Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Predict Big Solar Cycle

An anonymous reader pointed us at a post on the Physorg blog, which discusses the possibility of an upcoming period of intense solar weather. We've discussed this before, but increasingly the evidence looks like 'Solar Cycle 24' (due to start in 2010 or so) is going to make life interesting here on earth. From the post: "Hathaway explains: 'When a gust of solar wind hits Earth's magnetic field, the impact causes the magnetic field to shake. If it shakes hard enough, we call it a geomagnetic storm.' In the extreme, these storms cause power outages and make compass needles swing in the wrong direction. Auroras are a beautiful side-effect. Hathaway and Wilson looked at records of geomagnetic activity stretching back almost 150 years and noticed something useful:. 'The amount of geomagnetic activity now tells us what the solar cycle is going to be like 6 to 8 years in the future,' says Hathaway."

131 comments

  1. Solar Cycle 24 by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmm, is that the cycle where we see one day of the Sun's life, and during that day the sun gets shot multiple times, saves the president, arrests the president later, gets beaten mercilessly, heals completely, and saves the girl, all in one day.. Or am I confusing this with something else...?

    TLF

    --
    I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    1. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're confusing it with the cycle where the sun changes weather patterns on earth and some people pretending to be scientists blame it all on you and demand that you live in a cave (or just die) and give them all political power (since they know best what everyone should do) in order to make up for your evil deeds, such as creating prosperity for everyone.

      But don't worry, I'm sure some idiot somewhere will cite these effects as "proof" that corporations control the world's climate. After all, all solar changes are obviously a result of man's interference in outer space.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    2. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by alienmole · · Score: 1

      You're close. Scientists have determined that a solar flare occurs every time Jack Bauer scratches his ass.

    3. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but if Chuck Norris simply sneezes the Solar Flare will be pushed back. It's just too bad Chuck Norris never gets sick and has no allergies. Jack Bauer, you win this round.

      TLF

      --
      I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    4. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 4, Funny

      So what you're telling me is to buy stock in a corporation, and probably one that produces sun tan lotion?

      TLF

      --
      I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    5. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by carney1979 · · Score: 1, Funny

      I just hope my ham radio hobby get's interesting again......

      David

    6. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

      Oh course you miserable bastard. Were all going to die because of you. Now go live in that cave (Which will hopefully flood when the ice caps melt).

      --
      You mad
    7. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by WilliamSChips · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You're getting it confused with the cycle where a science-fiction author makes ridiculous claims about environmentalists in a fiction book and the new Slashdot which stands for corporate imperialism eats it up like their SUVs eat up oil, and then accuse any government that does anything other than corporate subsidies, selling ourselves to China via the national debt, pork, or invading nations on claims of chemical and nuclear weapons when the only chemical weapons in Iraq are our white phosphorus of nannystatism which must be stopped in order to make government 'leaner' aka more corrupt. Maybe I should just do this, though.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    8. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is clear PROOF that corporations control the world's climate. You'd have to be an idiot not to see that all solar changes are obviously a result of man's interference in outer space.

    9. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      buy stock in a corporation, and probably one that produces sun tan lotion?

            And/or become a dermatologist or oncologist ;)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    10. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by can56 · · Score: 1

      In my former life, I worked in research (magnetotellurics) regarding natural EM fields, which employs two sources: lightning (high frequency - 1 Hz and up), and solar effects (very low frequency - 1 Hz and way down). One thing I never figured out is why the solar cycle is ~11 years. Anyone care to hit me with a clue bat?

    11. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by Namlak · · Score: 1

      Hmm, is that the cycle where we see one day of the Sun's life, and during that day the sun gets shot multiple times, saves the president, arrests the president later, gets beaten mercilessly, heals completely, and saves the girl, all in one day.. Or am I confusing this with something else...?

      No, this solar cycle is the one with three wheels.

    12. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Solar Cycle 24 actually starts at solar minimum, which is right about now. The cycle, which is about 11 years long, will peak in about 5 or so years from now, when there will be the most activity on the sun. Although, major flares and CME's can happen anytime, as witnessed by the large flare earlier this month during solar minimum.

      Another interesting factoid is that the magnetic field of the sun flips its polarity every eleven years around solar maximum, where the north pole of the sun becomes the south pole, and so on.

      -rv

    13. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Or hemroid cream.
      Bound to be alot of people that get this stuff confused.
      Your call.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    14. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who doesn't get the point of posting as a coward?

      Yes

    15. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by l33t_f33t · · Score: 1

      dermatologist, isn't that Greek for Fake Doctor?

    16. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by cbacba · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wrongo

      Solar cycle 24 is starting now, it will peak a little around 2010 or 2012.

      It's more likely time to sell stock in suntan oil companies. The ozone hole is likely to decrease substantially (somewhat depending on mt aribus' outgassing activities). It's possible the hole might decrease to the lowest amount it's been measured at due to the expectations of this cycle's strength. Unfortunately, it very possible that the envirowhackos will have a field day on global warming as this cycle strengthens due to interactions between the increased magnetic activies, the cosmic ray backgrounds and the formation of cloud cover - permitting the slight rise of temperatures due to the decrease in cloud formation we will probably get due to the decrease in cosmic ray impacts due to the increase in magnetic field activities. Also, we can expect more areas to have drought conditions although at present we are still getting lots of rain due in part to the fact that we are flat out at the minimum between cycles 23 and 24.

      Don't expect the whackos to know or admit the above because it doesn't promote their political agenda based on the supposed man created global warming.

    17. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      OT: The point of posting as AC is that it allows you to say what you think/feel without a penalty. Saying something bad about apple will get you a smackdown which casts you into the depths of -1 ness for some time. The same goes for most other anti-group think posts. I've had to climb out of the -1 abyss a few times, and it's not exactly fun. While you don't get as much recognition for a 0 mod, it's still better than posting at -1.

    18. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

      ehh, good times all around.

      --
      You mad
    19. Re:Solar Cycle 24 by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1
      I agree. It sure is fun to talk to Russia on 10m running 25W ssb mobile. I did just that routinely during the solar max in '89 and '90. I'm hoping for some sweet 6m propagation this cycle, too.

      I'm k4det, btw. 73!

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  2. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are now in the solar minimum and we just got hit by an X6 flare. It should be interesting to see what it looks like when the Sun is at a maximum.

    1. Re:Great by jonfr · · Score: 1

      There was a X9 few days before the X6 one. It didn't hit the Earth directly, becose the sunspot was on the eastern limb of the sun at the time. We got lucky.

    2. Re:Great by dbolger · · Score: 1

      Out of interest, how do they define an "eastern" side of the sun?

    3. Re:Great by Namlak · · Score: 1

      Out of interest, how do they define an "eastern" side of the sun?

      It's driectly opposite the "Western" side?

    4. Re:Great by Joebert · · Score: 1

      It's the one directly across from the Western side, to the left of the Northern side & to the right of the Southern side.

      You may be thinking of stories, which only have two sides. Suns have four.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    5. Re:Great by Aerovoid · · Score: 1

      I'm not 100% sure on this, but I think they just define the sides (North, East, South and West) relative to Earth. So if there is some activity on the surface of the Sun that's more on the right side of it (from our perspective) one can just call that the East side.

  3. H-alpha filters by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know many in the amateur astronomy community are gearing up for this cycle, and are saving their pennies for H-alpha filters & telescopes.

  4. And now My prediction: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Al Gore blames the intense solar storm on global warming.

    1. Re:And now My prediction: by No2Gates · · Score: 1

      I blame solar storms on Al Gore.

      --
      Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
    2. Re:And now My prediction: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Overseer Hawkins will blame this on the heathens that do not act according to His laws.... beware....

      http://www.yisraylhawkins.com/

    3. Re:And now My prediction: by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Damn, with the talk of wackey compasses & whatnot, I was considering blaming Al Gore on Solar Storms.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    4. Re:And now My prediction: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I blame Fox News for the increasing number of ignorant Americans.

    5. Re:And now My prediction: by bhiestand · · Score: 1, Funny

      I blame Fox News for the increasing number of ignorant Americans. I blame the increasing number of ignorant Americans for Fox News.
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    6. Re:And now My prediction: by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      I blame Fox News for the increasing number of ignorant moderators, pushing their neocom's agenda by modding as troll everything they feel threatening to their rather narrow vision of the world.

      --
      Your ad could be here!
  5. Wondering... by Darundal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...if anyone more knowledgable about the subject for me could tell me;

    A: What areas of the Earth are likely to be most and least affected
    B: How bad are the effects supposed to be
    C: What are some examples (links to articles or research) of previous effects that may be widely known (other than the Aurora)

    Thanks

    1. Re:Wondering... by jonfr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Check out NOAA webpage about this. The most affect areas are going to be the sunlid areas of the planet. But see more here, http://www.sec.noaa.gov/NOAAscales/index.html

    2. Re:Wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) The side facing the sun will be most affected. The dark side will be the least affected. Don't take a space vacation unless you have a hankering for cancer.

      b) Hard to say for sure... Some older sattelites might be fucked. Most ones built in the last 10 years or so should be unaffected (knock on wood).

      c) The last solar cycle of this magnitude was estimated to be around 6 million years ago. This coincides with a sudden increase in specie diversity (possibly caused by genetic mutations?)

    3. Re:Wondering... by Darlantan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, the poles tend to see a lot of magnetic activity, for obvious reasons. Given this, I'd say that if you want the least effects, the equatorial regions are where to be.

      Having said that, I'd like to point out that (due to the scale of these things) they're global events. If a big flare heads our way, it could cause global disruptions. A big flare could effectively disrupt global radio communications, as well as wipe out multiple sattelites. Power grid hits are also a possibility.

      If you are thinking about heading for greener pastures to avoid this thing, my advice to you is not to bother. If you're REALLY worried, get some power filtering equipment/UPSes and a backup generator.

      If you aren't worried...well, I have it on good authority that (if the weather is right) being out on the water during these events can be very spectacular. I had a relative who was out on one of the great lakes during calm weather, and according to him the aurora was spectacular. The smooth water reflected the lights overhead. Personally, I plan on heading north to see the show.

      --
      Fill in your four or five-letter word of wisdom here _ _ _ _ _.
    4. Re:Wondering... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      You would be safest in a deep cave, but when all else fails, your Mom's basement will do too... ;)

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    5. Re:Wondering... by Snorpus · · Score: 1
      Just in time for all those thousands of new hams who were waiting for the Morse requirement to be dropped. Things should be hopping on 6 and 2 meters. Better start digging the foundation for that 100 ft tower tomorrow.

    6. Re:Wondering... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      What are some examples (links to articles or research) of previous effects that may be widely known (other than the Aurora)

      This one makes you think a bit

      http://www.centerfirstamericans.com/mt.php?a=36&h= firestone

      Specifically:
      "The enormous energy released by the catastrophe at 12,500 yr B.P. could have heated the atmosphere to over 1000C over Michigan, and the neutron flux at more northern locations would have melted considerable glacial ice. Radiation effects on plants and animals exposed to the cosmic rays would have been lethal, comparable to being irradiated in a 5-megawatt reactor more than 100 seconds."

            Although they're not sure what caused the evidence they've found.

            If there was a really huge solar flare, probably your best bet is to be lucky enough to be on the night side of the planet when it happens.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:Wondering... by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Funny

      The most affect areas are going to be the sunlit areas of the planet.

            Well DUH! Thank you, Captain Obvious!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    8. Re:Wondering... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      So, no need to take any action. Check.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    9. Re:Wondering... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      those in the attic of mom's garage with roof mounted TV antenna will wish to exercise special caution

    10. Re:Wondering... by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that Michigan existed that long ago.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  6. Nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cycles huh? Is this part of why they call it Mother nature?

  7. Anything to do with the bible? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe this 'armageddon' is not man made but the sun does it, after all the Egyptians called their Sun God RA.

    And technically, the sun does provide all energy and gravity for us to live off.

    So come 2012 the rapture time, high intense radiation, mutants of all species will be made, super humans maybe with special powers.

    Maybe half or most of the population will die and not make it past the 'enhancement' but what ever does make it will
    be uber next gen upgraded like in mutantX.

    Are any scientists experimenting with fast evolution using radiation/cosmic rays on small animals/flies?

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:Anything to do with the bible? by elysiuan · · Score: 1

      > And technically, the sun does provide all energy and gravity for us to live off.

      Energy sure.

      But, a bit pendantically, without the Earth's own gravity we would have a much harder time walking about!

    2. Re:Anything to do with the bible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the Egyptians called their Sun God RA.

      And he sure is a fun god.
    3. Re:Anything to do with the bible? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Ridiculous? Yes.
      Silly? Yes.
      Off Topic? Most likely.
      Funny? A lame attempt, but some may consider it funny.
      Insightful? No.
      Interesting? In an "Oh god that is so lame" sort of way, yes, I suppose.

      But it is NOT flamebait. If you MUST mod down a post such as this rather than putting mod points to better use modding up a better post elsewhere, at least moderate it correctly. That post is in no way flamebait nor is it a troll.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    4. Re:Anything to do with the bible? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      And he sure is a fun god.

            Yep, pretty much all the sun god worshippers all over the world were into this "human sacrifice" thing... why don't we go back to sun worship?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  8. Damn them solarians! by whoop · · Score: 0, Troll

    So, obviously our culture has diseased the innocent solarian people. Now they are causing their own homeland to have solar warming.

    When will we learn from Algore??

    And it's been scientifically proven by consensus that the above is true. The only ones who doubt it are right-wing, gun-toting religious wackos who want corporations to make money and kill Bambi. Don't fall for their hype.

    1. Re:Damn them solarians! by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      So, obviously our culture has diseased the innocent solarian people.
      Those damned hermaphrodite Solarians are anything but innocent. Bastards nuked us!

    2. Re:Damn them solarians! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      How about you actually learn what's happening instead of thinking Crichton isn't fiction?

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:Damn them solarians! by DevelopersDevelopers · · Score: 4, Funny

      Calm down. It may look like Slashdot doesn't care about the plight of the Solarians right now, but I swear we'll pledge our support just as soon as the Sun releases them under the GPL.

    4. Re:Damn them solarians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so glad that I'm not the only one that saw an Asimov reference there...

    5. Re:Damn them solarians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the lessons I had hoped the American public would have learned from the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq was to question the media (and authority) when they were told of an impending crisis (in particular one with political implications) ...

      What we see today is that everyone has gone from believing that WMDs exist in Iraq because George Bush says they do to everyone believing that Man Made Global warming exists because Al Gore says so ...

      Blindly follow the media everyone ...

    6. Re:Damn them solarians! by Dunbal · · Score: 0

      Dont you know? Its George Bush's fault

            You know, I think GWB might actually succeed in surpassing Hoover on the infamy scale... it probably IS his fault /sarcasm

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:Damn them solarians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what exactly is wrong with hermaphrodites? I mean, other than that the term to describe intersexed folks is considered to be outdated.

    8. Re:Damn them solarians! by k1e0x · · Score: 0

      Troll rated? This is satirical.

      (I hate /. nobody has a sense of humor)

      --
      Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
    9. Re:Damn them solarians! by k1e0x · · Score: 0

      I support this but, Can you fix your statement however?

      Slashdot does not have to provide people freedom of speech and you have no "right" to use there services at all. You have no right to use Slashdots property, they allow you to, they grant you a privilege of posting that they may rightfully take away any time they choose.

      Again I support your idea for fair comments, so don't let it bother you that you got it wrong, this type of misunderstanding is all too common in publicly educated America.. Please view the online videos of Michael Badnarik's Constitution Class, to learn what a right is and what is a privdlage.

      --
      Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
  9. I guess we'll be needing these then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy yours today!

  10. Inconstant Moon type interesting by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Interesting
    How interesting? Inconstant Moon type interesting? I heard we were going to have a big Atlantic Ocean hurricane season as well. I'm still waiting.

    My point is, such forecasts of such still poorly understood phenomena still seem to go wrong much more often than they go right. And then when someone does happen to hit it right all I seem to hear is, "See, we knew all along. Now listen to us always!"

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Inconstant Moon type interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Not even close. I've been in the space weather business for over 30 years. This article is highly premature, one might even say inflamatory (pun maybe intended), and predictions for the next solar cycle are all over the map at this point. This is still an art form on the level of reading chicken entrails (NASA flacks' opinions aside), and I tend to believe the folks who think we'll see either a routine or even low cycle this next time around. But, I'm not going to bet money on it, either.

      The official forecast is going to be made by the NOAA Space Environment Center (or whatever they're calling themselves this week) and won't be out for at least several months. They are working with NASA and all other research organizations to sort out the official forecast. I wish them luck, because from what I hear the spread between various forecasts is larger than it has ever been.

    2. Re:Inconstant Moon type interesting by Jerf · · Score: 1

      It's even worse than that. For any given prediction, there's probably somebody making it. For instance, this guy predicts that global warming will cause an ice age. I'm not saying that's right or wrong; my point is that combined with the traditional predictions about what global warming will do, the end result is that the entire gamut is covered; no matter what, somebody gets to be right.

      The problem is that in our wonderfully complex world, being right about an event doesn't particularly imply that you are right about the causation. Certainly, all else being equal I'd say the person who is correct would seem to be more likely to be correct, but it's far, far from a guarantee.

    3. Re:Inconstant Moon type interesting by WilliamCotton · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between the data sets used to calculate the patterns seen in the solar cycle compared to the data sets used to calculated the hurricane trends or global temperatures. The sun's activity follows a rather predictable 11-year cycle. If you read the article and look at the graph of the Solar Cycles vs. Geomagnetic Activity, you'll see that the correlation is hard to deny. From the article: "Cross correlating sunspot number vs. IHV, they found that the IHV predicts the amplitude of the solar cycle 6-plus years in advance with a 94% correlation coefficient." This would also suggest that there is a 94% chance that you didn't read the article.

      --
      I've always prefered a command line interface. GUIs are such a cursory way to interact with a computer.
    4. Re:Inconstant Moon type interesting by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      I heard we were going to have a big Atlantic Ocean hurricane season as well. I'm still waiting.

      Ireland spent about six weeks recently under the worst weather conditions seen in decades, high winds, incessant rain, flooding, the works. I'd call that a hurricane, and I know I've never seen anything like it in my life.

  11. TimeTravel tag? by stevenm86 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So does this mean we can predict solar flares and use them to travel to the past or the future?

    1. Re:TimeTravel tag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if your first destination is 1969. Otherwise you'll never discover the phenomenon in the first place.

    2. Re:TimeTravel tag? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      So does this mean we can predict solar flares and use them to travel to the past or the future?

      And risk being flung into a distant galaxy inhabited by cranky muppets? No frelling way!

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  12. Al Gore by nurb432 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Will just go back on Oprah claim its people that are causing it and we need to act now.

    Oh, and sell more books.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  13. We call it 'astrology'. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But seriously, there's a guy in New Zealand who publishes weather predictions based upon lunar cycles. He has a loyal following, even though 99% of the time he's wrong. On the rare occasion he gets it right (either by chance, or by making the same predictions as genuine meteorologists) his flock proclaim his method to be completely reliable and accurate. Strangely enough, when he's wrong, they either remain silent, or claim he was right by applying highly selective interpretations of his predictions and the actual weather.

    Just as 'astrologers' concoct incredibly vague predictions, such as "Something interesting may occur to somebody or something at some time in the future. Or not", and then triumphantly announce success when something does or doesn't happen. Yet far more people trust astrologers than scientists. I guess that explains a whole lot about the completely fucked-up mess that is the human species.

    1. Re:We call it 'astrology'. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      He has a loyal following, even though 99% of the time he's wrong.

            Typical of most religions.

      Yet far more people trust astrologers than scientists.

            That doesn't mean they're right. But the swindlers who are after a buck know that if you dazzle people enough, they will gladly part with their money. Everyone loves a show. Science, on the other hand, doesn't give a damn what people THINK. Which is why there's not much of a "following", except from rational people. Back to the topic - statistics are an excellent guide for prediction, yet they fail when you try to apply them to a specific case. Your coin has a 50-50 chance of falling heads or tails, but no one can accurately predict what side will fall face up on the NEXT toss. I can only say that, after a million or so tosses, there will be roughly the same amount in the heads and tails column.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:We call it 'astrology'. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That doesn't mean they're right.


      No, it doesn't, and of course I wasn't suggesting they were.

      ...swindlers who are after a buck...


      The 'Moon Man' is a huckster. I think he knows as well as anybody that his method is completely bogus as far as weather forecasting is concerned, but as a money-spinner it's absolutely first class. He sells a lot of books.
  14. Sounds.... by LordPhantom · · Score: 1

    ...like the Sun has PMS.

    1. Re:Sounds.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is PMS? Is it some alien weapon they use to wipeout man?

  15. As accurate as the hurricane season prediction? by Jerry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This year was supposed to have several MAJOR hurricanes, worse than ever before, because of "Global Warming".
    IIRC, 11 were predicted. Zero appeared.

    I suspect this Solar catastrophe prediction will be just as accurate.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    1. Re:As accurate as the hurricane season prediction? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I hope it's accurate because we rarely ever get to see aurora from southern New England. I've seen it only once. :(

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    2. Re:As accurate as the hurricane season prediction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This year was supposed to have several MAJOR hurricanes, worse than ever before, because of "Global Warming".
      IIRC, 11 were predicted. Zero appeared.

      I suspect this Solar catastrophe prediction will be just as accurate


      In spite of how the media blamed global warming for the prediction the report itself had this to say:

      The global warming arguments have been given much attention by many media references to recent papers claiming to show such a linkage. Despite the global warming of the sea surface of about 0.4C that has taken place over the last two decades, global numbers of hurricanes and their intensity have not shown increases over the past twenty years (Klotzbach 2006). In addition, we have no valid physical theory as to why small changes of global average sea surface temperature (SST) should bring about increases in Atlantic basin hurricane activity. In the past century, Atlantic basin hurricane activity has been above-average both when global SST has been increasing (from the middle 1920s through the middle 1940s) and when global SST has been decreasing (from the middle 1940s through the middle 1960s).

      In other words, there was no link to Hurricanes and global warming yet every news report claimed that the record hurricanes were going to be caused by global warming ...

      People need to start questioning the media

    3. Re:As accurate as the hurricane season prediction? by jd · · Score: 1
      IIRC, none landed. Very different thing. Plenty of hurricanes out to sea, this year, though the late El Nino screwed up the original forecast. The oceans are warming quite nicely - twice the originally forecast rate, I believe, with truly massive die-offs in the zooplankton globally and an extremely stable and rapidly-growing dead zone off the Oregon coast. Forecasts for global climate change have been revised sharply now-wards, as a result of more recent studies on ocean currents and ocean temperatures.


      As for comparing a weather forecast with a stellar forecast, please bear in mind that the sun is ludicrously simple and trivial, compared to the complexities of weather. Remember our dear friend the Butterfly Effect? No? Pray, let me remind you of the consequences of living in a system that is sensitive to initial conditions, which is so variable between two points as to be essentially fractal, and where we can't even determine all the inputs and can barely measure the ones we know of. In comparison, a ball of hydrogen plasma that is collapsing in on itself and has very limited internal structure is a piece of cake to simulate. Astronomers have also been around a lot longer than Southern US meteorologists. True, only by a couple orders of magnitude, and I'm sure that the natives in Florida would have been happy to pass their observations on to the European colonists of the late 1700s, if anyone amongst them had thought the climate worth paying attention to. (Well, I can't expect things like that to change quickly.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:As accurate as the hurricane season prediction? by whoop · · Score: 1

      Don't you understand the gravity of the situation?? Global Warming is adapting it's behavior. It now has the power to NOT have hurricanes!! This is gravely disturbing to conspiracy theory nuts everywhere! I can just imagine the possibilities it will lead to.

    5. Re:As accurate as the hurricane season prediction? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Isn't about time for a War on Global Warming?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    6. Re:As accurate as the hurricane season prediction? by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      So many big words, so little knowledge.

    7. Re:As accurate as the hurricane season prediction? by Locarius · · Score: 1

      Apparently you havn't been paying attention to the Philippines. Remember, this is GLOBAL warming, not Americas warming.

  16. Scientists Predict Big Solar Cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I for one think its about time we get our hands on larger dual energy personal vehicules.

    That will tech those pesky OPEPs type not to mess with us energy wasting type.

  17. Obligatory by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    It may look like Slashdot doesn't care about the plight of the Solarians right now, but I swear we'll pledge our support

    I for one welcome our new Solarian overlords!

    Bet you didn't see THAT one coming, did ya? ;)

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Obligatory by chawly · · Score: 1

      DID TOO !

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SOLARIS 11 COMING OUT? SOON?

  18. Solar cycles and geomagnetic activity by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    It is all explained here.

    Their forecast is based on historical records of geomagnetic storms. Hathaway explains: "When a gust of solar wind hits Earth's magnetic field, the impact causes the magnetic field to shake. If it shakes hard enough, we call it a geomagnetic storm." In the extreme, these storms cause power outages and make compass needles swing in the wrong direction. Auroras are a beautiful side-effect. Hathaway and Wilson looked at records of geomagnetic activity stretching back almost 150 years and noticed something useful:. "The amount of geomagnetic activity now tells us what the solar cycle is going to be like 6 to 8 years in the future," says Hathaway.

  19. Just another of many conflicting predictions by LM741N · · Score: 1

    Spaceweather.com has linked to a number of predictions over the last year or so regarding the next solar cycle. What is left out is that no evidence has ever been given showing showing that any method has proven to be accurate in the past. I challenge anyone to find such data.

  20. This is nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...let me know when the said scientists can predict my girlfriend's cycles.

  21. DX! by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Looks like 10 meters will be open for DX in a few years. Maybe even
    some 'crossing the pond' on 6 meters too!

    1. Re:DX! by Ramadog · · Score: 1
      Why not check out 10m now for the sporadic E? There has been plently of E layer propation around Australia. I have been watching http://propnet.org/ which shows there has been some good E layer propagation around North America as well.

      10 is not as dead as a lot of people seem to think. It also makes a great local band.

  22. Cool... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...gotta start saving for that H-alpha telescope. Believe it or not, for about $500 you can buy a telescope that allows you to view the sun through a filter with a bandwidth of less than .1 nm. This gives you an idea of what you can see with it.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  23. Re:DX! - bring it on by GomezAdams · · Score: 1

    As an amateur radio operator I welcome our DX Overlords. Actually I plan to be one - DXCC - WAZ - 5BWAS on QRP. HI HI.

    --
    Too lazy to create a sig...
  24. Ham radio and cycle 24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The amateur radio community (Yes, we're still here) is waiting with baited traps for the "Peak of '24". Ya see, its only in the cycle peaks when amateur radio becomes too much fun. Times like now, in the valley of solar near-death, we have to fight to maintain any contact with our buddies. Remember when Cb radios would skip from Alaska to Mexico? That was a solar maximum, and a weak one at that. Imagine what you could do with a legal kilowatt of power and a well engineered antenna! I know some of the old timers who are literally praying for a few more years before they go "silent key" in order to reap the harvest of contacts that is predicted. If you wish to experience the true camaraderie of thousands of geek friends and associates, during what may be the most interesting solar cycle yet, start studying for that ham ticket. We've made it even easier than ever before. See ya down the log.

    1. Re:Ham radio and cycle 24 by dangitman · · Score: 1

      I've always wanted to share knock-knock jokes in Morse code. This may be the perfect opportunity.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    2. Re:Ham radio and cycle 24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dah-di-dah Dah-dit Dah-dah-dah Dah-di-dah-dit Dah-di-dah, Dah-di-dah Dah-dit Dah-dah-dah Dah-di-dah-dit Dah-di-dah

      Did you know the lameness filter doesn't like morse code? There is a postercomment compression filter that blocks comments like the text above. Fortunately you can add some randome text to get around the problem.

    3. Re:Ham radio and cycle 24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dit-dah-dah di-di-di-dit dah-dah-dah di-di-dit dah di-di-di-dit dit di-dah di-dah-dit dit

    4. Re:Ham radio and cycle 24 by dangitman · · Score: 1

      dit-dit-dit-dit dit-dah dah-dah.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    5. Re:Ham radio and cycle 24 by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      As someone who cannot read Morse-code, the first thing that came to mind reading your post was the song "Da doo doo doo. Da dah dah dah" by The Police. ;-D

    6. Re:Ham radio and cycle 24 by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Doo wah diddy diddy dah-dit-dit dit-dit-dah dah-dah dah-dit-dit dit-dit dah-dit-dit dah-dit-dit dah-dit-dah-dah dah-dit-dit dit dit

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    7. Re:Ham radio and cycle 24 by nblender · · Score: 1

      whoa, dude. Tone it down a bit. That's a bit too geeky for this site ....

  25. Why does it have to be big? by dangitman · · Score: 1

    If you're going to make a solar powered bicycle, why not just make it normal sized?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  26. It's the one on the left by thegnu · · Score: 1

    Unless you're in China or Australia or New Zealand. Then it's the one on the right.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  27. Bitchy, bitchy, bitch by kitzilla · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, great ... the sun has a big cycle on the way. No doubt it will be bitchy and irritable beforehand. Like we need that.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  28. kinda here by zogger · · Score: 2, Informative

    A quick google tells me the sun reverses magnetic field every 22 years. 11 is in the middle, guess that is why but not fully. So we shift that question upstream one notch as to the "why?" part. source : http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/sun/activit y/solar_cycle.html

    I also just found out this NASA solar division lost funding

    http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/SunspotCycle.sht ml

  29. December 21st, 2012 by SilverwoodUG · · Score: 3, Funny

    6 to 8 years in the future?
    It doesn't land on December 21st, 2012 does it?
    End of the Maya Calendar

    1. Re:December 21st, 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like I'm gonna trust a calendar that looks like an IP address...

  30. Be careful about PhysOrg.com by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Be careful about PhysOrg.com: The web site carries "press releases", which are advertisements disguised as articles. (In the linked article, brand-name battery makers don't want people to buy the much less expensive but otherwise identical generic batteries, apparently. Also, battery makers want people to think it is normal to spend a lot of money on batteries.)

    1. Re:Be careful about PhysOrg.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your conclusions are lovely and fragrant, like a rose, freshly picked from a sanitation plant.

    2. Re:Be careful about PhysOrg.com by siLoOfMisfortune · · Score: 0

      Energizer: Our profits keep growing and growing and growing and growing.

      --
      "Okay, who put a "stop payment" on my reality check?"
  31. Curse You George Bush! by Columcille · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    If Bush had only gotten his environmental policies right, things like this wouldn't be happening. Surely this has to be a human-induced event like global warming, it cannot possibly be a natural phenomenon!

    --
    I love my sig.
  32. Donny, you're out of your element. by heinousjay · · Score: 1

    The hermaphrodite is not the issue here.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    1. Re:Donny, you're out of your element. by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      There have been many sci-fi Solarians, but only one group nuked us and became hermaphroditic (due to their hatred of human contact) later on. Asimov all the way!

  33. Back in 1990... by pixelguru · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I remember the last big solar event back in 1990 - cable TV had just become available at my parents' rural house that summer, but we enjoyed the first several months of HBO with fuzzy pink fringe and lots of static due to all the solar interference. Anything was better than our old aerial reception though, so we lived with a pink Crypt Keeper and Dream On.

    In the fall, I went back to school in western NY state (Alfred University, near the NY/PA border), and on many nights in December, we could see vivid Auroras even over the campus light polution. At the time, I didn't think it was possible for them to be visible at such a lattitude. If the next maximum ends up being as strong as predicted, we might even see them farther south.

    1. Re:Back in 1990... by john_uy · · Score: 1

      i would love to see the aurora reach the lower latitude countries. :)

      --
      Live your life each day as if it was your last.
  34. Anger alert. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AC has an anger problem.

  35. just picking on the comment with the summary by Ramadog · · Score: 1

    Just to be picky, the comment with the summary says the solar cycle is due to start in 2010 or so. In the first paragraph of the article it says Solar cycle 24, due to peak in 2010 or 2011.

  36. December 14th by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 2, Informative

    I enjoyed the aurora last week. They were so intense, they were bright even to the south of me. Photos at the link in my signature if you're curious. I've animated them too.

  37. wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    everyone predicted this would be a quiet season.

    yer an idiot.

    1. Re:wrong by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      everyone predicted this would be a quiet season.

      Everyone?

      For the 2006 north Atlantic hurricane season, NOAA is predicting 13 to 16 named storms, with eight to 10 becoming hurricanes, of which four to six could become 'major' hurricanes of Category 3 strength or higher

      http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2006/s2634.htm

      Nine named storms and five hurricanes formed this season, and just two of the hurricanes were considered major. That is considered a near-normal season -- and well short of the rough season government scientists had forecast.

      I do remember several news outlets taking this story and running it as "Global Warming predicted to cause Busy Hurican season." The resulting below normal season was news on (pretty much) every major news site and is being used by many to demonstrate that political motivations (not science) are driving the global warming debate.

  38. Carrington Event 1859 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 1859 a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) was observed by Richard Carrington
    a British Astronomer. Aurora was observed in Havana and transcontinental telegraph
    lines burst into flames...

    If one of a similar intensity were to hit us today, it would might
    burn out electrical systems hemisphere wide. Our power grids and
    transistor based control system could fail.

    I would be curious if someone with a statistics background could give
    some rough estimate as to the frequency of a CME hitting earth, based upon
    the fact that the last such an event (which would severly disrupt our civilization)
    happened only 147 years ago.

    http://csem.engin.umich.edu/muri/MURIreport2003.pd f

    http://www.agu.org/cgi-bin/SFgate/SFgate?&listenv= table&multiple=1&range=1&directget=1&application=s m04&database=%2Fdata%2Fepubs%2Fwais%2Findexes%2Fsm 04%2Fsm04&maxhits=200&=%22SH51B%22

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronal_mass_ejection

    http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AdSpR..38..232S

  39. an example of "things" out of mans control by Desirat · · Score: 1

    This new together with the fact that the magnetic field of the mother ship Gaya (Earth herself) are getting weaker and progressively reversing its magnetic poles, we will be served with all we wanted: Energy, pure and RAW! Somehow Carl Sagan shared same point of view of the Mayan culture... in the Carl Sagan Cosmos documentary series (and book), he managed to represent the Eras of the universe as a mosaic and we are on the edge of this universal Era! Mayan cultures build the same mosaic but in the form of the pyramids, as each platform of them, were an Era for the universe and the very top are the last Era. Imagining this planet as a living being, surrounded by forces that are calculated with powers of 10, together with the our global ignorance towards nature, we are not in due time get the true revelations! And man said "let there be light" and he was [blessed?] by light, heat, magnetism, gravity and all the energies of the universe. (in Animatrix) Its something bigger than lives! Due to the speed of the light being superior to the speed of the sound, some people seem intelligent until we hear them!

  40. End of the world, actually by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't believe no one has mentioned this, but that correlates neatly with the end of the Mayan long count calendar, signalling the end of the fifth age and mankind (according to some sources, also a new beginning of some sort), and the start of the sixth. Heres an excerpt from the article:

    The end of the 13th b'ak'tun is conjectured to have been of great significance to the Maya, but does not necessarily mark the end of the world according to their beliefs, but a new beginning or time of re-birth. According to the Popol Vuh, a book compiling details of creation accounts known to the Quiché Maya of the colonial-era highlands, we are living in the fifth world. The Popol Vuh describes the first four creations that the gods failed in making and the creation of the successful fifth world where men were placed. The Maya believed that the fifth world would end in catastrophe and the sixth and final world would be created that would signal the end of mankind.

    The last creation ended on a long count of 13.0.0.0.0. Another 13.0.0.0.0 will occur on December 21, 2012, and it has been discussed in many New Age articles and books that this will be the end of this creation, the next pole shift or something else entirely.


    I don't know if thats the coolest thing I've ever seen, or the creepiest.

  41. Worldwide DX at 6 meters! by EdlinUser · · Score: 1

    That was on the QST cover during a previous peak about 40 years ago.

  42. Re:December 21st, 2012 - from history by barryvoeten · · Score: 1

    No, its not that funny. At the calculated date, dec 21 2012, the cosmos will have the same constellation as at the end of the previous era, after the large ice age which ended 10.000 bC.
    It was the time when the Sfinx was built, before the times of the large rainfalls, 9000-8000 years ago,

    Now we don't really know what is the cause of galactic sorms, do we?

    The laughed-at Mayan calendar is in fact more accurate than ours. Why laugh? Ignorance?

    The end of the Mayan calendar is not the end of the world, it's the end of * this * world. Previous worlds have existed, ended by disasters such as Noah's flood. Us humans are only 150.000 years on this planet and we;ve gone through several ice-ages.

    In our case, our solar system will line up with "Hunab-Ku", the center of the Universe, as they refer to it. See it as an electromagnetic axis. The planet will cross the N-S border by 2012.
    If the polar axis flips, this may cause vulcanoes to erupt, clouds to darken the sky, the temperature to drop.

    Whatever Nasa science will tell us, if it is this alarming, it will only make the predictions of the Mayans more reliable. Get ready. Don't panic. Don't laugh,.get informed.

  43. Magnetic Polarity Switch? by ndrw · · Score: 1

    Any physicists out there want to comment on whether or not this could contribute to the global magnetic polarity switch everyone seems to think will happen soon?