Slashdot Mirror


User: dangitman

dangitman's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
8,784
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 8,784

  1. Re:The real problem on White House Forces Censorship of New York Times · · Score: 1

    WTF are you talking about? The content was sadomasochistic. That's not the fault of the media. What was the problem with the reporting of it?

  2. Re:Ham radio and cycle 24 on Scientists Predict Big Solar Cycle · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted to share knock-knock jokes in Morse code. This may be the perfect opportunity.

  3. Re:Wondering... on Scientists Predict Big Solar Cycle · · Score: 1

    So, no need to take any action. Check.

  4. Why does it have to be big? on Scientists Predict Big Solar Cycle · · Score: 1

    If you're going to make a solar powered bicycle, why not just make it normal sized?

  5. Re:Darn it. on White House Forces Censorship of New York Times · · Score: 1

    That's not the source, that's the compiled article. The source would be research notes, drafts, etc.

  6. Re:The real problem on White House Forces Censorship of New York Times · · Score: 1

    What it also did was weaken support for the war, embolden the insurgency, and diminished America's standing in the world.

    Weakening support for the war actually helps America. In time, that weakening support (if it results in withdrawal) will help boost America's standing in the world. I mean, America's standing couldn't really get any lower than it already was. Dealing with Abu Ghraib publicly at the time may have caused some short-term loss of standing. But keeping it secret would be even worse. Because it would not remain secret forever. Imagine if it were kept secret, then later America withdraws and world opinion of the US recovers to a more normal level. Then it comes out that there were these horrible atrocities that were covered up during the war. That would ruin America's reputation at a time when it was recovering. Best just to deal with the shit. You get a lot more respect for openly dealing with your problems than trying to pretend they don't exist.

  7. Re:Nothing unusual or unconstitutional here on White House Forces Censorship of New York Times · · Score: 1

    You mean kinda like Cliff Baxter [wsws.org], the Enron guy

    I thought he was the guy from Cheers. You live and learn.

  8. Re:Of course on Librarians Stake Their Future on OSS · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, Mr. Bookman is on the case.

  9. Re:I'd like to see this in other industries, too on Librarians Stake Their Future on OSS · · Score: 1

    No, because this Evergreen system looks to be a high-quality system - and so much commercial software in the field sucks ass. I believe that's what the GP was talking about with the "undeniable improvement." A monkey with a typewriter and a compiler could do a better job of writing the software than many of the library systems in the market. We aren't talking about personal financial software, that's an entirely different market. But you seem to have deliberately missed the part in the GP post where he said he was specifically talking about niche markets that are served by expensive crapware.

  10. Re:it's data entry and physical work, not software on Librarians Stake Their Future on OSS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This process took MONTHS and the work of several librarians and the expensive data-entry company.

    This seems irrelevant, as most libraries already use computerized systems. So, we're not talking about conversion from a card catalog. The data would already be in a database, and that could be converted pretty easily. It's a much simpler process to change software than to move from card to computers.

  11. Re:Good on Librarians Stake Their Future on OSS · · Score: 1

    Fifty bucks? That's a rather pitiful settlement.

  12. Re:Virtual Shelf sounds great on Librarians Stake Their Future on OSS · · Score: 0, Troll

    Library is a science? I thought it was more of an art.

  13. Amazing on Librarians Stake Their Future on OSS · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a really fantastic, useful adoption of Open Source. Has anything else this useful in the real world been done with Open Source apart from, say, Apache?

  14. Message to the Japanese government on Robotic Baby Seal Wins Top Award · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't blow a seal.

  15. Re:Prize goes to the 3D graphics provider on VMware Fusion goes Beta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not to nitpick the nitpick, but the Power Mac was originally names as such because of the PowerPC chip.

    I don't think so. After all, there were Performas made soon after the Powermac, that used the PPC chip. Not that anybody actually bought PPC Performas, but they existed. I think the name was a rather nice coincidence, but was mostly intended to maintain the lineage that started with the Powerbook. When the original Powerbook was released, mobile computing was considered to be a very advanced thing - for "power" users. I believe the intention was to refer to a powerful computer - not the architecture of the processor. After all, no previous Mac used the processor as part of the naming scheme. Quadras did not use "quadra" processors, for example.

    I think that lack of correlation between name of the machine, and name of the processor (eg Performa, iMac) shows that this was not a major factor in the naming. Although there might be some argument that the name actually changed. The first PPC machines were called "Power Macintosh" and quite clearly labeled. They were also widely called "Power PC." Later (I can't remember when) they started being referred to as "Powermac" to match the "Powerbook" moniker - and lost the "Power Macintosh" badge on the machines - as Apple moved away from "Macintosh" towards simply "Mac" and later moved towards simply "Apple" rather than "Apple Computer."

  16. Re:Wow. on Judge Rules Against Deep-Linking of Content · · Score: 1

    No, the best analogy would be a smaller sports enthusiast's site linking directly to footage of streaming sports events from a large commercial sports site's servers.

  17. Re:21st Century anachronism on Making Time With the Watchmakers · · Score: 1

    They have, but the problem with this generation of timelords is that they either want to take us back to the 1950s, take us back to biblical times, or bomb us back into the Stone Age.

  18. Re:When I was a kid in the early 60's on Making Time With the Watchmakers · · Score: 0

    there was a watch repair booth at the grocery store and an old man (as I remember him) sat there all day with his loupe repairing watches. My mom would drop me at his booth

    So, as a child, you were a watch? Interesting. How did you make the transition to becoming human? You could be a valuable case study for evolution.

  19. Re:Who still uses watches? on Making Time With the Watchmakers · · Score: 1

    This seems inaccurate. Many upper-class men are into wearing fishnet stockings and high heels.

  20. Re:Prize goes to the 3D graphics provider on VMware Fusion goes Beta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Power mac's are all powerpc machines - hence the "power" in their name.

    To pick nits, Powermacs are not named because of PowerPC. Just like Powerbooks are not named because of PPC (there were Powerbooks long before the PPC chip). They are so named because they are "power user" machines. iMacs also had PowerPC chips in them, but were not called "iPowerMacs." Xserves had PPC chips in them, but were not name Xpowerservers.

  21. Re:that's not a better analogy on Judge Rules Against Deep-Linking of Content · · Score: 1

    Except magazines ads are sold based on circulation numbers not actual ad impressions, so there's no lost revenue.

    There is if companies stop advertising, because they feel the ads are ineffective because people aren't looking at them.

  22. Re:Oblig. Bash.org quote on Robots Could Some Day Demand Legal Rights · · Score: 1

    There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute.

    Yes it is!

  23. Allow me to introduce myself on Non-Geeky Gifts for Tech Geeks · · Score: 1
    I'm a blender. I blend hockey pucks, that's all I'm programmed to do.

    Were you any good?

    Are you kidding? I was a star. I could blend a hockey puck at any speed. 30,000 RPM, 32,000 RPM, you name it. 31... But I couldn't go on living once I found out what the mulch was for.

    What for?

    Kitty litter.

  24. Re:If this is true... on The Google Phone? · · Score: 1

    In the future, we will all have a giant physical copy of the letters G-o-o-g-l-e in our living rooms. They can be reconfigured for any purpose - as furniture, TV, games, sex toys, telephones, hula hoops, etc. That's what all those shipping containers are for.

  25. Re:Read Gruber's Article, please on MacHeist "Week of Mac Developer" Causes Schism · · Score: 1

    Whether MacHeist got 85% or 75% doesn't change Gruber's point.

    It doesn't change his point, but it does make him wrong. And his "point" is just an opinion. Many creators take deals that are much worse than 15% from their agent or manager. And Macheist is neither an agent or manager, so I'm not sure what the relevance of his point is, anyway.