Slashdot Mirror


Best of What's New 2005

mmoyer writes "Begin the onslaught of year-end roundups. Popular Science takes the early lead with their Best of What's New awards, a roundup of what they consider the top 100 products and technologies of the year. In addition to the obvious awardees like the PSP and perpendicular magnetic recording, there's interesting asides like the world's first programmable wave pool and colored toy bubbles made from disappearing dye."

132 comments

  1. This is filed under Games? by richdun · · Score: 5, Funny

    So how fun is that fiber-reinforced polymer bridge in Wisconsin?

    1. Re:This is filed under Games? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well Tacoma had a bridge that gave people quite a ride a few years back. Maybe they're just waiting for a windy day?

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    2. Re:This is filed under Games? by falzer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I rate it an 8/10.

    3. Re:This is filed under Games? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      So how fun is that fiber-reinforced polymer bridge in Wisconsin?

      You know. Bridge-like.

      What I don't get is the SAAB Biodiesel and the Mercedes Benz. About the Biodiesel:

      --it generates 148 horsepower on pure gasoline, but when it sniffs ethanol, it cranks up the turbocharger's boost pressure (ethanol can handle higher pressure better than gas) to lift output to 184 horsepower.

      Who writes this stuff? Ethanol burns faster, thus produces greater compression during the expansion phase. Since ICEs obtain their power primarily from the expansion of gasses, higher compression ratios mean more power despite the lower efficiency of the fuel.

      On the MB S-Class:

      It sees at night, prevents accidents, and leaves most sports cars in the dust:

      It's called a Cadillac. It's been on the road for a good five or six years now. Where the hell has Mercedes been? But wait! They've added radar and LCD mirrors! OOooooo. I'm not impressed. :-/

    4. Re:This is filed under Games? by uacheesehead · · Score: 1

      The fact that it was filed under 'games' meant that my workplace banned it... weak!

  2. No way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Ohhhhh no. You won't get me to RTFA by refusing to post witty comments.

    Nice try.

  3. What no.. by WalterODimm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Magnetogravitaional Space Crafts?

  4. Some just don't compare... by mister_llah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comparing a PSP or a Jeep to Neuro-controlled bionic arms and perpendicular magnetic recording?!

    haha!

    Excuse me for being a cynic, but the PSP/Jeep portion of the 'grand awards' just feels like advertising...

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    1. Re:Some just don't compare... by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

      I dunno...being able to send power from 2 engines individually to 4 independent wheels which can steer at 45-degree angles -- forward or reverse, depending on which way you want to go -- sounds like quite a bit of achievement to me.

    2. Re:Some just don't compare... by lixee · · Score: 1

      What did you expect? It's sponsored by Microsoft.

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    3. Re:Some just don't compare... by smcallah · · Score: 0

      Not to mention, the PSP was new in 2004, not 2005.

    4. Re:Some just don't compare... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno...being able to send power from 2 engines individually to 4 independent wheels which can steer at 45-degree angles -- forward or reverse, depending on which way you want to go -- sounds like quite a bit of achievement to me.

      That's great. Every rabid soccer mom needs a better turning circle under power. At least they won't need to do a 8 point turn in heavy traffic out front of the school anymore. :)

  5. A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? by Jerry+Coffin · · Score: 1
    How do they figure that colored bubbles qualify for a grand award? There might be some real applications for this technology, but somehow giving a grand award to soap bubbles seems pretty silly, to put it nicely.

    --
    The universe is a figment of its own imagination.

    --
    The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
    1. Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? by Holi · · Score: 1

      I think the award was more for the dye then the bubbles.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      The real technology being given the award isn't the bubbles. It's the dyes themselves, which are as close to a programmable pigment as we're going to get. From the sounds of it, the pigments are even non-toxic, making it a rather amazing invention for someone who just wanted to make colored bubbles.

    3. Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you'd RTFA, you might find your answer.

      The colored bubbles are cool because no one's successfully done it before, getting the dye to spread uniformly over the entire bubble (as opposed to just flowing to the bottom) isn't trivial, and it took the guy about 10 years to actually get it done.

      But my guess is the grand award part comes in because of the specific dye they developed in the process. Specifically, this dye disappears after at most half an hour - faster if it's subjected to friction (eg. you can just rub it off your skin, out of your clothes, or whatever it lands on). The article claims (I'm not a chemist, so I don't know how true it is) that this is an entirely new type of dye.

      One of the applications they listed was toothpaste that colors the inside of a kid's mouth a bright color until they've brushed the necessary 30 seconds.

      All in all, to me it sounds like it deserves it - it's a new concept that opens up entirely new fields of innovation, rather than an iterative improvement over previous technology.

      --
      ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
    4. Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? by WalterODimm · · Score: 0

      Because this product is going to revolutionize raves as we know them. And the hippies turned executive have been waiting for this for almost 50 years.

    5. Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      This is Popular Science. The translation of that title is "Stuff we think is cool because the press release told us it is.... and pretty pictures too."

      I'm being a little cruel, I know. They're not really so horrible. They helped get me interested in technology when I was a teenager. But after I got out of highschool I graduated to mags that were much more in depth and took the time to actually reasearch and even use the products in question. I'd take anything on this list with a grain of salt.

      TW

    6. Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yeah, but wonderful technologies like this can be used for good, evil, and gross. From the article:
      the temporary washable color may soon show up in other products, including a bathroom wipe that leaves a momentary trail of color to show you where you've cleaned,

      Great. Ass dye. We have attained the singularity.

    7. Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but wonderful technologies like this can be used for good, evil, and gross.

      Ever hear of a company called "DuPont"? FYI, they're on the cutting edge of technology. Believe it or not, a lot of that technology goes right into making your home a better place to live, regardless of how "gross" it may be. If I were you, I'd be thankful for all these "gross" technologies. Without them we'd still be living in high maintenece homes that required a full repainting every year, had removable (for cleaning) carpets, wooden countertops, required annual winterproofing of windows, needed occasional airings to stay comfortable, and were painted in the ugliest colors you can imagine with chemicals that are slowly killing you.

    8. Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? by fatcatman · · Score: 1

      But after I got out of highschool I graduated to mags that were much more in depth and took the time to actually reasearch and even use the products in question.

      Like?

      (no, really. I want to know. I'd be interested in subscribing to said magazines.)

    9. Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? by ScottyH · · Score: 1

      I read Popular Science when I was a teenager, and I now enjoy Wired. Wired appeals to me now for the same reasons PS appealed to me then, although they aren't exactly the same. Scientific American goes more into depth on science subjects, but you also get little to no gadgets and cool stuff.

    10. Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? by utuk99 · · Score: 1

      If you want good no frills science reporting I recommend Science News. Its a small weekly (about 20 pages) with quick summaries of all the interesting science journals and usually one or two in depth articles.

    11. Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All in all, to me it sounds like it deserves it - it's a new concept that opens up entirely new fields of innovation, rather than an iterative improvement over previous technology.

      I'm sorry, but dye has been around for well over 20,000 years.

    12. Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Why don't we just narrow down to the magazine with the least Ads.

    13. Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Including a bathroom wipe that leaves a momentary trail of color to show you where you've cleaned,

      Great. Ass dye.


      Wipes for cleaning bathroom surfaces, not toilet paper.

  6. Greatest device by lsusurfer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Unfortuantly the xbox 360 came in at 101....

    1. Re:Greatest device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, the Xbox360 gets the Grand award for Home Entertainment. Rather far from 101, and much like the King Kong game, getting accolades before it's out and tested by the masses.

    2. Re:Greatest device by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      actually, the Xbox360 gets the Grand award for Home Entertainment ... getting accolades before it's out and tested by the masses.

      No kidding. Could they have written a more sensational piece?

      the Xbox 360 easily maintains the cred the original Xbox earned in 2001 when it crushed rival PlayStation with superior graphics and performance.

      *Crushed* the Playstation? I hope someone told Sony, because last I heard they were still dominant.

      Its one-teraflops processing speed, fueled by three 3.2-gigahertz processors (think: three desktop computers), may make the 360 the most powerful computer you've ever used.

      Do these guys need to work on their copy, or what? 3.2 GHz is impressive, but hardly "three desktop computers". And what's this "fueled by"? Is a processor a consumable? If so, can I turbo-charge it with silicon aditives? I mean, these guys have been writing way too many car reviews.

      Besides, the only reason why the X-Box is on top is because they beat Nintendo and Sony to market. Which is kind of funny, because it's sounding more and more like all the console makers will be using many of the same technologies. Which suggests that this could be the least impressive lineup of game consoles ever to hit the market. We'll see how it pans out, though.

    3. Re:Greatest device by cbreeze34 · · Score: 1

      here's why:

      sponsored by Microsoft

      --
      using anti-bacterial hand soap is like drying your feet in the middle of a shower.
    4. Re:Greatest device by im_mac · · Score: 1
      Do these guys need to work on their copy, or what? 3.2 GHz is impressive, but hardly "three desktop computers"

      That seems pretty powerful to me. The desktop I'm currently sitting at has only one 2.6GHz processor. Three 3.2GHz processors would be more than three times the power of what I'm using.

    5. Re:Greatest device by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that it's not actually three processors. It's three processor cores. Just like on the IBM Power and PowerPC chips, AMD64 X2, and the late-model Intel Pentiums and Xeons.

      Which isn't to say that the multicore SIMD design of this chip won't be impressive. It will be. But three desktop computers? I don't think so. Even the 1 teraflop claim is suspect. Just like how graphics card manufacturers can pump 3 trillion triangles a second, right? (*cough*underlabratoryconditionsmaybe*cough*)

    6. Re:Greatest device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you also complain about e.g. a motorcycle topping at mach 1 because you are only allowed to do 70 mph? Everyone gives optimistic specs, and it is not because you don't trust them that they are false, even if they are only achieved under lab conditions.

    7. Re:Greatest device by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Except the PPEs are low complexity cores meant for embedded devices, your desktop CPU includes many features the PPEs don't, like out-of-order processing. Wouldn't surprise me if a GHz in one of those is worth even less than a GHz in a Pentium 4.

      BTW, the TeraFLOPS includes the GPU, the CPU itself gets only a few hundred GigaFLOPS.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    8. Re:Greatest device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but I'd sure as hell complain if my motorcycle was advertised to go Mach 1 (they did the testing in a vaccum tunnel), but could only realistically go 150MPH. Yet that's the exact sort of B.S. that Popular Science is feeding us.

      Here's a hint for you: People usually expect performance numbers to have some sort of semblance to reality. Otherwise it's false advertising.

  7. Versareef by Otter · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I remember reading the CNN article on Versareef, illustrated with what looks to be Jaws at 35-40 feet. I was thinking "Gee, that's quite a wave pool they have there!" before reading the caption.

    Somehow, I'm thinking the Versareef won't be quite that big!

  8. Dyed Toothpaste by Prince+Myshkin · · Score: 5, Funny

    "...a toothpaste that turns kids' mouths bright pink until they've brushed for 30 seconds."

    If there's one things kids HATE, it's bright pink mouths...
    One of the more bizarre products I've heard of. Should do well in Japan.

    1. Re:Dyed Toothpaste by Surt · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it is more of an indicator for parents. Watch them start brushing, then check them again later for pink mouth to make sure they did a good job.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:Dyed Toothpaste by pbhj · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dentists used to have things called "disclosing tablets" that I got given as a child (about 1985-ish) they turned your mouth bright pink and where way coool ... it looked like you were a vampire that had just finished feasting!

      You'd brush away the dye to show that you've cleaned properly.

      FWIW

    3. Re:Dyed Toothpaste by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      On an not entirely unrelated side note... is it just me, or is 30 seconds not really a long time when it comes to brushing your teeth? I got taught to brush mine for five minutes after each meal when I was a kid.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    4. Re:Dyed Toothpaste by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      5 minutes is extremely excessive. You're probably brushing away enamel well before you hit the 3 minute mark, but I can't remember where I read the study on that, so I won't claim to know the specifics.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    5. Re:Dyed Toothpaste by Splab · · Score: 1

      Im still scared of dentist because of those pills - I hated them, was always about to puke when I had one in my mouth.

      Its so bad that the minute I see the letter from my dentist saying its "that time of the year" my mouth starts hurting all over.

      (I get complements for having a good set of teeth - so its not because I get to face the joy of the drill)

  9. If we're talking about games by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then Sony's new Rootkit with DRM goodness should get a prize in 2005. It helped dozens or thousands of WoW cheaters to evade The Warden. Now that's cutting edge gaming technology!

    1. Re:If we're talking about games by pl1ght · · Score: 0

      I love sony and purchase all of their components =D

  10. Hmmm by Ted_Bell111 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Best of Whats New.... Sponsored by Microsoft" And I thought it was the XBox's slim and compact design that won it the Grand Award!

    1. Re:Hmmm by ilyaaohell · · Score: 1

      Choice quote:

      "The Xbox 360 easily maintains the cred the original Xbox earned in 2001 when it crushed rival PlayStation with superior graphics and performance."

      Priceless...

      --
      UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
  11. Just a note by FST · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of you that don't know what perpendicular magnetic recording is, it is basically a new technology recently introduced by Toshiba into their line of MP3 players which is a way of stacking the bits perpendicular to the hard disk rather than laterally. Conventional HDD can hold up to 400 GB while this new technology allows for 10 times the storage per square inch. Many of the hard disk drives plan to introduce a new hard disk in pc's by 2007.

    In my opinion, with this new jump in technology, the future is secure with HDD of similar size, yet 10x the capacity.

    --
    46487 466780 252994 376409 96920 39622 205366 244315 622115 512361 668040 63608 259203 955314 811176 652718 166330 23922
    1. Re:Just a note by Xarius · · Score: 5, Informative

      Maybe it's time to Get Perpendicular!

      --
      C17H21NO4
    2. Re:Just a note by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      There was a flash animation explaining how it works on Toshiba's site, called GetPerpendicular.swf I believe.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    3. Re:Just a note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10x the size? I'm not even using a quarter of my 120GB HDD, and that's with about 20 Linux isos.

      Now if they made a conventional HDD with 10x the speed, that's a different matter.

    4. Re:Just a note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, It was developed by Hitachi/IBM PopSCI has it wrong...

    5. Re:Just a note by Skrekkur · · Score: 1

      Heh I was convinced that this was an april fools joke or just some sort of joke, Guess I have to look deeply into how this really works, That flash animation didnt help much, except well it seemed even more silly after that.

    6. Re:Just a note by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

      I thought it was developed by Hitachi too. but that could be because that I saw that hilarious flash video on their site. In fact, Hitachi was the 1st to release the Perpendicular bits in retail 3.5" hdds, though that doesn't really say they were the inventors.

  12. How about the worst of what's new? by tcd004 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Why don't people ever do these kinds of lists?

    I can think of a few. Cellphone spam, Sony DRM, the EU trying to take over the internet, T.O. What else?

    And of course Small Town Misfit (plug for my website)
    tcd004

    1. Re:How about the worst of what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be an American.

    2. Re:How about the worst of what's new? by randyest · · Score: 1

      You must be not.

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:How about the worst of what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touche!

      Your wit is boundless.

    4. Re:How about the worst of what's new? by jferris · · Score: 1

      Judging by the fact you are an "Anonymous Coward", can we assume that you are French?

      --
      You are in a maze of little twisting passages, all different.
    5. Re:How about the worst of what's new? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > the EU trying to take over the internet

      you sir are an asshole!
      you did not even try to think about it before brawling out such obwiously wrong statements.

      if you think that the EU wants to *take over* the internet, then you MUST think that the USA wants to take over the whole world and even acts like being offended when someone tells them that they don't have the right to!

      face it: ALL nations except the USA that nowadays also use the us-controlled internet could easily set up their own root servers, cut access for the usa and then the usa would be very very alone in their own mud of a net while the rest of the world would simply continue to call the new net structure "internet" while the old net would be called usanet. Over shot time usanet would fall down, because it does not have any use for everyone who wants to be international and free!
      Just like "chinanet"...

      I thought slashdotters where poeple who surely understand why freedom is good... bu i guess there's still a moron here and there that got a /.-account...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    6. Re:How about the worst of what's new? by ynohoo · · Score: 1

      don't be silly - if he were French he would be a "Lâche Anonyme"!

    7. Re:How about the worst of what's new? by randyest · · Score: 1

      Too bad.

      Good luck with your new "non-usa" "internet" lol.

      --
      everything in moderation
  13. lets Get Perpendicular! by simcop2387 · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.hitachigst.com/hdd/research/recording_h ead/pr/PerpendicularAnimation.html

    a very informative animation explaining how to do Perpendicular Magnetic Recording

    1. Re:lets Get Perpendicular! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so soon as I saw that tech in the blurb, I knew I was gonna have that song in my head all day...

      I blam Actuator Man.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:lets Get Perpendicular! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh. My. God.

    3. Re:lets Get Perpendicular! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      The only people who haven't seen that yet are both blind.

  14. Sensational? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTA "Xbox earned in 2001 when it crushed rival PlayStation with superior graphics and performance."

    Last I checked ps2 still held the largest market share?

    1. Re:Sensational? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I read that while two MS adds flashed on the site, and then I stopped reading.

    2. Re:Sensational? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are more Hondas on the road than Porsches, but I bet Porsche would crush a Honda in any road test. Market share is not directly correlated with quality when comparing products like Xbox and PS2. There are other factors involved. I don't think you can deny the technical superiority of the Xbox, can you?

    3. Re:Sensational? by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      The whole thing is sponsered by Microsoft, for those that didn't see it in, here's a direct link to the image in TFA: http://img.timeinc.net/popsci/images/topmiddle.gif

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    4. Re:Sensational? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go play w/ your Lynx. Market share = success in a market where the money is made on # games purchased.

  15. Colored toy bubbles? by lbmouse · · Score: 4, Funny

    ?? As opposed to colored military-grade bubbles.

    1. Re:Colored toy bubbles? by sesshomaru · · Score: 2, Funny
      ?? As opposed to colored military-grade bubbles.

      Those must be the ones they used to use on The Prisoner.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  16. Xbox 360 according to PS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Its one-teraflops processing speed, fueled by three 3.2-gigahertz processors (think: three desktop computers), may make the 360 the most powerful computer you've ever used. Now all those flying chunks of decimated buildings and exploding monster heads can be uniquely generated based on your actions, delivering the most realistic console-gaming experience ever--and in a full 1,080 lines of high-def resolution. The 360 is also the first Media Center extender that receives and plays back HDTV from Media Center PCs. And it comes with a free lifetime subscription to the Xbox Live online service. $300"

    What's wrong with this description?

    1. Re:Xbox 360 according to PS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's not?

    2. Re:Xbox 360 according to PS by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I give. What's wrong with it?

    3. Re:Xbox 360 according to PS by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's...

      And it comes with a free lifetime subscription to the Xbox Live online service.

      Which is only partially true (subscription is to the watered down Xbox Live that doesn't allow online play, except during "special events").

      Do I win?

    4. Re:Xbox 360 according to PS by Psiven · · Score: 0

      Or the bit about supporting full 1080p. That's bs too.

  17. Ahhhh yes... The annual Popular Science by StarsAreAlsoFire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Kiss of Death awards.

    Honestly now, how many Best of What's New features have YOU seen in real life? Bet you can count them on one hand..... ;~)

  18. Photography section is bogus by toupsie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not one listing for Digital SLRs just some crappy point and shoots with superfluous features, printers and camcorders. Why not a video section instead of the camcorders? 2005 has unleashed some great SLRs from Nikon and Canon. The Nikon D200 and Canon 20D are two great examples of consumer level Digital SLRs that will blow the doors off a Kodak Easyshare-One or Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-R1 in image quality, speed, CMOS/CCD size and focal range. I would talk about the Canon EOS 1Ds but I would short out my keyboard from the drool.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Photography section is bogus by jdumps · · Score: 1

      That might just be because the majority of consumers won't spend more than a $1000 on a camera, not to mention lenses, filters, extra batteries and whatnot. While Nikon and Canon have both stepped up the quality/price ratio of their consumer end digitals, most people don't fork over large sums of cash for something they might struggle to use. When it comes to cameras an easy learning curve is often more influential than image quality.

    2. Re:Photography section is bogus by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      The Nikon D200 and Canon 20D are in a very different category than the Sony R1. They also cost quite a bit more (D200 street price around $1700, the 20D is a few hundred less). And that's just for the body; no lens included with those, so the price goes up quite quickly. You also have to worry about getting dust on the sensor when changing lenses, which you don't with the R1. Yeah, there are many MANY benefits to going with a DSLR, but not everyone needs that much camera. Personally, I'm dying for a D200, though, especially paired with the new 18-200 VR lens.

  19. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  20. Obvious, eh? by speed_of_light · · Score: 0

    in addition to the obvious awardees like the PSP and perpendicular magnetic recording,

    Ohvious, eh? What's so great about a perpendendicy-magneto-recordotron anyway? 400k floppies are all I need!

  21. They're talking about octane rating by DG · · Score: 5, Informative

    Disclaimer: I build and race turbocharged race cars http://farnorthracing.com/

    To oversimplify a complex subject, when you burn fuels in a spark-ignited engine, it is possible to get a kind of explosive combustion called "detonation" instead of a nice smooth rapid burn.

    Detonation is also sometimes called "knock" and it is an engine killer. Detonation is Not Your Friend.

    The things that tend to increase the liklihood of experiencing detonation are a lean fuel/air mixture, excessive ignition advance, localized hotspots in the combustion chamber, excessive static compression ratio, excessive intake temperature, or excessive intake boost pressure.

    The measure of a fuel's ability to resist detonation is its "octane" rating. The derivation of the term is an article in of itself... bottom line is the higher the octane, the lower the probability of detonation.

    My race car drinks 118 octane, because it uses a ton of turbo boost and a lot of ignition advance to make power. Most regular pump gasses are 87-89 octane, and premium runs about 91-94 octane.

    Ethenol is an octane booster (Sunoco's 94 octane fuel has a lot of it) so all else being equal, it is safer to run higher boost levels when there is ethenol present in the fuel.

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
    1. Re:They're talking about octane rating by briancurtin · · Score: 0

      Disclaimer: I build and race turbocharged race cars http://farnorthracing.com/

      OT, but i have to say i've loved TE-37s for the longest time, especially in bronze. great choice, and nice car you have there.

      --
      My UID is a palindrome, that must be good for some type of prize.
    2. Re:They're talking about octane rating by DG · · Score: 1

      Thanks - although this is a race car, I got those wheels because they were the best tradeoff in strength, weight, size (offset mostly) and price at the time. Looks never really entered into it.

      Since those pictures, I switched tire size from 275/17 to 285/18 ad so had to sell the wheels. The new wheels are Enkei RPF1 18X10

      See http://farnorthracing.com/newimages/2005_setup.jpg

      The car, BTW, is for sale. $22k USD takes it, the trailer, and ALL the spares (rain tires/wheels, tons of spare parts, etc)

      DG

      --
      Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  22. The SonyEricsson K750i... by Crizp · · Score: 1

    ...was the best product of 2005, in my opinion. Cellphone with 2 Mp autofocus Sony camera and MP3 player with support for MemoryStick Duo cards.

    Granted the W800 is (though the same phone, really) a bit better with minijack for headphones and, apparently, better MP3 software. Still, the K750 was the first _good_ MP3 cellphone :)

    ObDisclaimer: I have one, of course.

    1. Re:The SonyEricsson K750i... by soul_hk · · Score: 1

      Especially since the K750 can be firmware upgraded to the W800...
      And yes, I do own a K750, fantastic phone.

  23. It's not "What's New" without Phil & Dixie by The+I+Shing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I mean, c'mon, how can you call it "What's New" and not have Phil & Dixie hosting it?

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:It's not "What's New" without Phil & Dixie by Walker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Phil Foglio is too busy with his Girl Genius web comic.

    2. Re:It's not "What's New" without Phil & Dixie by Molochi · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would mod you funny (I am an old PF fan) but alas lost all my mod points to a clahd in dragon poker.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  24. Re:Perpendicular Hard Drive Industry by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    But my guess is that it will be solely Toshiba until around - and I'm just guessing here - September 13, 2022.

    US Patent No: 6,942,936


    My guess is that every HDD manufacturer that it's Toshiba realizes that if they can't keep pace with Toshiba's increases in data density, they are going to go out of business, and therefore open their wallets wide and license the technology for their own products.

    My guess is also that due to these licensing costs, you shouldn't expect desktop drives to drop much below 50 cents per gigabyte for the next two or three years.

  25. Re:Perpendicular Hard Drive Industry by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    Manufacturers regularly license patents from one another. I wouldn't be surprised if Toshiba actually licenses it out to the highest bidder first rather than directly develop a product.

  26. Irrelevant by wiredlogic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So what. They are just ads in disguise. They awarded the lame ROM exercise machine ($14000 a pop) a few years back. It does nothing that you can't do for free or with $500 in equipment. Their basis for choosing the "best" things is pretty skewed.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  27. Is it advertising if you can't buy? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The accomplishment of being able to turn wheels independantly with great power transfer makes it worth mentioning.

    What should take it out of the list in my mind is not that it's like advertising - it's that you can't buy one! No fair comparing prototype cars with realy working stuff that you can actually buy.

    It's almost like anti-advertising as I'm annoyed with Jeep now for not actually producing one. And yes I'd actually use it for real off-road travel, not just trips to the mall.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  28. No Flying Car? by joshdick · · Score: 1

    Where's my flying car?

    This is the future, and I was promised a flying car, not some Jeep.

    1. Re:No Flying Car? by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

      What are you willing to give to have the flying car?

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  29. Too Early? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seem to me that declaring the XBox360 as a "best of" is a little bit early, as not a single unit has yet been sold, afaik.

    If it turns out that it has any "minor" defect, like an exploding power supply that causes thousands of homes to burn down, then it will likely need to be dropped from this list.

    I wonder if such an occurance is covered by their EULA? (873. Explosions and/or fires, including those involving lethal casualties, caused by this device, or any other devices supplied by MicroSoft, are the responsibility of said purchaser. Said purchaser hereby absolves MicroSoft, and its affiliates, from any legal action.)

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    1. Re:Too Early? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the x-box being on the list (oh! and the 5 microsoft ads that are on the page), proves that a position on this list is given to the highest bidder. If the console is any good it could possibly be in the running for 2006, but 2005? Give me a break, I wouldnt be suprised if MS paid for the whole damn article. Just to try and dupe their moronic customers into thinking a product that isnt even released yet, is the best product of the year. Just goes to show what microsoft thinks of all you fanboys out there.

    2. Re:Too Early? by bhiestand · · Score: 1
      I wonder if such an occurance is covered by their EULA? (873. Explosions and/or fires, including those involving lethal casualties, caused by this device, or any other devices supplied by MicroSoft, are the responsibility of said purchaser. Said purchaser hereby absolves MicroSoft, and its affiliates, from any legal action.)

      Hah, you were so shocked by 873 that you never read 874!

      874. NDA Purchaser will not make or disclose any statement, comment, or report about this product, or any other devices supplied by MicroSoft, to any party other than MicroSoft without prior written authorization from MicroSoft, inc. or its designated representative.

      875. Upon entering this agreement, Purchaser will cease making left turns, and will complete a triple-right-turn maneuver when they desire to turn to the left. MicroSoft is not liable for any damage or disruption this may cause. ...

      It's worse than we ever imagined. And it's all legal. Even if part of it manages to be thrown out in court, paragraph 1, which ALWAYS states something along the lines of "if part of this document is found to be illegal blah blah blah the rest is still valid" will still make sure we're stuck with the rest of the shit. And lawyers wonder why people despise them?
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  30. That should come back by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I still remember them showing you how to simulate typical D&D battle damage by strapping live cats to yourself and taking a cold shower...

    There's a web comic that could thrive!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  31. A little late by MrDiablerie · · Score: 1

    Funny, I submitted this same story on November 7th.

    1. Re:A little late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I didnt recieve my copy of Popular Science till yesterday

  32. 360 Electrical Duplex Outlet by LordNimon · · Score: 1

    Anyone know where I can get this outlet? Google reveals nothing.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  33. Sikorsky X2 by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Informative

    The counter-rotating blade concept isn't new by any means.. Many early helicopter designs used the concept to cancel torque, but tail rotors proved to solve the issue of torque while also adding a high degree of control.

    In helicopters, 180MPH is generally the speed limit, because that's when the aircraft's airspeed approaches the angular velocity of the rotor on it's rearward sweep. If the aircraft is traveling forward at roughly the same speed that the rotor is sweeping backward, it can't generate any lift on that side. It seems like increasing the rate of rotation would solve the problem, but the short answer is that that introduces even more problems.

    Most twin-blade craft use tandem or intermeshing props, like the Chinook or V22. I'm guessing the coaxial counter-rotating design hasn't been popular because it's orders of magnitude (Score: 5, Used "orders of magnitude" in a sentence) more complicated than a standard prop. One of the main concerns in warfare is equipment reliability -- things working when you need them most. If coaxial designs are significantly less reliable in practice, that's a tremendous offset to any possible tactical advantage.

    1. Re:Sikorsky X2 by dan_sdot · · Score: 1

      Yes, the idea of counter-rotating blades has been around for a long time. However this is innovation, because it has actually been implemented correctly.
      To draw a comparison, the idea of quantum computing has been around for a while, but they have yet to be implemented properly. When quantum computers begin to roll off of the production line, that will certainly deserve an science award of some type.

    2. Re:Sikorsky X2 by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I meant to say that the implementation of counter-rotation has been around for a while. It was basically abandoned with the invention of the tail rotor, for the sake of simplicity. Now that stronger matierals and better manufacturing processes are available, it's easier to implement co-axial counter-rotation, but that doesn't make it a new invention. If anything, the front-to-rear aligned tail rotor is innovative, but there were those things called airplanes which have been using them since, oh, their invention.

      The problem with coaxial counter rotation, by the way, is that any friction or flexing/warping of the shafts is twice as dangerous as with a single shaft. Since they're spinning in opposite directions, it's like they're spinning twice as fast. A hot spot (where lubrication or a bearing fails) can become very serious very quickly. Just ask Howard Hughes.

    3. Re:Sikorsky X2 by monkeybutter · · Score: 1

      I assume you are referring to the Volvo inboard engine.

      I am not an expert on the subject, but I get the impression that the innovation here is using forward-facing props to propel a boat.

      In fact, the article clearly states that the counter-rotating props are like those in certain prop-driven airplanes.

      To me as a recreational boat user, this is actually quite interesting - 20 percent more efficiency translates to lower fuel costs, or getting to my destination quicker.

    4. Re:Sikorsky X2 by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      No no.. the Sikorsky X2.

  34. Is it just me? by Corbu+Mulak · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that gets angry at comments like this? (from TFA)

    "Sony PlayStation Portable The introduction of Sony's PlayStation Portable (PSP) was the moment portable game consoles stopped being toys ..."

    1. Re:Is it just me? by (SM)+Spacemonkey · · Score: 1

      I didn't. I just read that statement as "Sony PlayStation Portable The introduction of Sony's PlayStation Portable (PSP) was the moment portable game consoles failed at their primary function ..."

      So I bought a Nintendo DS. It is for games. It has brought me great joy through incredible game design and pure innovation. Kirby's Canvas Curse is a platformer where you DRAW the platforms. Nintendog's is not an game but a weird experience into digital empathy. Advance Wars II is an old school difficult turn based stratedgy game, but with the DS the controls are easy as touch touch, done. The control is more intuitive than a mouse, its like playing chess and having the feel of the pieces in your hand as you think of your move. One great game designer once said games are about finding 30 seconds of pure phone then repeating it a thousand times in different circumstances. Warioware strips it back to just the fun, hundreds of bite sized pieces. Nintendo allows for creativity, and that will always win over graphics and creativity is cool.

      I have played the PSP, and I guess its just not for me. The games are mediocre. And who wants mediocrity? Why compromise when my ipod plays music better and my tv or laptop works can play movies without repurchasing them?

  35. Something the PSP can't do by setrajonas · · Score: 1

    Movies, Music, Gaming . . . Is There Anything the PSP Can't Do?

    Beat its only rival?

  36. Hypo-Spray! by paco3791 · · Score: 1

    Life imitates Star Trek yet again. Hope they can use this for other things besides vaccines. I Can't stand shots. http://www.popsci.com/popsci/bown2005/personalheal th/8407ee82ea447010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html

  37. DSLRs can be cheaper than the Kodak or Sony listed by toupsie · · Score: 1

    You can picture up the Nikon D50 or Canon 350D (Rebel XT) with "kit lenses" for less than the Sony or Kodak camera. You miss out on some of the higher end features but they will still spank both those point and shoots in quality. Both cameras have settings that do most of the work for you so you don't have to understand shutter speed, aperture or focus. Just point the camera and shoot but with much better results.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  38. What's not Best 2005? by toupsie · · Score: 1
    I thought this was the "Best of What's New 2005" not "What the Average Joe Can Handle 2005" from Popular Science. The section is Photography and it should have had the really Best of the field. Not one mention either of the Medium Format digital cameras that are out there.

    P.S. Though I am a Canon man, the 18-200VR lens rocks. I have tried it out on a friends D70.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:What's not Best 2005? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Another thing to note: the Canon 20D came out in 2004, so it doesn't really qualify for Best of 2005. Now, the 5D - _that's_ certainly worth a mention. It's 2x more expensive than I can afford, but it's still an achievement in the field of full-frame sensor DSLRs. Someday they'll be affordable. I hope.

      I can see why no mention of the Nikon D200 - it's not even out, yet. But then again, neither is the Sony R1, though the D200 specs _just_ came out last week, whereas the R1 specs have been known for quite awhile.

      A lot more video options on there than still, which is kind of surprising. People take a helluva lot more pictures than videos.

  39. What about Virtual Reality? by bigpat · · Score: 1

    We finally have a decent stereoscopic 3d Head mounted display under a thousand dollars and nobody takes note?

    The emagin z800 is 20 years of geek dreams finally made a reality and not even a nod from Popular Science?

    1. Re:What about Virtual Reality? by fitchmicah · · Score: 1

      Good point. Some of these new stereoscopic screens need no glasses.

  40. I don't like how everything is oversimplified. by fitchmicah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This article seems poorly written to me. These pop science magazines used to be appealing to me but now I'd rather read real research or go to colloquiums even if I don't completely understand everything.

    From the article on the "Emissions Neutral Vehicle..."

    "It breaks down hydrogen into electrons, which power the electric motor, and protons, which interact with oxygen taken in through the ENV's nosecone and are released as Earthfriendly water vapor and heat."

    They make it sound like fuel cells actually rip the proton from neutron, or like the electrons get "used up," or that the electrons are actually flowing through the motor like water flows through a straw. Something about the way these articles are written makes me feel uncomfortable. It's like they are saying "well, you and I will never completely understand, but at least someone out there does..."

    The worst thing is that explanations of more complex ideas might be botched even greater and I would never know if I trusted this magazine. I think this kind of writing promotes dogmatic science. Potential is hyped but details are not; existence of great ideas is mentioned but the ideas themselves are completely ignored.

  41. Re:Perpendicular Hard Drive Industry by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    I'll put $100 on Sep 14th, 2022.

    But really, I'm sure they'll license the technology to other companies.

  42. iPod Nano by fanblade · · Score: 1

    No iPod Nano? *gasp* Heresy!!

  43. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  44. Another note.. by alfrin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Never sing this song around a girl. I did that once, I got a slap in the face, for obvious reasons..

    1. Re:Another note.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you slapped her back. Harder.

  45. Thank God! by fm6 · · Score: 1

    I almost read TFA! But you saved me from that!

  46. Re:Perpendicular Hard Drive Industry by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Well, in most cases it's better to get a little money from everyone's sales than all the money from your own. I mean, theoretically Phillips (or whoever patented CDs) could've chosen not to license their patent too. The advantage of licensing is that other people can sink their own money into product production and marketing, and whether or not they sell, you still win. Most patents in the media sector (no pun intended), with the exception of iOmega, have licensed their technology. Let me rephrase that... the most succesful media formats have been licensed. While that might not be as important in fixed media, since interoperability isn't much of a factor, it can be beneficial for other reasons.

    I'm not sure who runs the SATA, but as a hypothetical: if all media companies are involved, they may vote not to license SATA to Hitachi, who would then be up the proverbial creek. What good is a HD if you can't attach it? It would only be useful in proprietary devices. While they've only used the tech in 1" drives so far, it's pretty reasonable to assume that desktop implementation will arrive in the near future.

    Aside from that, there's reciprocity. We get to license your tech; in return when we develop Tech X, we'll license it to you.

    Hitachi could always opt to go the monopoly route, but it's not without risk. It forces other companies to come up with competing solutions, which might end up being better or cheaper than your own.

    That's all just speculation, of course, but I would be very surprised if they didn't license it.

  47. as was pointed out here before... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 3, Interesting

    2.88MB 3.5" floppy drives used perpendicular recording.

    Although they were done by Toshiba also, there's no way this 2005 patent is the canonical patent for perpendicular recording, as there is obvious prior art.

    http://www.intel.com/design/archives/periphrl/docs /7281.htm

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  48. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  49. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  50. Re:DSLRs can be cheaper than the Kodak or Sony lis by Zathrus · · Score: 1

    ou can picture up the Nikon D50 or Canon 350D (Rebel XT) with "kit lenses" for less than the Sony or Kodak camera.

    It's still vastly higher than most consumers are willing to spend though. I just recently bought a Canon A610 -- it's certainly not a DSLR, but I'm very pleased with it, particularly for the price.

    I do find the inclusion of the Canon SD550 odd, as is Adobie Elements. And I think a Wifi enabled camera is more "gimmick" than goodness.

  51. the really B I G development in '05 by ericcantona · · Score: 0

    doh. somebody obviously made a error putting up these pages as the have forgotten to include the really big news from 2005, that emacs now supports images

    --
    When the seagulls follow the trawler, it's because they think sardines will be thrown in to the sea