Who? Maybe Corel? Blackberry was a shit show, they focused all their energy on a tablet that couldn't even retrieve email without being tethered to a phone while they lost their entire market share.
Android, unlike Apple has always allowed installation of third party APKs and adding third party stores. Since Amazon operates one its hard to see how Google would be considered a monopoly.
I'm not a lawyer, but isn't anti-trust typically about attempting to use your monopoly in one market to enter another? Doesn't appear to be the case here.
Bankers could pretty easily operate an exchange if they wanted - they already have that infrastructure. They could also trade, but it might be illegal for them at the moment.
I noticed the same, an inordinate number of puff pieces are submitted by BTC supporters to spread the propaganda. I'd actually intended to submit the JP Morgan article earlier this week to counter it but hadn't made the time yet.
Exactly what do you think is competing here? If the banking industry thought these were viable, they'd be trading them and they'd be operating exchanges.
The site is meant to have stories submitted by its readers so readers direct the type of content. So maybe the authors job is just to write interesting stories and some reader would submit it?
Even if the/. editors let them get away with it they're still spammers. I'm attempting to do my part and flagging them a spam in the firehose but can't do it alone./shrug
Perhaps the most egregious are the two spammers from Wired who even sink so low as to upvote each other.
Then, what is the purpose of Google, if you can't trust them and have to go by your own?
Its about trusting them to find relevant search results - do you also expect Google's results page to also include Bing's search query, Yahoo's results page, etc. etc.?
So go to the site you trust instead of searching Google, then searching some other site? Its like going to the classifieds to find ads for another classified service. How often does your newspaper list other newspapers?
When Google wasn't deranking these sites searching for any product resulted in pages of these junk comparison sites which only exist to use affiliate links.
Slashdot Mirror
Who? Maybe Corel? Blackberry was a shit show, they focused all their energy on a tablet that couldn't even retrieve email without being tethered to a phone while they lost their entire market share.
Have you never seen a bulletin board before? Do you not know how pins work?
Obviously I was referring to the lawsuit, not being removed from the store.
Do you mean literally copy? As in source code or identical layout? if so that isn't true.
One wonders if this isn't just a PR thing to drum up awareness - shame that US courts don't tend to award damages to defendants.
Unfortunately the majority of journalists have no particular background or knowledge of the beat they cover.
Android, unlike Apple has always allowed installation of third party APKs and adding third party stores. Since Amazon operates one its hard to see how Google would be considered a monopoly.
I'm not a lawyer, but isn't anti-trust typically about attempting to use your monopoly in one market to enter another? Doesn't appear to be the case here.
And tell us how accepting payment to place that hateful ad is the same as someone putting it up without your knowledge?
So change the scenario slightly and add a vending machine that dispenses pins for a quarter
Really though, are the creators of automated systems meant to think of every possible questionable phrase?
If someone pins a hateful ad on a bulletin board are the owners letting the person do it or have they just not seen it yet?
Canada has had a number of successful technology companies, but they've all been plagued by mismanagement see Blackberry, Nortel, Corel, etc
Bankers could pretty easily operate an exchange if they wanted - they already have that infrastructure. They could also trade, but it might be illegal for them at the moment.
Block chains existed before crypto-currencies and using one isn't an endorsement of other uses of the same technology.
I noticed the same, an inordinate number of puff pieces are submitted by BTC supporters to spread the propaganda. I'd actually intended to submit the JP Morgan article earlier this week to counter it but hadn't made the time yet.
Bankers are indeed sleazy, but what does that say about the BTC market when even they think its sleazy?
Exactly what do you think is competing here? If the banking industry thought these were viable, they'd be trading them and they'd be operating exchanges.
JP Morgan's CEO referred to bitcoin as a fraud, and made reference to tulips (the first recorded bubble).
Geekbench is generally considered wildly inaccurate.
The site is meant to have stories submitted by its readers so readers direct the type of content. So maybe the authors job is just to write interesting stories and some reader would submit it?
Even if the /. editors let them get away with it they're still spammers. I'm attempting to do my part and flagging them a spam in the firehose but can't do it alone. /shrug
Perhaps the most egregious are the two spammers from Wired who even sink so low as to upvote each other.
Note he linked to another story too, but the primary link is his own.
Jason Koebler is the author of the article, which is true for all his submissions..... which makes him a spammer.
Then, what is the purpose of Google, if you can't trust them and have to go by your own?
Its about trusting them to find relevant search results - do you also expect Google's results page to also include Bing's search query, Yahoo's results page, etc. etc.?
So go to the site you trust instead of searching Google, then searching some other site? Its like going to the classifieds to find ads for another classified service. How often does your newspaper list other newspapers?
When Google wasn't deranking these sites searching for any product resulted in pages of these junk comparison sites which only exist to use affiliate links.
said no one ever.
rgh02 spammer for wired, who also upvotes stories from the other wired spammer mirandakatz.
Windows 10 won't let you remove a lot of its shitty built-in apps normally, some even not with CLI.