DHCP can be set up to give the same address to a MAC address all the time (I think). It just makes it easier for admins to use. So DHCP should still exist, but your IP will not change.
I had a CDR catch fire once in one of those external cases. The power supplys on those are not good. Fortunately I got it out before it harmed the CDR. Tis still burning today.
Regardless of what it was created to do, it doesn't do anything illegal. Shoutcast was created to stream the Loveline from one city to another a task undoubtedly illegal. Now it has many many legal uses. The fact remains that no copyrighted material goes through the napster servers.
Your missing the point. While that may be all true it doesn't change the fact that Napster is NOT doing anything wrong. All it is doing is routing packets without ever knowing if it is legal or not. If they get the axe then what happens to the thousands of routers out there which do the exact same thing, or any other server/protocol for that matter.
Napster is NOT only used to transfer copyrighted material. It is also a valuable informational and promotional tool. Much like the world wide web. Yet I don't see the W3C being sued...
If you leave IE with WindowsSoft you have the same monopoly that caused the breakup in the first place. Pathetic. Seems like Netscape doesn't want IE moving to Linux.
Slashdot Mirror
"The issue of the number of addresses availible for IPv6 works out to be around:, 456 addresses. "
340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211
How did you get that? 256^6 = 2.81 * 10^14
So like 28.1 trillion IPs. At least I think IPv6 uses the byte.byte.byte.byte... format. Crrect me if I am wrong.
DHCP can be set up to give the same address to a MAC address all the time (I think). It just makes it easier for admins to use. So DHCP should still exist, but your IP will not change.
`Kevin
Learn to read. At the top of the page
"The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. Slashdot is not responsible for what they say. "
`Kevin
What does PICO equal?
You forgot a capital and a - and a period.
You mean "Check yor e-mail."
:)
IE uses JScript. So technically Javascript hasn't many bugs. Its still a dumb language though.
Wasn't that supposed to be the 786 equivalent to come out after P3?
Slashdotting an email address.
Plus they wouldnt even be guaranteed the $70. If it were freespace any ICANN registrar could get it.
`Kevin
I had a CDR catch fire once in one of those external cases. The power supplys on those are not good. Fortunately I got it out before it harmed the CDR. Tis still burning today.
`Kevin
Seems like they are not non profit.
Hell. Even the old turbo pascal / turbo c help items link to other help items.
But what about broken links to other sites?
Compression compression and more compression...
Nope
1 gig = 1,000 meg.
40 gig = 40,000 meg.
1 tb = 1,000 gig
so 40*1000*1000
40 tb = 40,000,000 megabyte
Of course this is with 1 kb equaling 1000 bytes no 1024. So add two terabytes roughly.
Actually AOL would be sued :)
First Microsoft then AOL... life would be great.
Regardless of what it was created to do, it doesn't do anything illegal. Shoutcast was created to stream the Loveline from one city to another a task undoubtedly illegal. Now it has many many legal uses. The fact remains that no copyrighted material goes through the napster servers.
Your missing the point. While that may be all true it doesn't change the fact that Napster is NOT doing anything wrong. All it is doing is routing packets without ever knowing if it is legal or not. If they get the axe then what happens to the thousands of routers out there which do the exact same thing, or any other server/protocol for that matter.
Napster is NOT only used to transfer copyrighted material. It is also a valuable informational and promotional tool. Much like the world wide web. Yet I don't see the W3C being sued...
Funny how when set to +1 as the threshold it appears you are talking to yourself. Logic error in code :)
If you leave IE with WindowsSoft you have the same monopoly that caused the breakup in the first place. Pathetic. Seems like Netscape doesn't want IE moving to Linux.
How is this offtopic? Suppose I as a Canadian wanted to make one of these legally.
Some moderators are power freaks.
`k
Cachedot should come back. Its all (relatively) static so I'm sure VA can handle the load.
Kinda like red hat eh :)
Does AOL even have software for linux? Just a thought on the patheticness of it all.
i think not...