Usually time constraints. Alice might want to communicate securely to Bob over an extended period while separated, but they can physically meet beforehand. For example, you want a secure link with a military drone.
That's the first thing I thought about at the mention of a "brick wall". What else is going to stop you building a super-computer that has N-times the processing power of an existing one?
The more important fundamental laws and facts of physical science have all been discovered, and these are so firmly established that the possibility of their ever being supplanted in consequence of new discoveries is exceedingly remote.
I'm not saying you're wrong. Just that people who have said similar things in the past have all been wrong.
Which is just 4 light-minutes away. Voyager 1 is 17 light-hours away, and has taken 35 years to get that far. The next nearest star system is Proxima Centauri, and that is 4 light-years away...
Until we understand consciousness, it's hard to say. Entanglement might have something to do with it. Duplication of a conscious state could be prohibited.
It's a shame you can't get a keyboard to go on the back of these surface devices. Starting with V, C, X, Z, etc. down the back left, and a couple of space buttons each side, but on the front.
The argument there gets a bit more complex, but you can get the basic point by looking at entropy. An unordered system is not likely to become ordered over time, and it cannot do so over an infinite time, which it would need to (it would eventually degenerate into a final stable state, unlike the universe we see around us with non-homogeneous elements).
Why can't it do so over an infinite time-period? If it's unlikely to become ordered over [a finite] time, then over an infinite time-period it's a certainty. Why would there be a final stable state? No thermodynamic system has one.
Exactly what I thought, along with why the f' is this news? It's been known about since the publication of Special Relativity over 100 years ago, and certainly before we started calling them tachyons, around 50 years ago.
Slashdot Mirror
So done using a language written in C, libraries written in C, and further libraries that depend on the language and libraries written in C?
Because not everyone will be on their Xbox all the time, and Microsoft might also have spare server time available for peak Xbox hours.
Usually time constraints. Alice might want to communicate securely to Bob over an extended period while separated, but they can physically meet beforehand. For example, you want a secure link with a military drone.
The weather?
That's the first thing I thought about at the mention of a "brick wall". What else is going to stop you building a super-computer that has N-times the processing power of an existing one?
Does it even qualify as scientific knowledge if it's not freely available for peer review?
I would prefer a power cable. Put the battery in my pocket.
Religiosity and intelligence.
Which is why a clearly visible shooting target, with the groin-area shot out, is more effective than an actual gun.
Completely agree. I'd add that the threat is the defense. Actually shooting the firearm is no defense at all.
Gedyr ah Emlyg?
That should be:
I couldn't see any mention of C++11. I'd assume they would use the new standard. Anyone know?
I couldn't see any mention of C++11. I'd assume they would. Anyone know?
The more important fundamental laws and facts of physical science have all been discovered, and these are so firmly established that the possibility of their ever being supplanted in consequence of new discoveries is exceedingly remote.
I'm not saying you're wrong. Just that people who have said similar things in the past have all been wrong.
It's not going to work on me. I don't have any fashion style.
Which is just 4 light-minutes away. Voyager 1 is 17 light-hours away, and has taken 35 years to get that far. The next nearest star system is Proxima Centauri, and that is 4 light-years away...
Until we understand consciousness, it's hard to say. Entanglement might have something to do with it. Duplication of a conscious state could be prohibited.
It's a shame you can't get a keyboard to go on the back of these surface devices. Starting with V, C, X, Z, etc. down the back left, and a couple of space buttons each side, but on the front.
The argument there gets a bit more complex, but you can get the basic point by looking at entropy. An unordered system is not likely to become ordered over time, and it cannot do so over an infinite time, which it would need to (it would eventually degenerate into a final stable state, unlike the universe we see around us with non-homogeneous elements).
Why can't it do so over an infinite time-period? If it's unlikely to become ordered over [a finite] time, then over an infinite time-period it's a certainty. Why would there be a final stable state? No thermodynamic system has one.
You'll want a RAID controller that supports TRIM.
Very happy with mine. But the 830s are becoming harder to find since the 840 came out.
I wonder how big the sample size would need to be to get two 100% matches.
You probably already have that many. Except they're in your graphics card.
There are Quasicrystals. These are ordered in space, but not periodic.
Exactly what I thought, along with why the f' is this news? It's been known about since the publication of Special Relativity over 100 years ago, and certainly before we started calling them tachyons, around 50 years ago.