Slashdot Mirror


How to Build a $500 Gaming Machine

bacterial_pus writes "Tom's Hardware has a very interesting article on how to build a $500 gaming rig. 'Instead of the newest killer rig from Alienware, Falcon Northwest, Voodoo, etc... how about a system for the rest of us with a realistic budget starting from scratch? We set out to build a reasonable gaming system that will get you through today's game titles without breaking the bank for around $500.'"

305 comments

  1. Re:Linux by StonedRat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did you miss the part about it being for gaming?

    --
    "Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." - Arthur C. Clarke.
  2. Pirates! by jmorris42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Uh huh. A gaming machine that doesn't run Windows? Or are they just yo ho ho pirates at Tom's and expecting everyone to be loading it up from the bootleg .iso of Windows XP Corporate Edition that 'everybody' has in their shoebox of warez?

    Add that line item in and to stay on budget will require some drastic downsizing in everything else.

    Oh, and I know they only cost $20 sans P/S but they also forgot a case. Idiots.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:Pirates! by rkcallaghan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uh huh. A gaming machine that doesn't run Windows? Or are they just yo ho ho pirates at Tom's and expecting everyone to be loading it up from the bootleg .iso of Windows XP Corporate Edition that 'everybody' has in their shoebox of warez?

      Oh, and I know they only cost $20 sans P/S but they also forgot a case. Idiots.

      While I realize it was bad form not to mention it directly; neither of those items is exactly rare in the typical Tom's reader's closet. I've got a few legit Windows licenses and extra chassis. They're aren't hard to come by.

      ~Rebecca

    2. Re:Pirates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your going to warez, and all you want is a cheap gaming machine, best bet is a modded xbox or ps2.

    3. Re:Pirates! by Praxx · · Score: 4, Informative

      Students at my university (who are also more likely to appreciate a $500 gaming rig) can get a Windows XP license for $6.

      --
      http://www.policystew.com/
    4. Re:Pirates! by stud9920 · · Score: 5, Funny

      We're not in 1995 anymore. Everyone owns a PC. Now if you build a modern PC, you won't need the old anymore, and good luck selling the old one.

      Only in Microsoft's wettest dreams is it not allowed to reeuse a copy of windows on a newer PC.

    5. Re:Pirates! by xSauronx · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The thing is, honestly, that they left those things out so that they could tout a $500 gaming machine as something worth reading so they could attract traffic to their website. A number of hardware sites have been doing rigs for years at multiple levels, especially budget machines, but i dont recall any of them leaving out necessary parts or accessories so they could use the "sub-$500 gaming rig" headline in an attempt to attract traffic to their site.

      Toms did, and now slashdot has directed traffic to them. I dont recall seeing an update on the front page of /. last time ArsTechnica or Anandtech put up budget rigs, which anyone with some common sense could easily look at and say "oh i dont need a new case or monitor for this, ill spend even less on a budget rig!" just so they could attract traffic.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    6. Re:Pirates! by Sqwubbsy · · Score: 1

      Don't point out the obvious, he was going for +1 insightful.
      Besides, he doesn't 'upgrade' a machine (which would have the power supply, case and Windows license he so desparately needs.)

      He's too 1337 for that...

    7. Re:Pirates! by Sen.NullProcPntr · · Score: 1
      Good point on Windows(tm) but this is Tom's Hardware after all.

      I would expect the case, and as others have mentioned kb, mouse, joystick, monitor, etc. to be included. The system is not much use without that stuff.

      Not being a "gamer" I don't know which is the bigger cost of gaming; hardware or software. Is there any point on saving a few bucks on the hardware? The total $ for games must add up (unless you are hoisting the Jolly Roger;-).

    8. Re:Pirates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how many people will spend $500 to build a new PC and then put Windows 98 on it? Half of your games will not run. You are allowed to reuse old windows versions if you can get them to even install. Then you will have to make do without security updates or patches because your OS has been end-of-lifed by Microsoft.

    9. Re:Pirates! by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, and I know they only cost $20 sans P/S but they also forgot a case. Idiots.

      Who needs a case? See?

      --
      No Sigs!
    10. Re:Pirates! by netkid91 · · Score: 0

      Wow, thats effecient cooling for your CPU :P, but wouldn't dust collect easily on that???

      --
      NO~, I read Slashdot because I think it's stupid.....
    11. Re:Pirates! by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Meh, ,who needs a case when you can just use a pumpkin!

    12. Re:Pirates! by Antony.S · · Score: 1

      We get it for free, at least in my school (Southampton University, UK)

    13. Re:Pirates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and I know they only cost $20 sans P/S but they also forgot a case. Idiots.

      Ironically, the article claims "we are focusing simply on the box itself" on page 1.

    14. Re:Pirates! by bcmm · · Score: 1

      They're talking about the machine, not the software. Might as well say "A gaming machine that doesn't run games? ...".

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    15. Re:Pirates! by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Only in Microsoft's wettest dreams is it not allowed to reeuse a copy of windows on a newer PC.

      Ever tried to install a Dell/HP/E-Machines/etc OEM copy of XP on anything else? It won't boot up, it throws you an error that your system isn't the same brand as what the XP disc was sold for use with.

    16. Re:Pirates! by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > I would expect the case, and as others have mentioned kb, mouse, joystick, monitor, etc. to be included.
      > The system is not much use without that stuff.

      Well an keyboard & mouse is only $10 for the set just about anywhere. Add another $10 if you want an optical mouse. But speakers do seem to be something gamers fret about as is the display.

      If this was a 'toss together a gaming box from stuff in your discard pile' piece then there should have been lots of things different about this article. If you have a decent case you should have the P/S already in it. Probably a few sticks of older PC333 or PC266 memory also, maybe only 256MB total, but hey, we are building on the cheap, right? Ditto on having an older sub 100GB hard drive and non-burner optical drive lying around handy.

      Point is this piece is clueless, first off by not defining the target well enough to be useful.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    17. Re:Pirates! by stud9920 · · Score: 0

      Windows XP has been around for 4 years now. Plenty of time for a mid range PC to get outdated.

    18. Re:Pirates! by ottothecow · · Score: 2, Informative
      The average gamer is going to probobly have their preffered monitor/keyboard/mouse and simply no longer have a system capable of playing the newest games.

      They have all their software and accessories but they just dont have enough muscle for the newest stuff so they need new internals and nothing else.

      --
      Bottles.
    19. Re:Pirates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After reading this article I decided to order a new mobo and CPU (the same as in the article, even) to upgrade my 4 year old computer, which runs XP and always has. Of course, I did pirate it but still relevant to the discussion.

    20. Re:Pirates! by evilneko · · Score: 1

      You've never left a PC case open before, have you? ;)

      --
      Slashdot - where to disagree, is to be a troll
    21. Re:Pirates! by rednip · · Score: 1
      Ever tried to install a Dell/HP/E-Machines/etc OEM copy of XP on anything else?
      Ok, find someone who has a more than a 'restore disk', use that. How is this not pirating? Use the license key from the old machine.
      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    22. Re:Pirates! by todd10k · · Score: 1

      Wrong. OEM copys of XP work perfectly in other systems. its the key that wont work, to activate, you need to phone microsoft themselves. My friend (....) has used the same windows XP disk in at least 8 different machines, all with the same code, for perfectly valid windows installations. when you telephone up microsoft to activate your windows, you simply give a bullshit excuse and tell them you have formatted or your system broke down, and that you only have it installed on one machine.

    23. Re:Pirates! by insomniac8400 · · Score: 1

      "Given the money we have available, you could really go on the cheap and get one of those case/PSU combo bargains - but we would advise against it." Because those combos come with cases, and their gameing rig is just going to sit on a table, because its a l33t gaming rig. Also what is the point in a 20 dollar dvd-rom when a dvd burner is 40 bucks.

    24. Re:Pirates! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Looking at the system specs, you could dump the 64 bit processor for an AMD Socket A processer, and probably save atleast $100 on the processor and motherboard, and possibly even get away with slighly cheaper type of memory. Sure, it won't be as fast, but a socket A system can still run new games. From there you would have enough leftover cash to afford a Windows XP home lincense and a cheap case.

    25. Re:Pirates! by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Well it's hard for me to see this as cheating when I haven't bought a new system all at once for over 10 years. Why would I buy a new case when it wouldn't make my system run any better? And since I'm not upgrading everything, I won't have a working PC left over, so why would I need a new copy of Windows? I see this as a $500 performance upgrade, what does that have to do with buying a new mouse?

    26. Re:Pirates! by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Only in Microsoft's wettest dreams is it not allowed to reeuse a copy of windows on a newer PC.

      That's wrong on two levels. If you have "upgrade" media (which is what most people buy) from MS and try to install it on a PC without an installed MS OS, it will abort. Secondly, if you have the full version of XP, you will have to have to activate Windows again, and you aren't allowed to install it on two machines. Microsoft's wet dream has been realized. Microsoft no longer has customers, it has consumers.

    27. Re:Pirates! by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      While I realize it was bad form not to mention it directly; neither of those items is exactly rare in the typical Tom's reader's closet. I've got a few legit Windows licenses and extra chassis. They're aren't hard to come by.

      Windows XP Pro x64 OEM edition is $145 at Newegg... this isn't exactly something everyone has extra copies of sitting in their closet unless they've pirated it. It also adds around 30% to the cost of their "$500" system.

    28. Re:Pirates! by jimboisbored · · Score: 1

      Me too: MSDN Academic Alliance through SCC in Minnesota. I get several versions of XP (different service packs), 2000 and 2003 server, access, visio, and most of the other microsoft products except office.

    29. Re:Pirates! by Solkre · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's true, but you just screwed yourself on upgradability.

      I'm probably running on my last version of this setup (939 board) and that's because this mobo doesn't have a PCI-E slot. It's a great machine, it's just not upgradable for the future.

      I don't think it's wise to build a new machine that you don't think you'll be able to upgrade at least once. Also the idea of budget game machines makes me think of those people who'd come into my shop needing upgrades for the newest Sims. Gag I swear the Sims caused more computer upgrades than newer versions of Windows.

    30. Re:Pirates! by yurnotsoeviltwin · · Score: 1

      But if you have an upgrade version of XP, then you must have a full version of an earlier Windows lying around. Sure it's a bit more of a pain, but you can just install 98, then install the XP upgrade, and you're good to go. As for your second point, I've used the same Windows license on two machines (it was a Dell OEM disk), and it wasn't a problem at all. In fact, the first two times I installed it on the second machine I was even able to use online activation, then for some reason after I reformatted a few months ago I had to call them up. I actually didn't even lie, I told exactly what I was doing, and they were like "okay, here's the activation code for ya." So it really isn't hard at all to install XP from the same disk on two machines.

    31. Re:Pirates! by croddy · · Score: 1

      oh. my gaming machine runs debian.

    32. Re:Pirates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know a place around here (http://www.acnt.com/ that sells $25 cases with power supplies. The cases are actually pretty nice, though they don't come with exhaust fans. The power supplies, are cheap and I would not trust the 400W power rating on them too much, but I've used them to build computers for friends and family. I've probably built something like 15 computers in the last four years for various people using their cases.

      This cannot be the only place in the country that sells these cases. I am sure that there must be other places. Case and power supply are the least of my worries when I build a computer. The price of decent video cards available on site is usually my primary concern. Fry's Electronics is currently selling a GeForce 6200 for $80, which is pretty good for one available in-store.

    33. Re:Pirates! by cortana · · Score: 1

      No you don't--the cost is just included in your tuition fees. Good luck getting a refund if you don't intend to use your copy! :)

    34. Re:Pirates! by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1

      Well, my co-worker has one on his desk that's been open for months.

      --
      No Sigs!
    35. Re:Pirates! by Embrionic · · Score: 1

      At the college I teach at, we do not pass the difference in terms of tuition to the students.

    36. Re:Pirates! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The "Upgrade" versions of their OS don't require you to have the old OS installed. If you have the install media for an older OS it will allow you to proceed.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    37. Re:Pirates! by sydres · · Score: 1

      sure so did we but at the end of the semester we were suppossed to delete the copy, microsoft is not consistent even in their student licencing schemes. good thing I don't use windows

    38. Re:Pirates! by toleraen · · Score: 1

      So do the staff pick up the cost? The money has to come from somewhere...if it's a grant, government funding, etc, then that money is being spent on software instead of somewhere else. The students might not be charged for it directly, but they're paying for it in the end. That cash they're paying in tuition is going towards something the grant/funding/etc could have been paying for. There's no such thing as a free lunch.

    39. Re:Pirates! by Zerathdune · · Score: 1
      Ever tried to install a Dell/HP/E-Machines/etc OEM copy of XP on anything else?

      yep. went off without a hitch.

      --
      No single raindrop believes that it is responsible for the storm.
    40. Re:Pirates! by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

      Anyone building a $500 gaming rig isn't going to spring the extra $ for XP Pro over the home edition.

      That said, they should have approached the article more from the PoV of doing a large scale upgrade. Recycled monitor, KB, mouse, case, optical drive, OS, HD; new MB, ram, CPU, Vid. Anyone doing a homebrew system should have a $30 120gb HD from bestbuy.

    41. Re:Pirates! by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      Anyone building a $500 gaming rig isn't going to spring the extra $ for XP Pro over the home edition.

      Then why build it with a 64-bit AMD chip in the first place if you're not going to buy the 64-bit version of Windows XP for it? They could've just bought a 32-bit AMD Athlon XP 3200+ for a lot less money.

    42. Re:Pirates! by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

      Older PSUs are usually not able to handle the specific voltage requirements of a newer CPU and vid card combined. I try to buy a PSU that's about 100W over what I think I need, and it's rarely sufficient for my next get PC to run stable. Never mind that some PSUs currently on the market (never mind one from a year ago) may not have the 24 pin power connectors for your mobo, or the PCIe power cable to run your vid card.

      Merely suggesting that you could build a gaming rig with only 256mb ram just shows that you are not a pc gamer in the least. I thought it was laughable that the guide only included 512mb.

    43. Re:Pirates! by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the 64 bit version is faster in PC games, runs cooler, uses less power, and is future-proofed for a later OS upgrade, or when games start using the 64bit extentions. Also, the price difference is smaller than you think. They listed the retail boxed 64 3000+ version, which is about $30 more than the OEM that only runs about $117. The XP 3000 only runs about $110. It's well worth the extra $7 in a gaming machine.

    44. Re:Pirates! by Decker-Mage · · Score: 1

      I've got ten licenses for Windows XP, among all the other licenses from MS, and I'm only using five here of which three are strictly for virtual machines despite the fact they really don't notice that I have all three activated. [To Windows Activation it's the same machine being reinstalled, near as I can tell.] So, that's a bad assumption with our technically inclined audience I'd say and almost certainly with the THW audience judging from the discussions there. If you are serious about playing with Windows or have clients that you must work with that use Windows despite themselves, become a MS partner (free) and get one of their ActionPacks [$299] and you'll have licenses for most everything except Visual Studio of course which requires an MSDN subscription. Those cost an arm and a leg.

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
    45. Re:Pirates! by Decker-Mage · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I beg to differ on your second point. I've moved my Windows Server 2003 Enterprise from one system to another with no problem and it hasn't required anything except that I do one of two things: completely fill out the registration information before I click on Activate or give Microsoft a call. the same is true with Windows XP Pro here as well and yes I have called them when I've been at one of my remote machines or at a clients and are moving things over and it bounced for some strange reason. Actually they are quite nice over the phone when you explain what you are doing.

      Oops, I forgot. This is Slashdot. Microsoft is evil, they can't ever be nice. Sheesh!

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
    46. Re:Pirates! by bubkus_jones · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if all your system is missing is PCI-E, then wouldn't it just be a matter of upgrading the board and whatever you need that's PCI-E (as far as I've seen, it's pretty much just video cards at the moment). The rest of it should still be usable, right?

    47. Re:Pirates! by jimboisbored · · Score: 1

      Hell, i got two accounts from last year that work, but I lost the pass for one and two from this year. It's basically for educational use, never actually read if its supposed to be removed, but its not crippled software in any way.

    48. Re:Pirates! by ZhuLien · · Score: 1

      I had to build a similar computer for my mum a while ago, it worked out as follows:

      winxp $125 windows xp home
      mb $75 gigabyte motherboard
      cpu $66 sempron 2200
      hdd $72 80gb hdd
      dvd $80 pioneer 109
      gfx $75 radeon 9550
      ram $55 512mb RAM
      case $100 aria (secondhand)

      I was going to get a monitor, but it cost too much to post to her, so she ended up getting one locally. I could have saved even more by getting a larger case rather than the used aria (which was the only used part). That totaled AU$648! which can't be that far from US$500, but if it were just for games, I would have recommended a 40gb HDD and used freedos (which runs MAME) and saved a couple of hundred $$$. As everyone knows, there aren't that many good games for Windows ;)

    49. Re:Pirates! by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Probably a lot of the games are free too.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    50. Re:Pirates! by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      And what happens to the loyal MS customer^W consumer whose most recent full version is Windows 3.1 on 5.25 floppy, and you no longer have a working 5.25 floppy drive? I'll tell you: MS Consumer Service tells you to buy and install a 5.25 floppy drive or buy the full install version of Windows even though you're a registered user of all intermediate versions.

    51. Re:Pirates! by jrockway · · Score: 1

      I imagine M$ donates the software so students get hooked, on it and when they get out in the real world all they know is M$ so they continue to buy M$ products and keep M$ alive.

      --
      My other car is first.
    52. Re:Pirates! by enigma48 · · Score: 1

      No, you'd be wrong.

      You can't "upgrade" Windows 3.1 to Windows XP. You can upgrade 2000 to XP Pro, or 98/Me/2000 to XP Home.

      Now I realize that'll rattle your chains even more ("WHAT! I spent $100 for Win 3.1 about 8 years ago, I *deserve* a $100 discount for XP!) but give me a break. Microsoft isn't required to praise your kindness just because you bought something nearly a decade ago.

      No other vendor I'm aware of does this - and if you're tempted to go find a couple examples, I'm going to throw the phone book at you for 1 million counter-examples.

      That being said, their price for the OS is absurd. If normal competition took place over the past 10 years, prices would be lower. Microsoft had an unfair advantage (that they gained somewhat fairly; for much of their history they weren't a monopoly) and they've abused it.

      I'd love to see the Justice dept set their price for 1-2 years as a penalty. Guarantee them a level of profits for Office/Windows that matches what other vendors earn and restrict their ability to give discounts to OEMs. I'm not even sure if this would help at this point, I don't think any company is willing to try and make a Windows XP-compatible replacement - the startup cost (and lead time) is phenomenally high. No company would risk it.

      Thank god for Linux - even if you can't stand it, the competition has helped.

    53. Re:Pirates! by stanmann · · Score: 1

      I've been running my computers naked for 3+ years. Never a problem with heat or dust.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    54. Re:Pirates! by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Now I realize that'll rattle your chains even more ("WHAT! I spent $100 for Win 3.1 about 8 years ago, I *deserve* a $100 discount for XP!) but give me a break. Microsoft isn't required to praise your kindness just because you bought something nearly a decade ago.

      I think you missed the point. I paid for every version upgrade between DOS 3.1 and Win98 (less Win95 which came preinstalled and was part of the price), and they weren't cheap. MS didn't lose any money on me. I registered every version. I was the legal owner of that copy of the OS but was prevented from using it by their lame attempt at DRM, and they were unwilling to make it right. And right or wrong, the MS CS rep told me I could use the Win98 upgrade disc with any previous version installed. That was about five years ago and is the reason I switched to Linux full-time.

    55. Re:Pirates! by echomancer · · Score: 1

      If you're not using one of those legit Windows licenses in XP Pro flavor, would you mind sending me one?

      --
      And I lift my glass to the awful truth which you can't reveal to the ears of youth except to say it isn't worth a dime.
    56. Re:Pirates! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      I bought a high-end Alienware almost 2 years ago to the day. I had done a price analysis, and found out that if I bought all the pieces and put it together myself, I'd save about $300.00. As I am not a starving college student, that wasn't worth the hassles I knew I'd face chasing down drivers, bootstrapping, etc.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  3. Re:Linux by slackmaster2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dude, you haven't experienced gaming until you've played Tux Racer at 300fps! ;)

  4. Where is the Case? by bajan_on_ice · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And keyboard? And mouse? Monitor? Speakers?

    Not much of a gaming system without those. And those can add an easy $200 to the price if you
    go bargain basement...

    -chris

    --
    "The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding."
    1. Re:Where is the Case? by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

      Most people probably already have these components for their existing computer, so I can see why they would exclude them from the price of the system. I've reused my existing keyboard, mouse, and monitor for my past 3 systems. On my most recent system I did have to pickup a new case for about $50USD.

    2. Re:Where is the Case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but the article is comparing their $500 gaming rig to complete systems build by companies such as Alienware for example. So I would expect a $500 gaming rig to include a monitor, case, keyboard, mouse and a suitable operating system. In my book Linux doesn't cut it either. This is a good article but misleading.

    3. Re:Where is the Case? by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      Already bargins out there for a long time. I recently bought a PC for a customer who does some hobby gaming, for $499. EMachines sells machines with A64 3200+, 512MB, 160GB, a DVD Burner, and ATI Radeon X200. I know the X200 stinks, but it works for the gaming the customer does, and the machine has a PCIe 16x slot when they are ready to upgrade, plus this PC comes with an operating system (XP Home), a case, and a keyboard and mouse (no monitor though, although they sell monitors with it). As an IT worker, I think that nowadays building your own system only makes sense for high end PCs (I built my own $3000 rig, which has hardware similar to $4000-$4500 Alienware or Falcon systems). The profit margins are really low on low end machines, and the volume prices emachines gets on parts more than make up for the cost of labor, ect... This article doesnt really describe a full system, you still need the case, a mouse, keyboard, and a monitor. If this article had been intitled "Rebuild your old computer into a gaming rig for only $500", it would have been much more interesting.

    4. Re:Where is the Case? by tepples · · Score: 1

      I've reused my existing keyboard, mouse, and monitor for my past 3 systems.r

      Personal System/2 compatible keyboards and mice doesn't work too well with newer "legacy free" machines with 8 USB ports. Neither does connecting a monitor that can't go higher than 1024x768 to a machine capable of ridiculous fill rate. In addition, you can't as easily put the old computer in the kids' room if you reuse the peripherals for a new machine.

    5. Re:Where is the Case? by stevesliva · · Score: 1
      Thanks for posting... I've been watching the Best Buy eMachine ads, and wondering whether I could do much better myself. Let's see. Sometime in the past six weeks there was, for $299 (rebates, mores tax, yaddah yaddah): 3100+/256MB/100GB/DVDCRRW or $60 upgrade to 53300+/12MB/160GB

      This article will be useful for me to figure out if recycling keyboard, mouse, monitor, etc allows me to get a better cheap desktop. Maybe not!

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    6. Re:Where is the Case? by csplinter · · Score: 0

      >>And keyboard? And mouse? Monitor? Speakers? If you had rtfa you would know they were intentionally excluded.

    7. Re:Where is the Case? by Decker-Mage · · Score: 1
      Actually I wouldn't want whatever they recommended as I'm quite happy with my Sony Multiscan G400 (cost 3 times that system cost), IBM keyboard and optical mouse, and my ALPS speakers or for when I feed it through my stereo my Infinity bookshelf speakers. I'm already using a KVM, what's one more system hanging off of it. BTW, you'll pry those out of my cold dead fingers .

      Someday I'd like to upgrade the keyboard but the one I have my eye on costs $158 last time I looked. Sweet though!

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
    8. Re:Where is the Case? by EvilNecro · · Score: 1

      At home, I'm still using my vintage 1984 IBM "Type-M" keyboard. Very nice to type on! IMHO, the best keyboard ever made (just don't drop it, they are made of Real Metal!) At work I lucked out, someone threw one out, and I quickly replaced my cheesy plastic Dell job.

    9. Re:Where is the Case? by Decker-Mage · · Score: 1

      Actually my favorite was my Northgate Omnikey Ultra Plus which worked on both mi Amigas and my PC compatible. Unfortunately it gave up the ghost in the late '90's after over ten years of use. I'd like to get the Avant, the one I mentioned in the message, but what with upgrades and building a new machine it's on the backburner for now. My IBM keyboard is okay but nothing beats the touch of the old Selectric style IBM keyboards and the Northgate and Avants have that same touch.

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
  5. Calling all whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why doesn't some karma whore hurry up and post the system specs so the rest of us don't have to RTFA.

    1. Re:Calling all whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Seeing as I had it in another tab at the time:
      Part Product Price
      Processor AMD Athlon 64 3000+ $146
      Motherboard ASRock 939Dual-SATA2 $69
      Memory Corsair Value Select 512 MB (2x 256 MB) $52
      VGA eVGA 256-A8-N340-TX Geforce 6600 256 MB $113
      Hard Drive Western Digital Caviar SE WD800JD 80 GB $57.50
      Optical Drive LITE-ON Black 16X DVD-ROM $19.99
      Power Supply SeaSonic S12-330 ATX12V 330W $59.00
      Total $516.49
    2. Re:Calling all whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the article isn't about the specs, but about the reasons for choosing the components they did?

    3. Re:Calling all whores by InsideTheAsylum · · Score: 1

      Huh, I bought a similar computer for that much 2 years ago ;P

  6. Tommy, can you hear me? by winkydink · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did you forget something? Are you sure? Uh, the case?

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Tommy, can you hear me? by Roofus · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the line that said "Since we're on a tight budget, we'll forgo the use of a case and just lay our components on a piece of cardboard."

      Okay, so they didnt' really say that, but I think it's implied!

    2. Re:Tommy, can you hear me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're not talking about building a complete system as they say in the conclusion. More of an upgrade from your current system.

    3. Re:Tommy, can you hear me? by prockcore · · Score: 1

      The case, monitor, keyboard, mouse etc don't have to be upgraded. I'm assuming this $500 gaming machine is in response to console players saying PC gaming is too expensive.

      Adding the monitor etc to the price is like adding the TV and stereo to the price of the console. In 5 years when the newest stuff is out, you don't need to upgrade your case or mouse or keyboard to play the latest games.

    4. Re:Tommy, can you hear me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news today:

      Firefighters responded to a fire caused by an improperly wired electrical appliance.

      The FCC levied fines against a homeowner due to complaints of interference by the neighbors.

    5. Re:Tommy, can you hear me? by winkydink · · Score: 1

      If you're upgrading, chances are the HDD is fine too, and you probably already have a CD/DVD drive, both of which are purchased in the article.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    6. Re:Tommy, can you hear me? by kesuki · · Score: 1

      read the fine print "gaming graphic card not included" it's like those toys they sell that do all those neat things but the Batteries are NOT included!

    7. Re:Tommy, can you hear me? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      "We set out to build a reasonable gaming system"

      Build, not upgrade. System, not box.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    8. Re:Tommy, can you hear me? by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1
      For a complete budget gaming rig (not just an upgrade), check out Anandtech's guide.
      Hardware..... $$ Component
      Processor.... 75 Sempron 64 (754) 3000+ - 128KB 1.80 GHz Palermo
      Motherboard.. 77 DFI Infinity nF4X
      Memory....... 95 OCZ Premier 2x512MB
      Video Card.. 138 eVGA GeForce 6600GT 128MB
      Hard Drive... 81 Hitachi 3.0Gbps 160GB 7200RPM 8MB Deskstar T7K250
      Optical Drive 46 BenQ DW1640 Black (OEM)
      Case / Power. 82 Foxconn TPS544-S350 plus 350W PSU
      Display..... 169 Envision EFT920 19" CRT
      Speakers..... 47 Labtec ARENA 685 5.1 Speakers
      KB/Mouse..... 23 Logitech Internet Pro Desktop
       
      Bottom Line: 833
  7. How to buy a $5 gaming system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Two words: Atari 2600

    monitor not included.

  8. Kind of interesting... But by Azureflare · · Score: 1, Redundant
    They left out the case! Cases are like 60$ for a good one. What are they going to do, leave all the parts scattered over the floor, or pinned up on the wall? (of course pinning up on the wall also requires parts).

    The final cost of this machine is more like around $570, and then when you include the shipping on the parts you bought online... Well... I'd say it comes to more like $600. (Possibly more?)

    Still... A good guide for the newbies to budget PC design. This article really makes me feel outdated with my Geforce FX 5600 and Athlon 2800+... I guess I definitely don't have a decent rig for most modern games. But that's ok because I don't play any modern games.

    BTW anyone know a good way to avoid the annoying linkified ads in firefox? I just used links2. All those ads really slow down my browsing experience.

    1. Re:Kind of interesting... But by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Use AdBlock, and block everything from intellitext.com.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    2. Re:Kind of interesting... But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone know a good way to avoid the annoying linkified ads in firefox? I just used links2.

      http://www.privoxy.org/

      I'm using privoxy instead of adblock(FF extension), cause it works on any app. I'm very happy with it so far. On gnome, go Preferences->Network Proxy and direct it to Privoxy. All your gnome apps (like epiphany, liferea etc will use it automatically - you need to setup Firefox manually though. Edit->Preferences->General->Connection Settings). On links2 go Setup->Network options to set your HTTP proxy.

    3. Re:Kind of interesting... But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use both adblock and privoxy together. Works great.

    4. Re:Kind of interesting... But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      adblock > block the url *ads.tomshardware.com*

    5. Re:Kind of interesting... But by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, i've got an FX5700, and it's starting to show it's ages in more recent games - mostly the demo for the new Age Of Empires game...which is one of the few that I actually still play. That's the only reason I read this article, i wanted to see what video card they put in it.

    6. Re:Kind of interesting... But by Jarnis · · Score: 1

      And if you want to play todays games, you ignore the article.

      6600 (non-GT) is a piece of crap.

      You just can't get a gaming videocard for 100-120$. If you want to buy something that doesn't go obsolete for gaming immediately again, you need to spend about 200-250$ (that would be something like X800GTO, X800XL or 6800/6800GT - depends a bit if your mobo is AGP or PCIE)

      Yes, it's twice the price - and about three times the expected useful life as a gaming videocard. 6600 is already obsolete for gaming - its just a cheap piece of crap cashing in on good reputation of the 6600GT (which is nowdays too expensive compared to low end 6800s and X800s).

    7. Re:Kind of interesting... But by idonthack · · Score: 1
      ... my Geforce FX 5600 and Athlon 2800+ ...

      *sigh*
       
      And you feel outdated.
      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    8. Re:Kind of interesting... But by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      WTF? I game on a GF4 TI4600 or a GF FX 5200 depending on the game and which side of my desktop I want it on. Both are completely up to the task of running any game out there at 40+FPS (except BF2 won't run on the GF4, but thats another gripe for another day).

    9. Re:Kind of interesting... But by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      About links: I just started up Elinks on my knoppix remaster, and although it is a little like
      lynx, it is fast. The scroll wheel works in the browser, but I note that the black background
      makes it hard to see the cursor. I use this page for a start page:
      http://www.angelfire.com/ms/telegram/fast.html

    10. Re:Kind of interesting... But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $649.78 shipped(33.79) with a case w/power supply, DVD combo drive and Win XP pro.

    11. Re:Kind of interesting... But by Jarnis · · Score: 1

      Yes, if you play at 640x480.

      Today's displays tend to have 1280x1024 native resolution. Some opt for 1600x1200. To game at those resolutions, playing games that are going to be on the market one year from now, you need something a BIT more powerful than craptastically bad FX5200 :)

    12. Re:Kind of interesting... But by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Ahh, a graphics whore. I imagine you would never consider something like nethack to be one of the best games ever. I have played many games that would have been BETTER in 2D. Graphics do not make the game, gameplay does. If the game sucks at 1280x960 (my resolution of choice) it is still going to suck at 1600x1200 or 320x240.

    13. Re:Kind of interesting... But by Jarnis · · Score: 1

      I actually like nethack and other roguelikes (Zangband etc) very much.

      And I wouldn't imagine playing them without 1600x1200 screen either. Have to fit all those windows in one display (gameworld, inventory, equipment, info). And yes, I've played nethack on 80x25 VT100 terminal. That's so 1990s and swapping between different information views is clumsy and takes extra time. Nowdays computers allow bigger displays, so why not use them?

      What I want from games is simple - smooth compelling gameplay. Todays' games eat graphics cards for breakfast, so its POINTLESS to go and buy a cheap crappy card - it won't let you play latest games at reasonable resolution. The graphics tricks and pixel shader candy is secondary, but why watch blocky crap if the game allows higher resolution? Say, on online MMOs would you rather play in 800x600 and have your chat window eat up third of your screen with reasonably sized text font, or play at 1600x1200 and have it take a small bit off the bottom left corner?

      I agree that spending 450$+ for top of the line card is silly for most people. But saving that last 50-100$ and choosing a budget card over a good price/performer is stupid. That budget card is obsolete on the date of purchase, while that double-the-budget-price high midrange card will serve you well for 2-3 years (with some compromises in display candy at the tail end of that lifespan).

    14. Re:Kind of interesting... But by sp0rk173 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, i was seeing what a baseline video card would be. I would obviously get something a little above that.

      Oh, and for the record my last video card was a 9700 pro which i bought right after they came out. Most i've ever spent on a video card. It lasted me just as long as this one has. Those were in my younger and stupider days: when I bought girls dinner less than I bought computer parts. I can gladly say life has improved for me since then. I'd rather pay for a blowjob and a good screw than a video card, anyway.

      Thanks for telling me what I already knew, though.

  9. the punchline by randyest · · Score: 4, Informative

    Couldn't find a printable link, so to save you from 8 clicks on "next->" and more ads than I could count (they went over budget by $16.49):

    Processor: AMD Athlon 64 3000+ $146
    Motherboard: ASRock 939Dual-SATA2 $69
    Memory: Corsair Value Select 512 MB (2x 256 MB) $52
    VGA: eVGA 256-A8-N340-TX Geforce 6600 256 MB $113
    Hard Drive: Western Digital Caviar SE WD800JD 80 GB $57.50
    Optical Drive LITE-ON Black 16X DVD-ROM $19.99
    Power Supply: SeaSonic S12-330 ATX12V 330W $59.00
    Total: $516.49

    --
    everything in moderation
    1. Re:the punchline by rpozz · · Score: 1

      they went over budget by $16.49

      Not only did they go $16.49 over budget, as a few people have already pointed out, they have missed out the OS, case, speakers, mouse, keyboard and monitor. They seem to have failed miserably.

    2. Re:the punchline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But since this is Tom's, that's perfectly fine. And of course "rig" means "set of components with which to upgrade your machine."

    3. Re:the punchline by robbyjo · · Score: 1

      And... they expect to run the game under Linux? Where's the OS cost?

      --

      --
      Error 500: Internal sig error
    4. Re:the punchline by WhiteBandit · · Score: 1

      Couldn't find a printable link, so to save you from 8 clicks on "next->" and more ads than I could count (they went over budget by $16.49)

      That's okay! All those ads the site is infested with will pay for that. ;)

    5. Re:the punchline by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      Many people have mentioned missing hardware/software components, I will chime in here with a sound card (if there's an onboard one it wasn't mentioned) and a network interface (same here). These parts can often be pulled from old machines if they weren't onboard on the old machines, but a sound card with no acceleration can put more load on the CPU. A cheap NIC runs $10-15, and if I recall correctly tends to offload more work to the CPU than a better one (not that I think many people plunk down the money for better ones... I sure didn't, but I'm no gamer).

      The other thing that's really missing from this article is a test. Clearly, Tom didn't actually build this computer, so we have some idea based on his discussion of the compromises what kind of performance his stuff would have, but no concrete numbers. How do all of his compromises compound? Has he looked at inter-device interactions, or performance bottlenecks? No evidence of that in the article. For all I can see he just spent a half hour on NewEgg or some similar site. Bah.

    6. Re:the punchline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AND they missed the shipping prices. Shipping isn't cheap, that's going to jack up the price quite a bit.

      There's a reason I stopped Tomshardware a long time ago.

    7. Re:the punchline by Jules+Mercuri · · Score: 1

      WTF? I just bought an Aspire 500W power supply for a buck less than that Seasonic one... it's cool-looking and stable... and provides 170W more power. Oh well, to each his own.

    8. Re:the punchline by leathered · · Score: 1

      And the chances of your power supply being able to deliver half a kilowatt without going up in flames are...?

      --
      For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    9. Re:the punchline by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      the OS, case, speakers, mouse, keyboard and monitor

      All things that I already have, and that have not improved significantly since I bought them 2 years ago. I have been using the same (high quality home stereo) speakers for almost a decade now. My favorite mouse is the Logitech iFeel MouseMan, of which I own 3, one still in the box, and I do not plan to buy anything else for at least another 5 years.

      The things listed in this article are the things needed by someone with a good gaming computer from 1-2 years ago to have a good gaming computer today.

    10. Re:the punchline by Decker-Mage · · Score: 1

      For those you need to actually look at the motherboard specs which include the RealTek AC'97 sound system and 10/100 ethernet. I clicked on the mWave link to find those. The sound system won't satisfy the high-end games, probably, but despite being a musically inclined I don't need great sound from my computer, my stereo fulfills that need, thank ye. [And Creative can keep their crap out of my systems!] Actually it's not a bad little board and I'm adding it to my list for building yet another beta-testing machine. I do wonder if it can handle the X2 series of CPU's though. Those weren't mentioned in the specs.

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
  10. For those who can be bothered reading TFA by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

    1 Pay 498$ for XP licience
    2 Pay 1$ bus fare to nearest alienware retailer
    3 Throw brick through retailers window (If you buy a brick it breaks the budget so steal one)
    4 Grab demo model and run (you can call this pc liberation if makes you feel better)
    5 Pay 1$ bus fare home
    6 Happy gaming

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:For those who can be bothered reading TFA by blueadept1 · · Score: 1

      Overbudget. Bus fare is minimum $2.25 here for adult ($1.50 for child). PLUS you forgot that most bus fares are transferrable for about 90 minutes.

    2. Re:For those who can be bothered reading TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7 Turn on the computer and realize that it already has windows on it and you spent 498 bucks plus the 2 dollar bus fare to get arrested for theft.

      8 ????
      9 ????
      10 Profit!!!!

    3. Re:For those who can be bothered reading TFA by SycoCowz · · Score: 1

      Nice to see Abbie Hoffman's still around and posting on ./ :)

    4. Re:For those who can be bothered reading TFA by Alsee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm.... Pay 498$ for XP but steal a fricken' BRICK.

      We are the BSA and we approve this message.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    5. Re:For those who can be bothered reading TFA by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Where can you get a bus ticket for a buck?

    6. Re:For those who can be bothered reading TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GVRD? Those prices seem exactly like the prices for transit in the lower mainland

  11. You're forgetting something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about TCO?

    With Linux, the TCO on that box will be up at least %300.

    You need to get the facts, my friend!

  12. A Few Omissions by Chasuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most of us find a keyboard and a mouse useful on our gaming rigs, and a pair of speakers, and oh, I don't know, an OS, a case, and possibly even a monitor.

    A $500 gaming rig? Not quite!

    1. Re:A Few Omissions by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      My current videocard is below the minimum system requirements of most games.
      My keyboard, mouse, monitor, case, headphones, speakers, OS, router, cable modem, internet connection, UPS, electricity, TV to watch while I wait for a friend to join, and cat that sleeps on my monitor are all perfectly capable of new games.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    2. Re:A Few Omissions by Saint+V+Flux · · Score: 1

      They didn't "omit" them, the kind of people who read Tom's Hardware reuse old machines to build new ones, and therefore have a keyboard, mouse, speakers, case, and OS already sitting at their desk.

  13. And then there's how to game for $500 by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Insightful
    And then there's how to acquire a gaming machine for less than $500.

    PS2
    XBox
    Nintendo GC

    And coming soon:

    PS3
    XBox 360

    Remember that they were building a machine only for gaming too in that article.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Which of those can I run Civilization 3 on?

      --
      The cake is a pie
    2. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by shinygerbil · · Score: 1

      And don't forget the Nintendo Revolution, whatever that will end up actually being.

      --

      Steve
    3. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Skye16 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Shh! You're not supposed to ask questions like this. Console proponents hate when you point out that an RTS or FPS completely sucks ass on these "gaming systems".

      The moment you bring it up, the moment they go into a tizzy about how those game types suck anyway and you should just be happy with other types of games, 'cos, hey, they are, and they don't feel like they're missing out on anything.

      What works for them has to work for you. Or else!

    4. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Funny

      You forgot the Dreamcast, you insensitive clod!

    5. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      FPS doesn't suck on consoles. I'm sure you hate Halo 2, but there is a reason it's sold over 5 million copies. RTS... well, fair enough. If you're into RTS, you're definitely going to need a PC. However, chances are it's gonna cost you more than $500.

    6. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by TheEternalVortex · · Score: 1

      + $2k for your new HDTV

    7. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by SMS_Design · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, the machine CERTAINLY is way too underpowered for the likes of word processing, web browsing, and various desktop publishing applications.

    8. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FPS doesn't suck on consoles. I'm sure you hate Halo 2, but there is a reason it's sold over 5 million copies. RTS... well, fair enough. If you're into RTS, you're definitely going to need a PC. However, chances are it's gonna cost you more than $500.

      Yeah, and that reason is that legions of underpriveleged and/or retarded children don't realize the folly of playing a FPS without a mouse. When they start packaging mice with these systems for FPS play then MAYBE a console FPS will have a chance at not biting the weenie.

      Of course you still most likely won't be able to play any game mods on your console or do any modding yourself. Nothing like Team Fortress could ever come from those soul-sucking console pieces of shit. Consoles are for consumers, in the Huxley sense of the word. They're as close to mindless passive entertainment as you can come without paying for cable. There's a reason they use televisions as displays, you know. =)

      Consoles are evolving into PCs anyway; even the console manufacturers realize that the PC is a superior gaming platform. You can either wait for them to evolve fully (and be stuck with horrible FPS gameplay in the meantime) or you can skip the evolutionary process and play real games on a real PC. What a tough choice!

    9. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Not really. You can only get the XBOX 360 in a bundle. There is no bundle that is under $500 right now (last time I checked, at least). Still, it's a good point. But it doesn't work for everyone. I am shifting my gaming from PC to console with the coming generation of consoles, but I'm going to have to give up a lot of m my CounterStrike enjoyment (less responsive controls on a console) and strategy/RPG games (they just aren't the same on the console - a different breed entirely). But since I don't use a PC anymore, I'm not going to maintain the cost for upkeep.

      On the other hand, I would hope that Slashdotters know how to build their own frigging computer. I built my first when I was eleven years old, before there was a web and before the net hit big and before I had access to loca BBSes and I had no friends or adults around me who knew anything about computers. It jsut took a little initiative and common sense.

      People who buy their own desktop machines without specific reasons for it (say, you just want to get a cheap office machine for Aunt Florence and you don't want the support responsibility) have always struck me as a cut from the same cloth as those who always pay for the extra in-store warranty at Best Buy or give up their social security number to anyone who asks in a business setting. That is, they just go with the flow and don't put much thought into things.

      Then again, I suppose the same could be said of people in relation to cars (which I'm just now starting to get into in my late 30s).

      I love to see people - especially younger people - who are not necessarily heavily into computers, but realize that they can build their own. Not only do they get a sense of accomplishment from it, but the magic box is demystified and they gain some control. In the long run, they become better consumers who help shape the market with a more thorough and educated demand.

    10. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 2, Informative
      FPS doesn't suck on consoles. I'm sure you hate Halo 2, but there is a reason it's sold over 5 million copies.

      FPS sucks on consoles. Halo 2 has sold a lot of copies because it's the best FPS available for a console. This does not in anyway negate the suckage of FPS on consoles.

      --
      Why?
    11. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to recall those machines don't come with a monitor either.

    12. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by 222 · · Score: 1

      I cant remember, which one of those lets me play World of Warcraft?

    13. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
      I fully agree that playing a First person shooter on a console just isn't the same : Then again, keep in mind that nowadays most console FPS are purely designed around their limits ;

      For example, as vertical movement/aiming is much more complex with a controller, most of the leveldesign is based around having the action on a horizontal angle : when Halo got ported to the PC, its version (the single player part) sucked tremendously, because most of the action was too simple without much vertical fighting in it.

      Also, I wouldn't underestimate the new possibilities that the Nintendo Revolution controller might bring (definitely for playing RTS, I might imagine).

      All in all, a PC is still my preferred system to play an FPS.

    14. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by hitmark · · Score: 1

      this may well change soon. remeber that when the next nintendo comes out it will have a motion sensitive pointer like device as main controller. from what i understand those that have been able to test a modified version of metroid prime liked how it worked for aiming. and i would guess you could allso use it as a pointer control in a rts. hotkeys may be a problem tho.

      allso, didnt the PS2 sport usb ports? and support normal keyboard and mouse thru that? and now atleast the PS3 and the revolution (that new nintendo box) are going to use bluetooth for controller connection. i wonder if they will support keyboard and mouse profiles...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    15. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by VGPowerlord · · Score: 3, Informative
      Because we all know how much Goldeneye sucked on the N64... (Prove that you hate karma by giving me some good mod points)

      Yes, it did. It really shows if you've ever played an FPS on a PC prior to playing Goldeneye. Goldeneye feels like you're stuck in molasses.

      In addition to Goldeneye being so freaking slow, the mouse is much better at turning and aiming than a gamepad is. There's no noticable limitation on how fast you can turn with a mouse.

      I know someone is going to bring Halo up, so I'll beat you to the punch:

      The PC version will feature a faithful port of Halo's acclaimed story-based campaign that won't be changed in any substantive way. However, conventional mouse and keyboard controls give PC players an advantage that would make the game too easy if the difficulty settings weren't rebalanced somewhat. Pitchford mentioned that the harder settings might need the most tweaking, since the legendary difficulty should still be terrifically hard. Bungie is working closely with Gearbox and has provided some insight on how to maintain the game's balance.

      Source: Gamespot Article Halo PC Update, emphasis mine.

      Exactly what did they change?

      However, the team found that the simple step of removing the auto-aim assistance from the game (necessary to compensate for the inaccuracy of the joypad) ramped the difficulty up sufficiently, and no other balance changes were required.
      Source: Eurogamer Halo PC Preview
      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    16. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Uhmm...IMHO it's the issue of misunderstanding the roots of the dillema - on BOTH sides.
      It's not that it's impossible to attach keyboard or mouse to console (PS2 accepts normal USB ones... and PS1 had it's own mouse) or that it's impossible to do good FPS or RTS on a console (I think one of the most enjoyable FPS experiences for me was Quake2 on PS1 - mouse in right hand, dual shock (force feedback, ANALOGUE movement, 3 keys accesible without movinf fingers + 5 more) in the left; also there was fun RTS, Warzone 2100, that actually played better with Dual Shock than with mouse - developers must only think and create completelly new interface instead of "joypad emulates mouse by moving the pointer"). And it works in the other way too - there are few typically arcade games for PC, a great games I should add.

      But that doesn't really matter...it's al about pattern and place of usage. PC sits at the desk - you have monitor, keyboard and mouse right in front of you. Console place is in the living room, and nobody will feel comfortable sitting in the couch and trying to operate keyboard/mouse.
      That's it, nothing more, no ideology behind it. (but of course we all now that in the real world fanboys will be most vocal..)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    17. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you don't use a PC anymore, I'm guessing you posted from an XBOX 360 at Wal*Mart?

    18. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FPS does suck on consoles. Playing with a Xbox controller instead of a mouse completely screws up your aim. Whether people will care about playing with gimped controls is another story.

      I believe that was the one of the issues Gearbox had when porting Halo to the PC. They had to increase the difficultly and decrease damage on weapons such as the pistol, since a mouse + keyboard combo were THAT much better.

    19. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Why? Today's $500 computer is yesterday's $4000 screamer, and yesterday's $4000 screamer ran lots of good RTS games.

      A $500 computer would run Rise of Nations, Age of Empires, Warcraft II, etc. just fine.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    20. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Seumas · · Score: 1

      No, I posted from OSX, genius. I suppose I could have posted from my Sunblade (or my Sunray, for that matter), but that still isn't a PC and certainly none of these is a PC for gaming.

      Expand yourself a little bit.

    21. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

      I don't think being the "best FPS available for a console" would mean 5 million copies sold if all FPS suck on consoles. The shiniest piece of shit is still a piece of shit, and generally, pieces of shit don't sell.

      Also, just because you don't enjoy and/or aren't good at console FPS doesn't mean they suck. I know there are around 2 million Counter-Strike players who would disagree, but I don't think too highly of their opinions. Nothing against you if you play CS, but as the Steam forums prove, there are a lot of stupid CS players. Not that there aren't a lot of stupid Halo 2 players.

      That said, I don't see what the big deal is. I like FPS on both consoles and PC. I tend to prefer consoles simply because they're cheaper, but in terms of controls, using two thumbsticks instead of a mouse honestly doesn't bother me. It's less accurate, sure, but when everyone is using the same configuration it's not like you're at a disadvantage.

    22. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

      If you can honestly find me a PC (or the components thereof) that will cost me $500 including the operating system and all necessary peripherals and is capable of running Age of Empires III decently, I will be forever grateful.

    23. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you could throw two experienced FPS players in a deathmatch, one on a console (with gamepad) vs one on a PC (with mouse), I can almost guarantee that the PC player would come out the victor. There is currently no equal to having a mouse for movement and aiming in those types of games.

    24. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by evilneko · · Score: 1

      Playing with an XBox controller is a personal preference issue. I once argued the virtues of mice with a gamer who'd had it both ways. He was dead-set on the dual analog joysticks setup, and a bigger gamer than I.

      I once played HALO with my cousins on X-Box. I figured, what do these console losers know about FPS? How hard could it be? I got 0wned. Hard. I hate the dual-stick style. Gimme a mouse and I woulda owned em both--I think.

      --
      Slashdot - where to disagree, is to be a troll
    25. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Just play the original Age of Empires. In five years, the machine you need to play Age of Empires III will cost $500 and Age of Empires III will cost $9.99 in the discount bin.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    26. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by name773 · · Score: 1

      a good starcraft box should be pretty cheap

      i mean, that thing will run smooth on a pentium2, and it will definitely work on even lesser hardware

    27. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the Nintendo Revolution, you insensitive clod!

    28. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

      My bargain basement laptop I bought last year can run any of those games fantastically. If you're spending $500 custom building a desktop PC to jack up your framerate in Warcraft 2, you're a complete tool.

    29. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      Well, let's see how the Revolution's controller feels on an FPS or RTS.

    30. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

      Probably, though it would depend on the game. That wasn't my point, though. My point was that the controls don't matter when everyone's using the same stuff, because outside of personal preference, it's all the same. If you suck with dual sticks, it's your fault, not the controller's.

      Which is another reason I prefer consoles. When everyone's using the same hardware, I know that my performance is based on my skill rather than my CPU.

    31. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a pretty long post considering that all you're saying is that you're a closed-minded assface.

    32. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by rrhal · · Score: 1

      System Requirements from the website http://www.microsoft.com/games/pc/age3.aspx

              Microsoft Windows XP (OEM version of XP Home is $75)
              PC with 1.4 GHz equivalent or higher processor
              256 MB of system RAM
              2 GB available hard disk space
              32x speed or faster CD-ROM drive
              64 MB video card with support for hardware transformation and lighting required
              Sound card, speakers or headphones required for audio
              Microsoft Mouse or compatible pointing device
              56.6 Kbps or better modem for online play

      A system that meets or exceeds the above:

      CPU 60.00 AMD Sempron64 2500+
      HS/Fan 0.00
      Motherboard 75.00 DFI nF4X Infinity
      RAM 35.00 512MBB DDR400 RAM
      Video Card 45.00 Radeon 9100 from AllStarShop.com
      Hard Drive 48.50 Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 40GB
      DVDROM 20.00 LITE-ON 16X DVD-ROM Model SOHD-16P9S
      Case 34.99 Foxconn 3GTW001-W-HP350
      sound 0.00 On board
      lan 0.00 On board
      Monitor 0.00 used 17"
      Keyboard 12.00
      Mouse 13.00 MS Optical
      speakers 29.00 Logitech X-230
      floppy 2.99 Used
      OS 74.99 Win XP Home (OEM)
                            450.47 + Shipping

      I make the Rash assumption that you can scrounge a monitor. Lots of people are switching to LCD. Its a good time to be looking for a free CRT. All prices are from NewEgg except the Video card which is from AllStarShop.com. Further I assume that you will be using the onboard LAN for network play. Failing that the same person who donated the monitor could reasonably be expected to have a modem that hasn't been used since he or she got broad band internet some years ago.

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. Mark Twain
    33. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      How are you going to run Civ 3 on a "system" with no keyboard, mouse or OS?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    34. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by portscan · · Score: 2

      what FPS was better than goldeneye at the time it came out?

    35. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by rrhal · · Score: 1

      When I posted this I made a bit of a mistake - you see an AGP video card will not go into a PCI-e slot on the motherboard. So either choose an AGP mother board (New Egg has several in the price range - I like this one http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16813123242) or get a roughly $60 PCIe graphics card. A non TC 6200 if you can find one.

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. Mark Twain
    36. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I dunno... Quake 2?

      System Shock 2?

      Descent?

      Thief and Tribes were released soon after GoldenEye.

      Half-Life came the year after goldeneye.
      Quake 3 was only 2 years after goldeneye.

      Sluggish gameplay, mediocre graphics, and splitscreen multiplayer really brought down what people think of as 'awesome' - the AI, the realistic setting (complete with an engine that was probably raycasting), and bullet hit detection. Of course, I could see no increase in awesomeness of the AI over say, Thief or System Shock 2, or even Descent.

    37. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by grumbel · · Score: 1

      ### Shh! You're not supposed to ask questions like this. Console proponents hate when you point out that an RTS or FPS completely sucks ass on these "gaming systems".

      They don't suck, its simply a matter of getting the controls and gameplay balanced. Nobody doubts that you can aim more precisly with the mouse, but in the end its a completly non-issue in singleplayer games, since a little bit of auto-aim can make up for the difference. At the extreme end you can also do it like MetroidPrime and go for lock-on, no precise aiming required at all, yet the game seems still to be extremly popular. Pikmin was quite cool as well, again just a matter of figuring out controls that work with what you have. If you of course just brute force port a game from PC to Console you will have some throuble, but then jump'n runs don't play that good with mouse either.

    38. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Quiet, you!

      --
      The cake is a pie
    39. Re:And then there's how to game for $500 by portscan · · Score: 2

      quake 2 came out 3 months after goldeneye, so i will spot you that they were roughly contemporaneous. there was nothing near as good as goldeneye when it came out. quake 2 was the standard for a while, but goldeneye got a whole generation of gamers into FPS games. Wolfenstein, Doom (I or II), and even Quake were nowhere near as good, and the multiplayer for Goldeneye was actually awesome. Yes, it was a bit sluggish if you didn't have the memory expansion, but if you tried to play Doom III on an ATI Rage 128 Pro, I think you would complain that it sucked, too. Obviously it's a matter of opinion, but there are many people who do not share your viewpoint that Goldeneye was bad. Some refer to it as the greatest game of all time. Some just the best FPS, and some just the best console FPS. These are all opinions. Personally, I think Perfect Dark brought many welcome enhancements.

      Console gaming is just more fun for some people, plus it's way cheaper. Personally, I like the social aspect of several friends sitting around the TV playing games, not all hooked up over the internet (with PC gaming, only 1 user can really use the system at a time). If you have a big TV, split screen is not a big deal. Sorry to ramble on. Your points are all valid--I just respectfully disagree.

  14. Not too impressed by ceeam · · Score: 1

    As others said - no monitor and no peripherals (and I'd say that since it's a gaming machine then it would be reasonable to include a joystick and a wheel. But then I play lots of sims, others may skip it).

    Also - 512MB of RAM is too low for gaming these days (especially when compared against selected CPU+Video).

    Add all of the above and we are at $1000. As expected.

    Oh, and software costs are not included! This means we _need_ to upgrade DVD-ROM to a burner, right?

    1. Re:Not too impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This means we _need_ to upgrade DVD-ROM to a burner, right?

      Nope. Get a friend's copy of XP and "borrow" their serial number, then use Daemon Tools to load up the game images you downloaded off of thepiratebay.org. Easy as that, no burner needed. And, If you really knew what you were doing you could put your friend's copy of XP on a 1 gig usb memory stick and not even need a cdrom or a dvdrom at all.

    2. Re:Not too impressed by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      Get a friend's copy of XP and "borrow" their serial number

      Windows XP Product activation kind of puts a damper on that these days unless you have the volume license key version. Maybe you can borrow their copy of Windows 2000 Pro instead.

  15. OS not included in the price by Browzer · · Score: 1, Informative

    $500 will get you CPU+MB+RAM+HD+CD/DVD+VGA+P.S.

    Does anybody read the article anymore before posting, or FP is more important?

    Link to the conclusion, if you don't have the attention span to read a 400 word article.

    http://www.tomshardware.com/howto/20051014/the_500 _gaming_machine-08.html

    1. Re:OS not included in the price by Andrew+Tanenbaum · · Score: 0, Troll

      Then they can't really compare it to other systems, and that "$500" is meaningless. You need an OS for a computer. Are they assuming that we're all pirates?

    2. Re:OS not included in the price by kubevubin · · Score: 1

      And I didn't see mention of a case. I mean, are we supposed to have all of these components sprawled out on the floor or something?

    3. Re:OS not included in the price by corvair2k1 · · Score: 1

      Most people (like me) already have a Windows license, and it tends to float from computer to computer. Take that old computer, put Linux on it, and reactivate the Windows on a new machine.

      If you have to call MS about it, just explain the situation. They'll let you reactivate.

    4. Re:OS not included in the price by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      If you have to call MS about it, just explain the situation. They'll let you reactivate.

      Not in Australia they don't. I've got half a dozen expensive XP coasters from computers whose components are now spread across other machines.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    5. Re:OS not included in the price by MLopat · · Score: 1

      Could you clarify that for us?

      Last I checked, most the activation calls goto the same call centre over in India, whether you're calling from the USA, Australia, Canada, etc. and they will always let you reactivate retail software as long as you don't have it installed on another computer.

    6. Re:OS not included in the price by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      they will always let you reactivate retail software as long as you don't have it installed on another computer.

      You may be right, but our experience was a little different. We had one machine which was something of a "woodsman's axe". W'd rejig it to match whatever configuration our clients at the time were using. Microsoft reactivated XP on it a few times, but one time when we called to activate, the support person told us we'd made too many changes and they could no longer activate that copy.

      I haven't tried since then and anyway, all our new machines come with OEM Windows. You're SOL with reactivating those ones.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    7. Re:OS not included in the price by MLopat · · Score: 1

      Well they shouldn't be giving you a hard time with multiple re-activations. They may question it, but according to the license agreement there are no specified maximum activation numbers (aside from MSDN).

    8. Re:OS not included in the price by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      They may question it, but according to the license agreement there are no specified maximum activation numbers

      Dunno mate. You may be right about that, but I wasn't going to get down on my knees and beg. These days we just include the cost of the XP license in the contract. The clients haven't complained...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  16. Dell Coupons by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out Dell coupons, do a google search, dell has some good deals as long as you dont buy upgrades from them. Monarch or Newegg are my favorite low cost, and top pricewatch listings for lowest price.

    I wanted a Dell 24inch LCD, Dell had a dual core 2.8ghz system with 24 LCD for 1199. So, basically I got the computer for a 2-3 hundred above a 24 inch on sale. Or free on normal prices. (160 HD, Dual DVD/DVR, ATI 300, system)

    I picked up a 7800 GT/OC for 350, almost 7000 3dmark, every game can run 1900x1200 or 1600x1200 with AA/AF on. And it included Call of Duty 2.

    Figured I can always build an AMD X2 system later and put the GFX card in it, and bump upto 8500-9000 3dmark, next year when the prices drop.

    I missed running dual core, since my dual P3-800, so nice.

    1. Re:Dell Coupons by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Or a 499 system with 19 LCD and it comes with XP Home, both left out on their build.

  17. Re:Linux by Donniedarkness · · Score: 1

    The thing is, most people wouldn't want a Linux box for gaming.

    --
    Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
  18. Great Cheap Gaming System by davidwr · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you want a "great" inexpensive gaming system just pretend it's 3 years ago but pay today's prices.

    The best games of 2002 aren't all that bad.

    Want cheaper? Keep dialing back the clock.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Great Cheap Gaming System by slackmaster2000 · · Score: 1

      I do this to some extent. Not only can you save on hardware, but it's nice to pick up a game for $19 instead of $49 or $59. In multiplayer games after a couple years the number of wankers is substantially lower, and the abilities of the good players are much better, which can make it more fun. (but wait too long and everybody's playing retarded mods like a redeemer-only bathroom map in UT, heh)

      It is hard though when a new game you've been looking forward to only plays well at 800x600 with all the goodies turned off.

    2. Re:Great Cheap Gaming System by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny
      Want cheaper? Keep dialing back the clock.

      2330 PRINT "WEATHER REPORT: A SEVERE THUNDERSTORM"
      2340 PRINT "HIT LEMONSVILLE EARLIER TODAY, JUST AS"
      2350 PRINT "THE LEMONADE STANDS WERE BEING SET UP."
      2360 PRINT "UNFORTUNATELY, EVERYTHING WAS RUINED!!"
    3. Re:Great Cheap Gaming System by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 1

      Bingo!

      The games and systems are both cheaper, because the cutting-edge gamers have moved on to bigger and better things.

      You don't have to suffer through sub-par games, because time has already separated the wheat from the chaff.

      There is lots of accumulated knowledge about the game on the Internet, in case you get stuck and would rather have a hint than spend hours of trial-and-error finding what you missed.

    4. Re:Great Cheap Gaming System by tepples · · Score: 1

      In multiplayer games after a couple years ... the abilities of the good players are much better

      So what do I do if I don't want to go 0-200 for my first couple months of playing? Or do most older PC games have a handicapping system so that I can still have fun as I become proficient in the game?

    5. Re:Great Cheap Gaming System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, it's not even that bad. My system just up until recently had 512MB Ram, a 2Ghz semperon I upgraded last year about this time, and a GeForce2 GTS... Yep, late 1999's cream of the crop in video technology. What can I say, I haven't been gaming much the last 4 years. It ran HL2 suprisingly well, I must say, and that's 5, almost 6 year old tech. Sure, it wasn't as pretty as it could have been, everything in low settings, 800x600. But it was a decent experience... At least as good AND pretty as your average console game on a TV.

      You don't need AMD 64s, huge ram and expensive cards to run game acceptibly well.

    6. Re:Great Cheap Gaming System by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Completely agree. The difference between Rome:Total War and Medieval: Total War is like maybe 20%. And Civ III is entertaining, you don't really need Civ IV. Then there is the fact that you can enjoy great games like Starcraft, Warcraft III, Diablo IIx, any of the Sim-games (Tower, City, etc) on a non-cutting-edge system. Then throw in the shareware, especially SillySoft (Lux, their version of Risk, is good) and Ambrosia (need I say more), and you can have a dozen very fun games, even if they are a bit non-traditional.

    7. Re:Great Cheap Gaming System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Geforce2 is hardly 1999 tech. It wasn't even released until mid 2000.

    8. Re:Great Cheap Gaming System by Joe123456 · · Score: 0

      Not simcity 4

    9. Re:Great Cheap Gaming System by G-funk · · Score: 1

      *sniff* /wipes tear.

      <lament> Oh dear me how I miss my //c! </lament>

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  19. Re:Linux by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does Tux Racer at 300fps count as gaming? ;)

  20. Oops, 512MB isn't enough by slackmaster2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can always scale back graphics to bump up fps, but some of these new games are so memory intensive that 512MB just isn't cutting it anymore. I certainly regret making the decision to do 256x2 in my machine...especially since upgrading to gig and maintaining dual channel means I have to buy 2 sticks of 512. Bummer. Swapping is something I've had to deal with in a number of games, from HL2 to BF2. It's not terrible, but enough that I do have to go and shut down a lot of stuff I run at startup before playing to minimize it. I would spend the extra dough on a gig right off if I had to do it over.

    This article assumes (hopefully intentionally) that you're reusing a bit of stuff from your last machine...I mean, a *case*, mouse/keyboard, monitor, speakers, etc. Money might be found for more memory then by recycling a hard drive and CDROM/DVD drive.

    1. Re:Oops, 512MB isn't enough by rpozz · · Score: 1

      Also, 'budget' memory in my experience seems to have a nasty habit of failing memtest86. There's a reason for it being cheap.

    2. Re:Oops, 512MB isn't enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      k, If you'll read TFA, you'll have noticed that they mention everywhere that this is a starting point; that's why they bought a mobo that had AGP as well as PCI-E; So later, when they had a little more money, they could drop money on the latest NVIDIA/ATI offering instead of an older AGP card.
      Anyways, if you can read TFA and understand at least 3 words they say per page, you're also smart enough to realise that you don't have to follow their suggestions.
      This is a budget pc. You wanna drop more money for a gig of memory, do it.
      They aren't looking for high-performance, obviously. Anyways, I think perhaps that maybe a few people might have commented about the lack of a case already?

    3. Re:Oops, 512MB isn't enough by slackmaster2000 · · Score: 1

      If you were aware that you're posting on slashdot, you'd probably know that by the time you posted your comment, a half dozen others probably posted the exact same sentiments. That's the way it goes.

      Anyhow, nobody implied that we *have* to follow the guide. That's not even an argument. My first sentence, if you understood "at least three words" I said, gets at the fact that it's easier to solve raw FPS performance problems than it is to solve swapping problems. When a game suddenly starts jerking because of memory problems, it's a much more significant problem in terms of playability than frame rates dropping. I then went on to say that since this *guide* obviously assumes that we're re-using hardware, then there might also be enough money left in there (hard drive, CDROM) to bump up to a gig.

      Cripes man, take a deep breath.

    4. Re:Oops, 512MB isn't enough by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      Er, sorry but in this case you're wrong.

      Corsair value select ram is good stuff, with a good price.
      It comes with a _lifetime_ warranty and I haven't had any issues with it in any of the builds I've done since I started using it.

      I had a brain fart once and ordered crucial instead - never again. You are only paying for the name there I feel.

    5. Re:Oops, 512MB isn't enough by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Just curious - did the Crucial memory fail, or did it just cost $20 more than the Corsair value select?

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    6. Re:Oops, 512MB isn't enough by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > I certainly regret making the decision to do 256x2 in my machine... especially since upgrading to gig and maintaining dual channel means I have to buy 2 sticks of 512. Bummer.

      I'll second that. Back in 2003, I picked up the Corsair top of the line mem sticks 2x 256 TWIN512-3200LLPT -- wish I had picked a single 512 stick instead.

      I'm really amazed how much prices have fallen, since then.
      i.e. (NewEgg)
      $70 ASRock 939Dual-SATA2 Socket 939 ULi M1695 ATX
      $139 AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Venice Socket 939
      $153 eVGA GeForce 6600GT 128 Meg
      $80 Corsair ValueSelect 1 Gig
      $55 Case w/ 400 W
      ====
      $497 not bad at all.

      For gamers, I don't think its unreasonable to assume they have an extra monitor, keyboard, and hard drive laying around. I exclude cases, because why take apart a functioning case+mobo (especially jumpers / LEDs)? I found it to be a far more efficient use of my time, to get a new case with a new mobo.

      Cheers

    7. Re:Oops, 512MB isn't enough by MojoStan · · Score: 1
      I certainly regret making the decision to do 256x2 in my machine...especially since upgrading to gig and maintaining dual channel means I have to buy 2 sticks of 512.

      Are you sure? I think most modern motherboards with 4 DIMM slots support dual channel operation with 3 DIMMS if the third DIMM is equal in size and speed to the total of th first 2 DIMMS.

      For example, I recently built a cheap-ass system with an Intel D915GUX (915G chipset) motherboard. I chose to install 512MB in dual channel (2x256). According to the manual, I can upgrade to 1GB by putting both 256MB DIMMS into one channel's DIMM slots, then putting a new 512MB DIMM into one of the other channel's DIMM slots.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  21. Re:Linux by gbulmash · · Score: 4, Funny
    Dude, you haven't experienced gaming until you've played Tux Racer at 300fps! ;)

    Yes, but then the "Linus Is God" subliminal message, coming every 35th frame, would go by too fast to register.

  22. Re:Corners have been cut by gbulmash · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Gaming-tuned WINE variant is called Cedega. I've also read some comments that it kicks Crossover Office's butt on running productivity apps, but I haven't seen any reputable pubs do a head-to-head on them.

    - Greg

  23. Summary: by jannesha · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Basically, to spend only $516, you have to give up on the following:

    OS (unless you want to run your games under WINE)
    monitor
    keyboard
    mouse
    speakers
    case (that's right, just pile the components under your desk, folks!)

    yikes.

  24. www.sharkyextreme.com by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 2, Informative

    I usually check out www.sharkyextreme.com for some information on systems built to a certain price. It has a few different options like low-end, gaming, high end. (Don't exactly remember.) Helps a bit even if they aren't one of the top hardware sites. I've always found their guides to be very useful.

  25. Re:Corners have been cut by Sepodati · · Score: 1

    Oh come on. We all know what goes with a computer. Can't you just assume this is for the person that has an existing computer that doesn't play the games they want? You could maybe argue the case should be added, if the new motherboard won't fit into it or something, but that's about it.

    ---John Holmes...

  26. Feh by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 0, Troll

    You can buy a whole system for 500 prebuilt... Just by a Mini Mac. You can play all sorts of games! The Mac logo puzzle game... Break Out... Super Break Out... Photoshop...

    --
    MadOgre.com
  27. Here's some real budget gaming advice by Achra · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, this story is just junk.. But here's my 2 cents. Buy enough cheap ram to upgrade to 512mb. Make sure that you have a machine that runs in the neighborhood of 2ghz (P4/Athlon XP). Purchase an ATI Radeon 9500Pro ($40ish on ebay). This should be enough to be able to play Doom 3 and the other modern titles. No, they won't look great, but they will certainly be playable. I'm on a rig like that right now, and it runs Doom 3 at 1024x768 with specular lighting at around 30fps.
    As a general rule of thumb when purchasing a video card on a budget, always buy yesterday's performance model rather than today's budget model.

    --
    Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    1. Re:Here's some real budget gaming advice by stanmann · · Score: 1

      A Geforce fx5200 can be had for 25ish, and runs Doom3 at perfectly serviceable resolution and FPS with 1G ram.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    2. Re:Here's some real budget gaming advice by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      As a general rule of thumb when purchasing a video card on a budget, always buy yesterday's performance model rather than today's budget model.
      I'd like to follow that advice, but I'm stuck. What do you suggest for a guy who uses Linux often (and therefore must get an nVidia card, for the decent drivers) and also wants good performance in Half-Life 2 (which, I've read, the GeForce 5xxx series sucks at)? Do I just suck it up and keep chugging on my GeForce 3 500 until the 6600 gets cheap?
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Here's some real budget gaming advice by Achra · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not sure if I would jump at the FX 5200, as I'm pretty sure that's a seriously budget card. Most "comparison" charts I've seen put it inline with the Radeon 9200, which is a real dog. I would lean towards The Geforce 4 Ti 4200/4400/4600, I think. I know that was quite a card, and it's what I'm thinking of upgrading my Linux box's Geforce 3 to. They seem pretty cheap, although I have no real idea if they will push Half-life 2 or not. The framerates in benchmarks I've seen (for other games) are really high, even compared to modern cards, they just lack all the pretty pixel shading that modern cards do, being a DX8 board.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
  28. Missing parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay add $130 for Xp pro, $25 for keyboard and mouse, $120 for CRT monitor, $40 for a case and what do you have? An $830 computer. I'm sure that you could buy the same thing already made for less. This is why our company no longer builds PCs.

  29. Wow, that was useful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As others have already pointed out, this is not a "$500 gaming machine". It is missing some essential parts that likely will put you up closer to the $800-900 range at least. Also, I find it outright absurd that they seriously considered leaving out an optical drive, which by the way was only $20. Then again, Tom's Hardware has always been a little shady. I much prefer AnandTech; they seem to be more thorough and professional AND they include EVERYTHING (mouse, keyboard, monitor, case, power supply, speakers, etc) in their guides. Not that I usually follow them; it's best to look at the options availalble and make your own decisions based on what you want to do.

  30. Ars Technica by Kesh · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'd rather use the Ars Technica System Guides. They tend to be a bit more realistic and don't hype up a specific price point. Plus, they get all the components in. ;)

    Their Budget Box is comparable to the one Tom's built, and actually includes all the necessary parts in the price.

    1. Re:Ars Technica by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      Yea, I don't think I like those arstechnica links

      They don't have nearly enough advertising on their website.
      They only have two banners and one adbox.
      and their site design is such a mess

      Toms Hardware is sooooo much cooler with their green text links & massive link boxes.
      And the layout is much much cleaner

      /sarcasm
      Why do I hate TomsHardware?
      Is it because it doesn't have much Tom in it anymore?

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Ars Technica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ars technia's suggestions are for a Buget System, and not for a gaming system, even though many of the components are the same. But certain problems exist with both articles.

      1) Price of Ram. Toms says go with Corsair for $23. Lowest price anywhere is $30, ARS says go with generic... which might be fine for a non-overclocked office machine, but definatly bad for gaming machines.

      2) Although ARS technical Dealtime highlights lowest prices ( and its not nessesarly the best price ) It does NOT allow you to SORT by the lowest prices so you can avoid a fly-by-nigth operation.

      3) How to tell a fly by night operataion: Call them on their 800 line, ask for Quantity 2, and then ask if their shipping address and billing address are the same. I once ordered a HD from some dirtbag in La Brea. He sent a demo unit( fingerprints on it, open box etc..etc...and it didnt work, I returned it the next day, and he said "Man, Im having problems with my warehouse in Jersey..." After 3 weeks, and 10 phone calls, I got a refund, but only after I said I would drive there, and file with the DA, giving the DAs name and telephone number.

      and check out these dirtbags:
      http://arstechnica.dealtime.com/xPC-256MB_DDR2_PC2 _3200_400MHZ_DELL_OPTIPLEX_GX280_DIMENSION_SERIES
      AGP Brand RAM?
      Just so you can stump a newbie?

    3. Re:Ars Technica by Alan · · Score: 1
      and check out these dirtbags: http://arstechnica.dealtime.com/xPC-256MB_DDR2_PC2 _3200_400MHZ_DELL_OPTIPLEX_GX280_DIMENSION_SERIES [dealtime.com] AGP Brand RAM? Just so you can stump a newbie?

      It actually reads ACP, not AGP.

  31. Can anyone read? It's an UPGRADE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    THG's assumptions on reusable parts:
    keyboard
    mouse
    speakers
    case
    cables

    1. Re:Can anyone read? It's an UPGRADE by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2, Informative
      RTFA

      It clearly says "Instead of the newest killer rig from Alienware, Falcon Northwest, Voodoo, etc... how about a system for the rest of us with a realistic budget starting from scratch?" on the very first page.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    2. Re:Can anyone read? It's an UPGRADE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      smart guy.

      slashdot should stick to what it knows: IT, linux, and Windows-bashing. When referring to hardware, scratch means that all the components were bought individually, not that you start with nothing. The article also states that it assumes you already have a keyboard and the rest.

    3. Re:Can anyone read? It's an UPGRADE by Minwee · · Score: 1
      Tomorrow in Tom's Hardware there will be an amazing article detailing how _anybody_ can build a top of the line gaming rig _from scratch_, for absolutely nothing!

      Of course, _everybody_ already has one of those lying around, so "from scratch" just means that you push a few things around on the desk, but hey, it got you to read the article and load the ads.

    4. Re:Can anyone read? It's an UPGRADE by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Why not reuse the power supply too? Could have added another 512 ram instead.

  32. GameCube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $99

  33. YAWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But does it plug into your regular TV and play play station or xbox games?

    Still cost more than an XBOX or PS-2

    1. Re:YAWN by bullitB · · Score: 1

      But does it plug into your regular TV and play play station or xbox games?

      Well, yes, it has a TV out, and yes, it can play playstation games.

      More than a console? Certainly, but the games are often cheaper and there are more of them. Plus you don't have to play for Xbox Live or the like.

      Personally, I'm pleased with both my Xbox and a similar Windows PC which I keep around to do some work stuff on and occasionally use for games. But if you can only get one, there really are vastly more games you can play with a PC than a console (of any kinda).

    2. Re:YAWN by Sepodati · · Score: 1

      and yes, it can play playstation games.

      Holy crap, what a worthless website. Have they not ever heard of an "About" page that tells me WTF I'm looking at? Or are the very small letters in the top right I barely noticed supposed to tell me all I need to know about the site? And "choose a language" with one choice? I can't get that 5 seconds back... It's probably not your site, so the bitch isn't directed at you, btw...

      ---John Holmes...

  34. Don't read this article, please. by inkdesign · · Score: 2, Informative

    AMD Athlon 64 3000+ $146
    SRock 939Dual-SATA2 $69
    orsair Value Select 512 MB (2x 256 MB) $52
    Geforce 6600 256 MB $113
    Western Digital Caviar SE WD800JD 80 GB $57.50
    LITE-ON Black 16X DVD-ROM $19.99
    SeaSonic S12-330 ATX12V 330W $59.00
    Total $516.49

    There's the article, without a bunch of bullshit.

    Dunno wtf they expect you to do without a case though.

    1. Re:Don't read this article, please. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      All the geforce 6600 cost over $200. I just purchased one 2 weeks ago and got a 6600GT but they they only come with 128 megs of ram but they are generally faster than the original 6600's.

      still doom3 shutters when I go above 800x600. This was $275 later. What gives?

    2. Re:Don't read this article, please. by br0ck · · Score: 1

      I have a 6600 GT (and Athlon 2400+) and it runs smoothly at 1024x768 with most of the settings dialed up.

      Install the latest Doom 3 patch, the latest Nvidia Forceware patch, and the latest motherboard and sound card patches.

      For me, turning off EAX, setting the card's Antialiasing and Anisotropic Filtering control panel to 'Application Preference', and setting image_cacheMinK higher in autoexec.cfg (see page 7&8 of the guide) all seemed to make the biggest difference.

      For more info, try the tweak guide.

    3. Re:Don't read this article, please. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Odd I have the exact same hardware as you including eax with the sound blaster live.

      How much ram do you have? My system was one of the first chipsets to support ddr400 but only in the first bank. I settled with 512 megs of ddr333 ram so I could use 2 banks and 1gig dimms were pricy. I wonder if thats the bottle neck? I think I will take your advice. I turn off nvidia deskbar because it uses ram and I figured doom3 was ram hungry.

  35. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless they want a decent framerate on Doom 3.

  36. 3 gamer computer guides for 3 budgets by g_adams27 · · Score: 5, Informative
  37. Of Course No Case by matthewcraig · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Many comments have mentioned the case and keyboard and mouse and monitor and speakers were not included. Of course, they were not included because PC gamers building a new system already have another computer. These peripherals are assumed to be present in computer gamers' enviornments. The article did not include prices on a chair for sitting upon, but I will assume a gamer probably already has this peripheral. They don't need help purchasing one because if they didn't have a chair or a case or a keyboard, then they surely know it and can go buy it without the help of a computer purchasing walkthrough. These peripherals have not changed in decades, and Tom's Hardware does not include it in their gaming-rig loadouts.

    1. Re:Of Course No Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rant mode=on

      You're right! What was I thinking! I'll just rip the lcd out of my laptop and use that for a monitor, that'll work great! I just plug it into that pci-e video card, right? No adapters or anything, because Tom wouldn't lead me astray and not list all the parts for a pc when he's telling me how to build a pc, right? Speakers too, I'll just yank those out from underneath my laptops keyboard. But, hey! I have to pull the keyboard too so I have some buttons to push to play all those games I'll be able to afford by reusing these old parts. The laptops case may be a bit trickier, but I figure with some plywood and bondo (everybody should have those things, like a chair, right?) and just make the case a weeee bit bigger to fit all of these new parts I got for $500.

      The bottom line, if you're going to write an article titled "HowTo: The $500 Gaming Machine - The Budget Gaming PC Challenge" you might want to list all the parts for a pc, not half the parts. A lot of us college students, the target audience who would want a "budget pc", have laptops instead to do work at school.

      rant mode=off

    2. Re:Of Course No Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These peripherals have not changed in decades

      Actually, we went from AT keyboards and serial mice to PS2 about 10 years ago. Monitors went from CGA to EGA to VGA about 15 years ago. Cases changed from AT to ATX about 10 years ago too...

      TTFN!

    3. Re:Of Course No Case by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Wow, I've got 20 year old PS2 Keyboards and PS2 mice that are at least 15 years old. and the ATX switch was more like 5 years ago.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  38. what a ten page article is trying to say: by fanblade · · Score: 1, Redundant

    ASRock motherboard (AMD Socket 939, PCI Express/AGP, SATA2) - $69
    AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Processor (1.8GHz, boxed CPU kit with cooler) - $146
    eVGA's nVidia GeForce 6600 (256MB, AGP) - $113
    512MB Corsair Value Select (PC3200, dual-channel DDR400 RAM) - $52
    80GB Western Digital Caviar SE hard drive (WD800JD, SATA 150, 8MB cache, 7200rpm) - $57.50
    DVD-ROM from LiteOn (SOHD-16P9SBLK, 16x read) - $20
    330W PSU from Seasonic (S12-330, ATX 12V) - $59

  39. And the OS and the Case and keyboard and mouse? by bogie · · Score: 1

    Since your building this machine yourself you will need a copy of XP to actually play the games on. Also is this thing just going to float in the air or something? I guess the "$500 budget game machine" sounds better than the "$700 budget game machine" which is what this really would cost to build. But why let facts get in the way of a good ad generator, I mean story.

    btw that entire article could fit onto 2 pages if they could keep the ads down a bit. Has ad revenue really dropped that badly that even a site like Tom's needs to resort to tricks like this?

    The ratio of text you actually read to ads and other misc garbage is 10% vs 90% at best. Thank god for the zap plugins bookmarklet.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  40. Calling TRIPMASTER MONKEY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have a call for a karma whore! Why not just use Slashdot's pinnacle of Karma Whoring, TripMaster Monkey? Not only will we get some pathetic statement that his no-IQ minions will automatically mod as "insightfull", but we'll also get that fucking anime smile that makes me want to break some bones (someone else's, of course) every time he uses it.

  41. Easily Solved by i_will_frag_u_all · · Score: 1

    Its called www.newegg.com They have some great deals on some parts. I build mine for about 449 USD and it runs great. All the parts I bought from newegg

  42. anybody care to comment on ASROCK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ive looked at their stuff before & came very close to buying asrock boards. Anybody care to share their horror stories or endorsments of the brand?

    Theyre pretty cheap, its not another ECS/pcchips clone is it?
    They seem to have just sprung from nowhere a few years ago.

  43. Re:Corners have been cut by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Yeah I agree. The first 50 or so "but they didn't include a case!" posts were informative, now they're just redundant.

    As for the OS issue, I think it could be easily argued that Tom's Hardware is ... well, a HARDWARE guide, and thus they were concerned only with laying out the hardware you'd need to run games, not the OS or other software. I didn't expect them to actually build a $500 gaming rig and include a retail box edition of XP, did anyone else? Of course not; it's assumed that you'll acquire one yourself. The fact that it may include some variety of extralegal means is left unspoken.

    I had hoped that this article would actually result in some interesting discussion of low-budget / high-performance hardware and the implied tradeoffs there, but instead it's just attracted a lot of pedants boosting their karma by pointing out that there's no Windows license included for the 100th time.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  44. Missing more than just an OS and a case by stonedonkey · · Score: 1

    Not going to get very far without a keyboard and mouse, speakers, or a monitor, either. I'm all for putting together inexpensive rigs, but it's just not doable at $500. Not yet. I know they're "focusing simply on the box itself," but that's a cop-out. Especially when they didn't choose a "box" at all. I think it's safe to say that a "Gaming Machine" includes input and display (and a case and operating system), so the title of the article is misleading. It's more like "How much of a gaming-oriented computer can we put together for $500?" Not all of it, apparently. But we knew that already, didn't we? So what's the point of this exercise?

  45. Just how CLUELESS are you people? It's an UPGRADE! by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay, folks. Let's look through what we have so far in this thread - a number of people complaining about no monitor, keyboard, mouse, or case.

    Did it ever occur to any of you that all of those items are what WE CURRENTLY HAVE? Look at the parts list that he's building up in the review. It's evident that he's talking about UPGRADING a current system on a shoestring budget!

    Keyboards, mice, monitors, and cases can remain consistent through any upgrade. They neither improve nore degrade performance. HOWEVER...

    A new processor is obvious.

    Depending on how old your current system is, a new motherboard is probably required for the new CPU.

    New memory is also often required in order to take advantage of faster buses. (No smart-ass comments about public transportation, please.) Although I personally would not recommend anything less than 1 GB for gaming or 2 GB if you plan on playing Battlefield 2.

    A new video card is obviously needed for a lot of newer games, and the 6600 has a very good price/performance ratio right now.

    A new hard drive is always a good idea for several reasons. (A) Price/GB is always dropping. (B) More storage is always good. (C) A new drive allows the ability to transfer data from the old hard drive more efficiently than making a backup to DVD. (D) New hard drives are just about guaranteed to be faster than older hard drives, especially if there is a multi-year difference between the two.

    Everything that he mentioned in the article are what are needed to get yourself a "new" gaming system. A new case, keyboard, mouse, and monitor are not needed. The main internals that matter are clearly what he's talking about. So, it should have been evident that the article is about UPGRADING a current system, not buying a whole new gaming system from scratch!

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  46. Weren't looking very hard. by Agarax · · Score: 1

    Oh, and I know they only cost $20 sans P/S but they also forgot a case. Idiots.

    Yeah, but they obviously didn't look very hard when they were making this list.

    http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82 E16811209002

    Viola, and you still have your sub $500 gaming rig.

    --
    Remember folks, slashdot doesn't have a -1 "disagree" moderation!
    1. Re:Weren't looking very hard. by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right. $16 for a case and 400W PS. You need to add the cost of hearing protection to the project. Been there and done that. Don't ever buy a cheap PS. And after installing everything in a cheap case, you'll look like one of Freddy's victims.

    2. Re:Weren't looking very hard. by Agarax · · Score: 1

      Better than bolting everything to a piece of plywood if you dont factor a case into your equation.

      Crappy case/loud 400W PSU > no case/underpowered PSU

      And from the reviews it doesnt sound that bad for the money. Keeping in mind that this is Newegg of course.

      --
      Remember folks, slashdot doesn't have a -1 "disagree" moderation!
  47. Re:Corners have been cut by bcmm · · Score: 1
    Apparently they're going to lay all the components on their desk because they didn't include a CASE in the budget.
    And that's how to save money on cooling!

    And never mind a KVM switch, whatever happened to manually moving plugs around?
    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  48. Yea I got a 500 dollar gaming rig by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

    Yea, I spent 500 bucks for a "gaming rig" (plus 60 bucks for 1 gig of ram).

    Specs: Gateway 507GR
    300 watt PS
    3.0 HT p4
    512 meg ram
    200 gig HDD
    DVD/CD burner
    Intel GMA 900 integrated graphics
    Ex Pee home
    Cost so far: 350+tax (was on clearance at Orfice Depot over the summer)

    Added:
    ATI Radeon x700 pro 256 PCIE @$150

    Total: 500 bucks. For even more kicks, I added 1 gig of ram and a tv tuner card.

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  49. it's called xbox, ps2/3 gamecube by dindi · · Score: 1

    Yes mode me down I am an ass on that issue, and while 2 years ago I did not even want to hear of a console system, after I got a PS2 I got an xbox in 3 months and enjoying the benefits of it......

    While I sometimes install a demo on my PC and see the quality difference in GFX power and marvel the 1024, most of the time the framerate or the needed res/detail adjustments leave me with a game that I can barely enjoy unless I go and buy an other video card or latest processor for several hundreds.

    I know that my xbox farcry or doom3 looks like crap compared to the PC version, but I know that my thousand dollar PC ran DOOM 3 like CRAP while my $200 xbox gives me an enjoyable experience ....

    The other issue is the keyboard gaming : while I found the console controllers stupid some time ago, I got used to them soo much, it made me really hate playing with the keyboard and a mouse when I tried it recently with the FEAR demo (which by the way kept crashing my machine every 20 minutes - no my machine never crashes, even that that particular one runs XP with heavy DVD rendering loads)

    While I decided not to get a new console a while ago, the E3 presentation made me think of a PS3 and it just got stronger after tryin 2-3 games recently on the PC, one that something like : "GO BUY a NEW MACHINE I DO NOt RUN ON THAT SHIT" .......

    I mean 2.8 G P4 with 512M RAM and some year-old NVIDIA ...... For the price of a new card I just buy an xbox360, for the processor and motherboard price I buy a PS3 next spring ....

    Sorry but my apps run just fine on my other machine with the "other system" Linux, AMD XP2000, 768M ......

    I know that is an other argument and I probably would not have agreed with myself even 2 years back.....

    Besides: my projector is 800x600 native which will just kick butt with the outpot of the new consoles ... right now xbox 480p is a bit blocky on the 1.79cm wide screen ....

  50. News? by Ma3oxuct · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What the hell is wrong with Slashdot today. This article is dated the 14th of October. This is not news; the prices have changed if you browse the 'net a bit now. On top of that the article was rather stupid as so many have pointed out.

  51. Doom yes, Quake no by mbius · · Score: 1

    Having just slogged through Quake 4 on a 9500 pro, 512MB pc800, 2.53GHz P4, I can't recommend anyone else do this. Doom3 was surprisingly decent, but Quake at 1280x1024 / medium / no shadows did 20-30 fps with more stutter than Gary the Retard. Multiplayer is out of the question.

    If I can't run Oblivion, that'll be the deal-breaker.

    --
    you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
    Prime UID Club
    1. Re:Doom yes, Quake no by Achra · · Score: 1

      Um, well, I'd have to say that 1280x1024 in medium mode is not the kind of video settings that I would suggest for that hardware. It's not cutting edge hardware, it's a $40 ebay videocard. All I said was that it would play, and not look amazingly pretty doing it. :)

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    2. Re:Doom yes, Quake no by mbius · · Score: 1

      Not to nitpick, but the settings I mentioned aren't "amazingly pretty." My point is precisely that while Doom3 runs better than you'd expect on budget hardware, another modern game *is* borderline unplayable. Even at minimum resolution / quality. It's worth pointing out to potential buyers. If you've had a better experience with Quake, I'm interested to hear it.

      I'm on a rig like that right now, and it runs Doom 3 at 1024x768 with specular lighting at around 30fps

      If you can't milk more than 30 fps out of Doom3 on that card, I don't think you're in a position to suggest video settings. Tweaks for further improvement are documented out the wazoo.

      --
      you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
      Prime UID Club
    3. Re:Doom yes, Quake no by Achra · · Score: 1

      Well, it seems to me that it is a slightly dubious statement to say that Quake 4 doesn't run as well on the hardware as Doom 3.. When you have Quake 4 set to higher settings than Doom 3.
      I actually don't have a 9500pro, I've got a 9500. I assumed that a 9500pro (being basically a 9500 with twice as many pipelines) would be only more likely to play the games that are playable for me on my device.
      The default clockspeeds for my 9500 are 277mhz core and 270mhz memory. I ran the ATI Tray "find max clockspeed" util and have it clocked to the wall at 386mhz core and 303mhz memory. This 9500 didn't respond well to the enable the disabled pipelines hack. (as an aside, I don't overclock my CPU's.. I've had much better luck with GPU's than CPU's. This is a P4 1.7ghz with 512mb of 800mhz RIMM).
      Doom 3 @ 800x600 w/ specular w/o shadows - ~63fps
      Doom 3 @ 1024x768 w/ specular w/o shadows - ~50-55fps
      Doom 3 @ 1024x768 w/ specular w/ shadows - ~25-55fps
      (very jerky and unpredictable, I suspect that shadows have a lot to do with CPU, my cpu isn't very fast)

      Quake 4 @ 640x480 @ low quality - ~35fps
      Quake 4 @ 800x600 @ low quality - ~30fps
      Higher than 800x600 @ low was very unplayable. Turning up the quality would absolutely kill my system whenever there were smoke effects.
      In summary, Yes Quake 4 is a bigger bastard to run than Doom 3. I'm pretty sure that this has a lot to do with the wide open areas. 3d cards (afaik) still have a much easier time with enclosed spaces than with wide open levels.
      Also, I'm pretty sure that the biggest place that out opinions differ is in what is "playable". Quake 4 @ 800x600 and ~30fps is "playable" to me. But it'll definitely be my new benchmark for the next vidcard that I purchase.
      Cheers,
      -Achra

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    4. Re:Doom yes, Quake no by mbius · · Score: 1

      Cool beans. I bet there's more AI going on in Quake; the enemies seem a little smarter and more agile than in Doom. I'm lamenting my rdram situation as well...too hot to overclock, too expensive to upgrade.

      Happy hunting!

      --
      you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
      Prime UID Club
  52. Re:Linux by hitmark · · Score: 1

    nah, thats a tech demo :P

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  53. REAL sub $600 gaming rig by sarareku · · Score: 2, Interesting

    AMD Semperon 3000/ECS NFORCE3 A combo: Fry's %80
    Western Digital ATA133 80 GB HDD: Fry's $50
    1 GB OCZ DDR400 RAM [2X512]: Fry's $100
    Sony 16x DVDRW Dual Drive: Walmart $70
    Samsung DVDROM 16X OEM: Micro-Center $20
    Diamond/Stealth ATI Radeon 9550 256MB DDR: Micro-Center $65 [easy to overclock]
    Turtle Beach Catalina 7.1 Soundcard: Fry's $35
    MGE M1 Gamer Case with 450W Power Supply: Micro-Center $50
    2X CoolerMaster Case Fans: Micro-Center $10
    Antec Slot Fan/Blower: Micro-Center $5
    Windows XP Home Upgrade: Wal-Mart $89 [All you need is an old Windows 9x/ME/NT or system restore disc to use as full]

    After tax, a tiny bit under $600, not cheaping out on anything [this system has a good burner, a real sound card good for gaming and HT, twice the amount of RAM dual channel at that, and happens to have a case and proper cooling, 0h, and a legal operating system] If you bought all these parts online or ebay, I'm sure you could do even less than what I did.

    And Tom didn't even count in shipping or tax..loser. Someone could counter his system "performs better", but I seriously think the difference in performance would be very marginal, with twice the system and video ram, less intergrated parts, and better though cheap cooling.

    1. Re:REAL sub $600 gaming rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The graphics card is pretty weak. I'd forget the second optical drive, use onboard sound, and get the GF6600 or a 9800 variant. a 9550 is usable but if I had one I'd be wanting to upgrade it now, whereas a 6600 will let you play pretty much anything without having to go to 640x480 to ensure it's smooth, and it's more future-proof. Otherwise, I completely agree.

  54. Hmm... by linnerd40 · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or did they forget something...I just can't find words for it... oh yeah... A CASE? How about a monitor? I find it quite nice to actually see the games when I play them. Perhaps even have some controls to play them with (keyboard? mouse?)? And, although I am a great fan and supporter, I don't think many people want to have a Linux gaming system. Shary Extreme takes a much more realistic approach on the matter.

    --
    The box said: Requires Windows 98 or better. So I installed Linux!
  55. Wait a minute... by Lord+Duran · · Score: 1

    We also left out input devices, such a keyboard, mouse or monitor, I never knew my monitor was an input device. Stdin 2?

  56. Thoughts on sub-$150 Graphics? by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it just me, or is it getting harder and harder to buy a decent card for less then $200? I gotta say, I miss the days of $99 Voodoo Banshees. Heck, if you ask me cards in the $100 range should at least play last years games at 800x600x60fps, and a lot don't. Nvidia's and ATI's naming schemes don't exactly help here either (I especially like how ATI 8500s are faster than many 9200s and the ever increasing alphabet soup trailing off Nvidia card names).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Thoughts on sub-$150 Graphics? by stilz2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually there are quite a few decent, budget cards to be found. I myself just recently purchased a refurbished Leadtek 6800LE online. Even at stock speed, it should be able to handle most games fine at mid-high quality settings at 1024x768 resolution. These cards are quite popular with the budget overclockers/gamers, as there's chance to unlock their hidden 8 pixel pipelines and 2 vertex units. In my case, I was only able to unlock 2 vertex units, but with stock cooling the card went up to 400mhz core and 800mhz memory. It is no 6800gt/ultra, but still plenty fast for $95. But yeah, if you ask me I'd still say the best bang for the buck gaming system for $500 is an Xbox360/PS3.

    2. Re:Thoughts on sub-$150 Graphics? by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Geforce 6600 and Radeon x700 are perfectly playable at resolutions better than 800x600 and can be found for right at $100. As far as "confusing naming" goes, if you're making $100+ purchases without doing any research at all, you deserve whatever you get. It's not like you can't go to Tom's Hardware and check out their VGA charts and spend 5min looking and see numbers for everything from Intel integrated video up to 6800Us and x850XT-PEs.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    3. Re:Thoughts on sub-$150 Graphics? by Rancidlunchmeat · · Score: 1

      Ha! Voodoo Banshee! My first gpu upgrade! Nice PCI card, didn't even have AGP at that time.

      I never spend over $200 for a vid card, so I hear what you're saying. Got my last card in the $150 range.. a 5900NU w/ Call of Duty (game was selling retail at that time for $59.99, so the card was only about $100), and that lasted a good year. Just "upgraded" to an XFX 6800NU. It didn't come with any software at all (except drivers), but it was on weekend sale at Newegg for $160. If you're looking at a card under $150, I assume you're still AGP bound? (like me)

      Newegg has an eVGA 6800NU for $159 after mail in rebate

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16814130202

      Or you can pick up an eVGA 6600GT for $144 after the rebate

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16814130220

      I'd go for the 6800NU, myself but definately stay away from the 6600 non-gt.

      These aren't going to be spectacular cards, but they should run 'all last year's games at 800x600' just fine.

  57. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For $619 shipped I built this:

    Athlon 64 3400+ skt754 board(bought in combo)
    Rosewill Value Case and 350 watt ps
    250 gig seagate barracuda SATA
    1 gig corsair value ram
    NEC 320A(I believe) DVD dual layer burner
    Sapphire Radeon 9600 256meg
    Windows2k($64 included in 619)

  58. Why Build when you can buy a built system for $500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.uberreview.com/2005/10/biggames-home-vi deo-arcade-machine.htm Starting in November, Target Stores will offer a BigGames full size home video arcade machines that will retail for less than $500 nationwide. Each unit plays 12 of the original arcade versions of the most popular Midway® games including: Defender®, Defender® II, Robotron®, Joust®, Bubbles®, Splat(TM), Sinistar®, Rampage®, Rootbeer Tapper(TM), Wizard of Wor(TM), Timber(TM), and Satan's Hollow(TM). The unit stands 62" tall and has an included, built-in, full color monitor. It comes with additional A/V inputs that allow (almost) any existing home video game system, DVD player, VCR or any other A/V product to be plugged in and viewed on the built-in monitor. At 62" the unit is not truly full size but at $500 no work required it may be a good deal. Especially when the hackers get their hands on the unit. The quality of this system should be interesting. I just hope it is better than their http://www.mybiggames.com/index.htmwebsite.

  59. my new pc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I actually just bought a brand new system for $527 shipped, minus the cd drive, mouse and keyboard, and of course the monitor. Still, with all that, I managed to make a system that comperable to theirs for only ten bucks more AND have a decent case to put it all in. 3000+ Sempron, ECS (as long as it's not pc chips I'm fine with it), half gig of ram (decided to go cheap on the ram as it's a cheap upgrade down the line anyway) Powercolor X800 GT (the only thing I decide not to go cheap on) and case w/ 500 watt psu. That was all from one site that put it together and burned it in, so I actually could've gone cheaper if I shopped around a bit, but I didn't feel like waiting on 5 different orders to come in and then put together. I'm happy with it though, it runs everything I've thrown at it great, except for BF2 (demo), which still runs great, just not as pretty as I'd like. Still, if you add the mouse/kb, cheap cd-rom, and went pawn shopping for a monitor, it would truly be a worthwhile rig for under $600. Hell, nowadays people would probably give you an old crt anyway. I hate going cheap on the ram and especially the mobo, but I had never paid over a 100 bucks for a video card, so I took a chance and so far it's doing great! It gets 80-90 fps in CS: Source and HL2 with settings set to high minus shadows (personal preference) at 1280x1024, which is the max my lcd will go.

      It is possible to make a complete, decent system, just remember that once you hit that $500 mark, spending a few more dollers over, goes a long way.

  60. Missing Item by sponga · · Score: 1

    A case to store it all in. Surely if you are this cheap than your original case if you had one at all will not hold things right.

  61. But can you put two users on one PC? by tepples · · Score: 1

    The case, monitor, keyboard, mouse etc don't have to be upgraded. I'm assuming this $500 gaming machine is in response to console players saying PC gaming is too expensive.

    If you reuse the case, monitor, keyboard, and mouse, then other residents of your household will hog the machine for their own purposes.

    Adding the monitor etc to the price is like adding the TV and stereo to the price of the console.

    As households are more likely to have spare TVs than spare monitors and cases, another console can be put on any spare TV in the house, and the old console can use the spare TV's internal speakers. Consoles come packaged with the counterpart to a keyboard anyway.

    1. Re:But can you put two users on one PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than children (who all the prudes say should be supervised anyway) I don't know anyone who doesn't have their own PC. Not even my mom and dad need to share one.

    2. Re:But can you put two users on one PC? by tepples · · Score: 1

      AC wrote: I don't know anyone who doesn't have their own PC.

      In what income bracket?

  62. Sempron64 vs. Athlon64... by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    (all quotes via NewEgg unless cited otherwise)

    Foxconn NF4K8AB-RS Socket 754 NVIDIA nForce4-4X ATX AMD Motherboard - Retail
    Model #: NF4K8AB-RS $63.00
    Albatron PC6600Q Geforce 6600 256MB DDR PCI Express x16 Video Card - Retail
    Model #: PC6600Q $109.00
    AMD Sempron 64 2600+ Palermo 800MHz FSB Socket 754 Processor Model SDA2600BXBOX - Retail
    Model #: SDA2600BXBOX $64.00
    CORSAIR ValueSelect 1GB 184-Pin DDR SDRAM DDR 400 (PC 3200) Unbuffered System Memory Model VS1GB400C3 - Retail Model #: VS1GB400C3 $95.16
    Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 ST3120026A 120GB 7200 RPM IDE Ultra ATA100 Hard Drive - OEM
    Model #: ST3120026A $80.00 mounted as /
    Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 ST3200826AS 200GB 7200 RPM Serial ATA150 Hard Drive - OEM
    Model #: ST3200826AS $110.00 mounted as /home
    TOSHIBA Black IDE DVD Burner Model SD-R5372V - OEM Model #: SD-R5372V $35.00
    Antec Truepower 430W Power Supply on sale at CompUSA for $40 after rebates
    Existing InWin full-tower case $Free (Complete with murals done by Greg Colton, who did layouts for the "Dilbert" animated series.)
    Existing keyboard, monitor & mouse $Free
    Debian Linux $Free

    Full cost $557.15...yeah, it's a little over the $500 limit. Tom also went over the mark. Actually I'm going to spend $110 more on it, because I want two drives on the SATA chain for vidcap work.

    Kicking ass on the econo system that Tom's Hardware put together: Priceless.

    Linux is getting better and better on the gaming front. Windows? It ain't worth the hassle, the insecurity or the money. This configuration can do more than the Tom's system as well. You shouldn't build a modern machine without a DVD burner at this point...it doesn't make sense, because good ones are so inexpensive. And Sempron64 gives you better bang-to-buck ratio than Athlon64.

    I might go with a different video card than the Albatron, but I'll probably stick with the NVidia 6600. Again, good bang-to-buck ratio.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  63. "Keyboard and mouse not supported" on game box by tepples · · Score: 1

    allso, didnt the PS2 sport usb ports? and support normal keyboard and mouse thru that?

    Whether the PS2 hardware and operating system will recognize a device has no bearing on whether a particular game will recognize it. Most PS2 games are hardcoded to read directly from the two PS1 controller ports, not the USB ports.

    1. Re:"Keyboard and mouse not supported" on game box by hitmark · · Score: 1

      maybe so but i recall hearing about atleast two PS2 games that supported the kb&mouse setup. dont recall what they where tho but i think the post was made here on slashdot...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  64. ASROCK = Asus budget line. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said.

  65. Sub 400 dollar gaming rig by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Frys 200 DOllar AMD box
    Memory upgrade 89 dollars
    Video card 89 dollars.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  66. Secret bootloader by tepples · · Score: 1

    PS2, XBox, Nintendo GC, PS3, XBox 360

    That's like buying a DVD player that can only play MPAA movies, not Creative Commons licensed movies and other independent movies that have been saved as MPEG-2. How do I lawfully run independent video games on any of the video game consoles that you mentioned? Heck, how do I even run Half-Life mods (other than Counter-Strike) on a console?

  67. This isn't difficult. by Oz0ne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Any entry level budget PC which can be had a Frys, Compusa, Walmart, Best Buy, Circuit City, etc etc for about $200, with an upgraded video card and MAYBE upgraded ram will run today's games.

    No it won't run them at top resolution at 120fps... but who cares. Anything above 30fps is very playable. Anything above 60fps is just pure gravy.

  68. Adblock+ by jZnat · · Score: 1

    Couple Adblock+ with Filterset.G and you'll have yourself a clean browsing experience. I personally maintain my own filters, but by "maintain" I mean "edit every once in a while".

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  69. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My video card alone costs that.

  70. *Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story has a few hundred comments now. But I'm shocked to see that no one has realised they missed the $500 price point!

  71. I smell money by n0other · · Score: 1

    They left out so many things that I find it hard to believe they just forgot it. It's just to keep the price low and article's title more impressive. The more impressive the title is, the more echo it generates around the web, the more visitors, more money.

  72. very by Charles+Jo · · Score: 0

    carefully

  73. comments please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could someone please comment on why on earth it's damn near impossible to find a decent budget video on/out card? I meen ok say I skip the monitor to play on my TV (wich I'm realy thinking about), what's out their? And how come I can't find a good CRT? sure their old tech wise, but being in the 700 computer croud myself I'd kind of like to know. PS anyone know how to resurect a old dell (it's a p3), then I'd judt get a new hard drive some ram, and a mabie more recent graphics card.

  74. How to Build a $500 Gaming Machine by Hugonz · · Score: 1

    1.- Get 500 bucks.
    2.- Head for the computer shop
    3.- Stop by a Circuit City, Walmart or whatever...
    4.- Buy an Xbox, PS or Gamecube
    5.- Play away

    1. Re: How to Build a $500 Gaming Machine by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can buy a PS2, XBox, AND a Gamecube for $500. I personally think that if someone wants to play really great games that are 100% compatible with their hardware, they should stick to console based games.

      Admittedly, there are advantages to a PC in the area of gaming, but there are not enough advantages to warrent me paying $500 for a PC that plays games.

  75. Re:Just how CLUELESS are you people? It's an UPGRA by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

    hmm okay, but not really sure about the case, you might need a new case if the motherboard format switches.

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  76. Why pay retail? by Ndkchk · · Score: 2, Informative

    If I'm building a system with a budget like that, I'm not going to pay sticker prices for all of this. Here's a system that's better than that for the same price--actually, a little less.

    CPU: AMD Athlon64 3000+ Venice core, $139 at Newegg.
    Motherboard: Foxconn NF4K8AC-RS-1.0, $65 at Newegg, and with the processor, $5 off, taking it to $199.
    RAM: Buffalo Select 512MB DDR 400, $32.25 after rebate at Newegg.
    Video Card: Connect3D Radeon X700, $70 after rebate at TigerDirect. Or, if you're Nvidia, try the XFX Geforce 6600 256MB, $102 at Newegg.
    Hard Drive: Seagate 250GB 7200RPM 8MB, $70 after rebate at TigerDirect.
    Optical drive: NEC 3540A DVD+/- DL, $39 at Newegg.
    Power Supply: Antec SmartPower 2.0 400W, $55 at Newegg, and it won't catch fire when you put something else in that system, unlike their power supply.

    Now, with the Nvidia card you're at $497.25 after all rebates and before shipping. With the ATI, $465.25, leaving enough for another 512 MB of RAM so FEAR will actually run.

    So we have 250 GB of hard drive space, a DVD burner, more RAM, and a real power supply, all for under $500, leaving you that $15 they went over for a cheap case. Enjoy.

  77. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article does refer to UPGRADING. Gee I already have a case in my current system and.. wait.. is that on OS? Hey! I only need to upgrade my components! What's that you say? I can do it for $500? I should have read the article.

  78. A much better $500 Gaming PC - Ok, $673 by sweetnjguy29 · · Score: 1

    This isn't a spam, but I bought my last computer from them, and it was inexpensive. Cyberpowerpc also has cheap computers too...usually with more popular components and a little cheaper...

    Sometimes both sites offer free shipping, which usually costs $200...so wait for that!

    Sometimes, it doesn't make sense to build...

    This is ibuypowers weekly special:

    http://www.ibuypower.com/ibp/store/configurator.as px?mid=69

    -Raidmax 268 ATX Mid-Tower Case w/350W Power Supply
    -[939-pin] AMD® Athlon-64 3000+ CPU w/ Hyper Transport Technology
    -Free Game --- Half Life 2 Download Coupon with purchase of any AMD-64 based systems
    -Foxconn WinFast NF4UK8AA-8EKRS nVidia nForce4-Ultra Chipset Motherboard
    -512MB DDR-400 PC3200 Memory Module Corsair-Value or Major Brand
    -Nvidia 6200 Videocard
    -80 GB 7200 RPM Ultra ATA-100 Hard Drive
    -16X Dual Format/Double Layer DVD±R/±RW + CD-R/RW Drive
    -600W PMPO 3 PCS Super Bass Subwoofer Speaker System
    -PS/2 104 Key Windows 98 Keyboard
    - Optical Internet Mouse
    -MS Windows XP Home Edition w/Service Pack-2
    -ViewSonic 17" E70F Perfect Flat CRT .21H DPI Color Monitor

    This configuration isn't that great, but it is light years ahead of what tom's hardware recommends. Plus it has a free game, a monitor, and WinXP and 1 year of service support and a DVD writer!

  79. as if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the rig's ever going to need more than 128mb of video memory considering the low resolutions it'll be playing at... 256mb sweetspot MY ASS

    i would go for a cheap (probably used) 9800pro over that POS 6600nonpro

  80. A chair is not part of the computer by spideyct · · Score: 1

    A chair is not necessary to use the computer to play games. I would never expect Dell to deliver a chair to me when I purchase a complete computer system.
    A case, ok, you could probably get by without it. You would at least need to buy some sort of switch to connect to the motherboard to turn it on.

    A mouse, monitor, and keyboard are necessary for any game I would want to play. I could maybe get by without speakers.

    The argument that it is assumed that some peripherals are already owned is completely lame. If that were the case, why include a DVD-ROM drive? Heck, why include a motherboard and processor? A 3 year old motherboard and processor would work fine for games. Just buy a fancy video card and some RAM.

    The article was not titled "how to upgrade your system to play the latest games for $500" (but apparently it should have been).

  81. KB/Mouse on Xbox by dolson · · Score: 1

    I use a SmartJoy Frag on my Xbox. It's great for games like Call of Duty, Halo, and pretty much any FPS, really.

    I ordered from Lik Sang:
    http://www.lik-sang.com/info.php?category=83&produ cts_id=5438&

    Also, you can get it for PS2 as well, so that the games that don't support the USB ports will work:
    http://www.lik-sang.com/info.php?category=23&produ cts_id=5439&

  82. THG Fails by excelblue · · Score: 1

    Their $500 for a gaming machine seriously fails it. If you really go dealshopping, you can get a gaming computer with a case for about $500. I'm already done with the price searching to build a new box for $500 with the following specs: AMD Athlon64 3800+ Asus Socet754 Mobo (no, I will not be upgrading this rig ever!) 512MB RAM 300GB/16MB/7200RPM HD One DVD-RW, one CD-RW nVIDIA FX5700 It really works out quite well all for under $500. Definitely beats the one at THG, will be able to handle Doom3 and HL2 like a breeze. However, I'm mostly optimizing this for compiling stuff on Linux.

  83. After seeing the umpteenth... by Warhaven · · Score: 1

    ...complaint about there not being a keyboard, mouse, monitor etc., I have to ask the people who complained, "Did any of you actually -read- the article?" Here, let me help you:

    Plus, in a lot of cases, you can save yourself some shipping money by buying from one retailer when everything is purchased at the same time. We were also careful not to select any parts that were under any "special deals" or rebates at the time. We also left out input devices, such a keyboard, mouse or monitor, since we are focusing simply on the box itself.

  84. So tell me why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FA mentions getting an alienware machine. They come with a case/speakers/...

    1. Re:So tell me why by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

      Probably because upgrading a system is intimidating to a lot of people, so they try to take the wasy way out by buying a whole new system. I know that if given the choice between $2,500 or $500, I'll go for the $500. I think that a lot of other people would, too.

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  85. where are the benchmarks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all in all a good article, but
    where are the benchamrks for that system?
    sure it's cheap, but without any benchmarks
    a novice buyer has no clue as where
    this sytems stands in ranks ...
    anyway, i wouldn't go with a 64 bit cpu for a
    budget gaming system (no 64 bit ready games, duh!)
    sempron instead and most surely no corsair ram!
    kingston is the only way to go. maybe the cheaper
    32-bit cpu might allow for a 6600 GT!
    oh, and yeah, surely no corsair ram!:P

  86. What's up with the terminology? by niteblade · · Score: 1

    When it's running Linux, it's a box.
    When it's running games, it's a rig.
    When it's running Windows, it's a machine.

  87. Case? I don't need no Stinking Case! by txsslim · · Score: 1

    I ran my Gaming Machine, exposed to the elements in my Garage for two years! I waw thinking about building it into the desk, but I got lazy! Whingers!

    --
    "There are three rules in my House. 1) Keep Mama happy. 2) See Rule 1. 3) Life is NOT Fair, Get Over It!"
  88. Mosta that stuff not hard to come by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lotsa peole have been commenting on the lack of a case, keyboard, mouse, speakers, etc.
    I know people are gonna laugh at this, but Keyboard+Mouse+Speakers can all be found relatively cheap at Goodwill/Value Village. I recently got my mitts on a computer that had no Keyboard/Mouse/Speakers; Going to Goodwill, Keyboard+Mouse cost about five bucks and I had a spare pair of speakers lying around. Sure, it's not glamorous, but it fits in with the whole "Budget" theme of the guide. I imagine finding a cheap case isn't hard; hell, if you're a packrat, you've probably got a case or two lying around.

  89. Wow. by Xarius · · Score: 1

    For 500 of your dollars I could purchase a PS2, Xbox and a gamecube, plus several games, at the local GAME store. Second hand, granted, but fully functional.

    --
    C17H21NO4
  90. only 80gb and no burner? by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    Only a 80gb and no burner? I know this is a "budget gaming rig" but come on, I would like to do a little more with it than just play games.

    spend the extra $100 and upgrade from 80gb to at least 200gb and make the DVD-ROM a DVD-+RW.

    the author's comment on this?
    "Many readers may jeer at the fact that no burnable optical drive was selected, especially as prices have dropped dramatically in the last year. This is not intended as a media system, this is a streamlined gaming system on a budget, so let's stay focused. While burning CDs and DVDs as backups is smart, it's by no means mandatory. Plus, adding a DVD burner down the road is probably the easiest of all potential upgrades. "

    He built a system with the bare minimums to get the games to run. Paying $500 to only play games is stupid when you could spend another $100 and play games and have the space to download & burn movies, music, games, etc. Sure he stayed focused but he ended up building something that'd need upgrading almost immediately, and although adding a DVD burner is very easy there's no reason not to do it now, not like they're expensive, spend the extra $30 (DVD-ROM was $20) and get a burner and $40 to get a 200gb hd (80gb was already $60).

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  91. Slashdot humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get it...

    Where's the "Profit !" line?