Slashdot Mirror


Exchange Rates Spell High Prices for Windows 7 In the EU

CWmike writes "European customers will pay up to twice as much for Windows 7 compared with US users, even though the new operating system will ship without a browser in Europe. Some of the money Microsoft stands to make on the European editions of Windows 7 comes from the weak dollar. Last week, for instance, the dollar fell against the euro the most in a month, hitting $1.41 per euro. For example, Windows 7 Professional, the key retail edition for businesses, will sport a price tag of 285 euros, or $400.60, and £189.99, or $313.84, at Saturday's exchange rate. In other words, EU customers will pay twice the $199.99 U.S. price; U.K. buyers will pay 57% more. And depending on your view on bundling IE, Europe's customers will be paying more for less, with Microsoft's decision to yank IE8 from Windows 7 in an effort to head off EU antitrust regulators, who may still force the company to take more drastic measures."

548 comments

  1. Fine by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I won't buy it, then.

    Really, fuck US products. I don't need your music, software, cars, or internet.

    In fact, that includes Slas[NO CARRIER]

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Fine by ionix5891 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Im after downloading it for free and getting a legal key valid till 2010

      http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/download.aspx

      surprised that microsoft are so "generous" lately

      quite happy with it so far and (gasp!) will ensure my next laptop has win7 on it

    2. Re:Fine by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had the RC the day after release :) I'm very happy with the product, but not £189.99 happy. Especially not if the very same product is £60 - £70 cheaper in the US.

      Or are MS suggesting that it costs that much to spell words like "colour" and "flavour" correctly and swap the primary definition for "Hood" and "Bonnet" around? ;-)

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:Fine by Warlord88 · · Score: 1

      You live in EU? Then you definitely don't need American cars!!

    4. Re:Fine by h4rm0ny · · Score: 5, Informative


      It makes sense. They don't really lose anything as this is prior to you actually being able to buy it. Microsoft seem pretty confident that their new system is something to be proud of, so they get to show it off in the most ballsy way possible - by letting you actually have a copy and try it out for an entire year. The Vista criticism is now somewhat mitigated by people being able to get a copy of Windows 7 to install right now. Microsoft benefit from the "thousand eyes" testing principle of GNU/Linux. And when the time comes round that it is available to buy, you have an inducement in that its already installed and in use. There are also Advance Order deals available right now that let you buy it for half-price. Also, unlike the ridiculous number of different Vista versions there were, Windows 7 (ignoring server and mobile variants) comes in three flavours: Home, Professional and Ultimate which are easily differentiated by a short feature list of extras. Home Edition isn't the hamstrung version that it was with XP or Vista. It only lacks a couple of features that pros really would want, and Ultimate only adds things that really sound like the most exclusive features (e.g. the on and off-disk encryption utilities). So you aren't forced to buy some "deluxe" system just for basic features you'd expect.

      I think Microsoft are being "generous" for very sound financial reasons. They reckon people will try this and actually want to buy it. I'm a Gentoo and Kubuntu user most of the time, but credit where its due.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    5. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yea, what's this about American cars? I mean not even Americans are buying them :D

    6. Re:Fine by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Flamebait? Mods must have used up all their "senseofhumour" quote over the weekend.

      I'm not leaving Slashdot, I'm not boycotting US products in general, and taking it as a person insult if I did is just stoopid.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    7. Re:Fine by Jurily · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I had the RC the day after release :) I'm very happy with the product, but not £189.99 happy. Especially not if the very same product is £60 - £70 cheaper in the US.

      How does that even work? If the USD is low, shouldn't that make american products cheaper?

    8. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In IT and a few other industries they dont bother with complicated things like exchange rates so :

      $199 == £199 == â199

      the result of this is that we get really ripped off on some products.

    9. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How does that even work? If the USD is low, shouldn't that make american products cheaper?

      The usual answer is "customers want a stable price for software, we don't bother tracking the exchange rate on a day by day basis." In the EU they have fixed prices in euros, pounds whatever.

      A weak dollar means the nominal dollar price is higher. They could price lower but they are not in the business of selling at cost+n%, they are business of pricing at whatever the local market will bear. That doesn't change much with the exchange rate.

    10. Re:Fine by FreakyGreenLeaky · · Score: 1

      yes, but we'll always need their pr0n. There's something about an American accent when groaning appropriately...

    11. Re:Fine by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      That's the only smart thing to do. Why pay exorbitant prices for a shoddy operating system? Switch to something stable, like Debian. Some of the finest cities in Europe are already doing so, as noted in another /. article yesterday.

      Hell, I live in the US, and I don't want to pay for Windows!!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    12. Re:Fine by jimicus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Photography stuff is even worse. It's not unknown to find a DSLR will be priced at:

      $799 = £899 = â950

    13. Re:Fine by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, American car companies try to penetrate the European market lately. Brands completely unknown to Europeans are being marketed: Dodge for example. They also had a very, very, odd advertising campaign.

    14. Re:Fine by jfanning · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or are MS suggesting that it costs that much to spell words like "colour" and "flavour" correctly and swap the primary definition for "Hood" and "Bonnet" around? ;-)

      Actually MS has officially said "screw you" when it comes to a British English version of Windows. So you don't even get that for your extra £££.

    15. Re:Fine by cjsm · · Score: 1

      One point about the price difference is in the U.S. Microsoft offers both the upgrade version, which is cheaper, and the more expensive retail version. Europe is just getting the retail version, due to the removing of IE 8 because of the European lawsuit. But Microsoft is having a half price preorder sale, which is 49 pounds for the full retail version of Home Premium in Britain. I just preordered for $49 for the upgrade version in the U.S. I'd rather have the full version for $75, but the offer in the U.S. is only good for the upgrade version.

      But anyway, if you want Windows 7, preorder while you can. Sale is only for a couple of weeks, with limited supplies. Check Microsoft website for when your local sale is, and what vendors are offering it.

      --
      This ad space for rent.
    16. Re:Fine by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      Who would've guessed that Windows would go the shareware route. I guess it makes sense though.

    17. Re:Fine by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Im after downloading it for free and getting a legal key valid till 2010

      My son did the same thing for his HP tablet which had Vista Home premium which he found annoying, however come the crunch in 2010 he will just get the latest crack. If Microsoft think he will pay for a legitimate version of Windows 7 after foisting Vista on him then they can live in hope.

      Me, well I use Fedora but if I absolutely need any Microsoft product I have a corporate laptop. Of course I can run a virtual machine under Fedora which can sand box MS Windows and allows me if I wish to run any Microsoft centric product. The total cost of this is the same as it costs most people who use Microsoft products. The exception is I don't run virus protection.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    18. Re:Fine by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The encryption thing is bullshit. People aren't using their computers as typing machines any more. They're also using them as accounting machines and online shopping machines.

      Which means that personal, financial information is getting written out to the storage medium. Whether accidentally or purposely saved, or unintentionally cached.

      IOW, every machine needs to have some basic encryption functionality by default, just to mitigate the risk of thieves getting access to people's bank accounts when they steal their crappy old computers (and in this case, the older, the worse, because that means more time for you to use your computer for financial transaction or managing with actual account numbers.

      Apple puts encryption on every desktop (not on by default, but nevertheless present). Why can't Microsoft?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    19. Re:Fine by cheekyboy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      EU/UK is subsidising the US prices because americans are soo poor.
      American financial people think foreigners are as dumb as americans so often like to
      spruce up prices. If they just dared really dared to price it right, they would see higher sales.

      So yeah, if you want Win7, go to a chineese side street small retailer and get an OEM dvd thats legit
      and probably only $49.

      Full retail box price? Only utter morons pay for that. Learn how to use google simpletons.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    20. Re:Fine by mgblst · · Score: 1

      This is true, and it can work both ways. If the dollar gets stronger, then Microsoft would lose money. Of course, they would have purchased futures, or already sold them to the retailer, so things aren't quite so simple.

    21. Re:Fine by jlar · · Score: 1

      You simply cannot expect the price of Windows to be equal all over the globe. In many EU countries there is a thick layer of hidden costs that increases the price tremendously for almost all consumer goods. Let us take one example: warranty. In EU there is a EU mandated 2 year warranty on almost all products while in the US the warranty is usually much less. Since there is only the consumer to pay for the warranty this is a hidden cost that forces the seller to increase the price. Another example is the risk of litigation (which I guess MS considers quite high in EU). Other examples are legio.

      A hardware example is the MacBook Pro which in Denmark costs 40% more than in the US.

    22. Re:Fine by AC-x · · Score: 1

      First hit's always free

    23. Re:Fine by donaldm · · Score: 1

      You live in EU? Then you definitely don't need American cars!!

      I think many Europeans actually buy European cars such as in no particular order Audi, Alpha Romeo, BMW, Citroen, Fiat, Lamborghini, Mercedes-Benz, Peugeot, Renault, VW, Volvo ... etc with about 40% of the market being diesel. Of course Japanese and East European cars are also popular. :)

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    24. Re:Fine by nbharatvarma · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Heh. Interestingly they seem to do this only for currencies that have higher current value than the Dollar.. I dare them to make $199 to INR 199 :)
      $1 is roughly INR 50

      --
      ... and I shall strike upon thee with great vegeance, furious anger and a slightly positive karma.
    25. Re:Fine by Jurily · · Score: 1

      So yeah, if you want Win7, go to a chineese side street small retailer and get an OEM dvd thats legit
      and probably only $49.

      Downloading is faster. (Remember, I'm not in the US.)

    26. Re:Fine by umghhh · · Score: 1

      You mean there is a warranty on software products that is not actually meaningless and it comes from MS??? That would also mean MS is innovative on its own instead of buying technology it can abuse later on - I can only say wow things have changed while I did not look.

    27. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live in EU? Then you definitely don't need American cars!!

      The only American car I'd want is a black Pontiac Firebird or Trans-Am, and then do some additional tinkering...

    28. Re:Fine by twostix · · Score: 1

      Who the hell buys US cars??

      I don't even think that people in the US do anymore!

    29. Re:Fine by Antidamage · · Score: 1

      Exactly. $NZD is about half the US dollar. $NZD199 would put Windows 7 at a price I'd actually like to pay, not this $NZD400 rubbish.

    30. Re:Fine by jlar · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, the 2 year warranty is only a general example and is only valid for physical goods (although the European Commission is presently trying to extend it to software as well, http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10237212-92.html).

      There are however plenty of other hidden costs associated with doing business in EU.

    31. Re:Fine by trifish · · Score: 1

      > comes in three flavours: Home, Professional and Ultimate

      What are you talking about? There is the same number of flavors of Win7 as there is of Vista. The only difference is that Business was renamed to Professional.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7_editions#Editions

    32. Re:Fine by Quantumstate · · Score: 1

      Also they wouldn't lose money anyway because with the UK price at 1.5 times as much anyway the exchange rates would have to be very extreme to make up the cost.

    33. Re:Fine by Caetel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Microsoft don't even bother localising the software the the UK market, it's the exact same software as the US version. http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2009/06/08/9705183.aspx

    34. Re:Fine by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Have them do it with Zimbabwe dollars, the exchange rate reached several hundred trillion to one before it was most recently devalued...

      The Zimbabwe government redenominated the ZWD again on February 2, 2009 at a rate of 1,000,000,000,000 old ZWD to 1 new ZWD, and its currently just under 400 new ZWD to 1 USD.

      I have a set of uncirculated zimbabwe bank notes framed on my wall, just so i can say i'm a trillionaire... Good job they're uncirculated, because the currency became so worthless people were using it as a cheaper alternative to toilet paper.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    35. Re:Fine by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      This is a very good reason to ensure there is competition... A market will bear much higher priced from a monopoly simply because they have no other choice.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    36. Re:Fine by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      No they are suggesting that the non-US customers are more willing to pay higher prices. This was a topic that came up in my managerial economics course, some segments of the market are willing to pay a higher price than others. The trick as a company is to get as much of that differential as you can, ie don't let the costumer save the money they would be willing to pay, instead have them pay it (and take it as profit). There have been several studies that have shown that US customers are much more price sensitive than their EU counterparts. So the company charges more in the EU because they care less than in the US and the lost customers are worse less than the extra review from the ones that they keep at the higher price.

    37. Re:Fine by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Ah, sorry. I was misled by MS's website which was only advertising three editions (Home, Professional and Ultimate). It seems there are other editions but these are not normally available at retail. Well, then at least it remains sensible for the customer even if someone on Slashdot (me) is talking rubbish. ;)

      Thanks for the correction,
      H.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    38. Re:Fine by innocence18 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So where does that leave those of us trading in Flanian Pobble Beads?

      --
      Anonymity of the internet is responsible for the views expressed in my post.
    39. Re:Fine by GigaHurtsMyRobot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They'd probably get sued for more 'bundling.' You're free to google for better alternatives, like TrueCrypt.

    40. Re:Fine by FithisUX · · Score: 1

      Me too (on Windows). Actually I prefer to give a donation to FSF or LinuxFoundation or download NetBSD and donate to this project. Anyway, even QNX is free these days and I have no problem to give them a small amount to customize it for x86 desktops. Or even better OpenSolaris does everything for free and giving 20$ to Oracle or SUN is a better alternative. I share my PERSONAL thoughts on the issue : 200$ is way too much on a non standards-compliant OS that cannot play music, print, scan, sometimes connect to the internet or self-host out of the box. I believe Syllable is more advanced than this product.I'm also angry because I have to use it here for work and crashed without AntiVirus in 4 days after installation. Everytime I have to use a device I must download blob that in the setup.exe form replaces half of the OS to make it work. Microsoft is a hostage of the vendors and it pretends it has the most advanced OS. It is a big wrapper of nonstandards compliant HW and it says that GFX cards are DirectX ready, but they are not, you have to download a driver/wrapper. The GFX cards are not DirectX standards compliant, they implement no DirectX logic in HW. The best you can have without blobs is Vesa. Multifunction printers scanners faxes are not supported out of the box because there is no standards compliance. A cryptic (reminds of the ancient Egypt) procedure make us believe that windows magically talk to HW, but it is not done by windows, not a stack but a vendor driver. Vendors make the OS talk. Moreover IE should not be there. It is a product whether it is free or commercial. Windows supports lack of intelligence and autoconfiguration for the devices, to kill competitors and this is a political issue that should have been addressed years ago. I cannot understand why EU allows such a product to enter Europe. AHCI, Firewire, USB, PJL are standards which allow to an OS to use devices in the form of Stack/Profile pairs. We are in 2009 and a printer / GFX card or MPEG2 cannot present itself to the OS , provide its capabilities and be ready to be used without a profile (or driver if you prefer). Windows is partially responsible for keeping us to the Stone age of computing. It maybe legal (I personally doubt) but hazardous to innovation and diversity of products. I also observe that Unix vendors have their share in this deadlock but not the bigger one. This how I see things, maybe others don't see that way but I personally feel that my opinion is supported by arguments.

    41. Re:Fine by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      It's really a bad excuse to play it as an exchange rate problem.

      And it cuts the other way too in some cases. I have seen the price the other way around too, cheaper in the EU than in the US.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    42. Re:Fine by Weeksauce · · Score: 1

      This is where the difference between nominal and real FX rates comes into play. Exchange rates are divided into two categories: nominal (price that a bank/multinationals pay for an FX rate) and real (price consumer pays for goods in sercvices in local currency). If you ever travel over to the UK from the U.S. you still pay £1 for the same candy bar that would cost $1 over here. FX rates really only matter to one group, multinational corporations who hedge FX flucations using currency hedging and swaps (FX accounts for roughly 50% of vol vs. equity for multinationals). I thought this was a news for nerds discussion board, so why are we talking about econ/finance?

      --
      An inventor is a man who asks 'Why?' of the universe and lets nothing stand between the answer and his mind.
    43. Re:Fine by iJusten · · Score: 1

      MacBook Pro costs 1149 in Germany, Finland and France - probably in the whole euro-area, but can't be bothered to check. MacBook Pro costs 12 495 crowns (1156,94) in Sweden MacBook Pro costs 1199$ (856,42) in the United States. At some point, Mac Mini cost hundred euros more in Sweden than in the monetary union, and there it cost hundred euros more than in the States.

      --
      Chronologically late.
    44. Re:Fine by andy.ruddock · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please, don't drag your fiddling small change into the conversation.

      --
      God: An invisible friend for grown-ups.
    45. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn how to use google simpletons

      And where would I find this google simpleton (tm) technology? Should I google it for me? ;)

    46. Re:Fine by jonaskoelker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      $199 == [A^]£199 == [a^]199

      I take it the "A circumflex" is a shorthand for the empty string, and "a circumflex" is a shorthand for the Euro sign?

      I take it utf-8 is still broken on slashdot?

    47. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough* trucrypt.

    48. Re:Fine by schon · · Score: 1

      How does that even work? If the USD is low, shouldn't that make american products cheaper?

      Only if you assume this isn't a monopoly pricing things as they see fit.

    49. Re:Fine by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Yeah but they've gone above the usual 1$ = 1€ stupidity and actually have a higher number for Europe too, as if they were still stuck in the early Euro days where the thing was at .8$.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    50. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      not broken, defective by design

    51. Re:Fine by JediTrainer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In IT and a few other industries they dont bother with complicated things like exchange rates so :

      $199 == £199 == â199

      the result of this is that we get really ripped off on some products.


      Try living in Canada, where

      $199 USD == $350 CAD, regardless of the exchange rate (even during the periods that the Canadian dollar was worth more than the US)

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    52. Re:Fine by paulatz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To be completely fair, many EU countries has a much higher VAT (or sale tax) than the USA, and the USA price usually does not include it, while the "European" price does. Yet, even in the most dramatic case, like Denmark or Italy, where VAT is 25% and 20% respectively, it is still only a small percentage than the difference.

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    53. Re:Fine by MooUK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because it affects us?

      Also, surely one could be an economics nerd.

    54. Re:Fine by Hack'n'Slash · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between a hood and bonnet over there? The only thing I can think of over here is that a hood would be attached to the clothing, whereas a bonnet is a separate garment.

    55. Re:Fine by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      $799 = £899

      What country uses A-with-a-hat-on pounds?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    56. Re:Fine by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Funny

      $799 = £899

      What country uses A-with-a-hat-on pounds?


      Those of us in the tiny mountainous principality of Asshatteryburg, you insensitive clod!

      It was originally "Hapsburg," but you know what happens when stuff gets written down without a spellchecker over the years.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    57. Re:Fine by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Microsoft don't even bother localising the software the the UK market, it's the exact same software as the US version.

      Which is handy, as I plan on getting a copy of Windows 7 Ultimate sent to me in the UK by a friend in the states. That way I may have to pay some customs charges, but they will not add up to the ridiculous price difference. Hell, now I think about it I might just get him to email me the product key and throw the contents of the DVD on one of my work FTP sites we have for clients.

      Isn't the internet a wonderful thing.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    58. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Apple puts encryption on every desktop (not on by default, but nevertheless present). Why can't Microsoft?

      The encrypting file system has been part of windows since windows 2000.

      It's not perfect, but pretty good.

    59. Re:Fine by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      They have also been buying existing brands which are established in Europe and rebranding them, Daewoo has become Chevrolet for instance...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    60. Re:Fine by cgenman · · Score: 1

      You can always use TrueCrypt for free if you're worried about encrypting your Windows drives.

      Full system-wide encryption is a good idea, except that: 1. Most Windows home installations don't have a password and 2. When it does have one, that password gets forgotten all the time. I can't tell you the number of desktops I'd have to re-install if they were actually properly secured.

    61. Re:Fine by Chrisje · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dodge is far from unknown in Europe. Just unpopular.

      When the gas prices went up to 4 dollars for a gallon (0.70 Euros for a liter) I told some dude in California that I hadn't seen gas that cheap since 1982 in Europe.

      Having said that, Dodge and most other American car companies make cars that guzzle gas, are too damn big and impractical for the streets of Amsterdam, Rome, Paris or Prague, have a complete inability to corner and generally are quite ugly.

    62. Re:Fine by corbettw · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This seems ripe for arbitrage. Why wouldn't someone just buy a metric (of course!) shitton of licenses in the US, then sell them in the EU at less than the minimum-advertised price (MAP), but still greater than the price they bought them for? It's not like Microsoft could stop you even if they wanted to.

      Oh wait, that's right, the EU has decided that MS can't sell the exact same product in the EU as in the US. So now there's no way for someone to pull the kinds of shenanigans I'm describing. Once again, a government bureaucrat does an excellent job of protecting a corporation's interests and screwing over the consumer. Yeah bureaucracy!

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    63. Re:Fine by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Many europeans buy local cars, if you go to France you will se primarily French cars on the roads (Renault, Citroen, Peugeot)... Same in Germany (Audi, BMW, Mercedes). And even when american brands are offered, they are European oriented models (vauxhall/opel, ford have models like the fiesta, focus and mondeo in europe etc)..

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    64. Re:Fine by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      *Chuckle* Windows English (Canadian) would have colour and flavour I imagine. But then we still have to pay the ~85% exchange as well...

    65. Re:Fine by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      The Current USD/Canada exchange is: 0.8672 http://www.bankofcanada.ca/en/rates/exchange.html, so $199 is $229 ... eh?

    66. Re:Fine by MrBandersnatch · · Score: 1

      This will probably be fine for the home version but I suspect, knowing MS as we all do, that if you pull that stunt in a professional environment that your license will be worth squat. Always read the small print (or better still pay someone who understands it to do so) which will know doubt have "VALID IN USA AND NORTH AMERICA ONLY" somewhere in there.

    67. Re:Fine by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 0

      They've made their business model on being "just good enough" for people to use it, but not smooth the rough edges. Actually they smooth the rough edges before actually measuring to make sure things are put together correctly, so it looks like it's doing to work but it never will. And then they add little shims and ties and glue to get everything together.

      Most companies do this sort of thing, but few disband their web browser team after they realize the web browser is going to be the next platform to control and actually succeed. Then completely abandon it, since it's "good enough".

      Until a lot of people want it, it's the perfect tool for self-selective market segmentation. Smart people will pay extra for it, dumb people won't realize they need it.

      You're right, a responsible company would provide it to everyone. But this is a company after profits, not Karma. Apple won't win any points unless it's enabled by default. A small percentage of people might be advised to turn it on, but mostly it's going to be the people who know about it turning it on, and the rest never knowing it's there. Not having it and never knowing it's there are about the same thing, functionally.

    68. Re:Fine by Weeksauce · · Score: 1

      What I was trying to explain is that because of the difference between real vs. nominal FX rates, it does not affect you the individual. The only person affected by this is the Microsoft. The difference in FX (and future FX variance) shouldn't even matter to Microsoft as they are booking FX hedges anyway (changes in FX Rates don't matter). You the individual, pays X where X equals either sterling or dollars for most products because FX doesn't matter in relation to a basket of goods. I don't have a problem with people talking about finance/econ on this board; but I find it frustrating when people pretend to be experts on the subjects...

      --
      An inventor is a man who asks 'Why?' of the universe and lets nothing stand between the answer and his mind.
    69. Re:Fine by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      "yes, but we'll always need their pr0n. There's something about an American accent when groaning appropriately..."

      Not to mention our pr0n chicks usually are much better looking...and aren't hairy as a bigfoot.

      Geez, I've seen some foreign pr0n that looks as bad as some of the stuff we had in the US in the 70's. Hell, with some of those chicks, you'd need a machete to get through the 'jungle'.

      I won't even get into them needing to braid the hair under their arms....[shudder]

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    70. Re:Fine by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Well, I most certainly never heard a Dodge commercial before and I have never ever see a dealership in my area. Heck, the only Dodges I've seen on the road here are from the Ramstein airbase. (They probably get their gas at US prices there)

      Off course, every European "knows" the brand "Dodge" from Married With Children... but apart from that... Don't think so.

    71. Re:Fine by billybacs · · Score: 1

      To expand on H4rmony's comment, and paraphrase your link, only those 3 will be available to consumers. Enterprise is just Ultimate for VLKs, and Starter/Basic are for emerging markets only. I think h4rmony's point was simply that consumers only need to think about three versions, and businesses just get Enterprise and everyone holds hands feels terrific.

    72. Re:Fine by billybacs · · Score: 1

      Go with the Trans-Am...or better yet get the Firehawk. I used to have a Trans-Am. If I can afford ones again...I'd cry if I could get a 2nd-gen TA and a 2002 FH. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v320/DJRedBarron/Barrons%20Vehicles/2002%20Firehawk%20Trans%20Am/GraphicsKit2-10.jpg Beastly.

    73. Re:Fine by trifish · · Score: 1

      > consumers only need to think about three versions

      That's actually wrong. Unlike in Vista, the Starter edition is intended for Netbooks in fully developed countries. So the number of applicable flavors is still the same as with Vista -- 4.

    74. Re:Fine by ragefan · · Score: 1

      surprised that microsoft are so "generous" lately

      quite happy with it so far and (gasp!) will ensure my next laptop has win7 on it

      Spoken like a true drug addict...

      Look at all this free crack this guy on the corner gave me!

    75. Re:Fine by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      That's the UK for you. When I moved back in '90, the pound was roughly twice the dollar, yet all goods bore the same sticker as their US counterparts.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    76. Re:Fine by jimicus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, obviously it's far too difficult for /. to support the pound symbol properly. Or the euro symbol.

      Or indeed any symbol not widely used in the US.

    77. Re:Fine by jisatsusha · · Score: 1

      It's true that there's EFS, but Microsoft still seems to think it's only necessary for business users, which is a mistake in my opinion.

    78. Re:Fine by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It would, if they offered the product at EUR prices that reflect the USD prices. They don't, though. They are, essentially, charging what the market is able/willing to pay.

      Think of music CDs selling for like 2 bucks in India. Only that this time the US is India.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    79. Re:Fine by jonadab · · Score: 1, Funny

      > I take it utf-8 is still broken on slashdot?

      Slashdot is intended to be an American forum. As such, Unicode is neither necessary nor desirable. If it were supported, foreigners and trolls would start posting all kinds of diacritical marks and funny symbols and weird junk like that, which is not wanted.

      If Europeans want a Unicode-friendly forum where they can use foreign currency symbols and letters with funny looking little hats overtop and whatnot, they can jolly well start their own site. We don't want it here.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    80. Re:Fine by furby076 · · Score: 1

      How does that even work? If the USD is low, shouldn't that make american products cheaper?

      It's hedging their bets. They want their $200 USD. They are obviously willing to take more, but are not willing to take less. The market is volotile and in recent times the US has been on the losing end of the exchange rate. This is great for tourists coming from EU to the US, but sucks for US tourists who want to go to EU (which btw hurts the EU more then it hurts the US).

      So how does this play out with products? Well MS will mass produce millions of these boxes and they will sit on shelves in the EU for years to come. MS wants to gaurantee they get their $200/box. To do so they have to set the prices high enough that if the US market continues on this downward spiral they will continue to make their $200/box. If the market goes up, or stays the same, then MS just makes more money - which is not a bad thing.

      BTW if you don't buy what I said above you can always go with the answer of "MS is screwing EU over the anti-trust suit and removal of IE" :)

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    81. Re:Fine by VitrosChemistryAnaly · · Score: 1

      "If Europeans want a Unicode-friendly forum where they can use foreign currency symbols and letters with funny looking little hats overtop and whatnot, they can jolly well start their own site. We don't want it here.

      It's funny that you would use a British-ish phrase to let them know that they're not welcome here.

      Wilkommen! Get your kraut-ass back home. Is that how it works?

      --
      "It's a tarp!" -- Dyslexic Admiral Ackbar
    82. Re:Fine by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      So every time a business uses a laptop or computer from the states in Europe they are in breach of the license agreement?

    83. Re:Fine by vwjeff · · Score: 1

      Maybe they are making up for the money the EU has fined them. How is including a web browser or media player in an OS anti competitive behavior?

    84. Re:Fine by orngjce223 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wrong. It refers to the lid on the front of a car. Get a car geek (mechanic) to point this out for you next time :P

      --
      Note: I was 13 when I wrote most of this. Take with several grains of salt.
    85. Re:Fine by Daneboy · · Score: 1

      Yes, absolutely correct. Either TFA is confused, or there is some very peculiar Microsoft-math at work here.

      If the US Dollar is weak -- which it absolutely is these days! -- then products exported from the US to other markets should be LESS expensive than they are in the US. If a copy of Windows costs $200 and $1 = â1, it should in theory cost â200 in Europe. If the dollar then fell to half a â, Windows should cost only â100. But that's a bit simplistic and will only be true if the worldwide prices are, in fact, derived directly from the US price. That may not be the case.

      More than likely, what happened is that Microsoft has locked in the prices worldwide based either on historical exchange rates or on their local branches' opinion about what Windows "should" cost in each market. So someone in Microsoft UK decided more or less arbitrarily that Windows should cost £189.99 in that market. And since the dollar has dropped since that decision was made, UK customers are "paying more" in US$ terms -- but really, the UK price probably hasn't been changed. So it's a combination of TFA being overly sensationalist AND Microsoft being Microsoft.

      --
      /* "Specialization is for insects." -Heinlein */
    86. Re:Fine by zsau · · Score: 1

      The reason for this is that they recognise most Brits are smart enough to understand words even when they're spelt differently from what they expect. Plus most people probably won't even notice the difference until its brought to their attention. And now many of use are used to distinguishing between circular discs and data-storing disks. A CD is a disc-shaped disk. The British version of Firefox is awful! (Then again, any version of Firefox is awful.)

      --
      Look out!
    87. Re:Fine by umghhh · · Score: 1

      How is parent's post a troll's work? Can a moderator modify this - at least informative for the link?

    88. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called the Microsoft Middle Finger tax. EU is forcing Microsoft to adjust their product line about 5 months before a major multi-year release. So Microsoft is passing on the costs of the adjustment to all of the EU citizens. The EU has to learn their are consequences to being whining babies about everything.

    89. Re:Fine by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      That's why I buy my cameras in Japan. Why pay $799, when you can get it for ¥799?

    90. Re:Fine by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      I think that was the parents point - if you live in the EU you won't even miss US-made cars :-)

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    91. Re:Fine by MooUK · · Score: 1

      Some people are being charged a higher price than others - clearly it affects us.

      Yes, I know this is what companies endeavour to do - charge the highest price to each individual that they are willing to pay. Doesn't mean as the buyer I have to like it.

    92. Re:Fine by metamatic · · Score: 1

      This seems ripe for arbitrage. Why wouldn't someone just buy a metric (of course!) shitton of licenses in the US, then sell them in the EU at less than the minimum-advertised price (MAP), but still greater than the price they bought them for?

      Because Microsoft will refuse support for those licenses so as not to annoy their EU distributors.

      It's called "gray market". It's been going on since the 80s. Anyone smart buys their software via mail order from the USA.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    93. Re:Fine by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Âustralia, of course!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    94. Re:Fine by Weeksauce · · Score: 1

      What I've been trying to say is that they are not charging you more in real currency terms! As a purchaser of goods you have to look at it from a real currency perspective, NOT nominal. If you looked it your way (nominal) then I could say that tommorrow, when the FX Rates change again, that you are being charged a different price then you were the day before. In this case you would still be changed the same amount in sterling the next day; therefore, the FX rate becomes insignificant. Based on this, all I was trying to say was that it's unfair for the GP to refer to the daily FX rate in his summary.

      --
      An inventor is a man who asks 'Why?' of the universe and lets nothing stand between the answer and his mind.
    95. Re:Fine by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Your parent is right, though. Starter Edition wont be available retail. The only way you'll get it is through purchasing a device (i.e. netbook) with it already installed. So it really is just a set of three versions that someone buying Windows 7 must choose from. Not taking away that you were correct that there are other versions "out there", but my point is that there are only three versions, easily distinguished from each other by the purchaser by simple and clear feature differences, for them to choose from.

      The feature sets are pretty logically broken down as well. Professional has everything Home has, plus XP mode, a domain joining wizard and a complete backup integrated. Ultimate is everything Professional has plus multi-language support and complete drive encryption. They really do separate out quite nicely from a customer point of view.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    96. Re:Fine by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Heh. Interestingly they seem to do this only for currencies that have higher current value than the Dollar.. I dare them to make $199 to INR 199 :)

      I think I'd prefer ZWL (Zimbabwean dollars).

    97. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A weak dollar means the nominal dollar price is higher. They could price lower but they are not in the business of selling at cost+n%, they are business of pricing at whatever the local market will bear. That doesn't change much with the exchange rate.

      And when you are a monopoly you get to charge whatever the fuck you want and people will ask for seconds!

    98. Re:Fine by dastrike · · Score: 1

      Well, you can write both those symbols here, it just takes some extra, shouldn't-be-needed-in-this-century, effort to make it happen.

      £ = £

      € = €

      --
      while true; do eject; eject -t; done
    99. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *woosh*

      I should have said 1980's black Pontiac Firebird or Trans-Am, and then do some additional tinkering...

    100. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No different to Vista, where the huge price markup and the resulting opportunity to embarrass the whining Gates in an interview was ignored by Huw Edwards of the BBC, who was so busy fawning over Bill and giving free publicity to Vista he forgot to query Gates' astonishing faux pas when he announced that the price difference between the UK and US versions of Vista was due to currency exchange rates. Ignoring the fact that the weak dollar should have meant Vista was cheaper, not more expensive.

      Still, that's what you get in a country with a government like Broon's, although to be pedantic, Bliar, who was so far up Bill's rear he gave him an honorary knighthood, was actually in power at the time.

    101. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which major multi-year release was 5 months after december 2007?

    102. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then explain why here in Australia we're paying AU$199 for a Home Premium upgrade (=US$160) and it's US$119 in the US? (Actually in the US it's US$50 right now because of the special, but we don't get that offer here of course)

      So much for the $x = £x theory.
      My new theory is that the MS pricing analysts are high on crack and think that the same product should cost different amounts in different countries, even when those countries are no more (and often less) wealthy.

      Seriously I have no idea. Why shouldn't it cost the same amount here? We have around the same GDP/capita, culture and language as America in the UK and Aus, why are the prices so different?

    103. Re:Fine by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      No idea why that posted as AC...

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    104. Re:Fine by bigngamer92 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't MSFT already make their Indian version cheaper? Of course you can't get it in English but I believe they lower the cost of Windows to something the average Indian can afford. Which is irritating since you can't just bring over the Indian price to your region because they need to Maximize profit or whatever.

    105. Re:Fine by zuperduperman · · Score: 1

      Same here. I think Win 7 is great. I was all ready to upgrade every machine in the house (that's 4 computers) because the home networking stuff is actually really useful. I even went to pre-order with my credit card ready. Then I found out:

      a) no pre-order discount for Australian residents
      b) list price almost double that of US (after exchange rate conversion).

      WTF? AUD$400 (USD320) just to upgrade to a decent version of the OS? No home / family / multi-license offer? $400 is more than most of the computers in my house are worth!

      I think Microsoft is making a possibly fatal mistake here with this bizarre pricing. If they offered Win7 for a reasonable price they could start a genuine renaissance and reverse the tide of Mac growth. Instead they're taking all the karma they gained from the quality of Win7 and the excellent beta / RC program and trashing it.

    106. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You now, what bothers me is that nobody considers the following when discussing price:

      - taxes, other countries taxes might be higher than US on profit
      - sales tax
      - support cost, such as hiring locals to do technical support at a higher wage
      - localization of software
      - longer warranty mandated (doesn't apply to software as far as I know, but does to hardware)

      All people seem to see is, US is paying xx amount and Europe is paying yy amount. If you have an issue with pricing, you might want to take it to your local government asking them about taxes. Countries that slap on a 25% sales tax (Norway for instance) eat almost almost 25% of the total European price and almost 50% the difference (assuming European pricing is double of US) already. Factoring the above and suddenly the gap isn't so big after all.

      I'm all for lower prices, but MS will price their product to what the market can bear. Factoring income level and cost of living MS products are priced about right which brings me to another point. Do you ever ask, how come US employees earn zz relative to me, perhaps I should earn less?

      I do acknowledge that sometimes the price disparity is much bigger relative to the cost of living, but my point is don't just blame the company without considering all the facts.

    107. Re:Fine by dakohli · · Score: 1

      This means that if you buy it in the States, it will be cheaper. Each Euro is worth US$ 1.40 right now, so should be 40% off or so for those who can order it online with someone who can ship it up.

    108. Re:Fine by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, they can only be traded for other
      Flanian pobble beads.

      Now I stick with the ningi and the pugh.

      My wallet is enormous!

    109. Re:Fine by phtpht · · Score: 1

      I won't buy it, then. Really, fuck US products. I don't need your music, software, cars, or internet. In fact, that includes Slas[NO CARRIER]

      Actually what we don't need is another version of windows.

    110. Re:Fine by FreakyGreenLeaky · · Score: 1

      who the fuck flagged this Flamebait? Probably a closet Mormon or some such. Anyway, dude, come'n, shaving *everything* off is just creepy. Think Californication and David Duchov's character enjoying a bit of nice thatch. There is NOTHING more of a turn-on than a nicely maintained thatch; and not a Mohawk either.

    111. Re:Fine by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Well, you learn something every day. Thanks.

    112. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apart from cars, those things are all free. And hardly anyone here buys US cars.

    113. Re:Fine by Hack'n'Slash · · Score: 1

      Oh, the Engine Access Panel! Why would someone call it a hood or a bonnet? WTF? :)

    114. Re:Fine by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I just use the iso codes (GBP, USD etc). It's less trouble than trying to remember what magic symbols slashdot does, doesn't or sometimes supports.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. It's not only Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In Australia, the price of Windows 7 is AU$200. The US equivalent is AU$60.
    You do the math.

    Yes, this is a big "f*** you" from Redmond.

    AC

    1. Re:It's not only Europe by j35ter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh well, we'll just leech it from http://thepiratebay.org/

      --
      Delta-Mike November Bravo Tango
    2. Re:It's not only Europe by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or use something else. Seriously. Pirating Windows just helps Microsoft by promoting network effects, letting device and software makers get away with only supporting Windows and making the next version of Windows more attractive to buyers. If you think Windows is too expensive don't buy it. Either stick with the old version, or migrate to something else.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:It's not only Europe by icsx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You are allowed to say FUCK here. There is no censorship needed. Infact, lets all say it loudly and proudly: FUCK YOU

    4. Re:It's not only Europe by Goffee71 · · Score: 1

      How hard is it to buy from a US online store? Not an Amazon obviously, as they'll get grumpy and redirect you, but I'd hope smaller stores would do it? Surely even with the postage it will still save you money?

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    5. Re:It's not only Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft are a monopoly so are charging monopoly prices at retail. The "free" trial for Windows 7 isn't a sign of the products strength but a sign of their monopoly strength. It's still a usability fuck up, 50 million product variations is just insane, and not including Bitlocker as standard across the whole range is a toss up between stupid or just plain fucking greedy. Microsoft got themselves into a mess with Explorer and creating a split between its two biggest markets for a self-styled universal product is dumb. They could've spun Explorer off into Windows Live along with all the other junk.

      I still hurt from being screwed over adopting Windows 2000 which Microsoft have been trying to kill off ever since XP so the sharp end of all the projected Windows 7 retail box sales can go ram themselves up Balmer's ass. I'm the last fan of GPL, Linux, and all the other pimple faced shit that goes with it and Microsoft are going out of their way to make me hate them. The way I see it is the EU should abolish their OEM lock in deals and make them survive on their own with retail pricing. Speaking of which, what's with Bill Gates saying the public were "lucky" that business "allowed" consumer features? Okay, cunt. Make Windows business only and see how long Microsoft survives.

      Microsoft make a wannabe Tory government look like baby Jesus.

    6. Re:It's not only Europe by mqduck · · Score: 1

      Pirating Windows just helps Microsoft...

      Maybe, but you have to admit that it helps MS LESS than buying it.

      --
      Property is theft.
    7. Re:It's not only Europe by Xest · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately something else doesn't always support the software that people just want to be able to run without any hassle.

    8. Re:It's not only Europe by LizardKing · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Murderdolls - I Love To Say Fuck

      FUCK

      Well I ain't got a fucking problem, I just love to say fuck
      And I don't care who's around me, I could really give a fuck
      And I don't care if you're my mother, Or my motherfucking father
      I could really give a fuck now, That ain't my motherfucking problem

      Oh, yeah
      I love to say fuck when I'm driving in my car
      Fuck when I'm walking in the fucking park
      Fuck you if you don't like what I say
      I love to say fuck every fucking day
      Oh yeah

      I love to say fuck

      Well I hope I don't offend you, When I say the word fuck
      I guess you had it coming to you, You're such a worthless little fuck
      And I don't care if you're my mother, Or my motherfucking father
      I could really give a fuck now, That ain't my motherfucking problem

      Oh, yeah
      I love to say fuck when I'm driving in my car
      Fuck when I'm walking in the fucking park
      Fuck you if you don't like what I say
      I love to say fuck every fucking day
      Oh yeah

      I love to say fuck

      Well I ain't got a fucking problem, I just love to say fuck
      And I don't care who's around me, I could really give a fuck
      And I don't care if you're my mother, Or my motherfucking father
      I could really give a fuck now, That ain't my motherfucking problem

      Oh, yeah
      I love to say fuck when I'm driving in my car
      Fuck when I'm walking in the fucking park
      Fuck you if you don't like what I say
      I love to say fuck every fucking day
      Oh yeah

      I love to say fuck

      F.U.C.K. every fucking day (Fuck fuck fuck fuck)

      Fuck

      One nation under fuck with liberty fucking justice for all

    9. Re:It's not only Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Pirating Windows just helps Microsoft

      I think the best thing that could happen to Linux and other alternative operating systems would be if Microsoft made it absolutely impossible to pirate Windows. It would be very interesting to see the result of that.

      (I'd like to see the same thing happen with Photoshop too. I have a feeling Gimp development would get quite a boost as a result. So many people use Photoshop over alternatives just because it's so easy to get a pirate copy.)

    10. Re:It's not only Europe by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And I don't care who's around me, I could really give a fuck

      It's 2009 on the Internet. Nobody here is bothered by the use of the word "fuck". But we object to your incorrect use of "could really give a fuck". It's "couldn't really give a fuck". Honestly. What is it with Americans and their blindspot for this phrase? How much sense does it make to say "I could care less" in a dismissive way? You're saying that you do care with this phrase when what you're trying to say is that you don't: i.e. that you couldn't care less. HTH :)

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    11. Re:It's not only Europe by RedK · · Score: 1

      Fortunatly, that argument is mostly trite that gets repeated through sheer ignorance or malice.

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    12. Re:It's not only Europe by Duds · · Score: 1

      The above post is complete fiction unless the US retail price is $40US.

    13. Re:It's not only Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking that. Either buy directly or use a US VPN. Get it shipped to a US friendly address then have them forward the discs & key to me.

      Sending the whole box would likely incur VAT @ 15%, Duty @ 2.9%, non-UK currency fee, handling charges and other stuff that would probably add $150 to the price anyway.

    14. Re:It's not only Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, this is a big "f*** you" from Redmond.

      AC

      As one of my favorite reviewers once said, "By the way it's all right, you can swear on the internet. Your mum probably is not going to be reading it. I know because she's too busy being fucked, by me."

      Ode to Ben "Yahtzee" Croshaw.

    15. Re:It's not only Europe by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      In Australia, the price of Windows 7 is AU$200. The US equivalent is AU$60.
      You do the math.

      OK, I will do the math, with assistance from the XE: Currency Convertor

      200.00 AUD = 160.921 USD
      60.00 AUD = 48.2797 USD
      Oh, and one last value from the article since you specifically are talking about Windows 7 numbers:
      199.00 USD = 247.314 AUD
      AU$200 is less than US$199, not more.

      P.S. Where did that AU$60 figure come from? The cheapest edition of Vista purchased from NewEgg (a popular US computer discount website) is:
      Windows Vista Home Basic for System Builders) for $89.99 USD ($111.781 AUD).

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    16. Re:It's not only Europe by ScentCone · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Oh well, we'll just leech it from thepiratebay.org

      And if you don't like the price of some other import, do you just get some guys together, do down to the port and steal the stuff off the boat? If you don't like the price, consider not buying it and not ripping it off. Consider inspiring a company that is based in your own economy to produce an operating system you want, at a lower price. But mostly, just have the intellectual honest to not rip off something just because you don't like the price. Or do you do the same in restaurants? Do you hop the fence into concerts that you think aren't fair because they have a price? Or do you have the integrity to just not go? Or, is it OK for someone to set a price on what they make and sell, but you, in particular, get to take that away from them when it suits you, personally? Should your employer get to decide, at the end of your pay period, that he thinks you're a little over priced that week? Yeah, I thought so.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    17. Re:It's not only Europe by Blue+Stone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It would be nice if the EU, instead of bitching about MS including Internet Explorer in their OS (leading to the ludicrous situation where they omit to include ANY browser with the win7 E version) did something about this blatant price gouging of european consumers.

      If this isn't monopoly abuse, I don't know what is.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    18. Re:It's not only Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see why Australian Companies don't by it from the US then.
      And if MS sprout some bullshit about licencing (aka grey) they they should be prosecuted for not paying RENTAL tax, and done for misleading GST receipts on Invoices for .gov purchases (which would not be a sale if 'licenced'.
      So far they are having their cake and eating it too.
      What if a German imports from the US, then resells back to UK or other?

    19. Re:It's not only Europe by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Not really in the grand scheme of things...
      Any costs associated with producing windows are already covered, so any subsequent copies sold are effectively pure profit. Piracy allowed MS software to become widespread, and continued piracy keeps it widely used... Think how many people in poor countries who can't afford windows would migrate to linux over night if it became impossible to use pirated windows?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    20. Re:It's not only Europe by johnsie · · Score: 1

      I thought VISTA was the bet thing that could happen to Linux? Oh wait... Everyone just went back to XP. Microsofts problem was that they called it 'Windows XP' instead of' 'Windows 2001'. Having the year in there at boot time would make it alot more noticable that a person was using an outdated operating system.

    21. Re:It's not only Europe by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      You seem to be missing the elliptical phrase implied at the end, that's all.

      I could care less[...but I don't know how.]

    22. Re:It's not only Europe by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I would switch away from Windows tomorrow if there was an alternative that ran the software I have installed on my PC.

      It's not a trite argument, I'm not ignorant and far from being malicious I'd hope I'm being objective.

      Reality is that there is a lot of software out there that only runs on a variant of MS Windows. To stop using Windows, people would have to stop using that software.

    23. Re:It's not only Europe by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Reality is that there is a lot of software out there that only runs on a variant of MS Windows. To stop using Windows, people would have to stop using that software.

      So start migrating gradually. Each time you are about to upgrade a piece of software you use, consider whether you could migrate instead, to something that's multiplatform. After a couple of years you'll have migrated all your key apps, and you'll be ready to switch. Then you just call the vendors and ask to switch your license to the new platform; most of them are glad to do so.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    24. Re:It's not only Europe by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Well that makes sense, but I have never, ever heard the "complete" phrase. It sounds like your phrase was a joking continuation of the original "couldn't care less" which would explain why its a regional perculiarity. Stripped of the extension you supplied though, and because there is another phrase that requires your extension to separate the two, it just sounds like the speaker doesn't understand what they're saying.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    25. Re:It's not only Europe by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling Gimp development would get quite a boost as a result. So many people use Photoshop over alternatives just because it's so easy to get a pirate copy.

      I suspect that 99% of the people using pirated copies of Photoshop would be able to do everything they need using the $80 Photoshop Elements. They just pirate the full program out of some misguided belief that they need it.

      I mean, I do web design for a living and photography as an enthusiastic amateur, and I don't need or use the full version of Photoshop. Until you start doing CMYK separations and the like, you really don't need it.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    26. Re:It's not only Europe by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      What has this to do with stealing shit on the high seas?

      Or did the RIAA indoctrination work that well on you?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    27. Re:It's not only Europe by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes it's the RIAA indoctrination that has made me use a word in the same way that it has been used since 1701 (first recorded use, see also pirate radio, common use since 1913). Curse them and their infernal propaganda!

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    28. Re:It's not only Europe by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      What software are you using which doesn't run in WINE and doesn't have cross-platform alternatives? It's not a trite argument, it's a serious question. I haven't used Windows for a few years. When I did, I gradually replaced all of the software I was using with portable alternatives. For example, I ran Mozilla for mail and web browsing, OpenOffice for documents, Vim for writing, The Gimp for image editing. When I eventually ditched Windows, I did so without changing a single piece of userland software.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    29. Re:It's not only Europe by RedK · · Score: 1

      Sure, a few business packages only exist for Windows. That's not what we're talking about here. For what people do at home as hobbyist or even professionally, alternatives are out there. You ignore them out of lazyness or just so you can claim you're stuck on Windows. So yes, either you are lazy or malicious.

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    30. Re:It's not only Europe by ignavus · · Score: 1

      You know, Australians get a better deal with Linux.

      The American price of Linux is the same number of US dollars as the Australian price expressed in Aussie dollars ... BUT the Aussie $ is worth less than the US$ - so we get Linux cheaper than the Americans!

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    31. Re:It's not only Europe by tonycheese · · Score: 1

      It's sooo not called sarcasm.

    32. Re:It's not only Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, sarcasm doesn't always come across well in text. Also, sarcasm is saying the opposite of what you mean, typically in an overstated manner. "Could care less" is not the opposite of "Couldn't care less", "Couldn't care more" is.

      If you try to say you are being sarcastic by saying "could care less" instead of "couldn't care less" you still sound like a retard because you aren't using sarcasm properly.

  3. OEM Prices Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've never ever bought a retail copy of windows. I've only met one person who actually has. Stop wasting our time and quote the OEM prices, because thats what everyone buys.

    1. Re:OEM Prices Please by tsa · · Score: 1

      I also bought a retail copy, because I won a Mac and can't use an OEM version. I guess many more people are in my situation.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:OEM Prices Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just buy a USB mouse with your OEM copy and then shelve the mouse.

    3. Re:OEM Prices Please by peragrin · · Score: 2, Funny

      except for the 50% of people who don 't qualify for the OEM/ education versions.

      If your OEM and your installing it on non authorized machines then you will be sued by MSFT it is just a matter of time until they find out.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:OEM Prices Please by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Non-authorized machines? What is that, exactly? If I sell a machine, the customer wants Windows, I install it from an OEM disk that I legally paid for, what's the deal?

      Or, are you referring to those people who use the same OEM disk to install on dozens or hundreds of machines?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    5. Re:OEM Prices Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You won a Mac? Come on, you bought it. Don't be in denial - it's OK that you spent that much money on a computer.

      We've all done it.

      I remember when I "won" a NVidia GeForce 7600 with 512MB RAM and put it in an AGP slot. It was a silly thing to do, but we all make mistakes.

    6. Re:OEM Prices Please by tsa · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I misspelt. I OWN a Mac, I didn't win it.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    7. Re:OEM Prices Please by xeper · · Score: 2, Informative

      except for the 50% of people who don 't qualify for the OEM/ education versions.

      "Qualify"? You just go to a shop, buy an OEM/SBE Version and install it. Perfectly legal - in some (most?) EU-countries...

      --
      While money can't buy happiness, it certainly lets you choose your own form of misery.
    8. Re:OEM Prices Please by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      OEM doesn't mean it won't work on Mac. It just means that MS reduces its 30 days of crappy support to zero days of support. (e.g. you as the ostensible manufacturer, will be responsible for providing that support)

      You can get OEM editions at newegg (if you're in the US. I don't know how you do it outside the US)

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    9. Re:OEM Prices Please by will_die · · Score: 1

      For microsoft end user software(XP,Vista, Win 7, office) you most certainly qualify as an OEM. Microsoft definition is "an original equipment manufacturer, or an assembler, reassembler, or installer of software on computer systems" you install software you qualify and microsoft is acutally more easy then that for hardware requirements. Microsoft just does not want joe blow end user to install and use.
      There are some catches, once the package is opened there are no returns(you can see the serial number) some OEM packaging is changing and sellers are accepting returns, once installed on a motherboard it is stuck to that computer and under the OEM no motherboard switching even if it breaks, and most important you do not get to call up Microsoft for support, the OEM installer (aka you) are the people responsible for support, so no waiting for hours on the phone. With Vista they did make a limitation on 32/64 bit where they shipped seperatly and the OEM version limited you to just one version, I think that was later changed and Win 7 ships with both on the same DVD.
      Now for server rated software, this is for OEM licenses, most of that is tied to a specific piece of complete hardware and cannot be transfered in any form.

    10. Re:OEM Prices Please by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      There was a time where to buy OEM windows you had to buy something else like a mouse to make it a 'bundle' but that hasn't been true for years.

      OTOH only geeks generally but OEM Windows - the major stores sell at full retail (sometimes considerably higher, with 'free' support) as there's more profit in it.

    11. Re:OEM Prices Please by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      32/64 on the same DVD? If the MSDN RC builds are to be believed that isn't true.. each version takes up a DVD of its own. It's possible the retail ships with two DVDs but I've never seen a retail package.

    12. Re:OEM Prices Please by darien · · Score: 1

      I'm sure a lot of those files are the same across the 32-bit and 64-bit installations... it could work. Although since Windows 7 installs from an image, they'd have to be pretty cunning. More simply, they could just use a dual-layer DVD.

      If I recall correctly, the Vista Ultimate retail package does come with two DVDs, but if you have any other edition it comes with only one disc; if you want the version for the other artchitecture you have to go to the Microsoft website and fill out a form to have it mailed to you.

    13. Re:OEM Prices Please by will_die · · Score: 1

      May be confusing it with the next version of Office with will have box 32 and 64 on same disk.
      Anyways the retail package of WIn 7 will ship with 32 and 64 bit versions of the product, except for home basic and lower.

    14. Re:OEM Prices Please by tsa · · Score: 1

      Really? I always thought the install process didn't work with OEM copies. I will try it on my laptop once, because the Windows I had there has crashed beyond repair anyway. Thanks.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    15. Re:OEM Prices Please by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      OEM is a great way to get Windows Software, especially if you are a techy - and don't need MS Support. Compared to the crap you get with most DELLS, HP/Compaq et al - which is at best a next to useless Restore Disk and at worst a sectioned off HD partition with what a restore disk would've had.
      If you happen to change your hardware too much, its digital signature wont match the OEMBIOS.sys - and the restore disk will fail, as it no longer believes you bought your computer from said manufactuer... i.e. the Bulk-License IDKEY is no longer valid.
      At least with OEM, just like a Retail Version you get an install key ID that isn't tied to any particular piece of hardware.

    16. Re:OEM Prices Please by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      There are some catches, once the package is opened there are no returns(you can see the serial number) some OEM packaging is changing and sellers are accepting returns, once installed on a motherboard it is stuck to that computer and under the OEM no motherboard switching even if it breaks

      Not true in practice. When I changed machines completely (from a 2ghz Athlon to a 3800+ AMD64 dual core) all that was required was that I call Microsoft for a manual XP activation code (which came from a guy in India who asked me a few simple questions.. Just told him I upgraded my computer.. the facts)

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    17. Re:OEM Prices Please by rvw · · Score: 1

      Dell OEM cd's won't work on non-Dell machines, as they check whether the machine is a Dell. Some stores sell OEM cdroms without this limitation.

    18. Re:OEM Prices Please by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      In the US, you have to buy hardware of some sort to get an OEM version. Lots of online shops will get around that by giving you a "free" power Y adapter or something similarly cheap with the OEM versions.

    19. Re:OEM Prices Please by Tycho · · Score: 1

      I'm still using the same serial number of the XP Pro SP1 upgrade version using a copy of NT 4.0 RTM as upgrade media. I bought each copy legally, through educational channels, XP in 2002, NT 4.0 in 1997 and this copy of XP has been on at least half a dozen unique hardware configurations and reinstalled a dozen times on top of that. This copy of XP has only been installed on only one computer at a time. Two years ago, last time I reinstalled XP, this copy just authorized itself without a phone call on my part. When I did have to call MS, there nothing quite like repeating 50 numbers to a computer over the phone, by voice and being unable to punch the numbers in using the phone's keypad.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    20. Re:OEM Prices Please by master811 · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed also that everyone seems to be ignoring the fact that the article is comparing RETAIL prices (in the EU) to UPGRADE prices in the US. They won't be selling Upgrade copies in the EU, so as a result have dropped the cost of the Retail price down.

      If you actually compare the EU retail, to the US retail, the prices are actually very fair, and more or less the same.

    21. Re:OEM Prices Please by Briareos · · Score: 1

      You can get OEM editions at newegg if you're in the US. I don't know how you do it outside the US.

      Like this, for instance...

      np: Whitetree - Other Nature (Cloudland)

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    22. Re:OEM Prices Please by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      Well, I can buy the OEM version "bundled" with a keyboard :)

    23. Re:OEM Prices Please by zuperduperman · · Score: 1

      I find the OEM argument kind of bizarre.

      You go to the effort of paying for a legal license to use the software ... but you do it fraudulently! (unless you really are a commercial system builder). So the license you end up with is worthless, because it doesn't qualify you to use the software, but you still think it was worth buying nonetheless!

      If your intent is to disregard the license, why don't you just pirate it from the outset?

    24. Re:OEM Prices Please by xeper · · Score: 1

      I find the OEM argument kind of bizarre.

      You go to the effort of paying for a legal license to use the software ... but you do it fraudulently! (unless you really are a commercial system builder).

      Actually, no, it can be perfectly legal.... the subtle differences between US and EU legislation :)

      --
      While money can't buy happiness, it certainly lets you choose your own form of misery.
  4. Huh? by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the Euro has more buying power than the dollar (lets say it's double for ease of math), wouldn't the price of something be $10 in the US and €5 in Europe?

    1. Re:Huh? by Winckle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You clearly don't understand Globalisation.

    2. Re:Huh? by Kokuyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed. Globalisation makes source material cheaper for companies and end-products more expensive for consumers while the same consumers at the same time have to be more accepting of corporate bullshit, lesser quality and have to be flexible when it comes to their jobs.

      Meanwhile, consumers are NOT allowed to profit from globalisation themselves. That would defeat the whole idea of carving more money out of your customers.

    3. Re:Huh? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Globalisation is all about the customer, and their position with regard to the market.

      For an example, take a capital letter L, invert it, and place it next to a lower-case o. The customers is the L. For added realism, put a capital F behind the inverted L and keep adding and deleting a single space between them.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:Huh? by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 1

      **r the pr*tecti*n *f *ur children let's n*t use a capital *, capital * *r l*wer case * anym*re.

    5. Re:Huh? by RuBLed · · Score: 1

      For an example, take a capital letter L, invert it, and place it next to a lower-case o. The customers is the L. For added realism, put a capital F behind the inverted L and keep adding and deleting a single space between them.

      I see...

    6. Re:Huh? by kukulcan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I fail to see the link between a "weaker dollar" and higher prices in the EU. Actually, it should work the other way - a weaker dollar should lead to *lower* prices in the EU, in Euros. Anyway, i never understood the pricing of some companies - MS, Apple, Sony - as they seem to assume that 1$ = 1 = 0.75£ or something. Economically this just doesn't make sense. The prices should reflect the costs, which in these companies are in different currencies. The prices should then be ajusted to reflect the division of the costs in these currencies, and some hedging should be done to counteract exchange rate risk. Just assuming a fixed exchange rate (one which is wrong...) just doesn't make sense to me. I would love to see the justification for this, including why the prices in EU and Britain always seem to be higher than in the US or Japan.

    7. Re:Huh? by ChienAndalu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed. Globalisation makes source material cheaper for companies and end-products more expensive for consumers

      You are very wrong.

    8. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prices reflect the sweet spot on the supply/demand curve. With software, supply is (nearly) unlimited, so all they worry about is the demand. Europeans have more spending power right now, so Windows 7 will sell at a higher price there than it would in the US because they have more money. Since it really only costs them approximately $.04 to sell a license of Windows 7, they priced it lower in the US because Americans have less buying power, and that price point reflects the most money they can take in when estimating how many people will shell out that much cash.

    9. Re:Huh? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Only if you could buy at the dollar price. When pricing products for different markets, companies usually pick some arbitrary exchange rate, often USD == EUR. This means you end up with something like $100 for one and â100 for another. A few years ago, this was close to being accurate, so the dollar and Euro prices were similar. If the Euro becomes stronger by, say 50%, against the dollar, then the prices are still $100 and â100, but the Euro price is now equivalent to $150. If you buy the US version, then you are only paying â67, but this is not typically an option.

      When the dollar was very weak against the pound (it dipped to under 50p at one point) we saw this a lot in the UK. Most prices are set on the assumption that $1 is somewhere between 60p and 90p, so we ended up paying over 50% more than the US price in a number of cases.

      (Sorry if Slashcode's complete lack of support for unicode eats the Euro symbol (â))

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:Huh? by cliffski · · Score: 2, Funny

      Intel and Microsoft and Google are all US companies. I am in the UK. I use all 3 companies products and I also use the world wide web, which an English guy helped design based on underlying code that the US developed. As a Uk developer I sell to everywhere, including Nigeria and China.

      What alternative to globalisation do you suggest? That Spanish people have to rely on Spanish made and designed chips and the Spanish version of TCP/IP?

      Globalisation, if coupled with a lack of regulation and transparency can lead to abuse. It has also led us towards phenomenal technological change and economic advancement.

        By all means lets focus some attention on levelling the playing field and fixing the worst excesses of globalisation, but lets not pretend life would be better if companies were artificially pigeon-holed into territorial markets.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    11. Re:Huh? by jfanning · · Score: 1

      I think they meant that Microsoft is making even bigger profits because of the weak dollar. So it amplifies the difference between the pricing.

      And MS has a very strange idea of Europe. They don't even offer the special pre-order discount anywhere outside of France, Germany, or the UK. So those of us in the rest of Europe are totally fucked.

    12. Re:Huh? by ubersoldat2k7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That Spanish people have to rely on Spanish made and designed chips and the Spanish version of TCP/IP?

      Actually TCP could be more nicer:

      Hola -> Hola Que Tal -> Hola

    13. Re:Huh? by donaldm · · Score: 1

      There is no need to get upset at the rip-off costs of Windows 7 just tell Microsoft that you are thinking of installing Linux and watch the price of Windows 7 plummet. :)

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    14. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except most US companies just change the currency sign and ship it off.

    15. Re:Huh? by auLucifer · · Score: 1

      It's a sex joke. The F is male, L is female, o is a barrel

      --
      If I was witty I'd put something funny here but, as it stands, I am not and have just wasted seconds of your life
    16. Re:Huh? by auLucifer · · Score: 1

      Before anyone jumps on me. L is the recipient ... I think it's too late for this

      --
      If I was witty I'd put something funny here but, as it stands, I am not and have just wasted seconds of your life
    17. Re:Huh? by chatgris · · Score: 1

      Simply put, this has nothing to do with globalization and everything to do with Monopoly.

      --
      Open Your Mind. Open Your Source.
    18. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That article is over a year old.

      People are taking wage cuts all over the country and the World for that matter and all I see in my local store is the same old Chinese made shit go UP in price. And none of those charts address that real wages have been going DOWN in the last decade or so. And NONE of those charts addresses the hyper-inflationary increases in medical and higher education costs.

    19. Re:Huh? by maxume · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that the only way to make a € that doesn't get eaten by slashcode is to use the named entity: €.

      £ and ¥ also seem to work: £ ¥.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    20. Re:Huh? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Prices never reflect cost of production. Prices reflect what the consumer is willing to pay.

      As far as the dollar price, I'd expect exchange rates in Japan/China having more of an affect on production cost at least for Hardware. For Software duplication can happen anywhere.. I expect for something like Win7 they'll be duplicating it in Europe and selling it internally (thus avoiding import duties).

    21. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This link is from research sponsored by the American Enterprise Institute. It basically outlines that yes, life has gotten easier in the last 100 to 50 years. It makes no mention of the use of the abuses by corporations in a globalized economy such as poor working conditions and the "race to the bottom" that follows with an unregulated globalized economy.

      Despite what they would like you to think, AEI is not really an academic institute. Its not an organization for free exchange of ideas and the development of knowledge, but a self serving propaganda machine for funded by and produced for the same corporations like Microsoft trying to justify their egregious behavior.

    22. Re:Huh? by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      And MS has a very strange idea of Europe. They don't even offer the special pre-order discount anywhere outside of France, Germany, or the UK. So those of us in the rest of Europe are totally fucked.

      How so? Is someone pointing a gun at your head and making you buy it? Nancy Reagan was right, Just Say No.

    23. Re:Huh? by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      You might find that the theoretical extra buying power on an international market withers and dies when it comes to consumer prices, and it's not just about software. From videogames, to cameras and bell peppers, it's very rare to see an euro buying more stuff than a dollar can, even after taking VAT into account. I had that issue last summer, on a trip to Spain: Pretty much every item was more expensive than the equivalent in middle America, including housing. The one thing that was lower was salaries, even before taxes.

      Friends and family that came to the US on vacation have been making cheap purchases to take home for a few decades, even before the euro started. The only exception was the late 90s, where the dollar traded so high as to reach price parity at retailers.

      So, you see, retail prices do not really react that much to currency volatility, because retail prices have relatively little to do with the cost of goods. Only in an Argentinian-style devaluation do prices actually change with the exchange rate. Now, if we were talking commodities, it'd be a completely different story

    24. Re:Huh? by jfanning · · Score: 1

      Given the choice between Ubuntu and Windows 7 I'll take Windows.

      And for some reason my games actually work.

      But anyway, what is so special about France and Germany that they get a discount and the rest of us don't?

    25. Re:Huh? by Angstroem · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, that's not the way it works with the market.

      If US companies enter the European market, they either use the 1US$=1EUR scheme if the EUR is higher, otherwise the price will of course be adjusted. Remember the 1980s when the US$ was skyrocketing to nearly EUR1,80? Even entry-level US electronics like the Commodore C64, Ensoniq synthesizers were priced insanely high.

      The other way round, however, European companies like to match US$ prices, even if that means selling at a loss. Have a look what Volkswagen, Mercedes, BMW, or Porsche cost in the US compared to their EU prices... But also other pricing is weird: in 2003, I bought a Canon S45. Street price in the US: US$330. Street price in Germany: EUR550. Back then the exchange rate US$:EUR was about 1.20:1.

      Clearly, the Europeans are doing something very wrong, and this is not only overtaxation...

    26. Re:Huh? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Remember the 1980s when the US$ was skyrocketing to nearly EUR1,80?

      No. Sorry, You're looking for Earth Prime. This is Earth One where the Euro wasn't envisioned until 1992, and wasn't in first use until 1998, and in first exclusive use until 2002. Please retune your dimensional transport system.

    27. Re:Huh? by Angstroem · · Score: 1

      Geez. Would it make any sense to compare it to extinct currencies? But if you like DEM3,50 better, well, use that instead.

    28. Re:Huh? by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      I'd say he's somewhat wrong. Most of the source cost does get converted into profit, but some of it does help to lower prices and ease the pain of inflation. Even that article admits that the cost of living has remained flat for Americans, which means that globalization has done nothing for the country. Things like good health and education that improve life are as out of reach as ever.

    29. Re:Huh? by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      I love the anti-globalization people. You don't have a single economist, on the left or the right, who agrees with you, yet you won't let that stop you from being loud.

    30. Re:Huh? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, just having a little fun. :) I'd like to punch the moderator that modded your earlier post troll though. You make some good points that others weren't making.

    31. Re:Huh? by Angstroem · · Score: 1

      Wow, first-time troll modding.

      Obviously someone was truly pissed -- or unable to read and understand. But he's forgiven, as reading *and* understanding is a rare gift these days...

    32. Re:Huh? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      What kind of inversion? In color space, in rotation, or in scaling?

      I don't get what you're trying to say...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    33. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consumers profit a hefty lot from globalisation. I dare you to imagine a closed economy today and imagine prices and availability of goods there. Would consumers there be really better of?

  5. Not surprising by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 2, Informative

    For some reason, pretty much everything in technology is assumed 1€=1$... at least ever since the dollar is weak. Poor Britons have it worse, because they often get 1&pound=1$

    Try buying Apple hardware here... That hurts.... Smallest MacBook? 945€ In the US 999$ (which translates to 712€ at current rates)

    1. Re:Not surprising by beelsebob · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not forgetting that the EU price includes sales tax, while the US one doesn't, lets add for example belgium's 21% sales tax -- that makes the US price actually â861. Still not a great deal in the EU, but not as royally shafted as you made it look.

    2. Re:Not surprising by Alarash · · Score: 0

      This is because companies sell based on the cost of living, and yes, $1 is pretty much equal to 1. If I earn $2000 in the US, or 2000 in Europe, then paying $199 in the US or 199 in Europe is the same. Now of course if you look at the absolute value, we are being screwed over in Europe. This is why a lot of Europeans still buy from the US (even if you pay the customs you save money). And this is why the European union was asking the Bush administration to stop keeping the dollars low - you exports are cheaper, and your import as well since they are paid in dollars anyway.

    3. Re:Not surprising by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, indeed. I tend to forget that. I'll never get used to this Sales Tax thing. I, like most Europeans, actually prefer to see what we have to pay without calculating it ourselves.

    4. Re:Not surprising by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is because companies sell based on the cost of living, and yes, $1 is pretty much equal to 1.

      [citation needed]

      I frankly seriously doubt that. In that case, an Apple computer in New York should be much more expensive than an Apple computer in rural Ohio.

      Also, the price of an Apple computer in Italy should be different than an Apple computer in Germany (Those countries definitely have different cost of living). This is not the case... Both are 945€

    5. Re:Not surprising by pjt33 · · Score: 0, Troll

      If I earn $2000 in the US, or 2000 in Europe

      In a month? I'd be delighted to get a job here in Spain which paid 2000 euros per month, and that's with a degree from a prestigious university and over 5 years' experience. In the US I would probably be earning about $4000 per month.

    6. Re:Not surprising by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Where I live, 2000€ per month is close to what a qualified worker (think manual labour, low level office work) earns per month. Of course, our rent is close to 1300€ alone for a medium-sized apartment.

      Just to illustrate: cost of living varies widely in Europe. (Hey, and oddly enough, the cheapest MacBook in Spain is 899€, which surprised me.)

    7. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the thing is, there aren't any barriers between me buying a product in NY and having it shipped to Ohio. No barriers between Germany and Italy, they use the same currency. The US and the EU do have a barrier, in that we would have to exchange our money and pay any applicable import/export fees.

      You'll notice that thing like the price of gas, the price of beer, the price of homes are different based on the cost of living in that area, in fact they DEFINE the cost of living in that area. Thats because those things can not easily be purchased in a different area and shipped to where you are. Or at least not conveniently. However, the larger the purchase, and the easier to transport, the more uniform the pricing will be across wider areas.

    8. Re:Not surprising by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      Except that allows governments to hide more and more tax in the price.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    9. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK, and with a degree from a prestigious university and only 6 months experience, I earn £2000 a month. After tax it becomes £1465 a month. (And I've chosen a job I like with less pay than one in e.g. finance industry.)

      £2000 = €2355 = $3300

    10. Re:Not surprising by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Yes, I understand completely. What I wanted to discredit is that the price is based upon "cost of living" as the original poster (Alarash) claimed. Hence my silly comparison of Ohio versus New York.

      However, the larger the purchase, and the easier to transport, the more uniform the pricing will be across wider areas.

      Absolutely true, but then it's clear that its not coupled to cost of living, which was entirely my point.

    11. Re:Not surprising by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      So what? You have to pay it anyway.... To me tax is part of the price of the item.
      I know, it's a cultural difference. Like putting ketchup on everything. ;-)

    12. Re:Not surprising by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Europe isn't homogenous. Spain have salaries like you say, where 2000 is a pretty decent salary, whereas some places are significanly poorer (in Poland, 1000 is a pretty decent salary) and some places are significantly richer (here in Norway 5000 is a pretty decent salary)

      I've got a 4 year university-degree, and 5 years of experience in programming, my wife has a similar-length degree and a couple of years more experience in financials, and we both earn aproximately 5000/month. Those are *good* as in above-average salaries, but not HIGH salaries. (my guess would be around a quarter of the people here earn more)

    13. Re:Not surprising by Kjella · · Score: 1

      In the US I would probably be earning about $4000 per month.

      Just make sure you compare apples to apples, those in the US make more than I do but I really work only 37.5 hours/week (+ half an hour's lunch break) a week, unlike most US jobs where they expect free overtime. And I get five weeks of vacation per year, I don't think any US job has that. Not that it's my impression they get that much more work done, but you do end up stuck in the office much longer.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    14. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting the obvious alternative to paying the tax. You can throw the whole batch of goods in the Boston harbor

    15. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It drives me mad to have to point this out EVERY ****ING TIME someone says something like this, so thankyou for doing so this time.

      Strip sales tax out of the picture on both sides, and Apple hardware is not substantially more expensive in Europe. Some US state sales taxes add quite a substantial amount at the counter, from what I understand.

      VAT is how we pay for healthcare, pensions, and frankly the higher cost of doing business in a massive multilingual trading block. If you want US prices, you live in the US. It's that simple. I prefer not to.

    16. Re:Not surprising by maxume · · Score: 1

      You guys put ketchup on everything?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    17. Re:Not surprising by Malc · · Score: 1

      We know how much the tax is - why the would I want to be reminded about it everytime I buy something?

      Perhaps the US has multiple layers of tax on things, whereas most European countries have a single VAT collected by one level of government. Is that true?

    18. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sales_taxes_in_the_United_States

      This looks like a total nightmare but it doesn't excuse any 'rip off britain' whining that whines about the tax-inclusive price. If you want US prices, go live there.

    19. Re:Not surprising by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Is that so? Take Belgium. It has VAT at 21%. The 945€ MacBook is as such 780.99€ without VAT. That are 1094$...

      The US price (assuming without sales tax, since that's tradition in the US) is 999$. That's still a 95$ difference. Not stellar, but not exactly nothing.

      Just saying...

      I like living here in the EU too... As I said elsewhere, this is confusing because most Europeans consider the price with VAT to be "The Price", and Americans consider the price without Sales Tax to be "The Price". It's a cultural difference, and it's unlikely to go away.

    20. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's value added tax, not sales tax. The difference is VAT stays the same, no matter how many passages between the producer and the final consumer, where as sales tax is charged per transaction.

    21. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being Belgian and working for an American ecommerce company, I can tell you that the sales tax argument is bogus. Off course the tax does increase the price but that doesn't explain the big difference of prices in some products. Really for example a Casio Priva costs 499 dollars thats 359 euro. Here you pay 600 euro or 840 dollars. The difference is more then just the 21% sales tax.

      It is just a matter of foreign (it's not only American) companies liking to shaft their European consumers who gladly like to bent over. They do it mostly because they can.

    22. Re:Not surprising by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Touché
      I don't even have ketchup in my fridge.... (It's a stereotypical American trait...)

    23. Re:Not surprising by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      No one claimed that a Casio Priva cost the same in the US and EU, merely that the price difference in the MacBook pointed out was small enough that it can reasonably be explained by exchange rate variation.

    24. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I said not substantially more expensive. I don't think $94 on the price of a thousand dollar macbook is substantially more expensive.

      I think over time the EU price situation will stabilise much further, as more companies discover how to treat it more as one single trading block (which is the largest in the west).

      Apple prices used to be vastly worse.

      Now, don't start me on Canon.

    25. Re:Not surprising by Agronomist+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      Romanians put ketchup on pizza.

      I shit you not.

      It's a different sort of ketchup; a little sweeter, a lot less tangy. Still comes in a bottle labelled Ketchup, though.

      On pizza.

      --
      -DwS
    26. Re:Not surprising by MacAnkka · · Score: 1

      And let's say... three months ago (30.4.2009), with an exchange rate of 1.32, the EU MacBook would have cost $1031. 32$ Difference. Not that much difference now, right? The prices are a little bit higher to accommodate for changes in the currencies values.

    27. Re:Not surprising by MacAnkka · · Score: 1

      And of course I meant two months ago, not three months. Silly me

    28. Re:Not surprising by oatworm · · Score: 1

      What's really fun about them is that we only get to see the total tax that's assessed on the product, not how it's broken down (local, county, state), so the whole "you will see how much the tax is" argument kind of becomes moot after a while. Then again, we don't have a national sales tax or VAT - it's all assessed depending on what city you live in, what taxes are being assessed by the county, and what the state wants to shave off while it's there. Then there's the issue of what's taxable (most states don't tax food, for example).

    29. Re:Not surprising by Falconhell · · Score: 1
  6. You are getting the same ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... albeit some simple assembly required. With IE 8 separated it can be still easily added ... on the other hand, you could also think about not having to pay for bloatware. Alas, the increased costs here in Europe for Win7 will make even more companies think about the future upgrade path: it might not be Windows anymore.

    1. Re:You are getting the same ... by Nick+Fel · · Score: 1

      You also won't be able to do an upgrade install at present. Could be a fairly big deal for a lot of people who aren't confident enough to restore all their files and applications.

  7. Captive customers can't complain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It goes to show how far the market for personal computer operating systems is owned by one firm. It is amazingly hard to sell commodity software yet Microsoft manage to do it, at the prices it chooses, because it has no effective competition. Admirable, if slightly freaky (it makes me think of someone selling 128MB memory cards for a premium).

  8. But it never works the other direction by AtomicJake · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Interestingly enough, when the dollar was strong against the Euro (e.g. 1 Euro = 0.8 US$), we did not have the reverse effect. At that time in Europe, Prices of goods from the US were just increased.

    1. Re:But it never works the other direction by michaelnz · · Score: 1

      Same in New Zealand. There was a time when the NZ$ was at 80 cents to the American dollar. CDs, software and books never went down, consumer goods stayed mostly the same. You think with a stronger dollar we'd have more buying power but it was less. The down side is that when us small countries have our currency value get raised it becomes a negative because our exports become more expensive in other countries. It's kind of a double whammy, nothing's cheaper but it's harder to sell our own stuff.

    2. Re:But it never works the other direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is always easier to take than to give back.... at least for consoles a

    3. Re:But it never works the other direction by noidentity · · Score: 1

      So convert your Euros into Dollars, then buy it from the US at half the effective price. Surely it's worth the effort to save that much.

    4. Re:But it never works the other direction by binkzz · · Score: 1

      Yes, when I ask companies about this they always give crappy answers, it truly annoys me. It makes me pirate certain products if I can't import them, simply because they believe they get away with patronizing their customers in Europe.

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
    5. Re:But it never works the other direction by Chatterton · · Score: 1

      Read carefully your licence. You will se the the US version is mean to be used in the US... By the licence you can't buy the US version and use it in Europe. Technically, you can do it, but if the BSA go through your house it is the same has having a pirated version.

    6. Re:But it never works the other direction by AtomicJake · · Score: 1

      So convert your Euros into Dollars, then buy it from the US at half the effective price. Surely it's worth the effort to save that much.

      As somebody else pointed out: This is prohibited by the license.

      Slightly OT: That's also (one big reason) why DVDs have region encoding ...

    7. Re:But it never works the other direction by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      A legitimate question (not a set-up): Have you investigated protectivist measures your government may have enacted against "cheap" imports to favor your domestic goods during this period of relatively weak currency?

    8. Re:But it never works the other direction by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      A legitimate question (not a set-up): Have you investigated protectivist measures your government may have enacted against "cheap" imports to favor your domestic goods during this period of relatively weak currency?

      The EU is part of the WTO, so this would be a good way to get an international ass-raping. Import levies do apply though (both ways), I'm just not entirely sure what they are.

  9. Well Duh! by StupidPeopleTrick · · Score: 1

    That is the way that it is. The only way to get around this is to have something like DVDs with different regions... and please please, lets not go there! Exchange rates are a fact of life for most of us. In New Zealand you wait for the NZD to get strong and buy from amazon... When it is weak, you put some in savings (waiting for the next strong time). Listen, the USD could get weak (and some have forecast as much), then you get Win7 on the cheap in the UK. Do the free upgrade or wait for the USD to weaken... makes for an interesting exec meeting I am sure... - StupidPeopleTrick

    1. Re:Well Duh! by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      The US$ IS weak. Didn't you read the article? It's the whole point of it. The Euro price has NO RELATION WHATSOEVER to the US$ price. The weaker the US$ gets, the more we pay relative to US customers.

  10. Been there, done that by benbread · · Score: 3, Informative

    Pretty much the entire rest of the world got fucked over with Vista pricing too.. Here's how Gates weasel'd out of it @1:08: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmd93lWbOsw

    1. Re:Been there, done that by imrehg · · Score: 1

      Pretty much the entire rest of the world got fucked over with Vista pricing too.. Here's how Gates weasel'd out of it @1:08: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmd93lWbOsw

      For the people who don't WTFV (watch the fine video), he thinks the prices are pretty much the same everywhere, he does not expect big differences, but cannot be sure because he does not know any numbers whatsoever...

      Maybe he should google for "microsoft 7 prices" instead of "binging" it....

    2. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never realized until this video how Ballmer and Gates are exactly the same person. They give them same weasel responses and bullshit fluff, and hell, they even sound alike and squirm the same way.

    3. Re:Been there, done that by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      I would not call that tiny group of people that actually bought Vista, the entire rest of the world.
      In most countries in the world, most people would not have a computer, much less one that actually can run Vista, and even then, they could not afford the price.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the people who don't WTFV (watch the fine video), he thinks the prices are pretty much the same everywhere, he does not expect big differences, but cannot be sure because he does not know any numbers whatsoever...

      No, that's not what he SAID.. That's what he wanted you to HEAR though.

      Q: But you wouldn't expect to see a big difference [in Vista pricing for Britain]?
      A: Our goal across the product line is to largely have a global way of looking at things.

      WTF? (he even chuckled as he heard himself spew it)

  11. News for nerds... by Fross · · Score: 4, Funny

    People actually pay for Windows?

    Wow.

    1. Re:News for nerds... by j35ter · · Score: 1

      No, real people don't!

      --
      Delta-Mike November Bravo Tango
    2. Re:News for nerds... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      This article is an unfair characterization of what's happening. It's not that Europeans will pay twice as much as Americans (well it is, but that's not the point). It is that in America, we're having a huge sale, everything must go, and everything is half off (for our rich European friends).

      And if any of you Europeans think this is unfair, do not despair, we can certainly make it up to you. Now that George W. Bush is out of office, I'm pretty sure that he would be willing to go to Old Europe on a consultative basis, and for about half the price, do to you, what he did to us, to devalue your currency in half.

    3. Re:News for nerds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why yes. Some even use it.

    4. Re:News for nerds... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      I saw it only once in my life. With Vista nonetheless.

      I explained the consequences to him, he did not get it...
      Needless to say, I had to end that friendship. I do not befriend child rapists, military supporters, and Vista buyers.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  12. Well, whaddaya know by Kokuyo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microsoft actually wants me to leech this off of BitTorrent. There's no other explanation.

    Well, wouldn't want to disappoint them, no? I was pretty surprised at how little I hate Windows 7. I was actually thinking of buying. But it seems my perfect track record of never paying for Windows will remain perfect.

    I mean, think about it. You can get new machines for what? 500 Euros? Do they really think that a, almost, 60% bonus for the OS will fly? I realize that OEM deals will look decidedly different, but come on...

    1. Re:Well, whaddaya know by QuantumG · · Score: 0

      Or you could keep using XP or support an alternative.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Well, whaddaya know by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I'm sure the magic of monopolistic bundling with hardware will solve this problem. After all, it's why Vista sold. Seriously, why does the EU care about browsers, the tying to hardware crap is so much worse from an anti-competitive standpoint.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    3. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Whoa, whoa, whoa, XP? Y'all from the future?

      Give me a compelling reason to move from (DRM free) 2K Pro, and we can talk.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:Well, whaddaya know by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Troll

      How about "I want to connect to the Internet". Seriously, you must be so owned right now.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:Well, whaddaya know by dnaumov · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Microsoft actually wants me to leech this off of BitTorrent. There's no other explanation.

      I am confused. Where does this feeling of entitlement to someones product come from? If you don't agree with their pricing for Windows 7, you are free to use the older version if you have it or switch to any of the many different free operating systems available.

    6. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Clueless, huh? Windows NT can connect to the intertubes at the same speed as Win7, or any other operating system. Fire up a virtual machine and test it out, huh?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    7. Re:Well, whaddaya know by cliffski · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      If you don't like the price, you are well within your rights to stick with XP or vista. That's fine. But claiming this allows you to legitimately pirate it is a bit of a stretch. I've always considered that plasma TV's were overpriced, but this didn't create a feeling on entitlement to take one for free.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    8. Re:Well, whaddaya know by DavidR1991 · · Score: 1

      There is no feeling of entitlement. It's the feeling of "I want the product, but MS is pricing me out of my ability to buy it"

      The other thing is, MS really needs to compete against piracy. People can't justify huge expenditure to themselves if they know can get the exact same thing elsewhere for £0 (or â0 etc.) - irrespective of the legality of it. This problem is big for software too, because the high pricing is really just an intangible barrier. There's no real reason the physical goods/software are that value - so the usage of a free pirate equivalent is further justified.

    9. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      How about "I want to connect to the Internet". Seriously, you must be so owned right now.

      Why's that then? What (inherent, not service or application) remote vulnerabilities does 2K Pro suffer from that XP has fixed?

      Assume just for a second that I'm not a retard, that I've disabled all remote services, nmapped the box to verify that, and am running it behind a NAT box with a sane iptables setup.

      What's going to own me?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    10. Re:Well, whaddaya know by trifish · · Score: 0

      > Microsoft actually wants me to leech this off of BitTorrent.

      Man, I'd think twice before doing that.

      10 years ago, when internet malware practically did not exist, I wouldn't worry. But, today? Almost any illegal software you download from the internet contains malware of some sort.

      Or, if you want your credit card numbers and passwords sent to the authors of the crack somewhere in Russia, then by all means, download a pirated version of Windows. But it may cost you much more than a legal copy of Win7.

    11. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      Give me a compelling reason to move from (DRM free) 2K Pro, and we can talk.

      Windows 2000 Pro does have DRM, just less of it. I found that out the first time I tried to make a legal copy of a DVD (legal under Canadian law) and Windows blocked it stating it was "illegal". This is with a copy of Win2kPro bought in Canada.

    12. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence you feel entitled to it anyway. I mean I want it I cant afford it so I can steal it right? Fuck yeah Ive always wanted that luxury sports car I couldnt afford!

    13. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      Fuck entitlement. I wants it, I gets it. And after I have it I suddenly become knowledgeable enough to install and support it for family, friends and customers.

      And there are no alternatives. The things I want to run do nut run under MacOS and fuck Linux on the desktop, seriously.

    14. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      OR I actually know what I'm doing, how about that possibility?

    15. Re:Well, whaddaya know by GamerCowboy · · Score: 1

      There is no feeling of entitlement.

      contradicts this:

      so the usage of a free pirate equivalent is further justified

      Your "justification" is the very definition of a "feeling of entitlement". You don't want to pay the price they're asking for but you want it anyway so you'll just go ahead and take it, am I right? While it's true that MS competes with piracy, attitudes like yours should not be encouraged.

      --
      void
    16. Re:Well, whaddaya know by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Give me a compelling reason to move from (DRM free) 2K Pro, and we can talk.

      Easy. Just install a nice stable distribution of Linux (there are plenty) then install Win 2000 or even XP under virtualisation and you get the best of all worlds. Who knows you actually might like Linux. Total cost for Linux is $0 and for for your Windows OS and applications that you already have also $0. Cheap if you ask me. :)

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    17. Re:Well, whaddaya know by bradley13 · · Score: 1

      There is no feeling of entitlement. It's the feeling of "I want the product, but MS is pricing me out of my ability to buy it"

      Man, there is this car for sale that I really like, but the dealership is pricing me out of my ability to buy it.

      Sorry, dude, but if you can't afford a product, the normal thing is to do without. If enough people do without, and Microsoft really wants to sell it, they will drop the prices. Economics 101.

      The other alternative is to join MSDN - you get licenses to use practially all Microsoft products. Obviously, you can't go install them on your friends' and family's computers, but you can install anything you want on your own systems.

      --
      Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    18. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh... actually, no. MS does NOT want anyone leeching their non-beta products from anywhere and running things for free. If you like Windows 7, buy it at whatever price has been set. If you cannot afford it, don't buy it. There are alternative operating systems out there that easily fit your budget and in many respects are even better than Windows.

      I hear Linux is on sale at the moment.

    19. Re:Well, whaddaya know by maxume · · Score: 1

      Does windows 2000 even know what a DVD is?

      I expect that they message may have been from your burning software (but maybe there is something funky going down).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    20. Re:Well, whaddaya know by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sigh. Do you run a web browser? Does it display images?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    21. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Yes, I run Firefox 3.0.11, and don't frequent warez or pr0n sites. Will you be getting to a point any time soon?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    22. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Does windows 2000 even know what a DVD is?

      No, it doesn't, which is why it's tiresome when people conflate the OS and applications running on it.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    23. Re:Well, whaddaya know by sznupi · · Score: 1

      That would be a nice advice if not for MS making the switch as hard as possible... (by using anticompetitive practices in the past)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    24. Re:Well, whaddaya know by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Troll

      Nah, I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    25. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was actually thinking of buying. But it seems my perfect track record of never paying for Windows will remain perfect.

      WOAH DOOD UR FUKIN 1337!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    26. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      I call "consultant" on you. :P

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    27. Re:Well, whaddaya know by trifish · · Score: 1

      Could you be more specific?

      By any chance, are you going to log and inspect internet traffic from and to your illegal Windows installation for the next following 3 or 4 years 24/7?

    28. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ou can get new machines for what? 500 Euros? Do they really think that a, almost, 60% bonus for the OS will fly?

      You can still buy Vista Ultimate full OEM version for only 505,90 EUR in selected webshops! For the price you can have the full bent over experience in Amsterdam several times over. It's that cheap!

    29. Re:Well, whaddaya know by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Does windows 2000 even know what a DVD is?

      No, it doesn't, which is why it's tiresome when people conflate the OS and applications running on it.

      Yes it does, or else you wouldn't be able to read UDF formatted data DVDs using it.

      According to Wikipedia, Windows 2000 can read UDF 1.02 and 1.5 formatted discs.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    30. Re:Well, whaddaya know by pmontra · · Score: 1

      MS is happy that you pirate Windows 7: they're not losing money (you never paid them once) and they're not giving a customer to the competition. You should switch to Linux instead, or to OSX if you also want to buy a new computer. That would disappoint MS.

    31. Re:Well, whaddaya know by DavidR1991 · · Score: 1

      No, it's not intended to be a contradiction. Whilst the outpricing could be understood as the entitlement thing ("it's too expensive, I'll just get it for free") my point was that even if it _were_ within the price region for someone to buy it, why should they buy it (at a known inflated price) when they can get it for free? What reason is there to do so?

      The only one I can thing of (from the perspective of an average Joe) is "it's the legal method vs. illegal" - but then piracy is so widespread these days that it is actually desensitizing the population to the stigma of "illegality"

    32. Re:Well, whaddaya know by DavidR1991 · · Score: 1

      In case you didn't notice "dude", I was not talking about myself - hence the use of "people" as opposed to just voicing that as my own opinion.

      I'm an indie games developer, and I do not support piracy, nor do I condone it. But on the other hand, in order to get rid of it you need to ditch the self-righteous preaching, and actually try and understand why people do it (which is what I was getting at). Preaching at people just gets them more annoyed - understanding, however, leads to logic which you can exploit to your own advantage. That's why I think DRM is idiotic - it's a brute force way of stopping something, and it's lazy. Publishers and developers need to do a bit of thinking to defeat piracy, rather than just breaking out the baseball bat

    33. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Wildclaw · · Score: 1

      Man, there is this car for sale that I really like, but the dealership is pricing me out of my ability to buy it.

      Man, there is this car for sale that I really like, but the dealership is pricing me out my ability to buy it so instead I think I'll copy the car for free from my neighbour using my portable replicator.

      Sorry, dude, but if you can't afford a product, the normal thing is to do without

      Letting artifical restrictions on supply stop you from using something makes you nothing more than a bitch to the man.

    34. Re:Well, whaddaya know by westlake · · Score: 1

      I mean, think about it. You can get new machines for what? 500 Euros? Do they really think that a, almost, 60% bonus for the OS will fly? I realize that OEM deals will look decidedly different, but come on...

      The geek always quotes retail list for the most expensive version of Windows he can find.

      But that is a very thin slice of the market.

      If you are home or SOHO user, what matters is the OEM bundle or the upgrade package. You might be shopping for the close-out price on a high-end system no one wants gathering dust on a pallet until October.

      For a student, there are, typically, even better deals: The Ultimate Steal

    35. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you fucking hypocrite. You have a dog in this race. The more people use Winduhs, the larger pool of potential customers you have for your games.

      You're disgusting.

    36. Re:Well, whaddaya know by DavidR1991 · · Score: 1

      Newsflash moron: I have to buy Windows as well. Especially if a large pool of potential users adopt Win7 - I have to do so also, to ensure my games work on it.

      It's also worth noting that whilst, yes, I do have a vested interest - a) I don't develop exclusively for Windows and b) It's not like I get a % cut from MS' profits or anything. It's hardly "having a dog in the race"

    37. Re:Well, whaddaya know by vivaelamor · · Score: 1

      Nice to hear from a developer who isn't all 'death to free-loaders!!!!' and 'piracy is theft'. As someone who would rather wipe their arse with copyright law than take notice of it I get tired of people who will threaten me for not abiding by a contract I didn't sign. Especially when they start with the whole infringement = theft stuff, whether I was going to give them money or not before I certainly am not after they outright lie to me.

      I can certainly understand a fear of not getting paid and am quite sympathetic to that fear when the reason for not getting paid is likely to be peoples ignorance in not supporting something they actually want just because it is free, as a charity worker I am very sympathetic in that regard.

      Copyright has little to do with enabling people to pay for stuff they want to support and I would argue that it has the opposite effect of making people more ignorant of the power their money has by giving them less control over it. If you can impress on people that the worth of your work is measured by what you would need to continue working then you stand more chance of getting what you deserve than if they think your work is worth the price of a CD. The only ones who should be worried sans copyright are those who don't have a competitive product, with competitive being measured by quality rather than quantity, and those who can't be competitive because they want more than they need. The next biggest reason people might have for not giving you money if not by copyright is, in my view, ignorance caused by the unnecessary enforcement of copyright in the first place.

      To give an example, recording artists use demo tapes to get known by record companies in order to get a contract and even stand any chance of making money from selling records. Imagine taking the effort put into making a demo tape and using that effort as an invitation for people who are interested to fund further work. There are already fan investment schemes going on for music artists along similar lines and considering the shaft that moderately successful artists have gotten from the music industry over the years I can only imagine it is the rich and/or ignorant who think the current way is better.

    38. Re:Well, whaddaya know by oatworm · · Score: 1

      Nah, he has a rule on his pirated ISA box running pirated Windows Server that checks for warez traffic and sends him an alert if it picks anything up. Since he hasn't picked up a thing, he clearly is doing things right!

    39. Re:Well, whaddaya know by joshuaobrien · · Score: 1

      Microsoft want as many people to pay for Windows as possible. They also want as many people to use Windows as possible. These are not necessarily related.

    40. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you don't feel as cool anymore, how about that possibility?

    41. Re:Well, whaddaya know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's warez traffic?

      Is this warez traffic? http://160.046.648.01/?data=561-145-489-848

      How does a bot recognize warez traffic?

      See the credit card number at the end of the URL?

  13. Thats what you get for by nonofyourc · · Score: 0, Troll

    pissing off a big corporation.. Europe, get ready to pay back the massive fines microsoft was forced to pay by European legislators. Bend over and take it.

    1. Re:Thats what you get for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words come to my mind: obedient fuck. You are one.

    2. Re:Thats what you get for by nonofyourc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you still end up paying for it one way or another :) ,the word shortsighted comes to mind :P

    3. Re:Thats what you get for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Europe, get ready to pay back the massive fines microsoft was forced to pay by European legislators. Bend over and take it.

      I don't think so.

      http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/06/28/0344234/The-State-of-Munichs-Ongoing-Linux-Migration

    4. Re:Thats what you get for by j35ter · · Score: 1

      Um, we actually took M$'s money, now we've elected a PirateParty member into the European Parliament. The way it looks, Balmer & co. are the ones bent over and awaiting our second coming :D

      --
      Delta-Mike November Bravo Tango
    5. Re:Thats what you get for by White+Flame · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you might have that a bit backwards. If .eu says that Microsoft isn't playing by their rules, and the prices go all askew, competitors will eat MS's market in that region. There's already been many stories about various European governmental entities using various Linux distros as a Windows replacement. It'd be great to have alternatives to Windows become the standard operating platform across an entire 1st world country.

      However, at this stage piracy will still keep Windows in the dominant user position.

    6. Re:Thats what you get for by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about Europe just prevent sale within the EU until it complies with the EU directive? How about instead of paying Microsoft Tax, EU subsidises educational and support forums for common Linux distributions? Spends the money MS gave them giving similar incentives as Intel was accused of to PC manufacturers to include and support Linux by default?

      You think the US can hold MS afloat by itself?

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    7. Re:Thats what you get for by avxo · · Score: 1

      You really think that MS would be the one hurting if the EU prevented the sale of Microsoft software? How naive are you? Such a ban would last all of 15 minutes before panicked EU politicos apologized profusely, lifted the ban and resigned.

    8. Re:Thats what you get for by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      I hope there will be more to come. When more than half of our delegates are local PP members, Balmer will more likely start to reconsider his crap.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    9. Re:Thats what you get for by Faluzeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "pissing off a big corporation.. Europe, get ready to pay back the massive fines microsoft was forced to pay by European legislators. Bend over and take it."

      An interesting post, however it has one slight flaw...You appear to be suggesting that the reason for the high price is the recent fine that was imposed on M$. It isn't. M$ has always ignored actual currency exchange rates and fixed its prices at a rate that is most favourable to itself. This is merely business as usual for M$.

    10. Re:Thats what you get for by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Uhhhmm - I need some perspective. You are European, or American? Or, possibly standing on the outside looking in?

      Windows is simply unnecessary. I only run it in virtual machines, mostly for the fun of it, and to test stuff. I don't "need" it. It's trash, considering that it's the only OS to be consistently eaten up by virus, worms, trojans, etc.

      Yeah, before you jump on that, I know that every operating system has it's bugs. Bug, Windows IS A BUG!!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    11. Re:Thats what you get for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why subsidize Linux forums? I'd prefer they subsidize BSD forums. (See the point? Why should the govt subsidize one over the other?) I don't want the govt to pick 'the winner' in OS.

    12. Re:Thats what you get for by Faluzeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "You really think that MS would be the one hurting if the EU prevented the sale of Microsoft software? How naive are you? Such a ban would last all of 15 minutes before panicked EU politicos apologized profusely, lifted the ban and resigned."
      Hmmm

      It would appear that you are the naive one. Expecting a politician to admit to, apologise for and resign over a mistake is stretching the bounds of credibility too far.

    13. Re:Thats what you get for by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Please forgive my naivety and ignorance. From this point on, and for all points before, assume that any reference I make to "Linux" is in fact an all-encompassing reference to Linux, Unix, *BSD, or any other opensource / "Free" operating system.

      I frankly don't give a fuck which one they support, as long as they support one more OS other than Windows. Invest in training "Linux" techs, "Linux" adult education courses, "Linux" uptake in primary and secondary education.

      I'm so very glad that your pedantry didn't get in the way of the point I was trying to prove.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    14. Re:Thats what you get for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows is simply unnecessary.

      Really? So you can field Active Directory with GPOs? Run .Net code? Manage multiple sites with a few mouse clicks? Run Office natively? (Yes, Wine's a joke, and no, OO isn't there yet, and yes, MS Office *is* the standard).

      From an end-user stand point, if you don't care to game (yes, I've played with Crossover and Cedega; they suck) you can make it. But for gamers or the corporate world MS is still faster and easier than the alternatives, and for that you will pay a price.

    15. Re:Thats what you get for by 0prime · · Score: 1

      Unless the politician is Korean.

      --
      I am not a *blank*, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
    16. Re:Thats what you get for by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      And you, geeky dweeb #17, are representative of EU consumer needs? Right...

    17. Re:Thats what you get for by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      You rely on gimmicks that have been marketed by Microsoft. AD - I don't need or want it. The corporate world can get by without it. There are .net alternatives available. Open Office is there. Just dump the proprietary "standards" that MS markets. People using those "standards" are really just fish, on MS's hook. There is no data in the world that cannot be preserved, and transmitted by way of OO and/or one of the various PDF utilities. Nothing. The only thing that I ever use MS Office for, is to run a calculator that relies on macros specific to MS office. Given time, OO could figure out how to run all of MS Office macros, but by then, MS will come up with yet more "standards" for the fish to bite on. Phhht. It's a race that can't be won, with no real prize at the end, so why bother? The fish need to be taught that they ARE fish, and they are being reeled in just as fast as MS can reel. It's all about money, that you really have no need to part with.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    18. Re:Thats what you get for by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      Considering that the EU is one of Microsoft's biggest markets, yes, Microsoft would definitely hurt. Badly. But that's all irrelevant because Microsoft is going to do whatever it takes to stay in the EU. And the EU will tell Microsoft what to do, and they will do it. You don't fuck with the government if you are a corporation (which only exists at the mercy of the government).

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  14. Not a problem really by geegel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everybody has the right to shoot himself in the leg, just don't moan when it hurts like a bitch. I wouldn't be surprised if I'll see a sudden rise in Windows' piracy rate or, even better, see more people switch to Ubuntu.

    --
    right...
    1. Re:Not a problem really by DanJ_UK · · Score: 1

      A sudden rise? I thought Windows' piracy rates have always and will always be fairly consistent from the news I read very week.

      --
      - Dan
    2. Re:Not a problem really by geegel · · Score: 1

      Consistent yes. There's always room for more though

      --
      right...
    3. Re:Not a problem really by geegel · · Score: 1

      On second thought, I just realized that an increase in an already high piracy rate is much more harmful than an increase in a lower one. Let me give you an example. Product A has a piracy rate of 50% which goes up to 55%. From the developer's perspective he just lost 10% of his customer base. Now let's take product B which has a piracy rate of 90% but which goes up to let's say 92%. The loss related to the customer base is double now (20%).

      --
      right...
    4. Re:Not a problem really by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      or, even better, see more people switch to Ubuntu.

      A neighbour asked if I would build him a grunty machine to do video production and as a general use computer. He told me he had heard Vista was a nightmare, he needed a machine now, and he wasn't sure what he should do.

      I told him that XP probably wouldn't 'get the juice' out of the current generation of processors properly and that windows 7 won't be out for a while and would he like to give Ubuntu (studio) a go. I told him he would at least save on the price of a copy of windows and he might be able to buy some other gear. As suggested by a slashdotter here I let him know that there would probably be problems as any computer has but we can work through any issues that arise, so far all has gone well.

      I was pleasantly surprised by the latest Ubuntu Studio Jaunty release. His video camera and mobile phone worked with it immediately, the webcam on the ASUS monitor works well with skype. We setup Amarok for his music collection. I showed him how to install more software, told him there were other video programs aside for Kino but to give this one a go, now he is using it to make dvd's of his fishing trips.

      My neighbour is a fireman, and is quite humble about his proficiency as a computer user. I told him the machine is NOT windows or a mac but he is using the machine with confidence blowing away any pre-conceptions in my mind of Linux usability. He is about as far away from being a Linux geek as anyone can be and keeping the purchase price of windows, to him, meant he could afford a kick ass logitech speaker setup and most of the purchase price of a new HP printer. When I asked him a few days ago about how the new computer was going his exact word were:

      "I'm lovin' it"

      Linux may not be ready for the desktop, but I think it's fast becoming the new value proposition.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    5. Re:Not a problem really by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      When I asked him a few days ago about how the new computer was going his exact word were:

      "I'm lovin' it"

      Sadly, McDonald's has trademarked "I'm lovin' it" as part of a recent advertising campaign.

      I'm afraid your friend will have had to say something else in future tellings of your story.

    6. Re:Not a problem really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not a surprise. Of course average Joe can migrate to Linux if he has a confident geek holding his hand the whole way. But there is many average Joe out there, and very few confident geeks.

    7. Re:Not a problem really by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Sadly, McDonald's has trademarked "I'm lovin' it" as part of a recent advertising campaign.

      I'm afraid your friend will have had to say something else in future tellings of your story.

      You're right, I was wondering where I had heard that before but I think that was simply the first thing that came to his mind.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    8. Re:Not a problem really by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      That is not a surprise. Of course average Joe can migrate to Linux if he has a confident geek holding his hand the whole way. But there is many average Joe out there, and very few confident geeks.

      I don't think it's a matter of how many confident geeks are out there I think it's a matter of confident business, there has actually been very little migration. I resolved to set the machine up the same way I would have installed any Windows installation. I showed him where Add/remove software was and how to look for software that he might want to add, which doesn't exist in windows. Plug your camera in here, your phone in here and just make sure your dog doesn't piss on the computer.

      The only difference with a windows install was I said to him "Don't be afraid to try stuff on the computer, it's hard to break and if you do we can probably fix it", I do not feel that confident saying that with windows installations because I know when they break it's a nightmare to fix them.

      I'm almost completely certain that no matter what he does he will *never* get a virus on that machine.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    9. Re:Not a problem really by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I told him that XP probably wouldn't 'get the juice' out of the current generation of processors properly

      WTF does that mean?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    10. Re:Not a problem really by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      "I'm lovin' it"

      Are you sure he wasn't talking about his McDonald's breakfast?

    11. Re:Not a problem really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means he is either dumb or using lies to further his agenda.

    12. Re:Not a problem really by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      WTF does that mean?

      Get everything you can out of the 'current generation of processors', like when you juice a lemon or an orange and you are trying to get all the juice out of it.

      No, I wasn't going to explain cpu architecture to my neighbour.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    13. Re:Not a problem really by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone should explain it to you. Did you put more than 4 gigs of memory in his computer? Otherwise it "gets the juice" just fine.

    14. Re:Not a problem really by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Can you explain it to me? What CPU features does Vista/7 take advantage of that XP does not?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    15. Re:Not a problem really by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone should explain it to you. Did you put more than 4 gigs of memory in his computer? Otherwise it "gets the juice" just fine.

      Well thank you for the gracious offer. I put 6Gb of ram in the machine as the base (target is 24Gb), however I think because the machine is triple channel that XP would only be able to address 3Gb of ram. So no, XP doesn't get all the juice.

      I mean it would be pretty lame if I gave him the machine and it could only *ever* use 3Gb of ram. Maybe I have missed something but he is hooked on workspaces now it's hard to go back to windows once you have used that Linux feature.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    16. Re:Not a problem really by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Can you explain it to me? What CPU features does Vista/7 take advantage of that XP does not?

      Not with any authority, however it is my understanding that four is the most cpu cores that XP can access, after going through the hassle of installing the appropriate service pack. Whilst I think that the i7 has 4 cpu cores I don't think XP can access the maximum thread count even with the service pack.

      I think the real comparison is that multi core cpu's and 64 bit is old hat to Linux where as it's a fairly recent addition to Windows. So I can expect less problems with Linux handling multiple cpu cores as opposed to Windows. Besides I think Ubuntu proves Windows as it is not really good value for money.

      The video production software was a simple select/install/use and is already multi-threaded and 64 bit so he didn't have to buy or pirate the software to be able to use it immediately. Furthermore the machine's cpu is not burdened with the overheads that having to use anti-virus software imposes on the machine no matter what version of Windows is used, which releases even more cpu time and disk bandwidth for user tasks.

      I have learned, since I have supported Microsoft products since MS-DOS was released, that supporting Windows installations eventually becomes a nightmare and with the DRM being further embedded into Windows 7 I would expect it's just going to get even more frustrating to support. Even though I will have to learn how to deal with those issues, if I put my neighbour through them, he's gonna hate it. I learned long ago that you *NEVER* deploy a new Microsoft product to users until more experienced users, such as yourself in all likelyhood, have run the most common issues out of the product. Vista was already out of the question.

      Realistically, even if Windows 7 was released today, it still wouldn't be ready for general users for another 6 months minimum! If my neighbour wants to fork out a couple of hundred dollars purchasing Winodws 7 when it's available, then he can. I've told him it's there if he wants it. For now though he is running Ubuntu Studio and making video productions of his fishing trips whilst listening to Hilltop Hoods.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    17. Re:Not a problem really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think because the machine is triple channel that XP would only be able to address 3Gb of ram. So no, XP doesn't get all the juice.

      Most likely the machine is only addressing 3GB of RAM because you are running 32-bit XP. If you installed a 64-bit variant of Windows you can address any amount of memory that the motherboard can handle.

  15. So don't buy it.... by budword · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are other options these days.

    1. Re:So don't buy it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      There are other options these days.

      Yes.......it's be interesting to see how well Photoshop CS4 runs on your non-MS/mon-Mac computer.

    2. Re:So don't buy it.... by ami.one · · Score: 1

      Finally, Year of Linux on the Desktop is Near ! (for Europe)

    3. Re:So don't buy it.... by binkzz · · Score: 1

      Not if you want to buy a preconfigured hardware set up a la laptop, dell or hp from a well known brand.

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
    4. Re:So don't buy it.... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      What non-Mac computer?
      Mac is precisely one of these options.
      Vista is another.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    5. Re:So don't buy it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What non-Mac computer?
      Mac is precisely one of these options.

      Oh that's right - I'll not by the new windows because of the extra £200 I'm being shafted out of - but I will buy a Mac so I can be charged a variable rate somewhere between £200 and £600 for the price of Mac OS (depending on which system you buy that's how much extra it can cost over buying the parts separately - with the only addition from Apple being the OS.)

      There are lots of reasons to go with Apple over MS - price is most definitely not one of them.

    6. Re:So don't buy it.... by 0prime · · Score: 1

      Buying a Mac in the EU is a viable option to not being price gouged?

      Thanks for the laugh.

      --
      I am not a *blank*, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
    7. Re:So don't buy it.... by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'll be sure to tell my boss that the company doesn't need all of the current windows-only software so linux isn't a problem, and that we can ignore the rapidly approaching security end-of-life on XP. Hell, office 2007 documents open absolutely perfectly in open office.

      Just because you, as an individual, have alternatives doesn't mean businesses do. And even if we could switch to linux on everything, we'd still be screwed trying to exchange document formats with others.

      This is a rogering for european and british business, and there's absolutely nothing we can do but take it in the wallet. Gotta love monopolies!

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  16. So it will be cheaper to import even a single copy by Etylowy · · Score: 1

    $199 + ~$20 shipping + 17-23% VAT - a single imported windows seven pro would be no more than $270, or 192 euro. You save 97 euro or $135 PER licence.

    let's say your company has 100 PCs...

    It looks like M$ makes users get the non-EU windows 7 by making it cheaper - what do you think will the companies selling PCs with "Free windows" do?

  17. Yeesh.. by seeker_1us · · Score: 1

    So you buy Windows 7 ...

    or.......

    You could use Linux and spend the money you save on a a netbook.

    1. Re:Yeesh.. by Chi-RAV · · Score: 1

      which will run Win7 Starter Ed.

  18. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    Except.... Often US companies do not ship technology related stuff (software and hardware) to Europe. Plus, upon importing you get to pay a hefty import tax (last time, I did buy something larger it was 33%... Urks!)

  19. Standard conversion rate is USD=Euro by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Usually the conversion rate is 1 USD is 1 Euro. For example, look at the prices for video games. A $60 game consts 60 euros. Even Valve applies this conversion rate in Steam, and Apple for their store. It's extra income for the company. And most customers don't mind that much.

    Of course there are some companies that want even more, for example the Rockband game in europe was 250% the price compared to the US retail price. EA said this was due to higher shipping rates (it's not like the other plasic toys from China cost that much).
    But I guess that Microsoft went the same way (or as a retaliation to the fines they got), because they don't even do the $1=1 euro conversion. I bet they Blame it on localization. I'm sure that costs 85 euro per copy.

    There's a fair chance this will hurt MS, because their TCO just went up a lot.

    1. Re:Standard conversion rate is USD=Euro by Krneki · · Score: 1

      Fuck them, set your proxy to US and pay the proper price.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    2. Re:Standard conversion rate is USD=Euro by binkzz · · Score: 1

      Usually the conversion rate is 1 USD is 1 Euro. For example, look at the prices for video games. A $60 game consts 60 euros. Even Valve applies this conversion rate in Steam, and Apple for their store. It's extra income for the company. And most customers don't mind that much.

      If only that were true. A $60 game doesn't always go for â60 here: sometimes it goes for â70 or even more!

      Does Valve do that? I thought they sometimes lowered their price on certain games due to the difference in currencies. I'll mail them and ask. At least it includes sales tax.

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
    3. Re:Standard conversion rate is USD=Euro by sciencewhiz · · Score: 1

      When I traveled to Germany, I saw the same thing, but it wasn't just US goods. I went to the Grocery Store, and everything pretty much had the 1 USD is 1 Euro factor.

  20. The same for Linux by Bromskloss · · Score: 5, Funny

    It costs twice as much in Europe as in the USA.

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    1. Re:The same for Linux by Alpha77 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not if you happen to be Finnish. In that case you need to write it yourself.

    2. Re:The same for Linux by vodevil · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It costs twice as much in Europe as in the USA.

      Some versions cost upwards of 1000x as much as in the U.S.

    3. Re:The same for Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like even Linux companies want us to get Linux from torrent sites. What's wrong with these corporate people, don't they get it?

    4. Re:The same for Linux by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It costs twice as much in Europe as in the USA.

      You have to commit twice as much GPL'd code as you've checked out?

  21. Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will be 400$ for Europeans cause somehow they have to pay for the huge fines that EU has charged them.
    Just like printing it!

  22. And for Linux? by countertrolling · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That'll be 699 Euros, or $985.59... Cough it up, you deadbeats! We're not dead yet.

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    1. Re:And for Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's your sense of humor, you dumbshit?

  23. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by cpghost · · Score: 1

    $199 + ~$20 shipping + 17-23% VAT - a single imported windows seven pro would be no more than $270, or 192 euro. You save 97 euro or $135 PER licence.

    But what about customs fees? They usually exceed VAT a lot, due to protectionism. And will a US copy of Windows activate from a European IP address / European phone call?

    Actually, the higher price is probably also due to I18N translation costs, though that is certainly not the only reason. The main reason is IMHO simply higher purchasing power in the EU, compared to the US. Even within the EU, consumer prices are usually higher in Germany than in Spain. But compared to the purchasing power in those countries, it is more or less the same.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  24. Hey Guys... by bmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you don't like the price, then don't buy it.

    Don't pirate it either. Use something else.

    But don't pirate it. If you do, you're doing what Microsoft considers "the next best thing" - ignoring alternatives. Alternatives scare the piss out of Microsoft. Back when Microsoft didn't have a stranglehold on the market, people were happy enough pirating 95 and 98, while ignoring things like BeOS and OS/2 (both competitively priced and more powerful) and it suited Microsoft and Bill Gates just fine.^1 Both OS/2 and BeOS are gone from the market because of piracy's market distortion.

    Hopefully Windows 7 will come with an even more strict WGA and OGA to extract more pain from consumers. Maybe they'll wake up.

    --
    BMO

    1. Of course, Microsoft executives prefer that people buy, but theft can build market share more quickly, as company co-founder and Chairman Bill Gates acknowledged in an unguarded moment in 1998.

    "Although about 3 million computers get sold every year in China, people don't pay for the software. Someday they will, though," Gates told an audience at the University of Washington. "And as long as they're going to steal it, we want them to steal ours. They'll get sort of addicted, and then we'll somehow figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade." http://articles.latimes.com/2006/apr/09/business/fi-micropiracy9

    1. Re:Hey Guys... by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Hopefully Windows 7 will come with an even more strict WGA and OGA to extract more pain from consumers. Maybe they'll wake up

      Microsoft better get Windows 7 right.
      Getting WGA and a strict OGA will hurt Microsoft and not customers.
      Microsoft is allowing installable ISO editions of its Windows 7. This is really Great!
      I could buy online, download it online and install it.
      BeOS failed because it did not coexist with anybody else.
      OS/2 is still running ATMs. IBM pulled it from Retail because it realized that its strong point is mainframe.
      Both of them did not go under because of piracy.
      Get your facts right.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:Hey Guys... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Both of them did not go under because of piracy.

      That's not what he's saying. The grandparent's point is that it was difficult for BeOS and OS/2 to compete with pirated Windows. I ran BeOS 5 for a while, and it was a nice system. It was also cheaper than Windows. It was not, however, cheaper than pirated Windows, and the advantage of software compatibility you got from pirated Windows was better value for money than BeOS.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Hey Guys... by aphelion_rock · · Score: 1

      It is going to be interesting times ahead for MS. I have tried Linux many times on and off over the last 14 years and switched back to Windows due to lack of some functionality. Every few years I try again, this year I installed Ubuntu 9 on my spare pc and was impressed. I loaned it to my teenage daughter, it kept her and her friends amused for days discovering all of the new functionality (plenty of cool factor too). It didn't have shockwave player for the browser so windows was returned but I imagine it is only a matter of time.... I have a legit copy of XP but a bootleg copy of MS office which I use very occasionally, fed up with the OGA nagware I un-installed it and installed open office, now the wife is giving me word docs to convert into PDF format, she is looking at Open Office too. I am considering Linux as my next OS as it does everything I want and is less prone to viruses and requires less updates. Many people in third world countries don't purchase MS O/S simply because it costs many years of the average workers wage to pay for it, in short, it is beyond the reach of the average citizen. If they make W7 too difficult to pirate then MS may well see a mass change in installations from the third world countries, particularly as the free alternatives are looking really good. China and India are good at building their own, don't be surprised if you see a new O/S emerge from one of these countries either.

    4. Re:Hey Guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gagging for Haiku to hit gold. It has the great design of BeOS and none of the featuritis crowd-sourcing bullshit that comes with Linux. Ah, simplicity. A good browser, email client, and office app like Gobe Productive and it would do for anyone's granny. If anyone got a decent VM running on Haiku so I could run legacy Windows apps and games on the thing without a hitch I'm sold. Fuck Windows. Fuck Microsoft. Oh, yeah. And fuck sodding Linux for being such a pain in the ass and OS X for being elitist. I don't need that shit.

    5. Re:Hey Guys... by Archimonde · · Score: 1

      If you don't like the price, then don't buy it.

      Don't pirate it either. Use something else.

      But don't pirate it. If you do, you're doing what Microsoft considers "the next best thing" - ignoring alternatives.

      I understand what you mean but honestly, what are the alternatives? I would gladly fork out $50 or max $100 for windows 7 but I got 5 computer at home and living in europe that sport would be quite expensive considering the article. But to get to your point, so I decide not to pay for it and not to pirate it.

      So what I'm left with? Mac OS X which I can only get on macs but I already have good computers and macs here cost at least 30% more than in US (that means *too much*). Naturally it can't be installed on non-mac computers (hackint0shing is out of the consideration).

      Then we have linux or more specifically ubuntu. Tried ubuntu and does a lot of stuff right, but here we get to the major problem and that is software. I use lightroom and photoshop mostly. I would gladly use some alternative but there isn't one by a mile. There are tons of software which are just barely developed and do just some core thing. Why there aren't some competitions for like best photoshop clone or best lightroom clone.? I heard that OO is good. Why stop there and rather do some complex software?

      --
      Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
    6. Re:Hey Guys... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      This is exactly it. The #1 reason that OS/2 Warp failed SO MISERABLY against Win95 was that it was easy to get Win95 for free. Remember that OS/2 was Win 3.1 compatible.

      In terms of compatability, features, and so on, OS/2 Warp was king. But everyone already had access to Win95, and that in the end, trumped the OS/2 advantage.

      MS makes money on its other products, mainly its office suite. They do not make a whole hell of a lot on its OS when you factor in the entire support costs. Those updates cost money to deliver, and were even willingly delivered to known pirates. The crackdown on pirates getting XP updates didnt happen until Vista was almost ready. The crackdown on the pirates getting Vista updates still hasnt happened.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    7. Re:Hey Guys... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      MS makes money on its other products, mainly its office suite. They do not make a whole hell of a lot on its OS when you factor in the entire support costs

      It's been a couple of years since I looked at an MS balance sheet, but last time I did around 45% of their profit came from Windows, 45% from Office, and 10% from everything else they did put together (MSN and XBox were both loss makers at the time). Do you have any evidence that they Windows isn't still a major profit centre for them? I'd be surprised if even the cheap NetBook price (something like $20) multiplied by over 90% of shipping computers doesn't give them vastly more money than development costs.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:Hey Guys... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Compared to Microsoft Office, Open Office *isnt* good.

      Open Office is definately good in comparison to what people were using 10 years ago, but MS Office really and truely is the king of features. For the home user, Open Office is probably more than sufficient, but in a real business environment it doesnt even come close.

      You cannot blame Open Office, but instead can only blame the Free Open Source Software paradigm, because a rag-tag group of loosely coupled and arbitrarily motivated developers simply cannot compete against the focused efforts of a for-profit corporation. Its the same reason that Photoshop is the best in the business. GIMP is nice and all, but it was made by developers for developers, instead of by developers for professionals.

      The only current FOSS projects that I see as really measuring up vs commercial alternatives are Operation Systems and Browsers. This is understandable and wholly predictable because these things have concrete endgames. A perfect browser rendering engine is a tangible finite thing, while a perfect image manipulator isnt finite at all (there is always another feature to be added.)

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    9. Re:Hey Guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people don't pirate and more people switch to Linux, chances are big this is just what is going to happen.

      If the market share of Linux is rising above a certain level you can be sure company's that are not in the pocket of Microsoft will start developing Linux native versions of their software. As an alternative they could contact the wine team and make sure the software runs flawlessly under wine...

      I am sure it is just a question of time before these things are starting to happen. Do not forget there are allready very professional applications like Maya and Houdini available as Linux native version. Not long ago Nero has made a Linux version of their burning software, and they are not the only ones. Picasa is ported to Linux and is used by a lot of photo amateurs. Also for the same amateur the programs Lightzone and RawTerapee are available. On the music front a lot of development is under way, and a lot of VST and Sequencer applications are ported (energyXT and ReNoise comes in mind).

      Things are speeding up indeed....

    10. Re:Hey Guys... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      Yes, but much as I am a big fan of Linux and it being the OS I most commonly use now, the market doesn't work like that.

      You simply can't expect people who do want the functionality in certain Windows-only apps to suddenly stop using those apps whilst they switch to Linux and wait for the software companies to catch up by porting over to Linux.

      Wine is a great piece of software but running a Windows app under Wine, which is in many cases a trivial thing for we Linux geeks to do, is a lot more complicated for those people who are happily able to use their PCs at the moment without being tech-heads in computers.

      Call me a snob but I'm not sure I want mass migrations over to Linux from Windows. Sure, when friends & family have tried Ubuntu or other distros, I'm first to stick my hand up and volunteer my help to them if they need it - but do we *REALLY* want inexperienced Windows users who currently run all their apps with administrator permissions doing the same thing on Linux? At least in Windows there's Microsoft's (awful) UAC to control some of this stuff, as well as endless amounts of security apps that can check for such things - but if you do the same in Linux then you're on your own when it comes to keeping your PC secure.

      Sure, Ubuntu does a good thing with extensive use of "sudo" but even I got hacked off with constantly having to use it recently to the point where I just set a root password and just "su" when I need it - fine for me because I know what I'm doing but I wouldn't want an inexperienced user doing the same thing.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  25. Typo in summary by ChienAndalu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I know this is slightly offtopic, but who else noticed that it reads "WIndows 7" instead of "Windows 7" in the headline? (At the time I am writing this)

    I want to know this because I suspect I might have a superpower.

    1. Re:Typo in summary by frenchbedroom · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I must have that superpower too ! High five, dude ! _o/*\o_

    2. Re:Typo in summary by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I know this is slightly offtopic, but who else noticed that it reads "WIndows 7" instead of "Windows 7" in the headline? (At the time I am writing this)

      I want to know this because I suspect I might have a superpower.

      You do. Its just not a very useful superpower... I see a good future for you proofreading ephemeral online news.

  26. I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it costs $300 then why is the price in Euros not $300?

    Do they have to pay the travel agent their conversion fee each sale?

    If they said that the price was going to be 200Euros (if that were $300) but now because of the exchange rate it would have to be 250Euros (if that were the rate for $300) then I could understand.

    But claiming exchange rate on a good when using the same currency is DUMB.

    And people are swallowing this shit???

  27. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by Etylowy · · Score: 1

    Well, so ones that do will earn more. How long do you think it will take:
    a) US based companies to realise that there is some decent money to be made selling windows 7 to EU customers
    b) EU based companies figure out it's better to cut the middle man, buy windows 7 wholesale in US, import it and sell to their customers

    Also there is no import duty for all personal imports of value up to 150 euro (so all windows seven oem, most retail), and AFAIK there is no import duty on software at all (or it's very low: 3-5% - adding an extra 5-10 bucks).

  28. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Software and videogames are generally toll free if you import to Europe, which means that Etylowy is correct in his calculations.

  29. Re:And M$ will get busted by EU. AGAIN. by Spad · · Score: 2, Informative

    The EU as an entity has a yearly budget of around 140 billion Euros (~$200 billion) and that's not counting any of the individual states. I hardly think that a couple of hundred million from Microsoft is going to make such a huge impact financially that the EU is picking on them as a money-making exercise.

  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. Why the UK/EU price difference? by sulimma · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Any customer in the EU is free to purchase from UK retailers.

    If Microsoft tries to prevent this they could be fined by the comission. (Happend before to VW and others.)

    1. Re:Why the UK/EU price difference? by ScaledLizard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Any customer in the EU is free to purchase from UK retailers.

      That is a good option for movies and games, that usually suffer from translation, but I prefer having my operating system speak to me in German.

    2. Re:Why the UK/EU price difference? by sulimma · · Score: 1

      I expect them to sell the German version in the UK, as there are German users in the UK.

      While this probably is not widely advertised you should be able to order it from a MS representative.

      There definitely are UK and US locale versions available in Germany.

    3. Re:Why the UK/EU price difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any customer is free to do this. Any customer is also free to buy video games 30% cheaper from the UK, yet you don't see those sales numbers collapsing in the rest of the EU either. Because although everybody can, realistically most people still won't.

    4. Re:Why the UK/EU price difference? by ScaledLizard · · Score: 1

      Even better: it seems you can install "language packs" that will make Windows print messages in other languages. I wonder if Amazon US would ship Windows 7 to Germany ...

    5. Re:Why the UK/EU price difference? by sulimma · · Score: 2, Informative

      A copyright holder can limit distribution of a work to regional markets, therefore it might be illegal to do so, but 5 years ago this worked flawlessly for a game that I ordered.

    6. Re:Why the UK/EU price difference? by AtomicJake · · Score: 1

      Any customer in the EU is free to purchase from UK retailers.

      That is a good option for movies and games, that usually suffer from translation, but I prefer having my operating system speak to me in German.

      That's the last what I would want: A keyboard and OS in German or French -- programming is a nightmare with those. Well, even worse are UK keyboards, you just think that you have a "normal" keyboard and OS, but then ...

    7. Re:Why the UK/EU price difference? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Despite the language packs being separate downloads, in Windows Vista, they were only available as extras for Vista Ultimate... at least for the copies sold in North America.

      Are you really sure you want to pay extra to get at those languages?

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    8. Re:Why the UK/EU price difference? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      A copyright holder can limit distribution of a work to regional markets, therefore it might be illegal to do so

      Not in EU. If it's on sale in UK, then the law explicitly prohibits from restricting sales to the rest of EU. So someone in Germany should be able to order it in UK store.

    9. Re:Why the UK/EU price difference? by sulimma · · Score: 1

      My post you are citing was a response to: "I wonder if Amazon US would ship Windows 7 to Germany ..."

      "Amazon US" is NOT an UK store. Distribution from the US to the EU is only legal with consent of the copyright holder.

      A UK store not shipping to Germany is in deed violation of EU law. I allready wrote that in my post immediately preceeding the one that you are citing.

      RTFP

    10. Re:Why the UK/EU price difference? by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Actually, things like this are becoming fairly common in the EU.

      Cans of Coca-Cola sold in the UK (particularly in restaurants) are often imported from Germany (and are easily recognizable by the fact that the writing on the can is in German). Apparently it's marginally cheaper to produce and bottle Coke in Germany than it is in the UK.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    11. Re:Why the UK/EU price difference? by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      Any customer is free to do this. Any customer is also free to buy video games 30% cheaper from the UK, yet you don't see those sales numbers collapsing in the rest of the EU either. Because although everybody can, realistically most people still won't.

      I think right now most people still don't really see this as an option, simply because it's all fairly new. Tech savvy people are doing this more and more though, I read a lot of (programming related) english language books so a bunch of my stuff comes off the english amazon. I've also bought hardware abroad (netherlands) and I know plenty other people who do this. Of course this opens up a new source of problems, for instance returning stuff. While I believe the legislation is partly harmonized I think sufficient details are still different enough to make it a head-ache. But for a copy of windows? I wouldn't hesitate. (if you were to buy it)

  32. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by jimicus · · Score: 1

    Actually, the higher price is probably also due to I18N translation costs, though that is certainly not the only reason.

    Bollocks is it.

    The only change they make for the UK is the date format and default currency symbol. Hell, even when you tell Windows that you're in the UK it still defaults to a US timezone and keyboard.

  33. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    Well, oddly enough, this still isn't happening and the dollar has been weak for ages. Why isn't this already the default modus operandi?

    I didn't know that there was only a low (or none) tax on software. The case were I did get taxed horribly, it was indeed hardware and not software. (And indeed it was 150++€)

  34. Financial crisis, it's all good. by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

    I'm starting to like this financial crisis-thingy.

    It drives up the price on Windows, it flushes out a lot of bad bank-decisions along with their inventors, it pummels the prices on housing (I'm renting my appartment, so nice market for me now), it makes people switch to Linux because it's free.

    Really, it should be called "Financial Happy Times" or something.

    --
    If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    1. Re:Financial crisis, it's all good. by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      You know, just because it's good for you right now doesn't mean the whole financial crisis doesn't suck for a lot of other folks, and won't suck for you in the near future (e.g. you get caught by a layoff, or your brother turns up broke on your doorstep).

      In the interests of full disclosure, I'm in roughly the same position as you right now: good job, cash in the bank that will probably turn into a down payment eventually, and ridiculously low fixed expenses. But I also know that the situation can change on a dime.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Financial crisis, it's all good. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Really, it should be called "Financial Happy Times" or something.

      Methinks that would Godwin the entire financial apocalypse.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  35. What has the US price to to with the EU price? by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

    If the euro price has already been established as ân*, the USD can fall to 5 bucks a euro if it wants; it doesn't make it any more expensive to buy in Europe except in people's imagination.
    Americans are still paying the same price; Europeans are still paying the same price. The exchange rate goes down and Microsoft makes a windfall. Lucky Microsoft. :shrug:

    *NOTE: "â" is slashdot's lame interpretation of the euro symbol.

    --
    No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    1. Re:What has the US price to to with the EU price? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      *NOTE: "Ã" is slashdot's lame interpretation of the euro symbol.

      HTML Entities are your friend

    2. Re:What has the US price to to with the EU price? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      How did you enter the Euro symbol? When I look at the source, it has â, which is a with a circumflex accent.

    3. Re:What has the US price to to with the EU price? by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1
      *NOTE: "Ã" is slashdot's lame interpretation of the euro symbol.

      "64 ASCII characters ought to be enough for anybody." â" Cmdr Taco, 1981

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    4. Re:What has the US price to to with the EU price? by binkzz · · Score: 2, Informative

      If the USD and the EUR were the same when the product was sold, and then the EUR goes down in price, I would agree with you.

      But if the price according to the exchange rates at release differs %100, I believe it's a scam.

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
    5. Re:What has the US price to to with the EU price? by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      *NOTE: "Ã" is slashdot's lame interpretation of the euro symbol.

      No, â is. Ã is the lame interpretation of the â symbol. ROFL

      In answer to the other poster: I entered the â with the euro key (alt-gr E) of course!

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    6. Re:What has the US price to to with the EU price? by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      HTML Entities are your friend

      Sorry, I live in the 21st century. ;)

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    7. Re:What has the US price to to with the EU price? by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      I just had to see how it interpreted Ã.

      It's "Ãf" - LMAO

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    8. Re:What has the US price to to with the EU price? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but slashdot doesn't.

  36. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by Etylowy · · Score: 1

    Well, first of all most of the personal imports would be games and that's no longer smart choise:
    - can't be done for console games - NTSC vs PAL
    - isn't that much of a deal - even if you save 30$ on a purchase (a max on PC titles) that would only cover more expensive shipping and tax at best

    Of course there are companies that import games from US and Asia and offer them at roughly 60-80% of the local retail price.

  37. Pay more for less? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can they still get IE8 for free, or will Internet Explorer cost money if you have Windows 7?

  38. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But what about customs fees?

    If there are significant customs and shipping fees, wouldn't they just manufacture and package the EU editions in the EU?

  39. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    I import my games from the UK. Sure, I pay more, but at least I get the damned things in English. (That said, I buy perhaps one game a year, at best)

  40. Exchange rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has the exchange rates for souls recently changed? How about shirts?

  41. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    ... and on top of that, many people in non-English speaking countries still want their software in English. You often pay a premium for that.... I wish I were kidding.

  42. "Even though"? by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

    European customers will pay up to twice as much for Windows 7 compared with US users, even though the new operating system will ship without a browser in Europe.

    No IE? Surely you mean "because"? :)

    1. Re:"Even though"? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I wonder how you would go downloading Firefox without using Internet Explorer...

  43. Correction: "... will be ASKED to pay ..." by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
    We all know about price elasticity: the more something costs, the fewer people buy it.

    If Microsoft strat gouging customers in various parts of the world, they really shouldn't be surprised if one of two^H^H^Hthree things happen:

    People don't buy their new products - and make do with older versions

    People find alternatives that are cheaper

    People obtain the product from unauthorised sources - i.e. piracy

    Now, operating systems development is basically a sunk cost. You pay for all the work (well, apart from the small proportion of making disks, boxes and support) up front, before you ever get to ship anything. After that, your product succeeds or fails on how much of that development cost you can recoup through sales. By screwing over customers, they're merely reducing the potential for sales - unless they're arrogant / stupid enough to assume no-one has an alternative supply.

    One possibility is that europeans are being punished for the huge fines imposed on MS for their illegal (allegedly) business practices. Either they're particularly slow learners, or think they have some god-given right to do whatever the hell they like. However, I wouldn't be surprised if the EU courts went even further on the basis of this blatant protectionist attitude. Maybe this time they'll learn.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  44. Why not buy the US edition? by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    At twice the price, why can't you just purchase a US edition? They all have the same language packs available.

    1. Re:Why not buy the US edition? by will_die · · Score: 1

      The complete language packs are only available with ultimate, with other versions you get around 70-80% of the stuff translated the rest is in the base language.
      The main problem is getting a company to ship it to you, with most gray market software, you need to get the software mailed to someone in the country of origin and then have them forward it on.
      Also you don't get support for microsoft, so if you have a problem in the first 90 days no calling up microsoft and asking for help.

  45. pfft... wasted read. by Stumbles · · Score: 1

    What a fudster that guy is. They guy is talking about international money exchange rates... ok fine. Then comparing, based on the exchange rates when he wrote the article, the differences some countries would pay in relation to the US. Ok, fine, good. But the guy blows his whole credibility by later inserting the EU directive to Microsoft's Explorer removal, and that some how is a factor in the cost differences. Bullshit. They guy is just using the exchange rates as FUD... he is mixing apples and oranges. Unless his real intent is to wake up you virus riddled, trojan-ned infested zombified Window users to dump that OS and use something more secure.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  46. cheaper ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a cheaper solution anyway, buy a vista ultimate retail box for 140euros, and since it is done after the 26june, ask for a 'free' seven upgrade on their website.
    There; full seven version for a low price (will not last too long I guess)

  47. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    custom fees? What are those? Seriously, I import a lot from various countries which include the US to the EU. I've also imported from the EU to the US. I have never in my life paid customs fees. Nobody buying Windows from the US will be paying customs either unless they buy a massive shipment of 300 copies or so.

  48. Re:And M$ will get busted by EU. AGAIN. by Etylowy · · Score: 1

    It was more like sligtly over a billion euro last time, so 0.7% of the budget. I can't see why they shouldn't make it double this time.
    If they think it's not enough pick a fight with M$, as if the pricing wasn't enough, then there is something wrong with it.

  49. I hate to say this, but it's always been so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is no recent phenomenon. This has been the case for us in the UK as long as I can remember.

  50. Can't rape the willing... by Animaether · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...really, the only reason 'IT' companies get away with it is... because we let them. Adobe nearly stated as much. See:

    http://www.amanwithapencil.com/adobe.html

    See also the 'spin' page for very common arguments (read: excuses) for why pricing in the EU (and other countries) is higher, along with debunking statements:
    http://www.amanwithapencil.com/adobe_spin.html

    I do have to admit that Adobe has since then adjusted pricing a bit more favorably...
    I don't have current numbers, only from half a year ago; no good, and comparing their store prices takes a good 2 hours just to navigate, make sure you select the correct product (English language), etc. .. all non-parallel because their store gets confused when you are trying to see pricing for products in 2 different tabs.) ...but it's still a pretty good chunk above the U.S. pricing.

    1. Re:Can't rape the willing... by David+Gerard · · Score: 5, Interesting

      At one stage it was actually cheaper to buy a return plane ticket from London to New York and buy CS3 there than to buy it in the UK.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    2. Re:Can't rape the willing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy is pretty dumb, Adobe is a US based company so when Adobe says, "in Europe" it means that they have to travel over there and do the work.

      Also here in America French is not a language that is regularly spoken.

    3. Re:Can't rape the willing... by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also here in America French is not a language that is regularly spoken.

      You mean Quebec finally sunk into the ocean? Rejoice!

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    4. Re:Can't rape the willing... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah I was going to buy CS3 for my wife who has dreams of making money in web design. Then I found out the cost... *then* I found out the cost in the US and realized it would be far cheaper to fly to the US, buy it there and fly back. We dropped the idea..

    5. Re:Can't rape the willing... by Linzer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also here in America French is not a language that is regularly spoken.

      I second this. The French I hear spoken here is highly irregular.

      --
      Gravitation is a theory, not a fact.
    6. Re:Can't rape the willing... by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a canadian I must unfortunately correct you in that Quebec is part of Canada not the US.

    7. Re:Can't rape the willing... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Also worth pointing out, that if you ask a person from France, the language that people in Quebec speak sounds nothing at all like French.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re:Can't rape the willing... by zsau · · Score: 1

      An an English speaker who comes from far, far away from America, and comes with a set of geographical skills, I must inform you that there is no continent of America. There is a country called America, and a continent called North America and another continent called South America. North and South America are more easily distinguished than Europe and Asia but if you do happen to need a word to link them together, English has plenty of terms like "the New World"[*] and "the Americas". We don't make much use of them, though, because there's little need.

      [*]: Which sometimes includes other places, but it's relatively common that if you want to talk about North and South America together, your discussion will also be relevant to Australia and other such places.

      --
      Look out!
    9. Re:Can't rape the willing... by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

      As someone actually possessing geography skills rather than just assuming he has them due to his nationality, there is no continent of America.

    10. Re:Can't rape the willing... by Darby · · Score: 1

      I can ensure you that Canada, Quebec, and the US are all very much part of the continent of America

      Well, for all your assurances, you're still dead wrong. There does not exist a continent named "America". There is the continent to which you were referring which is named "North America". There is another continent to the south named "South America". Collectively they are sometimes referred to as "The Americas", but there is no such continent as America. There is a country, however, officially designated as "The United States of America" which is most often referred to as "America" in common usage.

      I hope this basic lesson in common sense and geography was helpful, but I suspect it won't be. Anybody *so* certain of something *so* obviously false is unlikely to deal either honestly or well with having their errors proven to them.

       

    11. Re:Can't rape the willing... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      At one stage it was actually cheaper to buy a return plane ticket from London to New York and buy CS3 there than to buy it in the UK.

      I needed some business software in Hong Kong. I compared local prices with US dealers and saved about 50% by buying from the US and getting the box sent by parcel post. I got support, (not much needed) from the US, and updates online.

      (Actually, I had a bootleg copy I'd used to check the software out, so no problem to wait a couple of weeks for shipping; I only really needed the licence, but it wouldn't have been polite to say that.)

    12. Re:Can't rape the willing... by KevinColyer · · Score: 1

      > ..really, the only reason 'IT' companies get away with it is... because we let them.

      Perhaps the EU won't let them?

      Over-inflating prices is not a great strategy for a previously convicted monopolist and will cost EU businesses millions. This could possibly be the start of another anti-trust case. And (potentially) wonderfully ironic.

    13. Re:Can't rape the willing... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well, it's the same thing as with the government. Most people just are cattle, that say that they do not like it, but quietly accept everything that you do to them. Interstingly, this was also the fact in the "3rd Reich", and nothing at all has changed since then.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    14. Re:Can't rape the willing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The french quit speaking English when they started trying to emulate the American(US) culture. Quebec actually gives a shit about protecting the French language. And I'm guessing you never actually spoke to a Frenchman who went to Quebec.

    15. Re:Can't rape the willing... by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Exactly, it isn't even official french from what I hear from my friends from France. Unlike english, there is a central body that specifies the language for french, and quebecois is not it. It's pretty much what you'd get if you blended 17th and 18th century french from the regions in europe that spoke it in the time. Slang galore. It would be like someone speaking victorian english to us, pretty much the only people that would understand it is the english majors.

    16. Re:Can't rape the willing... by oatworm · · Score: 1

      As an average North American, and thus being possessed of geography skills above that of the average European troll, I can assure you that the "continent" of America is, in fact, composed of one continent and ONE EXTRA CONTINENT FOR NO EXTRA CHARGE!

      RIP, Billy Mays. RIP.

    17. Re:Can't rape the willing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is often still true when buying a laptop.
      e.g. take a look at prices on the lenovo UK website site vs. US version - laptops cost almost twice as much for lower specification. Also there are hardly any customisation options for the UK customers.

  51. Exchange Rates? by gringer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, if Exchange rates are the reason for the high price, why don't people purchase the thing without Exchange? It was a silly program anyway.

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
  52. The end of Windows' dominance? by A12m0v · · Score: 1

    Microsoft better reconsider pricing in Europe or it is bound to lose its market to Linux and maybe even Apple.

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:The end of Windows' dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh, the pricing in Europe has always been higher, and Windows dominates.

  53. Even Better: Windows 7 Home Basic (+ Shipping) by BBCWatcher · · Score: 1

    Why not buy Windows 7 Home Basic from an "emerging market"? At emerging market prices, of course. Or possibly Windows 7 Starter.

  54. No IE??? by palemantle · · Score: 1

    "European customers will pay up to twice as much for Windows 7 compared with US users, even though the new operating system will ship without a browser in Europe.
    Well duh, only twice the money ... but ... but ... they are rid of IE for good! So stop whinging you people. Them Europeans are getting a sweet deal me thinks!

  55. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Wait.. Are microsoft's european distributors paying the same import duties, too? Maybe it's not microsoft that's creating the problem here...

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  56. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by ubersoldat2k7 · · Score: 1

    Because you wouldn't be getting Microsoft support... oh wait!
    Seriously, how can people pay that much money for a product without warranty, without customer support and from a company without soul? Why do people like to be treated like criminals when buying a product, i.e.
    Warranty Voids if you open the envelope where the DVD comes in. How can I decide if I like it or not? I mean, you can even return 50' plasma and not a copy of Vista?
    And don't give me that shit about piracy, not every one is criminal you know.

  57. Microsoft is pulling an Adobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adobe products are ridiculously overpriced in the EU. If you can work with the American English version, order your copy from the US. Microsoft can ask any price they want for their operating system. It's not like people are going to use something else. Apple's products aren't exactly available at bargain prices either.

    1. Re:Microsoft is pulling an Adobe by GigaHurtsMyRobot · · Score: 1

      Adobe products are ridiculously overpriced everywhere, if you're just a consumer instead of a corporation. I know of no one who has ever bought anything from them besides Acrobat, and tons of people who have downloaded everything else. I'm not sure if they could manage consumer versions or consumer pricing without affecting their corporate business, due to greed, but Photoshop has become so essential that it should be in every kids grasp.

    2. Re:Microsoft is pulling an Adobe by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 0

      Photoshop has become so essential that it should be in every kids grasp.

      It is.

    3. Re:Microsoft is pulling an Adobe by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      They've got Photoshop Elements which I've seen in stores so some consumers must be buying it.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    4. Re:Microsoft is pulling an Adobe by SiChemist · · Score: 1

      Photoshop has become so essential that it should be in every kids grasp.

      Those kids should instead use the (legally) free GIMP for Windows.

  58. Anything is better than the Mac tax by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 1

    M$ is OK but M€ (that's an EURO symbol)  has a problem displaying on slashdot

    1. Re:Anything is better than the Mac tax by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      €

      works, but Mic€soft looks funny

  59. Linux unusable in the mind of MS & Apple fanbo by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The day I installed Ubuntu on my mum's computer (Hello Mum!) and then she proceeded to send emails, download a few images and do some searches, I knew Linux had reached maturity.

    Linux may lack the marketing that both Microsoft and Apple have, but the word is spreading.

    For example here in hte UK, for the first time I saw a Linux magazine in a local supermarket news stand (Sainsburys). Yeah, the same kind of place that sells TV magazines, PCWorld, MacWorld and all what would be considered broad hobbyist and popular interest publications. That is telling me that people actually risking money in the publishing business have identified a need, irrespective of Open Source politics.

    At the same time a major local retailer (WH Smith) is now regularly stacking between 2 and 3 Linux magazines (Linux Format, Linux Magazine and/or Linux User) against normally only one OSX magazine.

    So people actually doing business have detected that there is a swell of interest in Linux, that says more than anything Netcraft would report.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  60. Funny you would say that. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am Spanish speaker, I have always prefered English localizations.

    The reason is simple: one has to learn all the English lingo anyway, otherwise people like you and me would have to learn each other's language (Das passt nicht! )

    I always felt at a disadvantage until I was able to use English in a regular manner.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Funny you would say that. by Archimonde · · Score: 1

      Same here. I'm living in croatia and there is a lot of localized software around. Windows, office, freeware, mobile phones etc. But I prefer the english versions because the names are generally unified across all software. And of course, I started with english many years ago when there wasn't any localizations. But I always recommend english versions to beginners anyway. There are several reasons:

      1. They learn a useful language
      2. Localizations suck.

      I mean croatian language doesn't have good pool of words for technical terms like the ones used frequently in IT. So to "translate" words from english to croatian they invent words or cobble together some other words and that looks like frankenstein. So in my opinion it is easier to learn (somewhat standardized) english terms and phrases than completely *new* words which are in "croatian language" but they are not croatian at all.

      --
      Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
  61. Mods, yes, I know CA is a long way from Boston too by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    That's a lot easier when you're on the same side of the Atlantic as Boston. I'm not strong enough to throw a computer across an ocean.

  62. What do you mean with "paying more for less"? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    If Windows 7 + IE = âX

    Knowing that IE = â0

    then Windows 7 = âX

    which means you would be paying the same for less (if you believe that not having IE is to have "less", which I don't).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:What do you mean with "paying more for less"? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

      That was supposed to be an Euro symbol ....

      --
      IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  63. Re:And M$ will get busted by EU. AGAIN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they certainly won't be collecting in $$$

    now where's that little e-thingy we pay with on my keyboard???

  64. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by paulhar · · Score: 1

    That used to annoy the crap out of me too. It's trivially easy to ask the user where they are and pick sensible defaults for all the rest of the questions, including keyboards etc.

    However, as I've switched to a mac I find that in Windows I *should* use the US keyboard layout. Go figure... maybe Microsoft likes UK based Mac users?

  65. Nothing new to see here by Pop69 · · Score: 2, Informative

    US IT companies have almost always just changed the $ sign to a £ sign when they sell software here in the UK and made noises about "localisation costs" and "compliance costs"

    Just business as usual, screwing as much profit out of the consumer as possible.

    1. Re:Nothing new to see here by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Don't forget VAT.

      US Prices don't list taxes because the taxes vary by state and there is no federal sales tax.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  66. ReactOS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if all those future users would invest 50 Euros in ReactOS, they could get a more compatible OS for less money and no stupid restrictions.

  67. International restrictions? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    I wonder, what is there to stop me from getting a US-based friend to mail me a boxed US version of Windows 7?
    Are there any restrictions against me installing the US version (bought for the US price) on a computer in Europe?

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:International restrictions? by kwikrick · · Score: 1

      I cannot buy software, films or music from amazon US; if I try I get a notice with some legal bla bla about these products having export restrictions.
      Of course, I can buy them on amazon here in Europe, for double the price.

      Why?

      Amazon claims there are exemptions for these products in international trade law.

      If that is true, than that is pure evil protectionism.

      --
      assignment != equality != identity
  68. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    Very good question.... However, Microsoft has European offices. I guess that any Europe-based distributor needs to buy the licenses from the Europe HQ of Microsoft.

  69. Re:Biggest Shock Of All by Skuto · · Score: 3, Informative

    Windows pricing is exactly opposite as you describe, so you just reinforced the original posters point.

  70. Guys am I the only one to see this? by emanem · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Simple:
    How do you think they'll make pay the EU for the fines? By making windows more expensive!
    Occam's razor does apply here.
    Easy peasy.
    Cheers,

    1. Re:Guys am I the only one to see this? by DriveMelter · · Score: 1

      Nope, I was thinking the same. Microsoft could argue that it costs more to supply products to the EU as there is extra legal costs.

    2. Re:Guys am I the only one to see this? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I'd figure that with prices like these Razor1911 will be applied much more often...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    3. Re:Guys am I the only one to see this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft doesn't make very much money off of retail sales of Windows, the bulk of the money comes from OEM sales. Very few people are smart or willing enough to install an operating system. Hell a lot of people don't realize that Windows != their computer.

    4. Re:Guys am I the only one to see this? by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      True, but the politicians will be re-elected.

    5. Re:Guys am I the only one to see this? by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      I think this is the best reason to explain Microsoft's actions. The EU decided to levy huge fines against Microsoft and forced it to remove Internet Explorer from Windows 7. Microsoft risks getting fined again by the EU just by selling Windows 7 there. It's not unfair for Microsoft to charge more for Windows 7 to compensate for that risk.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    6. Re:Guys am I the only one to see this? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Simple:
      How do you think they'll make pay the EU for the fines? By making windows more expensive!

      Sir,

      Your theory falls apart when we get to Australia. Australia is not a member of the EU and yet suffers the same kind of price difference, for Home Premium the Australian retail price is A$299 (US$243) whilst in the US it is US$199. Ultimate is $A469 (US$380) whilst it sells in the US for US$319.

      It is not that difficult for companies to change their prices according to exchange rates on a monthly, weekly or daily basis. In Australia we do this all the time, normally we sell in AUD and convert the price to the currency of the purchaser. Seeing as Microsoft only deals with wholesalers this should be easy.

      My theory is that Australia is the only 1st world country left in the world that still has money, so we are paying welfare to support the US. Of course Occams Razor could apply and state that:
      Microsoft are gouging in foreign markets because they can get away with it and because they are a bunch of tossers.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  71. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by donaldm · · Score: 1

    If you have a PS3 then you can import a PS3 game from anywhere since no PS3 game is region locked. Some Xbox360 games are also not region locked although it does pay to check and like the PS3 if you have a High Definition TV (rather pointless if you only had a SDTV) then there is no issue displaying the game. In addition most modern TV's can easily display PAL and NTSC be they HDTV's or SDTV's.

    You have pointed out one of the biggest issues of importing, the shipping cost. If you are going to import then you need to take the shipping and import tax (if applicable) into account. Some agents do actually provide fee shipping for purchases over a certain amount so a little research is required.

    Getting back on topic if you are going to import Windows 7 from the US to the UK or Europe then you will have to be careful of the shipping cost and possible import tax. Of course if you have a friend or even yourself that visits the US then import tax may not be an issue.

    --
    There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  72. Two fold by C_Kode · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing they are looking at it two fold. First, if they can't force you to use their browser, they will make money off of it. Second, since they had to work to rip the browser out, they are going to make someone pay for that work. After all. Nobody works for free right?

  73. Love it by ledow · · Score: 1

    I know it's "normal practice" to do this sort of thing with IT purchases, but I do love it. It just means that MS, whether they need to or not, are slowly pricing themselves out of the market.

    As it is, I don't know of a single person who *buys* Microsoft Office / Windows. It either comes with their (over-priced) PC, they get the "Student/Teacher" edition (I work in schools), or they run in horror at the price for a boxed copy (and I refer them to OpenOffice or other OS). As people tighten their belts, new PC purchases are less and less common, spending limits are coming down (both in business and with consumers), and people are much less willing to buy things that are getting more and more expensive for no clear reason.

    In the last six months, I've been told (by Microsoft themselves, no less) that Windows XP is basically unpurchaseable in bulk any more without signing up to annual contracts (not going to happen), that Windows Vista requires upgrades to almost every PC on my networks and provides little benefit at all, that Windows 7 is just the same, that Internet Explorer won't necessarily be included (I'm in the EU) and I'll have a choice to install alternate browsers (which makes my "Firefox on the desktop" policy even easier to justify) and now that Windows 7 is going to be more expensive than necessary. If ever there was a time to push for replacement of the whole damn lot, it's now.

    MS has dug themselves an enormous hole. Of course people will end up buying Windows 7, but in my experience home users who have been lumbered with Vista aren't happy about it (and this is non-tech users too) and if they know the same will happen with Windows 7 they will be doing more of what they are already doing - coming to me and asking how to get "XP back".

    Please, Microsoft, please... keep it up. Piss off the EU regulator some more. Hike prices, cut features in Windows 7, make it hard to buy what people want. You're doing a great job so far, just continue on the same lines. How about threatening the EU with pulling out or something, that'd be funny and useful to me.

    It's a downward spiral when people who WANT to buy a product (say, XP) from you can't, and don't want your "alternative" (Vista / 7) that you suggest to them. If that was a temporary situation, it'd be normal. But Vista came and is now on the verge of going and still people can't buy what they want from you. It's fantastic. You're keeping me in work, and satisfying my own personal agenda too!

  74. When I worked in retail a few years back.. by damuhatori · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had tons of European customers always buying computer hardware. This was in Orlando, FL and they would go on vacation with their families and buy up everything because it was half the price it was in Europe.

  75. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by jimicus · · Score: 1

    A UK mac keyboard doesn't have a layout like a standard UK PC keyboard. The @ symbol's in the wrong place, as is ".

  76. You are supposed to think that way. by tjstork · · Score: 1

    This is how governments do things. They make it impossible for a private sector company to offer a good at a reasonable price through a combination of regulatory measures and taxes, and then, they say that the market has failed, and the government moves in, generally delivering a lesser product at a higher price to the taxpayer.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:You are supposed to think that way. by ledow · · Score: 1

      Brilliant. Wish they'd get a move on. Because, as far as I know, there are no alternatives authorised by my government and, in fact, the UK government in particular is so heavily entrenched in MS software that *anything* is an upgrade. Seriously, even their educaitonal standards bodies say how MS is a waste of money and shouldn't be used etc. and yet every government project in schools and other governmental bodies is MS-software, MS-funded, etc. It's so farcical. (And, as far as I know, the UK aren't particularly keen to hurt MS *at all* - our EU-membership is, was and always has been more of a "for-show" item than anything else)

      The goverment can't make me use an OS / office suite that they want (or if they do, I'll be long gone, don't fear), all they can do is kill MS. And if you think that MS are being forced into an "impossible situation", you have absolutely no idea just how much MS makes, after expenses, from even the smallest of businesses. If it happens that way, as far as I'm concerned, both the government and I are then just two sides benefitting from the same outcome no matter how it arose.

      Please, please, hurry it up, governments, if this is the case. My little Linux install CD is desperate to be used until it's worn out. Hell, stick a percent on my tax for this year if you get a move on.

      (Oh, BTW: I love the way you manage to turn it into not just a pro-MS thing, but also lob a conspiracy theory in to boot. It's nothing short of genius.)

    2. Re:You are supposed to think that way. by tjstork · · Score: 1

      (And, as far as I know, the UK aren't particularly keen to hurt MS *at all* - our EU-membership is, was and always has been more of a "for-show" item than anything else)

      The UK belongs in NAFTA. Even though the UK is geographically closer to the Continental Europe, you are a lot closer in ideals and values to the United States and Canada than you are to Germany or France.

      Please, please, hurry it up, governments, if this is the case. My little Linux install CD is desperate to be used until it's worn out. Hell, stick a percent on my tax for this year if you get a move on.

      See, this is why I like you. You are completely honest about your motives, without any of the fluffery that you have to cut through. I can deal with THAT!

      (Oh, BTW: I love the way you manage to turn it into not just a pro-MS thing, but also lob a conspiracy theory in to boot. It's nothing short of genius.)

      Thank you! Here I felt my conspiracy skills were sliding as I didn't get bigfoot in there. Actually, my conspiracy backtext was a "European protectionism" thing.

      --
      This is my sig.
  77. Re:Linux unusable in the mind of MS & Apple fa by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

    2 or 3 linux magazines, that's more than I expected. Magazine publishers are very aware of their markets, and considering the number of magazines that make no money, this does suggest that there are more Linux users out there than I thought (unless Shuttleworth is buying them all up). Monthly sales run to 28k according to ABC figures.

    Linux Format is looking for people to write articles for it, so if any geeks want to spread the word, go for it - you'll get paid too!

  78. Isn't this backwards? by tjstork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The US dollar is cheap, and getting cheaper. Therefor, Windows over in Europe ought to be cheaper than it would have been, not more expensive.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Isn't this backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US dollar is cheap, and getting cheaper. Therefor, Windows over in Europe ought to be cheaper than it would have been, not more expensive.

      Perhaps the added cost is due to the local support staff that would need to be hired and paid in Euros.

  79. As long as they don't force me to buy it.... by viraltus · · Score: 1

    At least in Spain is very difficult to buy a Machine without Windows pre-installed, and if you ask to remove the OS and give you the money back the look at you like if you were from Mars... I am from Mars anyway, but you know what I mean.

    --
    Dear /. CENSORS that set people's Karma to Neutral when you disagree with them: FUCK YOU!!
    1. Re:As long as they don't force me to buy it.... by alukin · · Score: 1

      The same situation in Ukraine. I hate that damned MicroSoft for that! Bastards force me to buy stupid Windows I do not need at all!

    2. Re:As long as they don't force me to buy it.... by alukin · · Score: 1

      The same situation in Ukraine. Bastards force people to pay M$ tax with each computer purchase and it is impossible to get money back for unused Windows. That's why I hate Microsoft. I do not want to pay $400 for stupid disc I never use.

  80. Re:And M$ will get busted by EU. AGAIN. by sznupi · · Score: 1

    And OTOH those $200 billion are 1% of Gross National Income of the EU. Any fines are pocket change.

    Also, how many times it has to be said that the EU primarily fines...surprise!...European companies. You just don't hear about it at all in the US.

    As a personal sidenote - I wouldn't be at the least surprised if MS or Intel fines are still smaller then the amount they managed to profit due to uncompetitive practices, due to hurting the free market. Either way, now the market simply gets even.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  81. Re:Linux unusable in the mind of MS & Apple fa by gpuk · · Score: 1

    FWIW, Linux Format has actually been available in-store at WHSmiths & larger supermarkets for almost a decade now...

  82. Wait Wait by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    So the EU tries to sue the piss outta M$, fines them, forces them to help their competitors, levys some weird tarrifs, and a loads of other crap and now they bitch that M$ is charging them more?

    Wow in the EU I guess between Spanish, Italian, German, Greek, Slavic, Finnish, whatever the evil and vile Dutch overlords speak (we lubs you anyways), and Arabic, don't have a word for RETRIBUTION. :)

    An old quote comes to mind from a comedian:

    "Hey when I hire a dominatrix, I don't complain about getting beat up, I PAY to get beat up!"

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    1. Re:Wait Wait by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      whatever the evil and vile Dutch overlords speak (we lubs you anyways)

      How come we're the only ones that get to be evil and vile? And we speak dutch btw. And english. And german. And some of us even get along quite well in french, italian or spanish(mostly french though as a 4th language).

      And we lube you too :-)

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    2. Re:Wait Wait by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      Because I blame the Dutch for everything. (Kennedy, AIDS, Michael Moore, Nike, Teletubbies, TANG, all that evil crap!)

      I used to blame Belgians but they have no sense of humor (seriously they sent me a letter once...)

      Only the Dutch have vile and evil overlords. Those pesky Finns are evil... but lack overlords. They are more like a Committee of Marginal Evil. I'd pick on the Polish folks but they are about as evil as Ewoks...

      Now Iceland... there is a land of pure Evil and Bad Taste... and weird sweaters....

      I'd love to see an Evil-Off competition between the Dutch and Icelanders.... ohhh... sooo damn evil!

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  83. Is it easy in EU to get money back for unused Win? by alukin · · Score: 1

    Only question that I am concerning about Win7 price is M$ taxes that I pay buying notebook. I just can not get good notebook without Win installed. And it is almost impossible in Ukraine to get money back for unused Win. I do not need it at all because I am quite satisfied with Linux.

    The question:

    Is it easy in EU to get money back for pre-installed Windows we must buy with notebook?
    I do not agree to pay $400 for thing I do not need at all!

  84. Microsoft Schill! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serious, why is the author mention anything about the Browser? It's the exchange rate that is causing the price increase not the removal of IE. Also, who the f$ck cares if the browser is removed from the OS. To bill it as "getting less" seems rather disingenuous. The browsers is the most trivial component of an OS. You can get one anywhere. Linux ships with several of them!

    Jackass!

  85. Re:And M$ will get busted by EU. AGAIN. by alukin · · Score: 1

    I do not worry about EU budget or MS income/loss. I do worry about my own pockets. Why I must pay additional $400 buying notebook? Bastards just force me to pay "MS taxes" for stupid disks I never use.

  86. What did you expect? by edbob · · Score: 1

    Did you think that Microsoft was going to allow people to be European for free? Seriously, though, I tend to think that Microsoft probably has an insiders view of what the central banks are planning. If this is the case, I suspect that the euro and the pound would probably weaken faster than the dollar in the coming months. The pricing just plans for this weakening that they already know will happen.

    1. Re:What did you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that the euro and the pound would probably weaken faster than the dollar in the coming months.

      I suspect you'll be proved wrong.

  87. incorrect math; incorrect conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    exchange rate is 0.783. 200AUD*0.783 USD/AUD = 157 USD.
    you're getting a good deal.

  88. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by cpghost · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Windows should have been MUI for everyone from the start.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  89. Re:Yeah, that's a HUGE market segment there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many people NEED what's in CS4 that isn't in CS3? Because CS3 works under Wine.

    If you have a new camera and you're shooting raw, you might have problems since the final update for CS3 was 4.6 back on 10/10/2008.

    http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=106&platform=Windows

    And how well (if at all) do the various CS3 plugins work under Wine?

  90. Bad Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think your example lacks merit, the Euro was only valued that little around the three first years of it's existence . Since that time it has never been under $1.

    Furthermore the Euro is hardly the only currency in Europe even today, and I'm not talking about British Pounds. Even now my own currency is extremely solid and attractive but we pay far more than countries that use U$D or Euro.

  91. Price discrimination by Patatoffel · · Score: 1

    Microeconomics can answer this question: monopolists engage in price discrimination in order to maximize their profits, predating the consumer surplus. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_discrimination

  92. Re:So it will be cheaper to import even a single c by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    The customs fee are not that high. 5% or so. But when you import, you'll have to pay import turnover tax, which is the same as VAT so it looks like the custom fee is very high.

    In the GP example, the VAT is already added.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  93. Re:And M$ will get busted by EU. AGAIN. by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

    I suggest buying from a different manufacturer if Windows adds $400 to the price of your computer. OEMs should be able to get Windows for considerably cheaper than you or I do.

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  94. Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good link. Hope that new rule passes there and we can get it in the US eventually. All this expensive software should have a warranty.

  95. Vista Ultimate (OEM) $214.99 CDN by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1
  96. Don't Blame the US or MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey don't blame the US because all software innovation comes from here. The only real competitor to Microsoft's dominance comes from Apple, who is also an American company. Sure their is Linux, but again where did the roots of Linux come from? UNIX which was created where, in the US.

    So don't blame us.

  97. Third world countries price by ProfMobius · · Score: 1

    You didn't get it. This is perfectly normal. Microsoft always said it would sell Win7 cheaper in third world countries, and at a higher price in developed countries.

    --
    EULA : By reading the above message, you agree that I now own your soul.
    1. Re:Third world countries price by emanem · · Score: 1

      The best joke ever....
      But considering this and the fact Obama is facing resistance for publich health I fear you're not so much away from reality...
      Cheers

  98. Re:Mods, yes, I know CA is a long way from Boston by compro01 · · Score: 1

    Build a trebuchet then.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  99. Article writer is wrong. by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    It does work the other way, you're completely right. How this got past the /. editors is beyond me.

  100. Wanna bet? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I take any bet that I will not be allowed to buy a copy in the US and use it in Europe. International free trade my butt... Appearantly it's only a good idea when some corporation benefits, but it's a definite nono if the consumer would.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  101. More $ for less product by furby076 · · Score: 1

    And depending on your view on bundling IE, Europe's customers will be paying more for less, with Microsoft's decision to yank IE8 from Windows 7 in an effort to head off EU antitrust regulators, who may still force the company to take more drastic measures."/quote No matter where you stand on the IE anti-trust issue (and i believe monopolistic practices suck) getting less product and paying more for it blows chunks. I have IE 8 on both of my computers. I don't use IE8 (I use firefox) but at least I have the *OPTION* of using IE8. I feel sorry for EU folks who are not getting as much as the US folks are getting. As far as the cost, there is not much you can do about that since it is based on exchange rates and they are volitile. Typically companies sell products at about the same cost but exchange rates differ and they do so pretty heavily.

    --

    I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
  102. exchange rate and Windows 7 by viralMeme · · Score: 1

    Exchange Rates Spell High Prices for WIndows 7 In the EU

    "Some of the money Microsoft stands to make on the European editions of Windows 7 comes from the weak dollar. Last week, for instance, the dollar fell against the euro the most in a month, hitting $1.41 per euro"

    Like how, what's the relationship between the exchange rate and the cost of burning a DVD?

  103. The maths by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1
    • MS is from USA
    • MS Windows is developed in USA
    • Retail price in USA is USD 200
    • Rebate of USD 10 for not shipping IE.
    • Same product shipped to EU will cost USD 190/1.4 = EUR 136
    • Difference between EUR 285 and EUR 136 is EUR 149.
    • Where's the extra EUR 149 going???

    Devious bastards!

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  104. EU UK ... HUH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > In other words, EU customers will pay twice the $199.99 U.S. price; U.K. buyers will pay 57% more.

    But the UK is part of the EU, so therefore customers in the UK will pay both "57% more" and "twice the price" at the same time!!

  105. Rawshooter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh.

    1. Re:Rawshooter by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

      So when did Rawshooter last get updated? Oh right. It was killed off way back in 2006. And it was just a converter, not an editor. Slightly different from Photoshop, wouldn't you think?

      "Duh" is right.

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  106. EU Fines by eples · · Score: 1

    Looks like the fine people of the EU get to pay off all those EU fines levied against Microsoft.

    Payback is a bitch, huh?

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
  107. Re:Warranty for software? by umghhh · · Score: 1
    Interesting - I am just wondering where this will go. At this moment the issues associated with quality of software and responsibility for damage done in case software has done unexpected is not protected at all unless said software is made on order where contracts usually regulate what happens when mishap occurs. At least some sort of best practice rules or certification that allows to sell to say hospitals etc. could be feasible.

    I wonder also if such regulation should not require use of open standards of communication, open file formats etc. How widely such warranty requirement should go is another issue.

    What wonders me too is what impact this could have on outsourcing and off-shoring of any activity to 'cheap' countries that is so prevalent last few years - looks like good prospects for QA specialists.

  108. The geek rewrites history once again by westlake · · Score: 1

    Back when Microsoft didn't have a stranglehold on the market, people were happy enough pirating 95 and 98, while ignoring things like BeOS and OS/2 (both competitively priced and more powerful)

    BeOS first appears on PPC Mac clones in 1996.

    BeOS was ported to X86 in March 1998.

    BeOS was optimized for digital media work... Through the late 1990s, BeOS managed to create a niche of followers, but the company failed... BeOS

    16 MB RAM and 150 MB of hard disk storage was recommended - and more - much more - would be desirable.

    The list of supported hardware was very short - and you could forget the portable or laptop PC.

    BeOS Ready Systems -- Intel, BeOS Probably Compatible List -- Intel

    These info pages from 1998-1999 come straight from Be itself.

    There were strong, competitive, MS-DOS machines on the market before the cloning of IBM PC BIOS.

    Win 3.1 anchored the franchise. Win 95 took off like a rocket.

    The convenience and economy of the OEM system install solves so many problems for the user, for the manufacturer, for the retailer, the service technician, that it is no longer possible to imagine an OS gaining traction in the mass consumer market without it.

     

  109. Re:And M$ will get busted by EU. AGAIN. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

    Logical fallacy. Confusing a proportion or a percentage with a scalar amount. Several hundred million Euro is a lot of money to anyone. Do you think all those $200 billion come from one monster source? No, it comes from lots of sources, probably few single sources of their money larger than these fines.

  110. Forever Spring by westlake · · Score: 1

    Linux may lack the marketing that both Microsoft and Apple have, but the word is spreading.

    To hear the geek tell the tale, he has converted everyone within leash - within reach. But when you look at the charts - the trend line remains as flat as his Dad's putting green. Top Operating Systems Share Trends

  111. Can you spell by De-Jean7777 · · Score: 0

    RIP OFF!

    --
    All the sexy babes want me... to fix their PC.
  112. Err, wrong price quoted here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In other words, EU customers will pay twice the $199.99 U.S. price [for Windows 7 Professional]"

    What? No, the US price is [url=http://store.microsoft.com/microsoft/Windows-7-Professional/product/B985134B]$300[/url].

  113. People get what they deserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, and for the price you get a crippled OS. Brilliant! We get what we deserve.
    The next question is, will the EU force other OS vendors to ship (or make available through download) their OS browserless too? Somewhere in that area you'll find the demarcation line between upholding the law and hypocrisy.

  114. Mock germans better, please! by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    Wilkommen! Get your kraut-ass back home. Is that how it works?

    As a half-german, I resent your half-hearted mockery of my half-people!

    It's "Iz zatt ze vai it wuhhkz?", bitte!

  115. A rational response to a troll? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is intended to be an American forum.

    I think it's intended to maximize advertisement revenue, and who gives a shit who wants to come and look at the stories?

    As such, Unicode is neither necessary nor desirable.

    Right, because no american would want to discuss prices in pound sterling, yen or euro, right? No true american would write "turoru wa sugoi ja arimasen" in hiragana, right? ("turoru" is my best transliteration of "troll").

    If it were supported, foreigners and trolls would start posting all kinds of diacritical marks and funny symbols and weird junk like that, which is not wanted.

    Correction: which you don't want. I want "€" rather than "euro". I want ">" rather than "greater than". And I don't particularly like remembering HTML entity names for the characters I want to use to express my point.

    If Europeans want a Unicode-friendly forum where they can use foreign currency symbols and letters with funny looking little hats overtop and whatnot, they can jolly well start their own site.

    Right, because Metcalfe's law says the value of a network increases the more fragmented and small it is, right?

    We don't want it here.

    You don't want it here. I do. I think we're 1-1. But slashdot is not a democracy; I think the operators will go for greater advertisement revenue by including us foreigners.

    Don't worry, we won't come charging at you with a hockey stick or &entity; or whatever we got.

  116. OMGWTFLOLBBQ by M0b1u5 · · Score: 1

    At that rate, it'll be over $1000 in New Zealand.

    I think I'm prepared to spend quite a few hours installing a cracked copy of Windows 7.

    No fuckign way should ANY version of windows cost more than $100 locally - about $65 USD.

    --
    How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"
  117. Re:Biggest Shock Of All by gsslay · · Score: 1

    Windows is an export. Exports cost more to the end consumer in the country being exported to.

    Which is what I said and what the article complains of. What was your point again?

  118. In some countries everything is more expensive by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the EU countries but in Canada, almost everything costs more than the US. You take the conversion rate in to account and it is still way more expensive. What amazes me is technology, like CPUs, video cards, and such. It is all more pricey by a good margin. this is pre GST/PST, by the way. I don't know the reason for it, maybe Canada charges more import duty, maybe there are higher wages along the line, maybe it is just coincidence, but shit costs more in Canada.

    Could be similar for EU countries too. If things are more expensive, be silly for game companies not to do the same.

  119. Re:Linux unusable in the mind of MS & Apple fa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Email, search, picture downloads. The ability of an OS to run Firefox does not make it mature for mainstream.

    Seriously, use a better damn example than that.

  120. The Math by Godji · · Score: 1

    Let's do the math. Windows with IE, $200. Windows without IE, $400.

    Therefore, cost of IE alone: -$200.

    So that's how much IE is really worth!