Slashdot Mirror


Old Electric-Car Batteries Put Into Service For Home Energy Storage

Hugh Pickens writes "Josie Garthwaite writes that old electric car batteries degraded below acceptable performance levels for autos still have enough life to serve the grid for at least ten years with a prototype announced by GM and ABB lashing five Chevy Volt battery packs together in an array with a capacity of 10 kilowatt-hours — enough to provide electricity for three to five average houses for two hours. 'In a car, you want immediate power, and you want a lot of it,' says Alexandra Goodson. 'We're discharging for two hours instead of immediately accelerating. It's not nearly as demanding on the system.'" (Read on, below.) Pickens continues: "Deployed on the grid, community energy storage devices could help utilities integrate highly variable renewables like solar and wind into the power supply, while absorbing spikes in demand from electric-car charging. 'Wind, it's a nightmare for grid operators to manage,' says Britta Gross, director of global energy systems and infrastructure commercialization for GM. 'It's up, down, it doesn't blow for three days. It's very labor-intensive to manage.' The batteries would allow for storage of power during inexpensive periods for use during expensive peak demand, or help make up for gaps in solar, wind or other renewable power generation. One final advantage of re-using electric car batteries is that the battery — the most expensive part of an electric car — remains an asset beyond its useful life in the vehicle. 'If there is a market in stationary power for spent batteries, consumers could recognize this as an increased resale value at end of life, however small,' says Kevin See."

198 comments

  1. If it's too puny for a car... by sshir · · Score: 0

    2 hours?! For us, east coasters, 2 hours don't make any difference... for others will be too... soon enough...

    And you can't use it in an off-grid solar setup - there aren't many charge/discharge cycles left...

    1. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by feedayeen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      2 hours?! For us, east coasters, 2 hours don't make any difference... for others will be too... soon enough...

      And you can't use it in an off-grid solar setup - there aren't many charge/discharge cycles left...

      It's difficult to read your post and understand what you are trying to convey; but I am assuming that you're talking about Hurricane Sandy based on your reference to the East Coast. This is not for that.

    2. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by alphatel · · Score: 1

      Not to mention they may burst into flames when flooded with water, not too comforting if you are preparing for the next storm surge.

      --
      When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    3. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not to mention they may burst into flames when flooded with water, not too comforting if you are preparing for the next storm surge.

      but the water will put out the flames right? see, self-correcting!

    4. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 hours for up to 5 houses. I'm on the low side of power usage but i use about 6 kwh (family could easily use 10kwh alot use 20 or more), if you only used the bare essentials it could last quite a while. Depending on the price (which would be heavily subsidized by the eco people in their electric cars) it could still be feasible.

    5. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by Smidge204 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure all those houses that burned down in Queens had piles of batteries laying around, that's what caused the fire. I'm also sure it's impossible for a normal car without a HV battery pack to catch fire for any reason, including flooding.

      Meanwhile, two dozen all-electric Nissan LEAFs failed to catch fire after the 2011 tsunami that hit Japan.

      (Maybe the Fisker Karma is just a piece of shit. Don't blame the HV battery.)
      =Smidge=

    6. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      heh... tell that to the firemen who could do nothing but stand in the pouring rain and watch entire blocks burn down...

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    7. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kwh usage per day.

    8. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Ummm... try testing that theory by tossing a chunk of elemental sodium or calcium into a bucket of water (or swimming pool, or jacuzzi). There are plenty of videos on Youtube illustrating the outcome...

    9. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm going to get modded down again.

      Fires during floods are caused by people with fire insurance, no flood insurance and lighters.

      Simple fact. Modding me down doesn't change it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to disappoint, but only about 4 percent of the population is like that. And, one of the favored past times of that population is to rave about, accusing others of being just like themselves when they are not allowed to get away with screwing people over.

      Although, about another 10 to 15% will play follow the leader when they take notice of something someone from group A is doing.

    11. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by HornWumpus · · Score: 0, Troll

      Bullshit. The house is gone (or going to be). The only question is: 'Will the insurance company pay for it?' You don't need to be a sociopath to light it up.

      So many people do it, that fires during floods are expected. Water doesn't start fires. Breakers open when the circuits gets wet.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    12. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really is a bit unfair to link to a report on the cars catching fire without linking to a follow-up with the results of the investigation into the cause of the fire.

      http://www.businessinsider.com/why-fisker-karmas-burned-during-sandy-2012-11

      Fisker engineers determined that the damage to the Karmas was the result of the cars being submerged under five to eight feet of seawater for several hours that left corrosive salt in a low voltage Vehicle Control Unit in one Karma. The Vehicle Control Unit is a standard component found in many types of vehicles and is powered by a typical 12V car battery.

      This residual salt damage caused a short circuit, which led to a fire that heavy winds then spread to other Karmas parked nearby. There were no explosions as had been inaccurately reported. The Karma's lithium-ion batteries were ruled out as a cause or contributing factor.

      Had the cars been flooded with fresh water there wouldn't have been a problem, cars just aren't designed to survive being flooded with salt-water because it is very rare for it to happen and the car is likely to be a write-off anyway even if it does get recovered. However if you were to put a battery pack in a place where flooding is a possibility you could take precautions to protect it from this sort of damage.

    13. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      And if the wind doesn't blow for 3 days then they are building it in the wrong place. They should try the Ozark hollows instead, the wind just whips off those mountains through those hollows pretty much 24/7.

      But at the end of the day we all know what this is REALLY about, its the simple fact that when you figure in all the costs the electric vehicles simply don't make economic sense. The batteries cost too much to make, don't last long enough, and when you figure the mining and disposal for the batteries I'd frankly be amazed if you could break even without government subsidies, much less come out ahead.

      The better way to go would be to build a "people's car" that is preferably less than $20k and would run on diesel so you could use biodiesel to wean us off of oil. Until we have a major breakthrough on battery tech it simply doesn't make sense to go electric on cars.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by Mal-2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think he's trying to say that taking two hours to deliver the power necessary to accelerate a car is not only acceptable but commonplace where he lives. If nobody around you is moving, you don't need to be able to react very quickly either.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    15. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Until we have a major breakthrough on battery tech it simply doesn't make sense to go electric on cars.

      Well, you could ban everything but glorified golf carts from cities, which would make them much nicer to be in, and those could reasonably be electric since it doesn't take so much battery for a golf cart or a GEM car as it does for a Leaf or what have you. But you're right, until the batteries get much better and/or much cheaper, biodiesel would still be a much better solution. Problem is, TPTB are hostile to biodiesel.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Why does your preparation for the "next storm surge" not start with moving to higher ground?

      (How much higher is a question for you to assess in your local conditions. For my local conditions when we moved, a minimum of 35m above MSL was mandatory along with at least 2deg of surface slope. YMMV.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    17. Re:If it's too puny for a car... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      2 hours?! For us, east coasters, 2 hours don't make any difference... for others will be too... soon enough...

      And you can't use it in an off-grid solar setup - there aren't many charge/discharge cycles left...

      It's difficult to read your post and understand what you are trying to convey; but I am assuming that you're talking about Hurricane Sandy based on your reference to the East Coast. This is not for that.

      In a warm climate, the battery solution is fine. It would be used to power lights, refrigerator, and a few small appliances.
      It really looks like it has future.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  2. Questions! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Chevy Volt batteries are failing already? It seems like the Volt has only been on the market for a year.

    How does he know that they will last for another ten? It's early days yet and the fact that they have failed for the Volt seems like premature failure to me.

    1. Re:Questions! by TheGavster · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is a concept study, sponsored in part by GM. The batteries they have are the ones for a Volt, so those are the ones that were used. I'm also going to go out on a limb and guess that they don't have a warehouse full of these setups ready to sell at Home Depot, but that they had some batteries that were used during development of the Volt and have a lot more miles on them then the average consumer-owned car.

      This does show what a technical challenge electric car batteries are: these were charged and discharged beyond the point where they could deliver useful, sustained power to a car, but are still more than capable of handling the lower current, long duration needs of a house. If the nuclear industry could figure out a cool application of their discarded (but still quite energetic) fuel, maybe we could get off of coal ...

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
  3. This will boost the electric car market by i · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you can reuse parts of your electric car for your household for economic benefit (and maybe as backup for blackouts) it makes these high priced cars more valuable and therefore expand the potential market.

    This will also potenially create a battery market for house backup for blackouts or accomodation to possible day to night price difference.
    Which also will expand the battery market. All this will lower the production unit costs for batteries.
    And here the cycle begin again... :)
     

    --
    Mundus Vult Decipi
    1. Re:This will boost the electric car market by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They are already using EVs as whole-house backup power supplies in Japan. A Nissan Leaf, a relatively small car, has a 24KWh battery pack. You can run a typical Japanese house for a few days from that in the event of an emergency.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:This will boost the electric car market by robot256 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You don't even need to take the battery out of the car to use it in an emergency, if you don't mind bolting a few cables under the hood. A 24kWh Nissan LEAF can power a refrigerator for 3 days. http://www.wusa9.com/Sandy/article/227657/474/Charge-It-One-Mans-Solution-To-Power-Outage

    3. Re:This will boost the electric car market by swillden · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's an interesting solution. A Leaf's battery (24kWh at 400V) will actually power a whole house for a couple of days, but that would require getting direct access to the main battery output to sustain whole-house amperages. What he did was to connect his fridge to a small inverter, which he connected in turn to the Leaf's 12V battery. The 12V battery in a Leaf is pretty much an ordinary car battery (a little smaller than most), whose normal use is to power the interior amenities of the car. Like any other 12V car battery, it would be depleted before too long... but the Leaf automatically recharges the 12V battery from the main battery as needed.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:This will boost the electric car market by FirstOne · · Score: 1

      "but that would require getting direct access to the main battery output to sustain whole-house amperages"

      That shouldn't be too difficult in the near future".

      The new high performance charging connector allows direct access to the EV battery via low impedance connection.

  4. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who needs emergency power isn't going to be using the inductive cooktop, air conditioner and three oil column heaters. This keeps the fridge, tv, radio, and microwave going.

  5. Re:Doesn't add up by SJ · · Score: 5, Informative

    Your house uses more than 10kw? I really have to ask, what the heck are you doing??

    I have a modest 4x2 house, with a stay-at-home wife and 2 kids. Big screen TV, and all the other creature comforts and I wouldn't even come close to use 10Kw.

    In this instance I have to say 'you're doing it wrong'.

  6. Re:Doesn't add up by dimeglio · · Score: 2

    If you turn off heating and air conditioning you should be using a lot less than 10kW.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  7. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what are you doing that uses 10kW ?

  8. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That'll work as long as power outages occur only during California weather conditions.

  9. Sounds like bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My little 1500 watt heater wrecks their calculations. And that's just in one room of one house.

    And 5 battery packs is a good chunk of space and weight.

    Plus you need charge controllers, transfer switches, and some way to recharge the batterys. And if you've got enough solar/wind to recharge 10kw in a reasonable time.. You don't really need that giant ass battery pack now. Otherwise you're using the grid to recharge and just delaying your energy usage.. and losing X% to efficiency losses thru every cycle.

    Nope. Sounds like bullshit put out by an industry worried they're gonna have to pickup the tab to recycle these giant toxic batteries.

    1. Re:Sounds like bullshit. by Smidge204 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is for grid-level storage, not in-your-home backup. Space and weight are a distant concern compared to cost.

      There is an important concept called demand (or load) leveling. How much electricity the grid demands changes significantly over the course of the day, so you much design your power plants and infrastructure to handle the peak load. However the peak load is only experienced a small fraction of the time, meaning you are considerably overbuilt for maybe 16 to 18 hours of the day - especially late at night when most people sleep. The problem is so severe that many utility providers offer Time-Of-Use rates where electricity during off-peak hours is considerably cheaper (and on-peak considerably more expensive) to encourage people and businesses to use less during the day and more at night.

      Batteries connect to the grid though a charge controlling inverter - a single piece of equipment. During the off-peak hours they absorb excess energy by charging, meaning the generation equipment runs more efficiently and more economically. During peak hours they release the energy decreasing the demand on the system so it doesn't have to be so overbuilt and therefore less expensive to maintain and operate.

      The process of shifting load from peak to off-peak is sometimes referred to "filling the bathtub" and utility providers love it since it makes their lives much easier. Battery storage is a great way to achieve this at the grid level and anyone who manages to develop a cost effective solution stands to make a LOT of money selling and installing such systems.
      =Smidge=

    2. Re:Sounds like bullshit. by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. If you haven't already, you should check out Sadow's liquid metal batteries. Development appears to be coming along nicely. They are designed for cheap grid-level storage.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    3. Re:Sounds like bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone know what metal they are using now? They started with magnesium and antimony but have moved on to cheaper metals. I can envisage a low-temperature (<150C) variant using mercury and sodium with a cyanide salt. Only one problem, the ingredients are horribly toxic.

  10. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In many areas, electricity is not commonly used to heat houses, and air conditioning is not commonly installed in houses. This means the electricity demand for houses is very different than your house and it will generally not use 10 KW.

    In fact, in the country I live in many older houses only have a 40 ampere max connection to the grid. At 230 volt, that's not even 10 KW.

  11. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    An 800W microwave, 3kW kettle for heating water, 3kW washing machine, and 3kW electric oven leaves you just enough change from 10kW for your big flatscreen TV. At peak time I would also have the tumble dryer running, my 500W PC running, lighting (only 240W, bargain!).

    In total, it's about 14kW at peak usage (thank heavens the heating is natural gas powered, as are the oven jobs and hot water). Heaven forbid if anyone tried to use a hairdryer at that time as well...

  12. For off-grid homes by crow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I agree that this doesn't make much sense for most people--the cost of the electricity to keep them charged isn't worth having a few hours coverage in blackouts for most people, this is quite useful for people with off-grid homes in remote locations. I had friends building in a remote location, and running the power lines to the house would cost as much as a solar array with batteries to last through the night. With used electric car batteries, the cost of such a system would drop significantly.

    The idea isn't to have electric car owners make use of their worn-out batteries, but to create a market for them to sell them.

    1. Re:For off-grid homes by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I had friends building in a remote location, and running the power lines to the house would cost as much as a solar array with batteries to last through the night. With used electric car batteries, the cost of such a system would drop significantly.

      The question here is startup costs versus operational costs. Solar panels and batteries both required maintenance and have to be replaced regularly... Power lines generally require little to no maintenance and require replacement only at great intervals.

      Lacking a pressing or political/ideological reason for choosing solar, I'd have to pencil out the figures and study them closely before assuming solar is the better solution. There's considerations that people don't often think of in these assumptions, like the need for power during the day and the annual cycle of solar availability.

    2. Re:For off-grid homes by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      the cost of the electricity to keep them charged isn't worth having a few hours coverage in blackouts for most people

      Surely once they're charged all you need is a trickle to keep them topped up? It's not like an electric car runs flat if you don't drive it for a week...

    3. Re:For off-grid homes by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      What energy is taken to "keep them charged"? Where does it all go? The only possible outlet for it is heat from the batteries. So if you're doing it over times of year when the house needs heating anyway, then there'd be zero wasted energy. (But I find it hard to believe that even a small amount would be lost as heat).

    4. Re:For off-grid homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Interestingly enough - these batteries can be bought second hand from assorted recycling yards for a few hundred bucks each, and a small array of them in your basement with some sort of charging system (solar, charging timer etc) would be good for an emergency backup should the power go out or as you mentioned, in an off-grid setup in a remote location. The rating from the factory is 4.4kwh so if you can find two decent units, you can have anywhere from 6-8kwh of storage in your basement easily enough for significantly less than what your typical off-grid battery arrays run for.

      A good sized solar array could power your house during the day, charge the batteries, and the battery array can power the house during the night.

      Either that or you can have a small single panel for trickle charging purposes, and the battery array for emergency power in case of failure.

    5. Re:For off-grid homes by PPH · · Score: 1

      Actually, given net metering and variable rate time of day metering, it might be economical to charge your batteries at night (low power rates) and sell that back to the utility during peak periods (high rates). One would have to work out the economics. And be willing to live with the deleterious health effects of a smart meter, of course.

      The best solution would be to install a battery system at the site of each wind turbine, making the control of the battery charge/discharge algorithm tightly coupled to instantaneous wind power output to fill in the gaps.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:For off-grid homes by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Combine it with solar and it costs nothing to keep the batteries topped up. Batteries are just one more piece of the puzzle.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:For off-grid homes by capedgirardeau · · Score: 1

      Solar panels are very typically guaranteed for 80% output at 25 years of age so they do not need to be replaced 'regularly' by typical definitions of regularly.

      Batteries you are looking at 10 year life cycles, which might come a little closer regular replacement. However, even that can often go to 15 year cycles with a properly sized and used string of batteries.

      --
      Wax on, wax off baby!
    8. Re:For off-grid homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already use power from my Volt as a house backup for my entirely off-grid solar system. Similar to the OP, it would have cost more to run grid lines in here than buy the solar stuff. It's not even that hard to do. The Volt also has a 12v system it keeps charged via a switching supply from the 360v batteries, and it will do a couple kw worth - so you hook up an inverter to the 12v system, turn it and the Volt on in the driveway, and it will kick out at least a kw (my home can easily get down to 300w total or so) to recharge the house batteries, which still handle the major peaks (my machine tools etc). The Volt's IC engine will simply cycle to keep the Volt batteries in a good status - you can decide whether that's near empty or half full (or full in a 2013, but I have a 2012). The system works like a charm, and the round trip losses in the Volt battery system are far less than the old submarine type lead acids I use for main house batteries. As well, the IC engine in the Volt is the most efficient in kWH/gallon of gas generator available *at any price* at the moment. It beats my little honda inverter-generator by almost a factor of two! For some reason, most hardware store generators lack refinements like PM generators, continuously and separately variable cam timing for intake and exhaust, computer controlled fuel injection that does not need use of a throttle most times (like a diesel), and a few other refinements the Volt has.

      Here's how you add 120v AC backup power to a Volt:
      http://www.coultersmithing.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=553

      Not the final solution, but one that works and probably won't ruin your warranty on the car. Others have looked into tapping directly off the 360v battery, which would be "just so" for making half and full H bridge inverters with, depending on what you need. But this surely would violate the Volt warranty (and should), and it's a bit tricky since the Volt battery is isolated and has ground fault sensing, so you can't tie any part of it to ground.

    9. Re:For off-grid homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be shocked to know this, but cows aren't actually spherical.

      Real-world batteries lose charge for a long list of reasons because they do not operate ideally. The amount of self-discharge varies depending on a number of factors, but it's still there.

    10. Re:For off-grid homes by Jannie+Ogg · · Score: 1

      I am not well educated, (I pour coffee for a living), so if I am asking a dumb question (or one that has already been covered in the thread), please be kind. Could these batteries be used to store passive solar energy?

  13. It is so common to see it in India. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The grid goes on the blink for so long in India, almost every (middle and higher class) homes have truck batteries that charge from the grid when the power is on and run fans, lights and TV when it is off. A typical truck battery powers a couple of fluorescent lights, and a couple of ceiling fan for about six hours. But they usually do not run air conditioners or refrigerators on batteries.. yet. Last trip I saw advertisement for "air conditioners specifically designed for inverters". (Inverter converts the DC current from the batteries to AC current for the mains. )

    In USA they do not have much use. For emergencies like Sandy, FEMA should simply develop a plan to send the fuel trucks from the army and drive around the affected neighborhoods and dispense fuel for cars in the drive way of homes. The municipalities can collect the cost of the fuel from the homeowners through utility bills later. And the collected money can be considered emergency grants from the federal govt to the municipalities. Once you have an assured supply of fuel in an emergency, we can use the hundreds of thousands of power plants that are already present in these locations.

    The hundreds of thousands of powerplants are typically four cylinder gasoline engines, and a good portion of them are six and eight cylinders, the automobile engines. Presently the alternator is sized to provide just enough electric power for the car. If we design a generator that runs at the right RPM, and connection kits that will allow it to be coupled to an car engine it would be very helpful. I am thinking of some kind of frame, a new serpentine belt, or some way to work off the belt driving the alternator. If FEMA funds the R&D to create these kits, builds them and stocks them, they can be deployed in an emergency.

    In an emergency so many people would happily stay at home and avoid driving around, if they can. But they are all forced to run around looking for food, gas and water. Municipalities should develop emergency plans where their residents simply text to some known number information like, "running short of water/food/gas", "Medical attention needed", "Number of young children = XX". They should consolidate and send around FEMA trucks to bring food/water/gas to them. If people have the peace of mind, they will stay home and let the roads free for people with real emergencies.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:It is so common to see it in India. by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      You know who else believed in a centrally-planned, government-run society?

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    2. Re:It is so common to see it in India. by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      just about every farm tractor has a "power take off" essentially an output shaft off the transmission or directly off the engine on smaller machines to run other equipment.

      I agree it would be really really nice if at least larger autos like pickups and SUVs had this; maybe with a little electronic interconnect to allow external device to control the throttle servo the cruise control ordinarily uses. Naturally safety interlocks to make sure this stuff is only usable when the main transmission is in neutral. Then you could just back the thing out on to the drive, cable up the transfer switch attach the generator to the take off and produce as much electricity as you can use as long 16gal of petrol lasts.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    3. Re:It is so common to see it in India. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Oh! yeah! The private sector! The free markets! Let the people decide! Great!

      The phone and power companies are private sector. Why the hell aren't they handling the emergencies better? It is completely irrational for private sector to set aside resources to handle emergencies. The free market will not reward them for it. All those resources are opportunity cost, they diminish profits. When an emergency hits, they will feign innocence, "no one could have seen this coming", "it is an act of God", "it is an unforeseen accident" and avoid paying for the damages caused by their total lack of preparedness.

      The libertarian solution for problems is as flawed as central planning communistic philosophy. Basically the libertarians would let the free market to take its course, and if people are harmed, they can sue and collect for the damages. The competition will deliver goods and services at the lowest possible cost, and their excesses will be checked because they have to pay for any damage they cause.

      This "solution" effectively puts the trial and personal injury lawyers as the only recourse against the excesses of free market. Further it assumes the government that is small enough to be drowned in the bathtub will somehow have the power to enforce the rulings of these judgement.

      Of course, I agree there is a free market solution possible for emergencies. In an emergency FEMA will do whatever it takes to alleviate the pain and suffering. And then send the bill to the power and the phone companies that are chartered by their municipalities to have the monopoly. Crack down on them hard couple of times, then they will be prepared for emergencies. Basically they will take insurance against this. And the insurance companies will demand high premia . The utilities will find it cost effective to be better prepared and have agreements to borrow crew and equipment from each other to reduce the insurance costs. This will eventually lead to better handling of emergencies.

      But the libertarian crowd is really shills for corporate america. They will take pot shots at people trying to solve problems. But if it ever takes a dime more from the corporations, they will fight that tooth and nail, even if it makes sure the problems go unsolved, and the wounds fester.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    4. Re:It is so common to see it in India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, you have more faith in the competence of FEMA than many people do.

      Second, I think you're rather glib about designing (and quickly distributing and installing in an emergency) an emergency power system that is compatible with hundreds of different makes and models of vehicles.

    5. Re:It is so common to see it in India. by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

      As someone who lives in the south and has gone through a lot of hurricanes I don't think your idea really makes sense.

      If you properly prepare for a hurricane then running short of water/food/gas isn't a problem during the period when it would be unsafe to drive around to get those things.
      Portable or whole-home generators that already exist make much more sense and are probably cheaper than designing something new to attach to cars.

      And quite honestly the only thing people NEED power for in these situations is cooling or heating. Usually there are shelters to help people with this but certainly there could be better solutions (obviously not everyone can afford a generator or even has the space to run one).

      In terms of food/water they tend to set up distribution centers with cases of MREs and water if things are bad.
      If you have family or friends or neighbors who can't get there themselves then you help them out by getting some for them.
      Maybe having neighborhoods set up emergency/disaster teams (kind of like neighborhood watch) to do this would be more efficient but in my experience it's not really an issue. Using the national guard for this is a waste.
      However, the south is obviously not as densely populated as new york city so maybe they need to do things differently than typical hurricane country does it. Also, most people in NYC don't own cars so your 'using the car as a home generator' thing wouldn't really help them.

      If things are REALLY REALLY bad then you were probably warned to evacuate and should have. Hurricanes aren't like earthquakes.

    6. Re:It is so common to see it in India. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      FEMA? LOL.

      They can't find their butt in the dark with both hands.

      Utilities already share crews etc. The simple fact is you can't anticipate everything. Attempting to prepare for all contingencies in a chaotic system isn't possible, even if you can print money.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:It is so common to see it in India. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You can add a PTO to any American pickup. Just add a transfer case (or a second if 4x4).

      The rigs are called 'crawlers' (thought they only use the second low gear, kits are available). Leaving the PTO would put it into an inconvenient location. You will need another drive shaft to bring the power to the front/rear bumper. Maybe you can reuse the stock one as you will need a new, shortened, rear driveshaft and lengthened front driveshaft.

      That said a typical healthy American V8 is too big for a household generator.

      If I was going to do something like this it would be part of a dyno. Using a generator as a dyno load wouldn't be that hard (just control the excitation voltage to control power absorption). Nobody _needs_ a home dyno. But I bet it would help shave ET.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:It is so common to see it in India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already make something like this- http://www.meps.com/ some television news vans (ENG) are using these instead of seperate on-board generators.

    9. Re:It is so common to see it in India. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You want to couple the generator to the crankshaft directly. A vee-belt that you can reasonably run from the existing pulley can only transmit a couple horsepower before it gives up, five tops. A multi-vee belt, maybe twice that. The easiest thing to do is to buy a generator and couple it to the crankshaft. The cheapest thing to do would be to get rare earth magnets anywhere you can, then inset them into the existing flywheel, and build a generator based around that. You have to get incredibly great tolerances, but any machine shop should be able to manage it. The existing flywheel is a fairly precision-engineered piece of metal and designed to handle significant forces. You'll want an engine from a vehicle with a manual transmission in order to get a flywheel with it. If you get a new radiator for a vehicle with an automatic transmission you can run water through the transmission cooler inside the radiator to heat it.

      Using a car engine for a generator isn't a bad idea, people do it all the time. They used to use jeep engines on trailers coupled to generators for military purposes before generator trailers became commonplace. If diesel fuel is readily available, try hard to get a diesel engine. The exhaust may smell worse for you, but it's usually not as bad for you, and with some trickery you can run it on waste oil.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:It is so common to see it in India. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      If we design a generator that runs at the right RPM, and connection kits that will allow it to be coupled to an car engine it would be very helpful.

      Now you've just gone off the rails completely... It's one thing to draw a little power from your car/battery in an emergency to power a few critical appliances (raido, cell phone, flashlights, etc.), and quite another to try and press them into extended, heavy-duty service.

      Automobiles aren't designed for stationary use to begin with. You'd have cars overheating left and right, as there's no airflow. Their wimpy little electric cooling fans would be struggling mightily, but would fail from that kind of abuse and frequent cycling in short order.

      Once you talk about inserting accessories, like an upgraded alternator, you've completely failed on the economical side as well... You can walk into stores RIGHT NOW and go buy a low-end 1kW generator right around $100, or a heavy-duty 4kW model for under $250. No need to go destroy your vehicle.

      In an emergency so many people would happily stay at home and avoid driving around, if they can. But they are all forced to run around looking for food, gas and water.

      In the first place, people should all be evacuated from the disaster area, not being provided conveniences at the expense of first responders' lives.
      Secondly, if FEMA or anyone else was in a position to provide services, they'd be restoring the water, natural gas, and power lines, NOT dispatching fleets of fuel delivery trucks to keep people comfortably watching TV...

      It's up to individuals to stock-up on these basic necessities to protect themselves in case of emergencies. Even minor events could cause you to lose water, power, or be unable to go buy food.

      A gallon of water per person/per day isn't difficult to manage. It's what, 4x1gal for a dollar at just about any grocery store? A reusable "WaterBOB" bladder that'll hold 100 gallons is $20-30. And in a pinch, those nice big water heater tanks can be tapped for 30+ gallons.

      A 25lbs bag of rice costs all of $12 right now (even less when on sale), and will give an average person all the calories they need for more than a month. Camping stores (or Walmart) sell a 5gal bucket full of a month's supply of a variety of food for under $100.

      And a full gas tank is always recommended by authorities before an impending potential disaster, but I would suggest a 55 gallon barrel. That's probably more than enough to get a family through even an extended outage, and is small enough to store in any homes (apartment dwellers will need to go considerably smaller, though), and any homes that use heating oil have a huge supply of kerosene already. Plus, natural gas lines seem to have held up quite well during Sandy, at least, and in a pinch, anybody with some mechanical inclination can convert an engine to run on natural gas or propane, instead of gasoline or kerosene.

      Municipalities should develop emergency plans where their residents simply text to some known number information like, "running short of water/food/gas", "Medical attention needed", "Number of young children = XX".

      First they're really going to need to crack the whip on cell phone companies, and have them make damn sure their towers will stay up and running during power outages, and not lose half of them in the first few minutes.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:It is so common to see it in India. by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      If you think phone and power companies are private sector, then I'm afraid there's nothing that will ever make sense to you.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  14. Living off the grid is different. by SpzToid · · Score: 2

    This development will help a lot of folks who don't have reliable access to power. Just because it doesn't matter where you live doesn't mean this feat of technology does not matter to other people somewhere else.

    http://www.haitianproject.org/updates/2012/9/living-son

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  15. Location, Location, Location. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Your house uses more than 10kw? I really have to ask, what the heck are you doing??

    I have a modest 4x2 house, with a stay-at-home wife and 2 kids. Big screen TV, and all the other creature comforts and I wouldn't even come close to use 10Kw.

    In this instance I have to say 'you're doing it wrong'.

    Put your house at around sea level below the 30th parallel in a sunny area and watch what happens to your electric bill.

    Also 4x2 house doesn't mean much. I see Europeans referring to their 4x2(?) less than 93 sq meter(1000 sq feet) inner core apartments as houses. That's a far cry from places like Texas where a 4x2 standalone house could be anywhere from 2200 to 4000 sq feet(372 sq meters) and two stories tall.

    A guarantee that the latter home will have peak loads of around 18kWh or more.

  16. Re:Doesn't add up by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 4, Informative

    Anyone who needs emergency power isn't going to be using the inductive cooktop, air conditioner and three oil column heaters. This keeps the fridge, tv, radio, and microwave going.

    In addition, if you are wanting to go solar or off-grid, then power supply is only half of the equation. The other half being how to reduce consumption. For example getting a LED based TV instead of a plasma based one or putting stuff into standby (or off) when not bring used.

    As for 10KW per hour, that is huge. What is consuming that much? An industrial level hair dryer?

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  17. The same problems remain by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    The problems with these kinds of distributed system aren't so much technological anymore... but economic and operational. Who pays for them? Who maintains them? Who operates them? Who manages operations?

    These are the hard questions to answer. (Though no doubt, I'll get plenty of replies with a variety of shallow and ill thought out answers...) These are the questions that need to have at least trial solutions before the system can be rolled out.

  18. Math by marciot · · Score: 1

    Why five houses for two hours? Does it not power one house for ten hours? I would prefer the latter...

    1. Re:Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why five houses for two hours? Does it not power one house for ten hours? I would prefer the latter...

      Because we're all socialists now, remember?

      You would only prefer the latter if you weren't in one of those other 4 houses....

    2. Re:Math by budgenator · · Score: 2

      Why five houses for two hours? Does it not power one house for ten hours? I would prefer the latter...

      Because it's not being designed for homeowners, it's being designed for renewable energy generators to smooth out power swings inherent in renewable power sources; like when a 1.5 MW wind turbine blow a gearbox and catches on fire.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  19. Hybrid Batteries by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

    I looked up the capacity of Prius batteries in case anyone is interested: Normal = 1.31kWh (MH), Plug-in = 4.4hWh (LI).

    1. Re:Hybrid Batteries by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      My Prius has a 67 horse power electric motor that acts as a generator to charge the car's batteries. Not sure, but if its generating capacity is 67 HP, that's about 50 kW. That should be plenty for a 10 kW house load. What I need to figure out is how to hook that up to my house electric system. It might be easier for the plugin Prius. Somehow, reverse the current flow.

      Our two-person, 2,800 sq. feet house in Colorado uses about 450 - 500 kWhr of electric energy per month with gas water heater, gas dryer, gas heat, electric cooking stove. When purchased, the house had an electric water heater. It was quickly replaced with a gas water heater, and our electric usage was cut in half. Anyone who has access to natural gas should IMMEDIATLY replace their water heater with a gas fired device. The payback is pretty quick. Likewise, a gas dryer will save enormous energy costs, particularly if it doesn't use a pilot light. Our gas bill in the summer is essentially the cost of having the gas meter attached to the house since the dryer and water heater use so little energy.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    2. Re:Hybrid Batteries by PPH · · Score: 1

      Not sure, but if its generating capacity is 67 HP, that's about 50 kW.

      That's peak. Something like a Prius probably consumes about 15 Hp cruising on the highway. So that's what its cooling system will be sized for. That's not bad, from a standby power point of view. It will provide adequate emergency power for a household (without electric hot water, air conditioning, etc). Just don't get carried away with the marketing numbers or you'll melt the motor.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  20. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    cuz you totally keep the kettle running 24/7

  21. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of kettles and washing machines do you have that consume 3,000 watts?!

  22. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your hot water tank easily uses more than that when it's heating. Are you an idiot?

  23. Re:Doesn't add up by hrvatska · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apparently you are not the target market that this is being considered for. Often times solutions are not a good fit for many, but still work for enough people that they are worth marketing. For some people a subcompact car is totally inadequate, for others it's more than enough. Just because you have a need for more than 10kW doesn't mean that this isn't a good solution for millions of others. Many of us do not have air conditioning, electric stoves, electric dryers, or massive flat screened TVs. Our needs are considerably less than yours. I live in a household of 3 people that used 296 kWH of electricity in October. Two of us work from home. My immediate neighbors are probably not using much more electricity than we are. I don't see why a 10 kWH battery couldn't supply us with several hours of emergency power. Why are you so dismissive of a solution that would be perfectly adequate for many others?

  24. Trailer Parks - Power Stations of the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if your yard is full of old cars, it's no longer a junk yard.
    Just think of all the beer you can keep cold in the refrigerators too.

  25. Got backup? by SternisheFan · · Score: 2

    In Long Island, N.Y., my buddy's area lost power for almost a week from Sandy, but by using backup battery power he and his family had the only lights in his neighborhood. (He works for a company that provides backup power for office buildings, cellphone towers, phone/computer systems,...) The neighbors all wondered why he had power when they didn't. It's simply because he is prepared for outages when they occur.

  26. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No refrigerator ?
    That heater has an electric pump or fan to distribute the heat...
    And don't forget those vampire devices add up when you are in a crunch.

  27. Hark! The sound of preppers' rapidly tweeting by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    This research is extremely promising to aid a small family compound during a short outage, and when used in combination with some wind, solar, and perhaps scavenged propane, a small group of people might live quite comfortably. There is a J-Lo class but though.....there will neither be enough batteries nor enough forethought to keep everyone sustainable where they live. The earth's biggest environmental concern is that a particular species has overrun the planet.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  28. Pure unadulterated BS... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    This is not the power capability (except at a minimum draw) for 2-3 houses. If you've got ANY high-demand devices such as an on-demand water heater, oven/range, or a washer/dryer- you're going to burn through the pack MUCH faster- it'll almost power a SINGLE house fully.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Pure unadulterated BS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only for 2 hours! Presumably when your power goes out for a couple hours, you can turn off your oven and your clothes dryer. In fact, since those are typically 240V appliances, they wouldn't even work off the 120V supplied by the battery.

      I'm assuming that they were talking about power lights, refrigerator, and maybe some entertainment for just a couple hours.

      dom

  29. Re:Doesn't add up by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That'll work as long as power outages occur only during California weather conditions

    Living without AC is unpleasant but doable. Many millions did it in the 19th and first half of the 20th century. Heat is more important, but in emergency situations you really only need to heat one or two rooms, not your whole house. In the 1998 ice storm, when many Quebecers were without power for many days, people moved into their living room and slept around the fireplace.

  30. Re:Doesn't add up by Svartalf · · Score: 0

    10 kW...

    Let's see...

    Microwave: 1kW
    Stove/Oven: 3kW
    Regular Water Heater: 5kW
    On Demand Water Heater: 19-24kW
    HVAC: 15kW

    In short, there's quite a few things that use QUITE a bit of power and would deplete this quickly. As a simple backup like a UPS for short-term emergencies, this stuff would work "okay" for 2-3 houses and well for ONE house, but it's not the panacea they're painting it out to be. (Nor, are you knowledgeable about stuff like this as you think you are...)

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  31. Re:Doesn't add up by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

    If you turn off heating and air conditioning you should be using a lot less than 10kW

    No. Our house uses gas for heating and cooking, we live in a country that doesn't need a/c and the daily electricity consumption: lights, computers, washing, kettle, TVs, microwave, fridge comes to about 9kW*Hr per day.

    The idea that a stack of 10kW*Hr batteries could power 5 houses for 2 hours is what happens when you apply statistics without any common sense. During the night, those batteries could power lots more houses (like ours) for much longer. However come waking up time, when every household uses an electric shower for each resident, kettles, toasters and lighting and I doubt you'd get 1 house for 20 minutes out of that many batteries - assuming they didn't fail under that load.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  32. Re:Doesn't add up by Svartalf · · Score: 0

    It's called an electric water heater. You know, that hot water thingy that allows you to have hot baths and the like... But then, you posted this as an anon coward on /. I shouldn't expect better.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  33. do it right by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    deep cycle marine batteries, why have two hours when you can have twelve or more

    1. Re:do it right by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Right from a cost/capacity/maintainability standpoint wet lead acid batteries make much more sense. These MH and LI batteries virtues are density and weight neither of which nearly as big a concern when you don't need have them mobile. The only reason they are interesting at all is the economics, where their performance might be to degraded for automotive use but they could see a second use life as stand by power.

      Still I find it highly questionably. Most LI batteries work near original capacity for their life span and then deteriorate very rapidly. How long is this second service life? The cost of installation, removal, and disposal all happening pretty frequently vs other batter technologies which can a decade and longer now, might very well negate the savings in reusing these things.

      My other concern is its often worse having an unreliable backup than no back up. At least if you know you don't have electricity when the mains are down you can plan on having a neuroscience heater and some fuel around, gas lanterns etc. I'd hate to go around thinking I was protected and find my battery was worthless when I really need to run the heat in the winter. Yea I know test your backups.

      Trouble is its hard to really validate a UPS's batteries are good except under load. Real load tests are sorta a pain in the arse to do at any frequency except where you have high tech like phase synced automatic transfer switches and such you won't have in a residential setting because they cost way to much.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:do it right by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Look into NiFe batteries, tollerate overcharging/overdischarging very well as well as any over abuse you can throw at them

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:do it right by olden · · Score: 1

      Li-ion in general, and variants currently used for EVs (e.g. NMC) in particular, dramatically outperforms lead-acid:
      - 3 to 5x the energy density
      - 5 to 20x higher sustained discharge current
      - 10 to 20x faster charge
      - 2 to 10x cycle life
      - higher charging efficiency, lower self-discharge, longer calendar life so less maintenance, etc. And all those figures keep improving, albeit slowly.

      EV battery packs are expected to be retired when they reach 70 to 50% capacity. As Li-ion's capacity fade slows down with age (assuming constant depth of discharge cycling; ie you lose less capacity the 2nd year than the first, less the 3rd than the 2nd, etc), a "spent" automotive pack may well have 2/3 of its life still remaining.
      All will boil down to pricing, but from technical specs only, used EV batteries look much more interesting than lead-acid for grid-helping applications.

  34. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hot water heater. An electric Dryer will consume 3kW drying your clothes because of the heating element in the thing.

    It amazes me to utterly no end how FRIGGIN' CLUELESS some people seem to be on this discussion.

  35. really? by Tastecicles · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't have figured that the foremost thoughts on the minds of people fighting to survive a disaster (either natural or manmade) is how Honey fucking Boo Boo is doing. I would have thought that the foremost thing on peoples' minds would be the following, in order of necessity: water, food, shelter.

    Water is easy: seal and stock. Stock a couple filters as well.
    Food is easy: cook, seal and stock. Most of this is already done for you; it comes in cans. Bonus! Get a hand turned can opener or a survival kit multitool and learn how to use it, forget the electric can opener - it's no good without power.
    Shelter: you have a house or other manmade structure around you, right now, do you not? You have the ability or knowledge to make fire? It's something Homo sapiens has enjoyed for several tens of thousands of years, now. Surely we have not forgotten how to strike two rocks together and use hair for kindling?

    Have we as a species become so dependant on Edison technology that we're destined to extinction when the last bulb flickers and dies? I hope not.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  36. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dude, you need new water heater if it runs 24/7.

  37. Re:Doesn't add up by MtHuurne · · Score: 2

    2000 W is quite typical for an electric kettle, so 3 kW is not crazy. Of course the kettle runs for only a few minutes, so while you can certainly get over 10 kW peak usage, 10 kW sustained is still enormous.

  38. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It depends on what is doing your heating. If you have electric heat, then 10kW is reasonable. Fortunately, I have natural gas boiler, hot water heater, stove, and clothes dryer.

  39. Catching up to Nissan by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This plan has been built into the Nissan LEAF program since the beginning. The recycling plan for their batteries is to build power storage substations, not just for a few houses. This is a better plan because it keeps the batteries out of people's houses and off their block, for the most part, while not moving them so far away that they won't do any good.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Catching up to Nissan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree to the idea to keeps the batteries out of people's houses and off their block...
      http://www.7mags.com/

  40. Re:Doesn't add up by guruevi · · Score: 2

    Your on-demand water heater uses ~100A (@220V which is line power in the US) continuously? That is my entire house's electricity supply (100A breaker) and would cost me about $3-4/hour, that is half a minimum wage in the US.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  41. Re:Doesn't add up by Miamicanes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A 10kW generator is *barely* enough to run 2 or 3 10,000BTU window air conditioners. I believe you need ~24kW of 220v capacity to start a normal 2-3 ton central air conditioner.

    It's a shame companies like Carrier, Rheem, etc can't put a little effort into designing central ac units that are "generator friendly" & can start with less inrush current. Like, maybe some kind of transmission that would allow the compressor to spin up slowly, instead of just soaking up 20+ kW for 3 seconds before settling down to half that amount. Or logic to start up the compressor, THEN the blower fan, instead of both at once.

  42. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You seem to be under the impression that this is meant to be a complete replacement for your every need.

    You're the one who is consumed with an ignorant demand that this idea doesn't fill your every possible need as you use everything in your house at once.

    How self-entitled do you feel you are?

    This is about serving in emergencies, and is no more meant to be a complete replacement than a flashlight is meant to provide the light of the sun.

  43. Re:Doesn't add up by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Informative

    Geez. My house never hits 10 kW peak. Period. I suppose if my wife were baking something, we had the dryer on AND I was running the welder we might hit that.

    I use a 2.5 kW generator for the house - works great except the electric stove and the dryer. If we are on generator because of a power outage, we can avoid baking, use the propane grill and just air dry clothes. That leaves the computers, lights and miscellaneous bits of civilization to work just spiffily.

    I can't even imagine what he uses 10 kW for....

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  44. Use compressed air instead! by fredan · · Score: 1

    Wind, it's a nightmare for grid operators to manage

    Instead of generating electricity directly in wind turbines, generate compressed air. Transport that energy in pipes and store it on land. On land you have an compressed air driven electricity generator for generating your electricity.

    Now you go from peak energy to base load energy. With this, wind will not be an nightmare for grid operators to mange anymore.

    The different to use compressed air as a storage for energy instead of batteries, is that you can discharge a compressed tank more times than you can discharge a battery.

    1. Re:Use compressed air instead! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      Use hydro pump storage instead, for large scale installs it's the only power storage that can be enlarged with a steam shovel

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Use compressed air instead! by fredan · · Score: 1

      I don't think that you can use hydro as a energy resource in a car or a bus. With compressed air you can.

    3. Re:Use compressed air instead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of water in West Texas.

    4. Re:Use compressed air instead! by bjs555 · · Score: 1

      You need to pump a lot of water to store the equivalent energy of a 50 Amp hr car battery. In fact, you'd need to pump all the water from a typical size swimming pool up 8 feet. And for a 10 KWhr system you'd need at least 16 batteries or 16 swimming pools. That suggests a new unit of energy - the swimming pool = at a height of 8 feet, the energy storage capacity of one car battery. Here are my calculations:

      A typical car battery is rated at 50 Amp hr.
      To get energy, multiply by battery voltage of 12.5 V.
      Max energy stored in battery = 50 Amp hr * 12.5 V = 625 Watt hr.
      Battery could supply 625 Watts for one hour or 62.5 Watts for 10 hours.

      1 Watt hr = 3600 Joules
      1 Joule = 0.7376 ft lb

      625 Watt hr * 3600 Joules / Watt hr = 2,250,000 Joules

      2,250,000 Joules * 0.7376 ft lb / Joule = 1,659,600 ft lb

      1,659,600 ft lb * 1 ton / 2000 lb = 830 ft tons
      Must lift 1 ton 830 feet or 10 tons 83 feet to store the same energy as a car battery.

      1 gallon of water weighs 8.34 lb.
      24,000 gal of water weighs 100 tons.
      An average swimming pool holds 20,000 gal of water or about 100 tons of water.
      Must pump all the water in a swimming pool up 8 ft to store the same energy as a car battery.

    5. Re:Use compressed air instead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that you can use hydro as a energy resource in a car or a bus. With compressed air you can.

      The context of the discussion is storing power for residential backup and load leveling purposes. Cars and buses are another article.

    6. Re:Use compressed air instead! by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      compressed gases are usually a terrible way to store energy in terms of loss.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    7. Re:Use compressed air instead! by fredan · · Score: 1

      I don't think that you can use hydro as a energy resource in a car or a bus. With compressed air you can.

      The context of the discussion is storing power for residential backup and load leveling purposes. Cars and buses are another article

      ok. fair enough.

      How've gonna store the water energy in your residential? With compressed air you can.

    8. Re:Use compressed air instead! by fredan · · Score: 1

      compressed gases are usually a terrible way to store energy in terms of loss.

      I'm talking about compressed air, which I think, is some kind of a gas.

      If you store energy in a battery, it will loss it's energy over time. I think this is the same for a compressed air tank...

    9. Re:Use compressed air instead! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Compressed air heats up during compression. It then losses pressure as it cools. It also condenses water, which will cause corrosion in the tank unless the water is regularly drained. Which also costs energy/pressure.

      If the tank is ignored it will eventually fail. 150psi*30squarefeet*144squareinches/squarefoot is enough energy to throw pieces of metal hard enough to cut you in half.

      Also compressors are loud and annoying. All tanks/plumbing leak, some just leak faster then others.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:Use compressed air instead! by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so?

      It's not like any of this is going in someone's house. That was never the point.
      =Smidge=

  45. Re:Doesn't add up by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yo' space ....

    I monitor my power consumption using a Current Cost system (don't necessarily suggest this device, it's a bit wonky, but it works). I get 6 kW running the oven AND the dryer. The hot water heater fires a few minutes every hour during the day. I cannot see a sustained 10 kW load. Ever.

    YMMV but if you're really pulling down that many amps, either you have a bunch of very, very clean people in your household.

    Or you're doing it wrong.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  46. Re:Doesn't add up by DarthBart · · Score: 1

    Wiring a delay between the compressor start and outdoor blower would be trivial and thermostats with even a small amount of smarts delay starting the indoor airhandler a few seconds after the outdoor unit starts. But, no matter how you slice it, a motor just starting up is effectively "Stalled" and draws a crap load of inrush current. There's designs to reduce that a bit, but they're expensive to build.

  47. Re:Doesn't add up by confused+one · · Score: 1

    They're designing to supplement the grid, not replace it. You're 10kW generator can't handle the peak loads on your house. When someone talks about x kW (it depends on region) powering n homes, they're talking about average demand.

  48. Re:Doesn't add up by pla · · Score: 1

    Lets see, my 10kW generator doesn't even power my whole house, and a 10kWH battery set is supposed to provide electricity to 5 houses for 2 hours, that would be 1kW a house. Somehow this seems to be a new use of the word "provide" I was not previously aware of.

    As an offline system, no, that amounts to a pitiful amount of power.

    As a grid-tie supplementary system, most likely your "background" power use comes in at somewhere between 0.5 to 1kW.

    Charging this bank overnight at $0.015/kWH, then using it during the daytime peak at $0.285/kWH comes out to a savings of very nearly $1000/year (so the first year would cover the cost of the inverter, basically), just for squeezing the last bit of use out of something otherwise considered garbage.

  49. Re:Doesn't add up by budgenator · · Score: 2

    If your 10KW generator doesn't run your whole house, either your generator needs load testing, or you have some really hellacious electric bills. Perhaps a Kill-A-Watt could help you figure out why your electric meter is spinning like a top. For planning purposes electric utillities assume a household uses 1.6KW, your claiming your using 6 1/4 times the typical.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  50. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Friction clutch.

  51. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah yes, the old "If I can't use it, no one else should ever be allowed to have it either' mentality.

    Well your computer is useless to a dirt farmer in china, does that mean you shouldn't be allowed to have a computer?
    Second thought, that would keep you from posting bullshit on slashdot, so perhaps you are on to something after all!

  52. Re:Doesn't add up by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    No he probably does not keep the kettle on 24/7. Maybe you missed the multiple uses of the work "peak" in the grandparent. Still I don't think its the least bit unusual, especially for those that don't live alone to have that or a similar combination of appliances running all at the same time. I often have the washer dryer running while I am cooking dinner, and have the TV on so I can see the news. So swap out your tea kettle for electric stove top and there you are. Now consider the things you don't really control like when the fridge compressor cycles on or even if you have gas fired hear the blower motor starts up, and you might have bigger peak loads than you at first expect.

    Is it unreasonable that when on emergency power you might modify your behavior and say wait to do the laundry; sure but I think his point was that under "normal" conditions a single person might at any given time draw as much as 10kW. So estimating that much is a suitable backup power source for 5 homes; is highly optimistic at best.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  53. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They do. Newer units are starting to use inverter-driven compressor motors for variable speed. The actual reason to use them is higher efficiency while operating, but a very nice side-effect is virtually no inrush.

    I spend time on several off-grid / renewable-energy forums, and one of the biggest changes for off-grid homes recently is that you can buy inverter-driven mini-split AC units that can cool a (small) home from solar / battery banks without any issue. Several people set the unit to "low" in the morning, and let it run all day, draws only 300W. Won't keep the house cold, in fact the temp slowly climbs through the day, but only to 78 instead of 85-90.

    I have a portable AC unit (roll-around, with the flex hose to exhaust hot air out the window) that uses an inverter. 9000 BTU, draws 1200W or so while running, starts just fine with a little Honda EU2000i generator (1600W continuous, 2000W peak). The 9000 BTU mini-split (standard compressor) in my server closet won't even try to start, the generator just bogs down.

  54. Re:Doesn't add up by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Or your house has a fresh, skunky smell all the time and you have no visible means of support.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  55. Re:Doesn't add up by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    Your house uses more than 10kw? I really have to ask, what the heck are you doing??

    Grow lamps, dude!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  56. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Your house uses more than 10kw? I really have to ask, what the heck are you doing??"

    Marajuana grow operation?

  57. Desulfate lead acid batteries instead by bjs555 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The FA talks about Li-ion batteries but I've read about people buying dead car batteries real cheap and bringing them back to life by desulfating them with a simple circuit based on a 555 timer. The idea is to pulse the battery at its resonant frequency of about 4 MHz with high voltage pulses to break up the lead sulfate crystals that often cause a battery to fail. Car batteries might be a cheaper alternative to Li-ion batteries for a home system. Here's a link to the circuit:
    http://www.reuk.co.uk/Battery-Desulfation.htm

    1. Re:Desulfate lead acid batteries instead by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      The main reason that car batteries fail is that the lead plates collapse to the bottom of the cells. The result is that either the lead short circuits the battery or are no longer connected to their internal conductors, more likely the latter. This is a physical failure not a physical chemistry failure. Car batteries are subjected to substantial mechanical stress due to the conditions under which they operate in automobiles.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    2. Re:Desulfate lead acid batteries instead by bjs555 · · Score: 1

      Streetlight, you're correct in pointing out that battery failure can occur by lead shedding causing a short or open circuit. But that's only one failure mode. Sulfation occurs when a lead acid battery is discharged too deeply. That can occur by self discharge when a battery is left to stand for a long time (10 months or so) without recharging. Here's some info:
      http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/sulfation_and_how_to_prevent_it
      The comments at the bottom of the link are interesting and include some real world results. Seems there is a bit of snake oil salesmanship in the battery additive/reconditioner industry but the pulse desulfators have been around for a while and do seem to work.

    3. Re:Desulfate lead acid batteries instead by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I've read about people buying dead car batteries real cheap and bringing them back to life by desulfating them

      There are a lot of failure modes for car batteries.

      You can't see the reason for the failure just by looking at it before buying it.

      If you buy one with other (eg. physical) damage, you've wasted your time and money.

      Even if you're lucky, your desulfated battery is going to have lower capacity and shorter useful life than a new battery.

      The "core charge" for a dead battery runs about 1/4th the cost of a NEW and WORKING car battery.

      In short, I don't think the economics are there to make "car battery repair" very viable.

      I suppose if I had a junk yard, or other source of completely free batteries (see "core charge" above) I'd keep stocked-up with specific gravity testers and replacement acid and be happy even with a very low success rate, and recycle all the failures.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Desulfate lead acid batteries instead by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      The article noted is full of BS. It's total nonsense. Science fiction.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    5. Re:Desulfate lead acid batteries instead by bjs555 · · Score: 1

      Maybe. I haven't tried it myself. But if you read the comments below the article you'll see that people who have nothing to sell say pulse delulfators have worked for them on batteries that won't hold a charge. People on other sites say the same thing. The stuff about matching the natural frequency of the battery sure sounds like BS but maybe the need for high frequency has something to do with the size of the sulphate crystals. Or maybe just charging at high voltage over and over at the 555 timer rate breaks up the sulphate deposits. I agree that there's a lot of BS around and it annoys me too but this seems to be in a gray area.

    6. Re:Desulfate lead acid batteries instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Car batteries aren't deep cycle batteries. Discharging and recharging them damages them. Car batteries are designed to create a large current for a short period of time to run the starter, then recharge. Deep cycle batteries (also called marine batteries) are designed to provide steady current for a long time, then recharge. They are not interchangeable.

    7. Re:Desulfate lead acid batteries instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They are not interchangeable"

      Tell that to these guys: http://www.odysseybattery.com/

  58. Re:Doesn't add up by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

    Many millions did it in the 19th and first half of the 20th century

    I'll up you one on that. Pretty much everybody did before the first half of the 20th century, everywhere.

    Dying in the desert heat when the power goes out is the price we pay for not living like desert people. Freezing to death when the power goes out is the price an idiot pays when they don't have good shelter, plenty of warm clothes, and if cold enough, a moderate heat source (you don't need much with good insulation). Living in a modern (desert) city with tons of asphalt, things painted dark colors, and poor building design is a great way to get heat stroke.

  59. Recycle Old Car Batteries and use New Batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's more feasible to recycle old car battery chemicals. Home energy storage should use new batteries to maximize the charge(Voltage,Wattage,Current). Old car batteries might leak and not hold electrical charge. Using old car batteries is a mess.

  60. Re:Doesn't add up by imsabbel · · Score: 2

    I strongly suspect you are a retard, or do not know how to use units.

    9kWh per day means that this battery could power your house for over 1 day. That would be a lot more than 2 hours for 5 houses of equal resonse.

    9kW continuous power draw (what you seem to imply by ignorance) would mean that you would burn >$500 in electricity per months, even at extremely low american prices.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  61. In this thread by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    Are tons of proud americans bragging against each other how much power their home needs.

    Without understanding concepts like peak power, or the insight that they are idiots if any of their claims are true.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  62. Re:Doesn't add up by drgould · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's a wild idea I'll just throw out.

    Don't use the microwave, kettle, washing machine, electric oven, flatscreen TV, tumble dryer and PC at the same time when you're running your generator.

    Crazy I know, but it might work.

  63. Re:Doesn't add up by drgould · · Score: 2

    Lets see, my 10kW generator doesn't even power my whole house, ...

    You don't seem willing to cutback your power consumption during a power outage, but you are willing to sit around in the dark and twiddle your thumbs.

  64. Re:Doesn't add up by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    A kill-a-watt is nice (I got myself one) but it's only good for things you can plug in through it that draw 15A or less.

    If you're really serious about finding out where all your power goes, and how much you're using and when, I can suggest a somewhat more expensive Energy Detective system that installs in your main electric panel.
    =Smidge=

  65. Re:Doesn't add up by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Maybe his GF has a hand held shower massage. You know what they use those for?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  66. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's too hot and there's no electricity it's a lot harder to get cooler than it is to get warmer.

    So if I have access to good winter gear I'd rather be in cold conditions for a few days than be in too hot (> 35C) conditions without AC for a few days. Set up a few tents indoors and stay in them while wearing winter gear, sleep in a sleeping bag in the tent)

  67. Re:Doesn't add up by timeOday · · Score: 1

    3 kW is crazy for an electric kettle because a standard home electric circuit cannot provide it. 2 kW is pushing it; you will not find an electric kettle or hair dryer that draws more than that. You will notice your electric water heater or clothes dryer is on a 220V circuit with a different plug.

  68. Re:Doesn't add up by TheLink · · Score: 1

    I wonder how much it costs to have enough solar panels and batteries to run AC for at least one room.

    The batteries are for night time (yes it can still be too hot in some tropical humid places at night).

    --
  69. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah I guess in an emergency/disaster many people bake cakes and take long hot showers to make themselves feel better, then turn on the air conditioning and chill...

  70. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GP: Apply cool water to burned area.

  71. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having been through hurricanes that had several days of power outage in humid, tropical summer conditions, you kind of have to deal with no AC with or without such a system. We have a generator, but don't bother wasting effort on AC. It mostly goes to three things in such an exceptional condition: the refrigerator so we don't waste food, lighting at nights, and a couple fans which can make a huge difference. Besides, if this were meant for only a couple hours outage, living with the AC turned off in a modern home shouldn't be that bad if your house has decent insulation.

    Otherwise, if you are the type that melts in such heat and don't have some medical condition, maybe you come from the background where you have enough money to just buy a bigger generator that can run an AC, so why complain about there being a cheaper model for those that don't need waste money so they can be prepared to be pampered after a major storm?

  72. Nuclear designs already exist for spent fuel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Fast Breeder Reactors, Molten Salt Reactors. Those technologies burn the "spent" fuel from traditional PWR reactors.

  73. Cost of decommissioning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I have a suspicious feeling that General Motors' motivation on this project is to find a place to reuse the batteries they have to replace after warranty replacements, rather than have to pay the costs of recycling or disposing of the hazardous metals.

    This shifts the cost of recycling and disposal onto the consumers, when the battery pack fails in their house.

    It gives GM additional revenue stream when you buy it at Home Depot. AND they don't have to pay for disposal. I am sure the environmentalists are creaming their pants when they hear how this plan monetizes and incentivizes "green" tech. But I see it as a ruse to displace costs to the consumer, and ultimately, harms the environment---do you really think that individual citizens will actually pay for proper lithium disposal when they can just bury it in their backyard for free???

  74. Re:Doesn't add up by plover · · Score: 2

    In other words, you can always put on more clothes, but there's a limit to what you can take off.

    --
    John
  75. Re:Doesn't add up by MattskEE · · Score: 3, Informative

    As for 10KW per hour, that is huge. What is consuming that much? An industrial level hair dryer?

    It's 10 kilowatt hours not kilowatts per hour. A kilowatt hour is a unit of energy which could supply a 1kW load for 10 hours, or equivalently a 10kW load for one hour, or any other load at power P [kW] for a time t [hours] where t=E/P where E is the energy in kilowatt hours. Power is the rate of consumption of energy, where a watt is 1 joule per second, and energy is what's actually needed to do a given unit of work.

    kW/h is basically a nonsense unit which means 10,000 joules per second per hour. This would be a power "acceleration" unit if you actually wanted to use it. Calling kWh kilowatts per hour is a pretty common misunderstanding that you see a lot in the news so as a EE I feel compelled to clarify when possible.

  76. Re:Doesn't add up by nick1austin · · Score: 2

    In the UK every socket outlet can deliver 3kw (13 amps @ 230 volts). 3kw is normal for kettles which can boil one cup of water in about 90 seconds from cold. OTOH hair dryers don't need that much power because it would be ridiculously hot. For the same reason tumble dryers are usually only 1kw.

  77. Re:Doesn't add up by MattskEE · · Score: 1

    The average US house uses about 1.3kW averaged over time. Obviously it can spike up to several kW or over 10kW when lots of appliances and any heating/cooling is turned on, but the batteries can handle spikes in load.

    Source: http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=97&t=3

  78. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My current kettle: http://direct.asda.com/Breville-VKJ671-1.7L-Jug-Kettle---Moonstone/001572219,default,pd.html

  79. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not too long ago I lived in a place where the main house breaker was 50 A (220 V)... so I am pretty sure I didn't go past 10 kW peak. It was an older house, with no central air, so instead it had two window AC units. It seemed enough to handle the US southeast summers. It didn't have gas either, so I guess there would have been a problem if I had the oven, microwave, both ACs on, the clothes dryer and the hot water heater kicked on full. Although this never came up (maybe because when I needed both ACs, I didn't frequently cook meals that needed the oven and all the range units on at the same time...).

  80. Re:This is scraping the bottom of the barrel..... by riverat1 · · Score: 1

    I think so far the sales curve of electric cars pretty well matches the sales curve of hybrids when they first came out a decade+ ago. It takes time to ramp things up.

  81. Re:This is scraping the bottom of the barrel..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 1107 figure is the number of electric cars in the UK that qualified and registered for the rebate, in 2011. Another thousand cars have been sold in just the first half of 2012. So it isn't good to compare one year's sale to the whole number of cars, a better comparison might be the 1.8 million vehicles that sold in 2011 (or even better, what portion of that is actually cars and not lorries, etc.). And for some reason, the UK is behind the curve compared to other European countries, where I've seen numbers that show electric cars being sold in the first half or third of a year in equal numbers to what the UK sells in a whole year, despite the much smaller populations (e.g. Norway).

  82. 10 kWh capacity vs 10 kW consumption by big_e_1977 · · Score: 1

    A battery with a 10 kWh capacity means it can only store 10 kWh of power. At my rates that is about $1.20 worth of electricity. In order for 10 kWh to last 24 hours the average energy consumption of the house must be 416 watts per hour. If a house drew 10 kwh that battery would in theory provide power for only 1 hour. In the real world, battery capacity is reduced at high discharge rates. The capacity of the inverter is another limitation.

  83. Re:Doesn't add up by timeOday · · Score: 1

    Oops, you're right that what I said is invalid outside the US.

  84. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As for 10KW per hour, that is huge. What is consuming that much? An industrial level hair dryer?

    A hydroponic pot growing operation.

  85. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your house uses more than 10kw? I really have to ask, what the heck are you doing??

    Grow lamps, dude!

    Use CFLs, then?

  86. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In our apartment in coastal Los Angeles, my wife and I have an average power usage of 4.75 kWh per day according to the utility company, with a daily average of 7 kWh last June when we were probably running more fans and watching much more HDTV than usual (the olympics recorded on our PVR). In practice, our peak evening load might be about 2kW if we have the microwave, fridge, HDTV, and ventilation fans all running at once. We use CFL bulbs in nearly all fixtures, and our computers are laptops that might peak at 60-70W if streaming videos or something like that.

    Around here, most have natural gas stoves, water heaters, and furnaces. Some have gas ovens and clothes dryers, though electric ovens (dual fuel) and electric clothes dryers are common in spite of gas supplies being present. Those of us in coastal areas do not need air-conditioning either. Newer or remodeled homes sometimes have instantaneous gas-fired water heaters. Nobody has an electric shower heater, and very few have an electric heating element in their clothes washer, since the house hot water system is designed to support bathing and washing duties.

    If we boil water for a pot of coffee or tea, we would use a kettle on our gas stove. Though more often, a dedicated electric coffee maker is employed which doesn't try to boil a whole pot at once, but rather heats a slow stream of water to support the drip brewing system (which means lower peak current too). Single-serving tea is often done by microwaving a cup of water or else using some hot water pot kept simmering rather than rapidly boiling cold water (which again means lower peak current). Due to our 120V wiring, appliances are designed to draw less power in general; a typical microwave or hair dryer is 1.2-1.5 kW peak.

  87. 2005 GM Hybrid pick-up truck by calidoscope · · Score: 2

    The 2005 vintage GM (Chevy, GMC) hybrid pick-up tracks had a 120V/20A duplex receptacle n the and a 120V/20A duplex receptacle in the bed. GM had thought contractors might like it as they could run power tools on a remote job site. I was giving some thought to one of these trucks for camping, but ended up going the Duramax route.

    --
    A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
  88. Re:Doesn't add up by calidoscope · · Score: 1

    I'm glad to know that I'm not the only one annoyed by "kilowatts per hour". Equally annoying is the use of "kilowatt hours per hour" when kilowatts would convey the same information.

    --
    A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
  89. Dafuq? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 kWh is enough to carry my 2,000 square foot home for almost two days (~36 hours). How is this only enough for 3 or 5 houses for two hours?

    1. Re:Dafuq? by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      This means you are using about 5 kW hr per day or 150 kW hr per month. That's very good efficiency. Probably what you would use in and emergency situation where you were under stringent control of electric energy use. I don't know if that's a winter number when you might be running a furnace blower motor for a forced air furnace or water pump motor for hydronic heating. Perhaps you heat with wood. GE is reporting that their bottom freezer refrigerators use about 550 kWhr of electric energy per year or about 1.5 kWhr per day. So maybe you can get away with 5 kWhr/day. My use is about 15 kWhr/day and I thought I was pretty efficient.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  90. What's Your Mission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Your house uses more than 10kw? I really have to ask, what the heck are you doing??

    Grow lamps, dude!

    Use CFLs, then?

    Then your shit will be as weak as the light from the CFLs.

    Is your mission to save energy or is it to produce potent shit?

    This is an issue that I have always had with modern day greenwashing.
    I don't buy a light bulb to save energy, I buy it to produce light.
    I don't buy a washer to save energy, I buy it to make my clothes as clean as possible.
    I don't buy a car to save energy, I buy it to get me from A to B as quickly as (legally) possible.
    The list goes on and on. Frankly I'm sick of poor lighting, not-so-clean clothes and slow cars. All that saving energy has done fro me is to make the providers raise their rates. Now I spend as much or more for energy despite using 30% to 40% less than before.

    1. Re:What's Your Mission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to mellow out, dude. You been smoking that weak shit grown under CFLs again?

  91. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's 10 kWh.

    A car battery can supply 500+A at 12V, or 6kW, in a single configuration. Just not for very long.

    I don't see why a 10 kWH battery

    *sigh*. The largest battery I've seen for personal energy storage are in the 250Ah range or 3kWh. You can't discharge them faster rate than about 500-1000W. They cost about $200. 10 kWh battery bank would cost about $1000 and give you 2kW power for 5 hours.

    10kWh storage is a little bit more than "emergency power". 1kWh is enough to provide lights in your house for a few days (eg. 20% cycle, LED lights, etc.). 10kWh is enough to run your TV, fridge, computer, lights, etc. for well over a day.

    Finally, the "massive flat screen TV" uses about 40-100W (depending on backlight brightness) for LED screens. It's not the days of the old CRTs anymore where you can heat the house just by keeping TV on. And the "massive TV" weighs less than an old 16in CRT so not sure what is so "massive" about it.

    As to TFA premise, I think it is dumb to use car batteries for deep cycle environments. They will die completely within weeks and months and just provide an environmental hazard while in use. It is more efficient to recycle these batteries and use proper battery design for proper job, not collecting half-usable garbage.

  92. Re:Doesn't add up by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

    Soft start or VFD

  93. Re:Doesn't add up by pwagland · · Score: 1
    I agree that 3kW is a little on the high side, 2400W is very common in 240V countries. That is because these countries normally specify 15A wires, and and 10A circuit breakers, so if you pull the maximum out of the socket that you are allowed to, you can pull 2400W For example, 2400W articles:

    According to energy.gov, clothes dryers use 1800-5000W, although the latter are surely industrial as they would need to sit on a three phase socket This still raises the question as to how long you really need to boil water for 2400W for a minute or two is not going to significantly shorten the life of the battery pack in the article.

  94. Re:Doesn't add up by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    So what's the hour figure?

    I find it interesting that you mention your kettle. A 3kW kettle when full can bring water to boil in what... 2min? That is a total of 0.2kWh of electricity used. Similar thing for the microwave.

    The reality is even though you are capable of drawing 10kW at a time I find it very unlikely that you will be drawing 10kWh in a 1 hour period. A typical fully loaded home like yours will use about 30kWh over a 24hour period, probably less even when I look at what you have compared to the average house around here and see that they have lower usage than that.

    Also your 500w PC? Do you actually run folding@home all day or does it like most PCs actually use around about 100w when you're not playing games?

  95. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A DRYER is NOT a WASHING MACHINE, you ignorant fuck!

  96. Re:Doesn't add up by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
    I guess you only bothered to read the short words.

    I'll type this slowly, so you can keep up. The statement "power 5 houses for 2 hours" makes little sense, since power consumption is not at a constant level throughout the day (or even in a week). Some hours use more power than other hours. Thus, overnight, when people are sleeping, that 10kW*Hr stack will be enough to keep many houses running for many more hours. However, at peak demand: morning, when everyone gets up or maybe evening, then a 10kW*Hr supply would NOT last as long, since more people in more households would be using more than the average amount of electricity.

    As a consequence, the bald statement "5 houses for 2 hours" is meaningless, unless WHICH 2 hours is stipulated.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  97. Re:Doesn't add up by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Equally annoying is the use of "kilowatt hours per hour" when kilowatts would convey the same information.

    So you consider a correct, but redundant unit as annoying as a plain wrong one?

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  98. Re:Doesn't add up by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Your house uses more than 10kw? I really have to ask, what the heck are you doing??

    Grow lamps, dude!

    You can grow lamps? I always thought they had to be manufactured ... maybe that would be a way to get around this silly prohibition of incandescent light bulbs. :-)

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  99. Re:Doesn't add up by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Yeah sure, in an emergency with power outage so you're running on battery, the first thing you'd do is take a warm shower and toast breads. Here's a hint: Most people have a little bit of common sense.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  100. Re:Doesn't add up by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

    Must be Bitcoin mining!

  101. Re:Doesn't add up by evilviper · · Score: 1

    In other words, you can always put on more clothes, but there's a limit to what you can take off.

    Really not true...

    Here on EARTH at least, there's no locations that are too hot for a healthy person to tolerate. And for those who aren't healthy, dumping a bucket of water over their head will very significantly drop their body temperature...

    Meanwhile, those in really extreme cold are going to have a difficult time surviving. The GP's plan of setting-up a 4-season tent indoors, and crawling into a -20 degree rated sleeping bag would be my plan, too, but that's not entirely tenable. Things like stepping out for a few minutes to use the restroom MIGHT KILL YOU. Not to mention the difficulties of having to MELT your supply of water, and serious risks of numerous cold-related health conditions like pneumonia.

    No question about it... I'd prefer to try and survive an extended disaster in Death Valley, rather than Antarctica.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  102. Or pressurize water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How've gonna store the water energy in your residential? With compressed air you can.

    What people misunderstand about hydro power is that it is essentially a water pressure power. You make a huge dam, and it outputs certain water flow at a certain pressure, for a certain time.

    If you could make a big, high pressure rated expansion vessel under something heavy, like your house or a large mound of dirt, you could add energy to it, as well as extract it from it, without a need for huge canyons and dams.

  103. Recycle? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    Aren't ordinary car lead batteries easy to recycle into new batteries by the manufacturers.. or is there some part which can not be recycled? Chemistry not my strong point.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  104. Battery backup / living in the woods. by ralferix · · Score: 1

    I lived with poor power for decades and when I was in high school I used to take the old batteries from gas cars and use them for battery backup. I started by running on 12v car lights, since the break lights have 2 filaments they could also be recycled. I once collected so many of them I was able to get 60 volts to light a neon light that usually worked on 110VAC, but discovered that the DC input was just fine for it. I used to design relay and transistor circuits to turn on lights automatically when the power was off and it was dark and the light had been on before the power failed. So I guess I have been using old car batteries for many years already, this makes perfect sense for a house that can get solar panels, you can be up after the hurricane, maybe with less power, and only if your panels survived the winds intact, which is a big if. We did loose power for 3 weeks after David in '79. It was interesting to see how the electric company had to repair lines across town to be able to start the big power plants, the ones that could only be started with lots of power to warm them up. I still keep an old APC UPS for the day that I can setup a solar panel to do this again. Technology has become much cheaper and better, we can go off the grid with solar and wind, if I can get bandwidth, I want to go live further away from the city where the land is cheap and I can grow my own food. But who knows, leaving the big city is probably not that easy. However with rents and housing prices in Silicon Valley being what they are there is a big incentive to telecommute. Gas or diesel generators are very noisy, used to hate them, they also pollute the air, solar and wind make the idea of living out in the woods more appealing to me, I still need the internet.

  105. Re:Doesn't add up by jcrb · · Score: 1

    All the replies complaining that I can't possible need 10KW should go and read some list like this
    http://www.generatorsales.com/wattage-calculator.asp
    and look at both what you would want to run not just for a short time, but in the case of a generator for say days at a time in a major outage, and also since my generator is auto start/auto switch over, look at the *peak* loads that might be generated by devices like sump pumps air conditioners, the various submersed pumps in the house to pump 'stuff' from the basement sink/bathroom/washing machine up to the level of the septic system, refrigerators, at the time the power fails. Also remember that when you bring the power back on many devices that weren't even running will still give you a turn on power surge. If that is higher than the generator's capacity it will stall and fail to start up.

    So no it doesn't use that all the time, but when the power goes out an this single battery system for multiple houses kicks in, who is going to remember to turn off their AC? Who is going to say "well the other people will turn off their AC so I can leave mine own" Thinking "if I optimize I can make the power last X hours" isn't how it would work out in the real world for most people. And if it doesn't work for most people then it isn't as great an idea as people think.

    --
    -jon
  106. Nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is already a connercial product in places like India for the last 10years! Nothing new or innovative. I created a simple version of this after my 10th grade (20+years back) with readily available items in the local electronic market - which could power a fluracent light for hours in my room. Today this has gone commercial have systems that can run house for 2days or more depending on how much you want to spend. With automatic trigger.

  107. Re:Doesn't add up by BeanThere · · Score: 1

    Sounds to me like you got oversold by the company that sold you the setup, and now don't want to admit it. 10kw is huge.

    I'm sure you trivially buy a 2kw kettle, there you save 1kw right there, it'll just take slightly longer to boil the water. Then don't run the microwave and kettle or oven at the same time, and you're already down to around 5kw to 6kw peak - and you've saved a farkload of money on the system.

    If you are rich and have lots of money to waste, then sure, go for it, 10kw system is OK.

    500W PC? That sounds like some hardcore gaming system.

  108. Re:Doesn't add up by BeanThere · · Score: 1

    If you can't even be bothered to turn off your AC during a major emergency with downed power then you deserve whatever happens to you. If you are rich and can afford an oversupply then sure, go for it, but stop giving lectures, the majority of folks simply cannot afford such large systems, and can and must "make do" by taking such tremendously complex steps such as "turning off AC" and "not running kettles, stoves and microwaves all at the same time".

  109. Re:Doesn't add up by jcrb · · Score: 1

    The AC isn't on the generator, but the air movers are, and the refrigerators and the sump pumps, kitchen lines for a toaster over, and a line n the garage so my elderly relatives can start the snow blower if I'm not home, some other water pumps. I'm not lecturing, although since you can't be bothered to read what I wrote about having to design for the surge load or the generator stalls, because I not being the genius that you apparently are, can't tell in advance when the power is going to go out and have everything turned off before the generator tries to start up.

    Given that the generator keeps my house from flooding in long heavy rains, my pipes from freeze because I don't have heat in the winter, or the food from going bad during a rolling summer blackout. I would say that most people can't afford *not* to have plans for backup power. If you live somewhere that the power goes out a lot in bad weather this isn't "luxury" for the rich, its called a cheap investment to avoid much higher weather related losses

    --
    -jon
  110. Re:Doesn't add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If his GF is using a shower massager 24/7, he's doing something very wrong. OTOH, if he tells us where she is, I'm sure we'd be happy to test her problems and provide suitable care.

  111. Re:Doesn't add up by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    Buy a clamp-on ammeter with a peak hold function. That'll go a long way in helping determine max current draw. If your power factor is close to unity, the real power used equals the apparent power, which is I * V (current * volts). Even if your power factor is not close to unity, the apparent power is what a generator has to supply, so that number is actually more useful than the real power draw.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  112. Re:Doesn't add up by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    I'm with you. I have a whole house 20kW generator and 1000 gal propane tank, and it's very close to perfectly sized for my house.

    I don't want to deal with worrying while I'm not at home that the AC is on or that the oven was on or the clothes dryer was running. My generator will start and run every motor in the house.

    I have 6x125 Ah batteries w/ a 2400W inverter that runs the servers, DVR, NAS, gb switch, etc while the gen starts.

    I was in the Cayman islands when Sandy was supposed to hit central Va, and I didn't have to worry too much about the dog sitter having to live in a 'dead' house while I was gone. It was a nice feeling not to have to worry.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  113. Re:Doesn't add up by plover · · Score: 1

    First, it depends on your latitude. The further north you live, the more you need to prepare for disappointment in the winter. Where I live, bright sunshine delivers a peak of only about 80 watts/sq meter at local solar noon on the winter solstice, while the summer solstice provides me with almost 1500 watts/sq meter at noon. The same panels in a tropical region would deliver more. Obviously, you don't need the A/C when it's 0 degrees out, but some light to fill out the day would be useful.

    If you follow the rough estimating guide of 10 watts per square foot, assuming you have a 1500W A/C unit, I think it would take 150 square feet, or about $7800 worth of solar panels. Sorry, but I don't know how much the batteries or controllers you would need would cost. I have to assume they are not free.

    --
    John
  114. Re:This is scraping the bottom of the barrel..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "1,107 are electric", "around 17,000"

    Yes, those numbers aren't huge. But for the purposes of this application that would mean 1100+ people in the UK and 17k+ people in the USA could make a big step towards being off-the-grid. Per year.

    And this using batteries that will already have been produced, used, and (effectively) disposed of.

    The numbers aren't that high, but the impact would be.

  115. Toyota/Prius prototyping this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But they are intending it more as an office building or apartment building UPS, for the prototypes they are messing with right now. Though considering the power consumption of some american homes, it might be enough...

  116. Re:Doesn't add up by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    Okay, well... most people in the US have 240V split phase service, so you'll need a clamp-on meter for each leg. Of course you'll have no way of knowing if the peak current measured by each meter occurred at the same time, since you won't know when it happened. You'll also only have peak data which could easily be 10 or 15 times your typical load. Basically you learn a whole lot of nothing, assuming you can get the meters to stay on long enough since they usually turn off after a few minutes or so.

    The only way to collect useful data is on a per-circuit basis, which is marginally better than a Kill-A-Watt since at least you can get 240V loads and things over 15A. The tradeoff is a lot more rooting around in the power panel and a lot more manual mathematics and guesswork.
    =Smidge=

  117. Re:Doesn't add up by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    Your comments are mostly valid, however not germane to the question asked (How can I determine peak load on a circuit?)

    Of course you'll have no way of knowing if the peak current measured by each meter occurred at the same time, since you won't know when it happened

    The question was peak load per circuit. Most high current devices in the US are 240V only (a tiny amount of current travels on the neutral for 120V things like light bulbs, etc). There is no need for two meters since the current is guaranteed to be balanced between the two 240V legs.

    If you do have significant neutral current, you can measure it directly. To determine time correlation, you can put pairs of conductors in the meter - you'll get the sum/difference of the currents, depending on their relative phases. You can learn a lot from that.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  118. Re:Doesn't add up by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    Who asked how to determine peak load on a single circuit? That question was never asked (nor even implied) in this branch.

    =Smidge=

  119. Re:Doesn't add up by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    I was countering your assertion that one needs to buy a special device to measure 240V or high current 120V circuits that can't be measured with a kill-a-watt. That's a single circuit device. I think we're in fierce agreement.

    I went to the link you provided for the TED device - that's pretty nice.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  120. Re:Doesn't add up by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    I never assert anything about individual circuits. I said "finding out where all your power goes, and how much you're using and when."

    The Kill-A-Watt is not a single circuit device. At best it's a single OUTLET device. There can be any number of things connected into the same circuit through different outlets that the Kill-A-Watt will not measure. It's ideal for examining individual small appliances but that's about it.

    The TED device installs on the main feed to the panel and measures power usage. You then turn on and off individual devices and the system records second-by-second power usage and other information. This enables you to do the same thing as running around the house with a Kill-A-Watt - providing what is effectively device-level monitoring - except you don't have to unplug anything and it works for any load rather than just 120V at 15A.
    =Smidge=