See the beauty of/. is I can post as much as I want and link to information as much as I want.
Good for you and your Horizon milk, you want a metal??
I was stating what I believe is to be true, I was not forcing the issue, I was not forcing anybody to drink milk unpasteurized, I was presenting information that maybe the pasteurization process takes milk and changes it in a more fundamental way than was originally thought of.
Nice to know people are so open-minded around here. And if your can't respect another persons opinoin then you are a bigger DUMBASS than I.
The lactase required to digest the milk is not only found in the body. Milk fresh from the cow contains lactase as well as other enzymes so the baby cow caw easily digest the milk and absorb the nutrients. Most people that are lactose intolerant would find that raw milk does not cause them any distress.
The advent of pasteurization has destroyed many of the essential enzymes that are required by the body to digest the milk.
Now food bourn bacteria is always an concern, but the whole pasteurization process was created because the conditions in which milk was produced back then were less than sanitary. Modern organic dairy farms have much cleaner facilities were the milking takes place and the equipment is kept sterile.
This link is to an article that explains the benefits of raw milk.
http://www.realmilk.com/raw.html
Actually milk isn't technically bad for you if it is drank un-pasteurized. The pasteurization process destroys a lot of the beneficial nutrients and enzymes in the milk. Raw milk is one of the best foods as long as the cow is grass fed.
Un-pasteurized milk is safe to drink as long as it is bought right at the farm and the farmer sanitizes all the milking equipment.
Questionless devotion to a religion is not to far off from blowing stuff up.
Show me an religion that says all religions are equal. You can't because all religions believe they are the correct one, hence the others are slightly inferior.
Your Right.
God forbid anything natural would be good for us, what was I thinking, down with nature, what does it know, it has only been around SINCE THE DAWN OF TIME. Yes the past 100 years have been fabulous, with the advent of heart disease, strokes, cancer, etc.. What a great time we live in.
Silly of me to think that nature would provide us with optimum health and immunity with the right combinations of organic foods and grass fed meats.
Of course not, sugar, vegetables oils, and especially hydrogenated vegetables oils (yummy) are the answer to long life.
Fuck all that shit, shoot me up with drugs so the companies can get rich, so I can have a long miserable life dealing with the side effects that are worse than the symptom it treats.
On that note, I hope you enjoy your future bout with heart disease right up till the heart attack gets you, ass puppet!
Actually that is why they are the perfect group. It shows that even with a healthy lifestyle of eating organic foods and grass fed meats that children injected with vaccines still developed autism.
I find that rather compelling
Just because some information is posted on a site called quackwatch does not make it the be all end all. People must judge for themselves, look at both sides, analyze the information and form your own conclusion. I personally feel the medical establishment is way off. The medical system is only good for emergency medicine. Humans were not meant to live dependent on drugs. Hippocrates once wrote "Let food be your medicine and medicine be your food"
After years of searching for a big chunk of the answer regarding healthy living I believe one man is just about on target.
http://www.mercola.com/
The point is use your mind, analyze all the information available and go with what feels right.
So genetically, a shitload of the population just happened to mutate at the same time when previous generations had not autism?
Use some common sense, what makes more sense, genetic mutation on a grand scale, or environmental effects on the whole population?
And where is this genetic evidence that you speak of??
Actually it is the same 50% in darkness.The length of one lunar revolution equals the length of orbit around Earth, hence one half of the moon is always in darkness.
Slashdot Mirror
Hell, I'd rather have Dirk Diggler's version on the soundtrack.
See the beauty of /. is I can post as much as I want and link to information as much as I want.
Good for you and your Horizon milk, you want a metal??
I was stating what I believe is to be true, I was not forcing the issue, I was not forcing anybody to drink milk unpasteurized, I was presenting information that maybe the pasteurization process takes milk and changes it in a more fundamental way than was originally thought of.
Nice to know people are so open-minded around here. And if your can't respect another persons opinoin then you are a bigger DUMBASS than I.
The lactase required to digest the milk is not only found in the body. Milk fresh from the cow contains lactase as well as other enzymes so the baby cow caw easily digest the milk and absorb the nutrients. Most people that are lactose intolerant would find that raw milk does not cause them any distress. The advent of pasteurization has destroyed many of the essential enzymes that are required by the body to digest the milk. Now food bourn bacteria is always an concern, but the whole pasteurization process was created because the conditions in which milk was produced back then were less than sanitary. Modern organic dairy farms have much cleaner facilities were the milking takes place and the equipment is kept sterile. This link is to an article that explains the benefits of raw milk. http://www.realmilk.com/raw.html
Actually milk isn't technically bad for you if it is drank un-pasteurized. The pasteurization process destroys a lot of the beneficial nutrients and enzymes in the milk. Raw milk is one of the best foods as long as the cow is grass fed. Un-pasteurized milk is safe to drink as long as it is bought right at the farm and the farmer sanitizes all the milking equipment.
Questionless devotion to a religion is not to far off from blowing stuff up. Show me an religion that says all religions are equal. You can't because all religions believe they are the correct one, hence the others are slightly inferior.
Your Right. God forbid anything natural would be good for us, what was I thinking, down with nature, what does it know, it has only been around SINCE THE DAWN OF TIME. Yes the past 100 years have been fabulous, with the advent of heart disease, strokes, cancer, etc.. What a great time we live in. Silly of me to think that nature would provide us with optimum health and immunity with the right combinations of organic foods and grass fed meats. Of course not, sugar, vegetables oils, and especially hydrogenated vegetables oils (yummy) are the answer to long life. Fuck all that shit, shoot me up with drugs so the companies can get rich, so I can have a long miserable life dealing with the side effects that are worse than the symptom it treats. On that note, I hope you enjoy your future bout with heart disease right up till the heart attack gets you, ass puppet!
Actually that is why they are the perfect group. It shows that even with a healthy lifestyle of eating organic foods and grass fed meats that children injected with vaccines still developed autism. I find that rather compelling
Just because some information is posted on a site called quackwatch does not make it the be all end all. People must judge for themselves, look at both sides, analyze the information and form your own conclusion. I personally feel the medical establishment is way off. The medical system is only good for emergency medicine. Humans were not meant to live dependent on drugs. Hippocrates once wrote "Let food be your medicine and medicine be your food" After years of searching for a big chunk of the answer regarding healthy living I believe one man is just about on target. http://www.mercola.com/ The point is use your mind, analyze all the information available and go with what feels right.
So genetically, a shitload of the population just happened to mutate at the same time when previous generations had not autism? Use some common sense, what makes more sense, genetic mutation on a grand scale, or environmental effects on the whole population? And where is this genetic evidence that you speak of??
Actually it is the same 50% in darkness.The length of one lunar revolution equals the length of orbit around Earth, hence one half of the moon is always in darkness.
To see how the lighting looks during a thunderstorm at night.