Google search results directly affect business, and on a frighteningly large scale. Who's to say whether a site's HTML is "deceptive"? It's a subjective decision, and one that presents a conflict of interest to Google.
If Google's ranking system can be fooled by hidden text, is that BMW's fault? I say it should be up to Google to come up with accurate ranks, NOT reset any site that doesn't jive with their system
Years ago I used to do just that at the public library (I live near Minneapolis, MN). My family had a black and white Macintosh Classic computer. My dad would drive us to one of the larger libraries in the area and we'd check out games and take them home for a week. One such game was called "Uninvited". It was like a text adventure game but with graphics and limited mouse interaction. I loved it!
Of course, these games came on 3.5" disks and after a few years my dad told me that the library didn't have them any more because of something called "viruses".
Sure, complete censoring is worse than a little sensoring. The flaw in your logic is who is being immoral. In the case of complete censoring, it's CHINA's wrongdoing, not Google's. Google would still be an upstanding company if they refused to implement some evil system on behalf of China's demands.
It's not a matter of who's gonna cave. It's a matter of simply doing what's right. Period.
I guess Standby is a leftover from old TV's that took time to warm up - that's pretty much gone now & I imagine non existant with flat screen TV's
I assume you mean flat panel and not flat screen. There are plenty of flat screens (CRTs and DLPs) that take a while to warm up. I'd say my 50" Samsung DLP takes six seconds to turn on the bulb, spin up the color wheel and show the picture.
The way I read it, they're pushing recommendations, not songs. That would be great. But my hangup here is that a song takes a while to transfer over WIFI. It's not like you can pass someone on the street and accept their song recommendation in time to get the whole file. Even a car passing you on the highway might not be next to you long enough.
Yeah, the more I read, the more low-tech this actually sounds!
The quiet Mach 6 wind tunnel is not the first of its kind. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration previously operated a wind tunnel capable of similar performance, but that wind tunnel is not currently in operation.
The tunnel is relatively inexpensive to operate because each "run" is only about eight seconds. First, air is pumped out of a large tank that is connected to one end of the wind tunnel, creating a vacuum inside the tank. Then a valve is opened between the tank and the wind tunnel, sucking a burst of air through the wind tunnel at high velocity.
You're going to learn the same programming concepts in either course? Then at the risk of sounding a bit cynical, pick the one you would rather have on your resume. That's really the only difference here.
Don't forget the days when people didn't know that "dot com" meant a webpage. In the 90's, advertisements were much more detailed about what an address meant. As years went by, the address got shortened more and more:
0. AOL keyword "whatever" 1. Open your web browser and enter "http://www.whatever.com" 2. "http://www.whatever.com" 3. "www.whatever.com" 4. "whatever.com"
My point being, with no TLD extension, people would just back up a step and say:
Sheesh. My point was that their logic is flawed. No matter how dense the bacteria, the printed resolution is governed by the negative (in turn governed by the size and density of the grains). The idea that the paper determines the resolution is silly.
By the same logic, a photograph developed from a negative has as many pixels as molecules on the surface of the paper. Anyone care to calculate that resolution?
FYI, the FloydSSH FAQ says it doesn't work on just any Java phone:
1) Which phones are supported?
Generally phones with socket connection support. I am testing on Motorola T720i and Siemens S55. Most of Nokia phones dont work. As for others i dont know.
Phone: Telnet, SSH
Motorola T720, T720i: yes, yes
Siemens S55, M55: yes, yes
Siemens MT50: yes, no
Nokia 6820: yes, no
Sonny Ericcsson T630: no, no
LG U8110: yes, yes
Motorola V500, V600: yes, yes
After Warty Warthog, no versions of Ubuntu have worked with my laptop. They install but the graphics are corrupted. I discovered this is because of the migration from xfree86 to xorg. I thought I would have to cling to Warty forever when I discovered that Debian still supports xfree86. In fact, after I installed Debian I was like "wait a minute, I knew Ubuntu was based on Debian but this is ridiculous" The only things I see different about Ubuntu are visual themes and less programs. If you have compatibility issues with Ubuntu, I strongly recommend trying plain old Debian.
YES. It does, if you're a faithful Catholic. Ignoring the scientific mistakes of one church official, their moral teachings definitely benefit the adherents of the religion. How many single-partner/abstinate men and women do you think have been infected?
Are you saying that religion is no help to the people that ignore everything the church says anyway?
Slashdot Mirror
Google search results directly affect business, and on a frighteningly large scale. Who's to say whether a site's HTML is "deceptive"? It's a subjective decision, and one that presents a conflict of interest to Google.
If Google's ranking system can be fooled by hidden text, is that BMW's fault? I say it should be up to Google to come up with accurate ranks, NOT reset any site that doesn't jive with their system
Years ago I used to do just that at the public library (I live near Minneapolis, MN). My family had a black and white Macintosh Classic computer. My dad would drive us to one of the larger libraries in the area and we'd check out games and take them home for a week. One such game was called "Uninvited". It was like a text adventure game but with graphics and limited mouse interaction. I loved it!
Of course, these games came on 3.5" disks and after a few years my dad told me that the library didn't have them any more because of something called "viruses".
Here is the exciting new logo for this suite. Oddly, it looks nothing like a real sea monkey.
Personally, I think it's a cross between a blue bird and a scorpion stinger.
SeaMonkey? I bet this thing dies in a matter of days.
Sure, complete censoring is worse than a little sensoring. The flaw in your logic is who is being immoral. In the case of complete censoring, it's CHINA's wrongdoing, not Google's. Google would still be an upstanding company if they refused to implement some evil system on behalf of China's demands.
It's not a matter of who's gonna cave. It's a matter of simply doing what's right. Period.
I guess Standby is a leftover from old TV's that took time to warm up - that's pretty much gone now & I imagine non existant with flat screen TV's
I assume you mean flat panel and not flat screen. There are plenty of flat screens (CRTs and DLPs) that take a while to warm up. I'd say my 50" Samsung DLP takes six seconds to turn on the bulb, spin up the color wheel and show the picture.
The way I read it, they're pushing recommendations, not songs. That would be great. But my hangup here is that a song takes a while to transfer over WIFI. It's not like you can pass someone on the street and accept their song recommendation in time to get the whole file. Even a car passing you on the highway might not be next to you long enough.
Yeah, the more I read, the more low-tech this actually sounds!
The quiet Mach 6 wind tunnel is not the first of its kind. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration previously operated a wind tunnel capable of similar performance, but that wind tunnel is not currently in operation.
The tunnel is relatively inexpensive to operate because each "run" is only about eight seconds. First, air is pumped out of a large tank that is connected to one end of the wind tunnel, creating a vacuum inside the tank. Then a valve is opened between the tank and the wind tunnel, sucking a burst of air through the wind tunnel at high velocity.
6 feet/sec, 15 min charge = 1 mile maximum range
For crying out loud, these are soldiers. Save a billion research dollars and have 'em hump the gear for 15 minutes.
Besides, who wants to worry about exoskeletons when you've dropped off the gear and on your way back down the hill?
You're going to learn the same programming concepts in either course? Then at the risk of sounding a bit cynical, pick the one you would rather have on your resume. That's really the only difference here.
"equipped with a 121-meter (400-foot) drill tower that can dig 7,000 meters (23,000 feet) below the seabed"
They're drilling 7 km into the crust. Am I the only one that thought the mantle was at least 30 km down at fault lines?
"on a voyage to collect the first samples of the Earth's mantle in human history"
Mantle != Core
Try renaming your attachment foo.zip to foo_zip. It will get around their filter and it's obvious what the original file is supposed to be.
Don't forget the days when people didn't know that "dot com" meant a webpage. In the 90's, advertisements were much more detailed about what an address meant. As years went by, the address got shortened more and more:
0. AOL keyword "whatever"
1. Open your web browser and enter "http://www.whatever.com"
2. "http://www.whatever.com"
3. "www.whatever.com"
4. "whatever.com"
My point being, with no TLD extension, people would just back up a step and say:
5. "www.whatever"
Sheesh. My point was that their logic is flawed. No matter how dense the bacteria, the printed resolution is governed by the negative (in turn governed by the size and density of the grains). The idea that the paper determines the resolution is silly.
100 megapixels per square inch with bacteria?
By the same logic, a photograph developed from a negative has as many pixels as molecules on the surface of the paper. Anyone care to calculate that resolution?
What about the part in your article where it says,
"Sega went for broke in building the best console they could buy with the Dreamcast, and sold them at less than cost. A lot less than cost."?
No iPod Nano? *gasp* Heresy!!
FYI, the FloydSSH FAQ says it doesn't work on just any Java phone:
1) Which phones are supported?
Generally phones with socket connection support. I am
testing on Motorola T720i and Siemens S55. Most of Nokia
phones dont work. As for others i dont know.
Phone: Telnet, SSH
Motorola T720, T720i: yes, yes
Siemens S55, M55: yes, yes
Siemens MT50: yes, no
Nokia 6820: yes, no
Sonny Ericcsson T630: no, no
LG U8110: yes, yes
Motorola V500, V600: yes, yes
He can't patent his DNA sequence -- I have at least 90% prior art!
After Warty Warthog, no versions of Ubuntu have worked with my laptop. They install but the graphics are corrupted. I discovered this is because of the migration from xfree86 to xorg. I thought I would have to cling to Warty forever when I discovered that Debian still supports xfree86. In fact, after I installed Debian I was like "wait a minute, I knew Ubuntu was based on Debian but this is ridiculous" The only things I see different about Ubuntu are visual themes and less programs. If you have compatibility issues with Ubuntu, I strongly recommend trying plain old Debian.
Assuming that we did teach ID in schools ... what would be the material?
Pretty much any allegorical text that can be taken literally. Yes, the Bible... and Animal Farm.
Little Johnny asks, "How?"
Shut up Johnny. Pigs can walk and talk and that's the end of it.
At 11.5 percent, it's still got a long way to go to reach Internet Explorer's 85.5 percent
Yeah, I can't wait until IE and Firefox are at 85.5%!
ASRock motherboard (AMD Socket 939, PCI Express/AGP, SATA2) - $69
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Processor (1.8GHz, boxed CPU kit with cooler) - $146
eVGA's nVidia GeForce 6600 (256MB, AGP) - $113
512MB Corsair Value Select (PC3200, dual-channel DDR400 RAM) - $52
80GB Western Digital Caviar SE hard drive (WD800JD, SATA 150, 8MB cache, 7200rpm) - $57.50
DVD-ROM from LiteOn (SOHD-16P9SBLK, 16x read) - $20
330W PSU from Seasonic (S12-330, ATX 12V) - $59
"Still think religion in Africa helps fight HIV?"
YES. It does, if you're a faithful Catholic. Ignoring the scientific mistakes of one church official, their moral teachings definitely benefit the adherents of the religion. How many single-partner/abstinate men and women do you think have been infected?
Are you saying that religion is no help to the people that ignore everything the church says anyway?