*shrug*, you're talking about a device with the power of a $50 used desktop (often with free shipping) you could buy on eBay. slap some open source software to do the job on there and you have a $50 device.
some can commit murder. we have large corporations with congressmen in their pocket who control our wars of choice. some supply arms, some are contractors to rebuild that which was needlessly destroyed.
neanderthals weren't beasts, they were archcaic humans, with language, advanced tools, art and complex social groups. It is racist of you to make a claim of "beastiality"
sure, but we have *nothing on earth to measure* to see how old is it. instead, we have things to measure that are younger such as the mineral I mentioned. we can also measure things outside the earth, but then we're in the realm of our current models and understanding which may change.
You are likely a male, and also a moron of the highest caliber. Having sex should not be made the butt of a joke, because someone you know had a heart attack attempting it? Eating tofu should not be made the butt of a joke, because your nephew choked to death on a tofu hot dog?
From your linked article, various ages for the Sun up to 4.6 billion years were made by various models + measurements + assumptions. The true age of the Sun is a mystery.....
wrong, there is *nothing to radiometrically date* to know the age of the Earth. that's the point and problem of inhabiting a tectonically living planet. We can only say it is not younger than 4.3 billion years.
Inuit writing is a very recent invention, less than 300 years. without written history, it is ridiculous to say "the inuit would have notice". maybe they did, and maybe the knowledge was lost.
What's not a mystery is that the Earth is quite surely about 4.5 billion years old.
No, absolutely false. that is just according to generally accepted model which may prove false or incomplete. There is no hard proof, other than that it is older than 4.3 billion years.
that model is a hypothesis with some supporting evidence, not a proven fact. It is not the reason rocks of greater than 4.03 billion years never found, that is due solely to the tectonic recycling of the earth's plates. The point is that it is possible our Earth is much older than 4.5 billion years if our model of the early solar system's development is flawed.
Rock and minerals are mosly recycled by our active planet. The oldest rock is 4.03 billion years old (gniess from NW Canada), and oldest mineral is 4.3 billion years (zircon crystals from west australia). But neither tells us the age of the Earth. That is done by assumption from meteorites and moon rocks.....true age of Earth is honestly a mystery.
the arctic thaws every year, and we don't have measurements of how much for even the last 100 years. A little run of bad weather and the "climatologists" (not a field of science for which any educational institution grants a degree) wail "it's due to global warming", whether hurricane, flood, drought or snow storm. Drought is cyclical, as is flooding. if you had been alive in the 1930s dust bowl in the midwest you'd be shitting your britches thinking the world was ending, claiming man's evil technology was to blame. The "climatologists" have been generating mostly useless models for over a decade, then cherry-picking those few that match reality (cooking the books after the fact), and then claim the model's future predictions are reliable. Meanwhile, carbon & cap& trade scams have already cost billions of eros of fraud in europe to date.
that just says something about the grant process that might not apply to photography teachers, though I would think race (preferentially non-white) also would be a factor in getting a grant in the USA. and being non-male.
for one assignment students turn in their own pictures with themselves in it near some assigned object. Later, another assignment has them work with their picture toward some given result on the object, with them still in the picture.
heaven forbid we would use need for help as the criteria for extra effort and mentoring, rather than race. And we wouldn't use quantity of students lifted from F and D range either.....no, instead we continue to mark and treat people according to "race"
Slashdot Mirror
*shrug*, you're talking about a device with the power of a $50 used desktop (often with free shipping) you could buy on eBay. slap some open source software to do the job on there and you have a $50 device.
some can commit murder. we have large corporations with congressmen in their pocket who control our wars of choice. some supply arms, some are contractors to rebuild that which was needlessly destroyed.
ah, that makes more sense. I thought it was Alcoholic Canadian, which is needlessly redundant
neanderthals weren't beasts, they were archcaic humans, with language, advanced tools, art and complex social groups. It is racist of you to make a claim of "beastiality"
sure, but we have *nothing on earth to measure* to see how old is it. instead, we have things to measure that are younger such as the mineral I mentioned. we can also measure things outside the earth, but then we're in the realm of our current models and understanding which may change.
only true for "noble componentry"
You are likely a male, and also a moron of the highest caliber. Having sex should not be made the butt of a joke, because someone you know had a heart attack attempting it? Eating tofu should not be made the butt of a joke, because your nephew choked to death on a tofu hot dog?
From your linked article, various ages for the Sun up to 4.6 billion years were made by various models + measurements + assumptions. The true age of the Sun is a mystery.....
maybe it was, over 4.3 billion years ago
8D
The U.S. Department of Defense already has .mil
perks come with inventing the interernet, and have the Two Words: nuclear fucking weapons
wrong, there is *nothing to radiometrically date* to know the age of the Earth. that's the point and problem of inhabiting a tectonically living planet. We can only say it is not younger than 4.3 billion years.
Inuit writing is a very recent invention, less than 300 years. without written history, it is ridiculous to say "the inuit would have notice". maybe they did, and maybe the knowledge was lost.
Did you read your links, there is no degree called "climatology" there.
What's not a mystery is that the Earth is quite surely about 4.5 billion years old.
No, absolutely false. that is just according to generally accepted model which may prove false or incomplete. There is no hard proof, other than that it is older than 4.3 billion years.
that model is a hypothesis with some supporting evidence, not a proven fact. It is not the reason rocks of greater than 4.03 billion years never found, that is due solely to the tectonic recycling of the earth's plates. The point is that it is possible our Earth is much older than 4.5 billion years if our model of the early solar system's development is flawed.
Rock and minerals are mosly recycled by our active planet. The oldest rock is 4.03 billion years old (gniess from NW Canada), and oldest mineral is 4.3 billion years (zircon crystals from west australia). But neither tells us the age of the Earth. That is done by assumption from meteorites and moon rocks.....true age of Earth is honestly a mystery.
Computing != Programming.
25% of people in IT might be women, but the percentage of coders is much lower. most women in IT have other roles. For that matter, so do most men
the arctic thaws every year, and we don't have measurements of how much for even the last 100 years. A little run of bad weather and the "climatologists" (not a field of science for which any educational institution grants a degree) wail "it's due to global warming", whether hurricane, flood, drought or snow storm. Drought is cyclical, as is flooding. if you had been alive in the 1930s dust bowl in the midwest you'd be shitting your britches thinking the world was ending, claiming man's evil technology was to blame. The "climatologists" have been generating mostly useless models for over a decade, then cherry-picking those few that match reality (cooking the books after the fact), and then claim the model's future predictions are reliable. Meanwhile, carbon & cap& trade scams have already cost billions of eros of fraud in europe to date.
oh, you missed that little thing in the 1930s known as "The Dust Bowl"?
deep cycle marine batteries, why have two hours when you can have twelve or more
that just says something about the grant process that might not apply to photography teachers, though I would think race (preferentially non-white) also would be a factor in getting a grant in the USA. and being non-male.
for one assignment students turn in their own pictures with themselves in it near some assigned object. Later, another assignment has them work with their picture toward some given result on the object, with them still in the picture.
heaven forbid we would use need for help as the criteria for extra effort and mentoring, rather than race. And we wouldn't use quantity of students lifted from F and D range either.....no, instead we continue to mark and treat people according to "race"
thank goodness for that, I enjoy the 70s porn
congress including obama made the law, then the president signs it
Obamba the lying flip flopping sack of shit, traitor to the Constitution, enemy of freedom and liberty.