Slashdot Mirror


One-Finger Keyboarding?

adubey writes: "Forget Qwerty, forget Dvorak; the best keyboard for palmtops may well be the Fitaly One-Finger Keyboard. " Kinda nifty idea actually, I'm wondering if we'll see one that would work for a wearable PC (like maybe this guy from IBM).

137 comments

  1. one finger? Hah! by Alien+Perspective · · Score: 1

    But will it work with your nose?

    1. Re:one finger? Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can already communicate everyting I need to say with one finger!

  2. Reboot by Shagg · · Score: 4

    Does this mean that if your computer locks up, instead of the 3-finger salute, you just "give it the finger"?

    --
    Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    1. Re:Reboot by gendal · · Score: 2
      Does this mean that if your computer locks up, instead of the 3-finger salute, you just "give it the finger"?

      I hear that the latest version of Microsoft's Natu ral keyboard provides just the most natural Microsoft combinations.

    2. Re:Reboot by Phaser777 · · Score: 1

      For once they didn't add any extra features. Only what you need for Windows.

  3. Neet Idea by pianoman113 · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a neat idea. I know I would much prefer a keyboard than the writing pad on my palm some times, and the collapsable, full sized one is too bulky and too expensive. Maybe I will think about trading my PDA up.

    --

    Free as in speech, free as in beer, or free as in lunch?
    1. Re:Neet Idea by Wattsman · · Score: 3

      It is pretty good, I've got it on my TRGpro.
      It takes a while to get used to the new character placement, but the ability to capitalize a character by sliding it (sort of like a click-n-drag) makes entering names a lot faster. My typing is still as good as it's been (one concern people have had is that the Fitaly layout will interfere with typing).
      The collapsable keyboard ($99) is worth it if you have to take notes at a meeting. Fitaly is fast, but I still find it faster to type than to tap. I should note that the collapsable keyboard is the smallest of all the PalmOS keyboards when folded up.

  4. Doesn't Work with Emacs by TheShrike · · Score: 2

    I mean, how am I supposed to do an alt-meta-shift-control-z? Oh wait, I don't have emacs on my PalmPilot, yet.

    --

    --
    If R is the set of all sets which don't contain themselves, does R contain itself?
    1. Re:Doesn't Work with Emacs by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 1

      Emacs = Esc, Meta, Alt, Ctrl, Shift


      ========
      Stephen C. VanDahm

    2. Re:Doesn't Work with Emacs by nsane · · Score: 1

      What does PICO equal?

      --
      i have misplaced my signature.
  5. Gesture-based keyboarding by 11223 · · Score: 2
    It seems to me that this type of keyboarding creates gestures - you soon learn what order to press the keys in properly to create the most common words, and soon enough you're back to graffiti, except instead of one letter per gesture, it's one word per gesture.

    Has anybody played with the demo? I'm not near a Windows box and can't get it on my palm right now.

  6. STILL not perfect... by Animol · · Score: 2

    I know, I know, I'm just a whiny geek, but what about Thumbcode? You mean I learned a whole system of typing on my hands to produce letters just so they could come up with yet another layout?!? C'mon, man! It's tough enough to learn to type on one keyboard with the continuously-shifting backslash problem, now there's ANOTHER layout?

    All whining aside, however, this looks like a really ingenious step toward making wearable computers *USABLE*, as well!

    --

    "I'm not even supposed to BE here today!"
    1. Re:STILL not perfect... by Phroggy · · Score: 1
      It's tough enough to learn to type on one keyboard with the continuously-shifting backslash problem, now there's ANOTHER layout?

      I don't buy keyboards that have backslashes in the wrong place. I define the correct layout to be the one that every major OEM (Compaq, HP, Apple and others) and Logitech have been using for years, and almost every manufacturer of cheap replacement keyboards keeps trying to screw up. Logitech is the only company I've found that makes a keyboard with the correct layout that doesn't cost an arm and a leg (only $15-$20).

      --

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  7. Slogan see-saw by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 3

    Current slogan: "Concentrate all of your typing into a 'single point of failure' with the Fitaly One-Finger Keyboard!".

    Tomorrow's slogan: "You have ten fingers. So why are you typing with only one? Use the Fitaly Ten-Finger Keyboard!"
    --

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
  8. Only one finger? by dwlemon · · Score: 1

    If you've got one finger free, like your "pointer" finger, then you're quite likely to have another finger free like the one next to it. Why not design a keyboard with that in mind? Wouldn't it be even more efficient?

    I'm trying to imagine a situation where a person is so bogged down that they only have one finger free. If that's the future of computing, I'll stick with inefficiently typing 100 wpm with all 10 fingers.

    dwl - devils advocate always

    1. Re:Only one finger? by AnarchoFreak_00 · · Score: 1
      1) Look at the size of the graffiti area
      2) Look at the size of your finger

      I know that the keyboard will be bigger than that. But there is also(?) a version for the stylus, To optuize the keyboard for 2 fingers etc.. that would mean another layout.

  9. One-Handed Reading by carlhirsch · · Score: 5

    Great! Now I'll have that other hand free for... well, you know.

    -carl

    --
    . We've got computers, we're tapping phone lines, you know that ain't allowed - Talking Heads, "Life During Wartime"
    1. Re:One-Handed Reading by Paul+Neubauer · · Score: 3

      Great! Now I'll have that other hand free for... well, you know.

      Jokes aside, a one-handed (which a one-fingered is as well) keyboard would be useful. The other hand may be on a mouse/trackball/trackpad. Or holding a telephone handset.. or a slice of pizza.. or a fork.. or..

      It's not the regular keys that are problem, generally. One can use a QWERTY keyboard one-fingered with hunt-n-peck, but combination keystrokes (those with shift, control, and alt) can be a very real stretch. Yes, I know, the right way is to just get the heck away from the keyboard when something (such as supper) would limit use to one hand.

      Another, much more serious application of 'one-finger' keying would be for those who can only type with a unicorn stick strapped to their forehead. The less travel required would be a Good Thing, and while voice recognition may be good, it still needs correction and that means typing.

      --
      I don't subscribe to RMS's GNUtopian vision.
    2. Re:One-Handed Reading by wfberg · · Score: 2
      You could use sticky keys to enter ctrl-alt-combinations.. You depress shift and the next key you press will be shifted.. You press shift, then ctrl, then b, hey presto, you pressed ctrl-shift-b.. Does this exist in X? Or just in terminals?

      Either way, you can type ESC, and then a key instead of META-key in Emacs.. HTH.. HAND.. ;-)
      --

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    3. Re:One-Handed Reading by Greyfox · · Score: 2

      Using the mouse?

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    4. Re:One-Handed Reading by Smitty825 · · Score: 1

      I realize that this is a bit off topic, but I thought that I saw a one-handed "keyboard" a few years ago. I'm trying to remember who made it, but it was essentially something that you put your hand on, and then each finger was given a key & the thumb recieved 3 key. You got characters to appear by pressing combinations of those buttons. I don't know if it still exists, but it was interesting

      --

      Doh!
    5. Re:One-Handed Reading by Loligo · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the Twiddler.

      -LjM

    6. Re:One-Handed Reading by divbyzero · · Score: 2


      Most chording keyboards (including the Twiddler) are seriously slow, and have a fairly steep learning curve. A researcher in Canada came up with a nifty one-handed keyboard system called Half Qwerty, which is nearly as fast as regular Qwerty and has almost zero learning curve. It leverages your existing skill at typing Qwerty combined with the fact that your hands are mirror images of one another.

      There's a patch to the Linux keyboard driver which implements it on top of a regular Qwerty keyboard.

      Enjoy,
      Div.

      But my grandest creation, as history will tell,

      --
      But my grandest creation, as history will tell,
      Was Firefrorefiddle, the Fiend of the Fell.
    7. Re:One-Handed Reading by Syberghost · · Score: 3

      You could use sticky keys to enter ctrl-alt-combinations..

      You keep doing all that one-handed typing, and you're gonna have sticky keys...

      --

    8. Re:One-Handed Reading by spudnic · · Score: 1

      I downloaded and tried out their half-qwerty demo (you can actually use the demo to learn to do it) and was very surprised how usable it is.

      I figured out that it's a lot easier if you just do it and don't think about it. Amazing how the mind works!

      It's too bad that I access most of my Linux boxen via SecureCRT and the Windows version of the driver is like $400. Geez, they're proud of that!

      But then I really need a half-QWERTY keyboard to clean up my desk space.

      Can you copywrite a keyboard layout?

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    9. Re:One-Handed Reading by thantos · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, for we physically limited folks who have to type one-handed (in my case, one-fingered), there are some alleviations:

      Windows (bless their soul) ships Win98 with "Accessibility Options" in the Settings folder; with it you can turn one-fingered ctrl/alt/shift toggling on. They stay on until you hit another key, or you double-tap to lock the mode until you hit it again.

      Under most professional Unixes, AccessX has been around for a bit. Even when its not, with Deep Magic, you can get xmodmap to remap the necessaries to strict toggles.

      Still, I'd love a physical version of the Fitaly keyboard. Less motion means, at the end of a 12hr hacking session, my shoulder doesn't feal like a chainsaw's eating me.

      --
      -- Riding the Winds of Fires Lit in Ancient Days
  10. Finger by CIHMaster · · Score: 1

    There are many things best done with one finger that are best left unsaid.
    This is not one of them.

  11. Still wondering about GUI research? by nharmon · · Score: 2

    We continually cheer new PDAs because of their "neat" features such as ultra high ammounts of memory, or their wireless ability. But when it really comes down to what PDA you buy, isn't the data entry interface the most important thing? I mean, if I'm sitting in a class, in order for me to take notes on a PDA, I have to enter data as fast as it's being said. With enough time to still listen and understand the lecture so that I might ask questions.

    Because until the user interface on a PDA is advanced, we can't expect it to grow to it's fullest potential.

    1. Re:Still wondering about GUI research? by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      We continually cheer new PDAs because of their "neat" features such as ultra high ammounts of memory, or their wireless ability. But when it really comes down to what PDA you buy, isn't the data entry interface the most important thing? I mean, if I'm sitting in a class, in order for me to take notes on a PDA, I have to enter data as fast as it's being said. With enough time to still listen and understand the lecture so that I might ask questions.



      We need a PDA with near perfect speech to text and a nice built in microphone. With enough storage space you could keep a entire semester of lectures on your palm, without all of that messy ink run off I always had trouble with!

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    2. Re:Still wondering about GUI research? by e-gold · · Score: 1

      I agree, and the ultimate (albeit non-graphical) user interface would be your PDA capturing VOICE as an input, imo. Given Moore's law and other effects, this probably isn't as far-off as it seems. Ultimately, we might be used to a device taking down everything a professor says, and cooperating with the device to filter and distill THAT into something useful, something akin to the opposite of taking notes traditionally, with the possibly the same or similar result. Maybe.

      On another topic, I am especially interested in anyone's experiences with IBM's ViaVoice for Linux. My grandmother is old, she will never use a keyboard and only maybe a mouse, so if I want her to have a computer (and I do) before she dies, this is my only choice. Thanks.
      JMR

      --
      Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
    3. Re:Still wondering about GUI research? by leperjuice · · Score: 1

      We need a PDA with near perfect speech to text and a nice built in microphone. With enough storage space you could keep a entire semester of lectures on your palm, without all of that messy ink run off I always had trouble with!

      Your idea would be helpful, but it is an imperfect replacement. The benefit of note taking is twofold. The first is the creation of a record of relevant information for later, and more thorough, perusal (something your solution provides). The second benefit, however, comes from having to "interact" with the information (analyzing it and filtering to decide which notes to take). That process helps information retention better than just listening to the lecture. So just recording the lecture alone will do little good, unless it is paired with later filtering and summarization.

      Note that I Am Not A Teacher, but a good many teachers and pupils in the course of my educational career have expressed the above opinion in one form or another.

      --

      -- "I am disrespectful to dirt. Can you not see that I am serious!"

    4. Re:Still wondering about GUI research? by egjertse · · Score: 1
      We need a PDA with near perfect speech to text and a nice built in microphone. With enough storage space you could keep a entire semester of lectures on your palm, without all of that messy ink run off I always had trouble with!

      Imagine a lecture hall full of people talking to their palm computers... This could get messy.

  12. awesome! by happystink · · Score: 1
    I've always said, all I need to recover from this carpal tunnel syndrome is some device to allow me to type with my penis for a while. Perfect.

    'one finger keyboard' strikes me as a euphemism along the same lines as when you buy a 'facial massager', but then I'm a huge, huge pervert.

    --

    sig:
    See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

  13. Finger Fatigue by Kartoffel · · Score: 3

    Using only one finger must get pretty tiring after awhile. Why limit yourself to just one finger when the majority of people have quite a few more fingers available?

    1. Re:Finger Fatigue by 11223 · · Score: 2
      (Re: your sig, and ontopic):

      I'm trying to get to their contact page - do you think that they would be interested in having a BeOS port so manufacturers of BeIA devices can include Fitaly text input? Just a thought.

    2. Re:Finger Fatigue by Harri · · Score: 2
      Using only one finger must get pretty tiring after awhile. Why limit yourself to just one finger when the majority of people have quite a few more fingers available?

      One obvious application is keyboards on touchscreens. These are usually used with one finger, and they could easily be small enough to be only practical with a pointing device, rather than for touch typing. You could probably fit one of those things on a largish mobile phone screen.

    3. Re:Finger Fatigue by Kristopher+Johnson · · Score: 1
      This is specifically designed for single finger or pen-tapping data entry.

      You can check out the patent here: http://www.patents.ibm.com/deta ils?&pn=US05487616__. You might also be interested in the related patents, for one-handed keyboards and other character-input devices.

  14. This is neat... by UpeoWaMacho · · Score: 1

    but we have to entirely relearn to type. Sure i did that using my TI-85 calculator when i learned to program it but it took a while. and i relearned to write on my mindspring palmpilot with their graffiti writing style that the screen recognizes. I leaned on a QWERTY. does this mean i'll have to learn another one?

    --
    Upeo
    1. Re:This is neat... by DamnOne · · Score: 1

      I read an article about two years ago by the internet from this newspaper - he thought up a seven key keyboard. It's harder to learn but quicker to work. I get RSI anyway...

  15. I've used it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I use the Fitaly keyboard for the Palm, and it works quite well. It takes a bit to get used to the layout, but once you learn it you can type pretty quickly. I'm much faster with it than I was with Graffity.

  16. If this were April first .... by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    I mean really, that is the reaction I have....

    But I suppose.......

    I imagine that there are going to be all kinds of ideas that will be tried out. Some kinda flaky.

    I am reminded of the april fools joke that was offering free cars if you accepted advertising on the side of the car, etc. It has since made the news as a legit business idea in California. Not that I am surprised.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  17. wearable computing requires more than a small kybr by mge · · Score: 1
    ruggedised componentry would be a start. Ship inspectors ? I live on the coast and salt is a bastard on the stuff my house is made of, let alone keyboards and other electrical / electronic componentry.

    And what about spillage ? Don't any of these guys eat or drink ?



    "The reason I was speeding is.....

  18. This is perfect... by caffeineboy · · Score: 1

    For all of the people who never type with more than one finger at a time to begin with...

    No more qwerty hunting and pecking - now hunting and pecking will be optimized for entry with a single finger or pen!

    From the title I was thinking that this was an input device though, not just a new "efficient" layout. I hope this discussion doesn't degenerate in to QWERTY vs. DVORJAK flame wars.

    --
    +++ ATH0 +++
    1. Re:This is perfect... by sredding · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah... it's perfect alright. $25 for the full-up round is a bit steep, IMHO. Once the 30-day demo runs out, it's gone.

      I'm hoping this discussion degenerates to a FITALY vs. QWERTY and DVORJAK flame war. [vbg].

  19. no its software..(and not linux?) Re:Reboot by leuk_he · · Score: 2

    Nice idea, but the windows version is a software program. If it locks up it ignores your finger, liked bill cared anyway..... By the way no linux version? (is there a pen version of linux?)

  20. Would people actually take the time to learn this? by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 2

    I mean, people are pretty accustomed to just doing whatever it is they want to do (no matter how slowly), that they may resent being forced to learn a new keyboard. Also, when you're typing with a pen or with one finger, you're not gonna be typing that fast anyway, no matter how optimized the keyboard is. So I wonder what kind of a speed increase this scheme really offers. Finally, what is wrong with the graffiti system built into current Palm Pilots?


    ========
    Stephen C. VanDahm

  21. I'm just waiting for keyboards to die. by Limecron · · Score: 1

    Sure, a one handed keyboard is great for PDAs and it better than mucking around trying to press a microscopic qwerty-based keyboard. But, it still doesn't help the fact that keyboards are just a ludcriously ineffective means of input.

    I am just waiting for the day when I can talk (or even better, think) to my computer. I mean, talk about a bottle neck. (meaning my uncoordinated fingers)

    1. Re:I'm just waiting for keyboards to die. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Bottle-neck? Not my fault you never learned
      touch-typing properly. A good typist can type
      faster than he can speak.

      Chris Mattern

    2. Re:I'm just waiting for keyboards to die. by TheKodiak · · Score: 2

      No, a good touch-typist can type faster than his computer can understand him speaking, or faster than a poor orator can speak. Depending on circumstances and content, intelligible human speech gets up to 300 wpm in the "exceptional" range. 150 wpm is much more comfortable. I think you're going to have a hard time defending the claim that in order to be considered a "good" touch typist, you need to type 150wpm.

      Reading the above paragraph, which has about 50 words longer than 3 letters, at a comfortable pace, took me 20 seconds. I know that reading aloud is often faster than speaking, since you don't have to stop to think, but this is not the case for all people, just as not all people can think properly while typing at full speed - even competent touch-typists.

      Yes - the correct answer to the "computers don't understand speech" problem is to be part of the 1% or so of the computer-using population who can touch-type original, sensible text at 120+ wpm. Unfortunately, wishing doesn't make it so.

      --
      -=Best Viewed Using [INLINE]=-
    3. Re:I'm just waiting for keyboards to die. by curril · · Score: 1
      A good typist can type faster than he can speak.


      Uh, no. Not unless you talk real slow. Typical speech is around 150-180 words per minute but a good typist rarely gets above 100 words per minute. That's why stenographers use special shorthand or special machines to up the speed when taking dictation in real time.

  22. What's with the two gaps? by blogan · · Score: 1

    What with the big gaps in the middle row? I'd like to see the side moved to eliminate those. Otherwise, you'll see a nice Windows logo there in a few years. Of course, they are missing critical keys (space, enter, a few punctuation). Nevermind the numbers, all the character above the numbers, shift, alt, ctrl......

    1. Re:What's with the two gaps? by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      From the looks of it, and how the keyboard seems to be designed, the two gaps are probably a split space bar. Now, for the rest of the keys, that is an interesting question, though, from the overall marketing of the keyboard, those are probably left to be placed elsewhere on the touch screen; this isn't a replacement for the keyboard hooked up to your desktop, just your palmtop.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    2. Re:What's with the two gaps? by Emil+Brink · · Score: 2

      By reading the article, I learned that those are actually space keys.

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
  23. Why, one ? by mirko · · Score: 1

    Sounds strange.
    I just got a Palm last week end and, thanks to "Giraffe", I learnt Graffiti in ten minutes.
    IMHO this is the best way to have text data entered in a computer, with, maybe, voice recognition (question: how do you indent text comfortably using a voice recognition programm?).
    The given URL does't lead to any valuable reason to type using only ONE finger.
    If you take the device in your hand and intend to type something, you'll need your other hand or you will type slowly and you won't find it comfortable.
    If you use your second hand, then, you won't be limited by one finger, except if you're one-fingered (or if you use your nose). So, instead of elaborating such gadgets that only a few one-fingered people could enjoy, why don't they start reflecting on really innovative input peripherals ?
    --

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  24. Alternate Input Methods? by doogles · · Score: 1

    The keyboard is obviously a very good input device and serves me quite well. I've been doing it long enough I can type faster then most.

    But how far along are we in regards to .. direct input? It sure would be a lot easier to "think" what I wanted to type and have it appear.

    Anyone know?

    1. Re:Alternate Input Methods? by Alik · · Score: 2

      A long time. We don't know how the speech centers of the brain really work. We definitely don't have the ability to make the kind of electrode array needed to read the entire dataflow, and we lack the computational power to process that data in realtime (although that last is trivial compared to the first two).

      It is something being actively worked on with sensory prostheses, but in order to directly read cognitively signifcant signals, we're going to have to obtain a much better understanding of mental processing. You're going to see true direct input about the same time neuroscience solves the strong AI problem (give or take a few decades).

      At the current rate of knowledge increase, though, this should happen within the average Slashdotter's lifetime.

    2. Re:Alternate Input Methods? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2
      You're going to see true direct input about the same time neuroscience solves the strong AI problem (give or take a few decades).
      Actually, a very primitive direct input system already exists. Electrodes were implanted into the brain of a man who had been totally paralyzed by stroke, and allowed him to move a cursor to select messages from a list. It doesn't use the speech centers, though; motor impulses are used to control it.

      For most of us, I suspect some sort of combination of subvocalization pickup, EEG reading (for selection - a "that's it!" event, as per a previous /. story), and eyeglasses-like heads-up display with pupil tracking will eventually be the norm for wearable computing. It'll be a long time before implants are used as input devices by the mainstream of people.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    3. Re:Alternate Input Methods? by Alik · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm aware of that; for that matter, I suspect the original poster is as well, since said story was posted to Slashdot. That's not really what he was asking, though.

      The EEG thing and eye tracking are reasonable ways of doing WIMP interfaces, but they can't handle typing. Subvocalization, at least according to the chair of our communication disorders department, is not really something that one can pick up; he claims that in order to get vibrations that the computer could interpret, you'd have to pretty much make all the actual sounds. Wearables are likely to work more on a basis of chorded keyboards or something similar, IMHO.

  25. OH NO POKEY ITALIANS!!! by samf · · Score: 1

    Looking at the keyboard, it's obvious to me that it was designed by Pokey's arch-rival, the Italians!

  26. Not one *finger*!! by rhdwdg · · Score: 5
    I've been using the software fitaly for my Palms for quite a while now, and loved it. Just a couple days ago (I ordered on the last day of the special price offer) I bought the FitalyStamp for my Palm III. The improvement is wonderful. The Palm IIIxe's digitizer seems to be a lot thicker than my old Palm Pro's, and the parallax was killing my accuracy. With the Stamp I'm back up to my proper 40-45 wpm. I type at that speed too, so I personally can write on my Palm as fast as at my desk.

    But back to the point -- this isn't about one finger input, it's about pen input. Big difference. It's fast: I just bring my Palm to meetings now and don't bother with paper. I can read my notes, unlike my handwriting, and upload them to my desktop so I can store them with the rest of my electronic notes. I hate paper.

    The product really works, and I just wish they could port InstantText to the Palm. Or Linux. It looks cool, but I'm not going to do my writing in Word 97 just to use it.

    1. Re:Not one *finger*!! by Kristopher+Johnson · · Score: 1
      After playing around with the Fitaly on my Handspring Visor, I can believe that it's better than the QWERTY keyboard layout for pen tapping.

      But it still pales in comparison to Graffiti input. The main problem with keyboard tapping is that you have to look at the keyboard while doing it. With Graffiti, your eyes are free. (Like touch-typing.)

      For those who have trouble getting Grafitti to recognize their handwriting, I'd recommend TealScript.

    2. Re:Not one *finger*!! by rhdwdg · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I'm being more of a karma whore or a Textware Solutions whore, but I don't think that's really a problem. The Palm is small enough that both the keyboard and screen fit in my field of vision. And after a few days and 10,000 words I started being able to tap while only half-looking, whereas after a similar amount of Graffiti I still needed to look at the unit to be successful.

      I admit, when I was using the software Fitaly I would just Graffiti a few characters, or especially numbers, if that was all I needed at a given time. But since getting the stamp I haven't looked back. Too bad you can't demo that except for knowing someone who bought it. If you don't like Fitaly after trying it, that's fine, but I think a lot of people are going to love it as much as I do.

  27. I'll know what to do with my free hand by Hawk357 · · Score: 1

    About time that someone came up with this idea!

    --
    Get your own Red Swingline Stapler
  28. give your computer THE FINGER by mwalker · · Score: 3

    top 10 advantages to a one-finger keyboard:

    10) easier to type "hunt-and-peckers unite!"
    9) "i'm not flicking you off, i'm practicing typing on the ceiling".
    8) if you get carpel tunnel in one finger, just switch fingers.
    7) you can finger your computer in public without getting stared at.
    6) don't have to worry about losing your career skills if you get your hand caught in the ceiling fan.
    5)linux users can now finger() someone with a finger.
    4) you can use two fingers to hold a donut and one to type
    3) that leaves one finger left over for picking your nose
    2) two words: pinky envy.

    and the #1 reason to use a one-finger keyboard:

    1) sometimes, there's just not enough room for two fingers.

  29. Fitaly is excellent by bouvin · · Score: 1

    I have been using Fitaly for my Palm for almost a year now. It is fairly easy to learn, and much faster than Graffiti (which I still use for the odd command or two, but nothing else). This is the 'soft' keyboard version, though I believe there is now a plastic overlay version available.
    It is one of the smoothest Palm applications I have used - it integrates well with other applications, and scrolls whatever is on the screen, so the cursor is always visible. Highly recommended.

    --
    --- In omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
  30. Re:I've never seen a Dvorak? Who sells 'em? by Harald74 · · Score: 2

    These people sell them, for example.

    --
    A)bort, R)etry or S)elf-destruct?
  31. Re:Would people actually take the time to learn th by fhwang · · Score: 2
    I tried spelling out words on this (just by visually hunting-and-pecking on the keyboard in their pictures) and it seemed like it was very easy to learn. One of the things they say is that they minimized travel distances for the most common letter transitions -- meaning not only does your finger travel less, but hunting-and-pecking is much easier because the letter you're looking for is probably close to the letter you just typed.

    Also, I can say personally that even though I know QWERTY very well -- I type about 80 wpm -- that's with two hands. My experiences using QWERTY one-handed haven't been so positive at all, so if I were to regularly need a one-handed keyboard, I'd seriously consider something like this keyboard. Sure, you'd have to relearn a little, but that's just as difficult a transition (possibly easier) as going from two-handed QWERTY to one-handed QWERTY.

    Francis Hwang

  32. Fitaly user speaks out... by isaac · · Score: 4
    I use Fitaly on my Palm V (more specifically, FitalyStamp, an overlay that replaces the Grafitti area) and it's great. I was quite used to Grafitti (having owned one PalmOS device or another since my Pilot 5000 in '96), but I find I'm much faster (upwards of 30wpm at times) and more accurate w/ Fitaly.

    That said, I don't see Fitaly replacing the standard mechanical keyboard. Where it might be useful, however is in touch screen devices like point-of-sale terminals or (especially) vertical-market devices for inventory tracking or insurance claims processing.

    And to the people wondering what the "blank keys" to either side of "n" and "e", they're space bars, naturally.

    Finally, I'm pretty sure the link in the article is obsolete. I use http://fitaly.com to get to Textware Solution's homepage frequently, and haven't seen a link to twsolutions.com in a long time.

    -Isaac

    --
    I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    1. Re:Fitaly user speaks out... by iabervon · · Score: 1

      I just tried it and found that it worked quite well, especially considering that I wasn't yet used to it at all.

      The thing that I like better about graffitti, though, is that I can do it reasonably accurately without looking at all towards the device, so I can take notes while continuing to watch the speaker, or enjoy the view while writing. Does your aim get sufficiently good that you don't need to look to type?

    2. Re:Fitaly user speaks out... by isaac · · Score: 2
      The thing that I like better about graffitti, though, is that I can do it reasonably accurately without looking at all towards the device, so I can take notes while continuing to watch the speaker, or enjoy the view while writing. Does your aim get sufficiently good that you don't need to look to type?

      I'm getting there. I can use the FitalyStamp in the dark, at least. At this point I don't have to stare at the FitalyStamp, just glance quickly to keep my bearings every few letters, which I had to do w/ grafitti anyhow to mak supe I,m wpiting tbe right letters. ;)

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
  33. This is the wrong solution by terzyva · · Score: 3
    I think that this solution misses the point - for efficiency, you need an input system where you do not need to look at the keyboard. This would be especially important for wearable computers.

    It would make much more sense to use a chording keyboard for an organizer - the Microwriter AgendA supported this a long time ago, but has unfortunately been discontinued. (BTW, I haven't been able to find a description of the AgendA's chording scheme - does anyone have a link?)

    For a wearable, something like the Twiddler would make much more sense. What I would really like is an updated twiddler that plugs directly into the PS/2 (or USB) port, and with a Trackpoint (like in IBM Thinkpad laptops) instead of the imprecise tilting mouse sensor.

  34. Only one finger.. by slim · · Score: 2

    This seems very odd to me. If you use one finger, surely that's the whole hand occupied, so why not make use of the other 4 fingers? What's more, the single finger you're using is going to be racing around the place like a mad thing, and that's going to be uncomfortable.

    I prefer the idea of the Quinkey chording keyboard, which has been around since the mid 80s at least, where each finger (or thumb) stays on one of 5 home keys, and input depends on chords. I've never bothered to learn such a thing, but it seems ideal for wearables and any application where you require a hand free.
    --

    1. Re:Only one finger.. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2
      I prefer the idea of the Quinkey chording keyboard, which has been around since the mid 80s at least, where each finger (or thumb) stays on one of 5 home keys, and input depends on chords. I've never bothered to learn such a thing...
      Well, that's the problem, isn't it? With a one-key-per-letter keyboard - fitaly, qwerty or whatever - you can take a new user and let them hunt and peck, so the system is usable (even if slowly) by a novice. How do you hunt-and-peck on a chording keyboard?

      The learning curve is just too steep for average casual users.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:Only one finger.. by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      As noted above, this system is really most suited to the handeld PDA market, where the screen is too small to use multiple fingers (or even one finger, really). Most people use a pen ("stylus") with these devices, and it's hard to use more than one pen at a time (with one hand at least), so this solution is pretty good.

      For PDAs, a chording keyboard would have to be some sort of hardware add-on, separate from the touchscreen. This is not always desirable for a portable device.

      On larger devices a multiple-finger chording interface could be more useful. Four or five keys are easier to fit onto an embedded device's interface than a whole QWERTY keyboard. If the device had a touchscreen that could handle multiple touches at once (?), such an input system could be added with no extra hardware. The trick, as always, would be to get people to use it.

  35. MS keyboard by xyllix · · Score: 3

    Wow, this is even better than Microsoft's keyboard. See http://www.mackido.com/Humor/MSKeyboar d.html. Control-Alt-Delete -- what more do you need with Microsoft?

  36. shouldn't 'y' and 'n' be next to each other? by moojin · · Score: 1
    shouldn't the 'y' and 'n' key be situated next to each other because the ease of use in answering yes or no questions.

    on second thought, i guess there aren't that many computer applications that ask you to enter in 'y' or 'n' as opposed to 'ok' and 'cancel'.

    maybe this keyboard should have programmable keys...

    visit: Eastern Suburbs Rugby Football Club's WebSite

    --
    Why did I lurk so long before registering for a Slashdot account? I could have had a Slashdot ID of less than 100000.
  37. Three Fingered keyboard by lanner · · Score: 1

    The Microsoft Keyboard;

    http://www.attrition.org/gallery/m s/win2k-kbd.jpg

    This obligitory Microsoft slam brough to you by attrition.org.

  38. Dvoraks do exist by Raunchola · · Score: 1

    I don't know about today's computers, but I have an Apple IIc Plus in my basement that had a toggle switch that could switch between standard and Dvorak keyboard settings. Granted, you had to switch the keycaps around to match up with the Dvorak chart provided with the Apple manual, which got really annoying after a while. But it was really funny to secretly switch it to Dvorak and listen in as an unlucky user exclaimed, "The damn keyboard is broken!"

    --

    --

    --
    The real Raunchola isn't cool enough to have any imposters
  39. A one-finger keyboard sounds neat... by foxtrot · · Score: 1

    ...but I suspect I'll eventually want to type something other than "Screw you!" at a computer.

    -JDF

  40. Similar idea to the Numpad by PanDuh · · Score: 1
    I think the fitaly keyboard is similar in concept to the Number key-pad. Basically, by laying everything out in a "square-ish" format where vertical movement is more prevalent, it reduces hand movement and thus increases typing speed.

    Thats why the key-pad basically 0wnz j00!

    1. Re:Similar idea to the Numpad by isil · · Score: 1

      i use 3 fingers and thumb for the number pad.
      (years of using a 10 key calculator)

  41. My, what a big keyboard grandma! by carlos_benj · · Score: 2
    My grandmother is old, she will never use a keyboard and only maybe a mouse, so if I want her to have a computer (and I do) before she dies, this is my only choice.

    But does your grandmother want to have a computer?

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  42. It's great for pen-typing... by ichimunki · · Score: 3

    I used Fitaly on my Palm for quite a while (until I discontinued use of the Palm, in fact). It was very easy to use and made the device a lot more useful in that I could get text in at a closer to "normal" rate. I envision future computing devices that incorporate a pen keyboard and a touch capable screen for the majority of the work. For major text needs (writing books, text mode programming/scripting, IRC) a regular ten-finger keyboard or something along those lines is obviously needed, but for web surfing, non-action games (which seem to require joysticks or such), graphics work, general GUI interaction, the Palm/Fitaly model is my preference. I like that direct interaction with the screen and like having a keyboard that is functional but does not require the hands to switch devices (from keyboard to mouse) by being part of the screen. Heck, if you're ambidextrous, the pen model makes you twice as efficient, right?

    --
    I do not have a signature
    1. Re:It's great for pen-typing... by ElvenKnight · · Score: 1

      If I may ask... Why did you discontinue use of the Palm? What device did you replace it with and why?

      -Matthew (Looking around at PDAs) Cortes

    2. Re:It's great for pen-typing... by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      I dropped it. :)

      I subsequently had numerous problems with AAA battery drain which caused me to lose data. Never figured out if this was the battery brand or the hardware.

      It also lost its appeal when I was travelling due to the addition of a laptop to my work life. That, and I had some bizarro usb/cradle problems with my (ugh) iMac. It just got to be more trouble than it was worth. Some day, when I decide I need a replacement Palm, I'll probably go with the best color Visor/Palm I can afford. I understand that the battery situation is radically different nowadays and that the cradle connector situation is equally advanced. Or maybe I'll just wait until my dream touchpad-notebook described above is an affordable alternative. The Palm was nice to have on buses and planes though, because of the small form factor.

      --
      I do not have a signature
  43. I don't know.... by kodekitten · · Score: 1

    I mean, I don't know... I'm sure it would be convinient when you're trying to save space, like with the Palms, but with your tower? I just don't see how it would be a time saver, it seems to me like it would be more time consuming, having to type everything out with 1 finger or 3, when you have 10! But, well, that's just me.... :)

  44. uh-oh... by Kartoffel · · Score: 2
    Looks like they're having finger trouble:

    $ finger @twosolutions.com
    finger: non-recoverable failure in name resolution.

  45. Linux programs by Uruk · · Score: 2

    I've written a program called gtkeyboard which uses this keyboard layout as one of its "possibilities". The keyboard is meant for all kinds of different applications (including possible wearable applications and things like keyboardless kiosks and the physically disabled).

    The keyboard layout was originally given to me as the "opti" keyboard by one of the people who contributed code to the project. It actually is quite good for using a keyboard with one finger, or in the case of gtkeyboard, with the mouse, which is functionally equivalent to one finger really.

    It is quite a good design, putting the spaces pretty much everywhere so that you can get to them from any key. With an average word length of 5 in English, it pretty much means that rougly 18-20% of your keystrokes are going to be spaces. Makes sense to have them in a convenient place, eh?

    Most people wouldn't believe how much research goes into making these things the way they are. With this keyboard, they did a lot of tests training people to use it. As was expected, at the beginning people were actually a bit slower with it than with a qwerty keyboard because they didn't know where the keys were. As time went on though, they were able to VASTLY improve their speed over even the best speeds with qwerty. (remember, we're talking one finger here, not 10)

    --
    -- Truth goes out the door when rumor comes innuendo. -- Groucho Marx
  46. Quikwriting sounds like a better approach by morton2002 · · Score: 2

    Ken Perlin (of Perlin noise fame) has developed this technology called Quikwriting that seems to facilitate a one-handed interface better than anything I've seen. I know it's not a keyboard, and I know it's yet another code you'd have to learn how to use, but it appears to me to be the most efficient techonology in this neighborhood. While you're at his site, you should check out his other user interface considerations.

    1. Re:Quikwriting sounds like a better approach by mblase · · Score: 1
      What it looks like is someone trying to implement the "Hellraiser" box in digital form. :)

      I've always thought that the BAT Keyboards were clever -- "a fully functioning keyboard for one hand." Not too practical for a Palm, of course, but perhaps for a tablet computer? I've always imagined that when you see folks on "Star Trek: TNG" typing away with one hand on a computer gadget they're holding, they're using a BAT layout.

  47. one fingered prehiperals by cybercuzco · · Score: 1
    And you thought the one button mouse was bad!

    --

  48. What does CE use? by smartin · · Score: 2

    I'm curious, what does Windoze CE use? Does it
    just display a keyboard, or has M$ "innovated" their own version of Graffiti

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    1. Re:What does CE use? by idistrust · · Score: 1
      I have a Nino 510 (CE 2.11)... and CE has a QWERTY keyboard... I find it quite hard to use. We also have handwriting recognition. In the pre-CE-3.0 models, this was done w/ Caligrapher, or Jot... in the new PocketPCs...WinCE 3.0, I believe it is built in. Both accessible by the keyboard icon, either in the taskbar (pre 3.0) or the little status bar at the bottom (3.0)

      If Palm did MP3's and other multimedia, I'd *DEFINITELY* switch though.

      --

      --Ask a silly person, get a silly answer.

  49. They've had this for decades now.... by mblase · · Score: 2

    ...It's called the Morse code telegraph. :)

  50. Good for some things, not for others. by lushmore · · Score: 2

    As a Fitaly and FitalyStamp user, I can say that the Fitaly keyboard is great, and it enables the palm to be useful for things like note-taking that Graffiti is IMO too slow for. I can manage 50+ wpm with my palm down on a table and typing english prose.

    However, it does have its drawbacks:

    • No more "no look" writing like you can do with graffiti
    • Hard to enter many nonalphanumeric symbols, eg. @
    • FitalyStamp prevents other graffiti-area hacks from working, eg. SwitchHack
    • My brain seems to remember how to type whole words, so when I type non-words I slow down to hunting and pecking again.
  51. Just press _any_ key... (-) by marat · · Score: 1

    Subj!

  52. And this is news how? This has been out 5 years! by the_reverend · · Score: 1

    I used it on my Newton 4 years ago, and I know it's been out longer than that. Granted, it's a clever solution when you don't have handwriting recognition, so we'll probably see more uses for stuff like this (although T9 is probably a better solution for phones). It is nice, but I can click fast enough on QWERTY, and my Newt _does_ have HRW...

  53. pr0n by rtscts · · Score: 1

    this'll be just perfect for those one-handed web surfers...

    1. Re:pr0n by Sonicboom · · Score: 1

      *lol*

      I was going to say the same thing.

      The pr0n sites should be selling these keyboards on their sites promoting "faster web surfing" or some other marketing ploy.

      How long will it take a guys wife/girlfriend to figure out what the keyboard is for tho?

      --
      [Connection closed by foreign host]
    2. Re:pr0n by rtscts · · Score: 1

      with a wife/gf he can get the 'real thing' (in theory)

    3. Re:pr0n by rtscts · · Score: 1

      hence 'in theory' :)

  54. Been one fingering for years by mks113 · · Score: 1

    Problem is, 15 cpm is a little slow for data input.

    dahdidahdidah

  55. Speech recognition isn't the ultimate solution by micromoog · · Score: 2
    Many people here seem to be of the opinion that if speech recognition were perfected, it would end the hunt for the perfect interface. I disagree.

    If I'm sitting in my cubicle at work, I just can't see myself speaking out loud "Dear Honeybunch: Smoochie smoochie. Love your teddy bear", or "Mom, the doctor says I have cancer", or "My account number is 235655324". Even normal, nonprivate communication would become a burden, if everyone is speaking to their machines aloud all day long. Noise levels would become unbearable.

    The keyboard/mouse combo definitely isn't the ultimate interface, but voice isn't either. An argument could be made for thought-recognition, but I think we're a long way from that yet. For now, I'll stick to my keyboard and mouse.

    1. Re:Speech recognition isn't the ultimate solution by techwatcher · · Score: 1

      Ah, a breath of sanity -- the other point is that speaking is actually *slower* than typing, even for self-trained touch typists. (Spoken books for the deaf, for example, usually use a form of speech compression to speed things along; this has been going on since at least the mid-70's.) As for hand-writing recognition, my writing deteriorated so badly (ever since I started keyboarding about 99% of what I write) that even I can barely recognize it.

  56. Re:Old Old News by evilpete · · Score: 1

    I know - my palm has been 'Optimized for One-Finger Entry' for years...
    +++++

    --
    +++++
    The harder you look the less you see. That's what we're up against.
  57. Modified Morse Code anyone? by shutdown+-h+now · · Score: 1

    Perhaps a slightly modified Morse Code is in order. We can add some formatting characters and a couple of slight hacks to good ol' Morse's Code and we have a very easy to use interface for wearables that does not require the user to look at what they're typing.

    The use of a sticky key code can allow for character combinations. Uppercase and lowercase could be handled either contextually by the computer or through a modified capslock/shift combo code. For caps lock we use sticky key code + shift code, for shift key we use shift code (which by the nature of it's intended use should be defaulted to sticky)

    I can imagine now, people everywhere absent mindedly tapping out emails and writing down notes while walking down the street. The additional benefit of only needing to learn a few additional modified codes if you already know Morse Code (and *who* doesn't know Morse Code?) allows for users to adapt quickly to the interface as well as learn a useful (if albeit slightly modified) standard already in place.

    Dan O'Shea

    The Ghost of Samuel Morse looks kindly upon thee...

  58. Double the input! Seperate your brain hemisphere by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1

    With this kind of keyboard, we'll be able to double the data entry across the industry.

    After several hundred years, we'll be hemispherical dual-use brained by evolution.

    Thanks Darwin!

  59. I had it for Palm, but this might be better... by leshert · · Score: 1

    I used this for the Palm, but I found graffiti to be faster and more accurate (particularly combined with TealScript to customize the glyphs).

    However, I was just thinking, this layout might make an excellent one-handed conventional keyboard for a PC. Just air-typing, it seems very natural; you'd probably need some kind of shift to do punctuation, though.

    Having a nine-month-old, sometimes a one-handed keyboard would come in VERY handy...

  60. English only by yooden · · Score: 1

    I wonder why nobody (at 2+) mentioned this to be absoluetly dependent on the english language. While qwerty has it's drawbacks, you can adapt it easily to any script using latin characters and not quite easily to any script using a similar alphabet. To use Fitaly with anything but English is stupid.

  61. Yet another Fitaly user by Didian · · Score: 1
    Been using fitaly on my Palm VII for about 2 months. I can type about 30-35 wpm, still slower than my qwerty keyboard speed, but much faster than qwerty-pen speed or graffti speed. The only real downfall of it is that you pretty much have to be looking at the screen to type. Graffti, for all its problems, can be used without looking. So I still use Graffti to take notes in meetings, but use Fitaly to write e-mails and the like.

    With the standard qwerty layout, not only do you have to look at the Palm, you have to often move your hand rather than just the pen. Fitaly puts all the keys within easy reach with minimum movement. You even get used to some of the more common letter combinations which can jack up your speed. This only makes sense, since qwerty was designed to put common letters on different hands (i.e., far away from each other) while fitaly was designed to center the most common letters.
    --
    "You despise me, don't you?"

    --
    "You despise me, don't you?"
    "If I gave you any thought, I probably would."
  62. Re:Doesn't Work with Emacs (pico) by CptnHarlock · · Score: 1

    Heh... You don't wanna know what "pico" means in Chili and a few other spanish-speaking countries... I can tell you it's a four letter word that starts with "d" and ends with "ick".. :-) .. It was quite amusing when my pretty good looking female teacher was asking me to use pico.. She never understood why I could't stop gigglin'... (No, she didn't speak spanish...)

    Thank you.
    //Frisco
    --

    --
    $HOME is where the .*shrc is
    -- silver_p
  63. Re:Would people actually take the time to learn th by hardburn · · Score: 1

    people are pretty accustomed to just doing whatever it is they want to do (no matter how slowly), that they may resent being forced to learn a new keyboard

    If this was for normal operations, I would agree. But this is for Palms and other such small computers. In that situation, you really need an input optimized for one-finger/pen typing. I think that if people are willing to put up with the quirks of Graffiti, they will put up with this.

    So I wonder what kind of a speed increase this scheme really offers. Finally, what is wrong with the graffiti system built into current Palm Pilots

    Speed apears to be about 50 WPM for most people. That even goes for people who have trubble typing on a QWERTY.

    As for Graffiti, well, I've had a Handspring Visor for about two months now and I just can't get used to it. I can form letters fine, but its not very fast or acurate. I get 15-30 WPM on Graffiti, but about 55 on a QWERTY. This will improve with time, I know, but I look at this and ask myself why I should bother. If I could enter stuff into my Visor faster it would be of much more use to me.


    ------

    --
    Not a typewriter
  64. How do the numerals work out? by donutello · · Score: 1

    I don't see any number keys - also I assume you are typing IN ALL CAPS. (Yaay, go AOL). Also no special symbols like +, *, ", etc. I could imagine all of this getting pretty hard to live without.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
    1. Re:How do the numerals work out? by Zagadka · · Score: 1

      I don't see any number keys - also I assume you are typing IN ALL CAPS...

      That's a pretty silly assumption, considering the screen shot very clearly shows mixed-case text (and most of it is lower-case, at that).

      Like the normal keyboard built-into the Palm (which is based on QWERTY), numbers and symbols are on separate keyboards. The "123" key switches to the number pad, for example. The "shf" and "cap" keys probably work as they do with the standard Palm keyboard as well, as "shift lock" and "caps lock" keys. (the symbols on the keys also update to show what would actually be generated by hitting that key)

      This would suck for typing up Canadian or British postal codes. Having the symbols on another keyboard also sucks for writing code. That isn't what these things are for though. They're for writing quick notes in English. (yes, English; the Fitaly isn't really well suited to other natural languages, because the arrangement of the keys is based on the frequency of consecutive letter pairs in English text).

    2. Re:How do the numerals work out? by William+Tanksley · · Score: 2

      I don't see any number keys - also I assume you are typing IN ALL CAPS. (Yaay, go AOL).

      Bad assumption. :-) A normal tap is lowercase; a 'slide' is upper case (i.e. when you start on the letter's square, slide the stylus, and lift not on the square). It's a VERY quick way of getting mixed case; absolutely no need for shift.

      Number keys are right there, on the right. I have no idea how you could miss them. Shift-number gives you a few symbols, and the rest are available by tapping one of four buttons which pops up a replacement keyboard picture (you can tap on the picture or on the Fitaly to get the symbol).

      I'm quite happy with the result; it is indeed far faster with Fitaly than it was without. I have to say that I'd like to replace at least one of the auxilary keyboard modes with my own custom one (with my commonly used symbols).

      -Billy

  65. Thumbcode anybody..? by ectoraige · · Score: 1
    It looks quite nice but it's no damn use for my PSION is it..? HCI has tinkered along in the past, with no dire need for innovation in terms of input. It's only recently that the industry has really kicked off, so I expect a lot more cool things to come. Graffiti is smart, but I still find it a little too slow, compared to mini-keyboads.

    For me though, the coolest has to be Thumbcode, developed over in Stanford University. There's an old (April 99) New York Times story here.

    Read about it, but basically it's a glove/keyboard with receptors/keys on each segment of your finger, palm up, forming a 3x4 keyboard. One "types" by touching a finger segment with your thumb. Depending on whether the four fingers are together or apart, we end up with a 96-character keyboard. The nice thing is it's completely device independent so I could plug my 'thumbboard' into whatever device I wanted. I think one of the wearable manufacturers have produced a working model, but I haven't been able to find a page about it.

    As a pianist, I reckon the fingers can be trained quite quickly to produce respectable wpm times. What I like most about it though, is it's really the first miniature input device that doesn't require you to hunch over squinting while you try to type in your shopping list... I also think it's very natural, so I'm looking forward to a production model someday.

    "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"

    --
    Vs lbh pna ernq guvf, ybt bss abj. Tb bhgfvqr. Syl n xvgr.
  66. But does it have zero keys? by QBasic_Dude · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I removed the casing of my keyboard, leaving only the thin membrane which has the key connecting wires. Typing is easy on this keyboard since you don't have to press a key -- just touch it. Besides, keyless keyboards never ware out because there is no moving parts.

  67. The ultimate hands-free input .. by tardibear · · Score: 1

    .. is the tongue. I couldn't find any precedent on the web for this idea as an input device but it has been tried as an output device for the blind. It's private too (although there might be interesting opportunities for hacking someone's tongue-keyboard when involved in an intimate encounter ...).

    1. Re:The ultimate hands-free input .. by discHead · · Score: 1

      Personally I believe the tongue has been underutilized in the field of biometrics.

  68. Insightful?! by TheDullBlade · · Score: 1

    I think some moderator appreciates the idea you just gave him.

    "Hmm, this guy is a real deep thinker, I never even considered the implications of being able to type in goatporn.com with one hand."

    --
    /.
  69. Not necessarily one-FINGER. by TheDullBlade · · Score: 2
    --
    /.
  70. Are you sure... by TheDullBlade · · Score: 1

    ...you want to be talking about "sticky keys" in this thread?

    --
    /.
  71. Patent Problems - One Finger? by Seqram · · Score: 1

    Woops, doesn't this run afoul of Amazon's completely original "One-click technology"?

  72. Yes but is it not ASCII by Grey · · Score: 1

    I Noted that it is not a complete ASCII keyboard.

    It is missing ~ ` | \ [ ] { }. At least one ~
    in nessary in today URL world unless you like
    %42 all the time....

    --
    Grey (Chris Lusena)
  73. Lefty by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Can the 'keys' be switched for left handed users?
    I'll need to hit the 'K' as often as the next person, but I'd rather go up and left instead of up and right.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  74. Users with disabilities. by speaker4thedead · · Score: 1

    Wow, I'm glad to see something like this might make it mainstream soon. I tutored math at a university for several years, and one of my students had cerebral palsy. (imagine Stephen Hawking with slightly more mobility) Because he had greatly reduced mobility, doing something as simple as typing up a simple email would often require an hour or more. It was so time and energy consuming for him that even *I* felt tired after watching him. We often mused about an optimized one finger keyboard.

    BTW, does anyone have the specs for a chord based keyboard or at least the frequency of letters and letter combinations for english? I've been playing with the idea of implimenting a simple chord keyboard for some time now.

    --
    "My religion is to live --and die-- without regret." -- Milarepa
  75. Re:Would people actually take the time to learn th by Chillas · · Score: 1
    I downloaded the Hackmaster version to my Visor, and within about five minutes I was matching my own speed on the qwerty keyboard. And I'm pretty fast and accurate with that to begin with.

    Graffiti is okay, I suppose, but I find it slower than typing.

    --
    --- Math illiteracy affects 8 out of every 5 people.
  76. (OT) Re:My, what a big keyboard grandma! by e-gold · · Score: 1

    But does your grandmother want to have a computer?

    Yes, if using it feels just like using a telephone or a television set (no, I don't want her using WebTV, though).

    She is from a time before keyboards were common, and she has neither the time nor the physical dexterity to learn how to type. OTOH, she can still talk. There are probably many people in her generation in a similar situation, and voice (possibly, IBM's ViaVoice for Linux, or possibly something else) would be the obvious input device. IMO.
    JMR

    --
    Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
  77. Curved! by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1
    I don't get it...he seems to have put a lot of thought into this, but should've gone one step further. Why is it so x,y Cartesian?...I mean, especially when dealing with one finger, my finger sure as hell can't move as easily completely in a flat x,y fashion. My finger is much more able to move in an arcing fashion...sort've polar instead of cartesian...

    So why the linearity?...just didn't totally think it through?

    1. Re:Curved! by discHead · · Score: 1

      What about a compromise: keys arranged in hexagonal honeycomb fashion?

    2. Re:Curved! by skids · · Score: 1

      Yeah... it's silly but happens that when you put
      a lot of thought into a design concept, you can
      miss basic things. Hex would be the best tesslation for the
      job, since it makes the keys easier to hit near
      the edges and clusters them better. I could see
      why he wouldn't curve it, given the graphics
      resolutions he has to work with might make the
      keyboard nearly illegible, plus waste valuable
      screen real estate.

  78. Just a thought..... by enditallnow · · Score: 1
    Could make Quake Binds a bit more fun :)

    Da Cr33p

  79. PalmOS, screen space, and Silkyboard by discHead · · Score: 1

    It's a nice idea, but the Palm version still wastes screen space. It would be better if they could do something like what Silkyboard does for QWERTY.

  80. Open Sourcing by GrEp · · Score: 1

    Any Palm gurus out there that could give some tips/would be willing to make an open source version of this? Props to whoever gets around to doing it first.

    --

    bash-2.04$
    bash-2.04$yes "Don't you hate dialup connections?"| write USERNAME
    1. Re:Open Sourcing by nickol · · Score: 1

      What about patent limitations?

  81. How about a Programmer's Layout? by hanway · · Score: 2

    This layout, like other 'optimal' keyboard layouts, is tuned for normal English text. While I doubt that anyone is going to do some heavy-duty programming with a pen, I'd be interested to see whether any keyboard layouts have ever been optimized for computer languages like C++. Not only are relatively rare letters like xyzijk more likely to show up in variable names, but symbols are much more common than they are in normal text, yet few of them are unshifted keystrokes on a normal keyboard, and not even the most useful ones at that.

    1. Re:How about a Programmer's Layout? by nickol · · Score: 1

      You see... Those keyboards are not needed to be carved from stone :-) The ultimate one should allow user to just draw keys needed, for example the for ( key. I'd like them to be not only rectangular. Trapezoidal in fact. With those letters that are needed. Multiple layouts for different languages. It's not that hard.