in the slightest: Tower defense, shoot-em-ups, artillery (or Worms) style.
Then there are several game types which doesn't involve destruction in the conventional (one-on-one) sense: Strategy games (though technically tower defense falls into this), constructive (though tends to be more social), puzzle.
Then there's the other obvious option of implementing pure versatility/power for characters: Diablo series, RPGs with no set class
However, you're underestimating the cost of time. Mass production decreases both the cost and time of making a specific product (or combination of products).
Of cause, there are some successes in filtering words in MMOs. Case in point, Toontown Online.
(Granted it's done by only allowing a small subset of preset phrases, but at least it works. The closest to vulgarity is the spamming of "You stink!" phrases.)
Or perhaps Google's search mechanisms would determine that you are wanting to know what other people know, and filters more of those results instead of similar results to what you've already found.
Slashdot Mirror
Isn't there more overseas companies than US companies? And if so, why should this be surprising in the slightest?
Disagree.
Let's say it's radiation exposure instead.
a) If you can demonstrate your ability to detect low level radioactive contamination under reasonable experimental conditions, they'll consider your case.
b) If you can't demonstrate you ability to detect low level radioactive contamination under reasonable experimental conditions significantly more than chance, you owe the plaintiff the same amount you are seeking.
This is assuming you don't use any external devices naturally, since I'm fairly certain anyone can detect electromagnetic fields with external devices.
The presumption is that privacy is the best solution against tyranny. Right now, I believe accountability is a preferred method of handling such threats, seeing that the world is globalized sufficiently to give everything an open view to the majority (your mileage may vary).
Actually, closer to diving 0 by 0... which I've no idea what it means either.
Well, marketing people and bureaucrats are generally not taken seriously, and hence reduces the gravity of the situation.
However, lawyers are pretty darned smart, and also tends to increase the gravity of the situation. Note that this also occurs if a bureaucrat makes a point which is (possibly coincidentally) valid.
Twitter has also been know for false hits as well though, so how can one prevent such a situation?
"I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species. I realized that you're not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment, but you humans do not. You move to an area, and you multiply, and multiply, until every natural resource is consumed. The only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet, you are a plague, and we are the cure. "
Inversely, perhaps males are more likely to realize they're addicted to an MMO and stop. :p
Additionally, this is inherently a biased sample, since it (1) only samples 1 game, and (2) only samples MMO game players.
Alternatively, if you have enough soldiers, guns, and bullets, you can just brute-force your way in.
Stop making MMOs which is based on simple damage manipulation
For instance, there are several game types which doesn't require (or avoids the requirement) healers in the slightest: Tower defense, shoot-em-ups, artillery (or Worms) style.
Then there are several game types which doesn't involve destruction in the conventional (one-on-one) sense: Strategy games (though technically tower defense falls into this), constructive (though tends to be more social), puzzle.
Then there's the other obvious option of implementing pure versatility/power for characters: Diablo series, RPGs with no set class
And you didn't think of Gravitar instead? Kids these days...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitar
However, you're underestimating the cost of time. Mass production decreases both the cost and time of making a specific product (or combination of products).
I'm curious on the non-game advances the Wii, PS3, and XBox 360 has provided for the community.
The Wii advances via it's mass-produced controller, the PS3 advances via mass-produced mini-computer, the XBox 360... um... (need some help here).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Atkinson
This person has been the sole reason why Australia doesn't have a R18+ rating, and I highly doubt a discussion paper will change his mind.
Of cause, there are some successes in filtering words in MMOs. Case in point, Toontown Online.
(Granted it's done by only allowing a small subset of preset phrases, but at least it works. The closest to vulgarity is the spamming of "You stink!" phrases.)
Actually, perpetual machines have more stringent guidelines for patent application, where there must be a working prototype first.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_machine
It's not proper collisions testing unless MythBusters does it. Preferably with big explosions somewhere in the process.
And the less people attempt, the rarer it'll be.
Alternatively, Linux netbook users could have converted their netbooks to dual-boot systems, hence still allowing the possibility of both to be true.
And then you get int an "Animal Farm" situation.
Wouldn't fingerprinting fail spectacularly on people with no fingers? (e.g. Darth Vader, Luke Skywalker (for one hand), etc...)
Incidentally, Singapore is considering a single set top box (between multiple vendors). This could be a similar situation.
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1019917/1/.html
Or it can simply work on redirecting all EM frequencies and defeat any conventional definitions of "seeing".
Google and Bing both come up on top in definitions, but Yahoo gets hidden somewhere below (lower than it's messenger).
Or perhaps Google's search mechanisms would determine that you are wanting to know what other people know, and filters more of those results instead of similar results to what you've already found.