Even if you knew for certain a cop was crooked, posting pictures of his house strikes me not only as obsessive, but also retributive without any court oversight, which is not what is supposed to happen in a society with the rule of law.
It would be laughable if it wasn't so disgustingly ignorant.
Cops are above the law. You can almost never get any sort of justice against the cop in a court of law. When we have so many bullshit laws and so many scumbag cops willing to enforce them that we don't have the rule of law, we have a police state as we obviously do now (check worldwide prison populations if you're so damn ignorant you're going to try and argue that one).
Cops *routinely* get away with torture and murder.
Your "argument" is deeply ignorant shit and nothing besides.
Ignore the fact for a moment that this was a DEA agent, which are hated by so many people. It is still a government official that is putting his/her life on the line in the service of their community.
The problem is your militant ignorance. DEA agents are hated by all decent people *for really really fucking good reasons*. They are *not* doing anything at all *in the service of their community*. That's why they are hated by the decent citizens of this country. There does not exist a legitimate reason for their existence and their job can only cause massive damage to our community. They are the enemies of our communities since they are the primary cause of violent crime.
Citizens who take the time to think know that. The fact that you're trying to claim that the exact opposite of reality is magically true because the government propaganda machine told you that only makes you look stupid, and given the massively destructive violence you are actively defending (quit lying, you can't support drug cops while standing against drug laws those are necessarily diametrically opposed positions.), it makes you look really fucking vile as well.
One is enough. Or are you saying that a DEA agent's life is worth less than a regular citizen's?
Of course it is.
Does a regular citizen get paid by tax dollars for the express purpose of making our communities violent hellholes? No, they don't. That is the entire result of the actions of the DEA since it was created. People who work for the DEA have actively chosen a career making America a worse place in every way. They have yet to do anything positive and never will because it's not possible for anything positive to come out of prohibition as we've proven twice now at the expense of millions of lives and trillions of dollars.
Yes, absolutely. DEA agents are a pure liability to our nation and our species so their lives are worth less than nothing.
This has nothing to do with 1st Amendment rights or equal opportunity for surveillance. I would be the first person to support that position. This is an instance in which I agree with the cops.
Actually that is exactly what it is. So you agree that cops are our rulers and that citizens are slaves. Your point is as clear as it is cowarldy and disgusting.
Should CNN be right on the spot with our special forces giving away their position to the enemy?
Absolutely. Those soldiers aren't patriots or Americans. They are the worst enemies this country has. Armed to the teeth, eager to kill the innocent, and utterly lacking in anything even approximating honor, decency, integrity or anything of the sort? Hell, if they went to Iraq, they declared war on America by doing so. Hell given I their crimes against humanity, it's disgusting to even call those fucking monsters human. They sure as shit aren't doing anything to help this country.
I did not support the war in Iraq, but that does not mean I would want to put our soldiers at risk either.
Then you are an active supporter of a criminal war and thus crimes against humanity. You don't get it both ways, you idiotic worthless piece of shit.
Could that war have happened if there weren't evil fucking traitors willing to follow the criminal orders to go over there? Of course not. So the only way it would be possible to be on the morally correct side would be to work toward the death of every anti-American scumbag traitor who signed up to go over to Iraq to murder hundreds of thousands of innocent people in order to make some scumbags rich and in order to promote a police state in America. That is exactly what happened and the exact motivation for that war as is now an absolutely clear fact in the public record.
Sorry, Sparky, but if you're so fucking stupid and evil as to be an active supporter of mass murder as you have demonstrated yourself to be with you that cowardly bit of bullshit you spewed.
There is an agreement, or general consensus, that it is in our best interests for our government to operate with some privacy at times.
Primarily, that's just bullshit propaganda spread by the government so they can get fucking worms like yourself to attempt to convince decent people that they have no rights the government doesn't give them. Fuck you for being such a vile scumbag. The government uses the fact that people as fucking stupid and ignorant as yourself are willing to let them commit all sorts of crimes in their name and then hide them behind the lie of "security" jsut so you can continue being a fucking coward and deny your complicity in crimes.
She was not just writing a blog about police activities. She was putting DEA agents at risk by disclosing their operations and locations. That went too far. Put together a citizen's advisory board, whatever. I support some oversight. Not letting every criminal know exactly where the DEA agents live.
Damn, you are fucking stupid and delusional. DEA agents are all fucking traitors. Drug laws are not only completely unconstitutional, but they are the primary overriding cause of violence in our country. DEA agents do not have any justification for their existence. Killing those vile fucking monsters is an act of patriotism every time. There does not exist a worse bad guy in the world than the scum who enforce drug laws. America is a police state due to these vile fuckers more than any other group in the country. They all need to die and that is a statement of pure patriotism. I've actually read and support the constitution. Not one of those motherfucking scumbag traitors can say the same.
. Please note, I am absolutely against the War on Drugs, so I would want to protect undercover cops, not drug enforcement specifically.
The fact that you think those things can be uncoupled is why you come across as so fucking stupid and ignorant of how the world works. Drug laws are only the problem they are because there are
If she had a reason to suspect one of the DEA officers was doing something illegal.. while not advocating vigilantism I could guess she'd have a reason to do it.. but to just do it because they are cops?
You obviously have only a tenuous grip on reality at best.
A sane person would have clued into the very well established fact that almost all cops are generally engaging in criminal activity at most times. Most of our laws were put in place by evil people for evil purposes and are completely unconstitutional, so any cop working on enforcing any of those laws has actively worked to earn being shot right in their treasonous, cowardly faces.
But given the fact that the laws are skewed entirely against the citizens of this country, she is a hero for tracking these vile, anti-American freedom despising traitors. How in the hell are you so stupid and insane that you can't even tell the difference between the good guys and the bad guys. There aren't even any arguments that could be made to support your utterly insane delusions.
I'd say on principle that the best option is to leave them alone and let the market decide
This can't possibly work, or even be a sane suggestion under any circumstances. We do not have anything even remotely approximating a free market, so that can not possibly work. It's not even anywhere within the bounds of sanity to make such an obviously worthless suggestion. Please take a look at the real world every once in a while and make a note of where your assumptions completely fail to reflect anything that could ever actually exist in the real world. It's the recipe for sanity.
We have a market whose rules were written by the major corporations Microsoft included, with the express intent of ensuring that our markets are incapable of functioning properly as we clearly see everywhere around us today.
Now, given the obvious fact that we do not have a functioning market and given that one of the major drivers behind this betrayal is the company under discussion how in the hell can you bring yourself to make such an obviously worthless, and rabidly, delusionally pro-corporate and anti-citizen statement. Do you really hate every other person in the world with such rabid intensity? Why? You couldn't actually mean what you said if that wasn't the case though.
It's a serious question. Assuming that you're not intentionally lying, how is it possible that you are capable of such incredibly naivety? It's like you've never in your life ever been on the planet Earth before. How else could you possibly be so out of touch with reality.
I mean do you have an explanation for how you could be so far out of touch with reality yet have thus far avoided drowning on your own spit? I mean, free markets can't ever possibly exist in the best of circumstances. That's an obvious fact. Approximating one will always be the best we could ever possibly do and our laws were written specifically for the purpose of keeping us as far as possible away from that theoretical ideal in order to tilt the playing field in the favor of Microsoft and other similar criminal organizations who despise free markets more than anything else in the world.
So, how is it that you think laws specifically written in order to prevent something somehow magically created exactly the thing they were designed to prevent and in fact isn't even possible anyhow?
Do you see how "free market" believers seem totally insane to anybody with any sense or knowledge or even basic common sense?
The fact that you get fucked as hard as everyone else by these sleazy criminal policies yet keep begging for more really makes demonstrates your unfitness to make any decisions that can possibly have any affect on another person ever. Please don't ever vote. You've proven that you are incapable or *really* unwilling to handle that responsibility and so your decisions premised totally on delusions you hold which aren't reflected in reality cause real harm to real people around you. Maybe one day you will actually wake up, grow up, and think through things at least a tiny bit before mindlessly repeating obviously false corporate propaganda. You'll be one hell of a lot less of a liability to decent people everywhere.
In practice, you sit down to play "for an hour", and next thing you know the sun's coming up.
No way, Dude. You're looking out the wrong window for that. The freaking Carthaginians were still around when the sun was coming up. It's on its way down again;-)
By that logic CBS and CW are not separate television channels.
No, not at all. I don't even know WTF CW is, but I'll assume they're owned by the same company that owns CBS. So my logic wouldn't indicate that they are separate television channels. It would indicate that treating CBS and CW as if they were independent entities is dumb since they're not. They are entities controlled by the same parent. They both act to further their parent's interests. Forgetting that is a problem. Pretending that isn't a critical factor in assessing things is silly. Pointing out that coupling does nothing but make sure the important facts are at the forefront.
There is nothing wrong with my logic.
Also you missed the key point that a buyer will NOT get a refund from paypal.com until proof-of-delivery is provided.
I didn't miss that "point". It's irrelevant to my point. What I said remains true regardless as to whether or not some other unrelated thing you said is either true or false. Which it actually is I neither know, nor care.
Had he known that you were trying to save the life of your loved one, and he'd acted the same, that would be correct.
Wrong. Had he known *for a fact* that it was not the case that a life was on the line then he'd still be an asshole, but his crime would be less egregious. It doesn't make it ok to actively be an asshole just because you're ignorant of the situation.
He was just being thoughtless, not malicious/evil.
Wrong again. He was *intentionally* fucking over other drivers and preventing them from keeping up with the flow of traffic because being an asshole amuses him. That was his statement. That is malicious by definition. Evil too in my book, but that term isn't well defined. Actively hurting others without gaining any benefit for yourself just for the intended purpose of being an asshole to people meets it in my book though. Had his intentionally malicious evil led to the death of an innocent person, then his execution would be completely justified. That doesn't mean that if he doesn't kill somebody with his childish asshattery that it magically becomes OK. It is never ok to act like that under any circumstances.
Thoughtless would be if he was daydreaming, ended up in the passing lane without consciously noticing and then when somebody asks him to get out of the way he does and apologises. That's thoughtless. What he did took active thought according to him. His intent was to fuck over other people for his amusement. Why you would even bother trying to defend the type of scum who routinely does that shit is a question you should be asking yourself. The answer to that will say a lot about you.
well, he's wrong, but then his beliefs are his own business. Can't please everyone. Last I checked, I was talking about being the responsible party.
No, I am not at all wrong. You yourself stated that as a fact. That was your assertion and something that you were bragging about. Trying to deny that now is both stupid and deeply dishonest.
You were not talking about being the responsible party. You were talking about going out of your way to fuck over other drivers because their frustration amuses you. Since you do not have the foggiest idea what the motivations of the other party are before deciding to fuck them over you are a bad person. It really is that simple. It sucks for everyone else that you don't possess even the most basic common sense or basic human decency which is all it would take a healthy person to realise that, but pretending the facts aren't what they are by your own admission is just stupid.
It's not up to you to decide whether or not somebody else's emergency is important enough. It's your responsibility to stay the fuck out of people's way and *not* be an asshole because you find that amusing. You don't have the right to make those decisions for others. When you attempt to usurp that authority over others, you grant them the right to decide whether or not you live or die. That is the oldest deal in the history of humanity and every struggle against every tyrant is premised on that fact.
so he might be the kind of friend I get along with.
Unlikely.
You think that your ability to fuck people over solely for your sick amusement is far more important than a person's right to save the life of their loved one. That is sick and evil beyond anything I would associate myself with. That's who you are, Sparky. An absolutely vile monster.
I choose friends who are hands down better people than you are. I don't associate with people who are, like you yourself bragged about being, driven purely by their hatred of other people living their lives without your approval.
Oh well, when and if you get your head pulped with steel toes boots for acting like the monster you brag about being you'll know damn well why it happened and that you richly deserved it.
I know that I saved my family from the fate that a shitbag like yourself attempted to inflict upon us. I'm quite obviously a far better person that you could ever hope to be and I have nothing but contempt for you because I know how fucking pointless and *murderous* your cowardly douchebaggery really is in practice.
Go die in a fire before you end up killing decent people.
But I have to admit, I get a bit of pleasure watching the guy behind me froth at the mouth because I delayed him a few seconds from getting to whatever thing he thinks is important enough that he doesn't mind endangering all the people around him.
So you're a scumbag and you take pleasure in being a scumbag? Wow, what a vile subhuman piece of shit you are.
What if the thing he was trying to get to actually was important like his little girl was dying in the back seat and good old douchebag raddan decided that he should not be allowed to get his little girl to the hospital to save her life because that would interfere with raddan's entirely unjustified belief that the world revolves around him.
This exact fucking situation happened to me last week.
Take this to heart, you evil self-centered piece of human garbage:
I managed to get around that scumbag through highly illegal and dangerous driving which would have been entirely unnecessary had he acted as if he were a decent human being. Minutes were *critical* at that point. Had that asshat succeeded in his vile plan to hold me down to the speed he decided that I should be driving and had my little girl died instead of *barely* by fucking *minutes* been saved at the emergency room, then I would have run that sick son of a bitch off of the road and beaten them to death without a second's hesitation or a moment's regret.
You should really think long and hard about what a disgustingly vile piece of shit *you are* when you take pleasure in hurting others without even helping yourself at all. When you get pleasure from things that can easily lead to the morally correct action on somebody else's part being beating you to death, then you are a very seriously diseased monster and should probably avoid mouthing off in public forums thereby demonstrating your disgusting subhuman nature. You're are a sick little fucker and beneath contempt. I adamantly hope that you die soon and painfully you vile evil worm.
If the speed limit is 65 and and both lanes have people next to each other going 65, get over it, no law is being broken.
That just means that your legislators are utter failures. There does not exist an excuse for failing to prevent people from blocking the freeways. This is the primary cause of congestion and accidents.
I'm not going to move into the right lane and get stuck behind someone going 55, unable to change lanes because everyone on my left is going 25-30mph faster than me.
So you'll stick *everybody else in the entire passing lane*r behind your dumb, slow moving ass and you thing that's somehow ok while it's a great tragedy to expect you to keep up with the flow of traffic WTF you utterly sleazy self-centered piece of garbage wrapped in skin?!?!?! I'm truly amazed at how fucking vile some people go out of their way to choose to be.
*You* are the problem in this situation. *You* are the jerk, and *you* are the bad guy.
You refuse to keep up with the traffic in the passing lane yet you also refuse to remain in the lane appropriate to your speed and driving abilities. The people going 85 in the *passing lane* are going with the flow of traffic and are driving appropriately for the conditions. You are not doing either of those things. You are intentionally and with malice aforethought blocking the passing lane in order to prevent other people from using the roads they pay for in a the perfectly safe manner they choose. You are increasing everybody's risk, and you're doing it solely so that you can be a jerk to the people around you. If you can not keep up with the normal pace of traffic in the fast lane, then the only decent, rational, or appropriate thing for you to do is stay out of the way of the people who are traveling at the proper speed. There is nothing about your actions that justify the problems you are willfully choosing to inflict on the poeple around you solely due to the fact that you can't be bothered to go the appropriate speed. The appropriate speed is never determined by the laws which you've already admitted your legislators are failures at determining, it's determined by the speed traffic is traveling. You are in the wrong and there is nothing that could possibly justify your active asshattery. Please stop it and start acting as if you were a decent human being instead of the malicious asshole you declared yourself to be.
You're not even helping yourself and you're fucking over tons of people around you. I mean think that through, Sparky, and consider what a vile scumbag your chosen course of action *proves* you to be absolutely and beyond any possibility of a doubt.
That is why there are millions of Christians some of whom are every bit as educated and smart as you are and why the Bible has been translated into more languages and is more widely distributed than any other book.
There's a world of difference between being "popular" which is what you describe and "correct" which I demonstrated that the bible isn't.
Anyone who has to resort to name-calling and insults has automatically admitted that they are really are completely unsure of themselves and their arguments.I resorted to nothing of the sort. It's a fact that your religious beliefs are demonstrably false. You still claim it must be magically true because you really really want it to be in spite of the fact that there isn't any evidence for it at all and plenty against. You are delusional because you still demand that your favorite fairy tales must magically be true. That's what delusional means. It isn't "calling names", it's using the correct term to describe what you're demonstrating.
You are just totally and utterly wrong.
Of course, everyone who doesn't see your imaginary friend must be wrong. It couldn't be, you, the one with the magical invisible friend, who's wrong. Oh, no, that would be quite impossible. I mean really, the Hebrews did build the pyramids...and then disappeared for thousands of years before magically reappearing back in time. Of course, that's the only thing it could be since your delusional conclusion has to magically always be true facts be damned.
The same is true of God and what is written in the Bible.
Idiocy. This is true only for the Diest god. The Judeo/Christian god and the bible are known with 100% certainty to be nonsense. It's trivially easy to prove that your god is nothing but fairy tales. Heck, the entire book of Exodus is obvious nonsense. There were no Hebrews building the pyramids because the Hebrews as a tribe didn't even exist for thousands of years. Think it through, Sparky and actually engage your brain. Even human history goes back much much further than your god has even lived. I mean seriously, that's how damn dumb and dishonest you Christian scumbags are. We have buildings still existing on the planet that were here before your god was. We know this to be an absolute fact, yet you, contrary to everything you claim, don't care enough about what your god says to even be bothered to figure it out. Hell, I don't even believe your god exists, and I can't be as insulting to him as you are by refusing to even think and then claiming that he wants you to be that damn dumb. Truly, you are a disgusting example of the type of stupid slave religion was designed to create.
You neither refuted any thing, nor even made a coherent point. But you just run along and keep supporting traitors who are happy to spy on you as they whine about governments spying on their people.
*You* don't feel gross hypocrisy by elected officials is a problem. That makes you a subject. Citizens worthy of the name actually know enough about history to understand exactly why it is a problem.
Carry on with your ignorance and delusional self-deception, subject.
If the Senators were considering barring Cisco for this same reason, would you be so vocal in attacking voices like mine?
No shit, Sherlock. The fact that they haven't done that *first* *before* dicking around with other country's companies is what makes them hypocrites and you one for attempting to justify their pure unadulterated scumbaggery.
Their jobs are, in part, to go after Cisco, MS, Yahoo, and the rest of the anti-American scum who are using the benefits they receive from my tax dollars in order to engage in the business of censorship and oppression overseas and at home. The fact that they are flat out refusing to uphold their oaths of office by aiding and abetting scum like Cisco and then pretend that they are standing up for American values in order to toss crap at foreign companies who are doing the exact same thing is hypocrisy of the purest form.
Or is it only some sort of mis-placed America-hate that drives you so?
No, I love America. That's why I despise scum like these Senators and yourself who so obviously hate every decent thing it ever stood for.
Again, the Senate has budgetary powers. They can blackball you if you piss them off. Cope.
And when they do it in such a disgustingly hypocritical fashion I have a responsibility to call them on their deceit, their dereliction of duty, and their contempt for America. Similarly, when you defend such anti-American crap, I have a responsibility to call you on your shit.
Does this mean the Senate is forced to look favorably on it? Of course not.
Actually it does mean just that since they're doing the same thing here and US companies are doing the same thing in other countries.
Otherwise we are absolutely justified in calling them and everyone defending them, like yourself, for example lying hypocrites. You might try to make at least a halfhearted attempt to look even slightly consistent and rational if you're going to be trying to call other people on something.
I find this response from the USA government very reasonable. They are not barring Nokia to do business with companies on the USA. They are not prosecuting them. They are just saying: "if you want to do business with ME, you have to play by my rules".
This could only be reasonable if the US government had cut off all business dealings with Microsoft and Yahoo after they worked to hand over dissidents to the Chinese government and enact the same freaking things over there. If they refuse to hold accountable the people who they actually have a responsibility to hold accountable, then they have no business trying to shove their lying noses into the business of companies who it isn't their responsibility to control.
It's disgustingly dishonest and hypocritical and is nothing but a cynical attempt at deceiving people into thinking that these scumbags aren't doing the exact same thing at home.
They're not at all saying, "if you want to do business with ME, you have to play by my rules". They're saying that there are no rules apart from the rule that they will fuck anybody they want to with or without justification.
I can ensure you that Canada, Quebec, and the US are all very much part of the continent of America
Well, for all your assurances, you're still dead wrong. There does not exist a continent named "America". There is the continent to which you were referring which is named "North America". There is another continent to the south named "South America". Collectively they are sometimes referred to as "The Americas", but there is no such continent as America. There is a country, however, officially designated as "The United States of America" which is most often referred to as "America" in common usage.
I hope this basic lesson in common sense and geography was helpful, but I suspect it won't be. Anybody *so* certain of something *so* obviously false is unlikely to deal either honestly or well with having their errors proven to them.
Slashdot Mirror
Even if you knew for certain a cop was crooked, posting pictures of his house strikes me not only as obsessive, but also retributive without any court oversight, which is not what is supposed to happen in a society with the rule of law.
It would be laughable if it wasn't so disgustingly ignorant.
Cops are above the law. You can almost never get any sort of justice against the cop in a court of law. When we have so many bullshit laws and so many scumbag cops willing to enforce them that we don't have the rule of law, we have a police state as we obviously do now (check worldwide prison populations if you're so damn ignorant you're going to try and argue that one).
Cops *routinely* get away with torture and murder.
Your "argument" is deeply ignorant shit and nothing besides.
Ignore the fact for a moment that this was a DEA agent, which are hated by so many people. It is still a government official that is putting his/her life on the line in the service of their community.
The problem is your militant ignorance. DEA agents are hated by all decent people *for really really fucking good reasons*.
They are *not* doing anything at all *in the service of their community*. That's why they are hated by the decent citizens of this country. There does not exist a legitimate reason for their existence and their job can only cause massive damage to our community. They are the enemies of our communities since they are the primary cause of violent crime.
Citizens who take the time to think know that. The fact that you're trying to claim that the exact opposite of reality is magically true because the government propaganda machine told you that only makes you look stupid, and given the massively destructive violence you are actively defending (quit lying, you can't support drug cops while standing against drug laws those are necessarily diametrically opposed positions.), it makes you look really fucking vile as well.
One is enough. Or are you saying that a DEA agent's life is worth less than a regular citizen's?
Of course it is.
Does a regular citizen get paid by tax dollars for the express purpose of making our communities violent hellholes? No, they don't. That is the entire result of the actions of the DEA since it was created. People who work for the DEA have actively chosen a career making America a worse place in every way. They have yet to do anything positive and never will because it's not possible for anything positive to come out of prohibition as we've proven twice now at the expense of millions of lives and trillions of dollars.
Yes, absolutely. DEA agents are a pure liability to our nation and our species so their lives are worth less than nothing.
This has nothing to do with 1st Amendment rights or equal opportunity for surveillance. I would be the first person to support that position. This is an instance in which I agree with the cops.
Actually that is exactly what it is. So you agree that cops are our rulers and that citizens are slaves. Your point is as clear as it is cowarldy and disgusting.
Should CNN be right on the spot with our special forces giving away their position to the enemy?
Absolutely. Those soldiers aren't patriots or Americans. They are the worst enemies this country has. Armed to the teeth, eager to kill the innocent, and utterly lacking in anything even approximating honor, decency, integrity or anything of the sort? Hell, if they went to Iraq, they declared war on America by doing so.
Hell given I their crimes against humanity, it's disgusting to even call those fucking monsters human. They sure as shit aren't doing anything to help this country.
I did not support the war in Iraq, but that does not mean I would want to put our soldiers at risk either.
Then you are an active supporter of a criminal war and thus crimes against humanity. You don't get it both ways, you idiotic worthless piece of shit.
Could that war have happened if there weren't evil fucking traitors willing to follow the criminal orders to go over there? Of course not. So the only way it would be possible to be on the morally correct side would be to work toward the death of every anti-American scumbag traitor who signed up to go over to Iraq to murder hundreds of thousands of innocent people in order to make some scumbags rich and in order to promote a police state in America.
That is exactly what happened and the exact motivation for that war as is now an absolutely clear fact in the public record.
Sorry, Sparky, but if you're so fucking stupid and evil as to be an active supporter of mass murder as you have demonstrated yourself to be with you that cowardly bit of bullshit you spewed.
There is an agreement, or general consensus, that it is in our best interests for our government to operate with some privacy at times.
Primarily, that's just bullshit propaganda spread by the government so they can get fucking worms like yourself to attempt to convince decent people that they have no rights the government doesn't give them. Fuck you for being such a vile scumbag. The government uses the fact that people as fucking stupid and ignorant as yourself are willing to let them commit all sorts of crimes in their name and then hide them behind the lie of "security" jsut so you can continue being a fucking coward and deny your complicity in crimes.
She was not just writing a blog about police activities. She was putting DEA agents at risk by disclosing their operations and locations. That went too far. Put together a citizen's advisory board, whatever. I support some oversight. Not letting every criminal know exactly where the DEA agents live.
Damn, you are fucking stupid and delusional. DEA agents are all fucking traitors. Drug laws are not only completely unconstitutional, but they are the primary overriding cause of violence in our country. DEA agents do not have any justification for their existence. Killing those vile fucking monsters is an act of patriotism every time. There does not exist a worse bad guy in the world than the scum who enforce drug laws. America is a police state due to these vile fuckers more than any other group in the country. They all need to die and that is a statement of pure patriotism. I've actually read and support the constitution. Not one of those motherfucking scumbag traitors can say the same.
. Please note, I am absolutely against the War on Drugs, so I would want to protect undercover cops, not drug enforcement specifically.
The fact that you think those things can be uncoupled is why you come across as so fucking stupid and ignorant of how the world works.
Drug laws are only the problem they are because there are
But when you start stalking, it just gets weird, creepy, and threatening.
Weird, creepy, and threatening...you mean exactly what the cops have chosen to be for decades?
Sorry, but any way it is possible to sanely look at the situation leaves her a hero and these cops sleazy, cowardly, vile anti-freedom monsters.
She's the good guy, all of the cops involved need to be shot in the face.
That is the attitude of a citizen of a free country. Your views are nothing but the bleating of a slave who loves it's master.
Please go die or move to Iran where they already have every disgusting thing you want in a society you fucking worm.
If she had a reason to suspect one of the DEA officers was doing something illegal.. while not advocating vigilantism I could guess she'd have a reason to do it.. but to just do it because they are cops?
You obviously have only a tenuous grip on reality at best.
A sane person would have clued into the very well established fact that almost all cops are generally engaging in criminal activity at most times.
Most of our laws were put in place by evil people for evil purposes and are completely unconstitutional, so any cop working on enforcing any of those laws has actively worked to earn being shot right in their treasonous, cowardly faces.
But given the fact that the laws are skewed entirely against the citizens of this country, she is a hero for tracking these vile, anti-American freedom despising traitors. How in the hell are you so stupid and insane that you can't even tell the difference between the good guys and the bad guys. There aren't even any arguments that could be made to support your utterly insane delusions.
I'd say on principle that the best option is to leave them alone and let the market decide
This can't possibly work, or even be a sane suggestion under any circumstances.
We do not have anything even remotely approximating a free market, so that can not possibly work. It's not even anywhere within the bounds of sanity to make such an obviously worthless suggestion. Please take a look at the real world every once in a while and make a note of where your assumptions completely fail to reflect anything that could ever actually exist in the real world. It's the recipe for sanity.
We have a market whose rules were written by the major corporations Microsoft included, with the express intent of ensuring that our markets are incapable of functioning properly as we clearly see everywhere around us today.
Now, given the obvious fact that we do not have a functioning market and given that one of the major drivers behind this betrayal is the company under discussion how in the hell can you bring yourself to make such an obviously worthless, and rabidly, delusionally pro-corporate and anti-citizen statement. Do you really hate every other person in the world with such rabid intensity? Why? You couldn't actually mean what you said if that wasn't the case though.
It's a serious question. Assuming that you're not intentionally lying, how is it possible that you are capable of such incredibly naivety? It's like you've never in your life ever been on the planet Earth before. How else could you possibly be so out of touch with reality.
I mean do you have an explanation for how you could be so far out of touch with reality yet have thus far avoided drowning on your own spit? I mean, free markets can't ever possibly exist in the best of circumstances. That's an obvious fact. Approximating one will always be the best we could ever possibly do and our laws were written specifically for the purpose of keeping us as far as possible away from that theoretical ideal in order to tilt the playing field in the favor of Microsoft and other similar criminal organizations who despise free markets more than anything else in the world.
So, how is it that you think laws specifically written in order to prevent something somehow magically created exactly the thing they were designed to prevent and in fact isn't even possible anyhow?
Do you see how "free market" believers seem totally insane to anybody with any sense or knowledge or even basic common sense?
The fact that you get fucked as hard as everyone else by these sleazy criminal policies yet keep begging for more really makes demonstrates your unfitness to make any decisions that can possibly have any affect on another person ever. Please don't ever vote. You've proven that you are incapable or *really* unwilling to handle that responsibility and so your decisions premised totally on delusions you hold which aren't reflected in reality cause real harm to real people around you. Maybe one day you will actually wake up, grow up, and think through things at least a tiny bit before mindlessly repeating obviously false corporate propaganda. You'll be one hell of a lot less of a liability to decent people everywhere.
In practice, you sit down to play "for an hour", and next thing you know the sun's coming up.
No way, Dude. You're looking out the wrong window for that. The freaking Carthaginians were still around when the sun was coming up. It's on its way down again ;-)
By that logic CBS and CW are not separate television channels.
No, not at all. I don't even know WTF CW is, but I'll assume they're owned by the same company that owns CBS.
So my logic wouldn't indicate that they are separate television channels. It would indicate that treating CBS and CW as if they were independent entities is dumb since they're not. They are entities controlled by the same parent. They both act to further their parent's interests. Forgetting that is a problem. Pretending that isn't a critical factor in assessing things is silly. Pointing out that coupling does nothing but make sure the important facts are at the forefront.
There is nothing wrong with my logic.
Also you missed the key point that a buyer will NOT get a refund from paypal.com until proof-of-delivery is provided.
I didn't miss that "point". It's irrelevant to my point. What I said remains true regardless as to whether or not some other unrelated thing you said is either true or false. Which it actually is I neither know, nor care.
What you just described is impossible. First off, ebay doesn't handle money so they can't refund anything.
EBay owns Paypal, so this distinction doesn't even make any sense. If Paypal makes a refund, that's EBay refunding the money.
Incorrect logic.
On your part, not mine.
Had he known that you were trying to save the life of your loved one, and he'd acted the same, that would be correct.
Wrong. Had he known *for a fact* that it was not the case that a life was on the line then he'd still be an asshole, but his crime would be less egregious. It doesn't make it ok to actively be an asshole just because you're ignorant of the situation.
He was just being thoughtless, not malicious/evil.
Wrong again. He was *intentionally* fucking over other drivers and preventing them from keeping up with the flow of traffic because being an asshole amuses him. That was his statement. That is malicious by definition. Evil too in my book, but that term isn't well defined. Actively hurting others without gaining any benefit for yourself just for the intended purpose of being an asshole to people meets it in my book though. Had his intentionally malicious evil led to the death of an innocent person, then his execution would be completely justified. That doesn't mean that if he doesn't kill somebody with his childish asshattery that it magically becomes OK. It is never ok to act like that under any circumstances.
Thoughtless would be if he was daydreaming, ended up in the passing lane without consciously noticing and then when somebody asks him to get out of the way he does and apologises. That's thoughtless. What he did took active thought according to him. His intent was to fuck over other people for his amusement. Why you would even bother trying to defend the type of scum who routinely does that shit is a question you should be asking yourself. The answer to that will say a lot about you.
well, he's wrong, but then his beliefs are his own business. Can't please everyone. Last I checked, I was talking about being the responsible party.
No, I am not at all wrong. You yourself stated that as a fact. That was your assertion and something that you were bragging about. Trying to deny that now is both stupid and deeply dishonest.
You were not talking about being the responsible party. You were talking about going out of your way to fuck over other drivers because their frustration amuses you.
Since you do not have the foggiest idea what the motivations of the other party are before deciding to fuck them over you are a bad person. It really is that simple. It sucks for everyone else that you don't possess even the most basic common sense or basic human decency which is all it would take a healthy person to realise that, but pretending the facts aren't what they are by your own admission is just stupid.
It's not up to you to decide whether or not somebody else's emergency is important enough. It's your responsibility to stay the fuck out of people's way and *not* be an asshole because you find that amusing. You don't have the right to make those decisions for others. When you attempt to usurp that authority over others, you grant them the right to decide whether or not you live or die. That is the oldest deal in the history of humanity and every struggle against every tyrant is premised on that fact.
so he might be the kind of friend I get along with.
Unlikely.
You think that your ability to fuck people over solely for your sick amusement is far more important than a person's right to save the life of their loved one. That is sick and evil beyond anything I would associate myself with. That's who you are, Sparky. An absolutely vile monster.
I choose friends who are hands down better people than you are. I don't associate with people who are, like you yourself bragged about being, driven purely by their hatred of other people living their lives without your approval.
Oh well, when and if you get your head pulped with steel toes boots for acting like the monster you brag about being you'll know damn well why it happened and that you richly deserved it.
I know that I saved my family from the fate that a shitbag like yourself attempted to inflict upon us.
I'm quite obviously a far better person that you could ever hope to be and I have nothing but contempt for you because I know how fucking pointless and *murderous* your cowardly douchebaggery really is in practice.
Go die in a fire before you end up killing decent people.
But I have to admit, I get a bit of pleasure watching the guy behind me froth at the mouth because I delayed him a few seconds from getting to whatever thing he thinks is important enough that he doesn't mind endangering all the people around him.
So you're a scumbag and you take pleasure in being a scumbag? Wow, what a vile subhuman piece of shit you are.
What if the thing he was trying to get to actually was important like his little girl was dying in the back seat and good old douchebag raddan decided that he should not be allowed to get his little girl to the hospital to save her life because that would interfere with raddan's entirely unjustified belief that the world revolves around him.
This exact fucking situation happened to me last week.
Take this to heart, you evil self-centered piece of human garbage:
I managed to get around that scumbag through highly illegal and dangerous driving which would have been entirely unnecessary had he acted as if he were a decent human being. Minutes were *critical* at that point. Had that asshat succeeded in his vile plan to hold me down to the speed he decided that I should be driving and had my little girl died instead of *barely* by fucking *minutes* been saved at the emergency room, then I would have run that sick son of a bitch off of the road and beaten them to death without a second's hesitation or a moment's regret.
You should really think long and hard about what a disgustingly vile piece of shit *you are* when you take pleasure in hurting others without even helping yourself at all. When you get pleasure from things that can easily lead to the morally correct action on somebody else's part being beating you to death, then you are a very seriously diseased monster and should probably avoid mouthing off in public forums thereby demonstrating your disgusting subhuman nature. You're are a sick little fucker and beneath contempt. I adamantly hope that you die soon and painfully you vile evil worm.
If the speed limit is 65 and and both lanes have people next to each other going 65, get over it, no law is being broken.
That just means that your legislators are utter failures. There does not exist an excuse for failing to prevent people from blocking the freeways. This is the primary cause of congestion and accidents.
I'm not going to move into the right lane and get stuck behind someone going 55, unable to change lanes because everyone on my left is going 25-30mph faster than me.
So you'll stick *everybody else in the entire passing lane*r behind your dumb, slow moving ass and you thing that's somehow ok while it's a great tragedy to expect you to keep up with the flow of traffic WTF you utterly sleazy self-centered piece of garbage wrapped in skin?!?!?! I'm truly amazed at how fucking vile some people go out of their way to choose to be.
*You* are the problem in this situation. *You* are the jerk, and *you* are the bad guy.
You refuse to keep up with the traffic in the passing lane yet you also refuse to remain in the lane appropriate to your speed and driving abilities.
The people going 85 in the *passing lane* are going with the flow of traffic and are driving appropriately for the conditions. You are not doing either of those things. You are intentionally and with malice aforethought blocking the passing lane in order to prevent other people from using the roads they pay for in a the perfectly safe manner they choose. You are increasing everybody's risk, and you're doing it solely so that you can be a jerk to the people around you. If you can not keep up with the normal pace of traffic in the fast lane, then the only decent, rational, or appropriate thing for you to do is stay out of the way of the people who are traveling at the proper speed. There is nothing about your actions that justify the problems you are willfully choosing to inflict on the poeple around you solely due to the fact that you can't be bothered to go the appropriate speed. The appropriate speed is never determined by the laws which you've already admitted your legislators are failures at determining, it's determined by the speed traffic is traveling. You are in the wrong and there is nothing that could possibly justify your active asshattery. Please stop it and start acting as if you were a decent human being instead of the malicious asshole you declared yourself to be.
You're not even helping yourself and you're fucking over tons of people around you. I mean think that through, Sparky, and consider what a vile scumbag your chosen course of action *proves* you to be absolutely and beyond any possibility of a doubt.
That is why there are millions of Christians some of whom are every bit as educated and smart as you are and why the Bible has been translated into more languages and is more widely distributed than any other book.
There's a world of difference between being "popular" which is what you describe and "correct" which I demonstrated that the bible isn't.
Anyone who has to resort to name-calling and insults has automatically admitted that they are really are completely unsure of themselves and their arguments.I resorted to nothing of the sort. It's a fact that your religious beliefs are demonstrably false. You still claim it must be magically true because you really really want it to be in spite of the fact that there isn't any evidence for it at all and plenty against. You are delusional because you still demand that your favorite fairy tales must magically be true. That's what delusional means. It isn't "calling names", it's using the correct term to describe what you're demonstrating.
You are just totally and utterly wrong.
Of course, everyone who doesn't see your imaginary friend must be wrong. It couldn't be, you, the one with the magical invisible friend, who's wrong. Oh, no, that would be quite impossible. I mean really, the Hebrews did build the pyramids...and then disappeared for thousands of years before magically reappearing back in time. Of course, that's the only thing it could be since your delusional conclusion has to magically always be true facts be damned.
The same is true of God and what is written in the Bible.
Idiocy. This is true only for the Diest god. The Judeo/Christian god and the bible are known with 100% certainty to be nonsense. It's trivially easy to prove that your god is nothing but fairy tales. Heck, the entire book of Exodus is obvious nonsense. There were no Hebrews building the pyramids because the Hebrews as a tribe didn't even exist for thousands of years. Think it through, Sparky and actually engage your brain. Even human history goes back much much further than your god has even lived. I mean seriously, that's how damn dumb and dishonest you Christian scumbags are. We have buildings still existing on the planet that were here before your god was. We know this to be an absolute fact, yet you, contrary to everything you claim, don't care enough about what your god says to even be bothered to figure it out. Hell, I don't even believe your god exists, and I can't be as insulting to him as you are by refusing to even think and then claiming that he wants you to be that damn dumb. Truly, you are a disgusting example of the type of stupid slave religion was designed to create.
Fuck the rest of you. I don't know you, and you're not invited over for whiskey, cigars, poker, and RTS gaming.
The feeling is mutual. No offense intended or taken ;-)
There's zero reason for outrage here.
You neither refuted any thing, nor even made a coherent point. But you just run along and keep supporting traitors who are happy to spy on you as they whine about governments spying on their people.
*You* don't feel gross hypocrisy by elected officials is a problem. That makes you a subject. Citizens worthy of the name actually know enough about history to understand exactly why it is a problem.
Carry on with your ignorance and delusional self-deception, subject.
If the Senators were considering barring Cisco for this same reason, would you be so vocal in attacking voices like mine?
No shit, Sherlock. The fact that they haven't done that *first* *before* dicking around with other country's companies is what makes them hypocrites and you one for attempting to justify their pure unadulterated scumbaggery.
Their jobs are, in part, to go after Cisco, MS, Yahoo, and the rest of the anti-American scum who are using the benefits they receive from my tax dollars in order to engage in the business of censorship and oppression overseas and at home. The fact that they are flat out refusing to uphold their oaths of office by aiding and abetting scum like Cisco and then pretend that they are standing up for American values in order to toss crap at foreign companies who are doing the exact same thing is hypocrisy of the purest form.
Or is it only some sort of mis-placed America-hate that drives you so?
No, I love America. That's why I despise scum like these Senators and yourself who so obviously hate every decent thing it ever stood for.
Again, the Senate has budgetary powers. They can blackball you if you piss them off. Cope.
And when they do it in such a disgustingly hypocritical fashion I have a responsibility to call them on their deceit, their dereliction of duty, and their contempt for America.
Similarly, when you defend such anti-American crap, I have a responsibility to call you on your shit.
Does this mean the Senate is forced to look favorably on it? Of course not.
Actually it does mean just that since they're doing the same thing here and US companies are doing the same thing in other countries.
Otherwise we are absolutely justified in calling them and everyone defending them, like yourself, for example lying hypocrites. You might try to make at least a halfhearted attempt to look even slightly consistent and rational if you're going to be trying to call other people on something.
I find this response from the USA government very reasonable. They are not barring Nokia to do business with companies on the USA. They are not prosecuting them. They are just saying: "if you want to do business with ME, you have to play by my rules".
This could only be reasonable if the US government had cut off all business dealings with Microsoft and Yahoo after they worked to hand over dissidents to the Chinese government and enact the same freaking things over there. If they refuse to hold accountable the people who they actually have a responsibility to hold accountable, then they have no business trying to shove their lying noses into the business of companies who it isn't their responsibility to control.
It's disgustingly dishonest and hypocritical and is nothing but a cynical attempt at deceiving people into thinking that these scumbags aren't doing the exact same thing at home.
They're not at all saying, "if you want to do business with ME, you have to play by my rules". They're saying that there are no rules apart from the rule that they will fuck anybody they want to with or without justification.
Growler: In British English this refers to lady parts, but in American English it's a gallon jug you get filled up on the way out of a brew pub.
Hence my British wife's hysterical laughter the first time we were in a brew pub with a sign advertising "Growlers to go".
I can ensure you that Canada, Quebec, and the US are all very much part of the continent of America
Well, for all your assurances, you're still dead wrong. There does not exist a continent named "America". There is the continent to which you were referring which is named "North America". There is another continent to the south named "South America". Collectively they are sometimes referred to as "The Americas", but there is no such continent as America. There is a country, however, officially designated as "The United States of America" which is most often referred to as "America" in common usage.
I hope this basic lesson in common sense and geography was helpful, but I suspect it won't be. Anybody *so* certain of something *so* obviously false is unlikely to deal either honestly or well with having their errors proven to them.
No - he was trying for 5, but only got -1!
Sounds like my last night out hitting on the ladies :-(