Are you saying Stallman is too retarded to install Libre Office?
Not you. Not what is "best".
I don't think I have insinuated it is.
Here is what you said, and that I responded to:
If you have a.doc file and don't own Microsoft Word, you no longer have a usable document
That comment is incorrect in addition to being retarded.
Maybe you shouldn't be allowed near English.
Ah, you are one of those morons who thinks that everybody in the world lives in the US of A. I am 100% certain my English is much better than yours, and it certainly is far better than your comprehension of my native language. Next time you want to engage in a conversation with adults, please ask an adult for help.
you are not LEGALLY allowed to use MS Word/Office/Windows
Why do you think I advocated using MS Word/Office? If you are incapable of finding software that can manipulate MS Word 97 documents, you should never be allowed near a computer. There are several alternatives.
If you can't open a.doc file in other software than Microsoft Word, then you're a moron who should never be allowed anywhere near a computer. In fact, if you still have a doc file and haven't converted it to the (really bad, by all means, but...) fully open.docx format, then you are also a moron who should get out of the last decade before the next one starts and you're 20 years behind reality.
You need to come back from the 1990s. Seriously. The exact opposite of what you are saying is true. The exact opposite. Microsoft is (today) more open with.Net than Sun and Oracle ever were with Java.
Yes, Microsoft of old were shits, but they have actually changed. Significantly.
There isn't a single instance where those prophets were right. Lots of instances where they were proven to be complete lunatics though. The Stallman case included.
Isn't Spain in the EU? How the hell is this allowed to happen?
EU: Here is a constitution, we're going to have a vote on it EU population: We're not going to vote for it (polls) EU: OK, you didn't like it. We renamed it, but kept it the same, now you can't vote on it EU population:OK then Ireland and a few others:Eh, no, we're still going to have a vote EU:Grumbling, hmmm, we really don't want you to! Ireland and a few others:Who cares EU: OK, so long as you vote in the correct manner Ireland and a few others:... Ireland: Sorry guys, that's a no to that constitution thing. EU: Sorry, that's wrong, please take another vote Ireland: Huh? EU: We said (louder), that's wrong, please take another vote Ireland: Feck off! EU: Are you hard of hearing. Vote again. NOW! Ireland: Feck off! EU: If you don't vote again we're going to FUCK UP YOUR ECONOMY! BADLY! Ireland: Seriously? EU: Seriously. We know you're struggling a bit right now, so we're going to make it a lot worse. NOW VOTE AGAIN!!! Ireland: OK. Sorry. We vote yes.
The EU is a democratic place in about the same way that the Soviet Union was democratic. The EU is the strongest threat to democracy in Europe since the 1930s.
Well, MS has creates some truly bad languages and they are still hard at it
They have. VB being a prime example. However, C# is what Java would be if it ever made it out of committee. It blows Java away in every way. Seriously. I've developed commercial Java apps since the late 1990s, and C# is leagues ahead of Java at this stage. Typescript is also, quite objectively, the very best way of developing JavaScript applications.
Interestingly the two mentioned are the brain children of one Anders Hejlsberg, the inventor of the (once quite nice, but today quite broken) Delphi.
in order to try and supplant it with their Typescript crapola
Here we have a Visual Basic for Application developer talking about something he knows nothing about. He then tries to make him self sound more "pure" than he is by bashing Microsoft. Moronic and childish. Ignorant stupidity.
There simply is nothing crapola about Typescript. Simple as that. Anyone who thinks there is has never tried to develop applications in both Javascript and Typescript.
So, let me get the IMSI/EMEI etc out of the way...
Every phone has a unique EMEI number. The phone number (called MSISDN) is what you punch onto your keyboard to call a phone, this phone number is then mapped to one or more EMEI codes to connect the callers. Since a user can have multiple phones, you can map a phone number to one or more EMEI numbers. IMSI is a unique identifier for a user (not a device) and should in theory be unique for each user in the world. For obvious reasons that is not the case, the best it can do is identify within a country, and depending on the country, perhaps not even that.
At the end of the day, an IMSI can have multiple MSISDNs, which can map to multiple EMEIs.
Every SIM has its own IMSI number, but there is no need for a mobile operator to assign an actual unique phone number to the SIM, the phone number is merely a "proxy" to the IMSI number. Obviously, a carrier might assign a unique phone number to your SIM but they'd be stupid to do so since it would waste perfectly good phone numbers, a dwindling commodity.
Slashdot Mirror
and you still have no arguments. How old are you? Five? Donald Trump indeed.
No, he asked you to substantiate your unsubstantiated claims. Have you stopped raping children? You never did you say? I say different. Check google
Translation: have no facts to back up my unsubstantiated claims.
And you still are not capable of providing any supporting data for your retarded claims.
OK, so you are probably not Trump, but you have documented you are far dumber.
Hey, 1995 called and wanted its retarded memes back.
past tense: squicked; past participle: squicked
cause (someone) to feel intense disgust.
"we get that bodily fluids can squick people out"
"cause (someone) to feel intense disgust."
Nope, the Jews were never captives in Egypt. That's all myth.
Are you saying Stallman is too retarded to install Libre Office?
I don't think I have insinuated it is.
Here is what you said, and that I responded to:
That comment is incorrect in addition to being retarded.
Ah, you are one of those morons who thinks that everybody in the world lives in the US of A. I am 100% certain my English is much better than yours, and it certainly is far better than your comprehension of my native language. Next time you want to engage in a conversation with adults, please ask an adult for help.
Why do you think I advocated using MS Word/Office? If you are incapable of finding software that can manipulate MS Word 97 documents, you should never be allowed near a computer. There are several alternatives.
If you can't open a .doc file in other software than Microsoft Word, then you're a moron who should never be allowed anywhere near a computer. In fact, if you still have a doc file and haven't converted it to the (really bad, by all means, but...) fully open .docx format, then you are also a moron who should get out of the last decade before the next one starts and you're 20 years behind reality.
If that's the thing he is talking about, then he's retarded.
You need to come back from the 1990s. Seriously. The exact opposite of what you are saying is true. The exact opposite. Microsoft is (today) more open with .Net than Sun and Oracle ever were with Java.
Yes, Microsoft of old were shits, but they have actually changed. Significantly.
There isn't a single instance where those prophets were right. Lots of instances where they were proven to be complete lunatics though. The Stallman case included.
Time for your meds now.
You and Stallman need to take your medications. ASAP. Your paranoia is destroying your brains.
There is also the issue that the EU thinks democracy is an evil idea that must be squashed wherever it rears its ugly head.
Isn't Spain in the EU? How the hell is this allowed to happen?
EU: Here is a constitution, we're going to have a vote on it
EU population: We're not going to vote for it (polls)
EU: OK, you didn't like it. We renamed it, but kept it the same, now you can't vote on it
EU population:OK then
Ireland and a few others:Eh, no, we're still going to have a vote
EU:Grumbling, hmmm, we really don't want you to!
Ireland and a few others:Who cares
EU: OK, so long as you vote in the correct manner
Ireland and a few others:...
Ireland: Sorry guys, that's a no to that constitution thing.
EU: Sorry, that's wrong, please take another vote
Ireland: Huh?
EU: We said (louder), that's wrong, please take another vote
Ireland: Feck off!
EU: Are you hard of hearing. Vote again. NOW!
Ireland: Feck off!
EU: If you don't vote again we're going to FUCK UP YOUR ECONOMY! BADLY!
Ireland: Seriously?
EU: Seriously. We know you're struggling a bit right now, so we're going to make it a lot worse. NOW VOTE AGAIN!!!
Ireland: OK. Sorry. We vote yes.
The EU is a democratic place in about the same way that the Soviet Union was democratic. The EU is the strongest threat to democracy in Europe since the 1930s.
Well, MS has creates some truly bad languages and they are still hard at it
They have. VB being a prime example. However, C# is what Java would be if it ever made it out of committee. It blows Java away in every way. Seriously. I've developed commercial Java apps since the late 1990s, and C# is leagues ahead of Java at this stage. Typescript is also, quite objectively, the very best way of developing JavaScript applications.
Interestingly the two mentioned are the brain children of one Anders Hejlsberg, the inventor of the (once quite nice, but today quite broken) Delphi.
Lots of Borland/Pascal programmers are saying we told you so though.
Isn't "lots" and "borland/pascal programmers" a contradiction in terms?
in order to try and supplant it with their Typescript crapola
Here we have a Visual Basic for Application developer talking about something he knows nothing about. He then tries to make him self sound more "pure" than he is by bashing Microsoft. Moronic and childish. Ignorant stupidity.
There simply is nothing crapola about Typescript. Simple as that. Anyone who thinks there is has never tried to develop applications in both Javascript and Typescript.
So, let me get the IMSI/EMEI etc out of the way...
Every phone has a unique EMEI number. The phone number (called MSISDN) is what you punch onto your keyboard to call a phone, this phone number is then mapped to one or more EMEI codes to connect the callers. Since a user can have multiple phones, you can map a phone number to one or more EMEI numbers. IMSI is a unique identifier for a user (not a device) and should in theory be unique for each user in the world. For obvious reasons that is not the case, the best it can do is identify within a country, and depending on the country, perhaps not even that.
At the end of the day, an IMSI can have multiple MSISDNs, which can map to multiple EMEIs.
Make that EMEI above, I was momentarily vacuous.
Every SIM has its own IMSI number, but there is no need for a mobile operator to assign an actual unique phone number to the SIM, the phone number is merely a "proxy" to the IMSI number. Obviously, a carrier might assign a unique phone number to your SIM but they'd be stupid to do so since it would waste perfectly good phone numbers, a dwindling commodity.
I love it when clueless morons post anonymously in all caps. Everything in your moronic post was wrong. Literally everything.