Oh that's simple. go2linux wouldn't get any advertising revenue by slashvertising their site if they linked to the actual post in a mailman archive. Of course, I could be wrong, and go2linux may be intending to donate today's advertising income to support their favourite FLOSS project, but somehow I doubt it.
There are still two prominent flash advertisements on the print page. IMO, that is more than a reasonable amount of advertising to be viewing when reading a relatively short article. OTOH, TFA had 3 prominent advertisements per page, a substantial "partnered content" section and "featured links", on every single page of the article chopped up into 5-pages. I presume the 2 popups per page view the site attempted to spawn (that firefox blocked) would also have been advertisements, totaling 25+ advertisements, 4 additional clicks, plus substantial crud I am required to wade through just to read the relatively short amount of content. No thanks, I clicked on TFA and immediately looked for the "print" button.
My personal motivation to work in this space is that I want to allow my now 3- and 6-year old children to make use of the Internet based on the same core principles as I now know them.
You really want your 3- and 6-year olds to inherit the spam-ridden porn-fest we have today? That's just mean. Think of the children!
No, we're not talking about two different fathers, but two sperm from the same father, each divided (in some proportion) between the two children. So the genetic make up is as follows:
First child:
50% - Suzie
23% - Joe Sperm A
27% - Joe Sperm B
Second Child:
50% - Suzie
27% - Joe Sperm A
23% - Joe Sperm B
Of course, those aren't the actual percentages of genetic makeup from each sperm in each child, but this illustrates the point.
You're right of course, clearly a company like vote-rigging Diebold won't see the error of their ways until they get kicked out of court with their tail between their legs, but a few quick messages will at least cause some water-cooler conversation and a bit of laughing behind the backs of the execs who initiated such an inane lawsuit.
Here's what I just emailed to their PR department:
Are your executives all on crack or what? You can't sue like a screaming toddler who didn't get the candy when a client chooses your competitor. That's utterly retarded.
By submitting the notice of removal instead of a defence of no jurisdiction, Spamhaus shot themselves in the foot, and submitted by default to the jurisdiction of the Illinois court.
Unfortunately the problem is the Illinois court does have jurisdiction over the UK company, the reason - if I remember correctly - is that instead of initially presenting the defence of no jurisdiction (which likely would have been ruled in Spamhaus's favour), Spamhaus initially requested the case be transferred to the federal court rather than Illinois, thereby submitting de facto to the jurisdiction of the Illinois court. A defence of no jurisdiction has to be presented in a very specific way at the right time, and Spamhaus f***ed that up big time.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any
electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information
storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher.
That's correct, it is your own business. Go out and try to spend that money, however, and you have a problem. Similarly distributing the copied CD is - at least in Canada - where the illegality arises.
Looks like google needs to do a little bit more work aligning those maps - a bunch of roads in your town appear to protrude into the water if you overlap the satellite view (hybrid).
I looked all over the linked site. No wiki to be seen. It says something about using FreeNet, Tor, and PGP. Last time I checked none of these were wiki software packages.
Or would an x-ray machine zap the crap out of an RFID chip?
Well I hope not, otherwise what happens when my jacket (with RFID enabled passport still in the jacket pocket) gets "zapped" before I get on the plane? I land in the USA with a passport that won't scan, and proceed to be bundled off to gitmo as a terr'ist.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, I saw that too but thought it was TFA.
http://derstandard.at/Text/?id=2845484
Why? It's free.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compiz
Oh that's simple. go2linux wouldn't get any advertising revenue by slashvertising their site if they linked to the actual post in a mailman archive. Of course, I could be wrong, and go2linux may be intending to donate today's advertising income to support their favourite FLOSS project, but somehow I doubt it.
There are still two prominent flash advertisements on the print page. IMO, that is more than a reasonable amount of advertising to be viewing when reading a relatively short article. OTOH, TFA had 3 prominent advertisements per page, a substantial "partnered content" section and "featured links", on every single page of the article chopped up into 5-pages. I presume the 2 popups per page view the site attempted to spawn (that firefox blocked) would also have been advertisements, totaling 25+ advertisements, 4 additional clicks, plus substantial crud I am required to wade through just to read the relatively short amount of content. No thanks, I clicked on TFA and immediately looked for the "print" button.
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?com mand=printArticleBasic&articleId=9015945
My personal motivation to work in this space is that I want to allow my now 3- and 6-year old children to make use of the Internet based on the same core principles as I now know them.
You really want your 3- and 6-year olds to inherit the spam-ridden porn-fest we have today? That's just mean. Think of the children!
No, we're not talking about two different fathers, but two sperm from the same father, each divided (in some proportion) between the two children. So the genetic make up is as follows:
First child:
50% - Suzie
23% - Joe Sperm A
27% - Joe Sperm B
Second Child:
50% - Suzie
27% - Joe Sperm A
23% - Joe Sperm B
Of course, those aren't the actual percentages of genetic makeup from each sperm in each child, but this illustrates the point.
You're right of course, clearly a company like vote-rigging Diebold won't see the error of their ways until they get kicked out of court with their tail between their legs, but a few quick messages will at least cause some water-cooler conversation and a bit of laughing behind the backs of the execs who initiated such an inane lawsuit.
Corporate Headquarters: 1-330-490-4000
Here's what I just emailed to their PR department:
This statement requires substantiating evidence.
Here you go: http://www.spamsuite.com/files/e360vSpamhausNotice Removal.pdf
By submitting the notice of removal instead of a defence of no jurisdiction, Spamhaus shot themselves in the foot, and submitted by default to the jurisdiction of the Illinois court.
Unfortunately the problem is the Illinois court does have jurisdiction over the UK company, the reason - if I remember correctly - is that instead of initially presenting the defence of no jurisdiction (which likely would have been ruled in Spamhaus's favour), Spamhaus initially requested the case be transferred to the federal court rather than Illinois, thereby submitting de facto to the jurisdiction of the Illinois court. A defence of no jurisdiction has to be presented in a very specific way at the right time, and Spamhaus f***ed that up big time.
Nope:
It's here:
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/59/
choongiri writes:
There's a copyright statement in the PDF itself, see above.
Yes:
Pssst... I think you may find this page informative:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joke
Oh my, that's so funny I laughed until I cried. Thanks.
That's correct, it is your own business. Go out and try to spend that money, however, and you have a problem. Similarly distributing the copied CD is - at least in Canada - where the illegality arises.
You keep using that word... I do not think it means what you think it means.
Looks like google needs to do a little bit more work aligning those maps - a bunch of roads in your town appear to protrude into the water if you overlap the satellite view (hybrid).
I looked all over the linked site. No wiki to be seen. It says something about using FreeNet, Tor, and PGP. Last time I checked none of these were wiki software packages.
Firefox under wine? Why would you even contemplate such a thing?
Or would an x-ray machine zap the crap out of an RFID chip?
Well I hope not, otherwise what happens when my jacket (with RFID enabled passport still in the jacket pocket) gets "zapped" before I get on the plane? I land in the USA with a passport that won't scan, and proceed to be bundled off to gitmo as a terr'ist.