Slashdot Mirror


User: MightyMartian

MightyMartian's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
19,559
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 19,559

  1. Re:Makes sense. on Pew Survey Documents Gaps Between Public and Scientists · · Score: 2

    And here's somebody who doesn't think solipsism is utterly pointless and nihilistic philosophy, and actually thinks researchers should adopt it.

  2. Re:Altough I agree on Microsoft To Sell Bing Maps, Advertising Sections · · Score: 1

    That's not the new Microsoft, that's the Microsoft of the last decade.

  3. Re: Altough I agree on Microsoft To Sell Bing Maps, Advertising Sections · · Score: 1

    Also consider that in most markets, Windows Phone is closer in phone marketshare to iOS than iOS is to Android. That's not saying a lot. But WP is definitely at the #3 spot, and the way this market is... if they can find that itch to scratch, things could change within the course of two or three years.

    Which is like bragging about Pluto because it's closer to the Sun than to Proxima Centauri.

    Third place in the mobile market is a dubious distinction, at best. In reality, Windows phones are irrelevant, but only slightly less irrelevant than, say, BlackBerry.

  4. Re:C# Java; MSFT Oracle on SCOTUS Denies Google's Request To Appeal Oracle API Case · · Score: 1

    Because moving from one proprietary language/library ecosystem to another proprietary language/library ecosystem is somehow an improvement.

    Fuck them both. We have truly open ecosystems like C++, and I would encourage any sensible developer going forward to move away from the likes of Java and the .NET ecosystems, now that the Supreme Court has essentially turned them into perpetual litigation machines.

  5. Re:Fucking Lawyers on SCOTUS Denies Google's Request To Appeal Oracle API Case · · Score: 1

    But cleanroom implementations are meaningless if copyright can be asserted over the API. Clean room implementations only work because it has been generally understood that an API itself is essentially a directory listing, like a phone book, that in and of itself does not constitute some sort of creative work. Before the Oracle case, it was assumed that it was the code itself that constituted the intellectual property. But that is now apparently no longer true, and thus the Win32 API has gained the same level of protection as the source code.

    If this stands, and is not corrected either by a lower court or by Congress, no one will every try a clean room implementation of any non-free library again, because there's a real likelihood that you would find yourself sued into oblivion for breach of copyright.

    Wine may be safe because MS is being constrained by future potential anti-competitive suits, and of course Samba is protected because of a deal cut with the EU. But from this day foreward, clean room implementation of proprietary APIs, and I assume any other software spec (document format, communications protocol, etc.) will have absolutely no protection under the law.

  6. Re:Fucking Lawyers on SCOTUS Denies Google's Request To Appeal Oracle API Case · · Score: 1

    Would you contribute to a future project like Samba or Wine now?

  7. Re: Oracle is GPLd now, then. on SCOTUS Denies Google's Request To Appeal Oracle API Case · · Score: 1

    It certainly is looking that way, but there is the whole notion that what amount to call tables can be copyrighted. What the supreme Court has done here is basically unravel the common understanding of the difference between spec and implementation, and if Java is the most obviously vulnerable, in a very real way it means any number of APIs that have been re-implemented (like the standard *nix set of system calls) could suddenly be plunged into a purgatory-like nether world. I made vulgar jokes about using stdio.h in C programs, but that's the real question. Considering that in many cases header files and libraries whose origins go back decades in many different languages and on many different architectures could become low-hanging fruit, and since copyrights are in most industrialized countries are essentially perpetual now, big software houses now have a far better club to beat competitors with than patents.

    Do you think another Samba or Wine project could happen if the lower courts rule for Oracle? Who would be crazy enough to even try?

  8. Re:Bell Labs on SCOTUS Denies Google's Request To Appeal Oracle API Case · · Score: 1

    Fucking hell, I guess I'm utterly fucked, because pretty much every C program I've ever written includes #include <stdio>. Here I thought I was invoking a free and open set of library functions passed on down since the 1970s, and now it turns out I've been stealing someone's hard work in creating a standard set of functional calls. I'm dirty fucking thief.

  9. Re:Fucking Lawyers on SCOTUS Denies Google's Request To Appeal Oracle API Case · · Score: 1

    If specifications alone can be copyrighted, then the software industry is in for a world of hurt.

  10. Re:Fucking Lawyers on SCOTUS Denies Google's Request To Appeal Oracle API Case · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A function name and parameter spec is now "someone's shit"? Oracle's position is about as sensible as SCO's was.

  11. Re:External influences on Interviews: Ask Steve Jackson About Designing Games · · Score: 1

    All the early games I played were very "crunchy"; D&D, AD&D, Palladium, Twilight 2000 and Traveler 2300. The inelegance of such systems really began to drive me nuts, and I ended up going with Fudge and its variants like Fate. I never really played Gurps very much, but as I recall it was the middle ground between the kind of ultra-loose systems like Fudge and the very complex systems like AD&D. Now, I run a couple of PBeMs; a Palladium Rifts one and a home-brew heavily narrative game in the Harn universe, and dice are rarely used in the Palladium game, and not even part of the Harn game

  12. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? on Greek Financial Crisis Is an Opportunity For Bitcoin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because the value of gold and silver is somehow less arbitrary than electronic bank balances.

  13. Re:I wrote about this! on WSJ Overstates the Case Of the Testy A.I. · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does your book have dinosaurs and hot android sex? I don't just read anything, you know. I have my standards.

  14. Re:Discussing inherent properties of a libtard SJW on Are We Too Quick To Act On Social Media Outrage? · · Score: 1

    This behavior is inherent in being human. You think conservatives don't partake of hysteria?

  15. Re:O rly on Are We Too Quick To Act On Social Media Outrage? · · Score: 1

    +10 Sad but True

  16. Re:Another great Scalia line on Supreme Court Ruling Supports Same-Sex Marriage · · Score: 1

    From Bagehot's The English Constitution:

    Generally speaking, in an electioneering country (I mean in a country full of political life, and used to the manipulation of popular institutions), the election of candidates to elect candidates is a farce. The Electoral College of America is so. It was intended that the deputies when assembled should exercise a real discretion, and by independent choice select the President. But the primary electors take too much interest. They only elect a deputy to vote for Mr. Lincoln or Mr. Breckenridge, and the deputy only takes a ticket, and drops that ticket in an urn. He never chooses or thinks of choosing. He is but a messenger—a transmitter; the real decision is in those who choose him—who chose him because they knew what he would do.

    One can see the logic of an electoral college that functions as a sort of independent assembly to choose an executive, but the problem is that it long ago, with the development of the notion of the Faithless Elector, became little more than a mindless formality.

  17. Re:Zero respect for SCOTUS on Supreme Court Ruling Supports Same-Sex Marriage · · Score: 1

    That five of the SC justices don't share his bigotry and bizarre narrow version of the Constitution.

  18. Re:Slashdot? Or 'Gay'dot? on Supreme Court Ruling Supports Same-Sex Marriage · · Score: 1

    Want to see people bent out of shape, you should go to one of the hype-social conservative Catholic forums on the web. Holy smokes, you've got people telling how God smucked down a tree in their neighborhood because He's so pissed off, and predicting that several states will secede. Someone on one forum even started blaming Neopagans (that one I confess I can't quite figure out).

  19. Re:Very Disturbing Trend on Supreme Court Ruling Supports Same-Sex Marriage · · Score: 1

    The constitution doesn't mention a helluva lot of things, which is why the Founding Fathers created the Supreme Court as a means of assuring that the Constitution could remain a living document.

  20. Re:Very Disturbing Trend on Supreme Court Ruling Supports Same-Sex Marriage · · Score: 1

    The Christian Identity movement has produced its share of terrorists.

  21. Re:Another great Scalia line on Supreme Court Ruling Supports Same-Sex Marriage · · Score: 1

    Scalia just wants to be keep getting free dinners. He's largely irrelevant on any civil rights matter that reaches SCOTUS and he knows it.

  22. Tanenbomb on Interview: Ask Linus Torvalds a Question · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    When are you going to finally write a proper microkernel, which everyone, including you secretly, knows is far superior?

  23. Re:Google should move on on Microsoft Brings Office To Android Smartphones For Free · · Score: 1

    So other than your paranoia, there is no actual advantage.

    And before you start talking about "staying on the device", I had to go and actively disable all the Skydrive crap on my notebook, so they're all playing that game.

  24. Re:sigh... on The Vicious Circle That Is Sending Rents Spiraling Higher · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm an idiot proclaiming the current rend is the new reality, you insensitive clod!

  25. Re:Google should move on on Microsoft Brings Office To Android Smartphones For Free · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's odd. I can use Google Drive, create documents and spreadsheets on all the above platforms, download them in multiple formats and edit them on other platforms.

    Why would I pay Microsoft money for that which I can already do?