Despite the CEO of cyanogen claiming they were taking away Android from Google, they were always irrelevant. They may have had a few wins with minor players consumers had no relevance with consumers and were never going to replace Google services.
I think most people would say over the past 10 years Microsoft has lost their position as the market leader. In the consumer space in particular is difficult to see what role they have in the future.
He's not wrong, if they aren't being paid to work on LibreOffice they're free to do whatever they want. That said, I doubt the UI is what prevents Libre/OpenOffice from being successful.
Unfortunately manufacturers have previously abused the power of automatic updates to remove features or to shove 'features' down users throats. And of course many other manufacturers don't even bother to issue updates anyway. Unfortunately I don't think well see any change to these problems without legislation.
Why do you want to limit peoples' choices and options? For many people it would mean that instead of earning a little extra cash on their schedule to make ends meet, they wouldn't have that option and wind up seeking government assistance and/or become homeless.
Except that these 'job's would still need to be done and the companies be forced to pay an appropriate wage.
It's different because ultimately the person in the cockpit has been tested, licensed and is responsible for the car. Uber has none of this, it's on the road because a product manager decided it was good enough to risk it - that isn't how society works they're literally playing with lives and well being of Ty p others.
Slashdot Mirror
Despite the CEO of cyanogen claiming they were taking away Android from Google, they were always irrelevant. They may have had a few wins with minor players consumers had no relevance with consumers and were never going to replace Google services.
Do those figures consider the enormous amount of stock Tim and Satya were gifted?
I think most people would say over the past 10 years Microsoft has lost their position as the market leader. In the consumer space in particular is difficult to see what role they have in the future.
The dialog was always misleading. The presence in the system tray was always annoying to users.
Its a book I read years ago, not sure what the point of viewing it is.
Darwin at work, people remove regulation, get killed by things that should be regulated.
Unfortunately they didn't have spending requirements hence shitty entertainment shows starring morons like Mulroney jr qualify.
He's right it's almost entirely crap. Heck, there aren't even any real scifi shows any more
I don't live in Copenhagen but what I saw were lanes in the street with no barriers. They also gave cyclists an advanced green.
He's not wrong, if they aren't being paid to work on LibreOffice they're free to do whatever they want. That said, I doubt the UI is what prevents Libre/OpenOffice from being successful.
They invented round corners, don't forget about those.
Nice story you made up, too bad it doesn't reflect reality. Standards patents are licensed under FRAND terms.
Something I posted on a previous Uber story - seize their assets as the proceeds of crime.
For one thing, the driver is apparently letting the car run red lights and drive dangerously through bike lanes.
Maybe they were white computers, if they were black computers they'd be shot.
Its more of a cultural problem, go to Copenhagen and you can see it actually works well.
Works every time. So does my light switch thinking about it
Make America Grey Again.
Unfortunately manufacturers have previously abused the power of automatic updates to remove features or to shove 'features' down users throats. And of course many other manufacturers don't even bother to issue updates anyway. Unfortunately I don't think well see any change to these problems without legislation.
Breaks for workers have been with us for a hundred years, it to take courage to change that.
Why do you want to limit peoples' choices and options? For many people it would mean that instead of earning a little extra cash on their schedule to make ends meet, they wouldn't have that option and wind up seeking government assistance and/or become homeless.
Except that these 'job's would still need to be done and the companies be forced to pay an appropriate wage.
Hiring fundraisers... IIRC the person in charge was making 300-400k
It's different because ultimately the person in the cockpit has been tested, licensed and is responsible for the car. Uber has none of this, it's on the road because a product manager decided it was good enough to risk it - that isn't how society works they're literally playing with lives and well being of Ty p others.
Given Uber continuously ignores the law at what point should they be considered organised crime and have their assets seized as the proceeds of crime?
Careful, they might kidnap you and hand you over to a country where its legal - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...