Slashdot Mirror


Making Time With the Watchmakers

PreacherTom writes "In the age of watches that have more computational power than Apollo 11's computer, one would think that the watchmaker has gone the way of the cobbler, the blacksmith and the Dodo. Quite the contrary. With the rise in interest for mechanical watches (especially luxury models), Rolex has sponsored a new school to train horologists in the arcane art. From the article: 'We were facing a situation today where we needed to foster a new generation of watchmakers,' says Charles Berthiaume, the senior vice-president for technical operations at Rolex and the Technicum's president 'Thirty to 40 years ago, there was a watchmaker at every jewelry store. That's not the case today,' he notes. Included are some remarkable examples of their training, dedication, and intricate patience as they take technology in an entirely different direction."

257 comments

  1. Definitely a trend .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    to watch.

    1. Re:Definitely a trend .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but only time will tell.

  2. I thought this was a sex book about The Moties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think The Gripping Hand could be *VERY* erotic.

    1. Re:I thought this was a sex book about The Moties by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Why don't you buy a copy and find out?

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:I thought this was a sex book about The Moties by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      I think The Gripping Hand could be *VERY* erotic.

      Go to bed with a watchmaker, wake up with all your parts rearranged.

    3. Re:I thought this was a sex book about The Moties by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Especially this watchmaker, except they're not so much rearranged as your brain is removed.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  3. PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    PreacherTom is an astroturfer for BusinessWeek magazine. Look at the URL in this recent Slashdot story and notice the campaign_id string. Now look at his user page. Scroll down to the submissions section. Notice how almost every one is a link to a BusinessWeek.com article containing the campaign_id string. Now look at the search results for "campaign_id preachertom". He's been pulling this shit on slashdot, digg, Fark, MetaFilter, and who knows where else. Check out this MetaTalk thread for the initial discovery.

    Spread the word, perhaps?

    1. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by chucken · · Score: 5, Interesting

      With the large amounts of slashdot readers prepared to do moderation and meta-moderation etc., could some shill-detection scanning of submitted articles be in order? (I'm thinking by hand, rather than automated). It's usually not hard to spot affiliate IDs in the hyperlinks, for example.

    2. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by rk · · Score: 1

      What's screwed up about this is that it's actually an interesting article, but it's not enough for actual USERS to find what's interesting. They've got to lead us to it.

      Screw you, BusinessWeek, and screw you, PreacherTom.

    3. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See the FireHose? If you've got it, use it.

    4. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if "campaign_id" was "znyop" and every place they posted, they used a different name?

    5. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      PreacherTom is an astroturfer for BusinessWeek magazine

      No, not really.

      He's what in the "old media" world we would call a "crier." He directs traffic to a given site, by saying how interesting it is. The fact that a given article actually is interesting should not be based in any way on who submits it -- be it a bored geek or a profit-seeking crier.

    6. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by kjart · · Score: 2, Interesting

      PreacherTom [google.com] is an astroturfer for BusinessWeek magazine.

      So...he links to BusinessWeek and presumably makes some money doing so. This is somehow morally reprehensible? I really don't care where the stories come from, as long as they are interesting (i.e. News for nerds, stuff that matters). I have no problems if he manages to eke out of living submitting stories from BuisnessWeek, just like I have no problems with Slashdot making money from this website.

      Now, if stories submitted by this guy get preferential treatment in anyway, now that is a problem.

    7. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by Banner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe he just reads Business Week a lot and finds their articles interesting and so he comments on them in these forums. There are -a lot- of people who really only read one news source and then spread what they see there all over the place.

      And if he is working for Business week and being paid to do this, so what? Slashdot has editors and -they- are the filter/gate through which all articles must pass. If they don't approve it, it doesn't get posted. This isn't a site like digg where just anyone can post an article to the webpage.

    8. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by ball-lightning · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the real question is, do (and should) we care? It's not like PreacherTom can force /. to post his submissions, and I actually found this article interesting (hence why I clicked the comments section to discuss). As far as I can tell, there isn't a problem unless we are being lied to (which we aren't) or the quality of the submissions has gone down (Your Mileage May Vary). Now, if /. received money for the stories, then I could see a problem. Double so if they didn't mention they received money to post the story. Fark features sponsored links, but always (AFAIK) admits they are sponsored. As long as this story was legitimately accepted by /. staff, I don't care whether Joe Average or a Publicist submitted it, and am not sure why anyone would.

    9. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So would it help to remove the campaign id in the link?
      http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/dec20 06/sb20061221_267151.htm

      Or is it based more on the time period, assignment of articles to specific individuals, or some other criteria?

    10. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a crazy idea... maybe the editors could make a point of stripping out superfluous URL parameters from links they post? Taking out the 'campaign_id' cruft from the BusinessWeek URL doesn't stop it from working and completely removes any benefit the submitter gets in posting it to Slashdot. (Unless BusinessWeek start checking HTTP_REFERER and paying people based on that...)

    11. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The new firehose section on Slashdot might help there. I, for one, won't e-mail an objection merely because of a business association (alleged or proven) but if others think it's a genuine problem then I would encourage them to object on that basis. However, I can say that I'm going to pay some attention to the stories listed for articles where I've good reason to believe the story is bogus, FUD, etc. What I hope is that Slashdot does NOT go down the path of entirely user-selecting, as I actually think the editors here do a far better job of picking the really meaty stuff and other sites that have tried that approach are plagued by story trolls. Slashdot isn't perfect, but there's a reason it has such an intense following AND has earned the respect and envy of even the "traditional" press at times.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    12. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Shill-detection"?

      That sounds harder than dupe-detection, which we've already shown is beyond us.

    13. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1, Redundant
      "PreacherTom is an astroturfer for BusinessWeek magazine"

      No, not really.

      He's what in the "old media" world we would call a "crier." He directs traffic to a given site, by saying how interesting it is. The fact that a given article actually is interesting should not be based in any way on who submits it -- be it a bored geek or a profit-seeking crier.

      So are you saying "No, not really: there is no such thing as astroturfing" or "No, not really: I know PreacherTom, and he's neither a paid shill or a figment of the imagination of a Business Week marketeer"? Because if he has a financial/business interest in the story he's submitting, that should be disclosed. As you say, an interesting story is still interesting even if hyped by a "crier", disclosure notwithstanding, right?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    14. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

      Wow, right you are! Heck, I'll bet he ain't even a preacher!

      --
      blah blah blah
    15. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see it should matter. The reviewers should look at submission quality. If the shill is submitting crap stories, reject them. If a story is quality, put it on up. If they're up to the level of spamming, like submitting "stories" on Viagra, or submitting like 30 a week or whatever, then sure, you have to do something about that... otherwise, that's what moderation is for.

    16. Re:PreacherTom is an Astroturfer by rickshaf · · Score: 1

      In evaluating PreacherTom's status, we should consider the following: (1) If Tom's really a preacher, maybe God made him do it. (2) If Tom's really a preacher, maybe the Devil made him do it. (3) If this is the only way Tom can make a living, do we want to support him by paying him unemployment? Seriously, though, I think a guy like PreacherTom should be allowed to ply his trade, but he should be required to disclose that he's a shill for "Business Week". That could include being required to change his moniker to "ShillerTom". For that matter, we could also require all lobbyists to do the same.... (In the interests of full disclosure, I should point out that I'm a traditionalist, in that I'm a real fan of natural grass.)

  4. This is from a shill. Check out the link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    This guy is steering you to BusinessWeek magazine and has been doing so for quite a while.

    1. Re:This is from a shill. Check out the link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This guy is steering you to BusinessWeek magazine and has been doing so for quite a while.


      Similar to the initiative to drive Slashdot traffic to "Nu" Scientist...

      http://www.google.com/search?q=new+scientist+site% 3Aslashdot.org (6390 hits)

      vs

      http://www.google.com/search?q=business+week+site% 3Aslashdot.org (18300 hits)

      Odd, I expected the number of hits to be the reverse, I guess I just find the Nu Scientist spam far more irritating.
  5. Wishful thinking by Demona · · Score: 3, Funny
    "as they take technology in an entirely different direction."

    Like "reliability"? Count me in!

    --
    Fuck Slashdot
    1. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've had my Rolex (a "cheap" S. S. Oyster day/date) for over thirty years and it's never missed a beat. I can get better time from a five dollar Casio but my world doesn't run on the hundredth of a second.

      I refute your vibrating crystals.

    2. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lied. I think it's a Datejust. Shows just the date, not the day of the week. The time, too.

    3. Re:Wishful thinking by krotkruton · · Score: 1
      "as they take technology in an entirely different direction."

      Like "reliability"? Count me in!
      Try "backwards".
    4. Re:Wishful thinking by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      No shit. My SS Patek Nautilus has been a workhorse for 25+ years as well. Plus it's not readily recognized as a neat watch by just anyone except those who appreciate a fine timepiece; sort of like a SS Rolex - most people gravitate to the flashy gold Presidents. Me, I like understated; even if a $5 digital keeps better time.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    5. Re:Wishful thinking by jd · · Score: 1

      I would truly love it if someone could produce a Swiss timepiece that could operate in the gigahertz range, because I have absolutely no friggin' doubt it would be vastly more accurate than the normal clock chips in PCs. It would make life hell for the overclockers, though.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:Wishful thinking by timeOday · · Score: 1
      If you want reliability got to WalMart and get a Casio G-Shock.

      To stand out from the crowds, you have to do something other people won't do, something dumb, like pierce your tongue or pay thousands for a hand-made wristwatch.

    7. Re:Wishful thinking by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a fake that likely was made by a master craftsman (or out of heisted rolex parts). My jewler friend (I fix his PCs, he takes care of the jewlery :) said the only reason he knew it was a fake is that he knows I'm too cheap to spend over $100 for something I don't wear except when required as an accessory. I hate watches, bracelets, cufflinks (as that implies cuffs), or anything else around my wrist. Drives me nuts!
      -nB

      Jewler was wrong, I paid $125 for it ;-)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    8. Re:Wishful thinking by TheLink · · Score: 1

      There are Swiss movements that aren't that expensive, so someone might have used one to make your replica. e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ETA_movement (the ETA site is flash ;) ).

      I think you can get a non-fake Tissot automatic with sapphire glass for about USD150.

      Maybe not as famous as Rolex.

      I wouldn't be surprised if Rolex uses movements from a less famous 3rd party for some of their watches.

      --
    9. Re:Wishful thinking by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1
      I would truly love it if someone could produce a Swiss timepiece that could operate in the gigahertz range, because I have absolutely no friggin' doubt it would be vastly more accurate than the normal clock chips in PCs. It would make life hell for the overclockers, though.
      Why would you want a nuclear-clock-accurate PC clock when you can just synchronize to one of the time servers on the net?
      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    10. Re:Wishful thinking by jd · · Score: 1
      1. There's nothing geeky or nerdish about using an NTP client any more
      2. I'd have the world's most accurate cuckoo chime
      3. The cogwheels would look truly cool in a transparent case
      4. For once I'd have a case mod worthy of a front-page splash on Slashdot
      5. If my home computer crashed when I was at work, I'd be able to see the effects

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    11. Re:Wishful thinking by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1
      I thought you wanted the Swiss to build you a crystal...
      The cogwheels would look truly cool in a transparent case
      Plus, with strobe lights, you could make it seem like they are stopped, going backwards, etc..
      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    12. Re:Wishful thinking by jd · · Score: 1

      My bad for not being clear. Besides, the Wiccans build far better crystals than the Swiss. But when it comes to chocolate and clockwork, the Swiss can't be beat. :) (However, chocolate clockwork that ran at 1 gigahertz would probably not last very long.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  6. Yeah but.. by yamamushi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How much does the watchmaking business pay nowadays?

    --
    - Aetheral Research -
    1. Re:Yeah but.. by yamamushi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nevermind, I RTFA and from the site "Starting salaries range from $45,000 to $55,000 a year."

      --
      - Aetheral Research -
    2. Re:Yeah but.. by MajorDick · · Score: 3, Informative

      A WATCHMaker , who can from nothing but raw materials completley fabricate a watch brings about 250,000 a year to start....... A repair man makes the 40-50 k range.

    3. Re:Yeah but.. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Does that include a deep discount on the watches? It'd suck if you couldn't afford to buy the watches you make.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:Yeah but.. by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Plus one gets to say: "I am a certified horologist"

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    5. Re:Yeah but.. by Mike610544 · · Score: 1

      ... and a Blink Watchmaker can create life as we know it. The salary for this is left as an exercise for the reader.

      --
      ... also, I can kill you with my brain.
    6. Re:Yeah but.. by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Plus one gets to say: "I am a certified horologist"

      Most of us can say something that sounds very similar, but doesn't mean the same thing at all.

    7. Re:Yeah but.. by jrmcferren · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A watchmaker does not "make" watches. A watchmaker is a high grade of repair tech. The major difference between a watch repair person and a watchmaker is that a watchmaker can make the parts on demand if needed.

      --
      sudo mod me up
  7. Makes as much sense as art history, I suppose. by maximthemagnificent · · Score: 0, Troll

    Subject pretty much says it all...

    1. Re:Makes as much sense as art history, I suppose. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an Art History major, you insensitive clod!

  8. Sylar by macadamia_harold · · Score: 3, Funny

    'We were facing a situation today where we needed to foster a new generation of watchmakers,' says Charles Berthiaume, the senior vice-president for technical operations at Rolex

    Well, just make sure they don't develop telekinesis and go on a power-hungry killing spree.

    1. Re:Sylar by zptao · · Score: 0

      He didn't develop it, he stole it.

    2. Re:Sylar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you really want to nitpick, he stole the powers, then developed them far and above the man he stole them from.

      It's all a matter of symantics, really.

    3. Re:Sylar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pssst, when trying to sound all intellectual and stuff: run a spell check on the smarty pants words before hitting submit, mkay?

    4. Re:Sylar by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      He didn't really develop his telekinetic powers so much as use them to steal everybody else's powers. I just hope that Eden actually shot herself and made her brain useless to Sylar.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  9. Seems appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The release of atom power has changed everything except our way of thinking...the solution to this problem lies in the heart of mankind. If only I had known, I should have become a watchmaker."
    - Albert Einstein

    1. Re:Seems appropriate by magical_mystery_meat · · Score: 1

      Good old Al.

    2. Re:Seems appropriate by bitt3n · · Score: 1
      "The release of atom power has changed everything except our way of thinking...the solution to this problem lies in the heart of mankind. If only I had known, I should have become a watchmaker." - Albert Einstein
      I wonder if he would have designed a watch that maintained the same time relative to a specific frame of reference, regardless of how close to the speed of light the wearer was traveling.
  10. Today's WSJ had an article on the swiss industry by SimpleinSeattle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Swiss watches, especially luxury ones are on the rise. 2005 it was a 10 billion dollar per year industry for the Swiss. It is expected to exceed 23 billion (with a B) in 2006.

    WSJ article at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116674321288757160 .html

    Swiss Watches Strike Export Record
    Surging Demand for Luxury Lines Has Makers
    Like Richemont Thinking About Capacity
    By MARTIN GELNAR
    December 22, 2006; Page B2

    ZURICH -- Swiss watch exports hit a record in November, suggesting that big watchmakers such as Swatch Group AG, Compagnie Financière Richemont SA and Rolex SA will see strong Christmas sales that will carry into the new year.

    Switzerland's watchmakers exported 1.52 billion Swiss francs ($1.25 billion) of goods in November, the Swiss watchmaking association said Thursday, up 13% from the same month last year. The biggest gains were seen for luxury watches selling for more than $6,000 each.

    Sales growth is so strong for Swiss watches that the country's watchmakers are facing a new problem: a lack of spare capacity, and especially of the highly skilled craftsmen that make each watch. Last month, Richemont said surging demand for luxury watches may lead to capacity constraints in some product areas over the next few years.

    Swiss companies are leaders in the global watch market, which has annual sales of about $23 billion.

    The country is by far the world's biggest watch exporter in value terms.

    In 2005, Swiss watchmakers exported goods valued at about $10 billion, and accounted for about 9% of Switzerland's total exports. While Hong Kong and China export more watches than Switzerland, they lag far behind in terms of value. Last year, Hong Kong exported watches worth $6 billion and China exported $2 billion, respectively.

    The concentration of the watch industry in Switzerland limits growth because production can't easily be shifted outside the country for branding reasons. And within the country, there are only so many people with the training needed to make a watch by hand.

    In a recent interview with Swiss daily Le Temps, Swatch Group Chief Executive Nick Hayek said the growth rates of as much as 40% in certain segments aren't sustainable. He noted his company is looking for 140 qualified watchmakers for its high-end Breguet brand, and 200 workers for its watch-movements maker ETA.

    But analysts say they don't anticipate serious capacity issues in the short term, and some suggest a shortage of watches may even benefit the industry.

    "Production capacity may get tight in some areas, also on the components side, but I don't think this will be a major issue next year," says Zuercher Kantonalbank analyst Patrik Schwendimann. "In a way, scarcity value may also be a positive for the image."

    Jon Cox of Kepler Equities expects the "supercycle" in luxury goods to continue. Global demand for expensive jewelry and watches has been boosted by new customers in emerging markets, he says, but he also notes a surge in demand from previously sluggish markets such as France.

    "So long as financial markets continue to move up, demand for luxury items will likely remain high," he says.

    Any capacity problems may have an impact on the number of watches sold but shouldn't hurt revenue, he says. "To offset any shortage, the companies could simply hike prices," Mr. Cox says.

    Write to Martin Gelnar at martin.gelnar@dowjones.com

  11. good pun! by fox1324 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "For the next generation of horologists, it's about time." thought that was clever

  12. Obligatory Watchmen Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs watchmaking? Become a nuclear physicist!

  13. Who still uses watches? by Matt+Perry · · Score: 2, Interesting
    With the rise in interest for mechanical watches...
    Do people still wear watches? I gave up watches long ago because it seems I'm surrounded by devices that tell time: cars, microwaves, computers, mobile phones, MP3 players, PDAs. Even my motorcycle has a clock on the instrument panel. Do Slashdotters still wear watches? If so, I'd be curious as to why.
    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:Who still uses watches? by Howserx · · Score: 1

      Not this guy. I have a clock on the wall at work so I know when to go home and one bedside to tell me when it's time to go to work. Other then that does it matter what time it is? Not for me.

      --
      I support the troops. I pay f'ing taxes.
    2. Re:Who still uses watches? by Vo0k · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I do. I began recently, after being watch-hostile for over 25 years. I was one and at first wore it because it was a gift, with intention to get rid of it ASAP, but I found out that it's good, comfortable, precise and doesn't fail like the $3 watches I kept having bad experiences with ('fix it for me please!') and I found it WAY more comfortable to peek at my wrist than to dig in my pocket for the phone or bend over the computer to see the system tray, or peer into dark dashboard of the car, or turn back to see the clock on the wall behind and so on. A wrist-watch is really more comfortable - under one condition, that is its quality is sufficient that it doesn't become a nuisance.

      Now I'm pondering some 'integration' again - pick a watch with some other handy functionalities. Any suggestions?

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    3. Re:Who still uses watches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Now I'm pondering some 'integration' again - pick a watch with some other handy functionalities. Any suggestions?

      I wear a timepiece that has all kind of integrated features. It's called a "cellphone".
    4. Re:Who still uses watches? by jfengel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Slashdotters may not, but watches are one of the only forms of jewelry allowed for upper-class and upper-middle-class men. Necklaces and earrings are still considered gaudy, and rings are restricted to a wedding band and perhaps a class ring/military ring.

      The sorts of guys who wear suits as fashion statements are very likely to wear a watch as well. It's not so much about knowing what time it is as about wearing something pretty (and expensive) on your wrist. Your tie and your watch are the most expressive things you're allowed to wear.

      Hey, I don't make the rules. I just talk about 'em. Me, I stopped wearing a watch years before I acquired a cell phone, and I don't wear any jewelry at all.

    5. Re:Who still uses watches? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      I only wear mine to meetings. Sometimes you're not facing the clock (and have cell phone off, and in a pocket). Also hooking at the watch hints that folks should start wrapping up.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    6. Re:Who still uses watches? by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I never understand why people supplant watches with phones or pdas. My watch needs to have its battery changed once every two years, and is water proof to 100m. Meaning I put it on, and for the next two years, I don't have to worry about it. I don't lose it, I don't forget it, it doesn't run out of juice and is always accurate. It's got a stopwatch to boot, so I can use it to time cooking, running, swimming and sundry other things. Lastly, it's easy access. I flick my wrist, and know the time. There's no digging, no flipping, no unlocking, no nothing.

      As said, I have no idea why people think that a phone is a good timepiece. And that's coming from someone who is eternally late. :)

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    7. Re:Who still uses watches? by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      Do people still wear watches?

      A short while ago I found out watches are more than utilitarian once I actually got a good one. Since I started wearing my Tissot, I couldn't conceive of wearing a Timex again. It's comfortable and I genuinely enjoy wearing it.

      Moreover, I'd like to echo a point I saw in another response; it's a PITA to look for a clock, dig for a cell phone and wake it up, or check the computer monitor. It's just convenient to have the time on my wrist.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    8. Re:Who still uses watches? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Do Slashdotters still wear watches? If so, I'd be curious as to why.

            Yes, because it's handy when you have to take a pulse, among other things. Especially on a house call. I guess I could always slap my pulse oximeter on the patients' fingers and get their pulse THAT way, but I'm just old fashioned. Plus there are other things (dysrythmias, respiratory rate etc) a watch is useful for.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re:Who still uses watches? by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Funny

      watches are one of the only forms of jewelry allowed for upper-class and upper-middle-class men. Necklaces and earrings are still considered gaudy, and rings are restricted to a wedding band and perhaps a class ring/military ring.

            May I introduce you to our range of nipple, penis and scrotum rings? I mean, who would know? :)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    10. Re:Who still uses watches? by gibbdog · · Score: 1

      I don't... I work around enough machinery that wearing a watch/ring/etc is a good way to lose a finger or other body part that it is attached to. One of my hobbies is the captive husbandry of venomous snakes. While working with snakes, a lot of times they tend to wrap their tail around your wrist etc while "hooking and tailing" them safely to a different enclosure. When a 6+ ft mamba wraps its tail around your wrist watch it can be quite a trick to not die. For this reason I never wear a watch as I don't want to forget to take my watch off one day and end up dead.

    11. Re:Who still uses watches? by jfengel · · Score: 1

      No, you may not. But thank you for offering.

    12. Re:Who still uses watches? by Quila · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Now I'm pondering some 'integration' again - pick a watch with some other handy functionalities. Any suggestions?

      You don't have to go electronic to get extra features. In mechanical watches, these are called "complications." Just look for a watch with multiple complications, such as stop watch, day, date, week, month, year, moon phases, perpetual calendar, etc.

      But be warned, when you get a quality watch with more than a few complications, you will be paying major money. The Patek Philippe Calibre 89 has 33 complications, over 1,700 parts, took nine years to design and make, and is worth about $6 million. The thing even calculates the date of Easter every year -- mechanically.
    13. Re:Who still uses watches? by Brummund · · Score: 1

      If I do need to know what the time is, I can be 100% sure that the cell phone is around. If the cell phone isn't around, I don't need to know what time it is.

    14. Re:Who still uses watches? by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Funny

      captive husbandry of venomous snakes.

            "Married" to your hobby, eh? You know, I really can't stand my ex wife, but I wouldn't go as far as to call her a venomous snake.. bah come to think of it, I probably would :-P

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    15. Re:Who still uses watches? by codeviking · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wear a Waltham pocket watch made in 1908. My dad is a pocket watch collector/repair hobbyist. He can tear a pocket watch completely apart and rebuild them. It's incredible how tiny many of the parts are. A pocket watch is a work of art, and it's neat to have a watch that's nearly 100 years old in your pocket, and that runs incredibly well.

      --
      My way back has been erased.
    16. Re:Who still uses watches? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Funny

      watches are one of the only forms of jewelry allowed for upper-class and upper-middle-class men.

      Don't forget the men who wear those very expensive trophy wives on their arms.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    17. Re:Who still uses watches? by allscan · · Score: 1

      Still replacing batteries eh? Time to get a solar watch, or one of the fancier (read more expensive) ones that charge while you move.

    18. Re:Who still uses watches? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Do people still wear watches?

      I have a Timex clip watch (sort of like this) that is handy for travel (especially if I'm some where my cell phone doesn't work), and for timing when I'm running.

      Pretty much never wear a wrist watch anymore, just clip this on my belt loop sometimes, or for fancy dress a pocketwatch.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    19. Re:Who still uses watches? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      This seems inaccurate. Many upper-class men are into wearing fishnet stockings and high heels.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    20. Re:Who still uses watches? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Especially on a house call.


      Since when do doctors still do house calls?


      -b.

    21. Re:Who still uses watches? by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since when do doctors still do house calls?

            _I_ do. I'm not in the US though. Price of a house call, about $30 ;)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    22. Re:Who still uses watches? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      I have a Timex clip watch (sort of like this) that is handy for travel (especially if I'm some where my cell phone doesn't work), and for timing when I'm running.

      Dude, that looks ginormous and ugly. Instead, why *not* carry a cellphone?

      -b.

    23. Re:Who still uses watches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simplicity.

      A watch does one thing (ignoring gadget watches) and does it very well.

      Cell phones as watches are really dumb in comparison as you have to fumble for it, and if you're talking on the phone, interupt your conversation while you consult it.

    24. Re:Who still uses watches? by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      Do Slashdotters still wear watches?

      I don't know about all Slashdotters, but I sure do. It's just easier, as others have pointed out, to simply look at your wrist to check the time instead of trying to find your cell phone.

      There's also an appeal in having a piece of technology that's functional, isn't prone to errors, and works using age old technology.

      In the last decade or so, I've actually taken to collecting watches. Next to computers and stereo equipment, it's my biggest expensive hobby. I have a beautiful old Hamilton and a decent Timex that are over 50 years old and are powered entirely by me. No batteries, no plugging it in or worrying about if I remembered to bring a charger. I just wind it up every day and it keeps time accurately enough for me. I have a Rolex that is powered completely by the motion of my wrist doing it's normal, every day activities. It's just neat having something mechanical that has no electrical components whatsoever. And even on the electrical front, I have a Citizens with their 'eco drive', which is completely solar powered.

      I also have several battery operated watches, which are good for other reasons. I have a Victorlux with a built in chronograph; something I've found useful on a number of occasions. I even have one of the original Casio calculator watches (the only digital watch I own), which is just neat to have. When I wear it, I'm often complimented on it by other nerds. And as a bonus, it really is a functioning calculator that's a lot easier to access then to pull out my cell phone, go through a few menus and find the calculator application.

      And one thing to remember: Watches are, in essense, jewelery. As far as I'm concerned, there are only two acceptable pieces of jewelery a man can wear: A wedding ring and a wristwatch. Three, if you're into cufflinks. They're coming back, just ask Steven Colbert. But I don't think many slashdotters find themselves in situations to wear them. The way I figure it, why not have something nice strapped to your wrist? As it stands, the only peice of technology a lot of people are willing to wear these days is a bluetooth earpiece. While I have one and find it very useful, I think it looks pretty stupid. I personally feel pretty dang good about having a peice of tech on my wrist which serves an important function and looks pretty nice.

      I'm also happy to hear about there being more watchmakers around. I have a (battery powered) gold Omega I inherited from my father that hasn't worked in decades. I haven't been able to find anyone in town who could work on it. "We have to send back to the factory" is the only response anyone can give me. Perhaps if we start having more master watchmakers around, more folk who know how to work on these pieces of technology, getting them repaired will be a little easier.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    25. Re:Who still uses watches? by tjr · · Score: 1

      I still wear a watch. Up until a few months ago, it was a watch that did nothing but tell time, no less. The glass crystal was destroyed while someone presumably more capable than I was replacing the battery, and I now wear a replacement that also tells me the day of the month.

      Why wear a watch? I spend many of my hours awake in front of a desktop or laptop computer. I spend my hours asleep right next to a digital clock. I carry a Palm Treo 650 that can tell me what time it is anywhere on the planet. Yet, I still find a wristwatch the most natural way to find out what time it is.

    26. Re:Who still uses watches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My suggestion? Don't. A good watch should tell time, and that's it. Anything else just means it's not going to do its main job as well as it could.

      My watch of choice is a quartz plastic Timex, with a nylon band. It's darn near indestructible (esp. with the nylon, rather than crappy leather or uncomfortable metal bands), pretty damn cheap, yet it has a huge face with analog hands. The only other thing I'd accept on a watch is a calendar, which I still need to fiddle with every other month, and only tolerate because I have trouble remembering what the date is.

      The only extras a watch should have are those that would actually improve the main task of keeping time. For example, a watch that automatically adjusted for daylight savings time, or time zones, or leap years. 'course, you could just get an atomic clock radio watch and save yourself a lot of trouble.

      I also have a light on my watch. It's designed for illuminating the face, but I find it more useful for seeing in pitch darkness (I use it to find my flashlight when I go camping), but it's definitely a frill I don't need (how often do you need to know the time when you're in pitch darkness?), and it runs down the battery. (Although it gets surprisingly good life. Must be LED or something.)

      Also, digital is crap. Analog hands forever. A wristwatch should show you what time it is, not tell you. If you have to read it, you've defeated the point of having a wristwatch. At that point you might as well fish your cell phone out of your pocket.

    27. Re:Who still uses watches? by bheer · · Score: 1

      > There's also an appeal in having a piece of technology that's functional, isn't prone to errors, and works using age old technology.

      Ah ... sort of like running Linux, then?

    28. Re:Who still uses watches? by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      Well, sort of.

      Run Linux on a 386 with 4 megs of ram using Elm to check your email, Lynx to browse web pages and have IrcII installed for messaging, and you're closer to the idea. Actually, a 386 might be a little overkill for that.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    29. Re:Who still uses watches? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      May I introduce you to our range of nipple, penis and scrotum rings? I mean, who would know?

      That weird guy down the hall, who always has to pick the urinal right next to me...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    30. Re:Who still uses watches? by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      I wear a watch (Casio G-Shock, about 4? 5? years old, batteries replaced once). Yes, there are plenty of ways to find out the time, but none are as convenient as looking at my wrist.

      - When I'm driving, yes, I glance at the dash clock to tell the time, but I'm not in my car very much.
      - I spend even less time within sight of the clock on my microwave ;)
      - When at a computer, I glance at the corner of the screen for the time. I'm not always near a computer.
      - My cellphone has a clock, but it's jammed in my pocket. Hard enough to extract when standing, much harder when I'm sitting down.
      - I don't have an MP3 player or PDA.
      - I go to the movies a lot; when I want to know what time it is, it's simpler to hit the backlight button (which stays lit for 3 seconds with a soft green glow that doesn't bother other people; cellphones are invariably much brighter, stay lit much longer, and again, it's a lot harder to get out of my pocket)
      - I tend to take long showers, and it's nice having a convenient clock in there (few cellphones are waterproof).
      - None of those other clocks have alarms attached to them that do me any good when I'm out walking around, except my cellphone, on which the alarm is a pain in the ass to set; and it only has one alarm. My watch has five alarms, easy to set and deal with. (One for waking me up in the morning, one for clocking back in from lunch, one for reminding me it's time to watch Heroes, etc.)

      Yeah, there's a lot of clocks around, but there's not always one convenient when I want to know what time it is, so I wear a watch to fill in the gaps. (There's no fashion/jewelry element to it, not for me.) The reason I wear G-Shocks in particular (which tend to cost $80-120) is because they last several years, they're EXTREMELY durable, and, to a degree, because I've been wearing them since high school, before cellphones were commonplace, so I got used to glancing at my wrist for the time.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    31. Re:Who still uses watches? by s7uar7 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget cufflinks, often worn by the same people who wear the expensive suits and ties.

    32. Re:Who still uses watches? by patio11 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I would bet on the watches outlasting the wives. If a watchmaker found out that 40% of his watches failed, most of them within 10 years, he'd have a psychotic break and start bashing people in the heads with quartz crystal formations to steal their superpowers. If a preacher finds out that 40% of his marriages fail in ten years, you know, he really isn't doing that poorly...

    33. Re:Who still uses watches? by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, which Tissot do you have? I'm looking for a watch to replace my Citizen and as such am curious at what people like.

      More on topic: I have to agree here. A watch is just convenient for me. I carry a cell phone, but that's in the pocket -- I only need glance at my wrist.

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    34. Re:Who still uses watches? by BrianH · · Score: 1

      The brain matches patterns faster than it processes words. When I glance at a watch, I just need to look at it for a split second to understand what time it is, or how much relative time has passed since my last glance at it. If I look at an LCD readout with the time, I have to read the numbers, process it mentally (a process that takes about half a second in most people), and then do any math needed to calculate relative times. There was a lot of press on research in this area when LCD watches first came onto the market, but digitals won out anyway because they are so much cheaper to produce. Still, once you learn them, handed watches are more convenient than digital readouts.

      And, as others have mentioned, I don't have to dig it out of my pockets.

      There's also a timeless (no pun intended) quality to watches. Buy a good one, and it will last you the rest of your life. Quality watches work with just about any fashion style, and never fail if maintained right. How many cellphones can you say that about?

      --

      There is nothing so pathetic as seeing a beautiful young theory roughed up by a tough gang of facts.
    35. Re:Who still uses watches? by SageMusings · · Score: 1

      Since I sit in front of a computer for most of my day with all manner of information in front of me, there is absolutely no reason for me to wear a watch. And for those brief moments when I'm detached from a computer, I have a Blackberry on my waist.

      To me, watches are nothing more than jewelry, baubles, or glass beads. I would not wear one unless I had a job that kept me away from other time-keeping technology. Ever try typing with a watch? Drives you batty....

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
    36. Re:Who still uses watches? by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      A few months ago I did an experiment: I left my watch at home for two weeks. Most of the day I have access to other time sources, so no problem there.
      I did miss it when traveling (walking/biking), and when cooking dinner: I don't have a clock in the kitchen, so I had to walk into the living room to do time checks.
      Also, it kept feeling weird not to wear a watch. It's a relief not to have the watch getting in the way all the time [1], but at the same time I felt I was missing something. I kept having to remind myself 'no, it didn't fall off, you just left it at home'. I went back to wearing it eventually.

      1: when in the office, I always take off my watch because it's uncomfortable when resting my wrist on the desk.

    37. Re:Who still uses watches? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      Sure, but ... does it play pong?

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    38. Re:Who still uses watches? by drsquare · · Score: 1
      A good watch should tell time, and that's it. Anything else just means it's not going to do its main job as well as it could.

      A good computer should decrypt encrypted messages, and that's it. Anything else just means it's not going to do its main job as well as it could.
    39. Re:Who still uses watches? by drsquare · · Score: 1
      As said, I have no idea why people think that a phone is a good timepiece.

      It's called redundancy. A watch is very large, bulky and inconvenient for something that does something already done by something else. I'm not a yuppie so I generally don't need to know the time that often or that accurately either, and when I do I just read it off the computer.

      If your life is that artificial that you always have to instantly know the exact time, then I feel sorry for you.
    40. Re:Who still uses watches? by Fool_Errant · · Score: 1

      And not very often by anyone else!

      (Which makes them even MORE of a fashion statement. After all, nothing says "I've got money to burn" quite like items which require wearing OTHER items in order to be able to wear them "appropriately.")

    41. Re:Who still uses watches? by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      "Also, digital is crap. Analog hands forever. A wristwatch should show you what time it is, not tell you. If you have to read it, you've defeated the point of having a wristwatch."

      What bollocks. If reading 3 or 4 numbers off a display takes you more time or effort than reading the hands on a watch, it's your reading comprehension that's crap. Granted plenty of digital watches have sucky displays filled with useless spinny crap and squeeze the time into an area the size of a toothpick.

      Personally I use a Casio F-E10; it's cheap, thin, and about as optimal as it gets display wise.

    42. Re:Who still uses watches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I charge the phone every night anyway and because the time is transmitted to my phone by the phone network who gets it from an atomic clock. So I'm pretty certain that it is correct. Even better; whether I have service coverage in a foreign country or not, it still picks up the local time and adjusts automatically just in case.

    43. Re:Who still uses watches? by maxume · · Score: 1

      I just look at the sun. If there isn't any sun, then it isn't important what time it is.

      I also use my cell phone, but I don't think it is a good time piece, I just don't like watches very much, and I happen to carry the phone around most of the time anyway.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    44. Re:Who still uses watches? by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      Out of curiosity, which Tissot do you have? I'm looking for a watch to replace my Citizen and as such am curious at what people like.

      I've got the black faced PRS200 with the stainless bracelet. It was a gift from my employer and I'm extremely happy with it. :)

      If the budget allows, the Touch is also a really nice watch with more features than I can shake a stick at.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    45. Re:Who still uses watches? by Gulik · · Score: 1

      Do Slashdotters still wear watches? If so, I'd be curious as to why.

      I do, and prefer mechanical movements. In a classic case of life immitating profound geekery, I was putting together a character for an RPG who was obsessed with watches, so I decided to research them a little, and ended up being fascinated myself with mechanical movements. The precision of the escapement mechanisms, the engineering that went into various complications. Then I discovered the really exotic complications, like minute repeaters; at the press of a button on the watch, it chimes -- one tone for the hour, a different one for the quarter-hour, and finally a third for the minute into that quarter-hour. Imagine the engineering that's required to do that entirely with gears, and then make it small enough to wear on your wrist. And, then, there are the really insane things, like the Ulysse Nardin Trilogy of Time series, one of which can act as an astrolabe.

      I, sadly, can afford none of these. But my Seiko S-Wave Automatic is quite sturdy.

    46. Re:Who still uses watches? by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd realized later I'd forgotten cufflinks and tie tacks. There are also a few other bits, like that tie-support thing that some people wear in their collars. And on tuxedos you have the option of fancy studs rather than buttons.

    47. Re:Who still uses watches? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      I wonder what you and the AC think of electronic watches with LCD hands instead of digits. :)
      All the bad points of both :)

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    48. Re:Who still uses watches? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      I'd rather go electronic. Cost aside, it wouldn't weight 1.1kg

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    49. Re:Who still uses watches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do the upper class men show off the nipple, penis and scrotum rings? In front of urinal? (or may be on the train for the Japanese ones :)

    50. Re:Who still uses watches? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      I'm not a native english speaker, so the mistake was understandable - at first I was sure you mean handcuffs. Appropriate too.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    51. Re:Who still uses watches? by heroofhyr · · Score: 1

      You didn't mention where you get the battery replaced. I used to be a watch repairer, and when you buy a watch certified to be waterproof at 100 meters and go to have the battery replaced, a lot of places will simply refuse to do it and suggest you send it to the manufacturer. That's because after the seal on the gasket has been broken to get the back off the watch (in order to take the old battery out and put a new one in), it has to be put under pressure tests again to ensure that it is still certifiable as waterproof with the new seal in. If you just go into a jewelry shop or a department store and they switch the batteries for you right there, please do not consider it waterproof anymore. It's understandable that they can't test it for you, as a pressure tester can cost upwards of 10,000eu and gets extremely rare usage. But be forewarned that 90% of the time it isn't even safe to go in the shower with an uncertified watch let alone swimming or deep diving. The only thing keeping the water out is screws and/or the threads of the caseback. Now, on the other hand if you do get it replaced properly and don't void your warranty on it, the waterproofing test is probably going to cost you quite a penny for the test, the labour, and the shipping and handling (usually it's somewhere between 60 and 100 eu -- I don't know what that is in US dollars since they keep falling in exchange value every week but $1.30 is about 1eu now). When you factor in the added functionality of a cellphone or a PDA, it doesn't seem like such a bad investment for people who can afford it and will actually use those things. Now, if you take the waterproofing out of the equation and compare a cellphone to, say, a cheap Timex (one with no Indiglo furiously eating up the Lithium cel in a few months) that costs a handful of coins and will last somewhere between 3-20 years depending on how filthy and gummed up it gets, and suddenly it's, as you say, a much more convenient and cheap option.

      I actually think it would be good if more people learned how to repair Rolexes. We used to have to send them out and our store policy was "Never open a Rolex!" because they had a tendency to explode and throw microscopic movements and pieces everywhere as soon as the caseback was taken off. The best story related to that job was actually the time someone came and asked me to take a look at their Rolex. I said, "What's wrong with it?" and she replied, "The battery just stopped this morning. I already had it replaced last year." I spent about ten seconds trying to come up with the least offensive way of telling the woman that a real Rolex doesn't use batteries. To make matters worse, she added with a pride-filled voice that it was a Mothersday gift from her son. If we had more Rolex training and no anti-Rolex store policy I could at least have changed the battery and spared her the embarrassment of finding out from a complete stranger that her son was a cheap bastard.

      --
      brandelf: invalid ELF type 'KEEBLER'
    52. Re:Who still uses watches? by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      I understand the part about the waterproof thing... though I have to say that so far, I haven't had any problems with showers or similar wetness. I doubt though that I'll take it scuba diving after having my battery replaced at the local watch shop. :)

      As said, it's not just the water proof thing - there are a host of reasons why I like to have a watch on my wrist. I'd like to see anyone time their swim or their noodles with a pda.

      Nice story about the "Rolex."

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    53. Re:Who still uses watches? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Most people in school have classes that start and end at a specific time. Few schools allow you to have a computer in class.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    54. Re:Who still uses watches? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Actually, only one person was bashed in the head with a quartz crystal formation. After that, Sylar used telekinesis to get his prey.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    55. Re:Who still uses watches? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      I have an mp3 player, a mobile, and I work on two computers at my workplace, but I still find it necessary to wear a watch. More habit than anything else; I like to have that feeling of something heavy on my left arm, and most certainly, I find it quite cumbersome to fish out my mobile from my pocket just to see the time.

      I also love watches; I've got four of them. I'm planning to buy another pretty soon. :-)

    56. Re:Who still uses watches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll notice he never said he was a doctor ;-)

    57. Re:Who still uses watches? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      I time my cooking and laundry with my Treo. Whats so hard about it?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  14. When I was a kid in the early 60's by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    there was a watch repair booth at the grocery store and an old man (as I remember him) sat there all day with his loupe repairing watches. My mom would drop me at his booth and I would just stand there, fascinated.
    I thought that was so freaking cool, to work on such tiny things like watches.
    I had a Mickey Mouse watch that broke and I got to watch him repair it.

    I was inspired by him (and other repairmen) to take stuff apart and see "what makes it tick"..
    Another thing that was common when I was a kid, there were handymen repair shops where you took just about anything that was broken and the nice man would fix it. Toasters, vacuum cleaners, TV's, radios, whatever.

    That's what I wanted to do when I grew up, be a handyman, to just fix broken stuff.
    Now I'm older, have arthritis in my hands, my eyes aren't so good anymore, there's just no way I could do this sort of work anymore. That sucks because that's what I love to do more than anything, fix things, work on stuff..

    My favorite TV show is "How it's Made"

    1. Re:When I was a kid in the early 60's by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      In the pictures, you can see a watch that a student made after three years of studying. It looks insanely complicated. Really amazing. I'd love to see the insides of a really complex watch.

    2. Re:When I was a kid in the early 60's by dangitman · · Score: 0

      there was a watch repair booth at the grocery store and an old man (as I remember him) sat there all day with his loupe repairing watches. My mom would drop me at his booth

      So, as a child, you were a watch? Interesting. How did you make the transition to becoming human? You could be a valuable case study for evolution.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    3. Re:When I was a kid in the early 60's by Detritus · · Score: 1

      While much of what you say is true, there are many situations where "scrap it, buy a new one" is not an option. There may not be any "new ones", since the originals were a limited production run and custom designed for a specific task.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    4. Re:When I was a kid in the early 60's by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Funny

      He could have evolved into a 7 billion ton robot monster like you did.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    5. Re:When I was a kid in the early 60's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the pictures, you can see a watch that a student made after three years of studying. It looks insanely complicated. Really amazing. I'd love to see the insides of a really complex watch.

      A few years back a bought a new watch - the most expensive piece of technology I have ever purchased. Some weeks after I bought it, I was seeing my dentist. He needed to take some x-ray pictures - the only thing on my mind was my all new wrist watch. Of course I asked him, if he would be able to make an x-ray picture of my watch. I was told that he did not have the equipment to "see" through metal, but he gave it a shot none the less.

      It never turned out any good pictures thou.

    6. Re:When I was a kid in the early 60's by beaviz · · Score: 1

      there was a watch repair booth at the grocery store and an old man (as I remember him) sat there all day with his loupe repairing watches. My mom would drop me at his booth and I would just stand there, fascinated.

      Not far from where I lived as a child (in the nineties) there was this little TV/stereo repair shop. Usually it was just the owner himself. I used to hang out there a lot after school. On display in the windows there was this REALLY old equipment for sale. No-one would buy anything from him. Ever. But many people (including other businesses) in town would use his service to repair their old equipment.

      I think that he has had many near-death experiences. As the years passed by, I began to see stacks-upon-stacks of boxes with Laserdisc-players in the backroom. I was curious as to why these were there. It turns out that this little one-man-shop were PAL-modifying NTSC players for the whole country!

      The years passed on and I grew older and stopped hanging around. Then some years ago I needed to by some antenna-plugs. I saw the same stack-upon-stacks, this time of DVD-players. Now he was removing region-protection from DVD-players!

      Some month ago the shop finally closed business. I was pretty sad to see it go, it was one of the last shops in town that actually knew anything about electronics.

  15. Almost a watchmaker by MajorDick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am fairly young (35) when I was growing up my Grandfater (a watchmaker by training) a boilerwelder by trade (it paid MUCH better) taught me how to clean and repair a watch from a young age.

    When I was 15 I lived with him to help on the farm since my Great Grandmother moved in with him. I asked for him to take me as an apprectice as a watchmaker (hey I lived there why not and I was good with guns, clocks, etc) besides my bedrrom was the "Watch Room"

    He said he wouldnt mind at all and thought I could make short work of it but he warned me he saw no future in it, as all the watches were going electronic and I could probably never make a living at it.

    Investing 8 hrs a day for 2+ years and not having it be a viable profession made my mind up , I decided not to

    Last year I was in L.A. I REAL WatchMAKER (not watch repair man, hack, etc, but WATCH MAKER, who can from nothing but raw metal make a watch from scratch command UPWARDS of 250,000 a Year.

    DOH ! I have my Grandfather last watch he wore every day, a Seiko, he loved it, it never needed cleaned, and kept perfect time.

    The article is about as dead on as it gets......I wish I wish I wish......

    1. Re:Almost a watchmaker by Boronx · · Score: 1

      I bet there's blacksmiths around that make a good living, and it's even possible to earn a buck or two driving horse and buggy.

  16. Like the Editors care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Considering they still keep accepting stories from Roland Piquepaille, another known shill, it's doubtful the editors will do anything about this guy.

    1. Re:Like the Editors care by pedantic+bore · · Score: 1
      There are shills, and then there are shills.

      This guy links to stories from Business Week. He doesn't paste them into his blog and pretend he wrote them.

      To his credit, Roland has stopped submitting plagarized blog entries, but he's still twice the shill.

      --
      Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
  17. It is a truly sad situation today by Quila · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have some very nice mechanical and quartz Swiss watches. I used to be able to go by a local master watchmaker to have them serviced or fixed. Then he retired and there was literally nobody else around to do it. Now I'm supposed to ship everything back to the manufacturer. Nobody in town will even replace the batteries on the quartz ones.

    1. Re:It is a truly sad situation today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Nobody in town will even replace the batteries on the quartz ones.

      I can out-sad that. Went to 3 jewellers' shops to get a battery replacement on my workhorse quartz watch.

      Third shop actually had a watch press and could pop the back off in order to exchange the battery. Told me "it was dead, no way it'd work again".

      I took a battery out of my pocket (I'd have been happy to buy the battery from them, but they never even offered to sell me one), plopped it into the back of the watch they opened for me, swung an out-of-place-looking piece of gold-plated material back into place, observed that the watch ran just fine, told 'em I'd take my chances, and manually pressed the back of the watch back into place between my two hands.

      3 years later, the "dead" watch is running just fine, and I've since acquired my own watch press so as to never have to darken a jeweler's door again.

      Would have gladly paid $10 for a $3 battery and 30 seconds of their time. They spent the 30 seconds ensuring that I'd just drop $30 (6 years worth of watch battery time) to never have to deal with their entire market segment for the rest of my life. WTF? Dumbest. Business. Model. Evah.

    2. Re:It is a truly sad situation today by Quila · · Score: 1
      Would have gladly paid $10 for a $3 battery and 30 seconds of their time.

      I was always happy to pay it. Not only did he put in a new battery, but he also checked everything to make sure it's working fine, cleaned it and buffed the crystal. Money well spent.

      But it is seriously sad. Not one jewelry store in town will dare to take the back off a Movado, even those who advertise that they repair watches.
    3. Re:It is a truly sad situation today by count0 · · Score: 1

      At the local department store, there is a desk where they will put on a new strap, replace batteries, remove links in a watch bracelet, etc. There is a list on display behind the counter for the staff of watch brands they must not open, or "it will come out of your pay cheque". These are mostly kinetic powered watches, from what I could tell...though I wouldn't be happy with them opening up my automatic mechanical watches, either.

      cz

  18. OK, I've got to get into this by istartedi · · Score: 1

    I'm not interested in watch making as a profession--I've been thinking of getting into it as a hobby. I've surfed around and looked at some of the tools you need--little lathes and other specialized tools that are hard to find because it's a "dying" art. That's what makes me find it interesting--it's technology, but because it doesn't require a multi-million dollar fabrication facility, it's potentially accessable to a hobbiest. Also, time pieces can be works of art, not just tech. It's funny, I don't even like to wear a watch, but the idea of having a miniature machine-shop in my apartment appeals to me on some level. After posting this, I will probably not follow through again though... it's just another one of those things that I think would be cool.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:OK, I've got to get into this by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Funny

      but the idea of having a miniature machine-shop in my apartment appeals to me on some level.

            Don't tell the government this, because you are obviously a terrorist.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:OK, I've got to get into this by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      A terrorist who builds really small bombs, right?

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    3. Re:OK, I've got to get into this by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A terrorist who builds really small bombs, right?

            Small enough to fit in a... I know - a WATCH! Soon airlines will ban all timepieces on flights. Remember, it's not the size that counts.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:OK, I've got to get into this by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Haha! that's so ridiculous. If I'm a terrorist I wouldn't spend years learning how to build fine mechanical time pieces. I'd... well... nevermind what I'd do. However, given our current climate of color-coded civil rights violations, it wouldn't surprise me if this hobby put me on the... wait for it... watch list. Oh.... groan. Sorry, but I tried really hard to avoid watch puns in my parent post.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    5. Re:OK, I've got to get into this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, it's not the size that counts.

      Oh, I know... it's the teeth that count? You were talking about gears on a watch, right?

    6. Re:OK, I've got to get into this by Trotsky820 · · Score: 1

      You might want to check out the Timezone Watch school at http://www.timezonewatchschool.com/WatchSchool/. They offer online courses on the basics of watchmaking. It's a pretty good hobby to get into.

  19. Yes by everphilski · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    While I might have time at my computer at work, i don't have time availble while I'm in a meeting at work. Or while I'm walking the halls at work (I have two desks... it is a weird situation). And if I get intercepted by a "customer" for "a few minutes" ... who knows what the real time is? I do, if i'm wearing my watch.
    And I'm still taking grad classes. That should be self-explanatory.
    I really like mine.

  20. And together with luxury... by Vo0k · · Score: 1

    ...cheap knock-offs of the luxury are on the rise too.
    With extremely aggressive marketing.
    Unfortunately.

    I wonder, couldn't Rolex sue for trademark infringement or damaging brand reputation or something? These spammers make me loathe the name.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:And together with luxury... by SocialWorm · · Score: 1

      Well, Rolex certainly tries to shut down copycats, I'm sure, but Rolex watches are nearly the epitome of luxury goods that have cheap knock offs. They have been for a long time. See Wikipedia if you're interested.

      --
      My Blog: http://nic.dreamhost.com/
    2. Re:And together with luxury... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rolex needs to be knocked off their block. At one time, they used to have quality products. Now it's just capitalizing on the name. Almost as bad as DeBeers and their brainwashing of people to want a diamond.

      A quartz-based timepiece is orders of magnitude more accurate than a mechanical one. You can get a good-looking quartz-crytstal watch for under a hundred bucks that will last you near a lifetime. Remind me again why someone would pay $15k for a friggen watch? Oh yeah, because they're a pretentious douche with too much money on their hands.

    3. Re:And together with luxury... by green1 · · Score: 1

      leaving alone the futility of trying to sue a spammer, they can't sue for damaging the brand reputation as long as the spammer doesn't pretend that he is selling genuine rolex, as long as they tell you it's a replica up front (and the actual product doesn't claim to be a rolex either) then they're covered from that stand point... unfortunately.

    4. Re:And together with luxury... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      No company is as bad as De Beers. Not even Philip Morris--their death toll is only in the thousands. De Beers, however, has a death toll in the millions for their funding of African wars through conflict diamonds. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    5. Re:And together with luxury... by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Seen some of the spams? They quite often fail to mention it's not genuine rolex.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    6. Re:And together with luxury... by green1 · · Score: 1

      I see as few as possible... but the ones I have seen have had the word replica all over the place, in fact it's often hard to tell what it's supposed to be a replica of because the word replica is the only really prominent thing around.

    7. Re:And together with luxury... by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      If it's an exact or nearly-exact replica, it infringes on copyright of the design.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  21. Luxury watches are big business (and fun) by mad+zambian · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out this blog for some of the weird and wonderful watches out there. Some of them costing 200K or more. (yes, two hundred thousand) One of my favourites is the TAG Heuer V4, but I doubt I would be able to afford it.
    Sigh.
    A similar thing might well happen to analogue electronic engineers I suspect, with everything going digital these days. Why have a filter circuit composed of discrete components when you can program a DSP to do the same thing?
    Or maybe not.

    --
    Trying to associate Microsoft with "fun" is like trying to associate Satan with aromatherapy. -Tycho
  22. Balderdash by John+Hasler · · Score: 1, Insightful

    > Thirty to 40 years ago, there was a watchmaker at every jewelry store.

    This is utter nonsense. Jewelry stores had watch repairmen, most capable of no more than cleaning, adjusting, and replacing movements.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  23. NYTimes had a story about it by wikes82 · · Score: 1

    Use www.bugmenot.com or register at your own risk http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/29/nyregion/29watch .html

  24. Roland isn't an Astroturfer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's just another sleazy fuckstick with an Adblog and a business agreement with Slashdot.

    Slashdot links to his Adblog and then gets a cut of the Ad revenue Roland earns when Slashdotters visit his site.

    If Roland was also posting to Slashdot from sockpuppet accounts, praising the living daylights out of "Roland's" Adblog, then he'd be an Astroturfer.

    1. Re:Roland isn't an Astroturfer. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      I think that a personal enemy of Roland's is an astroturfer and spews this bile about him. I almost want to make a fucking temple to the guy because of these annoying posts.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  25. 21st Century anachronism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was hoping by this time that we would be training the next generation of time lords.

    1. Re:21st Century anachronism by dangitman · · Score: 1

      They have, but the problem with this generation of timelords is that they either want to take us back to the 1950s, take us back to biblical times, or bomb us back into the Stone Age.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    2. Re:21st Century anachronism by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      We would be if Pete Tyler hadn't died. Or am I getting them mixed up with the Cybermen?

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  26. Re:When I was a kid in the early 60's..or 50s by zogger · · Score: 1

    Well...dang straight man, I feel the same way. Really is disappointing when you realise that the real small stuff is just out of reach anymore, glasses or no glasses. I still don't throw away much stuff though, hang onto it for "parts". It's a habit that is hard to shake.

    It doesn't matter really, for the most part stuff now is mostly throw away junk. Not all, but most.

  27. Re:When I was a khttp://vg.no/id in the early 60's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's what I wanted to do when I grew up, be a handyman, to just fix broken stuff. (...) that's what I love to do more than anything, fix things, work on stuff..

    This gets rather personal, so I'm ACing it: Be glad that you didn't. My dad worked for IBM for 40+ years. He repaired computers (and before that, typewriters). He started back when you would measure radio tubes for defective bits and replace them, all through the way to replacing defective chips on IC cards.

    Today, nobody does that. You're a glorified "replace these cards until it works" or worse yet, a glorified delivery boy replacing the broken box with a new one. The circuitry is so small and integrated, your hourly rate so high compared to just pushing out another at the assembly line, it's just not worth it. One of his colleagues sucidied over it, my dad retired.

    I've seen that happen to more and more small electronics - just making an estimate of what's wrong exceeds the cost of buying a new cheap device. Shops that used to fix things like that have closed up. Cars are the same - my dad would understand simple engines well, today you need a computer to tell you what's wrong - and probably a computer to fix it.

    I must admit, that's just the way it is. Even if I compare it to a "flip the burger" McDonald's rate, you have a very narrow window of oppertunity where an expensive piece of equipment needs to be fixed in a very short time. Ever tried to debug "Well there's some wierd race condition that only happens under load on release builds", it's roughly as bad as "Well the hardware locks up under some wierd conditions". Many times, even if you found an expert of the subject, it's just not worth it or he'll conclude "scrap it, buy a new one". Sorry to rain on your parade but it's just not as glorious as it sounds.

  28. Re:PreacherTom is a BizWeak Astroturfer by FractalZone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    PreacherTom is an astroturfer for BusinessWeek magazine.

    BusinessWeak magazine? Come on, it is tabloid business journalism at its lamest; entertaining yes, informative sometimes, but rarely if you want in depth information about the topics it purports to cover. I have an MBA and while I could cite some monthly business periodicals in the papers I wrote for classes, Businessweek was rarely one of them.

    The WSJ is much better, more accurate, and more insightful and has far more interesting articles in any given week than BusinessWeak does in a typical month. I guess that is why BW needs shills...

    --
    "You're young, you're drunk, you're in bed, you have knives; shit happens." -- Angelina Jolie
  29. Mechanics, yummie by kathmann · · Score: 1

    Interesting point (too bad about the turfer), there has been a watchmaking school in The Netherlands for years, and still going strong.

    And especially in a digital age does one appreciate the fine intricacies of a beautiful mechanical device more and more.

  30. Jon Osterman... by bruhinb · · Score: 1

    ...would be rolling over in his grave. If only he had stayed dead.

    1. Re:Jon Osterman... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      ...would be rolling over in his grave. If only he had stayed dead. didn't he join the blue man group or something?
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  31. Making Time With The Watchmakers? by Arivia · · Score: 1

    You really want to make time with this?

    --
    The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
  32. Arcane Examples by NSObject · · Score: 1

    Thirty to 40 years ago, there was a watchmaker at every jewelry store. That's not the case today.

    Maybe this will help explain why.

  33. The Rolex statement by Gorimek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What you wear says a lot about who you are.

    And wearing a Rolex is the only thing I can think of that trumps driving a Jaguar for saying "I'm very rich and very stupid".

    1. Re:The Rolex statement by muffel · · Score: 1
      There is is enough truth to it, because probably most Rolexes (like Ferraris and huge Yachts) are bought for the sole purpose of showing off money.

      But there's another aspect to a Rolex. It was the CEO of a high-end Swiss watchmaker (the type that one day introduced a "budget-model" for ~$20.000) from which I learned that in terms of reliability Rolex is simply unbeaten by other mechanical watches. Not as fancy and not really interesting for collectors, but the best mechanical quality for every-day use.

      So I got one (no gold or diamonds or the big clunky diver's type). And it just works. I like that.

      And while my stupidity might still be open for debate, one thing is sure: I'm definitely not rich.

      Cheers

      --

      bla
    2. Re:The Rolex statement by Wateshay · · Score: 1

      I have a Rolex that was given to me by my grandfather when I graduated from College. He gave one to every one of his grandkids upon graduation, not because he wanted us to be able to show off wealth but because they're a damn good watch and he thought everyone in business needed a damn good watch. ...and you know what? It really is a damn good watch, and when you think about it it's really not that expensive. Sure, you could buy a $150 Timex every five years and keep time just as well, but $5000 for a handmade precision machine that will appreciate in value and last the rest of my life is hardly a sign of decadent idiocy.

      --

      "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    3. Re:The Rolex statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wearing a Rolex is the only thing I can think of that trumps driving a Jaguar for saying "I'm very rich and very stupid".

      I'm sure the Jaguar will depreciate far more rapidly than the Rolex.

    4. Re:The Rolex statement by ObitMan · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the Jaguar will depreciate far more rapidly than the Rolex.

      yeah but they are still fun to drive.
      104,000 miles on my 94 XJ6.

      --
      Who run Barter Town?
    5. Re:The Rolex statement by Gorimek · · Score: 1

      OK, you're exempt. That's a family heirloom, not a tacky expression of real or pretended wealth.

    6. Re:The Rolex statement by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1
      $5000 for a handmade precision machine that will appreciate in value
      I'd love to know how you know that your watch, for sure, will appreciate in value.

      In your answer, please include the words "past performance is no guarantee of future results".
      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  34. Really? Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roland and certain Slashdot "editors" regularly link to his adblog for fun and profit, yet you support Roland and take issue with those critical of his behavior.

    I think we've found the astroturfer.

    1. Re:Really? Interesting. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, I don't care about Roland, I'm just pissed off by the whiners in EVERY SINGLE FUCKING ARTICLE. You see, it's one link. You can barely see it. But what you can see much more clearly is a bunch of self-righteous whiners. But apparently if I don't agree with your anti-Roland cult I'm an astroturfer.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:Really? Interesting. by macshit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed. Roland has a tremendously weird name, and a fairly lame website, but he often submits interesting stories, and he apparently spends a lot of time doing it. I don't why we should care that a story is from him as long as it's interesting...

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
  35. The Late Dodo by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Earlier this year I bought an analog wristwatch from an old coot who claimed to be "the last certified watchmaker left in New York City". I bought one from him, though I could tell from my NTP-sync'ed mobile phone that his own watch was 2 minutes slow.

    I was in a room with a Master of the Way of the Dodo.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:The Late Dodo by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      I bought one from him, though I could tell from my NTP-sync'ed mobile phone that his own watch was 2 minutes slow.

      He'll have the last laugh when your mobile phone battery dies when you're hiking in B.F.E. BTW - does anyone make a wristwatch that syncs to a time source (cell net or whatever)?

      -b.

    2. Re:The Late Dodo by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Who cares what time it is, except "twilight", when hiking in BFE (whatever that is)?

      The watch I bought from him runs on batteries too. But when it stops, I suppose it will be right twice a day. Except at night in the BFE, when I won't be able to read it.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:The Late Dodo by MeepMeep · · Score: 1

      BTW - does anyone make a wristwatch that syncs to a time source (cell net or whatever)?

      There are so-called 'atomic' wristwatches, but they should be called 'radio-controlled' watches - they listen for a time-synchronization beacon from an atomic clock in Colorado and set themselves. The radio signal covers most of the US and Canada, and there are a few other time signal stations around the planet (although they may or may not work with specific watches)

      Supposedly, TRUE atomic watches should be available once 'chip scale atomic clocks' become commoditized: http://www.darpa.mil/mto/csac/ Those'll be neat - you'll never need to set your watch again.
    4. Re:The Late Dodo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, atomic wristwatches already exist.

  36. Ok, so... by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...you can tick that joke off the list. It has clocked too many miles as it is, though I must hand it to you for chiming in with it, though to judge from the number of replies, it didn't wind up too many people. Mind you, with effort, we might yet get this thread to go round and round.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Ok, so... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      All I know is that not 10 miles from my house lives a real life cobbler. He also is the only one I know of.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:Ok, so... by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      Eh, I don't have time for these puns.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    3. Re:Ok, so... by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      Lots of cobblers in downtown Chicago. Seems like one on every other block. Took my leather computer bag into one last year and they did a great job re-stitching it -- better than new.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
  37. Obligatory Einstein Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only I had known, I would have become a watchmaker...

  38. My watch is more than a watch by Valacosa · · Score: 1

    I always wear my watch when I leave the house, but that's mostly because my watch doubles as a USB flash drive.

    For the win!

    --
    "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
  39. Finally... by varmint+jerky · · Score: 1

    an answer to the question "Who watches the watchmen"

  40. get a kinetic watch by kiwipeso · · Score: 1

    I got a seiko kinetic watch new years eve 2004, and I've never had any problems with it. It is always fully wound up just from me moving my arms while I walk to work.
    I'm pretty much sure of having the same watch going when I retire in 40 years time.

    --
    - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  41. clocks by erbbysam · · Score: 1

    The same thing is happening to the larger clock business. One of the remaining fully customized clock(large, like 1-20ft or postclock) is in our town. Almost everybody else has been bought of or outsourced and just have a small office here but they are entirely designed,built and assembled in the US. The clock, and watch business for the sake of this article are both losing quality to quantity and that seems to be happening almost everywhere in the US these days...

  42. Many can't afford their own wares by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It'd suck if you couldn't afford to buy the watches you make.

    Why? I'd much rather work on nice stuff, even if I personally couldn't afford it, rather than work with cheap stuff.

    Think about it, would you rather work in a shop turning out finely crafted watches you couldn't afford, or be on an assembly line cranking out plastic watches for Wal-Mart buyers?

    I regularly write software that I can't afford, but I enjoy it, and it's a nice living.

    What would really suck is working to create a product that you need but can't afford.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Many can't afford their own wares by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, but these are watches, not an accounting package. It's nice, when people work on things meant for private use (like watches, cars, and suits), for them to be able to buy and use those same things. It's also good advertising - a nice rolex, even the simpler ones, should start more than a couple conversations.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:Many can't afford their own wares by drsquare · · Score: 1
      Think about it, would you rather work in a shop turning out finely crafted watches you couldn't afford, or be on an assembly line cranking out plastic watches for Wal-Mart buyers?

      Whichever paid the most, had the best working conditions and the best job security. They all tell the time don't they?
    3. Re:Many can't afford their own wares by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1
      It's also good advertising - a nice rolex, even the simpler ones, should start more than a couple conversations.


      Unfortunately, those conversations would probably be along the lines of "What kind of a mid-level programmer at this company has a Rolex? The CEO doesn't even wear one." and "Give me your wallet, rich guy. And that Rolex too."
    4. Re:Many can't afford their own wares by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1
      Watchmaker - I'll wager that the CEO of Rolex has several watches of his own, and the conversation would go "good man, showing off the company goods". Tag Heuer would probably be somewhat less popular.

      Anyway, a mid-level programmer who can't afford a rolex needs a better job. That's the equivalent of getting a cheap nissan instead of the Maxima, or keeping your old car another year. It's almost the same as paying cash for your car vs. financing.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  43. Me by unfunk · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that this question arises fairly often here on Slashdot. Some poor fool thinks that just because every known device can display the time in one way or another, they don't have any reason to wear a timepiece.

    Sure, my phone and my iPod both display the time, but they're nowhere near as convenient as just glancing down at your wrist and knowing immediately what the time is.
    Watches can also look good. In fact, I've taken to only buying interesting designs that stand out, and get people asking about them, such as this little baby by EleeNo.
    My phone and my iPod don't look anywhere near as good as that watch.
    ...not to mention that after having worn a watch every day for as long as I can remember, when I'm not wearing one, I actually feel naked!

  44. Not well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's usually by the hour, but there's great overtime potential for people willing to work around the clock.

    Then again, unless you like to work with your hands, I wouldn't give it a second thought.

  45. insides of complicated watches by count0 · · Score: 1

    well, there's a number of forums online, but the most common place to see pics of watch movements is on ebay - many sellers will remove the back of the watch to show the movement...also search for 'skeleton' in watches for transparent cases - watch ppl were into case mods long before the LAN party crowd ;-)

  46. Hurray for antiques by Venner · · Score: 1

    Bravo and likewise. My day-to-day watch is a 17J 1911 Hamilton pocket watch - runs like a dream. I have a couple of other that I've been meaning to fix up and tune, but just haven't had the time yet. It's really true that "they don't make them like that anymore." I love to show people the beautiful craftsmanship of the gearings, etc.

    --
    A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
  47. A lesson in history. by dino213b · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At least clock making in the U.S. history..

    Around 1700, it was very rare for a person to own a clock or a watch - something on the order of 1 in 35 prominent white males owned one. By 1800, most cities in New England had clock makers. These clock makers could produce only around a dozen clocks per year and they never did so preemptively. They would wait for an order to be placed and then take their sweet time to produce a clock. There was an old saying about the craft.. "No two clocks tell the same time," indicating their accuracy. An interesting fact was that most of these clock makers could not live on making clocks alone: they had day jobs to support them. Clock making was merely a bonus.

    Then good old American manufacturing kicked in and production blew up to 1000 clocks a year made by one skilled worker, requiring nothing but ordinary laborers instead of master clock makers. Prices dropped around 1820s and it seems like the market was for once flooded with clocks. Some speculate that this cheaper price and wide availability created a market demand for clocks. Otherwise- why weren't they producing more of them?

    These are of course, clocks.. not just watches. Around this time (1750-1850), the clock stopped being a measuring device. Instead, it became a control device. Entire lifestyles changed - masters were replaced with factory workers. Time discipline became heavily monitored and for the first time ever the society went from an ephemeral lifestyle to one controlled by a machine.

    So here is an interesting question to ask Slashdotters:

    If a clock changed way of life in the 19th century, what is happening with our lives in the 21st century?

    Will we ever go back to a relaxed setting of working at our own pace or will we be slaves to the clock for some time to come? Why would we need a clock (or a watch) anyway? It seems like we have plenty of other semaphores to regulate our lives.

    Just something to ponder..

    1. Re:A lesson in history. by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      In the future, all clocks will synchronize wirelessly, getting rid of the excuse that "oh my clock was 5 minutes off so I'm really early not late".

  48. Video Watch by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    I bought one of those 2GB video watches. They are a bit bulky, but quite cool/nerdworthy if you don't mind recharging the battery after about 8 hours of it just boringly displaying the time.

    On it I have my limited MP3 collection and the Black Knight scene from the Holy Grail.

    You wouldn't believe how many chicks find this sexy!

    1. Re:Video Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You wouldn't believe how many chicks find this sexy!"

      Your right, I wouldn't.

    2. Re:Video Watch by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Is zero a number?

  49. You have no chance to survive... by Phantom+Coward · · Score: 1

    make your time...

  50. It is a truly cake eating situation today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny how people lament the effects of cheaper goods*, but complain about the cost of digital goods. e.g. Games, movies, music, etc.

    *Wal-mart, globalization, buggy-whip watchmakers, etc.

    1. Re:It is a truly cake eating situation today by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Because both aren't actually making things cheaper as they should but instead are bringing money to big corporations?

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  51. uhm, what about , you know, actual slavery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you really do not know what you are talking about. 'relaxing setting of working at our own pace' was not known to a lot of people in the 1800s. railroad workers, farmers, etc etc.

    especially the tens of millions of slaves who were the backbone of the economy.

    your whole post kind of rests on these assumptions that would not be accepted by the most cursory reader of american 19th century history.

    1. Re:uhm, what about , you know, actual slavery by dino213b · · Score: 1

      Actually, you didn't seem to read anything I wrote with any kind of academic scrutiny. Entire books can be written about this subject but I will leave it at a tentative glance. If you want to research this topic further, you will discover that slaves were actually the first "slaves to the clock" - as referenced by my previous posting.

      Research indicates that southern colonies were among the first to embrace the clock for the purpose of increasing efficiencies of plantations. One freed slave reflected on his experience : "the bell called and said, get up I'm coming to get you" (Bill Collins, Virginia). Another one put it a more painful light, "Maybe dey puts you on a task dis mawnin' and dat dere task got to be finished by seben o'clock dis evenin' and' if it ain't, dey whip you." (John Barker, Virginia.)

      So, it wasn't just one race that was affected. The clock made conditions MUCH WORSE for slaves. Furthermore, many academics blame industrialization for prolonging slavery, which would precede advent of clocks. Change in time measurement affected lives of everyone in some way and it would be improper of me to ignore one mistreated group of people in favor of another for my previous posting. There were groups of people suffering on both hemispheres and both sides of the continent around this time. Please keep in mind that people are still suffering today as they always have.

      Thanks for being passionate about the subject but please be more informed before responding.

  52. Blacksmith? by LlamaDragon · · Score: 1

    It's an uncommon profession, absolutely, but my cousin is a blacksmith on a thoroughbred farm and he makes a pretty good living making horseshoes and whatever other odds and ends are required for keeping racehorses going. And, of course, there's all those folks who run the Renaissance Fair circuit who make swords and armor.

  53. Aren't Rolex mass-produced? by mclaincausey · · Score: 1

    I believe most Swiss watches except for the, say Patek Phillipe-level that go from tens to hundreds of thousand dollars are actually factory-made. Still nice timepieces, but not really handmade. Possibly assembled by hand, at least in part... Not an expert, but that's what I've read anyway.

    --
    (%i1) factor(777353);
    (%o1) 777353
  54. Heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And here I was thinking of the Zero Wing quote, instead...

    You have no chance to survive.
    Make your time.

    Sorry :)

  55. Re:When I was a khttp://vg.no/id in the early 60's by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many times, even if you found an expert of the subject, it's just not worth it or he'll conclude "scrap it, buy a new one". Sorry to rain on your parade but it's just not as glorious as it sounds. There are still a few places where there's room for mechanical craftsmanship. High end Swiss watch repair, obviously. Me, I've been a locksmith for the last 15 years (except for those 2 years when my reserve unit got dragged off to Afghanistan, but that's another story), and I gotta say, the more things change, the more they stay the same. Sure, there's all kinds of fancy electronic stuff now, but the majority of it comes down to working with the same kind of mechanical designs they've been making since Linus Yale came up with the modern pin tumbler lock in the mid 19th century. Yeah, a lot of the low end work has gone the same way as computers, with it being cheaper just to buy a new craptastic Kwikset lock at Home Depot than pay someone like me to fix it; but any commercial/industrial or high-end residential stuff, you still pretty much need a locksmith to service it. It's a classic mechanical trade that will never go away. How many people reading this have keys? All of you, right? That, my friends, is job security.
    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  56. Watches? by Rix · · Score: 1

    You mean those things we replaced with cell phones?

  57. Rolex is PWND by AceyMan · · Score: 1

    FYI, I didn't RTFA.

    Rolex's are a good indicator of someone with more money than sense. The movements are not fabbed in house, but are generally mass-produced movements from ETA -- decent construction, don't get me wrong -- but would you pay $100,000 for a Jaguar with a Ford engine?

    True horology phreaks prefer makers that still make the movements in house. As these are becoming rarer and rarer, the costs of owning such a timepiece has gone up little by little. But it's neat knowing that if your watch says %MAKER% on the dial, then you know the guts were made by %MAKER%, as well.

    Plus, every MBA and his buddy has a Rolex whatever-date on his wrist. There are probably a thousand "Official Rolex" dealers in the USofA. But should you find someone wearing a Glashuette or Blaincpain or Patek, you'll know you found someone who actually took the time to learn the intricacies of what sets one watch apart from the rest.

    And no, I don't think a hand made mechanical watch is a "better timepiece" than a $30 Casio, or a cell phone. It's just neat to have the miniature equivalent of a V8 engine on my wrist at all times. That 'wow' factor is worth the price of admission to me.

    --
    -- Experience is a wonderful thing. It enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again.
    1. Re:Rolex is PWND by sa1lnr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "would you pay $100,000 for a Jaguar with a Ford engine?"

      Who owns Jaguar these days?

    2. Re:Rolex is PWND by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Ooh I can answer this.

      When I interviewed at Ford, I interviewed with a guy whom I only later found out was one of Jaguar's design engineers. He asked for my frank opinions of Jaguars. I told him that, with all due respect, Jaguars nowadays resemble Tauruses with leather. He looked quite shocked. He ended offering me a position on the engineering team (which I declined) because they were hungry was these types of "fresh blood" thinking instead of just the usual yes-sir mentality moping around the Big Three leadership.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  58. Re:When I was a khttp://vg.no/id in the early 60's by SuperQ · · Score: 1

    Ugh, I have a nice Abloy set that I can't install because I don't own a house anymore. It really sucks that no one uses mortice locks in the US. Well, lots of commercial construction uses mortice locks, but no residential places do. I had a hard enough time finding a door manufacturer that would provide un-drilled doors, and then I had to move to a place where I can't afford the housing.

  59. Oblig. by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    You have no chance to survive, make your time.

  60. They are free, if you make them by mangu · · Score: 1
    It'd suck if you couldn't afford to buy the watches you make.


    You can get them for the price of the materials used, if you work on your free time. Even if you make them out of platinum or gold, the amount used isn't so much that a skilled watchmaker couldn't afford.


    But, by your reasoning, it must suck to work at Rolls Royce. Or what about Boeing?

    1. Re:They are free, if you make them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, by your reasoning, it must suck to work at Rolls Royce. Or what about Boeing?

      I can't speak for RR, but it does suck to work for Boeing. It's cube farms as far as the eye can see. Watch "Office Space" and mentally replace "Initech" with "Boeing" and you're pretty close.

      If you want to be able to afford a Boeing product, go start a tech company.

    2. Re:They are free, if you make them by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Yeah, how many people really want a 787 of their own? The operating costs would kill you if you weren't Paul Allen or running an airline. Rolex is different - it's a personal article and cheap enough for any professional who cares to to own one.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  61. Like anything, if there's actually a demand by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    The worth of a watchmaker will increase. Many of these types of articles are intended to increase the supply of applicants for a particular sector. It reduces the cost to the business of finding new staff. If they simply advertised in a conventional way they would have to pay higher market rates.

    --
    Deleted
  62. Apollo 11 by Stormx2 · · Score: 1

    In the age of watches that have more computational power than Apollo 11's computer

    What? o.o Apollo 11 had almost 0 computational power! The cup I'm drinking out of is probably more intelligent than Apollo 11's computers ever were

  63. My brother's a watchmaker by WarwickRyan · · Score: 3, Informative

    He's dyslexic, so found schooling especially hard. However, he's excellent with mechanical things, so studied to be a horologist.

    There is such a demand for horologists at the moment it's crazy. Not just for watches, mind, but also for mechanical clocks.

    Too many kids are soft courses at uni (art/media etc etc) that we're being left with a dearth of people who have useful skills..

    1. Re:My brother's a watchmaker by blueish+yellow · · Score: 1

      Too many kids are soft courses at uni (art/media etc etc) that we're being left with a dearth of people who have useful skills.

      Yes, because making mechanical watches is a useful skill indeed.

    2. Re:My brother's a watchmaker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is, as long as someone is willing to pay six-figure amounts for a mechanical watch.

    3. Re:My brother's a watchmaker by asuffield · · Score: 1

      That's not "useful", it's another art course. Someone is willing to pay six-figure amounts for all kinds of artwork - but most people aren't going to be creating it.

    4. Re:My brother's a watchmaker by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

      Yes, there are a glut of jobs available for fine mechanics.

  64. Oh my god by eMbry00s · · Score: 1

    It's that time again isn't it?

    1. Re:Oh my god by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      The time when we throw toothbrushes at salesmen?

  65. Where do you want to play? by The+Mutant · · Score: 1

    I wear a Rolex. A modestly priced (yes, such a thing exists) GMT Master Model II. Nice, solid feel on my arm, great look.

    I've given lots of presentations at the board level to Investment Banks. Can't ever recall seeing a Casio or other digital stuff on the arms of the folks I was presenting to or later mingling with. Plenty of Swiss machinery, Rolexes included.

    So the watch you wear, while a deeply personal statement, also reflects where you want to play. About one month ago I pitched for $500 million in a competitive bid situation. No board is gonna give half a billion dollars to someone in jeans and a TShirt, wearing a ThinkGeek digital on their arm.

    Sure, down in the crowded cube farms the masses amuse themselves and each other with all sorts of cheap digital crap on their arms.

    But in the board room it's Swiss all the way.

    Rolexes are expensive. But like that tailor made suit, if you want to play the game you've got to dress the part. The cube farm is long behind me.

  66. Uhhhmmm, no. by The+Mutant · · Score: 1

    Rolex DOES NOT use the ETA movements; in some parts of the world they sell a brand known as 'Tudor', which does use the ETA movement.

    It's a subtle difference, one that makes me question your other conclusions.

    However I do agree with your points about the other watches, however let's be realistic - you can get a new Rolex for maybe £2K (sterling); a Patek will set you back at least ten times that.

    So is that Patek really good value for money?

  67. Progress? by no_pets · · Score: 1

    I hear you and society is much worse off with the decline of these handymen. When I was 16 I got a new stereo system for my car and of course thought I could hook it up myself. Well, I ended up crossing a wire and letting all of the smoke out of my amp. I thought it was toast. My dad recommended taking it to an appliance shop as they could fix stuff. I was skeptical but took it in anyway. Figuring that they just repaired stoves and washing machines I sheepishly asked if they could fix my amp. Holy crap if they didn't have it working the very next day at a minimal charge.

    Years later my home stereo CD player was having bad problems with skipping so I thought I'd take it to Best Buy. After all they had a repair center just for problems like this. Sure, they could repair it they said but it actually would require mailing it off to a repair center, take about 3 weeks to get back and would cost 1/3 to 1/2 the price of a new CD player. I just tossed it and bought a new one.

    And this is progress?

    --
    "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." - Shepard Book Quoting Malcolm Reynolds
  68. Prison inmates by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    I can't find it now, but there was a good piece NPR ran last year (I think) about prison inmates that were being trained in fine watch repair. You didn't need to have a high school diploma (many of these inmates didn't) to do the job, and you could make a good wage at it when you got out of prison. The training facility was sponsored in part by Timex (at least, a watchmaker name I recognized at the time). The story described several prisoners who immediately got jobs in watch repair as soon as they got released.

    If anyone can help find this article, please post below.

  69. Back to the topic? by fullback · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was faced last week with the choice of either having my Rolex repaired, or throwing something with a replacement cost of $8,000 in the trash. Since owning one is considered to be a sign of stupidity to this crowd, I chose the stupid path - I ran for Congress. No, I decided to have it repaired.

    Once upon a time, in a land far, far away (Japan), I decided to check the Rolex website for information. It turns out that Rolex is light years ahead of most global companies. They are already embracing a new paradigm: Web 4.0.

    Web 4.0 you say? Yes, indeed.

    Web 4.0 is retro. The master site for Rolex has no email addresses. None. No email for the headquarters or any office in all their offices flung far throughout the world. No email for you today. It's pure genius. It took me back to my work-a-day world of the 1980s. We used to have businesses back then that managed to survive (and even thrive) without "IT guys." We used to talk on the phone, send letters, send telex or even use those new fancy FAX machines. We could just give the new guy a desk, a phone and some pens.

    Think about it for a minute. Which is more frustrating: not being able to fire off an email, or not getting a reply to your email? Or, heaven forbid, a nonsense non-answer or automated "empathy mail like, "We are sincerely interested in your customer service experience and are commited to providing you blah blah blah blah..."

    Nip that customer frustration in the bud instead of prolonging the agony of no, or nonsense answers, since you're only going to tell the customer to get lost anyway. The first thing it does for a comapny is eliminate the angst of having to read customer complaints. Who needs that first thing in the morning? It weeds all but the most determined whiners and complainers.

    It also eliminates all the IT guys running around without ties having meetings in strange "geekspeak" going frantic about needing the latest version of ComExpRo 9000 version 23.01 beta ($24,000 license fee) and a new Sparkmaster Database Servoserver ($72,000) with 128 Megagoobers of chrome plated exhausts. Or something like that.

    No internet. No email. No spam. No security problems. No spyware. No upgrades. No Vista!

    And no maps to the office in Tokyo on the web site. If you can afford a Rolex, you shouldn't be sending emails or need maps anyway. Get your secretary to call and get directions. Bingo. If you don't have a secretary, get a casio. No, you should have enough smarts to figure out how to call and get directions.

    Off I went to the Tokyo office. It just so happens that I was there about 8 years ago, so I vaguely remembered where it was. It was just a short walk from Tokyo station. Since I'm a guy (internal flawless GPS system installed), I asked my girlfriend to "confirm" my GPS at the station with a random person.

    "Oh, the Rolex building? Sure, it's blah, blah, blah..."

    It turns out that everyone in Tokyo has been to the Rolex service center since everyone bought several back during the bubble and they all need servicing eventually. I found it easily. I walked directly to the counter after being offered a friendly smile by one of the many friendly-looking counter ladies, only to be handed a plastic tag with a number. I turned around to see about a dozen Rolexers lounging around in leather chairs waiting for their number to be called. All reading Rolex catalogs and Rolex magazines (some were even post Y2K - Rolex had no Y2K problem...). They check your watch as you wait, then present you with an estimate to repair it.

    When my number was called, I presented my cold, dead watch to the woman. She was holding it when she asked my if it had stopped. I said something to the effect, "Yes... see?"

    She then asked me when it stopped.

    Now, this is Japan and all interactions between strangers/customers/gods is formal and exceedingly polite. I formally and politely smiled as I pointed to the watch face and read off the time and date. Grin. Wink.

    1. Re:Back to the topic? by ogewo · · Score: 1

      This belongs on e2 ( http://www.everything2.com/ ). Great post, mate.

  70. Free education AND espresso. Sign me up. by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    Classes are paid for
    ...the Technicum is fully subsidized by Rolex, which underwrites the $10,000-a-year tuition for all students
    AND there's espresso
    The stainless-steel cafeteria offers students espresso served in porcelain cups.
    I wonder how good I'd be with those tiny parts after a quad soy latte?
    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  71. They're not dead! by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

    ...gone the way of the cobbler, the blacksmith and the Dodo.

    Huh? Dodos are extinct, but we still have cobblers and blacksmiths. Ask a motorcyclist where he (or she) goes to get his boots repaired.

    I still wear a watch. When I go for a walk, the only electronics I carry with me is my camera, which doesn't work well for telling time. In my car, the radio has a perfectly good clock, but a flaky backlight, so I can't always rely on that to see the time. Even when I'm surrounded by computers, microwaves, and wall clocks, I still like having the time on my wrist.

    My main watch is a battery operated analog/digital (dual face) piece that I found in the corner, on the floor, when I was cleaning out the landlord's garage (because I'm the one who actually uses the garage). I replaced the band and battery and cleaned off some white paint and have worn it ever since. My backup watch is a battery operated analog watch that my mom got for free with her subscription to Time magazine. Neither of them will keep Swiss watchmakers in business.

    --
    -Rich
  72. Rolex? Pfft. by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

    You think Rolex is anything special? Stupid, ignorant shill.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  73. Heh... by Xenographic · · Score: 1

    I'm just glad I finally know what the "make your time" part of the "you have no chance to survive make your time" means, now :]

    Now if only the rest of that made any sense...

  74. Read "The Millionaire Next Door" by s0rk · · Score: 1

    You sir, sound like a Under Accumluators of Wealth (UAW). If you read The Millionaire Next Door you will find that most millionaires do not have extravagant lifestyles. Read this book, it may enlighten you to change your views on what a millionaire may look like. That geek consultant in jeans, T-shirt with a ThinkGeek digital watch, may just be a millionaire. He/She may have more "game" than you and buy out your company and some of the companies you were pitching too. (Note: The book has some examples of plain ordinary looking individuals that bought out companies of people who had lavish lifestyles, nice pedigrees but not much wealth accumulated and/or business sense.)

    1. Re:Read "The Millionaire Next Door" by The+Mutant · · Score: 1

      Dude, I've read the book. Got a Masters in Finance also.

      "and buy out your company and some of the companies you were pitching too"

      I work for a Tier One Investment Bank. We were pitching a deal to take some biz from another bank. Nope, no unassuming Geek is gonna pitch in my league and take over a biz.

    2. Re:Read "The Millionaire Next Door" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a Tier One Investment Bank. We were pitching a deal to take some biz from another bank.

      You'd find the same dress code if you were pitching to a group
      of Mafia dons.

      That wouldn't be the only similarity, either.

  75. Re:Who still uses watches? Not me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like you said, there are clocks everywhere these days, who needs a watch?

    Personally, I consider my watchlessness a sort of status symbol, like not wearing a necktie: My time is my own, and I need not be overly concerned with the exact minutae, nor am I preoccupied with making some sort of fashion or status statement, with respect to my choice time-keeping gear. I have more important things to do.

    It is, of course, something of a luxury to be casually unconcerned with the passage of time, but then again, the time is always NOW, so who really needs a watch, anyway?

  76. Not by MarkusQ · · Score: 1
    A similar thing might well happen to analogue electronic engineers I suspect, with everything going digital these days. Why have a filter circuit composed of discrete components when you can program a DSP to do the same thing?

    Or maybe not.

    Definitely not. Underneath the digital abstraction that is tractable to think about there is are actual analogue circuits that have to be carefully designed so that the digital abstraction is a reasonable approximation of their behavior under normal conditions. Analogue engineers are still needed by the people who make digital electronics, and always will be unless they change substrates (to something like MEMS, for example).

    And to answer your question about the filter circuit, there are a variety of reasons why a DSP might not suit your purposes, including power consumption, real estate, operating frequency, etc.

    --MarkusQ

  77. I'm glad... by Rheingold · · Score: 1

    We're finally moving past being a species that still thinks digitial watches are a pretty neat idea.

    --
    Wil
    wiki
  78. Please,this is NOTHING compared to /.'s other sins by FallLine · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Just two days ago, the editors published this so-called "article" which claimed that the GAO did a study and "found" that patents are harming innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Not only was the article they linked to a fairly blatant re-republication of Democratic party spin, but the editors clearly did not even read the actual GAO report. You can see my comments that pointed it out largely fell on deaf ears (Hint: the GAO said nothing like what they claimed).

    This is hardly the first time I've seen slashdot do stuff like this. Given a choice between publishing what amounts of outright lies and distortions and a user (be it a lone person or even an organization) submitting articles that favor one particular news organization (particularly not an unreasonable one)... I'd certainly pick the latter. I frankly fail to see the problem with this if there is not a question of accuracy. If slashdot cannot find a more newsworthy article to publish through their usual means, why shouldn't a pro-active news organization help them and profit in the meantime?

  79. PreacherTom is not an astroturfer by FallLine · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So are you saying "No, not really: there is no such thing as astroturfing" or "No, not really: I know PreacherTom, and he's neither a paid shill or a figment of the imagination of a Business Week marketeer"? Because if he has a financial/business interest in the story he's submitting, that should be disclosed. As you say, an interesting story is still interesting even if hyped by a "crier", disclosure notwithstanding, right?
    Whatever you want to call it it is very different than what is popularly recognized as "astroturfing", i.e., creating a false impression of public sentiment (e.g., false product reviews, fake consumer action groups, etc). There is no real distortion of the truth going on here besides the fact that he isn't disclosing the alleged fact that he has a commercial interest in the magazine he links to. There are far greater problems on slashdot (such as outright reporting of biased facts, horrible ignorance, etc). For instance, just 2 days ago: read this

    What's more, the argument can be made (and probably should) that PreacherTom and those like him are doing Slashdot a favor by pointing out articles that are more interesting, more relevant, and more informative to the slashdot readers than what they themselves are able to contribute. Would it be better if slashdot readers simply remained ignorant of everything that businessweek et. al publish? I think not. Is there some fundamental problem with someone making money for performing a service that benefits the readers? Nay.
    1. Re:PreacherTom is not an astroturfer by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1
      . . . PreacherTom and those like him are doing Slashdot a favor by pointing out articles that are more interesting, more relevant, and more informative to the slashdot readers than what they themselves are able to contribute. Would it be better if slashdot readers simply remained ignorant of everything that businessweek et. al publish?

      Either we get ignorance of these interesting articles or ignorance of the submitter's interest in the story?. I believe that's what's called a "false dilemma". All I would ask for is disclosure. A paid WSJ submitter is up front about it, why not PreacherTom and Business Week? Would that be better? Aye.

      Anyway, back to the name. How about "shill"?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    2. Re:PreacherTom is not an astroturfer by FallLine · · Score: 1
      Either we get ignorance of these interesting articles or ignorance of the submitter's interest in the story?. I believe that's what's called a "false dilemma". All I would ask for is disclosure. A paid WSJ submitter is up front about it, why not PreacherTom and Business Week? Would that be better? Aye.
      Because I suspect that "his" submissions would not receive fair treatment. In other words, the editors would be far more likely to judge the submission based on something that has nothing to do with content of the submission.

      Why does PreacherTom's employment matter to the story? It has no bearing on the story. Why not just judge each submited article on the quality of the content submitted? If you truly believe in full-disclosure, then the remaining ~99% of submitters should also be required that they disclose their politics, political party, GPL-stance, etc. Most of the articles on this site come from a very leftist/anti-establishment point of view and yet I rarely ever see meaningful disclosure; this despite the fact that it certainly impacts the balance of what is being submitted.

      Anyway, back to the name. How about "shill"?
      This at least connotes that some kind of swindle is occurring. I, for one, do not believe that is a fair characterization. I believe that this service is somewhat valuable to slashdot and that it has far bigger fish to fry. Slashdot's attitude seems to be that there is no greater problem than someone having a commercial incentive to contribute honest journalism (capitalism, *gasp*), but that republishing outright lies and distortions from a political party and failing to correct them is just fine as long as it agrees with their personal biases.
  80. Blacksmiths?!? by Papatoast · · Score: 0

    Dude, there are tens of thousands of blacksmiths alive and well in the United States, not to mention the rest of the world, making tools, functional pieces, and VERY expensive art. Blacksmithing classes fill up fast.

    --
    We were somewhere around Barstow on the edge of the desert when the drugs began to take hold. - HST
  81. GO TO H3LL ASSH0LE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THE ASTROTURPHERS the SUX

  82. Re:When I was a khttp://vg.no/id in the early 60's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep. For TVs, radios, etc. repair is simply not worth it. There ARE people that buy broken LCDs and do component-level repair.. I think someone could make a living at it but doubt it's highly profitable. The surplus store I work at sells any working LCD for $100 minimum (I know a new one costs less, but apparently customers don't.. they whine when there's no LCDs and almost fight each other over a working LCD when it comes in.) Broken ones go for $20-40.. which sounds good for the buyer to fix for $1 of parts and markup to $100. But, the supply of bad LCDs is not steady and a large portion of his time involves doing the rounds to get LCDs to repair...

              Computers? Forget it. Let alone a NEW computer or card, used computers and cards are SO cheap.. prices where I work are $5 for most cards, and under $100 for P4s, $40 or less for P3s. So.. special DAC cards etc. probably are worth repairing, otherwise no. No OS, so software "repair" is still viable, but hardware? Not so much. Well, not THAT much for software stuff either.. I made a go at it, business has not been fast enough.. it's good "money on the side" to get $50 for an 1-2 hours, but not enough business for a primary job.

  83. Actually, they are not (just) watches by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    these are watches

    Expensive timepieces are not so much "watches" as they are a status symbol. Jewelry that tells time. In general, status item X can never, by definition, be inexpensive enough for everyone to have one.

    In this case, nobody needs a Rolex, and that's the point. Some people need more reliable watches than others, some people don't even need a watch. Some people who don't need a watch want a Rolex - that's marketing.

    Our economy produces all kinds of stuff one doesn't need, and on the way, provides jobs for all the people who make that stuff, sell it, ship it, etc.

    I'd much rather live in this society, not one that mandates that everyone be able to have the same watch, car, and suit. I think we've seen that before and it doesn't work out too well.

    There's all kinds of stuff available in our economy that I personally have no use for, but I appreciate that others do like it, and I don't begrudge anyone their stupidly expensive bling. Nor do I use other more mundane, but equally "useless" items like nail salons, dry cleaning or professional sports. But hey, there are plenty of people who do use those services, as well as buyers for caviar and diamonds. No skin off my nose.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  84. I haven't called a locksmith in years by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1
    I Am A Landlord, and I have not called a locksmith in years. The two most common reasons for a Landlord to call a locksmith: changing the locks when changing tenants, and breaking in for an eviction if the tenant has changed the locks.
    1. Changing the locks: I use a master/control-keyed system with exchangeable cylinders. I have my choice of changing the locks by playing "musical cylinders", or I can send cylinders to be rekeyed for $3.00 including the keys. What would you charge me for that service?
    2. Tenant has locked me out: I just break a window. Costs $15 to repair. How much would you charge me to let me in?
    Someday, all locks will be electronic, too. I wonder what locksmiths will do then?
    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  85. In fairness by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    The 48,000 Yen was probably a minimum repair cost. They just needed to make sure your watch wasn't broken to the point of costing more.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock