You can find every number you want if you have enough "points".
We are not just looking at points. We are looking at location, measure, angles and points.
You are looking at pi used in a way that it defines the decimal system, 10s, that's not coincidence. That's a Master architect saying "we understand what these numbers mean and how to use them". Archeologists are the wrong people to be custodians of the Pyramids. You need someone better at math than me pulling these measurements to pieces. They aren't imperfections, they are perfections to demonstrate that it was done on purpose and to get the attention of people smart enough to see what else is encoded.
The builders encoded the speed of light *twice* in measurements that also encode the size of the earth and moon. pi is encoded 5+ times in a building that doesn't have a circle in it. Not just outside measurements but also in the Kings chamber (pi*10), just coincidence that pi is also encoded as a ratio. We haven't even begun to discuss the angles and what they encode, the significance of the 30th parallel in radians and the relationship to time and how it link cubits and the metre to a second.
That's before you even consider that these numbers are *metric*, metres. What the hell are ancient Egyptians doing using a measurement system that was *supposedly* invented thousands of years later, aren't they supposed to be using cubits. Or feet for that matter which is also in there. Well the answer to that is encoded in 1 second.
What is so hard to get?
"ROFL" and that you are reducing this to a single variable "it's just coincidence" are signs of cognitive dissonance. Therefore you are dismissing any further evidence before you even see it, and I certainly haven't put all of it forward.
Why you are invested so much in your position? I'm not asking you to believe in Santa Claus, I'm saying look at the numbers - there are too many to be a coincidence.
You are refusing to look at the evidence placed before you because of the amount of mental effort required to alter your POV. Therefore it is easier to dismiss me as a kook or a lunatic than to examine the facts. Have I been rude or belittled you? You are doing what the nuclear fanbois do.
The numbers you show are coincidents, thats all.
If the angles were the only factor, you may have a point. However it is reinforced over and over and over in multiple different ways using math as a language. You are dismissing multiple incidences of data as a symphony of coincidence as something normal.
The chance is 100% that it is not a secret message.
The chances are 100% that is an assumption. There is nothing secret about this message - it's a 42 story high stack of stones. It's about as blatantly not secret as they come.
It is simply the simplest form to build a stable pyramid with maximum height.
Really! You're trying to tell me they accidentally encoding pi more than 5 times in two separate measurements? Pi *100 and pi*1 in one equation, twice. pi*1, pi*100, the speed of light, euler, avagadro, phi, pi. Show me another building with all of that information encoded into it, that isn't megalythic.
Show me the math where you can encode all of the information into a structure - there is nothing simple about it.
North East base (including socket):
231.91597+231.89692 463.81289
Rotational speed of earth per second.
463.81289*86400(secs in day) 40073.43369600
Equatorial diameter of earth. Height in metres (including socle) * secs in day
147.1445089*86400 12713.2855689600
Polar diameter of the Earth.
ROFL
This is the most perfect building mankind has ever made and it was made at the dawn of civilization. To refute all of this information and claim it's coincidence is Dogma. I think this challenges your presumptions and you are very uncomfortable about what a so called infant human civilization having possession of this knowledge.
Yes, it is for construction purpose. But when they were covered and "true pyramids" you did not see that concave structure because the cover was flat.
No. They are there to express information. pi is 3.14159265. The numbers are expressed in metres.
The Eastern Face base distance from your alleged construction line from the center is 115.1820912 metres subtracted from the height gives pi*10:
146.63928-115.1820912 31.4571888
The Western Face represents a ratio:
115.1705088/146.63928 .7854001247
which is pi/4. Which is then expressed *twice* in the angles. Look at my other post for yet more coincidences.
Of course the centre line of the Great Pyramid is pi*1000 (3141.5) metres south of the 30 parallel which puts it on North 29.9792458 and if you multiply that number by a million you get the speed of light., which is also expressed in an indirect measurement.
The chance of that being a coincidence is so extraordinarily remote I doubt you can express just how remote the odds are.
I'm curious where Lucas could have taken this. More curious than I am about anything else in the Star Wars universe.
Exactly. People who dived into Lucas' creation suddenly thought they owned it. They didn't respect the vision of the guy who was writing stories that served the story instead of a franchise. They were only in the territory, it was Lucas mapping it.
Sure I enjoy the Disney versions however what I see is the filling in of all the back story that Lucas created and Lucas could have farmed that out to Disney to keep fanboys happy while he focused on innovating the story to the final manifestation based on the fact that the inspiration for Star Wars came to Lucas and not the Disney Board.
If you want something great and interesting you have to let people take risks with the story. Star Wars lost that as soon as people started whining about Jar Jar, took it too seriously and forgot that it was a bunch of kids who made it into the cultural icon it is.
If you can't get something so simple and easily checked correct, why should I believe any of the rest of that?
Indeed you are right, my apologies, I was actually busy and in the middle of something else and it has been just over a year since I looked at these calculations. It's not exactly dinner conversations with friends so in what context would I ever bring such a thing up. I'm still wrapping my head around the mastery of it so, it's on me, my error which I will correct.
The base of the Great Pyramid has unequal sides, yet if you add two side together they equal pi*100 (in feet IIRC) and the other two and you get the same number.
Please note the IIRC part.
Oh come on. The base of the Pyramid is 755.9 feet long. Twice that is nowhere near 314 feet. Even a casual glance at the Great Pyramid would tell you that its base is a bit bigger than 157 feet anyway.
Well I didn't recall correctly. The Great Pyramid uses Three units of measurement, foot, cubit and metre. It was the metre measure, not the measurement in feet.
If you observe the South East Corner (or put it in a computer model) you will see the maximum visible base at the South East Corner is 460.7052 metres, if you subtract the height which is 146.63928 you get:
460.7052-146.63928 314.06592
Or pi * 100 as I said. Sorry I got the units wrong. Also I forgot, the same side expresses pi *1:
460.7052/146.63928 3.14175
Now pi is 3.14159265, so that is pi accurate to two place measuring the south east corner. Moving on, the Eastern Face base distance from the center is 115.1820912 metres subtracted from the height gives pi*10 (forgot about that one too - I'm pretty busy):
146.63928-115.1820912 31.4571888
So that's pi*1, pi*10, pi*100 and I also said pi*1000:
The circumference is 3023.6 feet, which is kind of close to pi*1000 so long as you're willing to accept a few percent error.
Well if you go to google earth you'll find that the Great Pyramid isn't precisely on the 30th parallel it's 3141 metres to the centre line south. That's what I meant.
So first the Great Pyramid represents a pi and metre relationship - how is that if the metre was invented thousands of years later? I don't know, I just think it's interesting and I was pointing it out. But i it's also in the South West Corner again metres, base minus height:
460.8100512 - 146.63928 314.1707712
and:
460.8100512/ 146.63928 3.14247
Different numbers same result just to reinforce that it wasn't an accident, the angle may have been but not the measurement. It's dogma to claim otherwise, implausible to have that many coincidences.
But that is purely coincidence as the Egyptians would have no idea about the foot unit anyway, which was invented thousands of years later and is completely arbitrarily so it's not like they would have come up with it independently either.
Nope, they've covered that in the euler ratio, foot to cubit but just to reinforce they understood feet too take the Grand Gallery =153.136 feet * pi
153.136 *3.14159265 481.09093205
Which is the height of the Great Pyramid in feet.
Just how many coincidences do you need to have before you accept it as evidence that it is a deliberate act?
Pi is referenced more times in the measurement, it's like the structure is dedicated to pi except that there is even more information encoded into it. All I'm kind of saying is that maybe that is what the Great Pyrami
And it is scientific consensus: this is coincidence.
It's a coincidence that Pythagoras, one of the founders of mathematics studied the Pyramids not the great wall of china which probably didn't exist then, can you show me an older man made structure that coincidentally has all of those mathematical constants in them?
It's a coincidence that all of these constants are in the Pyramids a structure that comes before all other megalythic and modern structures built, with no evidence that it's a tomb, yet here it exists like a textbook in stone with most of the important equations required to build a civilization and it's all a coincidence.
All just a coincidence, the stuff we based the core of modern math. Just a coincidence that there are other constants in the Great Pyramid we don't know how to utilize even before we consider the ratios and measurement *between* the other structures. All a coincidence that these dumb ancients just happened to include information that we don't know how to utilize yet in structures that coincidentally are older than any other human structure?
Sounds like dogma to me, it sounds unscientific. Hubris.
Just take a picture from a random part of the stars, then use your idea about the pyramids... you get the same surprising results.
Well, Humans didn't build the stars, Human Beings built the Pyramids. When you study other megalithic structures in the world, you find the same dimensions and the same huge stones which are coincidentally arranged to represent information about the stars like Angkor Wat coincidentally does. No one can explain how stones were moved, we can't do it today and unless you believe Aliens did it you're left with an enigma about how a supposedly hunter gatherer society out of pre-history generated enough surplus to build several 42 story high stack of stones, a couple of 26 story structures and a bunch of other megalythic structures that all accidentally contain mathematically information, like the bent Pyramid.
Ever examined the engineering effort that allegedly created the structure? According to current dogma the great pyramid's construction involves master craftsmen, quarrying, cutting, moving, accurately placing a 2-3 ton stone, once every six minutes, 14 hours per day, 7 days a week, for 20 years and coincidentally built it accurately enough to represent all and more of the constants upon which we base modern mathematics with some we can find but don't know how to use. No sick days, no uprisings, no food shortages, they just kept going producing this level of accuracy and speed with ropes and shadow.
And by some sheer coincidence they encodes another eight constants besides the ones I remember like Avogadro constant the conversion factor for converting grams to atomic mass units, euler, phi, pi, the metre, the foot, the cubit, the speed of light, the ratio of the size of earth to moon, the polar and equatorial circumference of the earth, coincidentally on the central land mass of the earth when viewed from above, coincidentally encoding the amount of seconds in a day, days in a leap year and finishing off by fluking it placing it at equal distance from the north pole and the center of the earth, making it exactly one degree wide and precisely 1/42600ths the mass of the Earth.
All a coincidence.
Yet I don't see anyone with a better explanation as to why they would want to make such an effort to build something like that for any other reason than to encode that information. They could have spent those resources on anything more useful than a tomb that doesn't even have a name on it? What about a dam? Seriously, I'd only build a structure like that to store nuclear waste. If modern
However it isn't paper - it's stone. And there aren't just points, there are derived constants. Circle the flats and the corners of the base of the great pyramid and subtract the smaller circumference from the large and tell me the number you get. It will blow you away. No way that is irrelevant.
And consider that you didn't even realize it was an eight sided structure until I pointed it out to you, I have little doubt that you have confirmed it by now. I don't care what you think about this however, consider what else don't you know?
The diagonal long edge is the length of seconds in a day in feet
Wait, so the ancient Egyptians used the modern (and arbitrary) British unit of a foot? As in 12 inches? 30.48 cm?
More like the British used the foot which is a universal constant of measure. The foot to the cubit represents the euler constant, if you care to take a look at it. Also, they used the metre, which you struggle to wrap your head around until you realize that if you take a 1 metre pendulum and swing it so that the arc is precisely 1 second (at the the 30th parallel for an exact second due to gravitational variations) you will find that the distance of the arc defines a cubit perfectly. Now you have a metre to cubit relationship.
Additionally if you take a cubit and add it to a metre it equals 5 feet, add a foot and you have 6 feet, which means you have a relationship between all three universal constants of measure. That defines the principles of the microcosm to macrocosm 5 and 6, which is what the land of Khem (i.e. Egypt), alchemy and Chemistry is all about.
Do the experiment yourself if you don't believe me. A weight, some string, a ruler and a stopwatch, it works anywhere.
At most it's a coincidence.
Except the designers of the great Pyramid eliminates that as a possibility. The base of the Great Pyramid has unequal sides, yet if you add two side together they equal pi*100 (in feet IIRC) and the other two and you get the same number.
Just how many coincidences do you need to have before you accept it as evidence that it is a deliberate act?
Or an alien conspiracy.
I would say a more reasonable explanation is that we are not the most advanced human civilization to walk the earth and that whatever happened during the Younger Dryas wiped that human civilization out. Is it also a coincidence that the three pyramids align to the constellation Orion at 10500BC when the Younger Dryas event happened? Have you considered that we are the survivors of that catastrophe - whatever it was?
As for Aliens, unknowable.
I'm sure there are constants such as Pi, phi, euler's constant, the golden ratio, and more that can be found in the pyramids' construction, as a consequence of geometry.
There are another eight constants in there in the measurement. Derived constants from other measurements include the speed of light and that isn't a consequence of geometry.
That in no way is proof they understood the constants in abstract. In fact there's little evidence they did.
If you look at the distance of the Great Pyramid to the 30th parallel you will find it is pi*1000. Divide the base by the height and you get pi. pi*10 is in the kings chamber. That's pi expressed four times, twice on two different edges producing the same number.
I personally think the Great Pyramid is a textbook, in stone. It may also be a warning that says whatever destroyed us can destroy you too because they knew they were a dying civilization.
But they were smart master builders and knew how to get a job done.
The GP is correct, though.
No, they were *Genius* builders. There is absolutely no way we could build that structure - we can't even figure out how they moved the stone.
You can do the alignments with the plumb bobs and shadow method that he said. In fact you can get an alignment with 1 degree of true north with the sun and shadows. We don't need GPS to for that.
Sure and you can measure my claims in the dimensions of the Great Pyramid.
he pyramids are aligned to within 1 degree of true north. Modern civilisation is only just approaching that level of accuracy with GPS *today*.
That is nonsense.
You seem not to grasp the parents explanation. With a simple stick everyone can figure true north with 1/10th accuracy super easy.
Yep.
Just make the stick long enough and measure a couple of days. E.g. use a small hill and put the stick on top of it.
Not without introducing error. Richard Feynman suggested that there are simple, beautiful elegant explanations that are also wrong.
The rest of your post seems rather nuts to me, starting with an 8 sided pyramid when you clearly see: it is a standard 4 sided one.
Then, my friend, you are as uninformed about these matters as we have found some people to be about Nuclear Power. There is nothing nuts about the information contained in the pyramids. What's nuts is that the actual truth of these structures is being dictated by archaeologist with arts degrees making assumptions instead of geologist, engineers and mathematicians who measure the structure. Study the numbers, you will see my claims supported.
With good will towards you, this is something I would strongly suggest you need to question your assumptions about.
Well, check out the 'uuge chronic spermotoxicosis cognitive dissonance of Mr. Kaos.
I think your comment is a really good example of why these type of policies are bad. Your toxic femininity shows you're prepared to take a man down who has worked for something you think you're entitled to. When you don't get your way you have a tantrum.
You're one desperate motherfucker, that's right!
Sure, I'll ask my decent, educated, attractive, hardworking, polite, kind, considerate and smart wife over dinner. I think your problem is you think feminism is about getting even, instead of being equal. No wonder other women can't stand you.
For aligning ancient temples, pyramids and other structures with East/West directions, the technique was ridiculously simple. Plant a pole, and mark the tip's shadow location at sunrise on equinox day and again the location at sunset.
No, just no.
The pyramids are aligned to within 1 degree of true north. Modern civilisation is only just approaching that level of accuracy with GPS *today*.
Aside for that the great pyramid is a *eight* sided pyramid and keeping enough tension on rope to line that up is pretty much impossible. It is packed with information.
To give you some idea, pi is represented *1, *10, *100 and *1000 in this structure. It contains phi, the euler constant and more. The diagonal long edge is the length of seconds in a day in feet, it's four edges define the length of a year in cubits accurate to five decimal places. The ratios of a foot, cubit and metre are represented in ratios, the base times the diagonal edge defines the equatorial circumference.
I could go on, and on and on, however it is known that Pythagoras studied the pyramids so it is quite clear they are a textbook, not a tomb. More than likely that Stonehenge was based on what was learned in the pyramids.
If you want a citation, look at the dimensions of the pyramids, I'd recommend the JH Cole study.
Hey dude, we often dress up not for your benefit but because thatâ(TM)s what we do. Maybe we are interested in the barista on the way to the office or someone we see outside at lunch.
When I wear a suit, tie, a nice watch and shiney shoes, I don't do it because I'm looking to pick up. I do it because I mean business. I don't buy a nice car to impress you, I do it to impress myself. It's still signaling.
Either way, itâ(TM)s awesome that you assume itâ(TM)s all about you...because I doubt it is.
That doesn't change that you are sexually signally. That's like saying the light from a light house is only for certain ships, the rest of them should just ignore the signal. Just because I ignore your sexual signalling doesn't mean you aren't sexually signalling, it means I'm not interested in you.
The point that it is consensual nullifies a lot of my concerns honestly, assuming that is so. It also invalidates all the schmucky harassment crap that floats around in offices that is tougher to have HR pursue.
So basically men should not approach women at all. Should men write a letter or something equally lame. I've got news for you, once you're past 30 it's women that get rejected by men. Your looks don't matter and if you've been relying on that then chances are you aren't much of a person that a decent man is going to be attracted to. Spend some time cultivating a decent personality.
The shitty way you treated guys while you were in your brief sexual prime will be reflected in all the sleazy men that decide to use you. Feel free to mod me down if that shatters your false reality.
Ask most women how many creepy coworkers and managers theyâ(TM)ve dealt with
Ask most men how many crazy hormonal women they've had to deal with.
Sure, same reason I work out, drive a nice car and wear nice clothes. My point is not about women do, I've got not problem with that. What I have a problem with is a company dictating interpersonal relationships between people.
Is it possible that I'm the only sane round here!?...
Nope.
How have you in USA reached to the position of accept -and even support, a company policy saying nay about the private life (and I mean private, as in it's no fucking issue for anybody but for those directly involved) of their employees?
You are dead fucking right. The whole idea of it is fucking ridiculous and the appropriate response is "FUCK OFF". It's simple boys and girls: Women, especially hot women are attracted to powerful men. This is not some woo woo concept it's how our entire species has propagated and survived.
Hypergamy is the behavior. Then there is the practise between peers, I spend so much time at work of course I'm going to notice women that work there and if they are interested they are going to encourage that attention.
Obviously I'm not going to provide unwelcome attention however women put on make-up, dress nicely and wear high heals. There is so much sexual signaling there that if a company is going to attempt to decide what I do outside then I may as well raise a complaint to HR and call that sexual harassment.
Sorry ladies at work you have to wear a suit, flat shoes and no make-up exactly the same way men do. Let's see how that goes down with women.
Additionally women only have a limited time to get their shit together if they want to have a family - that's a real well thought out "pro-woman" policy you've got there Intel.
See? *Employees*. Not slaves, not serfs, not minions.
Meditation is good and useful practise for accessing different states of consciousness without drugs. There are many reasons why you want to do this. To say it reduces motivation and increases ego just indicates it is not being used properly. Brains are smart - minds are smarter and whilst you can fool the conscious mind fooling the unconscious mind is like trying to pretend gravity doesn't exist as you step off a cliff. Bottom line here - don't be fucking stupid, intent is everything.
In some cases though meditation is a form of spiritual bypassing of all the shit you've been through in your life. These things mess with your super ego, those little voices in your head that can give you constructive or destructive messages. If they are destructive you're going to have a crap opinion of yourself and meditation will expand any false reality you have constructed and turn you into a real asshole.
Bottom line: deal with your issues consciously first then meditation will be useful. Chances are you won't act like a dick either.
You are right, however he is using disinformation tactics and attempting to aggravate people. I have argued facts with Atomic Asshole and he simply ignores them or worse attempts to twist your arguments into rhetoric he can use. To me Asshole is simply entertainment and his "arguments" are easily burst thought bubbles.
What about these babies have you fully researched how this happens.
Clearly you don't understand how soluble Plutonium Chloride is. That's why someone has called you AtomicAsshole. See, it's not just me that thinks you don't know what you're talking about. Maybe it's time to admit to yourself that You're wrong.
But you can't and it has nothing to do with nuclear power either. I know your little secret.
Slashdot Mirror
then it's as equally terrifying as if we aren't alone.
You can find every number you want if you have enough "points".
We are not just looking at points. We are looking at location, measure, angles and points.
You are looking at pi used in a way that it defines the decimal system, 10s, that's not coincidence. That's a Master architect saying "we understand what these numbers mean and how to use them". Archeologists are the wrong people to be custodians of the Pyramids. You need someone better at math than me pulling these measurements to pieces. They aren't imperfections, they are perfections to demonstrate that it was done on purpose and to get the attention of people smart enough to see what else is encoded.
The builders encoded the speed of light *twice* in measurements that also encode the size of the earth and moon. pi is encoded 5+ times in a building that doesn't have a circle in it. Not just outside measurements but also in the Kings chamber (pi*10), just coincidence that pi is also encoded as a ratio. We haven't even begun to discuss the angles and what they encode, the significance of the 30th parallel in radians and the relationship to time and how it link cubits and the metre to a second.
That's before you even consider that these numbers are *metric*, metres. What the hell are ancient Egyptians doing using a measurement system that was *supposedly* invented thousands of years later, aren't they supposed to be using cubits. Or feet for that matter which is also in there. Well the answer to that is encoded in 1 second.
What is so hard to get?
"ROFL" and that you are reducing this to a single variable "it's just coincidence" are signs of cognitive dissonance. Therefore you are dismissing any further evidence before you even see it, and I certainly haven't put all of it forward.
Why you are invested so much in your position? I'm not asking you to believe in Santa Claus, I'm saying look at the numbers - there are too many to be a coincidence.
You are refusing to look at the evidence placed before you because of the amount of mental effort required to alter your POV. Therefore it is easier to dismiss me as a kook or a lunatic than to examine the facts. Have I been rude or belittled you? You are doing what the nuclear fanbois do.
The numbers you show are coincidents, thats all.
If the angles were the only factor, you may have a point. However it is reinforced over and over and over in multiple different ways using math as a language. You are dismissing multiple incidences of data as a symphony of coincidence as something normal.
It's not rational.
The chance is 100% that it is not a secret message.
The chances are 100% that is an assumption. There is nothing secret about this message - it's a 42 story high stack of stones. It's about as blatantly not secret as they come.
It is simply the simplest form to build a stable pyramid with maximum height.
Really! You're trying to tell me they accidentally encoding pi more than 5 times in two separate measurements? Pi *100 and pi*1 in one equation, twice. pi*1, pi*100, the speed of light, euler, avagadro, phi, pi. Show me another building with all of that information encoded into it, that isn't megalythic.
Show me the math where you can encode all of the information into a structure - there is nothing simple about it.
North East base (including socket):
Rotational speed of earth per second.
Equatorial diameter of earth. Height in metres (including socle) * secs in day
Polar diameter of the Earth.
ROFL
This is the most perfect building mankind has ever made and it was made at the dawn of civilization. To refute all of this information and claim it's coincidence is Dogma. I think this challenges your presumptions and you are very uncomfortable about what a so called infant human civilization having possession of this knowledge.
The concaves represent information in ratio and measurement.
Yes, it is for construction purpose. But when they were covered and "true pyramids" you did not see that concave structure because the cover was flat.
No. They are there to express information. pi is 3.14159265. The numbers are expressed in metres.
The Eastern Face base distance from your alleged construction line from the center is 115.1820912 metres subtracted from the height gives pi*10:
The Western Face represents a ratio:
which is pi/4. Which is then expressed *twice* in the angles. Look at my other post for yet more coincidences.
Of course the centre line of the Great Pyramid is pi*1000 (3141.5) metres south of the 30 parallel which puts it on North 29.9792458 and if you multiply that number by a million you get the speed of light., which is also expressed in an indirect measurement.
The chance of that being a coincidence is so extraordinarily remote I doubt you can express just how remote the odds are.
some information for you
Or you know, you could just not watch those movies.
and let the rest of us enjoy them for what they are.
I'm curious where Lucas could have taken this. More curious than I am about anything else in the Star Wars universe.
Exactly. People who dived into Lucas' creation suddenly thought they owned it. They didn't respect the vision of the guy who was writing stories that served the story instead of a franchise. They were only in the territory, it was Lucas mapping it.
Sure I enjoy the Disney versions however what I see is the filling in of all the back story that Lucas created and Lucas could have farmed that out to Disney to keep fanboys happy while he focused on innovating the story to the final manifestation based on the fact that the inspiration for Star Wars came to Lucas and not the Disney Board.
If you want something great and interesting you have to let people take risks with the story. Star Wars lost that as soon as people started whining about Jar Jar, took it too seriously and forgot that it was a bunch of kids who made it into the cultural icon it is.
Jerks
If you can't get something so simple and easily checked correct, why should I believe any of the rest of that?
Indeed you are right, my apologies, I was actually busy and in the middle of something else and it has been just over a year since I looked at these calculations. It's not exactly dinner conversations with friends so in what context would I ever bring such a thing up. I'm still wrapping my head around the mastery of it so, it's on me, my error which I will correct.
Please note the IIRC part.
Oh come on. The base of the Pyramid is 755.9 feet long. Twice that is nowhere near 314 feet. Even a casual glance at the Great Pyramid would tell you that its base is a bit bigger than 157 feet anyway.
Well I didn't recall correctly. The Great Pyramid uses Three units of measurement, foot, cubit and metre. It was the metre measure, not the measurement in feet.
If you observe the South East Corner (or put it in a computer model) you will see the maximum visible base at the South East Corner is 460.7052 metres, if you subtract the height which is 146.63928 you get:
Or pi * 100 as I said. Sorry I got the units wrong. Also I forgot, the same side expresses pi *1:
Now pi is 3.14159265, so that is pi accurate to two place measuring the south east corner. Moving on, the Eastern Face base distance from the center is 115.1820912 metres subtracted from the height gives pi*10 (forgot about that one too - I'm pretty busy):
So that's pi*1, pi*10, pi*100 and I also said pi*1000:
The circumference is 3023.6 feet, which is kind of close to pi*1000 so long as you're willing to accept a few percent error.
Well if you go to google earth you'll find that the Great Pyramid isn't precisely on the 30th parallel it's 3141 metres to the centre line south. That's what I meant.
So first the Great Pyramid represents a pi and metre relationship - how is that if the metre was invented thousands of years later? I don't know, I just think it's interesting and I was pointing it out. But i it's also in the South West Corner again metres, base minus height:
and:
Different numbers same result just to reinforce that it wasn't an accident, the angle may have been but not the measurement. It's dogma to claim otherwise, implausible to have that many coincidences.
But that is purely coincidence as the Egyptians would have no idea about the foot unit anyway, which was invented thousands of years later and is completely arbitrarily so it's not like they would have come up with it independently either.
Nope, they've covered that in the euler ratio, foot to cubit but just to reinforce they understood feet too take the Grand Gallery =153.136 feet * pi
Which is the height of the Great Pyramid in feet.
Pi is referenced more times in the measurement, it's like the structure is dedicated to pi except that there is even more information encoded into it. All I'm kind of saying is that maybe that is what the Great Pyrami
And it is scientific consensus: this is coincidence.
It's a coincidence that Pythagoras, one of the founders of mathematics studied the Pyramids not the great wall of china which probably didn't exist then, can you show me an older man made structure that coincidentally has all of those mathematical constants in them?
It's a coincidence that all of these constants are in the Pyramids a structure that comes before all other megalythic and modern structures built, with no evidence that it's a tomb, yet here it exists like a textbook in stone with most of the important equations required to build a civilization and it's all a coincidence. All just a coincidence, the stuff we based the core of modern math. Just a coincidence that there are other constants in the Great Pyramid we don't know how to utilize even before we consider the ratios and measurement *between* the other structures. All a coincidence that these dumb ancients just happened to include information that we don't know how to utilize yet in structures that coincidentally are older than any other human structure?
Sounds like dogma to me, it sounds unscientific. Hubris.
Just take a picture from a random part of the stars, then use your idea about the pyramids ... you get the same surprising results.
Well, Humans didn't build the stars, Human Beings built the Pyramids. When you study other megalithic structures in the world, you find the same dimensions and the same huge stones which are coincidentally arranged to represent information about the stars like Angkor Wat coincidentally does. No one can explain how stones were moved, we can't do it today and unless you believe Aliens did it you're left with an enigma about how a supposedly hunter gatherer society out of pre-history generated enough surplus to build several 42 story high stack of stones, a couple of 26 story structures and a bunch of other megalythic structures that all accidentally contain mathematically information, like the bent Pyramid.
Ever examined the engineering effort that allegedly created the structure? According to current dogma the great pyramid's construction involves master craftsmen, quarrying, cutting, moving, accurately placing a 2-3 ton stone, once every six minutes, 14 hours per day, 7 days a week, for 20 years and coincidentally built it accurately enough to represent all and more of the constants upon which we base modern mathematics with some we can find but don't know how to use. No sick days, no uprisings, no food shortages, they just kept going producing this level of accuracy and speed with ropes and shadow.
And by some sheer coincidence they encodes another eight constants besides the ones I remember like Avogadro constant the conversion factor for converting grams to atomic mass units, euler, phi, pi, the metre, the foot, the cubit, the speed of light, the ratio of the size of earth to moon, the polar and equatorial circumference of the earth, coincidentally on the central land mass of the earth when viewed from above, coincidentally encoding the amount of seconds in a day, days in a leap year and finishing off by fluking it placing it at equal distance from the north pole and the center of the earth, making it exactly one degree wide and precisely 1/42600ths the mass of the Earth.
All a coincidence.
Yet I don't see anyone with a better explanation as to why they would want to make such an effort to build something like that for any other reason than to encode that information. They could have spent those resources on anything more useful than a tomb that doesn't even have a name on it? What about a dam? Seriously, I'd only build a structure like that to store nuclear waste. If modern
However it isn't paper - it's stone. And there aren't just points, there are derived constants. Circle the flats and the corners of the base of the great pyramid and subtract the smaller circumference from the large and tell me the number you get. It will blow you away. No way that is irrelevant.
And consider that you didn't even realize it was an eight sided structure until I pointed it out to you, I have little doubt that you have confirmed it by now. I don't care what you think about this however, consider what else don't you know?
Wait, so the ancient Egyptians used the modern (and arbitrary) British unit of a foot? As in 12 inches? 30.48 cm?
More like the British used the foot which is a universal constant of measure. The foot to the cubit represents the euler constant, if you care to take a look at it. Also, they used the metre, which you struggle to wrap your head around until you realize that if you take a 1 metre pendulum and swing it so that the arc is precisely 1 second (at the the 30th parallel for an exact second due to gravitational variations) you will find that the distance of the arc defines a cubit perfectly. Now you have a metre to cubit relationship.
Additionally if you take a cubit and add it to a metre it equals 5 feet, add a foot and you have 6 feet, which means you have a relationship between all three universal constants of measure. That defines the principles of the microcosm to macrocosm 5 and 6, which is what the land of Khem (i.e. Egypt), alchemy and Chemistry is all about.
Do the experiment yourself if you don't believe me. A weight, some string, a ruler and a stopwatch, it works anywhere.
At most it's a coincidence.
Except the designers of the great Pyramid eliminates that as a possibility. The base of the Great Pyramid has unequal sides, yet if you add two side together they equal pi*100 (in feet IIRC) and the other two and you get the same number.
Just how many coincidences do you need to have before you accept it as evidence that it is a deliberate act?
Or an alien conspiracy.
I would say a more reasonable explanation is that we are not the most advanced human civilization to walk the earth and that whatever happened during the Younger Dryas wiped that human civilization out. Is it also a coincidence that the three pyramids align to the constellation Orion at 10500BC when the Younger Dryas event happened? Have you considered that we are the survivors of that catastrophe - whatever it was?
As for Aliens, unknowable.
I'm sure there are constants such as Pi, phi, euler's constant, the golden ratio, and more that can be found in the pyramids' construction, as a consequence of geometry.
There are another eight constants in there in the measurement. Derived constants from other measurements include the speed of light and that isn't a consequence of geometry.
That in no way is proof they understood the constants in abstract. In fact there's little evidence they did.
If you look at the distance of the Great Pyramid to the 30th parallel you will find it is pi*1000. Divide the base by the height and you get pi. pi*10 is in the kings chamber. That's pi expressed four times, twice on two different edges producing the same number.
I personally think the Great Pyramid is a textbook, in stone. It may also be a warning that says whatever destroyed us can destroy you too because they knew they were a dying civilization.
But they were smart master builders and knew how to get a job done.
The GP is correct, though.
No, they were *Genius* builders. There is absolutely no way we could build that structure - we can't even figure out how they moved the stone.
You can do the alignments with the plumb bobs and shadow method that he said. In fact you can get an alignment with 1 degree of true north with the sun and shadows. We don't need GPS to for that.
Sure and you can measure my claims in the dimensions of the Great Pyramid.
Reference:The Great Pyramid
he pyramids are aligned to within 1 degree of true north. Modern civilisation is only just approaching that level of accuracy with GPS *today*. That is nonsense.
You seem not to grasp the parents explanation. With a simple stick everyone can figure true north with 1/10th accuracy super easy.
Yep.
Just make the stick long enough and measure a couple of days. E.g. use a small hill and put the stick on top of it.
Not without introducing error. Richard Feynman suggested that there are simple, beautiful elegant explanations that are also wrong.
The rest of your post seems rather nuts to me, starting with an 8 sided pyramid when you clearly see: it is a standard 4 sided one.
Then, my friend, you are as uninformed about these matters as we have found some people to be about Nuclear Power. There is nothing nuts about the information contained in the pyramids. What's nuts is that the actual truth of these structures is being dictated by archaeologist with arts degrees making assumptions instead of geologist, engineers and mathematicians who measure the structure. Study the numbers, you will see my claims supported.
With good will towards you, this is something I would strongly suggest you need to question your assumptions about.
None of this is on Wikipedia.
Yep. I recommend you consider it from one of the corners as a three dimensional structure. You can't consider it in two dimensions.
J H Cole.
Well, check out the 'uuge chronic spermotoxicosis cognitive dissonance of Mr. Kaos.
I think your comment is a really good example of why these type of policies are bad. Your toxic femininity shows you're prepared to take a man down who has worked for something you think you're entitled to. When you don't get your way you have a tantrum.
You're one desperate motherfucker, that's right!
Sure, I'll ask my decent, educated, attractive, hardworking, polite, kind, considerate and smart wife over dinner. I think your problem is you think feminism is about getting even, instead of being equal. No wonder other women can't stand you.
For aligning ancient temples, pyramids and other structures with East/West directions, the technique was ridiculously simple. Plant a pole, and mark the tip's shadow location at sunrise on equinox day and again the location at sunset.
No, just no.
The pyramids are aligned to within 1 degree of true north. Modern civilisation is only just approaching that level of accuracy with GPS *today*.
Aside for that the great pyramid is a *eight* sided pyramid and keeping enough tension on rope to line that up is pretty much impossible. It is packed with information.
To give you some idea, pi is represented *1, *10, *100 and *1000 in this structure. It contains phi, the euler constant and more. The diagonal long edge is the length of seconds in a day in feet, it's four edges define the length of a year in cubits accurate to five decimal places. The ratios of a foot, cubit and metre are represented in ratios, the base times the diagonal edge defines the equatorial circumference.
I could go on, and on and on, however it is known that Pythagoras studied the pyramids so it is quite clear they are a textbook, not a tomb. More than likely that Stonehenge was based on what was learned in the pyramids.
If you want a citation, look at the dimensions of the pyramids, I'd recommend the JH Cole study.
Hey dude, we often dress up not for your benefit but because thatâ(TM)s what we do. Maybe we are interested in the barista on the way to the office or someone we see outside at lunch.
When I wear a suit, tie, a nice watch and shiney shoes, I don't do it because I'm looking to pick up. I do it because I mean business. I don't buy a nice car to impress you, I do it to impress myself. It's still signaling.
Either way, itâ(TM)s awesome that you assume itâ(TM)s all about you...because I doubt it is.
That doesn't change that you are sexually signally. That's like saying the light from a light house is only for certain ships, the rest of them should just ignore the signal. Just because I ignore your sexual signalling doesn't mean you aren't sexually signalling, it means I'm not interested in you.
The point that it is consensual nullifies a lot of my concerns honestly, assuming that is so. It also invalidates all the schmucky harassment crap that floats around in offices that is tougher to have HR pursue.
So basically men should not approach women at all. Should men write a letter or something equally lame. I've got news for you, once you're past 30 it's women that get rejected by men. Your looks don't matter and if you've been relying on that then chances are you aren't much of a person that a decent man is going to be attracted to. Spend some time cultivating a decent personality.
The shitty way you treated guys while you were in your brief sexual prime will be reflected in all the sleazy men that decide to use you. Feel free to mod me down if that shatters your false reality.
Ask most women how many creepy coworkers and managers theyâ(TM)ve dealt with
Ask most men how many crazy hormonal women they've had to deal with.
Sure, same reason I work out, drive a nice car and wear nice clothes. My point is not about women do, I've got not problem with that. What I have a problem with is a company dictating interpersonal relationships between people.
That's a problem for men and women.
Is it possible that I'm the only sane round here!?...
Nope.
How have you in USA reached to the position of accept -and even support, a company policy saying nay about the private life (and I mean private, as in it's no fucking issue for anybody but for those directly involved) of their employees?
You are dead fucking right. The whole idea of it is fucking ridiculous and the appropriate response is "FUCK OFF". It's simple boys and girls: Women, especially hot women are attracted to powerful men. This is not some woo woo concept it's how our entire species has propagated and survived.
Hypergamy is the behavior. Then there is the practise between peers, I spend so much time at work of course I'm going to notice women that work there and if they are interested they are going to encourage that attention.
Obviously I'm not going to provide unwelcome attention however women put on make-up, dress nicely and wear high heals. There is so much sexual signaling there that if a company is going to attempt to decide what I do outside then I may as well raise a complaint to HR and call that sexual harassment.
Sorry ladies at work you have to wear a suit, flat shoes and no make-up exactly the same way men do. Let's see how that goes down with women.
Additionally women only have a limited time to get their shit together if they want to have a family - that's a real well thought out "pro-woman" policy you've got there Intel.
See? *Employees*. Not slaves, not serfs, not minions.
Exactly.
Meditation is good and useful practise for accessing different states of consciousness without drugs. There are many reasons why you want to do this. To say it reduces motivation and increases ego just indicates it is not being used properly. Brains are smart - minds are smarter and whilst you can fool the conscious mind fooling the unconscious mind is like trying to pretend gravity doesn't exist as you step off a cliff. Bottom line here - don't be fucking stupid, intent is everything.
In some cases though meditation is a form of spiritual bypassing of all the shit you've been through in your life. These things mess with your super ego, those little voices in your head that can give you constructive or destructive messages. If they are destructive you're going to have a crap opinion of yourself and meditation will expand any false reality you have constructed and turn you into a real asshole.
Bottom line: deal with your issues consciously first then meditation will be useful. Chances are you won't act like a dick either.
Have a nice day :)
Everytime I read your posts I feel like a noob.
What about Chinese employees in my office, any way to identify the ones I need to concern myself with (serious question)?
DU munitions spread dust that is very dangerous and it is easy to argue that they should be banned, but that isn't the question now.
AtomicAsshole denies these effects and then uses that denial as a claim to moral superiority.
You are right, however he is using disinformation tactics and attempting to aggravate people. I have argued facts with Atomic Asshole and he simply ignores them or worse attempts to twist your arguments into rhetoric he can use. To me Asshole is simply entertainment and his "arguments" are easily burst thought bubbles.
What about these babies have you fully researched how this happens.
Clearly you don't understand how soluble Plutonium Chloride is. That's why someone has called you AtomicAsshole. See, it's not just me that thinks you don't know what you're talking about. Maybe it's time to admit to yourself that You're wrong.
But you can't and it has nothing to do with nuclear power either. I know your little secret.